Federal Elections Commission?was not supported by law. Records of
exploratory activity may become records of a committee once formed. Further,
the subpoena called for production of records within the Committee?s
possession, whatever entity may have been the ?author? of those records.

The Committee on February 8 speci?cally stated that ?Text messages with
variations of ?McCrae?: all prior to July 3, 2017? was included in its search.
And yet we were only provided the following last night, among other
documents:

 

From: 'Mark Har?s? r.

To: 'Ma?m Warren"
Sent 08 Her 201? 
Subleal: No Subject

Hey Bro Mark are well! I wantedto circle backwithyou perour phone
conversation res-tween Dome H3136front. Ihave hadseveralrealtygood onwarsa?onsw?h several
Iegislatorsand withsorne fonts lobbying on this issue.-lamsti? trying tofeel myway astomhatme
be,butsense itisreallybogged downatmemoment

meinBJaden meto
me'keypeople' that can helpmecany?iatpanof?le countyinafuhmeUS Home lace.__.l
MarduZSw?hmedown?rere.Ymh1ow
the puli?mland?nantial connections betterihan myoneelselvmuld know, 
US 
hadbeenhelping 
much 

Mark

 

 

 

The timing of your disclosure raises signi?cant and material concerns
regarding the Committee?s cempliance and candor prior to, and now during,
the hearing. Minutes ahead of the testimony of Dr. Mark Harris? son?and only
after you understood that the State possessed certain documents in his
possession?you stated to Agency counsel that the Committee had failed to
produce certain correspondence. The explanation at that tinie for having
withheld those documents was that your query of search had been incomplete.
The testimony immediately following the Committee?s disclosure strongly
Suggests that explanation was not accurate.

Sincerely,

Josh Lawson
General Counsel

Encl: Records of Committee correspondence