1 2 3 4 James R. Patterson, State Bar No. 211102 Allison H. Goddard, State Bar No. 211098 Elizabeth A. Mitchell, State Bar No. 204853 PATTERSON LAW GROUP APC 402 West Broadway, 29th Floor San Diego, CA 92101 Telephone: (619) 756-6990 Facsimile: (619) 756-6991 5 Attorneys for MELISSA ESCALERA 6 7 8 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 9 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO - CENTRAL DIVISION 10 11 MELISSA ESCALERA, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Case No. 37-2016-00017392-CU-PO-CTL [E-FILE] 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 16 17 vs. SHARP HEALTHCARE, a California Corporation; GROSSMONT HOSPITAL CORPORATION dba SHARP GROS SM ONT HOSPITAL, a California Corporation and DOES 1- 100, inclusive, Defendants. PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE AND UNOPPOSED EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE OF CLASS ACTION CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANTS Date: Time: Dept: Judge: June 13, 2017 8:45 a.m. 68 Hon Judith F. Hayes 18 19 20 21 TO THE COURT, ALL PARTIES, AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: 22 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on June 13, 2017 at 8:45 a.m., in Department 68 of the San Diego 23 Superior Court, 330 West Broadway, San Diego, CA 92101, Plaintiff Melissa Escalera will and does 24 apply to this Court ex parte under California Code of Civil Procedure ยง 1005(b) and California Rule of 25 Court 3.770 for an order dismissing this putative class action Case No. 37-2016-00017392-CU-PO-CTL 26 (the "Escalera Action"). 27 Plaintiff requests a dismissal without prejudice and for a waiver of costs of the individual and 28 class claims relating to Defendants Sharp Healthcare and Grossmont Hospital Corporation dba Sharp Case No. 37-2016-00017392-CU-PO-CTL 1 EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR DISMISSAL OF CLASS ACTION 1 2 Grossmont Hospital (collectively "Sharp") in the Escalera Action. Plaintiff Escalera requests dismissal due to personal issues that have arisen over the last couple of 3 months, and because there is a similar case pending that will protect the putative class members' 4 interests. On January 12, 2017, Plaintiff Carla Jones filed related Case No. 37-2017-00001377-CU-NP- 5 CTL (the "Jones Action"), which alleges nearly identical claims against the same Defendants (Sharp) as 6 the Escalera Action. Plaintiff and Plaintiffs counsel believe it best to dismiss the Escalera Action 7 without prejudice and have the class action claims pursued in the Jones Action with Plaintiff Jones acting 8 as the proposed class representative. 9 The reasons for the requested dismissal of Plaintiffs claims are verified in the Declaration of 10 Elizabeth A. Mitchell, also submitted with this motion in compliance with California Rule of Court 11 3.770(a). As set forth in the Mitchell Declaration, neither Plaintiff Escalera nor her counsel have 12 received any compensation in exchange for the requested dismissal of the class claims in this case. 13 There is no need to provide notice to the class because no class has been certified and the 14 dismissal will not prejudice the class because the identical class claims will be pursued in the Jones 15 Action. California Rule of Court 3.770(c). 16 Dated: June 9, 2017 PATTERSON LAW GROUP, APC 17 18 19 20 Attorneys for Plaintiff 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 37-2016-00017392-CU-PO-CTL 2 EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR DISMISSAL OF CLASS ACTION