Attachment From: . To: Cc: Edetoulose; Bramlina Subject: Re: 7847 Change Order 69 (C069) Date: Thursday, May 19, 2011 1:20:38 PM . Hi Diane: As we discussed, FHWA will be requesting a meeting with the AWV Team in the near future in an attempt to understand and discuss ideas to mitigate these "do-over" situations from happening as we move forward through this and other AWV contracts. However, that said, I understand the critical nature' and the potential cost savings and logistic needs involved with doing this work at this time. Therefore, please consider this FHWA approval to move forward with this Change Order. Thank you - 'Randy Sent from my Verizon Wireless" BlackBerry From: "Berge, Diane" Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 08:55:23 -0700 To: Everett, Randolph Cc: Madden, Johnson, Paul E. Pri.eto, Bray, . Subject: 7847 Change Order 69 (C069) Randy, - We are requesting approval for Change Order 69. it is an added waterline and casing that generally runs East--West, just north of Royal Brougham Way.' Contract 7715 installed an east-west waterline a_nd casing _in this same vicinity, but the location of this line will conflict with a shaft to be built for the Stage 3 project._ This change order includes installing a new waterline and casing about 40 feet north of the existing one, and removes part of the existing line and abandons the rest. The designers iooked at modifying the Stage 3 shaft locations, but this was found to be more expensive than moving the waterline and casing. it makes sense to do the work on the' Stage 2 project since the line will run under SR99 that we are constructing. The Contractor opted to go Force Account on this work since the work needs to be done right away and they thought negotiating a price would take too long. We estimated $250,000 for this work. Please let me know if you need any additional information. Diane Berge, P.E. . Assistant Project Engineer WSDOT 206-768-5649