LAKELINE PARK MASTER PLAN December 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1 - INTRODUCTION.........................................................................................................................................1 SECTION 2 - SITE INVENTORY/ANALYSIS...............................................................................................................3 SECTION 3 - PARK PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT......................................................................................................5 SECTION 4 - PARK MASTER PLANNING....................................................................................................................9 SECTION 5 - DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS AND BUDGET.......................................................................17 SECTION 6 - APPENDIX..................................................................................................................................................19 FINAL CONCEPT PLAN FINAL CONCEPT PERSPECTIVE - NORTH FINAL CONCEPT PERSPECTIVE - SOUTH BUDGET OPINION OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS 140 Master Plan Report 3 SECTION 1 - INTRODUCTION PURPOSE The purpose of this Master Plan Report is to summarize the process and events that established the programming and elements for the Lakeline Park Master Plan. This report provides the City a framework for how the park will be developed. WHERE IS LAKELINE PARK? Lakeline Park consists of approximately 189 acres of undeveloped, City-owned land in south Cedar Park. The site is generally located on land within the 100-year floodplain and inundation area of the Upper Brushy Creek Water Control and Improvement District (UBCWCID) Dam No. 6 in the Buttercup Creek Watershed, adjacent to existing residential land uses, and is bound by US Highway 183/Bell Boulevard, Lakeline Boulevard, and Cypress Creek Road. 142 Master Plan Report 1 WHY A MASTER PLAN? The City’s adopted 2015 Parks and Open Space Master Plan identified the need to master plan and develop Lakeline Park as one of the highest priorities, and identified the following uses to be included in the parks development: • • • • • • • • • trails open play fields pavilions and picnic facilities splash pad festival areas undeveloped preserve areas fishing area water activities nature trails • • • • neighborhood connections off-street parking restroom facilities native/drought tolerant landscape improvements • perimeter multi-use trail • connection to Twin Lakes Park and the Brushy Creek Regional Trail March 2015 The Lakeline Park Master Plan identifies community preferences, characteristics and factors that were used to build consensus and commitment between City officials, City staff, and the community to create a defined plan of action for moving forward with the development of the park. WHO WAS INVOLVED? The process for the Lakeline Park Master Plan was led by the Cedar Park Parks and Recreation Department and Halff Associates Planning and Landscape Architecture team. Guidance was provided by Cedar Park City Council, the Parks, Arts and Community Enrichment Board (PACE), and the Cedar Park Community through various forms of public outreach and engagement activities. 2 143 SECTION 2 - SITE INVENTORY/ANALYSIS Extensive site inventory and analysis occurred throughout the master plan development and included gathering available data of the park site and surrounding area, and utilizing that information to identify opportunities and constraints. Data collected included prior studies, Geographic Information System (GIS) data, available Lidar imagery and topography, current FEMA floodplain models, and as-built construction plans from on and off-site improvements. A preliminary site base map was generated based on relevant information, followed by a comprehensive site inventory; research and assessment of nearby land uses; recreational and demographic growth trends; and evaluation of hydraulic and environmental conditions. Utilizing the site base map, on-site reconnaissance with the consulting team and City Staff was performed and included a photo inventory of existing conditions and surrounding influences, and identifying on-site conditions critical to the development of the site. After evaluating site conditions, the master planning team identified available ingress and egress opportunities; on- and off-road pedestrian and bicycle connections to adjacent neighborhoods, parks and the regional trail system; neighborhood buffer areas; and environmental constraints. This information was compiled into a composite overlay, providing a framework of on and off-site opportunities and constraints. This step of the master planning process resulted in a summary of initial findings and established parameters by which to facilitate public engagement. 144 Master Plan Report 3 SECTION 3 - PARK PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT Program development included in-depth public outreach to identify the community’s vision for the future park development. A project website and Online survey were created to allow for centralized public input/feedback. Stakeholder and public input meetings, and homeowner association outreach was conducted to identify community preferences and program uses or elements to be incorporated into the park master plan. The intended result from this step of the master planning process was to establish a “community vision” statement based on initial public input to further guide development of the park master plan. The following is a summary of this process and the results PUBLIC MEETING 1 (LEARNING AND LISTENING) APRIL 5, 2018 This public open house educated attendees about the park property and gathered public expectations, ideas and concerns, resulting in a strong base of needs, issues and ideas for park improvements. The majority of attendees were residents from adjacent neighborhoods. Those in attendance were provided general background information in regards to the site as identified in Section 1 of this report. Attendees were then provided the opportunity to leave feedback on various activities and amenities they would prefer to see in the park. These activities include: TRAILS trail types • • • • multi-use trails nature trails mountain bike trails cycle track (road bikes) trail amenities • • • • • • lighting water fountains mister (cooling stations) way-finding mile markers exercise stations RECREATION active recreation • • • • • • sports courts equipment rentals playground areas sports fields skate park splash pad passive recreation • • • • • • dog park fishing birding/nature viewing pavilions/picnicking social games free play open space FEATURES environmental/natural • • • • • • wildflower meadows wetland preserve community garden demonstration garden outdoor classroom rain collection arts and culture • • • • • • public art music/other event area recreational programs meeting place (indoor) food & beverage historic preservation 146 Master Plan Report 5 During the Public Meeting, an Online survey was launched to gather additional information on recreation preferences from both attendees, and those who were unable to attend the meeting. The survey remained open from March 21 to April 20, 2018 and gathered responses from 725 participants. ENV IRO NM E Very Importan t N Important 3 3 4 2 5 1 AR L CU 25% V E R E C R E ATI ON 1. COMMUNITY MEETING PLACE 2. AMPHITHEATER 3. PUBLIC ART T TU S & RE 2 3 4 5 6 AR L CU 3 % AC TI 2 4 1 T TU S & RE 1 5 AC TI V E R E C R E ATI ON RE RE REC ATION ATU /N NT N 1. MULTI-USE TRAILS 2. OPEN SPACE FREE PLAY 3. FISHING & BIRDING 4. PICNICKING 5. DOG PARK PASSIVE R ECR EA TIO ENV IRO NM E RE RE REC ATION ATU /N 9% 3 NT PASSIVE R ECR E 33% ATIO The charts below display community preferences of activities and were generated from the data gathered at both Public Meeting 1 and the Online survey. 1. NATURE DISCOVERY 2. WILDLIFE OBSERVATION 3. WETLAND RESTORATION 4. GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE 5. GARDENS 1. SPORTS FIELDS 2. EQUIPMENT RENTALS 3. SPORT COURTS 4. BICYCLE FACILITIES 5. SPLASH PAD 6. PLAYGROUND AREAS These charts indicate that the community valued a balance of Passive Recreation, Environmental Recreation, and Active Recreation within the park. Key items or activities identified by a majority of respondents included: RECREATION active recreation • • • • • • sports fields equipment rentals sports courts bicycle facilities splash pad playground areas passive recreation • • • • multi-use trails open space/free play fishing & birding picnicking FEATURES environmental/natural • nature/discovery • wildlife observation • gardens 6 arts and culture • community mtg. place • amphitheater • public art 147 In addition to these preferences, 65% of respondents indicated that multi-use trails were “very important” to provide in the park. Both the Online survey and public meeting results were consistent with one another. After analyzing this data, the consulting team and city staff developed the following overall vision statement to guide the further development of the park master plan: “To preserve the natural character of Lakeline Park while providing a balance of passive and active recreational opportunities. Following these events, the City Council was updated on the progress of the master plan process. 148 Master Plan Report 7 SECTION 4 - PARK MASTER PLANNING Park master planning began with the preparation of a preliminary concept plan delineating the overall character and image of the proposed park, incorporating public preferences and the “community vision” developed through the park programming phase. The results of the first public meeting and preliminary concept plan were presented to the City Council and PACE Board before proceeding with the second public meeting. PUBLIC MEETING 2 (EXPLORING IDEAS) JUNE 19, 2018 This public meeting was a formal presentation of the preliminary concept plan delineating the overall character and image of the proposed park as a result of Public Meeting 1 and Online survey results. The goal of this meeting was to receive public input on the concept about which ideas were liked, which needed refinement, and which needed to be removed, in order to guide the development of a refined concept plan. A formal presentation provided project background information, the feedback gathered at the first public meeting, and the Online survey results. The overall vision statement was shared with the audience followed by an in-depth and descriptive presentation of the preliminary concept plan. 150 Master Plan Report 9 The park site is bisected by a waterway creating a distinctive north and south park development area. The preliminary concept plan contained programming for both active and passive recreation, with both natural/environmental and arts/culture features in each development area. Following is a summary of the programming for each side of the park: NORTH SIDE The hub of activity on the north side of the park consisted of a great lawn for free play and events, social games and event pavilion/amphitheater; a play area with a splash pad, playground, grand pavilions and restrooms; a large multi-purpose area with practice fields and pavilions; community and demonstration gardens; a skate/bike park; a water sports pavilion for kayak rentals, boat launch; wildflower meadows to promote wildlife habitat; fishing piers; and a natural recreation area for birding/wildlife viewing. A park entrance drive from Little Elm Trail within future Alexis Drive right-of-way was proposed to provide vehicular and pedestrian access to the site with an internal loop road and large parking lot adjacent to the great lawn and play area, sufficient for three hundred vehicles. SOUTH SIDE The heart of the south side of the park consisted of baseball/softball and soccer/football fields; tennis/pickleball/basketball and sand volleyball courts; as well as supporting facilities such as restrooms and playgrounds. These uses are intended to be illuminated for use during evening hours. The southern side included a fishing pier; stabilized earth trails for hiking; and a natural recreation area to support birding/wildlife viewing, mountain biking, disc golf, and outdoor education. A park entrance from Old Mill Road was proposed to provide vehicular and pedestrian access to the site terminating at a large parking lot, sufficient for three hundred vehicles. TRAIL NETWORK Rated as the highest priority activity under passive recreation, trails were included as a major component of the preliminary concept plan tying the north and south sides of park together. A twelve foot wide regional spine trail was included with future extensions to the existing Brushy Creek Regional Trail to the east and future continuation to the west. The concept also included a 10 foot wide primary loop trail within the park that utilizes a proposed bridge, existing on-site trails and the regional trail to create a complete loop. Several optional trail routes and residential connections were also provided on the south side. Eight foot wide sidewalks and connections to adjacent neighborhoods and developments were also included in the concept plan. 10 151 After the presentation, attendees were provided the opportunity to review the preliminary concept plan, ask questions of the design consultants and City staff, and take a short written survey. Approximately 120 participants attended Public Meeting 2, and 77 of those provided written feedback. A second Online survey was launched the same day to show the preliminary concept plan to those that were unable to attend the public meeting and gather additional feedback. The Online survey was open from June 20 to July 9, 2018 in which 479 participants provided feedback. Feedback gathered at the meeting was digitized and combined with the Online survey results to determine whether the public agreed or disagreed with the types of features included in the preliminary concept plan, the location of those features, and any associated concerns. THE TYPES OF FEATURES AND PROGRAMMING IN THE CONCEPT PLAN REFLECT MY VISION OF LAKELINE PARK. THE LOCATION OF FEATURES AND PROGRAMMING IN THE CONCEPT PLAN MEETS MY EXPECTATIONS. AGREE AGREE MOSTLY AGREE MOSTLY AGREE NEUTRAL NEUTRAL MOSTLY DISAGREE MOSTLY DISAGREE DISAGREE DISAGREE The survey results indicated that 81% of respondents “agree” or “mostly agree” with the types of features and programming in the preliminary concept plan and 73% of respondents “agree” or “mostly agree” with the location of features and programming in the preliminary concept plan. Primary concerns with the preliminary concept plan included noise from both the skate/bike park and event pavilion/amphitheater. With consistent results and concerns from the online survey and public meeting, the consultant team and City staff developed a refined concept plan with supporting graphics illustrating specific areas. Primary revisions included the removal of the skate/bike park, event pavilion/amphitheater and increasing the no development zone from fifty to seventy-five feet. 152 Master Plan Report 11 PUBLIC MEETING 3 (REFINING THE PLAN) AUGUST 27, 2018 This public meeting was a formal presentation recapping the preliminary concept plan and survey results from Public Meeting 2. The refined concept plan and supporting graphics were then presented to the audience describing how comments were incorporated into the refined concept plan. The refined concept plan and supporting graphics were presented to the PACE board on September 10, 2018. The PACE board supported the refined concept plan and voted to recommend the approval of the refined plan to City Council The refined concept plan was then presented to City Council on September 13, 2018 for consideration and approval. At the meeting, a large number of performing arts stakeholders spoke and asked the Council to consider adding a performing arts venue, such as an amphitheater, back into the concept plan. As a result of this additional stakeholder input, City Council directed staff and the consultant team to engage with surrounding neighborhoods and performing arts and music stakeholders to consider how a performance facility could best be reincorporated into the park master plan. 12 153 Upon further evaluation and review of public and City Council comments, City Staff and the consultant team developed a framework of considerations for the performance facility. Considerations included: a multi-purpose pavilion for general day use, performing arts, music and other special events; sizing appropriate for this park and the user; performer needs - lighting, storage, sun orientation, spectator experience – sun orientation, personal space, shade; location and proximity to adjacent residents, noise buffering, floodplain, access, parking, utilities, and development cost. Based on these considerations, two potential locations in the “Great Lawn” were identified that could support the performance facility. Conceptual graphics were developed to assist with communicating the vision for this facility to the community for additional input. PUBLIC MEETING 4 (MULTI-PURPOSE PAVILION) OCTOBER 22, 2018 A fourth public meeting was held with a formal presentation recapping the public engagement process and City Council directive to evaluate the incorporation of a performance facility in the concept plan. Concept plan graphics and a map showing two locations considered were included in the presentation. The meeting was attended by: ten residents from the adjacent neighborhoods of Arbors at Lakeline, Red Oaks, Cedar Park Villas and Riviera Springs; and four representatives from performing arts and music groups. A written survey was conducted for preference on location of the facility and additional comments. Location “A” was preferred by 90% of attendees due to location related to residential areas, floodplain, shade opportunities, proximity to parking for loading/unloading and opportunity to use kayak launch driveway for food vendor staging. Additional comments included preferences and needs of performers (i.e.- lighting, sound mitigation, proximity to restrooms, adequate stage area, storage) to be considered with future detailed design of the facility. 154 Master Plan Report 13 Overall the concept was well received by the adjacent residents and performing arts and music interest groups. The Multi-Purpose Pavilion concept and summary of stakeholder input were then presented to City Council on November 15, 2018. City Council voted unanimously to include the Multi-Purpose Pavilion into the Final Concept Plan at location “A”. MASTER PLAN CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL DECEMBER 6, 2018 With the directive to include the multi-purpose pavilion in the Lakeline Park Master Plan, the consultant team revised the master plan to include the multi-purpose pavilion. The final master plan report was presented to City Council and approved on December 6, 2018. 14 155 The Final Concept Plan and perspectives are included in the Appendix at the end of this report. 156 Master Plan Report 15 SECTION 5 - DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS AND BUDGET PERMITTING The development of this park may include but not be limited to permitting and entitlements with the following regulatory entities: • • • • • • • • The City of Cedar Park - Site Development and Building Permits Upper Brushy Creek Water Control and Improvement District (UBCWCID) - Development Permit TCEQ Edwards Aquifer Recharge Zone Water Pollution Abatement Plan (WPAP) Texas Accessibility Standards Compliance United States Army Corps of Engineers - Nationwide Permitting Texas Historical Commission (for grant funded projects) United States Fish and Wildlife Service (for grant funded projects) Texas Parks & Wildlife Department (for grant funded projects) DEVELOPMENT BUDGET The Budget Opinion of Probable Construction Costs (OPCC) for all master plan site improvements including construction contingencies and soft costs is estimated at $21.7M (2018 dollars). The north side of the park is budgeted at $7.8M (2018 dollars), and includes: the great lawn, multi-purpose pavilion, play area, multi-purpose area, gardens, water sports pavilion, meadows, fishing piers, natural recreation area, entrance drive, loop road and parking. The south side of the park is budgeted at $7.1M (2018 dollars), and includes lighted, organized sports courts/fields, and supporting facilities, fishing pier, trails, natural recreation area, entrance drive and parking. Trails, sidewalks, and pedestrian bridges and connections throughout the park are budgeted at $5.4M (2018 dollars). Off-site roadway improvements providing access to the park from Little Elm Trail and Old Mill Road are budgeted at $1.4M (2018 dollars). These totals do not include permitting or regulatory review/approval fees. Construction contingencies are calculated at 20% to cover general conditions, mobilization, demolition, erosion/sedimentation controls, electrical distribution, unclassified earthwork, and other conditions resulting from detailed design. Soft costs are calculated at 17% to cover professional design and support services. The OPCC’s for both the north and south park areas include water, wastewater, and drainage infrastructure allowances at 12% of the total proposed improvements. A detailed Budget OPCC is included in the appendix at the end of this report. MAINTENANCE - OPERATIONS - REVENUE - EXPENSES Following is a summary of projected Maintenance-Operations-Revenue-Expenses (MORE) for Lakeline Park based on the master plan level of detail included in this report. These estimates and projections are intended for planning and budgeting purposes only and will be further refined based on final park use programming, phasing, design and implementation. Current City of Cedar Park parks maintenance and operations expenses and National Recreation and Park Association (NRPA) metrics were used to estimate future O/M costs and staffing projections. Estimated revenue is based on current City rental fees and contracts for similar programmed uses. Proposed uses that are not in the City’s current fee schedule were projected from comparable facilities in the Austin area. 158 Master Plan Report 17 Annual Maintenance (approximately 55 acres developed area including trails) Multi-purpose Fields (organized sports and practice fields) $ 110,000 Softball Fields (organized sports) $ 45,000 Court Sports (tennis/pickleball/volleyball) $ 15,000 Great Lawn/Play Area (playground, splash pad, pavilions $ 80,000 multi-purpose pavilion, restroom) Trails (concrete trails and walkways) $ 6,000 Contracted Maintenance (as needed) $ 15,000 Equipment Maintenance (2.5% initial equipment cost) $ 5,000 Estimated Total $276,000 Personnel Maintenance Workers (4) Crew Leader Park Attendant $170,000 $ 50,000 $ 40,000 Estimated Total $260,000 Total Annual M & O Cost (not including initial equipment cost) $536,000 Equipment (One-time cost for equipment) Groomer (1) Finish Mower (2) Wide Area Mower (1) Zero Turn Mower (2) Misc. Equipment Allowance $ 20,000 $100,000 $ 45,000 $ 30,000 $ 20,000 Estimated Total $215,000 Revenue Projections Pavilion (general day-use) Multi-purpose (6 major events annual) Kayak Rental Field Rentals (multi-purpose fields and softball/baseball) Field Lights Garden Rentals Tennis/Pickleball Court keys Tennis/Pickleball Contract $ 60,000 $ 30,000 $ 10,000 $ 80,000 $ 25,000 $ 3,000 $ 4,000 $ 10,000 Projected Revenue $222,000 Projected Cost Recovery based on estimated expenses and revenue +/-40%. 18 159 SECTION 6 - APPENDIX FINAL CONCEPT PLAN..........................................................................................................21 FINAL CONCEPT PERSPECTIVE - NORTH.........................................................................23 FINAL CONCEPT PERSPECTIVE - SOUTH...................................................................................25 BUDGET OPINION OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS.........................................27 160 Master Plan Report 19 20 A A A I LEGEND . FUTURE DEVELOPMENT I WOODFORD ?\Ki CEDAR \aa; 10' PARK TRAIL . ESTATES 3:ij PARK <92 8? PARK TRAIL ?4 VILLAS IV STABILIZED EARTH TRAIL Digge?m, . . PAVILION I l?s I AK H.O.DEVELOPMENT ZONE ~xii/5 . \ggl?fg?'??gg?m .. I I I. w/ CROSSING I I APPROPRIATE ?3 . . A - I. TRIBUTARIES CONTRIBUTING TO LAKELINE LAKE . . 9 . . I 0? L: gif GREAT LAWN I I . A PAVILION I 45' i I FREE GAMES LIIMEADOW LI I .A 77? 777-77 AREA . y? . 7 I I CYPRESS CREEK PRACTICE FIELDS FISHING PIER (TYP.) NEIGHBORHOOD . CONNECTION . PARKING ?7 #37 LIGHTED ORGANIZED - MULTI-PURPOSE FIELDS: NEIGHBORHOOD) UTURE RAIL CONNECTION g) SOCCER PRESERVE ROCK CONNECTION j\ ?x ,7 7 LODGE AT NEIGHBORHOOD 1'36?? I I CONNECTION .I LAKELINE A I I I 1 VILLAGE I I I . c? TRAILI-IEAD I L??ine LAKELIN -ee?A? I i I HALFF INAL CONCEPT PLAN LAKELINE PARK MASTER PLAN LAKELINE PARK 162 MASTER PLAN I Master Plan Report FINAL CONCEPT PLAN 21 22 FINAL CONCEPT PERSPECTIVE - NORTH LAKELINE PARK MASTER PLAN Master Plan Report 23 24 LAKELINE PARK MASTER PLAN Master Plan Report FINAL CONCEPT PERSPECTIVE - SOUTH 25 26 1 1 1 1 Parking Improved Parking, 300 spaces (includes asphalt paving and drives, base prep, concrete curb, striping and sign allowance) Overflow Parking, 200 spaces (includes gravel/road base material) Wildflower Meadows Wildflower meadows (includes meadow scalping and prep, seeding and establishment) Special Event Access Drive to Hwy 183 Access Easement Driveway (includes asphalt paving, base prep, concrete curb, and striping and sign allowance) Fishing Pier Pier allowance (includes composite decking, helical piers, framing, and connection to adjacent trail) Utility Infrastructure Water/Wastewater Allowance Storm Sewer/Water Quality Allowance OTHER PROJECT COSTS *Construction Contingency Estimated Soft Costs (Professional Design Services, Geotechnical reporting, testing) 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 168 1 1 1 1 1 Natural Recreation Area Stabilized earth trails - 4' width (includes clearing and grubbing, grading, and soil compaction) Trailhead allowance (includes paving, pavilion, interpretive facilities, water fountain, electrical and landscaping) Bird watching station allowance (includes blinds and stabilized earth trails to main trail) Disc golf allowance - 9 holes (includes clearing and grubbing for 300' holes, concrete tee boxes, and baskets) Outdoor classroom allowance (includes clearing and grubbing, and bench seating) Parking (300 spaces) Parking area (includes asphalt paving and drives, base prep, concrete curb, striping and sign allowance) Fishing Pier Pier allowance (includes composite decking, helical piers, framing, and connection to adjacent trail) Utility Infrastructure Water/Wastewater Allowance Storm Sewer/Water Quality Allowance OTHER PROJECT COSTS *Construction Contingency Estimated Soft Costs (Professional Design Services, Geotechnical reporting, testing) 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 1 1 1 Trail Lighting Trail Security Lighting Allowance OTHER PROJECT COSTS *Construction Contingency Estimated Soft Costs (Professional Design Services, Geotechnical reporting & testing) 317 317 318 Master Plan Report 27 OTHER PROJECT COSTS *Construction Contingency Estimated Soft Costs (Professional Design Services, Geotechnical reporting & testing) 410 411 OFF-SITE ROADWAYS 2,455 1 1 850 South Entrance Drive (From Old Mill Road) 850 lf., 26 ft. width (includes road widening, overlay, base prep, concrete curb/gutter, and striping and sign allowance) Driveway landscaping allowance (includes shade and ornamental trees) Entry monument allowance (includes signage, lighting, and landscaping) Sidewalk (includes subgrade and base prep) 406 407 408 409 1 1 3,380 1,850 1 1 2,000 Norh Entrance Drive (From Little Elm Trail, Alexis Drive ROW) 1,170 lf., 26 ft. width (includes road widening, overlay, base prep, concrete curb/gutter, and striping and sign allowance) Option to enhance 830 Lf of existing driveway (includes overlay, edge treatment, and drainage on existing drive) Driveway landscaping allowance (includes shade and ornamental trees) Entry monument allowance (includes signage, lighting, and landscaping) Sidewalk (includes subgrade and base prep) 401 402 403 404 405 OFF-SITE ROADWAYS Continued page 29 Item No. TRAILS TOTAL Quantity 9,320 4,300 1,350 1,350 1 1 Secondary Sidewalks/Trails/Neighborhood Connections - 8 FT Wide Miscellaneous sidewalks and connections - North Miscellaneous sidewalks and connections - South Neighborhood connections - North Neighborhood connections - South Culverts - North Culverts - South 311 312 313 314 315 316 Item 4,600 1 2,500 1,000 1 500 1 Primary Loop Trail - 10 FT Wide Main Loop Trail - 10 ft width (includes subgrade prep and 4,600 lf concrete trail) Main Loop Bridge - 75 Lf bridge (includes prefab bridge and abutments) Option to reconstruct existing Muir Lake trail (includes demo of 2,500 Lf of 8 ft wide concrete trail) Loop Option 1 Trail - 10 ft width (includes subgrade prep and 1,000 lf concrete trail) Loop Option 1 Bridge - 225 Lf bridge (includes prefab bridge and abutments) Loop Option 2 Trail - 10 ft width (includes subgrade prep and 500 lf concrete trail) Loop Option 2 Bridge - 225 Lf bridge (includes prefab bridge and abutments) 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 LS LS SY LS LS LF SY SY LS LS LF Unit LS LS LS LF LF LF LF EA EA LF EA LF LF EA LF EA LF LF LF 6,000 500 1,250 301 302 303 Unit LS LS LS LS EA EA Quantity 300 LF LS EA LS EA EA LS EA EA EA SY LS EA LS SF SY LF LF LF EA EA LF LS SF EA LS EA LS LS Unit LS LS LS LS LS SY SY EA EA LS EA SY EA Item Regional Trail - 12 FT Wide Main spine - 12 ft width (includes subgrade prep and concrete trail) Future regional trail (West) - 12 ft width (includes subgrade prep and concrete trail) Future regional trail (East) - 12 ft width (includes subgrade prep and concrete trail) Item No. TRAILS SOUTH TOTAL 4 Sand Volleyball Volleyball court allowance 224 13,500 1 3 1 2 1 2 1 Play Area Playground allowance (includes play equipment, ribbon curb, playground surfacing, benches, trash receptacles, shade structure, Pavilion (30'x30' structure includes subgrade prep, slab, and MEP) Restroom allowance (2,500 sf structure includes subgrade prep, slab, and MEP) 221 222 223 (includes sand court, poles, netting, court delineation, and lighting) 4 11,125 1 2 1 Soccer Fields (240x365) Sod TIF 419 (includes irrigation) Field lighting (includes primary electrical distribution) Aluminum bleachers (4 row, 50 seats) Field equipment (2 benches, flag, goals, and nets) Tennis Outdoor court allowance (includes slab, surfacing, fence, and court lighting) 18,000 5,500 875 100 75 2 4 200 1 5,500 2 1 2 1 1 Item Baseball/Softball Field (230 ft.) Skinned infield/bull pens Sod outfield: rolled sod bermuda TIF 419, w/ irrigation 8' outfield and foul line: w/ mow strip 8' bull pen fencing: w/ mow strip (inside field fencing) 16' batter's eye fence: w/ mow strip 12' gates: 6 ft. leaves 4' chainlink gates: bull pens & field (8' height) 25' backstop net: 25 ft. h x 220 lf. marine grade netting and fasteners Grandstand shade structure Grandstand bleacher pad (includes subgrade prep) Grandstand aluminum bleachers (4 row, 50 seats) Field lighting (includes primary electrical distribution) Dugout (includes fencing, bench w/ shelf, and shade structure) Foul poles (2) Wireless scoreboard (includes board and controller and structural posts) Quantity 1,100 28,000 300 200 220 216 217 218 219 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 Item No. SOUTH NORTH TOTAL 1 Water Sports Rental Kayak rental pavilion allowance (includes subgrade and pad, MEP and boat launch) Parking area (includes asphalt paving and drives, base prep, concrete curb, striping and sign allowance) Driveway (includes drive from entrance drive and ramp) Vehicle gates (2-way) 112 113 114 115 1 20 2,075 2 1 Community Garden Community garden allowance 111 LS 1 1 1 Restroom allowance (1,000 sf structure includes subgrade prep, slab, and MEP) Multi-purpose pavilion (4,500 sf structure includes subgrade prep and slab, furnishings, and MEP) Grand pavilion allowance (5,000 sf structure includes subgrade prep and slab, furnishings) (includes storage shed, materials bins, raised plots, fencing and gates) LS EA EA EA 1 Splash pad allowance (includes paving and surfacing, pumps, splash pad equipment, plumbing, drainage, landscaping, and electrical) LS 108 109 110 shade structure, landscaping, drainage, and electrical) SY EA SY EA EA Unit 1 65,000 4 Great Lawn Sod TIF 419 with irrigation Pavilion (30'x30' structure includes subgrade prep, slab, and MEP) Play Area Playground allowance (includes play equipment, paving, ribbon curb, playground surfacing and subgrade, benches, trash receptacles, 37,000 2 4 Quantity Item Multi-Purpose Area Hydromulched TIF 419, w/ irrigation Pavilion (30'x30' structure includes subgrade prep, slab, and MEP) Creekside pavilions (12'x12' structure includes base prep, slab, trash receptacle, grill and picnic table) 107 106 104 105 101 102 103 Item No. NORTH Budget Opinion of Probable Construction Costs Lakeline Park Master Plan 20% 17% 120.00 30,000.00 15,000.00 45.00 120.00 30.00 50,600.00 15,000.00 45.00 Unit Price 20% 17% 250,000.00 56.00 56.00 56.00 56.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 105.00 125,000.00 155.00 105.00 275,000.00 105.00 235,000.00 125.00 125.00 125.00 Unit Price 20% 17% 338,000.00 242,000.00 125,000.00 1,800.00 20.00 125,000.00 10,000.00 35,000.00 15,000.00 25,000.00 250,000.00 90,000.00 650,000.00 100,000.00 9.00 275,000.00 3,000.00 7,500.00 3.50 8.50 45.00 45.00 77.00 1,500.00 600.00 25.00 150,000.00 6.00 3,000.00 250,000.00 15,000.00 2,500.00 20,000.00 Unit Price 20% 17% 350,000.00 250,000.00 130,000.00 120.00 1.50 1,800.00 550.00 225,000.00 1,800.00 60.00 10,000.00 150,000.00 250,000.00 750,000.00 250,000.00 750,000.00 475,000.00 5.00 90,000.00 5.00 90,000.00 20,000.00 Unit Price 198,900.00 202,900.00 294,600.00 30,000.00 15,000.00 38,300.00 405,600.00 55,500.00 50,600.00 15,000.00 90,000.00 Amount 763,100.00 778,400.00 250,000.00 521,900.00 240,800.00 75,600.00 75,600.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 483,000.00 125,000.00 387,500.00 105,000.00 275,000.00 52,500.00 235,000.00 750,000.00 62,500.00 156,300.00 Amount 818,000.00 835,000.00 338,000.00 242,000.00 125,000.00 540,000.00 270,000.00 125,000.00 30,000.00 35,000.00 30,000.00 100,000.00 250,000.00 180,000.00 650,000.00 400,000.00 100,100.00 275,000.00 6,000.00 7,500.00 63,000.00 46,800.00 39,400.00 4,500.00 5,800.00 3,000.00 2,400.00 5,000.00 150,000.00 33,000.00 6,000.00 250,000.00 30,000.00 2,500.00 20,000.00 Amount 1,121,000.00 1,143,000.00 350,000.00 250,000.00 130,000.00 132,000.00 42,000.00 540,000.00 110,000.00 225,000.00 36,000.00 124,500.00 20,000.00 150,000.00 250,000.00 750,000.00 250,000.00 750,000.00 475,000.00 325,000.00 360,000.00 185,000.00 180,000.00 80,000.00 Amount Cost per Field Cost per Field $388,600.00 Cost per Field $661,400.00 Cost per Field Field QTY Field QTY 2 Field QTY 2 Field QTY $1,396,400.00 $401,800.00 $377,900.00 $616,700.00 Item Sub-Total $5,357,200.00 $1,541,500.00 $250,000.00 $933,900.00 $1,663,000.00 Item Sub-Total $968,800.00 $7,068,000.00 $1,653,000.00 $580,000.00 $125,000.00 $540,000.00 $490,000.00 $100,000.00 $1,080,000.00 $400,000.00 $777,200.00 Item Sub-Total $1,322,800.00 $7,868,500.00 $2,264,000.00 $600,000.00 $130,000.00 $132,000.00 $42,000.00 $540,000.00 $405,500.00 $150,000.00 $2,475,000.00 $685,000.00 Item Sub-Total $445,000.00 December 2018 BUDGET OPINION OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST 28 OTHER PROJECT COSTS *Construction Contingency Estimated Soft Costs (Professional Design Services, Geotechnical reporting & testing) 410 411 20% 17% 120.00 30,000.00 15,000.00 45.00 120.00 30.00 50,600.00 15,000.00 45.00 Unit Price 20% 17% GRAND TOTAL = $21,690,000.00 LS LS SY LS LS LF SY SY LS LS LF Unit LS LS 198,900.00 202,900.00 294,600.00 30,000.00 15,000.00 38,300.00 405,600.00 55,500.00 50,600.00 15,000.00 90,000.00 Amount 763,100.00 778,400.00 Cost per Field Field QTY $1,396,400.00 $401,800.00 $377,900.00 $616,700.00 Item Sub-Total $5,357,200.00 $1,541,500.00 1) All Opinion of Probable Construction Costs(OPCC) represent the Consultant and their Sub-Consultant(s) best judgement as professionals, familiar with the construction industry and current available unit pricing; Consultant/Sub-Consultant(s) do not guarantee that proposals, bids or actual project costs will not vary from its Opinion of Probable Construction Costs. Quantities are estimates only and the actual amount of work and/or materials are contingent upon final design of these facilities. 2) Unit pricing is based on average cost statewide and do not account for any site specific determinates that would effect costs of construction (i.e.- unknown subsurface conditions, etc.) 3) Off-site utility extensions to site not included. 4) *20% Construction Contingency includes but is not limited to: general conditions, mobilization, demolition, erosion/sed. controls, unclassified earthwork, electric distribution, and other conditions resulting from detailed design. 5) Environmental permitting is not included in this OPCC. 6) Easements and acquisition are not included in this OPCC. Disclaimers: OFF-SITE ROADWAYS 2,455 1 1 850 South Entrance Drive (From Old Mill Road) 850 lf., 26 ft. width (includes road widening, overlay, base prep, concrete curb/gutter, and striping and sign allowance) Driveway landscaping allowance (includes shade and ornamental trees) Entry monument allowance (includes signage, lighting, and landscaping) Sidewalk (includes subgrade and base prep) 406 407 408 409 1 1 3,380 1,850 1 1 2,000 Norh Entrance Drive (From Little Elm Trail, Alexis Drive ROW) 1,170 lf., 26 ft. width (includes road widening, overlay, base prep, concrete curb/gutter, and striping and sign allowance) Option to enhance 830 Lf of existing driveway (includes overlay, edge treatment, and drainage on existing drive) Driveway landscaping allowance (includes shade and ornamental trees) Entry monument allowance (includes signage, lighting, and landscaping) Sidewalk (includes subgrade and base prep) Quantity 1 1 401 402 403 404 405 Item No. OFF-SITE ROADWAYS Item OTHER PROJECT COSTS *Construction Contingency Estimated Soft Costs (Professional Design Services, Geotechnical reporting & testing) TRAILS TOTAL 317 318 BUDGET OPINION OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST 170 Master Plan Report 29 3O RK Master Plan Report 31