February 7, 2019 MEMORANDUM To: From: Subject: Select Committee on Mandatory Housing Affordability Council Central Staff Mandatory Housing Affordability: Councilmember-sponsored amendments On February 8, the Select Committee on Citywide Mandatory Housing Affordability (Committee) will continue its consideration of amendments to legislation to implement the Mandatory Housing Affordability (MHA) program. The February 8 meeting will focus on amendments sponsored by councilmembers. The Council is considering four pieces of legislation: 1. Council Bill 119444, which implements the MHA program citywide by amending the Land Use Code and amending the Official Land Use Map to make changes to zoning designations across the City; 2. Council Bill 119443, which amends the Comprehensive Plan in order to implement the MHA program citywide; 3. Council Bill 119445, which amends the Land Use Code and Official Land Use Map to implement the MHA program in Northgate; and 4. A companion Resolution, yet to be introduced, which will identify issues the Council will seek to address that are outside the scope of the MHA program. This memorandum has four attachments related to this legislation: 1. A table listing all councilmember-supported amendments and preliminary draft text amendments to Council Bill 119444 related to the land use code and Council Bill 119443 related to the text of the Comprehensive Plan; 2. A map series that identifies proposed zoning map amendments and indicates whether amendments to the maps in the Comprehensive Plan would also be required; 3. A list of preliminary issues to be discussed in the companion Resolution to be considered alongside the MHA legislation; 4. An excerpt from the Office of Planning and Community Development (OPCD) Director’s Report on the MHA legislation identifying proposed changes to development standards included in Council Bill 119444. Background In November 2017, Mayor Burgess transmitted Council Bill 119184 to implement the MHA program citywide. The legislation would rezone the City’s commercial and multifamily areas, urban villages, and areas on the edges of urban villages within a ten-minute walk of frequent 1 transit. In exchange for the ability to build additional floors, floor area or units, areas rezoned under the proposal would be required to include affordable housing units on site or make a payment in lieu to build affordable housing off-site. The legislation would also amend development standards for zoning districts subject to the MHA regulations and update the requirements for contributions toward MHA. A full description of the proposal is available in the Director’s Report and Recommendation on MHA Citywide Implementation. Maps showing specific rezone proposals are available on the City’s website. The Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) containing environmental review of the proposed amendments is also available. A Historic Resources survey has been added to the FEIS webpage, which includes maps and discussion of historic resources in the City. In 2018, the Council held nine meetings of the Committee to receive briefings on the proposal and held five public hearings to receive input on the proposal from members of the public. In 2019, the City Council held three meetings to identify amendments councilmembers may want to sponsor. Four pieces of legislation are being considered: 1. Council Bill 119444 would make area-wide revisions to the official zoning map; apply MHA requirements in the rezoned areas, requiring new commercial or multi-family development in the affected zones to contribute to affordable housing; add development capacity in the form of an increase in the amount of allowed height and/or floor area for buildings in zones where the MHA requirements would apply; modify or introduce new development standards to address design issues with current development and accommodate new building types; create a new Seattle Mixed-Rainier Beach zone; modify or introduce new requirements to apply MHA to contract rezones; modify certain rezone criteria in the Land Use Code; modify certain land use definitions; and modify or introduce new requirements for certain measurements, such as floor area ratio and Green Factor. 2. Council Bill 119443 would amend Comprehensive Plan maps and neighborhood plans to maintain consistency with the MHA proposal. Council Bill 119443 would expand the boundaries of the following urban villages: 23rd & Union-Jackson, Ballard, Columbia City, Crown Hill, North Beacon Hill, North Rainier, Othello, Rainier Beach, Roosevelt and West Seattle Junction. Council Bill 119443 would also amend goals and policies in the following neighborhood plans to maintain consistency with citywide policy to encourage housing choices in the City’s urban villages: Aurora Licton, Fremont, Morgan Junction, North Rainier, Northgate, Roosevelt, Wallingford, West Seattle Junction, and Westwood/Highland Park. 3. Council Bill 119445 would amend the official zoning map to rezone land in the Northgate Urban Center adjacent to the Northgate Light Rail Station and apply MHA requirements in the rezoned area. Council Bill 119445 would also amend the Land Use Code to create a new Seattle Mixed-Northgate zoning district. The Seattle Mixed- 2 Northgate zone includes urban design and livability standards that reflect the outcomes of a multi-year community planning process for the Northgate TOD area. 4. A companion Resolution, yet to be introduced, would identify additional issues for further work outside the scope of the proposed land use bills. Attachments Attachment 1 provides a table summarizing all of the proposed text amendments identified to date and draft amendment language shown using the Council’s standard mark-up language. Amendments included in this attachment are proposed by Councilmembers. Some, but not all amendments were discussed at the Committee meetings on January 7, 14 and 16. Amendments that were discussed at those previous committee meetings that do not appear in this table do not currently have a sponsor. Attachment 1 may not be an exhaustive list of potential changes. Other changes may be identified in the course of the Committee’s review, discussion, and public engagement. Attachment 2 provides tables summarizing proposed Official Land Use Map amendments for each Council district and a series of maps showing the potential amendments to the zoning, consistent with the alternatives studied in the FEIS. The table and maps also indicate whether amendments to maps in the Comprehensive Plan would be required. Attachment 3 provides a preliminary list of issues to be included in a companion Resolution, which will identify future actions that the City intends to take in response to community interest in additional work on key issues, particularly strategies to mitigate impacts from additional growth. This is not an exhaustive list of content for the companion resolution. Central Staff will continue to work with councilmembers to identify content for the Resolution. A draft Resolution will be posted to the MHA Select Committee webpage prior to the public hearing so that members of the community can provide feedback. Attachment 4 provides an excerpt from the OPCD Director’s Report, which summarizes the proposed changes to development standards that have been incorporated into Council Bill 119444. Preliminary Review of the Impact of the Amendments on Housing Production The amount of new housing, and the number of rent- and income-restricted housing units that will be produced through implementation of the Citywide MHA legislation will depend on the amount of development that occurs. The Executive estimated that approximately 3,000 units of rent-and income-restricted units could be created through implementation of the Citywide MHA legislation. This action, combined with implementation of MHA in Downtown, South Lake Union, Uptown, and the Chinatown-International District, is estimated to produce over 6,000 rent- and income-restricted housing units. There are several amendments under consideration that may impact the MHA production estimates for the citywide legislation. In general, the potential amendments taken individually 3 would have modest impacts on the estimates, but taken together will likely result in a moderate decrease in the amount of affordable housing that would be produced through the Citywide MHA legislation. Although some of the proposed map amendments may result in decreasing the MHA production estimates, they may address other livability concerns. The effects of a reduced quantity of housing produced and MHA payments received is not confined to an urban village where the reduction of the rezone proposal takes place. Since MHA payments are pooled for the city as a whole and reallocated annually to affordable housing development across the city, a reduction in MHA payment received in one urban village reduces the resources available for affordable housing investment everywhere in the city. The overall quantitative impact on the number of rent- and income-restricted housing units will be quantified by staff using the citywide MHA production model, and the results will be discussed at the Committee meeting on February 25. Next Steps A public hearing on the Council Bills and councilmember-proposed amendments will be held on Thursday, February 21, starting at 5:30 in the Seattle City Council Chamber. The Committee will deliberate on amendments to the bills and may vote on the bills and Resolution as early as February 25, 2019. cc: Kirstan Arestad, Central Staff Director Attachments Attachment 1: Land Use Code and Comprehensive Plan amendments proposed by Councilmembers Attachment 2: Map amendments proposed by Councilmembers Attachment 3: Preliminary list of issues to be included in a companion Resolution Attachment 4: Excerpt from the OPCD Director’s Report and Recommendations on Mandatory Housing Affordability Citywide Implementation 4 Attachment 1: Proposed Text Amendments # Topic/Issue Sponsor Discussion Chair Johnson The amendment would allow additions to existing buildings in RSL zones  above the maximum net unit area limit based on (1) a percentage increase of  existing floor area; or (2) allowing a second story that does not increase the  footprint of the existing structure. A. Amendments to Development standards  Development Standards in RSL Zones (SMC Chapter 23.44) A1 A2 Maximum Unit Size for Existing Dwelling Units in Residential  Small Lot (RSL) zones. Apartment Structures in RSL Zones Chair Johnson;  Councilmember O'Brien A3 Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) Standards in RSL Zones Chair Johnson A4 Garage Standards in RSL Zones  Chair Johnson Option 1 (CM Johnson): Remove the absolute limit on the number of units in  a development that would allow, on larger lots, apartment development of  more than three units.  Option 2 (CM O'Brien): Increase the absolute limit on the number of units in  an apartment structure to allow a four‐unit apartment building. This amendment would make ADU requirements in RSL zones more  consistent with what applies in Single‐family zones today by eliminating the  requirement that the ADU is located in or behind the principal dwelling unit  and limits on the height limit of exterior stairs. This amendment would apply standards for garage entrances that are  applicable in other Single‐family zones. This amendment would allow all lots in existence as of the effective date of  this ordinance to include a minimum of two dwelling units.  A5 Chair Johnson A6 Reduce the proposed density limit for smaller sites in Lowrise  Chair Johnson multifamily zones. A7 Modify development standards for pitched roofs that exceed  the zone height. Chair Johnson A8 Harmonize Incentive Zoning regulations for high rise  development First Hill with Mandatory Housing Affordability  requirements. This amendment would retain the option for development in high rise zones  to achieve a portion of extra residential floor through the provision of open  Councilmember Bagshaw space, green street improvements, or purchase of Transferable Development  Rights (TDR) from designated historic landmarks. A9 Green building standards Chair Johnson Density limits in RSL Zones Development Standards in Multifamily Zones (SMC Chapter 23.45) The proposed amendment would reduce the density limit to one unit for  every 1,250 square feet of lot area, which could result in slightly more  development on smaller sites. This amendment would reduce the required pitch of roofs, which are allowed  to exceed the height limit, on Lowrise multifamily structures. This amendment would increase the thresholds above which projects in  Multifamily zones would have to meet a green building standard.  5 # Topic/Issue Sponsor Discussion Development Standards in Commercial and Seattle Mixed (SM) Zones (SMC Chapter 23.47A and 23.48) This amendment would require that new development in pedestrian zones  Councilmember O'Brien  A10 Requirements for Small Commercial Spaces with over 5,000 square feet of commercial space at grade provide small  Chair Johnson commercial spaces. This amendment would retain the exception, allowing a 15% increase in floor  Floor Area exception for low‐income housing in the Pike/Pine  A11 Councilmember O'Brien area for projects that commit to providing at least 50% of their floor area as  Overlay affordable to income eligible households. A12 Upper‐level setback requirements along University Way NE A13 Development Standards for Live‐work units A14 Clarify regulations related to off‐street parking in the Seattle  Mixed‐Rainier Beach zone Chair Johnson This amendment would implement an upper level setback above 45 feet in  height for structures abutting University Way NE. The intent of this setback is  to maintain the human‐scaled character of University Way NE.    Chair Johnson This amendment would amend the development standards that apply to live‐ work units by (1) establishing a minimum size of 300 square feet for the  “work” portion that aligns with the requirements for small commercial  spaces; and (2) requiring a physical divider between the “live” and “work”  portions of the unit. The intent of these changes is to improve privacy for  residential functions and ensure that the front of the spaces are used for  business purposes. Councilmember O'Brien This amendment would amend limit special parking and loading standards in the proposed Seattle Mixed‐Rainier Beach district to projects that include the  types of uses the community seeks to encourage. Other Development Standards  A15 Preschool uses This amendment would replace the term “preschool” with “child care center”  Councilmember  to encourage the inclusion of child care centers in new development rather  Mosqueda Councilmember González than just preschools, which are included in the definition of child care center. A16 Tree regulations Chair Johnson Councilmember O'Brien This amendment would increase tree planting requirements in RSL zones to  achieve a 33% tree canopy cover target; create a new fee‐in‐lieu option for  satisfying tree planting requirements in RSL; add protections for trees planted  to meet tree planting requirements in RS; and require arborists working with  the City to be certified by the International Society of Arboriculture (ISA). Councilmember O'Brien This amendment would add portions of Northwest 90 th Street and Mary  Avenue Northwest in the Crown Hill Urban Village to the list of principal  pedestrian streets. A17 Crown Hill Principal Pedestrian Streets 6 # Topic/Issue A18 North Beacon Hill Principal Pedestrian Streets Sponsor Discussion Council President Harrell  This amendment would extend that Pedestrian (P) designation along the  length of the commercial districts proposed for Beacon Hill and add P  designations to properties fronting on 15th Avenue S.  There are two parts to  the amendment – the first would add the P designation to particular pieces of  property (see map amendment 2‐3), and the second (this amendment A19)  would add 15th Avenue South to the list of principal pedestrian streets. Chair Johnson This amendment would use increases in Consumer Price Index, All Urban  Consumers, Seattle‐Tacoma‐Bellevue, WA, Shelter (1982‐1984 = 100) to  automatically adjust payment amounts instead of Consumer Price Index, All  Urban Consumers, Seattle‐Tacoma‐Bellevue, WA, All Items (1982‐1984 =  100).  Councilmember O'Brien  Chair Johnson This amendment would extend the report date from July 1, 2019, for the  Director of the Seattle Department of Construction and Inspections and the  Director of Housing to provide Council with an assessment of program  performance, as required by Ordinance 125108, which will allow the  Executive to collect more data on how the program is performing prior to  recommending any changes to payment amounts. B.      Mandatory Housing Affordability Program B1 B2 Annual inflation adjustments to payment amounts Reporting Requirements B3 Council intent to adjust MHA payment requirements and high,  medium, and low area boundaries based on current market  Councilmember O'Brien conditions. This amendment would modify the intent language related to initial  implementation to establish that the Council will consider modifying payment  amounts and the boundaries of high, medium, and low areas by July 1, 2019  to reflect current more current market conditions.  The proposed payment  amounts and boundaries are based on market conditions at the time the  proposal was initially developed. B4 Off‐site Performance for Mandatory Housing Affordability ‐  Residential The proposed amendment would allow off‐site performance under the MHA‐ R program subject to the same conditions applicable to the MHA‐C program. B5 Councilmember Herbold Waive MHA requirements for Unreinforced Masonry (URM)  buildings that add units in existing buildings if they retrofit and  Chair Johnson qualify for the 2030 Challenge pilot This amendment would waive MHA requirements for URM buildings that add  units in existing buildings if they retrofit their building and qualify for the 2030  Challenge pilot by meeting certain energy efficiency goals. This amendment  could help encourage property owners to retrofit their buildings.  Under this  amendment, MHA would still apply to new floor area that is added to the  building. 7 # B6 Topic/Issue Sponsor Intent language regarding future actions if MHA is determined  Councilmember Herbold to be unlawful. Discussion This amendment would add a new section to CB 119444 expressing Council’s  intent to take steps, if the imposition of requirements under MHA are  determined to be unlawful, to prevent the continuance of the new zoning and  increased development capacity in the absence of substantial affordable  housing requirements. C. Rezone criteria C1 Consideration of transit service in rezoning areas Chair Johnson This amendment would use the definition of frequent transit service in the  Residential Small Lot (RSL), High Rise Residential, and Neighborhood  Commercial 3 zone criteria to identify areas where certain zones are  appropriate. D. Comprehensive Plan Amendments (CB 119443) D1 Fremont Neighborhood Plan Policy F‐P13 Councilmember O'Brien This amendment, instead of amending policy F‐P13, deletes it. Policies in the  Wallingford Neighborhood Plan that discuss the character of the area  between Stone Way and Aurora Avenue North between N 45th Street and N  40th Street, including policy W‐P1 (with amendments similar to those  proposed for F‐P13), would continue to provide guidance regarding the City’s  intent for the character of this area. D2 Morgan Junction Neighborhood Plan Policies Councilmember Herbold This amendment would change the existing policy MJ‐P14 and the new policy  MJ‐P23.1 related to Morgan Junction Urban Village to better reflect  community interests. E. Technical Staff are compiling a list of technical or clarifying changes to fix typos and other drafting errors identified by Central Staff or Executive staff. These changes will be presented at  the Select Committee on Citywide MHA meeting on February 25, 2019.  8 Amendment A1: Maximum Unit Size for Existing Dwelling Units in RSL zones. Councilmember Johnson Background: The proposed legislation establishes a maximum unit size of 2,200 square feet for a principal dwelling unit in Residential Small Lot (RSL) zones. This standard is meant to prohibit construction of very large, high-cost detached single-family homes in the RSL zone and encourage a mix of moderately sized homes. Applying this standard to existing structures may prevent additions to existing homes. T This amendment would accommodate moderately sized additions to existing homes, allowing existing homes to be greater than the 2,200 sq. ft. maximum size, while maintaining protections against teardowns and replacement with very large homes. The amendment would allow additions to existing buildings in RSL zones above 2,200 sq. ft. limit based on (1) a percentage increase of existing floor area or (2) a second story addition that does not increase the footprint of the existing structure. Notes: Double underlines indicate new language to be added. AF Double strikethroughs indicate language proposed to be removed. A dashed underline indicates that language that was proposed to be deleted that would be retained by this amendment. Amendments R Amend Section 22 to Council Bill 119444, as follows: Section 22. A new Section 23.44.018 of the Seattle Municipal Code is added to D Subchapter I of Chapter 23.44 as follows: 23.44.018 Maximum dwelling unit size in RSL zones The maximum net unit area of any dwelling unit in RSL zones, including any floor area in an accessory dwelling unit, is 2,200 square feet, except as provided in subsection 23.44.018.B. A. The following floor area is exempt from the maximum net unit area limit: 1. All stories, or portions of stories, that are underground. 2. All portions of a story that extend no more than 4 feet above existing or finished grade, whichever is lower, excluding access. 9 B. The following additions to a housing unit that existed on or before the effective date of the ordinance introduced as Council Bill 119444 may result in net unit area greater than 2,200 square feet: 1. Additions that add floor area equal to or less than 20 percent of the floor area that existed as of the date of this ordinance. Housing units with additions built after the date of this ordinance are not eligible for the 20 percent floor area addition allowance. 2. Additions that add floor area by adding a second-story to a single-story housing T unit that existed on or before the date of this ordinance, provided that the second-story addition is directly above the footprint of the existing single-story housing unit. Housing units with addition D R AF built after the date of this ordinance are not eligible for the second-story addition allowance. 10 Amendment A2: Apartment Structures in RSL Zones Councilmember Johnson & Councilmember O’Brien Background: The proposed legislation limits the number of units in an apartment development in Residential Small Lot (RSL) zones to three dwelling units or less, regardless of lot size, in addition to applying a density limit of one dwelling unit per 2,000 square feet of lot area for all development types. This standard is meant to prohibit construction of large apartment buildings in the RSL zones. Two apartment structures, each with 3-units, would be allowed on a lot in an RSL zone. The combination of the absolute limit on the number of units in an apartment structure and the density limit could result in some lots being underbuilt or prioritizing other structure types, such as cottage housing development, rowhouse development, and townhouse developments. T Option 1 (CM Johnson): Option 2 (CM O’Brien): AF Remove the absolute limit on the number of units in a development to allow, on larger lots, apartment development of more than three units. Increase the absolute limit on the number of units in an apartment structure to allow a four-unit apartment building. Under both options, the density limits would still apply, along with regulations on height, yard requirements, FAR, etc. that would address other urban design objectives. R Notes: Double underlines indicate new language to be added. Double strikethroughs indicate language proposed to be removed. D A dashed underline indicates that language that was proposed to be deleted that would be retained by this amendment. Amendments Option 1: Amend Section 12 to Council Bill 119444, as follows: Section 12. Section 23.44.006 of the Seattle Municipal Code, last amended by Ordinance 125603, is amended as follows: 23.44.006 Principal uses permitted outright The following principal uses are permitted outright in single-family zones: 11 A. Single-family ((Dwelling Unit)) dwelling unit. ((One single-family dwelling unit per lot, except that an accessory dwelling unit may also be approved pursuant to Section 23.44.041, and except as approved as part of an administrative conditional use permit under Section 25.09.260;)) B. In RSL zones, apartments, carriage houses, cottage housing development, rowhouse development, and townhouse developments; C. In RSL zones, apartments containing three dwelling units or less; T NOTE: This amendment would require renumbering subsections 23.44.006.D through Option 2: AF 23.44.006.K. Amend Section 12 to Council Bill 119444, as follows: Section 12. Section 23.44.006 of the Seattle Municipal Code, last amended by Ordinance R 125603, is amended as follows: 23.44.006 Principal uses permitted outright D The following principal uses are permitted outright in single-family zones: A. Single-family ((Dwelling Unit)) dwelling unit. ((One single-family dwelling unit per lot, except that an accessory dwelling unit may also be approved pursuant to Section 23.44.041, and except as approved as part of an administrative conditional use permit under Section 25.09.260;)) B. In RSL zones, carriage houses, cottage housing development, rowhouse development, and townhouse developments; C. In RSL zones, apartments containing three four dwelling units or less; 12 Amendment A3: ADU Standards in RSL Zones Councilmember Johnson Background: The proposed legislation, in general, applies existing Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) requirements currently applicable in single-family zones to Residential Small Lot (RSL) zones. However, there are two ADU standards that currently apply in Lowrise zones (not Single-family zones) that are proposed in RSL zones. This includes requiring that: 1. All ADUs must be located in the same structure as the principle dwelling unit or behind the principal dwelling unit; and 2. Exterior stairs providing access to the ADU may not be more than 4 feet high, except for stairs providing access to an ADU above a garage. AF T These standards are intended to make new development that includes ADUs more consistent with those that do not have ADUs but also make it more difficult to site an ADU, especially in existing buildings. This amendment would remove the two standards described above, making ADU requirements in RSL zones more consistent with what applies in Single-family zones today. Notes: Double underlines indicate new language to be added. Double strikethroughs indicate language proposed to be removed. R A dashed underline indicates that language that was proposed to be deleted that would be retained by this amendment. D Amendments Amend Section 28 to Council Bill 119444, as follows: Section 28. Section 23.44.041 of the Seattle Municipal Code, last amended by Ordinance 125603, is amended as follows: 23.44.041 Accessory dwelling units A. Accessory dwelling units, general provisions. The Director may authorize an accessory dwelling unit, and that dwelling unit may be used as a residence, only under the following conditions: 13 *** 6. Accessory dwelling units in RSL zones are required to meet the following additional standards: a. An accessory dwelling unit shall be located within the same structure as the principal dwelling unit or in an accessory structure located between the principal dwelling unit, including lines extended from the edge of the principal dwelling unit to all side lot lines, and the rear lot line. T b. Exterior stairs. Exterior stairs providing access to an accessory dwelling unit may not exceed 4 feet in height, except for exterior stairs providing access to an accessory D R AF dwelling unit located above a garage. 14 Amendment A4: Garage Standards in RSL Zones Councilmember Johnson Background: The proposed legislation includes design standards for garages currently in place for Multifamily zones and applies them to Residential Small Lot (RSL) zones. This includes allowing garages to face the street, provided the garage entrance is set back at least 18 feet from the street lot line and the total combined horizontal width of all garage entrances located on all street-facing facades are not more than 10 feet times the number of principal dwelling units located on the lot. The requirements for garage entrances may result in a row of garage doors along the street. This amendment would apply standards for garage entrances that are applicable in other Single-family zones. T Notes: Double underlines indicate new language to be added. AF Double strikethroughs indicate language proposed to be removed. A dashed underline indicates that language that was proposed to be deleted that would be retained by this amendment. Amendments R Amend Section 19 to Council Bill 119444, as follows: Section 19. Section 23.44.016 of the Seattle Municipal Code, last amended by Ordinance D 125603, is amended as follows: 23.44.016 Parking and garages *** F. Appearance of garage entrances in SF 5000, SF 7200, and SF 9600 zones. In SF 5000, SF 7200, and SF 9600 zones, the following provisions apply: 1. Garage setback. No portion of a garage, whether attached to a principal structure or within a detached accessory structure, may be closer to the street lot line than 80 percent of the remaining non-garage, street-level facade (see Exhibit A for 23.44.016) of the principal structure to which the garage is accessory. If the entire street-level facade of either a 15 principal or accessory structure is garage, no portion of the garage may be closer to the street lot line than 80 percent of the facade of the story above the street-level facade. AF T Exhibit A for 23.44.016 Garage setback 2. Garage entrance width. The total combined horizontal width of all garage R entrances located on the front facade may be up to 50 percent of the horizontal width of the front facade or 10 feet, whichever is greater. On corner lots, a garage entrance shall be allowed on D only one street-facing facade. 3. Exemptions a. Garages allowed under subsections 23.44.016.D.9, 23.44.016.D.10, 23.44.016.D.11, and 23.44.016.D.12 are not subject to the standards of this subsection 23.44.016.F. b. Garages that are set back more than 35 feet from the front lot line are not subject to the standards of this subsection 23.44.016.F. c. The Director may waive or modify the standards of this subsection 23.44.016.F based on one or more of the following factors: 16 1) Irregular lot shape; 2) Topography of the lot; 3) Configuration of proposed or existing structures on the lot; 4) Location of exceptional trees as defined in Section 25.11.020; and 5) The proposed structure or addition has design features including but not limited to modulation, screening, and landscaping. T G. Appearance of garage entrances in RSL zones. In RSL zones, the following provisions apply: street lot line. AF 1. Garage entrances facing the street shall be set back at least 18 feet from the 2. The total combined horizontal width of all garage entrances located on all street-facing facades shall not be more than 10 feet times the number of principal dwelling units R located on the lot. D ((G)) H. Screening ((.)) 17 Amendment A5: Density limits in RSL Zones Councilmember Johnson Background: The proposed legislation applies a density limit in Residential Small Lot (RSL) zones of one dwelling unit per 2,000 square feet of lot area for all development types. When calculation of the number of dwelling units allowed under this provision results in a fraction of a unit, any fraction up to and including 0.85 allows zero additional units, and any fraction over 0.85 allows one additional unit. T Existing lots in RSL zones that are less than 3,701 square feet would not be eligible to add a second unit; this applies to approximately 16% of the lots proposed to be rezoned to RSL in the proposed legislation. This amendment would allow all lots in existence as of the effective date of this ordinance to include a minimum of two dwelling units. Notes: AF Double underlines indicate new language to be added. Double strikethroughs indicate language proposed to be removed. A dashed underline indicates that language that was proposed to be deleted that would be retained by this amendment. Amendments R Amend Section 20 to Council Bill 119444, as follows: Section 20. A new Section 23.44.017 of the Seattle Municipal Code is added to D Subchapter I of Chapter 23.44 as follows: 23.44.017 Density limits A. In SF 5000, SF 7200, and SF 9600 zones, only one single-family dwelling unit is allowed per lot, except that an accessory dwelling unit may also be approved pursuant to Section 23.44.041, and except as approved as part of an administrative conditional use permit under Section 25.09.260, a clustered housing planned development under Section 23.44.024, or a planned residential development under Section 23.44.034. B. The following provisions apply in RSL zones: 18 1. The minimum lot area per dwelling unit is 2,000 square feet. 2. Except as provided in subsection 23.44.017.B.3, ((W))when calculation of the number of dwelling units allowed according to subsection 23.44.017.B.1 results in a fraction of a unit, any fraction up to and including 0.85 constitutes zero additional units, and any fraction over 0.85 constitutes one additional unit. 3. For lots in existence on the effective date of the ordinance introduced as Council Bill 119444, if the number of dwelling units allowed according to subsection D R AF T 23.44.017.B.2 equals less than two, two units are allowed. 19 Amendment A6: Reduce the proposed density limit for smaller sites in Lowrise multifamily zones. Councilmember Johnson Background: This amendment would modify density limits applicable to Lowrise multifamily zones. For development on lots smaller than 3,000 square feet, the proposed legislation would establish a density limit of one unit per every 1,350 square feet of lot area. For apartment development in Lowrise 3 multifamily zones the density limit would be one unit for every 800 square feet of lot area. The legislation would replace existing density limits that vary by zone and housing type. T The proposed amendment would reduce the density limit to one unit for every 1,250 square feet of lot area, which could result in slightly more development on smaller sites. Notes: AF Double underlines indicate new language to be added. Double strikethroughs indicate language proposed to be removed. A dashed underline indicates that language that was proposed to be deleted that would be retained by this amendment. Amendments R Amend Section 35 of Council Bill 119444, as follows: Section 35. Section 23.45.512 of the Seattle Municipal Code, last amended by Ordinance D 125359, is amended as follows: 23.45.512 Density limits and family-size unit requirements—LR zones ((A. The minimum lot area per dwelling unit in LR zones for cottage housing developments, townhouse developments, and apartments is shown on Table A for 23.45.512, except as provided in subsections 23.45.512.B, 23.45.512.C, 23.45.512.D, 23.45.512.E, and 23.45.512.G.)) 20 ((Table A for 23.45.512 Density limits in Lowrise zones1 Units allowed per square foot of lot area by category of residential use2 Cottage housing development3 and single- Rowhouse Townhouse Zone family dwelling unit4 development development5 LR16 1/1,600 1/1,600 or no limit7 1/2,200 or 1/1,600 1/2,000 duplexes T Apartment6 LR2 1/1,600 LR3 1/1,600 AF and triplexes only No limit 1/1,600 or no limit 1/1,200 or no limit No limit 1/1,600 or no limit 1/800 or no limit 1 R Footnotes for Table A for 23.45.512 Density limits for LR zones with a mandatory housing affordability suffix are shown in D subsection 23.45.517.C. 2 When density calculations result in a fraction of a unit, any fraction up to and including 0.85 constitutes zero additional units, and any fraction over 0.85 constitutes one additional unit. 3 See Section 23.45.531 for specific regulations about cottage housing developments. 4 One single-family residence meeting the standards of subsection 23.45.510.C may be built on a lot that is existing as of April 19, 2011, and has an area of less than 1,600 square feet. 5 For townhouse developments that meet the standards of subsection 23.45.510.C, the higher density shown is permitted in LR1 zones, and there is no density limit in LR2 and LR3 zones. 21 ((Table A for 23.45.512 Density limits in Lowrise zones1 Units allowed per square foot of lot area by category of residential use2 Cottage housing Zone Townhouse family dwelling unit4 development5 development For apartments that meet the standards of subsection 23.45.510.C, there is no density limit in LR2 and LR3 zones. The density limit for rowhouse development in LR1 zones applies only on lots less than 3,000 square feet in size.)) R A. Density limits AF 7 Apartment6 T 6 development3 and single- Rowhouse 1. Except according to subsection 23.45.512.A.4, the following developments D must meet the density limits described in this subsection 23.45.512.A: a. In LR1 zones, rowhouse development on interior lots less than 3,000 square feet in size and all townhouse development; and b. All development in Lowrise zones that do not have a mandatory housing affordability suffix. 2. Development described in subsection 23.45.512.A.1 shall not exceed a density of one dwelling unit per 1,350 1,250 square feet of lot area, except that apartments in LR3 zones 22 that do not have a mandatory housing affordability suffix shall not exceed a density limit of one dwelling unit per 800 square feet. 3. When density calculations result in a fraction of a unit, any fraction up to and including 0.85 constitutes zero additional units, and any fraction over 0.85 constitutes one additional unit. ((B)) 4. Density exception for certain types of low-income multifamily residential T uses ((1)) a. The exception in this subsection ((23.45.512.B)) 23.45.512.A.4 AF applies to ((low-income disabled multifamily residential uses, low-income elderly multifamily residential uses, low-income elderly/low-income disabled multifamily residential uses, and other)) low-income residential uses ((,)) operated by a public agency or a private nonprofit corporation. ((, if they do not qualify for the higher FAR limit shown in Table A for 23.45.510.)) R ((2)) b. The uses listed in subsection ((23.45.512.B.1)) 23.45.512.A.4.a shall have a maximum density of one dwelling unit per 400 square feet of lot area if a majority of D the dwelling units are designed for and dedicated to tenancies of at least three months, and the dwelling units remain in low-income disabled multifamily residential use, low-income elderly multifamily residential use, low-income elderly/low-income disabled multifamily residential use, or other low-income residential uses, for the life of the structure. *** 23 Amendment A7: Modify development standards for pitched roofs that exceed the zone height. Councilmember Johnson Background: This amendment would reduce the required pitch of roofs, which are allowed to exceed the height limit, on Lowrise multifamily structures. Development regulations allow certain features of a structure to exceed the height limit of a zone. These features include pitched roofs. Current regulations allow a roof to exceed the height limit, if it has a pitch of 6:12. As a practical matter this pitch cannot always be achieved. The proposed amendment would flatten the pitch to 3:12. T Notes: Double underlines indicate new language to be added. AF Double strikethroughs indicate language proposed to be removed. A dashed underline indicates that language that was proposed to be deleted that would be retained by this amendment. Amendments Amend Section 35 of Council Bill 119444, as follows: R Section 36. Section 23.45.514 of the Seattle Municipal Code, last amended by Ordinance 125603, is amended as follows: D 23.45.514 Structure height *** D. Exceptions for pitched roofs in LR zones that are not shed or butterfly roofs ((.)) 1. Pitched roofs that are not shed or butterfly roofs may extend up to 5 feet above the height limits set in Table A for 23.45.514, ((subject to the following limits,)) provided that all parts of the roofs above the height limit have a minimum slope of 6:12 3:12 ((, except as provided in subsection 23.45.514.D.5: 1. For cottage housing developments in all LR zones, the ridge of pitched roofs on principal structures may extend up to 7 feet above the height limit. 24 2. In LR1 and LR2 zones, for structures subject to a 30 foot height limit, the ridge of pitched roofs on principal structures may extend up to 5 feet above the height limit if)) and the height exception in subsection 23.45.514.F is not used. ((3. In LR3 zones, for structures subject to a 30 foot height limit, the ridge of pitched roofs on principal structures may either: a. extend up to 10 feet above the height limit, if the height exception provided in subsection 23.45.514.F is not used, and the number of full stories above grade is limited to three; or provided in subsection 23.45.514.F is used. T b. extend up to 5 feet above the height limit, if the height exception 4. In LR3 zones, for structures subject to a 40 foot height limit, the ridge of AF pitched roofs on principal structures may extend up to 5 feet above the height limit provided that the height exception in subsection 23.45.514.F is not used. 5)) 2. Portions of curved roof forms, such as barrel and domed roofs, may have a lesser slope than 6:12 3:12, if the Director determines that the massing of the roof form is R comparable to a pitched roof form such as a gable or gambrel roof that would have a minimum slope of 6:12 3:12. D *** 25 Amendment A8: Harmonize Incentive Zoning regulations for high-rise development with Mandatory Housing Affordability requirements. Councilmember Bagshaw Background: This amendment would retain the option for development in High-rise (HR) zones to achieve a portion of extra residential floor through the provision of open space, green street improvements, or purchase of Transferable Development Rights (TDR) from designated historic landmarks. T Under the current Incentive Zoning program, high-rise residential development in First Hill may achieve bonus floor area by: (1) contributing to affordable housing or (2) providing open space, developing a portion of a green street, or purchasing landmark TDR. Extra floor area available through the second option is limited to 40% of the eligible bonus floor area. Council Bill 119444 would eliminate the second option for achieving extra floor. Instead, all non-exempt floor area would be used to determine affordable housing contributions. AF The proposed amendment would allow landmark TDR owners in First Hill, such as the Trinity Church, to achieve some value from their TDR. Notes: Double underlines indicate new language to be added. R Double strikethroughs indicate language proposed to be removed. A dashed underline indicates that language that was proposed to be deleted that would be retained by this amendment. D Amendments Amend Section 37 of Council Bill 119444, as follows: Section 37. Section 23.45.516 of the Seattle Municipal Code, last amended by Ordinance 125173, is amended as follows: 23.45.516 ((Additional height and)) Method to achieve extra residential floor area in ((MR and)) HR zones A. ((General.)) Definitions in Section 23.58A.004 apply in this Section 23.45.516 unless otherwise specified. 26 ((1. In MR, MR/85, and HR zones, extra residential floor area may be permitted up to the maximum limits allowed by Section 23.45.510. 2. In MR and HR zones, additional height above the base height limit is permitted for structures that qualify for extra residential floor area, up to the maximum limits allowed by Sections 23.45.514 and 23.45.516. B. Eligible lots. The following lots are eligible for extra residential floor area and, except in MR/85 zones, additional height: T 1. Lots in MR or MR/85 zones in urban villages, urban centers, and the Station Area Overlay District, except when the lot abuts a lot zoned single-family or is directly across an AF alley from a lot zoned single-family; and 2. Lots in HR zones. C. HR zones 1. Extra residential floor area.)) R B. In HR zones, extra residential floor area above the base FAR may be gained in accordance with Chapter 23.58A subject to the conditions and limits in this Section 23.45.516. D ((Up to all)) 1. All extra residential floor area may be gained through the affordable housing incentive program provisions in Section 23.58A.014. 2. Up to 40 percent of extra residential floor area may be gained by one or any combination of: a. transfer of development potential; b. providing neighborhood open space ((or a payment in lieu thereof)); and/or 27 c. providing a neighborhood green street setback if allowed pursuant to subsection 23.45.516.F, all in accordance with this Section 23.45.516 and Chapter 23.58A. ((2. Structure height a. Structures 240 feet or less in height. The applicable height limit in an HR zone under subsection 23.45.514.B is 240 feet if the applicant satisfies the conditions for extra floor area but not all of the conditions in subsection 23.45.516.C.2.b are met. b. Structures over 240 feet. The applicable height limit in an HR zone T under subsection 23.45.514.B is 300 feet if the applicant satisfies the conditions for extra floor area and the following additional conditions are met: AF 1) For any structure above a height of 85 feet, the average residential gross floor area per story above a height of 45 feet does not exceed 9,500 square feet; 2) No parking is located at or above grade, unless it is separated R from all street lot lines by another use; and 3) At least 25 percent of the lot area at grade is one or more D landscaped open spaces, each with a minimum horizontal dimension of 10 feet, or at least 20 percent of the lot area at grade is landscaped, common amenity area meeting the standards of Section 23.45.522.)) C. Structures over 240 feet. For development containing structures with heights greater than 240 feet, the following additional conditions shall be met: 1. No parking is allowed to be located at or above grade, unless it is separated from all street lot lines by another use; and 28 2. At least 20 percent of the lot area at grade must be common amenity area meeting the standards of Section 23.45.522. D. Transferable Development Potential (TDP) from Landmark structures and open space 1. Sending lots. TDP may be transferred under the provisions of Section 23.58A.040, as modified by this Section 23.45.516, only from Landmark TDP sites and open space TDP sites. In order to be eligible as a Landmark TDP site or open space TDP site, a lot shall be located in First Hill and shall be zoned MR or HR. Sending lots are subject to the limits T and conditions in this Chapter 23.45 and Chapter 23.58A. The amount of TDP that may be transferred from a lot is limited to the amount by which the base FAR under Section 23.45.510 AF exceeds floor area on the lot that is not exempt under Section 23.45.510. 2. Receiving lots. Any lot located in an HR zone within First Hill is eligible for extra residential floor area according to the provisions of this Section 23.45.516 to receive TDP from an eligible sending lot, subject to the limits and conditions in this Chapter 23.45 and R Chapter 23.58A. ((E. Combined lot development. When authorized by the Director pursuant to this Section D 23.45.516, lots located on the same block in an HR zone may be combined, whether contiguous or not, solely for the purpose of allowing some or all of the capacity for chargeable floor area on one or more such lots under this Chapter 23.45 to be used on one or more other lots, according to the provisions of this subsection 23.45.516.E. 1. Up to all of the capacity on one lot, referred to in this subsection 23.45.516.E as the “base lot,” for chargeable floor area in addition to the base FAR, pursuant to Section 23.45.510 (referred to in this subsection 23.45.516.E as “bonus capacity”), may be used on one or more other lots, subject to compliance with all conditions to obtaining extra residential floor 29 area, pursuant to Chapter 23.58A, as modified in this Section 23.45.516. For purposes of applying any conditions related to amenities or features provided on site under this Section 23.45.516, only the lot or lots on which such bonus capacity is used are considered to be the lot or site using a bonus. Criteria for use of extra residential floor area that apply to the structure(s) shall be applied only to the structure(s) on the lots using the transferred bonus capacity. For purposes of the condition to height above 240 feet in subsection 23.45.516.C.2.b.3 of this Section 23.45.516, all lots in a combined lot development are considered as one lot. T 2. Only if all of the bonus capacity on all lots in a combined lot development is used on fewer than all of those lots, there may be transferred from a base lot where no bonus AF capacity is used, to one or more other lots in the combined lot development, up to all of the unused base FAR on the base lot, without regard to limits on the transfer of TDP or on use of TDP in Chapter 23.58A or subsection 23.45.516.D. Such transfer shall be treated as a transfer of TDP for purposes of determining remaining development capacity on the base lot and TDP R available to transfer under Chapter 23.58A, but shall be treated as additional base FAR on the other lots, and, to the extent that, together with other base floor area, it does not exceed the D amount of chargeable floor area below the base height limit on the lot where it is used, it shall not be treated as extra residential floor area. If less than all of the bonus capacity of the base lot is used on such other lots, and if the base lot qualifies as a sending lot for TDP, the unused base FAR may be transferred as TDP to the extent permitted by Chapter 23.58A and this Section 23.45.516, but in each case only to satisfy in part the conditions to achieve extra floor area, not as additional base FAR. 3. To the extent permitted by the Director, the maximum chargeable floor area for any one or more lots in the combined lot development may be increased up to the combined 30 maximum chargeable floor area under Section 23.45.510 computed for all lots participating in the combined lot development, provided that the maximum chargeable floor area on one or more other lots in the combined lot development is correspondingly reduced. To the extent permitted by the Director, and subject to subsection 23.45.516.E.2, the base floor area for any one or more lots in the combined lot development may be increased up to the combined base chargeable floor area under Section 23.45.510 computed for all lots participating in the combined lot development, provided that the base floor area on one or more other lots in the combined lot T development is correspondingly reduced. 4. The Director shall allow a combined lot development only to the extent that the AF Director determines, in a Type I land use decision, that permitting more chargeable floor area than would otherwise be allowed on a lot or lots and the corresponding reduction on another lot or lots will result in a significant public benefit through one of more of the following: a. preservation of a landmark structure located on the block or on an R adjacent block either through the inclusion of the lot with the landmark structure as a base lot in the combined lot development or through the transfer of TDP from the lot with the landmark D structure to a lot in the combined lot development; b. inclusion on the same block of a structure in which low-income housing is provided to satisfy all or part of the conditions to earn extra residential floor area; and/or c. provision of open space on the same block to satisfy in part the conditions to achieve extra residential floor area. 5. The fee owners of each of the combined lots shall execute an appropriate agreement or instrument, which shall include the legal descriptions of each lot and shall be recorded in the King County real property records. In the agreement or instrument, the owners 31 shall acknowledge the extent to which development capacity on each base lot is reduced by the use of such capacity on another lot or lots, at least for so long as the chargeable floor area for which such capacity is used remains on such other lot or lots. The agreement or instrument shall also provide that its covenants and conditions shall run with the land and shall be specifically enforceable by the parties and by the City of Seattle. 6. Nothing in this subsection 23.45.516.E shall allow the development on any lot in a combined lot development to exceed or deviate from height limits or other development T standards.)) E ((F)). Neighborhood green street setback. Floor area may be gained for a neighborhood AF green street setback according to the provisions of Chapter 23.58A by development on lots abutting one of the streets or street segments within the First Hill Urban Village shown on Map A for 23.45.516. Map A for 23.45.516 D R Neighborhood Green Streets 32 .25 ?a Map A far 23.45.5163 Haighbarl'md Green 3mm Green Steel Erm?m hem ?aw?iv M6. .. Lu. ?aring 15Heir-duals?. bar. Mull-1:. IHPI I.- Ear-.555. liq-In)" 9 Hug-n Pan-rid El, Ella Pupil-d mph-hr I6 SI '1 my! 51' BLIJUU 33 F ((G)). Neighborhood open space. In HR zones, subject to the limits in this Section 23.45.516 and Chapter 23.58A, extra residential floor area may be gained through a voluntary agreement to provide neighborhood open space ((or a payment in lieu of neighborhood open space)), according to the provisions of Section 23.58A.040. Amend Section 96 of Council Bill 119444, as follows: 125291, is amended as follows: T Section 96. Section 23.45.516 of the Seattle Municipal Code, last amended by Ordinance 23.58C.025 Applicability and general requirements AF *** B. Applicability. Except as provided according to subsection 23.58C.025.C, this Chapter 23.58C shall apply to development that includes units, whether such development occurs through one or more of the following: R 1. Construction of a new structure; D 2. Construction of an addition to an existing structure that results in an increase in the total number of units; 3. Alterations within an existing structure that result in an increase in the total number of units; or 4. Change of use that results in an increase in the total number of units. C. Development is exempt from the requirements of this Chapter 23.58C if it receives public funding and/or an allocation of federal low-income housing tax credits, and is subject to a regulatory agreement, covenant, or other legal instrument recorded on the property title and 34 enforceable by The City of Seattle, Washington State Housing Finance Commission, State of Washington, King County, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, or other similar entity as approved by the Director of Housing, (1) which restricts at least 40 percent of the residential units to occupancy by households earning no greater than 60 percent of median income, and controls the rents that may be charged, for a minimum period of 40 years, or (2) which restricts at least 40 percent of the residential units to be sold to households earning no greater than 80 percent of median income, for a minimum period of 50 years. The sale price for T sales subsequent to the initial sale shall be calculated to allow modest growth in homeowner equity while maintaining long-term affordability for future buyers. All buyers of such an AF ownership unit subsequent to the initial sale shall be households with incomes no greater than 80 percent of median income at initial occupancy. D. Relationship to incentive zoning. Where the provisions of the zone refer to this Chapter 23.58C and where bonus residential floor area or extra residential floor area may be achieved R according to the provisions of the zone and/or Chapter 23.58A, the following provisions apply: 1. All requirements to provide low-income or moderate-income housing, or D affordable housing as defined in Section 23.58A.004, for achieving bonus residential floor area or extra residential floor area according to the provisions of the zone and/or Chapter 23.58A shall be satisfied solely by compliance with this Chapter 23.58C. 2. Any non-housing requirements for achieving bonus residential floor area or extra residential floor area shall be satisfied according to the provisions of the zone and/or Chapter 23.58A. 35 3. Extra floor area achieved in HR zones by acquiring transfer of development potential, providing neighborhood open space, or providing a neighborhood green street setback D R AF T according to Section 23.45.516.B.2 is exempt from the requirements of this Chapter 23.58C. 36 Amendment A9: Requirements to meet a green building standard in Multifamily zones Councilmember Johnson Background: This amendment would increase the thresholds above which projects in Multifamily zones would have to meet a green building standard. T Under the existing code, projects in Multifamily zones can achieve extra floor area by meeting a green building standard and providing additional public benefits, such as screening parking or providing affordable housing. The green building standard requires development to achieve a green building certification, (i.e. LEED Gold, Built Green 4-Star, Passive House, etc.) plus a 15% energy efficiency improvement over the energy code minimum. Under existing rules, the Floor Area Ratio (FAR) above which the green building standard applies varies significantly based on the zone and type of development (e.g. detached, townhouse, rowhouse, or apartment). Under the proposed legislation, the requirement would vary by zone but not by development type. AF Green building standards typically incorporate multiple criteria, such as indoor air quality, local materials, or stormwater, as well as energy and water efficiency. The efficiency criteria reduce the ongoing annual energy and water utility costs to owners and tenants, but the green building standards may increase upfront costs to developers (though upfront costs to developers vary considerably due to a variety of project factors and design decisions). R While the green buildings standards are already in place, this requirement, combined with Mandatory Housing Affordability (MHA) requirements, could result in higher housing costs. This amendment would increase the FAR above which the green building standard applies so that the additional floor area provided through MHA can be achieved without meeting the green building standard. Developers could build to the maximum FAR by meeting the green building standard. The following chart summarizes what this would mean for the green building threshold: D Current Threshold (varies by development type) LR1 LR2 LR3 (outside urban village) LR3 (inside urban village) MR Threshold: Proposed Legislation Threshold: Proposed Amendment Maximum FAR 0.9-1.1 1.0-1.1 1.1-1.3 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.6 1.3 1.6 1.8 1.1-1.5 1.1 1.8 2.3 3.2 3.2 3.45 4.5 Below is a diagram that shows what this would mean for a townhouse project in a LR1. 37 Notes: Double underlines indicate new language to be added. T Double strikethroughs indicate language proposed to be removed. A dashed underline indicates that language that was proposed to be deleted that would be retained by this amendment. AF Amendments Amend Section 44 to Council Bill 119444, as follows: Section 44. A new Section 23.45.530 of the Seattle Municipal Code is added as follows: 23.45.530 Green building standards R For projects exceeding the floor area ratio (FAR) in Table A for 23.45.530, the applicant shall make a commitment that the proposed development will meet the green building standard D and shall demonstrate compliance with that commitment, all in accordance with Chapter 23.58D. Table A for 23.45.530 Green building standard thresholds for multifamily zones Zone Floor Area Ratio (FAR) LR1 0.9 1.1 LR2 1.0 1.2 LR3 outside urban centers and urban 1.1 1.6 villages LR3 inside urban centers and urban villages 1.8 MR 3.2 3.45 HR 7.0 38 Amendment A10: Small commercial space requirement Councilmember O’Brien & Councilmember Johnson Background: In certain areas, such as the Pike/Pine Conservation Overlay District, there are development standards in place to ensure that new development includes spaces for small commercial uses. Development standards that require that new development include spaces designed for small commercial uses is one strategy to support commercial affordability and limit the potential displacement of small, locally-owned businesses. T This amendment would require that new development in pedestrian zones with over 5,000 square feet of commercial space at grade provide small commercial spaces. Pedestrian zones are generally located in recognized neighborhood business districts and are locations already prioritized for an active streetscape. Option 1 (Councilmember O’Brien): This option would require that these small commercial spaces be permanent. AF Option 2 (Councilmember Johnson): This option would include a five-year expiration for these small commercial spaces. Notes: R Double underlines indicate new language to be added. Double strikethroughs indicate language proposed to be removed. D A dashed underline indicates that language that was proposed to be deleted that would be retained by this amendment. Amendments Option 1: Amend Section 49 of Council Bill 119444, as follows: Section 49. Section 23.47A.008 of the Seattle Municipal Code, last amended by Ordinance 125603, is amended as follows: 23.47A.008 Street-level development standards *** 39 B. Non-residential street-level requirements *** 3. Depth provisions for new structures or new additions to existing structures. Non-residential uses shall extend an average depth of at least 30 feet and a minimum depth of 15 feet from the street-level, street-facing facade. Non-residential uses smaller than 600 square feet in size shall extend an average depth of at least 20 feet and a minimum depth of 10 feet, provided that the space has a direct entrance or service counter for pedestrians from the street T or from a street-oriented courtyard that is no more than 3 feet above or below the sidewalk grade. If the combination of the requirements of Sections 23.47A.005 or 23.47A.008 and this AF depth requirement would result in a requirement that an area greater than 50 percent of the structure’s footprint be dedicated to non-residential use, the Director may modify the streetfacing facade or depth requirements, or both, so that no more than 50 percent of the structure’s R footprint is required to be non-residential. *** C. In addition to the provisions of subsections 23.47A.008.A and 23.47A.008.B, the D following standards also apply in pedestrian designated zones: *** 6. Space for small commercial uses at street level a. All structures abutting a principal pedestrian street that include more than 5,000 square feet of street-level commercial uses shall include small commercial spaces according to Table A for 23.47A.008.C and subsection 23.47A.008.C.6.b. Table A for 23.47A.008 Number of small commercial spaces required 40 Total amount of square feet in street-level Number of small commercial spaces required commercial use Up to 5,000 square feet 0 More than 5,000 sf up to 8,000 sf 1 More than 8,000 sf up to 12,000 sf 2 More than 12,000 sf up to 16,000 sf 3 More than 16,000 sf 4, plus 1 additional space for each additional 4,000 square feet above 16,000 square feet, up to a maximum of 8 T b. Requirements for small commercial spaces. The required small commercial spaces must: AF 1) Contain only commercial uses; 2) Be a minimum of 300 square feet and a maximum of 1,500 square feet; 3) Have an entrance for pedestrians from the street or from a street- R oriented courtyard that is no more than 3 feet above or below the sidewalk grade; and 4) Be separated from other commercial spaces by a physical D divider such as a wall or partition. c. Exception. The requirements of this section 23.47A.008.C.6 do not apply to: 1) Structures with more than 50 percent of the total street-level gross floor area occupied by any of the following uses: a) Arts facilities; b) Child care facilities; c) Colleges; d) Community clubs or community centers; 41 e) Libraries; f) Institutes for advanced study; g) Museums; h) Performing arts theatres; i) Child care centers; j) Elementary or secondary schools; k) Religious facilities; T l) Vocational or fine arts schools; or m) Shopping atriums, where multiple businesses operate AF within a contiguous space. 2) Structures with more than 25 percent of street-level gross floor area occupied by one or more business establishments that the Director of the Office of Economic Development determines meets the definition of a small business and is proposing to Option 2: R move to the structure after vacating another location in Seattle. D Amend Section 49 of Council Bill 119444, as follows: Section 49. Section 23.47A.008 of the Seattle Municipal Code, last amended by Ordinance 125603, is amended as follows: 23.47A.008 Street-level development standards *** B. Non-residential street-level requirements *** 42 3. Depth provisions for new structures or new additions to existing structures. Non-residential uses shall extend an average depth of at least 30 feet and a minimum depth of 15 feet from the street-level, street-facing facade. Non-residential uses smaller than 600 square feet in size shall extend an average depth of at least 20 feet and a minimum depth of 10 feet, provided that the space has a direct entrance or service counter for pedestrians from the street or from a street-oriented courtyard that is no more than 3 feet above or below the sidewalk grade. If the combination of the requirements of Sections 23.47A.005 or 23.47A.008 and this T depth requirement would result in a requirement that an area greater than 50 percent of the structure’s footprint be dedicated to non-residential use, the Director may modify the street- AF facing facade or depth requirements, or both, so that no more than 50 percent of the structure’s footprint is required to be non-residential. *** C. In addition to the provisions of subsections 23.47A.008.A and 23.47A.008.B, the R following standards also apply in pedestrian designated zones: *** D 6. Space for small commercial uses at street level a. All structures abutting a principal pedestrian street that include more than 5,000 square feet of street-level commercial uses shall include small commercial spaces according to Table A for 23.47A.008.C and subsection 23.47A.008.C.6.b for a period of five years after the certificate of occupancy. Table A for 23.47A.008 Number of small commercial spaces required Total amount of square feet in street-level Number of small commercial spaces required commercial use Up to 5,000 square feet 0 43 More than 5,000 sf up to 8,000 sf More than 8,000 sf up to 12,000 sf 1 2 More than 12,000 sf up to 16,000 sf 3 More than 16,000 sf 4, plus 1 additional space for each additional 4,000 square feet above 16,000 square feet, up to a maximum of 8 b. Requirements for small commercial spaces. The required small commercial spaces must: T 1) Contain only commercial uses; 2) Be a minimum of 300 square feet and a maximum of 1,500 AF square feet; 3) Have an entrance for pedestrians from the street or from a street- oriented courtyard that is no more than 3 feet above or below the sidewalk grade; and 4) Be separated from other commercial spaces by a physical R divider such as a wall or partition. c. Exception. The requirements of this section 23.47A.008.C.6 do not D apply to: 1) Structures with more than 50 percent of the total street-level gross floor area occupied by any of the following uses: a) Arts facilities; b) Child care facilities; c) Colleges; d) Community clubs or community centers; e) Libraries; f) Institutes for advanced study; 44 g) Museums; h) Performing arts theatres; i) Child care centers; j) Elementary or secondary schools; k) Religious facilities; l) Vocational or fine arts schools; or m) Shopping atriums, where multiple businesses operate T within a contiguous space. 2) Structures with more than 25 percent of street-level gross floor AF area occupied by one or more business establishments that the Director of the Office of Economic Development determines meets the definition of a small business and has committed D R to move to the structure after vacating another location in Seattle. 45 Amendment A11: Floor area exception for low-income housing in the Pike/Pine Overlay Councilmember O’Brien Background: The Pike/Pine Overlay currently includes an exception to the floor area limit for projects that commit to providing 50% of total gross floor area affordable to and occupied by “income eligible households” for fifty years. Income eligible households are defined as: 1. For rental housing units, except housing units of 400 or fewer net square feet, or sleeping rooms in a congregate residence, households with incomes no higher than the lower of: a. 80 percent of median income as defined in Section 23.84A.025; or T b. the maximum level permitted for rental housing by RCW 36.70A.540 as in effect when the agreement for the housing to serve as affordable housing is executed. 2. In the case of owner-occupied housing units, households with incomes no higher than the lesser of: median income, as defined in Section 23.84A.025, or AF a. b. the maximum level permitted for owner-occupied housing by RCW 36.70A.540 as in effect when the agreement for the housing to serve as affordable housing is executed. R 3. For housing units of 400 or fewer net square feet or sleeping rooms in a congregate residence, households with incomes no higher than 40 percent of median income as defined in Section 23.84A.025. For this purpose, the resident(s) of each sleeping room in a congregate residence are regarded as a separate household. Council Bill 119444 proposes to delete this exception. D This amendment would retain the exception, allowing a 15% increase in floor area for projects that commit to providing at least 50% of their floor area as affordable to income eligible households. Notes: Double underlines indicate new language to be added. Double strikethroughs indicate language proposed to be removed. A dashed underline indicates that language that was proposed to be deleted that would be retained by this amendment. Amendments Amend Section 104 of Council Bill 119444 to retain subsection 23.73.010.B.1.c, as follows: 46 Section 104. Section 23.73.010 of the Seattle Municipal Code, last amended by Ordinance 125429, is amended as follows: 23.73.010 Floor area limits outside the Conservation Core *** B. Exceptions to floor area limit 1. A 15 percent increase in the floor area limit is permitted for projects that meet the following conditions: T a. The project retains all the character structures existing on the lot, unless a departure is approved through the design review process to allow the removal of a character AF structure based on the provisions of subsection 23.41.012.B; and b. The project includes uses that contribute to the area’s recognized character as an arts district, including performing arts space or artist-studio dwellings that typically have design requirements such as nonstandard floor-to-ceiling heights that reduce the R total amount of usable floor area in a structure; or ((c. A minimum of 50 percent of the total gross floor area of the project is D housing that is affordable to and occupied by “income-eligible households,” as defined in Section 23.58A.004, and is subject to recorded covenants approved by the Director that ensure that the housing remains available to these households for a minimum of 50 years; or d)) c. Through the design review process a determination is made that including one or more of the following features offsets the increase in the bulk of the project and allows for a design treatment that achieves the intent of the neighborhood design guidelines better than adhering to the floor area limit that would apply without the exception: 1) A landscaped courtyard that is visible from the sidewalk and located primarily at street level on a street that is not a principal pedestrian street; 47 2) A through-block pedestrian corridor that connects parallel streets bounding the project, consistent with the neighborhood design guidelines; or 3) Open space at locations that support the gateway and open space concepts promoted in the neighborhood design guidelines. 2. Retaining character structures on a lot. A 25 percent increase in the floor area limit established in subsection 23.73.010.A is permitted for a project that retains all the character structures on the same lot according to the provisions in Section 23.73.015, unless a departure is T approved through the design review process to allow the removal of a character structure based on the provisions of subsection 23.41.012.B. Any increase in floor area permitted according to AF this subsection 23.73.010.B.2 shall not be combined with any other increase in floor area permitted according to subsection 23.73.010.B.1 or 23.73.010.B.3. 3. A 25 percent increase in the floor area limit is permitted on a lot that qualifies as a receiving site for a project that adds floor area through the use of TDP as permitted by R Section 23.73.024, provided that the amount of floor area added through the use of TDP is equivalent to at least 0.25 FAR, as calculated for the receiving site. Any increase in floor area D permitted according to this subsection 23.73.010.B.3 shall not be combined with any other increase in floor area permitted according to subsection 23.73.010.B.1 or 23.73.010.B.2. 48 Amendment A12 Upper-level Setbacks along University Way NE Councilmember Johnson Background: The proposed legislation would rezone University Way NE (the Ave) from NC3P-65 to NC3P-75 (M). The initial proposal for the Ave as part of the University District upzone, which was enacted through Ordinance (ORD) 125267, was to rezone this area from NC3P-65 to SM-U-85. The initial proposal also included an upper-level setback requirement for buildings with heights above 45 feet. When the Council was considering ORD 125267, the Council decided to not rezone the Ave at that time and requested that the Office of Planning and Community Development consider zoning changes as part of the citywide upzone. The proposal included in CB 119444 is to maintain the NC3 zoning and to increase heights from 65 feet to 75 feet. NC3-75 (M) does not include an upper-level setback. Notes: AF T This amendment would implement an upper level setback above 45 feet in height for structures abutting the Ave. The intent of this setback is to maintain the human-scaled character of University Way NE. Double underlines indicate new language to be added. Double strikethroughs indicate language proposed to be removed. R A dashed underline indicates that language that was proposed to be deleted that would be retained by this amendment. D Amendments Amend Section 50 of Council Bill 119444, as follows: Section 50. Section 23.47A.009 of the Seattle Municipal Code, last amended by Ordinance 125603, is amended as follows: 23.47A.009 Standards applicable to specific areas *** G. University Community Urban Center. The following provisions apply to specified NC zones within the portion of the University Community Urban Center west of 15th Avenue NE. 49 1. Maximum width and depth limits. The following standards apply to NC zones with a mapped height limit exceeding 40 feet: *** 2. Provisions for the transfer of development rights (TDR) and transfer of development potential (TDP) *** 3. Upper level setbacks on University Way NE. The following standards apply to T development on lots abutting University Way NE with a mapped height exceeding 55 feet. a. An upper-level setback with an average depth of 10 feet from street lot AF lines abutting University Way NE is required for portions of a structure above a height of 45 feet. Where a portion of the facade is set back more than 20 feet, the setback depth for that portion of the facade shall be considered 20 feet for purposes of calculating the average setback. b. Structures allowed in subsection 23.47A.014.E.1 and 23.47.014.E.2 are D R allowed in upper-level setbacks required in subsection 23.47A.009.G.3. 50 Amendment A13: Development Standards for Live-work units Councilmember Johnson Background: This amendment would amend the development standards that apply to live-work units by (1) establishing a minimum size of 300 square feet for the “work” portion that aligns with the requirements for small commercial spaces; and (2) requiring a physical divider between the “live” and “work” portions of the unit. The intent of these changes is to improve privacy for residential functions and ensure that the front of the spaces are used for business purposes. Notes: T Double underlines indicate new language to be added. Double strikethroughs indicate language proposed to be removed. AF A dashed underline indicates that language that was proposed to be deleted that would be retained by this amendment. Amendments Amend Section 49 to Council Bill 119444, as follows: R Section 49. Section 23.47A.008 of the Seattle Municipal Code, last amended by Ordinance 125603, is amended as follows: D 23.47A.008 Street-level development standards *** E. When a live-work unit is located on a street-level, street-facing facade, the provisions of subsections 23.47A.008.A and 23.47A.008.B, and the following requirements, apply: 1. The portion of each such live-work unit in which business is conducted must be a minimum of 300 square feet and must be located between the principal street and the residential portion of the live-work unit. The non-residential portions of the unit shall extend the width of the street-level, street-facing facade, shall extend a minimum depth of 15 feet from the street-level, street-facing facade, and shall not contain any of the primary features of the 51 residential (live) portion of the live-work unit, such as kitchen, ((bathroom,)) sleeping, ((or)) laundry facilities, or bathrooms containing a shower or bathtub. These basic residential features shall be designed and arranged to be separated from the work portion of the live-work unit by a physical divider such as a wall or partition. 2. Each live-work unit must have a pedestrian entry on the street-facing facade that is designed to be visually prominent and provide direct access to the non-residential portions of the unit. T 3. Each live-work unit must include an exterior sign with the name of the business associated with the live-work unit. Such signage shall be clearly associated with the unit and AF visible to pedestrians outside of the building. 4. The owner of each live-work unit must keep a copy of the current business license associated with the business located in that unit on file. D R *** 52 Amendment A14: Clarify regulations related to off-street parking in the Seattle Mixed-Rainier Beach zone Councilmember O’Brien Background: The proposed Seattle Mixed-Rainier Beach district would create special development standards for the area around the Rainier Beach light rail station in order to encourage the development of a food innovation district to provide economic development opportunities to the Rainier Beach community. Proposed section 23.48.945 would include special parking and loading standards that would allow surface parking between the street and buildings, multiple curb cuts, and surface parking to cover up to 50% of a lot. T These standards are not consistent with development standards around other light rail stations, which are generally designed to reduce vehicular trips to the station area and reduce conflicts between automobiles and pedestrians accessing the station. Notes: AF This amendment would amend section 23.48.945 to limit these parking and loading standards to projects that include the types of uses the community seeks to encourage: light manufacturing; colleges; vocational or fine arts schools; food processing and craft work; child care centers; or subsidized housing. Those uses are listed in proposed Section 23.48.920.B. R Double underlines indicate new language to be added. Double strikethroughs indicate language proposed to be removed. D A dashed underline indicates that language that was proposed to be deleted that would be retained by this amendment. Amendments Amend Section 77 of Council Bill 119444 by amending proposed new section 23.48.945 as follows: 23.48.945 Parking and loading in SM-RB zones The standards of Sections 23.48.055 and 23.48.085 are modified as follows for portions of lots that do not abut a pedestrian street for a development that includes space dedicated to one or more uses listed in Section 23.48.920.B.: A. Surface parking is not required to be separated from the street by other uses. B. Two two-way curb cuts are allowed, provided no curb cuts are located on pedestrian streets. 53 D R AF T C. The amount of lot area allocated to accessory surface parking can be as much as 50 percent of the total lot area. 54 Amendment A15: Preschool uses Councilmember Mosqueda and Councilmember González Background: In several sections of CB 119444, there are certain benefits granted to projects that include preschools that do not apply to projects that include child care centers. In the Land Use Code, "child care center" is a broader term that includes preschools. This amendment would replace the term “preschool” with “child care center” to encourage the inclusion of child care centers in new development rather than just preschools. Notes: T Double underlines indicate new language to be added. Double strikethroughs indicate language proposed to be removed. AF A dashed underline indicates that language that was proposed to be deleted that would be retained by this amendment. Amendments Amend Section 49 of Council Bill 119444, as follows: R Section 49. Section 23.47A.008 of the Seattle Municipal Code, last amended by Ordinance 125603, is amended as follows: D 23.47A.008 Street-level development standards *** C. In addition to the provisions of subsections 23.47A.008.A and 23.47A.008.B, the following standards also apply in pedestrian designated zones: *** 5. Maximum width and depth limits *** c. For purposes of this subsection 23.47A.008.C.5, the following portions of a structure shall not be included in measuring width and depth: 55 1) Designated Landmark structures that are retained on the lot. 2) Stories of a structure on which more than 50 percent of the total gross floor area is occupied by any of the following uses: a) Arts facilities; b) Community clubs or community centers; c) Child care center Preschool; d) Elementary or secondary schools; T e) Performing arts theaters; or AF f) Religious facilities. *** Amend Section 50 of Council Bill 119444, as follows: Section 50. Section 23.47A.009 of the Seattle Municipal Code, last amended by R Ordinance 125603, is amended as follows: 23.47A.009 Standards applicable to specific areas *** D G. University Community Urban Center. The following provisions apply to specified NC zones within the portion of the University Community Urban Center west of 15th Avenue NE. 1. Maximum width and depth limits. The following standards apply to NC zones with a mapped height limit exceeding 40 feet: *** c. Width and depth limits do not apply to stories of a structure with more than 50 percent of the total gross floor area occupied by any of the following uses: 1) Community clubs or community centers; 56 2) Religious facilities; 3) Arts facilities; 4) Child care center Preschool, elementary, or secondary schools; or 5) Performing arts theaters. *** Amend Section 58 of Council Bill 119444, as follows: 125432, is amended as follows: AF 23.48.040 Street-level development standards T Section 58. Section 23.48.040 of the Seattle Municipal Code, last amended by Ordinance *** D. Maximum width. The provisions of this subsection 23.48.040.D apply to all structures in SM-U zones and structures along Class 1 pedestrian streets in all other Seattle Mixed zones, R except the provisions of this subsection 23.48.040.D do not apply in SM-SLU zones. *** D 3. For purposes of this subsection 23.48.040.D, the following portions of a structure shall not be included in facade width measurement: a. Designated Landmark structures that are retained on the lot. b. Structures in SM-U zones that qualify as vulnerable masonry structures according to Section 23.48.630 and are retained on the lot. c. Stories of a structure on which more than 50 percent of the total gross floor area is occupied by any of the following uses: 1) Arts facilities; 2) Community clubs or community centers; 57 3) Child care center Preschool; 4) Elementary or secondary schools; 5) Performing arts theaters; or 6) Religious facilities. D R AF T *** 58 Amendment A16: Additional tree regulations Chair Johnson and Councilmember O’Brien Background: In May 2018, the Planning, Land Use, and Zoning (PLUZ) committee began considering legislation to strengthen tree protections in the city. This effort resulted in a draft tree protection ordinance (Tree Bill), last discussed in committee on September 19, 2018. Revisions to this legislation are on hold, pending Council action on the citywide Mandatory Housing Affordability (MHA) legislation. However, the MHA bill (CB 119444) does include some tree-related regulations that intersect with issues explored in the latest version of the Tree Bill. The MHA bill does not alter the requirements for tree planting or preservation in SF 5000, SF 7200, and SF 9600 zones, though it moves those requirements from SMC 23.44.008 to SMC 23.44.020. AF T Under CB 119444, the Residential Small Lot (RSL) zone would have new tree planting/preservation requirements, based on a tree score system. A lot’s tree score would be equal to one point for every 750 square feet of lot area. Trees sufficient to achieve the total tree score for the lot must either be planted or preserved. The requirements are intended to achieve a target of 26% tree canopy cover for RSL zones. Notes: R This amendment would increase tree planting requirements in RSL zones to achieve a 33% tree canopy cover target; create a new fee-in-lieu option for satisfying tree planting requirements in RSL; add protections for trees planted to meet tree planting requirements in RSL; and require arborists working with the City to be certified by the International Society of Arboriculture. It would also specify policy goals for setting in-lieu fees and the expenditure of tree planting in-lieu funds. Double underlines indicate new language to be added. D Double strikethroughs indicate language proposed to be removed. A dashed underline indicates that language that was proposed to be deleted that would be retained by this amendment. Amendments Amend Section 24 of Council Bill 119444, as follows: Section 24. A new Section 23.44.020 of the Seattle Municipal Code is added to Subchapter I of Chapter 23.44 as follows: 23.44.020 Tree requirements 59 A. Tree requirements in SF 5000, SF 7200, and SF 9600 zones 1. When a single-family dwelling unit is constructed on a lot in a SF 5000, SF 7200, or SF 9600 zone, a minimum number of caliper inches of tree must be provided on the lot as follows: a. For lots over 3,000 square feet, at least 2 caliper inches of tree per 1,000 square feet of lot area. b. On lots that are 3,000 square feet or smaller, at least 3 caliper inches of T tree. 2. The minimum number of caliper inches of tree required may be met by AF preserving existing trees, planting new trees, or by a combination of preservation and planting. The preservation or planting of trees in the right-of-way may be counted, provided that they are approved by the Director of Transportation. 3. Submerged land shall not be included in calculating lot area for purposes of R either the tree preservation option or tree planting option. 4. Tree measurements. Trees planted to meet the requirements in this subsection D 23.44.020.A shall be at least 1.5 inches in diameter. The diameter of new trees shall be measured (in caliper inches) 6 inches above the ground. Existing trees shall be measured 4.5 feet above the ground. When an existing tree is 3 to 10 inches in diameter, each 1 inch counts as 1 inch toward meeting the tree requirements in this subsection 23.44.020.A. When an existing tree is more than 10 inches in diameter, each 1 inch of the tree that is over 10 inches shall count as 3 inches toward meeting the tree requirement. 5. Tree preservation plans. If the tree preservation option is chosen, a tree preservation plan must be submitted by a certified arborist and approved. Tree preservation plans 60 shall provide for protection of trees during construction according to standards promulgated by the Director. B. Tree requirements in RSL zones 1. Trees sufficient to achieve one point, according to Table A for 23.44.020, per 750 500 square feet of lot area shall be provided for any development: a. Containing one or more new dwelling units; b. Containing more than 4,000 square feet of non-residential uses in either T a new structure or an addition to an existing structure; or c. Expanding surface area parking by more than 20 parking spaces for AF automobiles. 2. Individual trees preserved during construction or planted after construction count toward the tree score according to Table A for 23.44.020. All required trees shall meet standards promulgated by the Director to provide for the long-term health, viability, and R coverage of plantings. These standards may include, but are not limited to, the type and size of plants, spacing of plants, depth, and quality of soil, access to light and air, and protection D practices during construction. 61 Table A for 23.44.020 Tree points Type of tree Points for non-conifer trees Points for conifer trees Small tree planted after construction 1 point 1.25 point Small/medium tree planted after 2 points 2.5 points construction Medium/large tree planted after 3 points 3.75 points construction Large tree planted after construction 4 points 5 points Trees 6 inches in diameter or greater 1 point per inch of diameter 1.25 point per inch of that are preserved during construction diameter T 3. Tree protection areas shall be designated for all trees that are proposed to be preserved to receive points under this subsection 23.49.020.B. No excavation, fill, placing of AF materials or equipment, or vehicle operation shall be allowed during construction within a tree protection area. Tree protection areas shall be an area equal to the outer extent of the dripline of the tree, except that they may be reduced if the following conditions are met: a. The alternative tree protection area is prepared by an certified arborist R who has visited the site and examined the specific tree’s size, location, and extent of root cover, evaluated the tree’s tolerance to construction impact based on its species and health, and D identified any past impacts that have occurred within the root zone; and b. The certified arborist has prepared a plan providing the rationale used to demonstrate that the alternate method provides an adequate level of protection. 4. The owner of the subject lot is required to ensure that the trees planted remain healthy for at least five years after inspection by the City and the owner of the subject lot shall be responsible for replacing any trees that do not remain healthy after inspection by the City. 5. In lieu of up to 50% of the tree point requirement, an applicant may provide a cash contribution to the City using a ratio of dollars to tree point as provided in a rule promulgated by the Director. Payments shall be made prior to issuance and as a condition of any 62 permit for any construction activity other than excavation and shoring. Payments in lieu of trees shall be deposited in a reserve account established solely to support tree planting and establishment. Earnings on balances in the special account shall accrue to that account. C. Street tree requirements in RSL zones 1. Street trees are required in RSL zones for development that would add one or more principal dwelling units on a lot, except as provided in subsection 23.43.020.C.2 and Section 23.53.015. Existing street trees shall be retained unless the Director of Transportation T approves their removal. The Director, in consultation with the Director of Transportation, shall determine the number, type, and placement of additional street trees to be provided in order to: AF a. Improve public safety; b. Promote compatibility with existing street trees; c. Match trees to the available space in the planting strip; d. Maintain and expand the urban forest canopy; R e. Encourage healthy growth through appropriate spacing; f. Protect utilities; and D g. Allow access to the street, buildings, and lot. 2. If a lot borders an unopened right-of-way, the Director may reduce or waive the street tree requirement along that right-of-way as a Type I decision if, after consultation with the Director of Transportation, the Director determines that the right-of-way is unlikely to be opened or improved. Amend Section 109 of Council Bill 119444, as follows: Section 109. Section 23.84A.002 of the Seattle Municipal Code, last amended by Ordinance 125681, is amended as follows: 23.84A.002 “A” 63 *** “Arborist, certified” means an individual that has successfully passed the certified arborist examination administered by the International Society of Arboriculture (ISA). *** “Arts facility” means space occupied by one or more ((not-for-profit)) organizations dedicated to the creation, display, performance, or screening of art by or for members of the general public. T *** AF Amend Council Bill 119444 by adding a new section to express Council’s intent in regards to setting inlieu fees and tree planting fund expenditures, as follows: Section _. The Director of the Seattle Department of Construction and Inspections shall establish a fee-in-lieu payment for tree planting in RSL zones based on the value of a tree at 25 years and provide a report on the fee amount to the Council by October 1, 2019. Funds accrued R in the reserve account for tree planting and establishment shall be used to advance the City’s Equity and Environment Agenda, including reducing disparities in tree canopy coverage between D residential neighborhoods. 64 Amendment A17: Crown Hill Urban Village principle pedestrian streets. Councilmember O’Brien Background: This amendment would add portions of Northwest 90th Street and Mary Avenue Northwest in the Crown Hill Urban Village to the list of principal pedestrian streets. Pedestrian (P) designations indicate areas where retail and other uses that support pedestrian activity are most appropriate in a commercial district. There are two aspects to the P designation – (1) designation to the zoning on the Official Land Use Map and (1) designation of “principal pedestrian streets” in the text of the Land Use Code along which requirements apply. Notes: AF T Both Northwest 90th Street and Mary Avenue Northwest abut zones with a P designation. Adding the streets as principal pedestrian streets to the Land Use Code will require that uses in future development meet P designation use and development standards. Double underlines indicate new language to be added. Double strikethroughs indicate language proposed to be removed. R A dashed underline indicates that language that was proposed to be deleted that would be retained by this amendment. Amendments D Amend Section 48 of Council Bill 1194444 to amend section 23.47A.005.D.2. to add 15th Avenue S as a principal pedestrian street as follows: Section 48. Subsection 23.47A.005.D of the Seattle Municipal Code, which section was last amended by Ordinance 125272, is amended as follows: 23.47A.005 Street-level uses *** D. In pedestrian-designated zones the locations of uses are regulated as follows: 1. Along designated principal pedestrian streets, one or more of the following uses are required along 80 percent of the street-level, street-facing facade in accordance with the standards provided in subsection 23.47A.008.C. a. Arts facilities; 65 b. Community gardens; c. Eating and drinking establishments; d. Entertainment uses, except for adult cabarets, adult motion picture theaters, and adult panorams; e. Food processing and craft work; f. Institutions, except hospitals or major institutions; g. Lodging uses; h. Medical services; j. Parks and open spaces; k. Rail transit facilities; T i. Offices, provided that no more than 30 feet of the street-level, streetfacing facade of a structure may contain an office use; AF l. Retail sales and services, automotive, in the Pike/Pine Conservation Overlay District if located within an existing structure or within a structure that retains a character structure as provided in Section 23.73.015; m. Sales and services, general, provided that no more than 40 feet of the street-level, street-facing facade of a structure on a principal pedestrian street may contain a customer services office; and R n. Sales and services, heavy, except for heavy commercial sales, and provided that no more than 30 feet of the street-level, street-facing facade of a structure may contain a non-household sales and service use. D The establishment of any such use is subject to the applicable use provisions of this Title 23. 2. The following streets are principal pedestrian streets when located within a pedestrian-designated zone: 10th Avenue; 11th Avenue; 12th Avenue; 13th Avenue, between East Madison Street and East Pine Street; 66 14th Avenue South, except within the North Beacon Hill Residential Urban Village; 15th Avenue East; 15th Avenue Northeast, north of Lake City Way Northeast; 15th Avenue Northwest; 17th Avenue Northwest; 20th Avenue Northwest; 23rd Avenue; AF 24th Avenue Northwest; T 22nd Avenue Northwest; 25th Avenue Northeast; 32nd Avenue West; 35th Avenue Northeast, except within the Lake City Hub Urban Village; R 35th Avenue Southwest, except within the West Seattle Junction Hub Urban Village; D 39th Avenue Northeast; Aurora Ave North, except within the Bitter Lake Village Hub Urban Village; Ballard Avenue ((NW)) Northwest; Beacon Avenue South; Boren Avenue; Boylston Avenue, except within the Pike/Pine Conservation Overlay District; 67 Broadway; Broadway East; California Avenue Southwest; Delridge Way Southwest; Dexter Avenue North; East Green Lake Drive North; East Green Lake Way North; East Olive Way; AF East Pike Street; T East Madison Street; East Pine Street; ((:)) East Union Street, except within the Pike/Pine Conservation Overlay District only lots abutting East Union Street between Broadway and East Madison Street; R Eastlake Avenue East; First Avenue North, except within the Upper Queen Anne Residential D Urban Village; Fremont Avenue North; Fremont Place North; Galer Street; Green Lake Drive North; Greenwood Avenue North; Lake City Way Northeast; Leary Avenue ((NW)) Northwest; 68 Linden Avenue North; Madison Street; Martin Luther King Jr. Way South; Mary Avenue Northwest between Mary Avenue Northwest and 14th Avenue Northwest; Mercer Street; North 34th Street; North 45th Street; AF North 85th Street; T North 35th Street; Northeast 43rd Street; Northeast 45th Street, except between Linden Ave North and Evanston Ave North; R Northeast 55th Street, east of 15th Avenue Northeast; Northeast 65th Street; D Northeast 125th Street; Northwest 65th Street; Northwest 85th Street; Northwest 90th Street between Holman Road Northwest and Northwest 87th Street; Northwest Market Street; Phinney Avenue North, between North 58th Street and North 63rd Street; Pike Street; 69 Pine Street; Queen Anne Avenue North; Rainier Avenue South; Roosevelt Way Northeast; Roy Street; Sand Point Way Northeast; South Alaska Street; South Henderson Street; AF South Jackson Street; T South Cloverdale Street; South Lander Street; South McClellan Street; South Othello Street; R Southwest Alaska Street; Stone Way North; D Summit Avenue, except within the Pike/Pine Conservation Overlay District; Terry Avenue; University Way Northeast; Wallingford Avenue North; West Dravus Street; West Galer Street; West Green Lake Drive North; 70 West McGraw Street, except within the Upper Queen Anne Residential Urban Village; and ((West Green Lake Drive North; and)) Woodlawn Avenue Northeast. D R AF T *** 71 Amendment A18: North Beacon Hill Pedestrian Designation Council President Harrell Background: Pedestrian (P) designations indicate areas where retail and other uses that support pedestrian activity are most appropriate in a commercial district. There are two aspects to the P designation – (1) designation to the zoning on the Official Land Use Map and (1) designation of “principal pedestrian streets” in the text of the Land Use Code along which requirements apply. Notes: AF T The proposed legislation adds a P designation to some commercial zones along Beacon Avenue S in the North Beacon Hill neighborhood. This amendment would extend that designation along the length of the commercial districts proposed for Beacon Hill and add P designations to properties fronting on 15th Avenue S. There are two parts to the amendment – the first would add the P designation to particular pieces of property (see map amendment 2-3), and the second (this amendment A17) would add 15th Avenue S to the list of principal pedestrian streets. This would mitigate impacts on the commercial district by requiring that there be commercial spaces Double underlines indicate new language to be added. Double strikethroughs indicate language proposed to be removed. R A dashed underline indicates that language that was proposed to be deleted that would be retained by this amendment. Amendments D Amend Section 48 of Council Bill 1194444 to amend section 23.47A.005.D.2. to add 15th Avenue S as a principal pedestrian street as follows: Section 48. Subsection 23.47A.005.D of the Seattle Municipal Code, which section was last amended by Ordinance 125272, is amended as follows: 23.47A.005 Street-level uses *** D. In pedestrian-designated zones the locations of uses are regulated as follows: 1. Along designated principal pedestrian streets, one or more of the following uses are required along 80 percent of the street-level, street-facing facade in accordance with the standards provided in subsection 23.47A.008.C. a. Arts facilities; b. Community gardens; 72 c. Eating and drinking establishments; d. Entertainment uses, except for adult cabarets, adult motion picture theaters, and adult panorams; e. Food processing and craft work; f. Institutions, except hospitals or major institutions; g. Lodging uses; h. Medical services; i. Offices, provided that no more than 30 feet of the street-level, street-facing facade of a structure may contain an office use; k. Rail transit facilities; T j. Parks and open spaces; AF l. Retail sales and services, automotive, in the Pike/Pine Conservation Overlay District if located within an existing structure or within a structure that retains a character structure as provided in Section 23.73.015; m. Sales and services, general, provided that no more than 40 feet of the streetlevel, street-facing facade of a structure on a principal pedestrian street may contain a customer services office; and R n. Sales and services, heavy, except for heavy commercial sales, and provided that no more than 30 feet of the street-level, street-facing facade of a structure may contain a nonhousehold sales and service use. The establishment of any such use is subject to the applicable use provisions of D this Title 23. 2. The following streets are principal pedestrian streets when located within a pedestrian-designated zone: 10th Avenue; 11th Avenue; 12th Avenue; 13th Avenue, between East Madison Street and East Pine Street; 14th Avenue South, except within the North Beacon Hill Residential Urban Village; 73 15th Avenue East; 15th Avenue Northeast, north of Lake City Way Northeast; 15th Avenue Northwest; 15th Avenue South; 17th Avenue Northwest; 20th Avenue Northwest; 22nd Avenue Northwest; 24th Avenue Northwest; AF 25th Avenue Northeast; T 23rd Avenue; 32nd Avenue West; 35th Avenue Northeast, except within the Lake City Hub Urban Village; 35th Avenue Southwest, except within the West Seattle Junction Hub R Urban Village; 39th Avenue Northeast; D Aurora Ave North, except within the Bitter Lake Village Hub Urban Village; Ballard Avenue ((NW)) Northwest; Beacon Avenue South; Boren Avenue; Boylston Avenue, except within the Pike/Pine Conservation Overlay District; Broadway; 74 Broadway East; California Avenue Southwest; Delridge Way Southwest; Dexter Avenue North; East Green Lake Drive North; East Green Lake Way North; East Madison Street; East Pike Street; AF East Pine Street; ((:)) T East Olive Way; East Union Street, except within the Pike/Pine Conservation Overlay District only lots abutting East Union Street between Broadway and East Madison Street; Eastlake Avenue East; R First Avenue North, except within the Upper Queen Anne Residential Urban Village; D Fremont Avenue North; Fremont Place North; Galer Street; Green Lake Drive North; Greenwood Avenue North; Lake City Way Northeast; Leary Avenue ((NW)) Northwest; Linden Avenue North; 75 Madison Street; Martin Luther King Jr. Way South; Mercer Street; North 34th Street; North 35th Street; North 45th Street; North 85th Street; T Northeast 43rd Street; Northeast 45th Street, except between Linden Ave North and Evanston AF Ave North; Northeast 55th Street, east of 15th Avenue Northeast; Northeast 65th Street; Northeast 125th Street; R Northwest 65th Street; Northwest 85th Street; D Northwest Market Street; Phinney Avenue North, between North 58th Street and North 63rd Street; Pike Street; Pine Street; Queen Anne Avenue North; Rainier Avenue South; Roosevelt Way Northeast; Roy Street; 76 Sand Point Way Northeast; South Alaska Street; South Cloverdale Street; South Henderson Street; South Jackson Street; South Lander Street; South McClellan Street; Southwest Alaska Street; AF Stone Way North; T South Othello Street; Summit Avenue, except within the Pike/Pine Conservation Overlay District; Terry Avenue; R University Way Northeast; Wallingford Avenue North; D West Dravus Street; West Galer Street; West Green Lake Drive North; West McGraw Street, except within the Upper Queen Anne Residential Urban Village; and ((West Green Lake Drive North; and)) Woodlawn Avenue Northeast. 77 Amendment B1: Annual inflation adjustments to payment amounts Councilmember O’Brien Background: In the original legislation that was introduced in January 2018, no adjustments for inflation or other modifications, such as changes based on more current market rents and capitalization rates, were made. Section 1 of Ordinance 125108 addresses the Council's intent for amendments to the payment and performance amounts, and the establishment of additional processes for modifying dimensional development standards and/or payment and performance amounts. AF T In response to the directive to determine whether the index currently used to annually adjust MHA payment amounts tracks with changes in average multifamily residential rents or other housing market variables, the Office of Housing (OH) has proposed changing the automatic payment adjustment index. The City currently uses the Consumer Price Index, All Urban Consumers, Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA, All Items (1982-1984 = 100) (CPI-U) for this purpose, but housing market indicators like average rents, which were used to set Seattle’s initial payment amounts, are only a portion of the costs tracked by CPIU. Rather, CPI-U is calculated to measure the value of the dollar for a broad range of consumer goods and services and has not kept pace with changes in average rents in the Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue market. R Based on OH’s analysis, the Consumer Price Index, All Urban Consumers, Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA, Shelter (1982-1984 = 100) (CPI-Shelter), which tracks residential rents and, for owner-occupied homes, the amount a homeowner would pay to rent or would earn from renting the home in a competitive market, has tracked more closely to the rise in average rents in Seattle over the past five to ten years than CPI-U. Because CPI-Shelter reflects changes in the housing market, use of this index for annual adjustments means that the percentage increase in payment amounts would likely be greatest when the housing market is strong. Payments would increase less or not at all during market downturns. D This amendment would use increases in CPI-Shelter to automatically adjust payment amounts instead of CPI-U. It also would change the date of this adjustment and make a technical correction related to the SM-U 85 zone. Notes: Double underlines indicate new language to be added. Double strikethroughs indicate language proposed to be removed. A dashed underline indicates that language that was proposed to be deleted that would be retained by this amendment. Amendments Amend Section 94 of Council Bill 119444, as follows: 78 Section 94. Section 23.58B.040 of the Seattle Municipal Code, last amended by Ordinance 125371, is amended as follows: 23.58B.040 Mitigation of impacts—payment option *** 2. Automatic adjustments to payment amounts. On March 1 of every year, 2017, and on the same day each year thereafter, the amounts for payment calculations according to Table A and Table B for 23.58B.040 shall automatically adjust in proportion to the annual T increase change for the previous calendar year (January 1 through December 31) in the Consumer Price Index, All Urban Consumers, Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue Bremerton, WA, Shelter AF All Items (1982-84 = 100), as determined by the U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, or successor index. *** Amend Section 97 of Council Bill 119444, as follows: R Section 97. Section 23.58C.040 of the Seattle Municipal Code, last amended by Ordinance 125371, is amended as follows: D 23.58C.040 Affordable housing— ((Payment)) payment option A. Payment amount 1. An applicant complying with this Chapter 23.58C through the payment option shall provide a cash contribution to the City, calculated by multiplying the payment calculation amount per square foot according to Table A or Table B for 23.58C.040 and Map A for 23.58C.050, as applicable, by the total gross floor area in the development, excluding the floor area of parking located in stories, or portions of stories, that are underground, and excluding any floor area devoted to an adult family home or domestic violence shelter, as follows: 79 a. In the case of construction of a new structure, the gross floor area in residential use and the gross floor area of live-work units; b. In the case of construction of an addition to an existing structure that results in an increase in the total number of units within the structure, the gross floor area in residential use and the gross floor area of live-work units in the addition; c. In the case of alterations within an existing structure that result in an increase in the total number of units within the structure, the gross floor area calculated by T dividing the total gross floor area in residential use and gross floor area of live-work units by the total number of units in the proposed development, and multiplying that quotient by the net AF increase in units in the structure; d. In the case of change of use that results in an increase in the total number of units, the gross floor area that changed to residential use or live-work units; or e. Any combination of the above. D R Table A for 23.58C.040 Payment calculation amounts: In Downtown, SM-SLU, and SM-U 85 zones Zone Payment calculation amount per square foot DH1/45 Not ((Applicable)) applicable DH2/55 Not ((Applicable)) applicable DH2/75 $12.75 DH2/85 Not ((Applicable)) applicable DMC 75 $12.75 DMC 85/75-170 $20.75 DMC 95 $12.75 DMC 145 $13.00 DMC 170 $5.50 DMC 240/290-440 $8.25 DMC 340/290-440 $8.25 DMR/C 75/75-95 $20.75 80 D R AF T Table A for 23.58C.040 Payment calculation amounts: In Downtown, SM-SLU, and SM-U 85 zones Zone Payment calculation amount per square foot DMR/C 75/75-170 $20.75 DMR/C 95/75 $12.75 DMR/C 145/75 $11.75 DMR/C 280/125 $13.00 DMR/R 95/65 $12.75 DMR/R 145/65 $11.75 DMR/R 280/65 $13.00 DOC1 U/450-U $12.00 DOC2 500/300-550 $10.25 DRC 85-170 $10.00 IDM-65-150 Not ((Applicable)) applicable IDM-75-85 Not ((Applicable)) applicable IDM 85/85-170 $20.75 IDM 165/85-170 $20.75 All IDR and IDR/C zones $20.75 PMM-85 Not ((Applicable)) applicable All PSM zones Not ((Applicable)) applicable SM-SLU 85/65-160 Not ((Applicable)) applicable SM-SLU 85-280 $10.00 SM-SLU 100/95 $7.50 SM-SLU 100/65-145 $7.75 SM-SLU 145 $7.75 SM-SLU 175/85-280 $10.00 SM-SLU 240/125-440 $10.00 SM-SLU/R 65/95 $12.75 ((SM-U 85 $13.25)) 81 Table B for 23.58C.040 Payment calculation amounts: Outside Downtown, SM-SLU, and SM-U 85 zones Payment calculation amount per square foot Zone Low Medium High Zones with an (M) suffix (([RESERVED])) $7.00 (([RESERVED])) $13.25 $20.75 Zones with an (M1) suffix (([RESERVED])) $11.25 $20.00 $29.75 Zones with an (M2) suffix (([RESERVED])) $12.50 (([RESERVED])) $22.25 $32.75 2. Automatic adjustments to payment amounts. On March 1 of every year, 2017, T and on the same day each year thereafter, the amounts for payment calculations according to Table A and Table B for 23.58C.040 shall automatically adjust in proportion to the annual AF increase change for the previous calendar year (January 1 through December 31) in the Consumer Price Index, All Urban Consumers, Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue Bremerton, WA, Shelter All Items (1982-84 = 100), as determined by the U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor *** D R Statistics, or successor index. 82 Amendment B2: Reporting requirements Councilmember Johnson & Councilmember O’Brien Background: Ordinance 125108, passed in August 2016, established the framework for mandatory housing affordability for residential development. Included in this legislation were reporting requirements intended to help Council make adjustments to the MHA program, ensuring that the program is meeting stated policy goals. T This amendment would extend the report date from July 1, 2019, for the Director of the Seattle Department of Construction and Inspections and the Director of Housing to provide Council with an assessment of program performance, as required by Ordinance 125108, which will allow the Executive to collect more data on how the program is performing prior to recommending any changes to payment amounts. Option 1 (Councilmember Johnson): This amendment would change the date to July 1, 2021. AF Option 2 (Councilmember O’Brien): This amendment would change the date to July 1, 2020. Notes: Double underlines indicate new language to be added. R Double strikethroughs indicate language proposed to be removed. D A dashed underline indicates that language that was proposed to be deleted that would be retained by this amendment. Amendments Option 1: Add Section _ to Council Bill 119444, as follows: Section _. Section 1.B.1 of Ordinance 125108, which established the framework for mandatory housing affordability for residential development, is amended to extend the July 1, 2019, program performance report date to July 1, 2021. In this report, the Director of the Seattle Department of Construction and Inspections and the Director of Housing should include an assessment of past and anticipated program performance, including an assessment of whether a 83 developer building outside of the Downtown and South Lake Union Urban Centers would be economically indifferent between performance and payment given market conditions at that time. If the Council determines that developers of projects, other than smaller projects and projects inside of the Downtown and South Lake Union Urban Centers, favor the payment option, the Council will consider raising payment amounts to avoid a bias towards payment, consistent with statutory authority. Units produced under the mandatory housing affordability program provided in Chapter 23.58C shall be measured as net new units. Existing rent- and Option 2: AF subtracted from the target production. T income-restricted affordable units demolished for development subject to the program are Add Section _ to Council Bill 119444, as follows: Section _. Section 1.B.1 of Ordinance 125108, which established the framework for R mandatory housing affordability for residential development, is amended to extend the July 1, 2019, program performance report date to July 1, 2020. In this report, the Director of the Seattle D Department of Construction and Inspections and the Director of Housing should include an assessment of past and anticipated program performance, including an assessment of whether a developer building outside of the Downtown and South Lake Union Urban Centers would be economically indifferent between performance and payment given market conditions at that time. If the Council determines that developers of projects, other than smaller projects and projects inside of the Downtown and South Lake Union Urban Centers, favor the payment option, the Council will consider raising payment amounts to avoid a bias towards payment, consistent with statutory authority. Units produced under the mandatory housing affordability program provided in Chapter 23.58C shall be measured as net new units. Existing rent- and 84 income-restricted affordable units demolished for development subject to the program are D R AF T subtracted from the target production. 85 Amendment B3: Council intent to adjust MHA payment requirements and high, medium, and low area boundaries based on current market conditions. Councilmember O’Brien Background: This amendment would modify the intent language in Ordinance 125108, which established the framework for implementing the Mandatory Housing Affordability program. The framework in Ordinance 125108 establishes an initial implementation phase and a postimplementation phase. The initial implementation phase involves establishing the MHA program in urban centers, urban villages, and multifamily and commercial zones outside those areas throughout the City by increasing development capacity. Notes: AF T This amendment would modify the intent language related to initial implementation to establish that the Council will consider modifying payment amounts and the boundaries of high, medium, and low areas by July 1, 2019 to reflect current more current market conditions. The proposed payment amounts and boundaries are based on market conditions at the time the proposal was initially developed. Double underlines indicate new language to be added. R Double strikethroughs indicate language proposed to be removed. D A dashed underline indicates that language that was proposed to be deleted that would be retained by this amendment. Amendments Add Section _ to Council Bill 119444, as follows: Section _. Section 2 of Ordinance 125108 is amended as follows: Section 2. The Council expresses the following intent as to implementation of Seattle Municipal Code Chapter 23.58C: A. Initial implementation *** 2. Setting initial payment and performance amounts 86 a. Payment and performance amounts are not included in Chapter 23.58C in this Council Bill 118736. Payment and performance amounts for particular zones will be added to Tables A and B for 23.58C.040 and Tables A and B for 23.58C.050 at the time development capacity is increased in those zones during the initial implementation phase according to subsection A.1 of this section. The Council intends to consider whether to include higher performance and payment amounts, subject to statutory limits, for those areas where the increase in development capacity would be likely to increase displacement risk. Factors to T consider are (a) areas that have been identified in Seattle 2035, Growth and Equity, Analyzing Impacts on Displacement and Opportunity Related to Seattle’s Growth Strategy, May 2016, as AF having a high displacement risk; (b) areas where the increment of increased development capacity is greater than the standard MHA-implementing zone change; and (c) areas where planning processes, including, but not limited to, the SEPA process for MHA-R implementation have identified affordable units at risk of demolition, the Council will consider whether to R implement additional or alternate MHA program measures to increase affordable units sufficient to offset the affordable units at risk of demolition as a result of the increase in development D capacity due to MHA. b. The Council recognizes that payment amounts set out in the ordinance introduced as Council Bill 119444 reflect market conditions, such as rents and capitalization rates, that existed at the time the initial proposal was developed. Since that time market conditions have changed. As part of the initial implementation phase, the Council intends to consider adjusting the payment amounts to reflect current market conditions through a bill separate from Council Bill 119444. The Council will consider changes to payment amounts through that separate bill no later than July 1, 2019. As part of that consideration the Council 87 will also consider whether to adjust the boundaries of high, medium, and low areas for MHA implementation based on changed market conditions. c ((b)). The Council recognizes that, after Chapter 23.58C is amended to include payment and performance amounts for particular zones, additional amendments to the payment and performance amounts provided in Chapter 23.58C for those zones may be needed during the initial implementation phase according to subsection A.1 of this section to further the target production level of no less than 6,000 affordable units for households with incomes no T higher than 60 percent of median income over a ten-year period described in the July 13, 2015, Statement of Intent for Basic Framework for Mandatory Inclusionary Housing and Commercial AF Linkage Fee. Such amendments could include changes to the payment and performance amounts in Tables A and B for 23.58C.040 and Tables A and B for 23.58C.050, and adding amounts for additional zones or portions of zones in connection with rezones of specific subareas such as portions of the University District. The Council intends that amendments during the initial R implementation phase be preceded by a robust stakeholder engagement process including representatives of the for-profit and non-profit development sectors who participated in the July D 13, 2015, Statement of Intent for Basic Framework for Mandatory Inclusionary Housing and Commercial Linkage Fee. *** 88 Amendment B4: Off-site Performance for Mandatory Housing Affordability-Residential Councilmember Herbold Background: This amendment would authorize off-site performance under the Mandatory Housing AffordabilityResidential (MHA-R) program. Off-site performance could be achieved by an applicant through a partnership with a non-profit affordable housing developer. Currently, under the MHA-R program off-site performance in partnership with another developer is not an option. However, to recognize that the developer of a non-residential building may not be able to perform, it is an option under the Mandatory Housing Affordability-Commercial (MHA-C) program. AF T To authorize off-site performance under the MHA-C program a developer must demonstrate to the Office of Housing Director that off-site performance will result in equal or better affordable housing outcomes. Off-site performance is required to occur within the same urban center or village or within a mile of a project, if the project is not located within an urban center or village. And, a developer choosing off-site performance has to provide a security equal to the in-lieu payment amount upon which the City can execute. The proposed amendment would allow off-site performance under the MHA-R program subject to the same conditions applicable to the MHA-C program. Notes: R Double underlines indicate new language to be added. Double strikethroughs indicate language proposed to be removed. D A dashed underline indicates that language that was proposed to be deleted that would be retained by this amendment. Amendments Amend Section 94 of Council Bill 119444, as follows: Section 98. Section 23.58C.050 of the Seattle Municipal Code, last amended by Ordinance 125432, is amended as follows: 23.58C.050 Affordable housing—performance option *** 89 C. Performance requirements. Units provided to comply with this Chapter 23.58C through the performance option shall meet the following requirements: *** 8. Additional performance standards. In addition to meeting the standards in this Section 23.58C.050, Units provided through the performance option that are located on a site other than the same lot as the development shall meet the following additional standards: a. Equal or better mitigation. The applicant shall demonstrate to the T satisfaction of the Director of Housing that affordable housing impact mitigation provided through the performance option on a site other than the same lot as the development required to AF mitigate affordable housing impacts according to this Chapter 23.58C is equal to or better than mitigation provided through performance on the same lot. b. Location. Units provided on a site other than the same lot as the R development required to mitigate affordable housing impacts according to this Chapter 23.58C shall be located: D 1) Within the same urban center or urban village as the development required to mitigate affordable housing impacts according to this Chapter 23.58C; or 2) Within one mile of the development required to mitigate affordable housing impacts according to this Chapter 23.58C if such development is located outside of an urban center or urban village. c. Developer’s agreement. If the owner of the development required to mitigate affordable housing impacts according to this Chapter 23.58C is not the owner of the 90 units provided through the performance option, then in addition to the agreement required according to subsection 23.58C.050.E, the owner of the development required to mitigate affordable housing impacts according to this Chapter 23.58C and the owner of the units provided through the performance option shall execute a developer’s agreement, acceptable to the Director of Housing, allowing the exclusive use of the units provided through the performance option to satisfy the requirements according to this Chapter 23.58C in return for necessary and adequate d. Letter of credit T financial support to the development of those units provided through the performance option. AF 1) If the units provided through the performance option are located on a site other than the same lot as the development required to mitigate affordable housing impacts according to this Chapter 23.58C, the owner of the development required to mitigate affordable housing impacts according to this Chapter 23.58C shall provide to the Director of R Housing an irrevocable bank letter of credit, approved by the Director of Housing, in the amount according to subsection 23.58C.040.A. D 2) The Director of Housing may draw on the letter of credit one year after the date of issuance of the certificate of occupancy, or, if a certificate of occupancy is not required, the final building permit inspection, for the development required to mitigate affordable housing impacts according to this Chapter 23.58C if the certificate of occupancy or final building permit inspection for the units provided through the performance option has not been issued on or before that date. The owner of the development required to mitigate affordable housing impacts according to this Chapter 23.58C shall also pay an amount equal to the interest on the cash contribution, at the rate equal to the prime rate quoted by Bank of America, or its successor, plus three percent per annum, from the date of issuance of the first building permit 91 that includes the structural frame for the development required to mitigate affordable housing impacts according to this Chapter 23.58C. 3) If and when the City becomes entitled to draw on any letter of credit, the Director of Housing may take appropriate steps to do so, and the amounts realized, net of any costs to the City, shall be used in the same manner as cash contributions according to subsection 23.58C.040.B. D R AF T *** 92 Amendment B5: Waive MHA requirements for Unreinforced Masonry (URM) buildings that add units in existing buildings if they retrofit their building and qualify for the 2030 Challenge pilot Councilmember Johnson Background: Unreinforced masonry buildings (URMs), are old brick buildings typically built prior to 1945. Because these buildings were not built using modern building codes, they are much more likely to experience damage or collapse during an earthquake. Seismically retrofitting a URM reduces this danger. The City is working to encourage the retrofitting of URMs meet public safety and environmental goals. T Under existing rules, alterations within an existing structure that result in an increase in the total number of units are subject to MHA requirements. While this provision can result in new affordable housing, it can also make retrofitting difficult, particularly for URM buildings that require extensive structural improvements. Notes: AF This amendment would waive MHA requirements for URM buildings that add units in existing buildings if they retrofit their building and qualify for the 2030 Challenge pilot by meeting certain energy efficiency goals. This amendment could help encourage property owners to retrofit their buildings. Under this amendment, MHA would still apply to new floor area that is added to the building. Double underlines indicate new language to be added. Double strikethroughs indicate language proposed to be removed. D R A dashed underline indicates that language that was proposed to be deleted that would be retained by this amendment. Amendments Amend Section 96 of Council Bill 119444, as follows: Section 96. Section 23.58C.025 of the Seattle Municipal Code, last amended by Ordinance 125291, is amended as follows: 23.58C.025 Applicability and general requirements *** C. Development is exempt from the requirements of this Chapter 23.58C if: 93 1. It ((it)) receives public funding and/or an allocation of federal low-income housing tax credits, and is subject to a regulatory agreement, covenant, or other legal instrument recorded on the property title and enforceable by The City of Seattle, Washington State Housing Finance Commission, State of Washington, King County, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, or other similar entity as approved by the Director of Housing, (1) which restricts at least 40 percent of the residential units to occupancy by households earning no greater than 60 percent of median income, and controls the rents that may be charged, for a minimum T period of 40 years, or (2) which restricts at least 40 percent of the residential units to be sold to households earning no greater than 80 percent of median income, for a minimum period of 50 AF years. The sale price for sales subsequent to the initial sale shall be calculated to allow modest growth in homeowner equity while maintaining long-term affordability for future buyers. All buyers of such an ownership unit subsequent to the initial sale shall be households with incomes no greater than 80 percent of median income at initial occupancy; or R 2. Floor area within an existing structure that results in an increase in the total number of units if the following conditions are met: D a. The existing structure has unreinforced masonry bearing walls and is included in the list of unreinforced masonry structures (URMs) identified by the Department in April 2016, or any subsequent list pursuant to subsection 23.48.630.B. with a classification of Critical Risk (C), High Risk (H), or Medium Risk (M); and b. the development that results in an increase in the total number of units would also result in the following: 1) The structure would be rehabilitated to comply with rules adopted by the Director governing the seismic retrofitting of vulnerable masonry structures; and 94 2) The project qualifies for the 2030 Challenge High Performance Existing Building Pilot Program. D R AF T *** 95 Amendment B6: Intent language regarding future actions if MHA is determined to be unlawful. Councilmember Herbold Background: This amendment would add a new section to CB 119444 expressing Council’s intent to take steps, if the imposition of requirements under MHA are determined to be unlawful, to prevent the continuance of the new zoning and increased development capacity in the absence of substantial affordable housing requirements. Notes: Double underlines indicate new language to be added. Double strikethroughs indicate language proposed to be removed. T A dashed underline indicates that language that was proposed to be deleted that would be retained by this amendment. Amendments AF Amend to Council Bill 119444 to add a new Section, as follows: Section ##. The City Council expresses the following intent as to future actions related to this ordinance. The Council is enacting the rezones effected by Section 1 of this ordinance based on an expectation that those rezones are accompanied by requirements to provide a substantial R amount of affordable housing. If the imposition of requirements under Chapter 23.58C of the Seattle Municipal Code as contemplated by this ordinance is determined to be unlawful, it is the D Council’s intent to (1) implement an alternative approach, in connection with some or all of the development capacity provided by the rezones effected by Section 1 of this ordinance, resulting in provision of a substantial amount of affordable housing; (2) take steps to prevent the continuance of the new zoning and increased development capacity in the absence of substantial affordable housing requirements by repealing the rezones effected by Section 1 of this ordinance; and/or (3) take other actions, including a moratorium on some or all development while an alternative approach is implemented. 96 Amendment C1: Rezone criteria and transit service Chair Johnson Background: The City uses the criteria included in Chapter 23.34 to determine which zoning category is appropriate for a particular location. Under CB 119444, new criteria are proposed for the RSL district, and other zoning criteria are proposed to be updated. Some of these criteria use inconsistent language to describe similar circumstances. One clear example is transit service. The rezone criteria use a number of different phrases to discuss how transit service should be used to determine whether a particular zone is appropriate for an area. For example, the Neighborhood Commercial 3 zone is appropriate in areas with “excellent transit service.” Highrise zones are appropriate in areas where “transit service is good to excellent.” T In 2018, the Council adopted a new definition of “frequent transit service” that relies on data from King County Metro regarding frequency of transit service. An area is determined to have frequent transit service if it is within walking distance of a stop served by a rail transit facility or a stop that serves a bus route with weekday service at least every 15 minutes. Notes: AF This amendment would use the definition of frequent transit service in the Residential Small Lot (RSL), High Rise Residential, and Neighborhood Commercial 3 zone criteria to identify areas where certain zones are appropriate. R Double underlines indicate new language to be added. Double strikethroughs indicate language proposed to be removed. D A dashed underline indicates that language that was proposed to be deleted that would be retained by this amendment. Amendments Amend Section 7 of Council Bill 119444 as follows: Section 7. Section 23.34.012 of the Seattle Municipal Code, enacted by Ordinance 117430, is amended as follows: 23.34.012 Residential Small Lot (RSL) zone, function and locational criteria((.)) A. Function. An area within an urban village that provides for the development of homes on small lots that may be appropriate and affordable to households with children and other households which might otherwise choose existing detached houses on larger lots. 97 B. Locational ((Criteria)) criteria. An RSL zone ((shall be appropriate only under circumstances as provided in Section 23.34.010 B.)) is most appropriate in areas generally characterized by the following: 1. The area is similar in character to single-family zones; 2. The area is located inside an urban center, urban village, or Station Area Overlay District where it would provide opportunities for a diversity of housing types within these denser environments; T 3. The area is characterized by, or appropriate for, a mix of single-family dwelling units, multifamily structures that are similar in scale to single-family dwelling units, such as AF duplex, triplex, rowhouse, and townhouse developments, and single-family dwelling units that have been converted to multifamily residential use or are well-suited to conversion; 4. The area is characterized by local access and circulation that can accommodate low density development oriented to the ground level and the street, and/or by narrow roadways, R lack of alleys, and/or irregular street patterns that make local access and circulation less suitable for higher density multifamily development; D 5. The area is within a reasonable distance of frequency frequent transit service, but is not close enough to make higher density multifamily development more appropriate. 6. The area would provide a gradual transition between single-family zoned areas and multifamily or neighborhood commercial zoned areas; and 7. The area is supported by existing or projected facilities and services used by residents, including retail sales and services, parks, and community centers. 98 Add a new section to Council Bill 119444 to amend Section 23.34.028 to update the rezone criteria for the Highrise zone as follows: Section _. Section 23.34.028 of the Seattle Municipal Code, last amended by Ordinance 123209, is amended as follows: 23.34.028 - Highrise (HR) zone, function and locational criteria. A. Function. An area that provides a concentration of high density multifamily housing in a pedestrian-oriented neighborhood with convenient access to regional transit stations, and where the mix of activity provides convenient access to a full range of residential services and amenities and employment centers. B. Locational Criteria. Threshold Conditions. Subject to subsection 23.34.028.B.2 of this section, properties that may be considered for a Highrise designation are limited to the following: a. Properties already zoned Highrise; T 1. AF b. Properties in areas already developed predominantly to the intensity permitted by the Highrise zone; or c. Properties within an urban center or urban village, where a neighborhood plan adopted or amended by the City Council after January 1, 1995 indicates that the area is appropriate for a Highrise zone designation. D R 2. Environmentally Critical Areas. Except as stated in this subsection 23.34.028.B.2, properties designated as environmentally critical may not be rezoned to a Highrise designation, and may remain Highrise only in areas predominantly developed to the intensity of the Highrise zone. The preceding sentence does not apply if the environmentally critical area either 1) was created by human activity, or 2) is a designated peat settlement, liquefaction, seismic or volcanic hazard, or flood prone area, or abandoned landfill. 3. Other Criteria. The Highrise zone designation is most appropriate in areas generally characterized by the following: a. Properties in areas that are served by arterials where transit service is good to excellent and with frequent transit service and where street capacity is sufficient to accommodate traffic generated by highrise development; b. Properties in areas that are adjacent to a concentration of residential services or a major employment center; c. Properties in areas that have excellent pedestrian or transit access to downtown; d. Properties in areas that have close proximity to open space, parks and recreational facilities; 99 e. Properties in areas where no uniform scale of structures establishes the character and where highrise development would create a point and help define the character; f. Properties in flat areas on the tops of hills or in lowland areas away from hills, where views would not be blocked by highrise structures; g. Properties in sloping areas with views oblique or parallel to the slope where the height and bulk of existing buildings have already limited or blocked views from within the multifamily area and upland areas where the hillform has already been obscured by development. Add a new section to Council Bill 119444 to amend Section 23.34.078 to update the rezone criteria for the Neighborhood Commercial 3 zone as follows: T Section _. Section 23.34.078 of the Seattle Municipal Code, last amended by Ordinance 123209, is amended as follows: Function. To support or encourage a pedestrian-oriented shopping district that serves the surrounding neighborhood and a larger community, citywide, or regional clientele; that provides comparison shopping for a wide range of retail goods and services; that incorporates offices, business support services, and residences that are compatible with the retail character of the area; and where the following characteristics can be achieved: A variety of sizes and types of retail and other commercial businesses at street level; 2. Continuous storefronts or residences built to the front lot line; 3. Intense pedestrian activity; 4. Shoppers can drive to the area, but walk around from store to store; 5. Transit is an important means of access. R 1. D A. AF 23.34.078 - Neighborhood Commercial 3 (NC3) zones, function and locational criteria. B. Locational Criteria. A Neighborhood Commercial 3 zone designation is most appropriate on land that is generally characterized by the following conditions: 1. The primary business district in an urban center or hub urban village; 2. Served by principal arterial; 3. Separated from low-density residential areas by physical edges, less-intense commercial areas or more-intense residential areas; 4. Excellent Frequent transit service. 100 Amendment D1: Fremont Neighborhood Plan Policy F-P13 Councilmember O’Brien Background: Seattle’s Comprehensive Plan includes neighborhood plan goals and policies that help to guide City action in relation to its urban villages. Many of these goals and policies date back to a neighborhood planning process from the late 1990s. Others have been updated through other planning processes. The Fremont neighborhood plan uniquely includes a policy (F-P13) that seeks to guide development in an adjacent urban village – Wallingford. F-P13 states: T F-P13 In the area where the Wallingford Urban Village end the Fremont Planning Area overlap (the area bounded by Stone Way on the east, N. 45th Street on the north, Aurora Avenue North on the west and N. 40th Street on the south) maintain the character and integrity of the existing single-family zoned areas by maintaining current single-family zoning on properties meeting the locational criteria for single-family zones. This duplicates the policy guidance provided by Wallingford policy W-P1 which states: Protect the character and integrity of Wallingford single-family areas. AF W-P1 R Alongside legislation to amend the land use code and rezone areas to implement the Mandatory Housing Affordability citywide, the City Council is considering a Bill (CB 119443) that would amend the Comprehensive Plan to expand the boundaries of urban villages and to update neighborhood plan goals and policies to reflect a citywide interest in supporting opportunities for affordable housing throughout urban villages. Amendments to the text of neighborhood plan goals and policies would shift the emphasis of the policies to supporting the physical character of lower-density areas, rather than the single-family use of areas in the urban village. D CB 119443 proposes to amend policies F-P13 and W-P1. In the edits to F-P13, reference to the area within the Wallingford urban village is proposed to be deleted, thereby refocusing the policy to areas in Fremont. However, the Fremont urban village does not include any single-family areas, which means that the proposed new policy F-P13 would inaccurately represent the character of the Fremont urban village. This amendment, instead of amending policy F-P13, deletes it. Policies in the Wallingford Neighborhood Plan that discuss the character of the area between Stone Way and Aurora Avenue North between N 45th Street and N 40th Street, including policy W-P1 (with amendments similar to those proposed for FP13), would continue to provide guidance regarding the City’s intent for the character of this area. Notes: Double underlines indicate new language to be added. Double strikethroughs indicate language proposed to be removed. A dashed underline indicates that language that was proposed to be deleted that would be retained by this amendment. 101 Amendments Amend Attachment 2 of Council Bill 119443 to indicate that policy F-P13 should be deleted as follows: FREMONT *** COMMUNITY CHARACTER POLICIES *** F-P13 ((In the area where the Wallingford Urban Village and the Fremont Planning Area overlap (the area bounded by Stone Way on the east, N. 45th Street on the north, T Aurora Avenue North on the west, and N. 40th Street on the south) maintain)) Maintain the physical character ((and integrity)) of ((the existing single-family zoned)) AF historically lower-density areas of the urban village by ((maintaining current singlefamily zoning on properties meeting the locational criteria for single-family zones)) encouraging housing choices such as cottages, townhouses, and low-rise apartments. Encourage primarily residential uses in these areas while allowing for small scale R commercial and retail services for the urban village and surrounding area, generally at a lower scale than in hub urban villages and urban centers.)) [RESERVED] D *** 102 Amendment D2: Morgan Junction Neighborhood Plan Policies Councilmember Herbold Background: Seattle’s Comprehensive Plan includes neighborhood plan goals and policies that help to guide City action in relation to its urban villages. Many of these goals and policies date back to a neighborhood planning process from the late 1990s. Others have been updated through other planning processes. T Alongside legislation to implement the Mandatory Housing Affordability citywide, Council is considering CB 119443 that would amend the Comprehensive Plan to expand the boundaries of urban villages and to update neighborhood plan goals and policies to reflect a citywide interest in supporting opportunities for affordable housing throughout urban villages. Amendments to the text of neighborhood plan goals and policies would shift the emphasis of the policies to supporting the physical character of lowerdensity areas, rather than the single-family use of areas in the urban village. AF This amendment would change the existing policy MJ-P14 and the new policy MJ-P23.1 related to Morgan Junction Urban Village to better reflect community interests. Notes: Double underlines indicate new language to be added. Double strikethroughs indicate language proposed to be removed. R A dashed underline indicates that language that was proposed to be deleted that would be retained by this amendment. Amendments D Amend Attachment 2 of Council Bill 119443 to amend MJ-P14 and MJ-P23.1, as follows: Morgan Junction *** HOUSING AND LAND USE POLICIES *** MJ-P14 ((Ensure that use and development regulations are the same for single-family zones within the Morgan Junction Urban Village as those in corresponding singlefamily zones in the remainder of the Morgan Junction Planning Area.)) Provide for 103 Encourage a mix of housing stock with a special focus on including the retention of affordable, entry-level, family-sized, owner-occupied housing in the historically singlefamily housing areas of the urban village. *** MJ-P23.1 Use community engagement and neighborhood planning tools to identify solutions for land use and housing affordability issues when more than 25 percent of the urban village could be affected by proposed changes. Consider community planning T to address land use, housing and other issues if the growth rate in the urban village accelerates to become significantly higher than anticipated in the Comprehensive Plan. D R AF *** 104 Attachment 2: Proposed Map Amendments Attachment 2 provides tables summarizing proposed amendments for each Council district and a series of maps showing the potential amendments to the zoning, consistent with the alternatives studied in the FEIS. These maps indicate whether amendments to maps in the Comprehensive Plan would also be required. Readers Guide for the Map Amendments LR2 LR2 (M) LR2 LR1 (M) LR3 RC (M) Amendment # V U 1-1 LR3 RC SW CARROLL ST LR1 59TH AVE SW Current Zoning MHA-proposed zone designation in CB 119444 LR1 C BEA HD LR3 RC RS Amendment Area W LR3 RC LR2 (M) LR2 LR2 LR2 Address or Area of the subject amendment 1-1 Current Zoning Amendment Description From: LR3 RC Intersection of SW Carroll St and Beach Dr SW To: CB 119444 Amendment LR3 RC (M) LR3 RC (no rezone) Current Zoning Amendment Area Do not apply MHA to the Residential - Commercial node at the intersection of SW Carrol St and Beach Dr SW. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Required? No No warranties of any sort, including accuracy, fitness, or merchantability accompany this product. Copyright 2019. All Rights Reserved. City of Seattle, City Council. 02/06/2019. Data source: City of Seattle. Link to record for CB 119444: http://seattle.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=3840745&GUID=7E5F305E-10DA-41F3-AE5D-66E3CAEB81B1 MHA-proposed zone designation in CB 119444 Proposed amendment to CB 119444 Indicates if an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan bill (CB 119443)105 is required. S DEARBORN ST GO 1ST AVE S 21ST AVE SW DELRIDGE WAY SW 6TH AVE S 15TH AVE S AIRPORT WAY S 1ST AVE S S S HOLDEN ST 16TH AVE S S ND H LA HIG HOLDEN ST AY AL W ARG IN SW S 16TH AV S BR 8TH AVE S 1ST AVE S M YE 14TH AVE S OIN SM DE S 96TH ST IAL OR EM AY SW 100TH ST M ES RS W W MARINE VIE SW ROXBURY ST S TRENTON ST SW 1-11 S CLOVERDALE ST PL 45TH AV E V V U U OL SO N SW BARTON ST L 26TH AVE SW S DR DR 39TH AVE SW SW 107T H WAY SW 107TH ST Amendment Number Proposed MHA Zoning W LE SW 116TH ST DA S 112TH ST EN GL 1ST AVE S SW SW 106TH ST S 8TH AVE S DP SW OO S ON DER HEN PL SW DW SW N TO SW HENDERSON ST B AR L P 1-10 8TH AVE SW SW TRENTON ST 9TH AVE SW 16TH AVE SW S KENYON ST SW THISTLE ST PL TM WES AR DUM WAY SW SW HOLDEN ST 2ND AVE SW SW PARK WAY SW SW ORCH ARD ST SA RO LB ELLIS AVE S V AN 35TH AVE SW AY S LUCILE ST A EA CHIG ST S MI M AR GI NA LW AY SYL WAY SW W S LUCILE ST WAY FAUNTLEROY ND US TR IA L S MCCLELLAN ST S HUDSON ST SW MORGAN ST SW HOLDEN ST S SP OK AN E CR ST N ST 1-12 W IL SW DAWSON ST 2-3 CORS ON AV E 1-13 4TH AVE S 23RD AVE SW CALIFORNIA AVE SW WA Y W RS U V V U V U SW GRAHAM ST 1-8 14TH AVE S ALA EAST MARGINAL WAY S 16TH AVE SW 49TH AVE SW 1-5 1-6 E KIN E RS 48TH AVE SW 1-4 SI INAL WAY SW 1-3 VE DA 2 2N W S RD HD SE N OB 49TH AVE SW SW GENESEE ST VE DA 23R W S JA C C BEA SW U V V U V U V U S SPOKANE ST ARG ST M V U 1-2 SW SW WE SW ANDOVER ST V U S FOREST ST S SPOK ANE ST E AV ST BR ON SW SPOK SW ANE ST SW SPOKANE S HOLGATE BR AC SW SPOKANE ST SW CHARLESTOWN ST 55TH AVE SW ST BE SW HANFORD ST SW GENESEE ST 12TH AVE S AIRPORT WAY S AY S NW SKA SW W ES 63RD AVE SW S HOLGATE ST AV AL KI A OR VE RB V U 1-1 S HA FLOR IDA SW SW ADMIRAL WAY SW ORLEA NS ST DR S ATLANTIC ST LF AY S Potential Amendments to Proposed MHA Zoning in Council District: 1 Amendment Area Residential Small Lot (RSL) Midrise (MR) Highrise (HR) Neighborhood Commercial (NC) ¯ No warranties of any sort, including accuracy, fitness, or merchantability accompany this product. Copyright 2019. All Rights Reserved. City of Seattle, City Council. 02/06/2019 data source: City of Seattle Commercial (C) Lowrise (LR) Seattle Mized (SM) 106 District 1: Proposed Map Amendments Zoning Proposed in CB 119444 Proposed Amendment Amendemnt Description Requires Amendment to the Comp Plan? Intersection of SW Carroll St and LR3 RC Beach Dr SW LR3 RC (M) LR3 RC (no rezone) Do not apply MHA to the Residential - Commercial node at the intersection of SW Carrol St and Beach Dr SW. No 1-2 Single-family zones within the West Seattle Junction Residential SF 5000 Urban Village LR1 (M1) RSL (M) Reduce all proposed rezones from Single Family within the West Seattle Junction Urban Village to Residential Small Lot. No 1-3 Single-family zones within the West Seattle Junction Residential SF 5000 Urban Village LR2 (M1) RSL (M) Reduce all proposed rezones from Single Family within the West Seattle Junction Urban Village to Residential Small Lot. No 1-4 Single-family zones within the West Seattle Junction Residential SF 5000 Urban Village LR1 (M1) RSL (M) Reduce all proposed rezones from Single Family within the West Seattle Junction Urban Village to Residential Small Lot. No 1-5 Single-family zones within the West Seattle Junction Residential SF 5000 Urban Village LR2 (M2) RSL (M) Reduce all proposed rezones from Single Family within the West Seattle Junction Urban Village to Residential Small Lot. No 1-6 Single-family zones within the West Seattle Junction Residential SF 5000 Urban Village LR1 (M1) RSL (M) Reduce all proposed rezones from Single Family within the West Seattle Junction Urban Village to Residential Small Lot. No 1-8 Area west of Fauntleroy, south of SF 5000 SW Graham Street LR3 (M2) LR2 (M1) Reduce the proposed zone designation in the Morgan Junction Urban Village south of S Graham Street and northwest of Fauntleroy Way SW to No a less intense Lowrise multifamily zone designation. 1-10 Area bounded by SW Barton, Barton Pl SW and 21st Ave S LR1 (M1) RSL (M) Reduce the proposed zone designation in the Morgan Junction Urban Village south of S Graham Street and northwest of Fauntleroy Way SW to No a less intense Lowrise multifamily zone designation. 1-11 26th Ave SW between SW Barton various SF & SW Roxbury ST LR1 (M1) RSL (M) Reduce the proposed zone designation within the Westwood-Highland Park Urban Village along 26th Av S from Lowrise multifamily to Residential No Small Lot. Current zoning is SF 5000 or SF 7200. 1-12 California Ave SW between SW Holly & SW Graham NC3-30 NC3P-55 (M) NC3-55 (M) Remove the Pedestrian (P) Zone designation in Morgan Junction Urban Village. No 1-13 California Ave SW between SW Graham & SW Raymond NC2-30 NC2P-40 (M) NC2-40 (M) Remove the Pedestrian (P) Zone designation in Morgan Junction Urban Village. No Map Amendment # Address / Area Description 1-1 Current Zoning SF 7200 107 LR2 (M) LR2 59TH AVE SW LR2 LR1 (M) LR3 RC (M) 1-1 LR3 RC C BEA V U SW CARROLL ST LR1 LR1 HD LR3 RC RS W LR3 RC LR2 LR2 (M) LR2 LR2 1-1 From: LR3 RC Intersection of SW Carroll St and Beach Dr SW To: CB 119444 Amendment LR3 RC (M) LR3 RC (no rezone) Current Zoning Amendment Area Do not apply MHA to the Residential - Commercial node at the intersection of SW Carrol St and Beach Dr SW. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Required? No No warranties of any sort, including accuracy, fitness, or merchantability accompany this product. Copyright 2019. All Rights Reserved. City of Seattle, City Council. 02/06/2019. Data source: City of Seattle. Link to record for CB 119444: http://seattle.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=3840745&GUID=7E5F305E-10DA-41F3-AE5D-66E3CAEB81B1 108 33RD AVE SW AVE SW EA TT FAUN TLE LE RO BR YW W AY B S SF 5000 S E TL T EA BR EB LR1 (M1) U V 1-2 RSL (M) NC3-65 SW G E NE SEE ST NC3-65 From: SF 5000 ST MR (M) 31ST AVE SW NC3-75 (M) 1-2 R C1-40 SW AVA LO NW AY TS W ES T ES W DO VE MR 32N D A T 35TH AVE SW D SW S TA KO AN C1-55 (M) W 34TH AVE SW SW AND OVER S T SW SF 5000 Single-family zones within the West Seattle Junction Residential Urban Village To: CB 119444 Amendment LR1 (M1) RSL (M) Current Zoning Amendment Area Reduce all proposed rezones from Single Family within the West Seattle Junction Urban Village to Residential Small Lot. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Required? No No warranties of any sort, including accuracy, fitness, or merchantability accompany this product. Copyright 2019. All Rights Reserved. City of Seattle, City Council. 02/06/2019. Data source: City of Seattle. Link to record for CB 119444: http://seattle.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=3840745&GUID=7E5F305E-10DA-41F3-AE5D-66E3CAEB81B1 109 41ST AVE SW SF 5000 LR2 RSL (M) LR3 LR3 (M) U V 38TH AVE SW LR2 LR2 (M1) LR2 (M) 1-3 From: SF 5000 NC3-65 LR3 (M) LR3 LR2 LR2 (M) SW OREGON ST SW OREGON ST NC3-75 (M) FA U NT LE RO Y W AY SW 39TH AVE SW LR2 LR2 (M) NC3P-65 NC3-65 NC3-65 LR3 LR3 (M) 37TH AVE SW 1-3 40TH AVE SW 41ST AVE SW SW GENESEE ST NC3P-65 NC3P-85 (4.75) NC3P-75 (M) NC3P-95 (M) NC3P-75 (M) Single-family zones within the West Seattle Junction Residential Urban Village To: CB 119444 Amendment LR2 (M1) RSL (M) NC3P-65 Current Zoning Amendment Area Reduce all proposed rezones from Single Family within the West Seattle Junction Urban Village to Residential Small Lot. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Required? No No warranties of any sort, including accuracy, fitness, or merchantability accompany this product. Copyright 2019. All Rights Reserved. City of Seattle, City Council. 02/06/2019. Data source: City of Seattle. Link to record for CB 119444: http://seattle.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=3840745&GUID=7E5F305E-10DA-41F3-AE5D-66E3CAEB81B1 110 NC3P-85 (4.75) NC3-55 (M) NC3P-55 (M) NC3-40 NC3-55 (M) 36TH AVE SW NC3-40 LR2 (M) U V 1-4 LR2 38TH AVE SW 37TH AVE SW 38TH AVE SW NC3-95 (M) LR3 (M) LR1 (M1) SW EDMUNDS ST 35TH AVE SW NC3-85 NC3P-40 NC3P-65 LR3 (M) LR3 LR3 LR1 1-4 From: SF 5000 SF 5000 SW HUDSON ST 36TH AVE SW LR1 (M) Single-family zones within the West Seattle Junction Residential Urban Village To: CB 119444 Amendment LR1 (M1) RSL (M) Current Zoning Amendment Area Reduce all proposed rezones from Single Family within the West Seattle Junction Urban Village to Residential Small Lot. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Required? No No warranties of any sort, including accuracy, fitness, or merchantability accompany this product. Copyright 2019. All Rights Reserved. City of Seattle, City Council. 02/06/2019. Data source: City of Seattle. Link to record for CB 119444: http://seattle.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=3840745&GUID=7E5F305E-10DA-41F3-AE5D-66E3CAEB81B1 111 NC3-95 (M) NC3-75 (M) NC3-85 NC3P-85 NC3P-95 (M) NC3-65 NC3-65 NC3P-75 (M) NC3P-65 SW EDMUNDS ST LR2 NC3-55 (M) NC3-40 NC3-85 (4.75) NC3-65 NC3-75 (M) NC3-85 (4.75) NC3-95 (M) LR2 (M) NC3-40 NC2-75 (M) LR2 (M1) LR2 40TH AVE SW 42ND AVE SW 41ST AVE SW NC3-55 (M) U V 1-5 LR2 SF 5000 NC2-65 LR2 (M) SW HUDSON ST SW HUDSON ST LR1 (M1) 1-5 From: SF 5000 Single-family zones within the West Seattle Junction Residential Urban Village To: CB 119444 Amendment LR2 (M2) RSL (M) Current Zoning Amendment Area Reduce all proposed rezones from Single Family within the West Seattle Junction Urban Village to Residential Small Lot. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Required? No No warranties of any sort, including accuracy, fitness, or merchantability accompany this product. Copyright 2019. All Rights Reserved. City of Seattle, City Council. 02/06/2019. Data source: City of Seattle. Link to record for CB 119444: http://seattle.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=3840745&GUID=7E5F305E-10DA-41F3-AE5D-66E3CAEB81B1 112 LR2 LR3 LR2 (M1) LR2 (M) SW HUDSON ST LR1 (M1) 41ST AVE SW SF 5000 NC2-65 U V 1-6 40TH AVE SW SW HUDSON ST 42ND AVE SW NC2-75 (M) LR3 (M) LR1 SW DAWSON ST NC2-30 NC2-40 (M) 1-6 From: SF 5000 LR1 (M) Single-family zones within the West Seattle Junction Residential Urban Village To: CB 119444 Amendment LR1 (M1) RSL (M) Current Zoning Amendment Area Reduce all proposed rezones from Single Family within the West Seattle Junction Urban Village to Residential Small Lot. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Required? No No warranties of any sort, including accuracy, fitness, or merchantability accompany this product. Copyright 2019. All Rights Reserved. City of Seattle, City Council. 02/06/2019. Data source: City of Seattle. Link to record for CB 119444: http://seattle.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=3840745&GUID=7E5F305E-10DA-41F3-AE5D-66E3CAEB81B1 113 LR1 (M1) LR1 SW GRAHAM ST LR1 (M) U V 1-8 LR3 LR2 (M) LR2 SF 5000 LR3 (M2) RSL (M) SW W AY NC3-40 (M) 40TH AVE SW Y O TL ER N FA U 41ST AVE SW LR3 (M) LR1 (M1) NC3-30 1-8 From: SF 5000 Area west of Fauntleroy, south of SW Graham Street To: CB 119444 Amendment LR3 (M2) LR2 (M1) Current Zoning Amendment Area Reduce the proposed zone designation in the Morgan Junction Urban Village south of S Graham Street and northwest of Fauntleroy Way SW to a less intense Lowrise multifamily zone designation. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Required? No No warranties of any sort, including accuracy, fitness, or merchantability accompany this product. Copyright 2019. All Rights Reserved. City of Seattle, City Council. 02/06/2019. Data source: City of Seattle. Link to record for CB 119444: http://seattle.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=3840745&GUID=7E5F305E-10DA-41F3-AE5D-66E3CAEB81B1 114 22ND AVE SW LR2 RSL (M) LR2 (M) SF 5000 RSL (M) SW HENDERSON ST SW HENDERSON ST LR2 (M1) PL YS WA GE ID AVE SW 22N D W 21ST AVE SW N O T R BA NC3-55 (M) LR DE SW C1-40 LR1 (M1) LR3 (M) V U 1-10 LR3 SF 7200 1-10 From: SF 7200 RSL (M) KELSEY LN SW 22ND AVE SW SW BARTON ST SF 5000 LR3 LR3 (M) Area bounded by SW Barton, Barton Pl SW and 21st Ave S To: CB 119444 Amendment LR1 (M1) RSL (M) Current Zoning Amendment Area Reduce the proposed zone designation in the Morgan Junction Urban Village south of S Graham Street and northwest of Fauntleroy Way SW to a less intense Lowrise multifamily zone designation. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Required? No No warranties of any sort, including accuracy, fitness, or merchantability accompany this product. Copyright 2019. All Rights Reserved. City of Seattle, City Council. 02/06/2019. Data source: City of Seattle. Link to record for CB 119444: http://seattle.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=3840745&GUID=7E5F305E-10DA-41F3-AE5D-66E3CAEB81B1 115 24 AV TH ES W SW BARTON ST LR3 NC3-75 (M1) C1-40 SF 7200 LR3 (M) SF 7200 SF 5000 SF 7200 V U 1-11 LR3 (M) 25TH AVE SW 26TH AVE SW LR3 RSL (M) MR (M) 24TH AVE SW LR1 (M1) LR2 LR2 (M) 23RD AVE SW MR 27TH AVE SW SW CAMBRIDGE ST NC2-65 NC2-75 (M) SW ROXBURY ST 1-11 From: various SF 26th Ave SW between SW Barton & SW Roxbury ST To: CB 119444 Amendment LR1 (M1) RSL (M) Current Zoning Amendment Area Reduce the proposed zone designation within the Westwood-Highland Park Urban Village along 26th Av S from Lowrise multifamily to Residential Small Lot. Current zoning is SF 5000 or SF 7200. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Required? No No warranties of any sort, including accuracy, fitness, or merchantability accompany this product. Copyright 2019. All Rights Reserved. City of Seattle, City Council. 02/06/2019. Data source: City of Seattle. Link to record for CB 119444: http://seattle.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=3840745&GUID=7E5F305E-10DA-41F3-AE5D-66E3CAEB81B1 116 NC2P-40 (M) SW D ED RSL (M) SW E RIDG BEVE LR1 (M1) RSL (M) T LR1 (M1) SW GRAHAM ST LR3 LR3 (M) NC3-30 NC3-40 (M) PL V U 1-12 Y O R E TL SW N U AY FA W LR1 (M1) SW MORGAN ST NC3-55 (M1) 44TH AVE SW FAUNTLEROY WAY SW YS CALIFORNIA AVE SW 45TH AVE SW 44TH AVE SW NC2-30 41ST AVE SW RSL (M) 42ND AVE SW SF 5000 NC2-40 NC2-30 (M) LR2 (M1) NC3P-55 (M1) LR1 (M1) LR2 SF 5000 LR2 (M) LR2 SW HOLLY ST LR2 RSL (M) LR3 (M) California Ave SW between SW Holly & SW Graham LR2 (M) 1-12 From: NC3-30 LR3 To: CB 119444 Amendment NC3P-55 (M) NC3-55 (M) Current Zoning Amendment Area Remove the Pedestrian (P) Zone designation in Morgan Junction Urban Village. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Required? No No warranties of any sort, including accuracy, fitness, or merchantability accompany this product. Copyright 2019. All Rights Reserved. City of Seattle, City Council. 02/06/2019. Data source: City of Seattle. Link to record for CB 119444: http://seattle.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=3840745&GUID=7E5F305E-10DA-41F3-AE5D-66E3CAEB81B1 117 LR3 RC LR3 RC (M) SW RAYMOND ST NC2P-40 (M) RSL (M) LR1 (M1) RSL (M) V U 44TH AVE SW 1-13 CALIFORNIA AVE SW 42ND AVE SW NC2-30 NC3-30 SF 5000 NC2-30 SW GRAHAM ST LR3 LR3 (M) NC3P-55 (M1) 1-13 From: SF 5000 California Ave SW between SW Graham & SW Raymond To: CB 119444 Amendment NC2P-40 (M) NC2-40 (M) Current Zoning Amendment Area Remove the Pedestrian (P) Zone designation in Morgan Junction Urban Village. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Required? No No warranties of any sort, including accuracy, fitness, or merchantability accompany this product. Copyright 2019. All Rights Reserved. City of Seattle, City Council. 02/06/2019. Data source: City of Seattle. Link to record for CB 119444: http://seattle.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=3840745&GUID=7E5F305E-10DA-41F3-AE5D-66E3CAEB81B1 118 S DEARBORN ST U VV U V U 2-3 38TH AVE S WR AV TR IAL WA Y S N GE EE ES Y BIA N WA LU M S GENESEE ST ES S CO S 50TH AVE S 15TH AVE S 4TH AVE S 2-1b 2-4 2-1a N BEACO 1ST AVE S S MCCLELLAN ST AVE S ON AC EAST MARGINAL WAY S 2-1c LV D ON B IN G T ASH E W L AK U V V V U VU U BE S FOREST ST SI ND US 3-15 3-16 36TH AVE S S HOLGATE BR DR S S HOLGATE ST 6TH AVE S ST SW FLORID A S JUDKI NS ST 14TH AVE S 1ST AVE S ALA SKA NW AY S S ATLANTIC ST F S S ROYAL BROUGH AM W A Y DR 12TH AVE S GO L LAK E PA RK S 31ST AVE S VD 23RD AVE S BL 20TH AVE S LE 17TH AVE S TT 3-14 LAKESIDE AVE S SE A V U S JACKSON ST M L KING JR W AY S 5TH AVE S 6TH AVE S S KING ST S K IN FR PL ALASKAN WAY S E YESLER WAY S ALASKA ST Y WA S HUDSON ST S CORS ON AV E ELLIS AVE S NB AV S 1 ST ES D G IN AL S OTHELLO ST S BR 16TH AV 2-9 GI NA L S AY 14TH AVE S S S HENDERSON ST AV E S WI L A IN S BANGOR ST CORNELL T UK BE AC IN TE RU RB ON AV ES AN TH AVE S AY S AV E TUKWILA INTL BLVD W LE Y RD S MEMORIAL DR S MILITAR TL B LV D S INE DA EN GL S E AV 51ST AVE S T MO 8TH AVE S LK S S ROXBURY ST S VE R FO L SA ER AT S S NO EP ON NT RE AY RS W DE S L AL W M YE S 96TH ST S 112TH ST SC RD 74 SO N D ER H E N PL SW DR S S CLOVERDALE ST C AR K EEK S TRENTO N ST E OV 57TH AVE S 8TH AVE S AR W 1ST AVE S M RD MILITARY ST 64TH AVE S YS S CLOVERDALE ST V U S WEBSTER S T 62ND AVE S WA EA S HOLDEN ST 1ST AVE S VE AVE S RAINIER AY S HLA N KA AV JR W AV S M AR HIG PA R KING AY IFT W W ES T 2ND AVE SW 9TH AVE SW A RD S ML S GRAHAM ST S MYRTLE ST SW HENDERSO N ST SW 116TH ST S N A VE BEACO ES P SW FR T OR RP AI AY SW OF S EW W ARGINAL S BAILEY ST S KENYON ST SW ROXBURY ST ON I LS W S ORCAS ST PARK WAY SW SW HOLDEN ST S DAWSO N ST S LUCILE ST 6TH AVE S W ES T M S LUCILE ST S Potential Amendments to Proposed MHA Zoning in Council District: 2 Amendment Number Amendment Area Proposed MHA Zoning Residential Small Lot (RSL) Midrise (MR) Highrise (HR) Neighborhood Commercial (NC) ¯ No warranties of any sort, including accuracy, fitness, or merchantability accompany this product. Copyright 2019. All Rights Reserved. City of Seattle, City Council. 02/06/2019 data source: City of Seattle Commercial (C) Lowrise (LR) Seattle Mized (SM) 119 District 2: Proposed Map Amendments Zoning Proposed in CB 119444 Proposed Amendment North Rainier Urban Village - Mt LR2 Baker Park Historic District LR2 (M) LR2 (no rezone) 2-1b North Rainier Urban Village - Mt SF 5000 Baker Park Historic District RSL (M) SF 5000 (no rezone) 2-1c North Rainier Urban Village - Mt SF 5000 Baker Park Historic District RSL (M) SF 5000 (no rezone) 2-3 North Beacon Hill - Beacon Ave S various NC NC1 AND NC2 NC1P AND NC2P Map Amendment # Address / Area Description 2-1a Current Zoning 2-4 Area SW of S Mt Baker & MLK LR3 RC 2-9 Block face east of Othello Park on SF 5000 S 45th Street Amendemnt Description Remove areas within the Mount Baker Park Historic District from the North Rainier Urban Village expansion area, maintain existing zone designations, and do not apply MHA. Remove areas within the Mount Baker Park Historic District from the North Rainier Urban Village expansion area, maintain existing zone designations, and do not apply MHA. Remove areas within the Mount Baker Park Historic District from the North Rainier Urban Village expansion area, maintain existing zone designations, and do not apply MHA. Extend the Pedestrian designation to the full extent of the Neighborhood Commercial zones fronting on Beacon Av S and 15th Av S within the North Beacon Hill Urban Village. Requires Amendment to the Comp Plan? No No Yes No SM-95 (M1) NC3-55 (M) Reduce the proposed zoning within the North Rainier UV in the area southwest of the intersection of MLK Jr Way S and S Mt Baker Blvd from Seattle Mixed commercial with a 95' height limit to a commercial zone designation with a 40' or 55' height limit. RSL (M) LR1 (M1) Increase the proposed zone designation from Residential Small Lot to Lowrise 1 multifamily in the area to the east and south of Othello Park in No the Othello Urban Village. No 120 S MOUNT BAKE R BLVD SF 5000 LR2 RC (M) 30TH AVE S S HANFO RD S T V U 2-1a LR2 RC LR2 LR2 (M) RSL (M) E OR TM WE VE S A 2-1a From: LR2 North Rainier Urban Village - Mt Baker Park Historic District To: CB 119444 Amendment LR2 (M) LR2 (no rezone) Current Zoning Amendment Area Remove areas within the Mount Baker Park Historic District from the North Rainier Urban Village expansion area, maintain existing zone designations, and do not apply MHA. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Required? No No warranties of any sort, including accuracy, fitness, or merchantability accompany this product. Copyright 2019. All Rights Reserved. City of Seattle, City Council. 02/06/2019. Data source: City of Seattle. Link to record for CB 119444: http://seattle.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=3840745&GUID=7E5F305E-10DA-41F3-AE5D-66E3CAEB81B1 121 SH AN F OR D ST SF 5000 V U 2-1b C MC RSL (M) E AV LR2 CK TO LIN LR2 (M) S LR2 RC (M) LR2 RC 2-1b From: SF 5000 North Rainier Urban Village - Mt Baker Park Historic District To: CB 119444 Amendment RSL (M) SF 5000 (no rezone) Current Zoning Amendment Area Remove areas within the Mount Baker Park Historic District from the North Rainier Urban Village expansion area, maintain existing zone designations, and do not apply MHA. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Required? No No warranties of any sort, including accuracy, fitness, or merchantability accompany this product. Copyright 2019. All Rights Reserved. City of Seattle, City Council. 02/06/2019. Data source: City of Seattle. Link to record for CB 119444: http://seattle.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=3840745&GUID=7E5F305E-10DA-41F3-AE5D-66E3CAEB81B1 122 29TH AVE S SM-NR 85 LR1 (M1) 30TH AVE S NC1-40 S MCCLELLAN ST NC1-55 (M) SF 5000 ER I NI RA E S AV SM OU N SM-NR 85 SM-95 SM-NR 65 (M1) SM-NR 95 (M) LR3 RC SM-NR 85 SM-NR 85 LR2 RC (M) SF 5000 BLV NC1-40 (M) BLVD D 2-1c LR2 To: ER U V LR2 RC 2-1c From: TB AK 32ND AVE S S MOUNT BAKER BLVD KER NT BA U O M S NC1-30 35TH AVE S 29TH AVE S NC1-75 (M1) NC1-55 (M) NC1-40 SF 7200 S LANDER ST 34TH AVE S RSL (M) MR (2.0) SM-NR 65 ML KING JR WAY S LR3 34TH AVE S SM-NR 125 SM-NR 95 (M) 2-1c LR3 (M) MR (M1) SM-NR 145 (M) U V 33RD AVE S SM-NR 125 S BAYVIEW ST 32ND AVE S C2-75 (M) 31ST AVE S C2-65 S HANFORD ST RSL (M) SF 5000 North Rainier Urban Village - Mt Baker Park Historic District CB 119444 Amendment RSL (M) SF 5000 (no rezone) Current Zoning Amendment Area Remove areas within the Mount Baker Park Historic District from the North Rainier Urban Village expansion area, maintain existing zone designations, and do not apply MHA. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Required? Yes No warranties of any sort, including accuracy, fitness, or merchantability accompany this product. Copyright 2019. All Rights Reserved. City of Seattle, City Council. 02/06/2019. Data source: City of Seattle. Link to record for CB 119444: http://seattle.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=3840745&GUID=7E5F305E-10DA-41F3-AE5D-66E3CAEB81B1 123 LR2 (M1) NC2-40 2-3 V U LR2 (M1) NC2P-65 (4.0) NC2P-75 (M1) ON AC BE VE S A LR2 (M) LR2 NC2P-65 (4.0) NC2P-65 (4.0) NC2P-40 NC2-40 NC2P-40 NC2-40 S FOREST S NC2-40 NC2-55 (M) LR1 (M1) NC2-40 NC2P-55 (M) NC1-55 (M1) LR2 NC1-40 (M1) (M) NC1-40 2-3 2-3 From: various NC LR1 (M1) S HORTON ST NC1-55 (M) ALAMO PL S LAFAYETTE AVE S 17TH AVE S 16TH AVE S S HINDS ST HINDS PL S LR3 SF 5000 U V RSL (M) LR3 (M) ES NC1-30 S HANFORD ST SF 5000 LR2 RSL (M) V 19TH A 16TH AVE S S WINTHROP ST T S AVE 18TH 15TH AVE S S STEVENS ST 14TH AVE S LR1 (M1) NC2-55 (M) NC2P-40 LR3 (M2) S MCCLELLAN ST LR3 (M2) 20TH AVE S LR3 (M1) 17TH AVE S SF 5000 LR2 North Beacon Hill - Beacon Ave S To: CB 119444 Amendment NC1 AND NC2 NC1P AND NC2P Current Zoning Amendment Area Extend the Pedestrian designation to the full extent of the Neighborhood Commercial zones fronting on Beacon Av S and 15th Av S within the North Beacon Hill Urban Village. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Required? No No warranties of any sort, including accuracy, fitness, or merchantability accompany this product. Copyright 2019. All Rights Reserved. City of Seattle, City Council. 02/06/2019. Data source: City of Seattle. Link to record for CB 119444: http://seattle.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=3840745&GUID=7E5F305E-10DA-41F3-AE5D-66E3CAEB81B1 124 S MOUNT BAKER BLVD SM-NR 85 SM-NR 85 S WINTHROP ST SF 5000 SF 5000 SM-NR 95 (M) SM-NR 95 (M) U V 2-4 S HANFORD ST LR1 S RSL (M) LR3 RC M L KING JR WAY 27TH AVE S SM-NR 65 M L KING JR WAY S MORSE AVE S SM-95 (M1) SM-NR 85 SH AN RD FO ST LR1 (M) From: LR3 RC 27TH AVE S ES AV 2-4 LR3 NC3-75 (M) T ON EM RSL (M) SF 5000 LR3 (M) AR CL S HORTON ST NC3-65 Area SW of S Mt Baker & MLK To: CB 119444 Amendment SM-95 (M1) NC3-55 (M) Current Zoning Amendment Area Reduce the proposed zoning within the North Rainier UV in the area southwest of the intersection of MLK Jr Way S and S Mt Baker Blvd from Seattle Mixed commercial with a 95' height limit to a commercial zone designation with a 40' or 55' height limit. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Required? No No warranties of any sort, including accuracy, fitness, or merchantability accompany this product. Copyright 2019. All Rights Reserved. City of Seattle, City Council. 02/06/2019. Data source: City of Seattle. Link to record for CB 119444: http://seattle.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=3840745&GUID=7E5F305E-10DA-41F3-AE5D-66E3CAEB81B1 125 LR2 (M1) 44TH AVE S NC3P-95 (M) LR2 LR2 (M) LR1 (M1) 45TH AVE S S OTHELLO ST NC3P-85 (5.75) U V 43RD AVE S 2-9 SF 5000 RSL (M) NC3P-95 (M2) NC3P-85 (1.3) LR2 (M) 2-9 From: SF 5000 45TH AVE S LR2 44TH AVE S S WEBSTER ST Block face east of Othello Park on S 45th Street To: CB 119444 Amendment RSL (M) LR1 (M1) Current Zoning Amendment Area Increase the proposed zone designation from Residential Small Lot to Lowrise 1 multifamily in the area to the east and south of Othello Park in the Othello Urban Village. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Required? No No warranties of any sort, including accuracy, fitness, or merchantability accompany this product. Copyright 2019. All Rights Reserved. City of Seattle, City Council. 02/06/2019. Data source: City of Seattle. Link to record for CB 119444: http://seattle.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=3840745&GUID=7E5F305E-10DA-41F3-AE5D-66E3CAEB81B1 126 Council District 3 E M O PL N T E L AK ES T W BO YE RA 10TH AVE E EAST LAKE AVE E EV IEW BLV DE 4-18 VE E 24TH AVE E E LYNN ST 42ND AVE E 43RD AVE E 19TH AVE E BOYLSTON AVE E E BLAINE ST 12TH AVE S 14TH AVE S LA K ES ID AV E E 3-15 15TH AVE S N CO AV E S 17TH AVE S S S HOLGATE BR BE A 6TH AVE S V VU U E AV 4TH AVE S 1ST AVE S S JUDKINS ST R NIE RAI AY S 32ND AVE S S S AY S TW NW LAKESIDE AV E DR POR A LA S KA 34TH AVE 23RD AVE LF 36TH AVE S GO AIR EAST MARGINAL WAY S 32ND AVE E 19TH AVE S DEARBORN ST 3-16 S LANDER ST V U 2-1c V U 2-3 S MCCLELLAN ST LAK E PA RK DR S S G JR WAY S D 3-14 M L KIN LV V U S JACKSON ST 23RD AVE S EB E YESLER WAY 20TH AVE S TL 7TH AVE S AT E JEFFERSON ST E KE LA ELL ALDER D VE S T A 5TH AVE S 6TH AVE S SE E CHERRY ST LAKE WASH ING TON B LV D ST ON ST S K FRIN PL CouncilS KING Distric t2 ST AY Council District 2 YESLER WAY Council District 7 E RS SW 8T H AV E E AV F JE F ME N M L KING JR WAY E JA H 9T E AV ST I NG R P S ST T ION IA ST ST ES S R A Y B M M UM ERR JA L CH CO ALASKAN WAY S 14TH AVE T 12TH AVE YS AD V U Council District 3 SI T 23RD AVE E 12TH AVE E BROADWAY E BROADWAY ENT ION PL CON V VE R IV E M 3-17 ST E UNION CH UV - SF TO RSL NOT LR H 6T VE DA E Y 3R D AV VE WA 2N AVE RN A KAN E 1ST EST ALAS W UN T ES PIN T ES PIK E PINE ST NA RE BO 5T H 4T AV H E AV E E O IS E DENNY WAY 15TH AVE E E THOMAS ST E JOH N ST E JOHN ST 12TH AVE AV MELROSE AVE LE Council District 3 EO BELLEVUE AVE E LI V E Council District 7 YA WAY 19TH AVE E N 5TH AVE N DENNY WAY E ROY ST E MCGILVRA BLVD FAIRVIEW AV E E ALOHA ST E BLVD AUR ORA AVE N BA W TT AL ER L Y ST ST ON GT AURORA AVE N DEXTER AVE N L AK IN SH LAKE WA E GALER ST 31ST AVE S AVE N DR ST 5T H AR E BOSTON V U KE AVE N TAYLOR AVE N M E LA WEST VE N DEXTER A VE N A ORA A UR ROY ST DE L W ASHING TON BLVD E ROANOKE ST MCGILVRA BLVD E NO RT HL HARVARD AVE E AK E W Council District 4 AY WALLINGFORD AVE N C PL E AURORA BR FI NE PA CI ST E LA KE RAYE ST BOSTON ST IFI C VE NA N MA HR N 35T H ST N 34T H ST PA C FU V U 6-18 NE S MCCLELLAN ST Potential Amendments to Proposed MHA Zoning in Council District: 3 Amendment Number Amendment Area Proposed MHA Zoning Residential Small Lot (RSL) Midrise (MR) Highrise (HR) Neighborhood Commercial (NC) ¯ No warranties of any sort, including accuracy, fitness, or merchantability accompany this product. Copyright 2019. All Rights Reserved. City of Seattle, City Council. 02/06/2019 data source: City of Seattle Commercial (C) Lowrise (LR) Seattle Mized (SM) 127 District 3: Proposed Map Amendments Current Zoning Zoning Proposed in CB 119444 Proposed Amendment RSL (M) LR1 (M1) LR2 LR3 (M1) MR (M2) Northwest corner of 20th Av S and S Holgate SF 5000 RSL (M) LR2 (M1) 1419 22nd Avenue SF 5000 RSL (M) LR2 (M1) Map Amendment # Address / Area Description 3-14 Areas east of Martin Luther King SF 5000 Junior Way and S Jackson St 3-15 1722 22nd Ave S 3-16 3-17 Amendemnt Description Increase the proposed zone designation in the areas east of Martin Luther King Junior Way and S Jackson St from Residential Small Lot to a Lowrise multifamily zone designation. Increase the proposed zone designation from Lowrise multifamily to Midrise. Increase the proposed zone designation for a portion of the block at the northwest corner of 20th Av S and S Holgate St from Residential Small Lot to Lowrise multifamily. Increase the proposed zone designation to LR2 (M1) Requires Amendment to the Comp Plan? No No No No 128 TEMPLE PL S 27TH AVE S LR2 (M) S MAI N ST S MAIN ST R WA YS SF 5000 ING J MLK 27TH AVE S LR2 RSL (M) V U 3-14 NC2-40 NC2P-40 NC2-55 (M) NC2P-55 (M) 3-14 From: SF 5000 Areas east of Martin Luther King Junior Way and S Jackson St To: CB 119444 Amendment RSL (M) LR1 (M1) Current Zoning Amendment Area Increase the proposed zone designation in the areas east of Martin Luther King Junior Way and S Jackson St from Residential Small Lot to a Lowrise multifamily zone designation. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Required? No No warranties of any sort, including accuracy, fitness, or merchantability accompany this product. Copyright 2019. All Rights Reserved. City of Seattle, City Council. 02/06/2019. Data source: City of Seattle. Link to record for CB 119444: http://seattle.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=3840745&GUID=7E5F305E-10DA-41F3-AE5D-66E3CAEB81B1 129 MR (M2) LR2 LR3 (M1) LR3 LR2 V U 3-15 22ND AVE S S STATE ST NC3-75 (M2) C1-65 NC3-75 (M) C1-65 3-15 LR2 From: 1722 22nd Ave S To: CB 119444 Amendment LR3 (M1) MR (M2) Increase Current Zoning Amendment Area the proposed zone designation from Lowrise multifamily to Midrise. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Required? No No warranties of any sort, including accuracy, fitness, or merchantability accompany this product. Copyright 2019. All Rights Reserved. City of Seattle, City Council. 02/06/2019. Data source: City of Seattle. Link to record for CB 119444: http://seattle.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=3840745&GUID=7E5F305E-10DA-41F3-AE5D-66E3CAEB81B1 130 IN VALENT PL S LR3 (M1) E LR2 S GRAND ST SF 5000 V U 20TH AVE S 3-16 RSL (M) C1-65 C1-75 (M) S HOLGATE ST C1-65 3-16 From: SF 5000 Northwest corner of 20th Av S and S Holgate To: CB 119444 Amendment RSL (M) LR2 (M1) Current Zoning Amendment Area Increase the proposed zone designation for a portion of the block at the northwest corner of 20th Av S and S Holgate St from Residential Small Lot to Lowrise multifamily. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Required? No No warranties of any sort, including accuracy, fitness, or merchantability accompany this product. Copyright 2019. All Rights Reserved. City of Seattle, City Council. 02/06/2019. Data source: City of Seattle. Link to record for CB 119444: http://seattle.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=3840745&GUID=7E5F305E-10DA-41F3-AE5D-66E3CAEB81B1 131 SF 5000 V U 3-17 22ND AVE RSL (M) NC2-65 NC2-75 (M) NC2P-55 (M1) NC2P-65 NC2P-75 (M) 3-17 From: SF 5000 1419 22nd Avenue To: CB 119444 Amendment RSL (M) LR2 (M1) Current Zoning Amendment Area Increase the proposed zone designation to LR2 (M1) Comprehensive Plan Amendment Required? No No warranties of any sort, including accuracy, fitness, or merchantability accompany this product. Copyright 2019. All Rights Reserved. City of Seattle, City Council. 02/06/2019. Data source: City of Seattle. Link to record for CB 119444: http://seattle.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=3840745&GUID=7E5F305E-10DA-41F3-AE5D-66E3CAEB81B1 132 1ST AVE NE YN E LAKE CITY WA 5TH AVE NE AV NA BOYLSTON AVE ECouncil District 4 E HARVARD AVE E Council Distr ict 3 10TH AVE E RT HL AK 35TH AVE NE BLVD NE W AY PO IN T SA ND 47TH AVE NE 42ND AVE E 43RD AVE E E BLAINE ST MCGILVRA BLVD E KE VIE W LA Council DistrictEASTLAKE 7 AVE E AVE N ECo t 3AVE E DistricUE O uncilBELLEV E 23RD AVE 32ND AVE E 23RD AVE E 19TH AVE E 19TH AVE E THOMAS ST 15TH AVE 12TH AVE BROADWAY E E JOHN ST I AD E WAY E M ST E DENNY WAY A RON MAD R D LIV E E ROY ST N SO MCGILVRA BLVD E VE ST VE 24TH AVE E NO EW 19TH AVE E BO YE RA E IR VI 40TH AVE NE E DR E ALOHA ST TA AURO RA AVE N AR T 25TH AVE NE MONTLAKE BL VD AR E ROANOKE ST E GALER ST ON FA ST E M LM BE MERCER ST ST EW NE 41ST ST VE KE AVE N TL A W ES N AVE DE XTER AVE N ORA A UR DE L V U REPUBLICAN ST L MON T LA K E BLV IFI C 4-18 VALLEY ST HP 5T NA N PA C NE 65TH ST MA N 34T ST H ST 4 NE D NE TL A KE AV E NE EAS W AY NE 30TH AVE NE 20TH AVE NE 17TH AVE NE 22ND AV E NE 7TH AVE NE NE 40TH ST HR E 6-18 N 35 TH AURORA AVE N DEXTER AVE N NE 45TH ST CAMPUS PKWY FU AURORA BR 15TH AVE NE CO W PL E N NE LATONA AVE NE THACKERAY PL NE LATONA AVE NE UNIVERSITY WAY NE WAY E EE N MERIDIAN AVE N 5TH AVE NE NE NE 40TH ST NE KE NORTHLA Y WA N 38TH ST TAYLOR AVE N 4-10 NE 42ND ST N 40TH ST 5T 6T 7T 8T H HA H HA AV V AV V E E E E V U NE ON CET PRIN A Y W NE 55TH ST NE BLAKELEY ST E 4-17 NE 50TH ST RA NE V BL ENN VD A LN V U D YP BA 4-15 NE 65TH ST N IO STONE WAY N Council District 6 Council District 4 V U N 45TH ST BL V NE 70TH ST UN V U 4-14 MERIDIAN AVE N GR KE N 50TH ST N 56TH ST 4-19 4-4a 4-6 4-4b NA N LA YN EN R EE E T AS V RA LA K NE A ON LA T V E A NE TG WE S N 65TH ST 4-2b 55TH AVE NE NE 9TH AV E U V V U V U V VU U NE 75TH ST 4-2a N WA V U 20TH AVE NE ROOSEVELT WAY NE 12TH AVE NE 12TH AVE N E 1ST AVE NE E R N LINDEN AVE NE 80TH ST N AY N AURORA AVE N ISS W ER NN BA WAY N ST EA EE N LA KE D NE 85TH ST 48TH AVE NE L COR Council District 4 E NE Council District 5 N 80TH ST GR NE 95TH ST V EN Council District 5 Council District 6 N 85TH ST 5-10d 30TH AVE NE MERIDIAN AVE N COLLEGE WAY N N 90TH ST 5-10c NT WAY NE N 92ND ST 5-10b POI 5-10 V E NE 5-10a RA U V V U V U V U V U NE 110TH ST SAND V U 2 4 TH A N 105TH ST 5-4 Potential Amendments to Proposed MHA Zoning in Council District: 4 Amendment Number Amendment Area Proposed MHA Zoning Residential Small Lot (RSL) Midrise (MR) Highrise (HR) Neighborhood Commercial (NC) ¯ No warranties of any sort, including accuracy, fitness, or merchantability accompany this product. Copyright 2019. All Rights Reserved. City of Seattle, City Council. 02/06/2019 data source: City of Seattle Commercial (C) Lowrise (LR) Seattle Mized (SM) 133 District 4: Proposed Map Amendments Map Amendment # 4-2a 4-2b Address / Area Description Current Zoning Area north of Roosevelt High SF 5000 School, north of NE 70th ST Area north of Roosevelt High School, between NE 68th and NE SF 5000 70th St Requires Amendment to the Comp Plan? Zoning Proposed in CB 119444 Proposed Amendment Amendemnt Description LR1 (M1) RSL (M) Reduce the proposed zone designation from Lowrise to Residential Small No Lot. LR2 (M1) LR1 (M1) Reduce the proposed zone designation from Lowrise 2 to Lowrise 1. Reduce changes to (M) level increases where the Historic District overlaps with the boundary of the existing Roosevelt UV. Do not expand the UV Yes boundary or apply MHA where the Historic District overlaps with the proposed UV boundary expansion area. No 4-4a Roosevelt Urban Village SF 5000 Ravenna-Cowen Historic District RSL (M) SF 5000 4-4b Roosevelt Urban Village and Ravenna-Cowen North Historic District SF/LR/NC LR/RSL/NC SF/LR/NC (no rezone) 4-6 6207-6211 12th Ave NE; 10121032 NE 62nd SF 5000 LR1 (M1) LR2 (M1) C1-40 NC2-55 (M) NC2-75 SF 5000 LR1/LR1 RC (M1) RSL (M) Reduce the proposed Lowrise multifamily zone designation to Residential No Small Lot. SF 5000 LR1 (M1) RSL (M) Reduce the proposed Lowrise multifamily zone designation to Residential No Small Lot. SF 5000 LR1 (M1) RSL (M) Reduce the proposed Lowrise multifamily zone designation to Residential No Small Lot. LR3 LR3 (M) MR (M1) SF 5000 RSL (M) SF 5000 (no rezone) 4-10 4-14 4-15 4-17 4-18 4-19 4907 25th Ave NE Wallingford Urban Village - area currently zoned SF north of N 49th St Wallingford Urban Village - area currently zoned SF north of N 46th St Wallingford Urban Village - area currently zoned SF north of N 40th St between Ashworth & Densmore Eastern edge of Eastlake Urban Village Single-family zoned area between 16th and 17th Ave NE, south of NE 68th S Remove areas from the proposal and do not apply MHA where the Yes Ravenna-Cowen North Historic District overlaps with the existing or proposed Roosevelt Urban Village boundary. Increase the proposed zone designation on NE 62nd St between Roosevelt Way NE and 12th Av NE in the Roosevelt Urban Village from Lowrise 1 to No Lowrise 2. No Increase the proposed height from 55 feet to 75 feet. Increase proposed multifamily zone designations on the east side of the No Eastlake Urban Village to Midrise. Do not apply MHA, do not expand the Roosevelt Urban Village Boundary, and do not rezone the existing single-family zoned area between 16th and Yes 17th Ave NE, south of NE 68th St. 134 12T H AVE NE SF 5000 NE 72ND ST BROOKLYN AVE NE 12TH AVE NE LR3 (M2) SF 5000 NE 70TH ST NE 69TH ST 4-2a From: LR1 (M1) 15TH AVE NE 4-2a 14TH AVE NE V U NE 71ST ST RSL (M) LR2 (M1) Area north of Roosevelt High School, north of NE 70th ST To: CB 119444 Amendment LR1 (M1) RSL (M) Current Zoning Amendment Area Reduce the proposed zone designation from Lowrise to Residential Small Lot. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Required? No No warranties of any sort, including accuracy, fitness, or merchantability accompany this product. Copyright 2019. All Rights Reserved. City of Seattle, City Council. 02/06/2019. Data source: City of Seattle. Link to record for CB 119444: http://seattle.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=3840745&GUID=7E5F305E-10DA-41F3-AE5D-66E3CAEB81B1 135 14TH AVE NE LR1 (M1) NE 70TH ST V U 4-2b ST SF 5000 12TH AVE NE NE 69TH 15TH AVE NE LR3 (M2) BROOKLYN AVE NE NE 71ST ST LR2 (M1) RSL (M) NE 68TH ST MR (M2) LR3 (0.75) NC3P-75 (M1) NE 68TH ST NC3P-65 (2.0) LR2 RC (M1) NC3P-95 (M) NC3P-85 (5.75) 4-2b From: SF 5000 Area north of Roosevelt High School, between NE 68th and NE 70th St To: CB 119444 Amendment LR2 (M1) LR1 (M1) Current Zoning Amendment Area Reduce the proposed zone designation from Lowrise 2 to Lowrise 1. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Required? No No warranties of any sort, including accuracy, fitness, or merchantability accompany this product. Copyright 2019. All Rights Reserved. City of Seattle, City Council. 02/06/2019. Data source: City of Seattle. Link to record for CB 119444: http://seattle.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=3840745&GUID=7E5F305E-10DA-41F3-AE5D-66E3CAEB81B1 136 NC2-55 NC3P-85 (5.75) (M) NC3P-95 (M) NC2P-75 (M1) NC2-40 NC1P-40 (1.2) NC2P-65 (4.0) NC2P-40 (0.75) NE 64TH ST NC2-40 LR3 (M2) NC3-75 (M) LR2 (M1) LR1 (M1) SF 5000 D ST RSL (M) 15TH AVE NE NE RA VE 58T H NN AB LV D NC2P-40 (M1) NC2P-30 (M1) LR3 ST LR3 (M) 17TH AVE NE LVD NE NE 16TH AVE NE T PL AB ST SF 5000 EN E NN 12TH AVE NE RAV N 2ND E6 CO W NE 6 1ST S BROOKLYN AVE NE 12TH AVE NE NC2-40 (1.3) From: NE 63R 4-4a NC2-40 4-4a LR2 (0.75) V U NC3-65 TH 11 NE E AV NE NC2P-40 (1.2) NC1P-40 (0.75) 14TH AVE NE NC3P-85 (5.75) NC2P-55 NC2-40 (M1) NC2-40 V U RSL (M)4-19 LR1 RC NC2-55 (M1) (M) 17TH AVE NE NE 65TH ST NC2P-65 (4.0) NC2P-65 (1.3) 16TH AVE NE NC2P-75 (M2) SF 5000 Roosevelt Urban Village - Ravenna-Cowen Historic District To: CB 119444 Amendment RSL (M) SF 5000 Current Zoning Amendment Area Reduce changes to (M) level increases where the Historic District overlaps with the boundary of the existing Roosevelt UV. Do not expand the UV boundary or apply MHA where the Historic District overlaps with the proposed UV boundary expansion area. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Required? Yes No warranties of any sort, including accuracy, fitness, or merchantability accompany this product. Copyright 2019. All Rights Reserved. City of Seattle, City Council. 02/06/2019. Data source: City of Seattle. Link to record for CB 119444: http://seattle.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=3840745&GUID=7E5F305E-10DA-41F3-AE5D-66E3CAEB81B1 137 LR2 (M1) V U RA V BL ENN VD A NC2P-40 (M1) LR3 NE 62ND ST 18TH AVE NE NE 61ST ST NC2P-40 LR3 (M) NE 56TH ST NC2P-40 LR3 NE 58T H ST NE A NN VE RA LVD B 12TH AVE NE ST NE SF/LR/NC 62 ND 17TH AVE NE From: NE NA OM IP L LR3 (M) NC2P-30 (M1) 4-4b NE CO PL WE NE N BROOKLYN AVE NE NE 15TH AVE NE NC2-40 NC2-40 (1.3) NE 63RD ST RSL (M) 4-4b NC3-65 NC2P-40 RAVENNA AVE NE NC2-40 LR2 (M1) LR2 (0.75) NC2-40 PA RD RK NE NC3P-85 (5.75) NE 65TH ST 22ND AVE NE NC1P-40 (0.75) NC2P-40 (1.2) NC1-40 (M) LR1 21ST AVE NE NC1P-40 (1.2) NC2P-40 (0.75) LR1 (M1) LR1 RC (M1) NC2-40 NC2P-65 (1.3) LR1 RC 20TH AVE NE NC2-40 RSL (M) NC1-30 19TH AVE NE NC2-40 NC2P-65 (4.0) LR3 18TH AVE NE NC2P-65 (4.0) NC3P-85 (5.75) 16TH AVE NE NE 66TH ST NC2P-65 (4.0) LR3 (M) 17TH AVE NE NC3P-85 (2.0) NE 68TH ST LR2 RC (M1) 17TH AVE NE NC3P-95 (M) 16TH AVE NE NC3P-85 (5.75) SF 5000 14TH AVE NE NC3P-65 (2.0) LR2 (M1) 21ST AVE NE NE 68TH ST LR3 (0.75) PA R K RD Roosevelt Urban Village and Ravenna-Cowen North Historic District To: CB 119444 Amendment LR/RSL/NC SF/LR/NC (no rezone) Current Zoning Amendment Area Remove areas from the proposal and do not apply MHA where the Ravenna-Cowen North Historic District overlaps with the existing or proposed Roosevelt Urban Village boundary. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Required? Yes No warranties of any sort, including accuracy, fitness, or merchantability accompany this product. Copyright 2019. All Rights Reserved. City of Seattle, City Council. 02/06/2019. Data source: City of Seattle. Link to record for CB 119444: http://seattle.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=3840745&GUID=7E5F305E-10DA-41F3-AE5D-66E3CAEB81B1 138 NC3P-75 (M) NC3P-65 NC3-75 (M) NC3-65 NE 63RD ST NC2-40 (1.3) NC2-40 LR2 (M1) NC2-55 (M1) 12TH AVE NE NC2-75 (M1) U V 4-6 NE 62ND ST SF 5000 LR1 (M1) NC2-55 (M) NC2-40 4-6 From: SF 5000 6207-6211 12th Ave NE; 1012-1032 NE 62nd To: CB 119444 Amendment LR1 (M1) LR2 (M1) Current Zoning Amendment Area Increase the proposed zone designation on NE 62nd St between Roosevelt Way NE and 12th Av NE in the Roosevelt Urban Village from Lowrise 1 to Lowrise 2. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Required? No No warranties of any sort, including accuracy, fitness, or merchantability accompany this product. Copyright 2019. All Rights Reserved. City of Seattle, City Council. 02/06/2019. Data source: City of Seattle. Link to record for CB 119444: http://seattle.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=3840745&GUID=7E5F305E-10DA-41F3-AE5D-66E3CAEB81B1 139 NE 51ST ST LR2 LR1 (M) LR1 LR3 LR3 (M) N E KE A BL Y LE ST C1-55 (M) NC2-55 (M) MIO-65-C1-40 NC2-55 (M) C1-40 25TH AV E BURKE GIL M NE AN TRL NC2-40 V U 4-10 NE 49TH ST C1-65 V E NE NNA A RAVE LR3 24TH AVE NE C1-75 (M) NE 48TH ST NC2-75 (M1) 4-10 From: C1-40 NC2-75 (M1) 4907 25th Ave NE To: CB 119444 Amendment NC2-55 (M) NC2-75 Current Zoning Amendment Area Increase the proposed height from 55 feet to 75 feet. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Required? No No warranties of any sort, including accuracy, fitness, or merchantability accompany this product. Copyright 2019. All Rights Reserved. City of Seattle, City Council. 02/06/2019. Data source: City of Seattle. Link to record for CB 119444: http://seattle.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=3840745&GUID=7E5F305E-10DA-41F3-AE5D-66E3CAEB81B1 140 LR2 NC2P-40 (M) LR2 RC (M1) N 51ST ST V U 4-14 N 50TH ST WALLINGFORD AVE N GREEN LAKE WAY N WOODLAWN AVE N N 52ND ST SF 5000 LR1 (M1) BURKE AVE N LR2 (M) DENSMORE AVE N NC2P-30 WOODLAWN AVE N N 49TH ST N 48TH ST N 47TH ST 4-14 From: SF 5000 LR2 (M1) LR2 MERIDIAN AVE N LR2 (M1) Wallingford Urban Village - area currently zoned SF north of N 49th St To: CB 119444 Amendment LR1/LR1 RC (M1) RSL (M) Current Zoning Amendment Area Reduce the proposed Lowrise multifamily zone designation to Residential Small Lot. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Required? No No warranties of any sort, including accuracy, fitness, or merchantability accompany this product. Copyright 2019. All Rights Reserved. City of Seattle, City Council. 02/06/2019. Data source: City of Seattle. Link to record for CB 119444: http://seattle.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=3840745&GUID=7E5F305E-10DA-41F3-AE5D-66E3CAEB81B1 141 SF 5000 N 49TH ST MERIDIAN AVE N N 48TH ST V U 4-15 LR2 (M) CORLISS AVE N LR2 N 46TH ST N 46TH ST BAGLEY AVE N N 47TH ST LR2 (M1) LR2 (M1) NC2-55 (M) NC2-40 NC2P-40 NC2P-40 N 45TH ST 4-15 From: SF 5000 SUNNYSIDE AVE N LR1 (M1) LR2 RC NC2P-55 (M) NC2P-40 Wallingford Urban Village - area currently zoned SF north of N 46th St To: CB 119444 Amendment LR1 (M1) RSL (M) Current Zoning Amendment Area Reduce the proposed Lowrise multifamily zone designation to Residential Small Lot. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Required? No No warranties of any sort, including accuracy, fitness, or merchantability accompany this product. Copyright 2019. All Rights Reserved. City of Seattle, City Council. 02/06/2019. Data source: City of Seattle. Link to record for CB 119444: http://seattle.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=3840745&GUID=7E5F305E-10DA-41F3-AE5D-66E3CAEB81B1 142 N 43RD ST WOODLAWN AVE N LR1 (M1) ASHWORTH AVE N INTERLAKE AVE N N 42ND ST N LUCA LR2 (M1) V U 4-17 N 41ST ST N 42ND ST SF 5000 LR2 (M1) WALLINGFORD AVE N LR2 (M) LR2 DENSMORE AVE N LR3 (M2) S PL NC1-30 N 40TH ST NC1-40 (M) 4-17 From: SF 5000 Area zoned SF north of N 40th St between Ashworth & Densmore To: CB 119444 Amendment LR1 (M1) RSL (M) Current Zoning Amendment Area Reduce the proposed Lowrise multifamily zone designation to Residential Small Lot. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Required? No No warranties of any sort, including accuracy, fitness, or merchantability accompany this product. Copyright 2019. All Rights Reserved. City of Seattle, City Council. 02/06/2019. Data source: City of Seattle. Link to record for CB 119444: http://seattle.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=3840745&GUID=7E5F305E-10DA-41F3-AE5D-66E3CAEB81B1 143 LR2 RC LR3 (M1) RED AVE E LR2 NC2P-65 (M1) E LYNN ST NC2P-40 NC2-40 LR2 RC NC2P-40 NC2P-40 NC1P-30 C1-55 C1-40 IG1 U/45 C1-40 (M) 4-18 From: LR3 To: 4-18 LR2 NC2-65 (M1) E NEWTON ST LR3 NC1-40 LR3 LR2 LR1 BOYER AVE E SR520 WB ROANOKE LR3 OFF RP SF 5000 E MILLER ST E MILLER ST E LYNN ST LR2 (M) LR2 E BOSTON ST LR1 (M) SF 5000 SF 5000 LR3 C1-40 CB 119444 Amendment EB SR520 I5 NB LR2 (M) LR3 (M) LR3 V U LR3 (M) NC2P-65 (M1) YALE AVE E MINOR AVE E LR3 LR2 RC SF 5000 NC2P-30 I5 SB LR2 LR2 LR2 E EDGAR ST 10TH AVE E NC2-40 I5 SR SB EB 520 ON RP B N 0 5 2 I 5 RP SR ON EB E LR2 (M) LR2 RC LR3 (M) SF 5000 E ROANOKE ST LR2 BOYLSTON AVE E SR520 WB I5 SB ON RP SF 5000 LR2 LR2 LR2 C1-40 NC2-65 LR2 LR2 (M2) (M) LR2 FRANKLIN AVE E FAIR VI E WA VE E SF 5000 E EDGAR ST SR520 WB I5 NB ON RP NC2-40 E NEWTON ST 13TH AVE E LR3 RC E EDGAR ST SF 5000 11TH AVE E LR2 RC 11TH AVE E NC2-30 BROADWAY E LR3 RC HARVARD AVE LR2 E HAMLIN ST 10TH AVE E NC2P-40 FEDERAL AVE E NC3P-40 HARVARD AVE E NC3-40 BOYLS TON AV E OFF RP I5 EXPRESS LR3 RC BROADWAY E NC3-55 NC3-40 (M) LR2 RC E SHELBY ST LR3 12TH AVE E LR3 (M) 12TH AVE E LR2 RC HAMLIN ST ON RP C2-40 IB U/45 LR1 Eastern edge of Eastlake Urban Village LR3 (M) MR (M1) Current Zoning Amendment Area Increase proposed multifamily zone designations on the east side of the Eastlake Urban Village to Midrise. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Required? No No warranties of any sort, including accuracy, fitness, or merchantability accompany this product. Copyright 2019. All Rights Reserved. City of Seattle, City Council. 02/06/2019. Data source: City of Seattle. Link to record for CB 119444: http://seattle.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=3840745&GUID=7E5F305E-10DA-41F3-AE5D-66E3CAEB81B1 144 NE 68TH ST LR2 RC (M1) NC2-40 4-19 From: SF 5000 SF 5000 V U 4-19 17TH AVE NE 16TH AVE NE RSL (M) LR1 RC (M1) NC2-55 (M) Single-family zoned area between 16th and 17th Ave NE, south of NE 68th S To: CB 119444 Amendment RSL (M) SF 5000 (no rezone) Current Zoning Amendment Area Do not apply MHA, do not expand the Roosevelt Urban Village Boundary, and do not rezone the existing single-family zoned area between 16th and 17th Ave NE, south of NE 68th St. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Required? Yes No warranties of any sort, including accuracy, fitness, or merchantability accompany this product. Copyright 2019. All Rights Reserved. City of Seattle, City Council. 02/06/2019. Data source: City of Seattle. Link to record for CB 119444: http://seattle.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=3840745&GUID=7E5F305E-10DA-41F3-AE5D-66E3CAEB81B1 145 NE L EL 30TH AVE NE NE AY 30TH AVE NE LAKE CITY W NE AV E 35TH AVE NE NE 70TH ST 40TH AVE NE 4-4b 4-4a 55TH AVE NE ROOSEVELT WAY NE 12TH AVE NE 20TH AVE NE NE 65TH ST NE 65TH ST YP LN E Potential Amendments to Proposed MHA Zoning in Council District: 5 NE 45 TH Amendment Number Amendment Area PL WAY NE 47TH AVE NE NT PO I ND SA 4-10 30TH AVE NE V U NE 55TH ST NE BLAKELEY ST BA NE 45TH ST 20TH AVE NE 22ND AVE NE NE 50TH ST 17TH AVE NE LVD N LATONA AVE NE 4-19 IO NW V U N 45TH ST 4-15 Council District 4 12TH AVE NE 4-6 B Council District 6 4-2a UNIVERSITY WAY NE LATONA AVE NE N 56TH ST NE 75TH ST UN MER IDIAN AVE N 15TH AVE NE ROOSEVELT WAY NE NE PL 1ST WAY LA KE EAS T EN RE NE 85TH ST 4-2b NA EN PHINNEY AVE N A Council District 5 Council District 4 U V VU U V V VU U NE 70TH ST V RA NW 55 TH PL 9TH AV E NE LINDEN AVE N 8TH AVE NW 15TH AVE NW ST NE N 46TH ST N 65TH ST NE 71ST A ON LA T V E A NE Y WA RY N AR ST K E T G V U 4-14 M NE N NW 48TH ST EE N L AKE DR WA YN N 50TH ST LEA NW 46TH ST LAKE NW LEARY WAY ST NW MARKET EEN GR V U N 65TH ST GR N ST WE NW 65TH ST 6-15 ST NN NE 95TH ST AY EA NE 110TH ST NE 92ND ST I N 80TH ST V U VE RA 5TH AVE NE N 85TH ST NE 115TH ST 5-4 COLLEGE WAY N N 90TH ST NE 125TH ST NE NORTHGATE WAY W ER NN N BASS WAY U V V U V U V U 5-3 E WAY 1ST AVE NE AURORA AVE N V U NW 80TH ST 14TH AVE NW T GA H T OR N N 5-10d 6-7 V U 5-11 THACKERAY PL NE NW 85TH ST 6-9 6-10 6-11 V U 5-10 5-10a 5-10c 6-4 6-16 6-17 6-8 N 115TH ST N 105TH ST 5-10b NE 117TH ST WALLINGFORD AVE N N Council District 5 RD Council District 6 AN DAYTON AVE N GREENWOOD AVE N 6-6 6-5 NW 3RD AVE NW 6-3 AN TH LM N 122ND ST L COR U V V U V U U V V U VU U V U V VU U V LM HO RD 0 10 5TH AVE NE V U 1ST AVE NE N 125TH ST T WAY NE PO I N NW 96TH ST NW N SAN D NW 100TH ST AY N 128TH ST 5-1 PL W N 130TH ST NW 125TH ST HO NE 145TH ST 1ST AVE NE LINDEN AVE N RO OS EV EL T BOTH NE 150TH ST N 145TH ST NW 130TH ST ELL W AY NE 155TH ST W NW 145TH ST NE NE 25TH AVE NE N 155TH ST W AY BO TH NE 165TH ST MERIDIAN AVE N ES DAYTON AVE N TM IN ST ER W AY N NE 168TH ST 25TH AVE N E N 171 E ST ST ASHWORTH AVE N NW 10TH AVE NE LINDEN AVE N D AY T O N AV E N FREMONT AVE N NW 15TH AVE NE H 5T 17 T S E N 160TH ST NE 175TH ST NE L L T HE BO A Y W EN AY ST V 47T H A N 165TH ST N E 18 NE 178TH ST 0TH 184TH R E W N GE YN WA RD EN NE LIN ST YL E LL ARD RL HA IS CA N 175TH ST E AV NW 167TH S T H 0T 1 NW IN N TH 24 AVE N MIDVALE AVE NW 175TH ST N 175TH ST BA L Proposed MHA Zoning Residential Small Lot (RSL) Midrise (MR) Highrise (HR) Neighborhood Commercial (NC) ¯ No warranties of any sort, including accuracy, fitness, or merchantability accompany this product. Copyright 2019. All Rights Reserved. City of Seattle, City Council. 02/06/2019 data source: City of Seattle Commercial (C) Lowrise (LR) Seattle Mized (SM) 146 District 5: Proposed Map Amendments Map Amendment # Address / Area Description Current Zoning Zoning Proposed in CB 119444 Proposed Amendment Amendemnt Description Requires Amendment to the Comp Plan? 5-1 Mobile Home Parks south of N 125th St and west of Ashworth Av N C1-40 C1-55 (M) C1-40 (no rezone) Do not apply MHA and do not rezone two mobile home parks located southwest of the intersection of N 125th St and Ashworth Av N in the Bitter lake Urban Village. No 5-3 Northaven site - Resolve split zoning LR3 (M) MR (M1) Consolidate the proposed zone designation for a split-zoned site in the Northgate Urban Center, currently developed with Northaven Senior Living, and increase the proposed zone designation for a portion of the site to Midrise multifamily residential. No 5-4 Area along NE 108th St between SF 5000 11th Av NE and NE Northgate Way LR1 (M1) RSL (M) Reduce the proposed zone designation for an area along NE 108th St between 11th Av NE and NE Northgate Way from Lowrise multifamily to Residential Small Lot. No 5-10 Aurora Ave N between N 85th St NC or C 65 and N 100th St NC3-65 or 75 NC3P-65 (M) or 75 Expand pedestrian designations along some Neighborhood Commercial No (M1) zoned areas along Aurora within the Aurora - Licton Spring Urban Village. 5-10a Aurora Ave N between N 100th St and N 93rd St NC3-75 (M) NC3P-75 (M) Expand pedestrian designations along some Neighborhood Commercial No zoned areas along Aurora within the Aurora - Licton Spring Urban Village. 5-10b west side of Aurora Ave N C1-40 between N 93rd St and N 86th St NC3-65 (M1) NC3P-65 (M1) Expand pedestrian designations along some Neighborhood Commercial No zoned areas along Aurora within the Aurora - Licton Spring Urban Village. 5-10c east side of Aurora Ave N C1-65 between N 94th St and N 85th St NC3-75 (M) NC3P-75 (M) Expand pedestrian designations along some Neighborhood Commercial No zoned areas along Aurora within the Aurora - Licton Spring Urban Village. C1-40 NC3-75 (M1) NC3P-75 (M1) Expand pedestrian designations along some Neighborhood Commercial No zoned areas along Aurora within the Aurora - Licton Spring Urban Village. SF 5000 none LR2 (M1) Rezone from Single Family to Lowrise multifamily and expand the boundary of the Northgate Urban Center. 5-10d 5-11 W side of Aurora Ave N from N 86th St to N 84th St; E side from N 85th St to N 84th St The area northeast of the intersection of Meridian Ave N and N 113th St LR3 C2-65 Yes 147 C1-75 (M) STONE AVE N C1-65 C1-55 (M) C2-40 N 125TH ST ASHWORTH AVE N C2-65 C1-40 C1-55 (M) 5-1 V U ASHWORTH AVE N C1-75 (M) SF 7200 N 122ND ST SF 7200 1 ST N 12 ST 5-1 From: C1-40 Mobile Home Parks south of N 125th St and west of Ashworth Av N To: CB 119444 Amendment C1-55 (M) C1-40 (no rezone) Current Zoning Amendment Area Do not apply MHA and do not rezone two mobile home parks located southwest of the intersection of N 125th St and Ashworth Av N in the Bitter lake Urban Village. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Required? No No warranties of any sort, including accuracy, fitness, or merchantability accompany this product. Copyright 2019. All Rights Reserved. City of Seattle, City Council. 02/06/2019. Data source: City of Seattle. Link to record for CB 119444: http://seattle.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=3840745&GUID=7E5F305E-10DA-41F3-AE5D-66E3CAEB81B1 148 LR2 LR2 LR2 (M) LR3 (M) 5-3 V U 8TH AVE NE LR3 MR (M) MR NC3-40 NC3-55 (M) NC3-65 NC3-75 (M) 5-3 From: LR3 Northaven site - Resolve split zoning To: CB 119444 Amendment LR3 (M) MR (M1) Current Zoning Amendment Area Consolidate the proposed zone designation for a split-zoned site in the Northgate Urban Center, currently developed with Northaven Senior Living, and increase the proposed zone designation for a portion of the site to Midrise multifamily residential. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Required? No No warranties of any sort, including accuracy, fitness, or merchantability accompany this product. Copyright 2019. All Rights Reserved. City of Seattle, City Council. 02/06/2019. Data source: City of Seattle. Link to record for CB 119444: http://seattle.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=3840745&GUID=7E5F305E-10DA-41F3-AE5D-66E3CAEB81B1 149 NC3-40 LR2 (M) LR2 NC3-55 (M) NC2-40 RSL (M) 11 TH AV EN E NC2-55 (M) U V 5-4 SF 7200 NE 10 8TH S 5-4 From: SF 5000 T Area along NE 108th St between 11th Av NE and NE Northgate Way To: CB 119444 Amendment LR1 (M1) RSL (M) Current Zoning Amendment Area Reduce the proposed zone designation for an area along NE 108th St between 11th Av NE and NE Northgate Way from Lowrise multifamily to Residential Small Lot. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Required? No No warranties of any sort, including accuracy, fitness, or merchantability accompany this product. Copyright 2019. All Rights Reserved. City of Seattle, City Council. 02/06/2019. Data source: City of Seattle. Link to record for CB 119444: http://seattle.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=3840745&GUID=7E5F305E-10DA-41F3-AE5D-66E3CAEB81B1 150 N 92ND ST LR2 N 92ND ST FREMONT AVE N LINDEN AVE N N 94TH ST SF 5000 LR2 (M1) C1-65 N 94TH ST N 93RD ST C1-40 N 91ST ST N 95TH ST LR3 (M) LR2 N 90TH ST LR2 LR1 (M1) N 87TH ST N 86TH ST NC3-40 NC3-65 (M1) MIDVALE AVE N N 87TH ST LR3 5- C1-40 C1-40 LR2 SF 5000 LR2 (M) N 89TH ST N 88TH ST LR2 (M1) N 92ND ST NC3-75 (M) NC3-65 (M1) N 95TH ST LR2 (M1) SF 5000 LR1 LR1 (M) N 88TH ST CAROLINE AVE N V U 5-10 LR2 LR1 (M) LR2 (M) C2-65 E AVE N N 95TH ST DENSMOR LR1 EVANSTON AVE N N 96TH ST RSL (M) LR2 (M1) WOODLAWN AVE N LR3 ASHWORTH AVE N N 96TH ST WALLINGFORD AVE N LR1 (M1) LR2 (M) ASHWORTH AVE N N 97TH ST N 100TH ST SF 7200 LR2 INTERLAKE AVE N NC3-75 (M) RSL (M) DENSMORE AVE N LR3 INTERLAKE AVE N LR3 SF 5000 STONE AVE N LR3 NC3P-40 STONE AVE N N 98TH ST NC3P-40 AURORA AVE N RSL (M) LR3 (M) LR3 N 85TH ST NC2-40 C1-40 SF 5000 LR2 LR2 (M) LR2 C1-40 C1-40 Aurora Ave N between N 85th St and N 100th St 5-10 From: NC or C 65 To: CB 119444 Amendment NC3-65 or 75 NC3P-65 (M) or 75 (M1) Current Zoning Amendment Area Expand pedestrian designations along some Neighborhood Commercial - zoned areas along Aurora within the Aurora - Licton Spring Urban Village. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Required? No No warranties of any sort, including accuracy, fitness, or merchantability accompany this product. Copyright 2019. All Rights Reserved. City of Seattle, City Council. 02/06/2019. Data source: City of Seattle. Link to record for CB 119444: http://seattle.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=3840745&GUID=7E5F305E-10DA-41F3-AE5D-66E3CAEB81B1 151 N 100TH ST NC3P-40 NC3P-75 (M1) NC3P-40 NC3P-55 LR1 (M1) (M) SF 5000 RSL (M) LR3 RSL (M) N 98TH ST C2-65 SF 5000 LR3 (M) N 96TH ST LR2 (M1) LR2 (M) N 96TH ST NC3-75 (M) LR3 N 95TH ST V U 5-10a LR3 (M) N 95TH ST INTERLAKE AVE N LR3 STONE AVE N LR1 (M1) AURORA AVE N RSL (M) MIDVALE AVE N LINDEN AVE N N 97TH ST LR2 N 94TH ST NC3-75 (M) LR2 From: C2-65 N 93RD ST C1-40 5-10a LR3 C1-65 LR2 (M1) SF 5000 N 94TH ST Aurora Ave N between N 100th St and N 93rd St To: CB 119444 Amendment NC3-75 (M) NC3P-75 (M) Current Zoning Amendment Area Expand pedestrian designations along some Neighborhood Commercial - zoned areas along Aurora within the Aurora - Licton Spring Urban Village. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Required? No No warranties of any sort, including accuracy, fitness, or merchantability accompany this product. Copyright 2019. All Rights Reserved. City of Seattle, City Council. 02/06/2019. Data source: City of Seattle. Link to record for CB 119444: http://seattle.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=3840745&GUID=7E5F305E-10DA-41F3-AE5D-66E3CAEB81B1 152 LR2 N 93RD ST LR2 (M) LR2 (M1) C1-40 LR3 N 91ST ST N 90TH ST V U 5-10b AURORA AVE N N 88TH ST N 87TH ST N 86TH ST C1-40 NC3-75 (M) N 88TH ST LR2 (M) LR2 LR3 (M)C1-40 LR3 5-10b From: C1-65 N 89TH ST MIDVALE AVE N LR1 (M1) LR2 LR3 (M) NESBIT AVE N LINDEN AVE N SF 5000 STONE AVE N N 92ND ST STONE AVE N LR2 west side of Aurora Ave N between N 93rd St and N 86th St To: CB 119444 Amendment NC3-65 (M1) NC3P-65 (M1) Current Zoning Amendment Area Expand pedestrian designations along some Neighborhood Commercial - zoned areas along Aurora within the Aurora - Licton Spring Urban Village. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Required? No No warranties of any sort, including accuracy, fitness, or merchantability accompany this product. Copyright 2019. All Rights Reserved. City of Seattle, City Council. 02/06/2019. Data source: City of Seattle. Link to record for CB 119444: http://seattle.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=3840745&GUID=7E5F305E-10DA-41F3-AE5D-66E3CAEB81B1 153 SF 5000 N 93RD ST ASHWORTH AVE N LR3 (M) C1-40 LR2 (M1) NC3-65 (M1) AURORA AVE N N 92ND ST V U 5-10c N 91ST ST SF 5000 N 92ND ST LR3 LR2 LR2 (M1) N 90TH ST C1-65 NC3-75 (M) N 86TH ST LR2 5-10c From: C1-65 C1-40 LR3 (M) LR3 LR2 (M) LR2 C1-40 C1-40 C1-40 C1-40 STONE AVE N LR3 N 88TH ST INTERLAKE AVE N N 87TH ST LR1 (M) LR2 (M) MIDVALE AVE N N 88TH ST LR1 STONE AVE N LR1 (M1) NESBIT AVE N LINDEN AVE N LR2 N 89TH ST LR2 ASHWORTH AVE N LR2 (M) LR2 C2-65 INTERLAKE AVE N LR2 N 94TH ST STONE AVE N N 94TH ST NC3-75 (M) SF 5000 SF 5000 N 85TH ST east side of Aurora Ave N between N 94th St and N 85th St To: CB 119444 Amendment NC3-75 (M) NC3P-75 (M) Current Zoning Amendment Area Expand pedestrian designations along some Neighborhood Commercial - zoned areas along Aurora within the Aurora - Licton Spring Urban Village. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Required? No No warranties of any sort, including accuracy, fitness, or merchantability accompany this product. Copyright 2019. All Rights Reserved. City of Seattle, City Council. 02/06/2019. Data source: City of Seattle. Link to record for CB 119444: http://seattle.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=3840745&GUID=7E5F305E-10DA-41F3-AE5D-66E3CAEB81B1 154 LR1 (M1) SF 5000 NC3-75 (M) C1-40 AURORA AVE N LR3 LR3 (M) C1-40 NESBIT AVE N N 86TH ST LR3 LR3 (M) N 85TH ST LR2 LR2 V U LR2 (M) 5-10d C1-40 LR2 (M) NC3-75 (M1) C1-40 RSL (M) RSL (M) SF 5000 N 84TH ST C1-55 (M) 5-10d From: C1-40 C1-40 SF 5000 W side of Aurora Ave N from N 86th St to N 84th St; E side from N 85th St to N 84th St To: CB 119444 Amendment NC3-75 (M1) NC3P-75 (M1) Current Zoning Amendment Area Expand pedestrian designations along some Neighborhood Commercial - zoned areas along Aurora within the Aurora - Licton Spring Urban Village. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Required? No No warranties of any sort, including accuracy, fitness, or merchantability accompany this product. Copyright 2019. All Rights Reserved. City of Seattle, City Council. 02/06/2019. Data source: City of Seattle. Link to record for CB 119444: http://seattle.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=3840745&GUID=7E5F305E-10DA-41F3-AE5D-66E3CAEB81B1 155 N 114TH ST SF 7200 LR2 MERIDIAN AVE N LR2 (M) V U 5-11 LR1 LR1 (M) N 113TH ST LR3 LR3 (M) 5-11 The area northeast of the intersection of Meridian Ave N and N 113th St From: To: SF 5000 CB 119444 Amendment none LR2 (M1) Current Zoning Amendment Area Rezone from Single Family to Lowrise multifamily and expand the boundary of the Northgate Urban Center. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Required? Yes No warranties of any sort, including accuracy, fitness, or merchantability accompany this product. Copyright 2019. All Rights Reserved. City of Seattle, City Council. 02/06/2019. Data source: City of Seattle. Link to record for CB 119444: http://seattle.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=3840745&GUID=7E5F305E-10DA-41F3-AE5D-66E3CAEB81B1 156 NE 117T H ST 1ST PL N N 115TH ST V U 5-3 HG RT 5-10b AVE N 1ST AVE NE 5TH AVE NE EN AV D LINDE N WAY KE LA N W W BO STON ST MERIDIAN AVE N 7TH AVE NE NE 40TH ST NE KE NORTHLA WAY AY W VE EASTLAKE A N Potential Amendments to Proposed MHA Zoning in Council District: 6 Amendment Number Amendment Area cil District 3 E AURORA BR N 35T H ST N 34T H ST V U 4-18 10TH AVE E W W MCGRAW ST PL E DR NE 42ND ST 2ND AVE NE STONE WAY N V U FLORENTIA ST NN QUEEN A N 40TH ST RT HL AK T NE 45TH ST 4-17 N 38TH ST TH S MC GR AW W RAYE ST 4-15 V U 6-18 W FLO RENTIA ST V U NO N 36 LATONA AVE NE M AN PL N WH IT PHINNEY AVE N NW 55 TH PL ST 3RD AVE W 11TH AVE W NW 36T H ST FREMONT AVE N BALLARD BR ON N 39TH ST W BERTONA ST 10TH AVE W YKE AV EW 28TH AVE W 32ND AVE W 15TH AVE W W 30TH AVE W 34TH AVE W GR EE 20TH AVE NW 36TH AVE NW 40TH AVE W TH OR ND DR PL W AN IS E NT AV PL I S T A ER S NW 39TH ST N 45TH ST NE 50TH ST Council District 4 AVE N ER VE N XT RA A DE A U R O M GIL CL MO CK N DV A PL L E MI Council District 6 E BOYLSTON AVE E Council District 4 HARVARD AVE E Coun 8TH AVE NW SEA E W NI EN N AY W NE W RY LEA W PL AV W E AV RS ON N SO ER K NIC 15TH RP N N TH ST N 56 V U N 46TH ST AW Y 4-14 M N AR ST K E T 2N D AV E NE WA N 50TH ST NW 48TH ST DL E LA K EN NW LEARY WAY NE 65TH ST N 65TH ST ST EA EN NW MARKET ST W DRAVUS ST W BARRETT ST W MCGRAW ST V U 6-15 ST NW AV AN AVE W 30TH W EMERSON ST RD VE LE HO LM GI W W TILDEN ST R PL M ANO ME 63 E GR ST ILS AVE W EMERSON ST WE N NW 46TH ST 31 ST GO W CO MM OD WAY OR NT EW E M AY RN E V WE SH 54TH ST YA AR LE NW W N 65TH ST N ST NE 71S T N NW 65TH ST OO LAKE D R W EEN AY ST GR W EA 15TH AVE NW W ER NN BA AY N 6-10 6-11 24TH AVE NW COLLEGE WAY N 5-10d NW 80TH ST 32ND AVE NW N 90TH ST N 85TH ST 6-7 3RD AVE NW L YA 6-9 6-8 NW N 92ND ST NE 92ND ST 1ST AVE NE 6-4 6-16 6-17 NO 5-10c L ISS U V V U V U 6-6 LO W 5-10 5-10a OU 6-5 V U V U ST R 28TH AVE NW 6-3 N C OR U V V U U V V U VU U V VU VU VU U VV U AN NW NW 85TH ST W AY AVE N LM HO RD N 105TH ST DN NE NORTH GATE WAY CORLISS AVE N WAY WALLINGFORD AVE N NW 96TH ST VIEW NW NW 100TH ST E PL NR AURORA AVE N NE PL P TU N TH A LM GREENWOOD AVE N NW 0 10 HO V U 5-11 AT E Council District 5 Council District 6 N 122ND ST E DAYTON AVE N 5-1 1ST AVE NE V U Proposed MHA Zoning Residential Small Lot (RSL) Midrise (MR) Highrise (HR) Neighborhood Commercial (NC) ¯ No warranties of any sort, including accuracy, fitness, or merchantability accompany this product. Copyright 2019. All Rights Reserved. City of Seattle, City Council. 02/06/2019 data source: City of Seattle Commercial (C) Lowrise (LR) Seattle Mized (SM) 157 District 6: Proposed Map Amendments Current Zoning Zoning Proposed in CB 119444 Proposed Amendment Requires Amendment to the Comp Plan? Map Amendment # Address / Area Description 6-3 Areas zoned Single-family in the Crown Hill Urban Village SF 5000 LR1 (M1) RSL (M) 6-4 Areas zoned Single-family in the Crown Hill Urban Village SF 5000 LR2 (M1) RSL (M) 6-5 Areas zoned Single-family in the Crown Hill Urban Village SF 5000 LR2 (M1) LR1 (M1) 6-6 Areas zoned Single-family in the Crown Hill Urban Village SF 5000 LR1 M1) RSL (M) 6-7 Areas zoned Single-family in the Crown Hill Urban Village SF 5000 LR1 (M1) RSL (M) 6-8 Areas zoned Single-family in the Crown Hill Urban Village SF 5000 LR2 (M1) LR1 (M1) 6-9 Areas zoned Single-family in the Crown Hill Urban Village SF 5000 LR1 (M1) RSL (M) 6-10 Areas zoned Single-family in the Crown Hill Urban Village SF 5000 LR1 (M1) RSL (M) Reduce proposed zone designations in some areas currently zoned Singlefamily in the Crown Hill Urban Village west of 13th Av NW between NW No 80th and 83rd Streets from Lowrise multifamily to Residential Small Lot. 6-11 Areas zoned Single-family in the Crown Hill Urban Village SF 5000 LR2 (M1) LR1 (M1) Reduce proposed zone designations in some areas currently zoned Singlefamily in the Crown Hill Urban Village in the half block east of Mary Av NW No between NW 80th and 83rd Street from Lowrise 2 (M1) multifamily to Lowrise 1 (M1) multifamily. 6-15 Block between 8th Av NW and 9thAv NW and NW 56th St and NW 57th St SF 5000 LR1 (M1) RSL (M) Reduce the proposed zone designation for the area between 8th Av NW and 9thAv NW and NW 56th St and NW 57th St in the Ballard Urban Village expansion area from Lowrise multifamily to Residential Small Lot. Amendemnt Description Reduce proposed zone designations in the area currently zoned Singlefamily in the Crown Hill Urban Village south of NW 92nd Street between 13th and 15th Avenues NW from Lowrise multifamily to Residential Small Lot. Reduce proposed zone designations in some areas currently zoned Singlefamily in the Crown Hill Urban Village south of NW 90th Street between 12th and 14th Avenues NW from Lowrise multifamily to Residential Small Lot. Reduce proposed zone designations in some areas currently zoned Singlefamily in the Crown Hill Urban Village in the half block east of 16th Av NW between NW 85th and 89th Street from Lowrise 2 (M1) multifamily to Lowrise 1 (M1) multifamily. Reduce proposed zone designations in areas currently zoned Single-family in the Crown Hill Urban Village in the area east of 18th Av NW between NW 85th and 89th Street from Lowrise multifamily to Residential Small Lot. No No No No Reduce proposed zone designation in areas currently zoned Single-family No in the Crown Hill Urban Village north of NW 83rd Street between 13th and 12th Avenues NW from Lowrise multifamily to Residential Small Lot. Reduce proposed zone designations in some areas currently zoned Singlefamily in the Crown Hill Urban Village in the half block east of 16th Av NW No between NW 80th and 85th Street from Lowrise 2 (M1) multifamily to Lowrise 1 (M1) multifamily. Reduce proposed zone designations in areas currently zoned Single-family in the Crown Hill Urban Village in the area east of 18th Av NW between No NW 80th and 85th Street from Lowrise multifamily to Residential Small Lot. No 158 Zoning Proposed in CB 119444 Proposed Amendment Amendemnt Description Requires Amendment to the Comp Plan? The area west of the intersection LR3 of 15th Ave NW and NW 85th St NC3P-75 (M1) NC3P-55 (M) Reduce the height of the proposed commercial zone from 75 feet to 55 feet. No 6-17 Commercial node at the intersection of 15th Ave NW and NC3P-40 85th ST NC3P-55 (M) NC3P-75 (M1) Increase the height of the proposed commercial zone designation from 55 No feet to 75 feet and increase the MHA tier. 6-18 Area adjacent to the troll in the Fremont Urban Village LR3 (M1) LR1 (M) Reduce the proposed zone designation from Lowrise 3 (M1) multifamily to Lowrise 1 (M) multifamily along N 36th St generally between Linden Av N No and Albion Pl N Map Amendment # Address / Area Description 6-16 Current Zoning LR1 159 SF 7200 13TH AVE NW U V 6-3 14TH AVE NW 15TH AVE NW MARY AVE NW NW 95TH ST LR1 (M1) RSL (M) NC2P-55 (M2) C1-40 NC2P-55 (M) LR2 LR2 (M) SF 5000 AN NW NC2P-75 (M1) 6-3 From: LM O H RD C1-40 NW 92ND ST 13TH AVE NW NW 92ND ST Areas zoned Single-family in the Crown Hill Urban Village To: CB 119444 Amendment LR1 (M1) RSL (M) Current Zoning Amendment Area Reduce proposed zone designations in the area currently zoned Single-family in the Crown Hill Urban Village south of NW 92nd Street between 13th and 15th Avenues NW from Lowrise multifamily to Residential Small Lot. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Required? No No warranties of any sort, including accuracy, fitness, or merchantability accompany this product. Copyright 2019. All Rights Reserved. City of Seattle, City Council. 02/06/2019. Data source: City of Seattle. Link to record for CB 119444: http://seattle.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=3840745&GUID=7E5F305E-10DA-41F3-AE5D-66E3CAEB81B1 160 NC2P-75 (M1) NW 90TH ST C1-40 6-4 LR2 (M1) LR2 LR1 (M1) SF 5000 12TH AVE NW U V 13TH AVE NW 14TH AVE NW LR2 (M) RSL (M) NC2P-55 (M)NC2-40 LR3 RC (M) NC2P-40 6-4 From: SF 5000 LR3 RC 11TH AVE NW NW 87TH ST LR3 RC LR2 RC LR2 RC (M) LR2 Areas zoned Single-family in the Crown Hill Urban Village To: CB 119444 Amendment LR2 (M1) RSL (M) Current Zoning Amendment Area Reduce proposed zone designations in some areas currently zoned Single-family in the Crown Hill Urban Village south of NW 90th Street between 12th and 14th Avenues NW from Lowrise multifamily to Residential Small Lot. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Required? No No warranties of any sort, including accuracy, fitness, or merchantability accompany this product. Copyright 2019. All Rights Reserved. City of Seattle, City Council. 02/06/2019. Data source: City of Seattle. Link to record for CB 119444: http://seattle.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=3840745&GUID=7E5F305E-10DA-41F3-AE5D-66E3CAEB81B1 161 NW 89TH ST NC2P-55 (M) U V HO LM AN R 6-5 RSL (M) NW 87TH ST LR1 (M1) NC2-40 (M) C1-30 E NW NC3P-55 (M) LR2 (M) LR2 6-5 SF 5000 C1-40 NC3P-40 16TH AVE NW 18TH AVE NW SF 5000 LR2 (M1) 15TH AV 17TH AVE NW NC2P-75 (M1) SF 5000 From: W NW 89TH ST NC2P-55 (M) LR2 DN LR2 LR2 (M) NC3P-75 (M1) NC3P-75 (M1) LR3 Areas zoned Single-family in the Crown Hill Urban Village To: CB 119444 Amendment LR2 (M1) LR1 (M1) Current Zoning Amendment Area Reduce proposed zone designations in some areas currently zoned Single-family in the Crown Hill Urban Village in the half block east of 16th Av NW between NW 85th and 89th Street from Lowrise 2 (M1) multifamily to Lowrise 1 (M1) multifamily. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Required? No No warranties of any sort, including accuracy, fitness, or merchantability accompany this product. Copyright 2019. All Rights Reserved. City of Seattle, City Council. 02/06/2019. Data source: City of Seattle. Link to record for CB 119444: http://seattle.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=3840745&GUID=7E5F305E-10DA-41F3-AE5D-66E3CAEB81B1 162 SF 7200 LR2 (M) LR2 LR1 LR2 NW 89TH ST NC2P-55 (M) NW 89TH ST LR1 (M) U V 6-6 SF 5000 C1-40 SF 5000 LR1 (M1) E NW NC2P-55 (M) 15TH AV LR2 (M1) C1-30 17TH AVE NW 19TH AVE NW 16TH AVE NW NW 87TH ST 18TH AVE NW RSL (M) NC2-40 (M) NC2P-75 (M1) NC3P-40 LR1 6-6 From: SF 5000 LR2 LR1 (M) LR2 (M) LR2 NC3P-75 (M1) NC3P-55 (M) NC3P-75 (M1) Areas zoned Single-family in the Crown Hill Urban Village To: CB 119444 Amendment LR1 (M1) RSL (M) Current Zoning Amendment Area Reduce proposed zone designations in areas currently zoned Single-family in the Crown Hill Urban Village in the area east of 18th Av NW between NW 85th and 89th Street from Lowrise multifamily to Residential Small Lot. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Required? No No warranties of any sort, including accuracy, fitness, or merchantability accompany this product. Copyright 2019. All Rights Reserved. City of Seattle, City Council. 02/06/2019. Data source: City of Seattle. Link to record for CB 119444: http://seattle.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=3840745&GUID=7E5F305E-10DA-41F3-AE5D-66E3CAEB81B1 163 LR2 RC LR2 RC (M) LR2 RC 6-7 13TH AVE NW V U SF 5000 NW 83RD ST 6-7 From: SF 5000 12TH AVE NW LR1 (M1) RSL (M) Areas zoned Single-family in the Crown Hill Urban Village To: CB 119444 Amendment LR1 (M1) RSL (M) Current Zoning Amendment Area Reduce proposed zone designation in areas currently zoned Single-family in the Crown Hill Urban Village north of NW 83rd Street between 13th and 12th Avenues NW from Lowrise multifamily to Residential Small Lot. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Required? No No warranties of any sort, including accuracy, fitness, or merchantability accompany this product. Copyright 2019. All Rights Reserved. City of Seattle, City Council. 02/06/2019. Data source: City of Seattle. Link to record for CB 119444: http://seattle.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=3840745&GUID=7E5F305E-10DA-41F3-AE5D-66E3CAEB81B1 164 LR1 (M) LR2 LR1 LR2 (M) LR2 RSL (M) NC2P-40 LR1 (M1) NC3P-40 LR2 RC 17TH AVE NW NC2-55 (M1) NC3P-55 (M) SF 5000 LR2 RC 15TH AVE NW MARY AVE NW 6-8 V U 16TH AVE NW NW 83RD ST 18TH AVE NW LR2 RC LR2 (M1) LR2 (M1) NC2P-55 (M) SF 5000 NC2-40 1 NC2P-40 NW 80TH ST RSL (M) SF 5000 6-8 From: SF 5000 To: LR1 (M1) NC2P-55 (M) LR1 (M1) NC2P-40 RSL (M) Areas zoned Single-family in the Crown Hill Urban Village CB 119444 Amendment LR2 (M1) LR1 (M1) Current Zoning Amendment Area Reduce proposed zone designations in some areas currently zoned Single-family in the Crown Hill Urban Village in the half block east of 16th Av NW between NW 80th and 85th Street from Lowrise 2 (M1) multifamily to Lowrise 1 (M1) multifamily. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Required? No No warranties of any sort, including accuracy, fitness, or merchantability accompany this product. Copyright 2019. All Rights Reserved. City of Seattle, City Council. 02/06/2019. Data source: City of Seattle. Link to record for CB 119444: http://seattle.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=3840745&GUID=7E5F305E-10DA-41F3-AE5D-66E3CAEB81B1 165 LR1 RSL (M) LR1 (M) LR2 LR2 (M) LR3 LR2 LR1 (M1) NC3P-40 LR2 (M1) NW 83RD ST 18TH AVE NW U V 6-9 SF 5000 NC2P-55 (M) 16TH AVE NW 19TH AVE NW 15TH AVE NW 17TH AVE NW NC3P-55 (M) NC2-40 NC2P-40 NW 80TH ST 6-9 From: RSL (M) SF 5000 SF 5000 LR1 (M1) NC2P-55 (M) NC2P-40 Areas zoned Single-family in the Crown Hill Urban Village To: CB 119444 Amendment LR1 (M1) RSL (M) Current Zoning Amendment Area Reduce proposed zone designations in areas currently zoned Single-family in the Crown Hill Urban Village in the area east of 18th Av NW between NW 80th and 85th Street from Lowrise multifamily to Residential Small Lot. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Required? No No warranties of any sort, including accuracy, fitness, or merchantability accompany this product. Copyright 2019. All Rights Reserved. City of Seattle, City Council. 02/06/2019. Data source: City of Seattle. Link to record for CB 119444: http://seattle.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=3840745&GUID=7E5F305E-10DA-41F3-AE5D-66E3CAEB81B1 166 LR2 RC NW 83RD ST LR1 (M1) SF 5000 V U 6-10 13TH AVE NW 14TH AVE NW LR2 (M1) RSL (M) NW 80TH ST 6-10 From: SF 5000 Areas zoned SingleFamily in the Crown Hill Urban Village To: CB 119444 Amendment LR1 (M1) RSL (M) Current Zoning Amendment Area Reduce proposed zone designations in some areas currently zoned Single-family in the Crown Hill Urban Village west of 13th Av NW between NW 80th and 83rd Streets from Lowrise multifamily to Residential Small Lot. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Required? No No warranties of any sort, including accuracy, fitness, or merchantability accompany this product. Copyright 2019. All Rights Reserved. City of Seattle, City Council. 02/06/2019. Data source: City of Seattle. Link to record for CB 119444: http://seattle.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=3840745&GUID=7E5F305E-10DA-41F3-AE5D-66E3CAEB81B1 167 LR2 (M1) LR2 RC NC2-55 (M1) NC3P-40 NW 83RD ST 14TH AVE NW NC2P-55 (M) V U 6-11 MARY AVE NW NC2-40 SF 5000 LR1 (M1) NC2P-40 NC2P-55 (M) NC2P-40 NW 80TH ST LR1 (M1) 6-11 From: SF 5000 RSL (M) Areas zoned SingleFamily in the Crown Hill Urban Village To: CB 119444 Amendment LR2 (M1) LR1 (M1) Current Zoning Amendment Area Reduce proposed zone designations in some areas currently zoned Single-family in the Crown Hill Urban Village in the half block east of Mary Av NW between NW 80th and 83rd Street from Lowrise 2 (M1) multifamily to Lowrise 1 (M1) multifamily. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Required? No No warranties of any sort, including accuracy, fitness, or merchantability accompany this product. Copyright 2019. All Rights Reserved. City of Seattle, City Council. 02/06/2019. Data source: City of Seattle. Link to record for CB 119444: http://seattle.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=3840745&GUID=7E5F305E-10DA-41F3-AE5D-66E3CAEB81B1 168 NW 58TH ST LR1 (M1) SF 5000 RSL (M) V U 6-15 LR2 (M1) NW 56TH ST LR1 (M1) NC1-40 (M2) NC2-55 (M2) 8TH AVE NW 9TH AVE NW NW 57TH ST NC1-30 NC1-40 (M) NW MARKET ST 6-15 From: SF 5000 Block between 8th Av NW and 9thAv NW and NW 56th St and NW 57th St To: CB 119444 Amendment LR1 (M1) RSL (M) Current Zoning Amendment Area Reduce the proposed zone designation for the area between 8th Av NW and 9thAv NW and NW 56th St and NW 57th St in the Ballard Urban Village expansion area from Lowrise multifamily to Residential Small Lot. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Required? No No warranties of any sort, including accuracy, fitness, or merchantability accompany this product. Copyright 2019. All Rights Reserved. City of Seattle, City Council. 02/06/2019. Data source: City of Seattle. Link to record for CB 119444: http://seattle.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=3840745&GUID=7E5F305E-10DA-41F3-AE5D-66E3CAEB81B1 169 LR2 (M1) SF 5000 NC3P-40 NC3P-75 (M1) NC3P-75 (M1) LR2 LR2 (M) LR2 V U 6-16 LR3 15TH AVE NW 16TH AVE NW LR1 (M1) NC3P-55 (M) NW 85TH ST LR1 (M1) SF 5000 6-16 From: LR3 LR2 (M1) The area west of the intersection of 15th Ave NW and NW 85th St To: CB 119444 Amendment NC3P-75 (M1) NC3P-55 (M) Current Zoning Amendment Area Reduce the height of the proposed commercial zone from 75 feet to 55 feet. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Required? No No warranties of any sort, including accuracy, fitness, or merchantability accompany this product. Copyright 2019. All Rights Reserved. City of Seattle, City Council. 02/06/2019. Data source: City of Seattle. Link to record for CB 119444: http://seattle.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=3840745&GUID=7E5F305E-10DA-41F3-AE5D-66E3CAEB81B1 170 LR1 (M1) C1-30 NC2P-55 C1-40 NC2P-75 (M1) (M) SF 5000 LR2 (M) LR2 (M1) SF 5000 LR2 NC3P-75 (M1) LR2 (M1) LR1 (M1) 16TH AVE NW LR2 (M) NC3P-75 (M1) NC3P-40 V U 6-17 LR2 (M1) NC3P-55 (M) NC2P-40 NW 85TH ST NC2P-55 (M) LR2 RC LR2 RC LR3 RC (M) LR2 RC (M) LR2 RC LR1 (M1) NC2-55 (M1) LR2 RC SF 5000 LR2 (M1) -7 SF 5000 13TH AVE NW LR2 LR3 RC NC2P-55 (M) 14TH AVE NW LR3 MARY AVE NW LR2 15TH AVE NW NC2-40 NW 83RD ST NC2-40 6-17 From: NC3P-40 NC2P-55 (M) RSL (M) Commercial node at the intersection of 15th Ave NW and 85th ST To: CB 119444 Amendment NC3P-55 (M) NC3P-75 (M1) Current Zoning Amendment Area Increase the height of the proposed commercial zone designation from 55 feet to 75 feet and increase the MHA tier. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Required? No No warranties of any sort, including accuracy, fitness, or merchantability accompany this product. Copyright 2019. All Rights Reserved. City of Seattle, City Council. 02/06/2019. Data source: City of Seattle. Link to record for CB 119444: http://seattle.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=3840745&GUID=7E5F305E-10DA-41F3-AE5D-66E3CAEB81B1 171 DG EW AY N N 36T H ST WHITMAN AVE N WINSLOW PL N BR I AURORA AVE N LR3 (M1) LR3 LR3 (M1) LR2 NC3P-75 (M1) NC3P-65 (M) NC3P-65 AURORA BR N 34T IC-65 (M) LR1 LR2 LR3 (M1) N 35T H ST LR3 C1-65 LR3 (M) NC2-75 (M) H ST IC-65 6-18 From: 6-18 NC3P-75 (M1) NC3P-75 (M) LR3 (M1) V U NC3P-40 NC3P-65 IC-65 TROLL AVE N LR1 NC3P-40 NC2-75 (M1) ALBION PL N AURORA AV N SB ON RP T ON EM N FR AY W LINDEN AVE N LR2 (M) LR2 C1-40 LR3 (M) C2-30 C1-65 Area adjacent to the troll in the Fremont Urban Village To: CB 119444 Amendment LR3 (M1) LR1 (M) Current Zoning Amendment Area Reduce the proposed zone designation from Lowrise 3 (M1) multifamily to Lowrise 1 (M) multifamily along N 36th St generally between Linden Av N and Albion Pl N Comprehensive Plan Amendment Required? No No warranties of any sort, including accuracy, fitness, or merchantability accompany this product. Copyright 2019. All Rights Reserved. City of Seattle, City Council. 02/06/2019. Data source: City of Seattle. Link to record for CB 119444: http://seattle.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=3840745&GUID=7E5F305E-10DA-41F3-AE5D-66E3CAEB81B1 172 Attachment 3: Preliminary list of issues to be included in a companion Resolution Concurrent with CB 119444, Council will be adopting a companion resolution recognizing that the implementation of citywide MHA alone is not sufficient to achieve all of the goals of Seattle’s neighborhoods. This resolution communicates Council’s commitment to either taking action itself or requesting that the Mayor and Executive departments carry out a variety of citywide initiatives including but not limited to the following topics: 1. Address displacement, particularly in neighborhoods identified as having a high risk in the Growth and Equity Analysis a. Develop a consistent and thorough monitoring and reporting process of housing production and impacts on low-income households b. Increase funding for the Equitable Development Initiative c. Develop strategies to help retain economic and racial diversity in neighborhoods, including residents, businesses, and institutions d. Invest in strategies to help low-income and elderly homeowners remain in their homes e. Explore expanding the Tenant Relocation Assistance Ordinance f. Develop programs to support right of return for displaced residents 2. Invest MHA payment in-lieu fees and Seattle Housing Levy funds a. Prioritize investment in neighborhoods with high displacement risk b. Prioritize investment in neighborhoods where fees were generated and create more family-sized housing c. Include policies that align with the Equitable Development Initiative priorities in the Seattle Housing Levy Administrative & Financial Plan d. Invest in affordable homeownership projects near where in-lieu funds are generated 3. Provide baseline reporting on the production of affordable housing units by urban village to determine if actual units produced align with expectations 4. Incentivize production of more long-term affordable housing through project-specific density increases 5. Evaluate enforcement of Ordinance 124861, requiring owners of certain low-income housing to notify the City of the proposed sale of the property, and explore expanding the scope beyond multifamily housing 6. Analyze and resolve edge conditions and split-zoned parcels 7. Identify areas eligible for historic district designation and proactively support their designation 8. Conduct planning work for historic districts and consider additional strategies to provide protections to contributing buildings 9. Establish process for updating neighborhood design guidelines 10. Improve tree regulations a. Retain protections for exceptional trees b. Create permitting process for removal of significant trees (trees 6 inches in diameter in breast height or larger) c. Establish replacements requirements and in-lieu fee option d. Fund administration and enforcement of tree regulations 11. Explore alternative names for Single Family zones, such as Neighborhood Residential 12. Determine if infrastructure improvements are necessary to accommodate anticipated growth 173 13. Develop and implement strategies to support and incubate small, independent businesses 14. Monitor permit activity in Residential Small Lot (RSL) zones and report to Council if adjustments to development standards in RSL zones are recommended if the type of development occurring is not meeting intended outcomes 15. Work with the Seattle Department of Transportation to develop requirements for age-friendly street furniture In addition to the above citywide initiatives, the resolution will also contain district-specific initiatives, including but not limited to: District 1 (CM Herbold) • • • • • • • Provide baseline reporting on the production of affordable housing units by urban village to determine if actual units produced align with expectations Identify areas eligible for historic district designation and buildings eligible for landmark designation in District 1 and proactively support their designation Admiral o Support community-based organization efforts to create community spaces and affordable housing Morgan Junction o Determine when the urban village will be a candidate for community planning, including a cultural/historic resources survey o Engage with Washington State Ferries to mitigate impacts of vehicles arriving from ferries at Fauntleroy Terminal o Collaborate with community stakeholders to determine when and under what conditions a pedestrian zone designation along California Way SW would be appropriate West Seattle Junction o Begin community planning in coordination with light rail station area planning o Recognize the importance of community resources, such as libraries, community centers, and hospitals, and support community efforts to attract these uses to the neighborhood Westwood-Highland Park o Begin community planning, with a particular focus on creating a complete plan for the Delridge corridor and addressing the interests of the South Delridge community South Park o Assess how neighborhood meets criteria for urban village designation o Support community efforts to explore the designation of an historic district District 4 (CM Johnson) • • Roosevelt o Conduct additional planning work in the recently established Ravenna-Cowen North Historic District o Conduct additional planning work and in the area immediately surrounding the future light-rail station University District 174 o o Continue implementing actions under Section 5 of Resolution 31732 related to supporting businesses Explore strategies for prioritizing pedestrian use of the Ave, such as a woonerf District 6 (CM O'Brien) • Crown Hill o Identify next steps for the community planning process District 7 (CM Bagshaw) • Downtown o Review and prepare recommendations to modify requirements for providing off-street pick-up locations for service provides to access solid waste, recycling, and compost containers 175 Attachment 4: Excerpt from the OPCD Director’s Report and Recommendations on Mandatory Housing Affordability 6. Development Capacity Increases This section summarizes the development capacity increases that are proposed to implement MHA. In some cases, development capacity increases are implemented through a change in the zone designation (e.g., a property zoned NC2-40 that is rezoned to NC2-55). In other cases, changes to the development standards for a zone increase its capacity (e.g., a property zoned LR2 remains LR2, but the development standards for LR2 zones change). Some properties may be affected by both types of changes. The proposed changes to development standards vary by zone and generally include increases in the maximum height and the floor area ratio (FAR) limits. In some zones, the proposal would modify other development standards in order to provide additional development capacity or achieve urban design objectives. Figures 6.1 - 6.5 on the following pages summarize how the proposal modifies key development standards for each zone to increase capacity. The tables contain the maximum height, density, and FAR limits under existing regulations and specify how they increase under the proposal. The prototypes show the scale and form of development that we can be expected in most zones after MHA implementation and how they relate to the context of existing structures. This report focuses on the zone changes most prevalent in the study area after MHA implementation, including the Residential Small Lot (RSL) zone, Multifamily Residential zones (LR, MR, HR), Neighborhood Commercial (NC), and Commercial (C) zones. We included a draft of this material in the MHA Urban Design and Neighborhood Character Study, originally published in the fall 2016. Based on community input, we made a number of changes to development standards between issuing that report and transmitting the proposed legislation. Where the development capacity increases have been updated, this Director’s Report shows updated depictions and models consistent with the proposed legislation. Following these tables, this section then describes the character, housing types, and aesthetic qualities of development likely to occur in the modified zones. A series of prototypes are illustrated for development under the proposed MHA zone standards. The prototypes for each zone are intended to reflect realistic development scenarios. The prototypes vary by: • Site sizes and shape • Neighborhood context • Housing formats (e.g., townhouses vs. apartments) • Design and massing choices 32 176 SUMMARY OF LAND USE CODE DEVELOPMENT CAPACITY INCREASES Figure 6.1 Standard MHA Development Capacity Increases in the Residential Small Lot (RSL) Zone ZONING DENSITY LIMIT Existing Proposed Residential Small Lot Residential Small Lot (RSL, RSL/T, RSL/C) (RSL) Housing Type Existing RSL 1 / 2,500 ft2 Tandem RSL/T 1 / 2,500 ft Cottage RSL/C 1 / 1,600 ft2 FAR LIMIT Proposed 2 Existing HEIGHT LIMIT* Proposed Existing Proposed 25’ 1 / 2,000 ft2 None (all housing types) 0.75 30’ 18’ (all housing types) 18’ * Allowances for 5 feet of additional height for roof pitch are included in all existing and proposed cases. Figure 6.2 Standard MHA Development Capacity Increases in Lowrise Zones: Height and FAR Limits ZONING FAR LIMIT* Existing Proposed Lowrise 1 (LR1) Lowrise 1 (LR1) Lowrise 2 (LR2) Lowrise 2 (LR2) HEIGHT LIMIT Housing Type Existing Proposed Existing Proposed Cottage Housing 1.1 1.3 18’ + 7’ pitched roof 22’+ 5’ pitched roof Townhouse 1.2 1.3 Rowhouse 1.1 1.3 Apartment 1.0 1.3 Cottage Housing 1.1 1.4 Townhouse 1.3 1.4 Rowhouse 1.2 1.4 Apartment 1.3 1.4–1.6 Lowrise 3 (LR3) Outside of urban village, center, or station areas Lowrise 3 (LR3) Outside of urban village, center, or station areas Cottage Housing 1.1 1.8 Townhouse 1.4 1.8 Rowhouse 1.3 1.8 Apartment 1.5 1.8 Lowrise 3 (LR3) Inside of urban village, center, or station areas Lowrise 3 (LR3) Inside of urban village, center, or station areas Cottage Housing 1.1 2.3 Townhouse 1.4 2.3 Rowhouse 1.4 2.3 Apartment 2.0 2.3 30’ 30’ + 5’ pitched roof + 5’ pitched roof 18’+ 7’ pitched roof 22’+ 5’ pitched roof 30’ 40’ + 5’ pitched roof + 5’ pitched roof 18’+ 7’ pitched roof 22’ + 5’ pitched roof 30’ 40’ + 5’ pitched roof + 5’ pitched roof 18’+ 7’ pitched roof 22’ + 5’ pitched roof 40’ 50’ + 5’ pitched roof + 5’ pitched roof * To achieve the maximum FAR limit under existing regulations, a builder must meet standards for the location and configuration of parking and achieve green building performance. Under proposed regulations, builders would only have to achieve green building performance standard. 6. Development Capacity Increases 177 Figure 6.3 Standard MHA Development Capacity Increases in Lowrise Zones: Density Limits ZONING DENSITY LIMIT Existing Proposed Lowrise 1 (LR1) Lowrise 1 (LR1) Lowrise 2 (LR2) Lowrise 3 (LR3) Lowrise 2 (LR2) Lowrise 3 (LR3) Housing Type Existing* Proposed Cottage Housing 1 Unit / 1,600 ft No Limit** Townhouse 1 Unit / 1,600 ft 1 Unit / 1,350 ft2 Rowhouse 1 Unit / 1,600 ft 1 Unit / 1,350 ft2 Apartment 1 Unit / 2,000 ft No Limit** Cottage Housing 1 Unit / 1,600 ft2 Townhouse No Limit Rowhouse No Limit Apartment No Limit Cottage Housing 1 Unit / 1,600 ft2 Townhouse No Limit Rowhouse No Limit Apartment No Limit 2 2 2 2 No Limit No Limit * To achieve the maximum density limit under existing regulations, a builder must meet standards for the location and configuration of parking and achieve green building performance. Under the proposal, builders must achieve green building performance standard. ** A family-sized housing requirement applies. Figure 6.4 Standard MHA Development Capacity Increases Midrise and Highrise Zones ZONING FAR LIMIT* HEIGHT LIMIT Existing Proposed Existing Midrise (MR) Midrise (MR) 3.2 base 4.5 60’ base 80’ 4.25 bonus (no base or bonus) 75’ bonus (no base or bonus) 300’ 440’ Highrise (HR) Highrise (HR) Proposed 13 (with bonuses) for buildings 240’ and less 14 (with bonuses) for buildings over 240’ 15 (with bonuses) Existing Proposed * To achieve the maximum FAR limit under existing regulations a builder must meet standards for the location and configuration of parking and achieve green building performance. Builders would continue to have to meet these standards under the proposed legislation. 178 Figure 6.5 Standard MHA Development Capacity Increases in Commercial and Neighborhood Commercial Zones ZONING FAR LIMIT Existing Proposed NC-30 C-30 NC-40 C-40 2.25 single use 3.0 30’ 40’ 2.5 all uses (no single-use limit) + 4’ or 7’ for ground floor commercial space features + 4’ or 7’ for ground floor commercial space features NC-40 C-40 NC-55 C-55 3.0 single use 3.75 40’ 55’ 3.25 all uses (no single-use limit) + 4’ or 7’ for ground floor commercial space features NC-65 C-65 NC-75 C-75 4.25 single use 5.5 65’ 75’ 4.75 all uses (no single-use limit) NC-85 C-85 NC-95 C-95 4.5 single use 6.25 85’ 95’ 6.0 all uses (no single-use limit) NC-125 NC-145 5.0 single use 7.0 125’ 145’ 6.0 all uses (no single-use limit) 160’ 200’ NC-160 NC-200 Existing HEIGHT LIMIT Proposed 5.0 single use 8.25 7.0 all uses (no single-use limit) Existing Proposed IC-45 IC-55 IC-65 2.5 2.75 45’ 65’ IC-65 IC-65 2.5 2.75 65’ 65’ Other Development Capacity Increases The zone designations summarized above represent most land affected by the proposed legislation. Several other zones not summarized above would receive similar development capacity increases. The end of Section 6 has a summary of development standard increases for zones that apply in limited locations and overlay zones. Modified Development Standards for Urban Design & Livability The proposed legislation includes new and modified development standards to improve urban design outcomes, respond to community input, and enhance livability as Seattle grows. Some of these standards would also mitigate the potential impact of the largerscale buildings that could result following MHA implementation. Section 7 summarizes modified standards not directly related to increasing development capacity. 6. Development Capacity Increases 179