SR 104/Paradise Bay-Shine Road – Intersection Safety Improvements Intersection Control Evaluation Background and Project Needs SR 104 is functionally classified as a rural-principal arterial. It is a limited access, partially controlled, one lane in each direction. This intersection is the first intersection west of the Hood Canal Bridge and is subject to long platoons for traffic during a bridge opening. This intersection is in Jefferson County, has rolling terrain and is an NHS route. The posted speed within the project limits is 40 mph. SR 104 had a 2017 AADT of 17,800 with about 7.3% trucks. This project is categorized as an I-2 Safety Improvement (Collision Reduction) project. The intersection of SR 104/Shine Road is an Intersection Analysis Location (IAL) for the year 2016. Ninety percent of the 26 total crashes (2009 – 2015 crash history) at this intersection were entering at angle type crashes from Paradise Road. This project will provide improved intersection control, which has the potential to reduce number and severity of crashes. This is a 4-leg intersection, about 800 ft. west of the west end of the Hood Canal Floating Bridge. In the westbound direction, a climbing lane begins just past the intersection. There is left-turn channelization on mainline for both directions of travel. There is a right-turn lane for the westbound direction that serves the Paradise Bay Rd. There is no channelization on either of the minor legs. The vertical grade from the Hood Canal Bridge approaching this intersection is around an incline of 5%, and the 85th percentile speeds are around 45 mph. This intersection met signal warrants based on a 2005 count. There are times when SR 104 is closed for bridge openings. Given the close proximity of the Hood Canal Bridge, at these times eastbound traffic will often queue well to the west of this intersection. After the bridge is open to traffic, there are often times large platoons of traffic heading both directions. Alternatives Given the safety performance of the existing minor-street stop control, maintaining the existing control is not considered as an alternative for the project. A single-lane roundabout and signalized intersection were evaluated as part of this analysis. SIDRA was used for the roundabout analysis and Synchro was used for the signal analysis. Please refer to appendices for SIDRA and Synchro reports. Intersection Leg SR 104 (West) SR 104 (East) Shine Road Paradise Bay RD Overall I/S Existing 2018 PM Peak (PM was critical peak*) Single-Lane Roundabout Signalized Intersection Level of Service Ave Delay (s) Level of Service Ave Delay (s) A 8.8 B 19.7 A 6.1 C 22.9 A 5.1 C 21.6 A 9.6 B 19.5 A 6.4 C 20.9 *does not represent platoon from bridge opening Feasibility Both the signalized intersection and the single-lane roundabout are feasible alternatives. Below, we will discuss the advantages and disadvantages of each. Signalized Intersection – The signalized intersection will likely have a smaller footprint than that of a roundabout, and therefore have minimal to no right-of-way needs. SR 104/Paradise BayShine RD intersection is on a curve and has a downward sloping profile (east-west direction). One concern is the potential for rear-ends generated by a stopped queue from the signal. Another safety concern with a signal is the potential for red light running. Single-Lane Roundabout – Per the operational analysis above, the roundabout out-performed the signalized intersection during the PM peak hour. During off-peak hours, it is expected that the roundabout would also out-perform the signal because of the low delay for all entering vehicles. In addition, off-peak hours would typically have free-flow conditions and therefore higher vehicular speeds. Roundabouts are a preferred intersection control for high speed facilities because of their proven safety performance. During a Hood Canal Bridge closure, traffic on SR 3 can back up 1 to 2 miles (see graphic below). When the bridge opens, a platoon of traffic will send a steady stream of vehicles on SR 104 towards the Shine Road/Paradise Bay Road intersection. With the roundabout alternative, it may be difficult for traffic on Paradise Bay Road and Shine Road to enter westbound SR 104 due to gap availability. One solution to remedy this concern is installing a metered-entrance single-lane roundabout. Metered entrances are endorsed by FHWA in their Roundabout Guide (Chapter 8.1): 8.1.1 Metered entrance Roundabouts operate effectively only when there are sufficient longer and acceptable gaps between vehicles in the circulatory lanes. If there is a heavy movement of circulating drivers, then entering drivers at the next downstream entry may not be able to enter. This situation occurs most commonly during the peak periods, and the performance of the roundabout can be greatly improved with entrance metering. The concept of entrance metering at roundabouts is similar to ramp metering on freeways. A convenient sign is a changeable one that reads “Stop on red signal” and shows the usual yield sign for a roundabout otherwise. The sign would also include a yellow and red signal above the sign. The operation of the sign would be to show drivers the roundabout sign, display the yellow light and the sign “Stop on red signal,” and finally display the red light and the same text sign. This would cause entering vehicles to stop and allow the vehicles at the downstream entrance to proceed. A queue length detector on the downstream entrance may be used to indicate to the signal controller when the metering should be activated and deactivated. Once on the circulatory roadway, vehicles are not stopped from leaving the roundabout. A similar treatment has been used at a roundabout in Kennewick, WA on the state highway system with operational issues that are expected at Shine Road. Detection loops can be placed on Paradise Bay Road and Shine Road. When these legs of traffic had been delayed for more than a fixed period or exceed a length of queue, a ramp meter signal can be activated on SR 104 to relieve some of the traffic pressure on the minor legs. This metering signal will likely be activated only during a bridge opening and will deactivate when the SR 104 platoon has cleared. SR 104/Shine Road/Paradise Bay Road Typical backup on SR 3 during Hood Canal Bridge closure. Relative to a roundabout, a signal does not process vehicles as efficiently. With or without a bridge closure, a signal would propagate longer queues which would increase the potential for high speed, rear end crashes. Safety Analysis From the 2016 IAL (2009 – 2015 crash history), there were a total of 2 serious injuries and 24 non-serious crashes. 23 out of the 26 crashes were entering-at-angle crashes, and 25 out of the 26 crashes were intersection related. First Collision Type Entering-At-Angle Same Direction Sideswipe Rear-End Fatal Serious (indicated by Total Crashes 0 1 23 0 1 1 0 0 2 red arrows below) Under Federal Law, 23 United States Code Section 409, reports, surveys, schedules, lists, or data compiled or collected for the purpose of identifying, evaluating, and planning for safety enhancements or for developing safety projects which may be implemented using Federal-aid highway funds shall not be subject to discovery or admitted into evidence in a Federal or State court proceedings. Since 2016, there has been 4 other crashes; 2 suspected serious injury crashes. 3 of the 4 crashes were entering-at-angle crashes. The roundabout alternative will potentially eliminate all of the entering-at angle crashes and significantly reduce severity of crashes relative to the signal alternative. Community Engagement Community engagement is expected to be conducted in the Spring of 2019. WSDOT will present both the roundabout and signal alternatives. Selection and Conclusion A single-lane roundabout is recommended for this intersection based on the safety improvements and operational benefits. A metered-entrance single lane roundabout should be considered in the future if operational issues with a bridge opening is determined to be an issue. At a minimum during the initial construction, the hardware and conduit for a metered roundabout should be installed. Attachments: SIDRA Analysis Synchro Analysis HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 3: Shine Rd/Paradise Bay Rd & SR 104 Movement Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) Future Volume (veh/h) Initial Q (Qb), veh Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) Parking Bus, Adj Work Zone On Approach Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln Adj Flow Rate, veh/h Peak Hour Factor Percent Heavy Veh, % Cap, veh/h Arrive On Green Sat Flow, veh/h Grp Volume(v), veh/h Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln Q Serve(g_s), s Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s Prop In Lane Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h V/C Ratio(X) Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h HCM Platoon Ratio Upstream Filter(I) Uniform Delay (d), s/veh Incr Delay (d2), s/veh Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh LnGrp LOS Approach Vol, veh/h Approach Delay, s/veh Approach LOS 10/10/2018 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR 1 1 0 1.00 1.00 561 561 0 2 2 0 1.00 1.00 10 10 0 1.00 1.00 569 569 0 130 130 0 1.00 1.00 1 1 0 1.00 1.00 0 0 0 13 13 0 1.00 1.00 88 88 0 1.00 1.00 2 2 0 6 6 0 1.00 1.00 1800 4 0.50 0 5 0.43 11 664 1798 23.0 23.0 0.01 770 0.86 1136 1.00 1.00 17.8 4.7 0.0 9.5 1800 12 0.83 0 196 0.11 1714 12 1714 0.4 0.4 1.00 196 0.06 196 1.00 1.00 27.2 0.1 0.0 0.2 1800 213 0.61 0 819 0.54 1525 213 1525 5.2 5.2 1.00 819 0.26 964 1.00 1.00 8.6 0.2 0.0 1.5 1786 4 0.25 1 81 0.26 85 32 1523 0.0 1.1 0.12 457 0.07 457 1.00 1.00 19.2 0.3 0.0 0.4 1786 28 0.46 1 348 0.26 1333 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.87 0 0.00 0 1.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1786 104 0.85 1 416 0.26 1216 120 1433 3.4 4.5 0.87 472 0.25 472 1.00 1.00 20.4 1.3 0.0 1.6 0.0 A 668 22.9 C 22.6 C 27.3 C 8.7 A 19.5 B 0.0 A 32 19.5 B 0.0 A 21.6 C 2 22.5 4.5 18.0 3.1 0.1 3 12.4 4.5 5.0 2.4 0.0 4 34.0 4.5 43.5 25.0 4.4 6 22.5 4.5 18.0 6.5 0.4 7 4.9 4.5 5.0 2.2 0.0 8 41.5 4.5 43.5 31.3 5.7 1646 4 0.25 11 8 0.01 1567 4 1567 0.2 0.2 1.00 8 0.48 114 1.00 1.00 34.1 36.6 0.0 0.1 70.8 E Timer - Assigned Phs Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s Change Period (Y+Rc), s Max Green Setting (Gmax), s Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s Green Ext Time (p_c), s Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay HCM 6th LOS Shine Rd 10/10/2018 2018 PM Existing jmn 1.00 No 1800 660 0.85 0 766 0.43 1787 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.00 0 1.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.00 No 1800 862 0.66 0 967 0.54 1800 862 1800 29.3 29.3 967 0.89 1137 1.00 1.00 14.2 8.1 0.0 12.1 22.3 C 1087 19.7 B 1.00 No 1786 0 0.92 1 27 0.00 105 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.00 0 1.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.00 No 1786 4 0.50 1 19 0.26 74 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.00 0 1.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 A 120 21.6 C 1786 12 0.50 1 37 0.26 143 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.10 0 0.00 0 1.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 A 20.9 C Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Queuing and Blocking Report 2018 PM Existing 10/10/2018 Intersection: 3: Shine Rd/Paradise Bay Rd & SR 104 Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) EB TR 227 140 213 762 WB L 40 15 42 200 WB T 153 114 162 920 WB R 53 28 60 NB LTR 36 11 36 925 SB LTR 92 35 84 803 200 1 0 Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 0 Shine Rd jmn SimTraffic Report Page 1 SITE LAYOUT Site: 101 [SR 104/Paradise/Shine 1-lane 2018 PM] SR 104/Paradise/Shine 1-lane Roundabout SIDRA INTERSECTION 7.0 Copyright © 2000-2017 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd sidrasolutions.com Organisation: WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Created: Monday, October 8, 2018 10:46:20 AM Project: Not Saved MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: 101 [SR 104/Paradise/Shine 1-lane 2018 PM] SR 104/Paradise/Shine 1-lane Roundabout Movement Performance - Vehicles Mov ID OD Mov Demand Flows Total HV veh/h % Deg. Satn v/c Average Delay sec Level of Service 95% Back of Queue Vehicles Distance veh ft Prop. Queued Effective Average Stop Rate Speed per veh mph South: Shine Rd 3 L2 1 0.0 0.014 9.5 LOS A 0.1 1.4 0.22 0.51 8 T1 1 0.0 0.014 5.0 LOS A 0.1 1.4 0.22 0.51 36.3 18 R2 14 0.0 0.014 4.8 LOS A 0.1 1.4 0.22 0.51 35.4 16 0.0 0.014 5.1 LOS A 0.1 1.4 0.22 0.51 35.5 L2 11 0.0 0.712 10.4 LOS B 7.1 183.4 0.54 0.53 35.1 6 T1 618 5.0 0.712 6.1 LOS A 7.1 183.4 0.54 0.53 35.1 16 R2 141 1.0 0.712 5.7 LOS A 7.1 183.4 0.54 0.53 34.4 771 4.2 0.712 6.1 LOS A 7.1 183.4 0.54 0.53 35.0 Approach 36.2 East: SR 104 1 Approach North: Paradise Bay Rd 7 L2 1 3.0 0.005 12.6 LOS B 0.0 0.7 0.64 0.61 33.9 4 T1 1 3.0 0.005 8.1 LOS A 0.0 0.7 0.64 0.61 34.1 14 R2 Approach 1 3.0 0.005 7.9 LOS A 0.0 0.7 0.64 0.61 33.3 3 3.0 0.005 9.6 LOS A 0.0 0.7 0.64 0.61 33.8 34.3 West: SR 104 5 L2 96 2.0 0.087 9.1 LOS A 0.4 10.5 0.08 0.63 2 T1 2 0.0 0.087 4.7 LOS A 0.4 10.5 0.08 0.63 34.5 12 R2 7 0.0 0.087 4.4 LOS A 0.4 10.5 0.08 0.63 33.7 Approach 104 1.8 0.087 8.8 LOS A 0.4 10.5 0.08 0.63 34.3 All Vehicles 895 3.8 0.712 6.4 LOS A 7.1 183.4 0.48 0.55 34.9 Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Signalised Intersections. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement. LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6). Roundabout Capacity Model: SIDRA Standard. SIDRA Standard Delay Model is used. Control Delay includes Geometric Delay. Gap-Acceptance Capacity: SIDRA Standard (Akçelik M3D). HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. SIDRA INTERSECTION 7.0 Copyright © 2000-2017 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd sidrasolutions.com Organisation: WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Processed: Tuesday, October 9, 2018 6:05:21 AM Project: G:\__Analysis\_State\SR 104\MP 13.76 Shine Rd-Paradise Bay Rd\Sidra\SR 104 Shine Rd.sip7