('Inngreaa at the i?niteh gram Washington, ?101 213515 July 10, 2019 The Honorable William P. Barr Attorney General US. Department of Justice 950 Ave, N.W. Washington, DC. 20530 Dear Attorney General Barr: We are writing today to encourage you to work with President Trump to support the issuance of a memorandum or executive order appropriate under our Constitution and laws to . clearly outline the President?s rationale for including a citizenship question on the census. Inclusion of such a citizenship question is clearly constitutional and lawful, and as members of Congress we can say say unequivocally that we support inclusion of such a question and that it is critical that the President do so as quickly as possible as we prepare for the coming census. From our vantage point in Congress, there are numerous important reasons to include the question on the census, of which the President clearly is aware. Those reasons range from determining appropriations levels for states and localities and having data for states to make decisions on ballot box placement, to collection of data for purposes of understanding the impact of immigration (legal and illegal) on communities, as well as obviously impacting apportionment and re-districting. Despite claims to the contrary, citizenship is unquestionably germane to carrying out our duty to apportion representatives. Setting aside the fact it remains an unsettled question as to whether states can, in fact, use citizenship data in redistricting, the 14th Amendment demands that we take into account citizenship in allocation of representation. Under section 2 of the 14th Amendment and as further amended by the 19th and 26lh Amendments in order that we be able to enforce the penalty put in place by the Amendment?s authors and rati?ers for any interference with the right to vote, the administration arguably is required to capture the citizenship information. As you know, much noise has been made about the Chief Justice?s opinion in Department of Commerce v. New York. But in truth, the opinion is very clear that the administration most certainly can include a citizenship question. Even more, the Court?s opinion stated that the Secretary has very good reason to choose to ask the question on the census, as opposed to relying upon the less complete community surveys and rejected the District Court?s conclusion on this point. Inclusion of the citizenship question on the census is said to be inherently political and that it will suppress responses by those illegally present in the United States. If that it is true, it is but PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER one factor as the Chief Justice notes in determining if it is meritorious. But it is not obviously the case, either. Most importantly, it?s a two-way street for those who claim this is politically motivated rather than a substantive concern about getting the best data on citizens. The question should be included, a majority of Americans agree, and the President would be correct to include the question with a new rationale in light of the Supreme Court?s decision. We again encourage its inclusion, and for the census to be printed with it as soon as possible. Respectfully, ML Member of CongresV dy 7% em of Congress Member of Congress Jord of Congress Ralph Norman Member of Congress We Andy Harris M. D. Member of Congress Scott Perry Member of Congress Wo?m?kw Mo Brooks Member of Congre Bill Posey Member of gless Mnoan Member of Congress Ted S. Woho D. Member of Cong Mark Meadows Member of Congress ?r/Wm Alex Mooney Member of Congress 7.223% Ted Budd Member of Congress j/ ML 5/ 7 Z, Warren Davidson Membel of Congless Michael Cloud Member of Congress 3% Andy 31% 0 Member of Con 25% Louie Gohmert Member 'ess Scott DesJarlais, MD. Member of Congress