lemma County

Board of State and Community Corrections
SB 1022 Adult Local Criminal Justice Facilities
Construction Program

Tehama Community Corrections Reentry
and Day Reporting Center

October 24-, 2013

 

 

 

 

 

Submitted by:

Tehama County Sheriff?s Department
Jail Custody Division

Red Bluff, CA

 

 

   

BOARD OF STATE AND COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS

SB 1022
ADULT LOCAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE FACILITIES
CONSTRUCTION FINANCING PROGRAM

PROPOSAL FORM

This document is not to be reformatted.

 

COUNTY NAME STATE DOLLARS REQUESTED

 

 

Tehama County 0 20,000,000
SMALL COUNTY MEDIUM COUNTY LARGE COUNTY
(200,000 OR UNDER GENERAL COUNTY (200,001 - 700,000 GENERAL COUNTY (700,001 GENERAL COUNTY
POPULATION) POPULATION) POPULATION) 

 

 

 

TYPE OF PROPOSAL PROGRAM SPACE PROPOSAL QB BEDS AND PROGRAM SPACE PROPOSAL
PLEASE CHECK ONE (ONLY):

PROGRAM SPACE BEDS AND PROGRAM SPACE 

      
 

FACILITY NAME

Tehama County Main Jail

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

Tehama Community Corrections Reentry and Day Reporting Center
STREET ADDRESS

64-5 Madison Street
CITY

Rad Bluff

 

 

 

   
 

ZIP CODE
96080

 
 
 
   

 

CONSTRUCTING BEDS OR OTHER
SPACE AT EXISTING FACILITY

  
 


REMODELING

  
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A. MINIMUM SECURITY B. MEDIUM SECURITY C. MAXIMUM SECURITY
BEDS BEDS BEDS D. SPECIAL USE BEDS
Number Of
beds 64

constructed

TOTAL

BEDS 64


 

 

 

 

Tehama Proposal Formdocx 1

Sayre/c Ir

 

PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN AGREEMENT

NAME Williams J. Goodwin TITLE Chief Administrator
PElag/Em' SICNAT RE

.w

 

 

 

 

COUNTY ADMENISTRATOR

NAME Julie Sisneros Administrative Services Director
DEPARTMENT TELEPHONE NUMBER
Administrative Services 530-527?4655
STREET ADDRESS

727 Oak Street

CITY STATE ZIP CODE E-MAIL ADDRESS
Red Blutf CA 96080

 

 

 

PROJECT DEFICER
NAME Anderson TITLE Auditor-Controller

 

DEPARTMENT TELEPHONE NUMBER
County Auditor 530627?3474
STREET ADDRESS

444 Gait Street

CITY STATE CODE ADDRESS

Red Bluff CA 98080

 

 

 

 




 

 

 

 

PROJECT CONTACT PERSON

NAME Williams J. Goodwin TITLE Chief Administrator

DEPARTMENT TELEPHONE NUMBER
Administrative Services 530627?4655

STREET ADDRESS

7'2? Oak Street

CITY STATE ZEP CODE E-MAIL ADDRESS

Red Bluff CA 96080 Bgoedwm@oo.tehama.ce.u

 



 

 

Tehama Proposal Form 2

 

BUDGET SUMMARY ENSTRUCTEONS

Definitions of total project costs for purposes of this program (state reimbursed,
county cash contribution and county in-kind contribution) can be found in the
Project Costs, State Reimbursement and County Contribution (Match) section of
the Request for Proposals (RFP). The county cash and inukind contributions are
collectively the county contribution. Those defined costs in the RFP shall be the
guide for accurately completing this budget summary section.

in the Budget Summary Table that follows in part of this section, indicate the
amount of state financing requested and the amount of cash and/or in~kind
contributions allotted to each budget line?item, in total defining the totai project
costs. While it is necessary to fully include each eligible project cost for state
reimbursed and county cash contribution line items, it is not necessary to include
county inwkind contribution amounts. All other eligible costs are considered hard
costs and are to be claimed under state reimbursed or county cash contribution.

inclusion of the in-kind contribution amounts is optional and counties may choose
whether or not to include any of the amounts eligible under each in?kind
contribution line item. The in?kind contribution line items represent gnly county
staff salaries and benefits, or current fair market value of land. An appraisal of
land value will be required after conditional award (or with proposal submittal if
the county is seeking funding preference under the real estate due diligence
criterion), and only if iand value is included as part of the county?s contribution.

The total amount of state financing requested cannot exceed 90 percent of the
total project costs. The county contribution must be a minimum of 10 percent of
the total project costs (unless the applicant is a small county petitioning for a
reduction in the county contribution amount). County contributions can be any
combination of cash or in?kind project costs. Small counties that petition for a
reduction in the contribution amount must provide a minimum of five percent
contribution of the total project costs. Small counties requesting a reduction in
county contribution must state so in part A of this section.

State financing limits (maximums) for all proposals are as follows:
a $80,000,000 for large counties;
a $40,000,000 for medium counties; and
$20,000,000 for small counties.

Tenama Proposal Form.docx 3

A. SMALL CGUNTY PETETION FOR REDUCTEQN IN 

A small county may petition the B800 Board for a reduction in its county
contribution. This proposal document will serve as the petition and the BSCC
Board?s acceptance of the county?s contribution reduction, provided the county
abides by all terms and conditions of this SB 1022 RFP process and receives a
conditional award. Small counties requesting the reduction must stilt provide a
minimum of five percent contribution that may be any combination of cash and/or
in-kind contribution. lf requesting a reduction in match contribution, check the
box below to indicate the county?s petition.

This proposal includes a petition for a county conttibntion reduction
request as re?ected in the proposat budget.

Tehama Proposal Formdocx 4

3 BUDGET SUMMARY TABLE
(Report to nearest $1000)

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   
   

 

1. (Construction $16,322,500 $9 $15,322,500
2. Additional Eligible Castes" $1836000 $0 931,836,000

Architectural $879500 $893500 $1773000
4. Project/Construction $1100pog 

Management . . .. ., .
5. CEQA $45000 $455000
6. State Agency Fees $51.009 $51,009
7. Audit $10000 $10000
8.. Needs Assessment $93,009
9. ?transition Planning $300,000 $300,000
10. County Administration $72300 $72000
11. Land Value $400,000 3409,09
Tom. PROJECT cosrs 3:885:000 35- 21964560
PERCENT or: TOTAL 9108?? 5.06% seem 100.00 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Additional Eligible Costs: This line item is limited to specified fees and moveable equipment and
moveable furnishings (eligible for state reimbursement or cash contribution), and public art (eligible for
cash contribution only).

Provide an explanation below of how the dollar figures were determined for each, of the budget line
items above that contain dollar amounts. Every cash contribution (match) line item shall be
included with a reporting of the full amount budgeted, unless a line item is not an actual cash
contribution project cost for the county. (In that case, indicate so below.) For each line item
explanation below, include how state financing and the county contribution dollar amounts have
been determined and calculated (be specific).

1. Construction (includes fixed equipment and furnishings):
Cost estimate based on professional estimate and escalated to mid?point of construction.
Detailed estimate was created to include identified scope items illustrated on conceptual
plans including anticipated fixed detention equipment, food service and laundry equipment,
casework for DRC and Program areas, and includes construction contingency.
2. Additional Eligible Costs (specified allowable fees, moveable equipment and
moveable furnishings, and public art):
a) Define each allowable fee type and the cost of each: Includes permits and
reviews $102,000; sewer, water, and storm fees $112,000; data, phone, monitors,
computers $520,000; inspections and testing $292,000

SB_1022_partial Tehama RFP form 131101 (2).docx 5

bi il?oveable equipment and rnoyeable furnishings total amount: $810,000
(based on percentage)

c) Public art total amount: 0.00%

3. Architectural:

a) Describe the county?s current stage in the architectural process: County and
consultants had extensive dialogue on the operational and built environment
expectations to create the conceptual design plans to date. The proposed project,
while autonomous on separate site, provides extreme value to the existing adjacent
detenion facility and campus.

b) Given the approval requirements of the SPWB and associated state
reimbursement parameters, define which portions/phases of the
architectural services the county intends to seek state dollar reimbursement:
The County currently has the cash match to accommodate full design, award of
bid, and well into construction to accommodate these sewlces/fees. The county is
seeking State reimbursement for design services after PP's. Those phases would
include Bidding, and CA for reimbursements.

c) Define the budgeted amount for what is described in b) above: $893,500.

d) Define which portion/phases of the architectural services the county intends
to cover with county contribution dollars: As noted above, approximately 50%
of the Architectural fees are part of the cash match and for remaining the county will
be seeking State reimbursement when eligible.

e) Define the budgeted amount for what is described in d) above: $879,500

4. Projecthonstruction Management:
Constrution Management will be performed by a qualified firm and will be contracted out.
Majority of this cost will be part of State reimbursement.

5. CEQA:
CEQA cost estimate based on recent experience on similar projects.

6. State Agency Fees (maximums: due diligence $16,000; SFilli $35,000):

a) Real estate due diligence fee: $16,000
b) State Fire Marshal fee: $35,000

7. Audit - Define whether the county is intending to use independent county auditor
(in-kind) or services of contracted auditor (cash) and amount budgeted:
Intent is to use an independent contract Auditor (cash contribution)

8. Needs Assessment - Define whether work is performed by county staff (in-kind) or
consultant (cash) 
Consultants were utilized to provide a comprehensive Needs Assessment and planning,
graphic design, and produce information needed for this Application.

9. Transition Planning - Define whether work is performed by county staff (in?kind) or
consultant (cash):
Cost is for County staff to plan new facility, write operational programing and staffing
plans, and plan occupancy.

10. County Administration:
Estimate of cost of County labor for Project Administration and Management.

11. Land Value:
$400,000 value by Shaw and Associates, Real Estate Appraisers and Consultants.

SB_1022__partiai Tehama RFP form 131101 (2).docx 6

 

Prior to completing this timetable, the county must consult with all appropriate county staff 
county counsel, general services, public works, county administrator) to ensure that dates are

achievable.

Please consult the State Capital Outlay/Board of State and Community Corrections
Process Details and Timing Requirements section of the RFP for further information. Complete the

table below indicating start and completion dates for each key event, including comments if desired.

Note the required timeframes for specific milestone activities in this SB 1022 process. (The 8800

Board intends to make conditional awards at a January 2014 meeting.)

 

Site assurance/comparable long-
term possession within 90 days
of award

1/16/2014

4/9/2014

 

Real estate due diligence
package submitted within 120

days of award

1/16/2014

5/7/2014

 

State Public Works Board
meeting Project Established
within 18 months at award

5/8/2014

8/27/2014

 

Schematic Design with
Operational Program Statement
within 24 months of award
(design-bid?build projects)

3/11/2014

10/8/2014

 

Performance criteria or
'pericrmance criteria and concept
drawings with Operational
Program Statement within 30
months of award (design-build
projects)

 

Design Development
(Preliminary drawings) with
Staffing Pian

11/3/2014

6/29/2015

 

Staffing/Operating Cost Analysis
approved by the Board of
Supervisors

8/3/2015

8/3/2015

Operational costs
established and EDS
approval

 

Construction Documents
(Working drawings)

9/18/2015

2/26/2016

Additional time for SFM,
8800 reviews and SPWB

 

Construction Bids

5/19/2016

7/15/2016

Anticipating 2 month bid

 

Notice to Proceed within 42
months of award

8/9/2016

9/12/2016

State process for review of
bids and any potential
protests

 

Construction (maximum 3 years
to compiete)

9/13/2016

1/15/2018

Accommodates 16 month
construction project

 

Staffing/Occupancy within 90
days of completion

 

 

1/17/2018

 

2/27/2018

 

Transitional period and staff
training

 

SBw1022_partial Tehama RFP form 131101 (2).docx

 

 

To synopsize and capture key information from Section 5: Narrative, applicants
must complete this Fact Sheet. Minimal information is requested. Narrative
information or explanations are not to be included on this Fact Sheet nor as part
of the tables in this section. Explanations of what is provided in these tables may
be included in the Narrative section of the Proposal Form. Proposal narratives
may include reference back to one or more of these specific tables refer to
Table 4 in the Fact Sheet), rather than repeat information in the narrative that is
already provided in the tables.

Tables 1 through 7? below constitute the Fact Sheet, which shall be provided with
each proposal submittal, without regard as to whether the proposal includes bed
construction. These tables of information shall be used by the raters in
conjunction with the information provided in the proposal narrative (see Narrative
section of the Proposal Form).

The information requested in this Fact Sheet pertains to those facilities (Type ll,
ill and 1V), approaches and programs under the jurisdiction of the sheriff or local
department of corrections.

Tables 1 4, 6 and 7: For Average Daily Population (ADP), provide the average
number per day for the first six months of 2013. For programs that started after

January 1, 2013, provide the average number per day for the length . .. .

program was in effect (after the name of the program, provide the starting date).
The same time period parameters pertain to Assessments per Month. ?Lack of
space? releases in Table 1 refers to the total of non?sentenced inmates released
and sentenced inmates released early.

Table 3: The term ?approaches? includes home detention, not incarcerating
misdemeanants, etc, or other poiicies/procedures and approaches that do not
include specific measures influencing recidivism reduction.

Tables 4, 5 and 7: The term ?programming? refers to the utilization of formal
programs that specifically incorporate measures to influence recidivism

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

reduction.
Table 1: Provide the foilowing information.
1. County general popuiation 63,772
2. Number of detention facilities 1
3. BSCC?rated capacity of system 191
4-. ADP (Secure Detention) of system 184
5. ADP (Alternatives to Detention) of system 134
6. Percentage felony inmates of system 88.4%
7. Percentage non-sentenced inmates of system 55.4%

 

 

 

 

Tehama Proposai Form.docx 8

 

 

 

 

 

 

8. Arrests per month 271
9. Bookings per month of system 291
10. ?Lack of space? releases per month 132

 

 

detention facilities in your jurisdiction.

Table 2: Provide the name, BSCC-rated capacity (RC) and ADP of the adult

 

Name

RC

ADP

 

Tehama County Jail

191

184

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

Tabie 3: List approaches currently in place to reduce the need for beds, and ADP

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

tor each.
Pre-?i?riai Approaches ADP
1. Jail Cite and Release Protocol 3
2.
3.
4i.
5,
6.
Sentenced Offender Approaches ADP
Sheriff1 5 Work and Education Program (WREP) 84
Home Detention Electronic Monitoring (GPS) 50

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

Tehama Proposal Formdocx 9

 

 

 

 

Table 4: List the current offender programming in place and the ADP in each

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

program.
Pro?Trial Program ADP
1. MRT Male/Female 10
2. Narcotics /Alcoholics Anonymous 2
3. Male Church 7
4. Female Church 2
5. Male Anger Management 0
6.
Sentenced Offender Program ADP
GED Program 5
2. MRT Male Female 7
3. Narcotics Anonymous /Alcoholics Anonymous 2
4. Male Church 4
5. Female Church 2
6. Male Anger Management 4

 

 

Table 5: List the offender programming gaps and deficiencies.

 

Gaps and Deficiencies

 

MRT - is too limited by inmate classification as to who can attend the program

 

GED Program takes an extended time to complete

 

Female Anger Management - Not offered at this time

 

Male Anger Management Limited participation due to inmate classification

 

 

 

 

nee-sene-

 

 

Table 6: List the offender assessments used for the purpose of jail population

management.

 

Assessment Tools

Assessments
per Month

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

Tehama Proposal Formdoox 10

 

 

 

 

Table 7: List the offender assessments used for determining programming.

 

 

 

 

Assessments
Assessment Tools per Month
1. MRT Uses no specific assessment tool 
GED - Reviewed and approved by a Sergeant, no specific A
tool
Either Court-ordered or voluntary 

 

Male/ Female Church - Voluntary basis by classification 

 

Anger Management inmate request, voluntary unless A
Court?ordered, no specific assessment tool

 



 

 

 

 

 

Tehama Proposal Form.doox 11

 

As defined previously in the RFP, there are two proposal types in this funding
process. What follows below are the narrative points that must be discussed
within each of the five major topic areas. Please note:

3 Beds and Program Space Proposals: Proposals that include any type
of bed construction (remodel/renovation or new construction) shall
address all of the points under each of the five major topic areas below.

a Program Space Preposais: Proposals that do not include any type of
bed construction shall address all five major topic areas, skipping those
areas within 1, 2 and 3 that specifically fali under the Bed Construction
heading. The All Projects heading under 2 does apply.

Attach up to the maximum number of 35 pages of double-spaced narrative (no
smaller than 12 point font) ordered in the subject areas indicated within the
proposal type. If it can be written in less than the maximum pages, please do so
(avoid ?filler?). Up to 10 additional pages of essential appendices may be
included at the discretion of the applicant. Appendices cannot be used to give
required narrative information. Pictures, charts, illustrations or diagrams are
encouraged in the narrative or appendices to assist reviewers in fully
understanding the proposed scope of work. Data sources must be identified.

it the project is for a regional facility (must meet the requirements outiined in the
Regional Facilities section of the RFP), clearly indicate so. include the names of
the partnering counties and their individual data which supports the project and
responds to the requested narrative points.

 

Manama-1'

 

B: 1.01 Describe the ?ndings of the needs assessment completed by the county.

 

Provide a county jail system overview capacity, ADP and other relevant factors), including a
description of other current or planned construction. If the county has an AB 900 award(s), indicate

 

 

 

B: 1'02 such and identify the number of beds to be constructed and current stage of planning or construction
for this project(s).
Describe the system issues anticipated to be remedied by the new construction, such as:
B. 1.93 . .
overcrowding, medicai, or mental health beds.
3' 1 (34 Describe the current trends in the number of arrests, bookings, releases due to lack of space and
other reievant factors as they relate to the need for beds.
3' 1 G5 Discuss the current approach to reducing the need for beds, inciuding programs and alternatives to

incarceration.

 

B: 1.06 Provide data showing the effectiveness/ impacts of these alternatives.

 

 

 

 

Tehama Proposal Formdocx 12

 

 

 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A: 2.01

 

 

1 07 Describe any pians underway, or future plans, to impiernent alternatives to incarceration and their
anticipated results.
PS: . . .
1-01 Describe the process for determining the need for program space.
PS: Describe the current approach to offender programming use of current program space, types of
1.02 programs, and services) for custody and non-custody offenders.
PS: Describe what least restrictive alternatives have been put in place to address the needs of the
1.03 population intended to be served by this proposal.
. Describe the gaps and deficiencies in current programming for custody and non-custody offendersand which of these gaps or defrcrencres wail be addressed With proposed program space construction
funding.
PS: Describe the approach taken to determining the kind of programming that will take place in the new
1.05 program space.
Provide information and data supporting the county's need for program space.
PS: Indicate the approach to alternatives to incarceration and how the program will assist in managing the
1.07 jail population.
Describe the need for programming that could assist with the jail population management.
2. SCOPE 9F WORK

 
   

Detail the fuil scape of work that is the subject of this proposal, including a comprehensive description
of the number and types of beds (if any), program spaces, and other core and spaces;
indicate whether this is new stand?alone construction, an addition to an existing or space that
is being remodeled or renovated.

 

 

 

B: 2.01 Describe the planning process that resulted in this bed construction scope of work.
B: 2.02 Describe the reiationship between stated needs and the planned construction.

B: 2.03 Describe the anticipated beneficial outcomes of the new bed construction.

8: 2.04 Define the staffing that will be required to operate the new construction.

 

 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Describe the planning process used to develop the design for the construction of program space.
Describe the relationship between stated needs and the proposed program space construction.
PS: Define the features of this program space construction that make it suitable for the intended
2.03 programming.

 

Tehama Proposal Formdocx

13

 

 

PS:
2.04

Describe plans to lmpiement and operate programs in the space.

 

PS:
2.05

 

 

Describe the anticipated beneficial outcomes of the new program space construction.

 

 

 

 

OFFENDER MANAGEMENT mo I 

     

 

Describe how the proposed construction will address the county's offender management goals

 

 

B: 3'91 regarding use of secure detention
3 02 Describe how the proposed bed construction aligns with the Community Corrections Partnership (CCP)
plan.
Describe the use of, or plans to use, offender assessment(s) and other interventions to address jail
B: 3.03 population management, including objective tools or instruments to manage the offender population,

such as pretrial assessments, etc.

 

  
 

Describe the county's planned construction in relation to the expected need for beds in the future.

 

 

 

 

Describe how this program space construction will address the county's offender management goais.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Describe how the program space construction aligns with the CCP planDescribe the programming to be conducted in the new program space.
Describe how the program space will foster a quality reentry model and seamless reentry process.
PS: Describe coilaborative partnerships that will provide services within the program space and provide
3.,05 continuity through the reentry and community supervision process.
PS: Describe the sources of ?nanciai support Medi?Cai, other federal sources, etc.) that will be
3.06 accessed to aid in the delivery of programs.
PS: Describe the offender assessment(s) and the process for determining the programming offenders
3.07 (custody and non?custody) wiil receive.
PS: Describe the approach to the principles and objectives of evidence-based programming that will be
3.08 incorporated to reduce recidivism, including program evaluation.
PS: Define the staff quali?cations necessary to present the planned programming staff training
3.09 certification).
PS: Describe the target population and estimated numbers of individuais to be served daily and annually
3.10 in the program space. Describe how you arrived at those estimates.

. 4-3 -
4 01 Describe the plan for project management and administration, including key positions and

responsibilities.

4.02 Describe the current state of the county's project planning process.

 

 

 

Tehama Proposal Formdoox 14

 

 

4.03 Describe the county's readiness to proceed with the project.

 

4.04 Describe the construction project timeline.

 

 

 

 

 

5.01 Justify the amount of state financing requested for the planned construction.

 

Describe the anticipated benefits/impact of the construction in relation to construction costs (including

5'02 any fiscal bene?ts).

 

5.03 Describe steps that the county has taken to minimize costs of this project.

 

5.04- Describe efforts to leverage other sources of funds federal) for program delivery.

 

Detail the cost effectiveness of this construction project, including from a population management

5'05 perspective.

 

 

 

 

Tehama Proposal Form.docx 15

 

All counties applying for SB 1022 financing must include a Board of Supervisors?
resolution with the proposal submittal. The resolution must include the requisite
components as outlined below. applies only to counties seeking the funding
preference as described in the RFP Funding Preference section.) For counties
submitting multiple proposals (which requires participation in a regional facility as
described in the RFP), separate resolutions for each proposal, with the
necessary language contained in each resolution, is required.

A. Ali counties seeking to satisfy one or more of the funding preference
criteria must provide the resolution language outlined below.
Criterion is mandatory if any funding preference is sought.
Criteria 3 and 4 are optional.

PREFERENCE CRITERION Adeduate County Contribution Funds
in addition to all of the required documentation identified in the RFP,
the foiiowing ianguage must appear in the resolution:

The County of (the ?County?) is seeking funding
preference for its proposed project within the Adult Local Criminal Justice
Facilities Construction Financing Program (the 1022 Financing
Program?). As such, the Board of Supervisors of
County does hereby represent, warrant and covenant as follows:

 

 

1) Lawful/v Available Funds. The county cash contribution
funds, as described in the documentation accompanying the County?s
SB 1022 Financing Program Proposal Form, have been derived
exclusively from lawfully available funds of the County.

2) County Cash Contribution Funds Are Local and Authorized.
The payment of the county cash contribution funds for the proposed adult
local criminal justice facility project (the ?Project?) is within the power,
legal right, and authority of the County; (ii) is legal and will not conflict with
or constitute on the part of the County a material violation of, a material
breach of, a material default under, or result in the creation or imposition
of any lien, charge, restriction, or encumbrance upon any property of the
County under the provisions of any charter instrument, bylaw, indenture,
mortgage, deed of trust, pledge, note, lease, loan, installment sale
agreement, contract, or other material agreement or instrument to which
the County is a party or by which the County or its properties or funds are
othenivise subject or bound, decree, or demand of any court or
governmental agency or body having jurisdiction over the County or any of
its activities, properties or funds; and have been duly authorized by all
necessary and appropriate action on the part of the governing body of the
County.

Tehama Proposai Formdocx 16

3) No Prior Pledge. The county cash contribution funds and
the Project are not and will not be mortgaged, pledged, or hypothecated
by the County in any manner or for any purpose and have not been and
will not be the subject of a grant of a security interest by the County. In
addition, the county cash contribution funds and the Project are not and
will not be mortgaged, pledged, or hypothecated for the benefit of the
County or its creditors in any manner or for any purpose and have not
been and will not be the subject of a grant of a security interest in favor of
the County or its creditors. The County shall not in any manner impair,
impede or challenge the security, rights and benefits of the owners of any
lease?revenue bonds sold by the State Public Works Board for the Project
(the ?Bonds") or the trustee for the Bonds.

4) Authorization to Proceed with the Proiect. The Project
proposed in the County?s SB 1022 Financing Program proposal is
authorized to proceed in its entirety when and if state financing is awarded
for the Project within the SB 1022 Financing Program.

PREFERENCE CRITERION Real Estate Due Oiliqence
The following statement must appear in the resolution:

The County is seeking funding preference for submittal of the complete
initial real estate due diligence package.

PREFERENCE CRITERION CEQA Compliance
One of the following two statements must appear in the resolution:

The County is seeking funding preference for submittal of documentation
evidencing that compliance with CEQA has been fully completed for the
proposed project, and further is certifying that all related statutes of
limitation have expired without challenge.

Or:

The County is seeking funding preference for submittal of documentation
evidencing that compliance with CEQA has been fully completed for the
proposed project, and is certifying that all challenge has been completely
resolved in a manner that allows the project to move fonivard as proposed.

PREFERENCE CRITERION Authorization of Protect Documents
The following language must appear in the resolution; the bracketed
and underlined information must be updated as appropriate to be
consistent with the person(s) each county authorizes to execute the
respective project documents:

Tehama Proposal Form.docx 17

The County is seeking funding preference associated with review of and
authorization to execute the project documents required within the
SB 1022 Financing Program. As such, the Board of Supervisors of

County does hereby approve the form of the Project Delivery and
Construction Agreement, the Board of State and Community Corrections
Jail Construction Agreement, the Ground Lease, the Right of Entry for
Construction and Operation, and the Facility Sublease. Each of the
[Chairman of the Board of Supervisors, the Chief Executive Officer of the
County and the Chief Operations Officer of the Countvl. or their designees
(collectively, the ?Authorized Officers"), acting alone, is hereby authorized
for and in the name of the County to execute, and the Clerk to the Board
of Supervisors is authorized to attest, the Project Delivery and
Construction Agreement, the Board of State and Community Corrections
Jail Construction Agreement, the Ground Lease, the Right of Entry for
Construction and Operation, and the Facility Sublease, in substantially the
form hereby approved, with such additions thereto and changes therein as
are required by the BSCC or the State Public Works Board to effectuate
the SB 1022 Financing Program and as condition to the issuance of the
Bonds. Approval of such changes shall be conclusively evidenced by the
execution and delivery thereof by any one of the Authorized Officers each
of whom, acting alone, is authorized to approve such changes.

Each of the Authorized Officers is authorized to execute these respective
agreements at such time and in such manner as is necessary within the
SB 1022 Financing Program. Each of the Authorized Officers is further
authorized to execute, acknowledge and deliver any and all documents
required to consummate the transactions contemplated by the Project
Delivery and Construction Agreement, the Board of State and Community
Corrections Jail Construction Agreement, the Ground Lease, the Right of
Entry for Construction and Operation, and the Facility Subiease.

B. For counties, except as otherwise noted below, the Board of
Supervisors? resolution for the project shat! contain the foliowing:

9 Names, tities and positions of County Construction Administrator, Project
Financial Officer and Project Contact Person.

a Authorization of appropriate county official to sign the Applicant?s
Agreement (page two of Proposal Form) and submit the proposal for
funding.

a Assurance that the County will adhere to state requirements and terms of
the agreements between the County, the Board of State and Community
Corrections and the State Public Works Board in the expenditure of any
state financing allocation and county contribution funds.

Tehama Proposal Formdocx 18

a Assurance that the County has appropriated, or will appropriate after
notification of conditional award of financing but before state/county
financing agreements, the amount of county cash contribution identified by
the County on the financing program proposal form submitted to the Board
of State and Community Corrections; the County acknowledges the need
to identify the source of funds for county cash contribution, and assures
that the cash match contribution does not supplant (replace) funds
otherwise dedicated or appropriated for construction activities. (Ibis
section does not apply to counties seeking the funding preference.)

9 Assurance that the County will safely staff and operate the that is
being constructed (consistent with Title 15, California Code of
Regulations) within ninety (90) days after project completion.

For Beds and Program Snace proposals (that are NOT regional facilitv
projects as defined in this RFP), include the following certification: The
County certifies that it is not and will not be leasing housing capacity in
this SB 1022 financed aduit local criminal justice facility to any other public
or private entity for a period of 10 years beyond the completion date of the
adult local criminal justice facility.

a For Beds and Program Space proposals (that ARE regional facilitv
proiects as defined in this RFP), include the following certification: The
County certifies that it is not and will not be leasing housing capacity in
this SB 1022 financed adult local criminal justice facility for profit purposes
to any other public or private entity for a period of 10 years beyond the
completion date of the adult local criminal justice facility.

(Provide the following site assurance for the adult local criminal justice
facility at the time of proposal or not later than ninety (90) days following
the Board of State and Community Corrections? notice of conditional
award): Assurance that the County has project site control through either
fee simple ownership of the site or comparable long?term possession of
the site, and right of access to the project sufficient to assure undisturbed
use and possession of the site, and will not dispose of, modify the use of,
or change the terms of the real property title, or other interest in the site of
facility subject to construction, or lease the facility for operation to other
entities, without permission and instructions from the Board of State and
Community Corrections. (This section does not apply to counties using a
build-to-suit arrangement.)

a Attestation to i as the current fair market land vaiue for the
proposed new or expanded facility. (This can be claimed for on-site land
value for new facility construction, on?site land value of a closed facility
that will be renovated and reopened, or on-site land value used for
expansion of an existing facility. it cannot be claimed for iand value under
an existing operational detention facility. If claimed as in?kind contribution,
an independent appraisal will be required as a pre-agreement condition.

Tehama Proposal Formdocx 19

(This section applies only to counties that are claimino land value as part
of the countv?s contribution. Further, this section does not to
counties using a build-to-suit arrangement.)

Tehama Proposal Formdocx 20

 

BED CONSTRUCTION
B: 1.01: Describe the ?ndings of the Needs Assessment completed by the County.

A 2013 comprehensive Jaii Needs Assessment was developed for the Sheriff's Department by a
consultant team comprised of the Criminal Justice Research Foundation, Lionakis Architects, and Vanir inc.
The data and information compiled in the planning study demonstrated an immediate and critical need to
expand (1) medical/mental health staff space, (2) inmate counseling/program areas, (3) staff provider support
areas, (4) outdoor recreation, (5) food service, and (6) laundry in the jail. The study also recommended the
County construct additional and appropriately designed new spaces to implement inmate assessment
processes, treatment, other inmate service programs and dedicated housing that will accommodate reentry
programs for male/femaie offenders completing sentences and transitioning back to the community.

8: 1.02: Provide a County jail system overview capacity, ADP, and other relevant factors).

The County?s only Type ll, 36 year old jail facility is located adjacent to the community?s Courthouse in
downtown Red Bluff, CA. The jail was built in 1977 with additions completed in 1994. The jail has a Board of
State and Community Corrections (8800) rated capacity for 191 inmates and houses both pretrial and
sentenced offenders. The jail operates under a Superior Court Consent Decree which was the result of a
1998 Class Action iawsuit. Under the Consent Decree, the original ?old side" housing contained in the Jail can
only operate with a maximum bed capacity of 106. The jail has consistently been operating at or at peak
periods above the average daily operating capacity of the detention facility. The jail?s current ADP is 184
which is 96.3% of the BSCC rated bed custody capacity. in order to address crowding in the facility, the
Sheriff has begun to develop and implement an array of alternative to incarceration programs and case
processing procedures which has ailowed the jail to function within the limits of available custody beds. in

response to these issues, the County has completed initial programming, conceptual site design, and space

layout with adjacencies sizes for the Sheriff, Probation, and Health Services Agency components of the
proposed Tehama Community Corrections Reentry and Day Reporting Center Project.
8: 1.03: Describe the system issues anticipated to be remedied by the new construction.

The jail was originally constructed in 1977 with both cells and dormitory housing settings arranged in
two distinctive halves. Half of the building has two tiers of cells and dormitories with a central dayroom in a
podular design. The other half has several rows of cells and dormitories accessed from central corridors with
detached dayrooms in a linear design with cell bar fronts. There is only one small quasi-outdoor recreation
yard, two cramped program areas, and extremely undersized kitchen and laundry. The facility also inciudes a
very small medical unit consisting of two isolation cells, an exam room, and one office.

The jail has 205 square feet per bed/bunk which is 50.0% less space than newer jails constructed
throughout the State. The medical/mental health unit contains just 1,055 square feet and only 778 square feet

is available for inmate programs. These two vital areas represent just 5.1% of the jail?s total space.

 

We? Square Faut?age areatrduwn at? were: Functional? Use
Area: Serene animations Emit

 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 

mailing
1'3 

??tmj?ranzsr Semen-:2
1.843 {:13 ?at; i
i we 
5iraar5vzt? ammivr
3. ?6 3?45 titty



himself managing:
siren jammy



one: jt?n ta 5.4-.
.l'txi?mi'ui, are;



Emmi bee-1f Trauma ?aunt}? Jain Squaw! Quadrangle: 5.25:9

Ham: no: Ft?s?km?s 6mm}- Jait 21235 a mad as: new image: martian-twee mt are-u
and 5,235 mom?bnwf.

 

 

 

(See Appendix A: Photo Layout of Tehama County Jail)

By utilizing the SB 1022 funding source, the Sheriff will be able to both correct these major space deficiencies
and extend the useful life of the jail another 30 years, avoiding the need to construct a much more expensive
and costly replacement facility on another site. Consolidating the various treatment programs and alternatives

2

into one centre! location and making a ?one stop shop" approach avaiiable for inmates and out-of-custody
offenders, agencies, and service providers will improve service delivery, offender?s supervision, and will be
cost-effective overtime. integrating criminal justice agency support staff in one location and facility is more
efficient to operate, particularly in minimizing Sheriffs operational costs. The construction of a new stand-
alone jaii reentry housing unit would provide a ?step down?, short-term, highly structured and service-focused
custody environment for this population of detainees and will also make these limited services available across
the jail?s various inmate security ciassifications.

B: 1.04: Describe the current trends in the number of arrests, bookings, and releases due to lack of
space and other relevant factors as they relate to the need for beds.

Reported crime pattern data shows the County?s tote! crime rate of 2,911.1 per 100,000, pOpulation is
2.6% higher than the California state?wide crirne rate (2,836.5) in 2012. For the past ten years, an average of
3,605 adults have been arrested each year for felony and misdemeanor crimes. The jail processes an
average of 291 bookings each month. This represents an average of ten bookings per day, five are felony and
five are misdemeanor bookings. An average of eight male and two female bookings occur each day. In 2013,
the Jail had an average daily inmate population (ADP) totaling 184. The daily population only includes 22
pretrial and sentenced misdemeanants and 160 incarcerated felony inmates. The highest or
peak ADP recorded at the jail in the past seven years was 237. This is 28.8% higher than the average inmate
ADP over the same time period.

The AB 109 Realignment Act has had a significant impact on jail custody trends. On March 20, 2012,
the Tehama County Jail System held 205 custody inmates, 37.6% or 77 of the inmate population were AB 109
County Jail Prison (N3) convicted felony defendants sentenced to County Jaii, parolees (3056 PC), or PRCS
offenders held in custody under the Realignment Act flash incarceration, or revocation provisions of the law.
The other 128 incarcerated inmates were pretrial and sentenced local adult offenders and other

detainees being held on warrants and holds from federal/state law enforcement agencies.

 

Tehama County
Number and Percent of AB 109 Inmates Incarcerated in the
County Jail on March 20, 2012

AB 109 Inmates (N3),
Parole and FREE: 77

Other County Jail
Inmates: 128

"2,43 109 Inmates

 

 

Other CountyJaI'l .
Inmates Total Jail Inmates: 205

 

 

 

- . Note The AB 109 inmate population includes 58 (N3) and PRCS offenders, - 
. 1_1_ parale- revocation inmates and 8 pretrial 3056 parole holds. Postu?ealignrnent I:
3 3m mates ?account for 78. 4% of the jail' 5 total sentenced populations - 

 

Currently, the overwhelming majority of Tehama County Jail pretrial detainees are able to
secure a release from custody pending the Court?s disposition and/or other outside agency transfers for
warrant holds. Only about one out of every three releases taking place in July 2013 were continuing
custody inmates who were sentenced or held in a pretrial status pending Court disposition of their arrest.

B: 1.05: Discuss the current approach to reducing the need for beds, including programs and
alternatives to incarceration.

Teharna County has taken significant steps to maximize use of recognized pretriai and post-sentence
alternatives to incarceration programs and innovative case processing practices in an effort to avoid detention
system overcrowding. The Sheriffs Department has developed three major alternatives to incarceration
programs and early release protocols for incarcerated inmates. The programs are being implemented in
response to the increasing impact the AB 109 Realignment legislation is having on the County?s only tell
facility. The three aiternative programs being stressed include a new (1) Jail Cite and Release protocol, (2)
Sheriff?s Work Release and Education Program (ill/REP), and (3) the Sheriff?s Department?s Home

Detention Electronic Monitoring Program (CPS).

The expanded use of citation release allows misdemeanants to remain in the community, and
eliminates an unnecessary burden on the jail. Low and medium risk sentenced offenders who are currently in
custody have the ability to complete their entire sentence through the WREP Program regardless of the length
of confinement time. The Home Detention Program allows AB 109 inmates and other local incarcerated
offenders to participate in the GPS electronically monitored (EM) alternative to incarceration program. The
program is considered a constructive custody alternative. Participants are accountable for all of their time 24-
hours a day, seven?days-a-week and may only ieave their residence for work, school, and other bra-approved
appointments.

in addition, the local justice system has implemented intensive supervision programs and new
Probatien and Sheriff?s Day Reporting Center (DRC) which has been designed around National best practice
research. All of these program modifications have allowed qualified offenders to fulfill their sentences without
occupying jail beds. The Probation Department has also adopted the practice of recommending split
sentences for AB 109 offenders under Section 1170(h) of the Penal Code as often as possible, which further
reduces the need for long-term bed space in the County Jail which aliows offenders to spend a significant
portion of their custodial time out in the community. Probation aiso utilizes flash incarceration to ensure
continued compliance with probation terms. Since flash incarceration is limited to a maximum often days in
the jail, this program operates as an alternative to incarceration by providing a graduated intermediate sanction
process to encourage compliance rather than simply rebooklng offenders who are failing probation into the jail
to serve the remainder of their terms.

B: 1:06: Provide data showing the effectiveness/impacts of these alternatives.

The impact the jail cite and release protocol is having has been significant. in July 2013, nearly 42.5%
(116) ofthe 180 pretrial releases which occurred at the jail were the result of the new cite and release protocol.
Sheriff?s data also shows that the alternative programs are not only handling more offenders, the average

number of assigned days in WREP and particularly the GPS monitoring component has been significantly

5

increasing. if these same offenders had remained incarcerated, the jail's ADP would have increased by 41
inmates. The trend data shows that the jail beds saved as a result of the Sheriffs use of the alternative

programs has nearly doubled in the past 18 24 months.

 

   

   
  

         

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

- . .1 .
. Total- Ave; As'signedg-. -- Total . .Bed Days 
- Assigned i Particlpa_n_t-' Participant Saved -. 
. -- . Referrals Participants" Program Days 'Days'm' Days Served . .- 
2011
Jan - Jun 12 4 272 23 Days 226
Jul Dec 46 15 1,008 22 days 710
Total 58 15 1,280 22 Days 936 3 Custody 590%
2012
Jan Jun 348 95 6,037 17 Days 3,164
Jul Dec 418 109 13,967 33 Days 4,751
Total 765 102 20,004 26 Days 7,915 22 Custody Beds
2013:
Jan - Jun 415 120 15,141 36 Days 7,522 41 Custody Beds
TehamlimiTabcsl-Chts?abia?

 

 

Source: Tehama County WREP Offender Montth Rosters, 2011 . 2013

B: 1.07: Describe any plans underway, or future plans, to implement alternatives to incarceration and
their anticipated results.

Data developed from a point-in?time ?snapshot" of the total County Jail population on August 6, 2013
showed that when inmate characteristics were combined and analyzed according to specific release criteria,
about 8% - 12% of the population could be viewed as candidates for some form of alternative program that
provided high levels of monitoring, control, and supervision. Using this information, the Sheriff and Community
Corrections Partnership (CCP) have begun discussing the option of implementing a pilot Pretrial OR Reiease
and Community Supervision Program which would be staffed at the County Jail. The basic function of the pilot
program would be to screen, with a validated instrument, all individuals arrested pending Superior Court action
who have the characteristics which indicate they will appear in Court, as directed, and remain arrest-free while
their matter is being adjudicated.

PROGRAM SPACE CONSTRUCTION

PS: 1.01 Describe the process for determining the need for program space.

Tehama County determined the need for program space by conducting a series of meetings with the
Community Corrections Partnership?s (CCP) Program Services Sub-committee that included the Sheriff, 
Probation, Health Services Agency, Behavioral Health and County Substance Abuse clinicians, and 
local service providers. During these meetings, the stakeholders examined current jail and non-custody
treatment and other offender programs to determine their efficacy, identify gaps/deficiencies, and decide how
to address de?ciencies and other service options that should be implemented. The meetings took place over
several months and provided the stakeholders the opportunity to provide input and express ideas regarding
the availability of services and how services could be implemented or expanded to the criminal justice system.

Following these meetings, Probation, County Heaith Services Agency, and Behavioral Health assisted
the Sheriff?s Department in deciding how to better use the limited existing space. These discussions also
formed the basis for the funding of the Probation/Sheriffs Department Day Reporting Center concept
which subsequently was implemented in the County?s closed old Juvenile Hall. in addition, the Sheriff
examined the needs of in~custody AB 109 and local offenders, in particular the severe lack of program space
and the lack of health/mentat health clinical support spaces needed to expand treatment and counseling forjail
inmates suffering from chronic substance abuse and/or a mental illness. This examination also formed the
basis for adding a medical/mental health suite, other vocational spaces and additional program areas to serve
the proposed Tehama Community Corrections Reentry and Day Reporting Center Project that would be
directed to in-custody populations and expanding out-of?custody offender population being supervised through
the WREP, Sheriffs Home Detention alternative programs, and Day Reporting Center.

PS: 1.02: Describe the current approach to offender programming use of current program space,
types of programs, and services) for custody and non-custody offenders.

Currently, offender programming in Tehama County is severely limited due to a lack of adequate
space. For in-custody offenders, the jail has one small multi-purpose room and one single classroom in which

to offer programs and vocational training. The multipurpose room can hold about ten individuais at a time,

which restricts the number of offenders who can take part. Classes are provided by different community
partners, local churches, and trained mental health and substance abuse counselors. The available classes
include computer literacy, independent studies for offenders to obtain their high school diploma or GED,
substance abuse counseling, anger management, and evidence-based cognitive behavioral MRT
(Moral Reconation Therapy). These core services are available to both male and female detainees. The
anger management and Therapy is provided through the Tehama Health Services Agency, Drug and
Alcohol Division. The counseling provided to inmates by trained staff from the Tehama Health Services
Agency emphasizes cognitive behavioral and social learning therapy combined with motivation interviewing
techniques. The jail?s inmate programs are offered and deiivered on a scheduled basis six days a week. The
only day sen/ices and inmate programming is not avaiiable, other than access to recreation, is Saturday.

All classes are available on a first-come, first serve basis, but may not be available based on an
offender?s classification level. Since only one multi-purpose room is available to hold groups or classes, the
jail is unabie to offer programs to gang members or offenders affiliated with gangs because of the inability to
mix them with the general population. As for independent studies, the number of participants per housing unit
is also limited. However, since independent studies are completed in cells, offenders who are othenivise
ineligible for classroom instruction can participate.

For out-of-custody offenders, programs are likewise scarce. The main substance abuse counseling
program in Tehama County is the Day Reporting Center. This program is directed from the old Juvenile Hall
facility which has limited and poorly designed space and is expensive to maintain. Overall, group participation
is restricted to about 15 participants because of facility space limitations. Participation for this program is
determined by Probation staff and is based on the results of the STRONG risk assessment tool that
determines an offender?s need for the program. Offenders with a medium to high risk of reoffending are

offered the program. At this time, there is insufficient space to offer the counseling and treatment to lower risk

offenders. Other available programming includes life skills counseling, employment readiness
assistance, and gender specific groups including anger management and parenting.

The following snapshot developed for the month of September 2012 shows the type of medicai
services and clinical hours mental health and drug and alcohol services and assessments which are taking
place at the County Jail. As the snapshot shows, the clinical division saw 274 inmates, 66 or which were AB
109 offenders detained in the County Jail. The Health Services Agency?s Drug and Alcohol Division staff
provided 30 hours of clinical assessments and direct inmate services. Nearly 552% of the inmates receiving
drug and alcohol services at the facility were AB 109 sentenced inmates. The Mental Health Clinical Division
staff also provided 32.7 hours of direct clinical and counseling services to 18 individual inmates, 7 of whom

were incarcerated AB 109 offenders.

   

 

Clinic Division: Medical Sen/ices Mental Health Division.

Physiciaanhysician Assistant 32.? hours of call time (direct services to inmates)
$67 (62 were - 18 were individual inmates
Nurse encounterslassessments 7 were 
- 274 (66 were 12.5 hours of MRT
- 7 group sessions
Drug and Alcohol Division: 30 inmate services (duplicate count)
30 hours of MRT - 12 individual inmates/all 

- 6 assessments (pro?enrollment)
12 group sessions
- 61 inmate services (duplicate count)
38 were 
~29 individual inmates
- 16 were 


Note: Medical services in the Jail not funded by APB-109: 2 FTE nurses and .5 FTE medical assistant (This was the regular staf?ng
pattem priorto 

 

 

 

Mental Health services provided in the Jail prior to averaged 10 hours per week therapist. This level of service wilt continue
to be provided at Mental Health Division expense, Typically these services have been paid furlhrough funding. With the
augmentation MAB-109 dollars. we intent to increase our regular mental health call services to 20 hours per week plus MRT groups.

PS: 1.03: Describe What least restrictive alternatives have been put in place to address the needs of
the population intended to be served by this proposal.

The least restrictive alternatives in place include jail cite and release protocol, Sheriff?s Work
Release and Education Program (WREP), Sheriff's Home Detention Electronic Monitoring (GPS) Program,
Day Reporting Center, contract drug/alcohol residential/non?residential programs, and other

intermediate sanctions including alternative Court sentencing, flash incarceration, and split sentencing.

9

Coilectively, these programs give the Sheriff, Probation, and Superior Courts a continuum of least restrictive
options when making jail release, sentencing decisions, or when responding to program vioiations involving
incarcerated er out-of-custody felony/misdemeanor offenders supervised in the community. Through these
alternatives, the Tehama criminal justice system is able to forego prolonged incarceration in the County Jail by
relying on "core? multi-faceted program strategies that include custody diversion programs, (2) community
supervision, (3) evidence-based assessments, treatment/programming, and (4) a continuum of intermediate
sanctions for program violations for local and AB 109 (N3) parole and PRCS offenders.

PS: 1.04: Describe the gaps and de?ciencies in current programming for custody and non-custody
offenders, and which of these gaps or de?ciencies will be addressed with proposed program space
construction funding.

A lack of space is the pressing gap and deficiencies for all programs being offered to incarcerated and
out-of?custody supervised offenders. ln-custody programming is extremely limited by the population
classification system and the overati lack of programming space in the current jail footprint. The ability to
isolate a group that could do programming in a single part of the jail is made far more complicated because of
the current layout. it is difficult to isolate a specific housing unit for transitional reentry programming, for
example, because of the classification barriers. The shortage of jail space also leads to a lack of efficacy in
the classes/services as well as an inability to maintain a consistent programming schedule and attendance
because of a mix of volunteer programs coming more or less regularly and other paid regular programs with
assigned staff.

Likewise, out-of?custody programs are limited by the lack of space resulting in service to a small
segment of offenders. Adding classrooms, multi-use areas, office space, as well as confidential working areas
for staff to better interact with offenders will allow the County to offer multiple programs in a single iocation
while improving access, maintaining safety and confidentiality. Despite not having adequate jail program
areas, many programs stilt take place including anger management, (13) MRT (Moral Reconation Therapy),

(0) substance abuse assessments/counseling, and GED preparation. With expanded space con?gured into

10

a new centralized Community Corrections Reentry and Day Reporting Center located adjacent the existing jail,
the County can pursue and implement the evidence-based assessment processes, treatment interventions,
offender reentry assistance, and community supervision objectives the Tehama CCP justice system and
supporting service agencies want to establish. By constructing new medical/mentai health staff areas
proposed in the project, the mentally ill population will be better served because the limited compliment of
correctional health/mental health clinicians and support staff will be better able to focus their assessments,
case management, and overall monitoring of these high-risk offenders. This will improve overall safety for this
population and help enhance service delivery.

PS: 1.05: Describe the approach taken to determining the kind of programming that will take place in
the new program space.

Teharna?s CCP membership and justice agency stakeholders came together when the AB 109
Realignment Law was enacted through a sub-committee planning process to determine the kind of programs

and service interventions that would be most effective and have the greatest impact in increasing treatment

support for high-risk offenders while improving offender recidivism. Agency staff examined datacomprled

through Probation's STRONG assessment process and other information accumulated from jail staff and locat
mental health, medical, residential treatment providers, adult education, and social service agencies who
routinely interact with offenders and their families. The stakeholders also reviewed the multiple reasons for
recidivism and identified the lack of transitional services to assist offenders in integrating back into the
community as a primary reason recidivism rates have remained high. This discussion formed the basis for the
parameters around which the agencies determined which programs and services should be offered. ln
addition, the agencies examined the various funding sources that could be leveraged to maintain the proposed
services to ensure the viability of the planned programs .

The discussions and analysis of the data clearly demonstrated that offenders placed in iocal County

Jait custody, community supervision, and treatment programs have high needs in the area of substance

11

abuse, mental health issues, lack of vocation/educational skills, post-release homelessness, job
development and supportive employment, medical issues, (9) medication management and
monitoring, and help in accessing and completing eligibility documentation for Federal/State financial
assistance programs.

PS: 1.06: Provide information and data supporting the County?s need for program space.

The offender risk and needs assessment data reviewed by the Sheriff and other local justice agencies
shows there is no single category of offenders. Education levels, work history, job readiness, drug and alcohol
abuse history, and physical/mental health issues vary widely. What the analysis shows, however, is that two
out of five jail inmates have not earned a high school diploma or a Generai Education Development (GED)
certificate. Three of every four offenders released have a substance abuse problem and more than one out of
three report some form of physical or mental disability. Fifth-five percent have children under the age of 18
who often depend on them for some financial support. Only one out of five have had sustained employment.
These deficits and [imitations create substantial challenges for people who are released from jaii into the
community. Other data compiled in the Needs Assessment study also shows the level of programming and
services at the jail is continually encountering pretrial and sentenced inmates needing mental health and
healthcare services.

in 2012, the Health Services Agency mental health clinical staff worked with an average of 34 new
mental health cases among the jail inmate population each month (18.0% The data also shows that
over the last six years, between 39 47 detainees were receiving medications on the last day of
the month. in 2012, an average of 258 inmates were seen at sick call by the healthcare staff each month.
About 60.0% of these inmates were also seen by the Jaii?s physician or mid-level practitioner during the
month. On the average, ten inmates a month were transported for off-site medical appointments. An average

of 16 mate and female detainees received dentat services each month in 2012.

12

  

. .TehamaCounIy-Jail Mental Health dMedicelServices
2007' toes I 2009 3 2019-15- [2:512

Inmates'Reouiring Mental
't-t'ealth 

    

 

 

 

 

Mental Health Services:

Number of Mental Health cases
open on last day of month 5 6 6 6 6 7

Number of new Mental Health
cases opened during month 11 30 29 32 33 34

Number of inmates receiving
medications
on last day of month 39 43 42 45 46 47

Met?cal Services:

Number of inmates seen at
sick call during month 119 136 304 297 280 258

Number of inmates seen by
physician/midnievel

practitioner during month 98 86 89 99 154
Number of off-side medical
appointments during month 5 9 8 5 5 10

Number of inmates receiving
dental cases 10 9 12 10 17 16

 

 

 

TchamaNAZDl 

A facility physical plant condition assessment also conducted as part of the Needs Assessment has
identified that the jail lacks sufficient and appropriate space to conduct the programs that are currently in place.
The County Jail has less than 25.0% of the program space available compared to other similarly?sized
detention facilities recently constructed in California. Current inmate program areas are considerably email
and inadequate for the jail?s ADP and the problems will be compounded with the increasing AB 109 longer
term offender population.

The AB 109 Realignment Law is also having a significant impact on healthcare, mental health, and
substance abuse services the County provides inmates at the jail facility. The facility condition assessment
identifies a significant lack of medical and mental health treatment spaces, including a lack of staff offices,
medical records storage, and secure pharmacy storage. This lack of space creates inefficiencies and
inadequacies in the delivery of these services to the inmate population.

PS: 1.07: Indicate the approach to alternatives to incarceration and how the program will assit in
managing the jail population.

13

Beginning with the County's CCP Realignment Plan and continuing with the policies and program
priorities of the Sheriff and Probation has been the need to use and expand alternatives to incarceration
programs and non-custody alternatives whenever possible so as to maximize offender success and reduced
jail crowding without compromising public safety. The agency?s programming embodies evidenceubased
assessment principles and includes increasing these services to incarcerated inmate populations and
offenders participating in expanded alternatives to incarceration and non?custody diversion programs including
Electronic Monitoring and Day Reporting Center. Each program and incarceration alternative strategy the two
Departments have put into place are concerned with maintaining community safety, increasing
treatment support for higher risk supervised offenders, and improving offender program compietion rates
while minimizing probation and program violations.

Each Department is also committing staff resources to further identifying and rerouting suitable
inmates from custody beds to treatment programming and community service in an effort to further manage
the jail?s daily population counts. The Sheriff is particularly aggressive in their approach to monitoring and find
inmates who can be released. The Department's goal is to maintain the most appropriate population in
incarceration alternatives by continuing to use a thorough screening process upon entry to the jail to aid in
ensuring participants are a minimal risk to public safety. A second and important goal of both Departments is
to build and facilitate research?based ?best practice" reentry services that both custody and non~custody
offenders and probationers can take advantage of. Success with these efforts is viewed as a productive way
to reduce recidivism and decrease the jail population.

PS: 1.03: Describe the need for programming that could assist with the jail management.

Tehama County recognizes that providing a diverse and proven range of programs to incarcerated
inmates and non-custody offenders is vital to the overall management of the County?s only jail Jail
programs provide a positive and substantial effect on the level of tension in the detention facility and impact

recidivism after release. Research is showing and exemplary community corrections program models now

14

operating in some counties that new interventions and directed treatment like cognitive behavioral counseling
using trained facilitators can positively change offender behavior and thinking by making alternative life
choices. Currently, our County operates a Day Reporting Center out of the old Juvenile Hail which has
building constraints and limited space. There is also little to no program space at the Main Jail and it is
currently extremely difficult to offer any real meaningful programs. By contrast, the proposed newly
constructed Community Corrections Reentry and Day Reporting Center culinary classroom, and multiple in-
and out-of?custody program rooms would provide much needed educational and reentry program opportunities
for the entire jail population and out-ot?custody offenders and probationers living in the community. By adding
additional vocational training space and combining the administration of existing alternative programs in one
centralized building, these new program spaces will serve a much greater portion of the local offender
population with expanded offerings and many more hours of program participation.

With a new SB 1022 funded facility, the County will be able to effectively offer programs and services
reducing the operational strain on Main Jail operations while improving the overall welfare and safety of

inmates, the public, and staff. This project will also provide the County's Court system with more options,

intermediate sentencing sanctions, and alternatives involving both pretrial and sentenced offenders.

 

ALL PROJECTS
A: 2.01: Detail the full scope of work that is the subject of this proposal, including a comprehensive
description of the number and types of beds (if any), program spaces, and other core and ancillary
spaces; indicate whether this is new stand?alone construction, an addition to any existing facility, or
space that is being remodeled or renovated.

The Teharna County Community Corrections Reentry and Day Reporting Center Project is a 34,500
SF multi-purpose facility that will accommodate a variety of functional uses. Although the facility will be
located adjacent to the Main Jail and primarily operated by the Sheriffs Department, overall management of

the new facility is a collaborative partnership with Probation, County Health and Human Services, contracted

15

services providers, and the Courts. The conceptual design provides the spaces to accommodate the various
agencies and functions with the flexibility to address current and future offender program/service needs. The
Day Reporting Center (DRC) will be located on the site where out-of-custody offenders and public have clearly
identified access and distinct separation from any secure portions of the campus. There are primarily two
distinct functional uses in the DRC including an administration area for staff and programs for out-of?custody
treatment. A critical component of the DRC is the Sheriff?s and Probation?s Work Project area for assigned
offenders to receive their work assignment and is conveniently located on site with separate entry. The space
is intended to consolidate administration and monitoring of all criminal justice alternative programs the
agencies are managing.

A primary area within the new facility is the Reentry component and support services. The new
expansion includes beds/bunks, but particular transitional beds that accommodate a specific inmate profile that
can benefit from structured programs prior to returning to the community. The in-custody beds can also be
used for additional classifications. There are two 32-bed dormitory style housing units in two level/tiered
structures mirrored in plan to each other. Operationaily, the plan is to utilize an indirect supervision model at a
fixed position for staff efficiency. The podular dormitory design of the housing will provide the facility
segregated dormitories with additional flexibility for security and ciassification purposes. Multipie program
rooms (3) are currently envisioned to allow a variety of intense and structured programs be implemented. Two
outdoor recreation yards are also included in the design. Careful planning has been done to assure good
sightlines for staff supervision into the housing units and select program rooms.

The kitchen and laundry areas will be full service and will replace the currently undersized/deficient
kitchen and laundry at the Main Jail. The new kitchen is currently anticipated to be a cook serve operation with
carting of food product to not only the new housing units as part of this program but also all of the existing units

at the Jail. The kitchen will also contain a iarge culinary food service classroom.

16

 

 

 

 

 

   

"msm??m?mig'

 

 

 

?33 H13 MUSIQHW

 
 



 
  

57% E57

 

 

 





 

 



 

 

 



TEHAMA COUNTY COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS REENTRY AND DAY REPORTING CENTER: AND EXISTING JAIL

BITE

   

 

 

 

 

 

>0 
If 3.

ya

LIONAKIS

 

but?; an my emmw

 

 

17

The adjacency of this new project to existing Jail provides the opportunity to serve the campus and
reduce current problems with contraband control. The Medical and Mental Health function included within the
expansion concept will also supplement and replace portions of the existing areas at the adjacent Main Jail.
The current Medical area at the Jail is antiquated and extremely undersized to serve the current population.
There is relatively little to no administrative space at the existing facility and are utilizing one of the originally
designed exam rooms as an office space. The adjacency of this new project provides the opportunity for
provider staff to serve both facilities. The conceptual design provides a variety of spaces to accommodate the
various functions of a suite. (See Appendix B: Aerial Overlay, Site Plan, and Space Layout for the
Tehama County Community Corrections Reentry and Da Reporting Center)

BED CONSTRUCTION
B: 2.01: Describe the planning process that resulted in this bed construction scope of work.

Tehama County contracted with the Criminal Justice Research Foundation, Lionakis, and Vanir, inc. to
conduct a 2013 Jail Needs Assessment. information from the Assessment demonstrated a priority need to
construct additional rated beds for separate dedicated reentry housing for male/female detainees. Because of
limited program and other local resources, the consultants recommended the proposed project be constructed
behind and adjacent to the existing jail on the site where the County Library is currently located. The proposed
project would accommodate a new Day Reporting Center (DRC) and administration area that consolidates
Probation's AB 109 functions, mental health, and substance abuse support service providers, and Sheriffs
staff so that they can effectively collaborate and integrate programs including an expanded Sheriff?s Work
Release with vocational training components and custody reentry housing.

3: 2.02: Describe the relationship between stated needs and the planned construction.

A key component of the project will include a continuum of reentry services that starts in the County

Jail when AB 109 and other iocal inmates transition into the community. Currently, inmates will leave the jail

facility with little or no follow-up assistance. Most need assistance with employment, housing, drug use or

18

other problems before they were booked into the jail and most still have service needs when released from
detention. The planned construction will give the Sheriff?s Department its very first opportunity to develop and
implement a ?step down" housing arrangement with appropriate program space for reentry services. The
housing and programs will provide an extraordinary amount of flexibility in addressing identified offender
service needs. The services will target factors that are linked to reoffending such as substance abuse, anti
social personality and hostility or anger. The discharge process would begin at least 30 45 days prior to
release. The discharge interventions would inctude assessments, employment preparation classes,
assistance with transportation, housing, and securing the identification documents which will aid in determining
eligibility for other program financial support, life skills counseling, and other key services.

The Sheriff, Probation, Health Services Agency, and other members of the CCP have identified the
development/ implementation of jail reentry service programming as atop priority need. The planning process
for the 64?bed new reentry housing unit was thoroughly discussed and resulted in this project application. This
new reentry housing will also allow the jail to focus these vital services to all inmate classifications and would -
give the jail capacity to also temporariiy house and extend these services to program violators who are
rebooked into the jail who can benefit from these additional services. This will allow staff to use existing
custody beds more effectively and integrate program space throughout the various custody levels in order to
reduce recidivism.

B: 2.03: Describe the anticipants beneficial outcomes of the new bed construction.

The project addresses major space and efficiency needs in the Tehama Jail and will extend the useful
life of the facility another 30 years, avoiding the need to construct a much more expensive and costly
replacement facility on another site. Consolidating the various programs and alternatives into one central
location and making a one-stop-shop approach available for inmates, agencies, and service providers will

improve service delivery, inmate supervision, and will be cost-effective overtime. integrating criminal justice

19

agency support staff in one location and facility is more efficient to operate, particulariy in minimizing Sheriff?s
operational costs.

The proposed project clearly aligns with the legislature?s approach and expectations for how counties
should handle and process the new AB 109 Reaiignment offender populations. The programming and inmate
support spaces designed for the project incorporates what criminal justice research is showing will aid in
reducing offender recidivism and controlling crime in local jurisdictions. The project also will provide the
County?s Court system with more options, intermediate sentencing sanctions, and alternatives involving both
pretrial and sentenced offenders.

B: 2.04: Define the staffing that will be required to operate the new construction.

The Sheriff?s Custody Division has estimated that the staffing levels and annual costs for the proposed
newjail construction project will amount to $1.1 miilion. The staffing for County Health Services is estimated at
approximately $0.6 million. These costs are estimated in 2013 dollars and include staffing for the new inmate
program space, intake, mental health clinic, laundry, and kitchen. The staffing projected by the Department

includes the fotlowing:

1- Correctional Lieutenant
1? Sergeant .
12 Correctional Of?cers
2 Extra Kitchen Staff

- $1.1 million
County Health Sennces Agency. . . .

Mental Heaith CilnIClan ll 
Licensed CliniCal Supervisor
3.9- Drug 8: Alcdhoi Counselor ll
.. _5 Drug Alcohol _Aide Bilingual
_2?21n3titutional Registered Nurse 11
1-?Medicat Assistant ll

sub-Total $0.6 million

Total . 'f $1.7 million

26

These staffing levels have been reviewed with the County Administrator and Board of Supervisors as
part of the SB 1022 Resolution approval process.
PROGRAM SPACE CONSTRUCTIGN

PS: 2.01: Describe the planning process used to develop the design for the construction of program
space.

The planning process for the proposed program space included several stakeholder meetings with
staff from Probation, the Sheriff?s Department, Health Services Agency, and CCP. These meetings resulting in
a consensus about the need for the centralization of multiple services in a single location. The optimal rotation
and use of group and classroom spaces, as well as the need for confidential office space for therapy, case
management, and eligibility under the Affordable Care Act and public assistance services was discussed. The
decision was made to make the planning process a continued priority between all departments and providers
involved in the programming services. If awarded funding, the net steps will be the development of
memorandums of understanding, (lVlOUs) protocols, and outcome measurements for future evaluation
regarding the effectiveness of the proposed programs.

PS: 2.02: Describe the relationship between stated needs and the proposed program space
construction

The County?s consultant team have specifically identi?ed a need to expand (1) medical, (2) mental
health, (3) counseling programming, (4) staff provider support areas, (5) inmate services, (6) outdoor
recreation, (7) food service, and (8) laundry in the jail. Additional male and female transitional reentry housing
is also needed to alleviate current crowding in the facility. The proposed project includes new and expanded
medical, mental health, education, drug counseling, life skills development, employment preparation, and
inmate reentry services I programming space as well as a new and improved food service and jail laundry
area. Two 32-bed male and female dormitory housing units with three dedicated inmate program support

areas and outdoor recreation would be constructed in the project. The project also accommodates secure

21

staff parking, reduces traf?c and deliveries to the Main Jail, and more clearly defines the public and secure
areas around the jail site. This will simply the overall management and security of site related issues.

PS: 2.03: Define the features of this program space construction that make it suitable for the intended
programming.

The Day Reporting Center portion of the facility is a multipurpose area that will accommodate a
variety of functional uses. Although the facility will be located adjacent to the Main Jail, it will have adequate
separation, and its own entry identity. The conceptual design provides a variety of spaces to accommodate the
various agencies and functions with the flexibility required to operate current and future programmatic needs.
The success of the area is contingent upon the proper adjacencies, efficient flow of reception to assessment,
access to identified programs and service providers, and specific county operations. The Day Reporting
Center and Sheriff?s alternative programs will be located on the site where out-of-custody inmates and public
have clearly identified access and distinct separation from any secure portions of the campus. There are
primarily two distinct functional uses in the Center; an administration area for staff and program areas for out-
of?custody treatment. It will be adjacent to the jail with convenient proximity to allow ef?cient sharing of
resources and coordinating of programs. The in-custody program addition will have direct access to large and
small classroom type spaces for inmate programs, with necessary support spaces such as work room, toilet
rooms, staff offices, storage, and break room.

PS: 2. 04: Describe plans to implement and operate programs in the space.

The Sheriff?s Department is responsible for providing a number of mandatory and non-mandatory
inmate programs and sewices. The major inmate programs and services that are provided to pretrial and
sentenced male and female inmates incarcerated at the Main Jail include: religious church services, Narcotics
Anonymous, Alcoholics Anonymous, anger management, evidence-based Mora! Recognition Therapy (MRT),
and GED preparation. The evidence-based counseling provided to inmates emphasizes cognitive

behavioral and social learning therapy combined with motivational interviewing techniques. The Sheriff?s

22

Department will identify the programs suitable for each individual through validated risk/needs screening along
with classification, orientation and other mandatory programs ordered by the Court. The Department
recognizes and is strongiy committed to expanding custody services and evidence-based programming for the
jail system. The goal is to introduce and provide ongoing dedicated exemplary assessment, evidence-based
substance abuse treatment, mental health, and other support services to these incarcerated offenders.
PS: 2.05: Describe the anticipated bene?cial outcomes of the new program space construction.

Long-term, when new program space becomes available, the Sheriffs Department will explore
contracting with qualified public and private service providers experienced with risk and needs assessments,
evidence-based model counseling, and other interventions that will facilitate the reentry of offenders from the
jail to the community. By pursuing these program standards, in?custody dedicated service providers,
counselors, and education agencies knowiedgeable with offender populations and who are able to deliver
?best practices? in the jail setting will begin the process of transitional reentry planning to these offenders who
are redirected to community supervision.

The specific best practice programming components that are being considered for introduction and
use include assessing the clinical and social needs, and public safety risks of the incarcerated offender
popuiation, planning (short- and long?term) for treatment and services required to address the offender?s
needs, implementation of evidence?based in~custody rehabilitation programs designed to reduce recidivism
with adult offender populations, identifying required community and correctional programs that can assist

with post-release services, and coordinating the transition plan to ensure implementation and avoid gaps in

care.

 

BED 

B: 3.01: Describe how the proposed construction will address the County?s offender management
goals regarding use of secure detention.

23

The Sheriffs Department?s Custody Division Mission Statement promotes secure, safe, and humane
housing for pretrial/sentenced inmates as key elements of its offender management goals. The proposed
construction supports these goals by providing:

Range of Housing: Restores an effective balance of minimum to maximum security housing to
address changes in inmate population resulting from A8 109.

a Greater Flexibility. Provides much needed flexibility to effectively manage inmate population and
reduce risk of conflict between classifications.

a Expanding Program Areas: Provides greater space to serve incarceration and non-custody
population and also provides the flexibility to share program space.

Proaram Management Treatment staff will be provided with adequate offices, records storage,
and pharmacy space that is integral to jail operations and core treatment components of the new
reentry housing. This will allow staff to devote more time on care of inmates and to deliver
treatment more efficiently and cost effectively.

8: 3.02: Describe how the proposed bed construction aligns with the Community Corrections
Partnership (CCP) plan.

The Realignment Act gives the CCP authority to make recommendations and fund projects that
mitigate and manage impacts resulting from the legislation. The Tehama GDP is allocating its yearly funding
to train justice agency treatment and offender supervision staff, establish evidence-based new assessments,
and programming to properly serve and manage local offender populations including those incarcerated and
those under community supervision. The funding has brought about the implementation of Probation?s Day
Reporting Center and staffing to expand the Sheriffs Work/Education Furlough and Home Detention Program
jail alternatives. The funding has added mental health and drug counselor clinicians to the jail. The proposed

64-bed reentry housing unit also aligns with the CCP Plan.

24

B: 3.03: Describe the use of, or plans to use, offender assessmends) and other interventions to
address jail population management, including objective tools or instruments to manage the
offender population, such as pretrial assessments, etc.

Tehama County is, and has been managing, its population under the auspices of a Federal Court
Consent Decree which limits nearly half (106) of existing jail beds contained in the 36 year old linear section of
the facility. Because of the cap, one of the critical initial activities that takes place at the jail involves the
screening for early release offenders (cite/reiease protocol). New detainees also receive medical screening to
determine if there are any significant medical or problems that shouid be addressed prior to
booking. A booking officer conducts an interview using an objective classification form. if the detainee is not
released, they are then booked into the facility and receive a separate screening to determine appropriate
housing. Daily screening also occurs by an assigned Sergeant with the sentenced population in order to direct

AB 109 and other inmates into Work Release, Home Detention, or other out?of?custody programs. The goal is

to make every effort to incarcerate only arrestees who pose a risk to public safety. in the past two years, the

participation rates have tripled for these programs. The Sheriff is also currently evaluating new validated

pretriai management tools and program screening instruments for implementation at the jail and programs.

3: 3. 04: Describe the County?s planned construction in relation to the expected need for beds in the
future.

The project provides much needed traditional ?step down? housing for both male and female inmates
which is essential to support offender reentry efforts. With these beds and effective programs/services to be
developed and directed to the inmate population, the need for longer term custody housing is significantly
diminished for 10 15 years or eliminated as indicated in our Needs Assessment Study.

PROGRAM SPACE CONSTRUCTION

PS: 3.01: Describe how this program space construction will address the County?s offender
management goals.

25

The new construction with program space is vital for the County to achieve our offender management
goals. A key objective in reaching these goals is to allow for the housing of inmates in a safe, secure manor
while facilitating participation in appropriate rehabilitation services. By adding program rooms, the new facility
will allow the Sheriff to expand current vocational training which will allow inmates to learn trades, thereby
increasing their chances for employment where they are incarcerated or supervised in the community in one of
the alternative programs the County has developed. in addition, spaces to start a culinary program for inmate
workers is included in the design of the new kitchen. The Day Reporting Center will allow Probation to move
this function out of the old inadequate Juvenile Hall and add classrooms and office space to expand and
consolidate available services. The new facility will provide dedicated spaces for all our partnering agencies, a
conference room large enough to host family reunification events, graduations, other pro-social events, a GED
class with a computer lab, a client lounge area, and a designated space for family literacy programming. A
specific area for the Sheriff is included in the project for multiple vocational, educational training, and cognitive
behavioral group counseling rooms for recognized evidence-based services.

PS: 3.02: Describe how the program space construction aligns with the CCP plan.

The Public Safety Realignment mission is to implement AB 109 through welt-informed
offender/probationer case management, bringing about an appropriate blending of criminal justice supervision
and evidence?based treatment strategies that maintain, but then improve, community public safety through
recidivism rate reductions that ultimateiy lead to tong-term crime rate reductions. A key element that
Tehama?s jail system currently lacks concerns jail reentry services for inmates transitioning from incarceration
back to their community. The Sheriff?s Department and the local CCP have consistently expressed a strong
interest to develop and implement when additional dedicated inmate program space becomes available to the
jail system, a structured jail reentry housing unit and services program as proposed in this application.

PS: 3.03: Describe the programming to be conducted in the new program space.

26

The programming to be conducted in the proposed spaces includes (1) evidence-based MRT (Moral
Reconation Therapy), (2) mental health and suicide prevention, (3) a life skills program, (4) employment
preparation and job assistance, (5) substance abuse treatment and counseling, (6) anger management, (7)
child abuse and parenting, (8) computer literacy, and (9) a victim impact program. In addition, the proposal
includes a plan to provide offenders with access to housing stabilization services and assistance with obtaining
public assistance and other benefit eligibility services. Out-of-custody offenders requiring mental health
treatment, individual/group therapy and counseling as well as other supportive services will be able to be
served in the new programming space.

PS: 3.04: Describe how the program space will foster a quality reentry model and seamless reentry
process.

When the new space becomes available, the Sheriff?s Department will be contracting with qualified
public or private providers experienced with risk and needs assessments, evidence-based model counseling,
and other ?best practice? interventions that will facilitate the reentry of inmates from the jail to the community.
By pursuing these program standards, in-custody dedicated service providers, counselors, and education
agencies knowledgeable with offender populations will be responsible for programming that covers five major
offender needs areas including (1) academic, vocational and financial, (2) alcohol and other drugs, (3)
aggression, hostility, anger, and violence, (4) criminal thinking, behaviors, and associations, and (5) family,
marital and relationships. These services will include a structured individual reentry planning process for each
offenders who is redirected to community supervision under this new model and seamless reentry program our
criminal justice system is pursuing.

PS: 3.05: Describe collaborative partnerships that will provide services within the program space and
provide continuity through the reentry and community supervision process.

During the first days and weeks after incarcerated offenders return to the community, they are at a
heightened risk of rearrest and relapse, making this period crucial for their success. in order to assure a

successful reentry program is developed, the Sheriff?s Department intends to work with the Tehama County

27

Health Services Agency, Probation, and an established network of local community service providers to
strengthen the linkages between the jail and the service providers. This will ensure continuity in the
implemented reentry and community supervision process by involving these key community partners early in
the design and rollout of the reentry program.

PS: 3.06: Describe the sources of financial support (in, Matti-Cal, other federal sources, etc.) that will
be accessed to aid in the delivery of programs.

The following local, State, and Federal funding sources will be assessed to aid in the delivery of the
programming that will be available at the new Tehama Community Corrections Reentry and Day Reporting
Center Project: County General Funds, Public Safety Realignment Funds, Medicaid Administrative Activity
Funds, Substance Abuse Prevention Treatment Funds, Mental Health Services Act Funds, Mental Health
Medi?Cal Funds, Drug Medi-Cai Funds, and Health and Mental Health Realignment Funds. Our Health
Services Agency will also be reviewing the recently signed Senate Bill 82 ?investment in Mental Health
Wellness Act of 2013? for a possible grant to increase local capacity for mobile crisis support, crisis
intervention, crisis stabilization, and residential mental health treatment.

PS: 3.07: Describe the offender assessmentfs) and the process for determining the programming
offenders (custody and non-custody) will receive.

The County CCP Executive Committee Agencies, particularly the Sheriff, Probation Department, and
Health Service Agencies, have expressed support and are working to bring validated assessment tools into
our justice system. We are committed, because it is good public safety policy, to use recognized assessment
instruments when assigning both incarcerated and out-of-custody to the appropriate level of
monitoring/supervision and matching their identified needs with programs that address the specific criminal
risk factors of the individual. The Probation Department?s Day Reporting Center has began using the Static
Risk Assessment Offender Needs Guide (STRONG), which is used on all formal probation, PRCS and
mandatory supervision cases to assess static risk level to assign level/type of community supervision.

Dynamic risk factors (ONG portion of the tool) are also assessed on probationers on active supervision

28

caseloads to direct case plan development to identify/address the criminogenic factors posing the highest risk
for recidivism. The Substance Abuse Subtle Screening inventory-Third Edition is also used by
Health Services to assess the presence of substance abuse or chemical dependency and the probability of
engaging in substance abuse behaviors. The County Jail is also currently reviewing a process which would
extend the STRONG assessment process particularly involving offender dynamic risk factors when
determining what interventions or services should be specifically directed to individual male/female offenders.
Our criminal justice system also understands this is only the ?rst step in linking services to the assessed needs
of offenders. Custody programs and community resources must also deliver high quality, effective
programming with fidelity to proven methods. By adhering to principals of risk-need-responsivity with
offenders, the CCP has begun allocating appropriate iocal funding to create quality programming across a
number of areas, which should give our justice system better outcomes overtime.

PS: 3.08: Describe the approach to the principles and objectives of evidence?based programming that
will be incorporated to reduce recidivism, including program evaluation.

From the inception of our GOP, and particularly the Sheriff and Probation Department, have made
utilizing evidence-based interventions as a top priority in each program the agencies are involved with or are in
the process of developing. The Departments are relying on research to identify the most cost effective,
evidence-based practices that have been shown to lower recidivism, victimization, and probation failure. in
terms of risk, the justice system is targeting resources to the highest susceptible risk offenders using
assessment tools when applying supervision, case management, and treatment to inmates and out-of?custody
offenders. Where possible, our existing and proposed new programming will apply interventions that target an
offender's particular criminogenic needs. These areas are dynamic and can change and include such factors
as antisocial attitudes and beliefs, antisocial peers, antisocial personality pattern, lack of positive
family support, low levels of education or employment success, lack of pro~social leisure activities, and

substance abuse.

29

Programming interventions are being applied based on an offender?s characteristics developed from
the assessment instruments when staff establish program referrals or treatment approaches to deal with
mental health, medical, substance abuse, and other pressing factors that may affect individual offender
outcomes. Our Probation and Sheriffs Departments, as well as the County Health Services Agency, are using
behavioral focused, cognitive behavior counseling, including MRT, to help guide offenders in acquiring new
skills and behaviors that research shows is effective when combined with structured social learning
approaches in an intervention model. Our CCP has also established a working group to develop program
tracking and monitoring of these new services to ensure fidelity, and track performance, as well as participant
outcomes.

PS: 3.09: Define the staff quali?cations necessary to present the planned programming staff
training certification).

Qualifications our agencies are relying on for program specialist include possession of a Bachelor?s
Degree or equivalent; demonstrated experience in the development and implementation of successful justice
intervention programs; experience working with at-risk offender populations; and experience working with
multi-agency teams. A typical qualifying background would include casework and social sciences, 
and criminal justice or related ?eld. A qualified staff will possess skill and ability to successfully supervise and
motivate clients; utilize behavior management approaches; and conduct academic and service need
assessments.

PS: 3.10: Describe the target population and estimated numbers of individuals to be served daily and
annually in the program space. Describe how you arrived at those estimates.

The target custody population will be determined by the jail inmate classifications. Offenders in
custody for more than a few days will have the ability to receive of programming that assessments show they
need. The Day Reporting Center will continue to supervise an ADP of 50-75 probationers in the community,
and the Sheriff?s Alternative Programs will likely have at least another 40-50 offenders participating in MRT

groups and other vocational training classes that can be offered through this expanded program space.

30

 

4.01: Describe the plan for project management and administration, including key positions and
responsibilities.

Tehama County has an experienced in?house construction planning and administration team that has
the ability to successfully manage this capital expenditure project. The County will supplement their staff with
the services of a contract construction management (CM) firm. The County?s Construction Manager will be
Julie Sisneros, County Administrative Services Director, who will serve as the County?s designated Project
Manager and will be responsibte for ensuring that all phases of the construction work are coordinated
throughout the project delivery process. LeRoy Anderson, County Auditor-Controller, will be the project Fiscal
Officer, who will manage fiscat expenditures, reporting, and ensure the building construction remains within the
set budget. Williams Goodwin, Chief Administrator of Tehama County, will be the designated SB 1022
contact person.

County stairc have developed a project administration system that utilizes both proven monitoring and
control protocols. Each project is constructed using qualified staff consultants in a ?team approach? throughout
its development. The County and its consuitants have extensive experience with major projects, including
adult detention facilities, and wiil use a management approach similar to other successfut major construction
projects. The County also has scheduling, budgeting, and cost accounting software in place to ensure
success of this project. When the initial RFP for a Jail Needs Assessment Study was issued, Lionakis of
Sacramento formed a collaborative and experienced team for the County that included the Criminal Justice
Research Foundation and Vanir CM to complete the study. This preuestabiished team will continue to serve as
an extension to County staff throughout the design and construction process.

Designated County staff will respond to the BSCC on all contract matters, and Lionakis will respond to
at! minimum standard issues. An integrated project delivery process will be used for programmatic and quality
control delivery in which the County, construction management ?rm, consultants, and all stakeholders (Sheriff,

31

Probation, and Health Services Agency) are involved to review the drawings and the performance of all
consultants retained for the project. in addition, the construction management firm will monitor, schedule, and
coordinate activities on behalf of the County and Sheriff?s Department. (See Appendix C: Tehama County
Construction Management Monitoring Control Delivery Process and Procedures Charts}.

A single General Contractor will be responsible to organize the construction workforce, order
materials, establish a quality control program, and schedule the work of all trades including mechanical,
plumbing, and electrical, in a logical order. The Construction Manager, jail transition team personnel, on-site
inspector, and Project Architect will observe and inspect all completed construction work. Following
substantial completion, Sheriffs Custody, Probation, and Health Services Agency personnel will transition into
the functional spaces and train staff. The local fire department will inspect and verify operation of the ?re
safety equipment. Upon successful completion of any corrective work, inspections, and audits, final payment
will be made to the General Contractor and ProjectArchitect.

4.02: Describe the current state of the County?s project planning process.

Tehama County has completed the initial programming, conceptual site design, and space layout for
the Sheriff's Department, Probation Department, and County Health Services Agency components of the SB
1022 Tehama Community Corrections Reentry and Day Reporting Center. Because the project is an
expansion of the existing County owned parcel adjacent to the Main Jail, it?s anticipated that completing the
CEQA process should not be an issue. Upon notification of the Conditional Award, County staff will finalize a
contract with Lionakis, the Sacramento architectural firm, to validate the program and finalize the design for the
Community Corrections Reentry and Day Reporting Center. The County will be prepared to award the design
contract at the time of the Project Establishment. A project team consisting of representatives from the
Sheriff?s Department, Probation Department, Health Services Agency, County Administrative Services, and
construction management firm will oversee and review the design process.

4.03: Describe the County?s readiness to proceed with the project.

32

The County owns the land for the project, has access to the financial resources for the County match,
has completed the programming and conceptual planning process, and has assembled the County staff and
consultant team essential for the successful completion of the Tehama Community Corrections Reentry and
Day Reporting Center project.

4. 04: Describe the construction project timeline.

Upon notification of the Conditional Award, the County will work quickly to finalize the Real Estate Due
Diligence, institute the CEQA process, Site Assurance documents, and complete the contract process to hire
the design firm of Lionakis. The required documentation will be presented to the California Department of
General Services (DGS) for review, then to the State Public Works Board (SPWB) for the Project
Establishment by May 2014. The Schematic Design and Operational Program Statement will be submitted to
for review in October 2014. SPWB Plan Approval is scheduled for completion in August 2015,
with the SPWB Consent to Ground Lease occurring in December 2015. Final Approval is scheduled for April
2016, and the Pooled Money investment Board Loan Request in December 2015. The Department of Finance
Action to Approve Drawings and Proceed to Bid will finalize in March 2016. Bids will be received in July 2016,

construction will commence in August 2016, and will be completed by January 2018. (See Appendix D: SB

1022 Detailed Construction Schedule Diagram).

 

5.01: Justify the amount of state financing requested for the planned construction.

The architectural firm of Lionakis was contracted to provide programming and the conceptual design
for the Tehama Community Corrections Reentry and Day Reporting Center project. The SB 1022 application
cost estimates were based on general square footages derived from (1) agency staff discussions regarding
space needs, (2) acceptable functional use areas/spaces utilized in these types of facilities, and (3) state

minimum jail standards. A professional cost?estimate was provided by Vanir CM estimating staff based upon

33

the conceptual design, and was escalated to the projected midpoint of construction. The construction estimate
was reviewed by the County and Lionakis for accuracy and intent. Fees and staff time for the project budget
were based upon the scope of the conceptual design and the complexity of the project type. Percentages and
allowances were determined by industry averages and/or experience from past construction projects.

5.02: Describe the anticipated benefits/impact of the construction in relation to construction costs
(including any ?scal benefits).

Operationally, the proposed project wilt allow the Tehama County criminal justice system to
consolidate the community?s limited, but essential, mental heaith, drug counseling, employment assistance, life
sklils, and other important resources for assisting offenders into one primary prominent downtown location.
This will bring about a more cost-effective and efficient use of these types of important resources for the
Sheriff, Probation Department, and the Courts. The space will allow for expanded growth and integration of
other ?best practices? services at this site. By co-locating the core justice agencies and offender service
programs together as the project will accomplish, there will be even greater opportunity to supervise offenders
and address pressing problems including substance abuse, transitional housing, benefit eligibility assistance,
transportation, and employment preparation needs of locai probationers, AB 109 and other in-and-out?of?
custody offenders.

5.03: Describe steps that the County has taken to minimize costs of this project.

For this project, the County used Lionakis and Vanir CM, who are both recognized design and
construction management firms with extensive jail and other cost effective building experience. The proposed
project has been planned with clear delineations between co-located agencies and the buildings security
detention areas and other public access spaces.

Working with the designer, the Sheriff and County construction staff has explored using innovative, tow
cost methods for construction, both prefabricated and onsite construction, more conventional framing and

finishes in non?custody areas, and economies of scale where applicable. Throughout the design process, the

34

County will be seeking to emphasize the least capital cost by identifying, proposing and utilizing the most cost
effective method of construction where feasible.
5. 04: Describe efforts to leverage other sources of funds federal) for program delivery.

In recognition of the need to both implement evidence-based assessments and expand programs to
address the broad service needs of the Realignment and other local offender populations, the Sheriff,
Probation Department, and Health Services Agency are formally working together to identify and leverage
potential sources of funds which are being redirected or committed to the Tehama Countyjustice system.

The agencies have been able to obtain or expand existing funds through Public Safety Realignment,
Medicaid Administrative Activity funds, Perinatal Categorical funds, Substance Abuse Prevention Treatment
funds, Mental Heaith Services Act funds, Mental Health Medi-Cal funds, Drug Medi-Cal funds, and 1991
Health and Mentai Health Realignment funding sources. These sources are being used for programming and
new services directed to in-an-out?of?custody offenders.

5.05: Detail the cost effectiveness of this construction project, including from a population

 

management perspective.

The Sheriff?s Department and County construction staff will seek a building design with minimum
staffing cost that will translate into the lowest long-term lifecycle cost expense to community taxpayers. The
County intends on not only minimizing capital construction costs, but is specifically mindful of the need to
minimize lifecycle cost and thus, annual staffing and operations cost of the new The programming and
inmate support spaces designed for the project incorporates what research is showing will aid in reducing
offender recidivism and controlling crime in Tehama County. The project also provides much needed
transitional ?step-down? housing for both male and female inmates that can support offender reentry efforts.
Finally, this will provide the County?s Court system with more options, intermediate sanctions, and alternatives
involving both pretrial and sentenced offenders. This will improve the overali welfare and safety of inmates,

the public, and staff assigned to the Main Jail.

35

Board of State and Community Corrections
SC 1022 Adult Local Criminal Justice Facilities
Construction Program

 

Tenama County Community Corrections Reentry
and Day Reporting Center

a Appendix A: Photo Layout of 36 Year Old Tehama County Jail

a Appendix B: Aerial Overlay, Site Plan, and Space Layout For the
Tehama County Community Corrections Reentry and
Day Reporting Center

3 Appendix C: Tehama County Construction Management Monitoring 

.. 

Appendix D: SB 1022 Detailed Construction Schedule Diagram

Tenama County Sheriff?s Department
Red Bloft; CA

.3335 9:333: 31:3

 

banana? 

 523%

 

?30m; Egg 2&3.

 

 

ELLIS

Sm a I 
?9:9

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

HVO

 

 

 






AXES

 

n03 VINVHELL 

 

 

 

eNIa'una (3)

 

 

 

 

 

mme


 

.LEIEHLS ENld

E3

 

 

74W a 
.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Appendix 

 

 

smgNon

 

 

 

 

3E5 



 

i . 
Amnoo VWVHELL 

_l


 

 

 

 

 

 

 


.

31.3?: awn

rt: :11 



semis NOSEGVW

Noulduv 

 

 

W533 359? SUEEN unnm 

EilS

EH

 

 

 

Appendix 

 

 

wumvmu
:r

 

:rmwmadl -.

 

 

 

 

5' 
. 121,555--

OUTWR REC:
I a: s:

.- tannins-d? 

.
. . 

 

MEDINA MENTAL
FEALTH I
- - DFFICE
TEHAMA COUNTY COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS REENTRY AND

DAY REPORTING CENTER

FIRST FLOOR

95ml}

FUNCTIONS SQUARE FOOTAGES:

CIRCULATION- 2.987
DAY REPORTING- 6,106
FOOD SERVICES- 6,314
HOUSING:
FIRST FLOOR- 7.778
UPPER TIER- 3,177
LAUNDRY- 567
MECHI ELECI IT- 1.625
1,564
ADMIN- 1.661
WORK PROJECT- 1.385
OUTDOOR 2,856

TOTAL GROSS SQUARE FOOTAGE:

FIRST 31,283
UPPER TIER- 3,177

TOTAL- 34,450

CERCULATIDN

DAY REPORTING

FOOD SERVICES

 

WORK PROJECT

 

Appendix 

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

County Board of Prepare Feasib ty Study to determine general
Administrative Supervisors parameters for project size. capacity, and function.
Services Study alternatives for conceptual cost and time.
Board of Estabtish conceptual budget and
Sheriff?s Dept. Supervisors Needs Assessment Schedule.
Arch?gitural County Prepare draft Environmental impact Study. Board of
Consultant Administrative Supervisors certi?es ?nding.
Environmental Services Board Establish project budget and
Specialist of Supervisors Schedute documents that become
basis for next development phase 
County Prepare tand use master plan, determine Design.
Consultant Administrative infrastructure needs. building requirements. and
Planner Services Program Statement.
Sheriff's Dept.
Budget: The Consultant Architect
prepares cost estimates as part of
Sheriffs Dept. County Administrative Services monitors each design phase. The County
County consultant?s design work to assure compliance with Administrative Services will review these
the Program requirements and assists the Sheriff's estimates and direct any design
Consuttant County Department to interpret the proposed design changes that may be needed to
. Architect Administrative solutions. keep the costs within budget.
esrgn .
Servrces
County Administrative Services wit) perform a quatity Schedule: County Administrative
BSCC Staff control review, code check, value anaiysis, and seek Services will monitor the Consultant's
BSCC approval of the design packages. deliverables to assure they are
submitted within allotted times and that
milestone completion dates are
achieved.
County Administrative Services will prepare the bid Budget: County will seek input/
County packages using ?nal constniction drawings and approval from Sheriff?s Department. and
Administrative speci?cations prepared by Consultant Architect. BSCC for the ?nal estimates of
Services Sheriff's Dept. construction and project costs. After
County Administrative Services witi establish bid bids are opened. County Administrative
Support: requirements and general conditions that comply Services will review and recommend
8' . Consultant, BSCC Staff with public works contracts and BSCC award as appropriate.
A . .
Award requirements. . . 
Scheduie: Bid time period is ?xed by
Bid process will be administered by County County poiicy. Time is allowed to review
County Administrative Services. the bids and resoive problems or bid
Administrative Board of protest that may occur. Time periods
Services Supervisors Issues Notice to Proceed are closely monitored by the County
Administrative Services to expedite the
contract award.
County Construction Manager will oversee contract work to County Administrative Services
Project Administrative assure compliance with the approved construction will oversee the contract payment
Construction Services documents. process and track actual expenses vs.
Manager the approved budget. Management
Consultant Project I Construction Manager will also manage the decisions conditioned upon meeting
Construction Consultant Architect approval and change order process with the budget objectives.
Testing objective to keep the project within scope.
inspection BSCC Staff Schedule: County Administrative
The Consultant Architect, Consultant Testing Services will monitor contract schedule
inspections. and County Administrative Services will and assure milestone dates are
monitor and enforce quality control. achieved.
Project Construction Manager. Sheriffs Dept and
Project I Consultant Architect will conduct punch list and ?nai
Construction Consultant inspections. Corrective contract work be
Manager Architect veri?ed prior to contract closeout. County
Administrative Services wilt coordinate installation of County Administrative Services witl
Closeout County Sheriff?s Dept. telephone systems and building iumishings. Local arrange for final audit and assist the
Administrative Fire Marshal will inspect and test ?re and life safety BSCC with their ?nal inspections.
Services BSCC Staff systems.
Sheriffs Dept. Sheriff?s Dept. provides the Transition Team. On
site training of operational staff prior to full
occupancy and shake down of facilities is included.

 

 

 

Board of State and Community Corrections (BSCC)

Appendix 

Preje -T 'mation and 

I informa on _rOuting
pmject?workbook
psrojec Isubmittat p?r
correspondence

verbal vs written

 

{Records Management System:

pIOject ?ling system

construction diarres bonks

  

I project records

 

central ?ling locatIon
_g contract documents

 

 

 

Fiscal Auditing System

progress payments 
I contingencies

    

- La?project forms and [notices

I. requests
.jproIect account
-- - .-

 

changejorders

quarterly reports

 

 

Cost Control and Claim '5 Avoidance System:

 

 

 

I life cycle cost analysis I change OI?der review I claims review process
I weekiy budget review I schedule review I long-lead materials
I weekty progress meeting I progress review I progress payments
I on?going value engineering I con?ict resolution I value management
I alternative construction I early completion incent?ves
I arbitration
Construction Contract:
I construction agreement I project forms I generat conditions
I supplemental conditions I contract documents I drawings
I speci?cations I public notices I bidders information
I manuais I product submittal I "as built" drawings
Other Contract Agreements:
I architect agreement I consultant agreement I geo?technical
I testing agencies I inspector I construction manager
I project manager I purchase orders I warranties
I bonds I insurance

 

Appendix 

 

 

 

 
   
   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
   

 

 

 

 

 

  
        

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

         

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tehama Community Corrections Reentry/84 Day Reporting
Center SB 1022 Master Project Schedule
"3 Finn Egnaikim??mt?alJi/nl hrtF/anrr' "in Kama ?nmi tiitnn i/nrv?rtmt/D ?rst}? 4 ?1 'n wife/inked I?Uml?nrillei; ?i 5 "ll 133

?fe: 1731BSCC Noti?es County of Conditionai Award ?1 day Wed 1/15/14 Wed 1/"l 5H4 11E
3 County to submit site assurance 3 r'nons' Thu'1/1s/14' Wed 4/9/14 We
4 county to submit real estate due diligence 4 mons Thu 1/15/14: Wed 5/7/14 
5 92m -
?131
5 State deviupment ufprutect scope 4 mans Thu Wed 5127/14 
7 County development 'Thu 5/13/11 Wed 13/27/14 WM
0 County development ofdetailed cost est/mete by '4 mons? Thu 5/3/11 Wed 11/27/14 3
phase (Ct-page estimate)
9 Statement desclbing status orcee/xe status or '4 mons? Thu 5/a/14 Wed 8/27/14 mm
any litigation
Program Design i?hase 151 days. Toe 3/11/14 Wed 10/8114?
mm
Schematic Design on [305 Agenda 10 days Thu Wad 11126114 
37 see A'p'o'ro'ueio'r' Schematic Design tit/eye Wed 11/25/14 wed11/26/14 
3? Design Development Phase {Preliminary Plans} 143 clays Wed 12/31/14 Mon 6/29/15 ?my
Design Development on 805 Agenda 3 10 days Tue 8/11/35 Mon 3/24/15 Er
5? BUS Approvel of Design Devetupment 0 days? Mon 3/24/15 'Mon'd/2'4/1Due Diligence approval leiterfrorn DGS 10 Tue 6116/?15? Mon 8/24/15 W1
5? Caeh Match Approval I I I ?2 I Tue 6/30/15 Mon 8/24/15 mi?
?1 'lnI-itind match approval I 2 mons Tue 13/20/15 Mon 5/24/15 
?13" County signs Certi?cation of Matching Funds 1 day" Tue 13/25/15" "Tue'a/z'S/is .
61 County Signs PDCA and ascent/earnest '1 day Tue 15/25/15 Tue 13/25/15 
?35? Project on SPWE Agenda (CSA) we. Wed 51/26/15 Tue1o/5/15 
ES SPWB Meeting: Approval o1 Pie/iminary Plans 0 days' 'Tue 10/5/15 Tue'10/6/15 5
Review Project Scope 40 days Wed 10/7115 Tue 12/1/15
59 Review Project Schedule to days? Wed 1o/7/15 Tue 12/1/15 -
7? Reutew'cost estimeie (a?o'ege Estimate) 4o Wed 10/7/15 Tue 12/1/15 Te]
71 County Sign: Ground Lease Easement tray? Wed 12/2/15 Wed 12/2/15 3 
Agreement Right of Entry 
72 Working Drawing Phase hot/eye" Tue 10/11/15: Wed 3/16/Secure Regulatory Approvals 5 days Thu 41?7/?16 Wed 4113/16 
95 Construction oo'oumenis'o'n' Bosegende - days Wed 4/27/16 Wed 11/27/16 
e'o's'noprouoi arsonetmotion ooeumente 1 day "Thu 4/28/16 Thu 4/28/15 3 I 
95 
ms 81 Award 57' days Thu 5I19l15 Mon 8/8118
1/15 mode/ii: Thir?ill?t?lt} Thu 5/19/11: 3 5'19
tor Prepare geese/zoo; tut! tine/201m no 5/26/15 2
105 311111an 'ii'd'oy's Thus/nits rrn/I/tri i 
it: Emit/alien nteuuissueintontto Awnm sous Mon 'mtltE Fin/tents e}
Ild DeodirielurBid Pmlesl Suave Medina/{5' reroute El
"5 I Prepaie'cdniroc'i'aitd Bite/d Age/ton item 7 to days Man 7/251'16' Fri N585 3 E3
116 comet may Mon aims Morin/ans 

Construction Phase 358 days Tue 91'131'16 Tue 215118 
i
1:0 Staf?ng occupancy Swie' wed1/17/1a Tue 2/27/13 we:
Task We); Summary mm Erie/rial Milestone 0 Inactive Summary lttant/iilSi/mmary Rnlup Pinion-only 
Ef??t?lmiPlum-1 Summary WU Task MonualTns/r Manuel Summary Ping/ass 
Milestone 0 Enamel Tasks ?w 7 1* Inactive Mrtuotonu -Z- Start-only andane l?y
Thu 10/10?: Pavel

 

 

Appendix