WEST VIRGINIA



Infrastructure 8. Jobs Development Council

2017 NEEDS ASSESSMENT

WV INFRASTRUCTURE AND JOBS DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL

DECEMBER 2017

DRAFT - WVIJDC Needs Assessment 2017

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction

4

Executive Summary

5

I. State Wide Inventory

7

A. Public Water Utilities

7

B. Public Sewer Utilities

7

1. Wastewater Systems

7

2. Combined Sewer Overflows

7

II. Assessment of Current Needs

8

A. Public Water Systems

8

B. Public Sewer Systems

8

C. Combined Sewer Overflow Communities

8

D. Summary of Current Needs

11

III. Future Needs

12

IV. Obstacles, Issues and Related Problems

13

A. Financial Concerns

13

B. Physical and Geographical Concerns

14

V. Recommendations

15

VI. References

16

Appendix A
Appendix B
Appendix C
Appendix D
Appendix E
Appendix F
Appendix G

Existing Water Systems and Customers
Existing Sewer Systems and Customers
Current Needs – Water Project Applications
Current Needs – Sewer Project Applications
Infrastructure Funding Agencies
Number of Served and Unserved Structures in West Virginia
Served and Unserved Areas by County

1

 DRAFT - WVIJDC Needs Assessment 2017
WV INFRASTRUCTURE AND JOBS DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL
VOTING MEMBERS
The Honorable Jim Justice, Governor, Chairman
Ann V. Urling, Deputy Chief of Staff Office of the Governor, Chairman’s Designee

PUBLIC MEMBERS

AGENCY MEMBERS

John P. Boyle II
Monongalia County, WV

Michael Albert, Chairman
Public Service Commission of WV
Jonathan Fowler, P.E.
Eng. Div. Staff Engineer, PSC Designee

Joseph Freeland
Wetzel County, WV

Erica L. Boggess, Executive Director
WV Housing Development Fund

Matthew D. McComas
Wayne County, WV

Austin Caperton, Cabinet Secretary
WV Division of Environmental Protection
Katheryn D. Emery, P.E., Assistant Director
Div. of Water & Waste Mang. - DEP Designee

Mary K. Prim
Putnam County, WV

Rahul Gupta, MD, Commissioner
WV Bureau for Public Health
Robert DeCrease, P.E. Manager, Drinking
Water Trtmt. Revolving Fund - BPH Designee

John W. Reisenweber
Berkeley County, WV

Marie Prezioso, Executive Director
WV Water Development Authority

Louis R. Spatafore
Harrison County, WV

David Warner, Executive Director
WV Economic Development Authority

2

 DRAFT - WVIJDC Needs Assessment 2017
NON-VOTING ADVISORY MEMEBERS

SUPPORTING STAFF

Commissioner - Division of Highways

Wayne Morgan, P.E., Secretary/Exec. Director

Director - State Rail Authority

Lisa Williams, Administrative Assistant

Chancellor - Higher Education Policy Commission

Brian Blackwell, Project Manager

Chancellor - Council for Community & Technical
College Education

Brandon Crace, Project Manager

The Honorable Eric Nelson - WV House of Delegates

Michael Duminiak, GISP, GIS Manager

The Honorable Brent Boggs - WV House of Delegates

Maria Simental, GISP, GIS Programmer/Analyst

The Honorable Chandler Swope - WV Senate

3

 DRAFT - WVIJDC Needs Assessment 2017
INTRODUCTION
The West Virginia Infrastructure and Jobs Development Council was established in 1994 under the West
Virginia Infrastructure and Jobs Development Act, Chapter 31-15A of the West Virginia Code. The
Council is a governmental instrumentality of the State. Its primary role is to evaluate requests from
project sponsors seeking to plan, acquire, design, and construct water, sewer, and economic
development projects within the State and to approve funding for those projects.
This assessment was conducted pursuant to the requirements contained in Chapter 31-15A-6(b) of the
WV Code:
1) The Council is required to develop a comprehensive Statewide inventory of water supply
systems and sewage treatment systems and an assessment of current and future needs;
2) The assessment identifies the areas of the State which do not have adequate public water or
sewage systems;
3) Offers recommendations for the construction of new facilities or the extension or expansion of
existing facilities to meet the identified needs;
4) It includes an identification of the obstacles, issues and problems which prevent or inhibit
development of adequate infrastructure throughout the State, including financial,
governmental, physical, or geographical factors and make recommendations that the Council
considers appropriate regarding the obstacles, issues or problems identified; and
5) The comprehensive inventory and assessment shall be updated at least once in every three-year
period beginning in 1996.
In 2011 the Council, in conjunction with the West Virginia Water Development Authority, implemented
a statewide Geographic Information System (GIS) to achieve the following goals related to water and
sewer infrastructure:
-

Establish a database for existing water and sewer facilities, general locations, and service areas;
Provide a means to continually update the database as new facilities are proposed and
constructed;
Provide an electronic tracking mechanism for funding applications and project status; and
Provide the Council with situational awareness to support its decision-making process.

This assessment relies heavily on the data acquired from the GIS system in its inventory of existing water
and sewer systems.
Data relied upon in this report is current as of December 31, 2017.

4

 DRAFT - WVIJDC Needs Assessment 2017
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Use of the GIS database
In conjunction with its GIS implementation, the Council collected location data on all known existing
public (government and privately owned) water and sewer systems within the State. This data includes
the location of treatment facilities, as well as the general locations of water distribution and sewer
collection lines. The water distribution and sewer collection lines data is available to the public via the
Council’s website at www.wvinfrastructure.com. Although the GIS data provides the State with the
most accurate information obtained to-date, the following limitations must be noted for purposes of
this assessment:
1) The GIS relies on the location of known structures (addressable structures which are
updated periodically, at least every three years) to approximate the served and unserved
population. Therefore, the accuracy may be impacted by structures that are uninhabited,
removed or built between updates;
2) In establishing the locations of existing water and sewer lines, the GIS relies on records
obtained from utilities who own and/or operate those facilities. In some areas, data gaps
remain because of missing, unreliable, or unavailable utility records;
3) The data provides the location of existing water and sewer lines generally. It does not
provide a resolution of detail required to conduct design analysis, i.e., locate manholes,
valves, pump stations, pipe sizes, storage tanks, or hydraulic information;
4) The Council updates the existing inventory database whenever a project application is filed
by requiring Project Sponsors to provide preliminary maps of the project, and the public
IJDC website portal is updated to show the project location (blue spigot for water and red
outfall for sewer). By clicking on the project, the public can find out the project description,
estimated cost, funding scenario, number of new customers served, and project team
members by company name and telephone number. However, not all water and sewer
projects are required to be filed with the Council and therefore many projects may not be
added to the database during the Council’s application approval process. The Council is
workings with others to obtain this GIS information for water and sewer systems in order to
be able to provide a more complete database.

Served and Unserved Areas
Public water systems - approximately 62% of the State’s structures are served by a public water system.
The number of customers served by public water utilities in West Virginia is approximately 652,228.
Public sewer systems – approximately 46% of the State’s structures are served by a public sewer system.
The number of customers served by public sewer utilities in West Virginia is approximately 449,449.
The unserved areas within the State vary considerably between Counties. Appendix F provides a
summary of served and unserved structures within the State, while GIS data is provided graphically in
Appendix G.

5

 DRAFT - WVIJDC Needs Assessment 2017

Current/Future Needs
Current funding needs for water and sewer infrastructure based on applications filed with, and
approved by, the Council are approximately $296M for water projects and $395M for sewer projects. In
addition, based on the list of Long-Term Control Plans (LTCPs) filed with WVDEP as of 12/31/17, the
requirement to satisfy the State’s Combined Sewer Overflows (CSOs) need exceeds $1.6 Billion. Since
many of the LTCPs involve construction of sanitary sewers which qualify for Council funding, and the
combined sewers then become stormwater sewers, the estimate is over $1.0 Billion to satisfy CSOs
need.
Projected future needs assume a goal of serving every customer in the State. Based on assumptions
made, the cost of providing water service to every remaining unserved household in the State is
approximately $2.3 Billion. For sewer service, the estimate is approximately $10.7 Billion. If
rehabilitation work is considered in the estimate, the need may be approaching approximately $17
Billion.

6

 DRAFT - WVIJDC Needs Assessment 2017
EXISTING SYSTEM INVENTORIES
Public Water Utilities
A list of existing water systems and the customers served by each are provided in Appendix A. In total,
there are 326 public water utilities operating in the State serving approximately 652,228 customers.
In terms of structures, the number of structures within the State that have water service available is
approximately 610,742.

Public Sewer Utilities
A list of existing sewer systems and the customers served by each are provided in Appendix B. In total,
there are 293 public sewer utilities operating in the State serving approximately 449,449 customers.
The number of structures within the State that have sewer service available is approximately 450,748.

The following table provides a summary of existing systems (utilities) throughout the State:

Existing utilities1
Customers served1
Served structures
Unserved structures
Percent structures served

WATER
326
652,228
610,742
366,142
62%

SEWER
293
449,449
450,748
526,136
46%

Also provided in Appendix F is a listing of served and unserved structures in the State, organized by the
following geographical and political boundaries:
ξ
ξ
ξ
ξ
ξ

County
Congressional Districts
Regional Planning and Development Council Areas
Senatorial Districts
House Districts

7

 DRAFT - WVIJDC Needs Assessment 2017
ASSESSMENT OF CURRENT NEEDS
Public Water Systems
Current applications
A list of water project applications received as of 12/31/17 is provided in Appendix C. This includes all
preliminary applications approved by the Council as technically feasible, but without committed funding
as of 12/31/17. The total estimated costs of these projects exceed $302M, where approximately $6M
has been committed from other funding sources. The total estimate of current needs for water systems;
therefore, is approximately $296M.

Public Sewer Systems
Current applications
A list of sewer project applications approved as of 12/31/17 is provided in Appendix D. This includes all
preliminary applications approved by the Council as technically feasible, but without committed funding
as of 12/31/17. The total estimated cost of these projects exceed $398M, where approximately $3M has
been committed from other funding sources. The total estimate of current needs for sewer projects;
therefore, is approximately $395M.

Combined Sewer Overflow Communities
Combined Sewer Overflows (CSOs)2
Based on the list of Long-Term Control Plans filed with WVDEP as of 12/31/17, the requirement to
satisfy CSOs need exceeds $1.0 Billion. Although the LTCPs currently estimate the cost to meet State
requirements at $1.6 Billion, only sanitary sewers qualify for Council funding. Since stormwater sewers
do not qualify for Council funding, a portion of the improvements needed will not involve the
construction of sanitary sewers and the combined sewers becoming stormwater sewers. Therefore,
since many of the LTCPs involve the construction of sanitary sewers and the combined sewers becoming
stormwater sewers, the estimate is over $1.0 Billion to satisfy CSOs need. Below is a list of CSO
communities and their estimated total needs for compliance. Communities listed without an estimate
did not have an approved LTCP filed with the DEP or did not have a cost listed in their LTCP.

8

 DRAFT - WVIJDC Needs Assessment 2017
UTILITY

Barrackville
Beckley
Belington
Benwood
Bethany
Boone Co PSD
Bridgeport
Buckhannon
Cameron
Cedar Grove
Charleston
Clarksburg
Davis
Dunbar
Elkins
Fairmont
Farmington
Fayetteville
Flatwoods-Canoe Run
Follansbee
Grafton
Greater Paw Paw PSD
Hinton
Huntington
Kenova
Keyser
Kingwood
Logan
Marlinton
Marmet
Martinsburg
McMechen
Monongah
Montgomery
Moorefield
Morgantown
Moundsville
Mullens
New Martinsville
Nutter Fort
Nitro
Parsons

ESTIMATED NEED ($)

5,743,960
10,000,000
6,551,377
6,756,200
1,500,000
6,900,000
3,786,876
1,887,400
6,000,000
256,318,000
55,020,000
35,000,000
23,252,000
3,287,500
33,000,000
6,306,915
4,500,000
11,493,800
7,513,250
584,617,186
1,710,948
9,882,000
13,000,000
77,000,000
2,100,000
1,812,594
3,379,000
6,356,007
2,068,000
172,990,000
9,770,400
465,000
58,223,836
16,592,538
1,275,000
9

 DRAFT - WVIJDC Needs Assessment 2017
Philippi
Piedmont
Point Pleasant
Princeton
Richwood
St. Albans
Shinnston
Sistersville
Smithers
Thomas
Wayne
Welch
Wellsburg
West Union
Weston
Westover
Wheeling
TOTAL ESTIMATED COST

14,920,800
5,000,000
6,500,000
8,691,000
107,726
2,139,775
11,952,000
1,400,000
4,799,950
740,000
22,691,961
8,399,400
2,865,700
3,634,531
1,940,000
80,000,000
$1,621,842,630

10

 DRAFT - WVIJDC Needs Assessment 2017
Summary of Current Needs
Current funding needs for water and sewer infrastructure based on applications filed with, and
approved by the Council, are approximately $296M for water projects and $395M for sewer projects. In
addition, based on the list of Long-Term Control Plans filed with WVDEP as of 12/31/17, the
requirement to satisfy the State’s Combined Sewer Overflows (CSOs) need exceeds $1.0 Billion.

11

 DRAFT - WVIJDC Needs Assessment 2017
FUTURE NEEDS
Definition
For purposes of this assessment, “future needs” are an estimate of the costs needed to serve the
remaining unserved households/prospective customers of the State.

Methodology
In the absence of large preliminary studies with an enormous scope of work, placing a dollar cost on
future needs is highly speculative and requires several assumptions, mainly relating to the following:
ξ
ξ
ξ

Average cost of serving each household/prospective customer
The number of unserved households/prospective customers
The manner in which each household/prospective customer would be served

The average cost of serving each household/prospective customer assumes that the remaining unserved
households/prospective customers would be provided service through a typical line extension. It does
not necessarily take into account the addition of treatment or storage requirements on a per customer
basis, which differs greatly for each locale and therefore is not easily estimated on such a broad scale. It
also does not take into account alternate methods for providing service, such as decentralized systems.
For water service, a cost per customer of $26,250 is assumed ($25,000 assumed in 2013 x CPI3).
For sewer service, a cost per customer of $36,750 is assumed ($35,000 assumed in 2013 x CPI3).
Finally, the number of unserved households/prospective customers must be estimated. This assessment
uses the difference between the number of households based on US Census data, and the number of
customers served based on statistical data filed with the PSC. It should also be noted that a strict count
of utility customers will also include non-residential entities, such as businesses, industries, etc. and this
must be considered when attempting to estimate the number of unserved households/prospective
customers.
Since a significant portion of current applications are for rehabilitation or contain rehabilitation work, it
can be assumed that future needs may be understated by as much as $4 Billion. Therefore, if
rehabilitation work is considered in the estimate, the need may be approaching approximately $17
Billion ($2.3 Billion plus $10.7 Billion from table below plus 4 Billion).

COST TO SERVE EVERY HOUSEHOLD/PROSPECTIVE CUSTOMER
Number of Households4
Customers served1
Difference (unserved)
Avg. cost per customer to serve
Overall need

WATER
740,890
652,228
88,662
$26,250
$2.3 Billion

SEWER
740,890
449,449
291,441
$36,750
$10.7 Billion
12

 DRAFT - WVIJDC Needs Assessment 2017
OBSTACLES, ISSUES AND PROBLEMS
FINANCIAL CONCERNS
Available Funding Levels
The current status of funding sources is summarized below:
-

-

-

-

-

The EPA State Revolving Fund (SRF) programs are largely driven by Congressional budgeting and
funding for both the Clean Water State Revolving Fund (CWSRF) and Drinking Water Treatment
Revolving Fund (DWTRF), and funding for these programs has been relatively stable the last few
years. However, there is no guarantee that will continue. In addition to the federally allocated
funds and the state match provided by the IJDC, both programs receive payments of principal
and interest that are used to fund projects. The CWSRF receives approximately $33 million
annually from this funding stream. The DWSRF program receives $15 Million annually for
projects from repayments.
The Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program was allocated $12,288,766 for
FY2017. FY2018 funding is unknown at the present time and will remain unknown until Congress
passes an appropriations bill or a revised budget.
The Appalachian Regional Commission (ARC) is estimating approximately $5 Million will be
available for FY2018 grant awards as a “best-case” scenario.
The Abandoned Mines Lands and Reclamation (WVDEP-AML) Waterlines Program budget for
Calendar Year 2018 is estimated to be approximately $19 Million available for waterline
construction. The $19 Million budgeted amount includes unspent AML Waterlines grant funds
carried over from previous grant years. AML anticipates that in future years, unspent waterlines
grant funds will not be carried forward, but will instead be redirected to AML Reclamation
projects. Current Federal legislation mandates that the coal tax and resultant federal funds will
end in 2021, and additional AML Waterlines Program funds may not be available after that time.
The US Department of Agriculture – Rural Utility Services (USDA-RUS) anticipates having the
same allocation for FY2018 as in FY2017, which was approximately $17,260,000 for loans and
$5,528,000 for grants.
WV Infrastructure & Jobs Development Council (Council) - During the 2017 Legislative Session,
the Enrolled Senate Bill 1013 passed on June 16, 2017 which restored the cuts to the
Infrastructure Fund from excess lottery revenues to a maximum of $40 Million which will be
utilized in fiscal year 2019. This restoration of the cuts from the previous year which was a
deposit of $20 Million collected during fiscal year 2017 and used to fund projects in fiscal year
2018.

Availability of Grant Funds
The most sought-after form of funding for water and sewer infrastructure projects is grants. This is also
the least available of fund types, due mainly to the fact that the largest funding programs were
established as revolving funds and therefore rely on loan repayments to replenish and sustain
themselves. The amount of grant funding available actually serves to make many projects viable and
hence proceed to construction. A review of the Infrastructure Fund’s project financing closings between
FY2015 and FY2017 reflects that approximately 79% of those projects had Council grants in their funding
13

 DRAFT - WVIJDC Needs Assessment 2017
packages. Had those grants not been available it is quite possible that most of the projects funded
through the Infrastructure Fund over the last three years would not have proceeded to construction, or
would have proceeded with reduced project scopes.

User Rates
Water and sewer user rates continue to rise in order to meet current utility expense increases and
evolving regulatory requirements. Accordingly, the income available for utilities to service the debt
associated with borrowing public funds is less. Every utility undertaking a capital project must determine
the maximum user rates it is willing to accept in order to construct a project. Although this amount is
different for each utility (and project), it will be capped as a direct function of the rates its customers are
willing to pay and/or what the management of the utility is willing to accept. As rates approach these
“unacceptable” levels, project sponsors (utilities) may be less willing to take on additional debt (loans)
and may only undertake capital projects if grant funds are available. Another probable outcome is that,
in the absence of grant funds, utilities will undertake only those projects with a high urgency, such as
those designed to ensure compliance with regulatory standards and consent decrees versus projects
that are not being mandated by law or regulation, such as extensions of service to unserved areas.

PHYSICAL AND GEOGRAPHIC CONCERNS
West Virginia’s geography and geology mandate relatively higher costs for underground infrastructure,
such as water and sewer projects. This impact exists not only for new construction, but for replacement
and rehabilitation projects as well. Real estate to construct new treatment facilities can be difficult and
expensive to acquire, which sometimes creates added controversy over plant and pump/lift station
siting proposals.
Typically, existing systems will expand service to more accessible areas first. As time progresses, the
remaining unserved areas will be located in more remote, rugged, and less densely populated areas.
This results in higher costs, both on a per-customer and per-mile basis.

14

 DRAFT - WVIJDC Needs Assessment 2017
RECOMMENDATIONS
1) The need for infrastructure investments and improvements far outweighs the funds available.
Determining which projects receive funding commitments must be based on objective, uniform
criteria; among the most important of these criteria is a project’s readiness to proceed to
construction after receiving its funding commitments. This incentivizes project Sponsors to
maintain timely project schedules;
2) Ensure that the “utilization rates” of the State’s existing available funds are as close to 100% as
possible, where “utilization” is defined as a formal, binding commitment of funds. Once the
available funds are 100% utilized, then planning for additional procurement of funding, i.e.,
bond issues, leveraging, etc. should be considered;
3) Funding agencies must continue to coordinate their efforts in order to maximize the
effectiveness of the State’s limited funds available;
4) Continue to provide matches for both EPA-SRF funds administered by the State (CWSRF and
DWTRF); and
5) Ensure that all federal funds are utilized and matched when necessary by State funds. Other
than the Infrastructure Fund, all other primary funding agencies for water and sewer projects in
the State receive their funds primarily from federal sources. Therefore, almost every funding
agency in the State partnering with the Infrastructure Fund can be considered as requiring a
“federal match” in order to ensure its projects are fully funded.

15

 DRAFT - WVIJDC Needs Assessment 2017
REFERENCES
1) 2016 Statistical Report, Public Service Commission of West Virginia
2) Combined Sewer Overflow (CSO) Long Term Control Plans, WV Department of Environmental
Protection
3) Consumer Price Index (CPI) for 2015 - 2017 from the US Bureau of Labor Statistics
4) US Census Data for 2010 updated from American Community Survey for 2015

16

 Appendix A
Existing Water Systems and Customers - Private Water Utilities
AVG. #
NAME OF UTILITY
Alpine Lake Public Utilities Company
Beckley Water Company
Bellwood Community Facilities Imp. Corp.
Cave Road Utilities, LLC
Cheat Mountain Water Company, Inc.
Fox Glen Utilities, Inc.
Hampton Roads Water System
Jefferson Utilities, Inc.
Lakewood Utilities, Inc.
Mountain View Water System LLC
Newell Company, Inc., The
Otsego Community Water System
P & P Enterprises Utilities, LLC
Springer Run Park, LLC
Sunny View Acres Water Project
Timberline Four Seasons Utilities, Inc.
Valley Water & Sewer Services, Inc.
West Logan Water Company
West Virginia Resorts LLC
West Virginia-American Water Co.
Total
TOTAL SERVED BY WATER IN STATE

CUSTOMERS
517
22,551
43
606
253
2,585
172
54
651
28
2
28
428
121
417
53
167,366
195,875
652,228

Source: 2016 Statistical Report, Public Service Commission of WV

 Appendix A
Existing Water Systems and Customers - Municipal Water Utilities

NAME OF UTILITY
Albright
Alderson
Anmoore
Athens
Beech Bottom
Belington
Belmont
Benwood
Berkeley Springs (Bath)
Bethlehem
Beverly
Bradshaw
Bridgeport
Bruceton
Buckhannon
Burnsville
Cairo
Camden-on-Gauley
Cameron
Capon Bridge
Carpendale
Cedar Grove
Ceredo
Chapmanville
Charles Town
Chester
Clarksburg
Clay
Davis
Davy
Delbarton
East Bank
Elizabeth
Elkins
Fairmont
Fairview
Falling Springs (Renick)
Farmington
Follansbee
Fort Gay
Franklin
Gary

AVG. #
CUSTOMERS
151
711
476
1,777
216
942
440
592
1,369
1,142
1,072
71
4,723
82
4,003
383
163
170
402
323
373
438
626
922
5,951
1,789
8,242
562
438
189
142
399
858
4,021
13,784
477
101
208
3,624
631
713
479

Source: 2016 Statistical Report, Public Service Commission of WV

 Appendix A
Existing Water Systems and Customers - Municipal Water Utilities
NAME OF UTILITY
Gilbert
Glasgow
Glen Dale
Glenville
Grafton
Grant Town
Grantsville
Harman
Harpers Ferry
Harrisville
Hartford
Hillsboro
Hurricane
Huttonsville
Junior
Kenova
Kermit
Keyser
Keystone
Kingwood
Lester
Lewisburg
Logan
Lumberport
Man
Mannington
Marlinton
Martinsburg
Mason
Masontown
Matewan
Matoaka
McMechen
Meadow Bridge
Middlebourne
Mill Creek
Milton
Monongah
Moorefield
Morgantown
Moundsville
Mount Hope
New Cumberland

AVG. #
CUSTOMERS
743
355
1,108
872
2,657
308
95
812
1,137
272
105
3,574
77
382
3,838
533
2,399
80
1,425
266
4,892
1,991
684
446
935
740
6,504
762
921
897
125
839
253
516
389
2,519
1,413
1,182
25,748
4,499
677
591

Source: 2016 Statistical Report, Public Service Commission of WV

 Appendix A
Existing Water Systems and Customers - Municipal Water Utilities
NAME OF UTILITY
New Haven
New Martinsville
Newburg
Northfork
Nutter Fort
Oceana
Paden City
Parkersburg
Parsons
Paw Paw
Pax
Pennsboro
Petersburg
Philippi
Piedmont
Pine Grove
Pineville
Pocahontas
Point Pleasant
Rainelle
Ravenswood
Reedy
Rhodell
Richwood
Ridgeley
Ripley
Rivesville
Romney
Ronceverte
Rowlesburg
Rupert
Salem
Shepherdstown
Shinnston
Sistersville
Spencer
St. Albans
St. Marys
Star City
Stonewood
Summersville
Terra Alta

AVG. #
CUSTOMERS
682
2,701
430
163
835
1,204
1,263
16,053
781
231
626
1,259
1,596
289
1,145
450
2,436
908
1,886
179
1,066
317
2,456
685
884
1,038
240
489
799
1,684
2,306
952
2,150
6,133
1,094
931
934
2,699
774

Source: 2016 Statistical Report, Public Service Commission of WV

 Appendix A
Existing Water Systems and Customers - Municipal Water Utilities
NAME OF UTILITY
Thomas
Triadelphia
Tunnelton
Union
Valley Grove
Vienna
War
Wardensville
Wayne
Weirton
Welch
Wellsburg
West Hamlin
West Milford
West Union
Wheeling
White Sulphur Springs
Williamson
Williamstown
Womelsdorff
Worthington
Totals

AVG. #
CUSTOMERS
354
517
418
387
317
5,480
367
2,393
9,440
1,118
1,612
995
271
716
13,304
1,877
1,678
1,529
109
460
248,826

Source: 2016 Statistical Report, Public Service Commission of WV

 Appendix A
Existing Water Systems and Customers - Public Service Districts (Water)
AVG. #
NAME OF UTILITY
Adrian Public Service District
Armstrong Public Service District
Berkeley County Public Service District
Big Bend Public Service District
Bingamon Public Service District
Birch River Public Service District
Bluewell Public Service District
Boone County Public Service District
Boone-Raleigh Public Service District
Branchland-Midkiff Public Service District
Brenton Public Service District
Brooke County Public Service District
Buffalo Creek Public Service District
Central Barbour Public Service District
Central Boaz Public Service District
Central Hampshire Public Service District
Century Volga Public Service District
Cheat View Public Service District
Chestnut Ridge Public Service District
Clay Battelle Public Service District
Clay County Public Service District
Clay-Roane Public Service District
Claywood Park Public Service District
Clover Public Service District
Cool Ridge-Flat Top Public Service District
Coon's Run Public Service District
Cottageville Public Service District
Cowen Public Service District
Craigsville Public Service District
Crum Public Service District
Cumberland P.S.D. c/o WV-American Water
Danese Public Service District
Downs Public Service District
East View Public Service District
Eastern Wyoming Public Service District
Elkins Road Public Service District
Ellenboro-Lamberton Public Service District
Enlarged Hepzibah Public Service District
Fenwick Mountain Public Service District
Flatwoods-Canoe Run Public Service District
Fountain Public Service District
Frankfort Public Service District

CUSTOMERS
1,946
800
22,346
545
441
2,998
1,176
114
1,121
1,057
651
1,628
1,021
3,669
1,152
1,644
654
850
3,782
419
1,796
417
1,338
1,308
1,930
1,269
97
936
442
228
1,381
1,096
251
843
210
1,860
435
2,750

Source: 2016 Statistical Report, Public Service Commission of WV

 Appendix A
Existing Water Systems and Customers - Public Service Districts (Water)
AVG. #
NAME OF UTILITY
Friendly Public Service District (Tyler County)
Gap Mills Public Service District
Gauley River Public Service District
Gilmer County Public Service District
Glen Dale Heights Public Service District
Glen Rogers Public Service District
Glen White-Trap Hill Public Service District
Grandview-Doolin Public Service District
Grant County Public Service District
Grant Public Service District
Greater Harrison County Public Service District
Green Valley-Glenwood Public Service District
Greenbrier County Public Service District No. 2
Hammond Public Service District
Hamrick Public Service District
Hardy County Public Service District
Hodgesville Public Service District
Hundred-Littleton Public Service District
Huttonsville Public Service District
Ice's Run Route 250 Public Service District
Jane Lew Public Service District Water Division
Jefferson County Public Service District
Jumping Branch-Nimitz Public Service District
Justice Public Service District
Kanawha Falls Public Service District
Kopperston Public Service District
Lashmeet Public Service District
Lavalette Public Service District
Leadsville Public Service District
Lincoln Public Service District
Little Creek Public Service District
Logan County Public Service District
Lubeck Public Service District
Mannington Public Service District
Marianna Public Service District
Marshall County Public Service District No. 1
Marshall County Public Service District No. 2
Marshall County Public Service District No. 3
Marshall County Public Service District No. 4
Mason County Public Service District
McDowell County Public Service District
Midland Public Service District
Mineral Wells Public Service District

CUSTOMERS
949
191
1,359
228
95
1989
1032
2,713
903
3,450
4,364
469
916
729
1,985
1,203
274
1,238
473
649
113
227
985
3,807
643
2,210
902
10,042
4,536
556
11
1,311
655
1,170
1,706
5,976
3,064
1,434
2,547

Source: 2016 Statistical Report, Public Service Commission of WV

 Appendix A
Existing Water Systems and Customers - Public Service Districts (Water)
AVG. #
NAME OF UTILITY
Mingo County Public Service District
Monumental Public Service District
Mountain Top Public Service District
Mt. Zion Public Service District
Nettie-Leivasy Public Service District
New Haven Public Service District
Northern Jackson County Public Service District
Norton-Harding-Jimtown Public Service District
Oakland Public Service District
Oakvale Road Public Service District
Ohio County Public Service District
Page-Kincaid Public Service District
Paw Paw Rt 19 Public Service District
Pendleton County Public Service District
Pleasant Hill Public Service District
Pleasant Valley Public Service District
Pleasants County Public Service District
Pocahontas County Public Service District
Preston County Public Service District No. 1
Preston County Public Service District No. 2
Preston County Public Service District No. 4
Putnam Public Service District
Queen Shoals Public Service District
Raleigh County Public Service District
Ravencliff-McGraws-Saulsville Public Service Dist
Red Sulphur Public Service District
River Road Public Service District
Salt Rock Public Service District
Short Line Public Service District
Southern Jackson County Public Service District
Southwestern Water District
Sugar Creek Public Service District
Summit Park Public Service District
Sun Valley Public Service District
Taylor County Public Service District
Tomlinson Public Service District
Union-Williams Public Service District
Valley Falls Public Service District
Walton Public Service District
Washington Pike Public Service District
Wetzel County Public Service District No. 1
Wilderness Public Service District
Totals

CUSTOMERS
4,119
868
887
516
1,375
1081
689
935
4,243
650
538
742
669
947
229
272
1,461
1,405
1459
9,589
4,653
1,269
2,207
781
1,169
2,441
2,040
585
424
1,217
1,081
923
3,212
1,659
826
1,382
709
2,038
194,995

Source: 2016 Statistical Report, Public Service Commission of WV

 Appendix A
Existing Water Systems and Customers - Water Associations and Authorities
AVG. #
NAME OF UTILITY
Arthurdale Water Association
Clinton Water Association, Inc.
Coal Mountain Water Company
Coolfont Mountainside Association, Inc.
Crumpler Community Water Association, Inc.
Denver Water Association
Gallipolis Ferry Water Association, Inc.
Garwood Water Maintenance Association
Green Camp Community Water Association
Hardy County Rural Development Authority
Herndon Water Works
Hiawatha Water Association
Hughes River Water Board
Hutchinson Community Water Association
J-2-Y-35 Water Association, Inc.
Lincoln Heights Improvement Association
Little Laurel Run Improvement Association
Ministers Run Water Association
Montana Water Association
Mount Hope Water Association
Mountain View Water Association
New Creek Water Association, Inc.
O'Toole Water Association, Inc.
Pleasants County Development Authority
Route 16 Water Corporation
Sugar Lane Water Association Inc
Tri-County Water Association
Webster County Economic Development Authority
Whitmer Water Association, Inc.
Windmill Gap Water Association
Woods Homeowners Association, Inc., The
Total

CUSTOMERS
109
3,602
41
120
85
142
433
19
80
3
151
513
85
35
147
301
1,202
873
1,374
584
79
1,087
208
1,259
12,532

Source, 2016 Statistical Report, Public Service Commission of WV

 Appendix B
Existing Sewer Systems and Customers - Private Sewer Utilities
AVG. #
NAME OF UTILITY
Alpine Lake Public Utilities Company
Big Bend Sewer Association, Inc.
Butcher Bend Lagoon Maintenance Association
Carney Park Landowners/Homeowners Association
C & J Utilities, LLC
Cacapon South Utility Association, Inc.
Cave Road Utilities, LLC
Chestnut Point Property Owners Association, Inc.
Circle Drive Estates Association
Coolfont Mountainside Association Inc.
Eastwood Systems, Inc.
Fountainhead Homeowners Association
Graham Meadows Service District, Inc.
Green Acres Utilities
Hidden Valley Treatment, Inc.
Holiday Park Leisure Acres Association, Inc.
HPSD, LLC
Hubbard Heights Subdivision H.O. Association
Lakewood Utilities, Inc.
Linmont Sanitation System, Inc.
Little Kanawha Service Company
Moorefield/Hardy County Wastewater Authority
Mountainaire Village
Newell Company, Inc., The
Ogden Sewer Company
P & P Enterprises Utilities LLC
Sewage Systems, Inc.
Shenandoah Junction Public Sewer, Inc.
Spring Valley Home Owners Association, Inc.
Springer Run Park, LLC
Timberline Four Seasons Utilities, Inc.
Vitech Enterprises, Inc.
Wastewater Management, Inc.
West Virginia Resorts, LLC
West Virginia-American Water Company
Williamsburg Sewer System, Inc.
Wood County Parks and Recreation Commission
Total

CUSTOMERS
516
19
59
32
84
75
41
120
55
109
84
211
172
81
58
3
449
82
36
166
743
50
54
1,056
209
17
4,581

Source: 2016 Statistical Report, Public Servide Commission of WV

 Appendix B
Existing Sewer Systems and Customers - Municipal Sewer Utilities
AVG. #
NAME OF UTILITY
Albright
Alderson
Anmoore
Ansted
Athens
Barboursville
Barrackville
Beckley
Belington
Belle
Belmont
Benwood
Bethany
Bethlehem
Beverly
Blacksville
Bluefield
Bradshaw
Bridgeport
Buckhannon
Buffalo
Burnsville
Cairo
Camden-on-Gauley
Cameron
Capon Bridge
Carpendale
Cedar Grove
Ceredo
Chapmanville
Charles Town
Charleston
Chesapeake
Chester
Clarksburg
Clay
Clearview
Davis
Delbarton
Dunbar
Durbin
East Bank

CUSTOMERS
101
523
408
607
451
1,886
655
7,416
825
579
402
565
216
1,111
807
103
7,775
129
4,692
3,104
502
214
155
103
396
323
371
381
777
815
3,244
23,008
649
1,692
7,492
303
253
429
429
3,453
168
403

Source: 2016 Statistical Report, Public Service Commission of WV

 Appendix B
Existing Sewer Systems and Customers - Municipal Sewer Utilities
AVG. #
NAME OF UTILITY
Eleanor
Elizabeth
Elkins
Fairmont
Farmington
Flemington
Follansbee
Fort Gay
Franklin
Gary
Gilbert
Glasgow
Glen Dale
Glenville
Grafton
Grantsville
Granville
Handley
Harman
Harrisville
Hartford
Hillsboro
Hinton
Huntington
Hurricane
Junior
Kenova
Kermit
Keyser
Kingwood
Leon
Logan
Lumberport
Man
Mannington
Marlinton
Marmet
Martinsburg
Mason
Masontown
Matewan
Matoaka
McMechen

CUSTOMERS
969
432
3,063
9,694
252
269
2,421
313
457
422
302
332
1,108
738
2,380
329
340
111
78
822
198
160
1,246
19,103
1,964
196
1,327
138
2,278
1,596
117
850
598
387
937
591
647
5,997
473
515
836
125
823

Source: 2016 Statistical Report, Public Service Commission of WV

 Appendix B
Existing Sewer Systems and Customers - Municipal Sewer Utilities
AVG. #
NAME OF UTILITY
Meadow Bridge
Middlebourne
Milton
Monongah
Montgomery
Moorefield
Morgantown
Moundsville
Mount Hope
Mullens
New Cumberland
New Haven
New Martinsville
Newburg
Nitro
North Hills
Nutter Fort
Oak Hill
Oceana
Paden City
Parkersburg
Parsons
Paw Paw
Pax
Pennsboro
Petersburg
Philippi
Piedmont
Pine Grove
Poca
Point Pleasant
Pratt
Princeton
Ranson
Ravenswood
Reedsville
Reedy
Richwood
Ridgeley
Ripley
Romney
Ronceverte
Rowlesburg

CUSTOMERS
335
555
1,895
573
677
1,351
22,124
4,439
523
455
675
2,578
152
4,459
314
835
3,303
1,582
1,200
15,396
694
231
159
544
1,261
1,258
289
682
2,108
226
4,025
1,705
1,810
321
98
878
316
2,259
1042
805
232

Source: 2016 Statistical Report, Public Service Commission of WV

 Appendix B
Existing Sewer Systems and Customers - Municipal Sewer Utilities
AVG. #
NAME OF UTILITY
Salem
Sand Fork
Shepherdstown
Shinnston
Sistersville
Smithers
Sophia
South Charleston
Spencer
St. Albans
St. Marys
Star City
Stonewood
Summersville
Terra Alta
Thomas
Triadelphia
Tunnelton
Union
Vienna
War
Wardensville
Wayne
Weirton
Welch
Wellsburg
West Hamlin
West Union
Weston
Westover
Wheeling
White Sulphur Springs
Willamson
Williamstown
Winfield
Worthington
Total

CUSTOMERS
742
58
1,105
1,039
952
380
832
7,080
1,559
6,147
913
915
922
1,662
657
304
497
131
302
5,472
458
351
761
9,282
867
1,460
396
556
2,707
2,249
12,578
1,680
1,281
1,416
1,110
312
297,346

Source: 2016 Statistical Report, Public Service Commission of WV

 Appendix B
Existing Sewer Systems and Customers - Public Service Districts (Sewer)
AVG. #
NAME OF UTILITY
Arbuckle Public Service District
Armstrong Public Service District
Berkeley County Public Service Sewer District
Big Bend Public Service District
Bluewell Public Service District
Boone County Public Service District
Boone-Raleigh Public Service District
Bradley Public Service District
Bramwell Public Service District
Brooke County Public Service District
Buffalo Creek Public Service District
Canaan Valley Public Service District
Center Public Service District
Central Boaz Public Service District
Central Hampshire Public Service District
Claywood Park Public Service District
Colfax Public Service District
Cottageville Public Service District
Cowen Public Service District
Crab Orchard-MacArthur Public Service District
Craigsville Public Service District
Culloden Public Service District
Deckers Creek Public Service District
East View Public Service District
Elk Valley Public Service District
Ellenboro-Lamberton Public Service District
Enlarged Hepzibah Public Service District
Flatwoods-Canoe Run Public Service District
Frankfort Public Service District
Glen Rogers Public Service District
Greater Harrison County Public Service District
Greater Marion Public Service District
Greater Paw Paw Sanitary District
Greater St. Albans Public Service District
Green Valley-Glenwood Public Service District
Greenbrier County Public Service District No. 2
Greenbrier Public Service District No. 1
Hamlin Public Service District
Hamrick Public Service District
Hancock County Public Service District
Harpers Ferry-Bolivar Public Service District
Hundred-Littleton Public Service District

Source: 2016 Statistical Report, Public Service Commission of WV

CUSTOMERS
575
784
21,928
1,258
1,833
1,592
200
1029
1,248
4
746
483
766
1,700
137
228
573
4,192
976
1,204
1,866
349
4,684
166
824
1,286
1,560
97
2,164
423
1,360
2,104
4,382
2,398
2,717
712
458
1,379
752
205

 Appendix B
Existing Sewer Systems and Customers - Public Service Districts (Sewer)
AVG. #
NAME OF UTILITY
Huttonsville Public Service District
Jane Lew Public Service District
Jefferson County Public Service District
Kanawha Falls Public Service District
Kanawha Public Service District fka Chelyan PSD
Kingmill Valley Public Service District
Lake Floyd Public Service District
Leadsville Public Service District
Logan County Public Service District
Lubeck Public Service District
Malden Public Service District
Marshall County Sewerage District
Mason County Public Service District
Meadow Creek Public Service District
Midland Public Service District
Mineral Wells Public Service District
Mingo County Public Service District
Mountain Top Public Service District
Mt. Zion Public Service District
New Creek Public Service District
North Beckley Public Service District
Northern Jackson County Public Service District
Northern Wayne County Public Service District
Norton-Harding-Jimtown Public Service District
Oakvale Road Public Service District
Ohio County Public Service District
Page-Kincaid Public Service District
Pea Ridge Public Service District
Pleasant View Public Service District
Pocahontas County Public Service District
Preston County Public Service District
Prichard Public Service District
Putnam Public Service District
Red Sulphur Public Service District
Salt Rock Public Service District
Shady Spring Public Service District
Sissonville Public Service District
Southern Jackson County Public Service District
Spring Valley Public Service District
Summit Park Public Service District
Sun Valley Public Service District
Tennerton Public Service District
Tyler County Public Service District (Friendly PSD)

Source: 2016 Statistical Report, Public Service Commission of WV

CUSTOMERS
945
898
2,565
1,064
2,614
1,390
153
780
1,589
2,362
3,282
726
271
884
1,785
419
299
132
1,062
3,881
121
2,774
689
1,765
2,043
405
4,797
159
596
244
196
10,668
1,224
1,588
4,303
1,637
770
508
566
727
885
290

 Appendix B
Existing Sewer Systems and Customers - Public Service Districts (Sewer)
AVG. #
NAME OF UTILITY
Union Public Service District
Union Williams Public Service District
Warm Springs Public Service District
Webster Springs Public Service District
West Dunbar Public Service District
White Oak Public Service District
Whitehall Public Service District
Totals

Source: 2016 Statistical Report, Public Service Commission of WV

CUSTOMERS
5,315
1,810
1,424
641
724
956
1,254
147,522

 Appendix E
Infrastructure Funding Agencies in West Virginia
WV Bureau for Public Health (WVBPH)
Programs:
Drinking Water Treatment Revolving Fund (DWTRF)
Contact:
Robert Decrease, 304-356-4301

WV Development Office (WVDO)
Programs:
Appalachian Regional Commission Grant (ARC)
Small Cities Block Grant (SCBG)
Contact:
Todd Goddard, 304-558-2234

WV Department of Environmental Protection (WVDEP)
Programs:
Abandonded Mine Lands (AML)
Clean Water State Revolving Fund (CWSRF)
Contact:
CWSRF - Kathy Emery, 304-926-0440
AML - Roger Earle, 304-926-0499
WV Infrastructure and Jobs Development Council (WVIJDC)
Contact:
Wayne Morgan, 304-414-6501

US Department of Agriculture - Rural Utilities Service (USDA-RUS)
Contact:
Janna Lowery, 304-284-4886

US Army Corps of Engineers (USACOE)
Programs:
COE 571 and COE 340
Contact:
Sharanna Romans, 304-399-5025

WV Water Development Authority (WVWDA)
Contact: Marie Prezioso, 304-414-6500

 Appendix F
Served/Unserved Structures (by County)

County
Barbour
Berkeley
Boone
Braxton
Brooke
Cabell
Calhoun
Clay
Doddridge
Fayette
Gilmer
Grant
Greenbrier
Hampshire
Hancock
Hardy
Harrison
Jackson
Jefferson
Kanawha
Lewis
Lincoln
Logan
Marion
Marshall
Mason
McDowell
Mercer
Mineral
Mingo
Monongalia
Monroe
Morgan
Nicholas
Ohio
Pendleton
Pleasants
Pocahontas
Preston
Putnam
Raleigh
Randolph
Ritchie
Roane
Summers
Taylor
Tucker
Tyler
Upshur
Wayne
Webster
Wetzel
Wirt
Wood
Wyoming

Unserved
2992
7915
1708
10994
9065
1373
1635
4940
7373
5118
2661
3712
12874
12398
4766
2638
6446
9399
19330
15156
8169
5616
4608
6526
4620
2542
7017
7218
4672
3856
5175
1848
13901
4967
4591
4174
3519
6668
3968
3939
8605
11432
9233
9990
10791
947
5991
2521
3603
10633
2154
5604
3492
23471
7588

Water
Served
% no
7220
29%
18192
30%
10590
14%
5392
67%
10912
45%
19890
6%
1087
60%
4828
51%
1732
81%
18446
22%
1541
63%
4169
47%
9166
58%
3221
79%
10471
31%
2220
54%
31440
17%
6476
59%
6149
76%
83909
15%
12319
40%
6038
48%
20372
18%
31227
17%
3938
54%
4927
34%
13764
34%
26625
21%
2495
65%
15374
20%
46231
10%
1847
50%
2595
84%
12088
29%
14586
24%
1762
70%
2851
55%
1653
80%
4663
46%
12498
24%
13812
38%
5497
68%
3189
74%
6601
60%
5943
64%
3176
23%
2495
71%
3454
42%
10225
26%
20670
34%
2312
48%
3950
59%
3086
53%
19241
55%
12187
38%

WVIJDC 2017 Needs Assessment

% yes
71%
70%
86%
33%
55%
94%
40%
49%
19%
78%
37%
53%
42%
21%
69%
46%
83%
41%
24%
85%
60%
52%
82%
83%
46%
66%
66%
79%
35%
80%
90%
50%
16%
71%
76%
30%
45%
20%
54%
76%
62%
32%
26%
40%
36%
77%
29%
58%
74%
66%
52%
41%
47%
45%
62%

F‐1

Unserved
7559
13273
9664
14290
7774
5766
2212
9284
8396
11213
3550
6008
11327
12883
2998
3869
15841
10225
15398
19141
14370
10178
20284
15073
4195
5146
17044
15054
2931
13082
14900
2764
13543
12569
5331
5486
4754
6920
6336
6612
9711
10230
9609
14560
14635
2884
5881
3401
9095
21825
2782
4720
5380
9183
14997

Sewer
Served
% no
2653
74%
12834
51%
2634
79%
2096
87%
12203
39%
15497
27%
510
81%
484
95%
709
92%
12351
48%
652
84%
1873
76%
10713
51%
2736
82%
12239
20%
989
80%
22045
42%
5650
64%
10081
60%
79924
19%
6118
70%
1476
87%
4696
81%
22680
40%
4363
49%
2323
69%
3737
82%
18789
44%
4236
41%
6148
68%
36506
29%
931
75%
2953
82%
4486
74%
13846
28%
450
92%
1616
75%
1401
83%
2295
73%
9825
40%
12706
43%
6699
60%
2813
77%
2031
88%
2099
87%
1239
70%
2605
69%
2574
57%
4733
66%
9478
70%
1684
62%
4834
49%
1198
82%
33529
21%
4778
76%

% yes
26%
49%
21%
13%
61%
73%
19%
5%
8%
52%
16%
24%
49%
18%
80%
20%
58%
36%
40%
81%
30%
13%
19%
60%
51%
31%
18%
56%
59%
32%
71%
25%
18%
26%
72%
8%
25%
17%
27%
60%
57%
40%
23%
12%
13%
30%
31%
43%
34%
30%
38%
51%
18%
79%
24%

 Appendix F
Served/Unserved Structures (by Congressional District)

Congressional District
1
2
3

Unserved
117853
143105
105184

WVIJDC 2017 Needs Assessment

Water
Served
% no
208981
36%
186057
43%
215704
33%

% yes
64%
57%
67%

F‐2

Unserved
141324
179851
204961

Sewer
Served
% no
185510
43%
149311
55%
115927
64%

% yes
57%
45%
36%

 Appendix F
Served/Unserved Structures (by Region)
Region
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

Unserved
43067
28628
25743
31781
63260
30435
45842
27594
41146
14815
13831

Water
Served
% no
74178
37%
87271
25%
111825
19%
43665
42%
45985
58%
118469
20%
44689
51%
13867
67%
26936
60%
22474
40%
21383
39%

WVIJDC 2017 Needs Assessment

% yes
63%
75%
81%
58%
42%
80%
49%
33%
40%
60%
61%

F‐3

Unserved
74205
76281
44701
44811
59324
63430
64975
31177
42214
14246
10772

Sewer
Served
% no
43040
63%
39618
66%
92867
32%
30635
59%
49921
54%
85474
43%
25556
72%
10284
75%
25868
62%
23043
38%
24442
31%

% yes
37%
34%
68%
41%
46%
57%
28%
25%
38%
62%
69%

 Appendix F
Served/Unserved Structures (by Senatorial Districts)

WVIJDC 2017 Needs Assessment

Water
Senate District
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17

Unserved
19138
37150
34649
20615
3965
20578
17027
5163
16631
30632
35390
30970
5443
21361
35119
21200
11073

Served
36674
31326
27946
22509
26896
56568
48157
48863
27695
35398
36474
54740
58487
26619
15283
16823
40276

Sewer
% no
34%
54%
55%
48%
13%
27%
26%
10%
38%
46%
49%
36%
9%
45%
70%
56%
22%

% yes
66%
46%
45%
52%
87%
73%
74%
90%
62%
54%
51%
64%
91%
55%
30%
44%
78%

F‐4

Unserved
16980
45328
26032
26288
8642
48971
53376
12616
26585
39940
50947
54453
14876
33461
39662
17871
10062

Served
38832
23148
36563
16836
22219
28175
11808
41410
17741
26090
20917
31257
49054
14519
10740
20152
41287

% no
30%
66%
42%
61%
28%
63%
82%
23%
60%
60%
71%
64%
23%
70%
79%
47%
20%

% yes
70%
34%
58%
39%
72%
37%
18%
77%
40%
40%
29%
36%
77%
30%
21%
53%
80%

 Appendix F
Served/Unserved Structures (by House Districts)

Delegate District
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67

Unserved
6733
7300
3295
5714
5918
10347
12285
4221
4683
18060
10960
6929
3101
2277
623
1547
326
276
10529
1387
8702
8187
966
3854
5363
3989
6024
13308
1612
3518
925
6476
7617
11706
7159
3853
224
414
1480
2135
3832
14621
17803
4422
2453
8484
5320
6490
1601
6262
4432
1551
6079
6118
5257
3338
7443
13280
7434
2251
412
1727
1084
1059
7548
7166
4614

Water
Served
% no
15170
31%
6514
53%
13741
19%
4482
56%
4265
58%
5184
67%
6039
67%
5204
45%
8221
36%
8902
67%
7667
59%
2915
70%
9923
24%
2676
46%
3663
15%
10930
12%
9217
3%
3759
7%
17978
37%
10194
12%
8017
52%
8997
48%
7860
11%
19888
16%
10132
35%
12492
24%
25242
19%
9865
57%
4020
29%
1639
68%
5958
13%
21741
23%
6271
55%
6178
65%
26790
21%
23376
14%
11181
2%
8259
5%
8553
15%
7839
21%
8400
31%
9145
62%
7060
72%
6879
39%
7983
24%
13383
39%
7480
42%
31712
17%
3889
29%
30728
17%
45430
9%
2987
34%
3913
61%
5030
55%
3672
59%
1478
69%
3386
69%
2795
83%
2097
78%
2300
49%
4414
9%
3319
34%
2996
27%
3167
25%
1570
83%
712
91%
3867
54%

WVIJDC 2017 Needs Assessment

% yes
Unserved
69%
4024
47%
7251
81%
3748
44%
5275
42%
5349
33%
12250
33%
13895
55%
3563
64%
8614
33%
2387
41%
16444
30%
6488
76%
7883
54%
3392
85%
366
88%
3395
97%
1965
93%
1934
63%
21499
88%
8164
48%
13921
52%
13834
89%
6201
84%
19816
65%
12769
76%
12146
81%
12927
43%
17350
71%
3442
32%
182
87%
4036
77%
14027
45%
12738
35%
15292
79%
2547
86%
6329
98%
10
95%
1328
85%
4312
79%
5305
69%
9991
38%
13067
28%
16763
61%
7188
76%
6342
61%
15109
58%
9169
83%
16156
71%
4251
83%
14310
91%
13356
66%
3283
39%
7325
45%
8962
41%
7490
31%
1532
31%
7683
17%
13043
22%
8211
51%
3669
91%
417
66%
3979
73%
1251
75%
1749
17%
2769
9%
6581
46%
6046

F‐5

Sewer
Served
% no
17879
18%
6563
52%
13288
22%
4921
52%
4834
53%
3281
79%
4429
76%
5862
38%
4290
67%
24575
9%
2183
88%
3356
66%
5141
61%
1561
68%
3920
9%
9082
27%
7578
21%
2101
48%
7008
75%
3417
70%
2798
83%
3350
81%
2625
70%
3926
83%
2726
82%
4335
74%
18339
41%
5823
75%
2190
61%
4975
4%
2847
59%
14190
50%
1150
92%
2592
86%
31402
8%
20900
23%
11395
0%
7345
15%
5721
43%
4669
53%
2241
82%
10699
55%
8100
67%
4113
64%
4094
61%
6758
69%
3631
72%
22046
42%
1239
77%
22680
39%
36506
27%
1255
72%
2667
73%
2186
80%
1439
84%
3284
32%
3146
71%
3032
81%
1320
86%
882
81%
4409
9%
1067
79%
2829
31%
2477
41%
6349
30%
1297
84%
2435
71%

% yes
82%
48%
78%
48%
47%
21%
24%
62%
33%
91%
12%
34%
39%
32%
91%
73%
79%
52%
25%
30%
17%
19%
30%
17%
18%
26%
59%
25%
39%
96%
41%
50%
8%
14%
92%
77%
100%
85%
57%
47%
18%
45%
33%
36%
39%
31%
28%
58%
23%
61%
73%
28%
27%
20%
16%
68%
29%
19%
14%
19%
91%
21%
69%
59%
70%
16%
29%