Do counterarguments need to be addressed? (b) (5) Have other federal entities been consulted? (b) (5) From: Daniel Jorjani [mailto:daniel.jorjani@sol.doi.gov] Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2017 4:47 PM To: Grant, Eric (ENRD) Subject: Fwd: MBTA "Jorjani, Daniel" From: Sent: To: CC: Subject: "Jorjani, Daniel" Wed Oct 18 2017 16:44:05 GMT-0600 (MDT) David Bernhardt <(b) (6) Gary Lawkowski Fwd: MBTA I was emailing Eric during the Monuments meeting re MBTA status. His robust comments are below. CC'ing Gary. ---------- Forwarded message ---------From: Grant, Eric (ENRD) Date: Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 5:55 PM Subject: RE: MBTA To: Daniel Jorjani Dan, Following please find ENRD’s questions and comments, collected from a wide range of Division lawyers. As you know, Jeff is recused from this matter, so please direct replies to me. Thanks, Eric Why an M-Opinion? (b) (5) What do you propose that DOJ do with this opinion? (b) (5) W (b) (5) How will Interior’s interpretation impact environmental-law prosecutions generally? (b) (5) Do counterarguments need to be addressed? (b) (5) Have other federal entities been consulted? (b) (5) From: Daniel Jorjani [mailto:daniel.jorjani@sol.doi.gov] Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2017 4:47 PM To: Grant, Eric (ENRD) Subject: Fwd: MBTA David Bernhardt <(b) (6) From: Sent: To: Subject: David Bernhardt <(b) (6) Wed Oct 18 2017 16:48:51 GMT-0600 (MDT) "Jorjani, Daniel" Re: MBTA Well we have a bit of work to do. Change is not easy. Sent from my iPhone On Oct 18, 2017, at 6:44 PM, Jorjani, Daniel wrote: I was emailing Eric during the Monuments meeting re MBTA status. His robust comments are below. CC'ing Gary. ---------- Forwarded message ---------From: Grant, Eric (ENRD) Date: Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 5:55 PM Subject: RE: MBTA To: Daniel Jorjani Dan, Following please find ENRD’s questions and comments, collected from a wide range of Division lawyers. As you know, Jeff is recused from this matter, so please direct replies to me. Thanks, Eric Why an M-Opinion? · (b) (5)