Case 2:18-cr-00027-NBF Document 45 Filed 11/26/18 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. YUTTANA CHOOCHONGKOL ) ) ) ) ) Criminal No. 18-27 GOVERNMENT’S ANALYSIS OF THE SENTENCING CONSIDERATIONS IN 18 U.S.C. § 3553(A) AND NOW comes the United States of America by Scott W. Brady, United States Attorney for the Western District of Pennsylvania, and Paul E. Hull, Assistant U.S. Attorney for said district, hereby submits this Responsive Analysis of the Sentencing Considerations in 18 U.S.C. § 3553 (a) as follows: 1. Nature, circumstances, and seriousness of the offense On January 10, 2018, defendant, Yuttana Choochongkol, was residing at Worldwide Clinical Trial facility in San Antonio Texas. At 8:16 am ET, he reported to staff there that he was feeling “fine” and not suffering any problems or ill effects. He ate three meals that day. He was not administered any medication or alcohol that day. Two days had elapsed since he was last administered any medication or alcohol. At approximately 6:16pm ET, he sat down at a computer at the facility. At approximately 8:26pm ET, an internet communication was sent to the Heinzfield “Contact Us” portal from the same computer at this facility that threatened the athletes and attendees of the National Football League Divisional Playoff Game on Sunday, January 14, 2018 incorrectly referring to the Steelers vs. Panthers. It was sent by defendant using the online name: I am Anonymous; the email address: anonymouskillers@gmail.com; phone number: 878 9114111. It stated: “Be prepared for a massacre at the Steelers vs Panthers playoff game this Sunday. Its going to be my last day to live and why not take as many people with me as I can. Or why not take a professional football player with me too? I’m going to try and kill as many Steelers football Case 2:18-cr-00027-NBF Document 45 Filed 11/26/18 Page 2 of 5 players and fans as possible before taking my own worthless life. So see ya’ll in Hell. Hahahahaha.” This communication was traced to the computer at which the defendant sat. He was observed being on that computer at the time this first threat was transmitted. He continued to use that computer until a second threat was transmitted. Again on January 10, 2018 at approximately 8:47pm ET, an internet communication was sent to the KDKA/CBS “Contact Us” portal, threatening the athletes and attendees of the National Football League Divisional Playoff Game on Sunday, January 14, 2018. It was sent by a person using the online name: I am Anonymous; the email address: anonymouskillerclown@gmail.com; phone number: 724 911-4111; directed to the CBS local Staff in Pittsburgh. It stated: “This Sunday’s playoff game in Pittsburgh is going to be one like no other. Why? Because it’s going to be my last day on this pathetic planet. So why not take some innocent lives with me? The Steelers game will be packed and that’s when I plan on killing Steelers football players and fans before taking my own pitiful life. After all what does a person that is going to commit suicide have to lose? Absolutely nothing!! So why not take out some million dollar Steelers players before me? Sounds like a good idea. Hahahahah.” This communication was traced to the computer at which the defendant sat. He was observed being on that computer at the time this second threat was transmitted. On January 11, 2018 at 8:07 am ET, defendant, Yuttana Choochongkol, reported to staff there that he was feeling “fine” and not suffering any problems or ill effects. He ate his breakfast. He was not administered any medication or alcohol that day. Three days had elapsed since he was last administered any medication or alcohol. At approximately 8:23am ET, he sat down at a computer at the facility. 2 Case 2:18-cr-00027-NBF Document 45 Filed 11/26/18 Page 3 of 5 On January 11, 2018 at approximately 9:04am, an internet communication was sent to the Heinzfield “Contact Us” portal, threatening the athletes and attendees of the National Football League Divisional Playoff Game on Sunday, January 14, 2018. It was sent by a person using the online name: Kill Roethlisberger; the email address: roethlisbergerassassin@gmail.com; phone number: 878 411-9111. It stated: “Consider me armed and dangerous for this Sunday with inside connection. I will be packing an Uzi with many clips underneath my winter gear. My target will be the whole Steelers sideline. There is only one God!! His name is Allah!!” Defendant thus deliberately threatened a large public gathering three times in two days. In doing so, he created serious concerns for the safety of the public at this gathering. If not for the FBI being able to trace the communications to him, those concerns would have persisted until the completion of the game that Sunday. The defendant made these threats at a time when the country was beset by gun violence at public events and school threats were rampant. 2. History and characteristics of the defendant The defendant’s education includes a GED. He has worked numerous temporary jobs and been a participant in clinical trials for the last ten years. He also was involved in bitcoin mining using computer equipment at the time of his arrest. The defendant has been involved in criminal activity for over 20 years, since age 19. He was convicted of eight (8) crimes from September 2, 1997 through February 21, 2008. Those crimes ranged from theft by deception, retail theft, theft, solicitation of sex, battery, and possession of controlled substance. Only two (2) of these crimes have counted toward his criminal history calculation. When the defendant transmitted these threats, he was on bond from a misdemeanor case of failure to identify himself to a peace officer. For the most part in these cases, 3 Case 2:18-cr-00027-NBF Document 45 Filed 11/26/18 Page 4 of 5 he received fines, probationary sentences and small jail terms. 3. 4. 5. The need to promote respect for the law The need to provide just punishment for the offense The need to deter others from committing similar criminal conduct Under these factors, the court should take into consideration that the defendant intended by his conduct to cause apprehension of gun violence, having transmitted his threats to a news organization and to the venue for the game. He also appeared to escalate the seriousness of the situation by making the third threat the next day, referring to “Allah”, which made it appear to be terrorism related. When interviewed by law enforcement after his arrest, the defendant minimized the seriousness of his conduct. He described his sending communications threatening to harm persons at a large public gathering as a “prank”. Agents discussed the seriousness of making threatening communications by pointing out that the country is in a time of “mass shootings.” In the interview, the defendant dismissed the seriousness of his conduct, making threatening communications, by describing them as “harmless” unless someone was really hurt or killed. Unbelievably, the defendant said he thought his threats would be looked at, ignored, and thrown away. He described himself as coherent and bored at the time he transmitted the threat. He then acknowledged the agents when they stated that they thought the defendant was minimizing his conduct. Under these circumstances, the sentence imposed by the court must be sufficient to deter defendant and other would-be transmitters of threats of violence. Deterrence is equally important when the threats are false since the still instill fear and trigger a law enforcement response. The court must judge what type of jail sentence promotes respect for the law and is a just punishment for the criminal conduct of the defendant. We submit that only a sentence near the maximum 4 Case 2:18-cr-00027-NBF Document 45 Filed 11/26/18 Page 5 of 5 guideline range or above does so. 6. The applicable guideline range The government believes a sentence at or above the maximum guideline range in this case is appropriate for the defendant’s course of conduct of sending multiple communications threatening to kill persons at an NFL playoff game, his callous and cavalier attitude toward the ramification of his actions, and his lengthy criminal history. 7. The need to provide the defendant with educational or vocational training, medical care, or other correctional treatment While the defendant could benefit from educational and vocational training, this is not a significant issue given the defendant’s offenses. He does not suffer from any particular medical issue that cannot be addressed adequately by available medical facilities. 8. The need to provide restitution Restitution is not at issue in this case. Wherefore, the government respectfully requests that the court consider the above matters when it imposes sentence. Respectfully submitted, SCOTT W. BRADY United States Attorney By: 5 /s/ Paul E. Hull PAUL E. HULL Assistant U.S. Attorney PA ID No. 35302