Case Document 12 Filed 02/21/19 Page 1 of 3 A0 472 (Rev. 1 1/16} Order of Detention Pending 'l'rial FILED ?m UNITED STATES DISTRICT Cou?wee for the FEB 21 2019 DiStriCt Of Maryland AT GREENBELT CLERK. us. DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MARYLAND United States of America BY V. Case No. GLS l9-mj-063 Christopher Paul Hasson Defendant ORDER OF DETENTION PENDING TRIAL Part 1- Eligibility for Detention Upon the 1:1 otion ofthe Govemment attorney pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3 142(f)( I or Motion ofthe Government or Court?s own motion pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3 I the Court held a detention hearing and found that detention is warranted. This order sets forth the Court?s ?ndings of fact and conclusions of law, as required by 18 U.S.C. 3142(i), in addition to any other ?ndings made at the hearing. Part II - Findings of Fact and Law as to Presumptions under 3142(e) CIA. Rebuttable Presumption Arises Under 18 U.S.C. 3142(e)(2) violator): There is a rebuttable presumption that no condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure the safety of any other person and the community because the following conditions have been met: the defendant is charged with one ofthe following crimes described in 18 U.S.C. 3142(f)(l): a crime of violence, a violation of 18 U.S.C. 1591, or an offense listed in 18 U.S.C. 2332b(g)(5)(B) for which a maximum term of imprisonment of IO years or more is prescribed; or 1:1(b) an offense for which the maximum sentence is life imprisonment or death; or an offense for which a maximum term of imprisonment of 10 years or more is prescribed in the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 801-904). the Controlled Substances Import and Export Act (21 U.S.C. 951-971). or Chapter 705 ofTitle 46. U.S.C. (46 U.S.C. 70501?70508): or I: any felony if such person has been convicted oftwo or more offenses described in subparagraphs through of this paragraph. or two or more State or local offenses that would have been offenses described in subparagraphs through ofthis paragraph ifa circumstance giving rise to Federal jurisdiction had existed, or a combination of such offenses; or any felony that is not otherwise a crime of violence but involves: a minor victim; (ii) the possession ofa firearm or destructive device (as defined in 18 U.S.C. 921); any other dangerous weapon; or (iv) a failure to register under 18 U.S.C. 2250: and (2) the defendant has previously been convicted ofa Federal offense that is described in 18 U.S.C. or ofa State or local offense that would have been such an offense ifa circumstance giving rise to Federal jurisdiction had existed: and I: (3) the offense described in paragraph (2) above for which the defendant has been convicted was committed while the defendant was on release pending trial for a Federal, State, or local offense; and El (4) a period of not more than ?ve years has elapsed since the date of conviction. or the release ofthe defendant from imprisonment, for the offense described in paragraph (2) above, whichever is later. Page 1 of 3 Case Document 12 Filed 02/21/19 Page 2 of 3 A0 472 (Rev. 11/16} Order of Detention Pending Trial DB. Rebuttable Presumption Arises Under 18 U.S.C. 3142(e)(3) (narcotics. firearm. other qzi?nscs): There is a rebuttable presumption that no condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure the appearance of the defendant as required and the safety of the community because there is probable cause to believe that the defendant committed one or more of the following offenses: El (1) an offense for which a maximum term of imprisonment of 10 years or more is prescribed in the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 801-904). the Controlled Substances Import and Export Act (21 U.S.C. 951-971), or Chapter 705 ofTitle 46, U.S.C. (46 U.S.C. 70501-70508); E10) an offense under 18 U.S.C. 924(0). 956(a), or 2332b; (3) an offense listed in 18 U.S.C. 2332b(g)(5)(B) for which a maximum term of imprisonment of 10 years or more is prescribed; (4) an offense under Chapter 77 of Title 18. U.S.C. (18 U.S.C. 1581?1597) for which a maximum term of imprisonment of20 years or more is prescribed: or (5) an offense involving a minor victim under 18 U.S.C. 1201, 1591. 2241, 2242. 2244(a)(l). 2245. 2251, 2251A. 2252(a)(1), 2252(a)(2), 2252(a)(3), 2252A(a)(1). 2252A(a)(2). 2252A(a)(3). 2252A(a)(4). 2260, 2421, 2422, 2423, or 2425. Cl C. Conclusions Regarding Applicability of Any Presumption Established Above The defendant has not introduced sufficient evidence to rebut the presumption above, and detention is ordered on that basis. (Par! need not be completed.) OR The defendant has presented evidence sufficient to rebut the presumption. but after considering the presumption and the other factors discussed below, detention is warranted. Part - Analysis and Statement of the Reasons for Detention After considering the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. 3142(g) and the information presented at the detention hearing. the Court ncludes that the defendant must be detained pending trial because the Government has proven: clear and convincing evidence that no condition or combination ofconditions of release will reasonably assure the safety of any other person and the community. a preponderance of evidence that no condition or combination of conditions of release will reasonably assure the defendant?s appearance as required. In addition to any ?ndings made on the record at the hearing, the reasons for detention include the following: Weight of evidence against the defendant is strong Subject to period of incarceration if convicted El Prior criminal history Participation in criminal activity while on probation. parole, or supervision 'story ofviolence or use of weapons E?jistory of alcohol or substance abuse I:l Lack of stable employment [1 Lack of stable residence El Lack of?nancially responsible sureties El Lack ofsignificant community or family ties to this district Page 2 of3 Case Document 12 Filed 02/21/19 Page 3 of 3 A0 472 (Rev. 1 Order of Detention Pending Trial Signi?cant family or other ties outside the United States I:l Lack of legal status in the United States I: Subject to removal or deportation after serving any period of incarceration Prior failure to appear in court as ordered Prior attempt(s) to evade law enforcement I: of alias(es) or false documents ?ckground information unknown or unveri?ed Prior violations of probation, parole, or supervised release OTHER REASONS OR FURTHER EXPLANATION: Part IV - Directions Regarding Detention The defendant is remanded to the custody of the Attorney General or to the Attorney General?s designated representative for con?nement in a corrections facility separate, to the extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody pending appeal. The defendant must be afforded a reasonable opportunity for private consultation with defense counsel. On order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the Government, the person in charge of the corrections facility must deliver the defendant to a United States Marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection with a court proceeding. r? f' Date: 02/21/2019 IE Charles B. Day United States Magistrate Judge Page 3 of 3