Doc ID: 6635988 OPERATIONS DIRECTORATE REGISTRY (DOR) [3 INFORMATION SUBJECT DATES) RECEIVED KW If 4037/5)? I/a77 EXT. CONTROL ?5a - 0 ur? 99/ ACTION TO COPIES T0 6 SU PENSB $04 2 F66 DDO ACTION REQUIRED SIGNATURE DECISION INITIALS DDO ADDO ADDO (MAJ ACTION DATE RECEIVED BY ACHON OFFICER ACIION TAKEN DATE COMPLETED BY ACIION [j VERBAI. E-MAII. WRITTEN INTERIM RESPONSE N0 REQUIRED FINAL RESPONSE ACTION TRANSFERRED 10 DATE NOTE: This .911)? must be appended to the completed action and returned to the DOR for review, logging, and forwarding. NSA 01A Case 100386 Page 00303 Doc ID: 6635988 DDO UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT memorandum DATE: 25 January 1994 N52-015-94 REPLYTO Arm OF: N5 2 swam: Review of UKUSA Exchange Agreement - ACTION MEMORANDUM TO: DISTRIBUTION 1. Request your support in reviewing the UKUSA Exchange Agreement. This information will satisfy the foreign reviews and audits currently underway with Congressional, and GAO staffs, in addition to providing a comprehensive study of current exchange policies with GCHQ. 2. In Nov 1993, BBC initiated an operational review of the UKUSA Exchange Agreement to include a list of what is not currently exchanged with the British, what we should not exchange in the future, and new things that should be exchanged in the future. Attached is a copy of the memo asking each 000 Group to review the agreement (ref Attachment A). 3. In Dec 1993, the Country Desk Officer (CDO) for the United Kingdom met with DDO, DDT, and DD: staff elements to discuss the aforementioned effort and explain that N52 was trying to satisfy external audits and reviews of UKUSA as well. Everyone agreed that a full Agency review would be appropriate in light of the complexities involved in providing a full picture of the exchange. By combining efforts, we could eliminate duplication and provide a more comprehensive paper that could be easily updated on a routine basis. 4. Attachment provides a format for presenting the information, denoting 2 categories: (1) by country, and (2) by topic (ref Attachment for list of topics). For each country and topic, identify exactly what is exchanged in terms of raw traffic, product and technical reports, technology, etcetera. A similar report was prepared by 000 in 1987 to satisfy a DCI?Directed Study of the SIGINT relationship; if each group can find their submission to this study, it would make an excellent basis for the working levels tosinput into Attachment B. I (1) (3)-50 USC 3024(1) 86-36 NSA Case 100386 Page 00304 Doc ID: 6635988 m)u) usc 3024(1) (MID P.L: 86 36 USC 3024(1) I 86-36 . 5. Where possible, request copies of any Memorandums of Understanding or Divisions of Effort between NSA and GCH be-provided in support of the exchanges I I Compartmented exchanges should be included in an annex an re erenced as such in its associated country or topic Please provide information in an ASCII format so the data can be transferred into a spreadsheet format. 6. We anticipate periodic meetings to discuss the status as necessary. Given the multiple requirements to respond to Congressional, DOD, and GAO audits, we need your input by 19 Feb 1994. Please direct any questions on this request to lor at 963?37455. JOHN . DIRKS Director of Foreign Relations Encls: a/s DISTRIBUTION: DDO DDT DDI CC: DDP SUSLOL N5 A044 B042 W045 2092 PO44 T091 Ill NSA FOIA Case 100386 Page 00305 DATE: TO AWN 51.13.1927: .33: A . exis that term into 18 November 1993 ATTACHMENT A UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT memorandum P044-142-93 Revrew or Exchange Agreement" ACTION MEMORAJDUM DISTRIBUTION The DOC has tasked the P04 staff to review US-UK Exchange Agreement. Aware that a) no single document ts in sufficient detail to serve as such an agreement, ?ad b) to list what IS shared would be extremely expensive in of required has decided to break the tasL three parts: . Part A: List in sufficient detail those things that are not (to the best of your knowledge) exchanged with the UK today - Part B: List in detail those things that managers 'nd senior technical experts believe may well need to be altered or declared unexcLanceable in tie near future (5 - 8 years ou: or less)igiven certain assumptions about. de"elopments affecting US-UK relations Include an "expert" (manager) POC for each item and 2-3 sentences describing the aSsunption leading to an alteration or denial of the currently'exchangeable subject matter. Inputs should be mad- in ASCII format on a floppj disk. . Part C: 'List those new things that should be exchanged with the UK in the future. Include an "expert" (manage: POC for each item and 2?3 sentences describin the assumption leading to proposed exchange. Inputs should be made in ASCII format on a floppv disk. 2. (U) Task Timeline . By Mid-November senc copy of task to each of the Group Chiefs, and Chiefs 904/905. NO. 1: (R51 63A apua; arms: UMP-35690 (gm-1:123? NSA OIA Case 100386 Page 00306 . - By 30 November meet with each of the Group Chiefs for 15 minutes to clarify and answer lquestions. All inputs . By 15 January 1994 susp?n?e. . and puollcatlon. to P0442 for integration . By 30 January 1994 for very restricted mung-EmmaI?OIA Case 100386 Page 00307 6635988 MGR-ET NSA INTELLIGENCE EXCHANGE WITH GCHQ CURRENT NEAR FUTURE NLT YEAR 2000 TYPE OF WHAT WE WHAT WE WHAT WE DO NOT PROVIDE WE SHOULD WHAT WE SHOULD NOT PROVIDE AGREEMENT RECEIVE PROVIDE (include POC ralionalc) PROVIDE (include POC rationale) NSA FOIA Case 100386 Page 00308 Dolc ID: 6635988 P452-015-94 (1) (3)-50 USC 3024(1) 86-36 ATTACHMENT US Foreign Intelligence Requirements Categories and Priorities UKUSA REVIEW TOPICS NSA OIA Case 100386 Page 00309 ID: 6635988 (1) (31-50 USC 3024(1) 86~36 5% NSA FOIA Case 100386 Page 00310