IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT »-.J FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division •I ' UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Case No. 17-MJ-611 ^ V. Filed Under Seal JULIAN PAUL ASSANGE, Defendant, AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF A CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AND ARREST WARRANT 1. I, Megan Brown, make this affidavit in support of a criminal complaint charging the defendant, Julian P. Assange, with violating 18 U.S.C. §371 by conspiring to (1) access a computer, without authorization and exceeding authorized access, to obtain classified national defense information in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1030(a)(1); and (2) access a computer, without authorization and exceeding authorized access, to obtain information from a department or agency ofthe United States in furtherance of a criminal act in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1030(a)(2), (c)(2)(B)(ii). 2. I am a Special Agent with the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and have been so employed since February 2011. Since joining the FBI, I have investigated violations of federal law involving counterterrorism and counterintelligence matters, and I have gained experience through training and everyday work related to conducting these types of investigations. Since February 2017,1 have been assigned to a Counterespionage squad at the Washington Field Office in Washington, D.C. In this capacity, I investigate matters involving allegations of espionage, as well as the unauthorized disclosure of classified information, and related crimes. As a Special Agent with the FBI, I have received classroom and on-the-job 1 training in general law enforcement and also in such specialized areas as counterintelligence, counterterrorism, and investigation of espionage-related crimes. I have participated in federal, multi-jurisdictional, and international investigations involving national security matters, conducted physical and electronic surveillance, executed search warrants, and debriefed witnesses and participants to unlawful activity related to these matters. Through my investigations, I have gained knowledge in the use ofvarious investigative techniques including the utilization of Rule 41 search warrants, subpoenas, national security letters, physical and electronic surveillance, trash covers, and other sophisticated investigative techniques. As a federal agent, I am authorized to investigate violations of the laws of the United States. I have investigated criminal violations relating to espionage and the unauthorized disclosure of classified information, including violations related to the illegal possession, distribution, and/or receipt of classified information, and related crimes, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 793, 794, 1030, and 1924. I also am authorized to execute warrants issued under the authority of the United States, and I have participated in arrest warrants and search warrants in my capacity as an FBI Special Agent. 3. The facts in this Affidavit are based on my personal observations, information obtained fi*om other agents and witnesses, my training and experience, and my review of records, reports, articles, and websites. Unless otherwise noted, information provided to me by other law enforcement personnel does not necessarily reflect my personal observations or investigation, but rather has been passed to me by individuals with first-hand knowledge. This Affidavit does not set forth all ofmy knowledge about this matter, but is intended merely to establish probable cause for the criminal complaint. 4. As shown below, the conspirators took elaborate measures to conceal their communications, mask their identities, and destroy any trace of their conduct, using, for example, encryption and anonymization techniques, and erasing and wiping data. For this reason, the facts are derived in large part from forensic analysis of available computer data, remnants, or unalterable systems. SUMMARY OF PROBABLE CAUSE 5. These charges relate to one of the largest compromises of classified information in the history of the United States. Between in or around January 2010 and May 2010, Chelsea Manning,' an intelligence analyst in the U.S. Army, downloaded four, nearly complete and largely classified databases with approximately 90,000 Afghanistan war-related significant activity reports, 400,000 Iraq war-related significant activity reports, 800 Guantanamo Bay detainee assessments, and 250,000 U.S. State Department cables. Manning provided these records to WikiLeaks, a website founded and led by the defendant, Julian P. Assange. On its website, WikiLeaks expressly solicited classified information for public dissemination. WikiLeaks publicly released the vast majority of the classified records on its website in 2010 and 2011. Manning has since been tried and convicted by court-martial for her illegal acts in transmitting the information to WikiLeaks. 6. The charges in this criminal complaint focus on a specific illegal agreement that Assange and Manning reached in furtherance of Manning's illegal disclosure of classified information. As explained below, investigators have recovered Internet "chats" between ' Manning used the name"Bradley E. Manning" at the time of the events at issue in this Affidavit. According to a statement fi*om Manning's attorney published on or around August 22, 2013, Manning has identified as a female since childhood and was changing her name to "Chelsea Manning." As a result, I refer to Manning using her current name and the female gender. Assange and Manning from March 2010, The chats reflect that on March 8, 2010, Assange agreed to assist Manning in cracking a password stored on United States Department of Defense (DoD) computers connected to the classified Secret Internet Protocol Router Network (SIPRNet). Manning, who had access to the computers in connection with her duties as an intelligence analyst, was using the computers to download classified records to transmit to WikiLeaks. 7. Cracking the password would have allowed Manning to log onto the computers under a usemame that did not belong to her. Such a deceptive measure would have made it more difficult for investigators to determine the source of the illegal disclosures. While it remains unknown whether Manning and Assange were successfiil in cracking the password, a follow-up message from Assange to Manning on March 10, 2010, reflects that Assange was actively trying to crack the password pursuant to their agreement. 8. Circumstantial evidence reflects that Assange and Manning intended to crack the password to facilitate Manning's illegal disclosure of classified information. At the time they formed their illegal password-cracking agreement, Manning had already provided WikiLeaks with hundreds of thousands of classified records relating to, among other things, the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. In the recovered chats surrounding the illegal agreement. Manning and Assange engaged in real-time discussions regarding Manning's transmission of classified records to Assange. The chats also reflect the two collaborating on the public release of the information and Assange actively encouraging Manning to provide more information. The chats, moreover, reflect that Manning actively took steps to try to conceal herself as the source of the leaks. Thus, the context of the agreement demonstrates that Assange and Manning intended to crack the password to facilitate Manning's disclosure of classified information of the United States. I. BACKGROUND OF CO-CONSPIRATORS A. Defendant Julian P. Assange and WikiLeaks 9. Assange, a citizen of Australia, created the website WikiLeaks.org in 2006 to release on the Internet otherwise unavailable documents. WikiLeaks' website solicited submissions of classified, censored, or otherwise restricted information.^ 10. Although associates and volunteers worked for WikiLeaks in various capacities, WikiLeaks was closely identified with Assange himself. As reported in an article published in Wired magazine in or around September 2010, Assange stated, "I am the heart and soul of this organization, its founder, philosopher, spokesperson, original coder, organizer, financier, and all the rest." As stated by Assange in a January 2010 interview during the 26th Chaos Communication Congress, WikiLeaks had a fiill-time staff of five and 800 "occasional helpers." Assange has also stated that he made the final decision as to whether a particular document submitted to WikiLeaks was legitimate. 11. Assange, who has never possessed a security clearance or need to know, was prohibited firom receiving classified information of the United States. B. Co-Conspirator Chelsea Manning 12. Manning, a United States citizen, enlisted in the U.S. Army in October 2007 and subsequently attended the U.S. Army Intelligence Analyst Course at Fort Huachuca, Arizona. 13. On April 7,2008, Manning signed a Classified Information Nondisclosure Agreement. In doing so. Manning acknowledged being advised that unauthorized disclosure or ^At some pointbetween September and December 2010, WikiLeaks deleted the word "classified" fi-om a description of the kinds of material it accepted. retention or negligent handling of classified information could cause damage or irreparable injury to the United States or could be used to advantage by a foreign nation. 14. On January 22, 2009, Manning was granted a U.S. government security clearance at the "Top Secret" level and signed a Sensitive Compartmented Information (SCI) Nondisclosure Statement. In so doing. Manning acknowledged that she would be granted access to SCI material, which involves or derives from intelligence sources or methods and is classified or in the process ofbeing classified. She further acknowledged being advised that her unauthorized disclosure or retention or negligent handling of SCI could cause irreparable injury to the United States or be used to advantage by a foreign nation, and could constitute a federal crime. 15. Executive Order No. 13526 and its predecessor orders define the classification levels assigned to national security and national defense information. Under Executive Order No. 13526, information may be classified as "Confidential" if its unauthorized disclosure reasonably could be expected to cause damage to the national security; "Secret" if its unauthorized disclosure reasonably could be expected to cause serious damage to the national security; and "Top Secret" if its unauthorized disclosure reasonably could be expected to cause exceptionally grave damage to the national security. C. Manning's Access To Classifled Information And Computer Networks In Iraq 16. On or about October 12, 2009, Manning was deployed as a Military Occupational Specialty ("MOS") 35F - Intelligence Analyst, to Forward Operating Base ("FOB") Hammer in Iraq. 17. Manning worked as an intelligence analyst in Iraq from October 2009 to May 2010. During that time, she had access to classified national defense information through various U.S. Army and DoD computer network systems, including SIPRNet—a. network used for classified documents and communications at the Confidential and Secret levels, as designated according to Executive Order No. 13526. 18. Manning had access to multiple classified databases and websites on SIPRNet, including the following: (1) the Combined Information Data Network Exchange ("CIDNE"), a set of DoD databases containing classified reports regarding the Afghanistan and Iraq wars, many of which contained raw intelligence information such as source names and locations; (2) a U.S. Central Command ("CENTCOM") website, which included reports of investigations of civilian deaths caused by U.S. forces; (3) an Intellipedia website named "JTF-GTMO Detainee Assessments," which included documents regarding detainees at the U.S. Naval Base in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba; (4) Net Centric Diplomacy ("NCD"), a Department of State database containing classified diplomatic cables; and (5) an Intelink-S search engine, which was a web portal that provided U.S. intelligence agencies with a single point of service to search for information across various classified websites on the SIPR network. 19. At FOB Hammer, Manning worked in a Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility ("SCIF"). Under Executive Order No. 13526, Section 4.1, and Army regulations. Manning was prohibited firom removing classified information firom the SCIF in which she worked, fi"om storing the information in her residential quarters, and firom loading the information onto a personal computer. Further, the act of removing classified media firom a SCIF and hand carrying that information was permitted only when approved by the appropriate official. 20. In the SCIF, Manning had access to several SIPRNet computers, two of which she principally used at different times. In this affidavit, I refer to these two computers as "IPl" and "IP2." 21. Manning's use ofthe computers was also governed by the AR-25-2. The AR-25- 2 is an Army regulation that establishes the standards, processes, and procedures for information assurance practices in the United States Army. It applies to everyone within the Army. 22. In March 2010, the AR-25-2 prohibited certain "activities ... by any authorized user on a Government provided [information system] or connection." These prohibited activities included "[a]ttempt[ing] to ... circumvent, or bypass network [information systems] security mechanisms." The AR-25-2 also prohibited "[s]haring personal accounts and authenticators (passwords or PINs)." II. MANNING'S EARLY DISCLOSURES TO WIKILEAKS 23. According to Manning, she began helping WikiLeaks soon after WikiLeaks publicly released messages from the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks on November 25, 2009. 24. As the examples in the following two sections demonstrate, Manning transmitted a large amount of classified information to WikiLeaks prior to March 2010, which was when she formed the agreement with Assange that is the subject of this complaint. A. Classified Significant Activity Reports Relating To Iraq And Afghanistan Wars 25. During her court-martial proceedings. Manning has admitted that, prior to March 2010, she provided WikiLeaks with classified significant activity reports from the Iraq and Afghanistan wars ("Iraq War Reports" and "Afghanistan War Reports," respectively). 26. According to Manning, she downloaded the Iraq War Reports and Afghanistan War Reports from the relevant CIDNE databases in late December 2009 and early January 2010, and initially saved the records on a CD-RW that she kept in her SCIF. Manning admitted that she later took the CD-RW out of the SCIF and copied the data from the CD-RW onto her 8 personal laptop. Manning stated that she transferred the data from her laptop to a Secure Digital ("SD") memory card, which she took with her when she went on leave later in January 2010. 27. Investigators later recovered the SD card that Manning used to transport the Iraq War Reports and Afghanistan War Reports. Forensic analysis of the SD card revealed that it contained the CIDNE databases for Iraq (391,883 records) and Afghanistan (91,911 records). The SD card also contained a README.txt file, which contained the following message: Items of Historical Significance for Two Wars: Iraq and Afghanistan Significant Activities (SIGACTs) between 0000 on 01 JAN 2004 and 2359 on 31 DEC 2009 (Iraq local time, and Afghanistan local time) CSV extracts are from the Department of Defense (DoD) Combined Information and Data Exchange (CIDNE) Database. It's already been sanitized of any source identifying information. You might need to sit on this information, perhaps 90-180 days, to figure out how best to release such a large amount of data, and to protect source. This is possibly one of the more significant documents of our time, removing the fog of war, and revealing the true nature of 21st century asymmetric warfare. Have a good day. 28. According to Manning, she uploaded the Iraq War Reports, Afghanistan War Reports, and README.txt file to the WikiLeaks website on or around February 3, 2010. 29. WikiLeaks publicly released the Iraq War Reports and Afghanistan War Reports on its website later in 2010. In July 2010, WikiLeaks released approximately 76,000 of the Afghanistan War Reports. Then, in October 2010, WikiLeaks released approximately 391,832 Iraq War Reports. 30. Manning and WikiLeaks had reason to believe that public disclosure of the Afghanistan War Reports and Iraq War Reports would cause injury to the United States. Documents included in the Afghanistan War Reports contained information the disclosure of which potentially endangered U.S. troops and Afghan civilians, and aided enemies of the United States. Numerous Secret reports, for example, related to the identity and significance of local supporters of United States and Coalition forces in Iraq and Afghanistan. 31. In fact, according to a July 30, 2010 New York Times article entitled "Taliban Study WikiLeaks to Hunt Informants," after the release ofthe Afghanistan War Reports, a member of the Taliban contacted the New York Times and stated, "We are studying the report. We knew about the spies and people who collaborate with U.S. forces. We will investigate through our own secret service whether the people mentioned are really spies working for the U.S. If they are U.S. spies, then we will know how to punish them." 32. Moreover, on May 2, 2011, United States government officials raided the compound of Usama bin Laden in Abbottabad, Pakistan. During the raid, they collected a number of items of digital media, which included, among other things, (1) a letter firom bin Laden to another member of the terrorist organization al-Qaeda in which bin Laden requested that the member gather the DoD material posted to WikiLeaks, and (2) a letter from that member of al-Qaeda to Bin Laden with information from the Afghanistan War Reports released by WikiLeaks. 33. In addition, some of the Afghanistan War Reports included detailed reports of improvised explosive device ("lED") attacks on United States and Coalition forces in Afghanistan. The enemy could use these reports to plan future lED attacks because they described lED techniques, devices, and explosives, and revealed the countermeasures used by United States and Coalition forces against lED attacks and potential limitations to those countermeasures, 34. I have reviewed a number of the Afghanistan War Reports and Iraq War Reports that WikiLeaks released. The reports that I reviewed contained classification markings reflecting that they were classified as "SECRET." This suggests that the versions of the Afghanistan War 10 Reports and Iraq War Reports that Manning transmitted to WikiLeaks clearly reflected that they were classified. B. Classified Iceland Documents 35. As a further example, Manning also provided WikiLeaks with a number of classified documents relating to Iceland prior to March 2010. 36. According to Manning, she accessed the NCD portal on February 14, 2010, and found a cable entitled "10 Reykjavik 13," which addressed an Icelandic issue known as "Icesave." Manning admitted that she burned the information onto a CD-RW on February 15, 2010, took it to her personal housing unit, saved the document to her personal laptop, and then uploaded it to WikiLeaks. 37. WikiLeaks released this "Icesave" cable on its website on or around February 18, 2010. I have reviewed the document that WikiLeaks released on its website. It contained clear markings reflecting it was classified as "Confidential," That suggests that the version of the Icesave cable that Manning transmitted to WikiLeaks clearly reflected that it was classified. 38. In addition, on February 14,2010, Manning, using IPl identified to her, viewed the Intellipedia website for Iceland. From this website. Manning clicked on links to, and viewed, three files entitled "Sigurdardottir.pdf," "Skarphedinsson.pdf," and "Jonsson.pdf" A forensic examination of Manning's personal laptop computer showed that a storage device was inserted into her machine. The volume name of the CD—"100215_0621"—vindicated that the CD was burned on February 15, 2010, at 6:21 a.m. The file names "Jonsson.pdf," "Sigurdardottir.pdf," and "Skarphedinsson.pdf' were burned to the CD. 39. On March 29, 2010, WikiLeaks posted on its website classified U.S. State Department biographies of three Icelandic officials: Icelandic Prime Minister Johanna 11 Sigurdardottir; Icelandic Minister of Foreign Affairs and External Trade Ossur Skarphedinsson; and Icelandic Ambassador to the United States Albert Jonsson. I have reviewed the three biographies released by WikiLeaks. They contained clear markings indicating that they were classified as "Confidential." 40. Thus, as the examples in these two sections demonstrate. Manning provided hundreds of thousands of classified documents to WikiLeaks prior to March 2010. WikiLeaks received and published the classified documents, despite their clear markings indicating that they were classified. III. MANNING'S CHATS WITH ASSANGE 41. A person assigned a name with initials '"NF" held a series of online chat conversations with Manning in which the pair discussed providing classified documents to WikiLeaks and the protection of Manning's identity as a source of the documents. According to the dates on the chats, they occurred between March 5, 2010, and March 18,2010. During the chat conversations, Manning used the alias "Nobody" and the account "dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de," while NF used the account "pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de." 42. Those chats took place on the "Jabber" chat server. Jabber is used for real-time instant messaging. Manning and NF used a Jabber chat service hosted on jabber.ccc.de. "CCC" is a commonly used acronym for the Berlin-based Chaos Computer Club, which according to accounts on the Internet, Assange had firequented. 43. At her court-martial proceedings. Manning stated that she "engaged in conversation often" with NF, "sometimes as long as an hour or more." Forensic analysis showed that Manning deleted or removed the NF chat logs fi"om her laptop. Nevertheless, investigators have been able to recover several portions of the chats between Manning and NF from 12 Manning's personal computer. 44. A complete copy of the recovered chats between Manning and NF is attached to this Affidavit as Attachment A. A. Assange Was "NF" 45. At her court-martial proceeding, Manning claimed that she believed the individual with whom she was chatting "was likely Mr. Julian Assange, Mr. Daniel Schmidt, or a proxy representative of Mr. Assange and Schmidt." 46. As summarized below, however, the evidence demonstrates that Assange was the "NF" who communicated with Manning in the March 2010 chats. 47. Specific information provided by NF in the March 2010 chats indicates that NF was Assange. For example, when chatting with Maiming on March 5, 2010, NF confided that he liked debates, and that he "[j]ust finished one on the IMMI, and crushed some wretch firom the journalists union." NF told Manning that the debate was "[v]ery satisfying," and that "the husband of the wretch" had exposed a source, an IT consultant who had given NF "10Gb of banking documents." 48. "IMMI" refers to the Icelandic Modem Media Initiative, a legislative proposal of considerable public interest in Iceland at the time. According to accounts available on the Internet, on March 5,2010, before NF's chat with Manning about a debate, the University of Iceland presented a panel that discussed media topics, including the IMMI. Assange was a member of that panel, as was the female deputy president of the Icelandic journalists association. 49. Moreover, the NF in the March 2010 chats with Manning appeared to have extensive knowledge of WikiLeaks' day-to-day operations, including knowledge of submissions of information to the organization, as well as of financial matters. During the chats, on March 8, 13 2010, and March 16, 2010, Manning asked NF about the financial state of WikiLeaks. On both occasions, NF responded by identifying financial difficulties that WikiLeaks had to overcome, such as losing its credit card vendor. NF also stated that WikiLeaks had raised half a million of an unspecified currency. NF thus demonstrated intimate familiarity with WikiLeaks' financial affairs and circumstances, which Assange would have. 50. Further, the NF in the chats with Manning mentioned that he planned to attend a conference on investigative joumalism in Norway in late March 2010. On March 17,2010, NF told Manning that NF would "be doing an investigative joumo conf in norway this week end, so may be out of contact most of the time." In fact, on March 18, 2010, according to an article on the Internet authored by Assange, Assange traveled from Iceland eventually to Oslo, Norway, where he attended and spoke at a March 20 conference held by SKUP, an investigative- journalism organization. According to accounts on the Internet, Assange's name appeared on a list of individuals scheduled to attend the conference, and Assange was identified as a "lecturer." A review of the other names on the list revealed no other persons known to be associated with WikiLeaks, and no one named NF. Further, SKUP's website had a photo ofAssange speaking at the conference. 51. In addition, NF repeatedly discussed with Manning details about a video being prepared for release, which NF referred to as "Project B." As reported in the New Yorker on June 7,2010, "Project B" was the code name Assange and WikiLeaks used for the video about the 2007 Apache helicopter attack, later released under the name "Collateral Murder." 52. Also, on June 27, 2011, the FBI interviewed U.S. Person No. 1 (USl), who met Assange in December 2009 in Berlin, Germany. According to USl, Assange and USl exchanged email addresses at this time and began communicating via email. Eventually, 14 Assange and USl began using the Jabber instant messaging service to communicate. According to USl, Assange used the Jabber accountpressassociation@jabber.ccc.de to communicate with USl via Jabber. Assange used pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de until the summer of 2010 to communicate with USl. As noted, pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de was the Jabber account used by NF in the chats with Manning. 53. The evidence further reflects that Manning believed NF was Assange. In chats with U.S. Person No. 2 (US2) on May 23, 2010, Manning stated that Assange "*might*" have used the "ccc.de jabber server," the same server used in the chats between NF and Manning. And on May 22,2010, Manning told US2 that she had communicated with Assange when explaining that she was a source for WikiLeaks. Manning stated, "im a high profile source... and i've developed a relationship with assange... but i don't know much more than what he tells me, which is very little, it took me four months to confirm that the person i was communicating was in fact assange." 54. Furthermore, a forensic examination of Manning's personal computer seized on May 28, 2010, revealed that pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de was associated with Assange in Manning's "Buddy List" configuration file (blist.xml), and that deleted versions of Manning's blist.xml file identified pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de as an alias for NF. The file had a creation date and last vmtten date of May 28, 2010. 55. Based on this evidence, I have concluded that Manning's partner in the chats, assigned the usemame "NF," was in fact Assange. Accordingly, in the following discussion of the March 2010 chats, I identify Assange as the person with whom Manning communicated. B. Nature of the Assange-Manning Chats 56. As the below examples illustrate, the recovered chats between Manning and 15 Assange reflect that the two collaborated on Manning's disclosure of classified information to WikiLeaks for WikiLeaks to disseminate publicly. 1. JTF-GTMO Documents 57. At her court-martial proceeding, Manning admitted that she provided WikiLeaks with Joint Task Force Guantanamo ("JTF-GTMO") Detainee Assessment Briefs ("DABs") in early March 2010. 58. In fact, Attachment A reflects discussions between Manning and Assange about the value of these documents and Manning's transmission of them to Assange. 59. On March 7, 2010, Manning asked Assange, "how valuable are JTF GTMO detention memos containing summaries, background info, capture info, etc?" Assange replied, "time period?" Manning answered, "2002-2008." Assange responded, "quite valuable to the lav^^ers of these guys who are trying to get them out, where those memos suggest their innocence/bad procedure...also valuable to merge into the general history, politically gitmo is mostly over though." 60. Manning has admitted that "[a]fter this discussion, [she] decided to download the DABs." 61. On March 8, 2010, Manning told Assange, "im sending one last archive of interesting stuff... should be in the x folder at some point in the next 24 hours." Assange replied, "ok. great!" Manning added, "you'll need to figure out what to do with it all..." 62. Later that day. Manning wrote to Assange, "anyway, im throwing everything i got on JTF GTMO at you now... should take awhile to get up tho...summary/history/health conditions/reasons for retaining or transfer of nearly every detainee (about 95%)." Assange replied, "ok, great! what period does it cover for each internment?" Manning replied "2002- 16 2009.Assange inquired if the information included "initial medical evaluation to exit evaluation?" 63. Also on March 8, 2010, Manning updated Assange about the ongoing upload, stating that the "upload is at about 36%." Assange asked for an "ETA," to which Manning responded "11-12 hours... guessing since its been going for 6 already." Assange asked, "how many mb?" Manning replied "about 440mb" and "a lot of scanned pdf[']s." 64. Two days later, on March 10,2010, Assange reported to Manning, "there[']s a usemame in the gitmo docs" and asked "i assume i should filter it out?" Manning stated that "any usemames should probably be filtered, period." Manning then recognized, "but at the same time, theres a gazillion of them." 65. Later in the chat on March 10, 2010, Manning asked, "anything useful in there?" Assange replied "no time, but have someone on it." Assange then followed up that "there surely will be" and that "these sorts of things are always motivating to other sources too." Assange noted that such disclosures provided "inspiration" for other leakers because "gitmo=bad, leakers=enemy of gitmo, leakers=good." 66. WikiLeaks ultimately released the JTF-GTMO DABs starting in April 2011. By August 2011, it had released 765 JTF-GTMO DABs. 67. As General Robert Carr testified during Manning's court martial, the release of the DABs caused problems for the United States' efforts to move detainees out of Guantanamo Bay to other countries. According to General Carr, at the time of the release ofthe DABs, the Department of State was negotiating with foreign governments regarding the transfer of the detainees. The release of the classified DABs threatened to conflict with those negotiations. 68. I have reviewed a number of the JTF-GTMO DABs that WikiLeaks released. 17 They contained clear markings indicating that they were classified as "SECRET." 2. Assange Encourages Manning To Continue Searching For Documents 69. The March 2010 chats also reveal that Assange provided Manning with encouragement to provide more information. 70. On March 8,2010, when discussing the JTF GTMO upload. Manning told Assange, "after this upload, thats all i really have got left." Assange replied, "curious eyes never run dry in my experience." 71. hi response, Manning stated, "ive already exposed quite a bit, just no-one knows yet. ill slip into darkness for a few years, let the heat die down." Manning added, "considering just how much one source has given you, i can only imagine the overl[o]ad." 72. Earlier in the same day, Assange noted that there had been "2500 articles in .is referendum in the past 15 hours, despite it being a Sunday." (The domain name for Iceland is ".is.") Manning stated, "oh yeah.. .osc went haywire digging into .is." (Based on the context, in using the term "osc," Manning likely was referring to the CIA's open source center.) Assange responded, "yeah? that[']s something we want to mine entirely, btw." 3. Manning And Assange Discuss Concealing Source Of Documents 73. During his chats with Manning, Assange asked whether documents sent by Manning about an arrest by Iraqi police were "releasable." Manning advised Assange that certain documents could be released, but that an original incident report could not be, and that a translation of a report was "super not releasable." Assange asked that Manning "be sure to tell me these things as soon as possible," and "better yet in the submission itself," since Assange was "not the only one to process this stuff and also will forget details if publication is delayed a long time due to the flood of other things." After Manning asked if Assange was "gonna give release 18 a shot?," Assange opined that a lack of detail in the releasablematerial "may be problematic," Manning suggested that WikiLeaks could refer to a hotel located near where the arrest occurred; she "figured it would make it look more like a journalist acquired it... ifthe hotel was mentioned." Manning also advised Assangethat she was "all over the place ... clearing logs," and that she was "not logging at all... safe .... i just wanted to be certain." 74. Thus, in the quoted communications Manning and Assange discussed the form in which WikiLeaks could disclose the information about the arrest by Iraqi police, and the suppression ofparticular material that if released might reveal Manning's identity as the source. 75. In addition. Manning assured Assange that by "clearing logs" she was taking the proper steps to prevent discovery, by leaving no trace on her computer of their communications. 4. Assange's Knowledge That Manning Was In The U.S. Armed Forces In Iraq * 76. The March 2010 chats between Manning and Assange included military jargon and references to current events in Iraq suggesting that Assange knew Manning was an American service member in Iraq. 77. For example, on March 6, 2010, Assange asked Manning, "it looks like a MiTT report?" MiTT is a military acronym for Military Transition Team, a team that trains local Iraqi troops. 78. On March 18, 2010, Manning used the military term "MI" (for Military Intelligence) in a chat with Assange. Later that day, Assange wrote to Manning, "but remember...rules are just for the grunts..." in response to a discussion about the breaking of rules by an Army Lieutenant Colonel and senior officers. "Grunts" is military slang for enlisted military personnel in general and is often specifically used for infantrymen. 79. Further, Manning made several references to specific events and places in Iraq 19 (including the Tigris River) that indicated Manning was then in Iraq. IV. MANNING AND ASSANGE'S AGREEMENT TO CRACK A COMPUTER PASSWORD TO ACCESS CLASSIFIED NATIONAL SECURITY INFORMATION 80. As described below, during their March 2010 chats. Manning and Assange reached an agreement for Assange to assist Manning in cracking a password related to two computers with access to classified national security information. I understand the following through my review of the testimony of a forensic examiner in Manning's court martial, my conversations with FBI forensic examiners, and research on the Internet. A. Background On Password Hashes 81. A computer using a Microsoft Windows operating system does not store users' passwords in plain text for security reasons. Instead, the computer stores passwords as "hash values." When a user creates a password for the relevant usemame, the password passes through a mathematical algorithm, which creates a "hash value" for the password. Essentially, the creation of the hash value is a form of encryption for storing the password. The hash value—^not the plain text of the password—^is then stored on the computer. 82. As additional security, the computer does not store the full hash value in one location. Instead, the hash value for that usemame is broken into two parts. One part is stored in the Security Accounts Manager (SAM) database as the SAM registry file. The SAM file in a Windows operating system keeps usemames and parts of the hash value associated with the usemame. The other part of the hash is stored in the "system file." To obtain the fiill hash value associated with the password, one needs the parts fi"om the SAM file and the system file. 83. Finally, as further security, Windows locks the SAM file and system file. Only users with administrative level privileges can access the files. 20 84. However, even if a user does not have administrative level privileges, the user might be able to access the system file or the SAM file by using special software, such as a Linux operating system. A person, for example, can reboot a computer using a CD with the Linux operating system and view the contents of the SAM file or system file. 85. The evidence suggests that Manning did just that. Forensic analysis of Manning's personal laptop computer reflects that she burned the Linux operating system to a CD on or around March 2, 2010. Through forensic analysis, investigators have further determined that Manning therefore could have viewed the SAM file ofboth IPl and IP2—^the SIPRNet computers that Maiming primarily used—^by rebooting them with the Linux operating system that she downloaded. B. Agreement To Crack Password 86. On March 8, 2010, at approximately 3:55 p.m., Manning asked Assange whether he was "any good at Im hash cracking." a. At the time, Windows operating systems commonly used two methods for hashing and storing passwords, Lan Manager (LM) and New Technology Lan Manager (NTLM). Referring to an LM hash or an NTLM hash is tantamount to sajdng, "Windows password." Thus, in the above-described message, Manning asked Assange if he was able to crack passwords for computers running Windows operating systems. 87. In response to Marming's question, Assange answered, "yes." Assange then stated, "we have rainbow tables for Im." A "rainbow table" is a tool used to crack a hash value to determine the password associated with it. 88. After Assange claimed to have rainbow tables. Manning stated 21 lc." Manning then stated, "i think its Im + Imnt." a. Manning Hkely meant to say "Im + ntlm." The hexadecimal string of text is consistent with the format of an LM or NTLM hash. Further, on Windows operating system version Vista or newer, LM is disabled, and only NTLM is used. Manning's remark that she "thought" that the hash was "Im + Imnt" suggests that she retrieved it from a computer running a pre-Vista version of Windows. 89. A few minutes later, Manning further explained, "not even sure if thats the hash....i had to hexdump a SAM file, since i don't have the system file." Assange asked, "what makes youthink [it's] Im?"^ Assange asked, "its from a SAM?" Manning answered "yeah." Assange then stated that he "passed it onto our Im guy." a. hi the above-described chats Manning informed Assange that she had accessed the SAM file with a program and had identified this particular 16-byte hexadecimal value as a potential LM or NTLM password hash. b. By saying she retrieved the password hash through a "hexdump," Manning likely meant that she used a sofl;ware program to view the SAM file in "hexadecimal format," in which raw computer data can be viewed. 90. Two days later, at approximately 11:30 p.m. on March 10, 2010, Assange followed up on the issue. Assange messagedManning and asked, "any more hints about this Im hash?" Assange stated, "no luck so far." 91. Investigators have not recovered a response by Manning to Assange's question, and there is no other evidence as to what Assange did, if anything, with respect to the password. ^The numbers provided by Manningwere part of, but not the full, hash. Manning would have needed the part of the hash from the system file as well to obtain the fiill value. 22 The next chats that investigators were able to recover were dated March 16,2010. Thus, there is approximately a six-day gap in the chats after Assange asked for further hints on the hash. 92. Nevertheless, the recovered chats described above reflect an agreement between Manning and Assange to crack the hash. C. Password Belonged To A SIPRNet Computer 93. Forensic investigators have determined that the hash that Assange agreed to help Manning crack came from IPl and IP2. 94. Using an image of Manning's SIPRNet computer hard drives, the forensic investigator booted it with the same Linux operating system that Manning burned to a CD on her personal computer. 95. The forensic investigator then navigated to the SAM file on the computers. Using a hex editor, the investigator was able to view and obtain the precise hash value that Manning forwarded to Assange. 96. The hash value that Manning forwarded to Assange was associated with the password for an "FTP" user on IPl and IP2. The FTP user was not attributable to any specific person. 97. Although there is no evidence that the password to the FTP user was obtained, had Manning done so, she would have been able to take steps to procure classified information under a usemame that did not belong to her. Such measures would have fhistrated attempts to identify the source of the disclosures to WikiLeaks. V. ASSANGE FLEES FROM JUSTICE 98. On May 27, 2010, based on information provided by US2, Army investigators in Iraq took Manning into military custody at FOB Hammer. Manning was subsequentlycharged 23 with a variety of criminal offensesin a mihtary court-martial related to her disclosures to WikiLeaks, including charges alleging unlawful transmission of national defense information, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 793(e), theft of government information, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 641, and unlawful access to a government computer, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1030(a)(1). 99. On July 30, 2013, Manning was convicted of most ofthese charges, including unlawftil gathering or transmission of national defense information, computer intrusion, and theft of government property. Manningwas acquitted of aiding the enemy and of one count of 18 U.S.C. § 793(e). Manningwas sentenced to 35 years' imprisonment in August 2013. 100. Meanwhile, beginning as early as November 2010 and as late as April 2017, media outlets reported that the Departmentof Justice was investigating charges against WikiLeaks or Assange in connection with the disclosures by Manning. 101. On November 20, 2010, in connection with unrelated charges in Sweden, an international arrest warrant was issued against Assange. Following litigation between December 2010 and May 2012, the United Kingdom (U.K.) Supreme Court determinedthat Sweden's extradition request had been lawfully made, and the U.K. had ten days to take Assange to Sweden. Instead of appealingto the European Court of Human Rights, in June 2012, Assange fled to the Ecuadorian embassy in London. Ecuador formally granted Assange diplomatic asylum on August 16, 2012, "citinghis well-founded fears of political persecution and the possibility of the deathpenaltywerehe sent to the United States." Specifically, Assange feared that "ifhe were to be sent to USA, he might be prosecuted and perhaps be executed by a military court in regard to his involvement in the release of stolen and leaked American documents on its crimes in Afghanistan and Iraq." See http://www.aalco.int/Ruling%20of%20UNWGAD%20on%20Julian%20Assange.pdf. 24 102. Assange has made numerous comments reflecting that he took refuge in the Ecuadorian embassy to avoid extradition and charges in the United States. 103. For example, in 2013, the WikiLeaks website posted an affidavit by Assange concerning alleged monitoring of his activities and the search and seizure of his property. In this affidavit, Assange acknowledged that he was "granted asylum after a formal assessment by the government of Ecuador in relation to the current and future risks of persecution and cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment in the United States in response to my publishing activities and my political opinions. I remain under the protection of the embassy of Ecuador in London for this reason." See https://wikileaks.org/IMG/html/Affidavit_of_Julian_Assange.htmL 104. On May 19, 2017, in response to Sweden's decision to discontinue its investigation regarding suspected rape by Julian Assange, Assange publicly stated, "While today was an important victory and an important vindication ... the road is far fi*om over The war, the proper war, is just commencing. The UK has said it will arrest me regardless. Now the United States, CIA Director Pompeo, and the U.S. Attorney General have said that I and other WikiLeaks staff have no rights ... we have no first amendment rights.. .and my arrest and the arrest of our other staff is a priority.... The U.K. refuses to confirm or deny at this stage whether a U.S. extradition warrant is already in the U.K. territory. So, this is a dialogue that we want to happen. Similarly, with the United States, while there have been extremely threatening remarks made, I am always happy to engage in a dialogue with the Department of Justice about what has occurred." https://www.bloomberg.eom/news/articles/2017-05-19/swedish- prosecutors-to-drop-rape-investigation-against-assange. 25 CONCLUSION 105. The evidence summarized in this Affidavit establishes probable cause to believe that the defendant, Julian P. Assange, committed the offense alleged in the complaint; namely, Assange violated 18 U.S.C. § 371 by conspiring to (1) access a computer, without authorization and exceeding authorized access, to obtain classified national defense information in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1030(a)(1); and (2) access a computer, without authorization and exceeding authorized access, to obtain information from a department or agency of the United States in furtherance of a criminal act in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1030(a)(2), (c)(2)(B)(ii). Respectfully submitted, ml Agent Megan Brown Fed ral Bureau of Investigation Subscribed and sworn before me thi^^ day ofDecember 2017 fsl „...fesa Carroll Buchanan United States Magistrate Judge United States Magistrate Judge Alexandria, Virginia 26 Attachment A Message Text Sender Account Sender Alias pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-05 00:56:32 5-6 iiours for total upload? Nobody Nobody Nobody Nobody Nobody Nobody Nobody Nobody 2010-03-05 03:32:57 Date-Time uploaded 2010-03-05 03:33:31 no, it was like 5 minutes 2010-03-05 03:36:21 ping 2010-03-05 03:37:36 ping 2010-03-05 03:38:54 anyway... should be good to go with that... 2010-03-05 05:39:50 news? 2010-03-05 05:41:22 2010-03-05 21:07:12 hi Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-05 21:07:49 hiya Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-05 21:08:15 1 like debates. Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-05 21:09:27 Just finished one on the IMMI, and crushed some Nobody 2010-03-05 21:11:01 vid? Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-05 21:11:24 Of this? Nobody 2010-03-05 21:11:37 Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-05 21:11:56 Nobody 2010-03-05 21:12:04 ah wretch from the journalists union. dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@Jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetworl<@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de pressassociatlon@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de yeah Not videotaped, i think. Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx Very satisfying though >nod< 2010-03-05 21:12:44 Source here just gave me 10Gb of banking docs. Nobody 2010-03-05 21:13:10 lb? Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-05 21:13:11 Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-05 21:12:24 Nobody 2010-03-05 21:12:38 IHeleaked some before, was exposed by the husband of the wretch. pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-05 21:13:27 cross-bank, was an it consultant. Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-05 21:13:39 got arrested two weeks ago Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-05 21:13:50 Had is bank accounts frozen. Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-05 21:14:02 Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-05 21:14:09 /is/his Nobody 2010-03-05 21:14:26 Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-05 21:15:04 and has been offered 15 million kroner to shut up mmm needed to offload them so they'd stop going after him dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de Nobody 2010-03-05 21:17:31 >yawn< Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-05 21:19:26 tired? Nobody 2010-03-05 21:20:54 Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-05 22:53:22 ping Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-05 23:41:17 ping Nobody Nobody Nobody Nobody 2010-03-06 00:31:55 here Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-06 06:41:22 ping Nobody 2010-03-06 06:41:27 pong Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-06 06:41:34 can you tell me more about these files? Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-06 06:41:41 or the status of the issue? Nobody 2010-03-06 06:41:58 waking up =) 2010-03-06 00:32:52 pong 2010-03-06 00:39:19 ...and zero reply status =P 2010-03-06 06:40:54 ping uhmm... no new information... everybody is focused on the election pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetworl<@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de what's the caps thing? caps? Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-06 06:42:07 Nobody 2010-03-06 06:42:15 Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-06 06:42:22 CAPS Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-06 06:42:38 who's the author? Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-06 06:42:39 and are all these releasable? Nobody 2010-03-06 06:42:42 Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-06 06:42:46 what about the english translation? Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-06 06:42:55 yes Nobody Nobody 2010-03-06 06:42:55 so much going on... ahhhh everything is notes 2010-03-06 06:43:02 minus the photos Nobody 2010-03-06 06:43:13 Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-06 06:43:29 the photos are releasable ok, what about the incident report? cant release the original, but the information can be scraped from it i.e. sources indicate this happened at this place at Nobody 2010-03-06 06:43:52 dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de Nobody 2010-03-06 06:44:08 pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-06 06:44:17 yup Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-06 06:44:38 Nobody 2010-03-06 06:44:39 translation is super not releasable this time it looks like a MiTT report? Message Text Sender Account Sender Alias pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-06 06:45:01 dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de Nobody 2010-03-06 06:45:03 Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx possible yes, came from federal police into US hands 2010-03-06 06:45:07 and better yet in the submission itself Nobody 2010-03-06 06:45:12 yes, sorry pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-06 06:45:59 dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de Nobody 2010-03-06 06:46:02 pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-06 06:46:28 Nobody Nobody Nobody Nobody Nobody 2010-03-06 06:46:33 2010-03-06 06:48:47 pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-06 06:58:20 yes Nobody 2010-03-06 06:58:37 cool pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-06 06:58:40 lack of detail may be problematic, but we'[l see i.e ":easier": stories for press to get im sure you can try to confirm SOMETHING... there is a hotel called the Hotel Ishtar nearby to that location Date-Time ok. be sure to tell me these things as soon as i'm not the only one to process this stuff and also will forget details if publication is delayed a long time due to the flood of other things though... who knows... everybody is running around like headless chickens dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de malaki is expected to win again though? basically 2010-03-06 06:46:39 lose a few seats maybe 2010-03-06 06:46:42 but win overall 2010-03-06 06:46:56 probably have to form a new coalition blah, sorry about the craziness... gonna give release a shot? pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-06 06:59:09 dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de Nobody 2010-03-06 06:59:10 pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-06 06:59:36 Nobody Nobody Nobody Nobody Nobody 2010-03-06 06:59:46 dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de Nobody Nobody 2010-03-06 07:01:55 pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-06 07:02:42 haha Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-06 07:03:19 Nobody Nobody 2010-03-06 07:03:25 foreign Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-06 07:03:33 Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-06 07:03:43 evil work Nobody Nobody Nobody Nobody 2010-03-06 07:03:43 Iraq themed releases? 2010-03-06 07:00:01 2010-03-06 07:00:11 2010-03-06 07:00:24 2010-03-06 07:01:19 2010-03-06 07:02:38 does it have grid refs? grid references within the document, yes that was were the arrests took place morocco publishing company gives coordinates (in the military report) i figured it would make it look more like a journalist acquired it... if the hotel was mentioned [popular among gays, oddly]
http://travel.yahoo.com/p-hotel-2514619hotel_ishtar-i
l'm surprised there are any left. 2010-03-06 07:03:27 that is full transcript for video is now complete 2010-03-06 07:04:08 yes, the transcripts say a lot about attitudes 2010-03-06 07:05:30 might also be known as Sheraton Ishtar 2010-03-06 07:05:41
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SheratonJshtar
2010-03-06 07:06:13 its somewhere in that general area... ":Morocco Publishing"... its been too crazy for me to try dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de Nobody dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de Nobody 2010-03-06 07:07:14 and find dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de dawqnetwork@jabber.ccc.de anyway, gotta dash... should be back in a few hours Nobody 2010-03-06 07:07:21 good luck Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-06 07:07:34 you too Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-06 07:07:49 um, transcripts? Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-06 07:07:53 ah, yes, sorry. Nobody Nobody 2010-03-06 07:08:11 its a HUGE jumble xD Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-06 07:08:17 Nobody 2010-03-06 07:08:25 muh bad 2010-03-06 07:08:12 =P plural confused me. Sender Alias Nobody Nobody Nobody 2010-03-06 07:08:34 Nobody Nobody 2010-03-06 07:11:01 the arrest location Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-06 07:11:36 why important? Nobody Nobody Nobody Nobody Nobody Nobody Nobody Nobody Nobody 2010-03-06 07:11:46 1 think hotel Is on the west side dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de dawg network@jabber. ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de pressassoclation@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de Date-Time Message Text gotta go fo' realz =P Sender Account dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de 2010-03-06 07:08:37 ciaoness 2010-03-06 07:10:28 oh, it was on the EAST side of the tigris... thats important 2010-03-06 07:11:03 that is 2010-03-06 07:12:21 2010-03-06 07:12:43 2010-03-06 07:12:50 2010-03-06 09:25:55 2010-03-06 10:59:53 2010-03-06 12:48:15 2010-03-06 14:37:11 2010-03-07 07:03:53 ah, im all over the place... clearing logs... not logging at all... safe i just wanted to be certain any more questions? i have a quick question busy day for you ? ping ping brb, checking flights Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-07 07:08:29 Nobody Nobody 2010-03-07 07:11:49 k Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-07 07:15:36 Nobody 2010-03-07 07:16:00 how valuable are JTF GTMO detention memos 2010-03-07 07:14:56 i have a quick question? sure...lots of time pressure atm though so answer will be brief containing summaries, background info, capture info, etc? time period? pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-07 07:16:18 Nobody 2010-03-07 07:16:25 2002-2008 pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-07 07:17:35 pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-07 07:18:12 dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de quite valuable to the lawyers of these guys who are trying to get them out, where those memos suggest their innocence/bad proceedure also valuable to merge into the general history, politically gitmo is mostly over though Nobody 2010-03-07 07:18:20 yeah Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-07 07:18:28 although transfers to afghanistan might rise it again Nobody Nobody 2010-03-07 07:18:38 >%oPNG Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-07 07:19:29 2010-03-07 07:18:43 illget back to that later depends on definition of valuable of course.. there's been a fair bit of inflation the last few months:) Nobody 2010-03-07 07:19:39 i noticed Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-07 07:19:51 BTW Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-07 07:20:12 Nobody 2010-03-07 07:20:17 i saw Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-07 07:20:25 How cool is that? Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-07 07:20:54 dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de Nobody 2010-03-07 07:20:56 pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-07 07:21:13 dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de Nobody Nobody Nobody 2010-03-07 07:21:20 ah, been there before pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de Nobody 2010-03-07 07:22:34 indeed it is Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-07 07:22:51 i.e vetoing bills [go back and do it again!] pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-07 07:23:32 call is bad, 1agree, anyone with some $ has a syringe dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@iabber.ccc.de Nobody 2010-03-07 07:23:40 right into the heart of the state constitution >nod<: Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-07 07:23:52 bbk Nobody Nobody 2010-03-07 07:23:58 Nobody 2010-03-07 10:53:48 so when is the site coming back? dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de WE won the referendum - only 1.4% voted against. First referendum in Icelandic history, ever. not sure how much influence you actually had... though im sure you had an impact of some kind by &apos:we&apos: 1mean everyone working towards it Nobody im wary of referenda democracy sounds good... until you realize you&apos:re a vulnerable minority... 2010-03-07 07:21:57 but quite possibly swung It., there was lots of stuff going on behind the scenes here. 2010-03-07 07:22:09 case in point: proposition 8 in California 2010-03-07 07:22:21 Yes. This is democracy in the negative though, which is usually great. 2010-03-07 07:21:28 2010-03-07 07:21:51 gotta run too 2010-03-07 07:23:59 ttyl Date-Time Message Text Sender Account Sender Alias dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de Nobody 2010-03-08 05:46:56 hello Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-08 05:48:43 Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-08 05:48:50 heya! how goes? Nobody 2010-03-08 05:49:22 not bad Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-08 05:52:19 vid has been enhanced and rendered now. subtitles Nobody 2010-03-08 05:52:30 nice Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-08 05:52:47 Nobody Nobody 2010-03-08 05:53:03 the stills taken from the wide angle? 2010-03-08 05:53:31 dropped camera Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-08 05:53:42 no.. Nobody 2010-03-08 05:53:51 ah, the video stills then Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-08 05:53:52 from the video cam Nobody Nobody 2010-03-08 05:54:14 sounds good Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-08 05:56:10 still all over the place, here After the contrast enhancement, something about the lack of resolution / smoke gives a film-noir quality Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-08 05:56:16 yeah, i&apos:ve heard. Nobody 2010-03-08 05:56:25 heard? Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-08 05:56:29 Nobody Nobody Nobody 2010-03-08 05:56:43 done for engiish dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de 2010-03-08 05:55:54 it looks good, the stills are very moving pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-08 05:58:05 Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-08 05:58:59 dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de Nobody 2010-03-08 06:04:09 lalala Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-08 06:04:54 Nobody 2010-03-08 06:05:05 mm? pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-08 06:05:22 looks like we have the last 4 mothers of all audio to all pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-08 06:05:29 s/mothers/months Nobody Nobody Nobody 2010-03-08 06:05:46 interesting 2010-03-08 06:08:49 im sending one last archive of intersting stuff... should be in the x folder at some point in the next 24 hours pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-08 06:10:08 ok. great! Nobody Nobody 2010-03-08 06:10:09 74b3*.tar.b22 2010-03-08 06:10:50 you'll need to figure out what to do with it all... pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-08 06:11:03 a lot of odd things are happening lately Nobody 2010-03-08 06:11:08 such as? Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-08 06:11:48 2010-03-08 05:57:02 2010-03-08 05:57:09 outcome yet? busy few weeks no... wont be for weeks... it was very quiet expected a lot more people can get worked up internally... somethings are encouraged to be said, others not, and after they flow around long enough, there's a lack of grounding. jesus phones in the .is parliament 2010-03-08 06:06:09 *had nothing to do with this one* it's hard to describe without going through them ail pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de but there&aposis something in the air. Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-08 06:11:53 Nobody 2010-03-08 06:12:07 in Iceland, or globally Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-08 06:12:40 pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx germany say the same thing 2010-03-08 06:12:49 and there's some evidence of that Nobody 2010-03-08 06:13:13 such as... (i hate to inquire too much, but im benign) pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-08 06:13:36 it may be more readily visible in .is due to less inertia dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de Nobody [small economy] 2010-03-08 06:14:09 definitely feel something odd here... pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-08 06:14:38 some recent things... in denmark the main newspaper printed an entire book in afghanistan that was about to be injuncted suddenly in its Sunday paper pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-08 06:14:50 Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-08 06:14:55 Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-08 06:15:04 Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-08 06:15:25 to subvert the injunction [about afghanistan, not in] injunction came from dep of defence fox news editorialized to say, give money to WL Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-08 06:15:42 .nl government just fell over afghanistan this is what l&apos:m trying to detenmine. people in Date-Time Message Text Sender Account Sender Alias dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de Nobody 2010-03-08 06:15:49 indeed Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-08 06:16:00 Nobody 2010-03-08 06:16:07 yep Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-08 06:16:34 Nobody ago are now courted. 2010-03-08 06:17:06 1told you before, government/organizations cant german constitutional court just struck down data retention dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx Nobody Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx Nobody Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx wi actions tliat were considered totally radical 3 years control information... the harder they try, the more violently the information wants to get out 2010-03-08 06:17:22 2500 articles in .is referendum in the past 15 hours, despite it being a Sunday 2010-03-08 06:17:34 you're like the first pin to pop a balloon 2010-03-08 06:17:52 many other things like this 2010-03-08 06:18:13 restrict supply = value increases, yes 2010-03-08 06:18:21 oh yeah... osc went haywire digging into .is 2010-03-08 06:18:37 us dod has another tact though, dump billions in free ":news": content 2010-03-08 06:18:44 yeah? 2010-03-08 06:18:56 that&apos:s something we want to mine entirely, btw dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de Nobody Nobody Nobody dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de Nobody pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 1had an account there, but changed ips too quickly usually its pretty dull reading, one or two things on .is a day... but its like 20-25 for today alone 2010-03-08 06:19:40 just FBIS or analysis included? 2010-03-08 06:19:54 no analysis, too early... 2010-03-08 06:20:03 24-48 hours it takes for analysis if done 2010-03-08 06:22:01 anyway, im throwing everything i got on JTF GTMO at you now... should take awhile to get up tho 2010-03-08 06:23:22 summary / history / health conditions / reasons for retaining or transfer of nearly every detainee (about 95%) 2010-03-08 06:24:01 ok, great! Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-08 06:24:15 what period does it cover for each internment? Nobody 2010-03-08 06:19:10 2010-03-08 06:19:16 Nobody 2010-03-08 06:24:48 2002-2009... Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-08 06:25:21 so initial medical evaluation to exit evaluation? Nobody 2010-03-08 06:25:37 no, just summaries... Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-08 06:25:52 but summaries of that? Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-08 06:26:26 i.e from entry to exit? Nobody Nobody 2010-03-08 06:26:31 Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-08 06:26:50 Nobody 2010-03-08 06:26:58 Memos such asSUBJECT: Recommendation to not quite 2010-03-08 06:26:33 gaps where do the gaps come from? Retain under DoD Control (DoD) for Guantanamo Detainee.
ISN; US9AS-000002DP i have a csv that organizes the info as much as dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de Nobody 2010-03-08 06:27:51 pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-08 06:27:55 1 hate these gitmo guys Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-08 06:28:29 possible OFAFBU sums up the sort of people they ended up with [one flight away from being ugly] aka ":gitmo cute" pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-08 06:28:48 dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de Nobody Nobody 2010-03-08 06:28:56 haha Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-08 06:31:14 you too. and take care! Nobody 2010-03-08 06:31:42 Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-08 06:32:15 dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de 2010-03-08 06:30:57 anyway, gotta run, have a nice day Nobody Nobody after this upload, thats all i really have got left curious eyes never run dry in my experience 2010-03-08 06:32:18 i sat on it for a bit, and figured, eh. why not 2010-03-08 06:32:52 ive already exposed quite a bit, just no-one knows yet Nobody 2010-03-08 06:33:34 illslip into darkness for a few years, let the heat die down won't take a few years at the present rate of change pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-08 06:34:05 dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de Nobody 2010-03-08 06:34:08 true Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-08 06:34:19 almost feels like the singularity is coming there's such acceleration Sender Account Sender Alias dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de Nobody 2010-03-08 06:34:52 pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de pressassociatlon@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de pressassoci3tion@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de Date-Time Message Text yes... and considering just how much one source has given you, i can only imagine the overlad Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-08 06:35:05 yes Nobody Nobody 2010-03-08 06:35:15 *load Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-08 06:35:34 Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-08 06:35:57 2010-03-08 06:35:30 cya Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 1just hope we can do justice to it all. We have the numbers, just need to figure out how to scale the management. 2010-03-08 06:36:04 night! Nobody 2010-03-08 11:13:06 hi Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-08 11:44:16 hoi Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-08 11:44:27 Nobody Nobody 2010-03-08 12:19:56 wasnt asleep... going to sleep soon Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-08 12:21:39 ETA? Nobody 2010-03-08 12:22:05 2010-03-08 12:20:21 short sleep? upload is at about 36% Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 11-12 hours... guessing since its been going for 6 already 2010-03-08 12:22:33 how many mb? Nobody 2010-03-08 12:22:50 about 440mb 1Nobody 2010-03-08 12:24:46 Nobody Nobody 2010-03-08 14:38:00 a lot of scanned pdf's what are you at donation-wise? 2010-03-08 15:55:28 any good at Im hash cracking? Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-08 16:00:29 yes Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-08 16:00:44 donations: not sure. something in order of .5M but we lost our CC processor, so this is making matters somewhat painful. Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-08 16:00:55 Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-08 16:01:30 pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-08 16:02:23 we have rainbow tables for Im Nobody Nobody Nobody Nobody Nobody 2010-03-08 16:04:14 80XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX1c pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx need sleep >yawn> not even sure if thats the hash... i had to hexdump a SAM file, since i dont have the system file... 2010-03-08 16:10:06 what makes you think it&apos:s Im? Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-08 16:10:19 its from a SAM? Nobody 2010-03-08 16:10:24 yeah dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de 2010-03-08 16:05:07 i think its Im + Imnt 2010-03-08 16:05:38 anyway... 2010-03-08 16:06:08 2010-03-08 16:09:06 passed it onto our Im guy Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-08 16:11:26 Nobody Nobody Nobody Nobody Nobody 2010-03-0816:11:40 thx 2010-03-08 21:31:59 . got about an hour to go on that upload 2010-03-10 03:44:06 hi Nobody did you get what i sent? via sftp 2010-03-10 03:46:04 heyal 2010-03-10 03:46:24 MD5 (74b3*.tar.bz2) = c36e31ab* Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-10 03:47:39 will check Nobody 2010-03-10 03:47:47 sweet Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-10 03:47:54 somewhat distracted with all sorts of intrigues Nobody Nobody 2010-03-10 03:48:01 heh, im sure Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-10 03:48:24 we now have the last 4 months of audio from Nobody Nobody 2010-03-10 03:48:29 bbl Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-10 03:48:51 it was a *might* before Nobody Nobody 2010-03-10 03:48:55 somebody's bad... =) Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-10 03:49:16 yup. nixon tapes got nothing on us Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-10 04:25:37 hmm Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-10 04:25:42 there's a username in the gitmo docs Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-10 04:25:58 i assume i should filter it out? Nobody Nobody Nobody 2010-03-10 05:40:47 theres a username? Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-10 05:45:56 Nobody 2010-03-10 05:46:00 yes Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-10 03:45:05 2010-03-10 03:45:11 2010-03-10 03:48:13 imma get intrigued with my hot chocolate =) telephones at the .Is parliament 2010-03-10 03:48:35 yes, you said earlier 2010-03-10 03:49:11 ttyl 2010-03-10 05:42:16 any usernames should probably be filtered, period 2010-03-10 05:42:38 but at the same time, theres a gazillion of them is this ordered by country? Message Text ... gaziliion pdf's that is 2010-03-10 05:47:15 anything useful in there? Sender Account Sender Alias dawgnetwork@jabber.ccG.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@]abber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de Nobody Nobody 2010-03-10 05:46:48 Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-10 05:50:54 no time, but have someone on It Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-10 05:51:00 there surely will be Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-10 05:51:12 Date-Time and these sorts of things are always motivating to other sources too dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de Nobody Nobody Nobody Nobody 2010-03-10 05:51:22 Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-10 05:52:08 heh Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-10 05:52:29 Nobody 2010-03-10 05:52:38 Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx Nobody Nobody >nod< 2010-03-10 05:51:33 inflation 2010-03-10 05:51:34 =P 2010-03-10 05:51:43 from an economic standpoint 1was thinking more inspiration i know =) 2010-03-10 05:53:08 gitmo=bad,leakers=enemy of gitmo,leakers=good 2010-03-10 05:54:03 Hence the feeling is people can give us stuff for anything not as "dangerous as gitmo" on the one hand, and on the other, for people who know more, there&apos:s a desire to eclipse.... 2010-03-10 05:54:41 true 2010-03-10 05:55:05 ive crossed a lot of those "danger" zones, so im comfortable Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-10 05:55:32 oh? Nobody 2010-03-10 05:55:55 dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de Nobody 2010-03-10 05:56:02 Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-10 05:56:03 yes pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-10 05:56:13 dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de Nobody 2010-03-10 05:55:25 learned a lot from the Iceland cable on my side dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de and that is... everyone is too busy to investigate too deeply... or clean up the mess unless they think there&aposjs a real promotion in it Nobody 2010-03-10 05:56:19 indeed Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-10 05:56:35 Nobody 2010-03-10 05:56:41 yep Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-10 05:56:46 Nobody Nobody Nobody 2010-03-10 05:56:51 Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-10 05:57:53 after a few days, no one gives a damn, generally especially now with the pace of change so high oh yeah 2010-03-10 05:56:58 its nuts Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx ive given up on trying to imagine whats next i predict its nothing i can predict 2010-03-10 05:58:21 actually... 2010-03-10 05:58:29 gave an intel source here a list of things we wanted Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-10 05:57:28 Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-10 05:58:39 1-5 pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-10 05:59:06 1 was "something we have no idea of yet. hard to find, but the most likely to be important" pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-10 05:59:30 and they came back with the last 4 months of parliament dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de Nobody Nobody Nobody Nobody 2010-03-10 06:00:40 thats a wtf... who did this kind of moment 2010-03-10 06:00:54 fall-out =P So, that's what 1think the future is like;) Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-10 06:00:55 Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-10 06:01:15 yes Nobody 2010-03-10 06:01:57 dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de Nobody Nobody dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de Nobody dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de 2010-03-10 05:59:47 xD 2010-03-10 05:59:49 hilarious now that humans are getting more and more integrated into this information society... a level of transparency never imagined or even truly desired is coming into play 2010-03-10 06:02:18 it makes us more human if anything 2010-03-10 06:03:13 we've created states, governments, religious institutions, corporations... all these organizations to hide behind... 2010-03-10 06:03:26 but at the end of the day, we&apos:re just guys and girls Sender Account Sender Alias pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-10 06:04:02 pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de pressassoclation@jabber.ccc.de pressassoclation@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetworl<@Jabber.ccc.de dawgnetworl(@Jabber.ccc.de dawgnetworlc@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetworl<@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de Date-Time Message Text WikiLeaks is looking for donations, but what itsi»i, founders should do, is call upon script writers to make a, perhaps reality based, dramatized, thriller movie of one of the wikileaks cases, with corruption, infiltration, espionage, hitmen, sabotage, etc. and call the movie ":WikiLeaksl":

l see great potential for such a movie, and massive money and advertising it would generate would establish them firmly. l&apos:d then support by seeing the movie. Hollywood would likely support." Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-10 06:04:04 haha Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-10 06:04:35 yes. its very healthy Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-10 06:04:47 but then, there is farmville... Nobody Nobody Nobody Nobody 2010-03-10 06:04:59 the masquerade ball 2010-03-10 06:05:22 this is gonna be one hell of a decade 2010-03-10 06:05:45 it feels like 2010 should be ending soon... 2010-03-10 06:05:50 but we just got started sense deceptions to suck $ out of people it's as old as lipstick and the guitar of course, Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-10 06:05:51 pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-10 06:06:06 dawgnetworl<@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwor[<@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de Nobody 2010-03-10 06:06:39 voluntary matrix-style society? but mmorpg are evil in a whole new way Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-10 06:06:46 yes Nobody 2010-03-10 06:07:08 hmm Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-10 06:07:25 Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-10 06:07:53 mmorpg's that have long term users are pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-10 06:08:59 dawgnetworl<@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx incentivised to keep them profitable but 1imagine they&apos:ll merge into hybrid revenue modes, where congnitive tasks and freelabor are done using sense deception incentives 2010-03-10 06:09:48 like the ":video games" from toys? 2010-03-10 06:10:12 haven&aposit seen that 2010-03-10 06:10:34 but it sure isn't a decade to be a gullible idiot:) dawgnetworl<@jabber.ccc.de Nobody 2010-03-10 06:11:24 dawgnetworl<@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de Nobody Nobody 2010-03-10 06:11:40 Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-10 06:12:11 dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de Nobody Nobody 2010-03-10 06:12:47 pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-10 06:13:32 dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de Nobody 2010-03-10 06:13:32 pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-10 06:15:50 dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de Nobody 2010-03-10 06:16:12 Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-10 06:16:57 Nobody Nobody 2010-03-10 06:17:23 Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-10 06:17:31 dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de Nobody 2010-03-10 06:11:52 2010-03-10 06:13:04 2010-03-10 06:17:26 might be ok in the end basic gist: retired general takes over a toy company, invests in video games for kids to "play":, but they're actually training to remotely use little toy sized weapons former toy owner tries to stop him •company heh. that's the example 1was going to use for mmorpg (with drones) but decided it was too grotesque its not... its logical in frightening ways i think like that... i dont know how it happened, but i think that way i predict war will turn into a continuous spectrum of spying and violence ":how can i take advantage of two things that most people wouldn't think are connected" with companies doing a lot of the lower end {spying/violence} for their own reasons and a totally seemless crossover (as is happening with the us) between contractors/military to the degree that its not clear who is tasking who wow, dead on everywhere, greater degrees of freedom, more fluidity and mixing. always an interesting discussion =) ttyl night! Nobody 2010-03-10 20:58:03 hello Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-10 20:59:41 heya! Nobody 2010-03-10 20:59:52 whats new? Date-Time Message Text 350Gb of audio intercepts. But you knew already. Sender Account Sender Alias pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetworl<@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetworl<@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetworl<@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-10 21:00:22 Nobody Nobody 2010-03-10 21:00:30 mhmm Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-10 21:01:22 lots of smaller scale material 2010-03-10 21:00:57 is that the only thing? Nobody 2010-03-10 21:01:28 Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-10 21:01:44 >:nod<: e.g bbc legal defense against trafigura which was Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-10 21:02:15 aljazeera doing another segment on WL Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-10 21:02:35 Canadian detainee docs Nobody 2010-03-10 21:02:43 Canadian? Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-10 21:03:00 censored pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetworl<@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetworl<@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetworl<@jabber.ccc.de some russian and Chinese stuff that 1can't read Nobody 2010-03-10 21:03:08 hahaha Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-10 21:03:09 heh Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-10 21:03:17 and a list of ALL the tea party volunteers Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-10 21:03:42 from glen beck's email Nobody Nobody 2010-03-10 21:03:48 jesus fucking Christ pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx whats the big deal with that? because some people take that seriously 2010-03-10 21:04:26 an analysis of the greenhouse gas output of Australia&apos:s ":earth hour" fireworks 2010-03-10 21:04:32 (46 tonnes) 2010-03-10 21:04:57 The teaparty thing? lt's weird, but it should be dawgnetworl<@jabber.ccc.de Nobody 2010-03-10 21:05:21 pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-10 21:05:33 dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de Nobody Nobody 2010-03-10 21:05:39 *stays in reality* 2010-03-10 21:04:13 taken seriously yeah, its one of those... grey areas between reality and entertainment and ick lt's the right wing overclass (fox) organization of the righwing underclass. Think of them as brown shirts. 2010-03-10 21:06:23 well, i dont know what posting a list from glenn beck&apos:s email will do... but hey, its transparency pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-10 21:06:37 They're important because their organized free pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-10 21:06:54 And they may or may not break free of their masters. dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de Nobody Nobody 2010-03-10 21:07:50 is it like the entire world is uploading to you? Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-10 21:08:24 Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-10 21:08:31 Scientology in haiti... Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-10 21:08:52 dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de Nobody Nobody Nobody Nobody 2010-03-10 21:08:58 lots of german stuff i don&apos:t understand, but we have people who do >nod< 2010-03-10 21:09:08 wow... 2010-03-10 21:09:15 im gonna leave you to work than get back up and online... get immi passed... and start publishing whatever you can... =) pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-10 21:10:08 heh Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-10 21:10:16 Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-10 21:10:31 dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de Nobody pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-10 21:16:54 yes Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-10 21:17:05 Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-10 21:17:39 did you read our bulgarian shadow state doc? Nobody 2010-03-10 21:17:45 well, fuck you do everything an intel agency does... dawqnetwork@jabber.ccc.de Nobody 2010-03-10 21:17:58 not really labor. 2010^03-10 21:07:04 ah 2010-03-10 21:09:50 some hungarian finance things Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx aljazeera will also have a new WL doco by the same producer who did IMMI piece 2010-03-10 21:11:36 agreement between the royal mail and its union Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-10 21:11:49 oh, this one is nice Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-10 21:11:55 Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-10 21:12:31 Nobody entire romanian police database israeli's OECD application docs 2010-03-10 21:15:45 its like you're the first "lntelligence Agency" for the general public 2010-03-10 21:16:39 downside is you get so much stuff in a single day that its hard to prioritize that's just a matter of growth, though minus the anonymous sourcing Sender Account Sender Alias pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-10 21:18:15 dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de Nobody Nobody 2010-03-10 21:18:43 pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-10 21:19:47 Date-Time Message Text Thie original WL about reads: ":...will be tlie first intelligence agency of ttie people...": migiit iiave missed that, but its absolutely true 2010-03-10 21:19:31 anyway, gotta run... ttyl Wikileaks described itself as "the first intelligence agency of the people. Better principled and less parochial than any governmental intelligence agency, it is able to be more accurate and relevant. It has no commercial or national interests at heart; its only interest is the revelation of the truth. Unlike the covert activities of state intelligence agencies, Wikileaks relies upon the power of overt fact to enable and empower citizens to bring feared and corrupt governments, and corporations to justice." pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-10 21:20:14 ok. later! Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-10 23:30:54 Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-10 23:31:03 no luck so far any more hints about this Im hash? Nobody 2010-03-16 18:23:35 iii Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-16 18:32:42 iioi Nobody Nobody Nobody 2010-03-16 22:29:42 whats up? 2010-03-16 22:34:13 just about to go out 2010-03-16 22:34:14 all systems nominal 2010-03-16 22:34:24 good to know 2010-03-16 22:34:36 ttyl Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-16 22:35:52 Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-16 22:35:52 take care Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx :) Nobody 2010-03-16 22:36:04 Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-16 22:37:09 not sure will do... donations coming in good? Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-16 22:37:21 Nobody 2010-03-16 22:37:28 meh experience in the past is that they don't tend to in response to stories like this makes people scared to donate Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-16 22:37:32 Nobody Nobody Nobody 2010-03-16 22:37:34 too bad Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-17 22:32:26 Nobody Nobody 2010-03-17 22:39:49 Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-17 22:40:17 Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-17 22:40:35 Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-17 22:41:17 pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-17 22:41:42 dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de Nobody Nobody 2010-03-17 22:41:55 indeed dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de Nobody 2010-03-17 22:42:22 it was a blog posting Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-17 22:43:01 Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-17 22:43:16 Israeli and russian exfiltration too Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-17 22:44:02 french as well Nobody 2010-03-17 22:44:06 2010-03-16 22:37:52 i would've 2010-03-16 22:37:59 if i saw that 2010-03-17 22:40:02 what&apos:d your source say it was? it was very general organization-wide interesting what was the approach and motivation? i wonder if this didn't stir up some internal dissent must be some people not too happy about cracking down on whistleblowers and following the Chinese... 2010-03-17 22:42:11 90% of the effort is on Chinese exfiltration of documents well, that is a genuine problem it warned about not visiting the blogs, because the document and its contents is still classified gave a link the to the report through proper channels although knowledge tends to be stabalizing 2010-03-17 22:44:34 if you take a big picture perspective 2010-03-17 22:45:17 it almost pleaded people not to send anonymous documents, mentioning courage and personal trust... and told people to go through proper channels if they dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de Nobody 2010-03-17 22:44:17 Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-17 22:44:31 dawgnetwork@ja bber.ccc.de Nobody pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx have an issues Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx open skies policy was stabalizing 2010-03-17 22:45:44 so perhaps an open net policy is called for;) 2010-03-17 22:46:23 that's reasonable, though doesn't work 2010-03-17 22:45:24 in practice... Sender Account Sender Alias pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-17 22:46:27 pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de Date-Time Message Text what'd they say about courage? i can send a copy that it&apos:s contagious?;)? Nobody 2010-03-17 22:46:38 Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-17 22:46:40 Nobody 2010-03-17 22:46:53 but its non-rel Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-17 22:47:00 yes Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-17 22:47:32 subsys is really good these days Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-17 22:48:09 Nobody 2010-03-17 22:48:55 k please mark non-release, found on usb stick outed another spy this afternoon Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-17 22:49:00 Nobody 2010-03-17 22:49:16 ?? Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-17 22:49:27 local Nobody 2010-03-17 22:49:34 Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-17 22:49:38 police, watching one of my hotels gotchya Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-17 22:49:50 insider also confirmed Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-17 22:49:58 Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-17 22:50:41 we have access to the fleet tracking system ;) just got hold of 800 pages of inten'ogations docs and Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx another 40gb of .is privatization / banking stuff 2010-03-17 22:50:51 this country is going to melt... 2010-03-17 22:50:55 saw the film today 2010-03-17 22:51:04 it's looking great Nobody 2010-03-17 22:51:31 what film? Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-17 22:51:50 projectb Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-17 22:51:58i the massacre Nobody Nobody Nobody 2010-03-17 22:52:01 Igotchya Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-17 22:53:11 thanks Nobody 2010-03-17 22:53:18 Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-17 22:53:20 2010-03-17 22:52:32 2010-03-17 22:53:01 uploaded file marked as requested n/p you're great is there some way i can get a cryptophone to you? Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-17 22:54:03 Nobody 2010-03-17 22:54:14 not at this time Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-17 22:54:40 Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-17 22:54:47 probably best if you just order one? actually... Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-17 22:54:57 or rather some friend Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-17 22:55:14 bit pricy though Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-17 22:55:26 hmm Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-17 22:55:29 Nobody 2010-03-17 22:55:38 Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx actually never mind yes, i dont have access at present 2010-03-17 22:56:35 these things are good for urgent contact, but Nobody 2010-03-17 22:56:47 Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-17 22:56:56 Nobody 2010-03-17 22:57:21 it's safer to avoid due to location tracking possibilities i know that very well although there is a satphone module forget the idea for now Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-17 22:57:45 yes. you just contact us Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-17 22:57:52 but don't disappear without saying why for an extended period or l'll get worried ;) Nobody Nobody 2010-03-17 22:58:03 i wont Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-17 22:58:39 ok Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-17 22:58:57 pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-17 22:59:09 via email or any other mechanism Nobody 2010-03-17 22:59:15 pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-17 22:59:44 dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de Nobody 2010-03-17 22:59:55 Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-17 23:00:17 ok. Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-17 23:00:27 off to do some work. Nobody 2010-03-17 23:00:43 k, but def read the reflection i sent Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-17 23:00:53 iwill Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-17 23:01:01 Nobody 2010-03-17 23:01:03 toodles Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-17 23:12:56 heh Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-17 23:13:15 i like it. free advertising to just the right market dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de 2010-03-17 22:58:16 you'll know if something's wrong you can just tell me "all the ships came in" >nod< will be doing an investigative journo conf in norway this week end, so may be out of contact most of the time its good now Message Text >nod< Sender Account Sender Alias dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.cle dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de Nobody Nobody 2010-03-17 23:23:14 Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-17 23:23:45 yes pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-17 23:24:54 so pleading is the only thing left dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de Nobody 2010-03-17 23:25:34 Date-Time 2010-03-17 23:23:30 the tone is what interests me the most Nobody 2010-03-17 23:23:47 Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-17 23:23:55 slight desperation 2010-03-17 23:24:00 yes Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-17 23:24:08 Nobody 2010-03-17 23:24:21 low, no-one knows what to do Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-17 23:24:40 its not really a threat, its a plead interesting approach threats work better with most, but perhaps they see that our sources are resistant to them anyway... im sure it was brought on by discussions that showed slight sympathy pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-17 23:27:28 yes Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-17 23:27:46 Nobody 2010-03-17 23:28:32 dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de Nobody 2010-03-17 23:33:39 i think your intuition is correct "if we can&apos:t scare them, lets ask nicely" the hackers that these governments hire, the good ones... they're the cats that can only be herded by food... but when the cat food runs out, or they get treated rough... they'd be the first to dissent dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de Nobody 2010-03-17 23:34:21 food meaning money, of course... and treatment being, well, treatment weird analogy, i know... lol Nobody 2010-03-17 23:34:42 Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-17 23:38:21 yes Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-17 23:38:34 Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-17 23:39:09 and there are social vales that arise out of the internet that's possible that have evolved beyond those inside the isolated military-contractor complex dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de Nobody 2010-03-18 00:04:31 its like a classroom run by an overbearing teacher... when a kid strikes back anonymously by sabotaging the desk... the other kids get a little excited and rowdy, because they wanted too, but were afraid of getting caught... the teacher is embarassed and cant control the kids, so the teacher just makes an announcement that the students should continue working quiety after they have a look at the mess on the desk that the teacher is cleaning up dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de Nobody Nobody 2010-03-18 00:05:11 i think thats a better analogy 2010-03-18 00:37:17
http://freedomincluded.com/index Sit;- recommend: free (as dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de in freedom) hardware vendor" wtf is wrong with LTC Packnett xD you don't confirm, or even come off as possibly confirming shit... lol, slipped up in your favor, i guess Nobody Nobody 2010-03-18 08:40:59 dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de Nobody 2010-03-18 08:41:22 pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-18 08:41:31 eh? dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de Nobody 2010-03-18 08:42:06 2010-03-18 08:39:52 NYTarticle has LTC Packnett allegedly confirming the authenticity of the 2008 report posted on 15th pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-18 08:42:17 yes Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-18 08:42:19 hilarious dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de Nobody 2010-03-18 08:42:57 i dont think he's going to continue to be the Ml spokesperson they do break these rules though when being pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-18 08:43:04 dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de Nobody 2010-03-18 08:43:15 im sure Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-18 08:43:41 hammered refusing to confirm does make them look shadowy and untrustworthy Sender Alias Date-Time Message Text dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de Nobody 2010-03-18 08:43:45 dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de Nobody Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx 2010-03-18 08:43:55 true, but... im shocked 2010-03-18 08:44:12 yeah., but remember., rules pressassociation@jabber.ccc.de Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de dawgnetwork@jabber.ccc.de Nobody Nobody pressassociation@iabber.ccc.de pressassociation@ abber.ccc.de 3ressassociation@iabber.ccc.de Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx Nxxxxxxxx Fxxxx just didnt realize how little ittakes forthem to cave. arejust for thegrunts :P 2010-03-18 08:44:32 like no spying on citizens at the nsa 2010-03-18 08:44:43 which is common 2010-03-18 08:45:57 ":oh fuck, this might bea US citizen.7 shouldn&aposjt wegetthis checked by the FBI...": ":Fuck that. FBI isslow as fuck, we&aposjII justkeep listening in, capture him, and then turn him over" 2010-03-18 08:48 :27 i preferjen. also, too masculine looking 2010-03-18 08:48: 57 heh 2010-03-18 08:48:59 nevermine