Case 1:19-cv-01266-TJK Document 1 Filed 05/01/19 Page 1 of 11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
__________________________________________
)
MASAKO MORISHITA,
)
715 6th Street NW, Apt 302
)
Washington, D.C. 20001
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
Case No. 1:19-cv-1266
)
WHISTLER, LLC,
)
d/b/a MOMO YAKITORI
)
2214 Rhode Island Avenue, N.E.
)
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
Washington, D.C. 20018
)
)
Serve:
)
Andrew James Chiou
)
2214 Rhode Island Avenue, N.E.
)
Washington, D.C. 20018
)
)
ANDREW JAMES CHIOU,
)
th
1215 11 Street, N.W., Number 1
)
Washington, D.C. 20001
)
)
Serve:
)
Andrew James Chiou
)
2214 Rhode Island Avenue, N.E.
)
Washington, D.C. 20018
)
)
Defendants.
)
__________________________________________)
COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES
Plaintiff, MASAKO MORISHITA (hereinafter “Ms. Morishita” or “Plaintiff”) by and
through counsel, Eric L. Siegel of Kalbian Hagerty, LLP, and hereby brings this action against
WHISTLER, LLC d/b/a Momo Yakitori (hereinafter “Employer”) and ANDREW JAMES
CHIOU (hereinafter “Defendant Chiou”) (hereinafter collectively referred to as “Defendants”) to
recover for unpaid wages and damages under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended

 Case 1:19-cv-01266-TJK Document 1 Filed 05/01/19 Page 2 of 11

(the “FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq, the District of Columbia Collection and Payment of Wages
Law (“DCCPWL”), D.C. Code § 32-1301 et seq., the District of Columbia Minimum Wages Law
(“DCMWL”), D.C. Coe § 32-1001 et seq., and for unjust enrichment, and for cause states:
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
1.

This Court has federal question jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331
and 29 U.S.C. § 216(b).

2.

This Court has supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff’s state law collection and payment
of wages claim and minimum wage law claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(a) because
those claims arise from a common set of operative facts and are so related to the claims in
the action within the original jurisdiction of this Court that they form part of the same case
or controversy.

3.

Venue is proper under 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b) because a substantial part of the events giving
rise to Plaintiff’s claims occurred in the District of Columbia.
PARTIES

4.

Plaintiff Masako Morishita resides at 715 6th Street NW, Apt 302, Washington, D.C.
20001 and worked at all relevant times for Defendants, Whistler, LLC and Chiou, at their
principal place of business located at 2214 Rhode Island Avenue, N.E., Washington, D.C.
20018.

5.

Defendant Whistler, LLC is a District of Columbia limited liability company and operates
as a restaurant business that is in good standing, with its premises located at 2214 Rhode
Island Avenue, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20018.

6.

Defendant Andrew James Chiou resides at 1215 11th Street, N.W., Number 1, Washington,
D.C. 20001 and serves as President and owner of Whistler, LLC. At all relevant times, he
2

 Case 1:19-cv-01266-TJK Document 1 Filed 05/01/19 Page 3 of 11

and Defendant Whistler, LLC were Plaintiff’s employer.
7.

From January 21, 2018 to January 20, 2019, Defendants employed the Plaintiff, and, at all
times relevant to this action, condoned, ratified, authorized, and/or engaged in the customs,
practices, policies, and wrongful acts described in this Complaint through their agents
and/or employees.

8.

At all times relevant to this action, the Defendants were responsible for keeping and
maintaining all employment records relating to Plaintiff or caused such records to be kept
or maintained.

9.

At all times relevant to this action, one or both of the Defendants were engaged in
commerce within the meaning of the FLSA by providing Japanese restaurant services to
patrons in the District of Columbia.

10.

At all times relevant to this action, one or both of the Defendants were “employers” within
the meaning of the FLSA, the DCMWL and the DCCPWL.

11.

At all times relevant to this action, Plaintiff was an “employee” within the meaning of the
FLSA, the DCMWL and the DCCPWL and was not exempt from the FLSA’s maximum
hour provisions.

12.

At all times relevant to this action, one or both of the Defendants “employed” Plaintiff
within the meaning of the FLSA.

13.

At all times relevant to this action, one or both of the Defendants were aware that they were
legally required to pay Plaintiff the federal and District of Columbia minimum wages for
all hours worked.

3

 Case 1:19-cv-01266-TJK Document 1 Filed 05/01/19 Page 4 of 11

STATEMENT OF FACTS
14.

Throughout 2017, Plaintiff Masako Morishita and Defendant Chiou planned and engaged
in various tasks to open and operate Momo Yakitori restaurant in Northeast Washington,
D.C.

15.

Thereafter, Ms. Morishita was hired by the Defendants on or about January 20, 2018 to
serve as its cook, cashier, and waiter and to perform other tasks within the restaurant,
whether assigned or not, to grow the restaurant from its inception through January 2019.

16.

Ms. Morishita performed her restaurant duties day in and day out, performing whatever
tasks were required to service customers and grow the business. She worked in the Momo
Yakitori restaurant from January 21, 2018 through January 20, 2019, when her relationship
with Defendant Chiou and the restaurant was terminated.

17.

While she was not required to keep track of her hours because the Employer did not keep
time records, in violation of D.C. law, she did so through Uber receipts and other
documents. Ms. Morishita typically worked between 5 to 10 hours per day, 6 days per
week during the time that she worked for the Employer.

18.

Ms. Morishita worked many overtime hours over 40 hours per week to assist Defendant
Chiou in growing the restaurant business and serving customers.

19.

From January 21, 2018 through January 20, 2019, Defendants failed to pay Ms. Morishita
for her hours worked, whether regular or overtime, as well as minimum wages under D.C.
law. Specifically, Defendants failed to pay Ms. Morishita $12.50/hour for the period from
January 21, 2018 through June 30, 2018 and $13.25/hour for the period from July 1, 2018
through January 20, 2019, for a total of $20,615.89 in minimum wages owed under District
of Columbia and federal law.
4

 Case 1:19-cv-01266-TJK Document 1 Filed 05/01/19 Page 5 of 11

20.

In addition, Defendants agreed to reimburse Ms. Morishita for her transportation costs to
and from the restaurant from her residence, given her vital role as a trusted worker to help
get the restaurant running and operating to full capacity. Those transportation expenses
amounted to $3,029.62.

21.

For the period from January 21, 2018 through January 20, 2018, Ms. Morishita was not
paid any wages in exchange for her work performance, let alone minimum wages under
federal and District of Columbia law.

22.

Despite multiple requests, including later requests by her legal counsel, the Defendants
never paid the wages owed to Ms. Morishita.

23.

At all times relevant to this action, the Defendants were responsible for keeping and
maintaining all employment records relating to Ms. Morishita or cause such records to be
kept or maintained.

24.

Upon information and belief, the Defendants have failed to keep contemporaneous,
accurate time records for Ms. Morishita’s work hours, pursuant to the requirements of the
FLSA.

25.

Defendant Chiou has recently asserted in April 2019 as an alleged offset to the wages owed
to Ms. Morishita that he provided “consulting”, “culinary”, “event” and “event
management” services to help her start and grow a catering business.

26.

Defendant Chiou alleges that those services referenced in paragraph 25 were performed
during the period from January 20, 2016 and August 22, 2017.

27.

At no time prior to April 2019 did Defendant Chiou ever state to Ms. Morishita, either
orally or in writing, that he was charging her for services referenced in Paragraph 25 above.

5

 Case 1:19-cv-01266-TJK Document 1 Filed 05/01/19 Page 6 of 11

28.

Moreover, upon information and belief, some of the alleged services performed by Mr.
Chiou referenced in Paragraph 25 above were paid directly by the given client.
Accordingly, Ms. Morishita would not be required to also pay Mr. Chiou for such alleged
services.

29.

At no time prior to April 2019 did Defendant Chiou ever present Ms. Morishita with
invoices for services referenced in Paragraph 25 above.

30.

Defendant Chiou did not create and/or prepare any invoices for services referenced in
Paragraph 25 above contemporaneous with providing those alleged services.

31.

Upon information and belief, Defendant Chiou created and/or prepared invoices for
services referenced in Paragraph 25 in or around April 2019.

32.

In addition, Ms. Morishita purchased groceries and other supplies and items for the benefit
of the restaurant and Defendants based on Mr. Chiou’s promise that he or Defendant
Whistler, LLC would pay her back.

33.

In all, Ms. Morishita spent $1,055.39 for such groceries, supplies and other items for the
benefit of the restaurant.

34.

Contrary to his promises, Defendants never paid Ms. Morishita back the $1,055.39 she
spent for the benefit of the restaurant operations.

35.

All conditions precedent for the filing of this lawsuit have been satisfied.
COUNT I
FLSA MINIMUM WAGE VIOLATION

36.

Plaintiff realleges and incorporates by reference paragraphs 1 through 35 as if fully set
forth herein.

37.

Each of the Defendants is an “employer” within the scope of the FLSA.

6

 Case 1:19-cv-01266-TJK Document 1 Filed 05/01/19 Page 7 of 11

38.

Plaintiff was the Defendants’ “employee” within the meaning of the FLSA.

39.

Plaintiff was a “non-exempt” employee of the Defendants within the meaning of the FLSA.

40.

At all relevant times, the FLSA required the Defendants to pay Plaintiff at least the
minimum wage per hour during her employment in an amount of $20,615.89.

41.

The Defendants violated the FLSA by knowingly failing to pay Plaintiff at least the
minimum wage per hour, in violation of 29 U.S.C. § 206(a)(1)(C).

42.

The Defendants’ violations of the FLSA’s minimum wage requirements were repeated,
willful, and intentional.

43.

The Defendants are liable to Plaintiff for, among other damages, her unpaid minimum
wages, liquidated damages, and costs and reasonable attorneys’ fees incurred in the
maintenance of this action pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 216(b).
COUNT II
VIOLATION OF THE DCMWL

44.

Plaintiff realleges and incorporates by reference paragraphs 1 through 43 as if fully set
forth herein.

45.

Each of the Defendants is an “employer” within the meaning of the DCMWL.

46.

An employer shall pay each employee at least a minimum wage specified in the statute for
hours of work performed, and failure to do so is a violation of D.C. law. D.C. Code § 321010(a)(1).

47.

Ms. Morishita worked for Defendants from January 21, 2018 through January 20, 2019,
when her employment was abruptly terminated.

48.

Failure to pay Ms. Morishita all of her wages owed subjects the Employer to payment of
the minimum wages owed and mandatory treble damages, absent a showing of good faith.

7

 Case 1:19-cv-01266-TJK Document 1 Filed 05/01/19 Page 8 of 11

D.C. Code § 32-1012(b)(1).
49.

Ms. Morishita is owed $20,615.89 in unpaid minimum wages for the period from January
21, 2018 through January 20, 2019.

50.

Ms. Morishita is entitled to liquidated damages (treble damages) in the amount of
$61,847.67 for Defendant’s failure to pay the minimum wages owed.

51.

Defendants did not act in good faith by failing to pay Ms. Morishita minimum wages owed
and did not have reasonable grounds that its failure to pay was not a violation of the statute.

52.

Defendants have violated the minimum wages statute by not posting the required postings
in the workplace pertaining to payment of minimum wages under District of Columbia law.

53.

Defendants have violated the minimum wages statute by not keeping proper wage and hour
records as required by District of Columbia law.

54.

Defendants’ violations for failing to post and keep proper wage and hour records subjects
Defendants to penalties including fines and/or imprisonment.

55.

Ms. Morishita is entitled to be paid all reasonable attorneys’ fees, interest and costs that
she has incurred, and must incur going forward, to vindicate her rights under the statute.
COUNT III
VIOLATION OF THE DCCWPL

56.

Plaintiff realleges and incorporates by reference paragraphs 1 through 55 as if fully set
forth herein.

57.

Each of the Defendants is an “employer” within the meaning of the DCCPWL.

58.

“An employer shall pay all wages earned to his or her employees on regular paydays
designated in advance by the employer and at least twice during each calendar month,”
with the exception of administrative staff, such as an office manager, who may be paid

8

 Case 1:19-cv-01266-TJK Document 1 Filed 05/01/19 Page 9 of 11

once per month.” D.C. Code § 32-1302 (emphasis added).
59.

D.C. law also provides that upon the termination of an employee’s employment, she must
be paid all wages owed within four (4) days of her separation date. D.C. Code §32-1303(1).

60.

Defendant owes Plaintiff wages in the total amount of $20,615.89.

61.

Failure to pay Ms. Morishita all of her wages owed subjects the Employer to mandatory
treble damages. D.C. Code § 32-1303(4).

62.

Under the DCCWPL, Defendants’ failure to pay Plaintiff her wages owed requires that
Defendants pay treble damages in the amount of $61,847.67.

63.

In addition to damages owed, the District of Columbia issues statutory penalties for
violations of the law. Given that Ms. Morishita has previously demanded payment of the
wages owed to her, and Defendants have willfully either refused or ignored her requests,
Defendants are subject to penalties for multiple violations in the amount of $10,000.00 or
imprisonment for not more than ninety (90) days. D.C. Code § 32-1307(a)(2).

64.

Ms. Morishita is entitled to be paid all reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs that she has
incurred, and must incur going forward, to vindicate her rights under the statute, and it is
mandatory. D.C. Code § 32-1308(a)(1)(A).

65.

The DCCWPL expressly provides that Ms. Morishita may pursue attorney fees “computed
pursuant to the matrix approved in Salazar v. District of Columbia, 123 F.Supp.2d 8
(D.D.C. 2000) and updated to account for the current market hourly rates for attorney’s
services. The court shall use the rates in effect at the time the determination is made.” D.C.
Code § 32-1308(b)(1).

66.

The attorneys’ fees which Ms. Morishita may pursue as part of her relief also include the
fees associated with pursuing collection of any judgment received in Ms. Morishita’s favor.
9

 Case 1:19-cv-01266-TJK Document 1 Filed 05/01/19 Page 10 of 11

COUNT IV
UNJUST ENRICHMENT
67.

Plaintiff realleges and incorporates by reference paragraphs 1 through 64 as if fully set
forth herein.

68.

Unjust enrichment occurs when (1) a plaintiff conferred a benefit on a defendant, (2) the
defendant retained the benefit, and (3) under the circumstances, the defendant’s retention
of the benefit is unjust.

69.

Plaintiff conferred a benefit on Defendants by paying $1,055.39 for supplies, groceries and
other items for the restaurant during the time that she either worked there or assisted in
pursuing the concept for, and growing, the restaurant business.

70.

In addition, by traveling to and working in the restaurant, Ms. Morishita conferred a benefit
on Defendants by paying $3,029.62 in transportation expenses to and from the restaurant
from her residence.

71.

Defendants promised to reimburse Ms. Morishita for those transportation expenses.

72.

Defendants, or either of them, retained the benefits of Ms. Morishita’s expenditures.

73.

Under the circumstances, Defendants’ retention of the benefit is unjust.

74.

As a result of Defendants’ unjust enrichment, Plaintiff has suffered damages in the amount
of $1,055.39 and $3,029.62, respectively, requiring that Defendants disgorge and pay those
expenditures back to Ms. Morishita.
PRAYER FOR RELIEF
WHEREFORE Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Court:

A.

Declare the Defendants’ conduct to be a violation of the FLSA, the DCWML and the
DCCWPL;

10

 Case 1:19-cv-01266-TJK Document 1 Filed 05/01/19 Page 11 of 11

B.

Declare Defendants to have been unjustly enriched by benefits conferred by Plaintiff;

C.

Enjoin the Defendants to comply with all applicable federal and District of Columbia wage
laws;

D.

Award to Plaintiff her unpaid minimum and overtime wages plus liquidated damages under
FLSA;

E.

Award to Plaintiff her unpaid minimum wages plus treble damages under District of
Columbia law;

F.

Award to Plaintiff her unpaid wages plus treble damages under District of Columbia law;

G.

Award Plaintiff $1,055.39 and $3,029.62, respectively, for Defendants’ unjust enrichment;

H.

Award to Plaintiff her costs and reasonable attorneys’ fees incurred in this action;

I.

Award Plaintiff prejudgment and post-judgment interest as permitted by law; and

J.

Grant such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper.
JURY DEMAND

Plaintiff demands a trial by jury.
Dated: May 1, 2019

Respectfully submitted,
KALBIAN HAGERTY, LLP
By /s/ Eric L. Siegel
Eric L. Siegel
Bar No. 427350
888 17th Street, N.W., Suite 1000
Washington, D.C. 20006
(202) 419-3296
esiegel@kalbianhagerty.com
Attorney for Plaintiff Masako Morishita

11

 Case 1:19-cv-01266-TJK Document 1-1 Filed 05/01/19 Page 1 of 2

01213ÿ05267ÿ8966
ÿ

 8 

ÿ 7   ÿ    ÿ 0 ÿ

1 ÿ   ÿ 3 1 
1  8ÿ

 6 6    
8ÿ

ÿ
¨©ª©«¬ÿ̈¬®ª̄
°±̄©
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ

ÿ ±³®ÿ́µµ¶ÿ·¸¹ÿ©º»®³²ÿ¼©¨³ªÿ¶°¯¬½
²°ª̄
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ

ÿ
ÿ
%ÿ%)&(#ÿ+)(#'*ÿ*'%'"*-"#ÿ.¾
.¾
..¿
..¿.¾
..............ÿ
   ÿ  !"#$ÿ%ÿ&'()*'" 'ÿ%ÿ%)&(#ÿ+)(#'*ÿ,+-)"#)%%ÿ.....................ÿ   !"#$ÿ%ÿ&'()*'" 'ÿ
 
1
 ÿ
0 
8
 
ÿ
 3 1
 
1
  ÿ
0 8
68
ÿ
5 31 
ÿ
 
6/06 
ÿ
1
 ÿ
0 
8
 
ÿ
 3 1
 
1
  ÿ
0 8
68
 
ÿ
" #'2ÿ)"ÿ+-"*ÿ  "*'3"-#) "ÿ -('(4ÿ!('ÿ#5'ÿ+  -#) "ÿ%ÿ#5'ÿ#&- #ÿ%ÿ+-"*ÿ)"6 +6'*ÿ
ÿ
 7 ÿ-## &"'$(ÿ8%)&3ÿ"-3'4ÿ-**&'((4ÿ-"*ÿ#'+',5 "'ÿ"!39'&:ÿ
-## &"'$(ÿ8)%ÿ;" <":ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
³À
Â
ÿ
µ
Ã
ÿ
ªÁ
Ä
Å
Ä
Æ
ÿ
ÿÁ
ÿ
ÿÆ
ÿ
«·
Ç
Á
·
¸
ÿ
°·
Å
Ä
À
È
É
ÿ́
µ
µ
Êÿ́
Ë
Ë
Ë
ÿ
¾
Ì
È
Í
ÿ
ªÈ
À
Ä
Ä
È́
ÿ
º²ÿ́
ªÎ
Á
È
Ä
ÿ
¾
¿
¿
¿
ÿ́
ÿ ÏÍÁ̧ÅÈ
ÿ
²·
Ð
¸
ÿ́
»¶ÿ
Ñ
¿
¿
¿
Ò
Ó
ÿ
±Ä
Æ
Ô
ÿ
Õ
Ñ
¿
Ñ
Ö
ÿ
Ñ
Ñ
×
Ø
Ù
Ò
¿
¿
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
1ÿÿ1ÿÿ ÿÿ8= 8
1
8
ÿ
5 ÿ
 
071
8
 1
0
1
5 ÿ
1
1
1
 
ÿ
01

1
@6 8
91 ÿ5 ÿ 71 01  3ÿ  7
168ÿ8,+- 'ÿ-"ÿ>ÿ)"ÿ"'ÿ9 ?ÿ% &ÿ
,+- 'ÿ-"ÿ>ÿ)"ÿ"'ÿ9 ?ÿ"+$:ÿ
,+-)"#)%%ÿ-"*ÿ"'ÿ9 ?ÿ% &ÿ*'%'"*-"#:ÿ 57ÿ 126781
1ÿ0 868ÿ5 31Aÿ
ÿ
 
 ÿ   
ÿ
 
 ÿ   
ÿ ÿ
Dÿ!E(EÿFGHIJKLIKMÿÿ
Tÿ%ISIJONÿUVIWMPGKÿ
ÿ
ÿ
Dÿ Dÿ )KZGJ]GJOMISÿGJÿ,JPKZP]ONÿ,NOZIÿ Yÿ Yÿ
ÿÿÿ,NOPKMPQQÿ
ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ8!E(EÿFGHIJKLIKMÿ"GMÿOÿ,OJMX:ÿ  PMP[IKÿGQÿM\PWÿ(MOMIÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ ÿ GQÿ9VWPKIWWÿPKÿ#\PWÿ(MOMIÿ
ÿÿ
ÿ ÿ
ÿ
Rÿ!E(EÿFGHIJKLIKMÿÿ
Yÿ*PHIJWPMXÿ
 P
M
P
[
I
K
ÿ
G
Q
ÿ
-K
G
M
\
I
J
ÿ
(
M
O
M
I
ÿ
R
ÿ
R
ÿ
KZGJ]GJOMISÿOKSÿ,JPKZP]ONÿ,NOZIÿ aÿ aÿ
ÿÿÿ*IQIKSOKMÿ
ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ8)KSPZOMIÿ PMP[IKW\P]ÿGQÿÿÿ ÿÿ
ÿ
ÿ )
ÿ ÿ
G
Qÿ9VWPKIWWÿPKÿ-KGM\IJÿ(MOMIÿ
ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ,OJMPIWÿPKÿPMILÿ))):ÿ
 PMP[IKÿGJÿ(V^_IZMÿGQÿOÿ Tÿ Tÿ ÿ
bÿ bÿÿ
%GJIP̀Kÿ GVKMJXÿ
GJIP̀Kÿ"OMPGKÿ
ÿ
ÿ %
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ ÿ

Bÿ
Bÿ

¾¾¿¿¾

Bÿ
Bÿ

Bÿ Bÿ
Bÿ Bÿ
Bÿ Bÿ

12 ÿ0 86ÿ 881c d6 
ÿ   ÿ  
076ÿ5 ÿ801
ÿ
Bÿ  
ÿÿÿtuvwvxyzvÿ Bÿ= ÿÿÿ}~xzu€ÿƒu„yx…†ÿÿ
Bÿ0 
ÿÿÿt‘’wuwzvx€vw“~ÿt”~u‰…ÿÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
‡€

ˆ
x
€
‰
v
w
‰
~
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿÿ•~“w~–ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ

Bÿ Bÿ
Bÿ Bÿ
Bÿ Bÿ

  e 7 ÿ fÿ/ÿgfÿhf ÿ7 i jhklmÿ   mÿin iÿ  oiÿk pk o fioÿlhqkÿ0 qo ÿhrÿ 7ighfÿ fsÿhf ÿgfÿ ÿ7hkk ophfsgfjÿ  iqk ÿhrÿ8qgi ÿ

ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ


 {ÿ figikqoiÿ

Š {ÿ gkpe f ÿ
 ‹ ÿd sg7 k ÿ 7iÿ
ÿ
Š ‹ÿ gkpe f ÿ khsq7iÿ3g  gegilÿ
8h7g eÿ8 7qkgilÿ
ŠŒ{ÿ oo qeimÿ3g  eÿÿ8e fs kÿ
  ÿ91 ÿ  Š—‹rr ÿ
ŠŠ{ÿ  s k eÿ6Žpehl koÿ3g  gegilÿ
 Œÿ=e 7˜ÿ3qfjÿ —ŒŠ ÿ
Š
{ÿd kgf ÿ
 Šÿ 1™0  1™™ÿ 
{‹ j  ÿ
Š
‹ÿd kgf ÿ khsq7iÿ3g  gegilÿ

 
ÿ881 ÿ
gie ÿ/21ÿ
Š‹{ÿdhihkÿ2 ng7e ÿ
1ÿ 
{‹ j  ÿ
Š‹‹ÿdhihkÿ2 ng7e ÿ khsq7iÿ3g  gegilÿ 5in kÿ 8‹iÿ 78
i
q
i
 oÿ
Š {ÿ5in kÿ  kohf eÿ1fqklÿ

—
 
ÿ
 j
k
g7qeiqk eÿ 7ioÿ
Š Œÿd sg7 eÿd epk 7ig7 ÿ

—
Š
ÿ
6f
 
gkhfŽ fi eÿd ii koÿ
Š ‹ÿ khsq7iÿ3g  gegilÿ

—
{
ÿ
5i
n
 
kÿ8i iqihklÿ 7ighfoÿ 1rÿÿÿÿ
Š  ÿ9  einÿ0 k   n kŽ 7 qig7 eÿÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
 s
Žg
ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ  kohf eÿ1fqklÿ khsq7iÿ3g  gegilÿÿ ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ1f he f gsoi kÿ ig  ÿ j f7lÿgoÿÿ
Š ÿ o  oihoÿ khsq7iÿ3g  gegilÿ
ÿ

B7 ÿ eÿ6 
ÿÿÿ~u~x€ÿžw“wÿŸ›v ~x¡ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ57ÿ
 khp kilÿ
= f˜kqpi7lÿ
ÿ

Bÿ    ÿsÿÿ }xk eÿ
 ÿ¢¥~ÿÿ8~qgiuoÿ~x€ÿžw“wÿÿ

Bÿ  
ÿÿÿš~’ˆx€x…ÿ•~zvx€wuwu”ÿÿÿÿ
ÿÿÿÿÿÿ›x‘~x†}x~w’wu€x…ÿÿ

Œ {ÿ3 fsÿ0hfs Žf ighfÿ

ŒŒÿ pp  eÿŒ ÿ080ÿ ‹ÿ
 {ÿ
 ¥ oÿ 08ÿpe gfigrrÿhkÿÿ

ŒŠÿ™ginsk £ eÿŒÿ080ÿ ‹ ÿ
ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿs r fs fi ÿ
ŒŒ{ÿ hk 7ehoqk ÿ
ŒŠ{ÿ7 fimÿ3  o ÿÿ6 7iŽ fiÿ
ÿ
  ÿ178 
ngksÿ  kilÿŒ ÿ080ÿÿ
ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ  {—ÿ
 kgohf kÿ  igighfoÿ
Œ
{ÿ
hkioÿihÿ3 fsÿ
ÿ
‹Š‹ÿ   inÿ  f eilÿ
Œ
‹ÿ
hkiÿ khsq7iÿ3g  gegilÿ
 hkr giqk    f eilÿ
‹
{ÿd fs Žqoÿÿ5in kÿ
Œ—{ÿ eeÿ5in kÿ7  eÿ khp kilÿ
 Œ‹ÿ kqjÿ7 e i sÿ8 g¦qk ÿhrÿÿÿÿÿ
‹‹{ÿ0g geÿ7gjnioÿ
ÿ
ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ khp kilÿŒ ÿ080ÿ ÿ
‹
‹
‹
ÿ
 k
g
o
h
f
ÿ
0h
f
s
g
i
g
h
f
o
ÿ
  kohf eÿ khp kilÿ
 —{ÿ5in kÿ
Š {ÿ5in kÿ k qsÿ
‹ {ÿ0g geÿ  i gf  ÿ¤ÿ0hfsgighfoÿÿ
ÿ
ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿhrÿ0hfrgf Ž fiÿ
Š  ÿ
kqinÿgfÿ3 fsgfjÿ
5in kÿ8i iqi oÿ
Š{ÿ5in kÿ  kohf eÿ khp kilÿÿ
ÿ
Š ‹ÿ  eo ÿ0e gŽoÿ 7iÿ
 khp kilÿ7gjnioÿ
ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ  Ž j ÿ
Š  ÿ§qgÿ
 Žÿ Š ÿ080ÿ
Œ{ÿ0hplkgjnioÿ
Š‹ÿ khp kilÿ  Ž j ÿÿ
Š Œ—    ÿ

Š
{
ÿ
  
i
 
f
i
ÿ
ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ khsq7iÿ3g  gegilÿ

{{ÿ8i i ÿÿ7  pphkighfŽ fiÿ
Š‹ÿ  i fiÿ¤ÿ   k  g i sÿ  £ÿÿÿÿÿÿ

Š{ÿ= f˜oÿÿ= f˜gfjÿ
ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ kqjÿ ppeg7 ighfÿ

‹{ÿ0hŽŽ k7  100ÿÿ

{ÿ
k s Ž k˜ÿ
ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ7 i o  i7 ÿ
ÿ

 {ÿ  phki ighfÿÿ
ÿ
ÿ

ÿÿÿÿÿÿƒu„yu‰vwuÿ
ÿ

 flÿf iqk ÿhrÿoqgiÿrkhŽÿ flÿ7 i jhklÿ
Ž lÿ  ÿo e 7i sÿrhkÿingoÿ7 i jhklÿhrÿ
7 o ÿ oogjfŽ fi ÿÿ
ÿ
œ 1rÿ figikqoimÿin fÿ ÿjh  kfo œÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ


 Œÿ  iqk eg¦ ighfÿÿ
ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ ppeg7 ighfÿ

 ‹ÿ5in kÿ1ŽŽgjk ighfÿÿ
ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ 7ighfoÿ

 {ÿ7 7˜ i  kÿ1freq f7 sÿÿ
ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ0hkkqpiÿ5kj fg¦ ighfÿ

{ÿ0hfoqŽ kÿ0k sgiÿ

—{ÿ0  e  8 i eegi ÿ
2ÿ
‹{ÿ8 7qkgig o 0hŽŽhsgig o ÿ
ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ6¥7n fj ÿ
— ÿ k gik ighfÿ
——ÿ sŽgfgoik ig  ÿ kh7 sqk ÿÿ
ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ 7i 7  g £ÿhkÿ pp  eÿhrÿÿ
ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ j f7lÿ  7goghfÿ
—‹{ÿ0hfoigiqighf egilÿhrÿ8i i ÿÿ
ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ8i iqi oÿ
—{ÿ5in kÿ8i iqihklÿ 7ighfoÿÿ
ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ grÿfhiÿ sŽgfgoik ig  ÿ j f7lÿÿ
ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿk  g £ÿhkÿ kg  7lÿ 7i ÿ

 0ÿ23
ÿÿÿ567869ÿ  
  9 ÿÿ
0ÿ 3
ÿÿÿ/0 1 20834ÿ
ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ    ÿ
5697
6063646 3ÿÿ

0ÿGÿ3ÿÿÿJKLM N
6O672ÿM74ÿ 0ÿUÿ3ÿÿÿV4 W834ÿX 63ÿ

Case 1:19-cv-01266-TJK Document 1-1 Filed 05/01/19 Page 2 of 2

ÿ

ÿ
ÿ

   ÿ      ÿ      ÿÿ2 !   "ÿÿ
 # ÿ$ %& !'( ) % ÿ* !% !) ÿ
+, ÿ      ÿ      ÿÿ-"& !ÿÿ
ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ. % &!  ÿ

ÿ

ÿ

PQ ÿR   C >ÿ HÿG!H  > %& !ÿ-)%ÿ
++8ÿ &9&"ÿ:&;<% ÿÿ=> " ?> !%ÿÿ
PQ ÿS%<  ÿ*% % %  ?ÿ-)%& ! ÿÿ
ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ@) &%  & Aÿ  ) Bÿ; !C  '  DBÿÿ
ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ@&HÿT &9 )?ÿ-)%Eÿ
ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ! %& ! "ÿ  &;&!Bÿÿ
ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿC& ) &>&! %& !BÿC&   &"&%?Bÿ ; Bÿÿ ÿ
ÿ
ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ  "&;& !Bÿ  % "& %& !Eÿ
ÿ
ÿ
F@GHÿ   ÿ  Bÿ  " )%ÿ%<& ÿC )IEFÿ
F@GHÿ   ÿ  Bÿ  " )%ÿ%<& ÿC )IEFÿ

0ÿZ3
ÿÿÿX67 
 /[LVMÿÿ
0ÿY3
ÿÿÿK4a8
ÿ 6O61ÿ[6ba49ÿ
0ÿ$3
ÿÿÿ  34
674ÿ
ÿ
ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ\3 3]80 1 20834^ÿ
ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ\3 3]80 1 20834^ÿ
ÿ

ÿ

_# ÿR & ÿY    ÿ*% !C  C ÿ-)%ÿ
_8 ÿY    '$;>%3ÿ: " %& ! ÿ
_+ ÿY    ÿ: &"` ?ÿ-)%ÿ
_ #ÿR >&"?ÿ !Cÿ$ C&) "ÿÿ
ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿY  9 ÿ-)%ÿ
_Q ÿS%<  ÿY    ÿY&%&; %& !ÿÿ
_Q#ÿ=> "3ÿ: %3ÿG!)3ÿ* )  &%?ÿ-)%ÿ

++#ÿ( %&!;ÿ@&Hÿ! %ÿ( %&!;ÿ:&;<% ÿÿ
ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ-)%Eÿ
++ ÿ    &!;'-)) >> C %& ! ÿ
++ ÿS%<  ÿ &9&"ÿ:&;<% ÿ
++ ÿ->  &) ! ÿ̀'.&   &"&%&  ÿÿÿ
ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ=> " ?> !%ÿÿ
++,ÿ->  &) ! ÿ̀'.&   &"&%&  ÿÿÿ
ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿS%<  ÿ
++Pÿ=C ) %& !ÿÿ
ÿ

## ÿG!    !) ÿ
#8 ÿ$  &! ÿ
#  ÿ$&""  ÿ-)%ÿ
#+ ÿc ; %&  " ÿG! %  > !%ÿ
#  ÿ: ) 9  ?ÿ HÿS9    ?> !%ÿÿÿÿÿÿ
ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿdÿ=!H  ) > !%ÿ Hÿÿ
ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿU C;> !%ÿ
#  ÿ: ) 9  ?ÿ HÿS9    ?> !%ÿÿ
ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ Hÿ( %   !e ÿf ! H&% ÿ
#, ÿ*% )I< "C  e ÿ* &% ÿ
#Q ÿS%<  ÿ  !%  )% ÿÿ
#Q ÿ  !%  )%ÿT  C )%ÿY&  &"&%?ÿ
#Q,ÿR  !)<&  ÿ
ÿ

(3ÿS:G2Gcÿ
ÿ

ÿ

# 8ÿ: ) 9  ?ÿ Hÿ. H  "% Cÿÿ
ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ*% C !%ÿY  !ÿ
ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ@ D)" C&!;ÿ9 %   ! Eÿ

0ÿc3
ÿÿÿga
88]h Wb8ÿ
   
4ÿ
ÿ

++#ÿ &9&"ÿ:&;<% ÿÿ( %&!;ÿÿ
ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ@&Hÿ( %&!;ÿ:&;<% ÿ-)%Eÿÿ
ÿ

ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ

0ÿ#T ÿS  )& ; &C!& !";ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ0ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ8ÿÿÿÿ: H  > >ÿ*9%  C%ÿ ÿÿÿ0ÿ H ÿ:  >ÿ> - ! C  "C" ÿ% ÿ0ÿ+ ÿ : ÿ: &!   %  !%  CCÿÿ0ÿ H ÿi  >ÿ  !! H  % <    Cÿÿ 0ÿ,Y&ÿ$ %&; "%%&&j C!&ÿ % &)%ÿÿÿÿÿ0ÿÿÿÿÿ_.&ÿ-  %  &) % ÿU"ÿ % Cÿ;ÿ ÿ 0ÿY&Pÿ$ %&; "%%&&j C!&ÿ %ÿ &)%ÿ
ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ    %ÿ

H  >ÿ$ ;3ÿ
.&  )%ÿR&" ÿ
U C; ÿ
ÿ
(G3ÿ -k*=ÿSRÿ- iGScÿ@ Gi=ÿi =ÿk3*3ÿ G(GYÿ*i-iki=ÿkc.=:ÿl G  ÿmSkÿ-:=ÿRGYGc2ÿ-c.ÿl:Gi=ÿ-ÿf:G=Rÿ*i-i=$=ciÿSRÿ -k*=3Eÿ
ÿ´µÿ·¹̧º̧ÿ̧¹»¼½¾¿Àÿ́ÁÂÿ»½ÿûÄÿ̧ÿ¹Å¾½ÿÆ¿ÇÿÅÀÈɾÊÿ˾À¾ËÅËÿÌÉÍ»ÃÎÿÅÀÈɾÊÿÌÉÍ»ÃÿÉÀÊÿÅÀÏÅýÿ»ÀǾ¼ÐË»À½¸
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
pqrpsÿtuÿvqtwÿtwÿxÿ Y-**ÿÿ .=$-c.ÿÿÿ
Â
Ñ
Á
Á
Á
Á
p‚ƒ„…ÿ†rwÿ‡ˆ‰Šÿ‹ŒÿƒŽˆƒÿ‹ˆÿ„‡Ž‰‹ˆ‘ÿ
(GG3ÿ:=nk=*i=.ÿGcÿ
- iGScÿyz{r ÿu} }p}~}ÿ€ÿ

ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ S$TY-Gciÿ
ÿ
(GGG3ÿ:=Y-i=.ÿ -*=@*Eÿ
ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿGRÿ-cmÿ

ÿ
˜˜˜˜Ô˜ÿ
˜Â˜Î
˜ÿ́Á
˜˜˜Â
˜˜µ˜˜˜˜˜˜ÿ
.-i=Aÿÿ˜˜˜˜˜˜ÓÉ

ÿ

    %ÿ

ÿ
’wƒƒÿ‹ˆ“‘”•„‘‹‡ˆ–ÿ
ÿ

C& % &)%ÿ@   )&H?Eÿÿ

ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿUk:mÿ.=$-c.Aÿÿ
ÿ
ÿ
m=*ÿ
cSÿÿ

m=*
ÿÿÿÿÿÒ
ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿcSÿ
ÿ

ÿ
tŒÿŠƒ“—ÿ‰ƒ“ƒÿ„‡Ž‰ƒ‘ƒÿ”ƒ‰‘ƒÿ„“ƒÿŒ‡”Žÿ

*G2c-ik:=ÿSRÿ-iiS:c=mÿSRÿ:= S:.ÿ˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜Õ˜Ã˜Õ˜ÿÖÇ
˜˜˜¾¼
˜˜ÿ×
˜˜ÿ̧
˜¹¾
˜˜»
˜˜Í˜»
˜Ø
˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜ÿ

Gc*i:k iGSc*ÿRS:ÿ S$TY=iGc2ÿ G(GYÿ S(=:ÿ* ==iÿU*j++ÿ
- %<  &%?ÿH  ÿ &9&"ÿ  9  ÿ*<  %ÿ
ÿ
v‚ƒÿ™wš››ÿ„‹œ‹‰ÿ„‡œƒ”ÿ“‚ƒƒ‘ÿˆÿ‘‚ƒÿ‹ˆŒ‡”Ž‘‹‡ˆÿ„‡ˆ‘‹ˆƒÿ‚ƒ”ƒ‹ˆÿˆƒ‹‘‚ƒ”ÿ”ƒ‰„ƒ“ÿˆ‡”ÿ“•‰ƒŽƒˆ‘“ÿ‘‚ƒÿŒ‹‰‹ˆ“ÿˆÿ“ƒ”œ‹„ƒ“ÿ‡Œÿ‰ƒ‹ˆ“ÿ‡”ÿ‡‘‚ƒ”ÿƒ”“ÿ“ÿ”ƒž•‹”ƒÿ
ŸŠÿ‰ —ÿƒ¡„ƒ‘ÿ“ÿ”‡œ‹ƒÿŸŠÿ‰‡„‰ÿ”•‰ƒ“ÿ‡Œÿ„‡•”‘}ÿÿv‚‹“ÿŒ‡”Ž—ÿ”‡œƒÿŸŠÿ‘‚ƒÿ™•‹„‹‰ÿp‡ˆŒƒ”ƒˆ„ƒÿ‡Œÿ‘‚ƒÿyˆ‹‘ƒÿw‘‘ƒ“ÿ‹ˆÿwƒ‘ƒŽŸƒ”ÿ¢£¤›—ÿ‹“ÿ”ƒž•‹”ƒÿŒ‡”ÿ‘‚ƒÿ•“ƒÿ‡Œÿ‘‚ƒÿ
p‰ƒ”…ÿ‡Œÿp‡•”‘ÿŒ‡”ÿ‘‚ƒÿ•”‡“ƒÿ‡Œÿ‹ˆ‹‘‹‘‹ˆÿ‘‚ƒÿ„‹œ‹‰ÿ‡„…ƒ‘ÿ“‚ƒƒ‘}ÿÿp‡ˆ“ƒž•ƒˆ‘‰Š—ÿÿ„‹œ‹‰ÿ„‡œƒ”ÿ“‚ƒƒ‘ÿ‹“ÿ“•ŸŽ‹‘‘ƒÿ‘‡ÿ‘‚ƒÿp‰ƒ”…ÿ‡Œÿp‡•”‘ÿŒ‡”ÿƒ„‚ÿ„‹œ‹‰ÿ„‡Ž‰‹ˆ‘ÿŒ‹‰ƒ}ÿÿ
¥‹“‘ƒÿŸƒ‰‡ ÿ”ƒÿ‘‹“ÿŒ‡”ÿ„‡Ž‰ƒ‘‹ˆÿ‘‚ƒÿ„‹œ‹‰ÿ„‡œƒ”ÿ“‚ƒƒ‘}ÿÿv‚ƒ“ƒÿ‘‹“ÿ„‡‹ˆ„‹ƒÿ ‹‘‚ÿ‘‚ƒÿ ‡Žˆÿz•Žƒ”‰“ÿ‡ˆÿ‘‚ƒÿ„‡œƒ”ÿ“‚ƒƒ‘}ÿÿ
ÿ
G3ÿ p§yzv†ÿ§uÿ rwt{rzprÿ§uÿut wvÿ¥twvr{ÿ~¥xtzvtuu¨{rurz{xzvÿ’Ÿ–ÿp‡•ˆ‘Šÿ‡Œÿ”ƒ“‹ƒˆ„ƒ©ÿy“ƒÿ¢¢ªª¢ÿ‘‡ÿ‹ˆ‹„‘ƒÿ‰‹ˆ‘‹ŒŒÿ‹Œÿ”ƒ“‹ƒˆ‘ÿ
‡Œÿ«“‚‹ˆ‘‡ˆ—ÿ{p—ÿ¬¬¬¬¬ÿ‹Œÿ‰‹ˆ‘‹ŒŒÿ‹“ÿ”ƒ“‹ƒˆ‘ÿ‡Œÿyˆ‹‘ƒÿw‘‘ƒ“ÿŸ•‘ÿˆ‡‘ÿ«“‚‹ˆ‘‡ˆ—ÿ{p—ÿˆÿ£££££ÿ‹Œÿ‰‹ˆ‘‹ŒŒÿ‹“ÿ‡•‘“‹ƒÿ‘‚ƒÿyˆ‹‘ƒÿw‘‘ƒ“}ÿ
ÿ
GGG3ÿ ptvt­rzwqt~ÿ§uÿ~ tzpt~x¥ÿ~x vtrw©ÿv‚‹“ÿ“ƒ„‘‹‡ˆÿ‹“ÿ„‡Ž‰ƒ‘ƒÿ‡ˆ‰Šÿ‹Œÿ‹œƒ”“‹‘Šÿ‡Œÿ„‹‘‹®ƒˆ“‚‹ÿ “ÿ“ƒ‰ƒ„‘ƒÿ“ÿ‘‚ƒÿ̄“‹“ÿ‡Œÿ™•”‹“‹„‘‹‡ˆÿ
•ˆƒ”ÿwƒ„‘‹‡ˆÿtt}ÿ
ÿ
G(3ÿ pxwrÿxwwt°z±rzvÿxz{ÿzxvy rÿ§uÿwytv©ÿv‚ƒÿ““‹ˆŽƒˆ‘ÿ‡Œÿÿ²•ƒÿ‘‡ÿŠ‡•”ÿ„“ƒÿ ‹‰‰ÿƒƒˆÿ‡ˆÿ‘‚ƒÿ„‘ƒ‡”ŠÿŠ‡•ÿ“ƒ‰ƒ„‘ÿ‘‚‘ÿŸƒ“‘ÿ
”ƒ”ƒ“ƒˆ‘“ÿ‘‚ƒÿ”‹Ž”Šÿ„•“ƒÿ‡Œÿ„‘‹‡ˆÿŒ‡•ˆÿ‹ˆÿŠ‡•”ÿ„‡Ž‰‹ˆ‘}ÿ†‡•ÿŽŠÿ“ƒ‰ƒ„‘ÿ‡ˆ‰Šÿ‡ˆƒÿ„‘ƒ‡”Š}ÿÿ†‡•ÿŽ•“‘ÿ‰“‡ÿ“ƒ‰ƒ„‘ÿ‡ˆƒÿ„‡””ƒ“‡ˆ‹ˆÿ
ˆ‘•”ƒÿ‡Œÿ“•‹‘ÿŒ‡•ˆÿ•ˆƒ”ÿ‘‚ƒÿ„‘ƒ‡”Šÿ‡Œÿ‘‚ƒÿ„“ƒ}ÿÿ
ÿ
(G3ÿ pxywrÿ§uÿxpvt§z©ÿp‹‘ƒÿ‘‚ƒÿy}w}ÿp‹œ‹‰ÿw‘‘•‘ƒÿ•ˆƒ”ÿ ‚‹„‚ÿŠ‡•ÿ”ƒÿŒ‹‰‹ˆÿˆÿ ”‹‘ƒÿÿŸ”‹ƒŒÿ“‘‘ƒŽƒˆ‘ÿ‡Œÿ‘‚ƒÿ”‹Ž”Šÿ„•“ƒ}ÿÿ
ÿ
(GGG3ÿ  r¥xvr{ÿpxwr’w–—ÿtuÿxz†©ÿtŒÿŠ‡•ÿ‹ˆ‹„‘ƒÿ‘‚‘ÿ‘‚ƒ”ƒÿ‹“ÿÿ”ƒ‰‘ƒÿ„“ƒ—ÿŠ‡•ÿŽ•“‘ÿ„‡Ž‰ƒ‘ƒÿÿ”ƒ‰‘ƒÿ„“ƒÿŒ‡”Ž—ÿ ‚‹„‚ÿŽŠÿŸƒÿ‡Ÿ‘‹ˆƒÿŒ”‡Žÿ
‘‚ƒÿp‰ƒ”…³“ÿ§ŒŒ‹„ƒ}ÿ
ÿ
¯ƒ„•“ƒÿ‡Œÿ‘‚ƒÿˆƒƒÿŒ‡”ÿ„„•”‘ƒÿˆÿ„‡Ž‰ƒ‘ƒÿ‹ˆŒ‡”Ž‘‹‡ˆ—ÿŠ‡•ÿ“‚‡•‰ÿƒˆ“•”ƒÿ‘‚ƒÿ„„•”„Šÿ‡Œÿ‘‚ƒÿ‹ˆŒ‡”Ž‘‹‡ˆÿ”‡œ‹ƒÿ”‹‡”ÿ‘‡ÿ“‹ˆ‹ˆÿ‘‚ƒÿŒ‡”Ž}ÿÿ

 Case 1:19-cv-01266-TJK Document 1-2 Filed 05/01/19 Page 1 of 2
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12; DC 3/15) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
for the

District
of Columbia
__________
District
of __________
MASAKO MORISHITA

Plaintiff(s)

v.
WHISTER, LLC and ANDREW JAMES CHIOU

Defendant(s)

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Civil Action No. 1:19-cv-1266

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION
To: (Defendant’s name and address) Whistler, LLC
c/o Andrew James Chiou
2214 Rhode Island Avenue, N.E.
Washington, D.C. 20018

A lawsuit has been filed against you.
Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you
are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.
P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of
the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,
whose name and address are: Eric L. Siegel, Kalbian Hagerty, LLP, 888 17th Street, N.W., Suite 1000, Washington,
D.C. 20006

(202) 419-3296

esiegel@kalbianhagerty.com

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint.
You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

ANGELA D. CAESAR, CLERK OF COURT
Date:

05/01/2019
Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

 Case 1:19-cv-01266-TJK Document 1-2 Filed 05/01/19 Page 2 of 2
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No. 1:19-cv-1266
PROOF OF SERVICE
(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))
This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)
was received by me on (date)

.

’ I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)
on (date)

; or

’ I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)
, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,
on (date)

, and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or
, who is

’ I served the summons on (name of individual)
designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)
on (date)

; or

’ I returned the summons unexecuted because

; or

’ Other (specify):
.
My fees are $

for travel and $

for services, for a total of $

0.00

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

Print

Save As...

Reset

.

 Case 1:19-cv-01266-TJK Document 1-3 Filed 05/01/19 Page 1 of 2
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12; DC 3/15) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
for the

District
of Columbia
__________
District
of __________
MASAKO MORISHITA

Plaintiff(s)

v.
WHISTER, LLC and ANDREW JAMES CHIOU

Defendant(s)

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Civil Action No. 1:19-cv-1266

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION
To: (Defendant’s name and address) Andrew James Chiou
2214 Rhode Island Avenue, N.E.
Washington, D.C. 20018

A lawsuit has been filed against you.
Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you
are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.
P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of
the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,
whose name and address are: Eric L. Siegel, Kalbian Hagerty, LLP, 888 17th Street, N.W., Suite 1000, Washington,
D.C. 20006

(202) 419-3296

esiegel@kalbianhagerty.com

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint.
You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

ANGELA D. CAESAR, CLERK OF COURT
Date:

05/01/2019
Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

 Case 1:19-cv-01266-TJK Document 1-3 Filed 05/01/19 Page 2 of 2
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No. 1:19-cv-1266
PROOF OF SERVICE
(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))
This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)
was received by me on (date)

.

’ I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)
on (date)

; or

’ I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)
, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,
on (date)

, and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or
, who is

’ I served the summons on (name of individual)
designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)
on (date)

; or

’ I returned the summons unexecuted because

; or

’ Other (specify):
.
My fees are $

for travel and $

for services, for a total of $

0.00

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

Print

Save As...

Reset

.