Fiscal Year 2018 ICE Enforcement
and Removal Operations Report
Overview
This report summarizes U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Enforcement and Removal
Operations (ERO) activities in Fiscal Year (FY) 2018. ERO identifies, arrests, and removes aliens who
present a danger to national security or a threat to public safety, or who otherwise undermine border
control and the integrity of the U.S. immigration system. ICE shares responsibility for administering and
enforcing the nation’s immigration laws with U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and U.S.
Citizenship and Immigration Services.
During FY2018, ICE ERO continued its focus on priorities laid out by two primary directives issued in
2017. On January 25, 2017, President Donald J. Trump issued Executive Order 13768, Enhancing Public
Safety in the Interior of the United States (EO), which set forth the Administration’s immigration
enforcement and removal priorities. Subsequently, the Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS)
February 20, 2017 implementation memorandum, Enforcement of the Immigration Laws to Serve the
National Interest provided further direction for the implementation of the policies set forth in the EO.
Together, the EO and implementation memorandum expanded ICE’s enforcement focus to include
removable aliens who (1) have been convicted of any criminal offense; (2) have been charged with any
criminal offense that has not been resolved; (3) have committed acts which constitute a chargeable
criminal offense; (4) have engaged in fraud or willful misrepresentation in connection with any official
matter before a governmental agency; (5) have abused any program related to receipt of public benefits;
(6) are subject to a final order of removal but have not complied with their legal obligation to depart the
United States; or (7) in the judgment of an immigration officer, otherwise pose a risk to public safety or
national security. The Department continued to operate under the directive that classes or categories of
removable aliens are not exempt from potential enforcement.
ICE ERO continued efforts under the direction of the 2017 EO and implementation memorandum by
placing a significant emphasis on interior enforcement by protecting national security and public safety
and upholding the rule of law. This report represents an analysis of ICE ERO’s FY2018 year-end statistics
and illustrates how ICE ERO successfully fulfilled its mission while furthering the aforementioned
policies.
FY2018 Enforcement and Removal Statistics
As directed in the EO and implementation memorandum, ICE does not exempt classes or categories of
removable aliens from potential enforcement. This policy directive is reflected in ERO’s FY2018
enforcement statistics, which show consistent increases from previous fiscal years in the following
enforcement metrics: (1) ICE ERO overall administrative arrests; (2) an accompanying rise in overall ICE
removals tied to interior enforcement efforts; (3) ICE removals of criminal aliens from interior
enforcement; (4) ICE removals of suspected gang members and known or suspected terrorists; (5) positive
1

 impact on ICE removals from policy initiatives including visa sanctions and diplomatic relations; (6) ICE
ERO total book-ins and criminal alien book-ins; and (7) ICE ERO Detainers.
ICE ERO Administrative Arrests
An administrative arrest is the arrest of an alien for a civil violation of U.S. immigration laws, which is
subsequently adjudicated by an immigration judge or through other administrative processes. With
158,581 administrative arrests in FY2018, ICE ERO recorded the greatest number of administrative
arrests 1 as compared to the two previous fiscal years (depicted below in Figure 1), and the highest number
since FY2014. ICE ERO made 15,111 more administrative arrests in FY2018 than in FY2017,
representing an 11 percent increase, and a continued upward trend after FY2017’s 30 percent increase
over FY2016.
Figure 1. FY2016 – FY2018 ERO Administrative Arrests

Administrative Arrests of Immigration Violators by Criminality
ICE remains committed to directing its enforcement resources to those aliens posing the greatest risk to
the safety and security of the United States. By far, the largest percentage of aliens arrested by ICE are
convicted criminals 2 (66 percent), followed by immigration violators with pending criminal charges 3 at
the time of their arrest (21 percent). In FY2018, ERO arrested 138,117 aliens with criminal histories
(convicted criminal and pending criminal charges) for an increase of 10,125 aliens over FY2017. This
continued the growth seen in FY2017 when ERO arrested 26,974 more aliens with criminal histories than
in FY2016 for a 27 percent gain. While the arrests of convicted criminals remained relatively level from
FY 2017 to FY2018 at 105,736 and 105,140 respectively, administrative arrests with pending criminal
charges increased by 48 percent. This continues the upward trend seen in FY2017, where arrests with
pending charges increased by 255 percent over FY2016. Figure 2 provides a breakdown of FY2016,
FY2017, and FY2018 administrative arrests by criminality.

1

ERO administrative arrests include all ERO programs. All statistics are attributed to the current program of the processing
officer of an enforcement action.
2
Immigration violators with a criminal conviction entered into ICE systems of record at the time of the enforcement action.
3
Immigration violators with pending criminal charges entered into ICE system of record at the time of the enforcement action.

2

 Figure 2. FY2016 – FY2018 ERO Administrative Arrests by Criminality

Below, Table 1 tallies all pending criminal charges and convictions by category for those aliens
administratively arrested in FY2018 and lists those categories with at least 1,000 combined charges and
convictions present in this population. These figures are representative of the criminal history as it is
entered in the ICE system of record for individuals administratively arrested. Each administrative arrest
may represent multiple criminal charges and convictions, as many of the aliens arrested by ERO are
recidivist criminals.

3

 Table 1. FY2018 Criminal Charges and Convictions for ERO Administrative Arrests

Notes: Immigration crimes include “illegal entry,” “illegal reentry,” “false claim to U.S. citizenship,” and “alien smuggling.” “Obstructing
Judiciary& Congress& Legislature& Etc.,” refers to several related offenses including, but not limited to: Perjury; Contempt; Obstructing
Justice; Misconduct; Parole and Probation Violations; and Failure to Appear. “General Crimes” include the following National Crime
Information Center (NCIC) charges: Conspiracy, Crimes Against Person, Licensing Violation, Money Laundering, Morals - Decency Crimes,
Property Crimes, Public Order Crimes, Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), and Structuring.

4

 As a result of ERO’s enhanced enforcement efforts directed at restoring the integrity of the immigration
system, the percentage of administrative arrests of other immigration violators 4 increased from FY2017
(11 percent) to FY2018 (13 percent). Of this population of immigration violators arrested in FY2018,
Table 2 shows that 57 percent were processed with a notice to appear 5 while 23 percent were ICE
fugitives 6 or subjects who had been previously removed, illegally re-entered the country (a federal felony
under 8 U.S.C § 1326) and served an order of reinstatement. 7 Both the number of fugitive and illegal reentry arrests continued a three-year trend by increasing 19 percent and 9 percent, respectively, in FY2018.
Table 2. FY2016 – FY2018 ERO Administrative Arrests of Other Immigration Violators by Arrest Type 8

At-Large Arrests
An ERO at-large arrest is conducted in the community, as opposed to a custodial setting such as a prison
or jail. 9 While at-large arrests remained consistent, with a 1 percent overall increase from 40,066 in
FY2017 to 40,536 in FY2018 (Figure 3), at-large arrests levels remain significantly higher compared to
the 30,348 from FY2016. At-large arrests of convicted criminal aliens decreased by 13 percent in FY2018
as shown in Figure 4. However, this group still constitutes the largest proportion of at-large apprehensions
(57 percent). Increases year-over-year in at-large arrests of aliens with pending criminal charges (35
percent) and other immigration violators (25 percent) offset the decrease in arrests of convicted criminals.
The increased enforcement of these populations without criminal convictions add to the increases seen in
FY2017 for pending criminal charges (213 percent) and other immigration violators (122 percent). Again,
this demonstrates ERO’s commitment to removing criminal aliens and public safety threats, while still
faithfully enforcing the law against all immigration violators.

4

“Other Immigration Violators” are immigration violators without any known criminal convictions or pending charges entered
into ICE system of record at the time of the enforcement action.
5
A Notice to Appear (Form I-862) is the charging document that initiates removal proceedings. Charging documents inform
aliens of the charges and allegations being lodged against them by ICE.
6
A fugitive is any alien who has failed to leave the United States following the issuance of a final order of removal, deportation,
or exclusion.
7
Section 241(a)(5) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) provides that DHS may reinstate (without referral to an
immigration court) a final order against an alien who illegally reenters the United States after being deported, excluded, or
removed from the United States under a final order.
8
“Other” types of arrests of Other Immigration Violators include, but are not limited to, arrests for Expedited Removal, Visa
Waiver Program Removal, Administrative Removal, and Voluntary Departure/Removal.
9
ERO administrative arrests reported as “at-large” include records from all ERO Programs with Arrest Methods of Located,
Non-Custodial Arrest, or Probation and Parole.

5

 Figure 3. FY2016 – FY2018 At-Large Administrative Arrests

Figure 4. FY2016 – FY2018 At-Large Administrative Arrests by Criminality

Rise in ICE Removals through enhanced Interior Enforcement
The apprehension and removal of immigration violators is central to ICE’s mission to enforce U.S.
immigration laws. In addition to the 11 percent increase in ERO administrative arrests from FY2017 to
FY2018, ERO also made significant strides in removing aliens arrested in the interior of the country
(Figure 5). Such removals stem from an ICE arrest and is the ultimate goal of the agency’s interior
immigration enforcement efforts. Interior ICE removals continued to increase in FY2018, as ICE removed
13,757 more aliens in this category than it did in FY2017, a 17 percent increase (Figure 5). The increases
in both ERO administrative arrests and removals based on these interior arrests demonstrate the significant
successes ICE achieved during FY2018, as well as the increased efficacy with which the agency carried
out its mission.

6

 Figure 5. FY2016 – FY2018 Interior ICE Removals

Criminal Arrests and Prosecutions
While ICE ERO showed significant gains in all meaningful enforcement metrics, perhaps none are more
impressive nor have made more of an impact on public safety than its prosecutorial efforts. In conjunction
with the United States Attorney’s Office, ERO enforces violations of criminal immigration law through
the effective prosecution of criminal offenders.
In FY2018, ERO’s efforts resulted in the prosecutions of offenses which include, but are not limited to: 8
U.S.C § 1325, Illegal Entry into the United States; 8 U.S.C § 1326, Illegal Re-Entry of Removed Alien; 18
U.S.C § 1546, Fraud and Misuse of Visas, Permits and Other Documents; 18 U.S.C § 111, Assaulting
and/or Resisting an Officer; and 18 U.S.C § 922(g)(5), Felon in Possession of a Firearm.
In FY2017, ERO made 5,790 criminal arrests resulting in 4,212 indictments or Bills of Information and
3,445 convictions. While these FY2017 numbers showed moderate increases over FY2016 in criminal
arrests and indictments or Bills of Information, in FY2018 ERO made 7,449 criminal arrests resulting in
7,326 indictments or Bills of Information and 7,197 convictions. This surge in enforcement efforts directed
at criminal aliens and repeat offenders reflects a 29 percent increase in criminal arrests, a 74 percent
increase in indictments or Bills of Information, and a 109 percent increase in criminal convictions to
reverse a downturn from FY2017 (Figure 6).

Figure 6. FY2016 – FY2018 Prosecution Statistics
7

 Initial Book-ins to ICE Custody
An initial book-in is the first book-in to an ICE detention facility to begin a new detention stay. This
population includes aliens initially apprehended by CBP who are transferred to ICE for detention and
removal. As seen in Figure 7, while overall ICE initial book-ins went down in FY2017 (323,591)
compared to FY2016 (352,882), total book-ins increased in FY2018 to 396,448, illustrating the ongoing
surge in illegal border crossings.
Figure 7 shows the number of book-ins resulting from ICE and CBP enforcement efforts for FY2016,
FY2017, and FY2018. 10 Notably, book-ins from CBP increased 32 percent in FY2018 to 242,778, while
book-ins from ICE arrests continued an upward trend from FY2017’s 29 percent increase with an
additional increase of 10 percent in FY2018.
Figure 7. FY2016 – FY2018 Initial Book-ins to ICE Detention by Arresting Agency

10

CBP enforcement efforts represent records that were processed by Border Patrol, Inspections, Inspections-Air, InspectionsLand, and Inspections-Sea.

8

 Detainers
A detainer is a request to the receiving law enforcement agency to both notify DHS as early as practicable
before a removable alien is released from criminal custody, and to maintain custody of the alien for a
period not to exceed 48 hours beyond the time the alien would otherwise have been released to allow
DHS to assume custody for removal purposes. ICE issues detainers to federal, state, and local law
enforcement agencies only after establishing probable cause that the subject is an alien who is removable
from the United States and to provide notice of ICE’s intent to assume custody of a subject detained in
that law enforcement agency’s custody. The detainer facilitates the custodial transfer of an alien to ICE
from another law enforcement agency. This process may reduce potential risks to ICE officers and to the
general public by allowing arrests to be made in a controlled, custodial setting as opposed to at-large
arrests in the community.
The cooperation ICE receives from other law enforcement agencies is critical to its ability to identify and
arrest aliens who pose a risk to public safety or national security. Some jurisdictions do not cooperate with
ICE as a matter of state or local law, executive order, judicial rulings, or policy. All detainers issued by
ICE are accompanied by either: (1) a properly completed Form I-200 (Warrant for Arrest of Alien) signed
by a legally authorized immigration officer; or (2) a properly completed Form I-205 (Warrant of
Removal/Deportation) signed by a legally authorized immigration officer, both of which include a
determination of probable cause of removability.
Issued Detainers
In FY2018, ERO issued 177,147 detainers – an increase of 24 percent from the 142,356 detainers issued
in FY2017 (Figure 8). This number demonstrates the large volume of illegal aliens involved in criminal
activity and the public safety risk posed by these aliens, as well as ERO’s commitment to taking
enforcement action against all illegal aliens it encounters. The rise in detainers issued continues the trend
from FY2017’s 65 percent growth over FY2016 and shows a consistent focus on interior enforcement,
particularly for those aliens involved in criminal activity, despite continued opposition and lack of
cooperation from uncooperative jurisdictions.
Figure 8. FY2016 – FY2018 ERO Detainers Issued

9

 ICE Removals
Integral to the integrity of the nation’s lawful immigration system is the removal of immigration violators
who are illegally present in the country and have received a final order of removal. 11 A removal is defined
as the compulsory and confirmed movement of an inadmissible or deportable alien out of the United
States based on such an order. 12 ICE removals include both aliens arrested by ICE and aliens who were
apprehended by CBP and turned over to ICE for repatriation efforts. In FY2018, ICE saw a significant
increase in both overall removals as well as removals where ICE was the initial arresting agency.
Figure 9 displays total ICE removals for FY2016, FY2017, and FY2018 and highlights the 13 percent
increase from 226,119 to 256,085 in FY2018. After a drop in FY2017 overall removals stemming from
historic lows in border crossings, ICE removals rebounded in FY2018, with the previously identified 17
percent increase stemming from both strengthened ICE interior enforcement efforts as well as an 11
percent increase in removals of border apprehensions.
Figure 10 breaks down ICE removals by arresting agency, which demonstrates a 46 percent increase from
FY2016 to FY2018 (from 65,332 to 95,360) in removals tied to ICE arrests.
Figure 9. FY2016 – FY2018 ICE Removals

11

ICE removals include removals and returns where aliens were turned over to ICE for removal efforts. This includes aliens processed for Expedited
Removal (ER) or Voluntary Return (VR) that are turned over to ICE for detention. Aliens processed for ER and not detained by ERO or VRs after June 1st,
2013 and not detained by ICE are primarily processed by the U.S. Border Patrol. CBP should be contacted for those statistics.
12
Ibid.

10

 Figure 10. FY2016 – FY2018 ICE Removals by Arresting Agency

Figure 11 shows the breakdown of ICE removals based on criminal history. ICE removals of convicted
criminals followed overall removal trends with a small decrease from 138,669 in FY2016 to 127,699 in
FY2017, while rising to 145,262 in FY2018, a 14 percent increase. Over this same period, ICE removals
of aliens with pending criminal charges has steadily increased from 12,163 in FY2016 to 16,374 in
FY2017 for a 35 percent increase and to 22,796 in FY2018 for another 39 percent increase over the
previous year.
Figure 11. FY2016 – FY2018 ICE Removals by Criminality

ICE Removals to Ensure National Security and Public Safety
ICE removals of known or suspected gang members and known or suspected terrorists (KST) are
instrumental to ICE’s national security and public safety missions, and the agency directs significant
resources to identify, locate, arrest, and remove these aliens.
ICE identifies gang members and KSTs by checking an alien’s background in federal law enforcement
databases, interviews with the aliens, and information received from law enforcement partners. This
information is flagged accordingly in ICE’s enforcement systems. These populations are not mutually
exclusive, as an alien may be flagged as both a known or suspected gang member, and a KST. As seen in
Figure 12, ICE removals of known and suspected gang members increased by 162 percent in FY2017,
11

 more than doubling from the previous year. These critical removals increased again in FY2018, rising by
9 percent from FY2017. ICE’s KST removals also rose significantly between FY2016 and FY2017
(Figure 13), increasing by 67 percent, while removals of aliens in this group were relatively level in
FY2018, with ICE conducting 42 removals compared to 45 in FY2017.
Figure 12. FY2016 – FY2018 ICE Removals of Known or Suspected Gang Members

Figure 13. FY2016 – FY2018 ICE Removals of Known or Suspected Terrorists

Removals of USBP Family Unit and Unaccompanied Alien Children Apprehensions
Since the initial surge at the Southwest border SWB) in FY2014, there has been a significant increase in
the arrival of both family units (FMUAs) and unaccompanied alien children (UACs). In FY2018,
approximately 50,000 UACs and 107,000 aliens processed as FMUAs were apprehended at the SWB by
the U.S. Border Patrol (USBP). These numbers represent a marked increase from FY2017, when
approximately 41,000 UACs and 75,000 FMUA were apprehended by USBP. While USBP routinely turns
FMUA apprehensions over to ICE for removal proceedings, ICE is severely limited by various laws and
judicial actions from detaining family units through the completion of removal proceedings. For UAC
apprehensions, DHS is responsible for the transfer of custody to the Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS) within 72 hours, absent exceptional circumstances. HHS is similarly limited in their ability
to detain UACs through the pendency of their removal proceedings. When these UACs are released by
12

 HHS, or FMUA are released from DHS custody, they are placed onto the non-detained docket, which
currently has more than 2,641,589 cases and results in decisions not being rendered for many years.
Further, even when removal orders are issued, very few aliens from the non-detained docket comply with
these orders and instead join an ever-growing list of 565,892 fugitive aliens.
In FY2018, ICE removed 2,711 aliens identified as FMUAs from USBP apprehension data. As seen in
Figure 14, this number is up from 2,326 removals of FMUAs in FY2017, resulting in a 17 percent
increase. This maintains the upward trend from FY2017, where ICE removals of this population increased
by 35 percent over FY2016 (1,728). ICE similarly identifies UACs based on USBP apprehensions, and in
FY2018 ICE removed 5,571 UACs, a 55 percent increase over the 3,598 UACs removed in FY2017
(Figure 15). FY2017 similarly showed an increase in UAC removals when ICE removed 41 percent more
UACs compared to FY2016’s 2,545. Most of the remaining population of UAC and FMUA who have
been apprehended, remain in the country awaiting completion of their removal proceedings or defying
removal orders.
Figure 14. FY2016 – FY2018 ICE Removals of USBP-Identified Family Unit Apprehensions

Figure 15. FY2016 – FY2018 ICE Removals of USBP-Identified UAC Apprehensions

13

 Effects of Visa Sanctions and Diplomatic Relations
On September 13, 2017, DHS announced the implementation of visa sanctions 13 on Cambodia, Eritrea,
Guinea, and Sierra Leone due to a lack of historical cooperation from these countries with regard to
accepting their nationals who have been ordered removed. In coordination with the U.S. Department of
State (DoS), consular officers in these countries were ordered to implement visa restrictions on specific
categories of visa applicants. The categories were determined on a country-by-country basis. If the
impacted countries did not respond appropriately, the scope of the sanctions could be expanded to include
more visa applicant categories. The result of these sanctions can be seen in the ICE removals statistics for
these countries in Table 3. All the countries with newly-issued visa sanctions have greater removals in
FY2018 than in FY2017. In addition to visa sanctions, DHS and DoS have coordinated to improve
diplomatic relations with Cuba, resulting in a 189 percent increase of Cuban national removals from
FY2017 to FY2018. ICE continues to work with DHS and DoS to invoke visa sanctions where
appropriate for the purpose of fostering better cooperation with foreign countries in the context of
removals.
Table 3. FY2017 – FY2018 ICE Removals from Visa Sanction Countries and Cuba

Conclusion
As the agency primarily responsible for immigration enforcement efforts in the interior of the United
States, ICE plays a critical role in fulfilling the requirements laid out in The President’s EO and DHS’
subsequent implementation memorandum. The statistics in this report illustrate ICE’s commitment to
these policies and success in implementing them during FY2018.
ICE ERO’s FY2018 statistics demonstrate the agency’s strengthened interior enforcement measures and
show significant success in identifying, arresting, and removing aliens who are in violation of U.S. law,
particularly those who pose a public safety or national security threat. This was accomplished despite
limited resources and an increasingly challenging operational environment.
In FY2018, ICE ERO conducted 158,581 overall administrative arrests, 15,111 more than in FY2017,
while it conducted 256,085 removals – the highest level since FY2014, resulting in a more than 10 percent
increase in overall arrests and removals. ICE continues to prioritize its limited resources on public safety
threats and immigration violators, as reflected by the fact that, like in FY2017, 9 out of 10 ERO
administrative arrests had either a criminal conviction(s), pending charge(s), were an ICE fugitive, or
illegally reentered the country after previously being removed. These results clearly demonstrate that the
increased enforcement productivity in FY2017 has maintained an upward trend, and that ICE’s efforts to
13

Section 243(d) of the INA states that, upon notification from the Secretary of Homeland Security, the Secretary of State shall
direct consular officers to stop issuing visas to immigrants, nonimmigrants, or both, from countries that unreasonably delay or
fail entirely to repatriate their nationals.

14

 restore integrity to our nation’s immigration system and enhance the safety and security of the United
States have continued to yield positive results.

15

 Appendix A: Methodology
Data Source:
Data used to report ICE statistics are obtained through the ICE Integrated Decision Support (IIDS) system
data warehouse.
Data Run Dates:
FY2018: IIDS v.1.34 run date 10/08/2018; ENFORCE Integrated Database (EID) as of 10/06/2018
FY2017: IIDS v.1.28 run date 10/09/2017; ENFORCE Integrated Database (EID) as of 10/07/2017
FY2016: IIDS v.1.22.1 run date 10/04/2016; ENFORCE Integrated Database (EID) as of 10/02/2016
Removals
ICE Removals include removals and returns initiated by ICE and those initiated by other agencies in
which aliens were turned over to ICE for repatriation efforts. Returns include Voluntary Returns,
Voluntary Departures, and Withdrawals Under Docket Control. Any voluntary return recorded on or after
June 1, 2013 without an ICE intake case is not recorded as an ICE removal.
Removals data are historical and remain static. In FY2009, ICE began to “lock” removal statistics on
October 5 at the end of each fiscal year, and counted only aliens whose removal or return was already
confirmed. Aliens removed or returned in that fiscal year but not confirmed until after October 5 were
excluded from the locked data, and thus from ICE statistics. To ensure an accurate and complete
representation of all removals and returns, ICE will count removals and returns confirmed after October 5
toward the next fiscal year. FY2016 removals, excluding FY2015 “lag,” were 235,524. The number of
removals in FY2017, excluding the “lag” from FY2016, was 220,649. The number of removals in
FY2018, excluding the “lag” from FY2017, was 252,405.

16

 Appendix B: FY2017 and FY2018 Removals by Country of Citizenship14
FY2017 and FY2018 ICE Removals by Country of Citizenship
Country of Citizenship
FY2017 FY2018
MEXICO
128,765 141,045
GUATEMALA
33,570
50,390
HONDURAS
22,381
28,894
EL SALVADOR
18,838
15,445
DOMINICAN REPUBLIC
1,986
1,769
BRAZIL
1,413
1,691
ECUADOR
1,152
1,264
COLOMBIA
1,082
1,162
HAITI
5,578
934
NICARAGUA
832
879
JAMAICA
782
792
CHINA, PEOPLES REPUBLIC OF
525
726
INDIA
460
611
PERU
458
581
CUBA
160
463
ROMANIA
292
403
NIGERIA
312
369
CANADA
353
342
VENEZUELA
248
336
GHANA
305
243
PAKISTAN
177
235
SOMALIA
521
229
GUINEA
88
219
PHILIPPINES
182
217
SPAIN
172
209
UNITED KINGDOM
151
209
CHILE
129
166
COSTA RICA
151
162
BANGLADESH
203
147
GUYANA
137
142
KENYA
103
140
SAUDI ARABIA
139
135
ITALY
117
125
SENEGAL
197
125
14

Country of citizenship is reported as it appears in ICE’s system of record at the time data is pulled but may be updated
as additional information is discovered or verified.

17

 FY2017 and FY2018 ICE Removals by Country of Citizenship
Country of Citizenship
FY2017 FY2018
POLAND
120
123
SOUTH KOREA
113
122
VIETNAM
71
122
ARGENTINA
102
121
LIBERIA
107
113
GAMBIA
56
111
CAMBODIA
29
110
INDONESIA
68
110
RUSSIA
127
107
UKRAINE
86
105
TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO
128
104
BAHAMAS
95
101
MICRONESIA, FEDERATED STATES OF
110
99
ALBANIA
55
98
MAURITANIA
8
98
PORTUGAL
65
96
JORDAN
98
94
ISRAEL
81
93
BELIZE
82
91
EGYPT
57
85
FRANCE
82
85
TURKEY
93
85
IVORY COAST
13
82
BOLIVIA
76
81
HUNGARY
116
81
DEM REP OF THE CONGO
34
79
SIERRA LEONE
44
79
CAMEROON
58
72
GERMANY
75
72
CAPE VERDE
29
68
MALI
34
63
ERITREA
41
62
SOUTH SUDAN
2
61
PANAMA
69
59
MOROCCO
67
58
THAILAND
33
55
LEBANON
35
51
LITHUANIA
26
49
18

 FY2017 and FY2018 ICE Removals by Country of Citizenship
Country of Citizenship
FY2017 FY2018
IRAQ
61
48
BOSNIA-HERZEGOVINA
47
47
CZECH REPUBLIC
30
47
IRELAND
34
47
URUGUAY
38
47
NEPAL
45
45
SOUTH AFRICA
23
42
SUDAN
19
42
UNKNOWN
26
42
UZBEKISTAN
28
41
BURMA
10
40
NETHERLANDS
40
40
AUSTRALIA
22
39
MOLDOVA
34
38
ETHIOPIA
46
36
SRI LANKA
41
36
BURKINA FASO
31
35
MARSHALL ISLANDS
22
35
SLOVAKIA
20
35
BULGARIA
26
34
ANGOLA
7
32
KOREA
44
32
AFGHANISTAN
48
30
KAZAKHSTAN
14
30
SAMOA
13
30
SERBIA
18
30
JAPAN
13
28
MONGOLIA
23
28
ST. LUCIA
23
28
ARMENIA
24
27
TAIWAN
28
27
ANTIGUA-BARBUDA
19
24
NEW ZEALAND
16
24
TOGO
19
24
YEMEN
10
24
GREECE
20
22
IRAN
22
22
FIJI
13
21
19

 FY2017 and FY2018 ICE Removals by Country of Citizenship
Country of Citizenship
FY2017 FY2018
TONGA
13
21
GEORGIA
22
20
DOMINICA
10
19
SURINAME
7
19
SWEDEN
19
19
TANZANIA
13
19
ZIMBABWE
12
19
CONGO
5
18
MACEDONIA
10
18
MONTENEGRO
9
18
ALGERIA
28
17
BARBADOS
19
17
BELGIUM
9
17
LATVIA
19
17
TUNISIA
7
16
HONG KONG
9
15
KYRGYZSTAN
17
15
ST. KITTS-NEVIS
16
15
AZERBAIJAN
8
14
BURUNDI
6
14
KOSOVO
10
14
CHAD
7
13
ESTONIA
12
13
ST. VINCENT-GRENADINES
10
13
UGANDA
11
13
CROATIA
5
12
ZAMBIA
10
12
KUWAIT
12
11
MALAYSIA
8
11
BELARUS
10
10
BENIN
8
10
GRENADA
15
9
PALAU
15
9
LAOS
5
8
LIBYA
9
8
TAJIKISTAN
9
8
AUSTRIA
7
7
NORWAY
4
7
20

 FY2017 and FY2018 ICE Removals by Country of Citizenship
Country of Citizenship
FY2017 FY2018
SYRIA
2
7
GABON
3
6
PARAGUAY
5
6
SINGAPORE
4
6
BERMUDA
3
5
EQUATORIAL GUINEA
2
5
GUINEA-BISSAU
4
5
NIGER
20
5
YUGOSLAVIA
4
5
CZECHOSLOVAKIA
6
4
SWITZERLAND
5
4
TURKS AND CAICOS ISLANDS
4
4
CYPRUS
1
3
DJIBOUTI
1
3
FINLAND
3
3
MALAWI
4
3
CENTRAL AFRICAN REPUBLIC
1
2
DENMARK
5
2
ICELAND
1
2
NAMIBIA
1
2
NETHERLANDS ANTILLES
2
2
QATAR
4
2
RWANDA
10
2
SERBIA AND MONTENEGRO
2
2
TURKMENISTAN
9
2
UNITED ARAB EMIRATES
3
2
ARUBA
1
1
BAHRAIN
1
1
BHUTAN
0
1
BOTSWANA
3
1
BRITISH VIRGIN ISLANDS
3
1
GUADELOUPE
0
1
LESOTHO
0
1
MACAU
0
1
MADAGASCAR
1
1
MALDIVES
0
1
MONTSERRAT
0
1
PAPUA NEW GUINEA
1
1
21

 FY2017 and FY2018 ICE Removals by Country of Citizenship
Country of Citizenship
FY2017 FY2018
SLOVENIA
1
1
ANDORRA
1
0
CAYMAN ISLANDS
2
0
FRENCH GUIANA
1
0
LUXEMBOURG
1
0
MAURITIUS
1
0
MOZAMBIQUE
2
0
OMAN
3
0
SAN MARINO
1
0
SWAZILAND
1
0
226,119 256,085
Total

22