Case Document 549 Filed 03/13/19 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Criminal N0. 17-cr-201-1 (ABJ) v. i PAUL J. MANAFORT, JR., I Defendant. MAR 1 3 2019 ORDER OF FORFEITURE Clerk, U.S District Bankruptcy Cnurts for the District of Columbia WHEREAS, a written plea agreement was ?led with this Court and signed by the defendant, Paul J. Manafort, Jr., and his counsel, in which the defendant agreed to plead guilty to a Superseding Criminal Information (?Information?) charging, inter alia, a conspiracy to violate the Foreign Agents Registration Act in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 371 and Title 22, United States Code, Sections 612, 618(a)(1), and 618(a)(2), and the defendant has pled guilty to that offense (?Count One?); WHEREAS, the Information also alleged the forfeiture of any property, real or personal, which constitutes or is derived from proceeds traceable to the offense alleged in Count One, including, inter alia, a conspiracy to violate FARA, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 981(a)(l)(C) and Title 28, United States Code, Section 2461(c); WHEREAS, the Information further alleged that the United States would seek a personal money judgment of forfeiture against the defendant representing the value of any property, real or personal, which constitutes or is derived from proceeds traceable to the offenses alleged in Count One, including, inter alia, a conSpiracy to violate FARA, which property is subject to forfeiture pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 981(a)(l)(C) and Title 28, United States Code, Case Document 549 Filed 03/13/19 Page 2 of 8 ection 2461(0); WHEREAS, the Information further alleged that such a money judgment of forfeiture was ?to be offset by the forfeiture of any speci?c property?; WHEREAS, the Information further alleged that, if any of the property subject to forfeiture has, as a result of any act or omission of the defendant, been transferred, sold, or deposited with a third party or commingled with other property that cannot be subdivided without dif?culty, the United States would seek forfeiture of any other property of said defendant in substitution for such property (?Substitute Property?); WHEREAS, Title 21, United States Code, Section 853(p) authorizes the forfeiture of substitute property; WHEREAS, in his plea agreement, the defendant admitted to the forfeiture allegations in the Information and, in his Statement of the Offenses and Other Acts (?Statement?), he admitted that he obtained at least $11,000,000 as a result of the conspiracy to violate FARA offense alleged in Count One, for which he was convicted; WHEREAS, in his plea agreement, the defendant consented to the forfeiture of the following property and agreed, inter alia, such property constitutes or is derived from proceeds traceable to the conspiracy to violate ARA offense alleged in Count One, or is property traceable thereto, or, alternatively, can be forfeited as Substitute Property: a) The real property and premises commonly known as 377 Union Street, Brooklyn, New York 11231 (Block 429, Lot 65), including all appurtenances, improvements, and attachments thereon, and any property traceable thereto; b) The real property and premises commonly known as 29 Howard Street, New York, New York 10013 (Block 209, Lot 1104), including all appurtenances, improvements, and attachments thereon, and any property traceable thereto; Case Document 549 Filed 03/13/19 Page 3 of 8 c) The real property and premises commonly known as 174 Jobs Lane, Water Mill, New York 11976, including all appurtenances, improvements, and attachments thereon, and any property traceable thereto; (1) All funds held in account number at The Federal Savings Bank, and any property traceable thereto; e) All funds seized from account number at Capital One N.A., and any property traceable thereto; f) All funds seized from account number at The Federal Savings Bank, and any property traceable thereto; g) Northwestern Mutual Universal Life Insurance Policy and any property traceable thereto; WHEREAS, the defendant has admitted that certain additional property that constitutes or is derived from proceeds traceable to the conspiracy to commit FARA offense alleged in Count One, or property traceable thereto, has, as a result of the defendant?s acts or omissions, been transferred or sold or deposited with a third party or commingled with other property that cannot be subdivided without dif?culty, and has consented to the forfeiture of the following additional assets as Substitute Property: a) The real property and premises commonly known as 123 Baxter Street, New York, New York 10016; and b) The real property and premises commonly known as 721 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10022; WHEREAS, in his plea agreement, the defendant waived the provisions of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure and 32.2 regarding notice of the forfeiture in the charging instrument, advice regarding the forfeiture at the change-of-plea hearing, announcement of the forfeiture at sentencing, and incorporation of the forfeiture in the judgment; WHEREAS, on October 10, 2018, the Court entered a Consent Order of Forfeiture Case Document 549 Filed 03/13/19 Page 4 of 8 constituting a preliminary order of forfeiture with respect to the nine properties identi?ed herein above, the same which were listed in the plea agreement and for which the United States previously provided direct written notice and publication of notice in accordance with Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure as set forth in the United States Declaration of Notice; WHEREAS, this Court ?nds, pursuant to Rule and of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, based on the evidence and information before it, including the plea agreement and the defendant?s Statement, that the defendant obtained at least $11,000,000 in proceeds of the conspiracy to violate FARA offense alleged in Count One, for which he was convicted; WHEREAS, this Court ?nds, pursuant to Rule and of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, based on the evidence and information before it, including the plea agreement and the defendant?s Statement, that the speci?c property listed below is subject to forfeiture, as property that constitutes or is derived from proceeds the defendant obtained that are traceable to the conSpiracy to violate FARA alleged in Count One, or as Substitute Property; WHEREAS, this Court ?nds that the personal money judgment of forfeiture entered by this Order should be offset by the forfeiture of any speci?c property ordered forfeited herein; WHEREAS, pursuant to Rule of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure and paragraph 12(0) of the plea agreement, the government has requested that this order become ?nal as to the defendant upon entry, and be made part of the sentence and included in the judgment; NOW THEREFORE, I IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJ UDGED AND DE CREED: 1. Pursuant to Rule of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure and Title 18, United States Code, Section 981(a)(l)(C) and Title 28, United States Code, Section 2461(c), Case Document 549 Filed 03/13/19 Page 5 of 8 a Personal Money Judgment of Forfeiture against the defendant, Paul J. Manafort, Jr., for $11,000,000 is entered. This amount represents a sum of money equal to the amount of proceeds the defendant obtained (directly or indirectly) from the conspiracy to violate FARA offense charged in Count One, for which he was convicted, and an amount for which the defendant is solely liable. 2. The following speci?c property is forfeited to the United States, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Sections 982(b) and Title 28, United States Code, Section 2461(c), and Title 21, United States Code, Section 853(p) (collectively, the ?Forfeited Assets?): a) b) g) h) The real property and premises commonly known as 377 Union Street, Brooklyn, New York 11231 (Block 429, Lot 65), including all appurtenances, improvements, and attachments thereon, and any property traceable thereto; The real property and premises commonly known as 29 Howard Street, New York, New York 10013 (Block 209, Lot 1104), including all appurtenances, improvements, and attachments thereon, and any property traceable thereto; The real property and premises commonly known as 174 Jobs Lane, Water Mill, New York 11976, including all appurtenances, improvements, and attachments thereon, and any property traceable thereto; All funds held in account number at The Federal Savings Bank, and any property traceable thereto; All funds seized from account number at Capital One NA, and any property traceable thereto; All funds seized from account number at The Federal Savings Bank, and any property traceable thereto; Northwestern Mutual Universal Life Insurance Policy and any property traceable thereto; The real property and premises commonly known as 123 Baxter Street, New York, New York 10016; and Case Document 549 Filed 03/13/19 Page 6 of 8 i) The real property and premises commonly known as 721 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10022. 3. Upon ?nal forfeiture of the Forfeited Assets to the United States, the net proceeds realized by the United States shall be credited to the Personal Money Judgment of Forfeiture entered herein. 4. The United States has provided direct written notice to persons known to have alleged an interest in the Forfeited Assets, and has published notice of the October 10, 2018, Consent Order of Forfeiture in accordance with Rule of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, as described in the United States Declaration of Notice. No additional notice is required with respect to the Forfeited Assets as a result of this Order. 5. The United States shall have clear title to the Forfeited Assets following the entry of a Final Order of Forfeiture and the Court?s disposition of all third-party interests, or, if none, following the expiration of the period provided in Title 21, United States Code, Section 853(n)(2). 6. The United States may collect the Personal Money Judgment of Forfeiture by all available means, including, but not limited to, the forfeiture of property directly traceable to the proceeds of the offense and substitute assets. 7. No ancillary proceeding shall be conducted for the Personal Money Judgment of Forfeiture, as directed by Rule 322(c)(1) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. 8. The Attorney General or a designee, pursuant to Rule of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, is authorized to conduct any discovery to identify, locate, or dispose of property subject to this Order, including, but not limited to, depositions, interrogatories, requests for production of documents and for admissions, and, pursuant to Rule Case Document 549 Filed 03/13/19 Page 7 of 8 45 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the issuance of subpoenas. 9. The Attorney General, Secretary of Homeland Security, Secretary of the Treasury, or a designee, is authorized to seize, inventory, and otherwise maintain custody and control of the Forfeited Assets, whether held by the defendant or by a third party, pursuant to Rule 32.2 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure and Title 21, United States Code, Section 853(g). 10. Pursuant to Rule and (B) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure and as consented to by the defendant, this Amended Consent Order of Forfeiture and Personal Money Judgment of Forfeiture is ?nal as to the defendant upon entry and shall be made a part of the sentence and included in the judgment. 11. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce this Order, and to amend it as necessary, pursuant to Rule 32.2(e) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. Case Document 549 Filed 03/13/19 Page 8 of 8 12. The Clerk of the Court is hereby directed to send copies to all counsel of record. Upon request, the Clerk of the Court shall make certi?ed copies of this Order available to the Department of Justice. Datedthis l3 day of Wadkam. 3 THE HONORABLE AMW UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE WE ASK FOR THIS: ROBERT S. MUELLER, HI Special Counsel ?fry/QC ?ff . Anydrew Weissmann Jeannie S. Rhee Greg D. Andres Senior/Assistant Special Counsel