NOTE: This disposition is nonpreoedentia].

(Batten ?tate? @nurt of Qppeals
for the jfeberal @irtuit

 

BLACKBIRD TECH LLC, DBA BLACKBIRD
TECHNOLOGIES,
PEoinIiff-Appenont

V.

CLOUDFLARE, IN C.,
Defendant-Appellee

 

2018-1644

 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Northern District of California in No. 
Judge Vinoe Chhabria.

BLACKBIRD TECH LLC, DBA BLACKBIRD
TECHNOLOGIES,
PEoinIiff-Appenont

V.

INCAPSULA, IN C.,
Defendant-Appellee

 

2018-1648

 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Northern District of California in No. 3:17-cv-06883-VC,
Judge Vince Chhabria.

 

JUDGMENT

 

WALTER D. DAVIS, JR, Davidson Berquist Jackson 
Gowdy, LLP, McLean, VA, argued for plaintiff-appellant.
Also represented by STAMATIDS STAMOULIS, Stamoulis 
Weinblatt LLC, Wilmington, WENDY VERLANDER,
Blackbird Tech LLC dfbfa Blackbird Technologies, Boston,
MA.

ANTHONY WWHEW GARZA, Charhon Callahan Robson
Garza, P.C., Dallas, TX, argued for defendants-appel-
lees. Defendant-appellee CloudFlare, Inc. also represented
by STEVEN CHASE CALMHAN.

MICHAEL. JOHN SACKSTEDER, Fenwick West, 
San Francisco, CA, for defendant-appellee Incapsula, Inc.

 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

0RD ER ED and ADJ UDGED:

PER CURLAM (Looms, and Moons, Circuit
Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT