HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION STATEWIDE FACILITY 4 MASTER PLAN 0007 JACOBS 5350 5 APRIL 2019 ?4?5 an? Acknowledgments The Jacobs team thanks the Hawaii Department of Education (HIDOE) for allowing us the privilege to serve the public school communities of Hawaii. Our work is dedicated to the hundreds of students, parents, teachers, administrators, facility planners, and community volunteers who lent their time, passion, and voices to envision and design a bright future for students of the Aloha State. These individuals are named in Appendix J. Prepared for HIDOE Superintendent Dr. Christina Kishimoto Assistant Superintendent Dann Carlson Public Works Administrator John Chung, PE Project Manager Gregory Tanaka, PE Consultant Team Paul Mills, Jacobs – Strategy David Sturtz, Cooperative Strategies – Vision Lee Hwang, Cooperative Strategies – Foundation Jazzy Quinabo, Jacobs – Perspective Will Kane, Strategies 360 – Navigation Jane Clement, Strategies 360 – Voice Stacy Ellamar, Strategies 360 – Heart Jerry Perry, Jacobs – Sight Megan Reimann, Jacobs – Word Julissa McCann, Jacobs – Image Gary Allison, Jacobs – Memory April 2019 Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. 1132 Bishop St., Suite 1100, Honolulu, HI 796813 1.808.943.1133 • www.jacobs.com Cooperative Strategies 8955 Research Dr., Irvine, CA 92618 1.844.654.2421 • www.coopstrategies.com Strategies 360 851 Fort Street Mall, Suite 500, Honolulu, HI 96813 1.808.228.8339 • www.strategies360.com © Copyright 2019 Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. The concepts and information contained in this document are the property of Jacobs. Use or copying of this document in whole or in part without the written permission of Jacobs constitutes an infringement of copyright. Limitation: This report has been prepared on behalf of, and for the exclusive use of the HIDOE, and is subject to, and issued in accordance with, the provisions of the contract between Jacobs and the Hawaii DOE. Jacobs accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for, or in respect of, any use of, or reliance upon, this report by any third party. Executive Summary To fulfill the Strategic Plan objectives to work with stakeholders to secure and maximize state resources for public education and to be efficient and transparent to provide a high level of service and accountability, the Hawaii Department of Education (HIDOE) and Board of Education launched its first-ever statewide Facility Master Plan (FMP) in mid-2017, informed by a heightened level of data and insights from the 2016 Statewide Facility Assessment. Purpose Published in April 2019, the FMP is a 10-year strategic plan that provides a roadmap for equitably prioritizing and implementing public school facility projects statewide. It also aims to address systemic challenges and produce four positive results: modern, flexible facilities; equitably allocated resources; sustained capital funding; and coordinated and timely implementation of projects. Process This ambitious plan was developed by 500 local HIDOE and community stakeholders, including 100 students who volunteered dozens of hours in a year-long collaborative, transparent planning process tailored to meet the needs of Hawaii’s unique geography. Over the course of 10 months, these participants served in 24 crosssectional committees, lending their voices in over 100 workshops across the state to envision long-range goals, review demographic and facility data, and to develop, vet, refine, and prioritize operational scenarios and facility options for their respective regions. Modern, flexible facilities that enable collaborative learning and support positive student outcomes Coordinated and timely implementation of projects with heightened transparency and accountability FMP PURPOSE Equitably allocated resources informed by data, local priorities, and stakeholder voice Sustained capital funding for school facilities with improved predictability The overt stakeholder engagement of the FMP culminated with a two-day Statewide Allocation Summit (SAS) in March 2019, attended by more than 50 people from all regions of the state, including HIDOE leadership and legislative officials as well as staff, students, and community representatives. During the SAS, stakeholders built consensus on the core values and criteria that drive funding decisions and equitable sequencing of projects. Drawing inspiration from a student panel discussion, SAS participants also worked in small-group discussion to define goals and strategies for successful implementation. HIDOE Facility Master Plan Final Report i Results The results are bold. FMP stakeholders challenged assumptions about the status quo and assumed a positive perspective about obstacles. In addition to new schools and 21st century buildings, they also envisioned transformative outcomes, such as inter-campus collaborations, public-private partnerships, expanded Pre-K, new grade configurations, repurposed facilities, and updated school portfolios. The details of these outcomes, developed and prioritized by local stakeholders, are documented in the facility Options Reports in Appendices B-I. To complement these tangible results, the stakeholders also aspire to have an educational system that is more equitable, transparent, and accountable, with a funding framework that allows HIDOE to provide predictable and high-quality service. These large figures suggest three strategies for HIDOE: • Be strategic, efficient, and equitable with current level of funding • Be innovative, implement cost-avoidance strategies, and leverage assets into revenue streams • Be bold and advocate for new state funding sources Based on guidance provided by 50 stakeholders participating in the SAS, the FMP includes categorical project lists with data-driven rankings and running total costs with indicators whether each project fits within 10 years. This ranked list of statewide priorities is found in the “Statewide Project Sequencing Report” in Appendix A. Stakeholders generated over 1,300 projects for all 261 campuses that HIDOE maintains (including six conversion charter schools). The cost estimate for implementing all top-priority FMP projects as defined by local school communities exceeds $7 billion, and the cost jumps to more than $11 billion when including all priority tiers. Note that these Priority 1 projects are the highest non-negotiable needs from each complex—not minor wish list items—such as basic solutions to address fundamental challenges of population shifts, insufficient power, maintenance for safe and comfortable buildings, and modest improvements that support the educational mission and help HIDOE prepare students to compete in our global economy. While a current legislative allocation level of approximately $300 million per year makes modest progress over the long term, it falls short of meeting stakeholder expectations. It would take 23 years to complete all Priority 1 projects, assuming current funding escalates proportionally to construction costs. This does not include unexpected legislative add-on projects or future growth beyond current six-year enrollment projections. HIDOE Facility Master Plan Final Report Recommendations Backed by more than 500 coauthors, the FMP outlines a 10-year roadmap with a four-point strategy and specific actions to rethink and transform operations in alignment with HIDOE’s mandate for transparent and accountable service to the community. Figure 6 outlines a management plan of critical activities building on recent successes, grouped in four ii “swim lanes” aligned with FMP goals. This roadmap acknowledges that a fundamental change of political institutions requires significant time and effort. While overnight disruption is not feasible, gradual transition is. With the plan now complete, it is time to act. This year is a pivotal launching point in which specific strategic measures will be deployed to lay a foundation for incremental transition over the next five years to a new framework for funding and delivering school facility projects. • Strategy 3b: Complete legacy projects and transition to FMP sequencing • Strategy 3c: Funding policy reform • Strategy 3d: New funding sources Goal 4: Achieve equity and accountability and capitalize on stakeholder support Recommended strategies are: • Goal 1: Provide modern flexible facilities that enable collaborative learning and support positive student outcomes. Strategy 4a: Focused community engagements for complex grade reconfigurations • Strategy 4b: Implement transparent systems and reporting structures • Strategy 1a: Provide technical support for school design initiatives. • Strategy 4c: Community project design panels • Strategy 1b: Establish 21st century school design standards • Strategy 4d: Establish Stakeholder Oversight Committees • Strategy 1c: Project educational program reviews • Strategy 4e: Maintain progress through periodic FMP amendments and updates Goal 2: Coordinated and timely implementation of projects by continuing to innovate project delivery practices, building on recent successes such as Job Order Contracting and Design-Build contracts. • Strategy 2a: Customer and industry outreach • Strategy 2b: Develop a proactive capital renewal and maintenance strategy • Strategy 2c: Professional development • Strategy 2d: Qualifications-Based/Best-Value Selection Goal 3: Sustained capital funding for school facilities with improved predictability. • Strategy 3a: Initiate cost-saving, cost-avoidance, and revenue generating projects ( ! EPC SAC ! ( (! ! ( ( ! ( ! ( ( ! ! ( ! HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION ( ! ( ! ( !! ( FACILITY MASTER PLAN ( ! ( !! ( ( ! ( ! ( ! ! ( ( ! ! ( ( ! EPC !( SAC ( ! ( ! ( ( ! (! ! (! ( !! ( (! ( ! ( (! ! !! ( ! ( ( ! ! ( ( ! ( (! ! ( ( (! ! (! ! (( ( ! ( ! ( ! ( ( ! ( ! (! ! ( ! (! (! ! ( ! ( ! ( ( ! (! ! (! ! ( ! ( ! ( ! ( ! ( ! ( ( (! ! (! ! (! ! ( ! ( ! ( ( ! ( ( ! ( ! !! ( ( ! ( ! ( ! ( ( ! ( ! ( ! ( ! ( ! (! (( ! (! (! ! ( ( (! ( ! (! ! ( (! ( ! (! ! (! ! ( ! (! ! ( ! ( ! ! ( ! ( ! ( ! ( ! ( ! (( ! ( ! ( ! (! ( ! (! (! ( ! ( ! ( ! ( ! (! ! ( ! ( ! ( ! ( ! ( ( ( ! ( ( ( ! ( ! (! ! ( ! ( ! (! ( (! (! ( ! ( ! (! ! (! ! EPC EPC SAC EPC SAC SAC AT A GLANCE 500 LOCAL DOE AND COMMUNITY STAKEHOLDERS 24 COMMITTEES 10 EXECUTIVE PLANNING COMMITTEES 14 STAKEHOLDER ADVISORY COMMITTEES 100 STUDENTS ( ! ( ! ( ! EPC SAC ( ! ( ! EPC ( ! SAC SAC !(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( (EPC ! ! ( ! ( (! ! ( SAC ( ! ( !! ( ! ( ( (! ! ( ! ( ! } 130 WORKSHOPS 1,300+ OPTIONS LOCALLY PRIORITIZED ( ! ( ! SAC !! ( ( ( ! ! ( ( ! ( ! ( ! SAC ( ! ( ! ( ! ( ! ( (! ! ( ! ( ! ( ( ! (! ! (! ! ! ( ( ( ! ( ! ( (! ! EPC ( !! ( ( ! ( (! ! SAC SAC EPC ( ! ! ( ! ( ( ! ( ! SAC ( ! ( ! ( ! ( ! ! ( ( ! 1 1. PURPOSE 5 2. PROCESS 11 CONTENTS 3. RESULTS 15 4. RECOMMENDATIONS 27 Appendix A: Statewide Project Sequencing Report 21 Appendix B: Options Report Guide 25 Appendix C: Hawaii Northwest Options Reports 47 Appendix D: Hawaii Southeast Options Reports 71 Appendix E: Kauai Options Reports 85 Appendix F: Maui Options Reports 117 Appendix G: Windward Options Reports 143 Appendix H: Leeward Options Reports 175 Appendix I: Central Hawaii Options Reports 203 Appendix J: Honolulu Options Reports 243 Appendix K: Stakeholder Feedback 247 Appendix L: Acknowledgements SPOTLIGHT ON... New three-story classroom building to be visible between existing buildings New cafeteria, kitchen, and covered multipurpose area Central District, Oahu Mililani Option 8 Mililani Uka ES Replace portables and outdated buildings • Replace north portables with three-story classroom building, with fire lane along Building C, and replace portables and Buildings G, H, and J with new kitchen/ cafeteria, parking, and covered space BENEFITS: New fire lane New parking and delivery area • Replaces portables with modern spaces $$$ $20-40M Priority 1 Capacity Funding Category 1. Purpose The goal of this Facility Master Plan (FMP) is simple: a quality school for every child, regardless of where they live. School funding should be adequate to sustainably provide all students and teachers the basics of a safe, comfortable, and inspiring environment to teach and learn. Schools should have enough capacity in each community to provide a space for every student, while avoiding excess capacity that dilutes precious capital and operating funds from each classroom. Finally, schools should provide the flexible, fully equipped spaces needed to support best practices in project-based, student-centered learning. While the goal is simple, the data demonstrate that solutions are not. As concluded in the 2016 Statewide Facility Assessment, Hawaii’s more than 20 million square feet of public schools average 60 years old, requiring upkeep that far outpaces current funding levels. The state typically invests approximately $100 million per year on repairs and maintenance of existing schools, which is less than one-third of recommended industry standard 2 percent of building replacement value. At the same time, most Hawaii Department of Education (HIDOE) school buildings were originally built to support an outdated instructional model that has since evolved. As concluded in the 2016 Statewide Facility Assessment, most HIDOE schools fall short of Educational Specification standards, lacking the specialized facilities for critical academic content areas of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM), Career Technical Education, and Visual and Performing Arts. Not surprisingly, the costliest categorical need prioritized by FMP stakeholders is additions and renovations to provide specialized instructional spaces (see Results section). Hawaii’s population continues a decades-long migration from urban and rural communities toward new suburban developments, creating a scenario where schools in high-growth complexes have an aggregate capacity shortage of more than 12,000 seats, while others are left with HIDOE Facility Master Plan Final Report more than 22,000 surplus capacity for students that are no longer there. Schools should be enrolled at a balanced range of 80 percent and 120 percent of capacity, but in the 2017-18 school year, one-third of HIDOE schools operated outside of this range, with outlier utilization rates over 150 percent and well below 50 percent. This demographic trend also results in outlier school sizes that push resources to the limits of manageability. Last year, while 18 HIDOE elementary schools were enrolled higher than 800 students and topping out higher than 1,200 students, 33 of HIDOE’s smallest schools had lower than 300 students enrolled, challenging their ability to deliver quality programs given HIDOE’s Weighted Student Formula operating budgets. These challenges are not unique to Hawaii. The majority of public schools across the country were built in the mid-20th century with an expected serviceable life of 50-60 years. Starting around the year 2000, school districts began facing a stark challenge: traditional budgets to adequately maintain facilities operating within their expected life cycle became insufficient once they aged beyond their useful life. When facility repair budgets, renovation budgets, and the way in which priority capital projects were prioritized didn’t change, maintenance backlogs grew, leaving our nation’s facilities in worsening condition. Unlike other U.S. public school districts, HIDOE has no autonomous taxing authority separate from state government. All HIDOE capital funding for facility maintenance and new construction is allocated in 1 two-year increments by the state legislature and is subject to dramatic fluctuations driven by competing public priorities and local politics. Until now, capital investment decisions for schools haven’t been backed by a comprehensive set of objective data and consideration of local priorities and statewide equity. It is within the context of these challenges that HIDOE launched the firstever statewide FMP in mid-2017, informed by a heightened level of data and insights from the 2016 Statewide Facility Assessment. The FMP provides a roadmap for equitably prioritizing and implementing public school facility projects statewide. It also aims to address systematic challenges and produce four positive results: • Modern, flexible facilities that enable collaborative learning and positive student outcomes • Equitably allocated resources informed by data, local priorities, and stakeholder voice • Sustained capital funding for school facilities with improved predictability • Coordinated and timely implementation of projects with heightened transparency and accountability Modern, Flexible Facilities HIDOE aims to refresh its portfolio from old, substandard facilities to modern, 21st century facilities. The educational adequacy assessment and stakeholder feedback made it clear: many of Hawaii’s school facilities do not support collaborative teaching practices, and many lack dedicated science, art, music, and Career Technical Education spaces. Best practices in modern teaching stem from the key idea that everyone in the classroom is a student, and everyone a teacher. To support this key concept, the learning environment needs to move beyond the traditional four walls of the classroom and beyond the 50 minutes of the traditional class period. Instructional practices, and the facilities that support them, should foster flexibility in how, when, where, and with whom students learn. The teacher becomes a facilitator rather than a lecturer. HIDOE Facility Master Plan Final Report Modern, flexible facilities that enable collaborative learning and support positive student outcomes Coordinated and timely implementation of projects with heightened transparency and accountability FMP PURPOSE Equitably allocated resources informed by data, local priorities, and stakeholder voice Sustained capital funding for school facilities with improved predictability Modern facilities provide a diverse array of learning spaces, arranged such that students and teachers alike have access to a variety of learning environments and tools close to each other. Adjacent spaces should be visually transparent to each other to facilitate accountability while ensuring there is enough acoustic separation to allow teachers and students to focus without distraction. When new construction or major renovations are impractical, many stakeholder groups prioritized renovating two to four classrooms in their schools for art, science, and other project-based learning activities. These Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts, and Mathematics (STEAM) renovations will be an important step to making 21st century learning spaces accessible to all Hawaii’s students. Equitably Allocated Resources Capital funding for public school facilities is allocated by the state government on a two-year cycle in which HIDOE budget requests are vetted by the governor and negotiated between both chambers of the state legislature. Hawaii’s elected officials have a challenging task to weigh the need for school funding against other competing state 2 Figure 1: Kahuku Intermediate School and High School Option 8 rendering, showing a three-story classroom building addition replacing aging portables to help over-utilization. priorities—such as airports, highways, prisons, stadiums, and the University of Hawaii system—each having more needs than the current budget framework can support. Making the challenge more complex is that HIDOE’s funding requests are a detailed menu of projects allowing politics to drive decisions rather than common values and objective data. While some categories of needs are aggregated “lump sum” budgets that HIDOE has the latitude to use in the best interest of students, many single-school “legislative add-on” line item projects are promoted ahead of other priorities, diluting available facility funding for the rest of HIDOE schools. Without a strategic plan, the result has been sustained inequitable allocation of public resources, with some students benefiting at the expense of others who are under-represented. The FMP aims for a gradual transition to a new public decision framework to identify and prioritize capital projects statewide based on consistent, objective data and empowered local voice. This transition will require strength of political leadership and sustained public engagement to ensure local communities help inform how projects are implemented. Sustained Capital Funding HIDOE serves 261 schools with extensive capital needs far eclipsing traditional budgets, and it faces the challenge of whether to make modest HIDOE Facility Master Plan Final Report improvements at many schools or significant improvements at a select few. Moreover, a project’s funds must be spent within a two-year window or they lapse, a timeframe shorter than many project schedules in Hawaii allow. This reality drives a “pay as you go” approach to capital projects, with initial design funds allocated without the promise of securing construction funding. In the case of large projects (such as new schools), this translates to splitting projects into multiple construction phases, exposing HIDOE to schedule delays, escalating costs, and contractor liability risk. The results are predictably unpredictable: biennium funding allocations for school facilities are lower than requested, amounts fluctuate every cycle, and projects often exceed their budgeted time and cost. The FMP provides a 10-year view of prioritized projects by campus and thoroughly vetted by community representatives, allowing HIDOE and the legislature to plan and make decisions beyond a two-year horizon. The FMP also aims to raise awareness that the traditional funding level falls short of addressing top priorities in a reasonable timeframe (see Results section) and to build the case for an increase in traditional and non-traditional capital funding sources. Based on a survey of state facility directors conducted by Cooperative Strategies in 2017, other states have capitalized on additional funding sources, such as statewide voter referendums/levies (Alabama, California, New York), energy/natural resource taxes (Colorado, New Mexico, North Dakota, Washington, Wyoming), and commerce taxes (Colorado, Iowa). Coordinated and Timely Implementation of Projects Building on recent successes, HIDOE Facilities Services Division considers the FMP a key component of its ongoing transformation to deliver a higher level of service and accountability. By taking the courageous step to openly engage school communities in facility planning and elicit candid feedback on goals and markers of successful project implementation, HIDOE acknowledges that improvements in transparency and accountability are imperative and seeks to buildstakeholder trust critical to achieving public support for additional investments in schools. 3 HIDOE Facility Master Plan Final Report surplus tapaclty Kuwa? Campbell? Mil Nani? Moanalua Kalani - Baldwi n- Hila- Kakaulika- Kcalakaha- Waiakea- Lahainaluna- Keaau- Roosevelt- Konawaana' Haul Lanail West Kauai 2K seats short 18 complexes 1 2,602 Hana I Kai sar- I Honokaa I Laupahoehae Charter I Pearl City I East: Kauai I Knhala - Maui - Walpahu - Pahoa - Kahuku - Mckinley - Molokai - Kalahari: - Waialua - Central Kauai - Nan-kuli - Waianaa - Lsilehua - Radford Kailua Castle Kai mm 24 complexes 22,419 surplus seats imhmii?mslmad 1 881 oldest school building still in use 60 average building age {muuctun .1 'l SPOTLIGHT ON... Phase 2: Construct dropoff, parking, and outdoor areas at location of existing school buildings Phase 1: Construct new three-story high school in open area Phase 2: Construct cafeteria and gym spaces Kauai District Kapaa Option 4 Kapaa ES and HS Master plan joint HS and ES site to rebuild the schools using multi-story construction. First priority is Building A. BENEFITS: • Frees up green space • Improves security with fewer entry points • Improves learning and retention by accommodating individual learning styles Phase 3: Construct parking and play areas Phase 1: Construct admin and classroom building and drop-off area on open area CHALLENGES • Construction on occupied site • Safety concern with multi-story buildings • Teacher training for new subjects needed $$$$ $40-75M HIDOE Facility Master Plan Final Report Priority 1 Replace Funding Category 5 2. Process Overview The FMP was developed by 500 local HIDOE and community stakeholders from all regions of the state (including 100 students) who collectively devoted 12,000 hours to improve their schools by participating in a year-long collaborative, transparent planning process tailored to meet the needs of Hawaii’s unique communities and translate locally identified priorities into a statewide plan. The FMP is: • A statewide plan, with all communities participating in the same facilitated process to address the needs of all 261 public schools (including six conversion charter schools), making this the first comprehensive strategic plan of its kind in Hawaii • A partnership between HIDOE and the community in which local crosssectional committees collaborated iteratively to develop a long-range vision, review data, consider options, and draft, vet, refine, and prioritize solutions, yielding transparent, design-thinking, and fully documented decisions • Defined locally, not dictated by the state, allowing community values and grassroots agencies to drive outcomes • Data-driven, as stakeholders considered enrollment and facility data while developing solutions and applied objective criteria to rank priorities by measurable degrees of need, ensuring consistency and equity for all schools statewide • Participants To achieve transparency and procedural equity statewide, FMP participants were organized in a consistent committee framework and sequence of steps to develop facility plans on a regional scale, weighing in on the needs of their local and neighboring schools. These participants served in 24 cross-sectional committees of two types. 10 Executive Planning Committees (EPCs) are comprised of 20 to 30 HIDOE leaders, including Complex Area Superintendents (CASs), district administration and curriculum specialists, principals, and representatives from local Stakeholder Advisory Committees. EPC members were nominated by the local CASs, with each local complex intentionally represented by the high school principal along with one middle school and one elementary school principal. The role of the EPC is to document local goals, draft data-driven options, and make prioritized FMP recommendations with stakeholder Advisory Committee input. As illustrated in Figure 2, EPCs are aligned one-to-one with the seven HIDOE districts; however, the Big Island is represented by two EPCs due to long distances (North-West and South-East), and the remote Canoe Central EPC Hawaii NW EPC Hawaii SE EPC Honolulu EPC Kauai EPC Lanai EPC Leeward EPC Maui EPC Molokai EPC Windward EPC The product of inspired collaboration, conceived and developed in respectful “safe-zone” diverse small group discussions with an openminded “yes, if…” perspective about obstacles (instead of dismissing ideas with a facile “no, because…”), resulting in innovative, transformative recommendations Figure 2: EPC Map HIDOE Facility Master Plan Final Report 6 Complexes on the islands of Molokai and Lanai have separate EPCs from Maui District. 14 Stakeholder Advisory Committees (SACs) are comprised of 20 to 30 students, teachers, parents, and local business and community leaders. SAC members were nominated by school principals, with intentionally balanced composition, to ensure diversity of perspective, location/school affinity, and role/relationship to HIDOE. The role of the SAC is to study background data, review and provide feedback on the EPC’s draft options in diverse small groups, and participate in live polling to inform the EPC of relative level of support for proposed outcomes. Representatives of the SAC attend EPC workshops to heighten transparency. As illustrated in Figure 3, SACs are aligned one-to-one with the EPCs, except for Hawaii NW and Hawaii SE (each with two SACs in Hawaii North and Hawaii West, and Hawaii East and Hawaii South) and Maui EPC (with three separate SACs in Maui Central, Lahainaluna, and Hana). This alignment maximizes stakeholder engagement in remote communities. In Lanai, EPC and SAC members participated in joint workshops, operating a single committee representing the island’s only K-12 school. Methodology Over the course of one year, 500 stakeholders comprising the 10 EPCs and 14 SACs undertook a consistent series of similar workshops, using the same tools, data sets, language conventions, and transparent documentation format. Undergoing the iterative process outlined below, each EPC/SAC team developed a prioritized plan for recommended operational scenarios and facility options for their respective communities. Documentation of the process is captured in the Options Development Report for each region, recording base data and local values and goals that inform the drafting of scenarios and options that represent potential outcomes. As these scenarios and options are developed and vetted by the EPCs and SACs, the Options Development Report is annotated and released in multiple draft volumes to trace the FMP design-thinking evolution throughout the planning process and to demonstrate to participants that their voices are heard (see Appendices C-J). The FMP process culminated with a two-day Statewide Allocation Summit (SAS) in February 2019, attended by more than 50 people from all regions of the state, including HIDOE leadership and legislative officials as well as staff, students, and community representatives who had served on each of the 10 EPCs and 14 SACs. During the SAS, Central SAC stakeholders worked in small groups to create consensus on the core Hana SAC values and criteria that drive funding decisions and equitable sequencing Hawaii East SAC Hawaii North SAC of projects. Drawing inspiration from a student panel discussion, SAS Hawaii South SAC participants also worked in small-group discussion to define goals and Hawaii West SAC strategies for successful implementation. Figure 3: SAC Map HIDOE Facility Master Plan Final Report Honolulu SAC Kauai EPC Lahaina SAC Lanai SAC Leeward SAC Maui SAC Molokai SAC Windward SAC 7 01 Orientation The EPCs and SACs were assembled, and participants attended orientation workshops to gain an understanding of FMP goals and process, review their area facility and demographic data, and envision long-range goals that were relevant to their communities. Each EPC and SAC member was provided a three-ring “toolkit” binder with all manner of detailed background data that would be used throughout the FMP process. Output from SAC1 and EPC1 is captured in the first page the Options Development Report for each complex, highlighting key data and participant quotes and photos (see Appendices C-J). 02 Options Development The EPCs met for two full-day workshops to create a variety of operational scenarios and facility options ranging from major construction and renovation projects to basic repair and maintenance, attendance boundary changes, or even portfolio changes and grade reconfigurations. While each option was created by local committees to meet local needs, the goal for each option was the same statewide: a well-maintained school for all Hawaii’s students, equipped to support today’s best instructional practices. Output from EPC2 and EPC3 is documented in the Options Development Reportrt for each complex, with original draft scenarios and options in black font (see Appendices C-J). 03 Stakeholder Vetting Each SAC convened for two or three, three-hour evening meetings and reviewed the draft scenarios and options in small group discussion, adding notes about what they believed some benefits and challenges would be for each option, and completed live surveys to record their level of support for each option. Often, the SACs created new options for the EPCs to consider. Output from SAC2, SAC3, and SAC4 is documented in the Options Development Report for each complex, with stakeholder feedback and new ideas annotated in orange font (see Appendices C-J). HIDOE Facility Master Plan Final Report 8 04 Prioritization The EPC reconvened for two days to review SAC feedback, reach consensus on operational scenarios, and prioritize capital investments. In certain cases, the EPC elected to defer decision on operational scenarios involving portfolio re-alignments, such as inter-campus partnerships, grade reconfigurations, and school consolidations, recommending further due-diligence with broader outreach to community stakeholders. For transparency, student and adult representatives from the SACs attended the Prioritization Workshops to share SAC perspectives and participate in discussion. Output from EPC4 and EPC5 is documented in the Options Development Report through a summary priority matrix for each district/region, recommended highlighted scenarios, and any final edits annotated in blue font (see Appendices C-J). 05 Statewide Allocation Summit During the SAS, stakeholders built consensus on the core values and criteria that drive funding decisions and equitable sequencing of projects. Drawing inspiration from a student panel discussion, SAS participants also worked in small group discussion to define goals and strategies for successful implementation. Output from the SAS is documented in the FMP Project Sequencing Report outlining categorical groupings of all FMP projects, ranked and annotated by different funding levels based on SAS stakeholder feedback. (See Appendix A). 06 Stakeholder Debrief Each SAC reconvened to hear testimonials from the representatives who had attended the SAS, gain an understanding how common values, objective criteria, and stakeholder input were used to inform the FMP Project Sequencing Document (See Appendix K). SAC members also worked in small groups to develop recommendations for successful FMP implementation, including a commonly held appreciate of privilege desire continue engaged. Specifically, SAC members expressed the need to oversee and provide accountability for capital projects that occur in their schools, and to work with the DOE to keep the FMP current as the years progress. Output from SAS and SAC5 is documented in the Stakeholder Recommendations Report, (See Appendix K.) HIDOE Facility Master Plan Final Report 9 07 Facility Master Plan In April 2019, the FMP was finalized and launched to HIDOE leadership. The contents of this report outline the final findings and options. 08 Implementation The FMP outlines a 10-year transformational implementation plan, with specific recommended actions over three phases: Launch (2019), Transition (2020-2024), and New Framework (2025-2030) (see Section 4 for Recommendations). HIDOE Facility Master Plan Final Report 10 SPOTLIGHT ON... HI Northwest District Kohala Option 2 New drop-off lane adjacent to new main entrance to the school campus Kohala ES Kohala ES/HS two-story addition • Two-story addition at front of the ES (first floor - Admin/Welcome Center; second floor - library/STEAM/Career Tech/Maker Space), and old office gets repurposed for classroom space BENEFITS: • Improves supervision, security, and wayfinding; student collaboration; 21st century spaces $$$ $20-40M HIDOE Facility Master Plan Final Report Priority 3 Support Funding Category 11 3. Results Overview Borrowing a quote from another Jacobs client, FMP stakeholders were urged to avoid allowing ‘no, because…’ obstacles to inhibit creative long-range ideas, and instead to consider solutions from a ‘yes, if…’ perspective. Over the course of a year, hundreds of dedicated EPC and SAC members rose to the task, challenging their assumptions about the status quo and collaboratively envisioning innovative outcomes. The results of the FMP process include bold recommendations that not only address new and renovated schools with 21st century instructional supports, but also new, transformative outcomes such as inter-campus collaborations, public-private partnerships, expanded pre-k, new grade configurations, repurposed facilities, and updated school portfolios. Representative examples of these are illustrated below: Gender Equity and Accessibility Equity of access for all students Numerous, Statewide New Schools and Additions Capacity to accommodate enrollment growth • Athletic facilities • Restrooms • Elevators and Ramps Kaploei Scenario 1D / Option 9 • New Campbell / Kapolei Relief High School or Shared Regional CTE Center • New Kapolei Relief Middle School • Kapolei 16-classroom addition Mililani Scenario 1A / Option 22 Repair and Maintenance • Mililani HS master plan multi‐story additions Safe, comfortable learning environments, improved attendance rates, staff retention • Mililani HS recapture classrooms used for admin Statewide Prioritized R&M Projects Maui Options HS, 3 • New Kihei HS Phase 1, 2, 3 • Maui HS phased reconstruction Capital Renewal Cycles Various Additions Statewide HIDOE Facility Master Plan Final Report 12 21st Century Instruction Flexible spaces that promote relevant project-based learning and relationships, facilitating multiple learning styles Expanded Pre-K Waianae Scenario 1A Flexible STEAM classrooms • Collaborative Learning Maker Spaces • Phase 1: Construct 6th grade building to facilitate 6-8 grade reconfiguration • New 21st Century facility • Social-emotional benefits Phase 2: Convert elementary classrooms for expanded PreKindergarten program • Improved preparation • Socio-economic equity • New 21st Century facility Professional Learning Centers Special Education Enhancements Inter-Campus Collaboration Campbell / Kapolei Scenario 1D • Joint School Design due diligence for regional CTE center and/or relief high school • Expanded CTE program • Capacity relief Castle / Kailua / Kalaheo Scenario 1D • Joint School Design due diligence for integrated schedule and programs • Increased program offerings with combined WSF budget scale HIDOE Facility Master Plan Final Report 13 Strategic Portfolio Realignment Konawaena Complex Scenario 1B • Phase 1: Reconstruct Hookena for Hookena/Honaunau consolidation, Phase 2: Construct new Konawaena MS at Honauanu Phase 3: Renovate Konawaena MS for new Ke Kula O Ehunuikaimalino • Trade-up to new 21st Century facilities • • • • Permanent facilities for Hawaiian Immersion program Combined WSF budget improves programs Social-emotional benefits Reduce KHS/KMS traffic and safety risk Kaimuki Scenario 3B • Phase 1: Reconstruct Jarrett MS for combined Jarrett/Palolo PK-8 Phase 2: Repurpose Palolo for Honolulu Professional Development Center • Trade-up to new 21st Century facility • Reduced transitions for PK-8 students • • Grade Reconfiguration Social-emotional benefits, reduced transportation time, and unified communities through aligned transition grades Kapaa Scenario 1A Hanalei / Kilauea ES grade reconfiguration Molokai Scenario 1E Engage community to inform complex-wide grade reconfiguration Kahuku Scenario 1E Engage community to inform complex-wide grade reconfiguration Honokaa Scenario 1G Engage community for complex-wide grade reconfiguration Hilo Scenario 2A Engage community to inform intermediate/middle school grade reconfiguration Staff training and retention Improved community access and service Kailua Scenario 2B • Phase 1: Reconstruct Kaelepulu ES for combined Kaelepulu/Keolu Phase 2: Repurpose Keolu as Windward Professional Development Center • Trade-up to new 21st Century facilities • Combined WSF budget improves programs • Staff training and retention • Improved efficiencies HIDOE Facility Master Plan Final Report 14 Public-Private Partnerships Leverage partnerships and State assets into in-kind services and revenue. Statewide Transit Oriented Development Prepare for long-term growth and redevelopment in urban Honolulu McKinley Complex Scenario 3B • New Pohukaina ES vertical school in Kakaako • Act 155 21st century schools pilot projects • Various community, institutional, and business partnerships. Farrington Scenario 3B • Kalihi Kai ES reconstruction for long term elementary school portfolio Flood Risk Mitigation Proactive plan for sea level rise, improved life-safety and asset preservation. Kahuku Scenario 2A, Option 4 • Ka’a’awa due diligence for land acquisition/swap • Kahuku HS/Int flood control Molokai Scenario 2A • Move Kauanakakai ES out of flood zone Lahainaluna Scenario 1A • HIDOE Facility Master Plan Final Report Kamehameha III due diligence for alternate site 15 Cost Stakeholders developed over 1,300 projects for all 261 campuses that the DOE maintains (including six conversion charter schools). The cost estimate for implementing all top-priority FMP projects as defined by local school communities exceeds $7 billion in 2019 dollars, and the cost jumps to more than $11 billion when including all priority tiers. It’s important to note that Priority 1 projects are the highest ‘nonnegotiable’ needs from each complex – not frivolous wish list items. They are basic solutions for population growth, insufficient power, maintenance for safe/comfortable buildings, and modest improvements that support the educational mission and help HIDOE prepare students to compete in our global economy. The state currently funds about $300M per year toward school facilities, which can make a meaningful impact toward addressing facility needs, though not as quickly as many stakeholders consider acceptable. If the ratio of construction costs and state funding stayed the same as it is today, it would take 23 years to address FMP Priority 1 projects only and more than 36 years to implement all FMP projects. This does not account for any long-range growth beyond the DOE’s six-year enrollment projects nor a significant portion of the biennial budget that typically gets ear-marked for unexpected single-site legislative add-on projects, diluting available funding for the rest of HIDOE schools with objectively higher priority needs. $12.0 While these numbers may seem are daunting, they should not be a surprise. Twenty-one million square feet of facilities, averaging 60 years old, are inadequate for today’s standards; these facilities are underpowered and uncomfortable for students and faculty to work in. Typical DOE repair and maintenance (R&M) funding is approximately one-third of industry standard, with a growing backlog of deferred maintenance. Schools in high growth areas are 12 thousand seats short, requiring high-cost new construction, while under-utilized schools have 22 thousand surplus seats, which still require funds to operate and maintain. Moreover, construction costs are extremely high due to Hawaii’s geographic location, labor shortages, and material availability. HIDOE may be able to lower supplier costs by conducting intentional industry outreach to remove obstacles and elevate the Department’s profile as a preferred construction customer. These large figures suggest three strategies for HIDOE: • Be strategic, efficient, and equitable with current level of funding. • Be innovative, implement cost-avoidance strategies, and leverage assets into revenue streams. • Be bold and advocate for new state funding sources. 2038 2039 FMP Implementation Timeline at Current Funding Rate (presumes budget escalates at same rate as contruction costs) $10.0 $ Billion $8.0 $6.0 $4.0 $2.0 $0.0 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2040 2041 2042 2043 2044 2045 2046 2047 2048 2049 2050 2051 2052 2053 2054 2055 Year Priority 1 Total Cost HIDOE Facility Master Plan Final Report Priority 2-5 Total Cost Annual Budget ($300M) 16 Support ($600M Priority 1) Library PE, Athletics Food service, farm to school Admin, parking Telecom, electrical Health and Safety ($800M Priority 1) Pedestrian safety, Security Shelter and shade Heat abatement, restrooms Flood mitigation, vulnerability Capacity ($3.1B Priority 1) New schools and additions Replace portables and expired bldgs School portfolio operational strategy Repair & Maintenance ($1.2B Priority 1) Repair & Maintenance Building and site Instructional Spaces ($1.1B Priority 1) Special Education Career Tech Ed, STEM, Arts Language/cultural immersion Compliance ($218M Priority 1) ADA, Gender, Title IX Equipment (Cost included in Instructional) 21st century furniture Instructional technology Innovation (Cost included in Instructional) 21st century flex spaces Professional Learning Centers Energy efficiency, Solar Revenue generation, Act 155 Categories of Need In order to inform DOE’s annual funding requests and strategic project implementation, FMP solutions are aligned with the DOE’s eight funding categories, each targeting critical areas of need statewide. The cost breakdown of the $11B FMP solutions by funding category is illustrated in Figure XX below, with the area of each band reflecting the total cost by category, with shading to convey the proportion of cost classified as Priority 1 top needs. HIDOE Facility Master Plan Final Report 17 Statewide Project Sequencing • In order to integrate the 10 regional plans comprised of 1300 prioritized capital solutions into one equitable and actionable Statewide Plan, the DOE convened the Statewide Allocation Summit (SAS) in February 2019 to build consensus and elicit guidance from a diverse representation FMP participants from all regions of the state on how to equitably group, rank, and sequence these projects statewide. SAS attendees worked collaboratively to weigh in on the values and criteria applicable to all students that should inform the sequencing of projects. They also reviewed preliminary project sequence lists and worked in small groups to build categorical capital budgets with two distinct funding scenarios: • Current funding level - $3B ($300M/yr for 10 years) • Amplified funding level - $6B ($600M/yr for 10 years) Based on SAS guidance, FMP projects were assembled into situational groupings (see Figure 5) closely aligned with the DOE’s funding categories, and ranked by objective criteria within each group with a running cost total to indicate whether each project fits within the current or amplified funding scenarios, or beyond. Please refer to Appendix A Statewide Project Sequencing Report, which outlines the categorical ranking and funding allocation based on consensus built during the SAS. Each project group is ranked by data criteria as marked in the header of each page, and the running total is annotated with which funding scenario (or beyond) the project falls within. The results of this collaboration are illustrated in the Figure 5, highlighting the prioritized needs and corresponding cost allocations to each group. Stakeholder feedback at the SAS was clear – it is imperative that objective data guide decisions, and a new funding framework must be found. Moreover, stakeholders expressed a desire to remain engaged in the implementation phase of the FMP. Please refer to Appendix A Stakeholder Feedback for additional detail. Legacy Projects Capacity Health and Safety Repair and Maintenance Instruction and Support A: Fully funded Projects B: Partially funded Projects C: Other Requested Projects A: Crowded without GE B: Crowded due to GE C: Portable Replacement D: Operational Strategy A: Pedestrian Safety B: Security C: Shelter and Shade D: Heat Abatement E: Flood Control A and B: R&M Priority Repairs/Renewals C: ADA Compliance D: Replace Buildings A: Instruction B: Support C: Gender Equity and Title IX Figure 5: SAS Workgroup Topics HIDOE Facility Master Plan Final Report 18 5 Million . HIDOE Facility Master Plan Priorities and Cost Allocations 2,500 FMP Needs Priority 2 000 1 FMP Needs Priority 2-5 I SEE- SAS Allocation [lo-Year S300Mfyr} 1500 I SEE- SAS Incremental Allocation {lo-Year +8300Mf?i?rl 0 Capacity: Capacity: Capacity: Capacity: Health a Health 8: Health 3.: Health Health 8: REM: Repair Compliance: Capacity: Crowded Crowded Portable Operational Safety: Safety: Safety: Safety: Heat Safety: Flood 8: ADA Replace without GE due to GE Replacement Strategy Pedestrian Security Shelter and Abatement Control Maintenance Expired Safety Shade HIDOE Facility Master Plan Final Report ram Iii-Mu ?Him-J.- in run memy munum Instruction Support 1,000 500 I I -I I Compliance: Gender Equity 19 4. Recommendations The FMP outlines a 10-year Implementation Roadmap in alignment with the Strategic Plan mandate for transparent and accountable service to the community. With the FMP complete, HIDOE has an unprecedented base of public awareness of challenges and the beginnings of broad support for fundamental improvements. The year 2019 is a pivotal launching point in which specific strategic measures will be deployed that lay a foundation for incremental transition over the next five years to a new framework for funding and delivering school facility projects. As illustrated in Figure 6 and described in detail below, the Implementation Roadmap is organized under four overarching goals of Collaborative Learning, Project Execution, Predictable Resources, and Equity and Accountability, and it prescribes specific strategies along a timeline consisting of three phases: Launch (2019), Transition (2020-2024), and New Framework (2025-2030). Figure 6: Implementation Roadmap HIDOE Facility Master Plan Final Report 20 Goal 1: Modern, flexible facilities that enable collaborative learning and support positive student outcomes. Strategy 1a: Provide technical support for school design initiatives Recommended action: Follow through on FMP priorities to study and implement new, innovative inter-campus partnerships that feature coordinated educational programs and shared instructors and facilities (refer to Caste/ Kalaheo/Kailua Scenario 1D, and Campbell/Kapolei Scenario 1D). Leverage the commitment of informed, invested FMP stakeholders by forming Special Purpose Committee focus groups for Windward and Leeward comprised of relevant members from each region’s respective EPCs and SACs, including students and new stakeholders representing curricular programs, operational functions, and institutional/business community partners. The charge of these committees will be to: 1. Undergo a facilitated, data-driven planning process to further study and perform due diligence to confirm feasibility of these multi-faceted operational scenarios 2. Conduct expanded community outreach to elicit feedback and gain broader buy-in and support 3. Develop phased implementation plan for program integration and professional development 4. Define facility requirements and capital improvement needs HIDOE Facility Master Plan Final Report Schedule FMP Launch Phase Milestones • Spring/summer/fall 2019: due diligence • Fall/winter 2019: stakeholder outreach • Winter 2019 to summer 2020: implementation planning • Potential integration rollout in fall of 2020-2021 school year Investment • Time commitment of ~20 state- and school-level staff to participate in six to eight full-day workshops for each of two Special Purpose Committees • Modest cost of professional subject matter expert and facilitation services • Cost/use of school venues for two to four community engagement meetings • Cost of resulting CIP facility projects Value-Add Results • Expanded and enhanced educational programs for students • Improved operational and capital effaiciencies through coordinated shared use of talent and facility resources • Sustained momentum of innovative grassroots projects initiated by the FMP process • Leveraged in-house expertise and expanded professional development • Expanded stakeholder trust and support • Development of replicable/scalable school design process model • Relevant project-based learning opportunity for participating students 21 Strategy 1b: Establish 21st century school design standards Recommended action: Update prevailing 2005 education specifications and facility design standards to feature flexible spaces with adjacencies, visual transparencies, acoustic separations, and furniture/equipment that facilitate 21st century multi-modal project-based instruction and contribute to positive student-to-teacher, student-to-student, and school-to-community relationships. Ed Specs should address instruction and school operations, defining and quantifying indoor and outdoor spaces for schools of all relevant grade configurations and capacity/size ranges. Work should be informed by a diverse Special Purpose Committee composed of students, teachers of various content disciplines, arts, athletics, and administration as well as institutional and business community partners that undergo an interactive ed spec development process assisted by architectural subject matter experts and professional facilitators. HIDOE Facility Master Plan Final Report Schedule FMP Launch Phase Milestones Fall/winter/spring 2019-2020 Investment • Time commitment of ~20 state- and school-level staff to participate in three to five full-day workshops • Modest cost of professional subject matter expert and facilitation services Value-Add Results • New facilities that enable improved student experience and outcomes, improved staff recruitment and retention, and community engagement • Improved efficiencies and project execution through clear direction to project development teams • Reduced capital life cycle costs through flexible facility design • Expanded stakeholder trust and enthusiasm for CIP projects 22 Strategy 1c: Project educational program reviews Recommended action: Incorporate into HIDOE’s capital project design review procedures a formal functional review process at the Schematic Design and Design Development stages that confirms conformance to new ed specs and design standards. Reviewers should include HIDOE facility planners, project-specific user groups, and members of the Special Purpose Committee that informed the new Ed Specs. Reviewers should be afforded enough time and be provided simplified checklists and documentation tools to enable authentic feedback and be updated by transparent responses from the project development team. HIDOE Facility Master Plan Final Report Schedule FMP Transition Phase Investment Time commitment of ~12 state- and school-level staff to participate in four, two- to three-hour meetings/teleconferences for each project (design presentation and feedback meetings at SD and DD review stages). Value-Add Results Assurance that project development teams deliver new/renovated facilities that fulfill intent of new educational specifications, and desired benefits to future generations of students, teachers, administration, and community • Cost savings from functionally sound designs and avoided construction change orders 23 Goal 2: Coordinated and timely implementation of projects by continuing to innovate project delivery practices. Strategy 2a: Customer and industry outreach Recommended action: With a renewed commitment to customer service and continuous improvement, seek constructive feedback from HIDOE’s school community customers and the design and construction industry professionals that serve HIDOE. First, conduct a baseline customer satisfaction survey that will be used to develop and implement a process improvement plan, with periodic follow-up surveys to track and communicate progress. Conduct an industry outreach conference to elicit candid feedback from architects, engineers, contractors, and the trades. Use this feedback to improve policies and business practices that position HIDOE as a preferred AEC industry customer to vendors. Conduct periodic follow-up functions to communicate progress and expand pool of interested service providers. Schedule FMP Launch Phase Milestones Initiate programs in Fall 2019 Investment Focus existing one to two facility staff members to spearhead these initiatives Value-Add Results • Build on the goodwill generated with school stakeholders throughout the FMP process • Improve accountability and service quality • Learn from innovations and best practices • Expand partnerships that stimulate competition, improve service quality, and yield favorable bid prices HIDOE Facility Master Plan Final Report Strategy 2b: Develop a proactive capital renewal and maintenance strategy Recommended action: Commission a facility condition assessment to identify and prioritize current R&M backlog and establish proactive system renewal cycles, including a survey of electrical infrastructure, building envelope, and thermal comfort needs. Use data to set data-driven building replacement policies and demonstrate the extent and priority of maintenance needs and build the case for sustained, predictable legislative investments. Consider implementing a 15-year campus renewal cycle in which three high schools, three middle schools, and eight to ten elementary schools undergo major renovations and furniture refresh each year, transitioning from a reactionary to a proactive maintenance strategy. Schedule FMP Launch Phase Milestones 2019-2020, incremental updates on three- to five-year cycle Investment • Contract cost varies depending on approach and level of detail collected, Value-Add Results • Objective data to drive informed, equitable economic decisions • Build case for funding • Reduced surprises and pivot from reactionary to proactive maintenance strategy • Improved customer service 24 Strategy 2c: Professional development Recommended action: Perform organizational gap analysis and realign staff, new hires, and/or outsourced talent to strategically address R&M and CIP service requirements. Refresh data-driven customer service culture, program management strategies, project management procedures, and staff training, using support of industry partner/s as required. Implement systems for tracking process workflow and performance metrics, and initiate talent credentialing and professional development program. Schedule FMP Transition Phase (2020-2025) Investment • Contract cost varies depending on approach and level of detail collected Value-Add Results • Improved customer service and accountability • Improved efficiency and alignment of talent to value-add services • Improved staff retention and morale. • Cost, schedule, and quality performance improvements. HIDOE Facility Master Plan Final Report Strategy 2d: Qualifications-Based/Best-Value Selection Recommended action: Study peer agencies and partner with procurement department, legislature, and industry/labor organizations to develop and roll out new procurement methods to enable evaluation criteria including contractor qualifications and references to factor into weighted scoring formulas along with proposed cost for determining selected best-value vendor. Schedule FMP Transition Phase (2020-2025) Investment • Assign one to two staff project to spearhead initiative Value-Add Results • Improved predictability and project outcomes • Reduced change orders • Provides incentives to deliver high-quality services 25 Goal 3: Sustained capital funding for school facilities with improved predictability. Strategy 3a: Initiate cost-saving, costavoidance, and revenue-generating projects Recommended action: Follow through on FMP priorities for strategic realignment of school portfolios that not only result in improved student and community outcomes, but also yield long-term operational and capital savings (refer to Konawaena Scenario 1B, Kailua Scenario 2B, and Kaimuki Scenario 3B, as well as Act 155 Pilot Projects). While these scenarios feature new and renovated facilities to house combined school programs (representing a “tradeup” outcome for affected stakeholders), a profound structural change such a consolidation requires intentional community engagement to inform and listen to stakeholders. Similar to Strategy 1a, leverage the commitment of informed, invested FMP stakeholders by forming Special Purpose Committee focus groups for Konawaena, Kailua, and Kaimuki composed of relevant members from each region’s respective EPCs and SACs, including students, to: 1. Design a community specific engagement approach and community survey 2. Conduct expanded community outreach and serve as peer smallgroup facilitators to elicit feedback and gain broader buy-in and support 3. Review community feedback and make necessary scenario refinements 4. Develop a phased implementation plan for program integration and professional development 5. Define facility requirements and capital improvement needs HIDOE Facility Master Plan Final Report Also, invest in PPP technical subject matter expertise and project management support to accelerate ongoing Act 155 Pilot projects. By successfully delivering proof of concept and lessons-learned from the pilots, HIDOE will be positioned to incorporate asset revenue reinvestment into portfolio alignment and new construction projects statewide. Schedule FMP Launch Phase Milestones • Spring/summer/fall 2019: due diligence • Fall/winter 2019: stakeholder outreach and scenario refinements that will inform 2020 legislative budget • Winter 2019 to summer 2020: implementation planning and facility requirements • Summer/fall/winter 2020: facility design Investment • Time commitment of ~10 state- and school-level staff to participate in five full-day workshops for each of three Special Purpose Committees • Modest cost of professional subject matter expert and facilitation services • Cost/use of school venues for two to four community engagement meetings for each of three projects Value-Add Results • New facilities and enhanced educational programs for students, including Ke Kula O Ehunuikaimalino Hawaiian immersion school • Improved operational and capital efficiencies through pooled resources and coordinated shared use of talent and facilities • Sustained momentum of innovative grassroots projects initiated by the FMP process • Expanded stakeholder trust and support • Relevant project-based learning opportunity for participating students 26 Strategy 3b: Complete legacy projects and transition to FMP sequencing Recommended action: Follow through on FMP priorities to reduce backlog of partially funded legacy projects, and secure funding for new FMP projects from the top tiers of equitable, data-driven rankings, allowing approximately 20%-30% of each year’s request for new priorities unforeseen during the development of the FMP, such as rapid enrollment growth. Starting with the 2020 budget cycle, reduce the proportion of CIP budget allocated as unexpected legislative add-on projects each year over a five-year transition period to a level of no more than 20 percent by 2025, establishing a new, predictable funding framework based on statewide equity for all students. [The final 2019 budget is pending at the time of FMP publication, and while a majority of the initial request in 2018 were priorities developed during the FMP process, it is anticipated that the final budget will include unexpected earmarked legislative add-on projects as is customary.] Schedule FMP Transition Phase (2020-2025) Investment Time commitment of HIDOE staff to develop communications plan and brief the legislature Value-Add Results • Reasonable pathway to equity • Predictable funding will allow HIDOE to provide better service to schools This transition timeline acknowledges that fundamental change of political institutions requires significant time and effort. Achieving this strategy will require a broad legislative information campaign, and courageous leadership from HIDOE, Board of Education, and legislature HIDOE Facility Master Plan Final Report 27 Strategy 3c: Funding policy reform Recommended action: With successful transition to new funding framework in Strategy 3b, it is recommended to codify this practice into law. Other recommended reforms include gaining ability to have short-term bond payback terms to enable reasonable procurement of equipment and furniture, white van transport, and computers without depleting operational budgets. Schedule FMP Transition Phase (2025-2030) Investment Earned trust of stakeholders who will advocate for reform Value-Add Results • Equity • Financial flexibility HIDOE Facility Master Plan Final Report Strategy 3d: New funding sources Recommended action: Build a base of advocacy for long term campaign for new funding sources. Current funding framework is insufficient to deliver top statewide priorities within a reasonable timeframe, suggesting consideration of different models, such as asset revenue bonds, sales tax, tourism tax, property tax, etc. Achieving this complex of a change requires broad political will, earned only by succeeding in other strategies outlined in the FMP. Schedule FMP Transition Phase (2025-2030) Investment Earned trust of stakeholders who will advocate for reform Value-Add Results Ability to address priority needs in reasonable timeframe 28 Goal 4: Equity and accountability, capitalizing on stakeholder support. Strategy 4a: Focused community engagements for complex grade reconfigurations Recommended action: Follow through on FMP priorities for focused community engagement to inform grade reconfiguration decisions and resulting facility requirements (refer to Kapaa Scenario 1A, Molokai Scenario 1E, Kahuku Scenario 1E, Honokaa Scenario 1G, and Hilo Scenario 2A). Because these scenarios will impact all families within these complexes, the EPCs and SACs call for intentional community engagement to inform and listen to stakeholders before making final decisions. Similar to Strategy 3a, leverage the commitment of informed, invested FMP stakeholders by forming Special Purpose Committee focus groups for the six complexes composed of relevant members from each region’s respective EPCs and SACs, including students, to: 1. Design a community-specific community survey engagement approach and 2. Conduct expanded community outreach and serve as peer smallgroup facilitators to elicit feedback and gain broader buy-in and support 3. Review community feedback and make necessary scenario refinements, 4. Develop a phased implementation plan for program integration and professional development 5. Define facility requirements and capital improvement needs HIDOE Facility Master Plan Final Report Schedule FMP Launch Phase Milestones • Spring/summer/fall 2019: due diligence • Fall/winter 2019: stakeholder outreach and scenario refinements that will inform 2020 legislative budget • Winter 2019 to summer 2020: implementation planning and facility requirements • Summer/fall/winter 2020: facility design • 2011 initiate construction Investment • Time commitment of ~10 state and school level staff to participate in four full-day workshops for each of five Special Purpose Committees • Modest cost of professional subject matter expert and facilitation services • Cost/use of school venues for two community engagement meetings for each of five projects • Cost of resulting CIP facility projects Value-Add Results • New facilities and enhanced educational programs for students, including Ke Kula O Ehunuikaimalino Hawaiian immersion school • Improved operational and capital efficiencies through pooled resources and coordinated shared use of talent and facilities • Sustained momentum of innovative grassroots projects initiated by the FMP process • Expanded stakeholder trust and support • Relevant project-based learning opportunity for participating students 29 Strategy 4b: Implement transparent systems and reporting structures Recommended action: To complement HIDOE’s new online project tracking system, initiate a periodic CIP status reporting system, format, and cycle (quarterly, monthly, etc.) to update the Board of Education and interested stakeholders on schedule, cost, and quality status for all major projects and a statewide program roll-up. System should be programmed to pull data from HIDOE’s controls system with brief narrative updates from Project Management staff without inordinate manual data entry, and include an archive history of dated status reports in PDF format. Schedule FMP Transition Phase (2020-2024) Investment Focus existing staff and/or third-party consultants to develop reports Value-Add Results • Build on the goodwill generated with school stakeholders throughout the FMP process • Improve transparency and accountability • Elevate problems early to expedite speedy resolution HIDOE Facility Master Plan Final Report Strategy 4c: Community project design panels Recommended action: Incorporate into HIDOE’s capital project design review procedures a review process at the Schematic Design and Design Development stages that informs and elicits feedback from school communities. Community panel should include students, parents, teachers, administrators, and community stakeholders should be afforded enough time and be provided simplified checklists and documentation tools to enable authentic feedback and be updated by transparent responses from the project development team. Schedule FMP Transition Phase (2020-2024) Investment Time commitment of ~12 state and school level staff to participate in two, two- to three-hour meetings/teleconferences for each project (design presentation and feedback meetings at SD and DD review stages) Value-Add Results • Assurance that project designs reflect the functional and aesthetic preferences of the community • Cost savings from functionally sound designs and avoided construction change orders • Trust and buy-in from stakeholders 30 Strategy 4d: Establish Stakeholder Oversight Committees Strategy 4e: Maintain progress through periodic FMP amendments and updates Recommended action: Building on Strategy 4b, fulfill expressed desire by FMP stakeholders to remain informed about status of CIP projects by establishing a statewide Stakeholder Oversight Committee composed of approximately 40 members of diverse location and relationship to HIDOE, including students, with rolling membership terms. The SOC will be charged with receiving quarterly or biannual status reports from HIDOE via webcast or live meetings. The Stakeholder Oversight Committee will have no direct authority and will provide reports to the Board of Education. Recommended action: As it is designed to be a living document that transcends changes in educational programs, demographics, and priorities, implement transparent processed to document any necessary annual amendments to coincide with HIDOE’s budget cycle, and conduct a statewide Facility Master Plan update once every 4-6 years, to coincide with either two or three legislative biennia. Document the cause of annual amendments (e.g. rapid unforeseen enrollment growth, new mandates, etc.), send notices to all stakeholders, and make notices public on FMP website. Frequency of Statewide FMP updates should be predicated based on CIP progress during the third and fifth years, to allow one year for FMP development in time for top of biennium cycle. Schedule FMP Transition Phase (2020-2024) Investment Assigned staff responsibility of coordinating SOC meetings Value-Add Results • Heightened institutional accountability of HIDOE • Opportunity to celebrate successes and elevate issues • Capitalize on unprecedented base of public awareness of HIDOE’s challenges and the beginnings of broad support for fundamental improvements Schedule FMP Transition Phase (2020-2024) Investment • Assigned staff responsibility of managing and contributing to FMP update • Level of effort and cost will be moderate compared to HIDOE’s first ever 2019 FMP Value-Add Results • Heightened institutional accountability of DOE • Opportunity to celebrate successes and elevate issues • Translate the unprecedented base of public awareness into broad support for fundamental improvements HIDOE Facility Master Plan Final Report 31 SPOTLIGHT ON... Phase 2: Construct new cafeteria and gym spaces Phase 3: Construct new bus loop to serve both schools Phase 1: Construct new three-story IS, admin, and classroom building and drop-off in open area Phase 1: Construct new two-story ES, admin, and classroom building and drop-off in open area Phase 3: Construct new parking and outdoor areas on location of existing buildings HI Southeast District Waiakea Scenario 1B Waiakea ES and IS New 750-student ES and redraw ES boundaries to balance utilization at three ~750-student schools; Waiakea IS additions to include STEAM, Special Education, and flex spaces to net 125 additional capacity BENEFITS: • Relieves over-utilized IS and ES • Reduces traffic concentration Phase 2: Construct new Phase 3: Construct new parking and outdoor cafeteria and gym spaces areas on location of existing buildings CHALLENGES • Land acquisition time/cost • Attendance boundary adjustment • Unknown impact on GE applications • Inequity between new ES and older two ES $$$$ $20-40M HIDOE Facility Master Plan Final Report Priority 1 Capacity Funding Category 32 APPENDIX A Statewide Project Sequencing Report In 2018, the Hawaii Department of Education initiated its first ever Statewide Facility Master Plan aimed to lay the path for: • Modern, flexible facilities that enable collaborative learning and positive student outcomes. • Equitably allocated resources informed by data, local priorities, and stakeholder voice. • Sustained capital funding for school facilities with improved annual predictability. • Coordinated and timely implementation of projects with heightened transparency and accountability. Over 500 HIDOE stakeholders operating in 24 regional committees representing a cross section of their respective communities contributed in the development of prioritized regional plans. In February 2019 the DOE convened the Statewide Allocation Summit (SAS) with FMP participants from all regions of the state, a diverse representation of the students, parents, teachers, community members, and DOE administrators who designed their respective regional plans. HIDOE Facility Master Plan Final Report Charged with building consensus and providing guidance to the DOE in the integration of the 10 regional plans into one Statewide Plan, the SAS attendees worked collaboratively to weigh in on the values and criteria applicable to all students that should inform the sequencing of projects. They also reviewed preliminary project sequence lists and worked in small groups to build new categorical capital budgets with two distinct funding scenarios: Current funding level - $3B ($300M/yr for 10 years) Amplified funding level - $6B ($600M/yr for 10 years) The funding allocations by project group defined by SAS attendees differed from a pure cost breakdown as outlined in the table below. This report outlines an updated categorical ranking and funding allocation based on consensus built during the SAS. Each project group is ranked by data criteria as marked in the header of each page, and the running total is annotated with which funding scenario (or beyond) the project falls within. 34 Capacity Group A: Crowded without GE Ranking criteria: local priority, capacity shortage minus SY1718 GE in, descending Rank Region Complex Ref Option Title 1 Leeward Campbell 2 Maui Districtwide HS 3 Maui Lahainaluna 4 Central 5 Local  Ongoing  Rank Value Cost  Cumulative 10‐Year  Priority  Project Estimate  Funding Tier 1‐5 (2019 $M) Campbell HS 27‐classroom buildings (fully‐funded) 1 * ‐640 (funded) 0  $300M/yr  Maui/Baldwin relief school in Kihei Phase 1 (800 capacity, '20‐21, fully‐funded) 1 * ‐326 (funded) 0  $300M/yr  5 Lahainaluna HS new 8‐classroom addition (fully ‐funded) 1 * ‐48 (funded) 0  $300M/yr  Moanalua 11 Salt Lake ES classroom partitions to add capacity (fully‐funded) 1 * ‐12 (funded) 0  $300M/yr  Leeward Kapolei 9.2 Kapolei MS 16‐classroom building 1 * ‐465 22 22  $300M/yr  6 Central Mililani 22 Mililani HS administration expansion and recapture classrooms 1 ‐450 9 32  $300M/yr  7 Central Mililani 1A Mililani HS masterplanned multi‐story additions on current site 1 ‐450 117 148  $300M/yr  8 Leeward Kapolei 4 Kapolei HS 21st century classroom partitions (partially‐funded) 1 ‐360 22 170  $300M/yr  9 Maui Maui 3 Maui HS phased reconstruction 1 ‐326 111 281  $300M/yr  10 Maui Districtwide HS Maui/Baldwin relief school in Kihei Phase 2 (+ music, athletics, electives) 1 * ‐326 56 337  $300M/yr  11 Leeward Kapolei 9.1 New East Kapolei MS 1,050 capacity (partially‐funded) 1 * ‐145 131 468  $300M/yr  12 Leeward Kapolei 9.3 Kapolei MS remove portables and restore site 1 * ‐145 2 470  $300M/yr  13 Leeward Pearl City 8.1 Kanoelani ES: Replace 14 portables with permanent multi‐level building with capacity for 350 1 ‐140 19 489  $600M/yr  14 Leeward Campbell 1D.2 Campbell / Kapolei regional CTE center and/or relief high school due diligence 1 ‐100 3 492  $600M/yr  15 Kauai Waimea 5 ‘Ele’ele ES new two‐story, 12 classroom building 1 ‐81 20 512  $600M/yr  16 Leeward Campbell 4 Ilima Int fund 6th grade building, change grade configuration to 6‐8 1 ‐74 28 540  $600M/yr  17 Maui Kekaulike 1D Haiku ES reconstruction with site TBD 1 ‐54 42 582  $600M/yr  18 Maui Kekaulike 8 Paia ES phased reconstruction 1 85 20 602  $600M/yr  19 Central Mililani 6 Mililani MS classroom additions (net 5 additional classrooms) 1 86 28 630  $600M/yr  20 Leeward Campbell Campbell / Kapolei regional CTE center and/or relief high school implementation 1 ‐100 207 837  Beyond  1D.1 1D.3 * * * * Page 1 of 46 HIDOE Facility Master Plan Final Report 35 Health and Safety Group C: Shelter and Shade Ranking criteria: local priority, cost/student Rank Region Complex Ref Option Title 1 Central Moanalua 5 Moanalua HS shade structure in courtyard 1 1,013 2 2  $300M/yr  2 Central Mililani 23 Mililani HS covered walkways and security fencing around public  1 1,837 5 7  $300M/yr  3 Hawaii SE Kau 9 Covered Walkways at Ka’u HS  1 2,151 1 8  $300M/yr  4 Central Moanalua Moanalua High covered multipurpose playcourt 1 4,367 9 17  $300M/yr  5 Leeward Kapolei 8 Kapolei MS covered multi‐purpose facility 1 4,714 9 25  $300M/yr  6 Central Mililani 7 Mililani MS covered multi‐purpose amphitheater 1 5,021 9 34  $300M/yr  7 Maui Maui Maui Waena covered basketball court 1 6,939 9 43  $300M/yr  8 Leeward Waipahu 9.l Waipahu ES: remove portable and expand kitchen and cafeteria 1 8,713 9 51  $300M/yr  9 Central Mililani 10 Mililani Mauka ES covered playcourt (planned) 1 * 10,077 9 60  $300M/yr  10 Leeward Waipahu 9.d Kaleiopuu ES:  indoor/outdoor cafeteria extension with stage and full service kitchen. 1 * 10,220 9 68  $300M/yr  11 Central Leilehua 9.7 Wheeler MS/ES construct multi‐purpose dining/assembly space to connect library and Building C 1 11,231 9 77  $300M/yr  12 Central Leilehua 8.4 Wheeler MS/ES covered multipurpose playcourt 1 11,231 9 86  $300M/yr  13 Central Moanalua 9.6 Salt Lake El covered multipurpose playcourt 1 11,516 9 94  $300M/yr  14 Central Moanalua 9.1 Moanalua El covered multipurpose playcourt 1 11,720 9 103  $300M/yr  15 Maui Maui 11 Pomaikai ES covered playground and walkways 1 14,164 9 112  $300M/yr  16 Lanai Lanai 2 Lana’i K‐12 new commons/cafeteria/distributed library/performance venue 1 14,281 9 120  $300M/yr  17 Central Leilehua Helemano ES covered multipurpose playcourt 1 14,795 9 129  $300M/yr  18 Central Aiea Aiea Int site covered play court 1 16,524 9 137  $300M/yr  19 Central Radford 12.5 Makalapa ES expand cafeteria into field as with indoor outdoor multi‐purpose space. 1 17,081 9 146  $600M/yr  20 Central Moanalua 9.4 Red Hill El covered multipurpose playcourt 1 17,356 9 155  $600M/yr  9.2 19.1 8.1 8 Local  Ongoing  Rank Value Cost  Cumulative 10‐Year  Priority  Project Estimate  Funding Tier 1‐5 (2019 $M) * Page 10 of 46 HIDOE Facility Master Plan Final Report 36 Health and Safety Group C: Shelter and Shade Ranking criteria: local priority, cost/student Rank Region Complex Ref Option Title Local  Ongoing  Rank Value Cost  Cumulative 10‐Year  Priority  Project Estimate  Funding Tier 1‐5 (2019 $M) 21 Maui Maui 13 Kamalii ES covered playground 1 17,712 9 163  $600M/yr  22 Central Moanalua 9.5 Shafter El covered multipurpose playcourt 1 17,896 9 172  $600M/yr  23 Kauai Waimea 11 Waimea Canyon MS build covered play court 1 18,550 9 181  $600M/yr  24 Central Leilehua 8.3 Wahiawa ES covered multipurpose playcourt 1 18,792 9 189  $600M/yr  25 Central Leilehua 8.2 Kaala ES covered multipurpose playcourt 1 19,211 9 198  $600M/yr  26 Maui Kekaulike 13.3 Pukalani ES covered play court  1 20,013 9 206  $600M/yr  27 Central Aiea 11.5 Waimalu ES – multi‐purpose covered playcourt 1 22,759 9 215  $600M/yr  28 Maui Hana 1 Hana K12 covered elementary play court 1 23,250 9 224  $600M/yr  29 Leeward Waipahu 9.p Covered walkways allowance (all campuses) 1 #DIV/0! 5 229  $600M/yr  30 Honolulu McKinley 17.2 Kauluwela ES new covered walkway 2 1,563 1 230  $600M/yr  31 Honolulu Farrington 19.1 Dole MS repair covered walkways 2 1,603 1 231  $600M/yr  32 Honolulu Farrington 19.5 Kapalama ES new covered walkways 2 1,645 1 232  $600M/yr  33 Honolulu Farrington 19.2 Kalihi Kai ES new covered walkways 2 1,742 1 233  $600M/yr  34 Honolulu Farrington 19.4 Kalihi Waena ES replace existing covered wlkways, add new from public bridge to cafeteria 2 1,835 1 234  $600M/yr  35 Honolulu McKinley 17.3 Lanakila ES new covered walkway 2 2,370 1 235  $600M/yr  36 Honolulu Kaimuki 20.1 Hokulani ES extend covered walkway to drop‐off 2 3,125 1 236  $600M/yr  37 Honolulu Kaimuki 20.4 Lunalilo ES new covered walkway to cafeteria, library, Bldg D 2 3,247 1 237  $600M/yr  38 Leeward Kapolei 6 Kapolei HS student commons 2 3,732 9 245  $600M/yr  39 Honolulu Kaimuki 20.3 Kuhio ES new covered walkway 2 4,310 1 246  $600M/yr  40 Honolulu Farrington 19.6 Linapuni ES new covered walkways 2 5,236 1 247  $600M/yr  * Page 11 of 46 HIDOE Facility Master Plan Final Report 37 Health and Safety Group C: Shelter and Shade Ranking criteria: local priority, cost/student Rank Region Complex Ref Option Title 41 Honolulu McKinley 17.1 42 Hawaii NW Kealakehe 3 43 Leeward Waipahu 44 Kauai 45 Local  Ongoing  Rank Value Cost  Cumulative 10‐Year  Priority  Project Estimate  Funding Tier 1‐5 (2019 $M) Kaiulani new multi‐story covered walkway 2 5,249 2 249  $600M/yr  Kealakehe HS covered, multipurpose pavilion 2 5,425 9 258  $600M/yr  9.q August Ahrens ES multi‐purpose outdoor covered facility 2 6,765 9 267  $600M/yr  Kauai 6.2 Kauai HS new covered multipurpose space 2 6,973 9 275  $600M/yr  Honolulu Farrington 19.3 Kalihi Uka ES new multi‐story covered walkways 2 7,273 2 277  $600M/yr  46 Maui Lahainaluna Lahainaluna HS athletic masterplan projects, include cover of existing playcourt 2 7,547 9 286  $600M/yr  47 Leeward Pearl City 10.1 Kanoelani ES: indoor/outdoor multi‐purpose cafeteria, fire sprinkler 2 10,244 9 294  $600M/yr  48 Central Leilehua 6 Wheeler MS/Wheeler ES covered playcourt 2 11,231 9 303  $600M/yr  49 Central Moanalua 7 Moanalua Int covered playcourt 2 11,563 9 312  $600M/yr  50 Maui Lahainaluna 11 Nahienaena ES new multi‐purpose pavilion 2 11,672 9 320  $600M/yr  51 Leeward Waianae 8.1 Wai’anae Int covered playcourt 2 11,768 9 329  $600M/yr  52 Central Radford 15.1 Hickam El covered multipurpose playcourt 2 12,047 9 338  $600M/yr  53 Windward Kalaheo 4 Kailua Int indoor/outdoor cafeteria addition 2 12,305 9 346  $600M/yr  54 Central Radford 15.4 Nimitz El covered multipurpose playcourt 2 12,358 9 355  $600M/yr  55 Maui Lahainaluna 22 Lahaina Int. cover existing playcourt 2 13,230 9 363  $600M/yr  56 Leeward Waipahu 9.r Honowai  ES multi‐purpose outdoor covered facility 2 13,735 9 372  Beyond  57 Leeward Waipahu 9.s Waikele ES multi‐purpose outdoor covered facility 2 14,521 9 381  Beyond  58 Central Radford 7 Aliamanu MS covered play court 2 15,321 9 389  Beyond  59 Central Radford 15.5 Pearl Harbor El covered multipurpose playcourt 2 16,275 9 398  Beyond  60 Central Radford 15.2 Makalapa El covered multipurpose playcourt 2 17,081 9 407  Beyond  4 * Page 12 of 46 HIDOE Facility Master Plan Final Report 38 Health and Safety Group C: Shelter and Shade Ranking criteria: local priority, cost/student Rank Region Complex Ref Option Title Local  Ongoing  Rank Value Cost  Cumulative 10‐Year  Priority  Project Estimate  Funding Tier 1‐5 (2019 $M) 61 Leeward Pearl City 10.6 Palisades ES: cover neighboring park play courts; rooftop covered play court on newly built  admin/STEAM classrooms 2 20,344 9 415  Beyond  62 Central Radford 15.6 Pearl Harbor Kai El covered multipurpose playcourt 2 21,142 9 424  Beyond  63 Leeward Pearl City 10.4 Momilani ES: covered play court 2 21,457 9 432  Beyond  64 Leeward Pearl City 10.5 Pearl City ES: covered play court 2 22,061 9 441  Beyond  65 Kauai Kapa’a 3.1 Kilauea ES covered playcourt 2 23,440 9 450  Beyond  66 Leeward Pearl City 10.2 Manana ES: Replace Building F with multi‐purpose covered area; Construct ADA ramp 2 24,230 9 458  Beyond  67 Honolulu Kaimuki 20.2 Jefferson ES shade structure/trees 2 24,716 9 467  Beyond  68 Central Radford 15.3 Mokulele El covered multipurpose playcourt 2 30,055 9 476  Beyond  69 Kauai Waimea 9 Kalaheo ES multi‐purpose covered space and addition 2 30,725 14 490  Beyond  70 Leeward Pearl City 10.3 Lehua ES: outdoor multi‐purpose covered area (designed) 2 * 31,712 9 498  Beyond  71 Hawaii NW Kohala 4.1 Kohala MS ongoing playcourt and lanai projects  2 * 59,081 9 507  Beyond  72 Leeward Kapolei 10 Kapolei complex covered multi‐purpose spaces (all schools) 2 #DIV/0! 86 593  Beyond  73 Leeward Nanakuli 4 Nanakuli shade structures (all schools) 2 #DIV/0! 35 628  Beyond  74 Hawaii SE Pahoa 3 Pahoa ES covered walkways 3 2,793 1 629  Beyond  75 Hawaii NW Kealakehe 16 Kealakehe Int and ES new covered playcourt 3 11,532 9 637  Beyond  76 Kauai Waimea 7 Kekaha ES new covered play court 3 23,440 9 646  Beyond  77 Leeward Kapolei 17 Kapolei complex covered walkways (all schools) 4 5,000 5 651  Beyond  78 Honolulu Kalani 14.2 Kaimuki Middle covered multipurpose facility 4 8,482 9 660  Beyond  79 Honolulu Roosevelt 16.1 Kawananakoa Middle covered multipurpose facility 4 10,823 9 668  Beyond  80 Honolulu Kaiser 14.4 Niu Valley Middle covered multipurpose facility 4 11,547 9 677  Beyond  Page 13 of 46 HIDOE Facility Master Plan Final Report 39 Health and Safety Group C: Shelter and Shade Ranking criteria: local priority, cost/student Rank Region Complex Ref Option Title 81 Hawaii SE Keaau 8 Keaau MS covered multi‐purpose facility & walkways 4 11,578 9 685  Beyond  82 Leeward Campbell 6 Ilima Int new covered multipurpose space 4 12,132 9 694  Beyond  83 Honolulu Roosevelt 16.2 Maemae El covered multipurpose facility 4 12,519 9 703  Beyond  84 Kauai Waimea Waimea HS covered multipurpose area between Buildings C & F 4 12,556 9 711  Beyond  85 Honolulu Roosevelt 16.6 Stevenson Middle / Lincoln ES covered multipurpose facility 4 13,415 9 720  Beyond  86 Honolulu McKinley 16.4 Kauluwela El covered multipurpose facility 4 13,478 9 729  Beyond  87 Honolulu Kaimuki 19.8 Washington MS covered playcourt/multi‐purpose facility 4 13,520 9 737  Beyond  88 Honolulu Farrington 18.6 Kapalama El covered multipurpose facility 4 14,187 9 746  Beyond  89 Hawaii NW Honoka'a 2 New Honokaa HS/Intermediate campus commons  4 14,473 9 754  Beyond  90 Central Mililani 9 Kipapa ES covered multi‐purpose amphitheater 4 14,620 9 763  Beyond  91 Honolulu Kalani 14.5 Waikiki El covered multipurpose facility 4 15,267 9 772  Beyond  92 Honolulu Kalani 14.6 Wilson El covered multipurpose facility 4 15,376 9 780  Beyond  93 Honolulu Kalani 14.4 Waialae El PCS covered multipurpose facility 4 15,798 9 789  Beyond  94 Honolulu Farrington 18.5 Kalihi Waena El covered multipurpose facility 4 15,827 9 798  Beyond  95 Kauai Waimea ‘Ele’ele ES library renovations and multipurpose covered area 4 15,915 9 806  Beyond  96 Honolulu Roosevelt 16.3 Manoa El covered multipurpose facility 4 16,306 9 815  Beyond  97 Honolulu McKinley 16.2 Kaahumanu El covered multipurpose facility 4 16,461 9 823  Beyond  98 Central Aiea Aiea Int outdoor project based learning venue 4 16,524 9 832  Beyond  99 Honolulu Kaiser 14.2 Hahaione El covered multipurpose facility 4 16,717 9 841  Beyond  100 Honolulu Kalani 14.3 Liholiho El covered multipurpose facility 4 16,814 9 849  Beyond  2 6 7 Local  Ongoing  Rank Value Cost  Cumulative 10‐Year  Priority  Project Estimate  Funding Tier 1‐5 (2019 $M) Page 14 of 46 HIDOE Facility Master Plan Final Report 40 Health and Safety Group C: Shelter and Shade Ranking criteria: local priority, cost/student Rank Region Complex Ref Option Title Local  Ongoing  Rank Value Cost  Cumulative 10‐Year  Priority  Project Estimate  Funding Tier 1‐5 (2019 $M) 101 Hawaii NW Konawaena 11 Konawaena ES indoor/outdoor dining/multi‐purpose space 4 16,946 9 858  Beyond  102 Hawaii SE Pahoa 4 Pahoa ES/HS/Int covered playcourt 4 17,604 9 867  Beyond  103 Honolulu Kaiser 14.1 Aina Haina El covered multipurpose facility 4 18,198 9 875  Beyond  104 Honolulu Kalani 14.1 Kahala El covered multipurpose facility 4 18,916 9 884  Beyond  105 Maui Kekaulike 9 Paia ES covered play court 4 19,427 9 892  Beyond  106 Honolulu McKinley 16.5 Lanakila El covered multipurpose facility 4 20,440 9 901  Beyond  107 Honolulu Farrington 18.1 Fern El covered multipurpose facility 4 20,886 9 910  Beyond  108 Honolulu McKinley 16.1 Central Middle covered multipurpose facility 4 21,782 9 918  Beyond  109 Honolulu Kaiser 14.5 Kamiloiki El covered multipurpose facility 4 22,463 9 927  Beyond  110 Honolulu Kaimuki 19.1 Ala Wai El covered playcourt/multi‐purpose facility 4 22,522 9 936  Beyond  111 Honolulu McKinley 16.3 Kaiulani El covered multipurpose facility 4 22,640 9 944  Beyond  112 Honolulu McKinley 16.7 Royal El covered multipurpose facility 4 23,376 9 953  Beyond  113 Honolulu Roosevelt 16.4 Nuuanu El covered multipurpose facility 4 24,436 9 961  Beyond  114 Honolulu McKinley 16.6 Likelike El covered multipurpose facility 4 24,505 9 970  Beyond  115 Honolulu Kaimuki 19.4 Jefferson El covered playcourt/multi‐purpose facility 4 24,716 9 979  Beyond  116 Honolulu Kaiser 14.3 Koko Head El covered multipurpose facility 4 26,298 9 987  Beyond  117 Honolulu Farrington 18.2 Kaewai El covered multipurpose facility 4 26,541 9 996  Beyond  118 Honolulu Kaimuki 19.3 Hokulani El covered playcourt/multi‐purpose facility 4 26,955 9 1,005  Beyond  119 Honolulu Roosevelt 16.5 Pauoa El covered multipurpose facility 4 27,383 9 1,013  Beyond  120 Honolulu Kaimuki 19.6 Lunalilo El overed playcourt/multi‐purpose facility 4 28,006 9 1,022  Beyond  Page 15 of 46 HIDOE Facility Master Plan Final Report 41 Health and Safety Group C: Shelter and Shade Ranking criteria: local priority, cost/student Rank Region Complex Ref Option Title Local  Ongoing  Rank Value Cost  Cumulative 10‐Year  Priority  Project Estimate  Funding Tier 1‐5 (2019 $M) 121 Honolulu Kaimuki 19.7 Palolo El covered playcourt/multi‐purpose facility 4 28,849 9 1,030  Beyond  122 Honolulu Farrington 18.4 Kalihi Uka El covered multipurpose facility 4 31,366 9 1,039  Beyond  123 Honolulu Kaimuki 19.5 Kuhio El covered playcourt/multi‐purpose facility 4 37,180 9 1,048  Beyond  124 Honolulu Farrington 18.3 Kalihi El covered multipurpose facility 4 37,341 9 1,056  Beyond  125 Honolulu Kaimuki 19.2 Aliiolani El covered playcourt/multi‐purpose facility 4 40,688 9 1,065  Beyond  126 Honolulu Farrington 18.7 Puuhale El covered multipurpose facility 4 40,688 9 1,074  Beyond  127 Leeward Waianae 5.2 Wai’anae HS covered pavilion 5 4,943 9 1,082  Beyond  128 Leeward Pearl City 4 Pearl City HS shade structures 5 5,724 9 1,091  Beyond  129 Honolulu Roosevelt 5 Roosevelt HS outdoor performance & instruction space 5 6,692 9 1,099  Beyond  130 Maui Kekaulike 2 Kekaulike HS covered courtyard multi‐use commons 5 7,354 9 1,108  Beyond  131 Leeward Campbell 7.5 Holomua El covered multi‐purpose facility 5 7,360 9 1,117  Beyond  132 Leeward Campbell 7.1 Ewa El covered multi‐purpose facility 5 7,906 9 1,125  Beyond  133 Leeward Campbell 7.7 Keoneula El covered multi‐purpose facility 5 8,115 9 1,134  Beyond  134 Windward Castle 16 Covered multipurpose playcourt (various schools) 5 8,626 9 1,143  Beyond  135 Leeward Nanakuli 5 Nanakuli HS new multi‐purpose dining area 5 8,865 9 1,151  Beyond  136 Leeward Campbell 7.2 Ewa Beach El covered multi‐purpose facility 5 12,429 9 1,160  Beyond  137 Leeward Campbell 7.3 Iroquois Point El covered multi‐purpose facility 5 12,592 9 1,168  Beyond  138 Leeward Campbell 7.6 Kaimiloa El covered multi‐purpose facility 5 13,373 9 1,177  Beyond  139 Leeward Campbell 7.4 Pohakea El covered multi‐purpose facility 5 19,560 9 1,186  Beyond  140 Molokai Molokai 4 Molokai HS new multipurpose outdoor commons 5 22,061 9 1,194  Beyond  Page 16 of 46 HIDOE Facility Master Plan Final Report 42 Health and Safety Group C: Shelter and Shade Ranking criteria: local priority, cost/student Rank Region Complex Ref Option Title Local  Ongoing  Rank Value Cost  Cumulative 10‐Year  Priority  Project Estimate  Funding Tier 1‐5 (2019 $M) 141 Windward Kahuku 10 Kahuku ES covered outdoor multipurpose facility 5 22,174 9 1,203  Beyond  142 Windward Kailua 8 Waimanalo ES/Int covered multipurpose playcourt 5 22,347 9 1,212  Beyond  143 Windward Kalaheo 9 Kailua ES covered play court 5 24,505 9 1,220  Beyond  144 Molokai Molokai 9 Molokai MS new covered multipurpose space 5 42,914 9 1,229  Beyond  Page 17 of 46 HIDOE Facility Master Plan Final Report 43 Health and Safety Group D: Heat Abatement Ranking criteria: local priority, cost/student Rank Region Complex Ref Option Title Local  Ongoing  Rank Value Cost  Cumulative 10‐Year  Priority  Project Estimate  Funding Tier 1‐5 (2019 $M) 1 Windward Castle 19 He’eia ES AC improvements 1 9,246 4 4  $300M/yr  2 Leeward Pearl City 8.4 Momilani ES: A/C in cafeteria 1 12,438 5 9  $300M/yr  3 Maui Lahainaluna 16.3 Install air conditioning in classrooms 1 12,802 26 35  $300M/yr  4 Honolulu Kaiser 6 Heat abatement (various schools)  1 16,822 34 68  $300M/yr  5 Leeward Waianae 13 Air conditioning in all classrooms 1 24,821 50 118  $300M/yr  6 Kauai Districtwide HA Districtiwde implement heat abatement program 1 43,518 87 205  $600M/yr  7 Central Mililani 15 Mililani HS air conditioning 2 6,190 17 222  $600M/yr  8 Windward Kalaheo 5 Aikahi ES AC retrofit 2 7,324 4 226  $600M/yr  9 Honolulu Kalani 6 Heat abatement (various schools)  2 19,826 40 265  $600M/yr  10 Honolulu McKinley 6 Heat abatement (various schools)  2 24,359 49 314  $600M/yr  11 Honolulu Roosevelt 7 Heat abatement (various schools)  2 26,235 52 366  Beyond  12 Honolulu Kaimuki 9 Heat abatement (various schools)  2 26,235 52 419  Beyond  13 Honolulu Farrington 9 Heat abatement (various schools)  2 31,563 63 482  Beyond  14 Central Leilehua 15 Leilehua HS install air conditioning 3 10,245 16 498  Beyond  15 Leeward Pearl City 2.2 Pearl City HS install A/C 3 12,721 19 517  Beyond  16 Central Radford 17 Makalapa ES A/C 4 8,241 4 521  Beyond  17 Maui Hana 7 Hana K12 AC renovations 4 12,675 5 526  Beyond  18 Windward Kailua 9 Air conditioning retrofit projects (various schools) 4 25,158 50 576  Beyond  Page 18 of 46 HIDOE Facility Master Plan Final Report 44 Health and Safety Group E: Flood Control Ranking criteria: local priority, cost, cost/student Rank Region Complex 1 Leeward Waipahu 2 Kauai Kauai 3 Central Leilehua 4 Maui Lahainaluna 5 Windward Kahuku 6 Windward 7 Ref Option Title Local  Ongoing  Rank Value Cost  Cumulative 10‐Year  Priority  Project Estimate  Funding Tier 1‐5 (2019 $M) Kaleiopuu ES: covered walkways and emergency evacuation path from back of school to Hoae’ae  park 1 1,185 1 1  $300M/yr  Wilcox ES flood control 1 1,203 1 2  $300M/yr  Leilehua HS site drainage 1 1,273 2 4  $300M/yr  Kamehameha III Phase 1: land due diligence 1 1,464 1 5  $300M/yr  4 Kahuku HS/Int flood control 1 1,475 2 7  $300M/yr  Castle 14 Site drainage improvements (various schools) 1 2,000 2 9  $300M/yr  Windward Castle 2A Waiāhole, Ka’a’awa, and Hau’ula campuses remain open ‐ due diligence for land  acquisition/swap 1 2,193 0 9  $300M/yr  8 Maui Baldwin 10 Waihee ES drainage and traffic improvements 1 2,886 2 11  $300M/yr  9 Central Radford 18 Pearl Harbor Kai ES site drainage 1 4,902 2 13  $300M/yr  10 Leeward Pearl City Kanoelani ES renovate parking area and fire lane 1 5,938 5 18  $300M/yr  11 Maui Lahainaluna Lahaina Int. new multi‐purpose pavilion / emergency shelter 1 13,230 9 27  $300M/yr  12 Leeward Pearl City 11.2 Manana ES: parking lot and fire lane improvements (in progress) 1 14,045 5 32  $300M/yr  13 Molokai Molokai 10.1 Maunaloa ES and Kilohana ES multi‐purpose shelter in place  1 399,628 14 46  $300M/yr  14 Windward Castle Castle HS flood control and fire lane  2 1,756 2 48  $300M/yr  15 Honolulu Farrington Kalakaua MS flood drainage at cafeteria, locker rooms 2 2,252 2 50  $300M/yr  16 Central Waialua Waialua HS & Intermediate site drainage 2 2,786 2 52  $300M/yr  17 Honolulu Farrington 11.1 Dole MS flood drainage at cafeteria, health center 2 3,205 2 54  $300M/yr  18 Honolulu Farrington 11.6 Kalihi Waena ES flood drainage at central walkway 2 3,670 2 56  $300M/yr  19 Honolulu Roosevelt 9.2 Manoa ES flood drainage at 1st & 2nd grade 2 3,781 2 58  $300M/yr  20 Honolulu Kaiser Hahaione ES flood drainage at Bldg G 2 3,876 2 60  $300M/yr  9.f 13.2 18 1A.1 11.1 8 6 11.3 2 8 * * Page 19 of 46 HIDOE Facility Master Plan Final Report 45 Capacity Group A: Crowded without GE Ranking criteria: local priority, capacity shortage minus SY1718 GE in, descending Rank Region Complex Ref Option Title 21 Hawaii NW Konawaena 3 22 Maui Districtwide HS Local  Ongoing  Rank Value Cost  Cumulative 10‐Year  Priority  Project Estimate  Funding Tier 1‐5 (2019 $M) Konawaena HS historic renovation and additions 2 Maui/Baldwin relief school in Kihei Phase 3 (+ ### capacity) 5 * ‐119 21 858  Beyond  ‐326 67 925  Beyond  Page 2 of 46 HIDOE Facility Master Plan Final Report 46 Health and Safety Group E: Flood Control Ranking criteria: local priority, cost, cost/student Rank Region Complex Ref 21 Honolulu Kalani 8.2 Liholiho ES flood drainage at cafeteria 2 3,899 2 62  $300M/yr  22 Honolulu Kalani 8.1 Kahala ES flood drainage at Bldgs D&E 2 4,386 2 64  $300M/yr  23 Honolulu Roosevelt 9.1 Lanakila ES flood drainage at Bldg C&I, parking lot 2 4,739 2 66  $600M/yr  24 Honolulu Farrington 11.2 Fern ES flood drainage at Bldgs B, I, G 2 4,843 2 68  $600M/yr  25 Honolulu Kaimuki 11.1 Ala Wai ES regrade, add drainage  2 5,222 2 70  $600M/yr  26 Honolulu McKinley 8.1 Kaiulani ES runoff into HCC  2 5,249 2 72  $600M/yr  27 Honolulu Farrington 11.5 Kalihi Uka flood drainage at regrade, add drainage  2 7,273 2 74  $600M/yr  28 Honolulu Kaimuki 11.2 Kuhio ES address runoff, erosion, and flooding 2 8,621 2 76  $600M/yr  29 Honolulu Farrington 11.4 Kalihi ES flood drainage at playfields A&B , back doors 2 8,658 2 78  $600M/yr  30 Honolulu Farrington 11.7 Puuhale ES flood drainage at parking lot 2 9,434 2 80  $600M/yr  31 Maui Districtwide EME Maui District emergency shelter improvements 3 250 0 81  $600M/yr  32 Central Mililani Mililani HS site drainage 3 735 2 83  $600M/yr  33 Maui Lahainaluna Kamehameha III Phase 2: construct new school on alternate site 1 119,431 82 164  Beyond  34 Molokai Molokai Move Kauanakakai ES out of flood zone 1 161,482 42 206  Beyond  20 1A.2 2A Option Title Local  Ongoing  Rank Value Cost  Cumulative 10‐Year  Priority  Project Estimate  Funding Tier 1‐5 (2019 $M) Page 20 of 46 HIDOE Facility Master Plan Final Report 47 Instruction and Support Group A: Instruction Ranking criteria: local priority, facility instructional adequacy score Rank Region Complex Ref Option Title 1 Hawaii NW Honoka'a 3 2 Central Moanalua 10.4 3 Hawaii NW Honoka'a 4 Molokai 5 Local  Ongoing  Rank Value Cost  Cumulative 10‐Year  Priority  Project Estimate  Funding Tier 1‐5 (2019 $M) Paauilo renovations and multi‐use space conversions 1 0.60 2 2  $300M/yr  Shafter ES construct multi‐purpose STEAM classrooms above cafeteria (if school is not replaced  on nearby site by DOD) 1 0.62 8 10  $300M/yr  6 Honokaa ES renovations and multi‐use space conversions 1 0.62 2 12  $300M/yr  Molokai 19 Multipurpose STEAM classrooms (all schools) 1 0.64 5 17  $300M/yr  Leeward Pearl City 8.3 Momilani ES: 2 new STEAM CRs, 1 library, and 2 SPED classrooms on south side lawn 1 0.64 12 29  $300M/yr  6 Honolulu McKinley 13.6 Lanakila ES pre‐k renovation 1 0.65 2 30  $300M/yr  7 Central Aiea 11.4 Waimalu ES convert 6 classrooms in Bldg A w/ multi‐purpose and SPED 1 0.66 2 32  $300M/yr  8 Central Waialua 7 Waialua ES flexible maker‐spaces 1 0.66 2 33  $300M/yr  9 Leeward Pearl City 8.8 Pearl City Highlands ES: new STEAM building with 6 classrooms and PLC for teacher collaboration 1 0.67 9 43  $300M/yr  10 Central Waialua 8 Haleiwa ES STEAM classrooms 1 0.67 2 44  $300M/yr  11 Central Aiea 11.6 Webling – demolish and reconstruct library, to include flexible STEAM classrooms. 1 0.68 15 59  $300M/yr  1 0.69 2 62  $300M/yr  12 Central Moanalua 10.2 Red Hill ES replace portables P1 and P2 with new flexible STEAM classrooms and professional  learning center in courtyard near building B. 13 Central Leilehua 9.4 Iliahi ES renovate existing art room into multi‐purpose flexible space 1 0.70 2 64  $300M/yr  14 Hawaii NW Konawaena 19 Furniture and equipment refresh (all schools) 1 0.70 5 69  $300M/yr  15 Molokai Molokai 21 Equipment refresh (all schools) 1 0.71 2 70  $300M/yr  16 Molokai Molokai 18 Sustainable energy improvements 1 0.71 5 75  $300M/yr  17 Hawaii NW Honoka'a 13 Furniture and equipment refresh (all schools) 1 0.71 3 78  $300M/yr  18 Hawaii NW Kealakehe 21 Furniture and equipment refresh (all schools) 1 0.73 7 85  $300M/yr  19 Central Radford 12.8 Pearl Harbor ES expand library to include flexible learning spaces. 1 0.73 8 92  $300M/yr  20 Honolulu Roosevelt 17.1 Nuuanu ES new admin and convert admin to STEAM 1 0.73 15 108  $300M/yr  Page 21 of 46 HIDOE Facility Master Plan Final Report 48 Instruction and Support Group A: Instruction Ranking criteria: local priority, facility instructional adequacy score Rank Region Complex Ref Option Title 21 Kauai Waimea 16 Prioritized furniture/equipment refresh 1 0.73 4 111  $300M/yr  22 Hawaii NW Kohala 13 Furniture and equipment refresh (all schools) 1 0.74 1 112  $300M/yr  23 Windward Districtwide FUR Modern classroom furniture and equipment (all schools) 1 0.74 21 133  $300M/yr  24 Central Radford 12.4 Makalapa ES replace portables with multi‐story preschool learning center, add primary  classroom restrooms in Building I 1 0.74 12 145  $300M/yr  25 Central Districtwide DL Distance learning infastructure 1 0.75 0 146  $300M/yr  26 Central Districtwide TR Transportation solution to support innovation and partnerships between schools. 1 0.75 3 149  $300M/yr  27 Honolulu Districtwide IMM Anuenue K‐12 gymnasium and multipurpose additions 1 0.75 14 163  $300M/yr  28 Kauai Districtwide PAC Community‐based performing arts center 1 0.76 43 206  $300M/yr  29 Kauai Kapa’a Prioritized furniture/equipment refresh 1 0.76 5 211  $300M/yr  30 Honolulu Farrington Kalihi Waena ES replace pre‐k restroom fixtures for older grades 1 0.77 2 212  $300M/yr  31 Central Radford 21 Radford HS expand admin and relocation health to first floor 1 0.78 3 215  $300M/yr  32 Central Radford 5 Radford HS band room / music addition 1 0.78 10 225  $300M/yr  33 Kauai Kauai 18 Prioritized furniture/equipment refresh 1 0.78 6 231  $300M/yr  34 Honolulu Farrington Kalihi Kai pre‐k renovation 1 0.78 2 233  $300M/yr  35 Maui Hana 12 Hana green design renovations 1 0.78 10 243  $300M/yr  36 Maui Hana 4 Hana K12 multi‐purpose community arts and athletics center 1 0.78 29 271  $300M/yr  37 Central Leilehua 2 Leilehua HS project‐based learning spaces, STEAM & professional centers 1 0.78 12 283  $300M/yr  38 Hawaii NW Kohala 7.1 Kohala HS new gym 1 0.79 37 320  $300M/yr  39 Hawaii NW Kohala 7.2 Kohala HS new athletic facility masterplan 1 0.79 25 345  $300M/yr  40 Honolulu McKinley Central MS STEAM renovation 1 0.79 2 347  $300M/yr  15 15.3 15.2 5 Local  Ongoing  Rank Value Cost  Cumulative 10‐Year  Priority  Project Estimate  Funding Tier 1‐5 (2019 $M) Page 22 of 46 HIDOE Facility Master Plan Final Report 49 Instruction and Support Group A: Instruction Ranking criteria: local priority, facility instructional adequacy score Rank Region Complex 41 Leeward Pearl City 42 Central Radford 43 Honolulu Roosevelt 44 Honolulu 45 Ref Option Title 12 Local  Ongoing  Rank Value Cost  Cumulative 10‐Year  Priority  Project Estimate  Funding Tier 1‐5 (2019 $M) Manana ES special education medical fragile facilities 1 0.80 2 349  $300M/yr  Pearl Harbor Kai expand library to include professional learning center. 1 0.80 12 360  $300M/yr  3 Roosevelt HS new gymnasium with 4‐6 classroom spaces 1 0.80 31 391  $300M/yr  Kalani 5 Kaimuki MS STEAM classroom renovations 1 0.81 2 393  $300M/yr  Windward Kahuku 7 Kahuku HS/Int athletics master plan projects 1 0.81 25 418  $300M/yr  46 Honolulu Kaimuki 7 Washington MS STEAM classroom renovations 1 0.81 2 419  $300M/yr  47 Honolulu Kaimuki 8 Washington MS music classroom renovations 1 * 0.81 2 422  $300M/yr  48 Central Mililani 3 Mililani HS visual and performing arts center (planned) 1 * 0.81 36 457  $300M/yr  49 Honolulu Kaiser 12.3 Kamiloiki pre‐k renovation 1 0.81 2 459  $300M/yr  50 Leeward Waianae 14 Elementary SPED/Alternative Center 1 0.81 8 467  $300M/yr  51 Leeward Waipahu 12 STEAM renovations (elementary schools) 1 0.81 10 477  $300M/yr  52 Leeward Waipahu 6 Waipahu HS program specific building additions 1 0.82 16 493  $300M/yr  53 Leeward Waipahu 14 Waipahu HS land use partnership 1 0.82 0 493  $300M/yr  54 Lanai Lanai 10 Lana’i K‐12 initiate 50 acre land acquisition 1 0.82 0 493  $300M/yr  55 Honolulu Roosevelt Lincoln ES pre‐k renovation 1 0.83 2 495  $300M/yr  56 Kauai Waimea 3 Waimea HS new gym 1 0.83 37 532  $600M/yr  57 Kauai Waimea 17 Waimea HS or MS performing arts center 1 0.83 14 546  $600M/yr  58 Kauai Kapa’a Kapa’a HS new gym 1 0.83 37 583  $600M/yr  59 Leeward Waipahu 9.j Waikele ES: replace portables with permanent STEAM building 1 0.83 3 587  $600M/yr  60 Leeward Waianae 4 Wai’anae HS alternative learning center 1 0.83 17 603  $600M/yr  12.9 13.1 11.1 Page 23 of 46 HIDOE Facility Master Plan Final Report 50 Instruction and Support Group A: Instruction Ranking criteria: local priority, facility instructional adequacy score Rank Region Complex Ref Option Title 61 Leeward Waianae 2 Wai’anae HS marine science learning center expansion 1 0.83 10 613  $600M/yr  62 Leeward Campbell 3 Campbell HS private‐public‐partnerships for CTE 1 0.83 3 616  $600M/yr  63 Kauai Kauai 2.2 Kauai HS renovations of Buildings O 1 0.83 1 617  $600M/yr  64 Kauai Kauai 17.1 Kauai HS new gym 1 0.83 37 654  $600M/yr  65 Honolulu Districtwide 1C Hololulu complimentary CTE programs/facilities 1 0.83 42 696  $600M/yr  66 Honolulu Kalani 3 Kalani HS 21st music instruction space 1 0.83 36 732  $600M/yr  67 Maui Lahainaluna 18 Lahainaluna high school CTE spaces 1 0.83 6 738  $600M/yr  68 Central Leilehua 4 Wahiawa MS project‐based learning spaces & professional centers 1 0.83 9 747  $600M/yr  69 Honolulu Farrington 6 Dole MS STEAM classroom renovations  1 0.84 2 749  $600M/yr  70 Honolulu Kaimuki 5 Kaimuki HS repurpose buildings B, C& D for STEAM instruction 1 0.84 30 779  $600M/yr  71 Maui Districtwide Maui District Hawaiian immersion program facility needs engagement 1 0.84 0 779  $600M/yr  72 Honolulu Kaiser Kaiser HS Visual and Performing Arts Center 1 0.84 36 815  $600M/yr  73 Honolulu Roosevelt Stevenson MS renovate music spaces 1 0.84 2 817  $600M/yr  74 Honolulu Kaiser 5 Nui Valley MS STEAM classroom addition 1 0.84 3 820  $600M/yr  75 Honolulu McKinley 3 McKinley HS stadium lighting and seating addition 1 0.84 25 845  $600M/yr  76 Central Aiea 2 Aiea HS health careers and community clinic center 1 0.84 3 848  $600M/yr  77 Windward Kailua 5 Kailua HS athletic master plan projects  1 0.85 25 873  $600M/yr  78 Central Waialua 4 Waialua HS & Intermediate music arts facility 1 0.85 10 883  $600M/yr  79 Hawaii NW Konawaena 15 Konawaena HS athletic master plan projects 1 0.86 25 908  $600M/yr  80 Central Moanalua 2.1 Moanalua HS special education enhancements 1 0.86 8 916  $600M/yr  LAN 3 6.2 Local  Ongoing  Rank Value Cost  Cumulative 10‐Year  Priority  Project Estimate  Funding Tier 1‐5 (2019 $M) * Page 24 of 46 HIDOE Facility Master Plan Final Report 51 Instruction and Support Group A: Instruction Ranking criteria: local priority, facility instructional adequacy score Rank Region Complex Ref Option Title 81 Central Moanalua 8 82 Honolulu McKinley 13.5 83 Hawaii NW Kealakehe 84 Leeward 85 Local  Ongoing  Rank Value Cost  Cumulative 10‐Year  Priority  Project Estimate  Funding Tier 1‐5 (2019 $M) Moanalua Int new instructional music space 1 0.86 12 928  $600M/yr  Kaiulani ES pre‐k renovation 1 0.87 2 930  $600M/yr  15 Kealakehe Int new media production center 1 0.88 4 933  $600M/yr  Pearl City 6.1 Pearl City HS SPED improvements 1 0.88 2 935  $600M/yr  Leeward Pearl City 3 Pearl City HS renovate career technical education (CTE) spaces 1 0.88 3 938  $600M/yr  86 Kauai Waimea 12 Waimea Canyon MS renovate library into maker space 1 0.88 2 939  $600M/yr  87 Kauai Waimea 15 Waimea Canyon MS construct/convert science classrooms, and convert fomer ES rooms to MS  standards 1 0.88 2 941  $600M/yr  88 Leeward Nanakuli 8 Nanakuli HS visual performing arts (VPA) center 1 0.89 36 977  $600M/yr  89 Leeward Kapolei 3 Kapolei HS private‐public‐partnerships for CTE 1 0.89 25 1,002  $600M/yr  90 Leeward Kapolei 5 Kapolei HS new auditorium building with classrooms 1 0.89 36 1,038  $600M/yr  91 Leeward Waipahu 8 Waipahu Int DREAMS facility 1 * 0.91 17 1,054  $600M/yr  92 Hawaii NW Kealakehe 2 Kealakehe HS performing arts and student center 1 * 0.92 43 1,098  $600M/yr  93 Honolulu Kaiser 11 Flexible STEAM and/or outdoor learning spaces (all ES and MS) 2 0.60 7 1,104  $600M/yr  94 Honolulu Farrington 14 Flexible STEAM and/or outdoor learning spaces (all ES) 2 0.62 15 1,119  $600M/yr  95 Honolulu Kalani 11 Flexible STEAM and/or outdoor learning spaces (all ES and MS) 2 0.62 13 1,132  $600M/yr  96 Central Radford 11.2 Hickam El flexible project‐based STEAM classrooms 2 0.63 2 1,134  $600M/yr  97 Maui Kekaulike 7.1 Kula ES replace portables with new multi‐story buildings for STEAM, Music, and Professional  Learning Center 2 0.64 13 1,147  $600M/yr  98 Central Aiea 10.4 Flexible project‐based STEAM classrooms ‐ Pearl Ridge El 2 0.65 3 1,151  $600M/yr  99 Central Aiea 10.2 Flexible project‐based STEAM classrooms ‐ Waimalu El 2 0.66 3 1,154  $600M/yr  100 Honolulu McKinley Flexible STEAM and/or outdoor learning spaces (all ES and MS) 2 0.66 2 1,156  $600M/yr  12 * Page 25 of 46 HIDOE Facility Master Plan Final Report 52 Instruction and Support Group A: Instruction Ranking criteria: local priority, facility instructional adequacy score Rank Region Complex Ref Option Title 101 Central Radford 11.1 Aliamanu El flexible project‐based STEAM classrooms 2 0.68 2 1,157  $600M/yr  102 Central Aiea 10.1 Flexible project‐based STEAM classrooms ‐ Aiea El 2 0.70 3 1,161  $600M/yr  103 Central Radford 11.5 Pearl Harbor El flexible project‐based STEAM classrooms 2 0.73 2 1,162  $600M/yr  104 Honolulu Roosevelt Flexible STEAM and/or outdoor learning spaces (all ES and MS) 2 0.74 13 1,176  $600M/yr  105 Central Radford 11.3 Makalapa El flexible project‐based STEAM classrooms 2 0.74 2 1,177  $600M/yr  106 Honolulu Kaimuki 15 Flexible STEAM and/or outdoor learning spaces (all ES and MS) 2 0.76 13 1,191  $600M/yr  107 Central Radford 11.4 Mokulele El flexible project‐based STEAM classrooms 2 0.76 2 1,192  $600M/yr  108 Hawaii SE Kau 3.1 Ka’u HS athletic master plan high priority projects 2 0.77 25 1,217  $600M/yr  109 Central Radford 3 Radford HS 21st Century learning environments 2 0.78 2 1,219  $600M/yr  110 Central Radford 6 Radford HS science labs 2 0.78 2 1,221  $600M/yr  111 Molokai Molokai 15 Molokai MS Hawaiian Language Immersion Program classrooms 2 0.79 10 1,231  $600M/yr  112 Molokai Molokai 5 Molokai HS athletics improvements 2 0.80 25 1,256  Beyond  113 Molokai Molokai 3 Molokai HS replace portables with spaces for STEM and careers 2 0.80 20 1,276  Beyond  114 Central Radford 11.6 Pearl Harbor Kai El flexible project‐based STEAM classrooms 2 0.80 2 1,277  Beyond  115 Maui Maui 7 Lokelani Int convert/replace building J for multi‐purpose STEAM 2 0.80 5 1,282  Beyond  116 Hawaii SE Pahoa 7 Pahoa HS athletic master plan projects 2 0.81 25 1,307  Beyond  117 Lanai Lanai 7 Lana’i K‐12 athletic fields 2 0.82 10 1,317  Beyond  118 Windward Castle 5.1 Castle HS Special Education improvements 2 0.82 2 1,318  Beyond  119 Kauai Waimea 4 Waimea HS CTE renovations and enhancements 2 0.83 6 1,324  Beyond  120 Kauai Kapa’a 13 Kapaa HS performing arts center 2 0.83 14 1,339  Beyond  12 Local  Ongoing  Rank Value Cost  Cumulative 10‐Year  Priority  Project Estimate  Funding Tier 1‐5 (2019 $M) * Page 26 of 46 HIDOE Facility Master Plan Final Report 53 Instruction and Support Group A: Instruction Ranking criteria: local priority, facility instructional adequacy score Rank Region Complex Ref Option Title 121 Leeward Campbell 13 Campbell HS track, bleachers, PA system, restrooms 2 0.83 25 1,364  Beyond  122 Kauai Kauai 6.1 Kauai HS new two‐story classroom building 2 0.83 24 1,388  Beyond  123 Kauai Kauai 20 Kauai HS performing arts center 2 0.83 14 1,402  Beyond  124 Central Aiea 10.3 Flexible project‐based STEAM classrooms ‐ Webling El 2 0.83 3 1,405  Beyond  125 Honolulu Kaiser 4 Kaiser HS STEAM classroom addition 2 0.84 10 1,415  Beyond  126 Central Aiea 4 Aiea HS special education enhancements 2 0.84 2 1,417  Beyond  127 Windward Kailua 4 Kailua HS Visual and Performing Arts Center 2 0.85 36 1,453  Beyond  128 Leeward Waianae 15 Wai’anae Int athletic community complex 2 0.85 32 1,485  Beyond  129 Windward Kalaheo 18 Kalaheo HS band room renovation 2 0.85 2 1,487  Beyond  130 Hawaii NW Konawaena 6 Konawaena HS auto mechanic renovations (CTE‐various) 2 0.86 3 1,490  Beyond  131 Central Moanalua 4 Moanalua HS Career Technical Education renovations/additions 2 0.86 3 1,493  Beyond  132 Central Aiea 6 Aiea Int special education and flexible STEAM spaces 2 0.86 2 1,495  Beyond  133 Maui Kekaulike 6 Kalama Int new building for language immersion program 2 0.88 13 1,508  Beyond  134 Maui Districtwide Maui/Baldwin/Kekaulike shared CTE center (confirm size/capacity) 2 0.88 52 1,560  Beyond  135 Leeward Pearl City 5 Pearl City HS cultural center 2 0.88 6 1,566  Beyond  136 Central Mililani 4 Mililani MS special education enhancements 2 0.90 2 1,568  Beyond  137 Maui Kekaulike 3 Kekaulike HS new building for language immersion program  2 0.90 20 1,588  Beyond  138 Honolulu McKinley 13.4 Lanakila ES special ed renovation 3 0.65 2 1,590  Beyond  139 Honolulu McKinley 13.2 Royal ES special ed renovation 3 0.66 2 1,591  Beyond  140 Honolulu McKinley 13.1 Kaahumanu ES special ed renovation 3 0.67 2 1,593  Beyond  CTE Local  Ongoing  Rank Value Cost  Cumulative 10‐Year  Priority  Project Estimate  Funding Tier 1‐5 (2019 $M) * Page 27 of 46 HIDOE Facility Master Plan Final Report 54 Instruction and Support Group A: Instruction Ranking criteria: local priority, facility instructional adequacy score Rank Region Complex 141 Hawaii NW Kohala 142 Leeward 143 Ref Option Title Local  Ongoing  Rank Value Cost  Cumulative 10‐Year  Priority  Project Estimate  Funding Tier 1‐5 (2019 $M) 2 Kohala ES Two‐story addition 3 0.67 19 1,612  Beyond  Campbell 8.4 Pohakea El STEAM renvoation 3 0.68 1 1,613  Beyond  Leeward Pearl City 9.2 Lehua ES ‐ new admin building and repurpose existing admin for STEAM/maker space 3 0.70 12 1,625  Beyond  144 Molokai Molokai 17 Teacher housing renovations/enhancements 3 0.71 1 1,626  Beyond  145 Hawaii NW Honoka'a 4 Regional teacher housing 3 0.71 4 1,630  Beyond  146 Honolulu McKinley 20 Furniture and technology refresh (all schools) 3 0.72 7 1,636  Beyond  147 Honolulu Kalani Liholiho ES hot water for SPED 3 0.72 2 1,638  Beyond  148 Maui Lahainaluna 17 Teacher housing 3 0.73 4 1,642  Beyond  149 Leeward Campbell 8.1 Ewa El STEAM renvoation 3 0.73 1 1,643  Beyond  150 Hawaii NW Kealakehe 8 Waikoloa ES & MS acquire land for athletic facilities, fields, and/or playgrounds 3 0.73 0 1,643  Beyond  151 Honolulu Kaimuki 16.1 Ala Wai ES special ed renovations 3 0.74 2 1,645  Beyond  152 Leeward Campbell 8.2 Ewa Beach El STEAM renvoation 3 0.75 1 1,646  Beyond  153 Honolulu Kaimuki 16.2 Hokulani ES special ed renovations 3 0.75 2 1,648  Beyond  154 Honolulu Farrington 22 Furniture and technology refresh (all schools) 3 0.75 10 1,658  Beyond  155 Leeward Pearl City 9.3 Pearl City ES: 2 SPED and 2 STEAM renovations 3 0.76 2 1,660  Beyond  156 Leeward Campbell 8.6 Kaimiloa El STEAM renvoation 3 0.76 1 1,661  Beyond  157 Leeward Campbell 8.7 Keoneula El STEAM renvoation 3 0.78 1 1,662  Beyond  158 Honolulu Roosevelt 19 Furniture and technology refresh (all schools) 3 0.79 9 1,671  Beyond  159 Honolulu Kalani 16 Furniture and technology refresh (all schools) 3 0.79 7 1,678  Beyond  160 Leeward Pearl City 9.1 Manana ES ‐ STEAM renovations and new STEAM building 3 0.80 2 1,680  Beyond  12.3 * Page 28 of 46 HIDOE Facility Master Plan Final Report 55 Instruction and Support Group A: Instruction Ranking criteria: local priority, facility instructional adequacy score Rank Region Complex Ref Option Title 161 Honolulu Farrington 4 162 Leeward Campbell 163 Honolulu 164 Local  Ongoing  Rank Value Cost  Cumulative 10‐Year  Priority  Project Estimate  Funding Tier 1‐5 (2019 $M) Farrington HS special education program enhancements 3 0.80 2 1,681  Beyond  8.3 Iroquois Point El STEAM renvoation 3 0.81 1 1,683  Beyond  Kalani 12.1 Kahala ES special ed renovation 3 0.81 2 1,684  Beyond  Central Mililani 28 Mililani HS softball bleachers 3 0.81 1 1,685  Beyond  165 Honolulu Kaimuki 23 Furniture and technology refresh (all schools) 3 0.81 5 1,690  Beyond  166 Honolulu Kaiser 12.2 Kamiloiki special ed renovation 3 0.81 2 1,692  Beyond  167 Honolulu Kaiser 16 Furniture and technology refresh (all schools) 3 0.81 5 1,697  Beyond  168 Leeward Waipahu 7 Waipahu HS integrated academy digital signage 3 0.82 1 1,698  Beyond  169 Maui Baldwin 4 Baldwin HS renovate drama classroom 3 0.82 5 1,703  Beyond  170 Lanai Lanai 6 Lana’i K‐12 21st century classroom conversions 3 0.82 2 1,705  Beyond  171 Windward Castle 4 Castle HS 21st Century library 3 0.82 13 1,718  Beyond  172 Leeward Campbell 8.5 Holomua El STEAM renvoation 3 0.82 3 1,721  Beyond  173 Hawaii SE Hilo 4.2 Hilo HS football field improvements 3 0.82 25 1,746  Beyond  174 Kauai Kapa’a 11.2 Kapa’a HS other athletic masterplan projects (track/field) 3 0.83 25 1,771  Beyond  175 Leeward Waianae 3 Wai’anae HS CTE renovation 3 0.83 3 1,774  Beyond  176 Leeward Waianae 7 Wai’anae HS athletic master plan projects track/fields/ training room 3 0.83 25 1,799  Beyond  177 Kauai Kauai 2.1 Kauai HS renovations of Building S 3 0.83 1 1,801  Beyond  178 Honolulu Farrington 15.1 Dole MS special ed renovation 3 0.84 2 1,802  Beyond  179 Honolulu Kaimuki 6 Kaimuki HS revenue generation 3 0.84 10 1,812  Beyond  180 Central Waialua 3 Waialua HS & Intermediate new 21st century classroom building 3 0.85 2 1,815  Beyond  Page 29 of 46 HIDOE Facility Master Plan Final Report 56 Capacity Group B: Crowded due to GE Ranking criteria: local priority, capacity shortage minus SY1718 GE in, descending Rank Region Complex Ref Option Title 1 Leeward Waipahu 2.2 Waipahu HS 10‐classrooms and parking expansion (Phase 2) 1 ‐72 17 17  $300M/yr  2 Maui Baldwin 15 Iao Int convert old cafeteria into STEAM classroom 1 ‐50 2 19  $300M/yr  3 Maui Maui 1A Construct new Middle School on site TBD 1 ‐50 131 150  Beyond  4 Hawaii SE Waiakea Waiakea new elementary school 1 ‐11 90 239  Beyond  5 Hawaii NW Kealakehe Kealakehe HS Classroom addition, informed by 1D (STEAM, teacher PLC) 2 ‐109 10 250  Beyond  6 Maui Lahainaluna 2 Lahainaluna HS phased reconstruction 3 112 104 353  Beyond  7 Central Moanalua 12 Salt Lake ES construct new, multi‐level classroom building 4 ‐12 14 367  Beyond  8 Honolulu Kalani 4 Kalani HS classroom addition 4 245 17 384  Beyond  9 Central Moanalua 3 Moanalua HS new classroom building 4 403 21 404  Beyond  10 Windward Kalaheo 6 Aikahi ES 21st Century building additions 5 151 8 413  Beyond  1B.1 1A Local  Ongoing  Rank Value Cost  Cumulative 10‐Year  Priority  Project Estimate  Funding Tier 1‐5 (2019 $M) Page 3 of 46 HIDOE Facility Master Plan Final Report 57 Instruction and Support Group A: Instruction Ranking criteria: local priority, facility instructional adequacy score Rank Region Complex Ref Option Title 181 Honolulu McKinley 13.3 Kaiulani ES special ed renovation 3 0.87 2 1,816  Beyond  182 Honolulu Farrington 15.4 Puuhale ES special ed renovation 3 0.88 2 1,818  Beyond  183 Honolulu Kaiser 12.1 Hahaione ES special ed renovation 3 0.88 2 1,819  Beyond  184 Leeward Kapolei 16 Kapolei HS athletic projects ‐ track, bleachers, fields 3 0.89 25 1,844  Beyond  185 Honolulu Roosevelt Pauoa ES special ed renovation 3 0.89 2 1,846  Beyond  186 Hawaii SE Keaau 3 Keaau HS new synthetic field 3 0.90 25 1,871  Beyond  187 Hawaii NW Kealakehe 5 Kealakehe HS special education classroom renovations 3 0.92 2 1,873  Beyond  188 Hawaii SE Hilo 8 Keaukaha ES replace building A with a STEAM classroom building 4 0.60 10 1,883  Beyond  189 Windward Kahuku 12 Laie ES new classroom / admin buildings 4 0.64 16 1,899  Beyond  190 Molokai Molokai 11 Kilohana ES renovations for Special Education & Pre‐K programs 4 0.69 2 1,901  Beyond  191 Leeward Nanakuli 9.1 Nanakuli ES STEAM renovation 4 0.69 2 1,902  Beyond  192 Kauai Kauai 19 Wilcox ES space for staff/student collaboration 4 0.72 2 1,904  Beyond  193 Hawaii NW Kohala 3 Kohala MS new STEAM building 4 0.76 10 1,914  Beyond  194 Maui Maui 4 Maui HS athletic master plan projects 4 0.76 25 1,939  Beyond  195 Maui Kekaulike 13.1 Pukalani ES new multipurpose classroom addition 4 0.76 17 1,955  Beyond  196 Leeward Nanakuli 9.2 Nanaikapono ES STEAM renovation 4 0.76 2 1,957  Beyond  197 Hawaii SE Kau 2 Ka’u HS new STEAM classroom building 4 0.77 10 1,967  Beyond  198 Hawaii SE Kau 3.2 Ka’u HS athletic master plan other projects 4 0.77 25 1,992  Beyond  199 Central Radford 2.1 Radford HS athletic upgrades 4 0.78 25 2,017  Beyond  200 Molokai Molokai 7 Molokai MS new collaborative learning additions 4 0.79 10 2,027  Beyond  13.2 Local  Ongoing  Rank Value Cost  Cumulative 10‐Year  Priority  Project Estimate  Funding Tier 1‐5 (2019 $M) Page 30 of 46 HIDOE Facility Master Plan Final Report 58 Instruction and Support Group A: Instruction Ranking criteria: local priority, facility instructional adequacy score Rank Region Complex Ref Option Title 201 Hawaii SE Hilo 11.2 Kalanianaole K‐8 buildings A & B STEAM renovations 4 0.80 2 2,029  Beyond  202 Maui Lahainaluna 16.4 Outdoor learning improvements 4 0.81 1 2,030  Beyond  203 Windward Kahuku 6 Kahuku HS/Int health career improvements 4 0.81 3 2,033  Beyond  204 Windward Kahuku 5 Kahuku HS/Int music improvements 4 0.81 10 2,043  Beyond  205 Central Mililani 24 Mililani HS new gym 4 0.81 31 2,073  Beyond  206 Windward Kalaheo 3 Kailua Int 21st Century building additions 4 0.82 8 2,082  Beyond  207 Windward Castle ’Āhuimanu ES STEAM/maker space 4 0.82 2 2,083  Beyond  208 Kauai Waimea 1 Waimea HS culinary teaching kitchen and STEAM classroom in place of Building C 4 0.83 5 2,088  Beyond  209 Kauai Kapa’a 12 Kapa’a HS Swimming Pool 4 0.83 43 2,131  Beyond  210 Leeward Waianae 16 Wai’anae HS athletic natatorium / pool 4 0.83 36 2,167  Beyond  211 Kauai Kauai 4 Kauai HS lounge space in building K repurposed for STEAM 4 0.83 2 2,169  Beyond  212 Kauai Kauai 17.3 Kauai HS athletic courts/fields 4 0.83 25 2,194  Beyond  213 Windward Kailua 10 Renovate or construct classrooms for STEAM (various schools) 4 0.83 10 2,203  Beyond  214 Central Aiea 16 Aiea HS outdoor project‐based learning venue 4 0.84 9 2,212  Beyond  215 Central Leilehua 5 Wheeler MS/Wheeler ES new music facilities 4 0.85 10 2,222  Beyond  216 Central Waialua 5 Waialua HS & Intermediate special education enhancements 4 0.85 2 2,223  Beyond  217 Hawaii NW Konawaena 5 Konawaena HS visual and performing arts renovations 4 0.86 6 2,229  Beyond  218 Honolulu McKinley Kaiulani ES construct new admin bldg., repurpose admin into STEAM/maker space 4 0.87 12 2,241  Beyond  219 Windward Castle 8 King Int 21st Century building additions 4 0.88 8 2,249  Beyond  220 Hawaii SE Waiakea 2 Waiakea HS Athletic Master Plan projects 4 0.89 25 2,274  Beyond  18.2 18.3 Local  Ongoing  Rank Value Cost  Cumulative 10‐Year  Priority  Project Estimate  Funding Tier 1‐5 (2019 $M) Page 31 of 46 HIDOE Facility Master Plan Final Report 59 Instruction and Support Group A: Instruction Ranking criteria: local priority, facility instructional adequacy score Rank Region Complex Ref Option Title 221 Leeward Nanakuli 6 222 Leeward Nanakuli 223 Hawaii SE Keaau 224 Maui Kekaulike 225 Windward 226 Local  Ongoing  Rank Value Cost  Cumulative 10‐Year  Priority  Project Estimate  Funding Tier 1‐5 (2019 $M) Nanakuli HS career technical education (CTE) renovation 4 0.89 3 2,277  Beyond  3.1 Nanakuli HS baseball field renovation 4 0.89 5 2,282  Beyond  6.2 Keaau HS aquaponics facility 4 0.90 12 2,294  Beyond  4 Kekaulike HS athletic master plan projects 4 0.90 25 2,319  Beyond  Castle 15 Renovate or construct classrooms for STEAM (various schools) 4 0.90 10 2,329  Beyond  Hawaii NW Kealakehe 4.1 Kealakehe HS new STEAM building 4 0.92 17 2,346  Beyond  227 Hawaii NW Kealakehe 13 Kealakehe HS athletic master plan projects 4 0.92 25 2,371  Beyond  228 Hawaii NW Kealakehe 4.2 Kealakehe HS new gym building 4 0.92 37 2,408  Beyond  229 Molokai Molokai 10.2 Maunaloa ES classroom addition 5 0.54 4 2,412  Beyond  230 Hawaii NW Honoka'a 11.2 Paauilo K‐9 Gym and Bleachers 5 0.60 37 2,449  Beyond  231 Kauai Kapa’a Hanalei ES renovations 5 0.64 4 2,453  Beyond  232 Hawaii SE Hilo Kapiolani ES STEAM renovation  5 0.64 2 2,455  Beyond  233 Hawaii NW Konawaena 16 Milolii distance learning satellite facility 5 0.70 1 2,456  Beyond  234 Windward Kalaheo 8 st Kainalu ES 21  Century building additions 5 0.72 3 2,458  Beyond  235 Windward Kailua 12 Enchanted Lake ES STEAM and professional learning center 5 0.76 12 2,470  Beyond  236 Hawaii SE Kau 4 Ka’u HS or Na’alehu ES dormitory 5 0.77 4 2,474  Beyond  237 Maui Hana 6 Hana K12 acquire land makai of campus 5 0.78 0 2,474  Beyond  238 Central Leilehua 19 Leilehua HS athletic storage 5 0.78 1 2,475  Beyond  239 Hawaii NW Honoka'a 11.1 Waimea MS Gym and Bleachers 5 0.80 37 2,512  Beyond  240 Molokai Molokai 6 Molokai HS/MS acquire adjacent land for agriculture program 5 0.80 0 2,512  Beyond  8 16.2 Page 32 of 46 HIDOE Facility Master Plan Final Report 60 Instruction and Support Group A: Instruction Ranking criteria: local priority, facility instructional adequacy score Rank Region Complex Ref Option Title Local  Ongoing  Rank Value Cost  Cumulative 10‐Year  Priority  Project Estimate  Funding Tier 1‐5 (2019 $M) 241 Hawaii SE Pahoa 8 Build a HS performing arts center 5 0.81 43 2,555  Beyond  242 Central Mililani 4 Mililani HS special education enhancements 5 0.81 2 2,557  Beyond  243 Lanai Lanai 8 Lana’i K‐12 visitor center 5 0.82 4 2,561  Beyond  244 Lanai Lanai 9 Lana’i K‐12 teacher housing 5 0.82 4 2,565  Beyond  245 Hawaii SE Hilo 4.1 Hilo HS athletic master plan projects 5 0.82 25 2,590  Beyond  246 Kauai Kauai 3 Kauai HS move music program from Bldg to M 5 0.83 1 2,592  Beyond  247 Hawaii NW Konawaena 7 Konawaena HS land purchase and facilities for agriculture program 5 0.86 0 2,592  Beyond  248 Hawaii NW Kealakehe 7 Kealakehe Int new STEAM building 5 0.88 10 2,602  Beyond  249 Windward Castle 9 King Int outdoor learning space 5 0.88 1 2,603  Beyond  250 Windward Kalaheo 12 Kailua ES build an outdoor stage & amphitheater 5 0.88 1 2,604  Beyond  251 Kauai Waimea 10 Waimea Canyon MS convert existing building to black box theater 5 0.88 1 2,605  Beyond  252 Leeward Nanakuli 3.3 Nanakuli HS pool and locker rooms 5 0.89 5 2,610  Beyond  253 Hawaii SE Keaau 6.1 Keaau HS performing arts center 5 0.90 43 2,653  Beyond  254 Kauai Kapa’a 7 Kapa’a MS classroom renovations 5 0.90 17 2,670  Beyond  255 Maui Kekaulike 5 Kekaulike HS music and band expansion 5 0.90 12 2,682  Beyond  Page 33 of 46 HIDOE Facility Master Plan Final Report 61 Instruction and Support Group B: Support Ranking criteria: local priority, facility support adequacy score Rank Region Complex Ref Option Title Local  Ongoing  Rank Value Cost  Cumulative 10‐Year  Priority  Project Estimate  Funding Tier 1‐5 (2019 $M) 1 Hawaii SE Pahoa 5 Pahoa ES new cafeteria 1 2 Hawaii SE Hilo 9 Haaheo ES multi‐purpose center 1 3 Maui Maui 17 Kihei ES administration building 1 4 Central Leilehua 9.1 Helemano ES cafeteria addition (planned) 1 5 Kauai Kauai 15.2 Koloa ES parking expansion 6 Maui Kekaulike 7.2 7 Central Radford 12.3 8 Hawaii SE Waiakea 6 9 Leeward Pearl City 10 Central Moanalua 11 Maui Lahainaluna 12 Honolulu Kaiser 13 Central Radford 14 Central 15 0.24 12 12  $300M/yr  0.33 14 26  $300M/yr  0.39 11 37  $300M/yr  0.43 10 47  $300M/yr  1 0.48 2 49  $300M/yr  Kula ES new cafeteria 1 0.51 12 60  $300M/yr  Hickam ES expand cafeteria and multi‐purpose room for assembly and community use. 1 0.54 10 70  $300M/yr  Waiakea Waena ES cafeteria addition 1 0.56 12 82  $300M/yr  8.7 Pearl City Highlands ES: existing plan to construct new library/media center and repurpose  current library for admin offices 1 0.56 15 97  $300M/yr  10.3 Salt Lake ES renovate kitchen into a cooking kitchen.   1 0.57 3 100  $300M/yr  9 Nahienaena ES new multipurpose Library/STEAM building/Admin 1 0.58 22 122  $300M/yr  15 Aina Hiana ES cafeteria addition 1 0.58 10 131  $300M/yr  13.3 Pearl Harbor ES expand teacher parking on north side of site with 30‐40 stalls. 1 0.59 10 141  $300M/yr  Aiea 11.2 Pearl Ridge ES ‐ expand cafeteria and replace # portables w new flexible classroom building OR  replace # portables with new cafeteria and convert cafeteria into flexible classroom space. 1 0.60 20 161  $300M/yr  Hawaii NW Konawaena 1B.4 Phase 4: Renovate old Ehunui portables for admin 1 0.61 2 164  $300M/yr  16 Central Leilehua 9.3 Iliahi ES admin expansion 1 0.62 9 173  $300M/yr  17 Kauai Kapa’a 14 Kapa’a ES complete stalled library project 1 0.62 5 177  $300M/yr  18 Central Leilehua 9.5 Kaala ES replace portables w new library with flexible space and repurpose current library for  admin 1 0.64 15 192  $300M/yr  19 Hawaii SE Keaau 9.1 Keaau MS administration/PLC/STEAM community use facility 1 0.64 22 214  $300M/yr  20 Hawaii SE Keaau 9.2 Keaau MS parking lot expansion and drop off area 1 0.64 10 224  $300M/yr  * * * Page 34 of 46 HIDOE Facility Master Plan Final Report 62 Instruction and Support Group B: Support Ranking criteria: local priority, facility support adequacy score Rank Region Complex Ref Option Title Local  Ongoing  Rank Value Cost  Cumulative 10‐Year  Priority  Project Estimate  Funding Tier 1‐5 (2019 $M) 21 Maui Baldwin 11.1 Waihee ES new administration building 1 0.65 11 236  $300M/yr  22 Maui Baldwin 11.2 Waihee ES new cafeteria building 1 0.65 12 247  $300M/yr  23 Leeward Pearl City 8.5 Palisades ES: Replace current admin and gym with new multi‐level building in SW corner to  include admin, STEAM classrooms 1 0.65 20 267  $300M/yr  24 Central Radford 12.7 Nimitz ES construct new library and STEAM space and renovate current library into classrooms. 1 0.65 11 279  $300M/yr  25 Leeward Waipahu 9.o Kaleiopuu ES land acquisition for parking 1 0.65 3 282  $300M/yr  26 Central Radford 12.2 Aliamanu ES replace portables, Buildings M1, M2, and old Admin with new parking lot and drop  off.   1 0.66 5 287  $300M/yr  27 Leeward Waipahu 9.n Waipahu ES: expand parking lot by partnering with City to use adjacent gravel lot or acquire land 1 0.66 1 288  $300M/yr  28 Central Radford 12.6 Mokulele ES construct professional learning center space. 1 0.67 8 296  $300M/yr  29 Leeward Waianae 9 Building additions and renovations (elementary schools) 1 0.67 40 336  $300M/yr  1 0.71 9 345  $300M/yr  0.72 3 348  $300M/yr  0.74 126 474  $300M/yr  30 Central Leilehua 9.6 Wahiawa ES new administration and welcome center, repurpose existing admin as flex  classrooms 31 Leeward Kapolei 12 Mauka Lani ES expanded parking lot structure 1 32 Honolulu Farrington 5 Farrington HS follow through with phase 2 of existing master plan 1 33 Kauai Kauai 13.3 Wilcox ES expand parking 1 0.74 1 475  $300M/yr  34 Leeward Waipahu 2.3 Waipahu HS parking structure 1 0.75 32 507  $300M/yr  35 Leeward Waipahu 9.i Waikele ES: library renovation  1 0.76 3 511  $300M/yr  36 Leeward Campbell 14 Campbell HS parking structure 300 stalls 1 0.76 32 543  $300M/yr  37 Leeward Pearl City 8.8 Waiau ES: replace portables with new cafeteria and raze existing cafeteria. 1 0.76 15 558  $300M/yr  38 Leeward Pearl City 7 Pearl City HS adjacent land use or acquisition 1 0.83 0 558  $300M/yr  39 Kauai Kauai 16.2 Koloa ES multimedia library building 2 0.48 14 572  $300M/yr  40 Maui Hana 2 Hana K12 admin/teacher PLC collaboration building 2 0.49 11 583  $300M/yr  * Page 35 of 46 HIDOE Facility Master Plan Final Report 63 Instruction and Support Group B: Support Ranking criteria: local priority, facility support adequacy score Rank Region Complex Ref Option Title 41 Maui Kekaulike 10 Paia ES full‐service cooking kitchen 2 0.54 4 587  $300M/yr  42 Central Moanalua 15 Moanalua complex‐wide parking additions 2 0.66 1 588  $300M/yr  43 Central Waialua 6 Waialua ES new multipurpose cafeteria and administration center 2 0.67 20 608  $300M/yr  44 Maui Kekaulike 14 Pukalani ES new administration/PLC on 4‐acre adjacent site 2 0.67 11 619  $300M/yr  45 Windward Castle ’Āhuimanu ES new cafeteria 2 0.71 10 629  $300M/yr  46 Windward Kahuku 13 Laie ES cafeteria 2 0.72 10 639  $300M/yr  47 Maui Lahainaluna 21 Lahainaluna HS admin building 2 0.73 11 650  $300M/yr  48 Leeward Kapolei 15 Kapolei complex cafeteria expansions 2 0.74 10 660  $300M/yr  49 Leeward Campbell 5 Ilima Int replace administration and library with new, joint facility 2 0.75 12 671  $300M/yr  50 Leeward Waipahu 4 Waipahu HS new cafeteria 2 0.75 22 693  $300M/yr  51 Kauai Kauai 9 Kaumuali’i  ES new playground 2 0.83 1 694  $300M/yr  52 Windward Kalaheo 14 Ka’ohao ES PCS build permanent administration space 3 0.31 2 696  $300M/yr  53 Honolulu Farrington Linapuni ES replace playground for PK‐2 and repave playcourts 3 0.45 2 698  $300M/yr  54 Lanai Lanai 4 Lana’i K‐12 new welcome/administration/professional development center 3 0.48 11 710  $300M/yr  55 Molokai Molokai 12 Kilohana ES new administration building  3 0.50 11 721  $300M/yr  56 Maui Maui 6 Lokelani Int / Kihei ES new shared multipurpose space 3 0.52 29 750  $300M/yr  57 Maui Lahainaluna 6 Lahaina Int. new multipurpose Library/STEAM/Administration space building 3 0.56 22 772  $300M/yr  58 Honolulu McKinley 19 Kaahumanu ES multipurpose cafeteria expansion 3 0.58 10 781  $300M/yr  59 Honolulu McKinley 15.1 Kaahumanu ES replace playground 3 0.58 1 782  $300M/yr  60 Honolulu Roosevelt 15.2 Noelani ES replace playground 3 0.60 1 783  $300M/yr  18.1 17.5 Local  Ongoing  Rank Value Cost  Cumulative 10‐Year  Priority  Project Estimate  Funding Tier 1‐5 (2019 $M) Page 36 of 46 HIDOE Facility Master Plan Final Report 64 Instruction and Support Group B: Support Ranking criteria: local priority, facility support adequacy score Rank Region Complex 61 Honolulu McKinley 62 Windward Kailua 63 Honolulu Kaimuki 64 Honolulu 65 Ref Option Title 15.3 Local  Ongoing  Rank Value Cost  Cumulative 10‐Year  Priority  Project Estimate  Funding Tier 1‐5 (2019 $M) Kauluwela ES new playground behind Bldg D 3 0.62 1 784  $300M/yr  Parking expansion and drop‐off (various schools) 3 0.65 10 794  $300M/yr  18.1 Hokulani ES replace playground 3 0.65 1 795  $300M/yr  Farrington 17.2 Kalihi Kai ES level field, replace playground 3 0.66 1 796  $300M/yr  Honolulu Farrington 17.1 Kalihi ES level field, replace playground 3 0.66 1 797  $300M/yr  66 Honolulu Roosevelt 15.3 Pauoa ES replace playground 3 0.68 1 798  $300M/yr  67 Honolulu Kaimuki 18.2 Kuhio ES re‐landscape playfield.  3 0.69 1 799  $300M/yr  68 Honolulu Farrington 17.4 Kalihi Uka ES replace playground as part of parking expansion 3 0.70 1 800  $300M/yr  69 Honolulu Kaimuki 18.3 Palolo ES replace 3rd‐5th grade playground 3 0.71 1 801  $300M/yr  70 Honolulu McKinley 15.4 Lanakila ES correct erosion/setting and replace playground  3 0.71 1 802  $300M/yr  71 Honolulu Kaiser 13.1 Hahaione ES replace playground equipment 3 0.73 1 803  $300M/yr  72 Honolulu Kaiser 13.2 Kamiloiki ES replace playground equipment 3 0.73 1 804  $300M/yr  73 Leeward Kapolei 7 Kapolei HS central storage facility and loading docks 3 0.74 3 807  $300M/yr  74 Central Leilehua 17 Leilehua HS cafeteria expansion 3 0.75 15 823  $300M/yr  75 Honolulu Districtwide 2B District‐wide administration complex 3 0.78 9 832  $300M/yr  76 Honolulu Farrington Puuhale level field, replace playground 3 0.79 1 833  $300M/yr  77 Molokai Molokai 16 Molokai MS major renovation and expansion to the library to include technology and  community use 4 0.23 3 837  $300M/yr  78 Windward Kalaheo 13 Ka’ohao ES PCS cafeteria addition 4 0.31 10 846  $300M/yr  79 Hawaii SE Hilo 10 Kaumana ES replace portables with new library, administration and STEAM classroom building.   4 0.35 13 860  $300M/yr  80 Windward Kailua 16 Kaelepulu ES adminstration building 4 0.41 9 869  $300M/yr  11 17.3 Page 37 of 46 HIDOE Facility Master Plan Final Report 65 Instruction and Support Group B: Support Ranking criteria: local priority, facility support adequacy score Rank Region Complex 81 Honolulu Farrington 82 Lanai Lanai 83 Lanai 84 Ref Option Title 16.8 Local  Ongoing  Rank Value Cost  Cumulative 10‐Year  Priority  Project Estimate  Funding Tier 1‐5 (2019 $M) Linapuni ES add parking for 6 cars  4 0.45 0 869  $300M/yr  3 Lana’i K‐12 satellite nutrition centers 4 0.48 2 871  $300M/yr  Lanai 1A Lanai K‐12 campus expansion projects 4 0.48 64 935  $300M/yr  Maui Hana 11 Hana new cafeteria 4 0.49 12 946  $300M/yr  85 Honolulu McKinley 18.1 Kaahumanu ES expand/renovate admin offices 4 0.58 2 949  $300M/yr  86 Honolulu McKinley 14.1 Kaahumanu ES parking structure/subterranean, consider public‐private revenue generation 4 0.58 32 981  $300M/yr  87 Honolulu Kalani 15.2 Waialae PCS cafeteria expansion 4 0.58 10 991  $300M/yr  88 Honolulu Kalani 15.3 Wilson ES cafeteria expansion 4 0.60 10 1,000  $300M/yr  89 Honolulu Roosevelt 18.2 Maemae ES administration renovation 4 0.61 3 1,003  $300M/yr  90 Honolulu Kalani 15.1 Liholiho ES cafeteria expansion 4 0.61 10 1,013  $300M/yr  91 Honolulu Kalani 13 Liholiho ES add parking for 6 cars 4 0.61 0 1,013  $300M/yr  92 Honolulu McKinley 18.2 Kauluwela ES expand/renovate admin offices 4 0.62 2 1,015  $300M/yr  93 Honolulu McKinley 14.3 Kauluwela ES pave gravel parking lot 4 0.62 0 1,016  $300M/yr  94 Hawaii SE Keaau 20.2 Relocate public libraries at Keaau MS 4 0.64 0 1,016  $300M/yr  95 Honolulu Kaimuki 17.1 Hokulani ES add parking into new exit lane 4 0.65 5 1,021  $300M/yr  96 Hawaii SE Keaau 20.1 Relocate public libraries at Mountain View ES 4 0.66 0 1,021  $300M/yr  97 Honolulu Farrington 21.3 Kalihi Kai El cafeteria expansion 4 0.66 10 1,030  $300M/yr  98 Honolulu Farrington 16.5 Kalihi ES curb‐cut to upper field for supplemental parking 4 0.66 0 1,030  $300M/yr  99 Honolulu Kaimuki 21 Lunalilo ES administration expansion 4 0.67 9 1,040  $300M/yr  100 Central Aiea 1B Central District administration offices and STEAM education and professional development  center at Aiea ES  4 0.68 12 1,051  $300M/yr  * Page 38 of 46 HIDOE Facility Master Plan Final Report 66 Instruction and Support Group B: Support Ranking criteria: local priority, facility support adequacy score Rank Region Complex Ref Option Title 101 Honolulu Roosevelt 18.1 Pauoa ES administration renovation 4 0.68 2 1,054  $300M/yr  102 Honolulu Farrington 16.7 Kapalama ES repave/regrade existing parking lots 4 0.68 1 1,055  $300M/yr  103 Windward Kalaheo 7 Kainalu ES parking lot expansion 4 0.69 1 1,055  $300M/yr  104 Honolulu Roosevelt 14 Lincoln ES add parking for 40 cars 4 0.69 1 1,056  $300M/yr  105 Honolulu Kaimuki 22 Kuhio cafeteria expansion 4 0.69 10 1,066  $300M/yr  106 Honolulu Kaimuki 17.3 Kuhio ES replace parking with permeable paving to reduce runoff/erosion. Dependent on status  of Kuhio ES (Scenario 4B) 4 0.69 1 1,067  $300M/yr  107 Honolulu Farrington 21.2 Fern El cafeteria expansion 4 0.69 10 1,077  $300M/yr  108 Honolulu Farrington 16.2 Fern add parking for 10 cars 4 0.69 0 1,077  $300M/yr  109 Honolulu Farrington 21.1 Dole Middle cafeteria expansion 4 0.70 10 1,087  $300M/yr  110 Honolulu Farrington 7 Dole MS expand administrative space 4 0.70 8 1,095  $300M/yr  111 Honolulu Farrington 16.1 Dole MS add parking for 30 cars 4 0.70 1 1,096  $300M/yr  112 Honolulu Farrington 16.6 Kalihi Uka ES add parking for 10 cars and replace playground 4 0.70 0 1,096  $300M/yr  113 Honolulu McKinley 14.4 Lanakila ES expand parking 4 0.71 1 1,097  $300M/yr  114 Honolulu Farrington 16.3 Kaewai ES add parking for 6 cars 4 0.71 1 1,098  $300M/yr  115 Windward Kahuku 11 Laie ES parking expansion and drop‐off 4 0.72 10 1,108  $300M/yr  116 Central Mililani 25 Mililani HS maintenance facilities 4 0.72 2 1,110  $300M/yr  117 Maui Lahainaluna 20 Lahainaluna high school dormitory remodel 4 0.73 4 1,114  $300M/yr  118 Maui Lahainaluna 14 Lahainaluna MS & HS shared paved lot 4 0.73 0 1,114  $300M/yr  119 Honolulu Farrington Kalakaua MS add parking for 50 cars 4 0.75 2 1,116  $300M/yr  120 Central Leilehua Leilehua HS new PLC 4 0.75 9 1,125  $300M/yr  16.4 3 Local  Ongoing  Rank Value Cost  Cumulative 10‐Year  Priority  Project Estimate  Funding Tier 1‐5 (2019 $M) Page 39 of 46 HIDOE Facility Master Plan Final Report 67 Capacity Group C: Portable Replacement Ranking criteria: local priority, % of capacity in portables Rank Region Complex 1 Hawaii NW Konawaena 2 Windward Kahuku 3 Hawaii NW 4 Ref Option Title Phase 3: Renovate Konawaena MS for new Ke Kula O Enhunuikaimalino 1 9 Sunset Beach ES multi‐story facility 1 Kealakehe 10 Holualoa ES rebuild the school on site 1 Hawaii SE Pahoa 2B Pahoa ES permanent buildings 1 5 Leeward Kapolei 11.1 Mauka Lani ES permanent classroom building 1 6 Maui Kekaulike 12 Makawao ES new multipurpose classroom addition 1 7 Hawaii NW Kealakehe 18 Kealakehe ES new 8‐classroom building 1 8 Maui Maui 10 Rebuild Kahului ES on site 1 9 Leeward Pearl City 8.7 Waiau ES: Replace portables with new multi‐level 180 capacity classroom building on east side of  courtyard  1 10 Maui Lahainaluna 7 Lahaina Int. new 8‐classroom building 1 11 Hawaii SE Keaau 1B Mountain View ES phased reconstruction and move boundary 1 12 Central Leilehua 9.2 Helemano ES new library, repurpose current library into classrooms 1 13 Maui Maui 12 Lihikai ES replace portable buildings with permanent classroom building to include library/maker‐ space. 1 14 Hawaii SE Kau 5 Na’alehu ES phased reconstruction 1 15 Hawaii SE Kau 1A.2 Ka’u 6‐12 and Naalehu K‐5 ‐ short term renovation at Naalehu 1 16 Maui Baldwin 3 Baldwin HS phased reconstruction 1 17 Leeward Waipahu 9.a August Ahrens ES replace 15 portables with permanent classroom building; phase 1 and 2 of  electrical upgrade 1 18 Leeward Waipahu 9.m Waipahu ES: replace P10‐P15 with permanent STEAM/multi‐purpose bldg 1 19 Hawaii SE Pahoa 1B Pahoa HS/Int permanent buildings 1 Moanalua ES replace portables P1‐P5 with new multi‐level multi‐media center and 12 classroom  building including two flexible STEAM classrooms.  Repurpose library for professional learning  center. 1 20 Central Moanalua 1B.3 Local  Ongoing  Rank Value Cost  Cumulative 10‐Year  Priority  Project Estimate  Funding Tier 1‐5 (2019 $M) 10.1 89% 71% 70% 54% 50% 47% 44% 42% 38% * 37% 36% * 30% 29% 26% 26% 26% * 25% 24% 24% 19% 21 21  $300M/yr  28 49  $300M/yr  21 69  $300M/yr  27 96  $300M/yr  21 117  $300M/yr  20 137  $300M/yr  13 150  $300M/yr  36 186  $600M/yr  22 209  $600M/yr  13 222  $600M/yr  36 258  $600M/yr  11 269  $600M/yr  13 283  $600M/yr  26 309  $600M/yr  0 309  $600M/yr  117 426  Beyond  21 447  Beyond  10 457  Beyond  68 525  Beyond  7 532  Beyond  Page 4 of 46 HIDOE Facility Master Plan Final Report 68 Instruction and Support Group B: Support Ranking criteria: local priority, facility support adequacy score Rank Region Complex Ref Option Title 121 Honolulu McKinley 14.2 Kaiulani ES add parking for 12 cars 4 0.75 0 1,126  $300M/yr  122 Honolulu Farrington 16.9 Puuhale ES add parking for 50 cars and restripe existing lot 4 0.79 2 1,128  $300M/yr  123 Honolulu McKinley 14.5 Royal ES parking structure/subterranean, consider public‐private revenue generation, shared  with Central MS 4 0.82 32 1,160  $300M/yr  124 Central Aiea Aiea HS parking addition 4 0.82 1 1,161  $300M/yr  125 Honolulu Kaimuki Jefferson ES reconfigure parking lot with drop‐off expansion  4 0.84 10 1,171  $300M/yr  126 Hawaii NW Kealakehe 6 Kealakehe HS kitchen renovations 4 0.86 5 1,176  $300M/yr  127 Molokai Molokai 8 Molokai MS separate entrance 5 0.23 1 1,177  $300M/yr  128 Hawaii NW Honoka'a 7 Waimea ES acquire public library and multipurpose facility 5 0.52 3 1,180  $300M/yr  129 Windward Castle 17 Kahalu’u administration addition 5 0.57 9 1,190  $300M/yr  130 Kauai Waimea 8 Kekaha ES new administration facility 5 0.61 11 1,201  $300M/yr  131 Windward Kalaheo 11 Kailua ES professional learning center addition 5 0.67 9 1,210  $300M/yr  132 Kauai Kauai 5 Kauai HS building M repurposed for teacher/admin offices 5 0.68 3 1,213  $300M/yr  133 Central Mililani 5 Mililani HS, Mililani MS professional learning center 5 0.72 9 1,222  $300M/yr  134 Honolulu Farrington 20 Kalakaua MS and Linapuni ES administration expansion 5 0.75 9 1,232  $300M/yr  135 Honolulu McKinley 4 McKinley HS new multipurpose cafeteria addition 5 0.78 15 1,246  $300M/yr  136 Hawaii NW Konawaena 10 Kahakai ES administration and teacher collaboration space 5 0.83 3 1,250  $300M/yr  15 17.2 Local  Ongoing  Rank Value Cost  Cumulative 10‐Year  Priority  Project Estimate  Funding Tier 1‐5 (2019 $M) Page 40 of 46 HIDOE Facility Master Plan Final Report 69 Instruction and Support Group C: Gender Equity Ranking criteria: local priority, cost/student Rank Region Complex 1 Kauai Kapa’a 2 Leeward Campbell 3 Central Mililani 4 Honolulu McKinley 5 Kauai 6 Ref Option Title 11.3 Local  Ongoing  Rank Value Cost  Cumulative 10‐Year  Priority  Project Estimate  Funding Tier 1‐5 (2019 $M) Kapa’a HS softball field lights 1 1,055 1 1  $300M/yr  12 Campbell HS girls athletic lockers 1 1,610 5 6  $300M/yr  26 Mililani HS girls lockers 1 1,926 5 11  $300M/yr  10.2 Kaiulani ES restroom entrance reconfiguration  1 2,625 1 12  $300M/yr  Kauai 17.2 Kauai HS girls lockers 1 4,910 6 19  $300M/yr  Central Aiea 5 Aiea HS girls’ lockers and gym renovation 1 5,505 5 24  $300M/yr  7 Leeward Waipahu 3 Waipahu HS athletic improvements 1 10,196 25 49  $300M/yr  8 Windward Castle 7 Castle HS athletic master plan projects 1 21,949 25 74  $300M/yr  9 Maui Baldwin 8 Baldwin HS athletic improvements 2 16,779 25 99  $300M/yr  10 Central Moanalua 6 Moanalua HS girls’ athletic lockers 3 2,654 5 104  $300M/yr  Page 41 of 46 HIDOE Facility Master Plan Final Report 70 Instruction and Support Group D: Local Needs Ranking criteria: local priority, facility support adequacy score Rank Region All All Ref All Option Title Local  Ongoing  Rank Value Cost  Cumulative 10‐Year  Priority  Project Estimate  Funding Tier 1‐5 (2019 $M) Locally‐Determined Enhancements (all schools) $20k‐ $300k ea $17M  $300M/yr  Page 42 of 46 HIDOE Facility Master Plan Final Report 71 R&M Group A/B: Prioritized Maintenance and Repairs and Electrical Infrastructure Ranking criteria: local priority,conditon index TBD Rank Region All All Ref All Option Title Local  Ongoing  Rank Value Cost  Cumulative 10‐Year  Priority  Project Estimate  Funding Tier 1‐5 (2019 $M) Prioritized R&M, Electrical Upgrades (various schools) $686M  $300M/yr  $1.1B  $600M/yr  Page 43 of 46 HIDOE Facility Master Plan Final Report 72 R&M Group C: ADA Compliance Ranking criteria: local priority, cost/student, construction triggers TBD Rank Region Complex Ref 1 Hawaii NW Kohala 12 2 Central Radford 3 Central 4 Option Title Local  Ongoing  Rank Value Cost  Cumulative 10‐Year  Priority  Project Estimate  Funding Tier 1‐5 (2019 $M) Prioritized accessibility improvements (all schools) 1 2,033 4 4  $300M/yr  14.1 Hickam ES ADA accessibility improvements 1 2,543 2 6  $300M/yr  Radford 14.2 Nimitz ES ADA accessibility improvements 1 2,918 2 8  $300M/yr  Central Moanalua 2.2 Moanalua HS ADA enhancements 1 3,984 8 16  $300M/yr  5 Hawaii NW Honoka'a 12 Prioritized accessibility improvements (all schools) 1 4,815 10 25  $300M/yr  6 Central Radford 4.1 Radford HS ADA upgrades 1 4,974 6 31  $300M/yr  7 Windward Kalaheo 10.2 Kailua ES ADA improvements 1 4,983 2 33  $300M/yr  8 Central Radford 14.3 Pearl Harbor Kai ES ADA accessibility improvements 1 5,091 2 35  $300M/yr  9 Windward Kahuku 17 Kahuku HS/Int ADA accessibility to portables 1 5,442 7 43  $300M/yr  10 Central Aiea 18 Aiea HS ADA accessibility upgrades 1 6,252 6 49  $600M/yr  11 Leeward Pearl City 6.2 Pearl City HS ADA improvements 1 6,361 10 58  $600M/yr  12 Maui Lahainaluna 16.1 ADA accessibility (all schools) 1 6,401 13 71  $600M/yr  13 Hawaii NW Konawaena 18 Prioritized accessibility improvements (all schools) 1 6,683 13 84  $600M/yr  14 Windward Kalaheo 17 Kalaheo HS ADA improvements 1 6,896 6 90  $600M/yr  15 Windward Castle 5.2 Castle HS ADA improvements 1 7,070 8 98  $600M/yr  16 Hawaii NW Kealakehe 20 Prioritized accessibility improvements (all schools) 1 9,111 18 116  Beyond  17 Windward Castle 12 ADA accessibility projects (various schools) 1 9,505 29 145  Beyond  18 Honolulu Kalani 10.2 Liholiho elevator, restrooms 2 2,711 1 146  Beyond  19 Honolulu Roosevelt 11.1 Noelani ES two elevators 2 2,853 1 148  Beyond  20 Honolulu Kalani 10.1 Kahala ADA restrooms 2 3,584 2 149  Beyond  Page 44 of 46 HIDOE Facility Master Plan Final Report 73 R&M Group C: ADA Compliance Ranking criteria: local priority, cost/student, construction triggers TBD Rank Region Complex Ref Option Title 21 Honolulu Kaimuki 14.1 Hokulani ES elevator to library 2 3,804 1 150  Beyond  22 Honolulu McKinley 11.1 Kaahumanu ES ADA elevator, ADA restrooms 2 3,879 2 152  Beyond  23 Honolulu McKinley 11.2 Kaiulani ES ADA elevator 2 4,493 2 154  Beyond  24 Honolulu Kaiser Kamiloiki ES two elevators for ADA 2 4,581 2 156  Beyond  25 Honolulu McKinley 11.3 Royal ES Bldg A&B ADA elevators 2 4,679 2 158  Beyond  26 Honolulu Roosevelt 11.2 Pauoa ES one elevator 2 5,484 2 159  Beyond  27 Honolulu Kaimuki 14.2 Kuhio ES ramp to cafeteria, C Bldg restrooms, C&H elevators 2 5,668 1 161  Beyond  28 Windward Kailua 7 Waimanalo ES/Int ADA accessibility projects 2 6,450 2 163  Beyond  29 Honolulu Kaimuki 14.3 Palolo ES admin ramps, elevator, restrooms 2 7,033 2 165  Beyond  30 Honolulu McKinley 15.2 Kaiulani ES add ADA sidewalk to playground 3 2,625 1 166  Beyond  10 Local  Ongoing  Rank Value Cost  Cumulative 10‐Year  Priority  Project Estimate  Funding Tier 1‐5 (2019 $M) Page 45 of 46 HIDOE Facility Master Plan Final Report 74 R&M Group D: Replace buildings due to age and adequacy Ranking criteria: local priority, % old/beyond exp life, condition index TBD Rank Region Complex Ref Option Title 1 Central Radford 9 2 Central Radford 3 Leeward 4 Local  Ongoing  Rank Value Cost  Cumulative 10‐Year  Priority  Project Estimate  Funding Tier 1‐5 (2019 $M) Aliamanu MS phased reconstruction 1 100% 42 42  $300M/yr  12.1 Aliamanu ES replace Buildings A and B with multi‐story classroom building/administrative PLC.  1 81% 25 67  $300M/yr  Campbell 9.2 Iroquois Point ES – replace/reno buildings P12, P9 1 70% 2 70  $300M/yr  Leeward Campbell 9.1 Ewa Beach ES – replace/reno buildings A,C,D 1 60% 23 93  $300M/yr  5 Honolulu Farrington 8 Kalakaua MS replace buildings G & H  1 51% 7 100  $300M/yr  6 Leeward Pearl City 8.2 Momilani ES: Renovate admin 1 17% 2 102  $300M/yr  7 Leeward Pearl City 1B Highland Int rebuilt on alternate site 1 92% 131 233  $600M/yr  8 Hawaii SE Waiakea 1B.2 Waiakea Int phased reconstruction 1 74% 58 291  $600M/yr  9 Maui Baldwin 9 Wailuku ES phased reconstruction 1 63% 45 336  $600M/yr  10 Kauai Kapa’a 4 Kapa’a HS & ES phased reconstruction 1 57% 84 420  $600M/yr  11 Hawaii SE Hilo Hilo HS phased reconstruction 1 50% 119 538  Beyond  12 Windward Kahuku Kahuku HS/Int phased reconstruction 1 31% 102 641  Beyond  13 Honolulu Roosevelt 6.1 Kawananakoa MS raze/replace Bldg C with new band/music facility 1 30% 8 649  Beyond  14 Central Mililani 11 Mililani Waena ES phased reconstruction 1 12% 31 680  Beyond  15 Hawaii SE Hilo Kalanianaole K‐8 demolition/replace restrooms 2 66% 1 681  Beyond  16 Kauai Kauai 1 Kauai HS phased renovations and portable replacements 3 28% 50 730  Beyond  17 Hawaii NW Kohala 8 Kohala HS phased reconstruction 5 90% 39 770  Beyond  18 Honolulu Roosevelt 17.2 Nuuanu ES phased reconstruction 5 81% 15 701  Beyond  1A.1 8 11.1 Page 46 of 46 HIDOE Facility Master Plan Final Report 75 Capacity Group C: Portable Replacement Ranking criteria: local priority, % of capacity in portables Rank Region Complex Ref Option Title Local  Ongoing  Rank Value Cost  Cumulative 10‐Year  Priority  Project Estimate  Funding Tier 1‐5 (2019 $M) 21 Leeward Waipahu 9.c Kaleiopuu ES: 8‐classroom building 1 22 Central Mililani 8.1 Kipapa ES replace Bldg A & portables w/ multi‐level classrooms 1 23 Leeward Kapolei 11.2 Kapolei ES permanent classroom building 1 24 Central Aiea 11.3 Waimalu ES – replace # portables with multi‐level capacity for 150 1 25 Central Mililani 8.2 Miliani Ike ES replace existing portables with permanent space. 1 1 26 Central Mililani 8.3 Miliani Uka ES replace north portables with 3‐story classroom building w/ fire lane along  Building C, and replace south portables & buildings G, H, J w/ new kitchen/cafeteria, parking, &  covered space. 27 Hawaii SE Keaau 12 Keaau MS replace portables with permanent classroom building 2 28 Maui Maui 18 Maui Waena Int replace portable buildings with permanent classroom buildings 2 29 Kauai Kauai 16.1 Koloa ES new classroom building portable replacement 3 30 Kauai Kauai 14 Wilcox ES new classroom building 3 31 Windward Kailua 6.2 Olomana HS/Int permanent facilities 4 32 Leeward Nanakuli 10.2 Nanakuli ES replace portables with permanent buildings 5 19% 18% 17% 17% 15% 13% 13% 11% 40% 13% 76% 18% 13 545  Beyond  17 562  Beyond  42 604  Beyond  10 614  Beyond  14 628  Beyond  12 640  Beyond  13 653  Beyond  13 667  Beyond  13 680  Beyond  13 693  Beyond  18 710  Beyond  14 724  Beyond  Page 5 of 46 HIDOE Facility Master Plan Final Report 76 Capacity Group D: Operational Strategy Ranking criteria: local priority, strategy logic, cost Rank Region Complex Ref Option Title 1 Windward Kalaheo 1D Kailua, Kalaheo and Castle integrated program feasibility study 1 1 near term 0 0  $300M/yr  2 Hawaii NW Honoka'a 1G Honokaa complex ‐ engage community to inform grade reconfiguration. 1 1 near term 0 1  $300M/yr  3 Kauai Kapa’a 1A Hanalei and Kilauea serve K‐5 instead of K‐6 (w community engagement) 1 1 near term 0 1  $300M/yr  4 Molokai Molokai 1E Molokai complex focused stakeholder engagements to determine grade configurations and  school portfolio 1 1 near term 0 1  $300M/yr  5 Windward Kahuku 1E Kahuku complex ‐ engage community to decide on grade configuration 1 1 near term 0 1  $300M/yr  6 Statewide Statewide 2 Act 155 revenue generation program 1 1 near term 10 11  $300M/yr  7 Honolulu McKinley 24 Pohukaina ES new vertical elementary school 1 1 near term 48 59  $300M/yr  8 Windward Kailua Phase 1: Ka’elepulu reconstruction for consolidated Ka'elepulu/Keolu 1 1 near term 10 69  $300M/yr  9 Leeward Waianae 1A Wai’anae Pre‐K‐5 and 6‐8 1 1 near term 28 97  $300M/yr  10 Honolulu Kaimuki 3B Palolo/Jarrett PK‐8 1 1 near term 39 136  $300M/yr  11 Hawaii NW Konawaena 1B.1 Phase 1: Reconstruct Hookena for Hookena/Honaunau consolidation 1 1 near term 42 178  $600M/yr  12 Hawaii SE Hilo 1A.2 Hilo Int phased reconstruction 1 1 near term 60 238  $600M/yr  13 Hawaii SE Hilo 2A Hilo IS becomes 6‐8 1 1 near term 0 238  $600M/yr  14 Hawaii NW Konawaena Phase 2: Construct new Konawaena MS at Honauanu 1 2 mid term 90 328  $600M/yr  15 Honolulu Kaimuki Aliiolani reconstruction; elementary school consolidation  1 2 mid term 96 424  Beyond  16 Windward Kailua Phase 2: Reconstruct Keolu site for administration/PD center 1 2 mid term 25 449  Beyond  17 Honolulu Farrington Kalihi Kai ES ‐ Farrington complex ES school reconstruction and consolidation  1 2 mid term 93 543  Beyond  18 Maui Maui 2A.1 Phase 1: rebuild MCSA site for new admin/community education center, and relocate staff from  Puunene 1 2 mid term 62 605  Beyond  19 Maui Maui 2A.2 Phase 2: pursue A&B land adjacent to Puunene 1 2 mid term 1 606  Beyond  20 Leeward Campbell Campbell Elementary boundary change  4 3 long term 0 606  Beyond  2B.1 1B.2 4B 2B.2 3B 2B Local  Ongoing  Rank Value Cost  Cumulative 10‐Year  Priority  Project Estimate  Funding Tier 1‐5 (2019 $M) * Page 6 of 46 HIDOE Facility Master Plan Final Report 77 Capacity Group D: Operational Strategy Ranking criteria: local priority, strategy logic, cost Rank Region Complex Ref Option Title 21 Hawaii NW Districtwide 1 Honokaa/Kealakehe HS relief school study 1 3 long term 0 607  Beyond  22 Leeward Kapolei 2B Kapolei Elementary boundary change  4 3 long term 0 607  Beyond  23 Central Radford 1B Change elementary attendance boundaries 1 3 long term 0 607  Beyond  24 Maui Maui Phase 3: Construct new Elementary School at Puunene 1 3 long term 72 679  Beyond  2A.3 Local  Ongoing  Rank Value Cost  Cumulative 10‐Year  Priority  Project Estimate  Funding Tier 1‐5 (2019 $M) Page 7 of 46 HIDOE Facility Master Plan Final Report 78 Health and Safety Group B: Security Ranking criteria: local priority, cost/student Rank Region Complex Ref Option Title Local  Ongoing  Rank Value Cost  Cumulative 10‐Year  Priority  Project Estimate  Funding Tier 1‐5 (2019 $M) 1 Leeward Waipahu 9.h Waikele ES: Install security lighting 1 842 1 1  $300M/yr  2 Leeward Waipahu 9.k Waipahu ES:  Install security lighting  1 1,010 1 2  $300M/yr  3 Hawaii NW Kealakehe 17 Kealakehe Int and ES perimeter fence 2 1,337 1 3  $300M/yr  4 Honolulu Farrington 13.1 Dole MS security cameras, lighting, fences, alarm system 1 1,603 1 4  $300M/yr  5 Honolulu Farrington 13.5 Kapalama ES lighting, cameras, demolish custodial cottage 1 1,645 1 5  $300M/yr  6 Honolulu Farrington 13.4 Kalihi Kai ES lockdown door hardware 1 1,742 1 6  $300M/yr  7 Honolulu Kaiser 9.1 Hahaione ES security fencing 1 1,938 1 7  $300M/yr  8 Honolulu Kalani 9 Liholiho ES security fencing off of 9th Ave 1 1,949 1 8  $300M/yr  9 Honolulu Farrington 13.2 Fern ES motion sensor lighting 1 2,421 1 9  $300M/yr  10 Honolulu Kaiser 9.2 Kamiloiki ES security fencing 1 2,604 1 10  $300M/yr  11 Honolulu Kaimuki 13.1 Ala Wai ES secure outdoor sink  1 2,611 1 11  $300M/yr  12 Honolulu McKinley 10.1 Royal ES fencing 1 2,710 1 12  $300M/yr  13 Honolulu Roosevelt 10.1 Lincoln ES fencing/gate; floodlighting 1 2,732 1 13  $300M/yr  14 Windward Kalaheo 10.1 Kailua ES safety, security improvements 1 2,841 1 14  $300M/yr  15 Honolulu Kaimuki 13.2 Hokulani ES cameras, lighting 1 3,125 1 15  $300M/yr  16 Honolulu Roosevelt 10.2 Pauoa ES fencing 1 3,175 1 16  $300M/yr  17 Windward Kailua 13 Maunawili ES security fencing 3 3,333 1 17  $300M/yr  18 Honolulu Kaimuki 13.4 Palolo ES retaining wall/fence 1 3,344 1 18  $300M/yr  19 Honolulu Kaimuki 13.3 Kuhio ES site lighting 1 4,310 1 19  $300M/yr  20 Honolulu Farrington 13.3 Kalihi ES fencing 1 4,329 1 20  $300M/yr  Page 8 of 46 HIDOE Facility Master Plan Final Report 79 Health and Safety Group B: Security Ranking criteria: local priority, cost/student Rank Region Complex Ref Option Title Local  Ongoing  Rank Value Cost  Cumulative 10‐Year  Priority  Project Estimate  Funding Tier 1‐5 (2019 $M) 21 Honolulu Farrington 13.6 Linapuni ES lighting, fencing 1 5,236 1 21  $300M/yr  22 Windward Kailua 6.1 Olomana HS/Int urgent communications systems 1 6,849 1 21  $300M/yr  Page 9 of 46 HIDOE Facility Master Plan Final Report 80 APPENDIX Options Report Guide VII Introduction: Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan The Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan (FMP) is a participatory and data-driven process that allows priorities to be determined by regional district and local school stakeholders. The Facility Options Development Report has served as a planning tool to communicate key data, vision, and stakeholder voice throughout the process. The report also documents the evolution of operational and capital options and rationale for local prioritization and final FMP recommendations for those who were not directly involved in the planning process. The following pages show the third of four versions of the report: 1. Version 1: Draft Scenarios and Options created by each region’s Executive Planning Committee (EPC) 2. Version 2: Draft Scenarios and Options vetted by each region’s Stakeholder Advisory Committee (SAC) 3. Version 3: Prioritized Scenarios and Options determined by each region’s EPC (this document) 4. Version 4: FMP recommendations (forthcoming) There is a distinct report for each high school feeder complex, assembled by District/planning area: 1. Hawaii Northwest (Honokaa, Kealakehe, Kohala, Konawaena) 2. Hawaii Southeast (Hilo, Waiakea, Kau, Keaau, Pahoa) 3. Kauai (Kapaa, Kauai, Waimea) 4. Maui (Baldwin, Kekaulike, Maui, Hana, Lahainaluna, Lanai, Molokai) 5. Windward (Castle, Kahuku, Kailua, Kalaheo) 6. Leeward (Campbell, Kapolei, Nanakuli, Waianae, Pearl City, Waipahu) 7. Central (Aiea, Moanalua, Radford, Leilehua, Mililani, Waialua) 8. Honolulu (Farrington, Kaiser, Kalani, Admin, Kaimuki, Mckinley, Roosevelt) Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) HIDOE Facility Master Plan Final Report 82 VIII District Prioritization Summary Matrix District-wide Options/Scenarios are listed in dark green row. Options/Scenarios are listed out by Complex (Y axis) and Priority (X axis). Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) HIDOE Facility Master Plan Final Report 83 IX Complex Data and Goals Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) HIDOE Facility Master Plan Final Report 84 X Scenarios and Options For clarity of communication, each potential outcome designed by the Executive Planning Committee in partnership with the Stakeholder Advisory Committee is classified either as a SCENARIO or an OPTION: • Scenario – One of a set of mutually-exclusive “either/or” outcomes of which only one is possible (e.g., build new school to relieve crowding vs. add classrooms to existing schools, or change grade configuration vs. stay the same). Scenarios tend to be operational school portfolio changes in nature. • Option – An additive “and/or” facility project that could be possible in combination with other options and with one or many scenarios (e.g., campus repairs, new science building, replace track). Options tend to be facility capital improvement projects. The report displays Scenarios in vertical columns with dark blue headings, and Options in horizontal rows with light blue headings. In each format, each Scenario/Option is described in terms of the operational end-state, what capital projects are required, cost, benefits, challenges, and stakeholder feedback that is added in orange font with each subsequent release. Live polls are used during stakeholder vetting to measures and document degrees of stakeholder support. Each Scenario and Option is assigned a unique code to facilitate discussion and to trace edits as the scenario/option undergoes revisions throughout the planning process. Scenario codes are numbers with letter suffixes, (e.g., 1A, 1B, 1C), and Option codes are just numbers (2, 3, 4, etc.). The order of Scenarios and Options is arbitrary and does not convey preference or priority. EPC and SAC members will determine priorities through consideration of data and open discussion. Either Scenario 1A or 1B is possible Either Scenario 2A or 2B is possible Any one, combination, all, or none of Options 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, or 16 is possible Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) HIDOE Facility Master Plan Final Report 85 XI Report Key Option/Scenario Category Enrollment Safety: Proximity to Tsunami Zone Condition: Percent of Buildings Beyond Expected Life Capacity Career Tech Funding Category Compliance Support Innovation Health and Safety Equipment Arts Library Food Service Administration & Faculty Stakeholder Needs $500k-2.5M $2.5-20M $20-40M $40-75M $75-100M+ 1 2 3 4 5 ● ◕ ◐ ◔ ○ Priority 1 Priority 2 Priority 3 Priority 4 Priority 5 Replace STEM PE/Athletics $$$$$ $$$$$ $$$$$ $$$$$ $$$$$ Common Acronyms ADA – Americans with Disabilities Act EPC – Executive Planning Committee ES – Elementary School GE – Geographic Exception Capacity HS – High School Instruction IS – Intermediate School Repair and Maintenance MS – Middle School SAC – Stakeholder Advisory Committee SPED – Special Education STEM/STEAM – Science, Technology, Engineering, Art, Math Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) HIDOE Facility Master Plan Final Report 86 APPENDIX Hawaii Northwest Options Reports Hawaii Northwest District Overview Priority 1 Honokaa Kealakehe Kohala Konawaena • Scenario 1G: Honokaa complex - engage community to inform grade reconfiguration ($) • Option 3: Paauilo renovations and multi-purpose space conversions ($$) • Option 5: Paauilo ongoing restroom and painting projects ($) • Option 6: Honokaa ES renovations and multipurpose space conversions ($$$) • Option 8: Prioritized repairs and maintenance (all schools) ($$) • Option 12: District-wide electrical low-voltage upgrades (all schools) ($$$) • Option 13: Prioritized accessibility improvements (all schools) ($) • Option 14: Furniture and equipment refresh (all schools) ($) • Option 2: Kealakehe HS performing arts and student center ($$$) • Option 10: Holualoa ES rebuild the school on site ($$$$) • Option 11: Prioritized repairs and maintenance (all schools) ($$) • Option 14: Pedestrian safety (all schools) ($$) • Option 15: Kealakehe IS new media production center ($$) • Option 18: Kealakehe ES new eight-classroom building ($$$) • Option 19: District-wide electrical low-voltage upgrades (all schools) ($$$) • Option 20: Prioritized accessibility improvements (all schools) ($) • Option 21: Furniture and equipment refresh (all schools) ($) • Option 5: Prioritized repairs and maintenance (all schools) ($$) • Option 7.1: Kohala HS new gym ($$$) • Option 7.2: Kohala HS new athletic facility master plan ($$) • Option 9: Kohala ES/HS paved parking and vehicle drop-off ($) • Option 11: District-wide electrical low-voltage upgrades (all schools) ($$$) • Option 12: Prioritized accessibility improvements (all schools) ($) • Option 13: Furniture and equipment refresh (all schools) ($) • Scenario 1B: New Ke Kula Ehunuikaimalino, new Konawaena MS, and consolidated Honaunau/ Hookena ES at renovated Hookena ($$$$$) • Option 9: Traffic safety improvements (all schools) ($) • Option 13: Prioritized repairs and maintenance (all schools) ($$) • Option 15: Konawaena HS Athletic Master Plan projects ($$$) • Option 17: District-wide electrical low-voltage upgrades (all schools) ($) • Option 18: Prioritized accessibility improvements (all schools) ($) • Option 19: Furniture and equipment refresh (all schools) ($) • Scenario 1A: Kealakehe HS classroom addition ($$$) • Option 3: Kealakehe HS covered multi-purpose pavilion ($$) • Option 17: Kealakehe IS and ES perimeter fence ($) • Option 4.1: Kohala MS ongoing play court and lanai projects ($$) • Option 3: Konawaena HS historic renovation and additions ($$$) • Option 6: Konawaena HS auto mechanic renovations (CTE-various) ($$) • Option 4: Regional teacher housing ($$) • Option 10: Honokaa HS/ES close road through campus & fence west side of Pakalana ($$) • Option 5: Kealakehe HS special education classroom renovations ($) • Option 8: Waikoloa ES and MS acquire land for athletic facilities, fields, and/or playgrounds ($$$$) • Option 16: Kealakehe IS and ES new covered play court ($$) • Option 2: Kohala ES two-story addition ($$$) • Option 14: Locally-determined enhancements (all schools) ($) • Option 2: New Honokaa HS/IS campus commons ($$$$) • Option 9: Locally-determined enhancements (all schools) ($) • Option 4.1: Kealakehe HS new STEAM building ($$$) • Option 4.2: Kealakehe HS new gym building ($$$) • Option 6: Kealakehe HS kitchen renovations ($)= • Option 12: Locally-determined enhancements (all schools) ($) • Option 13: Kealakehe HS athletic master plan projects ($$) • Option 3: Kohala MS new STEAM building ($$$) • Option 6: Locally-determined enhancements (all schools) ($) • Option 5: Konawaena HS visual and performing arts renovations ($$) • Option 11: Konawaena ES indoor/outdoor dining/multi-purpose space ($$) • • Option 7: Kealakehe IS new STEAM building ($$$) • Option 8: Kohala HS phased reconstruction ($$$$) • Option 7: Konawaena HS land purchase and facilities for agriculture program ($$$) • Option 10: Kahakai ES administration and teacher collaboration space ($$) • Option 16: Milolii distance learning satellite facility ($$) Priority 2 Priority 3 Priority 4 Priority 5 • Option 7: Waimea ES acquire public library and multipurpose facility ($$$) Option 11: Waimea MS and Paauilo K-9 gym and bleachers ($$$) Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 90 Honokaa Complex FACLITY NEEDS Stakeholder Voice: Enrollment and Facility Data: School (a) 2017-18/ 2023-24 Enrollment (b) Capacity Oldest / (c) = (b) - (a) (d) = (a) / (b) Projected 2023-24 Newest / Avg Capacity Projected Building Surplus Utilization % Old or Beyond Expected Life Adequacy Score / Rank Out of 260 - High School Student 36 3 360 60 6 0 ,ŽŶŽŬĂ॒Ă ,ŝŐŚ Θ Intermediate (712) 652 / 596 / -9% 681 85 0.88 1928 / 1991 / 53 34% 0.77 / 68 394 Waimea Middle PCCS (6-8) 252 / 252 / 0% 436 184 0.58 1941 / 1991 / 48 28% 0.62 / 173 382 361 387 WĂ॒ĂƵŝůŽ 201 / 178 ůĞŵĞŶƚĂƌLJ Θ / -11% Intermediate (K-9) 224 ,ŽŶŽŬĂ॒Ă Elementary (K-6) 389 / 427 / 10% 418 Waimea Elementary (K-5) 553 / 576 / 4% 552 -24 1.04 2,029 2,311 282 0.88 TOTAL 46 0.79 1951 / 1951 / 65 95% We want to learn job skills like the trades, and there aren’t enough career classes at the school. Our schools need to prepare students for what businesses want in their employees, people with soft skills, the ability to think independently and work well with others. - Business Community Member We need more home-grown teachers who we can feel comfortable with and who can help the others earn our trust. - High School Student 0.54 / 235 The way each town sends kids to high school at different grades contributes to rivalries that start at parks and rec league sports. - Parent -9 1.02 1965 / 1967 / 50 91% 1966 / 1994 / 40 59% 0.61 / 189 61% 0.60 0.47 / 253 Stronger academic rigor is needed, which starts with having the right teachers. It’s hard to keep good teachers at Honokaa. Many students take online classes. - Teacher/Parent Challenges: Ch • 415 of 1,019 (41%) Honokaa HS/IS students GE out or attend charter • Library less than 50% of standard space: Waimea ES, Honokaa ES • Science less than 50% of standard space: Paauilo, Waimea IS • Cafeteria less than 50% of standard space: Honokaa HS/IS, Paauilo ES/IS • More than half of Honokaa facilities are classified as old or beyond useful life • Music less than 50% of standard space: Paauilo, Honokaa HS and IS, Waimea MS • Administration less than 50% of standard space: Honokaa ES • Waimea MS and Paauilo K-9 are under-utilized • PE locker less than 50% of standard space: Paauilo, Waimea MS • Resurface courts, training room • Fans and AC • Teacher housing • Career Technology Education programs Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 91 Honokaa Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS SCENARIOS 1A Honokaa 9-12, Paauilo K-8, Honokaa K-5 1B Honokaa 9-12, Paauilo 6-8, Honokaa K-5 $$$$$ • Honokaa K-6 $$$$$ Move Honokaa IS program and 6th grade from Honokaa ES to Paauilo Move Paauilo 9th grade to Honokaa Honokaa becomes 9-12 HS Paauilo becomes K-8 Honokaa ES becomes K-5 • • • • 1C Honokaa 9-12, Paauilo 7-8, • • • • • • • • • • Benefits 9th All students start high school in grade, unifying student classes/cohorts One united middle school program for Honokaa and Paauilo creates scale to enhance educational programs, such as language, career tech, athletics, and arts Honokaa HS admin focuses on 9-12 programs Keeps elementary programs in each town Unifies middle school students at same time Honokaa and Paauilo students are integrated from kindergarten • • • • • • $$$$$ Similar to 1B, except Paauilo is a 7-8 Move Honokaa IS program from Honokaa to Paauilo Move Paauilo K-6 and 9th grade to Honokaa Honokaa becomes 9-12 HS Paauilo becomes 7-8 MS Honokaa ES remains K-6 Requires 6-classroom addition at Honokaa ES to accommodate all K-6 Resulting 7-8 school would be unsustainably small • • • • • • Benefits Honokaa 6-8 MS $$$$$ Similar to 1A, except Paauilo is a 6-8 Move Honokaa IS program and 6th grade from Honokaa to Paauilo Move Paauilo K-5 and 9th grade to Honokaa Honokaa becomes 9-12 HS Paauilo becomes 6-8 MS Honokaa ES becomes K-5 Moderate renovations at Paauilo and Honokaa to accommodate changed programs • • • • • 1D New 9-12 HS in Waimea & Benefits 9th All students start high school in grade, unifying student classes/cohorts One united MS program AND one united ES program for Honokaa and Paauilo creates scale to enhance educational programs, such as language, career tech, athletics, and arts Honokaa HS admin focuses on 9-12 programs Paauilo focuses on MS Unifies MS students at same time Honokaa and Paauilo students are integrated from kindergarten • • • • • • • Construct new 21st century high school campus near Waimea town, location TBD Move Honokaa 9-12 and Paauilo 9th programs to new campus in Waimea Renovate and convert Honokaa HS/IS campus into complex-wide 6-8 MS Honokaa ES and Paauilo become K-5 Waimea MS and ES remains 6-8 and K-5 Waikoloa 9-12 feeds to new Waimea HS Opting for Option 12 • • • • • • Benefits 9th All students start high school in grade, unifying student classes/cohorts One united MS program AND one united ES program for Honokaa and Paauilo creates scale to enhance educational programs, such as language, career tech, athletics, and arts Honokaa HS admin focuses on high school Paauilo focuses on middle school Unifies middle school students at same time Honokaa and Paauilo students are integrated from kindergarten • • • • • • • Move high school to centralized location near areas with projected long-term growth. New 21st century HS and MS facilities that support collaborative learning All students start high school in 9th grade, unifying student classes/cohorts Offer public school alternatives to families opting for private and charter schools United MS creates scale to enhance programs, such as language, career, athletics, and arts Relieve overcrowding at Kealakehe HS Waikoloa 9-12 students have less travel time Challenges Challenges Challenges Challenges • • • • • • • New grade configuration requires operational planning with teachers and administration Increased transportation of Honokaa MS students to Paauilo Teacher turnover Waimea students still not integrated until HS • • • • New grade configuration requires operational planning with teachers and administration Increased transportation of Honokaa MS students to Paauilo and Paauilo ES students to Honokaa Potential longer commute for Paauilo ES parents Teacher turnover Waimea students still not integrated until HS • • • • • • • Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ New grade configuration requires operational planning with teachers and administration Increased transportation Paauilo/Honokaa Less scale benefits than from 1B Requires significant capital expense Requires additional classrooms SAC: Not age appropriate grade configuration (compared to K-5, 6-8) Teacher turnover Waimea students still not integrated until HS Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ • • • • • • • New grade configuration requires operational planning with teachers and administration Honokaa traditions closely tied to HS/IS Transportation distance from Paauilo makes it difficult to participate in extra-curricular activities Switches students that are being transported Expensive to build new high school Doesn’t solve current student rivalries at schools Teacher turnover Honokaa economy tied to school Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 92 Honokaa Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS SCENARIOS 1E Keep current locations and grade configurations 1F New 9-12 HS in Waimea Honokaa HS/IS remains 7-12 Paauilo remains K-9 Honokaa ES remains K-6 Waimea MS PCCS remains 6-8 Waimea ES remains K-5 EPC concurs with SAC • • • • Benefits • • • • • • • • • • No operational changes Challenges • • • • • • • • Current scenario has school transitions at different grade levels in each of the three towns within Honokaa complex Divided classes/student cohorts entering HS and MS at different grades Difficult to plan vertically aligned curriculum between schools Athletics difficulties when rival students come together at different grade levels Not enough teachers with high turnover Class sizes “Same old same old,” mix-and-match consistency Doesn’t solve current student rivalries Paauilo 9th students commute for athletics Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ • • • • • • • $500k-2.5M ‫ ڗ‬Priority 1 EPC narrowed down scenarios to 1A and 1B, and to select a districtwide option to study location and timing of future high school Benefits Shorter distance for Waimea and Waikoloa Helps relieve overcrowding at Kealakehe HS Small grade -evel class sizes Less bussing/transportation cost Reduced driving is safer Potential to help alleviate future population growth Kanu students would attend WHS (as act) Students will already be integrated Parents may be more willing to send kids to Waimea HS vs Honokaa HS Challenges • $$$$$ SAC-created option Build new 9-12 HS in Waimea to serve Waimea and Waikoloa students with attendance boundary adjustment Change feeder pattern for Waikoloa K-8 from Kealakehe to Waimea Option for Option 12 Benefits • community to inform grade reconfiguration $$$$$ $$$$$ • • • • • • 1G Honokaa complex – engage Challenges <300 students grades 9-12 left in Honokaa HS, ~600 students at Waimea HS Low enrollment creates budget challenge to support a wide range of comprehensive programs Still requires organization of grade configuration Expensive to build new school Operational planning with a new school Will draw from already low Kohala HS and Honokaa HS enrollment Need for more teachers and administrative staff Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ Recommendation • Build from SAC and EPC engagements to further engage Honokaa community to determine the best, local Pre-K-8 grade configuration to guide future capital investment Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 93 Honokaa Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS FACILITY OPTIONS 2 3 Benefits New Honokaa HS/IS campus commons • Construct new Professional Learning Center, administration, library, and cafeteria • Rebuild existing admin and library into 21st century STEM, art, and community space with distance learning facilities • Add/enhance spaces for Career Technical Education instruction Paauilo renovations and multi-purpose space conversions • Renovate existing space for STEAM • Move Pre-K into Building C. Renovate existing Pre-K space to add to wood shop OR keep Pre-K where it is and renovate classrooms in Building C for STEAM and add to the shop • Treat play court with acoustic panels and large fans • Moderate renovations for condition and electrical needs • Provides flexible space for projectbased learning and science/art • Allows play court to be used for assemblies • Provides technology infrastructure 4 Regional teacher housing • Provides housing to attract and retain teachers • Potential revenue generation 5 Paauilo ongoing restroom and painting projects 6 Honokaa ES renovations and multi-purpose space conversions • Use portion of large Paauilo or other site to build teacher housing 8 9 10 Cost/ROM Range • Maintaining safe school operations during construction $$$$$ • Maintaining safe school operations during construction $2.5-7.5M Waimea ES acquire public library and multi-purpose facility • Acquire public library and convert to Professional Learning Center and maker space • Acquire public multi-purpose gym and convert to community-based maker space Prioritized repairs and maintenance (all schools) • Safety, code, and maintenance projects • SAC: classroom fans and/or air conditioning, restroom renovations, covered areas, parking Locally-determined enhancements (all schools) • Budget allotment for each school to fund stakeholder-driven projects. • Consider kitchen renovations for farm-to-school program, emergency shelters, gyms/bleachers Honokaa HS/ES close road through campus • Close/re-route traffic to improve pedestrian safety • Construct additional parking $40-75M $$$$$ $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M $$$$$ • Follow through on committed projects for bathroom renovations and Building A painting • Multi-purpose flexible additions between Buildings K and J • Convert classroom to flexible STEAM/maker space for art and science program • Add a Admin, Professional Learning Center, and Custodial Addition north or south of current admin building 7 Challenges $500k-2.5M • Provides modern, flexible, collaborative space • Provides proper art/flexible and modern space • Provides professional space for administrator and teachers to plan and collaborate • Maintaining safe school operations during construction $20-40M $$$$$ • Provides needed modern and flexible space $20-40M $$$$$ • Addresses top-priority needs at each school • Empowers schools and students to define projects at time of execution $$$$$ $7.5-20M • Requires policy to consistently allocate and implement projects • Improves safety $$$$$ $500k-2.5M $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M Stakeholder Voice Funding Category Priority Tier ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS #2 4 ‫ڜ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ MS-ES #5 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ MS-ES #4 3 ‫ژ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ MS-ES #5 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ MS-ES #1 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ MS-ES #2 5 ‫ړ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS, MS-ES #3 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS #4 MSES #8 4 ‫ڜ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS #1 3 ‫ژ‬ Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 94 Honokaa Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS FACILITY OPTIONS 11 Waimea MS and Paauilo K-9 gym and bleachers • If Paauilo remained K-9, high school gym would benefit all area students and community 12 District-wide electrical low-voltage upgrades (all schools) 13 Prioritized accessibility improvements (all schools) 14 Furniture and equipment refresh (all schools) Benefits • Challenges If Paauilo remained K-9, high school gym would benefit all area students and community Cost/ROM Stakeholder Voice Range $$$$$ $20-40M Funding Category ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ MS-ES #7 $$$$$ $20-40M $$$$$ $500k-2.5M • Text goes here $$$$$ $500k-2.5M Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 95 Priority Tier 5 ‫ړ‬ 1 ‫ڗ‬ 1 ‫ڗ‬ 1 ‫ڗ‬ Kealakehe Complex DATA and NEEDS Stakeholder Voice: Enrollment and Facility Data: School 39 392 3 92 9 2 Kealakehe High (912) 390 39 3 90 9 0 39 393 3 93 9 3 35 358 3 58 5 8 38 3 88 8 8 388 (a) 2017-18/ 2023-24 Enrollment 1311 / 1590 / 21% (b) Capacity (c) = (b) - (a) (d) = (a) / (b) Oldest / Projected 2023-24 Newest / Avg Capacity Projected Building Surplus Utilization % Old or Beyond Expected Life Adequacy Score / Rank Out of 260 1334 -256 1.19 1997 / 2003 / 19 0% 0.90 / 3 Kealakehe 705 / 748 Intermediate (6-8) / 6% 1126 378 0.66 1975 / 2008 / 29 2% 0.90 / 2 Waikoloa Elementary & Middle (K-8) 702 -97 1.14 1994 / 2001 / 20 0% 0.72 / 99 830 / 799 / -4% ,ƃůƵĂůŽĂ Elementary (K-5) 523 / 520 / -1% 437 Kealakehe Elementary (K-5) 988 / 963 / -3% 838 -125 1.15 4,620 4,437 -183 1.04 -83 1.19 I wish all of my classes were like the STEM academy where the lessons are interactive and project-based with real-world application, not just ‘read the book and take a test.’ - High School Student It is our moral responsibility to make sure our students are critical thinkers. The types of jobs that will enable future generations to own a home and stay invested in the community aren’t ones where employees just do what they’re told. - High School Career Tech Coordinator 0.44 / 257 Technology is a powerful tool, but it is not a replacement for face-to-face interaction. Students still need ‘high touch.’ 5% 0.59 / 215 I prefer a classroom where students aren’t forced to work at everyone else’s pace. 10% 0.71 1916 / 2001 / 41 42% 1969 / 1993 / 40 – Community College Administrator - Community Member TOTAL Facility Fa a Needs: • 21% enrollment growth at Kealakehe HS • 31 mile commute from Waikoloa Village to Kealakehe HS • Library less than 50% of standard space: Kealakehe ES and HS • Science less than 50% of standard space: Waikoloa ES and MS • No dedicated science at elementary schools • Cafeteria less than 50% of standard space: Kealakehe ES • Holualoa ES has the fifth lowest Education Adequacy score in the state • Art and music less than 50% of standard space: Waikoloa ES & MS • No dedicated art at ES • Administration less than 50% of standard space: Holualoa ES • Four of the five schools in Kealakehe are over-utilized • PE lockers less than 50% of standard space: Waikoloa ES and MS and Kealakehe IS • Resurface courts Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 96 Kealakehe Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS SCENARIOS 1A Kealakehe HS classroom addition, informed by 1D (STEAM, teacher PLC) $$$$$ • $20-40M ‫ ڝ‬Priority 2 Build multi-story classroom building to add ~250 additional student capacity By December 2019, engage local stakeholders to determine space needs for new addition and locate new facility on designated plot • 1B Expand Waikoloa to K-12 1C New 9-12 High School in Waimea $$$$$ • $$$$$ Build ~200 capacity addition to Waikoloa K-8 facility for HS programming Realign attendance boundaries to relieve crowding at Kealakehe HS • • Kealakehe HS specialized spaces, outdoor learning, efficient scheduling, and off-campus programs $$$$$ 21st Construct new century HS campus near Waimea town, location TBD Realign attendance boundaries to relieve crowding at Kealakehe HS (grade reconfiguration and facility projects outlined in Honokaa complex Scenario 1D) • 1D • • • Alternate version of Scenario 1A Capacity utilization isn’t as big a problem at Kealakehe due to efficient scheduling and growing off-campus early college program Construct additions with professional learning center/teacher offices, flexible project spaces, and specialized classroom types such as CTE and STEAM instead of general classrooms Benefits Benefits Benefits Benefits • • • • • Relieves overcrowding at Kealakehe HS Provides new, flexible learning environments • • Relieve overcrowding at Kealakehe HS by drawing high school students living in Waikoloa Village (currently 166) Relieve overcrowding at Waikoloa ES/MS Reduce 60-mile round-trip commute • • • Relieve overcrowding at Kealakehe HS by drawing high school students living in Waikoloa Village (currently 166) Move HS to centralized location near areas with projected long-term growth New 21st century HS and MS facilities that support collaborative learning Offer public school alternatives to families opting for private and charter schools • • Student-designed, student-built outdoor learning spaces are source of learning an pride Professional learning center teacher offices facilitate more efficient capacity utilization and are more palatable to teachers than “floating” Specialized spaces provide program flexibility that general classrooms don’t Challenges Challenges Challenges Challenges • • • • Maintaining safe school operations during construction • Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ Would require land acquisition to build athletic facilities, fields, and performing arts spaces It’s probably 12 years too early for this scenario. In near term, small enrollment at Waikoloa would limit program offerings Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ • New grade configuration requires operational planning with teachers and administration Honokaa culture and traditions closely tied to the HS/IS Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ Efficient scheduling that enables higher capacity utilization depends on sustained presence of sophisticated administration and teaching staff Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ Recommendation • Create new permanent structure including STEAM classrooms and multi-purpose teacher meeting space informed by local engagements Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 97 Kealakehe Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS FACILITY OPTIONS 2 Kealakehe HS performing arts and student center 3 Kealakehe HS covered, multi-purpose pavilion • Follow through on plans for a performing arts and student center • Construct ## sf covered outdoor venue for dining, assembly, and community use Benefits Challenges Cost/ROM Stakeholder Voice Range $$$$$ • Provides a performing arts venue for the school and community $20-40M $$$$$ • Provides a covered play and multipurpose space $2.5-7.5M • Modern, flexible environments • Relieves overcrowding $$$$$ • Project for new gym facility in process • Modern, flexible environments • Relieves overcrowding • Provides new athletic facilities $$$$$ 5 Kealakehe HS special education classroom renovations • Provides space designed and equipped for special education 6 Kealakehe HS kitchen renovations 7 Kealakehe IS new STEAM building • Replace portables with new, flexible STEAM building • Modern, flexible environments • Replaces portable capacity with permanent space 8 Waikoloa ES and MS acquire land for athletic facilities, fields, and/or playgrounds • Provides athletic facilities, fields, and/or playground equipment for the school and community 4.1 Kealakehe HS new STEAM building 4.2 Kealakehe HS new gym building • Project for new STEAM facility in process 10 $$$$$ $500k-2.5M $$$$$ • Improves kitchen condition Waikoloa ES & MS eight-classroom STEAM addition • Currently under construction Holualoa ES rebuild the school on site • Relocate the new facility on one side of the road currently bisecting the campus • Includes solution for pedestrian traffic and perimeter 11 Prioritized repairs and maintenance (all schools) 12 Locally-determined enhancements (all schools) • Safety, code, and maintenance projects, to include site drainage • Budget allotment for each school to fund stakeholder-driven projects $500k-2.5M $$$$$ $20-40M $$$$$ $40-75M • Plan already in place • Provides modern, flexible learning environments including art, special education, and science • Rebuilds a school in poor condition and the 5th worst in the state based on the Educational Adequacy gap analysis • Improves safety by operating a school on only one side of a road $$$$$ $20-40M • Maintaining safe school operations during construction $40-75M $$$$$ • Addresses top-priority needs at each school • Empowers schools and students to define projects at time of execution $$$$$ $7.5-20M • Requires policy to consistently allocate and implement projects $$$$$ $500k-2.5M Priority Tier ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #8 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #6 2 ‫ڝ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #3 4 ‫ڜ‬ 4 ‫ڜ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #4 3 ‫ژ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #9 4 ‫ڜ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ MS - #3 5 ‫ړ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ MS - #6 3 ‫ژ‬ $20-40M • Renovate the high school kitchen to accommodate farm-to-school cooking • Acquires land regardless of whether or not Waikoloa remains a K-8 or becomes a K-12 school • May be used for after school programs 9 $20-40M Funding Category ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ MS - #4 n/a ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #1 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS-MS/ES - #2/4 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS-MS/ES - #1/2 4 ‫ڜ‬ Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 98 Kealakehe Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS FACILITY OPTIONS 13 Kealakehe HS athletic master plan projects 14 Pedestrian safety (all schools) 15 Kealakehe IS new media production center 16 Kealakehe IS and ES new covered play court 17 Kealakehe IS and ES perimeter fence 18 Kealakehe ES new eight-classroom building Benefits Challenges • 2016 Athletic Master Plan • Resurface courts, training room, weight room, synthetic track • Budget allotment to address pedestrian safety concerns, e.g., barriers, rerouting traffic, etc. Cost/ROM Stakeholder Voice Range $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M • Prevents repeated safety events $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M Funding Category ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #8 4 ‫ڜ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS-MS/ES - #5/3 1 ‫ڗ‬ 1 ‫ڗ‬ 3 ‫ژ‬ 2 ‫ڝ‬ 1 ‫ڗ‬ 1 ‫ڗ‬ 1 ‫ڗ‬ 1 ‫ڗ‬ $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M $$$$$ $500k-2.5M • • Partially funded Balance capacity between Options 10 and 18 19 District-wide electrical low-voltage upgrades (all schools) 20 Prioritized accessibility improvements (all schools) 21 Furniture and equipment refresh (all schools) Priority Tier $$$$$ $20-40M $$$$$ $20-40M $$$$$ $500k-2.5M $$$$$ $500k-2.5M Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 99 Kohala Complex DATA and NEEDS Stakeholder Voice: Enrollment and Facility Data: School (a) 2017-18/ 2023-24 Enrollment (b) Capacity (c) = (b) - (a) (d) = (a) / (b) Oldest / Projected 2023-24 Newest / Avg Capacity Projected Building Surplus Utilization % Old or Beyond Expected Life Adequacy Score / Rank Out of 260 We want to learn job skills like the trades, and there aren’t enough career classes at the school. 373 Kohala High (9-12) 253 / 235 / -7% 358 123 0.66 1921 / 1977 / 66 90% - High School Student 0.70 / 112 We start out every year $75 thousand short on our budget and have to find ways to make it up. -High School Principal 366 Kohala Middle (6-8) 179 / 146 / -18% 232 86 0.63 1939 / 1996 / 67 78% We need more home-grown teachers who we can feel comfortable with and who can help the others earn our trust. - High School Student 0.62 / 175 We need to foster more technical/trade programs. - High School Student 395 Kohala Elementary (K-5) TOTAL 347 / 371 / 7% 410 39 0.90 752 1,000 248 0.75 1953 / 1991 / 51 62% 0.53 / 239 77% 0.62 Challenges: Ch • 18% enrollment decline at Kohala MS • Industrial Arts less than 50% of standard space: Konawaena MS • Science less than 50% of standard at Kohala MS • More than half of Kohala facilities are classified as old or beyond useful life • Music less than 50% of standard at Kohala HS • No dedicated music or art rooms at Kohala MS and Kohala ES • Kohala HS and Kohala MS are under-utilized • No PE lockers at Kohala MS • New gym, renovate track, athletic lockers, training room at Kohala HS • Cafeteria less than 50% of standard space at Kohala MS • Parking and safe drop off • Fans and/or air conditioning Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 100 Kohala Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS SCENARIOS 1A Keep current operational 1B (No alternative scenarios) scenario $$$$$ • Kohala HS 9-12, Kohala IS 6-8, and Kohala ES K-5 continue to operate within same grade configurations and on same campuses Benefits • • No changes to implement Remains status quo Challenges • • Students remain in same facilities Still remains a need for improved/updated facilities such as gymnasium and other athletics Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 101 Kohala Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS FACILITY OPTIONS 2 3 4.1 4.2 5 6 Kohala ES/HS two-story addition • Add two-Story addition to Building X at front of the ES (First floor - Admin/Welcome Center, Second floor library/STEAM/Career Tech/Maker Space) and old office gets repurposed for classroom space Kohala MS new STEAM building • Replace portables with new STEAM building Kohala MS ongoing play court, science lab, and lanai projects • Follow through on committed covered play court plan. SAC: Design as multi-purpose outdoor area for dining, PE, assembly, and other community activities, and include covered walkways • Renovate lanai • Follow through on committed science room renovation plans Challenges • Improves supervision, security, and way-finding; student collaboration; 21st century spaces • $20-40M • Provides new and modern classroom spaces with flexible support for science, art, and CTE • Provides permanent educational space while removing portable spaces $$$$$ $20-40M • Flexible-use space, PE during inclement weather $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M • Safety, code, and maintenance projects • SAC: classroom fans and/or air conditioning Locally-determined enhancements (all schools) • Budget allotment for each school to fund stakeholder-driven projects • Consider kitchen renovations to build on Kohala farm-to-school program • Consider emergency shelter improvements Kohala HS new gym 7.2 Kohala HS new athletic facility master plan Kohala HS phased reconstruction 9 Kohala ES/HS paved parking and vehicle drop-off • Empowers schools and students to define projects at time of execution • Requires policy to consistently allocate and implement projects Construct new parking area for students, parent, teachers, and visitors Entrance needs to be re-planned for improved entry and exit to campus ‫ژ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ MS #2 4 ‫ڜ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ MS #1 2 ‫ڝ‬ n/a ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS/MS/ES #6/#4/#4 4 ‫ڜ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS #1 1 ‫ڗ‬ 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS #3 5 ‫ړ‬ $500k-2.5M ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS #4 1 ‫ڗ‬ $$$$$ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS/ES #1 $$$$$ $500k-2.5M $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M $$$$$ $40-75M • Improves safety and day-to day-operations Kohala ES STEAM classroom • 3 ‫ڗ‬ $$$$$ • Phased renovation or replacement of old buildings • • ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS #2 1 2.5-20M New athletic facility including locker rooms, tennis courts, fields, and weight room Consistent with State-wide Athletic Master Plan 8 Priority Tier ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS/MS/ES #3 $$$$$7$ • Addresses top priority needs at each school $20-40M • • Funding Category $$$$$ Same as Option 3 Prioritized repairs and maintenance (all schools) Cost/ROM Stakeholder Voice Range $$$$$ Kohala MS ongoing science lab projects 7.1 10 Benefits Convert classroom into flexible science/art classroom $$$$$ n/a Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 102 Kohala Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS FACILITY OPTIONS 11 District-wide electrical low-voltage upgrades (all schools) 12 Prioritized accessibility improvements (all schools) 13 Furniture and equipment refresh (all schools) Benefits Challenges Cost/ROM Stakeholder Voice Range Funding Category $$$$$ $20-40M $$$$$ $500k-2.5M $$$$$ $500k-2.5M Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 103 Priority Tier 1 ‫ڗ‬ 1 ‫ڗ‬ 1 ‫ڗ‬ Konawaena Complex DATA and NEEDS Enrollment and Facility Data: School (a) 2017-18/ 2023-24 Enrollment (b) Capacity 374 Konawaena High (9-12) 832 / 1072 / 29% 378 <Ğ <ƵůĂ ॒K ॒ ŚƵŶƵŝŬĂŝŵĂůŝŶŽ (K-12) 210 / 234 / 11% 161 376 Konawaena Middle (6-8) 632 / 613 / -3% 359 ,ƃŶĂƵŶĂƵ Elementary (K-5) 169 / 169 / 0% 363 ,Ž॒ŽŬĞŶĂ Elementary (K-5) 127 / 132 / 4% 284 371 <ĂŚĂŬĂŝ Elementary (K-5) 746 / 722 / -3% 375 Konawaena Elementary (K-5) TOTAL Stakeholder Voice: (c) = (b) - (a) (d) = (a) / (b) Oldest / Projected 2023-24 Newest / Avg Capacity Projected Building Surplus Utilization 1.29 1927 / 1985 / 49 -73 584 271 833 -239 % Old or Beyond Expected Life Adequacy ^ĐŽƌĞ ͬ ZĂŶŬ Out of 260 57% 0.76 / 73 1.45 1925 / 1925 / 42 25% 0.42 / 258 -29 1.05 1929 / 1970 / 56 61% 0.59 / 212 102 0.62 1953 / 1969 / 54 72% 0.48 / 252 152 0.46 1931 / 1990 / 64 81% 0.52 / 244 709 -13 1.02 1982 / 2001 / 29 0% 0.78 / 54 544 / 509 / -6% 601 92 0.85 2001 / 2001 / 17 0% 0.73 / 96 3,451 3,443 -8 1.00 42% 0.61 My best teachers are the ones who love what they do and bring energy to the classroom, ones who know me and can relate to me as a person. - High School Student The school is so small that we are always in deficit and can’t even afford to hire enough teachers for every grade. - Elementary School Principal Instead of ‘read this book on Monday and take a test on Friday’ like I was taught, I challenge my students to think critically, work together, and solve problems. - Teacher The business community is looking for employees with basic work-ready skills like math and writing, but also ones who show up on time, appreciate the value of work, communicate effectively, and work well with others. – Business Community Leader It’s a tragedy that the community doesn’t believe that the best place in the world for their kids’ education is their public school. - High School Career Tech Teacher Challenges: C • 29% enrollment growth at Konawaena HS • Nearly half of Honaunau and Hookena students GE out or attend charter • More than half of several facilities are classified as old or beyond useful life • Konawaena HS, MS, and Ke Kula Ehunuikaimalino are over-utilized • Honaunau ES and Hookena ES are under-utilized • Industrial Arts less than 50% of standard space: Konawaena MS • Library less than 50% of standard space: Konawaena HS and MS • Science less than 50% of standard space: Konawaena MS, Ke Kula O Ehunuikaimalino • Cafeteria less than 50% of standard space: Honaunau, Hookena, Konawaena ES, and Ke Kula O Ehunuikaimalino • Art less than 50% of standard space: Ke Kula O Ehunuikaimalino and Konawaena MS • No dedicated music rooms at ES • Administration less than 50% of standard space: Konawaena MS • Synthetic field, renovate track, resurface courts • More bus stops and distance learning satellites to improve attendance Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 104 Konawaena Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS SCENARIOS New Ke Kula Ehunuikaimalino and new consolidated Honaunau/Hookena 1A New Ke Kula Ehunuikaimalino, new Konawaena MS, and new consolidated Honaunau/ Hookena ES 1B $$$$$ $$$$$ • Rebuild Honaunau campus for new combined 350student Honaunau ES and Hookena ES Move Ke Kula Ehunuikaimalino to new school on Hookena site Relocate administrators housed on Konawaena HS to portables currently occupied by Ke Kula Ehunuikaimalino • • • $75-100M+ ‫ ڗ‬Priority 1 Rebuild Honaunau Hookena ES campus for new combined 350-student Honaunau & Hookena ES Move Konawaena MS to new school on Hookena Honaunau site, and rename Honaunau MS Move Ke Kula Ehunuikaimalino to renovated Konawaena MS campus Relocate administrators housed on Konawaena HS to portables currently occupied by Ke Kula Ehunuikaimalino Stakeholder outreach Include covered rec facility in Honaunau MS plan • • • • • New consolidated Honaunau/Hookena ES and repurposed Hookena ES campus 1C $$$$$ • Keep current scenario $$$$$ Rebuild Honaunau campus for new combined 350student Honaunau and Hookena ES Engage community stakeholders and businesses to determine for alternate purpose for Hookena ES site • 1D • • Keep Ke Kula Ehunuikaimalino in portables Keep Honaunau ES and Hookena ES open Benefits Benefits Benefits Benefits • • • • • • • Creates sustainable elementary programs with larger enrollment Replaces two inadequate facilities with new modern schools Gives Ke Kula Ehunuikaimalino its own campus and modern facilities Partially relieves overcrowding at Konawaena HS by 100 students while providing consolidated, collaborative space for administration • • • Creates sustainable elementary programs with larger enrollment and replaces two inadequate facilities with new modern schools Gives Ke Kula Ehunuikaimalino its own campus with close access to KHS facilities and programs Gives Konawaena MS its own campus off KHS. Honaunau site is more centrally located and better for MS than Hookena Completely relieves overcrowding at Konawaena HS while providing consolidated, collaborative space for administration • • • Creates sustainable elementary programs with larger enrollment Replaces two inadequate facilities with new modern schools Operational cost savings Creates potential for new community asset and/or DOE revenue Avoid closing schools Challenges Challenges Challenges Challenges • • • • • • • • School closure 4.6 miles distance from Hookena ES to Honaunau ES Ke Kula Ehunuikaimalino students would no longer have immediate access to Konawaena HS facilities and programs (band, athletics, etc.) School closure 4.6 miles distance from Hookena to Honaunau School closure 4.6 miles distance from Hookena ES to Honaunau ES • • Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ Continue operating two elementary schools within 5 miles of each other at less than 150 students each with limited educational program and operational budget imbalance Ke Kula Ehunuikaimalino remains in substandard facilities Doesn’t relieve Konawaena HS and MS crowding unless paired with Option 3 (see below) Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ Recommendation • Create new, 21st century ES for Hookena and Honaunau communities, new MS for complex-wide middle school students, and relocate Ehunukaimalino program to permanent facilities on the HS campus Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 105 Konawaena Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS SCENARIOS K-6 and 7-8 complex-wide 2A Continue current K-5 and 6-8 scenario $$$$$ $$$$$ • 2B Move sixth grade from Konawaena MS to Konawaena, Kahakai, Honaunau, and/or Hookena Construct classroom additions at Honaunau ES and Konawaena ES STEAM classroom maker space additions/conversions for sixth grade curriculum at Honauau, Konawaena, and Kahakai • • Benefits Benefits • • • Relieves crowding at Konawaena MS and adjacent Konawaena HS Adds support for science and art programs at elementary schools SAC: sixth grade social and emotional learning best at MS Challenges Challenges • • • Staff and program realignment SAC concerned about social and emotional learning impact on sixth grade students Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ Requires other scenarios/options to resolve overcrowding at Konawaena MS and HS Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ Recommendation • Maintain current K-5 and 6-8 scenario Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 106 Konawaena Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS FACILITY OPTIONS 3 4 Konawaena HS historic renovation and additions • Renovation of historic Buildings A and E • Replace portables with permanent classrooms building(s) with STEAM classrooms and 21st century flexible collaborative spaces yielding additional 250 capacity • Develop long-range campus master plan. Demo and replace cafeteria with new flexible venue for indoor/outdoor dining, library, administration, and professional learning center. Demo existing library/admin and convert to parking and community use maker space, art, music, meeting rooms • Rebuild Building ## currently used for music/business and ### into 21st century maker spaces • Rebuild Building F for admin, art, health, and ELL instruction Konawaena HS new campus commons • Combined with Option 3 Benefits Challenges • Addresses overcrowding • Reduces portables • Supports collaborative projectbased learning • Maintaining safe school operations during construction • Spaces for project learning, assemblies, performances, and community use • Teacher planning and PD space • Addresses undersized cafeteria 5 Konawaena HS visual and performing arts renovations • Renovate Building C for visual and performing arts space • Enhances visual and performing arts program 6 Konawaena HS auto mechanic renovations • Enhances career tech program 7 Konawaena HS land purchase and facilities for agriculture program $$$$$ • Maintaining safe school operations during construction ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #6 $$$$$ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #5 8 Konawaena HS multi-purpose space conversions • Combined with Option 3 • Modern, flexible project-based learning and admin spaces • Flex space for lectures 9 Traffic safety improvements (all schools) • Improves safety and parent drop-off time • Corrects shortage of admin space • Collaboration space for teachers ‫ڝ‬ $20-40M ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS – last 5 ‫ړ‬ $$$$$ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #3 $$$$$ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS/MS/ES #8/3/4&5 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #7 5 ‫ړ‬ 4 ‫ڜ‬ $$$$$ $500k-2.5M $$$$$ 11 Konawaena ES indoor/outdoor dining/multi-purpose space • Renovate cafeteria and construct covered multi-purpose space • Upsizes cafeteria with multipurpose facility • Potential community use $2.5-7.5M ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #6 12 Konawaena MS and Konawaena ES swap campuses • Replaces old facilities with new • Separate MS students from HS $$$$$ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ MS-ES - last 13 Prioritized repairs and maintenance (all schools) • Addresses top-priority needs at each school $$$$$ • Safety, code, and maintenance projects n/a 2 Kahakai ES administration and teacher collaboration space • Rebuild Konawaena MS as new 21st century Konawaena ES and vice versa ‫ڝ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #4 $$$$$ • No existing on-site swing space • SAC: this is low priority 2 ‫ڜ‬ 10 • Add administrative and professional learning center space to Building A Priority Tier 4 $2.5-7.5M • Purchase land and/or construct facilities for agriculture program Category ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #7 $$$$$ • Enhances career tech program Stakeholder Voice $20-40M $2.5-7.5M • Renovate Building X for automotive career space • Kahakai ES – follow through on planned traffic and drop-off project Cost $2.5-7.5M $$$$$ $7.5-20M n/a n/a ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS-MS/ES - #2/3 1 Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 107 ‫ڗ‬ Konawaena Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS FACILITY OPTIONS Benefits Challenges • Requires policy to consistently allocate and implement projects 14 Locally-determined enhancements (all schools) • Budget allotment for each school to fund stakeholder-driven projects • Empowers schools and students to define projects at time of execution 15 Konawaena HS Athletic Master Plan projects • 2016 Athletic Master Plan 16 • Synthetic track and field, resurface courts, boys and girls athletic lockers, weight room in locker room, and outdoor field lights Milolii distance learning satellite facility District-wide electrical low-voltage upgrades (all schools) 18 Prioritized accessibility improvements (all schools) 19 Furniture and equipment refresh (all schools) $$$$$ $500k-2.5M $$$$$ $20-40M • Improves absenteeism • Construct or lease space for distance learning • EPC: Lower priority due to fewer students 17 Cost $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M Stakeholder Voice Category Priority Tier ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS-MS-ES - #1 3 ‫ژ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #9 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #2 5 ‫ړ‬ 1 ‫ڗ‬ 1 ‫ڗ‬ 1 ‫ڗ‬ $$$$$ $20-40M $$$$$ $500k-2.5M $$$$$ $500k-2.5M Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 108 APPENDIX Hawaii Southeast Options Reports Hawaii Southeast District Overview Hilo Kau Keaau • Scenario 1A: Hilo HS and IS stay on respective sites with phased reconstruction ($$$$) • Scenario 2A: Hilo IS becomes 6-8 ($$) • Option 9: Haaheo ES multi-purpose center ($$) • Option 13: Prioritized repairs and maintenance (all schools) ($$) • Option 16.1: Kapiolani ES bus loop and drop-off ($$) • Scenario 1A: Kau 6-12 and Naalehu K5 ($$$) • Option 5: Naalehu ES phased reconstruction ($$$$) • Option 7: Prioritized repairs and maintenance (all schools) ($$) • Option 8: Locally-determined enhancements (all schools) ($) • Option 9: Covered Walkways at Kau HS ($) • Scenario 1B: Mountain View ES phased reconstruction and move boundary ($$$$) • Option 2: Keaau HS and MS add rooftop lighting rods ($) • Option 9.1: Keaau MS administration/PLC/STEAM communityuse facility and drop-off area ($$$) • Option 9.2: Keaau MS parking lot expansion ($$) • Option 11: Keaau MS electrical updates ($$) • Option 14: Keaau ES expand pickup/drop-off loop ($$$) • Option 21: Prioritized repairs and maintenance • (all schools) ($$) • Scenario 1B: Pahoa HS/IS permanent buildings ($$$) • Scenario 2B: Pahoa ES permanent buildings ($$$) • Option 5: Pahoa ES new cafeteria ($$) • Option 6: Keonepoko ES electrical upgrades ($$) • Option 9: Prioritized repairs and maintenance (all schools) ($$) • Scenario 1B: Waiakea new elementary school; Waiakea IS replacement/ additions ($$$$) • Option 6: Waiakea Waena ES cafeteria addition ($$) • Option 8: Prioritized repairs and maintenance (all schools) ($$) Priority 2 • Option 7: Hilo Union ES electrical upgrade ($$) • Option 11.1: Kalanianaole K-8 demolition/replace restrooms ($$) • Option 3.1: Kau HS athletic master plan high-priority projects ($$$) • Option 12: Keaau MS replace portables with permanent classroom building ($$$) • Option 7: Pahoa HS athletic master plan projects ($$$) • Option 5: Waiakea complex-wide electrical upgrades ($$) Priority 3 • Option 4.2: Hilo HS football field improvements ($$) • Option 3: Keaau HS new synthetic field ($$) • Option 3: Pahoa ES covered walkways ($) • Option 4: Waiakea IS/ES expand bus loop and parent drop-off ($$$) • Option 2: Kau HS new STEAM classroom building ($$$) • Option 3.2: Kau HS athletic master plan other projects ($$$) • Option 5: Keaau HS vehicle drop-off improvements ($) • Option 6.2: Keaau HS aquatics facility ($$$) • Option 8: Keaau MS covered multipurpose facility and walkways ($$) • Option 20: Relocate public libraries at Mountain View ES and Keaau MS ($$$) • Option 22: Locally-determined enhancements (all schools) ($) • Option 4: Pahoa ES/HS/IS covered play court ($$) • Option 10: Locally-determined enhancements (all schools) ($) • Option 2: Waiakea HS athletic master plan project • Option 9: Locally-determined enhancements (all schools) ($) Priority 4 • Option 5: Hilo HS and Hilo IS pedestrian bridge/tunnel across Waianuenue Avenue ($$) • Option 8: Keaukaha ES replace Building A with a STEAM classroom building ($$$) • Option 10: Kaumana ES replace portables with new library, administration, and STEAM classroom building ($$$) • Option 11.2: Kalanianaole K-8 Buildings A and B STEAM renovations ($$) • Option 4: Kau HS or Naalehu ES dormitory ($$$) • Option 6.1: Keaau HS performing arts center ($$$) • Option 8: Build a HS performing arts center ($$$) Priority 5 • Option 4.1: Hilo HS athletic master plan projects ($) • Option 14: Locally-determined enhancements (all schools) ($) • Option 15: Work with Department of Public Safety on plan to relocate HCCC • Option 16.2: Kapiolani ES STEAM renovation ($$) Priority 1 Pahoa Waiakea Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 111 Hilo Complex DATA and NEEDS Stakeholder Voice: Enrollment and Facility Data: School (a) 2017-18/ 2023-24 Enrollment (b) Capacity (c) = (b) - (a) (d) = (a) / (b) Oldest / Projected 2023-24 Newest / Avg Capacity Projected Building Surplus Utilization 1136 / 1261 / 11% 1070 -191 % Old or Beyond Expected Life Adequacy Score / Rank Out of 260 1.18 50% 0.79 / 48 Student We’re always getting wet when it rains. 355 Hilo High (9-12) 356 Hilo Intermediate (7-8) 506 / 489 / -3% 598 109 0.82 1929 / 1993 / 72 69% 0.81 / 38 365 <ĂůĂŶŝĂŶĂ॒ŽůĞ 328 / 360 Elementary & / 10% Intermediate (K-8) 354 -6 1.02 1921 / 1980 / 71 66% 0.81 / 31 351 de Silva Elementary (K-6) 450 / 472 / 5% 404 -68 1.17 1959 / 2011 / 53 93% 0.57 / 227 352 ,Ă॒ĂŚĞŽ Elementary (K-6) 197 / 190 / -4% 154 -36 1.23 1931 / 1973 / 69 84% 0.40 / 259 357 Hilo Union Elementary (K-6) 417 / 461 / 11% 453 -8 1.02 1912 / 1976 / 81 64% 0.61 / 188 367 <ĂƉŝ॒ŽůĂŶŝ Elementary (K-6) 351 / 368 / 5% 489 121 0.75 1920 / 1990 / 83 100% 0.58 / 217 369 <Ă॒ƻŵĂŶĂ Elementary (K-6) 285 / 307 / 8% 280 -27 1.10 1938 / 1992 / 40 21% 0.49 / 250 372 Keaukaha Elementary (K-6) 433 / 460 / 6% 406 -54 1.13 1930 / 1982 / 58 76% 0.57 / 226 4,368 4,208 -160 1.04 69% 0.63 TOTAL The classrooms get over 90 degrees. I don’t know how they expect us to learn! 1922 / 2014 / 53 - - Student The UH system is interested in establishing more partnerships with the DOE. Let’s share our faculty and your facilities, especially in remote rural areas. - UH Community College Chancellor If you push your elbow too hard into the wall, it’ll go right through. - Principal Sure, we’d like to have a covered play court, but what we really need are new bathrooms. - Administrator Challenges: Ch • 11% enrollment growth at Hilo HS • Kapiolani ES 222 of 456 (49%) students GE out or attend charter • Net GEs cause school to exceed capacity (de Silva 86, Keaukaha 150, Haaheo 52) • Moderate flood risk: 100% of site in extreme tsunami zone (Keaukaha ES and Kapiolani ES) • More than 2/3 of buildings are old or beyond expected life • Capacity over-utilization at Haaheo ES • Capacity under-utilization at Kapiolani ES • More than 25% of capacity in portables (Keaukaha ES, Haaheo ES) • Industrial arts less than 50% of standard space: Hilo IS • Library less than 50% of standard space: Hilo IS, Kapiolani ES, de Silva ES, Keaukaha ES • Science less than 50% of standard space: Hilo HS • No science rooms at most elementary schools • Cafeteria less than 50% of standard space: Hilo HS, Hilo Union ES, Kaumana ES, de Silva ES, Kapiolani ES, Haaheo ES • Music less than 50% of standard space: Hilo HS, Kalanianaole ES/IS • No music or art rooms at most elementary schools • Admin less than 50% of standard space: de Silva ES • Locker/shower less than 50% of standard space: Hilo IS, Kalanianaole ES/IS • Resurface courts, training room • Regional Special Education specialty center for professional development and life skills instruction Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 112 Hilo Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS SCENARIOS 1A Hilo HS and IS stay on 1B New Hilo IS on new site; Hilo HS expands onto Hilo IS site respective sites with phased reconstruction $$$$$ • • $40-75M ‫ ڗ‬Priority 1 Develop site master plans for Hilo HS/IS Perform renovations and selective demolition and construction of multi-story buildings to net additional ### capacity Create collaborative, project-based educational spaces and open greenspace Phasing plan could begin construction on Hilo IS parking lot or fields Repurpose annex for educational use (e.g., 9th grade team or CTE) or parking lot • • • 1C New Hilo IS on Kapiolani site; Hilo HS expands onto Hilo IS site $$$$$ • • New Hilo HS; Hilo IS moves onto Hilo HS site; Hilo IS site repurposed $$$$$ Acquire new land and construct new ###-### student Hilo IS Perform selective demolition and reconstruction of the current Hilo IS campus for expanded Hilo HS facilities and fields Consider tunnel/bridge to connect campus • 1D • $$$$$ Same as Scenario 1B, except instead of acquiring new site, vacate Kapiolani ES campus and construct new ###-### student Hilo IS Make ES attendance boundary adjustments Perform selective demolition and reconstruction of the current Hilo IS campus for expanded Hilo HS facilities and fields Consider tunnel/bridge to connect campus • • • • Acquire new land and construct new #### student Hilo HS Perform selective demolition and reconstruction of the current Hilo HS campus for new Hilo IS facilities and fields Repurpose current Hilo IS site for land swap or educational and/or revenue-generating use Potential use could include shared district-wide Special Education Professional Development Center • • • Benefits Benefits Benefits Benefits • • • • • • • • • • • • • Relieves over-crowding at Hilo HS Provides new, modern learning environments for Hilo MS and HS students Addresses outdated buildings in poor condition Does not require new land acquisition Improves traffic safety and flow Creates additional greenspace • • • Relieves over-crowding and traffic at Hilo HS Provides new, modern learning environments for Hilo MS and HS students and would facilitate the conversion to a 6-8 configuration Addresses outdated buildings in poor condition New construction off site creates swing space that reduces operational disruption of phased reconstruction Rebuilt IS site could house specialty high-demand program(s) • • • No land acquisition time/cost Relieves over-crowding at Hilo HS Provides new, modern learning environments for Hilo MS and HS students Addresses outdated buildings in poor condition New construction off site creates swing space that reduces operational disruption of phased reconstruction Rebuilt IS site could house specialty high-demand program(s) • • • Relieves over-crowding at Hilo HS Provides new, modern learning environments for Hilo MS and HS students Addresses outdated buildings in poor condition. New construction off site creates swing space that reduces operational disruption of phased reconstruction Current Hilo IS site creates opportunity for educational and/or revenue-generating use Challenges Challenges Challenges Challenges • • • • • • • • • Operational disruption of extended construction on occupied sites If Hilo IS becomes a 6-8, that would add crowding to an already crowded site If annex used for education, would create a long walk-time between it and the main campus • • Land acquisition time/cost Hilo HS would be dangerously split by busy Waianuenue Avenue ADA challenges for commuting across the street Maintaining inclusiveness on “separate” campuses • • • • Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ Kapiolani ES consolidation Hilo HS would be dangerously split by busy Waianuenue Avenue Part of Kapiolani ES site is in tsunami zone Swing space during construction (neighboring schools currently over-utilized) Potential for growth in Lanakila homes project Study if closure would have disproportionate impact on students based on SES Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ Land acquisition time/cost Moving the high school from its historic location Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ Recommendation • Renovates and rebuilds crowded, aging facilities at Hilo S and HS while freeing up space at area ES for Pre-K and other renovations Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 113 Hilo Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS SCENARIOS 2A Hilo IS becomes 6-8 $$$$$ • $2.5-7.5M 2B ‫ ڗ‬Priority 1 Grade reconfiguration in conjunction with scenarios 1A-1D Reassign 6th grade from crowded elementary schools to Hilo IS Review boundaries and GE process impacting current 6th-8th grade school choices • • Hilo IS stays 7-8 $$$$$ • Hilo IS remains 7-8 and Hilo complex elementary schools remain K-6 Construct # elementary school classroom additions for total of ### additional capacity, to include new STEAM, Special Education, and Pre-K classrooms for enhanced instruction May require attendance boundary adjustments to balance capacity utilization • • Benefits Benefits • • • • • Relieves overcrowding at Hilo complex elementary schools without ES additions All Hilo complex students would benefit from new/rebuilt IS facilities starting in 6th grade instead of 7th 6th grade instructional requirements are more similar to 7-8th grade requirements than those for ES • No operational changes Additions relieve overcrowding at Hilo complex elementary schools New, modern specialized spaces for enhanced elementary STEAM and Special Education instruction Challenges Challenges • • • • Grade reconfiguration requires operational planning and staff development Overcrowding if Hilo IS remains in its current location Need for facility upgrades if on current site Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ • Cost of multiple additions would exceed cost of same capacity at one IS site Attendance boundary adjustment Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ Recommendation • Renovates and rebuilds crowded, aging facilities at Hilo Int and HS while freeing up space at area ES for PreK and other renovations Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 114 Hilo Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS FACILITY OPTIONS 3 Benefits • Removes outdated buildings • New, modern environments Replace old, outdated buildings (e.g., Buildings A and M) beyond expected life with new/renovated multi-story buildings for flexible, collaborative spaces • Opens up space for athletics and agricultural education for science, arts, and CTE. Use plot behind Building R, replacing alternative education and CTE buildings and/or replacing the old gym. Hilo HS new educational buildings • 4.1 Hilo HS athletic master plan projects 4.2 Hilo HS football field improvements • Resurface courts, training room 6 Hilo IS CTE/home economics renovation • Creates new, flexible learning environments • • • Consider locating in Building L Demolish Building B Included in Scenario 1A Hilo Union ES electrical upgrade • • Increase capacity of current electrical system In design stage • Allows for AC use alongside use of electronics in classrooms 8 Keaukaha ES replace Building A with a STEAM classroom building • Modern, flexible spaces • Eliminates liability of old buildings 9 Haaheo ES multi-purpose center • Creates new, flexible use space • • $2.4 million already allocated for a new multi-purpose center In progress and fully/partially funded Kaumana ES replace portables with new library, administration, and STEAM classroom building • Replace aging portables with multi-purpose teaching, library and administration space • Include two to four STEAM classrooms for art and science instruction 11.2 $$$$$ $$$$$ 500k–2.5M Stakeholder Voice Funding Category Priority Tier ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #1 n/a ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #6 $$$$$ • Pedestrian safety 11.1 Cost/ROM Range 2.5M-7.5M Hilo HS and Hilo IS pedestrian bridge/tunnel across Waianuenue Avenue 10 • Extends construction on occupied site • 2016 Statewide Athletic Master Plan 5 7 Challenges Kalanianaole K-8 renovate Buildings A and B • Create new STEAM classrooms and core classrooms • Include bathroom renovations $$$$$ 2.5M-7.5M ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS/MS - #5/4 $$$$$ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ MS - #3 $$$$$ 2.5M-7.5M $$$$$ 20M-40M $$$$$ 2.5M-7.5M • Creates new, flexible learning environments • Provides space for teacher collaboration • Relieves over-crowding • Creates new, flexible learning environments Kalanianaole K-8 buildings A and B STEAM renovations • Include bathroom renovations $$$$$ 20M-40M $$$$$ 2.5M-7.5M $$$$$ 2.5M-7.5M 5 ‫ړ‬ 3 ‫ژ‬ 4 ‫ڜ‬ n/a ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #3 2 ‫ڝ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #6 4 ‫ڜ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - last 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #5 4 ‫ڜ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #8 2 ‫ڝ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #8 4 ‫ڜ‬ Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 115 Hilo Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS FACILITY OPTIONS 12 District-wide mild-moderate Special Education job and life skills training center • Renovate two to four classrooms at a school for simulated work environment for job and life skills training • Program design study 13 14 15 Prioritized repairs and maintenance (all schools) • Safety, code, and maintenance projects, to include site drainage Benefits Challenges • Provides Special Education students real-world learning environments for life and work preparation • Transportation • Empowers schools and students to define projects at time of execution Work with Department of Public Safety on plan to relocate HCCC • Safety: currently 0.3 miles from IS/HS sites • Work with appropriate agencies to relocate the correctional center away from the current HS/IS 16.1 16.2 Kapiolani ES bus loop and drop-off Kapiolani ES STEAM renovation $$$$$ • Pedestrian safety • Modern, flexible spaces Funding Category Priority Tier ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS/MS/ES - #3 n/a 1 ‫ڗ‬ 500k-2.5M ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS/MS/ES - #4/2/2 5 ‫ړ‬ $$$$$ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS – last 5 ‫ړ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #4/7 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #4/7 5 ‫ړ‬ 7.5M-20M • Requires policy to consistently allocate and implement projects. Stakeholder Voice ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS/MS/ES - #2/1/1 $$$$$ • Addresses top-priority needs at each school • Budget allotment for each school to fund stakeholder-driven projects Locally-determined enhancements (all schools) Cost/ROM Range $$$$$ $$$$$ 2.5M-7.5M $$$$$ 2.5M-7.5M Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 116 Waiakea Complex DATA and NEEDS Stakeholder Voice: Enrollment and Facility Data: School (a) 2017-18/ 2023-24 Enrollment 1134 / 1394 / 23% (b) Capacity (c) = (b) - (a) (d) = (a) / (b) Oldest / Projected 2023-24 Newest / Avg Capacity Projected Building Surplus Utilization % Old or Beyond Expected Life Adequacy ^ĐŽƌĞ ͬ ZĂŶŬ Out of 260 1480 86 0.94 1977 / 1998 / 36 2% 0.83 / 22 tĂŝĈŬĞĂ 777 / 1042 Intermediate (6-8) / 34% 927 -115 1.12 1939 / 1991 / 49 71% 0.73 / 92 384 tĂŝĈŬĞĂ Elementary (K-5) 795 / 986 / 24% 828 -158 1.19 1963 / 1993 / 43 45% 0.64 / 162 386 tĂŝĈŬĞĂǁĂĞŶĂ Elementary (K-5) 670 / 808 / 21% 734 -74 1.10 1952 / 1975 / 53 50% 0.61 / 196 4,230 3,969 -261 1.07 42% 0.70 389 tĂŝĈŬĞĂ ,ŝŐŚ ;ϵͲ 12) 385 TOTAL My company wants to work with high school students on real world projects like we do with UH students, but policies are standing in the way. - Local Business Leader The power infrastructure is so weak that we have to choose whether to plug in the fan so we don’t die of heat, or use the projector to teach with. - Principal Once you have to drop off and pick up multiple kids at different schools every day, you’ll understand how dangerous the traffic is. School ‘road rage’ is real. - Parent Challenges: Ch • Family and consumer science less than 50% of standard space: Waiakea IS • Library less than 50% of standard space: Waiakea IS, Waiakea ES • Science less than 50% of standard space: Waiakea IS • No science rooms at elementary schools • Cafeteria less than 50% of standard space: Waiakea IS, Waiakeawaena ES • Many buildings beyond expected useful life: Waiakea IS, Waiakeawaena ES • Art less than 50% of standard space: Waiakea IS • No music rooms at elementary schools • Admin less than 50% of standard space: Waiakeawaena ES • Capacity over-utilization at all schools except Waiakea HS • PE lockers less than 50% of standard space: Waiakea IS • Resurface courts, athletic lockers • Regional Special Education specialty center for professional development and life skills instruction • 21%-34% enrollment growth at all Waiakea complex schools Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 117 Waiakea Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS SCENARIOS 1A Waiakea intermediate and elementary classroom additions 1B Waiakea new elementary school; Waiakea IS additions $$$$$ $$$$$ • Keep current operational scenario with one intermediate school 6-8 and two elementary schools K-5 Replace portables and build new classroom additions at Waiakea IS and both elementary schools to include STEAM, Special Education, and collaborative flexible spaces to net 350 additional capacity Increase parking capacity • • • $40M-75M • • Waiakea new ES; Waiakea complex goes K-6 and 7-8 ‫ ڗ‬Priority 1 Acquire land and construct 750 student elementary school Redraw ES boundaries to balance capacity utilization at three ~750 student schools Replace/build new classroom additions at Waiakea IS to include STEAM, SPED, and collaborative flexible spaces to net 125 additional capacity Need to determine if new boundaries will include current Hilo Complex boundaries • 1C $$$$$ • Similar to 1B, with grade reconfiguration to K-5 ES and 6-8 IS Acquire land and construct 850 student elementary school Redraw ES boundaries to balance capacity utilization at three ~850 student schools Replace/build new classroom additions at Waiakeawaena ES to include STEAM, Special Education, and collaborative flexible spaces to net 125 additional capacity SAC: consider 7-9 configuration • • • • Benefits Benefits Benefits • • • • • Relieves over-utilized intermediate and elementary schools Provides new specialized classrooms while replacing portables No operational changes to implement • • • • Relieves over-utilized intermediate and elementary schools Keeps elementary schools from operating above 1,000 enrollment Reduced traffic concentration Creates additional greenspace 21st century educational spaces • • • • Relieves over-utilized intermediate and elementary schools Keeps elementary schools from operating above 1,000 enrollment No major construction required at Waiakea IS Reduced traffic concentration Could benefit students developmentally Challenges Challenges Challenges • • • • • • • • • • • Large schools may be challenging to manage. Enrollments will range from 808 to 1042 at each ES and Int school by 2023-24. Would adversely impact adequacy of already undersized core spaces such as cafeterias, libraries, and administration Extended construction during school operations Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ Land acquisition time/cost Attendance boundary adjustment Unknown impact on GE applications Inequity between new ES and older two ES Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ Land acquisition time/cost Attendance boundary adjustment Inequity between new ES and older two ES Curriculum challenge to move 6th grade teachers to elementary schools Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ Recommendations • Renovates and rebuilds crowded, aging facilities at Waiakea Int and ES while improving traffic safety and flow on campus Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 118 Waiakea Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS FACILITY OPTIONS 2 3 4 5 Waiakea HS athletic master plan projects • Waiakea IS new classroom and STEAM buildings • • • • 7 Replace buildings A, B, D, E, and F with new facility(ies) Include new STEAM classrooms Separate 6th and 7th-8th grade populations Included in Scenario 1A Waiakea IS/ES expand bus loop and parent drop-off • • • • Widen covered waiting area Expand parking into adjacent field Lengthen and/or change narrow bus loop and parent drop-off area Add school crossing signs to W. Puainako Street Waiakea complex-wide electrical upgrades • • 6 Resurface courts, athletic lockers SAC-edited option: replaces former options specifying upgrades only at Waiakea IS, Waiakea ES and Waiakeawaena ES Increase capacity of current electrical system Waiakea ES cafeteria addition District-wide mild-moderate Special Education job and life skills training center • Renovate two to four classrooms at a school with capacity for a simulated work environment for job and life-skills training 8 9 Prioritized repairs and maintenance (all schools) • Safety, code, and maintenance projects to include site drainage Locally-determined enhancements (all schools) • Budget allotment for each school to fund stakeholder-driven projects Benefits Challenges • Creates modern, flexible learning environments • Eliminates liability for old buildings in poor condition $$$$$ • Creates modern, flexible learning environments • Eliminates liability for old buildings in poor condition • Reduces traffic back-up on W. Puainako St. • Improves safety • Provides Special Education students real-world learning environments for life and work preparation ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS – last $$$$$ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #4 Funding Category Priority Tier 4 ‫ڜ‬ n/a ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ MS – #3 3 ‫ژ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #1 2 ‫ڝ‬ 2.5M-7.5M ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #3 1 ‫ڗ‬ $$$$$ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS/MS/ES - #2 $$$$$ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS/MS/ES #1/2/2 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS/MS/ES #3/4/4 4 ‫ڜ‬ 20M-40M $$$$$ 2.5M-7.5M $$$$$ Expands current cafeteria which is less than 50% of standard size Stakeholder Voice 2.5M-7.5M $$$$$ • Allows for air conditioning use alongside use of electronics in classrooms • Cost/ROM Range • Transportation • Addresses top-priority needs at each school • Empowers schools and students • Requires policy to to define projects at time of consistently allocate and execution implement projects 7.5M-20M $$$$$ 500k-2.5M n/a Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 119 Kau Complex DATA and NEEDS Stakeholder Voice: Enrollment and Facility Data: School 368 (a) 2017-18/ 2023-24 Enrollment <Ă॒ƻ ,ŝŐŚ Θ WĈŚĂůĂ 496 / 465 Elementary (K-12) / -6% (b) Capacity 592 Oldest / (c) = (b) - (a) (d) = (a) / (b) Projected 2023-24 Newest / Avg Capacity Projected Building Surplus Utilization 127 0.79 1881 / 2000 / 77 % Old or Beyond Expected Life 64% Adequacy Score / Rank Out of 260 The kids like to stay on campus until 6:30 pm because it’s safer and there’s grass. - Kau HS and Pahala ES Representative Thank goodness it was my daughter who fell through the floor. - Kau HS and Pahala ES Representative 0.65 / 145 Some families wait to send their kids to school until they’re 7 years old. We keep our classes hovering around 20 because 3rd graders are only in their second year of school. Children are not ready. They are behind. - Naalehu ES Representative 380 EĈ॒ĈůĞŚƵ Elementary (K-6) 388 / 378 / -3% 364 -14 1.04 1928 / 2011 / 63 71% Getting kids to school is another big problem besides getting facility needs. - Naalehu ES Representative 0.52 / 240 Main building is sinking in certain areas. I have to put my legs around the desk to stay still because my chair slides off. - Naalehu ES Principal TOTAL 843 956 113 0.88 67% 0.59 Challenges: Ch • Libraries less than 50% of standard space • No science rooms at Naalehu • More than 2/3 of buildings are old or beyond expected life • Art less than 50% of standard space: Kau HS and Pahala ES • No music or art rooms at Naalehu • More than 25% of capacity in portables (Naalehu) • New track, athletic lockers • Cafeterias less than 50% of standard space • Transportation distances Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 120 Kau Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS SCENARIOS 1A Kau 6-12 and Naalehu K-5 $$$$$ • • $20-40M Kau 9-12 and Naalehu K-8 ‫ ڗ‬Priority 1 Move all area K-5 students to Naalehu Move all 6th graders from Naalehu to Kau as a 6-12 campus Renovate ES for MS grades See Option 5 for capital project at Naalehu ES • • 1B 1C New Oceanview K-5, Kau 6-12, and Naalehu ES K-5 $$$$$ • Keep current operational scenario $$$$$ Build new building for MS education on Naalehu site Move all Kau/Pahala K-8th grade students to new building at Naalehu site • 1D • • $$$$$ Move Pahala ES program to Naalehu Acquire new site through direct purchase or land swap Redraw ES boundaries between Naalehu ES and new ES at Oceanview • • Continue operating schools in their current configurations and locations: Kau HS and Pahala ES remains K-12 and Naalehu ES remains K-6 Benefits Benefits Benefits Benefits • • • • • • • • • • • Concentrates ES education in one area location Allows the HS campus to focus on MS and HS education Does not necessarily require capital investments though Naalehu has significant condition needs and will need major renovations or building replacement in the near future Equity and consistency across the grade levels Helps with MS transition, builds camaraderie from the beginning K-12 stays together Funding concentrated by grade level Provides new facility for MS education Allows the HS campus to focus on HS education • • Provides a new area ES near local population center Reduced transportation Increases access and attendance No changes to implement Challenges Challenges Challenges Challenges • • • • • • • • • • • • Changing grade configurations Transportation challenges, need more buses Community outreach needed Creates a small HS campus and reduces funding Gifted and Talented Instruction Separating ES and MS More students on already impacted Naalehu ES campus Land acquisition time/cost Site infrastructure limited at Oceanview Potential lava risk Staffing • • • • • Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ Many students live in/around Oceanview with some facing challenges commuting to school (attendance) Small ES programs distributed between Pahala ES and Naalehu ES Staffing Transportation Funding spread too thin Have to have large class sizes due to staffing and challenges Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ Recommendation • Build a new school on the Naalehu site to educate all area PK-5 students and renovate current Kau site to include MS STEAM rooms for all area 6-8 students. Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 121 Kau Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS FACILITY OPTIONS 2 Kau HS new STEAM classroom building • Reconstruct outdated 1881 and 1909 buildings and principal’s cottage as twostory ## classroom building equipped with specialized STEAM, Special Education, and CTE spaces 3.1 Kau HS athletic master plan high-priority projects 3.2 Kau HS athletic master plan other projects Benefits Challenges • Removes outdated buildings • New, modern environments $$$$$ 20M-40M $$$$$ • 2016 Athletic Master Plan • Locker rooms, new track, field renovation, wrestling and training room • Kau HS or Naalehu ES dormitory 5 Naalehu ES phased reconstruction • • • Repurpose or build new facilities for student and instructor dormitories Develop site master plan and perform phased selective demolition and reconstruction of school to enhance Pre-K, Special Education, and STEAM programs with flexible, collaborative spaces Include Pre-K and severe equipment, capacity ~600 6 Naalehu ES new Pre-K facility 7 Prioritized repairs and maintenance (all schools) 8 Locally-determined enhancements (all schools) 9 Covered Walkways at Kau HS • • 20M-40M $$$$$ • 2016 Athletic Master Plan Locker rooms, new track, field renovation, wrestling and training room 4 Construct new 4-6 classroom Pre-K/early childhood building Included in Option 5 • Safety, code, and maintenance projects, to include site drainage • Budget allotment for each school to fund stakeholder-driven projects • Build covered walkways at Kau HS following renovations/new construction projects Cost/ROM Range 20M-40M $$$$$ • Creates boarding opportunity for needy students traveling long distances to school 20M-40M Stakeholder Voice 4 ‫ڜ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #3 2 ‫ڝ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #3 4 ‫ڜ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #8 last 5 ‫ړ‬ 1 ‫ڗ‬ $$$$$ 40M-75M ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #5 tie • Serves community high need for early education • New, modern environments $$$$$ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #5 tie $$$$$ 7.5M-20M $$$$$ • Empowers schools and students to define projects at time of execution • Requires policy to consistently allocate and implement projects 500k-2.5M • Empowers schools and students to define projects at time of execution • Requires policy to consistently allocate and implement projects 500k-2.5M $$$$$ Priority Tier ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #4 • Replaces outdated buildings • Removes exposure to heat and vog • New, modern environments • Addresses top-priority needs at each school Funding Category n/a ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #1 tie 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #5 tie 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #1 tie 1 ‫ڗ‬ Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 122 Keaau Complex DATA and NEEDS Stakeholder Voice: Enrollment and Facility Data: School 354 <ĞĂ॒ĂƵ ,ŝŐŚ ;ϵͲϭϮͿ (a) 2017-18/ 2023-24 Enrollment 1030 / 1132 / 10% (b) Capacity 1052 (c) = (b) - (a) (d) = (a) / (b) Oldest / Projected 2023-24 Newest / Avg Capacity Projected Building Surplus Utilization -80 1.08 ϭϵϵϵ ͬ ϭϵϵϵ ͬ ϭϵ % Old or Beyond Expected Life 0% Adequacy Score / Rank Out of 260 qu quotes q uo otttes e es 0.87 / 6 If you push your elbow too hard into the wall, it’ll go right through. - Principal 370 <ĞĂ॒ĂƵ DŝĚĚůĞ ;ϲͲ 8) ϲϵϳ ͬ ϳϰϱ / 7% 862 117 0.86 ϭϵϲϮ ͬ ϮϬϭϯ ͬ 31 17% 0.78 / 55 353 <ĞĂ॒ĂƵ ůĞŵĞŶƚĂƌLJ ϴϵϳ ͬ ϵϰϬ (K-5) / 5% 780 -160 1.21 ϭϵϵϲ ͬ ϭϵϵϲ ͬ 22 0% 0.71 / 107 ϯϳϵ DŽƵŶƚĂŝŶ sŝĞǁ Elementary (K-5) 502 / 506 / 1% 543 37 Ϭ͘ϵϯ ϭϵϯϭ ͬ ϭϵϵϵ ͬ 38 22% 0.61 / 202 3,323 3,237 -86 1.03 10% 0.74 TOTAL Sure, we’d like to have a covered play court, but what we really need are new bathrooms. - Administrator Our school is In remote areas with low income communities like ours, it’s important to consider the needs of the community. - Contributor Challenges: Ch • 10% enrollment growth at Keaau HS • Mountain View ES 365 of 778 (47%) students GE out or attend charter • Industrial Arts and family and consumer science less than 50% of standard space: Keaau MS • Library less than 50% of standard space: Keaau MS, Mountain View ES • No science rooms at Mountain View ES • Cafeterias less than 50% of standard space • Some buildings beyond expected useful life at Mountain View ES • Music less than 50% of standard space: Keaau HS • Art less than 50%: Keaau MS • No music or art rooms at ES • Capacity over-utilization at Keaau HS and Keaau ES • More than 25% of capacity in portables: Mountain View ES • New synthetic field Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 123 Keaau Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS SCENARIOS 1A Keep current operational scenario 1B Mountain View ES phased reconstruction and move boundary $$$$$ $$$$$ • All Keaau schools continue to operate within same grade configurations (K-5, 6-8, 9-12) and on same campuses • • • $40M-75M ‫ ڗ‬Priority 1 SAC-created option Rebuild or renovate Mountain View ES, adding 200+ seats Change boundaries between Keaau ES and Mountain View ES to relieve over-crowding at Keaau ES Benefits Benefits • No changes to implement • Provides new learning environments to area students attending Mountain View ES • Relieves over-crowding at Keaau ES • Improves safety for students at Mountain View ES (further from road) Challenges Challenges • Without additional capacity, this scenario implies moderate capacity over-utilization at Keaau HS (108%) and significant crowding at Keaau ES (121%) • Boundary change Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ Recommendation • Create new 21st century ES for Mountain View ES students and balance enrollment between Mountain View ES and Keaau ES through a boundary change Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 124 Keaau Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS FACILITY OPTIONS 2 Keaau HS and MS add rooftop lighting rods Benefits • Improves safety • Three lightning strikes recorded within five years • EPC5 addition • Improves athletic program Keaau HS new synthetic field 4 Keaau HS expand bus loop and parent drop-off • Refer to Option 14 • Reduces traffic on KeaauPahoa Road • Improves safety 5 Keaau HS vehicle drop off improvements • Meets ADA compliance 6.2 • Project defined in 2016 Statewide Athletic Master Plan 2.5M-7.5M ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS – last 3 ‫ژ‬ $$$$$ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #7 $$$$$ 4 ‫ڜ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #2 5 ‫ړ‬ 20M-40M ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #2 4 ‫ڜ‬ $$$$$ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ MS - #6 $$$$$ • Must collaborate with county • Reduces traffic on KeaauPahoa Road • Improves safety 8 Keaau MS covered multi-purpose facility and walkways • Creates sheltered areas for play and informal educational activities Keaau MS administration/PLC/STEAM communityuse facility and drop-off area • • • Two stories For joint complex area superintendent’s office, school admin, PLC, science and art instruction, and community use Demolish Buildings B (condemned),D, E, and G Keaau MS parking lot expansion $$$$$ 2.5M-7.5M • Creates flexible use administrative, student and community-use facility • Collaboration among administrators, teachers and the community • Provides modern, flexible learning environments for science and art • Eliminates liability for old and condemned buildings n/a ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #4 $$$$$ 20M-40M Keaau MS expand bus loop and parent drop-off 9.2 ‫ڗ‬ $$$$$ Keaau HS aquatics facility Priority Tier 1 Keaau HS performing arts center • (Note: need to confirm scope of phases not constructed from original design) Funding Category ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #4 500k-2.5M • Construct covered outdoor venue for dining, assemblies, performances, and community use • Covered multi-purpose facility and covered walkways Stakeholder Voice $$$$$ • EPC5 correction 7 9.1 Cost/ROM Range 500k-2.5M 3 6.1 Challenges $$$$$ 20M-40M $$$$$ 2.5M-7.5M n/a ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ MS - #9 4 ‫ڜ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #8 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #8 1 ‫ڗ‬ Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 125 Keaau Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS FACILITY OPTIONS 10 Keaau MS gym 11 Keaau MS electrical updates 12 Benefits Challenges • SAC-created option • Reference Option 8 15 16 17 $$$$$ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ MS - #6 SAC-created option Monitor growth in the area and plan for new construction as the population grows If warranted, initiate site selection and pre-design activities. Keaau ES expand pick-up/drop-off loop • • SAC-created option Include traffic study Keaau ES additional classroom buildings • • • SAC-created option Create new capacity to reduce over-utilization of existing capacity Capacity addressed by Scenario 1B Mountain View ES phased reconstruction • • • • • • • SAC-created option Rebuild the campus over time Separate the public library and school with separate entrances Electric system updates Create outdoor play area for upper elementary students Relocate school further away from Highway 11 Included in Scenario 1B (plus new drop off and negotiate with country about library) Mountain View ES build new library • • • Convert existing library to dual-purpose administration and STEAM classroom use Demolish Building A Included in Option 16 n/a ‫ڗ‬ 20M-40M ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ MS - #4 2 ‫ڝ‬ • Current Keaau MS is projected to have a surplus of over 100 seats through 2023-24; new capacity is not projected to be needed $$$$$ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ MS – last • Improves safety and time for pick-up and drop-off • Limited room for additional capacity on site $$$$$ • Provides relief to overutilized facility • Limited room for additional capacity on site $$$$$ • • Priority Tier 1 Keaau MS replace portables with permanent classroom building Plan for a second middle school in/around Uka Funding Category ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ MS - #1 $$$$$ 2.5M-7.5M • 14 Stakeholder Voice • SAC-created option • Ongoing project • SAC-created option 13 Cost/ROM Range • Provides new learning environments • Improves campus condition • Provides new, flexible learning environments • Improves campus safety • Provides modern, professional space for teacher collaboration • Provides modern, flexible learning environments for science and art • Eliminates liability for old and condemned buildings n/a ‫ڗ‬ 20M-40M ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #4 $$$$$ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #7 n/a $$$$$ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #2 n/a $$$$$ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #6 n/a 1 Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 126 Keaau Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS FACILITY OPTIONS 18 Mountain View ES build new classroom building and expand bus loop/drop-off • • • • 19 Build two-story classroom building, including STEAM classrooms Demolish Buildings B, C, and portables Expand bus loop/drop-off Included in Option 16 District-wide mild-moderate Special Education job and life skills training center • Renovate two to four classrooms at a school with capacity for a simulated work environment for job and life skills training 20 Relocate public libraries at Mountain View ES and Keaau MS • • • SAC-created option Relocate public libraries off school property and repurpose for school use Discussion with county in advance of capital funding 21 Prioritized repairs and maintenance (all schools) 22 Locally-determined enhancements (all schools) • Safety, code, and maintenance projects to include site drainage • Budget allotment for each school to fund stakeholder-driven projects Benefits Challenges • Provides modern, professional space for teacher collaboration • Provides modern, flexible learning environments for science and art • Replaces old condemned buildings • Reduces traffic on KeaauPahoa Road • Improves safety • Provides Special Education students realworld learning environments for life and work preparation Stakeholder Voice Funding Category Priority Tier $$$$$ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #3 n/a $$$$$ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #3 n/a • Transportation • Keeps library pedestrian • Need to work with local traffic off school campuses communities on the idea of during school hours; moving a public library improves safety $$$$$ 20M-40M $$$$$ • Addresses top-priority needs at each school • Empowers schools and students to define projects at time of execution Cost/ROM Range 7.5M-20M • Requires policy to consistently allocate and implement projects $$$$$ 500k-2.5M ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #5 ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS/MS/ES #1/3/1 ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS/MS/ES #6/7/8 4 ‫ڜ‬ 1 ‫ڗ‬ 4 ‫ڜ‬ Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 127 Pahoa Complex DATA and NEEDS Stakeholder Voice: Enrollment and Facility Data: School 383 WĈŚŽĂ ,ŝŐŚ Θ Intermediate (712) (a) 2017-18/ 2023-24 Enrollment 532 / 490 / -8% (b) Capacity 911 (c) = (b) - (a) (d) = (a) / (b) Oldest / Projected 2023-24 Newest / Avg Capacity Projected Building Surplus Utilization 421 0.54 1912 / 2012 / 41 % Old or Beyond Expected Life 25% Adequacy Score / Rank Out of 260 We want to learn real world subjects that will help us get jobs. - Student 0.81 / 37 The parents were uncertain what to do when the lava flow started. Are the kids safe? Do I go get the kids or wait until after work? 381 391 WĈŚŽĂ ůĞŵĞŶƚĂƌLJ 418 / 358 (K-6) / -14% Keonepoko Elementary (K-6) TOTAL 454 96 0.79 620 / 706 / 14% 674 -32 1.05 1,554 2,039 485 0.76 1947 / 1995 / 43 1991 / 1999 / 25 42% - Principal 0.45 / 255 5% 0.65 / 153 24% 0.63 Moving a school because of lava or tsunami is “a” factor but not “THE” factor. If you based your decision on that, you would have to close down all the schools on the Big Island. - Administrator Challenges: Ch • Pahoa HS 804 of 1285 (63%) Keonepoko 658 of 1114 (59%) Pahoa ES 149 of 228 (65%) students GE out or attend charter • Industrial Arts and family and consumer science less than 50% of standard space: Keaau MS • Library less than 50% of standard space: Pahoa ES • No science rooms at elementary schools • Some buildings beyond expected useful life • Music and Art less than 50% of standard space: Pahoa HS • No music or art rooms at elementary schools • Capacity over-utilization at Keaau HS and Keaau ES • More than 25% of capacity in portables: Pahoa ES • PE lockers less than 50% of standard space: Pahoa HS • Renovate fields, renovate tracks, resurface courts, athletic lockers • Admin less than 50% of standard space: Keonepoko ES Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 128 Pahoa Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS SCENARIOS 1A Pahoa HS/IS new site 1B Pahoa HS/IS permanent buildings $$$$$ $$$$$ • Acquire land outside of projected areas of probable lava flow and develop new school for ### students. • $20-40M Pahoa HS/IS minor renovations ‫ ڗ‬Priority 1 Create a site master plan to guide new construction on site to replace aging portables and termite damaged buildings with new, multi-story construction Replace ## portables with ## classroom building Scenarios 1B and 2B with engagements to determine grade configuration • • 1C 1D Pahoa MS; build on new site apart from the HS $$$$$ • $$$$$ Perform prioritized repairs and maintenance • Build a new middle school facility separate from the current high school site; renovate the high school on site Could be on the existing ES site if new ES is built (see Scenario 2A) • Benefits Benefits Benefits Benefits • • • • • • • Reduced safety and asset preservation risks (higher elevation) Provides new, modern facility Probable community support if • • Provides new, modern learning environments to replace old portable buildings in poor condition New modern, flexible learning environments Facility and site upgrades: covered walkways, AC, safety upgrades, parking • Avoids potential stakeholder opposition Avoids financial risk of investing in new construction near active and historic lava flows Relatively quick and inexpensive as compared to other options Challenges Challenges Challenges • • • • • Land acquisition time/cost Potential opposition of community members choosing to attend school in Pahoa (history) Increased transportation time/cost • • Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ Safety risk of operating school near active and historic lava flows Financial risk of investing new construction near active and historic lava flows Overcoming current project backlog and history of partially funded projects Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ • Challenges Safety risk of operating school near active and historic lava flows Stakeholders not being satisfied with minor renovations Stakeholder Voice Focuses on environments of MS and HS populations with the intent to promote safety and ease transitions between grade levels մմմմմ • • • Low enrollment – difficulty affording full complement of programs and staff Land acquisition time/cost Moving and/or splitting staff between campuses Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ Recommendation • Create new 21st century schools for the Pahoa community Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 129 3DKRD Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS SCENARIOS 2A Pahoa ES new site 2B Pahoa ES permanent buildings $$$$$ $$$$$ • Acquire land outside of projected areas of probable lava flow and develop new school for ### students. • $20-40M Pahoa ES minor renovations ‫ ڗ‬Priority 1 Create a site master plan to guide new construction on site to replace aging portables with new, multi-story construction Replace ## portables with ## classroom building Include cafeteria on the ES site Scenarios 1B and 2B with engagements to determine grade configuration • • • 2C 2D New Pahoa ES to merge Pahoa ES and Keonepoko ES on one site $$$$$ • $$$$$ Perform prioritized repairs and maintenance • • SAC-created option Build new ES to house both current Pahoa ES and Keonepoko ES students Could repurpose existing Keonepoko ES site for new HS and/or MS (see scenarios 1A,B and D) • Benefits Benefits Benefits Benefits • • • • • • • Reduces safety and asset preservation risks Provides new, modern facility Elementary having access to their own cafeteria • • Provides new, modern learning environments to replace old portable buildings in poor condition New modern, flexible Current ES has to use the HS cafeteria; cannot use it during lock-downs Avoids potential stakeholder opposition Avoids financial risk of investing in new construction near active and historic lava flows • • Creates new learning environments for Pahoa ES students Creates a larger ES population on one site allowing for increased resources and programming Creates new site for potential HS and/or MS use at Keonepoko ES Challenges Challenges Challenges Challenges • • • • • • • Land acquisition time/cost Potential opposition of community members choosing to attend school in Pahoa Increased transportation time/cost Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ • Safety risk of operating school near active and historic lava flows Financial risk of investing new construction near active and historic lava flows Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ Safety risk of operating school near active and historic lava flows Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ Consolidating two elementary schools Would create an ES of ~ 1,000 capacity Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ Recommendation • Create new 21st century schools for the Pahoa community Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 130 3DKRD Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS FACILITY OPTIONS 3 4 5 Pahoa ES covered walkways • • SAC-created option Build ES its own cafeteria (currently uses the HS cafeteria) 6 Keonepoko ES electrical upgrades 7 Pahoa HS athletic master plan projects 8 Build a HS performing arts center 9 Prioritized repairs and maintenance (all schools) 10 Locally-determined enhancements (all schools) • • Shelter from exposure to elements Follow through on existing rewiring project $$$$$ • Covered play area for students $$$$$ 2.5M-7.5M • Provides ES its own cafeteria for reliable use • Students would not need to cross the street to use a cafeteria shared by the HS (which is occasionally unavailable) $$$$$ 2.5M-7.5M $$$$$ • Allows for air conditioning use alongside use of electronics in classrooms 2.5M-7.5M $$$$$ • 2016 Athletic Master Plan • Locker rooms, field renovation, resurface courts • SAC-created option • Safety, code, and maintenance projects to include site drainage • Budget allotment for each school to fund stakeholder-driven projects Cost/ROM Range 500k-2.5M SAC-created option Should revisit scope based on design of Scenario 1B and 2B Pahoa ES new cafeteria • • Challenges Connect campus’ numerous portables to permanent buildings Designed; bid came in too high. Should revisit scope based on design of Scenario 2B. Pahoa ES/HS/IS covered play court • • Benefits 20M-40M $$$$$ • Creates performing arts venue in Pahoa • Could double as a shelter-in-place facility 20M-40M $$$$$ • Addresses top-priority needs at each school • Empowers schools and students to define projects at time of execution 7.5M-20M • Requires policy to consistently allocate and implement projects $$$$$ 500k-2.5M Stakeholder Voice Funding Category Priority Tier ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #2 3 ‫ژ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #4 4 ‫ڜ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #1 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #5 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #2 2 ‫ڝ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS – #4 5 ‫ړ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS /ES - #1/3 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS/ES – #3/6 4 ‫ڜ‬ Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 131 APPENDIX Kauai Options Reports 132 Kauai District Overview District-wide Options (Priority 1): Option PAC: Community-based performing arts center ($$$$) Option PED: District-wide initiative to address pedestrian safety (e.g., Chiefess Kaumualii ES) ($) Option HA: District-wide implement heat abatement program ($$$$) Kapaa Priority 1 • Scenario 1A: Hanalei ES and Kilauea ES serve K-5 instead of K-6 (with community engagement) ($) • Option 4: Kapaa HS and ES phased reconstruction ($$$$) • Option 9: Prioritized repairs and maintenance (all schools) ($$) • Option 10: Locally-determined enhancements (all schools) ($) • Option 11.1: Kapaa HS new gym ($$$) • Option 11.3: Kapaa HS softball field lights ($) • Option 14: Kapaa ES complete stalled library project ($$$) • Option 15: Prioritized furniture/equipment refresh ($$) Kauai • • • • • • • • • • Option 2.2: Kauai HS renovations of Building O ($$$) Option 8: Kaumualii ES new site entrance/exit ($$) Option 10: Kaumualii ES whole school renovations ($$) Option 11: Prioritized repairs and maintenance (all schools) ($$) Option 12: Locally-determined enhancements (all schools) ($) Option 13: Wilcox ES site improvements ($$) Option 15: Koloa ES site improvements ($$) Option 17.1: Kauai HS new gym ($$$) Option 17.2: Kauai HS girl’s lockers ($$$) Option 18: Prioritized furniture/equipment refresh ($$) Waimea • • • • • • • • • Priority 2 • • • • • • Option 11.2: Kapaa HS other athletic master plan projects (track/field) ($$) • Option 1: Kauai HS phased renovations and portable replacements ($$$$) • Option 2.1: Kauai HS renovations of Building S ($$) • Option 14: Wilcox ES new classroom building ($$$) • Option 16.1: Koloa ES new classroom building portable replacement ($$$) • Option 7: Kekaha ES new covered play court ($$) • Option 12: Kapaa HS swimming pool ($$) • Option 4: Kauai HS lounge space in Building K repurposed for STEAM ($$) • Option 17.3: Kauai HS athletic courts/fields ($$) • Option 19: Wilcox ES space for staff/student collaboration ($) • Option 1: Waimea HS culinary teaching kitchen and STEAM classroom in place of Building C ($$$) • Option 2: Waimea HS covered multi-purpose area between Buildings C and F ($$) • Option 6: Eleele ES library renovations and multi-purpose covered space and addition ($$) • Option 7: Kapaa MS classroom renovations ($$$) • Option 8: Hanalei ES renovations ($$) • Option 3: Kauai HS move music program building to M • Option 5: Kauai HS Building M repurposed for teacher/admin offices ($$) • Option 8: Kekaha ES new administration facility ($$) • Option 10: Waimea Canyon MS convert existing building to black box theater ($$) Priority 4 Priority 5 • Option 4: Waimea HS CTE renovations and enhancements ($$$) • Option 9: Kalahea ES multi-purpose covered space and addition ($$) • Option 3: Kilauea ES site improvements (covered play court, student dropoff) ($$) • Option 13: Kapaa HS performing arts center ($$$) Priority 3 Option 6.1: Kauai HS new two-story classroom building ($$$) Option 6.2: Kauai HS new covered multi-purpose space ($$$) Option 9: Kaumualii ES new playground ($) Option 16.2: Koloa ES multi-media library building ($$$) Option 20: Kauai HS performing arts center ($$$) Option 3: Waimea HS new gym ($$$) Option 5: Eleele ES new two-story, 12-classroom building ($$$) Option 11: Waimea Canyon MS build covered play court ($$) Option 12: Waimea Canyon renovate library into maker space ($) Option 13: Prioritized repairs and maintenance (all schools) ($) Option 14: Locally-determined enhancements (all schools) ($) Option 15: Waimea Canyon MS construct/convert science classrooms, and convert former ES rooms to MS standards ($$) Option 16: Prioritized furniture/equipment refresh ($$) Option 17: Waimea HS or MS performing arts center ($$$) Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 134 Kapaa Complex DATA and NEEDS Stakeholder Voice: Enrollment and Facility Data: School (a) 2017-18/ 2023-24 Enrollment (b) Capacity 455 <ĂƉĂ॒Ă ,ŝŐŚ ;ϵͲϭϮͿ ϭϬϴϮ ͬ ϵϰϴ / -12% 447 <ĂƉĂ॒Ă DŝĚĚůĞ ;ϲͲ 8) 586 / 615 / 5% ϴϵϵ 452 ,ĂŶĂůĞŝ Elementary (K-6) 286 / 274 / -4% ϰϱϵ <ţůĂƵĞĂ Elementary (K-6) 315 / 368 / 17% (c) = (b) - (a) (d) = (a) / (b) Oldest / Projected 2023-24 Newest / Avg Capacity Projected Building Surplus Utilization % Old or Beyond Expected Life Adequacy Score / Rank Out of 260 1.00 ϭϵϯϴ ͬ ϮϬϬϴ ͬ ϰϵ 284 0.68 ϭϵϵϳ ͬ ϭϵϵϳ ͬ 21 0% Ϭ͘ϴϵ ͬ ϰ Ϯϵϵ 25 Ϭ͘ϵϮ ϭϵϱϭ ͬ ϭϵϵϲ ͬ Ϯϵ ϵй 0.56 / 230 354 -14 1.04 ϭϵϯϴ ͬ ϮϬϬϰ ͬ 35 32% 0.62 / ϭϳϵ ϵϱϮ 4 52% The classroom ceiling is covered in asbestos. - Teacher 0.76 / 72 The high school and elementary school live in harmony on the same campus. We have high school students helping teach elementary students reading and math, and the older kids keep on best behavior because the younger ones are around. - Administrator In the shop building, I could write you a long essay on what’s its lacking. The area is so unclean. There are some lessons we’re not allowed to do because of the condition of the buildings. - High School Student Very important! We need a change in funding policy. - Teacher 454 <ĂƉĂ॒Ă ůĞŵĞŶƚĂƌLJ ϵϮϴ ͬ ϵϱϰ (K-5) / 3% TOTAL 3,159 ϵϰϮ -12 1.01 3,446 287 0.92 ϭϵϯϴ ͬ ϭϵϵϳ ͬ ϰϵ 60% 0.62 / 176 31% 0.69 Challenges: • Industrial arts less than 50% of standard space: Kapaa MS • Library less than 50% of standard space: Kapaa ES • Moderate flood risk: 100% of Hanalei ES site in extreme tsunami zone • No science room at Hanalei and Kilauea ES • Cafeteria less than 50% of standard space: Kapaa HS and Kapaa ES • 52% of Kapaa HS and 60% of Kapaa ES buildings are classified as old or beyond useful life • Music less than 50% of standard space: Kapaa MS • No dedicated music or art room at Kapaa ES and Hanalei ES • 37% of capacity in portables at Hanalei ES • New gymnasium, synthetic field, synthetic track, wrestling room • Student desire for shared performing arts center Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 135 Kapaa Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS SCENARIOS Hanalei ES and Kilauea ES serve K-5 instead of K-6 (with community engagement) 1A $$$$$ • $500k-2.5M Move grade classes from Hanalei K-6 and Kilauea K-6 to Kapaa 6-8 With capacity relief, renovate one to two classrooms at each ES into flexible STEAM classrooms EPC and SAC preferred scenario • ES K-6 $$$$$ Priority 1 6th • 1B Keep Hanalei ES and Kilauea • Benefits • • • • • • • Balances enrollment between Hanalei ES and Kilauea ES (which operate near and above capacity) to Kapaa MS, which is under-utilized Doesn’t require costly new construction that is limited on Hanalei due to flood zone location Provides space to provide enhanced STEAM instruction at elementary schools Reduces portables Transitions all 6th grade students in the complex to MS together, potentially improving class cohesion and social interaction Increased enrollment at Kapaa would allow more course offerings Challenges • • • • • Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ • • EPC and SAF prefer Scenario 1A Benefits No change Challenges Grade configuration change requires planning and staff development Potential community opposition to change Potential loss of 6th grade enrollment to homeschool/charter/private Access/transportation to school community to inform grade reconfiguration $$$$$ Maintain current mixed K-5, K-6 ES configurations Benefits 1C Kapaa complex – engage Challenges Hanalei ES continues to have no dedicated space for science and art due to current inability to construct new space due to flood zone MS students continue to transition at different grades Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ Recommendation • Create area-wide K-5, 6-8 grade configuration. Free up classrooms at ES (all at/over 100% utilized) to renovate for one to two STEAM classrooms and move instruction as possible to permanent facilities and out of portables (ES capacity is 22%-37% in portables) Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 136 Kapaa Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS FACILITY OPTIONS 2 Kapaa ES replace Building A 3 Kilauea ES site improvements 4 • • • • • 7 Master plan joint HS and ES site to rebuild the schools using multi-story construction to reduce building footprint and create more usable greenspace First priority is Building A Kapaa HS portable replacement • • • 6 Build cover over existing play court Build cover over existing drop-off area Kapaa HS and ES phased reconstruction • 5 Replace with multi-level single structure with capacity for 300 students Historic building; included in Option 4 Build multi-level classroom building with capacity for 200 students to replace portable spaces Consider one building for safety/security and resource efficiency Included in Option 4 Kapaa HS cafeteria renovation • • Follow up with existing plans for cafeteria renovation Included in Option 4 Kapaa MS classroom renovations • Renovate existing classrooms to house flexible, collaborative project-based spaces. Renovate existing buildings to provide glass walls for visibility and sound barriers. 8 Hanalei ES renovations 9 Prioritized repairs and maintenance (all schools) 10 Locally-determined enhancements (all schools) • • Renovate for STEAM and visual performing arts and administrative space Safety, code, and maintenance repairs • Budget allotment for each school to fund stakeholder-driven projects Benefits Challenges • Replaces building beyond useful life (1930s) with termite damage • Modern and flexible space • Student safety • Extends construction on occupied site • Displaces students and teachers (swing space) • Space for outdoor school and community • Lack of play area during activities during unfavorable weather construction • Provides shelter at pick-up and drop-off times during times of unfavorable weather • Frees up greenspace • Construction on occupied site • Improves security with fewer entry points • Safety concern with multi-story • Improves learning and retention by buildings accommodating individual learning styles • Teacher training for new subjects, STEAM, and CTE is needed • Replaces portables • Security - fewer entry points • Extends construction on occupied site Cost/ROM Range Stakeholder Voice $$$$$ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #4 n/a 2 ‫ڝ‬ $40-75M ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS/ES - #4/5 1 ‫ڗ‬ $$$$$ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #5 n/a $$$$$ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - last n/a $$$$$ • Use of cafeteria by students is limited • Collaborative instruction and studentfocused project-based learning • Modern and flexible spaces • Accommodates different learning styles • Teacher training in collaborative instruction and use of new spaces • Lack of project-based teachers • Teacher turnover and retention • Space for STEAM and arts programs • Provides professional space for administrative functions • Construction in a known flood zone $$$$$ • Theater boosts confidence and $2.5-7.5M appreciation for the arts • Addresses top-priority needs at each school $$$$$ $$$$$ $20-40M $7.5-20M • Requires policy to consistently allocate and implement projects Priority Tier ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #3 $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M • Provides adequate sized dining space to accommodate enrollment • Improves work environment for cafeteria employees • Allows for operational variation • Empowers schools and students to define projects at time of execution Funding Category $$$$$ $500k-2.5M ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ MS - #1 5 ‫ړ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - last 5 ‫ړ‬ 1 ‫ڗ‬ 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS/MS/ES #1/3/1 ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS/MS/ES #3/2/1 Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 137 Kapaa Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS FACILITY OPTIONS 11.1 Kapaa HS new gym 11.2 Kapaa HS other athletic master plan projects (track/field) • • 11.3 12 • 2016 Athletic Master Plan • 2016 Athletic Master Plan $$$$$ Funding Category • 2016 Athletic Master Plan ‫ڗ‬ 3 ‫ژ‬ 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS – 8#x 4 ‫ڜ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #2 2 ‫ڝ‬ 1 ‫ڗ‬ 1 ‫ڗ‬ $$$$$ $500k-2.5M • Kapaa HS rents Kapaa expensive and unheated public pool for practices. Since swimming is a winter sport, the temp gets dangerously cold. $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M $$$$$ 14 Kapaa ES complete stalled library project $$$$$ 15 Prioritized furniture/equipment refresh Kapaa HS performing arts center $20-40M Priority Tier 1 ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #5 $$$$$ • Music, dance, theater center • Construct shared performing arts center on TBD site to serve all schools on Kauai • Shared by all Kauai Island schools • Reduces cost/generate revenue as a community resource and potential source of Act 155 revenue 13 Stakeholder Voice $2.5-7.5M Delayed due to endangered birds Build a heated swimming pool at Kapaa HS for athletic and community use Cost/ROM Range $20-40M Include swimming pool and incorporate into site master plan Kapaa HS swimming pool • Challenges Breakout of partially funded gym Kapaa HS softball field lights • Benefits $20-40M $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 138 Kauai Complex DATA and NEEDS Stakeholder Voice: Enrollment and Facility Data: School (a) 2017-18/ 2023-24 Enrollment 1126 / 1237 / 10% (b) Capacity Adequacy Score / Rank Out of 260 We had a new building on Kauai High but It took 10 years to build, and by the time they got to it, the plans were already outdated. - Middle ϭϵϭϰ ͬ ϮϬϬϲ ͬ 57 337 0.73 2000 / 2000 / 18 0% Ϭ͘ϵϬ ͬ ϭ ϲϵϲ 40 Ϭ͘ϵϰ ϭϵϵϬ ͬ ϭϵϵϱ ͬ 26 0% 0.76 / 75 430 88 0.80 ϭϵϱϵ ͬ ϭϵϳϲ ͬ 45 28% 0.52 / 243 When it rains hard, sometimes rain goes into the classrooms. - Community Member ϭϵϱϳ ͬ ϭϵϴϱ ͬ 57 88% 0.67 / 126 If nothing is going to change at the top level, we are wasting our time here. We need to see changes. - Parent 33% 0.73 <ĂƵĂ॒ŝ ,ŝŐŚ ;ϵͲϭϮͿ 448 Kamakahelei Middle (6-8) ϵϲϯ ͬ ϵϯϭ / -3% 1268 457 <ĂƵŵƵĂůŝ॒ŝ Elementary (K-5) ϲϭϵ ͬ ϲϱϲ / 6% 460 <ƃůŽĂ ůĞŵĞŶƚĂƌLJ 381 / 342 (K-5) / -10% 463 Wilcox Elementary 812 / 831 (K-5) / 2% 3,997 % Old or Beyond Expected Life Ϭ͘ϵϴ 456 TOTAL (c) = (b) - (a) (d) = (a) / (b) Oldest / Projected 2023-24 Newest / Avg Capacity Projected Building Surplus Utilization 1264 27 ϴϵϰ 63 Ϭ͘ϵϯ 4,552 555 0.88 47% School Teacher 0.77 / 65 Recently our school did a revamp of science buildings but it took a really long time. Once we got in there and teachers saw what was in there, they were unhappy about it. The way the rooms were laid out is inconvenient. Will teachers be included to help design the spaces in their schools? - High School Student Challenges: • 10% enrollment growth projected at Kauai HS • Industrial arts and family consumer science less than 50% of standard space: Kauai HS and Kamakahelei MS • Science less than 50% of standard space: Kamakahelei MS • No science room at Koloa ES • 88% of Wilcox ES and 47% of Kauai HS buildings are classified as old or beyond useful life • No dedicated music rooms at any of the elementary schools, and no art room at Koloa ES • 40% of capacity in portables at Koloa ES • Lack of girls’ lockers, HS courts and fields in challenging condition • Library less than 50% of standard space: Kauai HS and Wilcox ES • Cafeteria less than 50% of standard space: Kauai HS and Koloa ES • Unsafe student drop-off at elementary schools Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 139 Kauai Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS FACILITY OPTIONS 1 2.1 2.2 Kauai HS phased renovations and portable replacements • Develop site plan to guide future development at Kauai HS to be completed in 5-10 years • Consider field space on west campus for sports (softball, tennis) • Repurpose gym space for full-sized track and field Kauai HS renovations of Building S • Renovate S specifically as a modern art classroom • Included in Option 1 Kauai HS renovations of Building O • Renovate O for CTE classes and turn the culinary into a commercial kitchen • Included in Option 1. Replace instead of renovate Building O. 3 Kauai HS move music program building to M 4 Kauai HS lounge space in Building K repurposed for STEAM 5 Kauai HS Building M repurposed for teacher/admin offices 6.1 6.2 • SAC: why renovate R when M is already music building? Can you just renovate M? • Move music program to Building M • Move music program to Building M Kauai HS new two-story classroom building Benefit Challenges • Rebuilds Kauai HS on a smaller footprint, providing more greenspace and collaborative learning environments • Extends construction on occupied site • Replace buildings D,X,Y, and Z with new covered eating area • Incremental to Options 2.1 and 2.2 $$$$$ $40-75M • Modern, flexible, improved spaces • Adds space $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M • Modern, flexible, improved spaces • Adds space, O not currently in use • Modern music instructional space to replace a building in poor condition $$$$$ $$$$$ • Modern and flexible learning space to replace buildings in poor condition $2.5-7.5M $$$$$ • Provides space for teacher collaboration $2.5-7.5M • Modern, flexible, improved spaces $$$$$ $20-40M • Multi-purpose outdoor eating area allows everyone to eat lunch $$$$$ • Improves pedestrian safety on major roadway with four lanes of traffic • Imp access could raise enrollment • Adds foot traffic and parked cars in Hokulei Village before and after school $2.5-7.5M 8 Kaumaulii ES new site entrance/exit • Improves safety and efficiency • Limits to improvements on public roadway • Will allow more unwanted trespassers $2.5-7.5M 10 • New site entrance/exit on northeast corner of the site, with separate bus and car traffic • Drop-off area along northeast side of property • Add a pull-in area on Kuhio Highway Kaumaulii ES whole school renovations • Renovate the existing facilities to improve condition and educational adequacy 3 ‫ژ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #4 3 ‫ژ‬ 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #9 5 ‫ړ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #7 4 ‫ڜ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - last 5 ‫ړ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #6 2 ‫ڝ‬ 2 ‫ڝ‬ $20-40M • Amplify into district-wide option $$$$$ • Creates outdoor play area for students • Modern, flexible, improved spaces • Plan has been in place for 5 years $$$$$ $500k-2.5M • Requires construction money $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M Priority Tier ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #5 $$$$$ Kamakahelei MS safe pathway to Nuhou Street Kaumaulii ES new playground Funding Category $20-40M 7 9 Stakeholder Voice $$$$$ • Replace buildings D,X,Y, and Z with new two-story classroom building • Incremental to Options 2.1 and 2.2 Kauai HS new covered multi-purpose space Cost/ROM Range ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ MS - #1 n/a ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #3 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #5 2 ‫ڝ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ SS - #x 1 ‫ڗ‬ Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 140 Kauai Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS FACILITY OPTIONS 11 Prioritized repairs and maintenance (all schools) 12 Locally-determined enhancements (all schools) 13 Wilcox ES site improvements 14 15 16.1 • Safety, code, and maintenance repairs • Budget allotment for each school to fund stakeholder-driven projects • • Site drainage improvements, and add/expand parking, shared with state offices Redesign parent and bus drop-off Wilcox ES new classroom building • • Replace portables with new multi-story classroom building with capacity for 150 students Consider one building for safety/security and resource efficiency Koloa ES site improvements • • Add/expand parking Redesign parent and bus drop-off at greenhouse area or current portable location Koloa ES new classroom building portable replacement • • Replace portables with new classroom building with new library and capacity for 200 students Consider one building for safety/security and resource efficiency 16.2 Koloa ES multi-media library building 17.1 Kauai HS new gym 17.2 Kauai HS girls’ lockers 17.3 Kauai HS athletic courts/fields • Renovate library for flexible, collaborative learning spaces and administrative space Benefits Challenges • Addresses top-priority needs at each school • Empowers schools and students to define projects at time of execution Cost/ROM Range Stakeholder Voice $$$$$ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS/MS/ES #2/3/1 ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS/MS/ES #3/2/2 $2.5-7.5M • Requires policy to consistently allocate and implement projects • Prevents rain from entering building • Addresses traffic and safety • Off-street parking • Replaces portable space with modern, permanent space for education • Addresses traffic and safety concerns during pick-up and dropoff times $$$$$ $500k-2.5M $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M $$$$$ $20-40M $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M • Replaces school capacity with 40% in portable space with permanent classrooms $$$$$ • Provides adequate professional space for administrative operations $$$$$ • 2016 Athletic Master Plan $$$$$ • Fully/partially funded $20-40M ‫ڗ‬ 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #7 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - last 3 ‫ژ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #8 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #6 3 ‫ژ‬ 2 ‫ڝ‬ 1 ‫ڗ‬ 1 ‫ڗ‬ 4 ‫ڜ‬ 1 ‫ڗ‬ 4 ‫ڜ‬ 2 ‫ڝ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #7 $$$$$ $20-40M • 2016 Athletic Master Plan $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M 18 Prioritized furniture/equipment refresh 19 Wilcox ES space for staff/student collaboration 20 Kauai HS performing arts center $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M • $$$$$ EPC4 add • Construct shared performing arts center on TBD site to serve all schools on Kauai as a community resource and potential source of Act 155 revenue $500k-2.5M • Music, dance, theater center • Shared by all Kauai Island schools • Reduces cost/generates revenue $$$$$ $20-40M Priority Tier 1 $20-40M $20-40M • 2016 Athletic Master Plan Funding Category ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #1 Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 141 Waimea Complex DATA and NEEDS Stakeholder Voice: Enrollment and Facility Data: School (a) 2017-18/ 2023-24 Enrollment (b) Capacity (c) = (b) - (a) (d) = (a) / (b) Oldest / Projected 2023-24 Newest / Avg Capacity Projected Building Surplus Utilization % Old or Beyond Expected Life Adequacy Score / Rank Out of 260 462 Waimea High (912) 577 / 687 / 19% 842 155 0.82 1936 / 1996 / 50 47% 0.77 / 66 464 Waimea Canyon Middle (6-8) 447 / 465 / 4% 621 156 0.75 1972 / 1992 / 42 1% 0.82 / 28 451 ॒ ůĞ॒ĞůĞ Elementary (K-5) 507 / 542 / 7% 397 -145 1.37 1941 / 1995 / 48 37% 0.61 / 201 <ĂůĈŚĞŽ Elementary (K-5) 452 / 458 / 1% 450 1937 / 2014 / 39 31% All we hear now is STEM, STEM, STEM but we need the arts too. We need all disciplines – career tech education, visual and performing arts, and science/technology/engineering/math in our society, and we should weigh them equally. - Parent 453 458 Kekaha Elementary (K-5) TOTAL -8 1.02 357 / 368 / 3% 367 -1 1.00 2,520 2,677 157 0.94 1937 / 1986 / 54 We should incentivize and embrace external partnerships. Let’s think of internships in reverse – bring the businesses into the schools. - Administrator The gym is old, but functional. The community might prefer to spend our money for other purposes if given the choice. - Teacher/Parent 0.69 / 118 37% 0.58 / 219 31% 0.69 There are certain subjects like digital media where teachers not suited for the material get stuck teaching that class because there’s a lack of teachers. - High School Student Challenges: Ch • 19% enrollment growth at Waimea HS • Library less than 50% of standard space: Eleele ES • High flood risk: 100% of site in current flood zone, Kekaha ES • Moderate flood risk: 97% of site in extreme tsunami zone, Waimea Canyon MS • Science less than 50% of standard space: Waimea HS and Waimea Canyon MS • No science room at elementary schools • Various buildings are classified as old or beyond useful life • No dedicated music or art room at elementary schools • Eleele ES 137% projected enrollment • Need for gymnasium, wrestling room, and training room • Cafeteria less than 50% of standard space: Waimea HS, Eleele ES • Admin less than 50% of standard space: Kekaha ES • Student desire for shared performing arts center Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 142 Waimea Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS FACILITY OPTIONS 1 Waimea HS culinary teaching kitchen and STEAM classroom in place of Building C • 2 Historic building Waimea HS covered multi-purpose area between Buildings C and F • • Build covered area for indoor/outdoor eating, gathering, PE, and community-use space Consider alternative location 3 Waimea HS new gym 4 Waimea HS CTE renovations and enhancements 5 • Replace outdated gym, per DOE 2016 Athletic Master Plan • Eleele ES new two-story, 12-classroom building • • 6 Upgrade current CTE equipment and infrastructure (HVAC, electrical, plumbing, etc.) for graphic arts, industrial arts, welding, and architecture/engineering/construction Replace up to four portable buildings with new two-story, 12-classroom building with additional capacity for 300 students and flexible STEAM classrooms, and consider teacher housing Highest complex priority Eleele ES library renovations and multi-purpose covered area • Convert library into learning center/library/community with multi-purpose indoor/outdoor space 7 Kehaha ES new covered play court 8 Kehaha ES new administration facility 9 Kalaheo ES multi-purpose covered space and addition • Incorporate art and music facilities • • 10 Replace portables with six classrooms with capacity for 150 students and SPED classrooms Include space for Pre-K Waimea Canyon MS convert existing building to black box theater Benefits Challenges Cost/ROM Range • Replaces building beyond useful life • Provides modern and flexible teaching and learning space • Building C on the historical registry • SAC: What are community feelings about Building C? $$$$$ • Outdoor space for school and community • Allows for two lunches • Current gym in extreme tsunami zone $20-40M $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M • Where will new gym be placed? $$$$$ $20-40M • Provides students modern • Extends construction on occupied equipment for job skills training site • Enhances existing CTE programs $$$$$ $20-40M • Replaces portables with permanent facilities and provides modern and flexible teaching and learning space $$$$$ • Teacher/student collaboration, assembly, performances, PE, dining, and community $$$$$ $20-40M $20-40M • Outdoor school/community activities • Construction within a flood zone • Modern space for collaboration. Current office <50% of standard. • Construction within a known flood zone $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M • Provides space for outdoor school and community activities $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M • Provides visual performing arts space and teacher collaboration • Potential to lose existing shop space • Convert Building R to a black box theater, move admin to renovated library/maker space • There was talk about Building R becoming a maker space. An alternative is to find a building and/or create space for the black box theater. $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M Stakeholder Voice Funding Category Priority Tier ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #6 4 ‫ڜ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #5 4 ‫ڜ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #6 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #4 2 ‫ڝ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #4 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #5 4 ‫ڜ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #1 3 ‫ژ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - last 5 ‫ړ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #6 2 ‫ڝ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ MS - #10 5 ‫ړ‬ Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 143 Waimea Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS FACILITY OPTIONS 11 Waimea Canyon MS build covered play court • Follow through with existing covered play court plans • Shovel-ready Benefits Challenges Cost/ROM Range • Outdoor school and community activities during unfavorable weather $2.5-7.5M $$$$$ $$$$$ 12 Waimea Canyon MS renovate library into maker space • Follow through with existing renovated library/maker space plans • Provides modern teaching and learning spaces. 100% grant funds. $500k-2.5M 13 Prioritized repairs and maintenance (all schools) • Addresses top-priority needs at each school $$$$$ 14 Locally-determined enhancements (all schools) 15 Waimea Canyon MS construct/convert science classrooms, and convert former ES rooms to MS standards • Safety, code, and maintenance repairs • Budget allotment for each school to fund stakeholder-driven projects • • Empowers schools and students to define projects at time of execution $7.5-20M • Requires policy to consistently allocate and implement projects EPC5 add 16 Prioritized furniture/equipment refresh 17 Waimea HS or MS performing arts center $$$$$ $500k-2.5M Stakeholder Voice Funding Category Priority Tier ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ MS – #3 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ MS - #5 1 ‫ڗ‬ 1 ‫ڗ‬ 1 ‫ڗ‬ 1 ‫ڗ‬ 1 ‫ڗ‬ 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS/MS/ES #3/2/2 ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS/MS/ES #2/1/3 $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M $$$$$ $20-40M Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 144 APPENDIX Maui Options Reports Maui District Overview District-wide Scenarios and Options: Priority 1 Option LAN (Priority 1): Maui District Hawaiian immersion program facility needs engagement ($) Scenario HS (Priority 1): Maui/Baldwin relief school in Kihei Phase 1 (800 capacity, '20-21) ($$$$$) Scenario HS (Priority 1): Maui/Baldwin relief school in Kihei Phase 2 (+ music, athletics, electives) ($$$) Baldwin Hana Kekaulike Lahainaluna • Scenario 1A: Construct new middle school ($$$$$) • Scenario 2A: Construct new Elementary School at Puunene, new admin/community education center at MCSA site ($$$$) • Option 3: Baldwin HS phased reconstruction ($$$$$) • Option 9: Wailuku ES phased reconstruction ($$$$) • Option 10: Waihee ES drainage and traffic improvements ($$) • Option 11.1: Waihee ES new administration building ($$) • Option 11.2: Waihee ES new cafeteria building ($$) • Option 13: Prioritized repairs and maintenance (all schools) ($$) • Option 14: Locally-determined enhancements (all schools) ($) • Option 15: Iao IS convert old cafeteria into STEAM classroom ($$) • Option 1: Hana K-12 covered elementary play court ($$) • Option 3: Hana K-12 refurbish gym floor ($) • Option 4: Hana K-12 multi-purpose community arts and athletics center ($$$) • Option 8: Prioritized repairs and maintenance (all schools) ($$) • Option 9: Locally-determined enhancements (all schools) ($) • Option 12: Hana green design renovations ($$) • Scenario 1D: Haiku ES reconstruction with site TBD ($$$$$) • Option 7.2: Kula ES new cafeteria ($$$) • Option 8: Paia ES phased reconstruction ($$$$) • Option 12: Makawao ES new multi-purpose classroom addition ($$$) • Option 13.2: Pukalani ES expanded traffic loop ($$) • Option 13.3: Pukalani ES covered play court ($$) • Option 17: Prioritized repairs and maintenance (all schools) ($$) • Option 18: Locally-determined HQKDQFHPHQWV DOO VFKRROV ($) • Scenario 1A: Kamehameha III rebuilt on new site • Option 5: Lahainaluna HS new 8-classroom addition ($$$) • Option 7: Lahaina IS new 8-classroom building ($) • Option 8: Lahaina IS new multi-purpose pavilion ($$$) • Option 9: Nahienaena ES new multipurpose library/STEAM building/admin ($$$) • Option 12: Prioritized repairs and maintenance (all schools) ($$) • Option 13: Locally-determined enhancements (all schools) (S) • Option 16.1: ADA accessibility (all schools) ($$) • Option 16.2: Electrical systems upgrades/wifi (all schools) ($$) • Option 16.3: Install air conditioning in classrooms ($$$) • Option 18: Lahainaluna high school CTE spaces ($$$) • Option 8: Baldwin HS athletic improvements ($$$) • • Option 3: Kekaulike HS new building for language immersion program ($$$) • Option 6: Kalama IS new building for language immersion program ($$) • Option 7.1: Kula ES replace portables with new multi-story buildings for STEAM, Music, and Professional Learning Center ($$$) • Option 10: Paia ES full-service cooking kitchen ($$) • Option 14: Pukalani ES new administration/professional learning center on 4-acre adjacent site ($$$) Option 2: Hana K-12 admin/teacher professional learning center collaboration building ($$) Priority 2 Priority 3 Priority 4 Scenario CTE (Priority 2): Maui/Baldwin/Kekaulike shared CTE center (confirm size/capacity) ($$$$) • Option 4: Baldwin HS renovate drama classroom ($) • Option 7: Hana K-12 air conditioning renovations ($$) • Option 11: Hana new cafeteria ($$) • Option 4: Kekaulike HS athletic master plan projects ($$) • Option 9: Paia ES covered play court ($$) • Option 13.1: Pukalani ES new multi-purpose classroom addition ($$$) • • Option 2: Kekaulike HS covered courtyard multi-use commons ($$) • Option 5: Kekaulike HS music and band expansion ($$$) Option 6: Hana K-12 acquire land makai of campus ($$$) Option EME (Priority 3): Maui District emergency shelter improvements ($$) Option PV (Priority 3): Maui District photovoltaic panels ($$$) Lanai Scenario HS (Priority 5): Maui/Baldwin relief school in Kihei Phase 3 (+ ### capacity) ($$$) Maui Molokai • Option 2: Lanai K-12 new commons/cafeteria/distributed library/performance venue ($$$) • Option 10: Lanai K-12 initiate 50 acre land acquisition ($$) • Option 11: Prioritized repairs and maintenance (all schools) ($$) • Scenario 1A: Construct new middle school on site TBD ($$$$$) • Scenario 2A: Construct new elementary school at Puunene, new admin/community education center at MCSA site ($$$$) • Option 3: Maui HS phased reconstruction ($$$$$) • Option 5: Lokelani IS/Kihei ES new traffic entrance/exit loop ($$$) • Option 8: Kihei ES replace domestic water system ($$) • Option 10: Rebuild Kahului ES on site ($$$$$) • Option 11: Pomaikai ES covered playground and walkways ($$) • Option 12: Lihikai ES replace portable buildings with permanent classroom building to include library/maker space ($$$) • Option 13: Kamalii ES covered playground ($$) • Option 15: Prioritized repairs and maintenance (all schools) ($$) • Option 16: Locally-determined enhancements (all schools) ($) • Option 17: Kihei ES administration building ($$$) • Scenario 1E: Focused stakeholder engagements to determine grade configurations and school portfolio ($$$) • Scenario 2A: Move Kauanakakai ES out of flood zone ($$$$$) • Option 10.1: Maunaloa ES and Kilohana ES multi-purpose shelter in place ($$$) • Option 13: Prioritized repairs and maintenance (all schools) ($$$) • Option 18: Sustainable energy improvements ($$) • Option 19: Multi-purpose STEAM classrooms (all schools) ($$) • Option 20: Kaunakakai ES traffic barrier ($) • Option 21: Equipment refresh (all schools) ($) • Option 22: Kilohana ES Building A Lanai renovation ($) • Option 4: Lahainaluna HS athletic masterplan projects, include cover of existing play court ($$$) • Option 6: Lahaina IS new multi-purpose library/STEAM/ administration space building ($$$) • Option 11: Nahienaena ES new multipurpose pavilion ($$$) • Option 21: Lahainaluna HS admin building ($$$) • Option 22: Lahainaluna IS cover existing play court ($$) • Option 7: Lanai K-12 athletic fields ($$) • Option 7: Lokelani IS convert/replace Building J for multi-purpose STEAM ($$$) • Option 14: Kamalii ES expand traffic and bus loop ($$) • Option 3: Molokai HS replace portables with spaces for STEM and careers ($$$) • Option 5: Molokai HS athletics improvements ($$) • Option 15: Molokai MS Hawaiian Language Immersion Program classrooms ($) • Option 2: Lahainaluna HS phased reconstruction ($$$$$) • Option 17: Teacher housing ($$$) • Option 4: Lanai K-12 new welcome/administration/professional development center ($$$) • Option 6: Lanai K-12 21st century classroom conversions ($$) • Option 6: Lokelani IS/Kihei ES new shared multi-purpose space ($$$) • Option 12: Kilohana ES new administration building ($$$) • Option 17: Teacher housing renovations/enhancements ($$) • Option 14: Lahainaluna MS and HS multilevel parking ($$$) • Option 16.4: Outdoor learning improvements ($$) • Option 20: Lahainaluna HS dormitory remodel ($$) • Scenario 1A: Lanai K-12 campus expansion ($$$$$) • Option 3: Lanai K-12 satellite nutrition centers ($) • Option 12: Locally-determined enhancements (all schools) ($) • Option 4: Maui HS athletic master plan projects ($$) • Option 7: Molokai MS new collaborative learning additions ($$$) • Option 11: Kilohana ES renovations for Special Education & Pre-K programs ($$) • Option 16: Molokai MS major renovation and expansion to the library to include technology and community use ($$) • • Option 8: Lanai K-12 visitor center ($$$) Option 9: Lanai K-12 teacher housing ($$) • • • • Priority 5 • • Option 4: Molokai HS new multi-purpose outdoor commons ($$$) Option 6: Molokai HS/MS acquire adjacent land for agriculture program ($$$) Option 8: Molokai MS separate entrance ($$) Option 9: Molokai MS new covered multipurpose space ($$) Option 10.2: Maunaloa ES classroom addition ($$$) Option 14: Locally-determined enhancements (all schools) ($) Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 147 Baldwin Complex DATA and NEEDS Stakeholder Voice: Enrollment and Facility Data: School 400 Baldwin High (9-12) (a) 2017-18/ 2023-24 Enrollment 1361 / 1490 / 9% (b) Capacity 1228 (c) = (b) - (a) (d) = (a) / (b) Oldest / Projected 2023-24 Newest / Avg Capacity Projected Building Surplus Utilization -262 1.21 1939 / 2011 / 56 % Old or Beyond Expected Life 68% Adequacy Score / Rank Out of 260 We want to learn job skills like the trades, and there aren’t enough career classes at the school. - High School Student It’s amazing what they can do if they are given the opportunity and have the right facilities to facilitate learning. - Teacher 0.78 / 52 We want to get communication skills and leadership skills… extracurricular activities help with that. - Student 404 ॒5ĂŽ /ŶƚĞƌŵĞĚŝĂƚĞ ;ϲͲ 953 / 1020 8) / 7% 790 -230 1.29 1929 / 2009 / 32 22% 0.83 / 20 We want to get our hands dirty and try to build something. -Student 424 tĂŝŚĞ॒Ğ Elementary (K-5) 698 / 693 / -1% 425 Wailuku Elementary (K-5) 698 / 721 / 3% 436 WƵ॒Ƶ <ƵŬƵŝ Elementary (K-5) 789 / 772 / -2% 710 4,696 4,300 TOTAL 783 789 0.89 1958 / 1996 / 32 0.91 1947 / 1992 / 50 -62 1.09 2011 / 2011 / 7 -396 1.09 90 68 15% 56% “My kids are wet all the time…can we have covered walkways?” 0.63 / 164 - Principal Current job market demands will begin to affect educational methods at the DOE. Projects incorporating STEM will become the standard. - Principal 0.65 / 150 0% 0.74 / 86 32% 0.73 Well-rounded, holistic education includes the arts. It should have an equal rather than competing place in our children’s education. - Teacher Challenges: C • 129 projected growth (9%) at Baldwin HS • More than half of facilities are classified as old or beyond useful life at Baldwin HS and Wailuku ES • Iao IS and Baldwin HS are overutilized • More than 25% capacity in portables at Baldwin HS • Industrial Arts less than 50% of standard space: Iao IS • Library less than 50% of standard space: Wailuku ES • Science less than 50% of standard space: Iao IS • Cafeteria less than 50% of standard space: Baldwin HS, Wailuku ES, Waihee ES • Art less than 50% of standard space: Iao IS • Music less than 50% of standard space: Baldwin HS and Iao IS • No dedicated art or music rooms at Puu Kukui ES and Waihee ES • New field, new track, resurface courts, athletic lockers, weight room Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 148 Baldwin Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS SCENARIOS 1A Construct new middle school $$$$$ • $75-100M+ • • • into a new middle school 1C Elementary schools K-6, Iao IS 7-8, construct additional new elementary school $$$$$ ‫ ڗ‬Priority 1 Acquire land and construct new 800-student 6-8 middle school to relieve Iao IS and Maui Waena IS Consider lease or acquire county land New school attendance boundary will be split between Baldwin and Maui, and students will attend high school aligned with their elementary school boundary Reduce portable classroom buildings Include study to determine location: new site, on Maui HS, or at temporary location Pursue 1B for MS and/or HS programming (e.g., career tech with potential local partnerships) • • 1B Convert commercial property • • 7-8, elementary classroom additions $$$$$ Acquire under-utilized commercial property such as vacant “big-box store,” and repurpose for a new 800-student 6-8 middle school New school attendance boundary will be split between Baldwin and Maui, and students will attend high school aligned with their elementary school boundary Reduce portable classroom buildings • 1D Elementary schools K-6, Iao IS • $$$$$ Move Iao 6th grade to elementary schools to address crowding Acquire land and construct new 600-student ES (in addition to scenario 2A/2B) Renovate spaces for 6th grade science Remove portables Adjust attendance boundaries • • • • • Move Iao 6th grade to elementary schools to address crowding Replace ES portables with multi-story STEAM classroom buildings for 600-students Remove portables Adjust attendance boundaries • • • Benefits Benefits Benefits Benefits • • • • • • • • Reduces overcrowding at Iao IS and Maui Waena IS, which combined have a projected deficit of 382 seats and are the 4th and 8th largest intermediate schools in the state Creates new, modern learning environment Reduces overreliance on portables • • Could be less expensive than new construction (though renovations are not always less expensive than new construction) Creates new, modern learning environment Reduces overreliance on portables • • Relieves crowding at Iao IS Creates new, modern learning environment at new elementary school Introduces STEM spaces at elementary schools Reduces overreliance on portables • • • Relieves crowding at Iao IS Creates new, modern learning environment at new elementary school Introduces STEM spaces at elementary schools Reduces overreliance on portables Additions could take less time than a new ES Challenges Challenges Challenges Challenges • • • • • • • Land acquisition is costly and time consuming New middle school student classes\will split between Baldwin HS and Maui HS • • • Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ Finding and acquiring property to renovate Existing facilities can limit the types of spaces and layouts possible when compared to new construction New middle school student classes\will split between Baldwin HS and Maui HS Traffic could be a problem Probable lack of greenspace Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ • Land acquisition is costly and time consuming Grade reconfiguration requires admin and staff planning ad development Middle school could lose programs due to smaller enrollment/lower funding Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ • Grade reconfiguration requires admin and staff planning ad development Swing space at ES during construction of additions Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ Recommendation • Build a new 21st century middle school, preferably on existing land. Consider new partnerships with MCC and/or UHMC. Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 149 Baldwin Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS SCENARIOS 2A Construct new Elementary School at Puunene, new admin/community education center at MCSA site $$$$$ • $40-75M • • school on existing private school campus $$$$$ ‫ ڗ‬Priority 1 Acquire land and construct new 600-student elementary school to relieve Baldwin and Maui complex elementary schools Consider the 10-acre closed Puunene school site in Maui complex currently used for DOE offices, which would need to be relocated to an alternate site Reduce portable classroom buildings Pursue Puunene plus additional land from A&B, and consider environmental toxicity of soils • 2B Establish new elementary • Start new elementary school to operate in part or whole on an existing under-utilized private school site Reduce portable classroom buildings • Benefits Benefits • • • • • • Reduces overcrowding at Baldwin and Maui elementary schools Creates new, modern learning environment Reduces overreliance on portables If Puunene site is used, DOE administration would benefit from improved professional environment in closer proximity to community Potential for new admin/multi-purpose meeting space for District and community • Reduces overcrowding at Baldwin and Maui elementary schools Utilizes existing land and facility Challenges Challenges • • • Land acquisition is costly and time consuming Puunene site is out of town Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ Requires successful negotiation with private school Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ Recommendation • Build a new 21st century elementary school at Puunene, adjacent site, or other site if a land swap becomes viable. Build a new, multi-purpose meeting, adult education, and administration space at the Maui Community School. Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 150 Baldwin Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS FACILITY OPTIONS 3 Baldwin HS phased reconstruction • • • • Develop long-range campus master plan Selective demolition and reconstruction of Baldwin HS campus with multi-story buildings on smaller footprint to open up space for fields Increase capacity by additional 300 seats Priorities detailed in Options 5, 6, and 7 4 Baldwin HS renovate drama classroom 5 Baldwin HS renovate kitchen 6 Baldwin HS replace/expand cafeteria 7 Baldwin HS new STEAM classroom building • • • • • • • 8 9 10 Renovate current drama classroom in poor condition Renovate current kitchen in poor condition Included in Option 3 Replace or expand undersized cafeteria with flexible multi-purpose indoor outdoor facility Included in Option 3 Construct new, modern multi-story classroom building to support collaborative science, technology, engineering, arts, and math instruction Included in Option 3 Baldwin HS athletic improvements • Build a new practice field, weight room and locker room. Includes replacing worst condition buildings and portables with new, multi-story construction to create space for athletic facilities. Wailuku ES phased reconstruction • Selective demolition and reconstruction of portables, cafeteria, library, and administration with multi-story buildings on smaller footprint to open up space for fields Waihee ES drainage and traffic improvements • Ste drainage improvements to address frequent flooding from mountain runoff • Study site to confirm if buildings need replacement due in part to chronic flooding on site • Improve drop off and vehicle traffic flow 11.1 Waihee ES new administration building 11.2 Waihee ES new cafeteria building 12 • Right-sizes the existing administration building that is half the standard size for the population • Right-sizes the existing cafeteria building that is less than half the standard size for the population Wailuku ES six-classroom addition • Follow through on planned six-classroom addition with portable reduction • Included in Option 9 Benefits Challenges • Relieves overcrowding • Removes outdated buildings • Creates new, modern learning environments • Opens up field space • Extends construction on occupied site Cost/ROM Range Stakeholder Voice Funding Category Priority Tier ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #1 1 ‫ڗ‬ $500k-2.5M ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #7 3 ‫ژ‬ $$$$$ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - last n/a $$$$$ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #5 n/a • Provides modern, flexible learning environments • Provides needed additional capacity $$$$$ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #3 n/a • Reduces Baldwin’s reliance on County facilities $$$$$ $$$$$ • Provides needed condition-related renovations • Provides needed condition-related renovations • Alternative food service during construction • Provides expanded cafeteria and multi- • Alternative food service purpose spaces during construction • Frees up green space and parking on small site $$$$$ $75-100M+ $20-40M • Extends construction on occupied site • Addresses student safety and building preservation challenges • Improves drop-off and pick-up on Kahekile Highway • Provides modern collaborative space for teachers • Provides a cafeteria appropriately sized for the student population $$$$$ $40-75M $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #6 2 ‫ڝ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #4 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #2 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES – last 1 ‫ڗ‬ 1 ‫ڗ‬ $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M • Project already planned. Provides modern learning environments. $$$$$ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #1 n/a Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 151 Baldwin Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS FACILITY OPTIONS 13 Prioritized repairs and maintenance (all schools) 14 Locally-determined enhancements (all schools) 15 Iao IS convert old cafeteria into STEAM classroom • Safety, code, and maintenance projects • Budget allotment for each school to fund stakeholder-driven projects Benefits Challenges • Addresses top-priority needs at each school • Empowers schools and students to define • Requires policy to consistently projects at time of execution allocate and implement projects Cost/ROM Stakeholder Range Voice Funding Category $$$$$ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS/MS/ES $7.5-20M #/1/1/5 $$$$$ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS/MS/ES $500k-2.5M #4/1/2 $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 152 Priority Tier 1 ‫ڗ‬ 1 ‫ڗ‬ 1 ‫ڗ‬ Kekaulike Complex DATA and NEEDS Stakeholder Voice: Enrollment and Facility Data: School (a) 2017-18/ 2023-24 Enrollment (b) Capacity (c) = (b) - (a) (d) = (a) / (b) Oldest / Projected 2023-24 Newest / Avg Capacity Projected Building Surplus Utilization % Old or Beyond Expected Life Adequacy Score / Rank Out of 260 435 Kekaulike High (912) 1088 / 1173 / 8% 1183 10 0.99 1995 / 1997 / 22 0% 0.85 / 13 420 Kalama Intermediate (6-8) 856 / 915 / 7% 989 74 0.93 1985 / 1998 / 29 0% 0.86 / 10 401 ,Ă॒ŝŬƻ ůĞŵĞŶƚĂƌLJ (K-5) 493 / 457 / -7% 347 -110 1.32 1954 / 1972 / 49 60% 0.45 / 256 412 Kula Elementary (K- 439 / 437 5) / 0% 495 58 0.88 1964 / 2001 / 43 69% 0.55 / 233 417 Makawao Elementary (K-5) 553 / 593 / 7% 509 -84 1.17 1938 / 1968 / 66 90% 0.49 / 251 422 WĈ॒ŝĂ ůĞŵĞŶƚĂƌLJ ;<Ͳ 408 / 444 5) / 9% 258 -186 1.72 1923 / 1938 / 88 100% 0.53 / 238 426 Pukalani Elementary (K-5) 416 / 431 / 4% 416 -15 1.04 1976 / 1981 / 38 4% 0.67 / 128 4,450 4,197 -253 1.06 46% 0.63 We want to learn job skills like the trades, and there aren’t enough career classes at the school. - High School Student It’s amazing what they can do if they are given the opportunity and have the right facilities to facilitate learning. -Teacher We want to get communication skills and leadership skills… extracurricular activities help with that. - Student We want to get our hands dirty and try to build something. - Student TOTAL My kids are wet all the time…can we have covered walkways? - Principal Current job market demands will begin to affect educational methods at the DOE. Projects incorporating STEM will become the standard. - Principal Well-rounded, holistic education includes the arts. It should have an equal rather than competing place in our children’s education. - Teacher Challenges: Ch • Industrial Arts less than 50% of standard space: Kalama IS • Library less than 50% of standard space: all five elementary schools • Science less than 50% of standard space: Kalama IS • Cafeteria less than 50% of standard space: Makawao ES, Kula ES, Haiku ES • More than half of most ES facilities are classified as old or beyond useful life • Music less than 50% of standard space: Kekaulike HS • No dedicated music rooms at any of the five elementary schools • Haiku ES, Makawao ES, and Paia ES are over-utilized • More than 25% of capacity in portables: Kula ES, Makawao ES, Haiku ES • Resurface courts, girls’ athletic lockers, training room • Admin less than 50% of standard space: Paia ES, Haiku ES, Kula ES Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 153 Kekaulike Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS SCENARIOS Haiku ES master-planned phased reconstruction on existing site 1A Haiku ES acquire adjacent land and expand campus 1B $$$$$ • Haiku ES acquire new site, rebuild, and repurpose old site 1C $$$$$ A plan to rebuild Haiku ES exists; execute this plan as is • • • • Benefits Benefits • • • • • • • • Same benefits as 1A Provides possibility for more swing space during construction if utilizing both sites for the new facility Potential to relocate Pre-K program to provide additional swing space Potential opportunity to improve traffic flow/safety on campus • • • • Challenges Challenges • • • • • • • • • Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ New land acquisition (cost, red tape) Need a new site plan for construction Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ ‫ ڗ‬Priority 1 Benefits Same benefits as Scenario 1A Allows current school to operate normally while new construction takes place, solving the challenge of swing space Does not interrupt current school operations Potential land swap Potentially quicker construction than “piecemeal” approach Opportunity to build completely new Challenges Long-term project Swing space during construction Traffic Need to work around flood plain $75-100M+ Acquire land adjacent to Haiku ES Create new plan to rebuild Haiku ES entirely on new site and repurpose the existing site and/or facility for another use TBD Benefits Plan and site already exists. Creates new, modern learning environment. Relieves overutilization (132%). Moves students from portable to permanent facilities (currently 53% of capacity is in portables). Haiku ES reconstruction with site TBD $$$$$ $$$$$ Acquire land adjacent to Haiku ES Modify existing plan to rebuild Haiku ES to include adjacent site 1D Challenges New land acquisition, costs Need a new site plan for construction Finding a centralized location acceptable to the local community Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ Recommendation Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 154 Kekaulike Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS FACILITY OPTIONS 2 Kekaulike HS covered courtyard multi-use commons 3 Kekaulike HS new building for language immersion program • Site improvements and 20,000 square foot shade structure Benefits Challenges $$$$$ • Creates sheltered space for schoolwide assemblies and performances $2.5-7.5M • Creates new, modern learning environments $$$$$ $20-40M • New #-classroom building for language immersion program housed at KHS • Impacted by ongoing Maui Hawaiian Education Program discussion 4 Kekaulike HS athletic master plan projects • Resurface courts, girls’ athletic lockers, training room 5 Kekaulike HS music and band expansion 6 Kalama IS new building for language immersion program • Project for $8 million band and music improvements in process • New #-classroom building for language immersion program housed at KMS • Impacted by ongoing Maui Hawaiian Education Program discussion • Athletic upgrades • After-hours community use $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M $$$$$ • Plan already exists • New, modern environments $20-40M • Creates new, flexible use learning environment • Maintains safe school operations during construction 7.1 Kula ES replace portables with new multi-story buildings for STEAM, Music, and Professional Learning Center • Creates new, flexible-use learning environment and Professional Learning Center • Need to work around new septic system 7.2 Kula ES new cafeteria • Café is 27% of standard size • Need to work around new septic system 8 9 Paia ES phased reconstruction • Rebuild campus for in phases 500 students to replace portables and aging, inadequate buildings • Include separate wings for language immersion and neighborhood gen ed programs • Impacted by ongoing Maui Hawaiian Education Program discussion Paia ES covered play court • Project in process 10 Paia ES full-service cooking kitchen 11 Makawao ES covered play court and stage 12 Makawao ES new multi-purpose classroom addition • Project in process and under construction • Build 21st century additions in courtyard and partial portable replacement to include student multi-purpose and administrative professional learning center Cost/ROM Stakeholder Voice Range • New, modern learning environment. • May require off site • Relieves over-utilization. temporary swing space. • Replaces portables. • Plan already exists • Creates sheltered play court • Doesn’t relieve crowding or over-use of portables • Creates local cooking option for Paia community • Doesn’t relieve crowding or over-use of portables • Creates new outdoor covered play and performance space • Doesn’t relieve crowding or over-use of portables • Creates new, modern learning environment • Relieves over-utilization $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M $$$$$ $20-40M Funding Category ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - last 5 ‫ړ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #2 2 ‫ڝ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #4 4 ‫ڜ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #5 5 ‫ړ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ Int - #3 2 ‫ڝ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #4 2 ‫ڝ‬ 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #1 tie 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #11 4 $$$$$ $20-40M $$$$$ $40-75M $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #6 $$$$$ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - last $$$$$ $20-40M Priority Tier ‫ڜ‬ 2 ‫ڝ‬ n/a ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #10 1 Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 155 ‫ڗ‬ Kekaulike Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS FACILITY OPTIONS 13.1 Pukalani ES new multi-purpose classroom addition 13.2 Pukalani ES expanded traffic loop 13.3 Pukalani ES covered play court 14 • Expand driveways Pukalani ES new administration/professional learning center on 4-acre adjacent site Pukalani ES new administration/PLC on 4-acre adjacent site 18 $$$$$ • New, modern learning environment $20-40M Funding Category 4 $2.5-7.5M $$$$$ • Creates new, modern professional learning center and office space for administration • Land acquisition • Creates new, modern PLC and office space for administration • Land acquisition $$$$$ Kula ES new multi-purpose classroom and cafeteria/professional learning center addition Prioritized repairs and maintenance (all schools) • Creates new, modern learning areas to replace poor condition portables • Addresses top-priority problems Locally-GHWHUPLQHG HQKDQFHPHQWV DOO VFKRROV • Budget allotment for each school to fund stakeholder-driven projects ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #3 $$$$$ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #9 n/a $$$$$ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #8 n/a $7.5-20M • Empowers schools and students to define projects at time of execution • Requires policy to consistently allocate and implement projects ‫ڝ‬ $20-40M $$$$$ • Safety, code, and maintenance projects to include roofs, electrical upgrades, window sealing, and site drainage Priority Tier ‫ڜ‬ 1 ‫ڗ‬ 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #5 $$$$$ • Improves traffic and student safety during pick-up and drop-off Redundant to Option 14 • Replace at least portables 8,10, 11 and Building F with multi-purpose facility for STEAM, music, professional learning center, cafeteria • Included in Option 7 17 Cost/ROM Stakeholder Voice Range $2.5-7.5M • 16 Challenges • Replace portables 1-2 and/or 7-11 with new, multi-story building • Change location from back of campus to front • Include traffic drop-off lane and/or replace portables 15 Benefits $$$$$ $500k-2.5M 2 ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS/Int/ES - #1/1/1 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS/Int/ES - #3/2/7 1 ‫ڗ‬ Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 156 Maui Complex DATA and NEEDS Stakeholder Voice: Enrollment and Facility Data: School (a) 2017-18/ 2023-24 Enrollment (b) Capacity (c) = (b) - (a) (d) = (a) / (b) Oldest / Projected 2023-24 Newest / Avg Projected Building Capacity Surplus Utilization % Old or Beyond Expected Life Adequacy Score / Rank Out of 260 418 Maui High (9-12) 1950 / 2126 / 9% 1639 -487 1.30 1972 / 1993 / 42 6% 0.72 / 102 428 Maui Waena Intermediate (6-8) 1176 / 1243 / 6% 1091 -152 1.14 1989 / 2017 / 23 3% 0.84 / 14 430 Lokelani Intermediate (6-8) 591 / 487 / -18% 723 236 0.67 1988 / 1994 / 27 0% 0.69 / 117 405 Kahului Elementary 976 / 1020 (K-5) / 5% 825 -195 1.24 1952 / 1968 / 51 81% 0.52 / 242 409 <ţŚĞŝ ůĞŵĞŶƚĂƌLJ ;<Ͳ 782 / 714 5) / -9% 943 229 0.76 1977 / 1993 / 37 6% 0.60 / 207 416 Lihikai Elementary (K-5) 863 / 830 / -4% 918 88 0.90 1965 / 1980 / 49 82% 0.57 / 228 431 <ĂŵĂůŝ॒ŝ Elementary (K-5) 496 / 487 / -2% 823 336 0.59 1996 / 1996 / 22 0% 0.74 / 87 433 WƃŵĂŝŬĂ॒ŝ Elementary (K-5) 596 / 609 / 2% 670 61 0.91 2012 / 2012 / 6 0% 0.83 / 23 7,516 7,632 116 0.98 22% 0.69 What message are we sending our students by putting them in temporary buildings? - High School Principal It’s amazing what they can do if they are given the opportunity and have the right facilities to facilitate learning. - Teacher We want to get communication skills and leadership skills… extracurricular activities help with that. - Student We want to get our hands dirty and try to build something. TOTAL - Student My kids are wet all the time…can we have covered walkways? - Principal Current job market demands will begin to affect educational methods at the DOE. Projects incorporating STEM will become the standard. - Principal Well-rounded, holistic education includes the arts. It should have an equal rather than competing place in our children’s education. - Teacher Challenges: C • 9% enrollment growth at Maui HS • 18% decline at Lokelani IS • More than half of Maui complex facilities are classified as old or beyond useful life • Maui HS and Kahului ES are overutilized • Lokelani IS, Kihei ES, and Kamalii ES are under-utilized • >25% capacity in portables at Maui HS, Lihikai ES, Kahului ES, Lokelani IS • Industrial Arts less than 50% of standard space: Lokelani IS, Maui Waena IS • Library less than 50% of standard space: Lihikai ES, Kihei ES, Kahului ES, Lokelani IS • Science less than 50% of standard space: Maui HS • Cafeteria less than 50% of standard space: Pomaikai ES, Lihikai ES, Kahului ES • Music and Art less than 50% of standard space: Maui HS, Maui Waena IS, Lokelani IS • No dance/drama at Maui HS • No dedicated art or music rooms at ES • Girls’ locker room, resurface courts, training room Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 157 Maui Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS SCENARIOS 1A Construct new middle school on site TBD $$$$$ • $75-100M+ • • • into a new middle school ‫ ڗ‬Priority 1 Acquire land and construct new 800-student 6-8 MS to relieve Iao IS and Maui Waena IS New school attendance boundary will be split between Maui and Baldwin, and students will attend HS aligned with their ES boundary Reduce portable classroom buildings Include study to determine location: new vs. old site, at Maui HS, or at a temporary location Pursue 1B for MS and/or HS programming (e.g., career tech with potential local partnerships) • 1B Convert commercial property 1C Construct new middle school on Maui HS site $$$$$ • • Waena IS 7-8, construct new ES $$$$$ Acquire under-utilized commercial property such as vacant ‘big-box store’ and repurpose for a new 800-student 6-8 MS New school attendance boundary will be split between Maui and Baldwin, and students will attend HS aligned with their ES boundary Reduce portable classroom buildings • 1D Elementary schools K-6, Maui • $$$$$ Construct new 800-student 6-8 MS to relieve Iao IS and Maui Waena IS on unused southwest corner of Maui HS site New school attendance boundary will be split between Maui and Baldwin, and students will attend HS aligned with their ES boundary Reduce portable classroom buildings • • • Move Kona Waena 6th grade to elementary schools to address crowding Acquire land and construct new 600-student ES (in addition to Scenario 2A/2B) Renovate spaces for 6th grade science Remove portables Adjust attendance boundaries • • • • Benefits Benefits Benefits Benefits • • • • • • • • Reduce overcrowding at Maui Waena IS and Iao IS, which combined have a projected deficit of 382 seats and are the 4th and 8th largest IS’s in the state Creates new, modern learning environment Reduces overreliance on portables Potential land in growing communities • • • • Could be less expensive than new construction (though renovations are not always less expensive than new construction) Creates new, modern learning environment Reduces overreliance on portables Potential for real-life interactions/partnerships Potential for new, diverse educational activities • • • Reduce overcrowding at Maui Waena IS and Iao IS, which combined have a projected deficit of 382 seats and are the 4th and 8th largest IS’s in the state Creates new, modern learning environment Reduces overreliance on portables Multi-story construction can provide larger, new facilities with increased greenspace • • Relieves crowding at Iao IS Creates new, modern learning environment at new ES Introduces STEM spaces at elementary schools Reduces overreliance on portables Challenges Challenges Challenges Challenges • • • • • • • Land acquisition is costly and time consuming New MS student classes\will split between Maui HS and Baldwin HS • • Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ Finding and acquiring property to renovate Existing facilities can limit the types of spaces and layouts possible when compared to new construction New MS student classes\will split between Maui HS and Baldwin HS Converting commercial space into appropriate educational space and being in a public setting Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ • • Would need to be planned in conjunction with Maui HS site master plan New MS student classes\will split between Maui HS and Baldwin HS Would need to plan the site to prevent overcrowding, traffic concerns, and manage MS and HS interactions Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ • Land acquisition is costly and time consuming Grade reconfiguration requires admin and staff planning ad development Need to change/plan all ES boundaries to prevent ES overcrowding Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ Recommendation • Build a new 21st century middle school, preferably on existing land. Consider new partnerships with MCC and/or UHMC. Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 158 Maui Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS SCENARIOS 2A Construct new elementary school at Puunene, new admin/community education center at MCSA site $$$$$ • $40-75M • school on Maui HS site $$$$$ ‫ ڗ‬Priority 1 Acquire land and construct new 600-student elementary school to relieve Baldwin and Maui complex elementary schools 10-acre closed Puunene site is currently used for DOE offices, which would need to be relocated to an alternate site Puunene, plus pursue additional land from A and B and consider environmental toxicity of soils • 2B Construct new elementary • Construct new 600-student K-5 ES on unused southwest corner of Maui HS site Reduce portable classroom buildings • Benefits Benefits • • • • • Reduce overcrowding at Baldwin and Maui elementary schools Creates new, modern learning environment Reduces overreliance on portables If Puunene site is used, DOE administration would benefit from improved professional environment in closer proximity to community • • • Reduce overcrowding at Baldwin and Maui elementary schools Creates new, modern learning environment Reduces overreliance on portables No land acquisition costs Challenges Challenges • • • Need new location for admin housed at Puunene Outside of main town (potentially isolating) • • Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ Would need to be planned in conjunction with Maui HS site master plan Would place another elementary school in close proximity to Kahului ES Must include traffic plan Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ Recommendation • Build a new 21st century elementary school at Puunene, adjacent site, or other site if a land swap becomes viable. Build a new multipurpose meeting, adult education, and administration space at the Maui Community School. Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 159 Maui Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS FACILITY OPTIONS 3 Maui HS phased reconstruction • • • • • Develop long-range campus master plan Selective demolition and reconstruction of Maui HS campus with multi-story buildings Increase capacity to balance utilization between Maui HS and new Kihei HS Maintain current capacity Include irrigation 4 Maui HS athletic master plan projects 5 Lokelani IS/Kihei ES new traffic entrance/exit loop 6 7 • Girls’ locker room, resurface courts, training room • Remaster driveway for Eastside to get traffic off of Lipoa • Consider including new driveway along 31 • Create new/modified entrance/exit loop with Lokelani IS Lokelani IS/Kihei ES new shared multi-purpose space • Create joint administration/professional learning center/library building on existing greenspace • Demolish existing library and repurpose area for greenspace and a playground • Build one or more pedestrian bridges across the gulch to facilitate joint-use facilities Lokelani IS convert/replace Building J for multi-purpose STEAM • Building J is currently under-utilized. Repurpose for STEAM classroom environments to provide flexible learning spaces. 8 Kihei ES replace domestic water system 9 Kahului ES new campus commons with multi-purpose library, cafeteria, and administration • Major renovation and selective building replacement for new flexible venue for indoor/outdoor dining, library, administration, and professional learning center Benefits • • • • Relieves overcrowding • Extends construction on Removes outdated buildings occupied site Creates new, modern environments Opens up field space ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #4 4 ‫ڜ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ Int - #4 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ Int - last 3 ‫ژ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ Int - #2 2 ‫ڝ‬ $2.5-7.5M ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #3 1 ‫ڗ‬ $$$$$ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #2 • Creates new play and multi-purpose • Creating joint-use facility space for administration and between the two adjacent students schools $$$$$ • Creates new, modern learning environment • Replaces building in poor condition $$$$$ 11 Pomaikai ES covered playground and walkways • Provides protection from the elements between buildings 12 Lihikai ES replace portable buildings with permanent classroom building to include library/maker space • Repurpose existing library for administration (in process) • Add parking to replace portables after construction ‫ڗ‬ $20-40M $20-40M $20-40M $$$$$ • Renovates facilities in poor condition • Creates new, modern learning environments • Extends construction on occupied site • Swing space during construction • Renovates facilities in poor condition • Creates new, modern learning environments and collaboration spaces Priority Tier 1 $$$$$ • Replaces system in poor condition Funding Category ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #1 $$$$$ $75-100M+ $2.5-7.5M • Improves safety and efficiency of current traffic patterns on site • Could have similar costs to renovating the school over time • New, modern learning environments Rebuild Kahului ES on site Cost/ROM Stakeholder Voice Range $$$$$ • Athletic upgrades • After-hours community use • SAC-created option 10 Challenges $$$$$ $75-100M+ $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M $$$$$ $20-40M n/a ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #1 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES – last 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #4 1 ‫ڗ‬ Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 160 Maui Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS FACILITY OPTIONS 13 Kamalii ES covered playground 14 Kamalii ES expand traffic and bus loop 15 Prioritized repairs and maintenance (all schools) 16 Locally-determined enhancements (all schools) 17 Kihei ES administration building Benefits Challenges Cost $$$$$ • Creates covered play area $2.5-7.5M • Safety, code, and maintenance projects • Budget allotment for each school to fund stakeholder-driven projects • $$$$$ • Addresses traffic concerns on campus $2.5-7.5M $$$$$ • Addresses top priority needs at each school • Empowers schools and students to define projects at time of execution $7.5-20M • Requires policy to consistently allocate and implement projects Include in Option 6 $$$$$ $500k-2.5M Stakeholder Voice Funding Category Priority Tier ‫ڗ‬ 2 ‫ڝ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #8 1 ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #5 ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS/MS/ES #2/1/5 ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS/MS/ES #3/3/7 $$$$$ $20-40M Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 161 1 ‫ڗ‬ 1 ‫ڗ‬ 1 ‫ڗ‬ Hana Complex DATA and NEEDS Stakeholder Voice: Enrollment and Facility Data: (a) 2017-18/ 2023-24 Enrollment School ,ĈŶĂ ,ŝŐŚ Θ Elementary (K12) TOTAL (b) Capacity (c) = (b) - (a) (d) = (a) / (b) Projected 2023-24 Capacity Projected Surplus Utilization 357 / 371 / 4% 425 54 0.87 371 425 54 0.87 Oldest / % Old or Adequacy Newest / Avg Beyond Score / Rank Building Expected Life Out of 260 1977 / 2009 / 32 0% 0.67 / 134 0% 0.67 The power goes out at least once a month, and then we can’t use computers. We also need better computers and furniture with wheels. - Hana Student We’re so remote and there’s no local facilities support, so the school and community have to take matters in our own hands. - Hana Student The Ma Ka Hana Ka ‘Ike construction educational program has helped at-risk students build selfesteem and learn they have to power to change their future. - Hana Community Member It’s amazing what they can do if they are given the opportunity and have the right facilities to facilitate learning. - Teacher My favorite teacher makes math fun by making us play games instead of just doing homework. - Hana 6th Grade Student Challenges: • No dedicated and equipped industrial arts space • No dedicated and equipped library • Small percentage of Hana K-12 is in the tsunami zone • No dedicated and equipped special education space • Cafeteria less than 50% of standard space • Gym floor damage from salt spray • No dedicated and equipped music and art spaces • Lockers less than 50% of standard space. No track. • No pool or fieldhouse in the Hana community Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 162 Hana Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS FACILITY OPTIONS Benefits Hana K-12 covered elementary play court 2 Hana K-12 admin/teacher professional learning center collaboration building • Creates space for teacher collaboration 3 Hana K-12 refurbish gym floor • Improves gym condition damaged from saltwater spray 4 Hana K-12 multi-purpose community arts and athletics center Include Options 5 and 10 5 Hana K-12 bunk room for overnight guest 6 Hana K-12 acquire land makai of campus 7 • Combined with Option 4 • Develop adjacent land for agriculture careers, marine science, and cultural heritage programs Hana K-12 air conditioning renovations • Air conditioning for all buildings on campus 8 Prioritized repairs and maintenance (all schools) 9 Locally-determined enhancements (all schools) 10 11 12 • Safety, code, and maintenance projects • Budget allotment for each school to fund stakeholder-driven projects Hana Visual and Performing Arts Center • Model after the Edith Kanakaole multi-purpose stadium in Hilo • Combined with Option 4 Hana new cafeteria • Build a new cafeteria designed with Hawaiian immersion and culture in mind with local input • Renovate and repurpose existing cafeteria for a bunk room (see Option 5) Hana green design renovations • Build off local efforts to create a net-zero campus Cost $$$$$ • Creates new multi-purpose covered space for students and the community 1 • Challenges $2.5-7.5M $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M $$$$$ $500k-2.5M Stakeholder Voice 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #11 2 ‫ڝ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #4 1 ‫ڗ‬ 1 ‫ڗ‬ $$$$$ $20-40M ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #10 • Provides accommodations for overnight guests to the school: traveling students and/or adults $$$$$ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #6 • Land acquisition • Empowers schools and students to define projects at time of execution 5 ‫ړ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #9 4 ‫ڜ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #2 1 ‫ڗ‬ $500k-2.5M ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #7 1 ‫ڗ‬ $$$$$ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #1 $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M $$$$$ • Addresses top-priority needs at each school $7.5-20M • Requires policy to consistently allocate and implement projects • Provides a multi-purpose performance and gathering venue in Hana (currently does not exist) • Provides a cafeteria to support Hawaiian immersion program and provides space to renovate for overnight guests • Builds off local initiatives to create a net-zero campus • Reduced operational costs after initial investments n/a ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ Last $$$$$ $20-40M • Improves learning conditions for students and teachers Priority Tier ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #8 • Provides athletic facilities and pool not currently in Hana • Plan already created • Provides additional land to enhance academic and extra-curricular programs Funding Category $$$$$ $$$$$ $20-40M $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M n/a ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #3 4 ‫ڜ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #5 1 ‫ڗ‬ Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 163 Lahainaluna Complex DATA and NEEDS Stakeholder Voice: Enrollment and Facility Data: School (a) 2017-18/ 2023-24 Enrollment (b) Capacity (c) = (b) - (a) (d) = (a) / (b) Projected 2023-24 Capacity Projected Surplus Utilization Lahainaluna High (9-12) 1020 / 1143 / 12% 969 -174 1.18 1912 / 2014 / 39 38% 0.78 / 52 Lahaina Intermediate (6-8) 724 / 652 / -10% 675 23 0.97 1979 / 1997 / 31 0% 0.71 / 106 Kamehameha III Elementary (K-5) 731 / 683 / -7% 646 -37 1.06 1935 / 1959 / 58 70% 0.50 / 250 Nahienaena Elementary (K-5) 735 / 739 / 1% 721 -18 1.02 1988 / 1998 / 24 2% 0.59 / 216 3,217 3,011 -206 1.07 28% 0.65 TOTAL My favorite high school class is business because we get to do independent learning on our own as opposed to being told what to do. - High School Freshman Oldest / % Old or Adequacy Newest / Avg Beyond Score / Rank Building Expected Life Out of 260 Our kids deserve more ... We have the most amazing kids, but we fail them at every turn. - High School Teacher We need more business classes and CTE. There are only certain programs offered here compared to other schools. - High School Senior We need to create a student experience that takes place in an engaging, media-rich environment promoting opportunities for both independent and collaborative work. - Maui Administrator We should have more externships and work/study classes. I’ve learned more at my job than in any of the courses I’ve taken at school. - High School Senior Honestly, I will take any strides of improvement that we can have. Almost anything is better than what we have now. - High School Senior Challenges: C • 123 projected growth (9%) at Lahainaluna HS (12%) • Industrial Arts less than 50% of standard space: Lahaina IS • Kamehameha III ES is in flood, sea rise, and tsunami zones • Science less than 50% of standard space: Kamehameha III ES, Nahienaena ES • 70% of facilities at Kamehameha III ES old or beyond its expected life. More than 25% of capacity is in portables: Lahaina IS, Kamehameha III ES • Art less than 50% of standard space: Lahainaluna HS, Kamehameha III ES, Nahienaena ES • Lahainaluna HS is projected to be 118% utilized • Athletic lockers less than 50% standard space: Lahainaluna HS • Girls’ athletic lockers, resurface courts, new wrestling room • Library less than 50% of standard space: Lahaina IS, Nahienaena ES • Kitchen less than 50% of standard space: Lahainaluna HS, Kamehameha III ES • Cafeteria less than 50% of standard space: Kamehameha III ES, Nahienaena ES • Administration less than 50% of standard space: Lahaina IS, Nahienaena ES Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 164 Lahainaluna Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS SCENARIOS 1A Kamehameha III rebuilt on new site $$$$$ • $75M-100M+ • • • 1C Kamehameha III rebuilt on Lahainaluna HS land $$$$$ $$$$$ ‫ ڗ‬Priority 1 Acquire land out of flood and tsunami zones and/or conduct land-swap and construct new ES as new home for Kamehameha III ES At point of implementation, review complex-wide enrollment and capacity utilization to determine size of new facility, ranging from 600-800 students Engage community and state to determine highest and best use for the culturally significant school site, such as historic museum and cultural center Construct a facility the community will value through incorporating functionality that can generate revenue (possibly include teacher housing on new ES site) Include discussions with Kaanapali Land Management Corp. in light of Kaanapli 2020 Masterplan • 1B Kamehameha III remains on same site • Continue to perform limited renovations as permitted by flood zones • • SAC-developed scenario Similar to 1A, except instead of procuring new land, build new ES on Lahainaluna HS’s large site Benefits Benefits Benefits • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Move students from poor-quality facilities into new/rebuilt buildings equipped for 21st century. Community gets modern school facility. Improved safety and reduced facility risk by rebuilding out of flood zones. Safety from flooding, sea level rise, and tsunamis. New community asset. Opportunity to generate revenue. Moves school away from site affected by erosion Moves school away from area affected by frequent trespassing New site can provide better accessibility and reduce traffic in town Potential for shorter commute for Napili keiki New, safer site provides peace of mind Utilizes existing land and facility No changes to vet through community Potential for lower cost to renovate building Cost savings - land availability on existing high school site Safety from flooding, sea level rise, and tsunamis Moves school away from site affected by erosion Moves school away from area affected by trespassing New site can provide better accessibility and reduce traffic in town Potential for shorter commute for Napili keiki Community gets modern school facility New, safer site provides peace of mind Opportunity to repurpose existing site to generate revenue Challenges Challenges Challenges • • • • • • • • Land availability limited and acquisition is costly and time consuming Kamehameha III site has significant cultural value requiring intentional stakeholder engagement in local and statewide community Vacates an existing school facility • • • • Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ Kamehameha III is located in flood zones restricting facility improvements Kamehameha III facilities are in poor condition and are among the worst equipped with spaces matching DOE design standards (#250 out of 260), with >25% of capacity in portables Site is densely developed with portables occupying most green spaces. Sea wall is continually eroded needing repairs. Not enough parking Trespassers onto property, and unsafe safety drills Construction during school hours Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ Traffic safety Mixed populations of ages Creating separate entrances and exits Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ Recommendation • Provides new, 21st century school for future area students. Current site has limited capacity for renovation due to location in flood, tsunami, and sea-level rise zones. Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 165 Lahainaluna Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS FACILITY OPTIONS 2 Lahainaluna HS phased reconstruction • • • 3 • 6 Girls’ athletic lockers, resurface courts, new wrestling room Provide coaches/adults with separate offices Lahainaluna HS new 8-classroom addition • • • Follow through on current CIP plans for a new 8-classroom building Include band room with storage into additions and student mental health area Under contract Extends construction on occupied site Disruption during construction Swing space Cost Disrupts landscape • Ability to follow-through to completion, taking longer than expected • Ensuring those that use facilities have input • Disrupts school hours • New buildings constructed without AC • Expands athletic opportunities • Gender equity • Health and safety • Ability to follow-through to completion • Ensuring those that use facilities have input • Addressing LGBT equality • Resurfaced court needs a roof • Provides modern, flexible learning environments • Resolves projected crowding • Ability to follow-through to completion • Ensuring those that use facilities have input • Provides modern, flexible learning environments • Choosing a building to demolish for • Provides library/administration spaces, which space to build are currently less than 50% of standard size Construct new, modern multi-story building to support student-teacher • More informational resources collaboration and 21st century instructional practices; include campus master plan • More student space to study 7 Lahaina IS new 8-classroom building 8 Lahaina IS new multi-purpose pavilion • Follow through on current CIP plans for a new 8-classroom building • Build a covered area to be used as a play court, eating area, and outdoor instruction • Include enclosed space and restrooms for emergency shelter Nahienaena ES new multi-purpose library/STEAM building/admin • • 10 • • • • • Lahaina IS new multi-purpose library/STEAM/administration space building • 9 • Relieves overcrowding • Removes outdated buildings • Creates new, modern, ADA accessible learning environments • Opens up field space • New teacher restrooms • More community space that can potentially generate revenue • Provides needed condition-related renovations Renovate two current science classrooms in poor condition and add/convert • Adds science classrooms; currently less than three science classrooms to meet standard space requirements 50% standard size Almost complete • New and modern science classrooms with appropriate equipment Lahainaluna HS athletic masterplan projects, include cover of existing play court • • 5 Challenges Lahainaluna HS new/renovated science classrooms • 4 Develop long-range campus master plan Selective demolition and reconstruction of Lahainaluna HS campus with multi-story buildings on smaller footprint to open up space for fields Increase capacity by additional 300 seats Benefits Construct new, modern multi-story library and STEAM building to support 21st century instructional practices Repurpose the two classrooms currently housing the library for classrooms Nahienaena ES new 8-classroom building • • Follow through on current CIP plans for a new 8-classroom building Almost complete • Provides new, modern learning environments • Provides multi-purpose covered area for eating, playing and instruction • More community space • Can generate revenue • Provides modern, flexible learning environments • Provides library and administration spaces, which are currently less than 50% of standard size • Provides a dedicated music room • Provides new, modern learning environments Cost/ROM Range $$$$$ Stakeholder Voice $75-100M+ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #3 $$$$$ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS – last Funding Category Priority Tier 3 ‫ژ‬ n/a ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #9 2 ‫ڝ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #2 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ Int - #1 2 ‫ڝ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ Int - #3 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ Int - #2 1 ‫ڗ‬ $20-40M ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #1 1 ‫ڗ‬ $$$$$ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #5 $$$$$ $20-40M $$$$$ $20-40M $$$$$ $20-40M $$$$$ $20-40M $$$$$ $20-40M $$$$$ n/a Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 166 Lahainaluna Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS FACILITY OPTIONS 11 Nahienaena ES new multi-purpose pavilion • Build a covered area to be used as a play court, eating area and outdoor instruction. 12 Prioritized repairs and maintenance (all schools) 13 Locally-determined enhancements (all schools) 14 Lahainaluna MS and HS multi-level parking 15 • Safety, code, and maintenance projects • Budget allotment for each school to fund stakeholder-driven projects • Construct multi-level parking structure between MS and HS • Include drainage solution All schools photovoltaic trees and rooftops • Install photovoltaic trees and panels at each school Benefits Challenges Cost/ROM Range • Provides multi-purpose covered area for eating, playing and instruction • More community space • Can generate revenue $$$$$ • Addresses top-priority needs at each school $$$$$ • Empowers schools and students to define projects at time of execution $20-40M $7.5-20M • Requires policy to consistently allocate and implement projects $$$$$ $500k-2.5M Stakeholder Voice ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #2 ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS/Int/ES #6/4/3 ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS/Int/ES #4//5/3 • Provides needed parking for staff, students, and community during events $$$$$ $20-40M ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #7 tie • Provides supplemental power supply needed for technology and operations $$$$$ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #1 $$$$$ 16.1 ADA accessibility (all schools) 16.2 Electrical systems upgrades/wifi (all schools) • Upgrade electrical infrastructure and increase Wi-Fi bandwidth $2.5-7.5M 16.3 Install air conditioning in classrooms $$$$$ 16.4 Outdoor learning improvements $2.5-7.5M Funding Category Teacher housing 18 Lahainaluna high school CTE spaces • Construct certified kitchen for CTE culinary program • Construct auditorium • Include certified greasetrap for kitchen • Managing residential property • Available land • Provides modern commercial kitchen for proper culinary program delivery • Provides space for musical and other arts performances and programs $$$$$ $20-40M $$$$$ $20-40M ‫ڗ‬ 1 ‫ڗ‬ 4 ‫ڜ‬ 1 ‫ڗ‬ 1 ‫ڗ‬ 4 ‫ڜ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #7 tie 3 ‫ژ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #2 1 ‫ڗ‬ $$$$$ • Provides incentives for teacher retention 1 ‫ڗ‬ $2.5-7.5M • Study feasibility of teacher housing ‫ڝ‬ 1 ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #5 $20-40M 17 2 n/a $$$$$ • Install hydro filling stations and water fountains • Outdoor seating for dining (middle and high school) Priority Tier Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 167 Lahainaluna Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS FACILITY OPTIONS 19 Lahainaluna IS staggered schedules to improve traffic 20 Lahainaluna HS dormitory remodel 21 Lahainaluna HS admin building 22 Lahainaluna IS cover existing play court • Benefits Challenges Implies need for before/after school care/activites Cost/ROM Range $$$$$ $20-40M $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M $$$$$ $20-40M • Include enclosed space and restrooms for emergency shelter $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M Stakeholder Voice Funding Category Priority Tier ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #2 n/a ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS/Int/ES #6/4/3 ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS/Int/ES #4//5/3 ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #7 tie Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 168 4 ‫ڜ‬ 2 ‫ڝ‬ 2 ‫ڝ‬ Lanai Complex DATA and NEEDS Stakeholder Voice: Enrollment and Facility Data: School (a) 2017-18/ 2023-24 Enrollment (b) Capacity Oldest / (c) = (b) - (a) (d) = (a) / (b) Projected 2023-24 Newest / Avg Capacity Projected Building Surplus Utilization % Old or Beyond Expected Life Adequacy Score / Rank Out of 260 We want to learn job skills like the trades, and there aren’t enough career classes at the school. - High School Student It’s amazing what they can do if they are given the opportunity and have the right facilities to facilitate learning. - Teacher We want to get communication skills and leadership skills… extracurricular activities help with that. - Student 415 >ĈŶĂ॒ŝ ,ŝŐŚ Θ 589 / 604 Elementary (K-12) / 3% 624 20 0.97 1946 / 2014 / 47 70% We want to get our hands dirty and try to build something. - Student 0.68 / 122 My kids are wet all the time…can we have covered walkways? - Principal Current job market demands will begin to affect educational methods at the DOE. Projects incorporating STEM will become the standard. - Principal TOTAL 604 624 20 0.97 70% Well-rounded, holistic education includes the arts. It should have an equal rather than competing place in our children’s education.” - Teacher 0.68 Challenges: • Library less than 50% of standard space • Cafeteria less than 50% of standard space • More than half (70%) of all square footage on campus is classified as old or beyond useful life • Art less than 50% of standard space • PE and athletic locker space less than 50% of standard space • New programs and facilities to reduce isolation and bullying Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 169 Lanai Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS SCENARIOS Lanai K-12 campus expansion 1A $$$$$ • $75-100M+ ‫ ڜ‬Priority 4 Follow through with funding and implementation of 2009 Lanai HS and ES Campus Master Plan Initiate process of acquiring 50 acres of county land to the west of the current site – see Option 10 Continue phased campus expansion per the 2009 Plan, with phases as follows: • Phase 1: STEM buildings (complete) • Phase 2: student commons with admin, cafeteria, and library • Phase 3: athletic fields • Phase 4: Auditorium • Phase 5: Faculty housing • • Lanai K-12 reconstruction on existing footprint 1B $$$$$ • Update Campus Master Plan to prioritize development of existing land, replacing older buildings with multistory structures Benefits Benefits • • • • • • Fulfills community-designed master plan Creates new, modern learning environment Moves students from portable to permanent facilities Provides athletic facilities for students and community Provides performance space for arts program • Saves time and cost associated with land procurement Compact site is more easily traversed Challenges Challenges • • • • • Long, narrow site would imply long walk times Time and cost of land acquisition Disruption from construction during school hours Re-engagement with county for land dedicated to school for expansion Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ • • Community is heavily invested in the 2009 Plan, and just wants hard work rewarded with funding Would require new site plan Construction would entail extended disruption to school operations and swing space during construction Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ Recommendation • Prioritized campus projects and due diligence for long-range campus expansion Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 170 Lanai Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS FACILITY OPTIONS 2 Lanai K-12 new commons/cafeteria/distributed library/performance venue Benefits Challenges • Creates sheltered space for schoolwide assemblies and performances • Maintaining safe school operations during construction 3 Lanai K-12 satellite nutrition centers • Distributed food kiosks around campus for easier access during crowded lunch period • Provides accessibility and additional options for food during busy lunch period • Current issue: Rule that students can’t take food outside of cafeteria 4 Lanai K-12 new welcome/administration/professional development center • Provides centralized administrative location for community, students, and staff • Maintaining safe school operations during construction 5 6 • Rearrange adjacency of elementary, middle, and high school classrooms by locating elementary school classrooms between middle and high school • Creates separation between MS and • Further distances for students to get HS students to destinations between classes • Potential to lessen behavioral incidents • Sharing CTE pathways with MS and • Makes it easier for HS students to drop HS is beneficial if they are next to off younger siblings in ES each other Lanai K-12 21st century classroom conversions • Creates new, flexible use learning environment • Maintaining safe school operations during construction • Provides athletic spaces for students and community • Maintaining safe school operations during construction • Provides centralized administrative location for community and students • Maintaining safe school operations during construction • Provides housing for teachers and possibly other civil servants on islands • Additional benefit to teachers for staff retention • Maintaining safe school operations during construction • Required if any type of expansion is performed on site • Even if construction is delayed, this low-cost investment is on critical path • Working with personnel not involved with initial discussions about dedicated adjacent land Lanai K-12 change ES, MS, HS classroom locations • Create modern classrooms by renovating two classrooms into one to create STEAM space 7 Lanai K-12 athletic fields 8 Lanai K-12 visitor center 9 Lanai K-12 teacher housing 10 • Construct athletic fields in area adjacent to existing site • Construct visitor center on site • Construct teacher housing on site Lanai K-12 initiate 50 acre land acquisition • Acquire land adjacent to current site by re-engaging county for previously dedicated land 11 Prioritized repairs and maintenance (all schools) 12 Locally-determined enhancements (all schools) Stakeholder Funding Priority Voice Category Tier ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #2 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #6 4 ‫ڜ‬ $20-40M ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #4 – tied 3 ‫ژ‬ $$$$$ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #8 $$$$$ $20-40M • Construct new core facilities • Distribute library spaces around campus • Construct new multi-purpose administrative center Cost/ROM Range $$$$$ $500k-2.5M $$$$$ $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M $$$$$ $20-40M $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M n/a ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #4 – tied 3 ‫ژ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #3 2 ‫ڝ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #9 5 ‫ړ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #7 5 ‫ړ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #1 1 ‫ڗ‬ 1 ‫ڗ‬ 4 ‫ڜ‬ $$$$$ $7.5-20M $$$$$ $500k-2.5M Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 171 Molokai Complex DATA and NEEDS Stakeholder Voice: Enrollment and Facility Data: School (a) 2017-18/ 2023-24 Enrollment (b) Capacity (c) = (b) - (a) (d) = (a) / (b) Oldest / Projected 2023-24 Newest / Avg Capacity Projected Building Surplus Utilization % Old or Beyond Expected Life Adequacy Score / Rank Out of 260 421 DŽůŽŬĂ॒ŝ ,ŝŐŚ ;ϵͲ 12) ϯϰϯ ͬ ϯϵϭ / 14% 513 122 0.76 ϭϵϱϭ ͬ ϭϵϴϵ ͬ ϰϵ 56% 0.77 / 70 434 DŽůŽŬĂ॒ŝ DŝĚĚůĞ ;ϳͲ ϭϵϵ ͬ ϮϬϭ 8) / 1% 234 33 0.86 ϭϵϳϴ ͬ ϭϵϳϴ ͬ 41 12% 0.56 / ϮϮϵ 407 Kaunakakai Elementary (K-6) 304 / 260 / -14% 328 Ϭ͘ϳϵ ϭϵϮϰ ͬ ϭϵϴϵ ͬ 56 67% 0.57 / 224 410 Kilohana Elementary (K-6) 83 / 70 / 16% 177 ϭϵϯϱ ͬ ϭϵϳϲ ͬ 60 54% 411 <ƵĂůĂƉƵ॒Ƶ Elementary NCPCCS (K-6) 344 / 344 / 0% 476 132 0.72 ϭϵϲϲ ͬ ϮϬϬϲ ͬ 38 58% 0.60 / 203 ϰϭϵ Maunaloa Elementary (K-6) 41 / 36 / 12% ϵϵ 63 0.36 ϭϵϯϳ ͬ ϭϵϴϬ ͬ 67 ϵϭй 0.47 / 254 1,302 1,827 525 0.71 56% 0.59 TOTAL 68 107 0.40 We always achieve beyond everyone’s expectations. Just think what we could accomplish if we had the best teachers and facilities. - High School Student Molokai schools are closely tied to the community, so facilities must be designed to be shared by community partners. A stadium and performance center would be great for us. - Administrator It’s important that we have collaborative, hands-on education with real-world job relevance. - Parent We can’t forget that we are Molokai, and must honor the ‘old things,’ our traditions. - Parent Because we’re rural, we need to think about creative solutions like distance learning and a mobile digital classroom. - Parent 0.58 / 220 Gender equity in STEM. - Teacher We should have buildings that open up so we can take the classroom outdoors. - Teacher Our isolation makes attracting and keeping good teachers a challenge. We need better professional development with a focus on children dealing with trauma. - Teacher Kids are vaping and getting into trouble as soon as they get to middle school. We need to offer better, more positive activities, the earlier the better. - Teacher Challenges: Ch • 12 to16% enrollment decline projected at elementary schools • Maunaloa ES 21 of 46 (46%) students GE out or attend charter • Library less than 50% of standard space: Kualapuu ES • High flood risk: 68% of site in current flood zone: Kaunakakai ES • Moderate flood risk: 74% of site in extreme tsunami zone: Kilohana ES • No science rooms at elementary schools • More than half of facilities are classified as old or beyond useful life • No music facilities at Molokai MS • No dedicated art or music rooms at any of four elementary schools • Admin less than 50% of standard space: Kualapuu ES • 29% of capacity in portables at Molokai HS • No PE locker facility at Molokai MS • Renovate track, resurface courts, athletic lockers, training room • Space for community partners Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 172 Molokai Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS SCENARIOS 1A Keep current operational scenario 1B Maunaloa Pre-K-8 $$$$$ • 1C Maunaloa, Kilohana, and Kaunakakai Pre-K-8 $$$$$ Molokai HS 9-12, Molokai MS 7-8, and all elementary schools K-6 continue to operate within same grade configurations and on same campuses • • • • Kaunakakai Pre-K-5; Molokai MS 6-8 $$$$$ SAC-created scenario Expand Mauanloa ES’s “Ohana” school model from Pre-K-6 to Pre-K-8 Renovate classrooms at Maunaloa ES for Pre-K, STEAM, & distance learning Maintain current Pre-K-6 operational model at Kauanakakai ES/Kilohana ES Create/renovate space at Maunloa ES for community shelter-in-place • 1D Maunaloa, Kilohana, and • • • • • • • • SAC-created scenario Move all 6th graders to the MS Expand Pre-K at elementary schools Convert classrooms at each Pre-K-8 school for Pre-K, STEAM, and distance learning Build a new MS classroom building on the current MS site (5-10 classrooms) • Benefits Benefits Benefits Benefits • • • • • • No changes to implement Community focused Cheaper than new construction and/or relocations • • • Less peer pressure, social behaviors for students Potential for greater long-term student retention by offering Pre-K programming Build on Mauanloa ES’s “Ohana” school model Reduced time/cost of transportation for 7-8 • • • • • Less student peer pressure and bad behaviors Improves long-term student retention through expanded Pre-K and reduces transitions Sustains student-teacher relationships Reduces time/cost of trans.for 7-8 Vertical alignment (students can take advanced or remedial courses as needed Pre-K-8) HS can use MS site/buildings • • Challenges Challenges Challenges • • • • • • • • • • • • Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ • Requires additional qualified teachers for middle grades education 7-8 grade lose access to MMS athletic facilities • • Requires additional qualified teachers for middle grades education 7-8 grade lose access to MMS athletic facilities Need to collaborate with Kualapu’u PCCS on support for 7-8 students • • • Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ • • • • $20-40M Benefits Challenges Removes a grade level from Kilohana and Maunaloa that are already small, underutilized, and under-resourced, jeopardizing viability Would require supplemental funding (even if these became specialized programs) Increased time/cost of transportation for 6th MS would be over-utilized and require additions prior to the conversion Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ Recommendation • ‫ ڗ‬Priority 1 Consider Scenario 1C or other scenarios including one Pre-K-12 and one Pre-K-8 Include shelter in place for all communities By December 2019, further engage local stakeholders to confirm island-wide configuration Inform identified capital projects based on confirmed configuration Creates a larger MS, which could support more MS programming than can currently be afforded Offer 6th graders access to 7-8th grade courses (also true of Option 1B) New MS building could be sized to replace existing portables and create new parking spaces Challenges Transportation time/cost Social Emotional Learning Student transitions ES-MS & MS-HS Small school size/inequitable budget Kaunakakai remains in flood zone Students remain in same old, unsafe facilities High operational costs Limited pre-school programs Difference between ES and MS grading system Focused stakeholder engagements to determine grade configurations and school portfolio $$$$$ $$$$$ SAC-created scenario, similar to 1B, except all three DOE-run elementary schools on Molokai go Pre-K-8, & Molokai MS is closed Expand Kauanakakai, Kilohana and Mauanloa from Pre-K-6 to Pre-K-8 Convert classrooms at each Pre-K-8 school for Pre-K, STEAM, and distance learning Re-plan adjoining Molokai HS/MS campuses for enhanced 9-12 programs 1E Build off SAC feedback to determine Pre-K-8 grade configuration Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 173 Molokai Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS Scenarios 2A Move Kauanakakai ES out of flood zone $$$$$ • $75-100M+ ‫ ڗ‬Priority 1 Acquire new site through direct purchase or land swap Construct new school sized to accommodate selected operational model and grade configuration Include design for community shelter in place • • 2B Keep Kaunakakai ES on current site $$$$$ • Continue operating Kaunakakai ES on current site that is 68% within flood zone • Perform limited renovations, repairs, and program enhancements, such as STEAM classroom conversions Benefits Benefits • • • • • • Reduces safety and asset preservation risks Provides new, modern facility Could be studied while moving forward with Scenario 2B Current site could be repurposed for desired functions such as visitor and/or teacher housing, professional development and retreat center, and/or community center, gardens Provides needed community shelter for disasters Planning ahead for a flooding event that is likely to occur in the future: would have time to build before a flood • Modest renovations can be implemented quicker than constructing a new campus Current site is centralized on the island Challenges Challenges • • Land acquisition time/cost (could pursue a land swap) • • • Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ Flood zone limits DOE’s ability to make largescale improvements Cost to update existing facility may be similar to new construction Facilities need significant repairs Flooding appears inevitable: it will be more costly to rebuild after a flood than before Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ Recommendation • Search for a new school site. Construct new school based on the grade configuration determine through local engage. Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 174 Molokai Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS FACILITY OPTIONS 3 Molokai HS replace portables with spaces for STEM and careers • • Selective demolition and new/renovated buildings for flexible, collaborative spaces for science, arts, and career technical education, such as robotics, organic agriculture, farm to school, and natural sciences Professional learning center with distance learning technologies 4 Molokai HS new multi-purpose outdoor commons 5 Molokai HS athletics improvements • • Construct covered outdoor venue for dining, assemblies, performances, and community use Molokai HS/MS acquire adjacent land for agriculture program 7 Molokai MS new collaborative learning additions • • Purchase/lease land for organic agriculture production Molokai MS separate entrance 9 Molokai MS new covered multi-purpose space • • 10.1 10.2 11 12 • Removes outdated buildings • New, modern environments • Opens up space for athletics and agricultural education • Extends construction on occupied site Develop campus entrance off of Lihi Pali Avenue apart from Molokai HS Cost/ROM Range $$$$$ $20-40M $$$$$ • Provides flexible shared space • Provides performance venue for cultural arts $20-40M • Enhances athletic opportunities $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M • Turn area difficult to monitor into • Time and cost of land plots for enhance agriculture career acquisition education and ‘farm to school’ • Fosters collaborative instruction and student-focused project-based Construct building additions in unused courtyard spaces to house flexible, collaborative learning project-based spaces in close proximity of existing classrooms. Renovate existing buildings to • Could replace existing portables provide glass walls for visibility and sound barriers. with space for new parking spaces Enhanced distance learning technologies and spaces 8 • Challenges Top priority projects in 2016 statewide athletics masterplan: renovate track, resurface courts, athletic lockers, training room 6 • Benefits • Provides flexible shared space $20-40M $$$$$ $20-40M $$$$$ • Distinct entrance apart from MHS • Reduces bullying Construct covered outdoor space adjacent to cafeteria in courtyard between the HS and MS for dining, assemblies, and outdoor learning Add a certified kitchen to use for culinary class and community use $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M • Need to ensure septic is not present $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M • Construct covered outdoor space for dining, assemblies, outdoor learning, community use, and emergency shelter • Shared school/community asset • Nearest shelter is currently 20-30 minutes away in town $$$$$ Maunaloa ES classroom addition • New, modern environments $$$$$ Maunaloa ES and Kilohana ES multi-purpose shelter in place • Replace inadequate spaces used for dual-grade class instruction with modern classrooms $$$$$ • Classroom renovations and alterations to support life-skills instruction for high-incidence Special Education • Classroom renovations to provide adjacent restrooms and spaces appropriate for Pre-K • Reconstruct school administration Funding Category $2.5-7.5M • Addresses old, inadequate space in poor condition $$$$$ $20-40M Priority Tier ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #2 tie 2 ‫ڝ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #5 tie 5 ‫ړ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #5 tie 2 ‫ڝ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #4 5 ‫ړ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ MS - #4 4 ‫ڜ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ MS - #5 tie 5 ‫ړ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ MS - #7 5 ‫ړ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #3 tie 1 ‫ڗ‬ 5 ‫ړ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #2 4 ‫ڜ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #5 3 ‫ژ‬ $20-40M Kilohana ES renovations for Special Education & Pre-K programs Kilohana ES new administration building $20-40M Stakeholder Voice Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 175 Molokai Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS FACILITY OPTIONS Benefits Challenges • Addresses top-priority needs at each school Cost/ROM Range Stakeholder Voice $$$$$ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS/MS/ES #1/1/1 ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS/MS/ES #2/3/3 13 Prioritized repairs and maintenance (all schools) 14 Locally-determined enhancements (all schools) • Budget allotment for each school to fund stakeholder-driven projects • Empowers schools and students to • Requires policy to define projects at time of execution consistently allocate and implement projects $500k-2.5M 15 Molokai MS Hawaiian Language Immersion Program classrooms • Provides new, modern learning environments to support language immersion programming $500k-2.5M • Creates new community asset for a variety of uses including a family learning center $2.5-7.5M • Safety, code, and maintenance projects to include site drainage • Renovate spaces for language immersion programs to be shared by Molokai MS and HS 16 Molokai MS major renovation and expansion to the library to include technology and community use 17 Teacher housing renovations/enhancements 18 Sustainable energy improvements 19 Multi-purpose STEAM classrooms (all schools) 20 Kaunakakai ES traffic barrier 21 Equipment refresh (all schools) 22 Kilohana ES Building A Lanai renovation $7.5-20M $$$$$ $$$$$ $$$$$ Funding Category 1 ‫ڗ‬ 5 ‫ړ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ MS - #5 tie 2 ‫ڝ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ MS - #2 4 ‫ڜ‬ 3 ‫ژ‬ 1 ‫ڗ‬ 1 ‫ڗ‬ 1 ‫ڗ‬ 1 ‫ڗ‬ 1 ‫ڗ‬ $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M $$$$$ $500k-2.5M $$$$$ $500k-2.5M • Partially-funded Priority Tier $$$$$ $500k-2.5M Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 176 177 APPENDIX Windward Options Reports Windward District Overview District-wide Options (Priority 1): Castle Priority 1 Priority 2 Option FUR: Modern classroom furniture and equipment (all schools) ($$) Kahuku • Scenario 1E: Kahuku complex – engage community to decide on grade configuration ($$$$$) • Scenario 2A: Kaaawa replacement school land acquisition due diligence ($) • Option 4: Kahuku HS/IS flood control ($$$) • Option 7: Kahuku HS/IS athletics master plan projects ($$$) • Option 8: Kahuku HS/IS phased reconstruction ($$$$$) • Option 9: Sunset Beach ES multi-story facility ($$$) • Option 14: Prioritized repairs and maintenance (all schools) ($$) • Option 16: Hauula electrical upgrades ($$) • Option 17: Kahuku HS/IS ADA accessibility to portables ($) • Scenario 1D: Kailua HS, Kalaheo HS, and Castle HS integrated program feasibility study ($$$) • Scenario 2B: Kaelepulu ES reconstruction; Keolu ES repurposed; Admin/PD Center ($$$$) • Option 5: Kailua HS athletic master plan projects ($$) • Option 6.1: Olomana HS/IS urgent communication systems ($$) • Option 14: Prioritized repairs and maintenance (all schools) ($$) • Scenario 1D: Kailua, Kalaheo, and Castle integrated program feasibility study ($$$) • Option 3: Kailua IS 21st century building additions ($$) • Option 10: Kailua ES safety, security, and ADA improvements ($$) • Option 15: Prioritized repairs and maintenance (all schools) ($$) • Option 17: Kalaheo HS ADA improvements ($$) • Option 19: Kalaheo HS Building F structural improvements ($$) • Option 5.1: Castle HS special education improvements ($$) • Option 6: Castle HS flood control and fire lane ($$) • Option 18.1: Ahuimanu ES new cafeteria ($$$) • Option 13: Laie ES cafeteria ($$$) • Option 15: Locally-determined enhancements (all schools) ($) • Option 4: Kailua HS Visual and Performing Arts Center ($$$$) • Option 7: Waimanalo ES/IS ADA accessibility projects ($) • Option 15: Locally-determined enhancements (all schools) ($) • Option 4: Kailua IS indoor/outdoor cafeteria addition ($$) • Option 5: Aikahi ES air conditioning retrofit ($$) • Option 16: Locally-determined enhancements (all schools) ($) • Option 18: Kalaheo HS band room renovation ($$) • Option 11: Parking expansion and drop-off (various schools) ($$) • Option 13: Maunawili ES security fencing ($) • Option 14: Kaohao ES PCS build permanent administration space ($$$) • Option 4: Castle HS 21st century library ($$$) Priority 5 Kalaheo • Scenario 1D: Kailua HS, Kalaheo HS, and Castle HS integrated program feasibility study ($$$) • Scenario 2A: Waiahole ES, Kaaawa ES, and Hauula ES campuses remain open ($) • Option 5.2: Castle HS ADA improvements ($$) • Option 7: Castle HS athletic master plan projects ($$$) • Option 10: King IS major renovation to Building C ($$$) • Option 12: ADA accessibility projects (various schools) ($$) • Option 13: Parking expansion and safe drop-off (various schools) ($$$) • Option 14: Site drainage improvements (various schools) ($$) • Option 19: Heeia ES air condition improvements ($$) • Option 22: Prioritized repairs and maintenance (all schools) ($$) • Option 23: Locally-determined enhancements (all schools) ($) Priority 3 Priority 4 Kailua • Option 8: King IS 21st century building additions ($$$) • Option 15: Renovate or construct classrooms for STEAM (various schools) ($$) • Option 18.2: Ahuimanu ES STEAM/maker space ($$$) • Option 21: Puahala ES administration/classroom renovation ($$) • Option 5: Kahuku HS/IS music improvements ($$$) • Option 6: Kahuku HS/IS health career improvements ($$) • Option 11: Laie ES parking expansion and drop-off ($$) • Option 12: Laie ES new classroom/admin buildings ($$$) • Option 6.2: Olomana HS/IS permanent facilities ($$) • Option 9: Air conditioning retrofit projects (various schools) ($$) • Option 10: Renovate or construct classrooms for STEAM (various schools) ($$) • Option 16: Kaelepulu ES administration building ($$$) • Option 3: Kailua IS 21st century building additions ($$$) • Option 7: Kainalu ES parking lot expansion ($$) • Option 13: Kaohao ES PCS cafeteria addition ($$) • Option 9: King IS outdoor learning space ($) • Option 11: King IS turn junkyard into educational space ($) • Option 16: Covered multi-purpose play court (various schools) ($$$) • Option 17: Kahaluu administration addition ($$) • Option 20: Heeia ES soundproof walls ($) • Option 10: Kahuku ES covered outdoor multipurpose facility ($$) • Option 8: Waimanalo ES/IS covered multipurpose play court ($$) • Option 12: Enchanted Lake ES STEAM and professional learning center ($$) • Option 6: Aikahi ES 21st century building additions ($$$) • Option 8: Kainalu ES 21st century building additions ($$$) • Option 9: Kailua ES covered play court ($$) • Option 11: Kailua ES professional learning center addition ($$) • Option 12: Kailua ES build an outdoor stage and amphitheater ($$) Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 179 Castle Complex DATA and NEEDS Stakeholder Voice: Enrollment and Facility Data: School (a) 2017-18/ 2023-24 Enrollment (b) Capacity Oldest / (c) = (b) - (a) (d) = (a) / (b) Projected 2023-24 Newest / Avg Capacity Projected Building Surplus Utilization % Old or Beyond Expected Life Adequacy Score / Rank Out of 260 301 Castle High (9-12) 1173 / 1139 / 3% 1558 419 0.73 1950 / 1999 / 49 62% 0.80 / 41 318 King Intermediate (7-8) 615 / 660 / 7% 949 289 0.70 1965 / 1995 / 49 57% 0.84 / 16 304 ,Ğ॒ĞŝĂ ůĞŵĞŶƚĂƌLJ 451 / 426 (K-6) / -6% 680 254 0.63 1960 / 1971 / 52 60% 0.63 / 163 306 <ĂŚĂůƵ॒Ƶ Elementary (K-6) 286 / 219 / -23% 326 107 0.67 1963 / 1969 / 53 91% 0.60 / 208 313 <ĈŶĞ॒ŽŚĞ Elementary (K-6) 617 / 611 / -1% 585 -26 1.04 1956 / 2015 / 58 94% 0.61 / 197 314 Wƻ॒ƃŚĂůĂ Elementary (K-6) 283 / 255 / -10% 407 152 0.63 1967 / 1967 / 51 100% 0.75 / 82 315 Kapunahala Elementary (K-6) 561 / 575 / 2% 570 -5 1.01 1962 / 1969 / 55 83% 0.61 / 191 323 Parker Elementary 332 / 292 (K-6) / -12% 386 94 0.76 1954 / 1973 / 49 14% 0.82 / 26 326 tĂŝĈŚŽůĞ Elementary (K-6) 95 / 102 / 7% 228 126 0.45 1954 / 1970 / 56 82% 0.56 / 231 335 ॒ ŚƵŝŵĂŶƵ Elementary (K-6) 308 / 343 / 11% 336 -7 1.02 1973 / 1977 / 42 3% 0.71 / 105 4,622 6,025 1,403 0.77 65% 0.69 TOTAL My kids would always say ‘Mom, it’s embarrassing to have people come to our school. I would like to have school that we all feel proud of. - Parent Castle didn’t have bathrooms for a full year and now they don’t have a cafeteria. We have no idea how long this renovation will take. - Teacher We need to look at our facilities being ADA accessible, not just because of inclusion but because kids break things a lot! King Intermediate kids miss out on class if they are on crutches. - Community Member Windward does a good job supporting teachers for CTE despite having limited space for professional development. How cool would it be if we had an innovation lab location where teachers can learn collaboratively? - Teacher Challenges: C • 45%-62% of elementary students GE out or attend charter • Industrial Arts less than 50% of standard space: Castle HS, King IS • Moderate flood risk: site in extreme tsunami zone (Puohala ES) • No science rooms at most elementary schools • Over half of facilities are classified as old or beyond useful life • No dedicated art or music rooms at most elementary schools • Admin less than 50% of standard space: Heeia ES, Kapunahala ES • Most schools have underutilized capacity • Resurface courts, girls lockers • Professional development space • Library less than 50% of standard space: Heeia ES, Kaneohe ES • Cafeteria less than 50% of standard space: Kapunahala ES Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 180 Castle Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS SCENARIOS (1A-1D apply to Castle, Kailua, and Kalaheo complexes) 1A Castle HS, Kailua HS, and Kalaheo HS maintain separate programs 1B Kailua HS and Kalaheo HS single high school at Kailua HS campus $$$$$ • $$$$$ Kailua HS and Kalaheo HS continue to operate as separate 9-12 programs (see Kalaheo Complex report for Kalaheo HS options) • • • Castle HS and Kailua HS 1D Kailua HS, Kalaheo HS, and Castle HS integrated program feasibility study $$$$$ (Doesn’t affect Castle HS) Merge Kalaheo HS program with Kailua HS at the larger Kailua HS campus Build multi-story addition (300+ capacity) and planned performing arts center at Kailua HS Work with local community to explore options for repurposing the Kalaheo HS campus • 1C Kalaheo HS consolidated into $$$$$ • SAC-created scenario, similar to 1B except Kalaheo HS attendance boundary is split between Castle HS and Kailua HS, instead of Kailua HS only • Replace ## portables at Castle with permanent facilities with ### capacity and build performing arts center at Kailua HS • • • Benefits Benefits Benefits • • • • • • • • • Kalaheo HS students gain access to academic and athletic facilities not present and not possible to construct on the Kalaheo HS site (formerly a MS) Improve capacity utilization. Kalaheo HS and Kailua HS currently have combined 800 surplus seats Invest in one HS campus rather than split funding between two, under-utilized campuses Kalaheo HS campus could be used for other educational or revenue-generating purposes More operational dollars from WSF • • Kalaheo HS students gain access to academic and athletic facilities not present and not possible to construct on the Kalaheo HS site (formerly a MS) Improve capacity utilization. Kalaheo HS, Castle HS, and Kailua HS currently have a combined 1,224 surplus seats Kalaheo HS campus could be used for other educational or revenue-generating purposes • • Combines operational budget based on over 2,700 students while allowing each campus to concentrate their resources in specialized programmatic, staffing, and facility investments Improved program quality and diversity (Career Technical Education, Gifted & Talented, Advanced Placement, college prep, music, athletics) Avoids diluting limited dollars by sharing of resources for all staff and students. Challenges Challenges Challenges Challenges • • • • • • • • • Due to declining population, Kalaheo HS at ~800 enrollment and Kailua HS at ~750 are individually 6th and 5th smallest HI high schools out of 33 Based on funding weighted student formulas, smaller HS’s are limited in programs offered Kalaheo HS operates on a small, former MS site with limited acreage for parking and athletics, with hilly ADA accessibility challenges More than half of buildings >50 years old Kalaheo HS and Kailua HS (2.6 miles apart) operate with combined 800 surplus capacity Currently experiencing high teacher turnover Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ • • • School consolidation requires significant stakeholder outreach and operational planning Traffic from Castle Junction area Though only 2.6 miles away, Kailua is further from Marine Corps Base Hawaii Merging campus communities and cultures (could be a challenge and a benefit) Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ School consolidation requires significant stakeholder outreach and operational planning • • Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ ‫ ڗ‬Priority 1 SAC-created scenario: three campuses merge into a single “community college model” high school program by December 2019, with synchronized schedules and transportation between campuses Each campus focuses staff and facilities in complementary program areas (e.g., Career Technical Education, STEM, visual and performing arts, humanities) Engage community in 3-5 strategic planning workshops Benefits No changes to implement Smaller schools can seem more personalized and less overwhelming to some stakeholders, though at expense of the size and scale that allows resources for diverse program offerings $20-40M Significant operational change requires extensive stakeholder outreach and operational planning Requires highly coordinated scheduling between campuses Increased transportation costs Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ Recommendation • Focused with area stakeholders on the model proposed by the SAC, which addresses the shared challenges of limited operational and capital funds by creating a one-of-a-kind high school partnership Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 181 Castle Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS SCENARIOS 2A Waiahole ES, Kaaawa ES, and Hauula ES campuses remain open $$$$$ • $500k-2.5M • • reconstruction; Kaaawa ES community center ‫ ڗ‬Priority 1 Three-school scenario: Maintain operations ‘as is’ at Kaaawa ES (Kahuku), Hauula ES (Kahuku), and Waiahole ES (Castle) Perform limited renovations as permitted by flood zones Explore land acquisition in Kualoa Ranch and/or land swap General R&M and pursue STEAM renovations • 2B Waiahole ES and Hauula ES 2C Waiahole 6-12 language magnet school $$$$$ • magnet school; Kaaawa community center $$$$$ Two-school scenario: Re-plan Hauula ES and/or Waiahole ES campuses for major reconstruction to accommodate ### enrollment for Kaaawa ES, Hauula ES, and :DLƗKROH ES students Repurpose Kaaawa campus for communitydesigned public use, such as after-school sports/recreation, satellite remote learning center, adult education, community clinic • 2D Waiahole 6-12 language • $$$$$ SAC-created option, same as 2A but includes converting Waiahole ES into a DOE or charter 6-12 language immersion magnet school Consolidate Waiahole ES and Kahaluu ES boundaries and build new 5-classroom building at Kahaluu ES to accommodate ~100 Waiahole ES students • • SAC-created option, same as 2B (repurpose Kaaawa ES) but also includes converting Waiahole into a DOE or charter 6-12 language immersion magnet school Consolidate Waiahole ES and Kahaluu ES boundaries and build new 5-classroom building at Kahaluu ES to accommodate ~100 Waiahole ES students • Benefits Benefits Benefits Benefits • • • • • No changes to implement Walkable community schools for those who don’t elect Geographic Exceptions • • • Larger schools can offer more enrichment programs such as language, music, and art Move all students from state’s worst facilities into new/rebuilt buildings equipped for 21st century Improved safety and reduced facility risk by rebuilding out of flood zones New community asset in Kaaawa • Same as 2A+ additional program options for area families Builds secondary school option for language immersion (specifically Puohala ES and Haaula ES families) • Same as 2B + additional program options for area families Builds secondary school option for language immersion (specifically Puohala ES and Haaula ES families) Challenges Challenges Challenges Challenges • • • • • • • • Three schools are among smallest in the state Based on funding weighted student formulas, smaller ES’s struggle to offer enrichment programs and sometimes need to assign multiple grades to teachers High proportion of students GE out: Kaaawa ES (49%), Hauula ES (41%), and Waiahole ES (62%), not including those who choose private schools Facilities are in poor condition and are among the poorest equipped with spaces matching DOE design standards - Kaaawa ES (260), Hauula ES (237), and Waiahole ES (231) out of 260 Kaaawa ES and Hauula ES located in flood zones restricting allowable facility improvements Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ • • • School consolidation requires significant stakeholder outreach and operational planning Increased transportation – 7 miles from Kaaawa ES to Hauula ES, and 6 miles from Kaaawa ES to Waiahole ES; especially challenging when the Waikane river floods Ensuring the community asset created in Kaaawa meets local needs and expectations Need to expand parking at Waiahole ES Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ • • Same as 2A + additional move for students who would move from Waiahole ES to Kalahuu ES Requires significant community engagement Waiahole requires electrical and plumbing upgrades Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ • • Same as 2B + additional move for students who would move from Waiahole ES to Kalahuu ES Requires significant community engagement Waiahole ES requires electrical and plumbing upgrades Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ Recommendation • Explore a land swap with a local business to provide a new home for Kaaawa and/or Hauula ES, which currently sit in flood zones that limit the viability of renovating these schools to modern standards Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 182 Castle Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS SCENARIOS (3A-3D apply to Castle Kahuku complexes) 3A King IS Windward District administration offices remain behind King IS ‘as is’ 3B King IS Windward District administration site redesigned for improved separation and wayfinding $$$$$ • $$$$$ Continue housing Windward District administration at back of King IS General R&M and pursue STEAM classroom renovations • King IS Windward District administration moves new offices at repurposed Keolu ES site 3C • Kailua, Kalaheo, and Kahuku $$$$$ Re-plan King IS to more clearly delineate separate school campus from Windward District offices Improve public access, parking, and clear campus wayfinding • 3D Satellite District offices in • • $$$$$ (Refer to Kailua Complex Scenario 2B) Re-plan and reconstruct Kaelepulu ES campus as 21st century Kaelepulu/Keolu ES Repurpose Keolu ES for Windward District administration offices Repurpose spaces at King IS currently occupied by Windward District admin for educational use • • • • SAC-created option Distribute Windward District offices across Windward complexes Renovate surplus space or build new • Benefits Benefits Benefits Benefits • • • • • No operational disruption or cost associated with other scenarios • Improves public access (including DAGs and National Guard) and wayfinding to Windward District offices Provides separation between King IS and Windward District offices • • Increased safety and security at King IS Centralized, publicly accessible professional administrative offices that promote collaboration Reclaim classroom spaces at various schools occupied by non-school personnel for educational purposes Centralized location for Windward District administration Provides access to District offices in various locations throughout Windward Challenges Challenges Challenges Challenges • • • • • • • • • • Poor public access and wayfinding to Windward District offices Little separation between King IS and Windward District offices Need for additional parking Current location not centralized for Windward Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ Operational disruption during construction Cost versus 1A ADA compatibility Need for additional parking Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ • • • • Recaptured capacity would cause King IS to have even lower utilization than current 70% Cost versus 1A Keolu ES not a central location for Windward School offices; especially for Kahuku Keolu ES would need rebuilt prior to repurposing Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ Distributing District functions and personnel as opposed to having them in a consolidating location Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ Recommendation • Keep District offices in their current location at King IS for the foreseeable future unless new land for development becomes a reality Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 183 Castle Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS FACILITY OPTIONS (not in priority order) 4 5.1 5.2 6 Castle HS 21st century library • • • • Construct new library with flexible project-based learning spaces Repurpose existing library for administration and professional learning center Expansion of Admin Improve wayfinding and security Castle HS special education improvements • • Renovate two+ classrooms for Life Skills and self-contained SPED program Existing project Castle HS ADA improvements • • Retrofit campus and repair sidewalks to be ADA compliant and accessible Existing project Castle HS flood control and fire lane • Fund current drainage improvement plan • Remove surplus portables in poor condition and construct a fire lane 7 Castle HS athletic master plan projects 8 King IS 21st century building additions 9 • Resurface courts, girls lockers • Construct additions in unused courtyards between classroom buildings to provide collaborative learning spaces associated with existing classrooms King IS outdoor learning space • Benefits • Provides modern library and flexible learning space • Supports teacher collaboration • Improves access and equity for special education students • Improves access and equity for students with ADA challenges • Improves safety and reduces building preservation risk • Provides for outdoor learning 11 King IS turn junkyard into educational space • Safety • Remove maintenance junkyard/laydown area on north end of campus and restore site for educational use such as a school garden 14 Site drainage improvements (various schools) • Requested by Kaneohe ES, Puohala ES, Kapunahala ES, Parker ES, Waiahole ES $$$$$ $20-40M $20-40M $$$$$ $$$$$ $20-40M $$$$$ $500k-2.5M • Improves ADA compliance and universal accessibility • Pedestrian safety • Staff convenience and community access to school • Requested by Kahaluu ES, Parker ES, Ahuimanu ES 3 ‫ژ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #2 2 ‫ڝ‬ 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #1 2 ‫ڝ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #5 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ IS - #1 4 ‫ڜ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ IS - #6 5 ‫ړ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ IS – 3 tie 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ IS – 3 tie 5 ‫ړ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #1 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #8 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #3 1 ‫ڗ‬ $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M $$$$$ $20-40M $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M Priority Tier ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #3 tie $2.5-7.5M $500k-2.5M • Improves building condition • Collaborative learning Parking expansion and safe drop-off (various schools) $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M $$$$$ • Renovate/rebuild Building C that has heavy corrosion into flexible learning environments 13 $20-40M • Provides modern learning environment King IS major renovation to Building C • Parker ES add elevator to access second floors • Ahuimanu ES make pathway to cafeteria ADA compliant/accessible $$$$$ $$$$$ Clear brush at back side of campus and construct outdoor learning area ADA accessibility projects (various schools) Cost/ROM Stakeholder Funding Range Voice Category • Improves equity and athletic program 10 12 Challenges Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 184 Castle Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS FACILITY OPTIONS (not in priority order) 15 Renovate or construct classrooms for STEAM (various schools) • Provide plumbing for science/art, flexible furniture, acoustical dividers, and renovations • Requested by Kahaluu ES, Kaneohe ES, Kapunahala ES, Waiahole ES 16 Covered multi-purpose play court (various schools) 17 Kahaluu administration addition • Requested by Waiahole ES, Ahuimanu ES • Consider location between Building A and the cafeteria 18.1 Ahuimanu ES new cafeteria 18.2 Ahuimanu ES STEAM/maker space • Construct new cafeteria between academic buildings to facilitate Pre-K • Repurpose current cafeteria for STEAM/maker space 19 Heeia ES air conditioning improvements 20 Heeia ES soundproof walls 21 Puohala ES administration/classroom renovation • • Benefits Challenges • Improves building condition • Provides modern learning environment $2.5-7.5M • Provides covered outdoor multi-purpose space $$$$$ • Provides modern administration offices and space for teacher collaboration $2.5-7.5M • Right-sized multi-purpose cafeteria $$$$$ • Right-sized multi-purpose cafeteria • New flexible learning environment $$$$$ $$$$$ $20-40M $$$$$ $20-40M $$$$$ • AC improvements $2.5-7.5M • Right sizes admin space where entry can be monitored for security • Provides new learning environments 22 Prioritized repairs and maintenance (all schools) • Addresses top priority needs at each school 23 Locally-determined enhancements (all schools) • Safety, code, and maintenance projects, to include site drainage • Budget allotment for each school to fund stakeholder-driven projects • E.g., Kaneohe ES net-zero portable $$$$$ • Improves building condition • Creates capacity to use or partition classrooms • Renovate/construct admin offices from current classroom to front of site near parent drop-off • Repurpose classroom currently housing administration for educational use • Empowers schools and students to define projects at time of execution Stakeholder Voice Funding Category $500k-2.5M $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M $$$$$ $7.5-20M • Requires policy to consistently allocate and implement projects $$$$$ $500k-2.5M Priority Tier ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #5 4 ‫ڜ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #9 5 ‫ړ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #10 5 ‫ړ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #4 2 ‫ڝ‬ 4 ‫ڜ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - last 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #11 5 ‫ړ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #7 4 ‫ڜ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HE/IS/ES #3/2/2 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HE/IS/ES #6/5/6 1 ‫ڗ‬ $20-40M Fund existing plan to AC two-story pod Replace poor condition accordion walls with new acoustically treated and moveable walls Cost/ROM Range Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 185 Kahuku Complex DATA and NEEDS Stakeholder Voice: Enrollment and Facility Data: School (a) 2017-18/ 2023-24 Enrollment (b) Capacity (c) = (b) - (a) (d) = (a) / (b) Oldest / Projected 2023-24 Newest / Avg Capacity Projected Building Surplus Utilization % Old or Beyond Expected Life Adequacy Score / Rank Out of 260 307 Kahuku High & Intermediate (712) 1390 / 1356 / 2% 1592 236 0.85 1951 / 1993 / 41 31% 0.78 / 59 303 ,ĂƵ॒ƵůĂ Elementary (K-6) 343 / 383 / 12% 330 -53 1.16 1951 / 1974 / 52 63% 0.54 / 237 305 <Ă॒Ă॒ĂǁĂ Elementary (K-6) 125 / 114 / -9% 161 47 0.71 1940 / 1960 / 60 86% 0.38 / 260 319 >Ĉ॒ŝĞ ůĞŵĞŶƚĂƌLJ (K-6) 671 / 678 / 1% 867 189 0.78 1951 / 1996 / 50 59% 0.61 / 187 325 Sunset Beach Elementary (K-6) 445 / 422 / -5% 467 45 0.90 1990 / 2008 / 33 36% 0.61 / 190 331 Kahuku Elementary (K-6) 425 / 389 / -8% 424 35 0.92 1988 / 1997 / 27 0% 0.77 / 69 3,342 3,841 499 0.87 46% 0.61 TOTAL I learn best by going outside and doing things with my hands, not reading books. That’s why I love the agriculture class. - Student This year, 200 parents were fighting for their kids to have one of the 25 spots in the Kahuku early college program. - Parent It happens every time it rains a lot, and it is just embarrassing to our school that we have to move the football game to another place. - Parent We love having Intermediate with High School. It’s scary at first for the 7th graders, but after a few weeks they’re used to it, and it’s great. - Parent Challenges: • Kaaawa ES 42 of 87 (48%) and Hauula ES 175 of 428 (41%) of students GE out or attend charter • Industrial Arts less than 50% of standard space: Kahuku HS and IS • High flood risk: 98% and 47% of site in flood zone (Kaaawa, Hauula) • Moderate flood risk: site in extreme tsunami zone (all) • No science rooms at elementary schools • Nearly half of facilities are classified as old or beyond useful life • Art and music less than 50% of standard space: Kahuku High & IS • No dedicated art or music rooms at elementary schools • Admin less than 50% of standard space: Hauula ES, Sunset Beach ES • Kaaawa ES and Laie ES have under-utilized capacity • More than 25% of capacity in portables: Hauula, Laie, Sunset Beach, Kaaawa • Resurface courts, training room, renovate field, renovate track • Expand Pre-K education at elementary schools • Library less than 50% of standard space: Webling ES • Cafeteria less than 50% of standard space: Kahuku El, Kaaawa, Hauula Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 186 Kahuku Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS SCENARIOS 1A Keep current operational scenario 1B Kahuku HS/IS 6-12, Pre-K-5 elementary schools $$$$$ 1C Kahuku HS 9-12, New 68 IS, Pre-K-5 ES’s $$$$$ 1D Kahuku HS 9-12, Hauula 6-8 IS, Pre-K-5 ES’s $$$$$ $$$$$ 1E Kahuku complex – engage community to decide on grade configuration $$$$$ $75-100M+ ‫ ڗ‬Priority 1 • Kahuku HS/IS remains 7-12, and elementary schools remain Pre-K-6 Schools remain on same sites • • Enroll all ### 6th grade students at Kahuku HS/IS, reconfigured from 7-12 to 6-12 Re-plan Kahuku HS/IS campus to accommodate expanded IS Construct/renovate # classrooms at all Kahuku elementary schools for expanded Pre-K programs • • • Acquire land or pursue land-swaps for property above flood zones in centralized location between Laie and Hauula Construct new ### student intermediate school to serve all ### Kahuku 6-8 students Re-plan Kahuku HS/IS campus to accommodate focused high school program Construct/renovate # classrooms at all Kahuku elementary schools for expanded Pre-K programs • • • • Similar to 1C, except Hauula ES is converted to a ### student IS, and Hauula ES students attend other schools Re-construct Hauula facilities above flood zone to serve all ### Kahuku 6-8 students Re-plan Kahuku HS/IS campus to accommodate focused high school program Construct/renovate # classrooms at all Kahuku elementary schools for expanded Pre-K programs • • • • • • • By December 2019, form committee and engage in three to five strategic planning workshops Determine site-specific design needs for ES, IS, and HS accordingly Build new capacity at Kahuku HS to replace portables Build or renovate at least two classrooms at every ES for Pre-K Benefits Benefits Benefits Benefits Benefits • • • • • • No changes to implement • • Facilitate desired expansion of Pre-K programs at elementary schools at low cost Moving 6th to Kahuku IS implies minimal operational change Additional program offerings for 6th graders • • Facilitate desired expansion of Pre-K programs at elementary schools at low cost Separation of IS from HS allows schools to focus on each grade level’s distinct challenges 21st century learning environments • • • Facilitate desired expansion of PreK programs at elementary schools at low cost Separation of IS from HS allows schools to focus on each grade level’s distinct challenges 21st century learning environments Existing land for new construction (cost effective) Challenges Challenges Challenges Challenges • • • • • Limited space for desired expansion of Pre-K programs at elementary schools Limited cafeteria space Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ • Grade reconfiguration implies planning and staff development Potential social challenges for 6th graders Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ • • • Grade reconfiguration implies planning and staff development Change of Kahuku HS/IS tradition Transportation impacts The location, time, and cost of land procurement Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ • • Community-building Determines long-term grade configuration prior to major capital investments Challenges Grade reconfiguration implies planning and staff development Change of Kahuku HS/IS tradition Transportation impacts; especially from Sunset Beach in the winter: Laie is more centralized Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ Recommendation • Replace portables on site with permanent construction. Engage local stakeholders to determine the long-term grade configuration that will inform design. Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 187 Kahuku Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS SCENARIOS (2A-2D apply to Castle and Kahuku complexes) 2A Kaaawa replacement school land acquisition due diligence $$$$$ • $500k-2.5M • reconstruction; Kaaawa community center ‫ ڗ‬Priority 1 Three-school scenario: Maintain operations ‘as is’ at Kaaawa (Kahuku), Hauula (Kahuku), and Waiahole (Castle) Perform limited renovations as permitted by flood zones General R&M and pursue STEAM renovations • 2B Waiahole/Hauula 2C Waiahole 6-12 language magnet school $$$$$ • magnet school; Kaaawa community center $$$$$ Two-school scenario: Re-plan Hauula and/or Waahole campuses for major reconstruction to accommodate ### enrollment for Kaaawa, Hauula, and Waiahole elementary students Repurpose Kaaawa campus for communitydesigned public use, such as after-school sports/recreation, satellite remote learning center, adult education, community clinic • 2D Waiahole 6-12 language • $$$$$ SAC-created option, same as 2A but includes converting Waiahole into a DOE or charter 6-12 language immersion magnet school Consolidate Waiahole and Kahaluu boundaries and build new 5-classroom building at Kahaluu; to accommodate ~100 :DLƗKROH (6 VWXGHQWV • • SAC-created option, same as 2B (repurpose Kaaawa) but also includes converting Waiahole into a DOE or charter 6-12 language immersion magnet school Consolidate Waiahole and Kahaluu boundaries and build new 5-classroom building at Kahaluu; to accommodate ~100 :DLƗKROH (6 VWXGHQWV • Benefits Benefits Benefits Benefits • • • • • No changes to implement Walkable community schools for those who don’t elect Geographic Exceptions • • • Larger schools can offer more enrichment programs such as language, music, and art Move all students from state’s worst facilities into new/rebuilt buildings equipped for 21st century Improved safety and reduced facility risk by rebuilding out of flood zones New community asset in Kaaawa. • Same as 2A+ additional program options for area families. Builds secondary school option for language immersion (specifically Puohala El and Haaula El families) • Same as 2B + additional program options for area families Builds secondary school option for language immersion (specifically Puohala ESand Haaula ES families) Challenges Challenges Challenges Challenges • • • • • • • • Three schools are among smallest in the state Based on funding weighted student formulas, smaller elementary schools struggle to offer enrichment programs and sometimes need to assign multiple grades to teachers High proportion of students GE out: Kaaawa (49%), Hauula (41%), and Waiahole (62%), not including those who choose private schools Facilities are in poor condition and are among the poorest equipped with spaces matching DOE design standards - Kaaawa (260), Hauula (237), and Waiahole (231) out of 260 Kaaawa and Hauula located in flood zones restricting allowable facility improvements Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ • • • School consolidation requires significant stakeholder outreach and operational planning Increased transportation – 7 miles from Kaaawa to Hauula, and 6 miles from Kaaawa to Waiahole; especially challenging when the Waikane river floods Ensuring the community asset created in Kaawa meets local needs and expectations Need to expand parking at :DLƗKROH Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ • • Same as 2A + additional move for students who ZRXOG PRYH IURP :DLƗKROH WR Kalahu’u. Requires significant community engagement :DLƗKROH UHTXLUHV HOHFWULFDO DQG SOXPELQJ upgrades Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ • • Same as 2B + additional move for students who would move from Waiahole to Kalahuu Requires significant community engagement Waiahole requires electrical and plumbing upgrades Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ Recommendation • Explore a land swap with a local business to provide a new home for Kaaawa and/or Hauula ES, which currently sit in flood zones that limit the viability of renovating these schools to modern standards Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 188 Kahuku Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS SCENARIOS (3B applies to Kahuku and Waialua complexes) 3A Maintain current operational model 3B Kahuku/Waialua partnership $$$$$ • $$$$$ Maintain current programs and operational models at Kahuku 7-12 and Waialua 7-12 • • Windward SAC-created scenario Align Kahuku and Waialua 7-12 educational programs for increased partnerships focused on shared goals and priorities EPC to consider future partnerships • Benefits Benefits • • No changes to implement Align program, staff, and facility resources to expand student opportunities Challenges Challenges • • Kahuku’s remote location and small size limit student opportunity • • Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ Significant intentional stakeholder outreach in Kahuku and Waialua communities required Complicated inter-district coordination and operational planning Distance between schools similar to current distance between Kahuku and other Windward schools Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 189 Kahuku Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS FACILITY OPTIONS (not in priority order) 4 5 6 Kahuku HS/IS flood control • • Conduct hydrology study and implement flood control project Outcomes could include sitework, pump stations, and/or elevation/relocation of facilities Kahuku HS/IS music improvements • • Replace/expand undersized music building in coordination with flood control project (Option 3) Included in Option 8 Kahuku HS/IS health career improvements • • Renovate/construct community clinic spaces near front of campus to enhance health careers education. Coordinate with flood control project (Option 3) Included in Option 8 7 Kahuku HS/IS athletics master plan projects 8 Kahuku HS/IS phased reconstruction • • • • • 9 Re-plan site to accommodate HS/IS program from selected scenario: 1A (1,500+ 7-12 students), 1B (1,800+ 6-12 students), 1C/1D (1,000+ 9-12 students) Coordinate with hydrology study and flood control project (Option 3) Implement phased reconstruction to replace outdated buildings with new multi-story 21st century buildings, to include professional learning centers and collaborative learning spaces Replace portables with permanent construction Construct ~ 20 classroom facility where portables currently reside Include collaboration space 10 Kahuku ES covered outdoor multi-purpose facility 11 Laie ES parking expansion and drop-off 12 Laie ES new classroom/admin buildings • • Replace portables with new 12-classroom facility with STEAM collaboration spaces and right-sized administration space • Repurpose part or whole of administration space for STEAM maker space 13 Laie ES cafeteria 14 Prioritized repairs and maintenance (all schools) Include a stage in cafeteria expansion • Safety, code, and maintenance projects, to include site drainage • Fix Hauula Building B and C leaks Cost/ROM Stakeholder Range Voice • Solves recurring rainwater flooding that reaches Buildings T and R and impacts usability of playfields $$$$$ • Provides adequate space for band program $$$$$ • Moves/updates community health clinic to limit public access $20-40M $20-40M $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M • Expands athletic opportunities $$$$$ $20-40M • Replaces outdated, moldy portable • Extends construction on occupied buildings with new, modern site environments equipped for collaborative $$$$$ instruction • Moves classrooms out of area that floods $75-100M+ when it rains • Provides flexible shared space • Replaces portables in poor condition with new facility • Provides covered multi-purpose area Construct near site entrance for assemblies, recreation, and potentially eating • Expand parent-drop off to improve traffic flow • Challenges Resurface courts, training room, renovate field, renovate track per 2016 plan Sunset Beach ES multi-story facility • • Benefits $$$$$ $20-40M $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M • Pedestrian safety • Staff convenience and community access to school • Moves students out of portables and into permanent facilities • Provides new, modern learning environments $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M $$$$$ $20-40M • Creates new cooking/eating and multipurpose area $$$$$ • Addresses top-priority needs at each school $$$$$ $20-40M $7.5-20M Funding Category Priority Tier ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ H-IS - #1 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ H-IS - #5 4 ‫ڜ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ H-IS - #7 4 ‫ڜ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ H-IS - #4 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ H-IS - #2 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #2 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #6 5 ‫ړ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #7 4 ‫ڜ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #4 4 ‫ڜ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #3 2 ‫ڝ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ H-IS/ES #3/1 1 ‫ڗ‬ Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 190 Kahuku Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS FACILITY OPTIONS (not in priority order) 15 Locally-determined enhancements (all schools) • Budget allotment for each school to fund stakeholder-driven projects Benefits Challenges Cost/ROM Stakeholder Range Voice • Empowers schools and students to define projects at time of execution • Requires policy to consistently allocate and implement projects $$$$$ 16 Hauula electrical upgrades 17 Kahuku HS/IS ADA accessibility to portables Funding Category ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ H-IS/ES $500k-2.5M #6/5 $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M $$$$$ $500k-2.5M Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 191 Priority Tier 2 ‫ڝ‬ 1 ‫ڗ‬ 1 ‫ڗ‬ Kailua Complex DATA and NEEDS Stakeholder Voice: Enrollment and Facility Data: School (a) 2017-18/ 2023-24 Enrollment (b) Capacity 309 Kailua High (9-12) 756 / 772 / 2% 475 Olomana Intermediate & High (7-12) 69 / 73 / 6% 126 327 tĂŝŵĈŶĂůŽ 462 / 386 Elementary & / -16% Intermediate (K-8) 302 Enchanted Lake Elementary (K-6) (c) = (b) - (a) (d) = (a) / (b) Oldest / Projected 2023-24 Newest / Avg Projected Building Capacity Surplus Utilization 0.61 1958 / 2015 / 51 53 646 429 / 422 / -2% 317 497 Adequacy Score / Rank Out of 260 86% 0.82 / 27 0.58 1968 / 1995 / 38 57% 0.50 / 248 260 0.60 1950 / 1975 / 57 80% 0.70 / 109 496 74 0.85 1964 / 1998 / 52 84% 0.67 / 130 <Ğ॒ŽůƵ ůĞŵĞŶƚĂƌLJ 143 / 143 (K-6) / 0% 188 45 0.76 1961 / 1977 / 55 87% 0.63 / 168 321 Maunawili Elementary (K-6) 344 / 300 / -13% 383 83 0.78 1958 / 1969 / 58 85% 0.66 / 139 324 Pope Elementary (K-6) 246 / 274 / 11% 387 113 0.71 1965 / 1975 / 48 40% 0.70 / 110 330 <Ă॒ĞůĞƉƵůƵ Elementary (K-6) 200 / 230 / 15% 153 -77 1.50 1973 / 1976 / 45 4% 0.49 / 249 2,600 3,648 1,048 0.71 65% 0.65 TOTAL 1269 % Old or Beyond Expected Life The smaller schools are not getting the same good stuff as others. Windward kids are just left in the shadows, it’s not fair. - Student My kids would always say ‘Mom, it’s embarrassing to have people come to our school. I would like to have school that we all feel proud of.’ - Parent Our elementary school wouldn’t have art, music, or PE if it weren’t for the community stepping up with private funding. - Parent My grandkids’ teachers at Waimanalo are overwhelmed. They have to teach multiple subjects and they are spread too thin. - Community Member Our tennis courts are so bad that we have to go to another school to practice. - Student It upsets my kids when I tell them about the great facilities we had on the mainland way back in the 1990s, like an indoor pool. - Parent Challenges: • Pope ES 165 of 350 (47%), Keolu ES 195 of 268 (73%), Waimanalo ES/IS 375 of 789 (48%) students GE out or attend charter • Moderate flood risk: site in extreme tsunami zone (Pope ES, Enchanted Lake ES) • Over half of facilities are classified as old or beyond useful life • Over-utilization at Kaelepulu ES • Most other schools have underutilized capacity • Library less than 50% of standard space: Waimanalo ES/IS • No science rooms at most elementary schools • Art less than 50% of standard space: Kailua HS, Waimanalo ES/IS • No dedicated art or music rooms at most elementary schools • Kailua HS PE locker/shower gender equity 35%/65% split • Renovate field, renovate track, baseball, resurface courts, training room, girls’ lockers • Cafeteria less than 50% of standard space: Kaelepulu ES • Admin less than 50% of standard space: Waimanalo ES/IS • Visual and Performing Arts Center • More college prep classes Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 192 Kailua Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS SCENARIOS (1A-1D apply to Kailua, Castle, and Kalaheo complexes) 1A Castle HS, Kailua HS, and Kalaheo HS maintain separate programs 1B Kailua HS and Kalaheo HS single high school at Kailua campus $$$$$ • 1C Kalaheo HS consolidated into Castle HS and Kailua HS $$$$$ Kailua HS and Kalaheo HS continue to operate as separate 9-12 programs (see Kalaheo Complex report for Kalaheo HS options) • • $$$$$ $$$$$ Merge Kalaheo HS program with Kailua HS at the larger Kailua HS campus Build multi-story addition (300+ capacity) and planned performing arts center at Kailua HS Work with local community to explore options for repurposing the Kalaheo HS campus • Kailua HS, Kalaheo HS, and Castle HS integrated program feasibility study 1D • SAC-created scenario, similar to 1B except Kalaheo HS attendance boundary is split between Castle HS and Kailua HS, instead of Kailua only Replace ## portables at Castle HS with permanent facilities with ### capacity and build performing arts center at Kailua HS • • • • Benefits Benefits Benefits Benefits • • • • • No changes to implement Smaller schools can seem more personalized and less overwhelming to some stakeholders, though at expense of the size and scale that allows resources for diverse program offerings • • • • Kalaheo students gain access to academic and athletic facilities not present and not possible to construct on the Kalaheo site (formerly a MS) Improve capacity utilization. Kalaheo HS and Kailua HS currently have combined 800 surplus seats Invest in one HS campus rather than split funding between two under-utilized campuses Kalaheo campus could be used for other educational or revenue generating purposes More operational dollars from WSF • • Kalaheo students gain access to academic and athletic facilities not present and not possible to construct on the Kalaheo HS site (formerly a MS) Improve capacity utilization. Kalaheo HS, Castle HS and Kailua HS currently have a combined 1,224 surplus seats Kalaheo HS campus could be used for other educational or revenue-generating purposes • • Challenges Challenges Challenges • • • • • • • • • Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ • • • School consolidation requires significant stakeholder outreach and operational planning Traffic from castle junction area Though only 2.6 miles away, Kailua HS is farther from Marine Corps Base Hawaii Merging campus communities and cultures (could be a challenge and a benefit) Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ School consolidation requires significant stakeholder outreach and operational planning • • Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ ‫ ڗ‬Priority 1 Combines operational budget based on over 2,700 students while allowing each campus to concentrate their resources in specialized programmatic, staffing, and facility investments Improved program quality and diversity (CTE, Gifted & Talented, Advanced Placement, college prep, music, athletics) Avoids diluting limited dollars by sharing of resources for all staff and students Challenges Due to declining population, Kalaheo HS at ~800 enrollment and Kailua HS at ~750 , are individually 6th and 5th smallest HS out of 33 Based on funding weighted student formulas, smaller high schools are limited in the diversity of programs they can offer versus larger ones Kalaheo HS operates on a small, former middle school site with limited acreage for parking and athletics, with hilly ADA accessibility challenges More than half of buildings >50 years old Kalaheo HS and Kailua HS (2.6 miles apart) operate with combined 800 surplus capacity Currently experiencing high teacher turnover $20-40M SAC-created scenario: three campuses merge into a single “community college model” high school program by December 2019, with synchronized schedules and transportation between campuses Each campus focuses staff and facilities in complementary program areas (e.g., Career Technical Education, STEM, visual and performing arts, humanities) Engage community in 3-5 strategic planning workshops Significant operational change requires extensive stakeholder outreach and operational planning Requires highly coordinated scheduling between campuses Increased transportation costs Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ Recommendation • Identify leadership team and conduct feasibility study for Scenario 1D within 12 months of FMP publication to include focused engagement of community stakeholders Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version (2019 February) 193 Kailua Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS SCENARIOS (2B applies to Kailua and Castle complexes) 2A Keolu ES and Kaelepulu ES remain open 2B Kaelepulu ES reconstruction; Keolu ES repurposed; Admin/PD Center $$$$$ $$$$$ • • Repair and maintain both elementary schools Include a covered play court and renovate Building C at Keolu ES to prevent the building from further sinking and create two STEAM classrooms • $40-75M Kaelepulu ES boundary change ‫ ڗ‬Priority 1 Reconstruct Kaelepulu ES facilities to house combined Keolu ES and Kaelepulu ES programs Repurpose Keolu ES site for district-wide administration and professional development center. • 2C $$$$$ • • SAC-created scenario. Change elementary boundaries to redistrict 50-100 students from Kaelepulu ES to neighboring elementary schools relieving over-utilization at Kaelepulu ES Benefits Benefits Benefits • • • • No changes to implement Smaller schools can seem more personalized and less overwhelming to some stakeholders, though at expense of the size and scale that allows resources for diverse program offerings • • • • • Merges two of the state’s smallest schools into one of sustainable operation size (~350) that can offer more enrichment programs such as language, music, and art Move students from outdated facilities into new/rebuilt buildings equipped for 21st century Converts surplus capacity into an asset Kaelepulu has sufficient land to rebuild with minimal disruption Builds a modern elementary school Potential staff benefits working in new, larger school Challenges Challenges • • • • • Keolu ES and Kaelepulu ES are one mile apart and at 143 and 200 enrollment are among smallest schools in the state, and struggle with limited funding for enrichment programs 73% of students in Keolu ES boundary GE out Keolu ES and Ka’elepulu ES facilities are outdated, and Keolu’s buildings suffer from structural/soils challenges Kaelepulu ES is over-utilized and lacks cafeteria/kitchen space Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ • • • Challenges School consolidation requires significant stakeholder outreach and operational planning Keolu ES not a centralized location for Windward District Merging campus communities and cultures (could be a challenge and a benefit) Note: Keolu houses central kitchen, which needs to remain in operation during and maybe after transition. Include model classroom PD designs in rebuilt Kaelepulu. Stakeholder Voice Reduces utilization imbalance among area elementary schools without capital investments: capital dollars can go to other area needs մմմմմ • • • Requires community engagement for boundary changes Families may react by GE’ing out of attendance boundaries, requiring unpopular enforcement of GE capacity limits Does not address budget challenges associated with small school size Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ Recommendation • Initiate outreach to educate stakeholders about Scenario 2B’s “trade up” consolidation plan to reconstruct Kaelepulu and repurpose Keolu campus. Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 194 Kailua Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS SCENARIOS 3A Keep Pope ES and Waimanalo ES/IS operations ‘as is’ 3B Pope ES or Waimanalo ES/IS becomes a K-5 and the other a 6-8 $$$$$ • $$$$$ Status quo scenario versus SAC-created scenario 3B Waimanalo ES/IS continues to serve K-8 Pope ES continues to serve K-6 • • • • SAC-created scenario Create a localized K-5 ES and 6-8 MS feeder between Pope ES and Waimanalo ES/IS Benefits Benefits • • No changes to implement Concentrates limited resources in ES and MS between the two adjacent schools Challenges Challenges • • Both schools operating with 373 surplus seats • Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ Operational change requires significant stakeholder outreach and operational planning Would create a small middle school difficult to resource Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ Recommendation • EPC consensus is to not change the school portfolio as proposed by members of the SAC Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 195 Kailua Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS FACILITY OPTIONS (not in priority order) 4 5 Kailua HS Visual and Performing Arts Center • Construct new arts venue for complex-wide and community use • Project in progress designs are complete Kailua HS athletic master plan projects • Per 2016 state-wide plan, renovate football and baseball fields, upgrade track with synthetic rubber surface, resurface courts, new training room (EPC: top priorities are tack and courts) 6.1 Olomana HS/IS urgent communications systems 6.2 Olomano HS/IS permanent facilities Benefits Challenges • Arts program improvements • Shared by all complex schools • After-hours community use • Athletic upgrades • After-hours community use 7 Waimanalo ES/IS ADA accessibility projects 8 Waimanalo ES/IS covered multi-purpose play court • Implement ADA ramp renovations at Building T $$$$$ $40-75M $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M $$$$$ • Split Option 6 to prioritize internet/telecom systems in short term • Replace portables with permanent facilities equipped for project-based instruction, designed in collaboration with local administration, teachers, and community Cost/ROM Range $2.5-7.5M • Improves site condition • Provides modern, flexible learning environments • Improves ADA compliance and universal accessibility • Provides covered outdoor multipurpose space $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M $$$$$ $500k-2.5M $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M 9 10 • Improves building condition • Install air conditioning, envelope integrity, and electrical upgrades as required • Provides modern learning environment • Requested by Waimanalo ES/IS, Enchanted Lake ES Air conditioning retrofit projects (various schools) Renovate or construct classrooms for STEAM (various schools) • Provide plumbing for science/art, flexible furniture, acoustical dividers, and renovations • Requested by Pope ES, Manuawili ES, Enchanted Lake ES 11 Parking expansion and safe drop-off (various schools) • Waimanalo ES/IS, Mauanawili ES, Enchanted Lake ES – expand parking and bus lane 12 Enchanted Lake ES STEAM and professional learning center • Renovate Buildings E, H, and G for STEAM classrooms and professional learning center space • Replace accordion doors with operable and acoustically treated walls • Improves building condition • Provides modern learning environment $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M • Pedestrian safety • Staff convenience and community access to school • Improves building condition • Provides modern flexible learning environments $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M Stakeholder Voice Funding Category Priority Tier ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #2 2 ‫ڝ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #3 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS/IS - #1 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS/IS - #1 4 ‫ڜ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ IS - #4 tie 2 ‫ڝ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ IS - #4 tie 5 ‫ړ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ IS/ES - #3/4 4 ‫ڜ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #2 tie 4 ‫ڜ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ IS/ES - #4/5 3 ‫ژ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #6 tie 5 ‫ړ‬ Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 196 Kailua Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS FACILITY OPTIONS (not in priority order) 13 14 Manuawili ES security fencing Benefits Challenges • Safety and security • Safety, code, and maintenance projects to include roofs, electrical upgrades, window sealing, and site drainage 15 Locally-determined enhancements (all schools) 16 Kaelepulu ES administration building • Budget allotment for each school to fund stakeholder-driven projects 3 ‫ژ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS/IS/ES - #1/2/1 1 ‫ڗ‬ $$$$$ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ $500k-2.5M HS/IS/ES - #4/4/2 2 ‫ڝ‬ 4 ‫ڜ‬ $500k-2.5M • Addresses top-priority needs at each school • Empowers schools and students to define projects at time of execution $$$$$ $7.5-20M • Requires policy to consistently allocate and implement projects • Incremental to Scenario 2B Priority Tier ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #6 tie $$$$$ • Prevent pedestrian traffic from adjacent public park on campus during the school day Prioritized repairs and maintenance (all schools) Cost/ROM Stakeholder Voice Funding Category Range $$$$$ $20-40M Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 197 Kalaheo Complex DATA and NEEDS Stakeholder Voice: Enrollment and Facility Data: School (a) 2017-18/ 2023-24 Enrollment (b) Capacity (c) = (b) - (a) (d) = (a) / (b) Oldest / Projected 2023-24 Newest / Avg Capacity Projected Building Surplus Utilization % Old or Beyond Expected Life Adequacy ^ĐŽƌĞ ͬ ZĂŶŬ KƵƚ ŽĨ ϮϲϬ 312 <ĂůĈŚĞŽ ,ŝŐŚ ;ϵͲ 12) 808 / 802 / -1% 1110 308 0.72 ϭϵϲϲ ͬ ϭϵϳϱ ͬ 48 ϱϭй Ϭ͘ϴϱ ͬ ϭϮ 310 Kailua 737 / 701 Intermediate (7-8) ͬ Ͳϱй 1081 380 Ϭ͘ϲϱ ϭϵϱϯ ͬ ϮϬϭϱ ͬ ϱϵ 83% Ϭ͘ϳϵ ͬ ϰϯ 300 ॒ ŝŬĂŚŝ ůĞŵĞŶƚĂƌLJ ϰϳϰ ͬ ϱϮϬ ;<ͲϲͿ / 10% 472 -48 1.10 ϭϵϲϬ ͬ ϭϵϲϬ ͬ ϱϳ ϵϳй Ϭ͘ϲϰ ͬ ϭϱϳ 308 Kailua Elementary ϯϱϮ ͬ ϯϱϮ ;<ͲϲͿ / 0% ϯϵϭ ϯϵ Ϭ͘ϵϬ ϭϵϱϭ ͬ ϭϵϳϬ ͬ ϲϬ 83% Ϭ͘ϳϰ ͬ ϵϬ 311 Kainalu ůĞŵĞŶƚĂƌLJ ;<ͲϲͿ ϰϰϱ ͬ ϯϳϴ ͬ Ͳϭϱй ϱϲϲ 188 Ϭ͘ϲϳ ϭϵϱϰ ͬ ϭϵϴϵ ͬ ϲϭ ϵϭй Ϭ͘ϲϱ ͬ ϭϱϭ 320 >ĂŶŝŬĂŝ 328 / 328 Elementary PCS (K/ 0% ϲͿ 310 -18 ϭ͘Ϭϲ ϭϵϲϰ ͬ ϭϵϲϵ ͬ ϱϬ ϳϵй Ϭ͘ϱϵ ͬ ϮϬϵ DƃŬĂƉƵ ůĞŵĞŶƚĂƌLJ ;<ͲϲͿ ϴϴϮ ͬ ϵϭϬ / 3% ϲϮϲ -284 ϭ͘ϰϱ ϭϵϲϬ ͬ ϭϵϵϰ ͬ ϱϬ 70% Ϭ͘ϲϰ ͬ ϭϱϱ 3,991 4,556 565 0.88 79% 0.70 322 TOTAL We are struggling for our son at Kalaheo to get all of the classes that colleges require because there are limited teachers and the classes happen during the same period. - Parent We lost our math teacher at the beginning of the year and had a bunch of subs who really didn’t know the material. - Student I hardly use anything I learned in high school at work. What are we offering students these days that they can take to the real world? Are we teaching them what they need to make it out there? - Community Member Our classrooms don’t reflect the future that we’re supposed to be preparing our students for. - Teacher Challenges: • Kailua ES 295 of 516 (57%) of students GE out or attend charter • Industrial Arts and Family Consumer Science less than 50% of standard space: Kailua IS • Future flood risk: 28% of site under 3.2' sea rise (Mokapu ES) • Moderate flood risk: site in extreme tsunami zone (Kailua ES, Aikahi ES, Kainalu ES, Lanikai ES,Kailua IS) • No science rooms at Kainalu ES, Aikahi ES • Over half of facilities are classified as old or beyond useful life • Overutilization at Aikahi ES, Mokapu ES • Under-utilized capacity at Kalaheo HS, Kailua IS, Kainalu ES • Music less than 50% of standard space: Kalaheo HS, Kailua IS • No music rooms at Mokapu ES • No art rooms at Kainalu ES, Aikahi ES • PE lockers less than 50% of standard space: Kailua IS • Kalaheo HS site (formerly a MS) not sufficient for HS athletics • Library less than 50% of standard space: Kailua IS • Cafeteria less than 50% of standard space: Kalaheo HS, Mokapu ES, Lanikai ES PCS • Safety and security • 21st century spaces for collaborative instruction Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 198 Kalaheo Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS SCENARIOS (1A-1D apply to Kalaheo, Castle and Kailua Complexes) 1A Kalaheo HS, Castle HS, and Kailua HS maintain separate programs 1B Kalaheo HS and Kailua HS single high school at Kailua campus $$$$$ • $$$$$ Kalaheo HS and Kailua HS continue to operate as separate 9-12 programs Perform prioritized repairs at Kalaheo HS, including major renovation of Building F, which is in poor condition (See Kailua Complex report for Kailua HS options) • • 1C Kalaheo consolidated into Castle HS and Kailua HS • • Castle HS integrated program feasibility study $$$$$ $$$$$ Merge Kalaheo HS program with Kailua HS at the larger Kailua HS campus Build multi-story addition (300+ capacity) and planned performing arts center at Kailua HS Work with local community to explore options for repurposing the Kalaheo HS campus • 1D Kailua HS, Kalaheo HS, and • SAC-created option, similar to 1B except Kalaheo HS attendance boundary is split between Castle HS and Kailua HS, instead of Kailua HS only Replace ## portables at Castle HS with permanent facilities with ### capacity and build performing arts center at Kailua HS • • • • Benefits Benefits Benefits • • • • • • • • • Kalaheo students gain access to academic and athletic facilities not present and not possible to construct on the Kalaheo site (formerly a MS) Improve capacity utilization. Kalaheo HS and Kailua HS currently have combined 800 surplus seats Invest in one HS campus rather than split funding between two, under-utilized campuses Kalaheo HS campus could be used for other educational or revenue generating purposes More operational dollars from WSF • • Kalaheo HS students gain access to academic and athletic facilities not present and not possible to construct on the Kalaheo HS site (formerly a MS) Improve capacity utilization. Kalaheo HS, Castle HS, and Kailua HS currently have a combined 1,224 surplus seats Kalaheo HS campus could be used for other educational or revenue-generating purposes • • Combines operational budget based on over 2,700 students while allowing each campus to concentrate their resources in specialized programmatic, staffing, and facility investments. Improved program quality and diversity (Career Technical Education, Gifted & Talented, Advanced Placement, college prep, music, athletics) Avoids diluting limited dollars by sharing of resources for all staff and students Challenges Challenges Challenges Challenges • • • • • • • • • Due to declining population, Kalaheo HS at ~800 enrollment and Kailua HS at ~750 , are individually 6th and 5th smallest HS’s out of 33 Based on funding weighted student formulas, smaller HS’s are limited in programs offered Kalaheo HS operates on a small, former MS site with limited acreage for parking and athletics, with hilly ADA accessibility challenges More than half of buildings >50 years old Kalaheo HS and Kailua HS (2.6 miles apart) operate with combined 800 surplus capacity Currently experiencing high teacher turnover Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ • • • School consolidation requires significant stakeholder outreach and operational planning Traffic from castle junction area Though only 2.6 miles away, Kailua is further from Marine Corps Base Hawaii Merging campus communities and cultures (could be a challenge and a benefit) Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ School consolidation requires significant stakeholder outreach and operational planning • • Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ ‫ ڗ‬Priority 1 SAC-created scenario: three campuses merge into a single “community college model” high school program by December 2019, with synchronized schedules and transportation between campuses Each campus focuses staff and facilities in complementary program areas (e.g., Career Technical Education, STEM, visual and performing arts, humanities) Engage community in 3-5 strategic planning workshops Benefits No changes to implement Smaller schools can seem more personalized and less overwhelming to some stakeholders, though at expense of the size and scale that allows resources for diverse program offerings $20-40M Significant operational change requires extensive stakeholder outreach and operational planning Requires highly coordinated scheduling between campuses Increased transportation costs Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ Recommendation • Focused engaged with area stakeholders centered on the model proposed by the SAC, which addresses the shared challenges of limited operational and capital funds by creating a one-of-a-kind high school partnership Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 199 Kalaheo Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS FACILITY OPTIONS (not in priority order) Benefits 2 Kailua IS modern classroom furniture • Upgrade classrooms with flexible, modern furniture • Facilitates modern instructional practices 3 Kailua IS 21st century building additions • Provides flexible shared space 4 Kailua IS indoor/outdoor cafeteria addition 5 Aikahi ES air conditioning retrofit 6 Aikahi ES 21st century building additions 7 Kainalu ES parking lot expansion 8 Kainalu ES 21st century building additions 9 Kailua ES covered play court 10 11 • • • • Challenges • Extends construction on site Create shared, project-based learning and collaboration spaces between existing buildings Build a covered indoor/outdoor extension to the current cafeteria • • • • • Once completed, recapture classroom currently housing administration for educational use 12 Kailua ES build an outdoor stage and amphitheater 13 Kaohao ES PCS cafeteria addition 14 Kaohao ES PCS build permanent administration space • Create an outdoor gathering and performance space $$$$$ $$$$$ • Provides campus-wide AC $2.5-7.5M $$$$$ • Provides flexible shared spaces $20-40M $$$$$ • Provides additional parking $2.5-7.5M • Provides flexible shared space • Extends construction on site Create shared, project-based learning and collaboration spaces between classroom buildings. Kailua ES professional learning center addition ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ IS - #4 $2.5-7.5M Create shared, project-based learning and collaboration spaces between existing buildings Expand parking lot with safety/security lighting Build fence to prevent pedestrians from traversing campus during school. Covered walkways to buildings E, F, and G and cover open stairwells exposed to the elements Add elevators to multi-story buildings currently not ADA compliant and repair stage life $$$$$ $$$$$ • Expands eating area for students Place AC units in all classrooms and student common spaces Kailua ES safety, security, and ADA improvements Stakeholder Voice $20-40M • Could expand north into adjacent field and/or along existing drop-off loop • Cost/ROM Range $$$$$ $20-40M • Provides multipurpose outdoor recreation space • Expands parking • Safety $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M • Admin/teacher/student collaboration • Recaptures classroom for educational use • Provides outdoor learning, gathering and performance space • Creates expanded eating area $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M • Replace existing portable housing administration with a permanent facility • Provides professional space for building administration and space for teacher collaboration $$$$$ $20-40M Funding Category Priority Tier n/a ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ IS - #2 4 ‫ڜ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ IS - #1 2 ‫ڝ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #9 2 ‫ڝ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #10 tie 5 ‫ړ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #7 tie 4 ‫ڜ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #5 5 ‫ړ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #7 tie 5 ‫ړ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #1 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #10 tie 5 ‫ړ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - last 5 ‫ړ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #6 4 ‫ڜ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #3 5 ‫ړ‬ Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 200 Kalaheo Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS FACILITY OPTIONS (not in priority order) 15 Prioritized repairs and maintenance (all schools) • Safety, code, and maintenance projects, to include roof repairs, repaving, structural, stage lifts • Kailua IS roof maintenance and science millwork 16 Locally-determined enhancements (all schools) 17 Kalaheo HS ADA improvements 18 Kalaheo HS band room renovation 19 Kalaheo HS Building F structural improvements • Budget allotment for each school to fund stakeholder-driven projects Benefits Challenges • Addresses top-priority needs at each school Cost/ROM Range Stakeholder Voice $$$$$ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS/IS/ES #2/3/2 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS/IS/ES #1/5/4 2 ‫ڝ‬ 1 ‫ڗ‬ 2 ‫ڝ‬ 1 ‫ڗ‬ $7.5-20M • Empowers schools and students to define projects at time of execution • Requires policy to consistently $$$$$ allocate and implement $500k-2.5M projects Funding Category $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 201 Priority Tier Leeward District Overview Priority 1 Priority 2 Priority 3 Priority 4 Campbell Kapolei • Scenario 1D: Campbell/Kapolei CTE program study and stakeholder outreach ($$$$$) • Option 3: Campbell HS private-publicpartnerships for CTE ($$) • Option 4: Ilima IS fund 6th grade building, change grade configuration to 6-8 ($$$) • Option 9: Campbell ES building renovations/replacements ($$$) • Option 10: Prioritized repairs and maintenance (all schools) ($$) • Option 12: Campbell HS girls athletic lockers ($$) • Option 14: Campbell HS parking structure 300 stalls ($$$) • Scenario 1D: Campbell/Kapolei CTE program study and stakeholder outreach ($$$$$) • 2SWLRQ .DSROHL +6 SULYDWH-publicpartnerships for CTE ($$) • 2SWLRQ .DSROHL +6 VW FHQWXU\ classroom partitions ($$) • 2SWLRQ .DSROHL +6 QHZ DXGLWRULXP EXLOGLQJ ZLWK FODVVURRPV • 2SWLRQ .DSROHL 06 FRYHUHG PXOWLpurpose facility ($$) • 2SWLRQ .DSROHL RQJRLQJ PLGGOH school expansion projects ($$$$) • Option 11: 0DXND Lani (and other) ES permanent classroom building ($$$) • Option 12: 0DXND Lani ES expanded parking lot structure ($$) • Option 13: Prioritized repairs and maintenance (all schools) ($$) • • Option 5: Ilima IS replace DGPLQLVWUDWLRQ DQG OLEUDU\ ZLWK QHZ joint facility ($$$) • Option 13: Campbell HS track, bleachers, PA system, restrooms ($$) • 2SWLRQ .DSROHL +6 VWXGHQW commons ($$) • 2SWLRQ .DSROHL FRPSOH[ FRYHUHG multi-purpose spaces (all schools) ($$) • Option 14: Locally-determined enhancements (all schools) ($) • 2SWLRQ .DSROHL FRPSOH[ FDIHWHULD expansions ($$$) • Option 4: Nanakuli shade structures (all schools) ($$) • Option 7: Nanakuli HS classroom renovation ($) • Option 13: Nanakuli HS gym improvements ($$) • 2SWLRQ &DPSEHOO FRPSOH[ 67($0 classroom renovations (all schools) ($$$) • Option 11: Locally-determined enhancements (all schools) ($) • 2SWLRQ .DSROHL +6 FHQWUDO VWRUDJH facility and loading docks ($$) • 2SWLRQ .DSROHL +6 DWKOHWLF SURMHFWV - track, bleachers, fields ($$$) • Scenario 2B: Campbell Elementary boundary change • Option 6: Ilima ,6 QHZ FRYHUHG PXOWLpurpose space ($$) • Scenario 2B: Kapolei Elementary boundary change • 2SWLRQ .DSROHL FRPSOH[ FRYHUHG ZDONZD\V DOO VFKRROV • Priority 5 Option 7: Campbell complex covered multi-purpose spaces (all schools) ($$$) Nanakuli Pearl City Waianae Waipahu Scenario 1A: Keep current operational scenario Option 2: Nanakuli HS upgrade electrical infrastructure ($) Option 8: Nanakuli HS visual performing arts (VPA) center ($$$) Option 11: Prioritized repairs and maintenance (all schools) ($$) Option 12: Locally-determined enhancements (all schools) ($) • Scenario 1B: Highland IS rebuilt on alternate site ($$$$$) • Option 2.1: Pearl City HS upgrade electrical infrastructure ($$) • Option 3: Pearl City HS renovate career technical education (CTE) spaces ($$$) • Option 6.1: Pearl City HS Special Education and ADA improvements ($$) • Option 7: Pearl City HS adjacent land use or acquisition ($) • 2SWLRQ 1HZ (6 EXLOGLQJ FRQVWUXFWLRQ and portable replacements ($$$$) • Option 11: Parking lot and fire lane improvement ($$$$) • 2SWLRQ 0DQDQD (6 6SHFLDO Education medical fragile facilities ($) • Option 13: Prioritized repairs and maintenance (all schools) ($$) • Scenario 1A: Waianae Pre-K-5 and 6-8 ($$$) • Option 2: Waianae HS marine science learning center expansion ($$$) • Option 4: Waianae HS alternative learning center ($$$) • 2SWLRQ :DLDQDH +6 SRZHU upgrades ($$) • Option 9: Building additions and renovations (elementary schools) ($$$$) • Option 10: 0DNDKD ES parking and traffic improvements (all schools) ($) • Option 11: Prioritized repairs and maintenance (all schools) ($$) • Option 12: Locally-determined enhancements (all schools) ($) • Option 13: Air conditioning in all classrooms ($$) • Option 14: Elementary Special Education, alternative center • Scenario 1A: Keep current operational scenario • Option 2.2: Waipahu HS 10classrooms and parking expansion (Phase 2) ($$$) • Option 2.3: Waipahu HS parking structure ($$) • Option 3: Waipahu HS athletic improvements ($$) • Option 6: Waipahu HS programspecific building additions ($$$$) • 2SWLRQ :DLSDKX ,6 '5($06 IDFLOLW\ ($$$) • Option 9.1: Building additions and renovations (elementary schools) ($$$$) • Option 10: Prioritized repairs and maintenance (all schools) ($$) • 2SWLRQ 67($0 UHQRYDWLRQV (elementary schools) ($$) • Option 13: Electrical capacity (all schools) ($$$) • Option 14: Waipahu HS land use partnership ($) • Option 5: Pearl City HS cultural center ($$$) • Option 10: ES multi-purpose covered areas ($$$$) • Option 8.1: Waianae IS covered play court ($) • Option 15: Waianae IS athletic community complex ($$$) • 2SWLRQ :DLSDKX +6 QHZ FDIHWHULD ($$) • Option 9.2: Building multi-purpose outdoor covered facility ($$) • Option 2.2: Pearl City HS install air conditioning ($$$) • 2SWLRQ (6 67($0 FODVVURRP renovations ($$) • Option 3: Waianae HS CTE renovation ($$) • Option 7: Waianae IS athletic master plan projects and community complex ($$) • Option 7: Waipahu HS integrated academy digital signage ($) • Option 3.1: Nanakuli HS baseball field renovation ($$) • Option 6: Nanakuli HS career technical education (CTE) renovation ($$$) • Option 9: Renovate both ES to include 67($0 VSDFHV • Option 14: Locally-determined enhancements (all schools) ($) • Option 16: Waianae HS athletic natatorium/pool ($$$) • Option 11: Locally-determined enhancements (all schools) ($) • Option 3.3: Nanakuli HS pool and locker rooms ($$) • Option 5: Nanakuli +6 QHZ PXOWLpurpose dining area ($) • Option 10.2: Nanakuli ES replace SRUWDEOHV ZLWK SHUPDQHQW EXLOGLQJV ($$$) • • • • • • Option 4: Pearl City HS shade structures ($) • Option 5.2: Waianae HS covered pavilion ($$) Option 8.2: Wai’anae IS second-floor rail ($) Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 202 203 APPENDIX Leeward Options Reports Campbell Complex DATA and NEEDS Stakeholder Voice: Enrollment and Facility Data: School (a) 2017-18/ 2023-24 Enrollment (b) Capacity (c) = (b) - (a) (d) = (a) / (b) Oldest / Projected 2023-24 Newest / Avg Capacity Projected Building Surplus Utilization % Old or Beyond Expected Life ĚĞƋƵĂĐLJ ^ĐŽƌĞ ͬ ZĂŶŬ Out of 260 252 Campbell High (912) 3110 / 3255 / 5% 2615 -640 1.24 1960 / 2005 / 37 22% 0.80 / 40 279 ॒/ůŝŵĂ 870 / 711 /ŶƚĞƌŵĞĚŝĂƚĞ ;ϳͲϴͿ / -18% 943 232 0.75 1962 / 2010 / 52 85% 0.82 / 29 296 ॒ ǁĂ DĂŬĂŝ * DŝĚĚůĞ ;ϳͲϴͿ 882 / 1473 / 67% 878 -595 1.68 2010 / 2010 / 8 0% 0.87 / 7 253 ॒ ǁĂ ůĞŵĞŶƚĂƌLJ ** 1084 / (K-6) 1091 / 1% 1155 64 0.94 1940 / 2017 / 46 56% 0.67 / 129 254 ॒ ǁĂ ĞĂĐŚ ** Elementary (K-6) 759 / 694 / -9% 772 78 0.90 1959 / 2015 / 44 60% 0.66 / 137 256 /ƌŽƋƵŽŝƐ WŽŝŶƚ Elementary (K-6) 700 / 685 / -2% 753 68 0.91 1960 / 1993 / 50 70% 0.72 / 100 269 WƃŚĈŬĞĂ Elementary (K-6) 526 / 441 / -16% 535 94 0.82 1965 / 1998 / 48 82% 0.62 / 182 280 Holomua Elementary (K-6) 1181 / 1172 / 1% 890 -282 1.32 1996 / 1997 / 21 0% 0.76 / 77 281 <Ă॒ŝŵŝůŽĂ Elementary (K-6) 646 / 645 / 0% 611 -34 1.06 1975 / 1996 / 32 0% 0.70 / 111 294 <ĞŽŶĞ॒ƵůĂ ** Elementary (K-6) 1058 / 1063 / 0% 998 -65 1.07 2007 / 2007 / 11 0% 0.73 / 95 11,230 10,150 -1,080 1.11 38% 0.73 TOTAL We have to think outside the box; we have no choice - Administrator Biggest problem is population. We are so overcrowded. Our classes get bigger and bigger every year. It’s hard to squeeze through the crowds, fields, and hallways to get to classes. We exceed the max capacity of every classroom. It’s hard to get a seat in some classes. - Campbell HS Student This impacts our programs and extracurriculars because our teachers don’t know how to group us. We have so many talented kids at our school but our band program can only hold 200 kids. We have to turn kids away all the time. - Campbell HS Student Our solution to overcrowding is shoving portables everywhere. We don’t have enough desks for everyone. We have kids sit on the floor with a blanket because it’s so cold. - Campbell HS Student We don’t have any art. We just have band but band is not accepting students anymore because we are at capacity. - Campbell HS Student *Projection reflects grades 6- SURMHFWLRQ UHIOHFWV JUDGHV .-5 Challenges: C • 5DSLG HQUROOPHQW JURZWK &DPSEHOO HS, (ZD 0DNDL 06 • Industrial Arts or Family Consumer Science less than 50% of standard space: Campbell HS, (ZD 0DNDL 06 Ilima IS • Future flood risk: 24% of site under 3.2' sea rise (Iroquois Point ES) • 0RGHUDWH IORRG ULVN VLWH LQ H[WUHPH tsunami zone (Campbell HS, (ZD Beach ES) • No science rooms at Pohakea ES • Cafeteria less than 50% of standard space: Campbell HS, (ZD 0DNDL 06 Iroquois Point ES, .DLPLORD ES • 0XVLF OHVV WKDQ RI VWDQGDUG space: Campbell HS • No music rooms at most elementary schools • No art room at Pohakea ES • Admin less than 50% of standard space: Pohakea ES • Some facilities are classified as old or beyond useful life • Extreme over-utilization at Campbell HS, (ZD 0DNDL 06 DQG Holomua ES • Under-utilized capacity at Ilima IS • 0RUH WKDQ RI FDSDFLW\ LQ portables (Campbell HS, .HRQHXOD ES) • Resurface courts, girls’ lockers • 3URDFWLYH SODQQLQJ IRU JURZWK Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 205 Campbell Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS SCENARIOS (1A-1C relate to both Campbell and Kapolei Complexes) 1A Campbell/Kapolei expansion 1B Campbell-Kapolei Career Technical Education Center $$$$$ • • • • school $$$$$ &DPSEHOO +6 DQG .DSROHL +6 RSHUDWH DV LV Continue ongoing Campbell HS 27-classroom multi-story addition and portable reduction project for near-term capacity relief Continue planning and design for future East .DSROHL +6 DQG RU Hoopili +6 SURMHFWV ZLWK expected construction to occur beyond 10-year planning horizon Continue annual enrollment projections and dialog ZLWK DUHD KRXVLQJ GHYHORSHUV Establish housing start trigger points to accelerate QHZ VFKRRO SODQV • 1C Campbell/Kapolei new high • • study and stakeholder outreach $$$$$ $$$$$ Acquire land along high-speed rail line and FRQVWUXFW QHZ - FDSDFLW\ +6 FDPSXV ZLWK highly-specialized facilities and equipment for advanced 21st century Career Tech Education (CTE) center to be shared and jointly operated by &DPSEHOO +6 DQG .DSROHL +6 ([SORUH SDUWQHUVKLSV ZLWK 8+ DQG SULYDWH SDUWQHUV WR attract and retain specialized instructors in locally relevant careers such as coding, agriculture, sustainability Continue ongoing Campbell HS 27-classroom multistory addition for near-term capacity relief until completion of CTE center, then remove portables • 1D Campbell/Kapolei CTE program • Similar to Scenario 1A, except accelerate East .DSROHL +6 GHVLJQ DQG FRQVWUXFWLRQ VRRQHU WKDQ current plans. &RPSOHWH ODQG DFTXLVLWLRQ DQG FRQVWUXFW QHZ KLJK VFKRRO ZLWK FRUH FDSDFLW\ IRU DQG LQLWLDO classroom capacity of #### seats based on updated enrollment projections 'HWHUPLQH QHZ KLJK VFKRRO ERXQGDU\ DUHD Determine feeder elementary and middle schools • • • • • Benefits Benefits Benefits • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 5HGXFHV +6 FURZGLQJ ZLWK QHZ RII-site capacity Expands student career opportunities Combines resources at Campbell HS and .DSROHL +6 WR FUHDWH D UHODWLYHO\ KLJKO\-resourced CTE program All opportunities in one plan/space &RPPXQLW\ %ULQJV XQLW\ WR WKH WZR KLJK VFKRROV &UHDWHV VSDFH WR JURZ SDWKZD\V $OOHYLDWHV RYHUFURZGHG KLJK VFKRROV $OORZV WLPH IRU EURDGHU EDVH RI VWDNHKROGHUV WR contribute to complex CTE program decisions Challenges Challenges Challenges Challenges • • • • • • • • • • • Campbell HS is already the largest school in the VWDWH DQG FRXOG EHFRPH HYHQ ODUJHU ZLWK WKH additions in process (YHQ ZLWK &DPSEHOO DGGLWLRQV &DPSEHOO +6 DQG .DSROHL +6 UHPDLQ RYHU-utilized 0DLQWDLQ QR VWXGHQW SDUNLQJ DW &DPSEHOO +6 Continue using Pohakea ES fields for Campbell HS portables 'RHVQ¶W VROYH XWLOL]DWLRQ DV SRSXODWLRQ JURZV Doesn’t alleviate traffic and safety problems 0DQDJLQJ PDLQWDLQLQJ HYHQ ODUJHU KLJK VFKRRO Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ • • • • &UHDWLQJ SDUWQHUVKLS EHWZHHQ &DPSEHOO +6 DQG .DSROHL +6 IXQGLQJ EHOO VFKHGXOH &7( programming, etc.) 7UDQVSRUWDWLRQ EHWZHHQ KRPH KLJK VFKRROV DQG the CTE center Land acquisition time/cost Collaboration: getting all the stakeholders in one room and agreeing on one thing Equity for attending a non-comprehensive site Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ &RPPXQLW\ VXSSRUW IRU QHZ KLJK VFKRRO FRPSOH[ Land availability Stakeholder Voice ‫ ڗ‬Priority 1 Step 1: Conduct 6-12 month due-diligence study and engagement of student, industry, higher education, community, and DOE stakeholders to determine feasibility and implementation strategy for shared CTE program and facility for &DPSEHOO .DSROHL 6FHQDULR % Step 2: Implement either Scenario 1A, 1B, or 1C depending on outcome of due-diligence Benefits No land to acquire No operational changes to implement &RQWLQXHV GLDORJ ZLWK KRXVLQJ GHYHORSHUV Continues business as usual; doesn’t create major disruption to operations 5HGXFHV FODVV VL]HV ZKLFK DUH RYHUFURZGHG 0RUH URRP IRU LQVWUXFWLRQ $75- 0 Project implies commitment of school and complex-area leadership, and may require state and/or outside facilitation մմմմմ Recommendation • Due to far-reaching significance and complex nature of this school design decision, EPC elects to initiate further study and broader engagement to determine best course of action to improve CTE programs and resolve capacity over-utilization Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 206 Campbell Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS SCENARIOS (2A-2B relate to both Campbell and Kapolei Complexes) 2A Keep current ES boundary scenario 2B Campbell Elementary boundary change $$$$$ $$$$$ • Study area enrollment and boundaries to GHWHUPLQH D ERXQGDU\ FKDQJH VFHQDULR WKDW ZRXOG relieve over-FURZGLQJ DW DUHD HOHPHQWDU\ VFKRROV 0RQLWRU JURZWK DQG FRQVLGHU FRPSOH[-ZLGH RU school area boundaries 3ULRULW\ FRQYH\V (3&¶V DFNQRZOHGJHPHQW WKDW D boundary study is not an immediate need, but VKRXOG EH FRQVLGHUHG ZLWKLQ -years • • Benefits Benefits • • No changes to implement • Relieve over-XWLOL]DWLRQ ZLWKRXW FDSLWDO expenditures Promotes sense of community Challenges Challenges • • • • Holomua ES operates at a projected 132% XWLOL]DWLRQ RYHU FDSDFLW\ E\ VWXGHQWV ZKLOH four area ES’s have some surplus capacity (TXLW\ EHWZHHQ VFKRROV DQG IDFLOLW\ Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ ‫ ڜ‬Priority 4 Boundary change (TXLW\ EHWZHHQ VFKRROV DQG IDFLOLW\ Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ Recommendation • &RQVLGHU HOHPHQWDU\ ERXQGDU\ VWXG\ WRZDUG HQG RI -year planning horizon Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 207 Campbell Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS FACILITY OPTIONS 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Campbell HS private-public-partnerships for CTE • Explore private-public-SDUWQHUVKLS ZLWK ORFDO PHFKDQLF EXVLQHVV WR SURYLGH UHDO-ZRUOG H[SHULHQFH • ([SORUH LQWHUQVKLSV ZLWK DUHD LQGXVWU\ H J SDUWQHU ZLWK +DZDLL 3DFLILF +HDOWK WR RIIHU D ZRUN VWXG\ SURJUDP IRU a VWXGHQWV • 3DUWQHU ZLWK +DZDLL 3DFLILF +HDOWK WR GHVLJQ DQG UHQRYDWH FODVVURRPV IRU D PRFN-hospital • 'HVLJQ D 06 &7( DZDUHQHVV FRXUVH IRU th grade students Ilima IS fund 6th grade building, change grade configuration to 6-8 • • • • 5HSODFH %XLOGLQJ , ZLWK D WKUHH-story building to add approximately 450 seats Include administration/counselor and self-contained special education rooms Currently have design money only for this project Approximately 450 6th graders expected to enroll from Holomua ES, Iroquois Point ES, .DLPLORD ES, Pohakea ES Ilima IS replace administration and library with new, joint facility • 5HSODFH FXUUHQW DGPLQLVWUDWLRQ DQG OLEUDU\ IDFLOLWLHV ZLWK RQH WZR-story facility to house a modern library and professional learning center for teachers and staff Ilima IS new covered multi-purpose space • Challenges • Provides real-ZRUOG H[SHULHQFHV IRU VWXGHQWV ZLWK UHODWLYHO\ ORZ capital investment • Need to create public-private partnerships • Construct covered outdoor space for dining, assemblies, outdoor learning, and community use at all ES that don’t currently have covered play courts Campbell complex STEAM classroom renovations (all schools) • 5HQRYDWH XS WR WZR H[LVWLQJ FODVVURRPV DW DOO (6 ZLWKRXW GHGLFDWHG DUW RU VFLHQFH URRPV including: • Pohakea ES – 67($0 FODVVURRPV • Iroquois Point ES – Buildings P12, P9 Campbell ES building renovations/replacements Renovate or replace facilities beyond their expected useful life • (ZD Beach ES – Buildings A,C,D • Iroquois Point ES – Buildings P12, P9 10 Prioritized repairs and maintenance (all schools) 11 Locally-determined enhancements (all schools) • Safety, code, and maintenance projects, to include site drainage • Budget allotment for each school to fund stakeholder-driven projects Cost/ROM Stakeholder Range Voice $$$$$ $2.5- 0 • 3URYLGHV QHZ OHDUQLQJ DQG support spaces • Replaces an outdated facility $$$$$ $20- 0 • 3URYLGHV QHZ OHDUQLQJ DQG support spaces • Replaces an outdated facility $$$$$ $20- 0 • Provides flexible shared space $$$$$ Construct covered outdoor space adjacent to cafeteria for dining, assemblies, and outdoor learning Campbell complex covered multi-purpose spaces (all schools) • Benefits $2.5- 0 • 0XOWL-purpose covered play and gathering space $$$$$ • Provides modern, flexible environments for project-based learning $$$$$ $20- 0 $20- 0 • Addresses old, inadequate spaces in poor condition $$$$$ $20- 0 $$$$$ • Addresses top-priority needs at each school • (PSRZHUV VFKRROV DQG VWXGHQWV to define projects at time of execution $7.5- 0 • Requires policy to consistently allocate and implement projects $$$$$ $500k- 0 Funding Category Priority Tier ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #3 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ Int - #1 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ Int – last 2 ‫ڝ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ Int - #4 4 ‫ڜ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #3 5 ‫ړ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #4 3 ‫ژ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #2 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #1/2/1 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #2/3/5 3 ‫ژ‬ Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 208 Campbell Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS FACILITY OPTIONS 12 Campbell HS girls athletic lockers 13 Campbell HS track, bleachers, PA system, restrooms 14 Campbell HS parking structure 300 stalls Benefits Challenges Cost/ROM Stakeholder Range Voice Funding Category $$$$$ $2.5- 0 $$$$$ $2.5- 0 • Confirm size and capacity $$$$$ $20- 0 Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 209 Priority Tier 1 ‫ڗ‬ 2 ‫ڝ‬ 1 ‫ڗ‬ Kapolei Complex DATA and NEEDS Stakeholder Voice: Enrollment and Facility Data: School (a) 2017-18/ 2023-24 Enrollment (b) Capacity (c) = (b) - (a) (d) = (a) / (b) Oldest / Projected 2023-24 Newest / Avg Capacity Projected Building Surplus Utilization % Old or Beyond Expected Life Adequacy Score / Rank Out of 260 292 Kapolei High (9-12) 2035 / 2311 / 14% 291 Kapolei Middle (68) 1521 / 1830 / 20% 1244 -586 1.47 1999 / 2006 / 18 0% 0.79 / 44 251 Barbers Point Elementary (K-5) 532 / 513 / -4% 584 71 0.88 1954 / 1957 / 63 100% 0.71 / 106 259 Makakilo Elementary (K-5) 490 / 503 / 3% 503 0 1.00 1969 / 1973 / 48 0% 0.62 / 183 282 Kapolei Elementary (K-5) 864 / 806 / -7% 901 95 0.89 1993 / 1998 / 23 0% 0.74 / 85 286 Mauka Lani Elementary (K-5) 626 / 659 / 5% 604 -55 1.09 1973 / 2008 / 33 16% 0.67 / 135 293 ,Ž॒ŽŬĞůĞ Elementary (K-5) 738 / 1010 / 37% 727 -283 1.39 2014 / 2014 / 4 0% 0.84 / 15 7,632 6,259 -1,373 1.22 17% 0.74 TOTAL 1696 -615 1.36 2000 / 2002 / 17 0% 0.83 / 24 Hearing about other’s challenges makes me realize how lucky we are at my school. - Kapolei Student These students’ stories about crowding are upsetting. Ten years from now, I don’t want to ask myself, where was I and what did I not do to prevent this from happening? -.DSROHL &RPPXQLW\ 0HPEHU Our building is structured in open concept pods. There are sound barrier issues that are distracting for the learning of our students. It’s hard for the teacher to control the classroom. It gets loud in here. - Kapolei teacher It would be better if they repurposed the library to be a social area, study area, meeting space for clubs, and hub for student activities. - Kapolei SAC Member Challenges: C • 5DSLG HQUROOPHQW JURZWK .DSROHL +6 .DSROHL 06 Hookele ES • Barber’s Point buildings in last third of expected useful life • Extreme over-XWLOL]DWLRQ DW .DSROHL +6 .DSROHL 06 Hookele ES • 0RUH WKDQ RI FDSDFLW\ LQ portables (0DXND Lani ES) • Industrial Arts and Family Consumer 6FLHQFH OHVV WKDQ RI VWDQGDUG VSDFH .DSROHL +6 • &DIHWHULD OHVV WKDQ RI VWDQGDUG space: 0DNDNLOR ES • 6FLHQFH OHVV WKDQ RI VWDQGDUG space: .DSROHL HS, .DSROHL 06 • &DIHWHULD OHVV WKDQ RI VWDQGDUG space: 0DXND Lani ES, 0DNDNLOR ES • 0XVLF DQG GDQFH GUDPD OHVV WKDQ RI VWDQGDUG VSDFH .DSROHL +6 • $UW OHVV WKDQ RI VWDQGDUG VSDFH .DSROHL 06 • No music room at any elementary • $GPLQ OHVV WKDQ RI VWDQGDUG space: 0DNDNLOR ES • Resurface courts • Equity and accountability Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 210 Kapolei Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS SCENARIOS (1A-1C relate to both Campbell and Kapolei Complexes) 1A Campbell/Kapolei expansion 1B Campbell-Kapolei Career Technical Education Center $$$$$ • • • • school $$$$$ &DPSEHOO +6 DQG .DSROHL +6 RSHUDWH DV LV Continue ongoing Campbell HS 27-classroom multi-story addition and portable reduction project for near-term capacity relief Continue planning and design for future East .DSROHL +6 DQG RU Hoopili +6 SURMHFWV ZLWK expected construction to occur beyond 10-year planning horizon Continue annual enrollment projections and dialog ZLWK DUHD KRXVLQJ GHYHORSHUV Establish housing start trigger points to accelerate QHZ VFKRRO SODQV • 1C Campbell/Kapolei new high • • study and stakeholder outreach $$$$$ $$$$$ Acquire land along high-speed rail line and FRQVWUXFW QHZ - FDSDFLW\ +6 FDPSXV ZLWK highly-specialized facilities and equipment for advanced 21st century Career Tech Education (CTE) center to be shared and jointly operated by &DPSEHOO +6 DQG .DSROHL +6 ([SORUH SDUWQHUVKLSV ZLWK 8+ DQG SULYDWH SDUWQHUV WR attract and retain specialized instructors in locally relevant careers such as coding, agriculture, sustainability Continue ongoing Campbell HS 27-classroom multistory addition for near-term capacity relief until completion of CTE center, then remove portables • 1D Campbell/Kapolei CTE program • Similar to Scenario 1A, except accelerate East .DSROHL +6 GHVLJQ DQG FRQVWUXFWLRQ VRRQHU WKDQ current plans. &RPSOHWH ODQG DFTXLVLWLRQ DQG FRQVWUXFW QHZ KLJK VFKRRO ZLWK FRUH FDSDFLW\ IRU DQG LQLWLDO classroom capacity of #### seats based on updated enrollment projections 'HWHUPLQH QHZ KLJK VFKRRO ERXQGDU\ DUHD Determine feeder elementary and middle schools • • • • • Benefits Benefits Benefits • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 5HGXFHV +6 FURZGLQJ ZLWK QHZ RII-site capacity Expands student career opportunities Combines resources at Campbell HS and .DSROHL +6 WR FUHDWH D UHODWLYHO\ KLJKO\-resourced CTE program All opportunities in one plan/space &RPPXQLW\ %ULQJV XQLW\ WR WKH WZR KLJK VFKRROV &UHDWHV VSDFH WR JURZ SDWKZD\V $OOHYLDWHV RYHUFURZGHG KLJK VFKRROV $OORZV WLPH IRU EURDGHU EDVH RI VWDNHKROGHUV WR contribute to complex CTE program decisions Challenges Challenges Challenges Challenges • • • • • • • • • • • Campbell HS is already the largest school in the VWDWH DQG FRXOG EHFRPH HYHQ ODUJHU ZLWK WKH additions in process (YHQ ZLWK &DPSEHOO DGGLWLRQV &DPSEHOO +6 DQG .DSROHL +6 UHPDLQ RYHU-utilized 0DLQWDLQ QR VWXGHQW SDUNLQJ DW &DPSEHOO +6 Continue using Pohakea ES fields for Campbell HS portables 'RHVQ¶W VROYH XWLOL]DWLRQ DV SRSXODWLRQ JURZV Doesn’t alleviate traffic and safety problems 0DQDJLQJ PDLQWDLQLQJ HYHQ ODUJHU KLJK VFKRRO Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ • • • • &UHDWLQJ SDUWQHUVKLS EHWZHHQ &DPSEHOO +6 DQG .DSROHL +6 IXQGLQJ EHOO VFKHGXOH &7( programming, etc.) 7UDQVSRUWDWLRQ EHWZHHQ KRPH KLJK VFKRROV DQG the CTE center Land acquisition time/cost Collaboration: getting all the stakeholders in one room and agreeing on one thing Equity for attending a non-comprehensive site Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ &RPPXQLW\ VXSSRUW IRU QHZ KLJK VFKRRO FRPSOH[ Land availability Stakeholder Voice ‫ ڗ‬Priority 1 Step 1: Conduct 6-12 month due-diligence study and engagement of student, industry, higher education, community, and DOE stakeholders to determine feasibility and implementation strategy for shared CTE program and facility for &DPSEHOO .DSROHL 6FHQDULR % Step 2: Implement either Scenario 1A, 1B, or 1C depending on outcome of due-diligence Benefits No land to acquire No operational changes to implement &RQWLQXHV GLDORJ ZLWK KRXVLQJ GHYHORSHUV Continues business as usual; doesn’t create major disruption to operations 5HGXFHV FODVV VL]HV ZKLFK DUH RYHUFURZGHG 0RUH URRP IRU LQVWUXFWLRQ $75- 0 Project implies commitment of school and complex-area leadership, and may require state and/or outside facilitation մմմմմ Recommendation • Due to far-reaching significance and complex nature of this school design decision, EPC elects to initiate further study and broader engagement to determine best course of action to improve CTE programs and resolve capacity over-utilization Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 211 Kapolei Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS SCENARIOS (2A-2B relate to both Campbell and Kapolei Complexes) 2A Keep current ES boundary scenario 2B Kapolei Elementary boundary change $$$$$ $$$$$ • Study area enrollment and boundaries to GHWHUPLQH D ERXQGDU\ FKDQJH VFHQDULR WKDW ZRXOG relieve over-FURZGLQJ DW DUHD HOHPHQWDU\ VFKRROV such as Hookele ES 0RQLWRU JURZWK DQG FRQVLGHU FRPSOH[-ZLGH RU school area boundaries 3ULRULW\ FRQYH\V (3&¶V DFNQRZOHGJHPHQW WKDW D boundary study is not an immediate need, but VKRXOG EH FRQVLGHUHG ZLWKLQ -years • • Benefits Benefits • • No changes to implement • Relieve over-XWLOL]DWLRQ ZLWKRXW FDSLWDO expenditures Promotes sense of community Challenges Challenges • • • • Holomua (6 RSHUDWHV DW D SURMHFWHG XWLOL]DWLRQ RYHU FDSDFLW\ E\ VWXGHQWV ZKLOH four area ES’s have some surplus capacity (TXLW\ EHWZHHQ VFKRROV DQG IDFLOLW\ Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ ‫ ڜ‬Priority 4 Boundary change (TXLW\ EHWZHHQ VFKRROV DQG IDFLOLW\ Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ Recommendation • &RQVLGHU HOHPHQWDU\ ERXQGDU\ VWXG\ WRZDUG HQG RI -year planning horizon Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 212 Kapolei Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS FACILITY OPTIONS 3 4 Kapolei HS private-public-partnerships for CTE • Explore private-public-SDUWQHUVKLS ZLWK ORFDO PHFKDQLF EXVLQHVV WR SURYLGH UHDOZRUOG H[SHULHQFH • ([SORUH LQWHUQVKLSV ZLWK DUHD LQGXVWU\ H J SDUWQHU ZLWK +DZDLL 3DFLILF +HDOWK WR RIIHU D ZRUN VWXG\ SURJUDP IRU a VWXGHQWV ODZ HQIRUFHPHQW IRUHQVLFV )%, PRFN court) • 3DUWQHU ZLWK +DZDLL 3DFLILF +HDOWK WR GHVLJQ DQG UHQRYDWH FODVVURRPV IRU D mock-hospital • 'HVLJQ D 06 &7( DZDUHQHVV FRXUVH IRU th grade students 6 • Kapolei HS new auditorium building with classrooms • Construct covered outdoor venue for dining, assemblies, performances, and community use Kapolei HS student commons • Construct a student commons facility in central field (pentagon) to include glass ZDOOV Kapolei HS central storage facility and loading docks 8 Kapolei MS covered multi-purpose facility • • Construct a facility for central receiving of school support items/materials Construct covered outdoor space adjacent to cafeteria for dining, assemblies, and outdoor learning in central part of the campus Kapolei ongoing middle school expansion projects • • • 10 • Provides real-ZRUOG H[SHULHQFHV IRU VWXGHQWV ZLWK UHODWLYHO\ ORZ capital investment • Need to create public-private partnerships 2QJRLQJ QHZ (DVW .DSROHL 06 DW FDSDFLW\ WR UHOLHYH VHYHUH RYHUFURZGLQJ Fund 16-FODVVURRP EXLOGLQJ FXUUHQWO\ EHLQJ SODQQHG IRU .DSROHL 06 )XQG 3KDVH ,,, RI (DVW .DSROHL 06 RQFH FRPSOHWH UHPRYH SRUWDEOHV RQ .DSROHL 06 Kapolei complex covered multi-purpose spaces (all schools) • Construct covered outdoor space for dining, assemblies, outdoor learning, and community use at all ES that don’t currently have covered play courts, including 0DXNODQL neighborhood park Cost/ROM Stakeholder Range Voice $$$$$ $2.5- 0 • Removes outdated buildings Fund plans to partition open-GHVLJQ FODVVURRPV ZLWK DFRXVWLFDOO\-treated and at • 1HZ PRGHUQ HQYLURQPHQWV • Space for athletics and ag OHDVW SDUWLDOO\ WUDQVSDUHQW PRYHDEOH ZDOOV education Design funded 7 9 Challenges Kapolei HS 21st century classroom partitions • 5 Benefits • Extends construction on occupied site. $$$$$ $2.5- 0 • Provides flexible shared space • Need to evaluate electrical • Provides cultural arts performance infrastructure venue • Provides modern, student commons center $$$$$ $20- 0 $$$$$ $2.5- 0 $$$$$ • Improves efficiency of shipping/storing school supplies and support items $2.5- 0 • 0XOWL-purpose covered play and gathering space • Provides shaded structure $2.5- 0 $$$$$ • Fosters collaborative instruction and student-focused projectbased learning $$$$$ $40- 0 • 0XOWL-purpose covered play and gathering space • Provides shaded structure • Inter-agency cooperation required at 0DXNDODQL Park $$$$$ $2.5- 0 Funding Category Priority Tier ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #7 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #6 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #3 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #5 2 ‫ڝ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - last 3 ‫ژ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ 06 - #3 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ 06 - #1 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #3 2 ‫ڝ‬ Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 213 Kapolei Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS FACILITY OPTIONS 11 Mauka Lani (and other) ES permanent classroom building Benefits Challenges • Portable replacement • 1HZ PRGHUQ HQYLURQPHQWV $$$$$ • 5HSODFH VHDWV LQ SRUWDEOHV WKH VFKRRO¶V FDSDFLW\ ZLWK D QHZ FODVVURRP EXLOGLQJ LQFOXGLQJ DW OHDVW WZR 67($0 FODVVURRPV • Confirm locations and capacities 12 Mauka Lani ES expanded parking lot structure 13 Prioritized repairs and maintenance (all schools) 14 Locally-determined enhancements (all schools) 15 Kapolei complex cafeteria expansions $20- 0 $$$$$ • Additional parking • Create and execute a plan to add parking to 0DXND Lani ES • Safety, code, and maintenance projects, to include site drainage • Budget allotment for each school to fund stakeholder-driven projects • &RQVWUXFW FDIHWHULD HDWLQJ VSDFHV YLD FRYHUHG FRPPXQLW\ VSDFH ZLWK PRELOH seating and tables 16 Kapolei HS athletic projects - track, bleachers, fields 17 Kapolei complex covered walkways (all schools) Cost/ROM Range $2.5- 0 $$$$$ • Addresses top-priority needs at each school • (PSRZHUV VFKRROV DQG VWXGHQWV to define projects at time of execution $7.5- 0 • Requires policy to consistently allocate and implement projects • Provides expanded space for dining and community use • Provides a 21st century assembly space $$$$$ $500k- 0 $$$$$ $20- 0 $$$$$ $20- 0 $$$$$ $2.5- 0 Stakeholder Voice Funding Category Priority Tier ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #1 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #4 1 ‫ڗ‬ 1 ‫ڗ‬ 2 ‫ڝ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ +6 06 #2/4/5 2 ‫ڝ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #7 3 ‫ژ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #6 4 ‫ڜ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ +6 06 (6 #1/2/2 ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ +6 06 #4/5/6 Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 214 Nanakuli Complex DATA and NEEDS Enrollment and Facility Data: School 263 261 (a) 2017-18/ 2023-24 Enrollment EĈŶĈŬƵůŝ ,ŝŐŚ Θ Intermediate (712) 1032 / 973 / -6% EĈŶĈŝŬĂƉŽŶŽ Elementary (K-6) 787 / 770 / -2% (b) Capacity 1264 975 Stakeholder Voice: Oldest / (c) = (b) - (a) (d) = (a) / (b) Projected 2023-24 Newest / Avg Capacity Projected Building Surplus Utilization 291 205 0.77 0.79 1971 / 2006 / 39 2004 / 2004 / 14 % Old or Beyond Expected Life Adequacy ^ĐŽƌĞ ͬ ZĂŶŬ Out of 260 We have teachers teaching two different subjects like automotive and Spanish. - Student I have to take algebra online because we don’t have the teacher. - Student 1% 0.85 / 11 We have desks that are unstable and shift as you write. We also have chairs that don’t have a back so they are uncomfortable. - Student 0% Cafeteria is so hot. Lines are so long it wraps around the cafeteria. Some kids miss 5th or 6th period or don’t eat at all. - Student 0.74 / 91 Nanakuli has the program that accepts anyone from what ever complex for music but we don’t even have a proper stage to perform on. - Student 262 EĈŶĈŬƵůŝ Elementary (K-6) TOTAL 450 / 442 / -2% 550 108 0.80 2,185 2,789 604 0.78 1978 / 2003 / 30 8% 0.65 / 146 3% 0.75 We don’t have proper water faucets. We went without electricity and faucets for two weeks. It was hot and dark. We don’t even have soap and we’re lucky if there’s toilet paper. -Student Challenges: Ch • /LEUDU\ OHVV WKDQ RI VWDQGDUG space: Nanakuli ES • 0RGHUDWH IORRG ULVN VLWH LQ H[WUHPH tsunami zone (Nanaikapono ES) • No dedicated science at elementary schools • 0XVLF OHVV WKDQ RI VWDQGDUG space: Nanakuli HS/IS • No music or art rooms at elementary schools • Under-utilized capacity • Resurface courts • Electrical infrastructure • Air conditioning Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 215 Nanakuli Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS SCENARIOS 1A Keep current operational scenario $$$$$ • 1B (no alternative scenario) $$$$$ $OO VFKRROV FRQWLQXH WR RSHUDWH ZLWKLQ VDPH JUDGH configurations and on same campuses Benefits • Benefits No changes to implement Challenges Stakeholder Voice Challenges մմմմմ Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ Recommendation • No operational changes recommended Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 216 Nanakuli Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS FACILITY OPTIONS 2 3.1 3.2 Nanakuli HS upgrade electrical infrastructure • • Upgrade electrical grid throughout site Design money Nanakuli HS baseball field renovations Nanakuli HS synthetic track • Nanakuli HS pool and locker rooms 3.4 Nanakuli HS athletics improvements resurface courts 4 5 6 Construct shade structures over building courtyards &RYHUHG ZDONZD\V DQG SOD\ DUHDV Nanakuli HS new multi-purpose dining area • Construct multi-purpose dining area for grades 7 and 8 Nanakuli HS career technical education (CTE) renovation • Renovate existing CTE spaces and provide modern equipment and fixtures 7 Nanakuli HS classroom renovation 8 Nanakuli HS visual performing arts (VPA) center • • • 3URYLGHV DGHTXDWH SRZHU IRU WHFKQRORJ\ and daily school operation • Up to date for needs of 21st century school rigor • Extends construction on occupied site • Fire hazard • Safety of athletes and spectators • Cost • Location • Safety of athletes and spectators • Safety of athletes and spectators • Safety of athletes and spectators • Cost • Location • Cost • Location • Cost • Location Cost/ROM Range Renovate building B-14 into modern, flexible, project-based space &RQVWUXFW 93$ FHQWHU ZLWK VWDJH WKDW LQFOXGHV RXWGRRU amphitheater and music instruction space • Provides covered areas during inclement ZHDWKHU • 0LWLJDWHV DJDLQVW UDLQ KHDW ODFN RI shade, and hot benches • Provides needed dining space • Additional dining space meets café requirements • 0LWLJDWHV VDIHW\ FKDOOHQJHV ZLWK sanitation, outdated equipment, and FDSDFLW\ RYHUIORZ LQWR KDOOZD\V Funding Category Priority Tier 1 ‫ڗ‬ 0- 0 ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - last 4 ‫ڜ‬ $$$$$ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - last $$$$$ $$$$$ $2.5- 0 ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - last $$$$$ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - last $$$$$ $2.5- 0 $$$$$ 500k- 0 • Provides modern spaces required for current CTE needs • &7( FRXUVHV ZLOO EH LQ RQH DUHD • Provides more opportunities 0- 0 • Provides modern, flexible education space • 3URYLGHV VWXGHQWV ZLWK SURSHU IDFLOLW\ 500k- 0 • Provides needed VPA space for attractive, expanding program • 0LWLJDWHV VDIHW\ KD]DUGV LQFOXGLQJ KHDW on stage • Benefits more that just the community • Provides a home for program • Helps maintain and sustain fine arts SURJUDPV ZLWK UHYHQXH Stakeholder Voice ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #1 $$$$$ 500k- 0 Complete Nanakuli shade structures (all schools) • • Challenges Complete 3.3 • Benefits $$$$$ $$$$$ $$$$$ 0- 0 n/a 5 ‫ړ‬ n/a ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS/ES - #5/4 2 ‫ڝ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #2 5 ‫ړ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #7 4 ‫ڜ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #3 2 ‫ڝ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #6 1 ‫ڗ‬ Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 217 Nanakuli Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS FACILITY OPTIONS 9 Renovate both ES to include STEAM spaces • • Include landscaping and sanitary drinking options &RQYHUW H[LVWLQJ VSDFHV LQWR 67($0 URRPV Benefits • Provide modern, flexible learning environments Nanakuli ES covered play court 10.2 Nanakuli ES replace portables with permanent building • Provides permanent, modern, flexible education space Prioritized repairs and maintenance (all schools) • Addresses top-priority needs at each school • Reduces future renovation needs • Longevity of facility • Promotes health and safety for students • Reduces soil erosion 11 12 Included in Option 4 • Safety, code, and maintenance projects, to include site drainage Locally-determined enhancements (all schools) • Budget allotment for each school to fund stakeholder-driven projects • (PSRZHUV VFKRROV DQG VWXGHQWV WR define projects at time of execution Cost/ROM Range $$$$$ • Provides covered multi-purpose area GXULQJ LQFOHPHQW ZHDWKHU 10.1 • Challenges 500k- 0 ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #3 $$$$$ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #2 $$$$$ 0- 0 $$$$$ 0- 0 • Requires policy to consistently allocate and implement projects $$$$$ 500k- 0 13 Nanakuli HS gym improvements • • • • • Stakeholder Voice Funding Category Priority Tier 4 ‫ڜ‬ n/a ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #2 5 ‫ړ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS/ES - #4/1 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS/ES - #9/5 1 ‫ڗ‬ 2 ‫ڝ‬ • Provides emergency shelter location +HDW DEDWHPHQW ZLWK IDQV 1HZ EDVNHWEDOO KRRS PRWRUV DQG ULPV 0LWLJDWH ORFNHU URRP IORRGLQJ Restroom facilities Scoreboard $$$$$ 0- 0 ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #8 Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 218 Waianae Complex DATA and NEEDS Stakeholder Voice: Enrollment and Facility Data: School (a) 2017-18/ 2023-24 Enrollment (b) Capacity Oldest / (c) = (b) - (a) (d) = (a) / (b) Projected 2023-24 Newest / Avg Capacity Projected Building Surplus Utilization % Old or Beyond Expected Life Adequacy ^ĐŽƌĞ ͬ ZĂŶŬ Out of 260 272 tĂŝ॒ĂŶĂĞ ,ŝŐŚ ;ϵͲ 12) 1742 / 1745 / 0% 1866 121 Ϭ͘ϵϰ ϭϵϱϳ ͬ ϮϬϬϴ ͬ 45 55% 0.77 / 62 275 Kamaile Academy PCS (K-12) ϵϬϴ ͬ ϵϬϴ / 0% 671 -237 1.35 ϭϵϴϵ ͬ ϭϵϵϳ ͬ 25 2% Ϭ͘ϲϵ ͬ 114 273 tĂŝ॒ĂŶĂĞ ϵϰϮ ͬ ϳϯϯ Intermediate (7-8) / -22% 1021 288 0.72 ϭϵϲϳ ͬ ϭϵϵϲ ͬ 46 74% Ϭ͘ϳϵ ͬ ϰϱ 257 DĈ॒ŝůŝ ůĞŵĞŶƚĂƌLJ ϴϮϵ ͬ ϳϬϮ (K-6) / -15% 763 61 Ϭ͘ϵϮ ϭϵϲϯ ͬ ϭϵϴϴ ͬ 51 82% 0.54 / 234 258 DĈŬĂŚĂ Elementary (K-6) 547 / 557 / 2% 587 30 Ϭ͘ϵϱ ϭϵϲϭ ͬ ϭϵϲϳ ͬ 55 ϵϴй 0.60 / 205 270 tĂŝ॒ĂŶĂĞ Elementary (K-6) ϱϭϵ ͬ ϯϴϮ / -26% 753 371 0.51 ϭϵϰϵ ͬ ϭϵϴϮ ͬ 54 76% 0.64 / 156 271 >ĞŝŚƃŬƻ Elementary (K-6) ϴϵϲ ͬ ϴϳϯ / -3% ϵϳϴ 105 Ϭ͘ϴϵ ϭϵϴϬ ͬ ϮϬϬϳ ͬ Ϯϵ 10% 0.65 / 147 5,900 6,639 739 0.89 57% 0.67 TOTAL West side gets neglected because they focus on places that are growing. I was in the yearbook committee of our school and as I went through the archive of photos, I noticed that the infrastructure stayed the same. - Teacher We can’t even get our students to stay up because it’s so hot. We have to go out and play to get them up. - Teacher I’ve been in the system for 30 years and haven’t seen it change. I don’t want to be retiring in a few years and [find] out that nothing has changed. - Parent Challenges: Ch • 22%-26% enrollment decline (Waianae IS, Waianae ES) • Industrial arts and family consumer science less than 50% of standard space: Waianae HS, Waianae IS • Library less than 50% of standard space: .DPDLOH Academy PCS • 0RGHUDWH IORRG ULVN RI VLWH LQ extreme tsunami zone (Waianae HS, Waianae IS, Waianae ES, 0DLOL ES, and .DPDLOH Academy PCS) • No dedicated science room at elementary schools • Cafeteria less than 50% of standard space: 0DNDKD ES, 0DLOL ES, .DPDLOH Academy PCS • 0RUH WKDQ KDOI RI EXLOGLQJV DUH ROG RU beyond expected life • Capacity under-utilization at Waianae IS, Waianae ES • Capacity over-utilization at .DPDLOH Academy PCS • Dance and drama less than 50% of standard space: Waianae HS • Art less than 50% of standard space: .DPDLOH Academy PCS • No music or art rooms at elementary schools • /RFNHU VKRZHU JHQGHU HTXLW\ Waianae HS • 5HQRYDWH ILHOGV QHZ WUDFN WUDLQLQJ room • Admin less than 50% of standard space: 0DLOL ES • 0HQWDO KHDOWK IDFLOLW\ • Air conditioning Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 219 Waianae Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS SCENARIOS 1A Waianae Pre-K-5 and 6-8 $$$$$ • $20- 0 ‫ ڗ‬Priority 1 &RQVLVWHQW ZLWK FRPSOH[-area Pre-. H[SDQVLRQ plans, change grade configuration at Waianae IS DQG IHHGHU HOHPHQWDU\ VFKRROV IURP .-6, 7-8 to Pre-.-5, 6-8 (move 6th grade from elementary schools to WIS, making room for Pre-. SURJUDPV &RQVWUXFW QHZ st century 6th grade academic EXLOGLQJ DW :DLDQDH ,6 RQ SDUNLQJ ORW ZLWK RXWGRRU learning area Renovate classrooms, playgrounds, and student drop-off at all four elementary schools as appropriate for Pre-. Waianae IS parking lot rebuild • • • Benefits • • • • • Opens space for Waianae-Nanakuli researchbased Pre-. LQLWLDWLYH 0RGHUQ IOH[LEOH VSDFHV IRU VL[WK JUDGH Better utilizes elementary and intermediate school facilities Additional students at WIS equals more dollars for WIS 0RUH PRWLYDWLQJ WR DWWHQG VFKRRO LQ D QHZ IDFLOLW\ Challenges • Less students at elementary schools equals less dollars for elementary schools Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ Recommendation • 3URFHHG ZLWK 6FHQDULR $ Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 220 Waianae Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS FACILITY OPTIONS 2 3 4 Waianae HS marine science learning center expansion • • • &RQVWUXFW QHZ EXLOGLQJ WR H[SDQG VXFFHVVIXO DTXDSRQLFV SURJUDP 5HVHDUFK SDUWQHUVKLS ZLWK )XWXUH )DUPHUV RI $PHULFD 3DUWQHUVKLS ZLWK KDUERU Waianae HS CTE renovation • • Renovate CTE spaces for health, cyber, finance, marketing, hospitality 3XUFKDVH QHZ HTXLSPHQW IRU UHQRYDWHG &7( VSDFHV Waianae HS alternative learning center • &RQVWUXFW QHZ DOWHUQDWLYH OHDUQLQJ FHQWHU RQ WZR DFUHV RQ HDVW VLGH RI VLWH Benefits Challenges • Opportunity for increased revenue generation by selling aquaponics products to restaurants • 3RVVLELOLW\ RI D QHZ DFDGHP\ Cost/ROM Range $$$$$ $20- 0 • Provides spaces needed for robust, modern CTE programs $$$$$ $2.5- 0 • Provides alternative learning center space for VWXGHQWV ZLWK PRUH IRFXVHG QHHG $$$$$ $20- 0 5.1 5.2 6 Waianae HS power upgrades • • Waianae HS covered pavilion • • • 7 Rebuild parking lot to the south of current parking area (UH architecture department FXUUHQWO\ ZRUNLQJ RQ VFKHPDWLF SODQ )XQG FRQVWUXFWLRQ RI SDUNLQJ ORW UHEXLOG Construct as multi-level, multi-purpose for emergency shelter. Included in Scenario 1A Waianae IS athletic master plan projects and community complex • • • 8.1 Construct indoor/outdoor multi-purpose cafeteria/library 3URYLGHV QHHGHG LQIUDVWUXFWXUH WR SRZHU WHFKQRORJ\ Waianae IS parking lot rebuild • 3HU $WKOHWLF 0DVWHU 3ODQ Uenovate ILHOGV QHZ WUDFN WUDLQLQJ URRP Also, explore feasibility of community park/sports complex on existing site Track project in design Waianae IS covered play court • $$$$$ Upgrade electrical infrastructure ,QVWDOO VRODU SDQHOV LQ SDUNLQJ ORW ZLWK FRYHUHG SDUNLQJ Construct multi-purpose covered play court $2.5- 0 • Provides adequate multi-purpose space for student dining and library $$$$$ $2.5- 0 • ,PSURYHV WUDIILF IORZ • Provides needed parking for staff and parents • • • • • • • • Provides field space for school and community Creates one center for IS and HS Facilitates mentorship Creates sense of community Anchors interest in community Increases jobs 0RWLYDWHV VWXGHQWV WR VWD\ LQ VFKRRO Could benefit multiple schools Waianae IS second-floor rail • Install second floor safety railing Funding Category Priority Tier ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #4 tie 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #6 3 ‫ژ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #4 tie 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #2 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #2 5 ‫ړ‬ • Aesthetics $$$$$ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ IS - #2 n/a • Locating space • Prone to vandalism • Provides covered multi-purpose space during LQFOHPHQW ZHDWKHU $$$$$ $2.5- 0 $$$$$ 500k-2.5M 8.2 Stakeholder Voice • Provides safety improvements for raised SHGHVWULDQ ZDONZD\V $$$$$ $500k- 0 ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ IS – last 3 ‫ژ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ IS - #4 2 ‫ڝ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ IS - #4 5 ‫ړ‬ Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 221 Waianae Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS FACILITY OPTIONS 9 Building additions and renovations (elementary schools) • • • • 10 11 Waianae ES renovate Buildings A and B for Pre-. FRQVWUXFW QHZ FDIHWHULD DQG renovate current one into project-based learning maker space, remove portables, renovate or replace Buildings C & I 0DNDKD (6 UHSODFH SRUWDEOHV ZLWK PXOWL-OHYHO SHUPDQHQW EXLOGLQJ ZLWK FDSDFLW\ RI 400, renovate Pre-. FODVVURRPV UHQRYDWH FXUUHQW SRUWDEOH IRRWSULQW DUHD IRU SOD\ fields, Leihoku ES renovate Pre-. FODVVURRPV UHSODFH SRUWDEOHV ZLWK PXOWL-level permanent EXLOGLQJ ZLWK FDSDFLW\ IRU FRQVWUXFW FRYHUHG SOD\ FRXUW 0DLOL (6 UHSODFH SRUWDEOHV ZLWK PXOWL-OHYHO SHUPDQHQW EXLOGLQJ ZLWK FDSDFLW\ IRU H[SDQG FDIHWHULD ZLWK PXOWL-purpose indoor/outdoor space, renovate Pre-. FODVVURRPV UHQRYDWH WZR FODVVURRPV IRU VSHFLDO HGXFDWLRQ OLIH-skills space Makaha ES parking and traffic improvements (all schools) • • Redesign drop-off lanes Construct parking area Prioritized repairs and maintenance (all schools) • Safety, code, and maintenance projects to include site drainage Benefits Challenges • Addresses facility deficiencies and improves equity at elementary schools • Alleviates use of public park • ,PSURYHV VDIHW\ ZLWK DELOLW\ WR ORFN IHQFLQJ • 21st century learning spaces Cost/ROM Range $$$$$ $40- 0 • ,PSURYHV WUDIILF IORZ • Provides needed parking for staff and parents • Improves parent involvement • $OOHYLDWHV FDUV VWXFN LQ PXG ZKHQ LW UDLQV 13 14 15 Locally-determined enhancements (all schools) • Budget allotment for each school to fund stakeholder-driven projects • Addresses top-priority needs at each school Air conditioning in all classrooms Elementary Special Education, alternative center • 0HQWDO KHDOWK IDFLOLW\ • (PSRZHUV VFKRROV DQG VWXGHQWV WR GHILQH projects at time of execution • • • • • • 5HODWLYHO\ ORZ FRVW Quick fix Increases student engagement Teacher retention Health benefits 21st century technology is preserved • Provides services for counseling to community • 0HHWV D KLHUDUFK\ RI QHHGV • Potentially increases student attendance Funding Category ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #4 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #3 1 ‫ڗ‬ $$$$$ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS/IS/ES - #3/2 1 ‫ڗ‬ • Requires policy to consistently allocate and implement projects • Electrical infrastructure • Wiring • 1HZ SODQV SURSRVDOV $$$$$ $500k- 0 ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #7/5/6 1 ‫ڗ‬ $$$$$ $2.5- 0 ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS/IS/ES - #1 1 ‫ڗ‬ • Existing outside providers • Determining location Waianae IS athletic community complex • 0XOWL-purpose addition $$$$$ $2.5- 0 ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #5 1 ‫ڗ‬ 2 ‫ڝ‬ 4 ‫ڜ‬ $$$$$ $20- 0 16 Priority Tier $$$$$ $500k- 0 $7.5- 0 12 Stakeholder Voice Waianae HS athletic natatorium/pool • 0XOWL-purpose addition • Explore integrating into the ocean $$$$$ $20- 0 Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 222 Pearl City Complex DATA and NEEDS Stakeholder Voice: Enrollment and Facility Data: School (a) 2017-18/ 2023-24 Enrollment 1568 / 1507 / 4% (b) Capacity (c) = (b) - (a) (d) = (a) / (b) Oldest / Projected 2023-24 Newest / Avg Capacity Projected Building Surplus Utilization % Old or Beyond Expected Life Adequacy Score / Rank Out of 260 My school was here before Hawaii became a state. When the wind blows hard, the wifi turns off. I don’t even know how that happens. We only have electricity on one wall. - Administrator 1823 316 0.83 1971 / 2014 / 41 0% 0.86 / 8 Highlands 889 / 863 Intermediate (7-8) / -3% 938 75 0.92 1959 / 1991 / 54 92% 0.80 / 39 260 DĈŶĂŶĂ Elementary (K-6) 389 / 356 / -8% 456 100 0.78 1969 / 1974 / 48 0% 0.68 / 119 264 Palisades Elementary (K-6) 442 / 424 / -4% 426 2 1.00 1955 / 1967 / 61 100% 0.61 / 195 265 Pearl City Elementary (K-6) 422 / 391 / -7% 522 131 0.75 1955 / 1956 / 62 100% 0.67 / 136 267 Pearl City Highlands Elementary (K-6) We need solutions to adapt maker spaces and pod-oriented collaboration learning areas. We need to fund STEM. We need to start designing areas of school for multiple uses at 546 / 557 / 2% 449 -108 1.24 1958 / 1961 / 59 100% 0.58 / 221 our time. - Teacher 268 Lehua Elementary 244 / 272 (K-6) / 11% 427 155 0.64 1965 / 2001 / 52 100% 0.63 / 170 283 Kanoelani Elementary (K-6) 790 / 842 / 7% 655 -187 1.29 1982 / 1998 / 32 18% 0.58 / 218 We should have open spaces where teachers can use them as they need to. We need to design spaces according to our students. - Teacher 285 Momilani Elementary (K-6) 413 / 402 / -3% 340 -62 1.18 1972 / 1972 / 46 0% 0.52 / 245 288 Waiau Elementary 482 / 483 / 0% (K-6) 470 -13 1.03 1974 / 1998 / 36 11% 0.62 / 185 6,506 409 0.94 52% 0.65 266 Pearl City High (912) 255 TOTAL 6,097 There are ways that you can future-proof classrooms. I put wheels on everything in my room. We need to stop thinking about the traditional rows and columns seating. - Teacher For the past 30 years, everyone’s been pouting about college. We need to break from that mentality. - Parent Challenges: Ch • /LEUDU\ OHVV WKDQ RI VWDQGDUG space: Pearl City Highlands ES, 0RPLODQL ES • No dedicated science room at elementary schools • &DIHWHULD OHVV WKDQ RI VWDQGDUG space: Waiau ES, .DQRHODQL ES • Half of buildings are old or beyond expected life • 0XVLF OHVV WKDQ RI VWDQGDUG space: Pearl City HS • No music or art rooms at most elementary schools • $GPLQ OHVV WKDQ RI VWDQGDUG space: Palisades ES, 0RPLODQL ES, Pearl City Highlands ES • Capacity over and under-utilization at elementary schools • 0RUH WKDQ RI FDSDFLW\ LQ portables: Waiau ES, .DQRHODQL ES • Resurface courts, girls’ lockers • Future-proof design • ADA compliance Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 223 Pearl City Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS SCENARIOS 1A Highlands IS phased reconstruction 1B Highland IS rebuilt on alternate site $$$$$ $$$$$ • Create master plan to reconstruct entire school site • 0- 0 ‫ ڗ‬Priority 1 Acquire land or repurpose another site and FRQVWUXFW QHZ +LJKODQGV ,6 &RQVLGHU H[LVWLQJ '2( VLWHV ZLWK IXUWKHU UHYLHZ RI capacity utilization, long-term enrollment projection, and focused community engagement Consider 6-8 grade configuration ,QLWLDWH VHDUFK DQG GXH GLOLJHQFH ZLWKLQ -12 PRQWKV RI )DFLOLW\ 0DVWHU 3ODQ DGRSWLRQ • • • 1C Highlands IS minor renovations $$$$$ • Perform needed renovations to maintain facility VWDWH ZLWKRXW PDMRU FDSLWDO LQYHVWPHQWV Benefits Benefits Benefits • • • • • • • • • • Alleviates multiple site issues that cannot RWKHUZLVH EH HDVLO\ IL[HG Alleviates ADA accessibility Opens space for parking Opens space for play area 0RGHUQL]HV HGXFDWLRQDO VSDFHV Alleviates lack of electrical infrastructure for existing one-to-one Replaces buildings in poor condition 0LWLJDWHV IORRGLQJ FRQGLWLRQV GXULQJ KHDY\ UDLQV • • • $ELOLW\ WR UHEXLOG FKDOOHQJHG IDFLOLW\ ZLWKRXW disrupting school operations 6-8 configuration could alleviate capacity utilization at elementary schools 0RYHV VFKRRO RII VLWH ZLWK LQVWDEOH VRLOV ([SORUH ODQG VZDS ZLWK FRXQW\ IRU DGMDFHQW SDUN • $OORZV VFKRRO RSHUDWLRQV WR FRQWLQXH GXULQJ construction • Would provide more space for parking 0DLQWDLQV VDIH IDFLOLW\ FRQGLWLRQV IRU VWXGHQWV Challenges Challenges Challenges • • • • Disruption to students during long construction project: ILQGLQJ VZLQJ VSDFH • • Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ Limited availability of land Community support to move 6th grade students into middle level 7UDQVSRUWDWLRQ RI VWXGHQWV WR QHZ PLGGOH VFKRRO location :RUNLQJ ZLWK FLW\ DQG FRXQW\ RQ ODQG VZDS DQG temporary disruption for park users Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ 0DLQWDLQV IDFLOLW\ RQ LQVWDEOH VRLOV Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ Recommendation • 3URFHHG ZLWK 6FHQDULR % WR LQFOXGH ODQG VHDUFK DQG GXH GLOLJHQFH DV ZHOO DV VWDNHKROGHU HQJDJHPHQW UHJDUGLQJ JUDGH FRQILJXration and school design Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 224 Pearl City Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS FACILITY OPTIONS 2.1 2.2 Pearl City HS upgrade electrical infrastructure • Upgrade electrical grid Pearl City HS install air conditioning • Install air conditioning in classrooms Benefits Challenges • 3URYLGHV QHFHVVDU\ SRZHU IRU technology and daily operational needs • Creates cool, comfortable environment for learning Cost/ROM Range $$$$$ $2.5- 0 Stakeholder Voice Funding Category 1 ‫ڗ‬ 3 ‫ژ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #4 tie 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - last 5 ‫ړ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #6 tie 2 ‫ڝ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #3 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #1 $$$$$ $20- 0 3 Pearl City HS renovate career technical education (CTE) spaces • • • 4 5HQRYDWH H[LVWLQJ &7( VSDFHV LQWR PRGHUQ OHDUQLQJ HQYLURQPHQWV ZLWK PRGHUQ equipment and fixtures Repurpose existing auto to flexible engineering/manufacturing/fashion space Partially funded Pearl City HS shade structures • ,QVWDOO VKDGH VWUXFWXUHV EHWZHHQ %XLOGLQJV $ % DQG ( ) • Provides modern appropriate space for CTE • Utilizes a currently under-utilized space • Creates outdoor space for student activities and outdoor CTE space $$$$$ $20- 0 $$$$$ $500k- 0 5 6.1 Pearl City HS cultural center • • 5HQRYDWH FXOWXUDO FHQWHU DXGLWRULXP IRU VKDUHG XVH EHWZHHQ VFKRRO DQG FRPPXQLW\ Include sound booth and technology renovation Pearl City HS Special Education and ADA improvements • • Special Education classroom renovation and equipment upgrades Elevator and ADA improvements • 3URYLGHV VKDUHG VSDFH ZLWK community for cultural arts • &UHDWHV D VSDFH WKDW ZLOO OLNHO\ EH in high-demand benefiting all students • Provides necessary equipment and accessibility to all students $$$$$ $20- 0 $$$$$ $2.5- 0 6.2 7 Priority Tier Pearl City HS building and site improvements • • • Resurface paved areas Replace aging sports facility bleachers Included in Option 13 Pearl City HS adjacent land use or acquisition • • Look into viability of using adjacent Department of Land and Natural Resources land Initiate due diligence on land soon $$$$$ • Provides additional land to expand high school program $$$$$ $500k- 0 n/a ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #6 tie 1 Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 225 ‫ڗ‬ Pearl City Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS FACILITY OPTIONS 8 • • • • • • 0DQDQD (6 5HQRYDWH FODVVURRPV WR FUHDWH WZR 67($0 FODVVURRPV DQG EXLOG QHZ 67($0 building in courtyard adjacent to Building F /HKXD (6 )ROORZ WKURXJK ZLWK IXQGHG GHVLJQ RI QHZ DGPLQ EXLOGLQJ IXQG FRQVWUXFWLRQ RI QHZ DGPLQ EXLOGLQJ UHSXUSRVH H[LVWLQJ DGPLQ IRU 67($0 PDNHU VSDFH 3HDUO &LW\ (6 5HQRYDWH FODVVURRPV IRU WZR 6SHFLDO (GXFDWLRQ DQG WZR 67($0 &5 renovations ES multi-purpose covered areas • • • • • • 11 • Addresses facility deficiencies and improves equity at elementary schools .DQRHODQL (6 5HSODFH SRUWDEOHV ZLWK SHUPDQHQW PXOWL-OHYHO EXLOGLQJ ZLWK FDSDFLW\ IRU • 0RYHV VWXGHQWV RXW RI SRUWDEOHV LQWR Construct indoor/outdoor extended multi-purpose cafeteria. permanent buildings 0RPLODQL ES: Renovate admin for Welcome Center, secondary and principal offices, support RIILFHV DQG EXLOG WZR QHZ 67($0 &5V RQH OLEUDU\ DQG WZR VSHFLDO HGXFDWLRQ FODVVURRPV RQ VRXWK VLGH ODZQ DLU FRQGLWLRQLQJ LQ FDIHWHULD 3DOLVDGHV (6 5HSODFH FXUUHQW DGPLQ DQG J\P ZLWK QHZ PXOWL-level building in SW corner to LQFOXGH DGPLQ 67($0 FODVVURRPV LQFOXGH QHZ SDUNLQJ ORW FRYHUHG GURS-RII DQG ZDONZD\V 3HDUO &LW\ +LJKODQGV (6 &RQVWUXFW QHZ 67($0 EXLOGLQJ ZLWK VL[ FODVVURRPV DQG SURIHVVLRQDO OHDUQLQJ FHQWHU IRU WHDFKHU FROODERUDWLRQ IXQG H[LVWLQJ SODQ WR FRQVWUXFW QHZ OLEUDU\ PHGLD FHQWHU DQG UHSXUSRVH FXUUHQW OLEUDU\ IRU DGPLQ RIILFHV UHSDLU DQG UHQRYDWH cafeteria floor to mitigate settling Waiau (6 5HSODFH SRUWDEOHV ZLWK QHZ PXOWL-level 180-capacity classroom building on east VLGH RI FRXUW\DUG ZKLFK LQFOXGHV WZR 67($0 URRPV DQG PXVLF URRP 5HSODFH SRUWDEOHV ZLWK QHZ FDIHWHULD DQG UD]H H[LVWLQJ FDIHWHULD 8SJUDGH HOHFWULFDO ER[HV WR VXSSRUW UHFHQW HOHFWULFDO upgrades ES STEAM classroom renovations • 10 Challenges Cost/ROM Stakeholder Range Voice Funding Category Priority Tier New ES building construction and portable replacements • 9 Benefits .DQRHODQL ES: Construct indoor/outdoor extended multi-purpose cafeteria. Include triggered sprinklers. 0DQDQD (6 5HSODFH %XLOGLQJ ) ZLWK PXOWL-SXUSRVH FRYHUHG DUHD FRQVWUXFW $'$ UDPS /HKXD (6 )ROORZ WKURXJK WR IXQG FRQVWUXFWLRQ RI H[LVWLQJ GHVLJQ RI RXWGRRU PXOWL-purpose covered area 0ROLODQL (6 )ROORZ WKURXJK ZLWK FRQVWUXFWLRQ RI IXQGHG FRYHUHG SOD\ FRXUW Pearl City ES: Build covered play court Palisades ES: &RQVLGHU SDUWQHUVKLS ZLWK 3DUNV 5HF WR FRYHU QHLJKERULQJ SDUN DUHDV DQG SOD\ FRXUWV ,I QR SDUWQHUVKLS LV SRVVLEOH LQFOXGH D URRIWRS FRYHUHG SOD\ FRXUW WR QHZO\ EXLOW DGPLQ 67($0 FODVVURRPV Parking lot and fire lane improvement • • • .DQRHODQL ES: Renovate parking area and fire lane 0DQDQD (6 )ROORZ WKURXJK ZLWK H[LVWLQJ SDUNLQJ ORW DQG ILUH ODQH LPSURYHPHQWV LQ SURJUHVV Waiau (6 ,QFOXGH FRQVWUXFWLRQ RI QHZ GURS-RII ODQH DORQJ SURSRVHG UHWDLQLQJ ZDOO RQ Hookanike 3ODFH DQG FRQVWUXFW QHZ ILUH ODQH IURP Hookanike 3ODFH WRZDUG %XLOGLQJ ) $$$$$ $40- 0 ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #2 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #4 3 ‫ژ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #5 2 ‫ڝ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #3 1 ‫ڗ‬ • Creates modern, flexible classroom environments $$$$$ $2.5- 0 • Provides covered area for school and community functions during inclement ZHDWKHU $$$$$ $40- 0 • Provides needed parking for staff and parents • Improves traffic during drop-off and pickup • Improves infrastructure relating to fire safety $$$$$ $40- 0 Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 226 Pearl City Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS FACILITY OPTIONS 12 Manana ES purchase Special Education medical fragile facilities • 13 14 Challenges • Provides proper equipment to support Special Education programs Safety, code, and repairs, e.g., structural repairs at LHS Building Z, fire alarm, and mold remediation Locally-determined enhancements (all schools) • Budget allotment for each school to fund stakeholder-driven projects, such as sound dampening in multi-purpose room for ukulele program Cost/ROM Range $$$$$ Purchase equipment for Special Education population Prioritized repairs and maintenance (all schools) • Benefits .- 0 • Addresses top priority needs at each school $$$$$ $7.5- 0 • (PSRZHUV VFKRROV DQG VWXGHQWV WR define projects at time of execution • Requires policy to consistently allocate and implement projects Stakeholder Voice Funding Category Priority Tier ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #6 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS/ES - #2/1 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #/7 4 ‫ڜ‬ $$$$$ $500k- 0 Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 227 Waipahu Complex DATA and NEEDS Stakeholder Voice: Enrollment and Facility Data: School (a) 2017-18/ 2023-24 Enrollment (b) Capacity (c) = (b) - (a) (d) = (a) / (b) Oldest / Projected 2023-24 Newest / Avg Capacity Projected Building Surplus Utilization % Old or Beyond Expected Life Adequacy Score / Rank KƵƚ ŽĨ ϮϲϬ 277 tĂŝƉĂŚƻ ,ŝŐŚ ;ϵͲ 12) 2554 / 2452 / 4% 2201 -251 1.11 ϭϵϲϳ ͬ ϮϬϬϲ ͬ 41 47% Ϭ͘ϳϵ ͬ ϰϳ 278 tĂŝƉĂŚƻ Intermediate (7-8) ϭϮϵϰ ͬ ϭϭϲϱ ͬ Ͳ 10% ϭϭϵϮ 27 Ϭ͘ϵϴ ϭϵϰϭ ͬ ϮϬϬϲ ͬ 38 Ϯϵй Ϭ͘ϴϲ ͬ ϵ 250 August Ahrens ůĞŵĞŶƚĂƌLJ ;<ͲϲͿ ϭϮϱϵ ͬ 1275 / 1% ϭϰϯϲ ϭϲϭ Ϭ͘ϴϵ ϭϵϱϴ ͬ ϮϬϬϯ ͬ 44 32% Ϭ͘ϳϯ ͬ ϵϳ 274 tĂŝƉĂŚƻ ůĞŵĞŶƚĂƌLJ ;<ͲϲͿ ϭϬϯϵ ͬ ϵϵϬ / -5% 1202 212 0.82 ϭϵϱϱ ͬ ϮϬϭϰ ͬ 40 44% 0.71 / 108 Ϯϳϲ ,ŽŶŽǁĂŝ ůĞŵĞŶƚĂƌLJ ;<ͲϲͿ ϲϱϵ ͬ ϲϮϴ / -5% ϳϵϬ ϭϲϮ Ϭ͘ϳϵ ϭϵϲϴ ͬ ϭϵϲϴ ͬ ϰϵ ϵϲй 0.57 / 225 287 <ĂůĞŝ॒ƃƉƵ॒Ƶ ůĞŵĞŶƚĂƌLJ ;<ͲϲͿ 848 / 844 / 0% ϵϳϳ 133 Ϭ͘ϴϲ ϭϵϴϵ ͬ ϭϵϵϳ ͬ 27 2% Ϭ͘ϲϱ ͬ 148 ϮϵϬ Waikele ůĞŵĞŶƚĂƌLJ ;<ͲϲͿ ϱϵϳ ͬ ϱϵϰ / -1% ϲϰϵ 55 Ϭ͘ϵϮ ϭϵϵϴ ͬ ϭϵϵϴ ͬ 20 0% Ϭ͘ϳϯ ͬ ϵϰ 7,948 8,447 499 0.94 36% 0.72 TOTAL Another issue is temperature. A lot of the main buildings don’t have AC and it gets really hot. It distracts students from learning because they focus on being hot. - Student I only have 5 mins of passing period. Teachers have to give up class time for students to get to class. Hallways are not wide. If you go off hallways, you drag dirt into classrooms, which makes a hassle for our teachers and custodians. - Student In the future, there should be more time to walk to class, wider hallways, more cement, or grass compared to dirt and mud. - Student Challenges: Ch • Family consumer science less than 50% of standard space: Waipahu HS, Waipahu IS • Library less than 50% of standard space: +RQRZDL ES • Cafeteria less than 50% of standard space: Waipahu HS • +RQRZDL ES buildings are old or beyond expected life • Capacity under-utilization at +RQRZDL ES • 0XVLF GDQFH DQG GUDPD OHVV WKDQ 50% of standard space: Waipahu HS, Waipahu IS • No music rooms at +RQRZDL ES and .DOHLRSXX ES • /RFNHU VKRZHU JHQGHU HTXLW\ Waipahu HS • Resurface courts, training room • Admin less than 50% of standard space: 0DLOL ES • Support for medically fragile students Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 228 Waipahu Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS SCENARIOS 1A Keep current operational scenario $$$$$ • 1B (no alternative scenario) $$$$$ $OO VFKRROV FRQWLQXH WR RSHUDWH ZLWKLQ VDPH JUDGH configurations and on same campuses Benefits • Benefits No changes to implement Challenges Stakeholder Voice Challenges մմմմմ Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ Recommendation • No operational changes recommended Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 229 Waipahu Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS FACILITY OPTIONS 2.1 2.2 Waipahu HS 18-classrooms (Phase 1) • • Challenges • Provides accessible space for population of high incident and medically fragile students • Provides adequate space for enrollment and specialty programs • Enhances current programs • ADA compliance • )LQGLQJ QHZ ORFDWLRQ IRU SOD\ FRXUWV • Electricity cost for additions that need aircon Waipahu HS 10-classrooms and parking expansion (Phase 2) • • • 2.3 Phase 1 construction of 18 specialty classrooms building Already funded Benefits Cost/ROM Range $$$$$ $$$$$ Phase 2 construction of 8-10 classrooms building (consider including special education space for high incidence and medically-fragile students) &RQVWUXFW QHZ H[SDQVLRQ WR SDUNLQJ ORW Project is designed $20- 0 Waipahu HS parking structure $$$$$ $2.5- 0 3 4 Waipahu HS athletic improvements • • &RQVWUXFW QHZ ORFNHU URRP WR DFFRPPRGDWH 7LWOH ,; &RQVWUXFW QHZ ZHLJKW URRP Waipahu HS new cafeteria • &RQVWUXFW QHZ PXOWL-purpose, multi-OHYHO FDIHWHULD ZLWK VWDJH WKDW RYHUORRNV Pearl Harbor 5 Waipahu HS parking lot expansion 6 Waipahu HS program-specific building additions 7 • • • • • • • • &RQVWUXFW QHZ H[SDQVLRQ WR SDUNLQJ ORW Included in Option 2.2 &RQVWUXFW QHZ EXLOGLQJ IRU $(& &RQVWUXFW VSDFH IRU HGXFDWLRQ DFDGHP\ ZLWK 3. LQVWUXFWLRQ Construct space for adult education center Construct health center &RQVWUXFW ODZ DQG MXVWLFH FHQWHU ZLWK PRFN FRXUW Construct arts and community center building Waipahu HS integrated academy digital signage • Install jumbotron • Provides some athletic facility equity • Losing facilities during renovations • 8SJUDGHV HTXLSPHQW DQG IDFLOLW\ IRU JURZLQJ sports program • Improves athletic performance • Provides adequate dining space for enrollment • Provides conduit to education of local history by having Pearl Harbor in background • $OORZV URRP IRU VWXGHQW SHUIRUPDQFHV • Providing lunch service during FRQVWUXFWLRQ RI QHZ FDIp RI H[LVWLQJ site • Duration of construction • Relocating classes/clubs during construction • Provides adequate parking for staff parents, and community • 3URYLGHV IDFLOLWLHV WR DOORZ IRU SURJUDP creation and expansion $$$$$ $2.5- 0 $$$$$ $2.5- 0 $$$$$ Funding Category Priority Tier ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #1 n/a ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #1 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #1 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #6 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #4 2 ‫ڝ‬ n/a ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #5 • Available space on site $$$$$ $40- 0 • Opportunity to generate revenue through community advertisements Stakeholder Voice • Legality • Equity optics $$$$$ $500k- 0 ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #3 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - last 3 ‫ژ‬ Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 230 Waipahu Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS FACILITY OPTIONS 8 9.1 Waipahu IS site DREAMS facility • • • • • • • • • Building additions and renovations (elementary schools) • • • • • 9.2 10 )ROORZ WKURXJK ZLWK FRQVWUXFWLRQ RI VHYHQ FODVVURRP VFLHQFH EXLOGLQJ Upgrade air conditioning system to split controls for medically fragile students Expand parking areas and redesign drop-off lanes to accommodate more traffic 0RGLI\ SHGHVWULDQ EULGJH WR VWUHHW Develop back of site for athletic fields or space Expand basketball courts Construct joint-use public youth center Air cond. for all classes in all spaces Parking turnaround to decrease traffic $XJXVW $KUHQV (6 5HSODFH SRUWDEOHV ZLWK SHUPDQHQW EXLOGLQJ ZLWK PRGHUQ IOH[LEOH FODVVURRPV /RFDWH VSHFLDO HGXFDWLRQ FODVVURRPV QHDU GULYHZD\ )ROORZ WKURXJK ZLWK FRQVWUXFWLRQ RI H[LVWLQJ GHVLJQV IROORZ WKURXJK ZLWK IXQGHG SKDVH DQG RI XSJUDGH WR electrical infrastructure +RQRZDL ES: Upgrade electrical infrastructure; repair roofs on buildings H & D; install security lighting on entire campus .DOHLRSXX ES: Fund permanent 8-FODVVURRP SHUPDQHQW EXLOGLQJ IRU 67($0 VSHFLDO HGXFDWLRQ WHDFKHU FROODERUDWLRQ IROORZ WKURXJK ZLWK IXQGHG GHVLJQ RI FDIHWHULD H[WHQVLRQ DQG LQFOXGH LQGRRU RXWGRRU IXQFWLRQ ZLWK VWDJH and full service kitchen )ROORZ WKURXJK ZLWK IXQGLQJ construction of cafeteria; upgrade electrical infrastructure; install A/C to main buildings currently ZLWKRXW LW FRYHUHG ZDONZD\V YDULRXV , construct emergency evacuation path from back of school to Hoaeae SDUN UHQRYDWH %XLOGLQJ * ILUH GRRU ZDONZD\ DQG VWDLUV Land acquired for parking. Waikele ES: Install security lighting on entire campus; renovate and modernize library; replace SRUWDEOHV ZLWK SHUPDQHQW 67($0 EXLOGLQJ Waipahu ES: Install security lighting on entire campus; relocate or raze portable 1 for space to expand kitchen and cafeteria; replace portables 10- ZLWK SHUPDQHQW 67($0 DQG PXOWLSXUSRVH SURMHFW EDVHG OHDUQLQJ VSDFHV ZLWK FDSDFLW\ IRU RQ HLWKHU VLGH RI :DLSDKX 6WUHHW H[SDQG SDUNLQJ ORW E\ SDUWQHULQJ ZLWK &LW\ WR XVH DGMDFHQW JUDYHO ORW land acquired for parking Benefits Challenges • • • • Addresses facility deficiencies and improves equity at middle grades Opportunity for public partnership for multi-use youth center Provides modern high tech building $$$$$ $20- 0 • • • • Addresses facility deficiencies and improves equity at elementary schools Health and safety Provides alternative emergency evacuation path Provides for more time efficient lunch periods • • • $$$$$ $40- 0 $$$$$ $2.5- 0 • Safety, code, and repairs, include electrical upgrades and safety lighting at all schools Addresses top-priority needs at each school $$$$$ $7.5- 0 11 Locally-determined enhancements (all schools) • • Budget allotment for each school to fund stakeholder-driven projects (PSRZHUV VFKRROV DQG VWXGHQWV WR define projects at time of execution • Requires policy to consistently allocate and implement projects $$$$$ $500k- 0 12 STEAM renovations (elementary schools) • Funding Category Priority Tier ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ Int - #1 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #1 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #1 2 ‫ڝ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS/Int/ES - #2 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS/Int/ES #7/3/4 4 ‫ڜ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #3 1 ‫ڗ‬ Using part of school grounds to FUHDWH DGGLWLRQDO SDWKZD\ 6XIILFLHQW FDIp VWDII RQ VLWH &RYHUHG ZDONZD\V IRU DOO FDPSXVHV LQFOXGLQJ WR FDIHWHULDV Confirm sites other than Waipahi ES and .DOHLRSXX ES Prioritized repairs and maintenance (all schools) Stakeholder Voice Changing light signal to accommodate left turn signal Building multi-purpose outdoor covered facility • • Cost/ROM Range Enhances science and arts instruction • 5HQRYDWH FRQVWUXFW QHZ 67($0 FODVVURRPV DW DOO HOHPHQWDU\ VFKRROV ZLWKRXW WKHP $$$$$ $2.5- 0 Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 231 Waipahu Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS FACILITY OPTIONS 13 Benefits Challenges Electrical capacity (all schools) Cost/ROM Range $$$$$ $20- 0 14 Waipahu HS land use partnership $$$$$ $500k- 0 Stakeholder Voice Funding Category Priority Tier ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #1 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #1 1 ‫ڗ‬ Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 232 233 APPENDIX I Central Hawaii Options Reports Central Hawaii District Overview District-wide Options (Priority 1): Priority 1 Priority 2 Aiea Leilehua Mililani • Option 2: Aiea HS health careers and community clinic center ($$) • Option 5: Aiea HS girls’ lockers and gym renovation ($$) • Option 8: Aiea IS site covered play court ($$$) • Option 11: Building additions and renovations (elementary schools) ($$$$) • Option 12: Alvah Scott ES improved vehicular traffic ($$) • Option 13: Prioritized repairs and maintenance (all schools) ($$) • Option 18: Aiea HS ADA accessibility upgrades ($$) • Scenario 1A: Keep current operational scenario • Option 2: Leilehua HS project-based learning spaces, STEAM and professional centers ($$$) • Option 4: Wahiawa MS project-based learning spaces & professional centers • Option 8: Covered multi-purpose play court (various schools) ($$$) • Option 9: Building additions and UHQRYDWLRQV YDULRXV VFKRROV • Option 10: Kaala ES parking and drop-off DUHD • Option 12: Prioritized repairs and PDLQWHQDQFH DOO VFKRROV • Option 14: Leilehua HS campus road UHSDYLQJ • Option 18: Leilehua +6 VLWH GUDLQDJH • Scenario 1A: Mililani HS master-planned multi-VWRU\ DGGLWLRQV RQ FXUUHQW VLWH • Option 3: Mililani HS visual and SHUIRUPLQJ DUWV FHQWHU SODQQHG • Option 6: Mililani MS classroom additions QHW ILYH DGGLWLRQDO FODVVURRPV • Option 7: Mililani MS covered multiSXUSRVH DPSKLWKHDWHU • Option 8: Replace portables and outdated buildings (various schools) • Option 10: Mililani Mauka ES covered SOD\ FRXUW SODQQHG • Option 11: Mililani Waena ES phased UHFRQVWUXFWLRQ • Option 13: Prioritized repairs and PDLQWHQDQFH DOO VFKRROV • Option 22: Mililani HS administration expansion and recapture classrooms • Option 23: Mililani HS covered walkways DQG VHFXULW\ IHQFLQJ DURXQG SXEOLF • 2SWLRQ 0LOLODQL +6 JLUOV¶ ORFNHUV • Scenario 1A: Keep current operational scenario • Option 2: Moanalua HS Special Education and ADA enhancements ($) • Option 5: Moanalua HS shade structure in courtyard ($) • Option 8: Moanalua IS new instructional music space ($) • Option 9: Covered multi-purpose play court (elementary schools) ($$$) • Option 10: Building additions and renovations (various schools) ($$$$) • Option 11: Salt Lake ES classroom partitions to add capacity ($$) • Option 13: Prioritized repairs and maintenance (all schools) ($$) • Option 16: Salt Lake ES electrical upgrade ($$) • Scenario 1B: Change elementary attendance boundaries • Option 2.2: Radford HS athletic upgrades gym structural slab repairs ($$) • Option 4: Radford HS ADA and electrical upgrades ($$) • Option 5: Radford HS band room/music addition ($$$) • Option 9: Aliamanu MS phased reconstruction ($$$$) • Option 10: Electrical system upgrades (all schools) ($$$) • Option 12: Building additions and renovations (elementary schools) ($$$$) • Option 13: Expanded parking lot and improved drop-off (various schools) ($$) • Option 14: ADA accessibility improvements (various schools) ($) • Option 18: Pearl Harbor Kai ES site drainage ($) • Option 19: Prioritized repairs and maintenance (all schools) ($$) • Option 21: Radford HS expand admin and relocate health to first floor ($$) • Scenario 1A: Haleiwa ES minor renovations • Option 4: Waialua HS and IS music arts facility ($$$) • Option 7: Waialua ES flexible makerspaces ($$) • Option 8: Haleiwa ES STEAM classrooms ($) • Option 9: Prioritized repairs and maintenance (all schools) ($$) • Option 4: Aiea HS Special Education enhancements ($) • Option 6: Aiea IS Special Education and flexible STEAM spaces ($$$) • Option 10: Flexible project-based STEAM classrooms (elementary schools) ($$) • Option 6: Wheeler MS/Wheeler ES covered play court ($$) • Option 4.1: Mililani MS Special Education HQKDQFHPHQWV • Option 15: Mililani HS air conditioning • Option 21: Mililani HS electrical upgrades • Option 4: Moanalua HS Career Technical Education renovations/additions ($$$) • Option 7: Moanalua IS covered play court ($$) • Option 15: Moanalua complex-wide parking additions ($$$) • Option 3: Radford HS 21st century learning environments ($$$) • Option 6: Radford HS science labs ($$) • Option 7: Aliamanu MS covered play court ($$) • Option 11: Flexible project-based STEAM classrooms (elementary schools) ($$) • Option 15: Covered multi-purpose play court (elementary schools) ($$$) • Option 2: Waialua HS and IS site drainage ($$$) • Option 6: Waialua ES new multi-purpose cafeteria and administration center ($$$) • Option 14: Locally-determined enhancements (all schools) ($) • Option 13: Locally-determined HQKDQFHPHQWV DOO VFKRROV • Option 15; Leilehua HS install air FRQGLWLRQLQJ • Option 17: Leilehua HS cafeteria H[SDQVLRQ • Option 12: Mililani Uka ES improved student drop-RII • Option 14: Locally-determined HQKDQFHPHQWV DOO VFKRROV • 2SWLRQ 0LOLODQL +6 VLWH GUDLQDJH • 2SWLRQ 0LOLODQL +6 VRIWEDOO EOHDFKHUV • Option 6: Moanalua HS girls’ athletic lockers ($$) • Option 14: Locally-determined enhancements (all schools) ($) • Option 20: Locally-determined enhancements (all schools) ($) • Option 3: Waialua HS and IS new 21st century classroom building ($$$) • Option 10: Locally-determined enhancements (all schools) ($) • Scenario 1B: Central District administration offices and STEAM education and professional development center at Aiea ES ($$$) • Option 7: Aiea IS outdoor project-based learning venue ($$$) • Option 15: Aiea HS parking addition ($$) • Option 16: Aiea HS outdoor projectbased learning venue ($$) • Option 3: Leilehua HS new professional OHDUQLQJ FHQWHU • Option 5: Wheeler MS/Wheeler ES new music facilities ($$$) • Option 9: Kipapa ES covered multiSXUSRVH DPSKLWKHDWHU • 2SWLRQ 1HZ SDLQW DW DOO VFKRROV • 2SWLRQ 0LOLODQL +6 QHZ J\P • Option 25: Mililani HS maintenance IDFLOLWLHV • Option 27: Mililani HS interior and exterior painting ($$) • Option 3: Moanalua HS new classroom building ($$$) • Option 12: Salt Lake ES construct new, multi-level classroom building ($$$) • Option 2.1: Radford HS athletic upgrades ($$) • Option 17: Makalapa ES air conditioning ($) • Option 5: Waialua HS and IS Special Education enhancements ($$) • Option 19: Leilehua HS athletic storage ($$) • Option 4.2: Mililani HS Special Education HQKDQFHPHQWV • Option 5: Mililani HS, Mililani MS professional learning center ($$) Priority 3 Priority 4 Priority 5 Option TR: Transportation solution to support innovation and partnerships between schools ($$) Option DL: Distance learning infrastructure ($$) Moanalua Radford Waialua Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 235 Aiea Complex DATA and NEEDS Stakeholder Voice: Enrollment and Facility Data: School (a) 2017-18/ 2023-24 Enrollment (b) Capacity (c) = (b) - (a) (d) = (a) / (b) Oldest / Projected 2023-24 Newest / Avg Capacity Projected Building Surplus Utilization % Old or Beyond Expected Life Adequacy Score / Rank KƵƚ ŽĨ ϮϲϬ 202 ॒ ŝĞĂ ,ŝŐŚ ;ϵͲϭϮͿ ϵϵϳ ͬ ϵϱϮ ͬ Ͳϱй 1041 ϴϵ Ϭ͘ϵϭ ϭϵϲϭ ͬ ϮϬϬϬ ͬ ϰϵ 73% Ϭ͘ϴϯ ͬ ϭϵ 201 ॒ ŝĞĂ /ŶƚĞƌŵĞĚŝĂƚĞ ϱϴϴ ͬ ϱϮϮ (7-8) / -11% 788 Ϯϲϲ Ϭ͘ϲϲ ϭϵϲϰ ͬ ϭϵϲϵ ͬ ϱϮ 87% Ϭ͘ϳϵ ͬ ϰϲ 200 ॒ ŝĞĂ ůĞŵĞŶƚĂƌLJ ;<ͲϲͿ ϯϱϰ ͬ ϯϭϵ / -10% ϰϭϲ ϵϳ 0.77 ϭϵϯϱ ͬ ϭϵϲϳ ͬ ϱϲ 100% Ϭ͘ϲϲ ͬ 141 227 Alvah Scott ůĞŵĞŶƚĂƌLJ ;<ͲϲͿ ϱϬϮ ͬ ϰϵϮ / -2% ϲϳϱ 183 0.73 ϭϵϱϱ ͬ ϭϵϱϴ ͬ ϲϮ 100% Ϭ͘ϲϰ ͬ ϭϱϵ 233 Waimalu ůĞŵĞŶƚĂƌLJ ;<ͲϲͿ ϰϮϲ ͬ ϯϳϵ / -11% ϱϳϴ ϭϵϵ Ϭ͘ϲϲ ϭϵϲϭ ͬ ϭϵϴϵ ͬ ϱϯ ϴϵй Ϭ͘ϲϰ ͬ ϭϲϬ Ϯϯϱ Webling ůĞŵĞŶƚĂƌLJ ;<ͲϲͿ ϰϳϵ ͬ ϰϳϲ / -1% ϱϰϬ ϲϰ 0.88 ϭϵϲϳ ͬ ϭϵϳϮ ͬ 48 74% Ϭ͘ϱϵ ͬ 214 243 Pearl Ridge ůĞŵĞŶƚĂƌLJ ;<ͲϲͿ ϱϯϰ ͬ ϰϵϮ / -8% ϱϲϯ 71 0.87 ϭϵϳϮ ͬ ϮϬϬϬ ͬ ϯϵ 8% Ϭ͘ϱϵ ͬ 210 3,632 4,601 969 0.79 76% 0.68 TOTAL We have the vision, just not the funding. - Student I want to see more investments in Health Services. We only have one teacher that teaches it all, one classroom and one teacher. More students are interested but we are crammed into one small room. - Student Our facilities are old. As they were doing construction on our roofs, the top floors got flooded. Now classes are all over the place. I wish we had AC. When it rains, we can’t get anywhere without getting wet. It’s stuff like that hurts our learning environment. - Student A program that needs improved facilities is the CTE Industrial Engineering pathway. Our tech coordinator is pushing for computer science but we don’t have the spaces to support these technologies. If we have the facilities, these programs will be more popular. I’m interested in CAD and 3D modeling. One way to build interest is with experience and exposure. - Student Challenges: Ch • Industrial Arts less than 50% of standard space: Aiea HS and Aiea IS • Library less than 50% of standard space: Webling ES • No science rooms at elementary schools • Cafeteria less than 50% of standard space: Pearl Ridge ES, Webling ES, Aiea ES • More than half of facilities are classified as old or beyond useful life • No dedicated art or music rooms at elementary schools • Admin less than 50% of standard space: Webling ES • Aiea IS, Aiea ES, Alva Scott ES, and Waimalu ES have under-utilized capacity • Girls’ lockers • Waimalu ES 251 of 575 (44%) students GE out or attend charter Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 236 Aiea Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS SCENARIOS 1A Central District administration offices at current locations 1B Central District administration offices and STEAM education and professional development center at Aiea ES $$$$$ $$$$$ • Continue leasing office space and operating in converted spaces at various school locations across Central District • • • • • Benefits Benefits • • No changes to implement $20-40M • • • • Provides state-of-the-art state-off the-art science and art space for area-wide project-based learning Provides space for other district-wide needs that can be centralized to maximize resources (current space is leased yearly) Opportunity to collaborate with potential Aloha Stadium development Provides professional space for teacher collaboration Recaptures classroom space at schools for educational use Challenges Challenges • • Expense of leased office space Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ ‫ ڜ‬Priority 4 Maintain Aiea ES operations Raze Buildings H and I Repurpose part of the available site for districtwide STEAM center, community use with health services, special education center, and district/complex administration and professional learning center Design within context of stadium re-development Consider potential long-term enrollment Reconfiguring the site for district and school joint use Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ Recommendation • Seize the opportunity of neighboring stadium redevelopment to create a large, multi-purpose meeting and instruction space that serves local school and District needs, while being a part of a larger area redevelopment project Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 237 Aiea Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS FACILITY OPTIONS 2 3 Aiea HS health careers and community clinic center • Renovate first floor of Building Q for health clinic/program • Possible partnership with Veterans Administration facility • Include Option 3 21st century classroom conversion Aiea HS 21st century classroom conversion • Move third floor district offices in Building Q to Moanalua or Radford if possible or to a location TBD and renovate into library • Demolish existing library and replace with multi-level STEAM classrooms • Expand parking into existing library site • Included in Option 2 4 Aiea HS Special Education enhancements 5 Aiea HS girls’ lockers and gym renovation 6 7 • Renovate Special Education space with life skills training equipment • Renovate locker rooms for girls’ program, per Athletic Master Plan • Designed but not funded for construction • Include Option 17 Benefits Challenges • Space for medical CTE program • Improves community access to healthcare • Provides modern collaborative educational spaces • Adjacent to parking • Helps to enhance academies • More accessibility to health clinic Cost/ROM Range $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M • Construction during school hours is a disruption to learning • Provides adequately equipped space for special education • Title IX equity in locker room space • Addresses an existing priority $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M $$$$$ $500k-2.5M $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M • Install new plumbing and renovate first floor of Building A for two flexible classrooms and special education • Helps school with its move towards project-based learning and STEAM Balloon Blow Constellation • Provides modern, flexible project spaces Aiea IS outdoor project-based learning venue • Provides modern, flexible project spaces $$$$$ Aiea IS Special Education and flexible STEAM spaces • Construct covered courtyard in Building D with garage door enclosures and electrical upgrades to be used as project-based learning space $$$$$ $20-40M $20-40M 8 Aiea IS site covered play court • Construct multi-purpose covered play court • Provides flexible-use outdoor space during high heat and inclement weather $$$$$ 9 Aiea IS performing arts stage • Enhances VPS program $$$$$ 10 • Follow through with existing stage project • Project fully funded Flexible project-based STEAM classrooms (elementary schools) • $20-40M $20-40M • Modern, flexible educational spaces Renovate and/or construct one to two new multi-purpose flexible educational spaces for STEAM at all area elementary schools $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M Stakeholder Voice Funding Category ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #1 tie Priority Tier 1 ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #1 tie ‫ڗ‬ n/a ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #7 2 ‫ڝ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #3 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ Int - #1 2 ‫ڝ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #2 4 ‫ڜ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ Int - #3 tie 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ Int - #2 n/a ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #2 2 Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 238 ‫ڝ‬ Aiea Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS FACILITY OPTIONS 11 Building additions and renovations (elementary schools) • Alva Scott – phased major renovations to classroom buildings • Pearl Ridge – expand cafeteria and replace # portables with new flexible classroom building OR replace # portables with new cafeteria and convert cafeteria into flexible classroom space • Waimalu – replace # portables with multi-level permanent capacity for 150 and multi-purpose covered play court, and convert six classrooms in Building A with multi-purpose and special education space • Webling – demolish and reconstruct library to include flexible STEAM classrooms 12 Alvah Scott ES improved vehicular traffic • Develop solution with adjacent property owners to use Heleconia Place for site egress 13 Prioritized repairs and maintenance (all schools) 14 Locally-determined enhancements (all schools) 15 Aiea HS parking addition 16 17 18 • Safety, code, and maintenance repairs • Budget allotment for each school to fund stakeholder-driven projects • Construct additional parking lot in place of existing library when building 21st century additions Aiea HS outdoor project-based learning venue • Construct outdoor collaborative performing venue on under-used front hill adjacent to Building A Benefits Challenges Priority Tier ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS/ES - #2/3 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #1 1 ‫ڗ‬ 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #14/6/4 3 ‫ژ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #8 tie 4 ‫ڜ‬ $2.5-7.5M ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #8 tie 4 ‫ڜ‬ $$$$$ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #5 $$$$$ $40-75M • Alleviates traffic issues during morning drop-off and afternoon pick-up $2.5-7.5M • Addresses top-priority needs at each school $$$$$ • Empowers schools and students to define projects at time of execution $$$$$ $7.5-20M • Requires policy to consistently allocate and implement projects • Provides parking for students and staff • Provides modern collaborative educational spaces for performing arts • Provides performance space for community use Include in Option 5 Designed but not funded for construction Aiea HS ADA accessibility upgrades Funding Category • Addresses facility deficiencies and improves equity at elementary schools Aiea HS sports facilities renovations • • Cost/ROM Stakeholder Range Voice • Provides accessibility to all students, staff, and community members $$$$$ $500k-2.5M $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M $$$$$ $$$$$ $500k-2.5M n/a ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ Int - #3 tie 1 Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 239 ‫ڗ‬ Moanalua Complex DATA and NEEDS Stakeholder Voice: Enrollment and Facility Data: School (a) 2017-18/ 2023-24 Enrollment (b) Capacity (c) = (b) - (a) (d) = (a) / (b) Oldest / Projected 2023-24 Newest / Avg Capacity Projected Building Surplus Utilization % Old or Beyond Expected Life Adequacy Score / Rank Out of 260 218 Moanalua High (9- 1942 / 12) 1975 / 2% 1646 -329 1.20 1972 / 2015 / 38 4% 0.81 / 36 219 Moanalua Middle (7-8) 823 / 746 / -9% 665 -81 1.12 1968 / 1976 / 48 70% 0.75 / 83 217 Moanalua Elementary (K-6) 639 / 736 / 15% 663 -73 1.11 1961 / 1971 / 53 86% 0.60 / 206 225 Red Hill Elementary (K-6) 468 / 497 / 6% 510 13 0.97 1969 / 1974 / 47 2% 0.62 / 174 228 Shafter Elementary (K-6) 474 / 482 / 2% 391 -91 1.23 1966 / 1968 / 51 100% 0.54 / 236 239 Salt Lake Elementary (K-6) 742 / 749 / 1% 633 -116 1.18 1970 / 2010 / 44 0% 0.63 / 172 5,185 4,508 -677 1.15 44% 0.66 TOTAL We need to trickle down these programs and give elementary school students exposure to explore these fields prior to high school. We get so bogged down with the math and reading, math and reading that we don’t let them see the fun stuff. The kids are losing out. - Parent Health services pathway can be improved. We go into textbook stuff because we don’t have the space to work on hands-on activities and gain clinical practices. The kitchen space is also limited, classroom sizes are small because the kitchen is small. - Student We need to not get caught up with what’s trending. We have to look beyond. All I’m hearing right now is CTE, CTE, CTE, but we need to think broader. We need to think of stuff like agriculture and manufacturing. Not all students are going to be pursuing computer careers. - Teacher Challenges: Ch • Up to 15% enrollment growth projected at elementary schools • Family consumer space less than 50% of standard: Moanalua HS • Industrial arts space less than 50% of standard: Moanalua MS • No science rooms at elementary schools • Library less than 50% of standard space: Shafter ES, Moanlua ES, Moanalua MS • Cafe less than 50% of standard space: Red Hill ES, Shafter ES • Half of facilities are classified as old or beyond useful life • No music facilities at two of four elementary schools • Admin less than 50% of standard space: Shafter ES, Moanlua ES, Moanalua MS • All schools have at least one core space that is less than 50% of required based on enrollments • Athletic lockers less than 50% of required space • Space for community partners Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 240 Moanalua Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS SCENARIOS 1A Keep current operational scenario $$$$$ • ‫ڗ‬ Priority 1 1B (no alternative scenario) $$$$$ All schools continue to operate as currently configured Benefits • Benefits No changes to implement Challenges Stakeholder Voice Challenges մմմմմ Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 241 Moanalua Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS FACILITY OPTIONS 2 3 Moanalua HS special education and ADA enhancements • • Renovate two classrooms for self-contained special education with life skills equipment Upgrade or replace ADA accessibility/elevator Moanalua HS new classroom building • Construct new classroom building for 300 students, to include STEAM classroom environments 4 Moanalua HS Career Technical Education renovations/additions 5 Moanalua HS shade structure in courtyard 6 Moanalua HS girls’ athletic lockers 7 Moanalua IS covered play court 8 Moanalua IS new instructional music space 9 Covered multi-purpose play court (elementary schools) 10 • • • Requires coordination with county or development of wooded area on site • Construct new music building near Building K Building additions and renovations (various schools) • • • Moanalua ES: replace portables P1-P5 with new multi-level multi-media center and 12 classroom building including two flexible STEAM classrooms. Repurpose library for professional learning center. Red Hill ES: replace portables P1 and P2 with new flexible STEAM classrooms and professional learning center in courtyard near Building B Salt Lake ES: renovate kitchen into a cooking kitchen Shafter ES: construct multi-purpose STEAM classrooms above cafeteria (if school is not replaced on nearby site by DoD) Salt Lake ES classroom partitions to add capacity • • 12 Consider trees in lieu of built structure • Construct new girls’ locker shower facility per Athletic Master Plan • 11 Convert/convert spaces to enhance CTE programs like health, graphics, and culinary Follow through with classroom renovations to add partitions to ‘open concept’ learning spaces for net gain of ### capacity Ongoing project Salt Lake ES construct new, multi-level classroom building • ## additional capacity. Consider expansion into library or into adjacent slope. Benefits Challenges • Improves special education and accessibility compliance • Provides modern, flexible education space • Alleviates overcrowding Cost/ROM Range $$$$$ $500k-2.5M • Cost could be avoided by restricting GEs to current capacity • Provides modern, flexible special education spaces for Career Technical instruction • Provides covered multi-purpose use space during inclement weather • Improves facility deficiency and improve gender equity • Provides covered multi-purpose use space during inclement weather • Provides modern, flexible educational space for music program enhancement • Provides covered outdoor multipurpose space • Addresses facility deficiencies and improves equity at elementary schools • Better utilization of land • Allows for professional development in Central District • Saves money from transporting food by creating a kitchen at Salt Lake ES • Provides additional capacity by activating hard-to-use spaces $$$$$ $20-40M $$$$$ $20-40M $$$$$ $500k-2.5M $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M $$$$$ $500k-2.5M $$$$$ $20-40M $$$$$ $40-75M $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M • Modern, flexible classroom space • Relieves over-crowding $$$$$ $20-40M Stakeholder Voice Funding Category Priority Tier ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #2 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS – #4 4 ‫ڜ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #1 2 ‫ڝ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS – last 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #5 3 ‫ژ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ Int - #1 2 ‫ڝ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ Int - #4 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES – #3 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #1 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES – #4 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #2 4 ‫ڜ‬ Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 242 Moanalua Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS FACILITY OPTIONS 13 14 15 16 Prioritized repairs and maintenance (all schools) • Safety, code, and repairs, e.g., Red Hill ES window louver sealing and roof repairs, Shafter flood control Locally-determined enhancements (all schools) • Budget allotment for each school to fund stakeholder-driven projects, e.g., Red Hill safety fence Moanalua complex-wide parking additions • Construct new or additional parking at each school site where needed Benefits Challenges • Address top-priority needs at each school • Saves on additional operational cost (i.e., bussing, use of another facility) • Safety for students • Eliminates interruption in instructional time • Cost prioritization in regard to other needs • Empowers schools and students to define projects at time of execution • Requires policy to consistently allocate and implement projects • Solves major parking issues • Encourages more community involvement • Existing plans for construction of auditorium at HS requires more parking • Facilitates the attraction of more events at HS to bring in additional revenue • Available land • Increased traffic $$$$$ $7.5-20M Salt Lake ES electrical upgrade • Cost Partially-funded project $$$$$ $500k-2.5M $$$$$ $20-40M Stakeholder Voice Funding Category Priority Tier ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS/Int/ES – #6/2/5 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS/Int/ES #7/3/6 3 ‫ژ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS – #3/5/7 2 ‫ڝ‬ 1 ‫ڗ‬ $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 243 Radford Complex DATA and NEEDS Stakeholder Voice: Enrollment and Facility Data: School (a) 2017-18/ 2023-24 Enrollment (b) Capacity (c) = (b) - (a) (d) = (a) / (b) Oldest / Projected 2023-24 Newest / Avg Capacity Projected Building Surplus Utilization % Old or Beyond Expected Life Adequacy Score / Rank Out of 260 224 Radford High (912) 1275 / 1214 / 5% 1302 88 0.93 1956 / 2010 / 55 88% 0.74 / 89 204 ůŝĂŵĂŶƵ DŝĚĚůĞ (7-8) 714 / 563 / -21% 915 352 0.62 1959 / 1962 / 58 100% 0.80 / 42 203 ůŝĂŵĂŶƵ Elementary (K-6) 594 / 528 / -11% 802 274 0.66 1958 / 2013 / 52 81% 0.61 / 194 209 Hickam Elementary (K-6) 588 / 716 / 22% 511 -205 1.40 1950 / 1965 / 61 94% 0.55 / 232 215 DĂŬĂůĂƉĂ Elementary (K-6) 606 / 505 / -17% 533 28 0.95 1971 / 1973 / 45 5% 0.69 / 115 220 DŽŬƵůĞůĞ Elementary (K-6) 314 / 287 / -9% 498 211 0.58 1960 / 1996 / 51 86% 0.67 / 127 221 Nimitz Elementary 706 / 698 (K-6) / -1% 614 -84 1.14 1954 / 1954 / 64 100% 0.61 / 192 222 Pearl Harbor Elementary (K-6) 586 / 530 / -10% 590 60 0.90 1956 / 1993 / 61 96% 0.62 / 177 223 Pearl Harbor Kai Elementary (K-6) 460 / 408 / -11% 566 158 0.72 1900 / 1968 / 65 100% 0.69 / 116 5,449 6,331 882 0.86 83% 0.67 TOTAL Each and every student be provided with an optimal learning environment as well as have a school and facility that they can be proud of. - Administrator DOE schools have to accept that some graduates cannot pursue 4-year degrees because college is cost prohibitive. They have to create curricula where students can aspire to work in less professional but still have very worthy and notable careers in the trade industries. - Administrator This would be awesome if curriculum could be structured to focus on careers, professions that these organizations welcome/have. This could inspire students and focus them into an area of study. - Administrator Challenges: Ch • -17% to 22%% enrollment change projected at elementary schools • Rapid enrollment decline at Aliamanu MS • Industrial arts and family consumer area less than 50% of standard space • Library less than 50% of standard space: Aliamanu MS and five of seven elementary schools • Moderate flood risk: 60% of site in extreme tsunami zone: Hickam ES • No science rooms at six of seven elementary schools • Kitchen or cafeteria less than 50% of required space at two elementary schools and middle school • Most facilities are classified as old or beyond useful life • Less than 50% of required music space at Radford HS • No dedicated art or music rooms at any of seven elementary schools • Admin less than 50% of standard space: Pearl Harbor ES, Hickham ES • 140% utilization at Hickham ES • Less than 50% of required athletic locker room at Radford HS • Space for community partners Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 244 Radford Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS SCENARIOS 1A Hickam ES and Nimitz ES new classroom buildings 1B Change elementary attendance boundaries $$$$$ $$$$$ • Re-plan sites and replace portable and/or permanent buildings with multi-story permanent classroom buildings to net add 10 classrooms at Hickam and four classrooms at Nimitz, with adjacent flexible STEAM, Special Education, and project-based learning spaces • Review attendance boundary lines to balance utilization at Hickam Mokulele ES, Nimitz ES, and Pearl Harbor Kai ES Include DoD/base in discussions for boundary and/or grade configurations • Benefits Benefits • • • • • • No operational changes to implement New facilities with 21st century updates Updated equipment for education of students Smaller class sizes State-of-the-art resources • • • • • • Balances utilization between Hickam Mokulele ES, Nimitz ES, and Pearl Harbor Kai ES Non capital solution to balance utilization More even distribution of students/funding Easier transition for students Walking distance to school Constant influx of new students More federal impact aid going to Title I schools (Makalapa ES, Pearl Harbor ES) Challenges Challenges • • • • • • • • • Cost and disruption of new construction when 442 projected surplus elementary capacity already exists within Radford complex Could create inequitable conditions within complex if other ES do not receive renovations Meeting projected enrollment Greater need for new buildings at other schools Hickham ES is in a tsunami and flood zone Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ ‫ ڗ‬Priority 1 Community support needed for boundary change Lack of free school bus transportation Geographic exception process Military housing population constantly changing Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ Recommendation • Avoid unnecessary capital expenses through a boundary change between neighboring elementary schools with sufficient capacity for area students Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 245 Radford Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS FACILITY OPTIONS 2.1 Radford HS athletic upgrades 2.2 Radford HS athletic upgrades gym structural slab repairs 3 4 5 6 Benefits Challenges • Improves PE and athletic program • Not identified in Statewide Athletic Master Plan • Construct cover for basketball court and expand weight room to 2nd floor Stakeholder Voice Funding Category Radford HS 21st century learning environments • Construct modern, flexible, STEAM, project-based learning spaces and professional learning centers between existing buildings as supports to existing classrooms ‫ڜ‬ 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS – #2 2 ‫ڝ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #1 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS – #4 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #3 2 ‫ڝ‬ $2.5-7.5M ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ MS - #3 2 ‫ڝ‬ $$$$$ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ MS - #2 ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #5 $$$$$ Radford HS ADA and electrical upgrades • Construct elevator to main building, upgrade electrical system capacity • Upgrade other needed areas for ADA compliancy Radford HS band room/music addition • Construct addition to band room by using portion of parking area near chorus room • Renovate and repurpose existing band room for art or as modern, multi-purpose, flexible space • Build performing arts complex Radford HS science labs • Follow through with planned media arts and science lab projects (media arts component is fully funded) • Include proper equipment and supplies for respective spaces Aliamanu MS covered play court 8 Aliamanu MS 21st century learning environments • Construct multi-purpose covered play court • Renovate and construct modern, flexible, STEAM, project-based learning spaces and professional learning centers between existing buildings as supports to existing classrooms • Included in Option 9 • Provides modern, flexible education space • Availability of adequate and • Provides covered multi-purpose use passionate teachers space during inclement weather • Facilitates use of 1:1 technology • ADA improvements • Completes existing projects for modern, flexible educational spaces $20-40M $$$$$ • Availability of adequate and passionate teachers $$$$$ $20-40M $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M • Provides covered multi-purpose use space during inclement weather • DOE construction regulations for covered play courts • Provides modern, flexible education space • Provides professional space for staff development, retention, and team planning • Re-plan site and implement phased building repair/replace project • Replaces outdated buildings at or beyond expected life 10 Electrical system upgrades (elementary ALL schools) • Facilitates use of 1:1 technology 11 Flexible project-based STEAM classrooms (elementary schools) Aliamanu MS phased reconstruction $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M • Provides modern, flexible education space • Available space • Provides specialized spaces for program enhancement • Extendeds disruption during construction • Upgrade electrical system capacity at all elementary schools $$$$$ $$$$$ $40-75M $$$$$ $20-40M • Modern, flexible educational spaces. • Renovate and/or construct one to two new multi-purpose flexible educational spaces for STEAM at all area elementary schools Priority Tier 4 $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M $2.5-7.5M 7 9 Cost/ROM Range $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M n/a ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ MS - #4 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS/MS - #3/1/1 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #5 2 ‫ڝ‬ Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 246 Radford Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS FACILITY OPTIONS 12 13 14 15 16 Building additions and renovations (elementary schools) • Aliamanu ES: Replace Buildings A and B with multi-story building with 21st century classrooms and new administrative and professional learning center. Replace portables, Buildings M1, M2, and old Admin with new parking lot and drop off • Hickam ES: Expand cafeteria and multi-purpose room for assembly and community use • Makalapa ES: Replace portables with multi-story preschool learning center, add primary classroom restrooms in Building I, and expand cafeteria into field as with indoor/outdoor multi-purpose space • Mokulele ES: Construct professional learning center space • Nimitz ES: Construct new library and STEAM space and renovate current library into classrooms • Pearl Harbor ES: Expand library to include flexible learning spaces • Pearl Harbor Kai ES: Expand library to include professional learning center • Incorporate Option 11 Expanded parking lot and improved drop-off (various schools) • Aliamanu MS: Construct parking and additional drop-off area in northwest corner of site (Aliamanu ES fully funded) • Makalapa ES: Reconfigure parking and drop-off lanes on north backside by cafeteria • Pearl Harbor ES: Expand teacher parking on north side of site with 30-40 stalls Challenges Cost/ROM Range ‫ڗ‬ • Alleviates some parking and traffic issues • Convenience and safety ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #6 tie 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #2 1 ‫ڗ‬ $20-40M ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #6 tie 2 ‫ڝ‬ $$$$$ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #4 $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M $$$$$ Covered multi-purpose play court (elementary schools) • Provides covered outdoor multipurpose space $$$$$ • Time shift of drop-off and pick-up times between Makalapa ES and Radford HS Makalapa ES air conditioning 18 Pearl Harbor Kai ES site drainage • Install air conditioning and photovoltaic panels • Requires completion of Option 10 • • Alleviates traffic issues • Facilitates health and wellbeing of HS students • Provides additional electrical capacity for technology needs • No-cost solution • Coordination of times between ES and HS • Convenience to parents that transport their kids • Bus/transportation timing and overlap with athletics and extracurriculars • Upgrading to modern electrical $$$$$ technology within confines of outdated structures $500k-2.5M • Addresses recurring flooding Follow through with planned site drainage project Prioritized repairs and maintenance (all schools) • Safety, code, and repairs, e.g., structural repairs at LHS Building Z, fire alarm, and mold remediation Priority Tier 1 $40-75M $500k-2.5M Makalapa ES time shift to mitigate traffic Funding Category ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #8 $$$$$ • Makes buildings accessible to all students • Complies with law • Construct covered multi-purpose facility for PE, assembly, dining, and educational use at all elementary schools Stakeholder Voice • Addresses facility deficiencies and improves equity at elementary schools • Requested at Hickam ES, Nimitz ES, and Pearl Harbor Kai ES ADA accessibility improvements (various schools) 17 19 Benefits $$$$$ $500k-2.5M • Addresses top-priority needs at each school $$$$$ $7.5-20M n/a ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #3 4 ‫ڜ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES – last 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS/MS/ES #6/6/9 1 ‫ڗ‬ Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 247 Radford Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS FACILITY OPTIONS 20 Locally-determined enhancements (all schools) 21 Radford HS expand admin and relocate health to first floor • Budget allotment for each school to fund stakeholder-driven projects, such as Iliahi sound dampening in multi-purpose room for ukulele program Benefits Challenges Cost/ROM Range • Empowers schools and students to define projects at time of execution • Requires policy to consistently $$$$$ allocate and implement projects $500k-2.5M Stakeholder Voice Funding Category ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS/MS/ES – #7/5/10 $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 248 Priority Tier 3 ‫ژ‬ 1 ‫ڗ‬ Leilehua Complex DATA and NEEDS Stakeholder Voice: Enrollment and Facility Data: School (a) 2017-18/ 2023-24 Enrollment (b) Capacity (c) = (b) - (a) (d) = (a) / (b) Oldest / Projected 2023-24 Newest / Avg Capacity Projected Building Surplus Utilization % Old or Beyond Expected Life Adequacy Score / Rank Out of 260 214 Leilehua High (912) 1683 / 1571 / 7% 230 tĂŚŝĂǁĈ DŝĚĚůĞ (6-8) 775 / 629 / -19% 237 tŚĞĞůĞƌ DŝĚĚůĞ ;ϲͲ 799 / 768 8) / -4% 883 115 0.87 1969 / 1978 / 47 207 Inouye Elementary 766 / 772 (K-5) / 1% 709 -63 1.09 1959 / 2015 / 39 64% 0.66 / 140 208 Helemano Elementary (K-5) 572 / 583 / 2% 565 -18 1.03 1956 / 1996 / 41 46% 0.57 / 223 210 ॒/ůŝĂŚŝ ůĞŵĞŶƚĂƌLJ 373 / 356 (K-5) / -5% 431 75 0.83 1964 / 1972 / 52 75% 0.61 / 193 211 <Ă॒ĂůĂ ůĞŵĞŶƚĂƌLJ 411 / 449 (K-5) / 9% 483 34 0.93 1958 / 1965 / 55 94% 0.61 / 198 226 Solomon Elementary (K-5) 921 / 917 / 0% 957 40 0.96 1969 / 2006 / 42 7% 0.62 / 178 229 tĂŚŝĂǁĈ Elementary (K-5) 457 / 459 / 0% 547 88 0.84 1950 / 1955 / 65 95% 0.64 / 158 236 Wheeler Elementary (K-5) 794 / 835 / 5% 720 -115 1.16 1936 / 1991 / 45 36% 0.62 / 181 7,339 8,133 794 0.90 58% 0.68 TOTAL 1780 209 0.88 1901 / 2006 / 50 71% 0.77 / 64 1058 429 0.59 1961 / 1963 / 53 93% 0.81 / 34 2% 0.84 / 17 We want one space that can do all of those things instead of specialized rooms. It would need to be so multi-purpose that it can handle everything. - Administrator Each and every student be provided with an optimal learning environment as well as have a school and facility that they can be proud of. - Administrator Creating facilities that are appealing, family-oriented, accommodating, and invites employees to work 24/7 is ideal. . . - Administrator DOE schools have to accept that some graduates cannot pursue 4year degrees because college is cost prohibitive. They have to create curricula where students can aspire to work in less professional but still have very worthy and notable careers in the trade industries. - Administrator This would be awesome if curriculum could be structured to focus on careers, professions that these organizations welcome/have. This could inspire students and focus them into an area of study. - Administrator Challenges: Ch • Enrollment growth projected at elementary schools. Decline projected at MS and HS. • Library less than 50% of standard space at four of seven elementary schools • No science rooms at four of seven elementary schools • Cafeteria space less than 50% of standard space at three of seven elementary schools • More than half of facilities are classified as old or beyond useful life • No dedicated art or music rooms at five of seven elementary schools • Admin less than 50% of standard space: Helemano ES • 27% of capacity in portables at Leilehua HS • PE locker facility less than 50% of requirement at Leilehua HS • Fire alarm system at HS needs replacement Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 249 Leilehua Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS SCENARIOS 1A Keep current operational scenario $$$$$ • 1B (no alternative scenario) $$$$$ All schools continue to operate as currently configured Benefits • Benefits No changes to implement Challenges Stakeholder Voice Challenges մմմմմ Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 250 Leilehua Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS FACILITY OPTIONS 2 Leilehua HS project-based learning spaces, STEAM and professional centers • • 3 4 Leilehua HS new professional learning center • 7 • Construct new music building near play court and renovate current music room into multi-purpose flexible maker spaces. Renovate MS Building E for ES use as classrooms and music. Include Option 7 Wheeler MS/Wheeler ES covered play court • Construct cover over play court to create multi-purpose dining/assembly space to be shared by the MS and ES Wheeler MS/Wheeler ES new 21st century classroom buildings • • 8 Renovate buildings for program-specific improvement to include multi-purpose flexible educational space (STEAM, professional learning center, common areas) Wheeler MS/Wheeler ES new music facilities • 6 Construct new 21st century library with space for college/career counseling center. Wahiawa MS project-based learning spaces & professional centers • 5 Re-plan site and renovate/construct new 21st century flexible spaces, STEAM rooms, and professional learning centers distributed across campus Incorporated into site master plan Replace ## portables and WES Building D with new multi-story 250-student classroom building(s) for MS and ES use to include flexible project-based learning STEAM spaces Included in Option 5 Covered multi-purpose play court (various schools) • Requested by Helemano ES, Kaala ES, Wahiawa ES, Wheeler MS/ES Benefits Challenges Cost/ROM Stakeholder Range Voice Funding Category Priority Tier • Opening adequate amount of land to • Modern, flexible educational spaces rebuild • Space for prep/planning, teacher/student collaboration, and prof development • Facilitates use of classrooms during teacher $$$$$ conference periods, increasing capacity $20-40M • Provides necessary space for projects • Provides space for student/teacher private discussions ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #2 1 ‫ڗ‬ • Provides modern, flexible, educational, and post-graduation resource • Provides student center type of space to gather and work on projects ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS – #3 4 ‫ڜ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ MS - #2 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ MS - #4 4 ‫ڜ‬ $2.5-7.5M ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ MS - #3 2 ‫ڝ‬ $$$$$ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ MS - #1 • Adequate amount of land to build $$$$$ $20-40M • Modern, flexible, educational spaces • Space for prep/planning, teacher/student collaboration, and professional development • Facilitates use of classrooms during teacher conference periods, increasing capacity • Potential to attract more students to explore sciences with new equipment and spaces $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M • Provides modern multi-purpose performance art space • Provides path for student learning outside of core academics • Encourages student creativity and extracurricular activities • Might not be used often without enough population for program • Multi-purpose outdoor dining, assembly, and performance space • Provides space for exercise without being out in the sun • Covering a play court that may possibly need to be renovated. Check on existing condition. • Replace outdated portables with modern, flexible educational spaces • Provides permanent classrooms with plumbing and no mold • Potential displacement of students during construction $$$$$ $20-40M • Provide covered outdoor multi-purpose space $$$$$ $$$$$ $20-40M n/a ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #3 1 Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 251 ‫ڗ‬ Leilehua Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS FACILITY OPTIONS 9 • • • • • • Addresses facility deficiencies and improves equity at Helemano ES: cafeteria addition (planned) and new library, repurpose current library into classrooms elementary schools Iliahi ES: renovate existing art room into multi-purpose flexible space and expand admin Kaala ES: replace portables with new library with flexible space and repurpose current library for admin • Helps satisfy more program needs with less space Wahiawa ES: new administration and welcome center, repurpose existing admin as flex classrooms Wheeler ES: construct multi-purpose dining/assembly space to connect library and Building C Kaala ES parking and drop-off area 11 Soloman ES phased reconstruction 12 Prioritized repairs and maintenance (all schools) 14 15 Challenges Cost/ROM Range Stakeholder Voice Funding Category Priority Tier Building additions and renovations (various schools) 10 13 Benefits • • • • Expand parking and reconfigure drop-off area Follow through with existing plans to replace portables and rebuild school In construction and fully funded Safety, code, and repairs, e.g., structural repairs at LHS Building Z, fire alarm, and mold remediation Locally-determined enhancements (all schools) • Budget allotment for each school to fund stakeholder-driven projects, such as Iliahi ES sound dampening in multi-purpose room for ukulele program • Address top priority needs at each school Leilehua HS install air conditioning • Install air conditioning throughout campus 16 Leilehua HS specialized teachers 17 Leilehua HS cafeteria expansion • Hire more teachers trained in their respective subjects • Expand café or construct café kiosks around campus • Incorporated into site master plan 18 Leilehua HS site drainage 19 Leilehua HS athletic storage • Look into site drainage mitigation • Replace shipping containers with permanent storage for athletic use $2.5-7.5M ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #4 1 ‫ڗ‬ $$$$$ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #2 $$$$$ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS/MS/ES #5/6/5 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS/MS/ES last 3 ‫ژ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS – #7 1 ‫ڗ‬ $20-40M ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #4 3 ‫ژ‬ $$$$$ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS – #8 $7.5-20M • Requires policy to consistently allocate and implement projects • Requires phased construction • Repave driving paths on campus • Repaint parking stall lines ‫ڗ‬ $$$$$ • Replace outdated facilities at or beyond expected life Leilehua HS campus road repaving 1 $40-75M • Provide needed parking • Improve pedestrian safety and convenience • Empowers schools and students to define projects at time of execution ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #1 $$$$$ • Alleviates distraction of heat to allow students to focus on learning • Provides confidence to students in the lessons they are being taught • Provides more time for lunch • Provides more accessibility to food • Mitigates flooding on campus during school hours • Provides permanent storage space for sports equipment $$$$$ $500k-2.5M $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M $$$$$ $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M n/a n/a ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #5 tie 3 ‫ژ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS – #1 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - last 5 ‫ړ‬ Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 252 Mililani Complex DATA and NEEDS Stakeholder Voice: Enrollment and Facility Data: School (a) 2017-18/ 2023-24 Enrollment 216 2571 / Mililani High (9-12) 2722 / 6% 238 Mililani Middle (68) 212 (b) Capacity (c) = (b) - (a) (d) = (a) / (b) Oldest / Projected 2023-24 Newest / Avg Projected Building Capacity Surplus Utilization % Old or Beyond Expected Life Adequacy ^ĐŽƌĞ ͬ ZĂŶŬ Out of 260 2009 -713 1.35 1973 / 2011 / 34 1470 -248 1.17 1999 / 1999 / 19 0% 0.87 / 5 <ţƉĂƉĂ ůĞŵĞŶƚĂƌLJ 605 / 590 (K-5) / -2% 791 201 0.75 1960 / 1976 / 49 61% 0.63 / 167 234 Mililani Waena Elementary (K-5) 781 / 769 / -2% 756 -13 1.02 1971 / 1985 / 45 12% 0.66 / 138 240 DŝůŝůĂŶŝ ॒/ŬĞ Elementary (K-5) 668 / 606 / -9% 735 129 0.82 2004 / 2004 / 14 0% 0.75 / 80 241 DŝůŝůĂŶŝ DĂƵŬĂ Elementary (K-5) 828 / 856 / 3% 805 -51 1.06 1993 / 1994 / 24 0% 0.77 / 63 242 DŝůŝůĂŶŝ hŬĂ Elementary (K-5) 664 / 655 / -1% 624 -31 1.05 1977 / 1997 / 37 6% 0.67 / 131 7,916 7,190 -726 1.10 12% 0.73 TOTAL 1873 / 1718 / 8% 5% 0.78 / 61 I definitely feel the overcrowding at our school. The teachers have a hard time finding shared rooms to use. - Student A lot of classrooms are converted to what we need. They use the cafeteria stage for plays but it’s not an ideal place to put on a production. Our dressing room is stuffed with tools for production. It is not a good place. We don’t have a dedicated performance area so we have to use the Pearl City Cultural Center. - Student If you ask any Mililani HS student what their one complaint is, it’s AC! Being in a hot classroom makes it harder to learn. - Student Challenges: Ch • -9% to +3% enrollment change projected at elementary schools • Maunaloa ES 21 of 46 (46%) students GE out or attend charter • High and middle school have less than 50% of required science room space • Four of seven facilities have space classified as old or beyond useful life • No music facilities at three of four elementary schools • High school has less than 50% of require space for both art and music • 22% of capacity in portables at Mililani HS • High school has less that 50% of required athletic locker space and athletic lockers/showers are beyond a 60/40 split for gender equity • Mililani HS has less than 50% of required cafeteria space Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report v2 (2018 Nov) 253 Mililani Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS SCENARIOS 1A Mililani HS master-planned multi-story additions on current site $$$$$ • $20-40M ‫ ڗ‬Priority 1 Re-plan campus and implement phased expansion to utilize open fields and replace single-story and/or portables with multi-story buildings to add 750 capacity May require relocation of field currently used for agriculture program Includes campus masterplan with 21st century updates, STEAM, robotics, etc. Swingspace options - lease space at Mililani Tech Park or outfield. Do not construct on agriculture field. • • • Mililani HS expansion onto vacated Mililani Waena ES Site; ES additions 1B 1C Mililani HS expansion onto vacated Mililani Waena ES site; new ES $$$$$ • $$$$$ Construct classroom additions at Kipapa ES, Ike ES, Mauka ES, and/or Uka ES for 500-700 net additional capacity and adjust attendance boundaries to accommodate displaced Waena ES students Refresh projections to confirm sizes: - Kipapa ES - replace Building A and portables with 400student multi-level building(s) - Ike ES - replace port w/ 300-student building(s) - Mauka ES - replace port w/ 250-student building(s) - Uka ES - replace port w/ 300-student building(s) Demolish Waena ES buildings and repurpose campus for new high school facilities supporting ### capacity to suit new programs as part of MHS or new magnet program Construct pedestrian overpass to Waena site Construct min-café on Waena site Grandfather Waena students during phase out • • • • • • 1D Mililani-area high school magnet program on new site $$$$$ Similar to 1B, except Waena ES is replaced on new site instead of additions on ES sites Acquire ## acre site, construct new ###-student elementary school, and adjust attendance boundaries to accommodate Waena ES students Demolish Waena ES buildings and repurpose campus for new HS facilities supporting ### capacity to suit new programs as part of MHS or new magnet program Grandfather Waena students during phase out • • • Benefits Benefits Benefits Benefits • • • • • • • • • • Reduces crowding Replaces portables and older facilities Requires no additional land Less travel time between classes No impact on Waena real estate • • • • Relieves crowding at Mililani HS and balances ES capacity utilization complex-wide Replaces inadequate Waena ES facility with much needed capacity for MHS Modern, flexible spaces, including specialized STEAM rooms at elementary schools New buildings for each ES will benefit all Option to make Waena ES a 9th grade center • • • Relieves crowding at Mililani HS and balances ES capacity utilization complex-wide Replaces inadequate Waena facility with much needed capacity for MHS Doesn’t disrupt other elementary schools Option to make Waena ES a 9th grade center Relieves crowding at Mililani HS Expand program offerings New modern learning environment Challenges Challenges Challenges Challenges • • • • • • • • • • Long-term disruption during phased construction on occupied site Requires temporary swing space classrooms Mililani Waena ES site and facilities remain small and functionally inadequate without major additional investment (see Option #) Temporary displacement adds stress to students Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ • • • • • • School consolidation and attendance boundary adjustment would require stakeholder outreach Requires temporary swing space classrooms if HS and ES projects are constructed concurrently Large elementary schools – average size increases from 700-enrollment to >850 Pedestrian safety between HS and Waena site Community pushback to convert Waena to HS Disruption and displacement of students Increased distance b/w HS buildings and Waena Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ • • • Land acquisition time and expense Requires temporary swing space classrooms if HS and ES projects are constructed concurrently One new elementary school could raise concerns about complex-wide equity Availability of land Displaces all Millilani Waena ES students Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ • • Land acquisition time and expense Availability of land Potential of overcrowding at MS and HS if families don’t choose magnet option Potential for enrollment process to be inequitable Thematic school will need to change based on community needs Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ Recommendation • Due to growth and limited land for new development, add capacity through vertical construction while replacing portables that offer f lim limited ited capacity, limit 21st century instructional opportunities, and are nearly as expensive to build as permanent facilities Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report v2 (2018 Nov) 254 Mililani Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS FACILITY OPTIONS 2 Mililani HS phased reconstruction • • 3 Re-plan campus and rebuild of core spaces and/or classroom facilities to utilize open fields and replace single-story and/or portables with multi-story buildings (capacity depends on Scenario 1A-1D) Create specific site-wide master plan to improve building condition and site acreage efficiency Mililani HS visual and performing arts center (planned) • Construct new facilities with instructional and performance spaces for the arts 4.1 Mililani MS Special Education enhancements 4.2 Mililani HS Special Education enhancements 5 • • Benefits Challenges • • • • • • • • Enhances student opportunities Joint use for all schools and community Provides space to host guest speakers, productions, and community programs • Provides needed facilities for Community Based Instruction program Mililani MS – Construct/convert space for medically fragile Special Education program • Mililani HS – Renovate five classrooms into fully-self-contained labs with life skills equipment • • • • • • 6 Mililani MS classroom additions (net five additional classrooms) • • 7 8 • • ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #1 N/A ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS – #5 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ MS - #3 tie 2 ‫ڝ‬ 5 ż ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ MS - #3 tie 5 ż ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ MS - #1 1 ‫ڗ‬ $2.5-7.5M ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ MS - #2 1 ‫ڗ‬ $$$$$ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #1 1 ‫ڗ‬ $$$$$ $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M Provides needed facilities for Community Based Instruction program Funding Category $$$$$ Space for prep/planning, teacher/student collaboration, and prof development Facilitates use of classrooms during teacher conference periods, increasing capacity Provides collaborative space Provides multi-purpose shared community use space during non-school hours $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M Provides capacity to alleviate overutilization • • • Extend awning structure and perform sitework to create multi-tiered amphitheater space Might be funded by classroom addition project ongoing Replace portables and outdated buildings (various schools) Adequate space on campus to construct a large venue $$$$$ $20-405M Follow through with five-classroom addition with small parking lot Consider additional five classrooms to planned 15 to make up capacity shortage Mililani MS covered multi-purpose amphitheater • • • Long-term disruption during phased construction on occupied site Temporary swing space classrooms Stakeholder Voice $2.5-7.5M Mililani HS, Mililani MS professional learning center Mililani HS – Convert or construct new professional learning center spaces Mililani MS – Convert or construct new professional learning center spaces Multi-story buildings improve site efficiency Provides modern, flexible spaces Improved safety and security Cost/ROM Range • Large MS of nearly 2,000 students 15 classrooms is still short 5 classrooms for enrollment $20-40M $$$$$ Indoor/outdoor dining and multi-purpose space for assembly, performance, and community use Replaces portables with modern spaces $$$$$ • Priority Tier Ike ES portables and school are relatively new Scale of end-state capacity for each dependent on selected Scenario 1A-1D: - Kipapa ES – replace Building A and portables with multi-level classrooms and modern, flexible spaces - Ike ES – replace existing portables with permanent space - Uka ES – replace north portables with three-story classroom building with fire lane along Building C, and replace south portables and Buildings G, H, and J with new kitchen/cafeteria, parking, and covered space $20-40M Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 255 Mililani Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS FACILITY OPTIONS Benefits • 9 Kipapa ES covered multi-purpose amphitheater 10 Mililani Mauka ES covered play court (planned) 11 Mililani Waena ES phased reconstruction • • • • • • Construct tiered multi-use dining/amphitheater with covered stage facing existing cafeteria Reconstruct entire school with 750-900 capacity multi-story facility on same site (Cannot be implemented under Scenario 1B or 1C) 12 Mililani Uka ES improved student drop-off 13 Prioritized repairs and maintenance (all schools) 14 Locally-determined enhancements (all schools) 15 Mililani HS air conditioning 16 Green construction for all new construction or renovations • • • • • • • • Long-term disruption and temporary swing space during phased construction $$$$$ $7.5-20M • Requires policy to consistently allocate and implement projects Mililani HS site drainage Look into site drainage mitigation in specific areas of campus $$$$$ $500k-2.5M $$$$$ Alleviates distraction of heat to allow students to focus on learning $2.5-7.5M $$$$$ Lessens carbon footprint • $$$$$ Helps maintain existing facilities $2.5-7.5M • Efficiently uses school sites with limited acreage • Higher cost for design and implementation $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M Design play courts to be constructed above structures Consider constructing additions on top of existing buildings if possible $40-75M $2.5-7.5M Addresses top-priority needs at each school Empowers schools and students to define projects at time of execution $$$$$ $$$$$ Improves pedestrian safety and traffic flow near Building F Paint existing structures where needed Vertical additions on existing structures • $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M $20-40M • • • • 20 $2.5-7.5M Provides multi-use outdoor space during inclement weather Provides more efficient use of small site Replaces outdated, inadequate facility Cost/ROM Range $$$$$ Replaces portables with modern spaces Consider construction of green buildings where possible Included in specific projects Construct covered play court over multi-use spaces as a part of multi-level use facilities • • Install air conditioning throughout campus 18 19 • Budget allotment for each school to fund stakeholder-driven projects New paint at all schools • • Safety, code, and maintenance repairs 17 • • Follow through with covered play court Challenges • Efficiently uses school sites with limited acreage No other schools or students are displaced Increases capacity Less footprint without demolition • • • Student displacement during construction Portables would need to be demolished to build new, temporarily decreasing capacity Older buildings may not be able to structurally support vertical additions Mitigates flooding on campus during school hours $$$$$ $40-75M $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M Stakeholder Voice Funding Category Priority Tier ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #6 4 ‫ڜ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #2 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #3 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES - #4 3 ۖ 1 ‫ڗ‬ 3 ۖ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #2 2 ‫ڝ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS/MS/ES #6/7/5 N/A ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS/MS/ES – last 4 ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS/MS/ES – #11/9/8 N/A ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS/MS/ES #7/8/9 N/A ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS – #4 3 ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS/MS/ES #9/5/7 ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS/MS/ES #14/6/10 Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 256 ‫ڜ‬ ۖ Mililani Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS FACILITY OPTIONS 21 22 Mililani HS electrical upgrades • Look into site drainage mitigation in specific areas of campus Benefits • Challenges Mitigates flooding on campus during school hours Mililani HS administration expansion and recapture classrooms • Partially-funded 23 Mililani HS covered walkways and security fencing around public 24 Mililani HS new gym 25 Mililani HS maintenance facilities 26 Mililani HS girls’ lockers 27 Mililani HS interior and exterior painting 28 Mililani HS softball bleachers Cost/ROM Range Stakeholder Voice Funding Category $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M $$$$$ $500k-2.5M $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M $$$$$ $20-40M $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 257 Priority Tier 2 ‫ڝ‬ 1 ‫ڗ‬ 1 ‫ڗ‬ 4 ‫ڜ‬ 4 ‫ڜ‬ 1 ‫ڗ‬ 4 ‫ڜ‬ 3 ۖ Waialua Complex DATA and NEEDS Stakeholder Voice: Enrollment and Facility Data: School 232 206 231 Waialua High & Intermediate (712) ,ĂůĞ॒ŝǁĂ Elementary (K-6) Waialua Elementary (K-6) TOTAL (a) 2017-18/ 2023-24 Enrollment 673 / 718 / 7% 224 / 264 / 18% (b) Capacity 1019 455 Oldest / (c) = (b) - (a) (d) = (a) / (b) Projected 2023-24 Newest / Avg Capacity Projected Building Surplus Utilization 301 191 0.70 0.58 568 / 542 / -5% 572 30 0.95 1,524 2,046 522 0.74 1938 / 1993 / 48 1921 / 2014 / 61 1966 / 2014 / 40 % Old or Beyond Expected Life 52% 79% Adequacy Score / Rank Out of 260 We need to not get caught up with what’s trending. We have to look beyond. All I’m hearing right now is CTE, CTE, CTE, but we need to think broader. We need to think of stuff like agriculture and manufacturing. Not all students are going to be pursuing computer careers. - Parent 0.79 / 49 Each and every student be provided with an optimal learning environment as well as have a school and facility that they can be proud of. - Administrator 0.63 / 171 64% 0.61 / 199 65% 0.68 DOE schools have to accept that some graduates cannot pursue 4-year degrees because college is cost prohibitive. They have to create curricula where students can aspire to work in less professional but still have very worthy and notable careers in the trade industries. - Administrator Challenges: Ch • Haleiwa ES 186 out of 384 (48%) students GE out or attend charter • High flood risk: 100% of site in current flood zone: Haleiwa ES • Moderate flood risk: 100% and 59% of site in extreme tsunami zone: Waialua HS/IS, and Waialua ES • Science less than 50% of standard space: Waialua HS and IS • No dedicated science rooms at elementary schools • More than half of facilities are classified as old or beyond useful life • Music less than 50% of standard space: Waialua HS & IS • No dedicated music or art rooms at elementary schools • Waialua HS/IS and Haleiwa ES have under-utilized capacity • PE locker/shower gender equity 38%/62% split: Waialua HS and IS • Renovate field, new bleachers, resurface courts, girls’ lockers • Cafeteria less than 50% of standard space: Waialua HS and IS, and Waialua ES Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 258 Waialua Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS SCENARIOS 1A Haleiwa ES minor renovations $$$$$ • • ‫ڗ‬ flood zone $$$$$ Priority 1 Maintain operations “as is” at Haleiwa ES Perform limited renovations as permitted by flood zones R&M covered by Option 9 Pursue STEAM classroom renovations • • 1B Haleiwa ES new campus out of • Acquire new site through direct purchase or land swap, and construct new school sized to accommodate selected operational model and grade configuration Repurpose Haleiwa ES campus for communitydesigned public use, such as after-school sports/recreation, satellite remote learning center, adult education, community clinic • Benefits Benefits • • No operational changes to implement • • • Improves enrollment by attracting local students electing GE, charter, or private school Improved safety and asset preservation Potential for new community facility and/or revenue generation New, modern facility Challenges Challenges • • • • • • • Haleiwa located in flood zone restricting allowable facility improvements Students remain in same facilities, many at or beyond expected useful life Haleiwa ES is among smallest in the state and operates at 58% of available capacity Based on funding weighted student formulas, smaller elementary schools struggle to offer enrichment programs and sometimes need to assign multiple grades to teachers 186 out of 384 students (48%) GE out or attend charter, not including those who choose private schools Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ Land acquisition time/cost Change of location will require significant stakeholder outreach Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ Recommendation • The Central EPC did not foresee an immediate risk to Haleiwa ES from flooding (Haleiwa is in flood and tsunami zones) and thus opted against relocating the school in this master plan Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 259 Waialua Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS FACILITY OPTIONS 2 3 4 Waialua HS and IS site drainage • • • • Renovate Building L with modern classrooms equipped with 21st century flexible spaces for project-based learning Waialua HS and IS music arts facility • • Construct new music room to include community performance space with stage Existing building has structural deficiencies 5 Waialua HS and IS Special Education enhancements 6 Waialua ES new multi-purpose cafeteria and administration center • • • • 7 Challenges Renovate Building K for self-contained Special Education and multi-use flexible space Demolish portables and replace with new cafeteria with adjacent covered multi-purpose indoor/outdoor dining facility Renovate existing cafeteria for administrative office use, and move administration out of current location in converted classrooms Adjust classroom capacity to balance removed portables Cost/ROM Range Stakeholder Voice Funding Category Priority Tier • Reduces repeated flooding $$$$$ Conduct hydrology study and implement flood control project Outcomes could include site work, pump stations, and/or elevation/relocation of facilities Explore non-DOE funding sources to mitigate site drainage Incremental corrections in process Waialua HS & IS new 21st century classroom building • Benefits $20-40M • Replaces outdated facility with modern, flexible education space $$$$$ • • • • • $$$$$ $20-40M Provides community space for art performances Allows Option 5 to occur Encourages community involvement Enables more enrollment into band program Provides music/arts facility for entire community $20-40M $$$$$ • Provides needed modern, flexible special education space with appropriate equipment for special needs students $2.5-7.5M • Utilizes unused spaces between buildings • Provides additional dining space and multiuse facility • Provides new professional admin space • Recaptures classroom spaces $$$$$ $20-40M • Provides modern, flexible education space • Moderate flood risk • Provides professional space for staff Renovate Building B (old library) into flexible, multi-use space development, retention, and team planning Consider including administration professional learning center if Option 6 not implemented • Makes use of current under-utilized space Construct modern, flexible multi-use spaces between Buildings A and B • Gets students prepared to transition to the MS • Benefits a greater number of students at WES ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS/Int – #3 2 ‫ڝ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS/Int – #1 3 ‫ژ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS/Int – #2 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS/Int – #4 4 ‫ڜ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES – #1 tie 2 ‫ڝ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES – #3 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ ES – #1 tie 1 ‫ڗ‬ 1 ‫ڗ‬ 3 ‫ژ‬ Waialua ES flexible maker spaces • • • 8 Haleiwa ES STEAM classrooms 9 Prioritized repairs and maintenance (all schools) 10 Locally-determined enhancements (all schools) 11 Explore partnership with Mililani HS for specialized programs • • $$$$$ • Provides flexible shared space Renovate one or two classrooms as STEAM space for arts and science instruction $500k-2.5M $$$$$ • Addresses top-priority needs at each school Safety, code, and maintenance repairs • Budget allotment for each school to fund stakeholder-driven projects $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M $7.5-20M • Empowers schools and students to define projects at time of execution • Requires policy to $$$$$ consistently allocate and $500k-2.5M implement projects • Expands and replicates successful program to other high schools • Provides economies of scale with larger enrolled programs $$$$$ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS-Int/ES – #5/9 ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS-Int/ES – last ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS/Int – #1 n/a Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 260 261 Honolulu Options Reports Honolulu District Overview District-wide Scenarios: Scenario 1C (Priority 1): Hololulu complimentary CTE programs/facilities ($$$$) Scenario IM1 (Priority 1): Anuenue K-12 gymnasium and multi-purpose additions ($$$) Scenario IM2 (Priority 1): Anuenue K-12 feasibility study for west Oahu satellite campus ($$$) Scenario 2B (Priority 1): District-wide administration complex ($$$) Kaiser Kalani Farrington Kaimuki • Scenario 3B: Farrington complex ES school reconstruction and consolidation ($$$$) • Option 5: Farrington HS follow through with phase 2 of existing master plan ($$$) • Option 6: Dole MS STEAM classroom renovations ($$) • Option 8: Kalakaua MS replace Buildings G and H ($$$) • Option 10: Electrical upgrade (various schools) ($$$) • Option 12: Pedestrian safety improvements (various schools) ($$) • Option 13: Security improvements (various schools) ($) • Option 15.2: Pre-K conversion (various schools) ($$) • Option 23: Prioritized repairs and maintenance (all schools) ($$) • Scenario 3B: Palolo/Jarrett Pre-K-8 ($$$$) • Scenario 4B: Aliiolani reconstruction; elementary school consolidation ($$$$) • Option 5: Kaimuki HS repurpose Buildings B, C and D for STEAM instruction ($$) • Option 7: Washington MS STEAM classroom renovations ($$) • Option 8: Washington MS music classroom renovations ($$) • Option 10: Electrical upgrade (various schools) ($$$) • Option 13: Security improvements (various schools) ($) • Option 24: Prioritized repairs and maintenance (all schools) ($$) • Priority 2 • Option 9: Heat abatement (various schools) ($$$) • Option 11: Flood drainage improvements (various schools) ($) • Option 14: Flexible STEAM and/or outdoor learning spaces (all ES) ($$$) • Option 19: Covered walkways/shade structure/trees (various schools) ($) • Option 5: Ilima IS replace administration and library with new, joint facility ($$$) • Option 13: Campbell HS track, bleachers, PA system, restrooms ($$) • Option 9: Heat abatement (various schools) ($$$) • Option 11: Flood drainage improvements (various schools) ($) • Option 12: Pedestrian safety improvements (various schools) ($$) • Option 14: ADA accessibility improvements (various schools) ($$) • Option 15: Flexible STEAM and/or outdoor learning spaces (all ES and MS) ($$$) • Option 20: Covered walkways/shade structure/trees (various schools) ($) Priority 3 • Option 4: Farrington HS Special Education program enhancements ($) • Option 15.1: Special Education enhancements (various schools) ($$) • Option 17: Playground improvements (various schools) ($$) • Option 22: Furniture and technology refresh (all schools) ($) Priority 4 • Option 7: Dole MS expand administrative space ($$$) • Option 16: Parking lot expansion (various schools) ($$$) • Option 18: Covered play court/multipurpose facility (various schools) ($$$) • Option 20: Kalakaua MS and Linapuni ES administration expansion ($$) • Option 21: Cafeteria expansion (various) ($$) Priority 5 • Option 24: Locally-determined enhancements (all schools) ($) Priority 1 McKinley Roosevelt • Option 3: Kalani HS 21st century music instruction space ($$) • Option 5: Kaimuki MS STEAM classroom renovations ($) • Option 7: Electrical upgrade (various schools) ($$$) • Option 9: Security improvements (various schools) ($) • Option 17: Prioritized repairs and maintenance (all schools) ($$) • Option 3: McKinley HS stadium lighting and seating addition ($$) • Option 5: Central MS STEAM renovation ($$) • Option 7: Electrical upgrade (various schools) ($$$) • Option 10: Security improvements (various schools) ($) • Option 21: Prioritized repairs and maintenance (all schools) ($$) • Option 23: McKinley HS roof renovation/replacements to Buildings M and A ($$) • Option 3: Roosevelt HS new gymnasium with 4-6 classroom spaces ($$$) • Option 6: Renovate music spaces (all middle schools) ($$$) • Option 8: Electrical upgrade (various schools) ($$$) • Option 10: Security improvements (various schools) ($) • Option 20: Prioritized repairs and maintenance (all schools) ($$) • Option 4: Kaiser HS STEAM classroom addition ($$) • Option 8: Flood drainage improvements (various schools) ($) • Option 10: ADA accessibility improvements (various schools) ($$) • Option 11: Flexible STEAM and/or outdoor learning spaces (all ES and MS) ($$$) • Option 6: Heat abatement (various schools) ($$$) • Option 8: Flood drainage improvements (various schools) ($) • Option 10: ADA accessibility improvements (various schools) ($$) • Option 11: Flexible STEAM and/or outdoor learning spaces (all ES and MS) ($$$) • Option 6: Heat abatement (various schools) ($$$) • Option 8: Flood drainage improvements (various schools) ($) • Option 9: Pedestrian safety improvements (various schools) ($$) • Option 11: ADA accessibility improvements (various schools) ($$) • Option 12: Flexible STEAM and/or outdoor learning spaces (all ES and MS) ($$$) • Option 17: Covered walkways/shade structure/trees (various schools) ($) • Option 7: Heat abatement (various schools) ($$$) • Option 9: Flood drainage improvements (various schools) ($) • Option 11: ADA accessibility improvements (various schools) ($$) • Option 12: Flexible STEAM and/or outdoor learning spaces (all ES and MS) ($$$) • Option 6: Kaimuki HS revenue generation ($) • Option 16.1: Special Education and/or PreK conversion (various schools) ($$) • Option 18: Playground improvements (various schools) ($$) • Option 23: Furniture and technology refresh (all schools) ($) • • Option 12.1: Special Education and/or PreK conversion (various schools) ($) • Option 16: Furniture and technology refresh (all schools) ($) • Option 13.1: Special Education and/or PreK conversion (various schools) ($$) • Option 15: Playground improvements (various schools) ($$) • Option 19: Kaahumanu ES multi-purpose cafeteria expansion ($$) • Option 20: Furniture and technology refresh (all schools) ($) • Option 13.1: Special Education and/or PreK conversion (various schools) ($$) • Option 15: Playground improvements (various schools) ($$) • Option 19: Furniture and technology refresh (all schools) ($) • Option 17: Parking lot expansion (various schools) ($$) • Option 19: Covered play court/multipurpose facility (various schools) ($$$) • Option 21: Lunalilo ES administration expansion ($$) • Option 22: Kuhio cafeteria expansion ($$) • Option 25: Locally-determined enhancements (all schools) ($) • Option 14: Covered play court/multipurpose facility (various schools) ($$$) • Option 18: Locally-determined enhancements (all schools) ($) • Option 4: Kalani HS classroom addition ($$$) • Option 13: Parking lot expansion (various schools) ($) • Option 14: Covered play court/multipurpose facility (various schools) ($$$) • Option 15: Liholiho ES, Waialae ES, and Wilson ES cafeteria expansion ($$) • Option 18: Locally-determined enhancements (all schools) ($) • Option 14: Parking lot expansion (various schools) ($$) • Option 16: Covered play court/multipurpose facility (various schools) ($$$) • Option 18: Administration expansion (various schools) ($$) • Option 22: Locally-determined enhancements (all schools) ($) • Option 14: Parking lot expansion (various schools) ($$) • Option 16: Covered play court/multipurpose facility (various schools) ($$$) • Option 18: Pauoa ES, Maemae ES administration renovation ($$) • Option 21: Locally-determined • Option 4: McKinley HS new multi-purpose cafeteria addition ($$) • Option 5: Roosevelt HS outdoor performance & instruction space ($$$) • • • • • • • • Option 3: Kaiser HS Visual and Performing Arts Center ($$$) Option 5: Nui Valley MS STEAM classroom addition ($$) Option 6: Heat abatement (various schools) ($$$) Option 7: Electrical upgrade (various schools) ($$$) Option 9: Security improvements (various schools) ($) Option 15: Aina Hiana ES cafeteria addition ($$$) Option 17: Prioritized repairs and maintenance (all schools) ($$) Option 12.1: Special Education and/or Pre-K conversion (various schools) ($$) Option 13: Playground improvements (various schools) ($$) Option 16: Furniture and technology refresh (all schools) ($) Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 263 Farrington Complex DATA and NEEDS Stakeholder Voice: Enrollment and Facility Data: School (a) 2017-18/ 2023-24 Enrollment 2309 / 2192 / 5% 784 / 624 / -20% (b) Capacity 106 Farrington High (912) 105 Dole Middle (6-8) 118 <ĂůĈŬĂƵĂ DŝĚĚůĞ (6-8) 107 Fern Elementary (K- 438 / 413 5) / -6% 467 113 <Ă॒ĞǁĂŝ Elementary (K-5) 316 / 325 / 3% 120 Kalihi Elementary (K-5) 121 (c) = (b) - (a) (d) = (a) / (b) Oldest / Projected 2023-24 Newest / Avg Capacity Projected Building Surplus Utilization % Old or Beyond Expected Life Adequacy ^ĐŽƌĞ ͬ ZĂŶŬ Out of 260 2042 -150 1.07 1939 / 1991 / 59 87% 0.78 / 60 993 369 0.63 1956 / 1960 / 61 100% 0.78 / 57 1040 152 0.85 1936 / 1977 / 51 51% 0.78 / 53 54 0.88 1951 / 1972 / 51 44% 0.67 / 132 338 13 0.96 1956 / 1970 / 60 93% 0.63 / 169 226 / 231 / 2% 614 383 0.38 1954 / 1954 / 64 100% 0.62 / 180 Kalihi Kai Elementary (K-5) 551 / 574 / 4% 752 178 0.76 1939 / 1977 / 54 76% 0.68 / 124 122 <ĂůŝŚŝ hŬĂ Elementary (K-5) 238 / 275 / 16% 351 76 0.78 1957 / 1957 / 61 100% 0.63 / 165 123 Kalihi Waena Elementary (K-5) 467 / 545 / 17% 559 14 0.97 1961 / 1973 / 52 89% 0.68 / 123 124 <ĂƉĈůĂŵĂ Elementary (K-5) 566 / 608 / 7% 606 -2 1.00 1954 / 1971 / 54 71% 0.68 / 121 145 WƵ॒ƵŚĂůĞ Elementary (K-5) 224 / 212 / -5% 344 132 0.62 1972 / 1973 / 46 4% 0.78 / 58 133 Linapuni Elementary (K-1) 180 / 191 / 6% 228 37 0.84 1965 / 1965 / 53 100% 0.51 / 246 7,078 8,334 1,256 0.85 76% 0.68 TOTAL 1075 / 888 / -17% We need to get our kids ready for the 21st century. Because we don’t know what the future will be, we have to prepare our students and facilities to be as resilient and flexible as possible. - Teacher Schools should have facilities that are operable. Our bleachers are not working and it’s going to take $750K to get them repaired. - Student Because we currently don’t have a whole venue to fit everyone in, we haven’t been able to have our assemblies and pep rallies. That impacts school morale. - Student Resources are lacking and we need to do work to make our schools more ADA-accessible. - Teacher I want public schools to be just as competitive as private schools or better. We need to step it up. - Parent Challenges: Ch • Dole MS 160 student projected decline (-20%) • 860 elementary students GE out or attend charter, 42%-76% of schools’ attendance boundaries • Over half of facilities are classified as old or beyond useful life • 1256 seats under-utilized capacity complex wide. Lowest utilization at Dole MS, Kalihi ES, Kalihi Kai ES, Kalihi Uka ES, and Puuhale ES • Industrial Arts and family consumer science less than 50% of standard space: Dole MS, Kalakaua MS • Library less than 50% of standard space: Kalihi Waena ES • No science rooms at most elementary schools • Cafeteria less than 50% of standard space: Kalihi Kai ES, Kapalama ES • Dance/drama less than 50% of standard space: Farrington HS • Music <50%: Farrington HS, Dole MS • Art <50%: Kalakaua MS • No dedicated art or music rooms at most elementary schools • PE lockers less than 50% of standard space: Kalakaua MS • Softball field, athletic lockers • Admin less than 50% of standard space: Dole MS • Security • Support for low income, at-risk students Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 264 Farrington Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS SCENARIOS (Scenarios 1A-1B apply to all Honolulu District complexes) Honolulu District separate Career Tech programs at each high school 1A $$$$$ • $40-75M • • standalone/shared Career Tech campus ‫ ڗ‬Priority 1 Renovate/enhance Career Technical Education (CTE) facilities at all Honolulu high schools Consider complementary programs among all area high schools to allow for more specialized career pathways and focused capital and staff resources Step 1: By December 2019, engage District and local MS, HS, and business stakeholders to determine strategic investments in CTE in District Step 2: Invest in MS STEAM renovations and HS CTE spaces accordingly • 1B Honolulu District $$$$$ • Acquire or repurpose land and construct new ### capacity high school campus with highlyspecialized facilities and equipment for advanced 21st century CTE center. Consider under-utilized Kaimuki HS campus. Facility may house a standalone school, and/or be shared and jointly operated by multiple Honolulu District high schools Explore partnerships with UH and private partners to attract and retain specialized instructors in locally relevant careers • • Benefits Benefits • • • • • • • No operational changes to implement Immediate implementation Each school needs to have a modern CTE basic facility Allows capacity to expand in the future Students better prepared for 21st century skills and careers Explore different curriculums • • • • Reduces HS capacity utilization with new off-site capacity Expands student career opportunities Combines resources to create a highlyresourced, concentrated CTE program, both in terms of facilities and staffing Opportunity to collaborate with higher education Relieves over-utilized schools Challenges Challenges • • • • • • • High cost of CTE facilities Difficulty in attracting/retaining qualified staff Teach accreditation barriers Many students may get a GE just for the available resources in the CTE courses Disparity of technology at each school Reality that all schools can’t be all things • • • • • • • Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ Creating partnership between schools (funding, bell schedule, CTE programming, etc.) Transportation between home high schools and the CTE center Land acquisition time/cost Lack of qualified teachers Logistical and operational challenges Needs vision and leaders to spearhead Students potentially miss out on well-rounded HS experience Students may not know what CTE specialization to commit to early in HS Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ Recommendation • Work with area stakeholders to determine strategic investments in area CTE spaces Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 265 Farrington Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS Scenarios (Scenarios 2A-2B apply to all Honolulu District complexes) 2A Keep current distributed administration scenario 2B District-wide administration complex $$$$$ $$$$$ • • • • • Benefits Benefits • • • • • • • • • Consolidation of offices and provides one location for District admin and meeting spaces Could eliminate need to rent space for large workshops, training, events, etc. Allows currently occupied spaces at local schools to return to locally determined use Improves communication and collaboration. Reduces time and cost of travel for meetings Increase number of meeting spaces Central location for professional development and teacher resources Removes and relocates district admin out of local school classrooms allowing principals expanded options for school design Challenges Challenges • • • • • • • • • • Maintaining administration distributed throughout Honolulu in multiple schools Lack of adequate large group meeting space Poor communication Cost of travel for meetings (mileage and time) Difficult to collaborate and coordinate availability Offices are currently spread out Accessibility to the public Low visibility Limited parking at Wilson Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ ‫ ژ‬Priority 3 Consider re-acquiring Wailupe Valley site or location more centrally-located, such as Kaimuki HS could be another potential location Move administrative offices scattered in schools around the District to one location Repurpose vacated classrooms for instructional or school-support functions such as STEAM Consider combining Scenario 1B CTE Centerr and Scenario 2B Admin Complex on same site for more efficient use of land and facilities and more public visibility to the CTE program Determine site by December 2019 Change grade configuration • No changes to implement $20-40M Wailupe may be too far Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ Recommendation • Create a multi-purpose meeting and district-wide administration to centralize admin and free up classrooms in schools Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 266 Farrington Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS SCENARIOS (Scenarios 1A-1B and 2A-2B apply to all Honolulu District complexes) Honolulu District separate Career Tech programs at each high school 1A 1B Honolulu District standalone/shared Career Tech campus $$$$$ • $$$$$ Renovate/enhance Career Technical Education (CTE) facilities at all Honolulu high schools Consider complementary programs among all area high schools to allow for more specialized career pathways and focused capital and staff resources • • 2A Keep current distributed administration scenario • complex $$$$$ $$$$$ • Acquire or repurpose land and construct new ### capacity high school campus with highlyspecialized facilities and equipment for advanced 21st century CTE center. Consider under-utilized Kaimuki HS campus. Facility may house a standalone school, and/or be shared and jointly operated by multiple Honolulu District high schools Explore partnerships with UH and private partners to attract and retain specialized instructors in locally relevant careers • 2B District-wide administration Consider reacquiring Wailupe Valley site or location more centrally-located, such as Kaimuki HS could be another potential location Move administrative offices scattered in schools around the District to one location Repurpose vacated classrooms for instructional or school-support functions such as STEAM Consider combining Scenario 1B CTE Center and Scenario 2B Admin Complex on same site for more efficient use of land and facilities and more public visibility to the CTE program • • • Benefits Benefits Benefits Benefits • • • • • • • • • No operational changes to implement Immediate implementation Each school needs to have a modern CTE basic facility Allows capacity to expand in the future Students better prepared for 21st century skills and careers Explore different curriculums • • • • Reduces HS capacity utilization with new off-site capacity Expands student career opportunities Combines resources to create a highlyresourced, concentrated CTE program, both in terms of facilities and staffing Opportunity to collaborate with higher education Relieves over-utilized schools No changes to implement • • • • • • Consolidation of offices and provides one location for District admin and meeting spaces Could eliminate need to rent space for large workshops, training, events, etc. Allows currently occupied spaces at local schools to return to locally determined use Improves communication and collaboration. Reduces time and cost of travel for meetings Increase number of meeting spaces Central location for professional development and teacher resources Challenges Challenges Challenges Challenges • • • • • • • • • High cost of CTE facilities Difficulty in attracting/retaining qualified staff Teach accreditation barriers Many students may get a GE just for the available resources in the CTE courses Disparity of technology at each school Reality that all schools can’t be all things • • • • • • • Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ Creating partnership between schools (funding, bell schedule, CTE programming, etc.) Transportation between home high schools and the CTE center Land acquisition time/cost Lack of qualified teachers Logistical and operational challenges Needs vision and leaders to spearhead Students potentially miss out on well-rounded HS experience Students may not know what CTE specialization to commit to early in HS Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ • • • • • • • • Maintaining administration distributed throughout Honolulu in multiple schools Lack of adequate large group meeting space Poor communication Cost of travel for meetings (mileage and time) Difficult to collaborate and coordinate availability Offices are currently spread out Accessibility to the public Low visibility Limited parking at Wilson Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ Wailupe may be too far Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 267 Farrington Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS SCENARIOS (elementary school portfolio) 3A Keep current operational scenario 3B Farrington complex ES reconstruction and consolidation $$$$$ $$$$$ • • Benefits Benefits • • • • • • • Larger schools can offer more enrichment programs such as language, music, and art Move students from old facilities into new/rebuilt buildings equipped for 21st century New community asset and potential revenue Better utilizes capacity, and one less elementary school that needs maintained to standard More resources for program and admin/staff with larger enrollment New facility to replace aging facilities Challenges Challenges • • • • • • • • High rate of GE/charter opt-out, from 42-76%,not including those who choose private schools Smaller schools struggle to offer enrichment Significant capacity under-utilization Facilities are in old, outdated condition Transit Oriented Development may produce rapid long-term enrollment growth Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ ‫ ڗ‬Priority 1 Coordinate with public housing/mixed use developments and conduct focused stakeholder outreach to inform consolidation of area elementary schools for “newer/fewer” near-term and “larger/stronger” long-term strategy Rebuild 1-2 sites to 21st century standards and add capacity to accommodate additional ES students expected in long-term transit-oriented development along light-rail line Land bank or repurpose surplus elementary site(s) for community-designed purpose TBD (consider teacher housing, PLC/admin space, revenue generation, other). SAC: Linapuni ES may be good candidate for consolidation due to unique grade configuration (PK2) adding disruptive transition. By December 2019, study feasibility of consolidating to eight ES’s. • No changes to implement $40-75M School consolidation Transportation for at-risk low-income students Community pushback Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ Recommendation • Prepare for Transit Oriented Development by beginning to rebuild old, relatively small elementary schools Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 268 Farrington Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS FACILITY OPTIONS (not in priority order) 4 5 Farrington HS Special Education program enhancements • • Renovate existing classrooms for self-contained Special Education rooms Renovate existing classrooms for Special Education resource rooms Farrington HS follow through with phase 2 of existing master plan • Continue implementation of master plan phase 2; renovation of Building A, and upgrade library technology; remove pool, replace locker rooms, and replace gym 6 Dole MS STEAM classroom renovations 7 Dole MS expand administrative space 8 Kalakaua MS replace Buildings G and H 9 • • • • Expand admin space on site Replace with core/CTE/art/music/exceptional students education space Historical Building G demo in process $$$$$ • Provides all spaces needed at HS for a comprehensive high school educational experience $$$$$ • Modern, flexible educational spaces. 11 Flood drainage improvements (various schools) • • • • • • • Dole MS cafeteria, health center Fern ES Buildings B, I, G Kalakaua MS cafeteria, locker rooms Kalihi ES playfields A&B, back doors Kalihi Uka ES regrade, add drainage Kalihi Waena ES central walkway Puuhale ES parking lot Dole MS security cameras, lighting, fences, alarm system Fern ES motion sensor lighting Kalihi ES fencing Kalihi Kai ES lockdown door hardware Kapalama ES lighting, cameras, demolish custodial cottage Linapuni ES lighting, fencing $$$$$ $$$$$ • Provides needed and modern space for in-demand programs • Supports academies; good for our feeder school $$$$$ $20-40M $20-40M $$$$$ $20-40M • Allows for technology upgrades to occur once electrical upgrades are in place $$$$$ $20-40M Funding Category Priority Tier ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #6 3 ‫ژ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #2 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #10 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #15 4 ‫ڜ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #11 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #5 2 ‫ڝ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #3 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #7 2 ‫ڝ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #2 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #2 1 ‫ڗ‬ • Safety benefits for events and afterschool extracurricular activities $$$$$ $500k-2.5M $$$$$ • Kalihi Kai ES reconfigure drop-off (cancelled) • Kalihi Uka ES longer drop-off zone • Puuhale ES reconfigure parking lot with drop-off zone (funded) • • • • • • $20-40M • Provides appropriate space for administrative functions Pedestrian safety improvements (various schools) Security improvements (various schools) $20-40M $2.5-7.5M • Assess, prioritize, and implement air condition and ventilation projects at all schools. • Assess, prioritize, and implement power upgrade projects at all schools Cost/ROM Stakeholder Range Voice • Provides appropriate space for Special Education program students • There’s a community need for Special Education program and facility equity Heat abatement (various schools) Electrical upgrade (various schools) 13 Challenges Renovate 2-4 classrooms into modern, multi-purpose, flexible STEAM spaces 10 12 Benefits $2.5-7.5M • Safety benefits for events and afterschool extracurricular activities $$$$$ $500k-2.5M Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 269 Farrington Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS FACILITY OPTIONS (not in priority order) 14 15.1 15.2 16 17 Flexible STEAM and/or outdoor learning spaces (all ES) • Construct or convert 1-2 classrooms into flexible resource spaces for science and art instruction • Construct covered outdoor learning space Special Education enhancements (various schools) • Dole MS Special Education renovation • Puuhale ES Special Education renovation Benefits Challenges • Provides new, modern learning environments for science, the arts and project-based learning • There’s a community need for special education program and facility equity Pre-K conversion (various schools) Cost/ROM Range $$$$$ $20-40M $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M Stakeholder Voice Funding Category ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #10 2 ‫ڝ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #11 3 ‫ژ‬ 3 ‫ژ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #13 4 ‫ڜ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #3 3 ‫ژ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #9 4 ‫ڜ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #9 2 ‫ڝ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #15 5 ‫ړ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #14 4 ‫ڜ‬ $$$$$ • Kalihi Kai ES Pre-K renovation • Kalihi Waena ES replace Pre-K restroom fixtures for older grades Priority Tier $2.5-7.5M Parking lot expansion (various schools) • • • • • • • • • • Dole MS add parking for 30 cars Fern ES add parking for 10 cars Kaewai ES add parking for 6 cars Kalakaua MS add parking for 50 cars Kalihi ES curb-cut to upper field for supplemental parking Kalihi Uka ES add parking for 10 cars and replace playground Kapalama ES repave/regrade existing parking lots Linapuni ES add parking for 6 cars Puuhale ES add parking for 50 cars and restripe existing lot Cellular structured grass solutions suggested $$$$$ $20-40M Playground improvements (various schools) • • • $$$$$ Kalihi ES, Kalihi Kai ES, Puuhale ES level field, replace playground Kalihi Uka ES replace playground as part of parking expansion Linapuni ES replace playground for PK-2 and repave play courts 18 Covered play court/multi-purpose facility (various schools) 19 Covered walkways/shade structure/trees (various schools) $2.5-7.5M $$$$$ • Construct sheltered multi-purpose facility where non-existent and feasible • • • • $20-40M $$$$$ Dole MS repair Kalihi Kai ES, Kapalama ES, Linapuni ES new Kalihi Uka ES new multi-story Kalihi Waena ES replace existing, add new from public bridge to cafeteria 20 Kalakaua MS and Linapuni ES administration expansion 21 Cafeteria expansion (various) • Addition or gut/renovation, add air conditioning, power, and security • Dole MS, Fern ES, Kalihi Kai ES • Consider indoor/outdoor design $500k-2.5M • Provides new, modern administrative space • Cafeterias currently less than half of standard space $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 270 Farrington Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS FACILITY OPTIONS (not in priority order) 22 23 24 Benefits Challenges Furniture and technology refresh (all schools) $$$$$ • Prioritized replacement of outdated furniture and equipment • Technology should be equal throughout entire campus Prioritized repairs and maintenance (all schools) • Safety, code, and maintenance projects, e.g., Kalakaua MS restroom renovation • Prioritize bathroom repairs Locally-determined enhancements (all schools) • Budget allotment for each school to fund stakeholder-driven projects • E.g.: Fern performing arts improvements in cafeteria, Puuhale ES stage curtain Cost/ROM Range $500k-2.5M • Addresses top-priority needs at each school • Empowers schools and students to define projects at time of execution $$$$$ $7.5-20M • Requires policy to consistently allocate and implement projects $$$$$ $500k-2.5M Stakeholder Voice Funding Category Priority Tier ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #4 3 ‫ژ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #1 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #11 4 ‫ڜ‬ Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 271 Kaiser Complex DATA and NEEDS Stakeholder Voice: Enrollment and Facility Data: School (a) 2017-18/ 2023-24 Enrollment (b) Capacity (c) = (b) - (a) (d) = (a) / (b) Oldest / Projected 2023-24 Newest / Avg Capacity Projected Building Surplus Utilization % Old or Beyond Expected Life Adequacy Score / Rank Out of 260 154 Kaiser High (9-12) 1141 / 1058 / 7% 1076 18 0.98 1971 / 1996 / 45 0% 0.84 / 18 139 Niu Valley Middle (6-8) 868 / 747 / -14% 682 -65 1.10 1956 / 1969 / 59 90% 0.73 / 93 100 ॒ ŝŶĂ ,ĂŝŶĂ Elementary (K-5) 469 / 474 / 1% 664 190 0.71 1951 / 1952 / 66 100% 0.57 / 222 108 ,ĂŚĂ॒ŝŽŶĞ Elementary (K-5) 549 / 516 / -6% 448 -68 1.15 1967 / 1972 / 49 56% 0.78 / 51 127 Koko Head Elementary (K-5) 300 / 328 / 9% 442 114 0.74 1954 / 1976 / 58 85% 0.75 / 79 155 Kamiloiki Elementary (K-5) 384 / 384 / 0% 404 20 0.95 1971 / 1975 / 45 0% 0.72 / 103 3,507 3,716 209 0.94 55% 0.73 TOTAL Student safety is a big issue. The old facilities make students complain. I would like to have better-looking facilities that support our learning. - Student School should be a place where everyone respects each other; a place where we can gather, share, and explore innovative ideas. - Student We want each campus to have a basic foundation for CTE courses. If we had renovated resources, we could keep up with innovation and attract more students to stay in public school. - Teacher We are so lucky that the Japanese school on our campus paid for the AC at Kaiser and we found a way to bypass state policy because there’s so much red tape. - Teacher Challenges: Ch • Koko Head ES 198 of 418 (47%) students GE out or attend charter • Industrial Arts and family consumer science less than 50% of standard space: Kaiser HS, Niu Valley MS • Moderate flood risk: site in extreme tsunami zone (Niu Valley MS, Aina Haina ES, Hahaione ES, Koko Head ES) • No science rooms at Aina Haina ES • Over half of facilities are classified as old or beyond useful life • No dedicated music rooms at most elementary schools • Niu Valley MS and Hahaione ES have moderate capacity overutilization • Aina Haina ES and Koko Head ES have under-utilized capacity • Kaiser HS PE locker/shower gender equity 13%/87% split • Resurface courts, girls’ lockers • Library less than 50% of standard space: Niu Valley MS • Cafeteria less than 50% of standard space: Aina Haina ES Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 272 Kaiser Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS SCENARIOS (Scenarios 1A-1B apply to all Honolulu District complexes) Honolulu District separate Career Tech programs at each high school 1A $$$$$ • $40-75M • • standalone/shared Career Tech campus ‫ ڗ‬Priority 1 Renovate/enhance Career Technical Education (CTE) facilities at all Honolulu high schools Consider complementary programs among all area high schools to allow for more specialized career pathways and focused capital and staff resources Step 1: By December 2019, engage District and local MS, HS, and business stakeholders to determine strategic investments in CTE in District Step 2: Invest in MS STEAM renovations and HS CTE spaces accordingly • 1B Honolulu District $$$$$ • Acquire or repurpose land and construct new ### capacity high school campus with highlyspecialized facilities and equipment for advanced 21st century CTE center. Consider under-utilized Kaimuki HS campus. Facility may house a standalone school, and/or be shared and jointly operated by multiple Honolulu District high schools Explore partnerships with UH and private partners to attract and retain specialized instructors in locally relevant careers • • Benefits Benefits • • • • • • • No operational changes to implement Immediate implementation Each school needs to have a modern CTE basic facility Allows capacity to expand in the future Students better prepared for 21st century skills and careers Explore different curriculums • • • • Reduces HS capacity utilization with new off-site capacity Expands student career opportunities Combines resources to create a highlyresourced, concentrated CTE program, both in terms of facilities and staffing Opportunity to collaborate with higher education Relieves over-utilized schools Challenges Challenges • • • • • • • High cost of CTE facilities Difficulty in attracting/retaining qualified staff Teach accreditation barriers Many students may get a GE just for the available resources in the CTE courses Disparity of technology at each school Reality that all schools can’t be all things • • • • • • • Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ Creating partnership between schools (funding, bell schedule, CTE programming, etc.) Transportation between home high schools and the CTE center Land acquisition time/cost Lack of qualified teachers Logistical and operational challenges Needs vision and leaders to spearhead Students potentially miss out on well-rounded HS experience Students may not know what CTE specialization to commit to early in HS Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ Recommendation • Work with area stakeholders to determine strategic investments in area CTE spaces Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 273 Kaiser Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS Scenarios (Scenarios 2A-2B apply to all Honolulu District complexes) 2A Keep current distributed administration scenario 2B District-wide administration complex $$$$$ $$$$$ • • • • • Benefits Benefits • • • • • • • • • Consolidation of offices and provides one location for District admin and meeting spaces Could eliminate need to rent space for large workshops, training, events, etc. Allows currently occupied spaces at local schools to return to locally determined use Improves communication and collaboration. Reduces time and cost of travel for meetings Increase number of meeting spaces Central location for professional development and teacher resources Removes and relocates district admin out of local school classrooms allowing principals expanded options for school design Challenges Challenges • • • • • • • • • • Maintaining administration distributed throughout Honolulu in multiple schools Lack of adequate large group meeting space Poor communication Cost of travel for meetings (mileage and time) Difficult to collaborate and coordinate availability Offices are currently spread out Accessibility to the public Low visibility Limited parking at Wilson Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ ‫ ژ‬Priority 3 Consider re-acquiring Wailupe Valley site or location more centrally-located, such as Kaimuki HS could be another potential location Move administrative offices scattered in schools around the District to one location Repurpose vacated classrooms for instructional or school-support functions such as STEAM Consider combining Scenario 1B CTE Centerr and Scenario 2B Admin Complex on same site for more efficient use of land and facilities and more public visibility to the CTE program Determine site by December 2019 Change grade configuration • No changes to implement $20-40M Wailupe may be too far Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ Recommendation • Create a multi-purpose meeting and district-wide administration to centralize admin and free up classrooms in schools Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 274 Kaiser Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS FACILITY OPTIONS (not in priority order) 3 Kaiser HS Visual and Performing Arts Center • Build an auditorium with spaces for 2D/3D music and art instruction 4 Kaiser HS STEAM classroom addition 5 Nui Valley MS STEAM classroom addition 6 Heat abatement (various schools) • • Construct 4-6 classroom addition for STEAM instruction Construct 4-6 classroom addition for STEAM instruction • Assess, prioritize, and implement air condition and ventilation projects at all schools Benefits • New visual and performing arts space • Expensive costs and • Space is available operational expenses • Will serve all schools in the complex and Kalani complex • Provides new, modern learning environments • School may not have a need to for science, the arts, and project-based learning build classroom • Improves art programs • Need to upgrade current space • Provides new, modern learning environments • Need to upgrade facilities (3-4 for science, the arts, and project-based learning classroom addition) • Hahaione ES Buildings G • Needed to keep facilities open • Improves community aesthetics 9 Security improvements (various schools) • Needed to keep campus safe 12.1 $20-40M $$$$$ $500k-2.5M $$$$$ $500k-2.5M • All students have access to elevators • Kamiloiki ES two elevators • Construct or convert 1-2 classrooms into flexible resource spaces for science and art instruction • Construct covered outdoor learning space Special Education and/or Pre-K conversion (various schools) • Schools will have to find innovative ways to accommodate • Provides new, modern learning environments for science, the arts, and project-based learning • Benefits all schools Playground improvements (various schools) 14 Covered play court/multi-purpose facility (various schools) • $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M $$$$$ $20-40M • Renovate to meet the needs of students $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M • Hahaione ES Special Education renovation • Kamiloiki Special Education and Pre-k renovation 13 $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M $20-40M • Hahaione ES, Kamiloiki ES fencing Flexible STEAM and/or outdoor learning spaces (all ES and MS) $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M $$$$$ Flood drainage improvements (various schools) 11 $20-40M • Needs to keep up with technology and accommodate air conditioning needs 8 ADA accessibility improvements (various schools) $$$$$ $$$$$ Electrical upgrade (various schools) 10 Cost/ROM Range • Creates a positive learning environment • Helps take care and maintain the technology equipment 7 • Assess, prioritize, and implement power upgrade projects at all schools Challenges • Needed to meet playground standards Hahaione ES, Kamiloiki ES replace playground $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M • Serves multi-purpose needs • Construct sheltered multi-purpose facility where non-existent and feasible $$$$$ $20-40M Stakeholder Voice Funding Category Priority Tier ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #2 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #10 2 ‫ڝ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #10 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #5 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #3 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #7 2 ‫ڝ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #2 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #6 2 ‫ڝ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #10 2 ‫ڝ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #11 3 ‫ژ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #8 3 ‫ژ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #9 4 ‫ڜ‬ Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 275 Kaiser Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS FACILITY OPTIONS (not in priority order) 15 Aina Haina ES cafeteria addition • • Construct building additions in unused courtyard spaces to house flexible, collaborative project-based spaces in close proximity of existing classrooms. Renovate existing buildings to provide glass walls for visibility and sound barriers. Enhanced distance learning technologies and spaces 16 Furniture and technology refresh (all schools) 17 Prioritized repairs and maintenance (all schools) 18 Locally-determined enhancements (all schools) • Prioritized replacement of outdated furniture and equipment • Safety, code, and maintenance projects to include site drainage • Budget allotment for each school to fund stakeholder-driven projects Benefits Challenges • Expands cafeteria at Aina Haina ES, which is currently less than 50% standard size $$$$$ $20-40M $$$$$ • Modernized furniture and technology will promote innovative learning $500k-2.5M $$$$$ • Addresses top-priority needs at each school. • Empowers schools and students to define projects at time of execution Cost/ROM Range $7.5-20M • Requires policy to consistently allocate and implement projects $$$$$ $500k-2.5M Stakeholder Voice Funding Category Priority Tier ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #14 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #4 3 ‫ژ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #1 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #11 4 ‫ڜ‬ Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 276 Kalani Complex DATA and NEEDS Stakeholder Voice: Enrollment and Facility Data: School (a) 2017-18/ 2023-24 Enrollment 1383 / 1350 / 2% (b) Capacity (c) = (b) - (a) (d) = (a) / (b) Oldest / Projected 2023-24 Newest / Avg Capacity Projected Building Surplus Utilization % Old or Beyond Expected Life Adequacy Score / Rank Out of 260 1015 -335 1.33 1958 / 2004 / 57 90% 0.77 / 67 <ĂŝŵƵŬţ DŝĚĚůĞ ;ϲͲ 988 / 1017 8) / 3% 1188 171 0.86 1956 / 1972 / 56 74% 0.82 / 30 114 <ĈŚĂůĂ ůĞŵĞŶƚĂƌLJ 380 / 456 (K-5) / 20% 471 15 0.97 1954 / 1975 / 59 84% 0.72 / 98 130 Liholiho Elementary (K-5) 466 / 513 / 10% 373 -140 1.38 1940 / 1973 / 53 43% 0.63 / 166 149 tĂŝ॒ĂůĂĞ 546 / 546 Elementary PCS (K/ 0% 5) 510 -36 1.07 1958 / 1965 / 55 100% 0.68 / 120 150 tĂŝŬţŬţ Elementary (K-5) 587 / 565 / -4% 493 -72 1.15 1964 / 1967 / 53 100% 0.60 / 204 153 Wilson Elementary 580 / 561 (K-5) / -3% 498 -63 1.13 1960 / 1970 / 52 64% 0.68 / 125 4,548 -460 1.10 79% 0.70 119 Kalani High (9-12) 116 TOTAL 5,008 Technology-wise we want our kids to compete with everyone in the world. We want them to be in the 21st century and not compete to get there when everyone else is already there. - Parent Students should be comfortable in their classroom and be given good opportunities to learn. We just need adequate facilities, they don’t need to be fancy. - Student We don’t have a lot of hope and we don’t know what to do. It’s very frustrating, not knowing where the money is going. - Parent Besides education and technology, we need to look at outdoor play and enrichment activities to complement student experience. - Community Schools should be safe and innovative; places where students have the motivation that spurs them to move on through the grade levels. - Parent Challenges: Ch • Net GEs cause school to exceed capacity: Wilson ES (283), Waikiki ES (199) • Industrial Arts and family consumer science less than 50% of standard space: Kalani HS, Kaimuki MS • Moderate flood risk: site in extreme tsunami zone (Kahala ES, Waikiki ES) • Over half of facilities are classified as old or beyond useful life • Extreme capacity over-utilization at Kalani HS and Liholiho ES. • Library less than 50% of standard space: Waikiki ES, Wilson ES • Cafeteria less than 50% of standard space: Wilson ES, Liholiho ES, Waialae ES • Dance/drama less than 50% of standard space: Kalani HS • Art less than 50%: Kaimuki MS • No dedicated music room at Waikiki ES • Kalani HS PE locker/shower gender equity 31%/69% split • Renovate field, renovate track, resurface courts • Admin less than 50% of standard space: Kahala ES, Waikiki ES Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 277 Kalani Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS SCENARIOS (Scenarios 1A-1B apply to all Honolulu District complexes) Honolulu District separate Career Tech programs at each high school 1A $$$$$ • $40-75M • • standalone/shared Career Tech campus ‫ ڗ‬Priority 1 Renovate/enhance Career Technical Education (CTE) facilities at all Honolulu high schools Consider complementary programs among all area high schools to allow for more specialized career pathways and focused capital and staff resources Step 1: By December 2019, engage District and local MS, HS, and business stakeholders to determine strategic investments in CTE in District Step 2: Invest in MS STEAM renovations and HS CTE spaces accordingly • 1B Honolulu District $$$$$ • Acquire or repurpose land and construct new ### capacity high school campus with highlyspecialized facilities and equipment for advanced 21st century CTE center. Consider under-utilized Kaimuki HS campus. Facility may house a standalone school, and/or be shared and jointly operated by multiple Honolulu District high schools Explore partnerships with UH and private partners to attract and retain specialized instructors in locally relevant careers • • Benefits Benefits • • • • • • • No operational changes to implement Immediate implementation Each school needs to have a modern CTE basic facility Allows capacity to expand in the future Students better prepared for 21st century skills and careers Explore different curriculums • • • • Reduces HS capacity utilization with new off-site capacity Expands student career opportunities Combines resources to create a highlyresourced, concentrated CTE program, both in terms of facilities and staffing Opportunity to collaborate with higher education Relieves over-utilized schools Challenges Challenges • • • • • • • High cost of CTE facilities Difficulty in attracting/retaining qualified staff Teach accreditation barriers Many students may get a GE just for the available resources in the CTE courses Disparity of technology at each school Reality that all schools can’t be all things • • • • • • • Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ Creating partnership between schools (funding, bell schedule, CTE programming, etc.) Transportation between home high schools and the CTE center Land acquisition time/cost Lack of qualified teachers Logistical and operational challenges Needs vision and leaders to spearhead Students potentially miss out on well-rounded HS experience Students may not know what CTE specialization to commit to early in HS Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ Recommendation • Work with area stakeholders to determine strategic investments in area CTE spaces Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 278 Kalani Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS Scenarios (Scenarios 2A-2B apply to all Honolulu District complexes) 2A Keep current distributed administration scenario 2B District-wide administration complex $$$$$ $$$$$ • • • • • Benefits Benefits • • • • • • • • • Consolidation of offices and provides one location for District admin and meeting spaces Could eliminate need to rent space for large workshops, training, events, etc. Allows currently occupied spaces at local schools to return to locally determined use Improves communication and collaboration. Reduces time and cost of travel for meetings Increase number of meeting spaces Central location for professional development and teacher resources Removes and relocates district admin out of local school classrooms allowing principals expanded options for school design Challenges Challenges • • • • • • • • • • Maintaining administration distributed throughout Honolulu in multiple schools Lack of adequate large group meeting space Poor communication Cost of travel for meetings (mileage and time) Difficult to collaborate and coordinate availability Offices are currently spread out Accessibility to the public Low visibility Limited parking at Wilson Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ ‫ ژ‬Priority 3 Consider re-acquiring Wailupe Valley site or location more centrally-located, such as Kaimuki HS could be another potential location Move administrative offices scattered in schools around the District to one location Repurpose vacated classrooms for instructional or school-support functions such as STEAM Consider combining Scenario 1B CTE Centerr and Scenario 2B Admin Complex on same site for more efficient use of land and facilities and more public visibility to the CTE program Determine site by December 2019 Change grade configuration • No changes to implement $20-40M Wailupe may be too far Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ Recommendation • Create a multi-purpose meeting and district-wide administration to centralize admin and free up classrooms in schools Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 279 Kalani Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS FACILITY OPTIONS (not in priority order) 3 Kalani HS 21st century music instruction space 4 Kalani HS classroom addition • • • Build a music instruction facility on Kalani HS campus 12+ classroom, multi-story addition to relieve over-crowding Include STEAM and Special Education classrooms 5 Kaimuki MS STEAM classroom renovations 6 Heat abatement (various schools) 7 Electrical upgrade (various schools) 8 Flood drainage improvements (various schools) 9 10 11 • Renovate existing classrooms (2-4) for STEAM • Assess, prioritize, and implement air condition and ventilation projects at various schools • Assess, prioritize, and implement power upgrade projects at various schools • Kahala ES Buildings D and E • Liholiho ES cafeteria Challenges • Creates a modern music learning environment • Extends construction on occupied site • Limited space to build $2.5-7.5M • Creates new, modern learning environments • Relieves over-crowding • Capacity growth avoidable by limiting incoming GEs $$$$$ • Cool environment will improve student focus • Cost • Electrical capacity of older schools • Disruption to learning if job is No potential school closings done during school hours Less water and sewer damage • Disruption to school space for Less potential of mold growth Fewer accidents of slipping, falling, drainage improvements and jumping over puddles • Students may feel like they are in jail if they are surrounded by fencing • Liholiho ES fencing off of 9th Avenue ADA accessibility improvements (various schools) • Provides new, modern learning environments for science, the arts and project-based learning • Allows for flexible time to use space to complete design projects Special Education and/or Pre-K conversion (various schools) Parking lot expansion (various schools) • • $$$$$ $20-40M $$$$$ $20-40M $$$$$ $500k-2.5M $$$$$ $500k-2.5M $2.5-7.5M • Kahala ES Special Education renovation • Liholiho ES hot water for Special Education 13 $20-40M $$$$$ • Kahala ADA restrooms • Liholiho elevator, restrooms Flexible STEAM and/or outdoor learning spaces (all ES and MS) $$$$$ $500k-2.5M • Less chance of electrical fires • Long time to complete • Less chance of flickering lights and outages • • • • Cost/ROM Range $$$$$ • Creates new, modern learning environments Security improvements (various schools) • Construct or convert 1-2 classrooms into teacher-driven flexible resource spaces for science and art instruction • Construct covered outdoor learning space 12.1 Benefits Liholiho ES add parking for six cars Cellular structured grass solutions suggested as alternative solution $$$$$ $20-40M $$$$$ $500k-2.5M $$$$$ $500k-2.5M Stakeholder Voice Funding Category Priority Tier ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #8 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #9 4 ‫ڜ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #10 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #5 2 ‫ڝ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #3 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #7 2 ‫ڝ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #2 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #6 2 ‫ڝ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #10 2 ‫ڝ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #11 3 ‫ژ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #13 4 ‫ڜ‬ Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 280 Kalani Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS FACILITY OPTIONS 14 Covered play court/multi-purpose facility (various schools) 15 Lihoho ES, Waialae ES, and Wilson ES cafeteria expansion Benefits Challenges $$$$$ • Construct sheltered multi-purpose facility where non-existent and feasible • • Build additions to the existing cafeteria Consider indoor/outdoor design 16 Furniture and technology refresh (all schools) 17 Prioritized repairs and maintenance (all schools) 18 Locally-determined enhancements (all schools) $20-40M • Current cafeterias are less than 50% of standard size $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M $$$$$ • Prioritized replacement of outdated furniture and equipment • Safety, code, and maintenance projects to include site drainage • Budget allotment for each school to fund stakeholder-driven projects Cost/ROM Range $500k-2.5M $$$$$ • Addresses top-priority needs at each school • Empowers schools and students to define projects at time of execution $7.5-20M • Requires policy to consistently $$$$$ allocate and implement $500k-2.5M projects Stakeholder Voice Funding Category Priority Tier ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #9 4 ‫ڜ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #14 4 ‫ڜ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #4 3 ‫ژ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #1 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #11 4 ‫ڜ‬ Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 281 Kaimuki Complex DATA and NEEDS Stakeholder Voice: Enrollment and Facility Data: School (a) 2017-18/ 2023-24 Enrollment (b) Capacity (c) = (b) - (a) (d) = (a) / (b) Oldest / Projected 2023-24 Newest / Avg Capacity Projected Building Surplus Utilization % Old or Beyond Expected Life Adequacy Score / Rank Out of 260 115 <ĂŝŵƵŬţ ,ŝŐŚ ;ϵͲ 12) ϳϬϯ ͬ ϲϵϯ / -1% 863 170 0.80 ϭϵϰϵ ͬ ϭϵϴϮ ͬ 61 86% 0.83 / 21 110 Jarrett Middle (68) 256 / 214 / -16% 522 308 0.41 ϭϵϱϲ ͬ ϭϵϲϬ ͬ 61 100% 0.81 / 32 152 Washington Middle (6-8) 801 / 638 / -20% 1021 383 0.62 ϭϵϮϲ ͬ ϭϵϵϬ ͬ 66 100% 0.75 / 81 101 Ala Wai Elementary (K-5) 384 / 383 / 0% 463 80 0.83 ϭϵϱϰ ͬ ϭϵϳϬ ͬ 58 84% 0.66 / 142 102 ůŝ॒ŝƃůĂŶŝ Elementary (K-5) Ϯϭϵ ͬ ϮϭϮ / -3% 368 156 0.58 ϭϵϱϭ ͬ ϭϵϳϬ ͬ 55 88% 0.65 / 154 ϭϬϵ ,ƃŬƻůĂŶŝ Elementary (K-5) 340 / 320 / -6% ϯϵϲ 76 0.81 ϭϵϱϴ ͬ ϭϵϳϭ ͬ 57 ϵϲй 0.66 / 144 111 Jefferson Elementary (K-5) ϯϴϬ ͬ ϯϰϵ / -8% 386 37 Ϭ͘ϵϬ ϭϵϱϭ ͬ ϮϬϭϬ ͬ 48 18% 0.81 / 33 128 <ƻŚŝƃ ůĞŵĞŶƚĂƌLJ 237 / 232 (K-5) / -2% Ϯϰϵ 17 Ϭ͘ϵϯ ϭϵϱϬ ͬ ϮϬϭϮ ͬ ϰϵ 45% 0.76 / 76 135 Lunalilo Elementary (K-5) 358 / 308 / -14% 488 180 0.63 ϭϵϱϭ ͬ ϭϵϳϭ ͬ 54 83% 0.67 / 133 142 WĈůŽůŽ ůĞŵĞŶƚĂƌLJ Ϯϳϳ ͬ Ϯϵϵ (K-5) / 8% 280 Ͳϭϵ 1.07 ϭϵϱϭ ͬ ϭϵϳϬ ͬ 55 81% 0.75 / 84 5,036 1,388 0.72 78% 0.73 TOTAL 3,648 Our PTA funded our classrooms’ AC and installed it themselves because going through the DOE is expensive and too difficult. It’s easier to find loopholes in the system. - Student We need to help our students become innovative and critical-thinking problem-solvers. We should promote philosophies we want our kids to grow up with. - Teacher Not all students will fit in the common core. I want our schools to have opportunities to learn outside of book learning. - Teacher Safety is a big issue. Our facilities are running down. We want our schools to be adequate, comfortable, and where their needs are met. - Teacher I want flex spaces where we can transform the space into a cafeteria for various learning activities. - Teacher Challenges: Ch • 1760 students GE out or attend charter, representing 42%-57% of school attendance boundaries • Industrial Arts less than 50% of standard space: Washington MS • Library less than 50% of standard space: Washington MS • Future flood risk: 54% of site under 3.2' sea rise (Ala Wai ES) • Moderate flood risk: site in extreme tsunami zone (Washington MS, Lunalilo ES, Jefferson ES) • No science rooms at Ala Wai ES, Aliiolani ES, Lunalilo ES • Cafeteria less than 50% of standard space: Kuhio ES • Over half of facilities are classified as old or beyond useful life • 1,388 seats under-utilized capacity complex-wide. Lowest utilization at Jarrett MS, Washington MS, Aliiolani ES, Lunalilo ES • Music and art less than 50% of standard space: Jarrett MS • No dedicated art or music rooms at most elementary schools • Kaimuki HS PE locker/shower gender equity • PE lockers less than 50% of standard space: Washington MS • Resurface courts, weight room, pool Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 282 Kaimuki Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS SCENARIOS (Scenarios 1A-1B apply to all Honolulu District complexes) Honolulu District separate Career Tech programs at each high school 1A $$$$$ • $40-75M • • standalone/shared Career Tech campus ‫ ڗ‬Priority 1 Renovate/enhance Career Technical Education (CTE) facilities at all Honolulu high schools Consider complementary programs among all area high schools to allow for more specialized career pathways and focused capital and staff resources Step 1: By December 2019, engage District and local MS, HS, and business stakeholders to determine strategic investments in CTE in District Step 2: Invest in MS STEAM renovations and HS CTE spaces accordingly • 1B Honolulu District $$$$$ • Acquire or repurpose land and construct new ### capacity high school campus with highlyspecialized facilities and equipment for advanced 21st century CTE center. Consider under-utilized Kaimuki HS campus. Facility may house a standalone school, and/or be shared and jointly operated by multiple Honolulu District high schools Explore partnerships with UH and private partners to attract and retain specialized instructors in locally relevant careers • • Benefits Benefits • • • • • • • No operational changes to implement Immediate implementation Each school needs to have a modern CTE basic facility Allows capacity to expand in the future Students better prepared for 21st century skills and careers Explore different curriculums • • • • Reduces HS capacity utilization with new off-site capacity Expands student career opportunities Combines resources to create a highlyresourced, concentrated CTE program, both in terms of facilities and staffing Opportunity to collaborate with higher education Relieves over-utilized schools Challenges Challenges • • • • • • • High cost of CTE facilities Difficulty in attracting/retaining qualified staff Teach accreditation barriers Many students may get a GE just for the available resources in the CTE courses Disparity of technology at each school Reality that all schools can’t be all things • • • • • • • Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ Creating partnership between schools (funding, bell schedule, CTE programming, etc.) Transportation between home high schools and the CTE center Land acquisition time/cost Lack of qualified teachers Logistical and operational challenges Needs vision and leaders to spearhead Students potentially miss out on well-rounded HS experience Students may not know what CTE specialization to commit to early in HS Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ Recommendation • Work with area stakeholders to determine strategic investments in area CTE spaces Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 283 Kaimuki Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS Scenarios (Scenarios 2A-2B apply to all Honolulu District complexes) 2A Keep current distributed administration scenario 2B District-wide administration complex $$$$$ $$$$$ • • • • • Benefits Benefits • • • • • • • • • Consolidation of offices and provides one location for District admin and meeting spaces Could eliminate need to rent space for large workshops, training, events, etc. Allows currently occupied spaces at local schools to return to locally determined use Improves communication and collaboration. Reduces time and cost of travel for meetings Increase number of meeting spaces Central location for professional development and teacher resources Removes and relocates district admin out of local school classrooms allowing principals expanded options for school design Challenges Challenges • • • • • • • • • • Maintaining administration distributed throughout Honolulu in multiple schools Lack of adequate large group meeting space Poor communication Cost of travel for meetings (mileage and time) Difficult to collaborate and coordinate availability Offices are currently spread out Accessibility to the public Low visibility Limited parking at Wilson Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ ‫ ژ‬Priority 3 Consider re-acquiring Wailupe Valley site or location more centrally-located, such as Kaimuki HS could be another potential location Move administrative offices scattered in schools around the District to one location Repurpose vacated classrooms for instructional or school-support functions such as STEAM Consider combining Scenario 1B CTE Center and Scenario 2B Admin Complex on same site for more efficient use of land and facilities and more public visibility to the CTE program Determine site by December 2019 Change grade configuration • No changes to implement $20-40M Wailupe may be too far Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ Recommendation • Create a multi-purpose meeting and district-wide administration to centralize admin and free up classrooms in schools Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 284 Kaimuki Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS SCENARIOS (Kaimuki grade configurations) 3A Keep current operational scenario Palolo/Jarrett Pre-K-8 3B $$$$$ $$$$$ • $40-75M 3C Palolo/Aliiolani/Jarrett Pre-K-8 ‫ ڗ‬Priority 1 Renovate/reconstruct Jarrett MS with 21st century facility to accommodate new combined Pre-K-8 program of 800 students from Palolo ES/Jarrett MS Repurpose Palolo ES site for admin purposes or community-designed purpose TBD (consider teacher housing, professional learning center/ admin space, revenue generation, other) Potential use of Palolo E – District Admin per 2B By December 2019, engage stakeholders in vision for new school and multi-purpose admin center • • • 3D Kaimuki 7-12 $$$$$ • $$$$$ Similar to Scenario 2B, except both Palolo ES and Aliiolani ES merge with Jarrett MS for a larger PreK-8 program of 1,200 students Repurpose both Palolo ES and Aliiolani ES sites for community-designed purpose TBD (consider teacher housing, professional learning center/admin space, revenue generation, other) • • Renovate/reconstruct Jarrett MS or Palolo ES campus for Palolo Pre-K-6 program Repurpose Jarrett MS or Palolo ES site for community-designed purpose TBD (consider teacher housing, professional learning center/admin space, revenue generation, other) Move Jarrett MS as a 7-8 into surplus HS capacity at Kaimuki HS; partner with Kaimuki HS and/or SEEQS to align programming 7-12 • • Benefits Benefits Benefits Benefits • • • • No changes to implement • • • • • • • • • Larger schools can offer more enrichment programs such as language, music, and art Move students from old facilities into new/rebuilt buildings equipped for 21st century New community asset and potential revenue Provides a consistent home for students grades Pre-K-8 for 9+ years Better utilizes Jarrett site (projected 41% utilized) One less elementary school that needs maintained to standard Similar school culture and ethnicities Continuity and consistent curriculum, programs, and culture from K-8 Student mentoring and leadership opportunities A lot of space available at Jarrett MS • • • • Provides a consistent home for students grades Pre-K-8 for 9+ years New classroom renovations and additions Better utilizes Jarrett MS site (projected to be 41% utilized) Two less elementary schools that needs maintained to standard Opportunity to repurpose and/or leverage two ES sites for alternative use or revenue generation • • • Better utilizes existing facilities (Jarrett MS and Kaimuki HS) and increases program opportunities Allows for 7-12 program integration at Kaimuki HS, and potentially attraction to Jarrett MS students opting for GE/charter Opportunity to repurpose and/or leverage a ES site for alternative use or revenue generation Could boost retention of HS students at Kaimuki HS Challenges Challenges Challenges Challenges • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • High rate of GE/charter opt-out, from 42-57%, not including those who choose private schools Kaimuki complex elementary schools are among smallest on Oahu, and based on funding weighted student formulas, smaller schools struggle to offer enrichment programs Significant capacity under-utilization Facilities are in old, outdated condition Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ School consolidation Grade configuration change Range of Pre-K-8 may be too big Some of Jarrett MS’s buildings are structurally deficient • Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ School consolidation Grade configuration change Too big, too many students in one location Range of Pre-K-8 may be too big Some of Jarrett MS’s buildings are structurally deficient May have trouble getting students to school from the back of Palolo Valley Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ • • School consolidation Grade configuration change Potential challenges of housing 7-8th graders on the HS campus Potential increase of GEs out of Kaimuki HS 6th graders will have to go back to their elementary schools so ES campuses will have to be renovated to accommodate Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ Recommendation • Plan for new are Pre-K-8 and multi-purpose meeting and administration facilities Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 285 Kaimuki Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS SCENARIOS (Kaimuki grade configurations) Palolo Pre-School/Aliiolani K4/Jarrett 5-8 3E 3F Kuhio becomes Pre-K, Kuhio students rezoned to Lunalilo and Aliiolani $$$$$ • 3G Merge Aliiolani and Palolo on Aliiolani and Palolo becomes Pre-K $$$$$ Renovate/reconstruct Palolo ES to be a preschool. Reconfigure Aliiolani ES to be K-4, and Jarrett MS to be 6-8 Benefits • $$$$$ Renovate/reconstruct Kuhio for Pre-K. Rezone Kuhio ES students to Lunalilo ES and Aliiolani ES Benefits • Renovate/reconstruct Aliiolani ES to accommodate Aliiolani ES and Palolo ES students. Repurpose Palolo ES for Pre-K Benefits • Challenges Stakeholder Voice Challenges մմմմմ Stakeholder Voice Supports Scenario 4B Challenges մմմմմ Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 286 Kaimuki Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS SCENARIOS (elementary school portfolio) 4A Keep current operational scenario 4B Aliiolani reconstruction; elementary school consolidation $$$$$ $$$$$ • • Benefits Benefits • • • • • • Larger schools can offer more enrichment programs such as language, music, and art Move students from old facilities into new/rebuilt buildings equipped for 21st century New community asset and potential revenue Better utilizes capacity, and one less elementary school that needs maintained to standard Supports Scenario 3F and 3G Challenges Challenges • • • • • High rate of GE/charter opt-out, from 42%-57% of students, not including those who choose private schools Kaimuki complex elementary schools are among smallest on Oahu, and based on funding weighted student formulas, smaller schools struggle to offer enrichment programs Significant capacity under-utilization Facilities are in old, outdated condition Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ ‫ ڗ‬Priority 1 Conduct study and focused stakeholder outreach to inform consolidation of area elementary schools for “newer/fewer” long-range strategy Rebuild Aliilolani ES to 21st century standards and add ~200 capacity to accommodate additional elementary school students. Rebuild oldest buildings while keeping large green space. Repurpose surplus elementary site for communitydesigned purpose TBD (consider teacher housing, professional learning center/admin space, revenue generation, other). SAC: closing and repurposing Kuhio ES makes the most sense due to size, location, and facility needs. • No changes to implement $20-40M School consolidation Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ Recommendation • Rebuild Aliiolani ES on site. Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 287 Kaimuki Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS FACILITY OPTIONS (not in priority order) 5 Kaimuki HS repurpose buildings B, C & D for STEAM instruction • • 6 Repurpose designated buildings as indoor/outdoor STEAM space designed for engineering pathways Existing planning project Kaimuki HS revenue generation • Study options to repurpose portions of the site for Act 155 compliance; use available land and/or space to generate revenues to help fund 21st century school facilities and operations 7 Washington MS STEAM classroom renovations 8 Washington MS music classroom renovations 9 Heat abatement (various schools) • • Renovate 2-4 classrooms for STEAM instruction 11 Flood drainage improvements (various schools) 14 15 • New, modern learning environments • Renovates old buildings • Studies options to designate a portion(s) of the site to generate revenue for HIDOE operations • New, modern learning environments • Adds industrial arts space, which is currently less than half of standard • New, modern music instruction space $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M $$$$$ $20-40M $$$$$ $20-40M $$$$$ $500k-2.5M Pedestrian safety improvements (various schools) $$$$$ • Hokulani ES extend exit road/fire lane for improved drop-off • Jefferson ES widen entrance/exit $2.5-7.5M Security improvements (various schools) $$$$$ Ala Wai ES secure outdoor sink Hokulani ES cameras, lighting Kuhio ES site lighting Palolo ES retaining wall/fence $500k-2.5M ADA accessibility improvements (various schools) $$$$$ • Hokulani ES elevator to library • Kuhio ES ramp to cafeteria, Building C restrooms, Buildings C and H elevators • Palolo ES admin ramps, elevator, restrooms • Construct or convert 1-2 classrooms into flexible resource spaces for science and art instruction • Construct covered outdoor learning space $$$$$ $500k-2.5M $$$$$ • Ala Wai ES regrade, add drainage • Kuhio ES address runoff, erosion, and flooding Flexible STEAM and/or outdoor learning spaces (all ES and MS) $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M • Assess, prioritize, and implement power upgrade projects at all schools • • • • Cost/ROM Range $500k-2.5M • Assess, prioritize, and implement air condition and ventilation projects at all schools Electrical upgrade (various schools) 13 Challenges Renovate 2-4 classrooms for music instruction and band (in planning) 10 12 Benefits $2.5-7.5M • Provides new, modern learning environments for science, the arts, and project-based learning $$$$$ $20-40M Stakeholder Voice Funding Category Priority Tier ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #7 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #8 3 ‫ژ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #10 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #10 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #5 2 ‫ڝ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #3 2 ‫ڝ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #7 2 ‫ڝ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #2 2 ‫ڝ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #2 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #6 2 ‫ڝ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #10 2 ‫ڝ‬ Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 288 Kaimuki Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS FACILITY OPTIONS 16.1 17 Challenges Cost/ROM Range $$$$$ Special Education and/or Pre-K conversion (various schools) • Ala Wai ES, Hokulani ES special ed renovations $2.5-7.5M Stakeholder Voice Funding Category Priority Tier ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #11 3 ‫ژ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #13 4 ‫ڜ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #8 3 ‫ژ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #9 4 ‫ڜ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #9 2 ‫ڝ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #15 4 ‫ڜ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #14 4 ‫ڜ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #4 3 ‫ژ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #1 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #11 4 ‫ڜ‬ Parking lot expansion (various schools) • • • • 18 Benefits Hokulani ES add parking into new exit lane Jefferson ES reconfigure parking lot with drop-off expansion Kuhio ES replace parking with permeable paving to reduce runoff/erosion. Dependent on status of Kuhio ES (Scenario 4B). Cellular structured grass solutions suggested as alternative solution $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M Playground improvements (various schools) • • • $$$$$ Hokulani ES replace playground Kuhio ES re-landscape playfield. Kuhio ES replace parking with permeable paving to reduce runoff/erosion. Dependent on status of Kuhio ES (Scenario 4B). Palolo ES replace 3rd-5th grade playground 19 Covered play court/multi-purpose facility (various schools) 20 Covered walkways/shade structure/trees (various schools) $2.5-7.5M $$$$$ • Construct sheltered multi-purpose facility where non-existent and feasible • • • • $20-40M $$$$$ Hokulani ES extend to drop-off Jefferson ES shade structure/trees Kuhio ES new Lunalilo ES new to cafeteria, library, Building D 21 Lunalilo ES administration expansion 22 Kuhio ES cafeteria expansion • Gut/renovation, add air conditioning, power, and security • Kuhio ES replace parking with permeable paving to reduce runoff/erosion. Dependent on status of Kuhio ES (Scenario 4B). 23 Furniture and technology refresh (all schools) 24 Prioritized repairs and maintenance (all schools) 25 Locally-determined enhancements (all schools) $500k-2.5M $$$$$ • Provides new, modern administrative space $2.5-7.5M • Kuhio ES cafeteria currently less than half of standard space $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M $$$$$ • Prioritized replacement of outdated furniture and equipment • Safety, code, and maintenance projects • Budget allotment for each school to fund stakeholder-driven projects $500k-2.5M $$$$$ • Addresses top-priority needs at each school • Empowers schools and students to define projects at time of execution $7.5-20M • Requires policy to consistently allocate and implement projects $$$$$ $500k-2.5M Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 289 McKinley Complex DATA and NEEDS Stakeholder Voice: Enrollment and Facility Data: School (a) 2017-18/ 2023-24 Enrollment 1583 / 1486 / 6% (b) Capacity (c) = (b) - (a) (d) = (a) / (b) Oldest / Projected 2023-24 Newest / Avg Capacity Projected Building Surplus Utilization % Old or Beyond Expected Life Adequacy Score / Rank Out of 260 1714 228 0.87 1923 / 2011 / 71 88% 0.82 / 25 Central Middle (6- 391 / 396 8) / 1% 609 213 0.65 1925 / 1962 / 83 100% 0.74 / 88 112 <Ă॒ĂŚƵŵĂŶƵ Elementary (K-5) 526 / 524 / 0% 750 226 0.70 1964 / 1987 / 48 56% 0.59 / 211 117 <Ă॒ŝƵůĂŶŝ Elementary (K-5) 351 / 381 / 9% 491 110 0.78 1956 / 1970 / 59 86% 0.76 / 71 125 Kauluwela Elementary (K-5) 422 / 640 / 52% 304 -336 2.11 1938 / 1975 / 53 42% 0.52 / 241 129 Lanakila Elementary (K-5) 390 / 422 / 8% 400 -22 1.06 1956 / 1974 / 54 84% 0.62 / 186 131 Likelike Elementary (K-5) 341 / 352 / 3% 457 105 0.77 1961 / 1967 / 53 100% 0.64 / 161 147 Royal Elementary (K-5) 373 / 369 / -1% 412 43 0.90 1951 / 2001 / 44 70% 0.66 / 143 4,570 5,137 567 0.89 78% 0.67 138 McKinley High (912) 104 TOTAL I hope we can come together as a community and look for other opportunities to improve our schools and secure funding sources. - Community Member School should be a place where students are excited to be there; where we are respecting all students and empowering them to exercise their passions and be the people they want to be. - Teacher We’re getting to a place where we know what we need. I want to see our communities be invested in their community and have schools be their hub. - Parent We need to help our students become innovative and critical-thinking problemsolvers. We should promote philosophies we want our kids to grow up with. - Teacher Challenges: Ch • Kauluwela ES 218 projected enrollment growth (52%) • 42%-51% of each school’s students GE out or attend charter • Industrial Arts less than 50% of standard space: Castle HS, King IS • Library less than 50% of standard space: Likelike ES • Moderate flood risk: site in extreme tsunami zone (McKinley HS) • No science rooms at most elementary schools • Cafeteria less than 50% of standard space: McKinley HS, Kaahumanu ES, Kauluwela ES • Over half of facilities are classified as old or beyond useful life • No dedicated art or music rooms at most elementary schools • Severe capacity over-utilization: Kauluwela ES • Capacity under-utilization at Central MS, Kaahumanu ES, Kaiulani ES, Likelike ES • Renovate lockers, new training room Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 290 McKinley Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS SCENARIOS (Scenarios 1A-1B apply to all Honolulu District complexes) Honolulu District separate Career Tech programs at each high school 1A $$$$$ • $40-75M • • standalone/shared Career Tech campus ‫ ڗ‬Priority 1 Renovate/enhance Career Technical Education (CTE) facilities at all Honolulu high schools Consider complementary programs among all area high schools to allow for more specialized career pathways and focused capital and staff resources Step 1: By December 2019, engage District and local MS, HS, and business stakeholders to determine strategic investments in CTE in District Step 2: Invest in MS STEAM renovations and HS CTE spaces accordingly • 1B Honolulu District $$$$$ • Acquire or repurpose land and construct new ### capacity high school campus with highlyspecialized facilities and equipment for advanced 21st century CTE center. Consider under-utilized Kaimuki HS campus. Facility may house a standalone school, and/or be shared and jointly operated by multiple Honolulu District high schools Explore partnerships with UH and private partners to attract and retain specialized instructors in locally relevant careers • • Benefits Benefits • • • • • • • No operational changes to implement Immediate implementation Each school needs to have a modern CTE basic facility Allows capacity to expand in the future Students better prepared for 21st century skills and careers Explore different curriculums • • • • Reduces HS capacity utilization with new off-site capacity Expands student career opportunities Combines resources to create a highlyresourced, concentrated CTE program, both in terms of facilities and staffing Opportunity to collaborate with higher education Relieves over-utilized schools Challenges Challenges • • • • • • • High cost of CTE facilities Difficulty in attracting/retaining qualified staff Teach accreditation barriers Many students may get a GE just for the available resources in the CTE courses Disparity of technology at each school Reality that all schools can’t be all things • • • • • • • Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ Creating partnership between schools (funding, bell schedule, CTE programming, etc.) Transportation between home high schools and the CTE center Land acquisition time/cost Lack of qualified teachers Logistical and operational challenges Needs vision and leaders to spearhead Students potentially miss out on well-rounded HS experience Students may not know what CTE specialization to commit to early in HS Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ Recommendation • Work with area stakeholders to determine strategic investments in area CTE spaces Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 291 McKinley Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS Scenarios (Scenarios 2A-2B apply to all Honolulu District complexes) 2A Keep current distributed administration scenario 2B District-wide administration complex $$$$$ $$$$$ • • • • • Benefits Benefits • • • • • • • • • Consolidation of offices and provides one location for District admin and meeting spaces Could eliminate need to rent space for large workshops, training, events, etc. Allows currently occupied spaces at local schools to return to locally determined use Improves communication and collaboration. Reduces time and cost of travel for meetings Increase number of meeting spaces Central location for professional development and teacher resources Removes and relocates district admin out of local school classrooms allowing principals expanded options for school design Challenges Challenges • • • • • • • • • • Maintaining administration distributed throughout Honolulu in multiple schools Lack of adequate large group meeting space Poor communication Cost of travel for meetings (mileage and time) Difficult to collaborate and coordinate availability Offices are currently spread out Accessibility to the public Low visibility Limited parking at Wilson Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ ‫ ژ‬Priority 3 Consider re-acquiring Wailupe Valley site or location more centrally-located, such as Kaimuki HS could be another potential location Move administrative offices scattered in schools around the District to one location Repurpose vacated classrooms for instructional or school-support functions such as STEAM Consider combining Scenario 1B CTE Centerr and Scenario 2B Admin Complex on same site for more efficient use of land and facilities and more public visibility to the CTE program Determine site by December 2019 Change grade configuration • No changes to implement $20-40M Wailupe may be too far Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ Recommendation • Create a multi-purpose meeting and district-wide administration to centralize admin and free up classrooms in schools Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 292 McKinley Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS FACILITY OPTIONS (not in priority order) 3 4 5 McKinley HS stadium lighting and seating addition • Install new lighting and seating for stadium McKinley HS new multi-purpose cafeteria addition • Construct multi-purpose dining area addition Central MS STEAM renovation • • Renovate existing two to four classroom spaces STEAM instruction Consider locating on land mauka of Vineyard Boulevard 6 Heat abatement (various schools) 7 Electrical upgrade (various schools) 8 Flood drainage improvements (various schools) 9 10 11 12 Challenges • Provides adequate illumination for stadium • Allows for flexibility in sports scheduling • Extends construction on occupied site • Provides flexible shared assembly space • Provides adequate space for student dining • Students believe cafeteria and assembly space are currently adequate • Provides modern, flexible, multipurpose educational space $$$$$ $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M $$$$$ $20-40M $$$$$ • Assess, prioritize, and implement power upgrade projects at all schools $20-40M $$$$$ • Kaiulani ES runoff into HCC • Kauluwela ES Building M $500k-2.5M $$$$$ Pedestrian safety improvements (various schools) • Lanakila ES new drop-off and restripe parking $2.5-7.5M Security improvements (various schools) $$$$$ • Royal ES fencing • Kaiulani ES restroom entrance reconfiguration $500k-2.5M ADA accessibility improvements (various schools) $$$$$ • Kaahumanu ES elevator, restrooms • Kaiulani ES elevator • Royal ES Buildings A and B elevators Flexible STEAM and/or outdoor learning spaces (all ES and MS) Cost/ROM Range $2.5-7.5M • Assess, prioritize, and implement air condition and ventilation projects at all schools • Construct or convert 1-2 classrooms into flexible resource spaces for science and art instruction • Construct covered outdoor learning space 13.1 Benefits $2.5-7.5M • Provides new, modern learning environments for science, the arts, and project-based learning Special Education and/or Pre-K conversion (various schools) • Kaahumanu ES, Royal ES Special Education renovation • Kaiulani ES Special Education and Pre-K renovation • Lanakila ES Special Education and Pre-K renovation $$$$$ $20-40M $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M Stakeholder Voice Funding Category Priority Tier ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #9 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #11 5 ‫ړ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #10 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #5 2 ‫ڝ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #3 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #7 2 ‫ڝ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #2 2 ‫ڝ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #2 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #6 2 ‫ڝ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #10 2 ‫ڝ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #11 3 ‫ژ‬ Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 293 McKinley Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS FACILITY OPTIONS 14 Parking lot expansion (various schools) • • • • • • 15 Kaahumanu ES parking structure/subterranean, consider public-private revenue generation Kaiulani ES add parking for 12 cars Kauluwela ES pave gravel parking lot Lanakila ES expand parking Royal ES parking structure/subterranean, consider public-private revenue generation, shared with Central MS Cellular structured grass suggested as alternative solution Challenges • • • • $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M $$$$$ Kaahumanu ES replace playground Kaiulani ES add ADA sidewalk to playground Kauluwela ES new playground behind Building D Lanakila ES correct erosion/setting and replace playground Covered play court/multi-purpose facility (various schools) 17 Covered walkways/shade structure/trees (various schools) $2.5-7.5M $$$$$ • Construct sheltered multi-purpose facility where non-existent and feasible $20-40M $$$$$ • Kaiulani new multi-story • Kauluwela ES, Lanakila ES new Administration expansion (various schools) • Kaahumanu ES, Kauluwela ES expand/renovate admin offices • Kaiulani ES construct new admin building, repurpose admin into STEAM/maker space 19 Kaahumanu ES multi-purpose cafeteria expansion 20 Furniture and technology refresh (all schools) 21 Prioritized repairs and maintenance (all schools) 22 Locally-determined enhancements (all schools) 23 McKinley HS roof renovation/replacements to Buildings M and A • Construct multi-purpose dining area addition $500k-2.5M • Provides appropriate professional space for school administration • Flexible shared assembly space • Adequate space for student dining • Budget allotment for each school to fund stakeholder-driven projects $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M $$$$$ • Prioritized replacement of outdated furniture and equipment • Safety, code, and maintenance projects Cost/ROM Stakeholder Range Voice Funding Category Priority Tier • Significant need for additional parking Playground improvements (various schools) 16 18 Benefits $500k-2.5M • Addresses top-priority needs at each school. • Empowers schools and students to • Requires policy to define projects at time of execution. consistently allocate and implement projects $$$$$ $7.5-20M $$$$$ $500k-2.5M $$$$$ $500k-2.5M ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #13 4 ‫ڜ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #8 3 ‫ژ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #9 4 ‫ڜ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #9 2 ‫ڝ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #15 4 ‫ڜ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #14 3 ‫ژ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #4 3 ‫ژ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #1 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #11 4 ‫ڜ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #1 1 ‫ڗ‬ Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 294 Roosevelt Complex DATA and NEEDS Stakeholder Voice: Enrollment and Facility Data: School (a) 2017-18/ 2023-24 Enrollment 1363 / 1289 / 5% (b) Capacity (c) = (b) - (a) (d) = (a) / (b) Oldest / Projected 2023-24 Newest / Avg Capacity Projected Building Surplus Utilization % Old or Beyond Expected Life Adequacy ^ĐŽƌĞ ͬ ZĂŶŬ Out of 260 1123 -166 1.15 1932 / 1971 / 76 96% 0.76 / 74 ŶƵĞŶƵĞ ^ĐŚŽŽů ;<Ͳ 455 / 528 12) / 16% 530 2 1.00 1958 / 1970 / 54 87% 0.65 / 149 126 <ĂǁĈŶĂŶĂŬŽĂ Middle (6-8) 775 / 797 / 3% 819 22 0.97 1936 / 1970 / 59 61% 0.78 / 56 148 Stevenson Middle (6-8) 647 / 643 / -1% 700 57 0.92 1951 / 2000 / 65 97% 0.81 / 35 134 Lincoln ůĞŵĞŶƚĂƌLJ ;<ͲϱͿ 341 / 366 / 7% 418 52 0.88 1955 / 1955 / 63 100% 0.72 / 101 136 DĂ॒ĞŵĂ॒Ğ ůĞŵĞŶƚĂƌLJ ;<ͲϱͿ 682 / 689 / 1% 571 -118 1.21 1950 / 1967 / 59 100% 0.62 / 184 137 DĈŶŽĂ ůĞŵĞŶƚĂƌLJ ;<ͲϱͿ 535 / 529 / -1% 627 98 0.84 1952 / 2000 / 62 93% 0.69 / 113 140 Noelani ůĞŵĞŶƚĂƌLJ ;<ͲϱͿ 475 / 509 / 7% 419 -90 1.21 1960 / 1972 / 51 75% 0.59 / 216 141 EƵ॒ƵĂŶƵ ůĞŵĞŶƚĂƌLJ ;<ͲϱͿ 370 / 353 / -5% 333 -20 1.06 1960 / 1970 / 55 81% 0.61 / 200 143 Pauoa Elementary 285 / 315 ;<ͲϱͿ / 11% 1954 / 1969 / 55 84% 0.75 / 78 87% 0.70 146 Roosevelt High (912) 103 TOTAL 6,018 381 66 0.83 5,921 -97 1.02 I attended a concert at Roosevelt HS and the lighting was so poor, that parents were helping other parents get to their car using the cell phone lights. - Parent I would just like to see my science teachers not complain about the roofs caving in on them and rain dripping on the tables. - Student There are some bright spots and good things going on in the DOE. I’m a proud parent of a junior at Farrington HS. I also want to be an advocate for the diverse learner needs. I’d like to see more flex groupings and classrooms. - Teacher We have a new science building that is our gem on campus. It’s our draw. I’m proud that this is the first year at Stevenson where no one GE’d to Kawananakoa. - Teacher We really need a covered play court because when it rains, we have no choice but to cram so many kids into two rooms to watch a movie. - Teacher Challenges: Ch • Net GEs cause school to exceed capacity: Roosevelt HS (348), Maemae ES (227), Noelani ES (97) • Lincoiln ES 234 of 503 (47%) students GE out or attend charter • Majority of facilities are classified as old or beyond useful life • Capacity over-utilization: Maemae ES, Noelani ES • Industrial Arts less than 50% of standard space: Roosevelt HS • Family consumer science less than 50%: Stevenson MS, Kawananakoa MS • Library less than 50% of standard space: Roosevelt HS, Anuenue K12, Noelani ES, Maemae ES • No science room at Noelani ES • Cafeteria less than 50% of standard space: Noelani ES, Anuenue K-12 • Music less than 50% of standard space: Roosevelt HS, Anuenue K12, Kawananakoa MS • Art less than 50%: Anuenue K-12 • Admin less than 50% of standard space: Maemae ES, Noelani ES, Anuenue K-12 • Anuenue K-12 has under-sized lockers and no gym • New gym, pool, wrestling room, riflery Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 295 Roosevelt Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS SCENARIOS (Scenarios 1A-1B apply to all Honolulu District complexes) Honolulu District separate Career Tech programs at each high school 1A $$$$$ • $40-75M • • standalone/shared Career Tech campus ‫ ڗ‬Priority 1 Renovate/enhance Career Technical Education (CTE) facilities at all Honolulu high schools Consider complementary programs among all area high schools to allow for more specialized career pathways and focused capital and staff resources Step 1: By December 2019, engage District and local MS, HS, and business stakeholders to determine strategic investments in CTE in District Step 2: Invest in MS STEAM renovations and HS CTE spaces accordingly • 1B Honolulu District $$$$$ • Acquire or repurpose land and construct new ### capacity high school campus with highlyspecialized facilities and equipment for advanced 21st century CTE center. Consider under-utilized Kaimuki HS campus. Facility may house a standalone school, and/or be shared and jointly operated by multiple Honolulu District high schools Explore partnerships with UH and private partners to attract and retain specialized instructors in locally relevant careers • • Benefits Benefits • • • • • • • No operational changes to implement Immediate implementation Each school needs to have a modern CTE basic facility Allows capacity to expand in the future Students better prepared for 21st century skills and careers Explore different curriculums • • • • Reduces HS capacity utilization with new off-site capacity Expands student career opportunities Combines resources to create a highlyresourced, concentrated CTE program, both in terms of facilities and staffing Opportunity to collaborate with higher education Relieves over-utilized schools Challenges Challenges • • • • • • • High cost of CTE facilities Difficulty in attracting/retaining qualified staff Teach accreditation barriers Many students may get a GE just for the available resources in the CTE courses Disparity of technology at each school Reality that all schools can’t be all things • • • • • • • Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ Creating partnership between schools (funding, bell schedule, CTE programming, etc.) Transportation between home high schools and the CTE center Land acquisition time/cost Lack of qualified teachers Logistical and operational challenges Needs vision and leaders to spearhead Students potentially miss out on well-rounded HS experience Students may not know what CTE specialization to commit to early in HS Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ Recommendation • Work with area stakeholders to determine strategic investments in area CTE spaces Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 296 Roosevelt Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS Scenarios (Scenarios 2A-2B apply to all Honolulu District complexes) 2A Keep current distributed administration scenario 2B District-wide administration complex $$$$$ $$$$$ • • • • • Benefits Benefits • • • • • • • • • Consolidation of offices and provides one location for District admin and meeting spaces Could eliminate need to rent space for large workshops, training, events, etc. Allows currently occupied spaces at local schools to return to locally determined use Improves communication and collaboration. Reduces time and cost of travel for meetings Increase number of meeting spaces Central location for professional development and teacher resources Removes and relocates district admin out of local school classrooms allowing principals expanded options for school design Challenges Challenges • • • • • • • • • • Maintaining administration distributed throughout Honolulu in multiple schools Lack of adequate large group meeting space Poor communication Cost of travel for meetings (mileage and time) Difficult to collaborate and coordinate availability Offices are currently spread out Accessibility to the public Low visibility Limited parking at Wilson Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ ‫ ژ‬Priority 3 Consider re-acquiring Wailupe Valley site or location more centrally-located, such as Kaimuki HS could be another potential location Move administrative offices scattered in schools around the District to one location Repurpose vacated classrooms for instructional or school-support functions such as STEAM Consider combining Scenario 1B CTE Centerr and Scenario 2B Admin Complex on same site for more efficient use of land and facilities and more public visibility to the CTE program Determine site by December 2019 Change grade configuration • No changes to implement $20-40M Wailupe may be too far Stakeholder Voice մմմմմ Recommendation • Create a multi-purpose meeting and district-wide administration to centralize admin and free up classrooms in schools Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 297 Roosevelt Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS FACILITY OPTIONS (not in priority order) 3 4 Roosevelt HS new gymnasium with 4-6 classroom spaces • • Rebuild or renovate gymnasium on-site Construct 4-6 flexible classroom spaces Roosevelt HS PE locker room expansion • • Construct additional locker room space Included in Option 3 5 Roosevelt HS outdoor performance and instruction space 6 Renovate music spaces (all middle schools) • • • • Construct multi-purpose outdoor space on northwest portion of site Renovate/upgrade/expand existing music spaces Include appropriate equipment Kawananakoa MS raze/replace Building C 7 Heat abatement (various schools) 8 Electrical upgrade (various schools) 9 10 11 12 Challenges Cost/ROM Range • Provides modern flexible educational space • Helps alleviate capacity needs • Extends construction on occupied site $$$$$ • Provides needed locker room space for PE class • Provides multi-purpose, outdoor space for arts instruction and other uses $$$$$ • Land is sloped • Provides adequate space to meet music program needs $$$$$ $20-40M $$$$$ $20-40M $$$$$ • Lanakila ES Building C and I, parking lot • Manoa ES 1st and 2nd grade $500k-2.5M • Security and fencing will improve safety at ES and prevent homeless invasions on campus ADA accessibility improvements (various schools) $$$$$ $500k-2.5M $$$$$ • Noelani ES two elevators • Pauoa ES one elevator Flexible STEAM and/or outdoor learning spaces (all ES and MS) $20-40M $$$$$ Flood drainage improvements (various schools) • Lincoln ES fencing/gate; floodlighting • Pauoa ES fencing $$$$$ $20-40M • Assess, prioritize, and implement power upgrade projects at all schools prior to installing air conditioning units Security improvements (various schools) $20-40M $2.5-7.5M • Assess, prioritize, and implement air condition and ventilation projects at all schools • Construct or convert 1-2 classrooms into flexible resource spaces for science and art instruction • Construct covered outdoor learning space 13.1 Benefits $2.5-7.5M • Provides new, modern learning environments for science, the arts, and project-based learning Special Education and/or Pre-K conversion (various schools) • Lincoln ES Pre-K renovation • Pauoa ES Special Education renovation $$$$$ $20-40M $$$$$ $2.5-7.5M Stakeholder Voice Funding Category Priority Tier ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #4 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #6 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ HS - #6 5 ‫ړ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #10 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #5 2 ‫ڝ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #3 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #7 2 ‫ڝ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #2 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #6 2 ‫ڝ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #10 2 ‫ڝ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #11 3 ‫ژ‬ Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 298 Roosevelt Complex SCENARIOS and FACILITY OPTIONS FACILITY OPTIONS 14 15 Benefits Challenges Parking lot expansion (various schools) • • $$$$$ Lincoln ES add parking for 40 cars Cellular structured grass is suggested as alternative solution 16 Covered play court/multi-purpose facility (various schools) 17 Nuuanu ES phased reconstruction 18 Pauoa ES, Maemae ES administration renovation 19 Furniture and technology refresh (all schools) 20 Prioritized repairs and maintenance (all schools) 21 Locally-determined enhancements (all schools) • Rebuild school with modern 21st century facility • Gut/renovation, add air conditioning, power, and security • Prioritized replacement of outdated furniture and equipment • Safety, code, and maintenance projects to include site drainage • Budget allotment for each school to fund stakeholder-driven projects • E.g., Manoa PV panels ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #8 3 ‫ژ‬ $20-40M ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #9 4 ‫ڜ‬ $$$$$ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ 5 ‫ړ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #15 4 ‫ڜ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #4 3 ‫ژ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #1 1 ‫ڗ‬ ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #11 4 ‫ڜ‬ $$$$$ • Provides modern facilities for instruction $40-75M $$$$$ • Provides new, modern administrative space $2.5-7.5M $$$$$ • Quick and easy to do and is important $500k-2.5M $$$$$ • Addresses top-priority needs at each school • Empowers schools and students to define projects at time of execution $7.5-20M • Requires policy to consistently allocate and implement projects Priority Tier ‫ڜ‬ $2.5-7.5M • Construct sheltered multi-purpose facility where non-existent and feasible Funding Category 4 $$$$$ Manoa ES repave play court Noelani ES, Pauoa ES replace playground Stakeholder Voice ᪫᪫᪫᪫᪫ #8 $2.5-7.5M Playground improvements (various schools) • • Cost/ROM Range $$$$$ $500k-2.5M Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan: Options Development Report Version 3 (2019 February) 299 APPENDIX Stakeholder Feedback Stakeholder Feedback Stakeholder Advisory Committee members expressed appreciation for being engaged by HIDOE to help identify and prioritize their local school needs. Overwhelmingly, SAC members described the FMP process as an important step toward bringing equity to schools statewide. Some committee members were surprised at the volume of projects and extent of facility needs, and many were happy to see that the FMP addresses persistent challenges even when some of them may be controversial. Stakeholders universally wanted to continue to be engaged in future facility planning and design and suggested expanding engagement to include additional community members moving forward. SAC feedback was clear: the FMP was an important step to bringing transparency, local voice, and local accountability to school facility planning, and SAC members want to continue working with the state to improve their local schools. To improve future HIDOE planning processes and engagements, stakeholders shared their opinions and insights with additional suggestions: • Consider geographic exceptions and school capacity (both Hawaiian immersion and other reasons) and the effect it has on enrollment and project prioritization • Consider geography, climate, and weather when determining priority of projects associated with natural environment • Consider limits to the number of Priority 1 projects that are implemented within the same geography and duration of time • Consider the ratio of resources spent by geography and density of population “ It’s obvious that a great deal of preparation went into this process, and I felt that our inputs were respectfully and professionally considered to help make tough decisions. - SAC5 Participant Suggestions continued on next page... 301 • Create oversight committees by a predetermined geography to help oversee processes and philosophies such as: −− FMP accountability, equity, and transparency −− FMP additional funding strategies • Provide a plan of action through reports of current progress, results, and future projects to stakeholders and representative committees • Provide multiple resource points for all information related to the FMP such as websites, mobile apps, or an FMP office −− FMP budget and appropriation −− FMP project bidding process −− FMP project progress −− FMP review and updates • Educate the general public about the facility issues and the options formed to remedy those challenges • Form relationships and partnerships with other government and private entities to help implement the plan • Future engagements can specifically target teacher, student, union, SCC, PTA, and other community member voices • Improve contract and procurement policies and transparency for additional community buy-in • Introduce strategies and approaches to accountability for tasks ranging from FMP implementation to project timelines and quality management. • Involve legislators to help oversee and take ownership of FMP plans respective to their community • Organize regular and goal specific community meetings to disseminate information, keep community apprised, or gather feedback at regular and specific intervals. 302 303 APPENDIX Acknowledgements V Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan Stakeholder Committee Participants (1 of 2) Name Relationship to DOE SAS Rep Hawaii ‐ East/South EPC Name Relationship to DOE SAS Rep Hawaii ‐ North/West EPC Name Relationship to DOE SAS Rep Maui EPC Chad Keone Farias Complex Area Superintendent, Kau‐Keaau‐Pahoa & Hilo‐Waiakea Arnold Uehara Cheryl Sumida ASA, Hawaii District Art Souza Complex Area Superintendent, Honokaa‐Kealakehe‐Kohala‐Konawaena Catherine Kilborn Principal, Baldwin H.S. Bechelle Elaydo Student‐ Grad 2018, Joint EPC/SAC Committee Darlene Bee Principal, Pahoa High/Inter Carol Yurth ASA, Hawaii District Chad Okamoto Principal, Pu'u Kukui El Butch Gima Community Representative, Joint EPC/SAC Committee Darlene Javar Principal, Naalehu Elementary Danny Garcia Principal, Kohala Elementary Dawn Schorling ASA, Maui Complex ‐ Baldwin HS Diane Preza Educational Non‐Profit, Joint EPC/SAC Committee Glenn Gray Principal, Kealakehe High School Ellen Gokcan ASA, Maui Complex ‐ Lokelani Inter Elton Kinoshita Principal, Joint EPC/SAC Committee Janette Snelling Principal, Kohala High School Halle Maxwell Principal, Keaau High School Principal, Mountain View Elementary ASA, Hawaii District Bruce Moore Relationship to DOE Alan Brown Dean Cevallos Barbara Oura‐Tavares Name Principal, Hilo Union Elementary Elna Gomes Principal, Kohala Middle  Gaudencia Watarida ASA, Hawaii District Kris Kosa‐Correa Principal, Waikoloa Elementary Gregg Yonemori Principal, Chiefess Kapiolani El Mark Hackelberg Principal, Kealakehe Intermediate Heather Dansdill Principal, Hilo Inter School Melvin Goya ASA, Hawaii District Karie Klein CABM, Hawaii District SAS Rep SAS Rep Education Specialist ‐ ELL/IM, District Adam Purdy ASA, Lahaina Complex Alika Tan Student‐ Senior, Joint EPC/SAC Committee Student‐ Grad 2018, Joint EPC/SAC Committee Principal, Kihei El Michelle Fujie LHES Teacher/Parent, Joint EPC/SAC Committee Ian Haskins Vice Principal, Princess Nahienaena Millena Lynne Calilao Student ‐Grad 2018, Joint EPC/SAC Committee Jacquelyn McCandless Principal, Maui Waena Inter Nat Ropa LHES Foundation President/Parent, Joint EPC/SAC Committee Jamie Yap Principal, Maui H.S. Nyssa Barfield Principal, Paauilo Elem/Inter  Jesse Henderson ASA, Kekaulike Complex Pam Alconcel Principal, Waiakeawaena El Noreen Kunitomo Principal, Honaunau Elementary Kathleen Dimino Complex Area Superintendent, Baldwin‐Kekaulike‐Maui Pierce Myers Community Member, Joint EPC/SAC Committee Principal, Waiakea High School Rachelle Matsumura Principal, Honokaa High School Kevin Drake CABM, District Raquel Malacasia Student ‐ Senior, Joint EPC/SAC Committee Director of UH Maui Lanai Education Center, Joint EPC/SAC Committee Complex Area Superintendent, Lahaina‐Hana‐Lanai‐Molokai Ken Watanabe Principal, Waiakea Elementary Scott Jeffrey West Hawaii CBM, Hawaii District Lindsay Ball Roderick Sumagit Athletic Director, Joint EPC/SAC Committee Lisa Massey ASA, Hawaii District Scott Tamura Principal, Waimea Elementary Lori Yatsushiro School Renewal Specialist, District Ross Uedoi Maui District ‐ Tech Support, Joint EPC/SAC Committee Lisa Souza Principal, Waiakea Inter Shawn Suzuki Principal, Konawaena High School Mark Elliott Principal, Kekaulike H.S. Shennie May Vicente Student‐ Sophomore, Joint EPC/SAC Committee Michelle Payne‐Arakaki Principal, Pahoa Elementary Teddy Burgess Principal, Konawaena Middle  Mark Simms Vice Principal, Lahainaluna HS Stacie Koanui Nefalar Robert Dircks Principal, Hilo High School Hawaii ‐ North SAC Matt Dillon Principal, Iao Intermediate Maui ‐ Molokai EPC Ron Jarvis Vice Principal, Keaau High School Ashley McDaniel Parent, Paauilo Elem/Inter Peter Ah‐Kee IT Specialist Alison Place Rich Young Parent Rep, Joint EPC/SAC Committee School Renewal Specialist, Complex Sharon Beck Principal, Kau High School Dawn Cordeiro Parent, Honokaa High School Vice Principal, Hana High & El SAS Rep Daniel Espaniola Wilma Roddy Principal, Keaau Middle School Erika Blanco Parent, Kohala Elementary Richard Carosso Principal, Haiku El SAS Rep Dawn Dyer Mains Principal, Molokai Middle Jonathan Bartsch Parent, Kohala High School Ross Uedoi Tech Support, Complex Joe Yamamoto Principal, Maunaloa El Kassie Tarpley Student, Kohala High School SAS Rep Stacy Bookland Principal, Lahaina Inter Kainoa Pali Lavina Hanohano Parent, Honokaa High School SAS Rep Beverly Heikes Caeden Kadarusman Parent, Hilo High School Student, Pahoa High/Inter Vice Principal, Molokai HS Steve Franz Principal, King Kamehameha III El Marilyn "Terri" Simms Principal, Kilohana El Marvalee Carvalho Parent, Honokaa High School Timothy Shim/Jim Jones Principal, Kalama Intermediate Ross Uedoi Tech Support, District Business and Trade, Canada‐France‐Hawaii Telescope Victoria Leworthy Special Ed Administrator, Complex Staci Gonzales School Psych, Complex Business, HPM Matthew Mendes Teacher, Honokaa High School Maui ‐ Central SAC Stanford Hao Principal, Molokai HS Student, Waiakea High School Mya Bartsch Student, Kohala High School Teacher, Hilo High School Teacher, Keaau High School Daryll Oliveira Donna Tanabe Principal, Kaunakakai El Mary Beth Laychak Charlene Masuhara Christopher N. Ho SAS Rep Donna Vierra Teacher, Baldwin HS Dustin Morita Teacher, Mountain View Elementary Pat Rice Community, Waimea Middle School Emma Endo Student, Baldwin HS Maui ‐ Molokai SAC Eric Scicchitano Business, HPM Patti Cook Community, Waimea Community Center Fernanda Maldonado Student, Baldwin HS Diane Mokuau Teacher, Molokai HS/former teacher at Maunaloa El Gavin Tanouye Teacher, Waiakea Elementary Sheri Bartsch Parent, Kohala High School Grant Nakama Community Rep, Maui Land and Pineapple Company Eileen "Lei" Kahoalii Parent_community Irene Perez‐Gilbride Teacher, Pahoa Elementary Tania Opamin Teacher, Waimea Elementary Jamie Gomer Kovacic Teacher/Parent, King Kekaulike HS/Kalama Inter Evelyn Haase Student, Molokai High School Tia Michelle Ubilas Teacher, Kohala High School Jayda Cortez Student, Baldwin HS Jacob Lott Student, Keaau High School Jamie Lewis Teacher, Mountain View Elementary Wendy Nickl Teacher, Kohala Middle Janean Stone Parent, Keaau Middle School Zephaniah Mendes Student, Honokaa High School Jay Bumanglag Teacher, Pahoa High/Inter Hawaii ‐ West SAC Will Carlson Jalen Kalama Student, Molokai High School Jaymie Yorita Teacher, Kahului School Kaitlin Derouin Student, Molokai High School Jeanine Coombs‐Todd Teacher, Kalama Inter Kau'i Manera Parent Kara Nakahashi Student, Baldwin HS Kimberly Ka'ai Student, Hilo High School Alexi Smith Student, Konawaena High School Leona Rocha Wilson Community Rep Kimberly Svetin Community Teacher, Waiakea Inter Alexus Agard Student, Kealakehe High School Matthew Hirose Student, Maui HS Lyn Bonk Community Melia Bonofiglio Student, Maui HS Maricel Kanemitsu Kayci Benevidos Parent, Waiakea Inter Breeze Chinen Student, Konawaena High School Micah Ban Student, Maui HS Matt Collins Teacher, Kilohana El Kira Taylor Student, Waiakea High School Cathy Bear Parent, Konawaena High School Michael Ban Parent/Teacher, Maui HS Pancho Alcon Community Kristy Cruz Parent, Mountain View Elementary Bill Chen Guy Gambone John Landers Teacher, Kahakai Elementary Teacher, Konawaena Middle School SAS Rep Petar Kovacic Teacher/Parent, King Kekaulike HS/Kalama Inter Penny Martin Community Laina Torres Parent, Hilo Inter School Lisa Morimoto Parent, Waiakeawaena El Jordan Bear Student, Konawaena High School Student, Hilo High School Joy Salinas Teacher, Kealakehe Intermediate Mary Tamaru Teacher, Mountain View Elementary Justin Brown Teacher, Kealakehe High School Sasha Kovacic Michele Hess‐Tokelau Parent, Pahoa Elementary Community College, HCC ‐ Palamanui Tracy Nakamoto Pamela Wilson Teacher/Parent, Kalanianaole Elementary/Inter Kevin Argueta Teacher, Kahakai Elementary Wesley Lo Community Rep Anne Kane Porsche Leopoldino Parent, Waiakeawaena El Lisa Lowe Student, Kealakehe High School Maui ‐ Hana SAC Rachel Solemsas Community College, Hawaii Community College Lori Lynch Parent, Honaunau Elementary Aina Galam Student, Hana Middle School Brent Mizutani SRS, KIF, Kauai District Randi Saplan Teacher, Keaau Middle School Nathan Weir Student, Kealakehe High School Arianna H Student, Hana Middle School Chesne Cabral‐Kitamura SBBH/ASD, Kauai District Rowllan Cabudol Student, Keaau High School Shaun Roth Parent, Kealakehe High School Becky Lind Community Member, Executive Director, Hana Arts Corey Nakamura Principal, Wilcox Elementary Ruby Grace Teacher, Chiefess Kapiolani El Stephanie Scarbrough Parent, Kealakehe Intermediate Clayton Carvalho Community Member, Travaasa Hana (facilities); basketball coach Daniel Hamada Sasha Enos Parent, Chiefess Kapiolani El Tina Clothier Community, People's Advocacy for Trails Hawaii (PATH) Duane Lammers Business Member, Hana Ranch Gail Nakaahiki CABM, Kauai District Shareen Turner Teacher, Waiakeawaena El Wendy Laros Business and Trade, Kona‐Kohala Chamber of Commerce Gary Chow Business Member, Hana Feast Jason Kuloloia Principal, Kapaa Elementary Tami Brilhante Teacher, Hilo Inter School Huaka Park Student, Hana High School  Julia Sanderl  Vice Principal, Kapaa Middle Thane Todd SAS Rep Ramana Sawyer Parent, Haiku El Peter Pale Community Rio Kovacic Student, Kalama Inter Sandra Czajkowski Teacher, Molokai Middle Saedene Ota Business Member Susan Nartatez Community College, MCC ‐ Molokai Education Center Student, King Kekaulike HS Wendy Espaniola Teacher, Maunaloa El Parent, Iao Inter/Wailuku El Kauai EPC Bill Arakaki SAS Rep Complex Area Superintendent, Kauai District Teacher, Waiakea High School Irie Mizner Community College, UH Hilo Jacob Pu Student, Hana Middle School Leila Kuboyama CTE Coordinator/RT, Kauai District Student, Pahoa High/Inter Jonahs K Student, Hana Middle School Lynn Antonio ASA, Kapaa Kalaeloa Kaukini‐Smith Student, Hana Middle School Melissa Speetjens Principal, Waimea Canyon Middle Christen Kawaauhau‐Young Teacher, Naalehu Elem Parent, Naalehu Elem Kia'i Park Student, Hana Middle School Kuikawā Park‐Jeremiah Student, Hana Middle School Jamie Kaluau Parent, Ka'u HS Lehualani Park Parent, Hana Middle School June Domondon Community Member, O Ka'u Kakou Leinaala Perry Parent, Hana High School  Maliah Ababa Student, Ka'u HS Marni Aina Raymond Polido Student, Kau'u HS Paul Zina Sharlene Morimoto SAS Rep Principal, Eleele Elementary ASA, Waimea Business Member, Asst General Manager, Travaasa Hana Angeline Bangkirig Student, Kauai HS Moani Aiona Teacher, Hana Middle School Becky Santos Parent, Kapaa Elementary Community Member, Ocean View Comm. Center Naarah HF Student, Hana Middle School Dawn Taba Teacher, Kauai HS Trixy Grace Teacher, Naalehu Elem Rick Rutiz Teacher, Hana High School  Edwin Sawyer Business, Kauai Film Academy Roxann Whitwell Parent, Hana Elementary School Elliot Lucas Student, Hana High School  Emmi Esaki Student, Hana High School  Heidi Tokuda Teacher, Kapaa Elementary Ian Nitta Teacher, Kapaa HS Kasiah Vercelli Student, Kapaa HS Kevin Matsunaga Teacher, Chiefess Kamakahelei Middle Citlaly Ramirez Student, Lahainaluna H.S. Teacher, Kapaa HS Everett Balmores Parent, Nahienaena El SAS Rep Lani Gokan Greg Poppy Teacher, Lahaina Inter SAS Rep Laurelle Riola‐Catbagan Jen Mather Parent, King Kamehameha III El Leila Nelson Student, Kapaa HS Jmar Gonzales Student, Lahainaluna H.S. Matthew Snowden Teacher, Waimea Middle Jocelyn Damaso Student, Lahainaluna H.S. John Rinen Teacher, Wilcox El Teacher, Eleele Elementary Rachel Dressler Student, Kauai HS Student, Lahainaluna H.S. Rafael Sifuentes Student, Kapaa HS Kyle Killett Student, Lahainaluna H.S. Rob Ladendecker Community College, Kauai Community College Mae Castillo Student, Lahainaluna H.S. Orrin Cross Business, Hula Grill Pakalana Phillips Teacher, Lahainaluna HS SAS Rep Business, Kauai Film Academy Serene Perry Tyra‐Li Perry Teacher, Lahainaluna HS SAS Rep Student, Kauai HS Ron Gall Ashley Olson  SAS Rep Special Ed, Kauai District Kauai SAC Allyson Casasola Maui ‐ Lahaina SAC SAS Rep Principal, Kapaa High Xavier Tablit Amberly Keohuloa Kelly Knudsen Principal, Kauai High Tierney Bacarse Hawaii ‐ South SAC Student, Hana Middle School SAS Rep Parent_community Lucy Ramirez Kalei Haleamau‐Kam Parent, Waikoloa Elementary SAS Rep Teacher, Kaunakakai School/former teacher at Maunaloa El Jennifer Kamimura Parent, Waiakea Elementary SAS Rep District Education Specialist, Complex Jill Kubojiri Jin Fujinaka SAS Rep Student ‐ Junior, Joint EPC/SAC Committee Michelle Barber Kasie Kaleohano Kelcy Koga Hawaii ‐ East SAC SAS Rep Maui ‐ Lanai EPC/SAC Bryan Arbles SAS Rep 305 VI Hawaii DOE Facility Master Plan Stakeholder Committee Participants (2 of 2) Name Relationship to DOE SAS Rep Oahu ‐ Central EPC Name Relationship to DOE SAS Rep Oahu ‐ Honolulu EPC Name Relationship to DOE SAS Rep Oahu ‐ Leeward EPC Name Relationship to DOE Principal, Aliamanu Middle Alfredo Carganilla/Ronald Oyama Principal/Vice Principal, Farrington High School Amy Martinson; Neil Battad Principal; Vice Principal, Highlands Intermediate Alma Souki Principal, He'eia Elementary Corey Allen Vice Principal, Nimitz El Ann Marie Murphy Principal, Central Middle School Andrew Moody Athletic Director, Nanakuli High & Inter Anela Pia Principal, Sunset Beach Elementary Corey Barton Vice Principal, Moanalua H.S. Billy Tabuyo ASA, Roosevelt, Hawaii Dept. Of Education David Tanuvasa; Jhameel Meyer Principal; Vice Principal, Aiea H.S. Blain Shinno IT Infor Tech Specialist, Hawaii Dept. Of Education Dean Yoshida IT Specialist Brendan Burns Principal, Aina Haina Elementary School Daniel Addis SRS, Waianae Complex Derek Kimura IT Specialist Christopher Yim Principal, Anuenue Middle School Darin Pilialoha Principal, Nanakuli High & Inter CABM, Hawaii Dept. Of Education Fred Murphy; Kevin Matsuba Ann Mahi Christopher Bonilla Complex Area Superintendent, Nanakuli‐Waianae Principal; Assistant Principal, Mililani H.S. Darnelle Ng Deane Mandac ASA, Kapolei Principal; TA, Iliahi El. Donna Tamanaha ASA, McKinley, Hawaii Dept. Of Education Debra Knight Principal, Nanaikapono El Glen Iwamoto Principal, Waimalu El Elden Nakamura CABM, Hawaii Dept. Of Education Disa Hauge Principal, Waianae HS Greg Nakasone Vice Principal, Mililani Middle Frank Fernandes Principal, Kaimuki Middle School Erin Crowell ASA, Kapolei John Erickson Complex Area Superintendent, Aiea‐Moanalua‐Radford Hanh Nguyen Candice Frontiera Principal, Ilima Intermediate Garett Yukumoto; Tom Yamamoto Correan "Cory" DeJesus SAS Rep SAS Rep SRS ASA, Castle Complex Daijo Kaneshiro IT Specialist Donna Lindsey Principal, Kahuku High & Inter Francine Honda Principal, Kailua High School Gay Kong Principal, Keolu Elementary James Rippard Principal, Kailua Elementary Jamie M. Dela Cruz Principal, Kaelepulu Elementary Joseph Passantino Principal, Aliiolani Elementary School Vice Principal, Leilehua H.S Justin Mew Principal, Kaiser High School Leighton Nakamoto Vice Principal, Wheeler Middle Kelly Bart Principal, Likelike Elementary School John Wataoka Principal, Waianae Inter Lanelle Hibbs Complex Area Superintendent, Castle‐Kahuku Leona Kaapuni ASA, Radford Larry Yuen ASA, Kaimuki, Hawaii Dept. Of Education Jon Henry Lee Principal, Campbell HS Linda Luke ASA, Kailua‐Kalaheo Complex Margaret Pearlman CTE Laura Ahn Principal, Niu Valley Middle School Jon Kinoshita IT Specialist Matt Ho Complex Area Superintendent, Kailua, Kalaheo Marjorie Pudiquet ASA, Waialua Lenn Uyeda Principal, Maemae Elementary School Jon Onoye ASA, Pearl City Melissa Mano CTE DES Laurie Pe'a SAS Rep Jody Agpalsa Principal, August Ahrens El Jennifer Luke‐Payne SPED DES, Pearl City‐Waipahu Jill Laboy Principal, Kaawa Elementary Mavis Nakabayashi ASA, Leilehua Linell Dilwith Complex Area Superintendent, Kaimuki‐McKinley‐Roosevelt Jordan Higa IT Specialist, Campbell‐Kapolei Nathan French Melissa Goo Curriculum Prog. Support,  Lorelei Aiwohi Principal, Kalakaua Middle School Joseph Halfmann Principal, Pearl City HS Noel Richardson Principal, Waimanalo Inter SPED Program Support,  Michael Harano Principal, Washington Middle School Keith Hayashi; Meryl Matsumura Principal; Vice‐Principal, Waipahu HS Resha Ramolette Principal, Kalaheo H.S. Mitchell Otani Principal, Kalani High School Keith Hui Complex Area Superintendent, Pearl City‐Waipahu Shelley Carreira ASA, Kahuku Complex Patricia Dang Principal, Kapalama Elementary School Laureen Dunn Vice Principal, Waialua H.S. & Inter Randall Galeon Vice Principal, Salt Lake El Robert Davis Complex Area Superintendent, Leilehua‐Mililani‐Waialua Ryan Ishimoto; Alton Goo Vice Principal; Vice Principal, Aiea Inter Scott Moore Principal, Waialua El SAS Rep SAS Rep ASA, Kaiser/Kalani, Hawaii Dept. Of Education Reid Kuba Principal, Jarrett Middle School Rochelle Mahoe Complex Area Superintendent, Farrington‐Kaiser‐Kalani Ron Okamura SAS Rep U'ilani Kaitoku Principal, Nanakuli El Wendy Matsuzaki PE Resource Teacher, District Oahu ‐ Windward SAC Ms. Terry Holck Resource Tchr, Common Core State Standards, Waianae Complex Angie Hashimoto Teacher, King Inter Community College, Windward Community College SAS Rep ASA, Nimitz Principal, Makaha El Ardis Eschenberg ASA, Mililani ASA, Nanakuli Bailey Nakano ASA, Aiea/Moanalua Sean Wong Principal, Roosevelt High School Randall "Randy" Miura Principal, Leihoku El Celeste Katayama Troy Tamura Principal, Mililani Waena Stuart Yasui IT Infor Tech Specialist, Hawaii Dept. Of Education Randell Dunn Principal, Waipahu Intermediate Cheryl Rodrigues Parent, Waimanalo Inter Tyler Brown Vice Principal, Radford H.S. Richard Fajardo Principal, Kapolei Middle Christian Leidholm Student, Kalaheo H.S. SAS Rep Principal, Moanalua Middle Nelson Shigeta SAS Rep Principal, King Intermediate Tennille Halemano Principal, Wilson Elementary School Niralyn Okuna Oahu ‐ Honolulu SAC Akira Kumagi Rie Kodama Teacher, Jefferson El Sean Tajima Teacher, Castle High School ASA, Campbell Christie Leidholm Parent, Kalaheo H.S. Complex Area Superintendent, Campbell‐Kapolei Christopher Delaunay Community, Government Relations/Attorney Student, Mililani HS Andrew Grant Teacher/Parent, Jarrett MS Stacie Kunihisa Principal, Kanoelani El Cynthia Okazaki Community, C4 Allicia Thompson Parent, Moanalua HS Andrew Yu Student, Kaiser HS Stanley Tamashiro Principal, Ewa El Emma Galdeira Teacher, Kailua Elementary Allysa Sunday Student, Radford HS Brenda Nakamura Community, Moiliili Community Center Tammy Miller CTE Coordinator, District Erik Burian Bob Barrett Business, Coastal Windows Christian Ellis Parent_counselor, Stevenson Middle School Wendy Kinoshita ASA, Waipahu Georgianna DeCosta Community, Castle Foundation Evan Imata Student, Mililani HS Darin Ujimori Teacher, Washington MS Wesley Shinkawa Principal, Kapolei HS Gerald Durangoo Student, Kailua High School Jasci‐Ann Fikany Student, Aiea HS David Kawada Parent, Niu Valley MS Oahu ‐ Leeward SAC Jeffrey Alameida Community Rep, SAC at Waialua HS Dolores Villanueva Teacher, Kaimuki Middle School Amber O'Neal Jennifer Okuma Teacher‐Middle, Leilehua HS/Inter Gwen Lee Teacher, Niu Valley MS Angel Kaio Jessica Smith Parent, Pearl Harbor Kai Jamie Shioji Special Education Teacher, Farrington Angelle Kaeo Andree Paradis   Student, McKinley HS Student, Castle High School Alexander "Xander" Babcock Oahu ‐ Central SAC SAS Rep Jenna Katayama Parent, Kailua High School Student, Castle High School Student, Waipahu HS Jo Pedro Parent, Kailua Elementary Parent, Waianae Inter Joseph Barszcz Teacher, Kailua High School Parent, Nanaikapono El Katrina Delaunay Community, DOE Windward Substitute Teacher John Goto Teacher, Radford HS Jennifer Grant Teacher, Farrington HS Angelo Laskowsky Teacher, Pearl City Highland Kiara Del Aragon Teacher, Enchanted Lake Elem Jonah Lorica Student, Aiea HS SAS Rep Jodi Chun Teacher_community, Jefferson El/Hope Street Fellow Ashley Ono Teacher, Makaha El Kylie Bean Student, Castle High School Katie Helbush Student, Moanalua HS SAS Rep Karla Dias Parent, Kaimuki Middle Ceaser Bergonia Kifferi Frunklin Teacher, Pearl Harbor Kai Kenny Thai Student, McKinley HS Cesceli Nakamura Parent, Waipahu HS Luika Wright Parent, Kailua Elementary Leilani Kanagawa Student, Leilehua HS/Inter Kimberly Delos Santos Student, Farrington HS Christel Lleces Community Rep, Waianae Resident Mason Afualo Student, Kahuku High & Inter Lisa Imata Parent, Mililani HS Kristen Brummel Community, Hope Street Group Clyde Suzuki Parent, Pearl City HS Matu'u Pulotu Parent, Hauula Elementary Lori Shimbukuro Parent‐ Elem, Iliahi Elementary Laurie Chang Teacher, Aliiolani El Daniella White Student, Campbell HS Maya Afualo Student, Kahuku High & Inter Lynnette Higa Teacher, Mililani Waena Leslie Roberts Community, Resident Melanie Afualo/Danny Afualo Parent, Kahuku High & Inter Megan Okuma Student, Leilehua HS/Inter Lisa Franklin Parent, Kalihi Uka El Melissa Drew Teacher, Waiahole Elementary Noela Nance Teacher, Radford HS Mathew Paulino Patricia Sober Parent, Waialua El Melissa Yoshimoto Sandy Ramiscal Parent, Mililani HS Mrs. Marti Taba Shareen Hui Ying Chee Student, Moanalua HS Suzanne Tran Student, Moanalua HS Noah Matsumoto Trish La Chica Community Rep, Mililani Town NB Reese Shioji Student, Farrington HS Virgilio Basilio Teacher, Waialua HS & Inter Richard Arkay Vimala Kolbeck Nathan Toyama Parent, Campbell HS SAS Rep Laurie Ines Dave O'Neal Parent, Waipahu HS Student, Waipahu HS Student, Roosevelt HS Eugene Pascual Teacher, Makaha El Micah Pregitzer Parent, Kalani HS Gail Kono Community Rep, Retired Educator Reyn Matsukawa Student, Kailua High School Parent, Noelani El Geraldine Averion Student, Kapolei HS Sara Ironhill Parent, Kaelepulu Elementary Community, Moiliili Community Center Hunter Comstock Student, Kapolei HS Sarah Koa Afualo Student, Kaiser HS Ian Pelayo Community Rep, Challenger Center Hawaii Shelley A.R. Ah Nee Parent, Waiahole Elementary Jill Fletcher Teacher, Kapolei Middle Susan Young Community, C4 Community, Waikiki Resident Jonathan Hirota Parent, August Ahrens Tani Simms Student, Castle High School Teacher, Aina Haina El Josette Germano SAS Rep Teacher, Kalaheo H.S. Student, Kahuku High & Inter Parent, Waianae Inter Tiana Ka'ai Parent, Kailua Inter Kazual Galeon‐Kekuawela Student, Nanakuli High & Inter Tracy Doane Teacher, Kailua Elementary Kristi Oda Teacher, Holomua El Tyler Goo Student, Kailua High School Lisa Kaneshiro Parent, Waikele Elementary Maya Abarca Student, Campbell HS Mrs. Keala Nunuha Parent, Nanaikapono El Nalani Schmidt Sakaba Parent, Nanakuli High & Inter Natalie Hepting Parent, Hookele El Robert Carter III Teacher, Kapolei Middle Sarah Milianta‐Laffin Parent, Ilima Inter Shane Asselstine Teacher, Momilani Elem Susan Marciel Teacher, Waipahu Inter Terri Trevathan SAS Rep Teacher, Kaelepulu Elementary Dominick Quiamas SAS Rep SAS Rep Principal, Hauula Elementary Tasha Tanda Ryan Amine Principal, McKinley High School Principal, Hookele El Lisa Higa Lisa Hockenberger Tammy Nochi Wayne Guevara SAS Rep Patrick O’Brien SAS Rep Principal, Kailua Inter Michael Jose; Jerry Yashiro Neal Okamoto SAS Rep Oahu ‐ Windward EPC Albert Hetrick teacher, Eva Elementary Tessie Lumabao Teacher, Waipahu HS Tina Chan Parent, Pearl City Highland Vincent Ganiron Student, Waipahu HS SAS Rep 306