Doc ID: Type: GOU

Kind: ARTICLE 78 
Recorded: 02/19/2019 at PM
Fee Amt: $305.00 Page 1 of 0
Rookland County. NY

Paul Piperato County Clerk



Hon.

 

Justice of the Supreme Court

In the Matter of the Application of I
NATHAN BUBEL and BRIAN DOWNEY,
Petitioners,
?against?

. PHILIP GIGANTE, PAUL A. MARCHESANI, and
ANTHONY P. VALVO.

Respondents

and THE ROCKLAND COUNTY BOARD OF

ELECTIONS and VILLAGE OF AIRMONT
VILLAGE CLERK,

3

FOP an Order Pursuant to Sections 16?100, 16?102 and
 6~1 l. 6 of the Election Law, declaring invalid the
Independent nominating petitions purporting to 
nominate the Respondents 'as candidates in the Village
of Airmont Election to be held on March '19, 2019.



 

 

At a Special Term for Election Proceedings
of the Supreme Court Of the State of New
York, County of Rockland, at the Courthouse

. at 1 South Main Street, New City, New York on
. the day of February, 2019.
.-. PRESENTOrder to Show Cause to Invalidate

I Index No.

I Upon the reading and ?ling of the annexed Veri?ed Petition of NATHAN BUBELL

and BRIAN DOWNEY, duly veri?ed on February 19,- 2019; and upon the original village

independent nominating petitions naming Respondents PHILIP GIGANTE as
candidate for the Public Of?ce of Mayor of the Village of Airmont, and PAUL A.

MARCHESANI. and ANTHONY VALVO (together with GIGANTE, hereinafter the

 

   


ENTERED 

LFEB 19 2019

- 

 

 

 

?Respondents?Candidates?) as candidates for the Public Of?ce of Trustee of the Village of
Ainnont, in the Village Election to be held on March 19, 2019, and upon all the papers and
proceedings heretofore had herein, it is hereby I

ORDERED, that the respondents named herein show cause before this Court at an IAS
Term, l?art . thereof, to be held at the Supreme Court Courthouse, 1 South Main

. . ?3330
Street, New City. New York, on the 145th day W4 2019, at 9% AM.

of that day or as soon thereafter as counsel can be heard, why an/ order should not be made and
entered herein I

1. Declaring insuf?cient, defective, invalid, null . and void the independent
nominating petition ?led with the Village of Airmont Village Clerk, purporting to designate
Respondent PHILIP GIGANTE as a candidate for the Mayor of the Village of Airmont in the
village election to be held on March 19, 2019;

2. Declaring insuf?cient, defective, invalid, null and void the independent
nominating petition ?led with the Village of Airmont Village Clerk, purporting to designate
Respondent PAUL A. MARCHESANI as a-candidate for the Trustee of the Village of Airmen-t
in the village election to be held on March 19, 2019;

3. Declaring insuf?cient, defective, invalid, null and void the independent
nominating petition ?led with the Village of Airrnont Village Clerk, purporting to designate
Respondent ANTHONY P. VALVO as a Candidate. for the Trustee of the Village of Airmont in
the village election to be held on March 19, 2019; I I I

4. Enjoining, restraining, andprohibiting the ROCKLAND COUNTY BOARD OF

ELECTIONS and the VILLAGE OF AIRMONT, VILLAGE CLERK from printing and placing

the name. of the said Respondents on the of?cial ballots to be used at March 19, 2019 Village 

Election;

 

 

 

5. why the Petitioners should not have such other and further relief as to this Court
ORDERED. that the respondent THE ROCKLAND COUNTY BOARD OF

ELECTIONS be, and it hereby is, ordered and directed to produceupon the hearing of this order

to show cause and all adjournments thereof and at such other time as the Court may direct, the I

aforesaid independent nominating petitions, cover sheet(s) and amended cover sheet(s) and any

other documents purporting to designate petitioners together with the objections and

speci?cations relating thereto, the report of the Clerks of the said THE ROCKLAND COUNTY .

BOARD OF ELECTIONS made on such objections and specifications, any written noti?cation 

of a determination of non-compliance together with proof of service upon the candidate and any
writing purporting to cure or correct said determination of non-compliance for examination by
this Court and such other documents as the Court shall direct.
6. ORDERED. that the reSpondent VILLAGE OF AIRMONT VILLAGE CLERK
be. and .it hereby is, ordered and directed to produce upon the hearing Of this order to show
cause and all adj ournments thereof and at such other time as the Court may direct, the-aforesaid
independent nominating petitions, cover sheet(s) and amended cover sheet(S) and any other
documents purporting to designate petitioners together with the objections and speci?cations
relating thereto, the report of the Clerks of the said VILLAGE OF AIRMONT VILLAGE
on such objections and specifications, any written noti?cation of a determination
of non?compliance together with proof of service upon the candidate and any writing purporting
to cure-or correct said determination of non?compliance for examination by this Court and such
other documents as the Court shall direct.
SUFFICIENT CAUSE APPEARING THEREFOR, leave is hereby granted to the

petitioner to submit upon the return day of this order to show cause, and on the argument and

 

 

 

. 1'16211?1 ng thereof, such additional af?davits, exhibits and other proof as may be necessary.

ORDERED that proof of service may be ?lediwith the Court on the return date speci?ed-
herein; and I I .

SUFFICIENT CAUSE APPEARING THEREFOR, 

ORDERED, that service of a copy of this order to show cause,? together with a copy Of
the paperslupo?n Which it is granted, on the respondent THE ROCKLAND COUNTY BOARD-
OF ELECTIONS be made by leaving a copy thereof to either Commissioner of the Rockland
. County Board of Elections or anyone authorized to accept service on behalf of THE
ROCKLAND COUNTY BOARDOF ELECTIONS at 11 New Hempstead Road, New City,
New York on or before the 19th day of February, 2019.

ORDERED, that service of a copy of this order to show cause, together with a copy of
the papers upon which it is granted, on the respondent VILLAGE OR AIRMONT VILLAGE
. CLERK be made by leaving a copy thereof to either Commissioner of the Rockland County
Board of Elections or anyone authorized to accept service on behalf of VILLAGE OR
VILLAGE CLERK on or before the 19th day of February, 2019, or. by sending it
overnight mail through the United States Postal Service to. OR AIRMONT-
VILLAGE CLERK, on or before the day of February, 2019, shall be deemed good and
acceptable service. I

i. and on the Respondent?Candidates PHILIP GIGANTE, PAUL A. MARCHESANI,
AND ANTHONY P, VALVO either U) by personal delivery of the same to such Respondent-
Candidates pursuant to CPLR 308 on or before the 19th day of February, 2019; or (2) by
personal delivery of the same to a person of suitable age and discretion at the addresses of such

Respondent?Candidates set forth in said Independent nominating petitions and by enclosing the

 

 

 

 

 

 

same in a securely sealed and duly postpaid wrapper addressed to such Respondent-Candidates
at the addresses set forth in the said Independent nominating petitions and by depositing the
same in a Post Of?ce branch or Post Of?ce box regularly maintained by the United States
Postal Seivice in the State of New York on or before the 19th day of February, 2019; or (3) by
af?xing the same to the door of the address of such Respondent?Candidates set forth in said
Independent nominating petitions and by enclosing the same in a securely sealed and duly
postpaid wrapper" addressed to such Respondent?Candidates at the addresses set forth in said
Independent nominating petitions ?led with VILLAGE OR AIRMONT VILLAGE CLERK and
by depositing the same in a Post Of?ce Branch 01 Post Of?ce box regularly maintained by the
United States Postal Service in the State of New York on or before the 19th day of February
2019: or (4) by delivering a copy thereof to a recognized overnight delivery carrier and/or the
United I States Postal Service, waiving the requirement of a signature, addressed to such
Respondent?Candidates at the addresses set forth in said Independent nominating petitions ?led
with OR AIRMONT VILLAGE CLERK on or before the 19th day of February,
2019; (5) by enclosing the same in a securely-sealed'and duly postpaid wrapper addressed to
such Respondent?Candidates at the address set forth in the Independent nominating petitions
?led with VILLAGE OR IAIRMONT VILLAGE CLERK and by depositing the same in a Post
Of?ce branch or Post Of?ce box regularly maintained by the United States Postal Service in the
State of New York on or before the 19th day of February, 2019, and that such service shall be .

deemed, due, timely, good and suf?cient service thereof and such service shall constitute

suf?cient notice thereof.

   

 

 

 

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF YORK
COUNTY OF ROCKLAND

In the Matter of the Application of VERIFIEDPETITION

NATHAN BUB EL and BRIAN DOWNEY, 
Index No.

Petitioners,
?against~ -
PHILIP GIGANTE, PAUL A. MARCHESANI, and
ANTHONY P. VALVO,
Respondents . .
i . 
- 1 3% .
and THE ROCKLAND COUNTY BOARD OF - E9322 1?11
ELECTIONS and VILLAGE OF AIRMONT VILLAGE i ail; 35'
i 
CLERK, ?itOrder Pursuant to Sections 16-100, 16102 and 16- 3% 5,
1 16 of the Election Law, declaring invalid the Independent .
a 

nominating petitions purporting to nominate the
RCSpondents as candidates in the Village of Airmont

Election to be held on March 19, 2019.

I The petitioners, by their attorney, Daniel S. S'zalkiewicz, respectfully shows and alleges:

l. The at all times hereinafter mentioned your Petitioner, NATHAN BUBEL was,

and still is, a duly quali?ed voter of the State of New York. He resides at 26- Madison Hill Road,
Airmont, NY 1090]. and is entitled-to vote in the March 9, 2019, Village of Airmont Election,

and is currently a candidate.

2. The at all times hereinafter mentioned your Petitioner, BRIAN DOWNEY was,

and still is, a duly qualified voter ofthe State ofNew York. He resides at 6 Edgebrodk Lane,

I

Airmont, NY 10952 and is entitled to vote in the March 19, 2019, Village of Airmont Election,
and is currently a candidate.

3. That the respondent ROCKLAND COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS (?Board
Hofltf?lections?) was and is charged with-the responsibility of the supervision of the conduct of I
of?cial elections held in the Village of Airmon't, New York State, including the duties of
receiving and ?ling Independent Nominating Petitions for the Public Of?ce in the Village of
Airmont. County of Pockland, New York State, the review and determination of objections and
speci?cs of objections to such Independent NominatingPetitions, noti?cation of a determination
of non? compliance, maintaining the permanent personal voter registration poll records Iof voters

and of?cial maps for the County of Rockland, and the preparation of of?cial Village Election

ballot for use in the County of Rockland, New York State,

- 4. That the respondent VILLAGE 0f the VILLAGE OF
AIRMONT (?Village Clerk?i) was and is charged with the responsibility of the supervision of the
conduct of of?cial elections held in th'elVillage of Airmont, New York State, including the duties

of receiving and ?ling Independent Nominating Petitions for the Public Of?ce in: the Village of 

'Airmont, County of Rockland, New York State, the review and determination of objections and
speci?cs of objections to such Independent Nominating Petitions, noti?cation of a determination
of non? compliance, maintaining the permanent personal voterregistration poll records of voters

and of?cial maps for the County of Rockland, and the preparation of of?cial Village Election

08
a.

ballot for use in the County of Rockland, New York State

3 as aw
cam-3e

5.

1

That on or about February 13, 2019 there were received by the VILLAGE

0.1.1

lega?
sa- a bl gm

- CLERK certain papers allegedly constituting independent nominating petitions purporti

SH
A

designate?for the March 19: 2019 Village Election the Preserve Airmont Party for the party
positions as hereinafter set forth:
(A) Name of Candidate: PHILIP GIGANTE

Place of Residence: 14 Edgebrookl Lane
Airmont, NewYork 10952

Position: Mayor
(B) Name of Candidate: PAUL A. MARCHESANI 333 
9?33 
Place of Residence: 12 Dawn Lane C1755 Lg
Airmont, New York 10901 a; 
Posmon: Trustee Etc? 
.. . ,2 
. . 
(C) Name of Candidate: AN P. VALVO g3? N,

Place of Residence: 1 Far View Terrace .
Airmont, New York 10901

Position: Trustee

6. That on behalf (if Petitioners NATHAN BUBEL, BRIAN DOWNEY, and
M1 GDALIA PESANTE (hereinafter referred to as. ?Petitioners Aggrieved Candidates?), there
were ?led with the VILLAGE. CLERK on or about February 13, 2019, Independent Nominating
Petitions designating said Petitioner for the March 19, 2019 Village Elections for the public
office of Mayor for the Village of Airniont. I
7. 7. That on behalf of Petitioners NATHAN BUBEL, BRIAN DOWNEY, and
MIGDALIA PESANTE (hereinafter referred to as ?Petitioners Aggrieved Candidates?), there
were filed with the VILLAGE CLERK on or about February 13, 2019, Independent Nominating
Petitions designating said Petitioners for the March 19, 2019 Village Elections for the public

of?ce of Trustee for the Village of Airmont.

8. Your Petitioners?Aggrieved Candidates are seeking designations for, and election 
to the Public Of?ce for which a designation was purportedly made by'the Respondent? I
Candidates Herein. Your Petitioners?Aggrieved Candidates are ?Aggrieved Candidate? within
the meaning of Section I 6--102 of the Election Law and as such have standing to. institute this
proceeding. Your Petitioners?Aggrieved Candidates are duly quali?ed for the election to the

subject Public Of?ce.

 

9. Upon information and belief, that the aforesaid alleged independent nominating
petitions filed by, or on behalf of, Respondents PHILIP GIGANTE, PAUL A. MARCHESANI,
and ANTHONY P. VALVO are insufficient, ineffective and invalid, does not conform to the
provisions of the Election Lawand other Laws of the State of-New York, and the Rules and
Regulations of the NEW YORK STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, VILLAGE CLERK, and.

the BOARD OF ELECTIONS, and are null and void by reason of the facts and allegations set
forth herein including but not limited to the annexed hereto and made part hereto and made part
hereof as Exhibit l. The Respondents BOARD OF ELECTIONS and VILLAGE CLERK should
be restrained and enjoined from?printing the name of said Respondents upon the official ballots
of said Village Election. -

10. Upon information and belief, the independent nominating petitions naming the
Respondents as candidates for the aforesaid party positions is invalid by. reason of the following
facts:

a. That the petition does not contain the minimum number of valid signatures of

registered voters registered to vote as required for the designation.

11.

That ,many Of the signers have not registered at the residences given in said
petition and were not and are not quali?ed electors and their names cannot be

counted as valid.

That signatures to said petition were obtained in Violation of law.

That on some of the respective sheets of. the purported petitiOn, material

alterations and/or additions were made thereon. subsequent to the obtaining of the

signatures and/0r subsequent to the execution thereof by the subscribing
witnesses.
hat many of the signatories set forth incomplete, insufficient, or untrue residenCe

addresses, or no addresses.

- That many alterations, interlineations, erasures, and mutilations appear in dates,

signatures and addresses of signatories.

That many 'of those whose signatures appear on said purported petition had
previously signed the. same petition.

That in some instances, the date of execution of witness statements is missing,
incomplete, prior to signatures to which he/ she claims to be attesting, or
insufficient. I

That the. date of some signatures is incomplete, missing, or inaccurate.

That many persons signing said purported petition are .not registered voters as
stated although they allege on-their sheets that they are registered.

That many signatories failed to set forth their complete and true names.

That in several instances, the addresses set forth for signers are incorrect, and in

some instances, said addresses do not exist.

m. That in some instances, the subscribing witnesses on the respective sheets .
inaccurately set forth the number of signatures contained on the sheets or did not
set forth any number of signatures in the witness statement.

That various persons who subscribed their-names to the purported petition donot
reside in-the Village of Airmont.

That some signatures are dated later than the dates of signatures appearing
thereafter 0n the same sheet.

That some signatures are dated prior to the dates of signatures appearing above
them, on the same sheet.

That many of those whose signatures appear upon said petition, had, prior thereto,
or on the same date, signed another petition for the same of?ce or position.

That in some instances, the person whose name appears as the subscribing witness
on a sheet also appears as a signatory 0n the sheet.

That on some sheets; the person appearing as-the subscribing witness is not a
registered voter as stated, although it is stated that such person is registered.

That many of the subscribing witnesses on respective sheets set forth incomplete,
insuf?cient, or untrue residence addresses, or no addresses.

That on some sheets, the-name, address. number of signatures on sheet, date,
and/or signature in the witness statement is illegible.

That the Witness Identi?cation information on some sheets is missing or
incorrect.

. That the purported petition is invalid for other reasons, which will be established
upon the hearing of this application.

6

 l. UpOn information andbelief: that in other respects, many of the signatures and
sheets may not be counted as valid.

12. Upon information and belief, Respondent?Candidate PHILIP GIGANTE acting as
an attesting Witness allowed someone other than the registered voter to sign for another without
the voter's permission or consent in violation of the law and contrary to Respondent?Candidate
sworn statement thereafter attested at the bottom of many pages that each of the individuals
whose names are subscribed'to this petition sheet containing 41 signatures, subscribed the same
in my presence on the dates above indicated and identi?ed himself or herself to be the individual
who signed this sheet. I understand that this statement will be accepted for all purposes as the
equivalent of an af?davit and, if it containsa material false statement shall subject me to the
same penalties as if Ihad been duly sworn. The aforesaid fraudulent activity and perjury
permeated the entire petition with forgeries, fraud and irregularities rendering the petitions
invalid independent of the number of signatures on it. .

l3. . Upon information and belief, Respondent?Candidate ANTHONY P. VALVO
acting as an attesting witness allowed someone other than the registered voter to sign for another
I without the voter's permission or consent in violation of the law and contrary to Respondent- .
Candidate sworn statement thereafter attested at the bottom of many pages that each of the
individuals whose names are subscribed to this petition sheet containing .30 signatures,
subscribed the same in my presence on the dates above indicated and identified himself or
herself to be the individual who signed this sheet. I understand that this statement will be
accepted for all purposes as the equivalent of an affidavit and, if it, contains a material false

statement shall subject me to the Same penalties as if I had been duly sworn. The aforesaid

 

 

fraudulent activity and perjury permeated the entire petition with forgeries, fraud and
ir1egularities rendering the petitions invalid independent of the number of signatmes on it.

14. More so PHILIP GIGANTE subscribed that he witnessed sheets 5,6, 14, 41, and
5'5. Howevel, as detailed 1n. Exhibit many of the signatures were signed by other people
than the voters with the candidates knowledge.

15. Additionally, those acting on behalf of PHILIP GIGANTE, and with his
knowledge, collected fraudulent signatures. Spec-i?cal 1y, these people are his relatives Andrew
Gigante (sheet 10) and Christine Gigante (sheet 15).

16. More so, ANTHONY .VALVO subscribed that he witnessed sheets 24, 25 and 26.
However, as detailed 1n Exhibit ,many of the signatures were signed by other people than the
vote1s with the candidates knowledge

17. Due to the extremely large number of signatures, constating a significant
percentage. of the total number of signatures submitted. witnessed by persons involved int/eh

conduct alleged herein, Petitioners allege that the independent nominating petitions were
permeated with fraud and involved in its entirety.

18. Due to the signi?cant role int eh Candidates campaign as alleged herein, the 
petitions should be deemed permeated with fraud. I

19. Upon information and belief, that in other respects, many of the signature sheets
may not be counted as valid; and that, in other reSpects, information and belief, the signers to the
purported petition. The candidate, the candidate's agents, including but not limited to the I
campaign manage/coordinator and the subscribing witnesses were parties to fraudulent conducts;

and upon information and belief, by reason thereof and ,on the basis of the allegations heretofore

set forth, the said purported independent nominating Petitions are permeated with fraud so as to
Vitiate it in its entirety. I

20. That, in accordance with prior decisions of this and other Cour-ts, Whose decisions
are controlling, Petitioners retainthe right to submit proof establishing ?the invalidity or
individual signatures and sheets on the purported petition not heretofore objected to, and of the
purported petition itself, for reasons not heretofore speci?ed, and-Petitioners intend to exercise
such right.

21. That your Petitioners request leave and reserve the right to submit upon the
argument and heading of this application, evidence by way of af?davits, testimony, and 
documentary proof to substantiate and support this application. -

22. That Petitioners request RespondentsBOARD OF ELECTIONS and VILLAGE
CLERK. to prbduce'upon the argument and hearing of this applications the aforesaid independent
nominating petitions, cover sheet(s) and amended cover sheet(s), identifiCation number
application form(s) and any other documents purporting to designate the said Respondents
candidate, together with the objections and speci?cations relating-Ito the aforesaid independent
nominating petitions, any written noti?cation of a determination of non?compliance together
with proof of service upon the candidate or contact person named therein, any writing purporting
to cure or correct said?determination of non-compliance, the permanent personal voter
registration poll records of voters, computer generated registration lists for the last four (4) years
and of?cial maps for the County Rockland, State of Nev?; York, and the report of the Clerks of

the said BOARD OF ELECTIONS made on such objections and speCi?cations and additional

records. - - a 13.4.9 EitN?a

g; a 5% an an

23. Other than this proceeding, your Petitioners have no adequate, suf?cient, or
effective remedy at law.

24. That your Petitioners request leave to-effect service of a copy of the order to Show
cause, together with a copy of the papers on-which it is granted, upon the respondent-objector
other than by personal service because:

This proceeding must be instituted on or before February 19, 2019;

b. Petitioners may, despite diligent effort, be unable to effect personal service upon
such reSpondents on or before such date; and

c. Petitioners are advised by their attorney that in'election matters governed by
sections 16?100, 16?102 and 16?1 16 of the Election Law, orders granting
alternative methods of service are routinely obtained.

25. In order that issues with respect to the allegations of this Petition be joined
expeditiously, it is respectfully requested that the Court fix the time within which the reSpective
Answers of the Respondents shall be served upon your Petitioners? attorney.

I 26. No previous application by Petitioners has been made to this or any other court

for the relief sought herein or for any similar relief.

10

WHEREFORE. your Petitioners respectfully prays for the relief request and for such
other and further relief as to this Court may seem just and .prOper in the premises.

- Dated: New York, New York
- February. 19. 2.0.1.9 .

 

By: Da?iel Sm Esq.
325 West 38th Street, Suite 810
New York, New York 10018
Telephone: (212) 706-1007
Fax: (914) 500?2315
Daniel@Lawdss.com

13 :30 03?? ?39 I
1431343914

I 52 =h 333 51111
. a 11

VERIFICATION

 

DANIELS. SZALKIEWICZ, an attorney duly admitted to practice before the courts of the State
of New York af?rms that he is the attorney for Petitioners 1n the within proceeding; that he has
..1:ead. the foregoing Petitien and: believes the contents thereof mto be true that the same 113 true ten-
his own knowledge except as to matters therein stated to be alleged on information and belief,
and that as to those matters, he believes it to be true; that his knowledge is based upon
discussions with the Petitioners or their 1ep1esentatives and review of the documents and ?les
pe1ta1n1ng to this matter; that the reason he IS vei 1fy1ng this Petition is because Petitioner IS not in

the county in which he has his of?ce.
if

   

DATED: New York, New York
February 19, 2019

 

 

By: Daniel S. Szalktiewicz, 
01511 WW3
?13 5031:1011
13113-3- 
8?11?ng 9-55 SW.

92?? Eli

 

EXHIBIT 1

 

Oljj eetion

 

SQM, NR, 

 

 

 

F, SH, SDM, NR, NR

 

F, SH, SDM, NR

 

 

 

I Susan Signed for Chris ?115 one is her signaturelu*_

 

- F, SH, HR 2, Susan- Slgned --
PR, SDM, NR, signi?cant difference in signature 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



i
I

i

 

5331?, 36M, NR, 

 

 

i
i




SWF, SDM, NR, 

 

SWF, SDM, NR, F, SH

 

SWF, SDM, NR, F, SH

 



SWF, SDM, NR

 

I 

SWF, .

 

 

 

I
1
1





10 PR, SDM, NR, (all prior signatures say ?Pat?) 
- SDM, NR, F?noteven close if
2_ 2 PR, SDM, NR
2 3 PR, SDMPR, SDM, 
8 SDM, NR, 
_2 9 
2 F, SH, SDM, NR
- - ?m 
. 1.3-3 3'
5 ?335 35
.3 7 ALF . 9,15: i=3
8 55?SWF, F, SH, SDM, NR
3 SWF, F, SH, SDM, NR
_5 4 . 
5 SWF, PR, F, SDM, NR, signed twiceSWF, AI, SDMSE13
$13-SDM, NR, no one by that name at that address



 

 

SW13, SDM, NR, F, SH

 

SWF, SDM, NR, F, SH

 

CD

SDM, NR, 

 

 

I

PR, TE, SDM, NR, 

 

 

PR, TE, SDM, NR

 

r5!

 

SQM, NR, F, ILLS

 

 




Ink not in black or blue

 

SQM, NR, F, SIL, ILLS

1.

 

 

'i 
{muo?hmmh-onoo



NR (N0 Sarallat address listed)

 

 

CZ)

ALT, NR (110 one with name at address listed)

 

 

ALT, SDM, NR, 

 

SEMI NR, 

 

 

 

AI: NR, SDM, NR

 

AI, NR, SDMSH, Signed twice (Bloom)
AI, NR, F, SH 

 

AI, NR, SDM, NR

 

NR, SDM, NR

 

oo on 00599100 noise ujuimImlox ox

AI, NR

 

 



0 A1, NR, SDM, NR
- SQMSH, Signed twice (Bloom)
DSP, ALT, SDM, NR 

 

DSP, DOS

 

 

I


DES, DSP

 

DOS, DSP

 

DSP, DOS, SDM, NR

 

 



\oixouo
u-x I 


SDM, NR

 

SDM, NR

 

SDM, NR

 

AI, ILLSNR, SDM, NR, SH, F, NFN, ILLS

 

SDM, NR, SH, F, NFN, ILLS -

 

ITSH, SDM, NR

 

F, SH, SDM, NR

 

y-n
c2:


NFN, SWF, SDM'I_l

?Sow", NR, F, SH, 
32MEXHIBIT 1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I SDMSDM, NR F, SH -- someone with same name signed later 011p_ag__
6 SDMSDM, NR, F, SH, NFN?w-Someone with same name signed earlier on 
page
- -m 
.I 10 FR 
L4 I SWF, ALT, A1
2 SWF, ILLS, NLN
3 SWF, NLN, AI
14 4 SWF, NR (purged) 
L4 SWF, NR?p11rged)
FL. -- 6 .2
ILIS, F, ND, AI 337'??
I4 3 SWF, ILLS, F, AI, ALT 
$31: 
LL. 10 SNEAI m3 3_
L51- ILLS. NFN, F. SDM:12 
SDMILLS, F, SDM, NR
7 IFFS, F, SDM, NR
15 8 ILLS, F, SDM, NR -
9 PR, ALT, signed twice (1: 5 1 5), SDM, NR
6 I NSWD, SWF, ILLS, AI 
2 NSWD, SWF, F, ILLS, AI
16 3 NSWD, SWF, F. ND, SDM, 
NSWD, SWF, 
6 NSWD, SWF, F, SDM, NR, DSP
16 7 SWF, F, NFN, SDM, NR, DSP
-.-.NSWD NR DSF 
F, ILLS. NR DSP
L0- 10 F, NFN, SDMSDM, NR
L7. 4 F, SH, SDM, NR
7 . 3 F, SH, SDM, NR 
L7 9 SH, SDM, NR 
?17 lg SH, SDM, NR 
""131? I SDMSDM, NR, F, SH

 

EXHIBIT 1

NR 
82M, NR, F, SH

 

SDM, NR

 

ILLS, ALT, AI

 

 



NR

 



- 

 





I


F. ALT, ILLS, TE


 

 

I

SEALT, SDM, NR

 

'i .
43m Li

SWALT,

 

ONUW

SWALT, NFN, SDM, NR

SEALT,

 


?4

\o?oo

I
1


CD

SWALT,

Hair, F. ILLS: NFNQ DSM. I 

smurfxr
SWALT,

 

ILLS, F, SH

 

ILLS, F, SH

 

NFN, SDM, NR, 

 

NFN, SDMILLS, F, 

 

SDM, NR, 

 

 



. SH SDM, NR, 

 

SDM: NR1 
_l LL39 SUM NBLEL

13 ii] . 
Jangng

3'11?in
1W0,

A
5? ?13m

 

 

1 I

F, SH, SDM, NR

 

F, SH, SDM, NR

 

SH, SDM, NR

 

F, SH, SDM, NR

 

SDM, NR

 

NFN, F, SH, SDM, NR

 

SDM, NR, DI

 



 



.F

 

NFN, PR, SDM, NR, 

 

PR, SDM, NR

 

1
I



PR, SDM, NR
NB

 

ILLS

 

NFN, ILLS

 

ILLS

 

 

 

 

. .


CD

 

ILLS

 

 

EXHIBIT 1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1 SWALT, 
2 
3 SWALT, SWF, NFN, SDM, NR, 
4 SWF- 

5 SWEALT NR 

- SWAIT NTN SDM NR 
SWF, NFN, SDM, NR, 

8 
9 

10 SWALT, SWF, ILLS, SDM, NR, ALT

-1 SDM, 

2 SWF, SDM, NR, SH

3 SDM, NR, SH

4 SWF, MFM, FR, SDM, NR, 

5 SWF, PR 

6 
7 SWF, ILLS 5g? 

- SWF, ILLS 
ILLD, ILLS, DI 91;: 
SW13, DI a? .o

1 31/13, SWALT, DI, SDM, NR, SH gig? I:
2 SWF, SE 
3 SWF, SWALT, DI, SDM, NR, SH 5% If,
4- SDM, NR, SH, DI J1
5 SWF, SWALT, SDM, NR, SH, DI 
6 SWF SWALT, SDM, NR, SH, DI

 

 

SWF, SWALT, 

 

SWF, SWALT, SDM, NR, SH, DI

 

SWF, SWALT, SDM, NR, SH, DI

 

SWF, SWALT, DI

CD

 

SH, SDM, NR

 

 

 

SH, SDM, NR

 

I
I

I

{LLJonooaI

SH, SDM, NR

 



 

5

6 SH, SDM, NR
1 .

3



 

ALT

 



 



 

SWALT, SWILL, SW, SWF

 

SWALT, SWILL, ILLS, SDM, NR, SWF

 

 

SWALT, SWILL, ILLS, SDM, NR, SWF

 

SWALT, SWILLSWALT, SWILL, ILLS, SDM, NR, SWF
4
5
6

WSWALT, SWILL, SWF

 

 

I
I
I

EXHIBITI

 

 

 

SWALT, SWILL, NFN, SWFF

 

SWALT, SWF

 

 

SWALT, SWILL, SW13

 

HKDOOH-J

CD

SWALT, SWILL, SW13

 

 

SDM, NR, ILLS, NFN

 

 

- FSM NR, ILLS, N13N

 

SDM, NR, ILLS, NFN

 

SDM, NFN, TE

 

 

ALT, PR, SDM, NR

 

1
1
1



 

SWALT, I

 

 

 



.. 


 

 

kiwi?1L1": ~ir
i 1

NFN
SWALT, TE

 

SWILL, SWALT, SW13, P, ILLS, AI,

 

SWILL, SWALT, SWP, P, ILLS, AI,

 

SWALT, SWP, 13_, ILLS, AI,

 

SWILL, SWALT, SW13, SDM, NR, ILLS, AI

 

1
1

AI, SWAI, ILLS

 

SWALT,

 

SWALT, NFN, ILLS

 

SWALT, NFN

 

1
1
1-l


1


SWALT ILLS


 



 

ILLS, NFN

 

1

SW13, N13N, SH, SDMSWF, NFN, SH, SDM, NR


W. 

 



 

NFN, ILLS, 

 

ILLS

 

A1

 

AI

 

ND,

 



 

ND,

 

ND,

 

ND, PR, SDM, NR, 

 

1 I 
1cm 111 431.0110 1?3 \1 mm 


N13, PR, SDM, NR, .

 

ND, PR SDM NR, 

 

 

 

p.11.

 

 

ND, SDM, 

 

 

ND, 1311,; NR, 

 

EXHIBIT 1

 

 

FR: H, DR

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ii DR 

ILLS: ALT

??31 - 

EN: SDMs SWALT,

 

SWALT,

 

SWALT, I

 

SWALT, NFN, SDMwimp?n L.) [\JiPSWALT, NFN, SDM, NR
.-
SWALT, Alt

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


435 8 SWALT, Em?: 
2_ NFN, SDM, N12- 2222 22?-
SDM, NR 22 -
ALT WE --.-..-. 
SDM, NR,

 

SDM, NR,

 

SDM, NR, . A

 

SDM, NR,

 

SEWNS, SDM, NR,

 

 

SDM, NR,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0 SDM, NR,

52 



_52 AI 


AI, 

(i9, A1, SDM, NR

 

 

 

 

5.: OD, A1, SDM, NR
:23- OD, AI, SDM, NR

 

OD, AI, DI, SDM, NR

 

SWF,

 



 

SEF, AI

 

 


.5

 

 



 

 

EXHIBIT 1

 

 

 

 

 


mimimmn

 

 

 

 

3_ SE13,

3, SWF,
_3 SWF,
53_ SWF,
SWAI

SWAI

 



SWAI, FR

 

SWAI

 

SEAI

 



 

. 


SDM, NR

. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1 P3. SDM, NR, 
:2 F5. 
3 P3, SDMSWALT, PR
. 2 SWALT,
3 SEALT,
Q3 4 SWALT, PR
5 SWALTSWALT, PR

 

i

 

EXHIBIT 1

_R_e_l'erence 1g);
No First Name
Forgery I

All alteration WithQutinitials 0r__in_itials other than witness or signer

similar 
Subscribing witness committed fraud

Date of witness statement is prior to the date of signature

witness info altered -
Subscribing Witness no date
illegible signature
no date
illegible date
l?R? signature is printing
date out of sequence
signature of subscribing winiess
no address listed for the signer
SDIVL signature does not match
Al? address'inconiplete or illegible
subscribing witness address inconiplete or illegible
CD but of district

l)l? date incomplete

signator previously signed the same petition

?01.13313 JD- i 1
Airman semi-did?

Wrong number of signatures stated in the subscribing witness statement

no ?rst name
subscribing witness. signature does not match
illegible signature

printed

Pv not in pen

no date on subscribing witness statement

subscribing witness signature not EXHIBIT 1

date of signature is prior to ?rst date of circulating petitions

date of witness statement is prior to date of signature

date incomplete

.. illegible. date. 
NR- not registered as per the BOE records

s11} Subscribing witness illegible