SCSJ Guest From: Jason Kay [jason.kay@kaync.corn] Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2011 11:32 PM To: Cc: Jim Blaine; Farr, Thomas David Lewis - National Committeeman; Tom Hofeller Redistricting; Strach,PhE|lip Youngquist, Kathieen, M. Subject: Re: attorney client communication Using both is a simple and powerful point. I agree Jim's suggestion. On Jun 30, 2011, at 11:08 PM, "brent.woodcox@gmai1.com" Wrote: 1 also agree that's important supporting evidence inasmuch as people will regard the registration advantage as initially suspect given the statewide realities of voter registration numbers. Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry From: Jim Blaine Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 23:05:24 -0400 T0: Brent Cc: Farr, Thomas David R. .lasonKay<1' .org>; Strach,Phillip Youngquist, Kathleen, Subject: Re: attorney client communication That and the fact that major statewide Dem candidate (Cooper) won every single district by meaningful margin. On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 11:03 PM, Brent Woodcox wrote: When Nathan and I counted earlier, I thought we counted 11 of 13 districts with a Democratic registration advantage. I could be wrong but it's Worth double checking. I do think the registration advantage is the best aspect to focus on to emphasize competitiveness. It provides the best evidence of pure partisan comparison and serves in my estimation as a strong legal argument and easily comprehensible political talking point. Sent from my iPad On Jun 30, 2011, at 8:46 PM, "Farr, Thomas wrote: Feitows Here is my best effort to reflect what 1 have been told about legislative intent for the congressionai plans. Please send me your suggestions and I will circulate a revised version for final approvai by Bob and David as soon as possible tomorrow morning. Thomas A. Farr Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak Stewart, P.C. 4208 Six Forks Road, Suite 1100 Raleigh, NC 27609 Telephone: 919--789~3174 i Fax: 919-783-9412 i wWW.o,q1otreedeakins.com This transmission is intended by the sender and proper recipient(s) to be confidential, intended only for the proper recipient(s) and may contain information that is privileged, attorney work product or exempt firom disclosure under applicable law. Ifyon are not the intended recipient(s) you are notified that the dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly proh ibited. If you receive this message in error, or are not the proper recipient(s), please notify the sender at either the email address or telephone number above and delete this your computer. Receipt by anyone other than the proper is not a waiver of any attorney-client, work product, or other applicable privilege. Tlianlt you. Unless expressly stated to the contrary herein, Nothing contained in this message was intended or written to be used, can be used, nor may be relied upon or used, by any taxpayer fior the purpose of avoiding penalties that could be imposed upon the taxpayer under the Internal Revenue Code of 986, as amended; and b) Any written statement contained herein relating to any federal tax transaction or issue may not be used by any individual or entity to recommend or the promotion or marketing of any such transaction or issue. From: Youngquist, Kathleen, M. Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2011 5:39 PM To: Farr, Thomas A. subject: Statement by Rucho and Lewis in support of proposed 2011 Congressional Kathleen M. Youngquist Legal Secretary i Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak Stewart, P.C. 4208 Six Forks Road, Suite 1100 i Raieigh, NC 27609 Telephone: 919-789-3169 Fax: 919-783-9412 |WWw.o,q1otreedeakins.com <