?33053 MS STUD Freedom Park to Gordon River Greenway Park Over Golden Gate Parkway IO NAPLES Prepared for Collier County, Florida Proiect N0. 60109.2 Collier QCWW September 2015 PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE CROSSING FEASIBILITY STUDY FREEDOM PARK TO GORDON RIVER GREENWAY PARK OVER GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY Prepared for Collier County, Florida Contract No: 13-6164 (ST) I L E No 54325 � LE BH A.GO AN D H B S CEN S O U September 2015 � � PR ER 9/24/15 F LO E R ID I S G SI ONAL EN N O A E STATE OF F PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE CROSSING FEASIBILITY STUDY FREEDOM PARK TO GORDON RIVER GREENWAY PARK Collier County Project No. 60109.2 Table of Contents Sections Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 1.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2 1.1 Project Location 2 1.2 Project Objectives 3 1.2.1 Background, Justification and Benefits 3 1.2.2 Feasibility Study Objectives 4 2.0 3.0 4.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS 5 2.1 Golden Gate Parkway 5 2.2 Public Transit 6 2.3 Pedestrian/Sidewalk Characteristics 7 2.4 Geotechnical Conditions 7 2.5 Drainage 7 2.6 Utilities 8 DESIGN CRITERIA 10 3.1 Horizontal Clearances 10 3.2 Vertical Clearances 10 3.3 Stopping Line of Sight Distance 11 3.4 Accessibility 11 3.5 Elevators 11 3.6 Aesthetics 11 Alternatives Analysis 4.1 Location Alternatives 12 4.2 Crossing Alternatives 13 4.2.1 Pedestrian Overpass 13 4.2.2 Pedestrian Underpass 15 Page i PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE CROSSING FEASIBILITY STUDY FREEDOM PARK TO GORDON RIVER GREENWAY PARK Collier County Project No. 60109.2 4.2.3 4.3 On-Street Crossing 16 Other Considerations 17 4.3.1 Constructability & MOT 17 4.3.2 Impacts 17 4.4 Alternative Crossings Comparison 18 4.5 Probable Construction Costs 19 LIST OF TABLES TABLE 1: Location Alternatives 12 TABLE 2: Alternative Crossings Comparison 18 TABLE 3: Estimate of Probable Construction Cost 19 LIST OF FIGURES FIG. 1 – Project Location & Vicinity Map 2 FIG. 2 – Project Vicinity Aerial View 3 FIG. 3 – Looking West towards Freedom Park 5 FIG. 4 - Looking East towards Gordon River Greenway 5 FIG. 5 – Bridge Culvert # 030172 5 FIG. 6 – Control Structure to the South 5 FIG. 7 - Collier Area Transit (CAT) Bus Route 6 FIG. 8 – South Sidewalk 7 FIG. 9 – North Sidewalk 7 FIG. 10 – Powerlines 8 FIG. 11 – Observed Utility Marker 9 FIG. 12 – Eastbound Speed Limit Sign 10 FIG. 13 - Westbound Speed Limit Sign 10 FIG. 14 – Nighttime View of Dana Point Bridge, CA 11 FIG. 15 – Example of Hawk Treatment 16 Page ii PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE CROSSING FEASIBILITY STUDY FREEDOM PARK TO GORDON RIVER GREENWAY PARK Collier County Project No. 60109.2 LIST OF EXHIBITS EXHIBIT 1 – Alternative Crossing Locations EXHIBIT 2 – Alternative Conceptual Bridge Sections EXHIBIT 3 – Overpass Option Layout EXHIBIT 4 – Underpass Option Layout EXHIBIT 5 – On-Street Option Layout EXHIBIT 6 – Overpass Rendering – Utilitarian Aesthetics EXHIBIT 7 – Overpass Rendering – Mid-level Aesthetics EXHIBIT 8 – Overpass Rendering – Signature Aesthetics (Concrete) EXHIBIT 9 – Overpass Rendering – Signature Aesthetics (Tied Arch) LIST OF APPENDICES: APPENDIX A – Exhibits APPENDIX B – Site Photos APPENDIX C – Reference Photos of Other Pedestrian Crossings APPENDIX D – Miscellaneous Backup Data Page iii PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE CROSSING FEASIBILITY STUDY: FREEDOM PARK TO GORDON RIVER GREENWAY PARK Collier County Project No. 60109.2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Collier County Growth Management Department, Transportation Engineering Division has initiated a feasibility study for a pedestrian crossing across Golden Gate Parkway in Naples, Florida. The proposed crossing will provide pedestrians with a convenient, safe route to traverse between Freedom Park, located on the north side of Golden Gate Parkway and Gordon River Greenway Park located on the south side of Golden Gate Parkway, just east of Freedom Park. The main objective of the study is to identify potential crossing locations, evaluate pedestrian crossing alternatives, define site constraints (geometry, utilities, environmental, etc.), within the project vicinity and prepare preliminary cost data. This report will be used by the county staff to evaluate crossing options and identify funding needs to advance the project to the next stage. Justification of the selected crossing option in the subsequent phase will need to carefully weigh the benefit and cost, combined with the level of anticipated use and potential safety considerations. The proposed location shall also address any safety and sight distance issues for vehicular traffic on Golden Gate Parkway. The primary benefit of the project will be to provide a safe crossing of Golden Gate Parkway. Four different location alternatives were compared for the purpose of this study (Ref. Exhibit 1). Alternative location 3 is midway between Freedom Park and Gordon River Greenway and is considered as the best possible location for further consideration. The focus of this study was to evaluate overpass, underpass and on-street crossing alternatives. The overpass option considered varying levels of aesthetics and pedestrian access features at each end (Ref. Exhibit 2). The potential layout consists of a stair and/or switch-back ramp access at the north terminus and a stair/elevator tower at the south terminus to minimize environmental impacts (Ref. Exhibit 3). Constructability & Maintenance of Traffic (MOT) is greatly simplified due to clear spanning of Golden Gate Parkway. Powerlines along the north side of Golden Gate Parkway will be impacted and three transmission poles will potentially need to be relocated further north to accommodate an overpass alternative. Due to drainage, geometric, functional, constructability, MOT, cost/benefit and a safety concern an underpass will need to be thoroughly scrutinized as part of subsequent phase of the project in conjunction with all the stakeholders (Ref. Exhibit 4). An on-street pedestrian crossing option (signal and crosswalk) provides an economical solution and one location was explored at Freedom Park as part of this study. (Ref. Exhibit 5) An overpass concept shall be carefully evaluated in conjunction with the on-street alternative based on anticipated level of pedestrian characteristics, use and available resources. Three varying degrees of aesthetics and accessibility options for an overpass alternative have been shown in Exhibits 6 thru 8. The probable construction cost for the overpass options range from 2.0 M to 5.0 M, whereas the on-street crossing provides the most economical solution at approx. 200K. Page 1 PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE CROSSING FEASIBILITY STUDY: FREEDOM PARK TO GORDON RIVER GREENWAY PARK Collier County Project No. 60109.2 1.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project site is located along the stretch of Golden Gate Parkway between Freedom Park (north side) and Gordon River Greenway (south side) in Naples, Florida. Golden Gate Parkway is owned and maintained by Collier County. The adjacent parcel to the south was recently purchased by Moorings, Inc. in April of 2014. The parcel to the north is owned by Collier County. Additional stakeholders include the City of Naples, which owns the sewer and water and Florida Power and Light (FPL) which owns the overhead electric in the vicinity of the project. Teco Gas, Century Link Cable, Summit Broadband, Comcast, FPL Fibernet, and Collier County own various utilities in the area. Potential wetlands exist along the southern and northern edge of Golden Gate Parkway. Bridge Culvert No. 030172 is also in close proximity of the proposed project. The Naples Zoo at Caribbean Gardens is immediately south of Gordon River Greenway. Naples High School and Coastland Mall are located just west of the project location. Figures 1 & 2 provide location map and vicinity details. 1.1 Project Location PROJECT LOCATION FIG. 1 – Project Location & Vicinity Map Page 2 PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE CROSSING FEASIBILITY STUDY: FREEDOM PARK TO GORDON RIVER GREENWAY PARK Collier County Project No. 60109.2 Freedom Park N Gordon River Greenway FIG. 2 – Project Vicinity Aerial View 1.2 Project Objectives This project is being explored primarily to provide a safe crossing of Golden Gate Parkway for pedestrians and bicyclists traversing from Freedom Park to the Gordon River Greenway Park. 1.2.1 Background, Justification and Benefits The Collier County Growth Management Department, Transportation Engineering Division has initiated a feasibility study for a pedestrian crossing across Golden Gate Parkway in Naples, Florida. The proposed crossing will provide pedestrians with a convenient, safe route to traverse between Freedom Park, located on the north side of Golden Gate Parkway and Gordon River Greenway Park located on the south side of Golden Gate Parkway, just east of Freedom Park. The main objective of the study is to identify potential crossing locations, evaluate pedestrian crossing alternatives, define site constraints (geometry, utilities, environmental, etc.), within the project vicinity and prepare preliminary cost data. This report will be used by staff to evaluate crossing options and identify funding needs to advance the project to the next stage. Justification of the selected crossing option in the subsequent phase will need to carefully weigh the benefit and cost, combined with the level of anticipated use and potential safety considerations. The proposed location shall also address any safety and sight distance issues for vehicular traffic on Golden Gate Parkway. Page 3 PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE CROSSING FEASIBILITY STUDY: FREEDOM PARK TO GORDON RIVER GREENWAY PARK Collier County Project No. 60109.2 1.2.2 Feasibility Study Objectives The objective of this feasibility study is to identify the opportunities and obstacles related to constructing a pedestrian/bicycle crossing of Golden Gate Parkway between Freedom Park and Gordon River Greenway Park. The study will focus on a pedestrian overpass (bridge), pedestrian underpass (tunnel) and an “onstreet” crossing (pedestrian signal). The feasibility study provides a cursory review of the existing conditions and features within the study limits. The feasibility study developed preliminary construction costs for the viable alternatives for budget purposes. This feasibility study and alternatives analysis provided will form the basis for further refinement and development of alternatives during the subsequent phases of the project. Page 4 PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE CROSSING FEASIBILITY STUDY: FREEDOM PARK TO GORDON RIVER GREENWAY PARK Collier County Project No. 60109.2 2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS 2.1 Golden Gate Parkway The segment of Golden Gate Parkway between Freedom Park and Gordon River Greenway is a 6-lane facility classified as a divided urban arterial Class 1a based on Collier County’s 2035 Needs Plan Level of Service (Table 10-4). The level of services is designated as “C” with an average annual daily traffic count (AADT) of 52,773. The roadway is posted 35 mph for westbound traffic and 45 mph for eastbound traffic. The Typical Section consists of three 12 foot wide travel lanes in each direction and a 12 foot auxiliary lane with right turn movement into Freedom Park as well as Gordon River Greenway Park and a 22 foot raised median. The raised median accommodates directional left turn lanes into the Parks. Stormwater runoff is conveyed by curb and gutter into a closed drainage system. FIG. 3 - Looking West towards Freedom Park FIG. 5 –Bridge Culvert #030172 FIG. 4 - Looking East towards Gordon River Greenway FIG. 6 – Control Structure to the South Bridge Culvert No. 030172 conveys Gordon River flow under Golden Gate Parkway at an approximate 29 degree skew. According to the available data, it is a 49.5 feet long multicell concrete box culvert structure constructed in 1963. It is listed as structurally adequate, has a sufficiency rating of 72.3 and is not posted for any load restrictions. A water control structure with Amil-gates exists on the south side. A guardrail exists at the approach end of this structure along Golden Gate Parkway for vehicular protection. Any proposed pedestrian crossing will need to minimize any impacts to this structure. Page 5 PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE CROSSING FEASIBILITY STUDY: FREEDOM PARK TO GORDON RIVER GREENWAY PARK Collier County Project No. 60109.2 2.2 Public Transit The Golden Gate Parkway – Goodlette Frank Road area is currently being served by Collier Rapid Transit (CAT) Route 25, shown in Lime Green, in Figure 5. A bus stop is located next to the westbound auxiliary lane into Freedom Park and will have to be accommodated as part of proposed improvements. Any proposed changes to the current bus stop location will have to be coordinated. Transit Bus Route 25 bus stop within Project Limits FIG. 7 - Collier Area Transit (CAT) Bus Route Map Page 6 PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE CROSSING FEASIBILITY STUDY: FREEDOM PARK TO GORDON RIVER GREENWAY PARK Collier County Project No. 60109.2 2.3 Pedestrian/Sidewalk Characteristics A five (5) foot sidewalk and eight (8) foot buffer area exists adjacent to the south side of Golden Gate Blvd as shown in Fig. 8, while a six (6) foot sidewalk exists adjacent to the north side of Golden Gate Parkway as shown in Fig 9. Pedestrian use can be characterized as moderate. Currently there are no designated pedestrian crossings within the project limits. There are no designated bike lanes and bikers currently use the sidewalk as seen in Fig 8. During the subsequent phase of the project, additional information including pedestrian and bicycle counts, mobility patterns and user demographics will be further analyzed. FIG. 8 - South Sidewalk 2.4 FIG. 9 - North Sidewalk Drainage The urban roadway section conveys stormwater by curb and gutter to a series of inlets that receive runoff water from Golden Gate Parkway and conveys it through an underground system. Feasible alternatives will have minimal effect on the existing stormwater facilities. Although no new impervious pavement area is being added to the corridor, impacts (however minimal) to adjacent vegetation (uplands/wetlands) may require Permitting Agency (SFWMD – USACE) reviews. 2.5 Geotechnical Conditions A limited desk-analysis was conducted to assess anticipated soil conditions. Soils in this area are expected to be quartz sand with trace clay and shell to depths ranging from 5 to 10 feet below existing ground surface. Shallow limestone of the Tamiami formation can be expected below the surficial sands and extends to over 100 feet deep. The top of the limestone is very dense and locally referred to as caprock. Seasonal high ground water is assumed to be 2-3 feet below existing pavement subbase. Page 7 PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE CROSSING FEASIBILITY STUDY: FREEDOM PARK TO GORDON RIVER GREENWAY PARK Collier County Project No. 60109.2 For purposes of this report, the following assumptions were made in order to develop “Order of Magnitude” costs.   The shallow limestone caprock may/will require pre-drilling but underlying limestone layers are suitable for conventional driven pile foundations or drilled shafts. Caprock is difficult and costly to excavate which makes an underpass option less viable. A full geotechnical investigation will be performed during subsequent phases of the project. 2.6 Utilities A limited site review was conducted to identify utilities readily visible within the project area. In addition, a Sunshine State One Call of Florida (SSOCOF), design ticket was placed to identify members of SSOCOF within the vicinity of the design project. (See Appendix D). Potentially Impacted Utilities:  Florida Power and Light (Fig. 10) High voltage Transmission lines exist along the north side of Golden Gate Parkway. Additionally, a distribution line is also present with a lower vertical clearance. The distribution line pole discontinues at the start of the Freedom Park auxiliary lane and appears to go underground further west. Any overpass option will require relocations. Potential signal poles will need to be coordinated with FPL to ensure proper OSHA clearance is maintained. FIG. 10 - Powerlines Other utilities within project area include:  Florida Power and Light Fibernet LLC Fiber (High speed fiber optic network to provide telecommunication support.)  Collier County Traffic Operations Section (Electrical and Fiber)  City of Naples (Sewer and Water)  Comcast (CATV)  Summit Broadband Inc. (Fiber Optic)  Teco Peoples Gas (Gas)  Century Link Naples (Phone & Fiber Optic) Page 8 PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE CROSSING FEASIBILITY STUDY: FREEDOM PARK TO GORDON RIVER GREENWAY PARK Collier County Project No. 60109.2 FIG. 11 – Observed Utility Marker More detailed investigations, field surveys and utility locations will need to be accomplished during the next phase of the project. Page 9 PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE CROSSING FEASIBILITY STUDY: FREEDOM PARK TO GORDON RIVER GREENWAY PARK Collier County Project No. 60109.2 3.0 DESIGN CRITERIA The proposed pedestrian overpass will be considered as a shared used path and will be 12 ft wide as required by FDOT PPM Section 8.7.1 3.1 Horizontal Clearances This segment of Golden Gate Parkway has a posted speed of 45 miles per hour (mph) eastbound and 35 mph westbound relative to the potential pedestrian crossing location. According to FDOT PPM Table 2.11.6, for design speed ≤ 45 mph, a minimum lateral offset of 16 feet is required from the edge of the outside travel lane to any bridge pier or abutment and 6 feet minimum from the traffic (auxiliary) lane. The existing median width (approx. 22 feet) is not sufficient to meet the lateral offset requirements, therefore vehicular protection will be required for any piers constructed within the median. FIG. 12 - Eastbound speed limit Sign FIG. 13- Westbound speed limit Sign (heading into the left curve ahead) 3.2 Vertical Clearances According to FDOT PPM Table 2.10.1, the minimum required vertical clearance for a pedestrian overpass is 17’-6”. Additionally according to FDOT PPM Figure 8.7.1, the minimum headroom/under clearance for pedestrians shall be 8’-0”. Page 10 PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE CROSSING FEASIBILITY STUDY: FREEDOM PARK TO GORDON RIVER GREENWAY PARK Collier County Project No. 60109.2 3.3 Stopping Line of Sight Distance There is no signal in the immediate vicinity of the proposed pedestrian crossing, therefore the proposed improvement is not anticipated to adversely impact stopping sight distance with the exception of Alternate Location 1. 3.4 Accessibility All features must comply with the Americans with Disability Act (ADA) requirements for accessibility per FDOT Structures Manual. 3.5 Elevators Elevators must comply with ADA and ASME A17.1-latest safety code for Elevators and Escalators subject to further analysis in the subsequent phase of the project. 3.6 Aesthetics Various levels of aesthetics will be explored as the potential project progresses. This will include structure type and integration of various elements for enhanced aesthetics. Landscaping and lighting can also provide significant enhancements and will have to be incorporated as desired. Aesthetic lighting can have a dramatic effect as shown below. Figure 14 Nighttime View of Dana Point Bridge, CA Page 11 PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE CROSSING FEASIBILITY STUDY: FREEDOM PARK TO GORDON RIVER GREENWAY PARK Collier County Project No. 60109.2 4.0 Alternatives Analysis 4.1 Location Alternatives Four potential locations were considered for the purpose of this feasibility study and are depicted in Exhibit 1. A variety of factors were considered in determining these location alternatives. These four pedestrian crossing locations provide varying degrees of access points and have differing benefits/impacts based on constructability, environmental impact, functionality and projected visual impact to pedestrians, bicyclist and the traveling public. Table 1: Alternative Locations Comparison Location Alternative Advantages Disadvantages Alt. 1 Close to Freedom Park. Alt. 2 Sight distance issues due to curve to the west and also existing Freedom Park. Farthest from Gordon River Greenway. Wetland impacts. Distance from Gordon River Greenway Park. Wetland impacts. Proximity to the existing Bridge Culvert and water control structure to the south. Wetland impact. Close to Freedom Park. Improved sight conditions relative to Alt. 1 Splits the distance between Freedom Park and Gordon River Greenway Park. Provides opportunity to connect crossing pedestrian traffic to the Freedom Park boardwalk network. Provides minimal crossing distance to traverse the roadway section. Equal distance between parks. Aesthetic placement for landmark crossing. Proximity to Gordon River Farthest from Freedom Park. Greenway Park. Connection to Gordon River Boardwalk will require crossing Gordon River. Sight issue for westbound traffic exiting from Gordon River Greenway. Wetland Impacts. Alt. 3 Alt. 4 Remark Recomm ended Location Page 12 PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE CROSSING FEASIBILITY STUDY: FREEDOM PARK TO GORDON RIVER GREENWAY PARK Collier County Project No. 60109.2 Based on the preliminary comparison Alternative Location 3 will be considered for the purposes of this feasibility study. 4.2 Crossing Alternatives The focus of this feasibility study was to compare the following three crossing alternatives  Pedestrian Overpass (Ref. to Exhibit 3)  Pedestrian Underpass (Ref. Exhibit 4)  On-Street Crossing (Ref. Exhibit 5) The Pedestrian Overpass and Underpass were considered at Location 3 discussed above, whereas the on-street crossing alternatives were considered near the entrances to Freedom Park and Gordon River Greenway. The following is a discussion of these various options. 4.2.1 Pedestrian Overpass Access/Approach Configuration The Overpass Alternative at location 3 has adequate room to place ADA compliant switch-back access ramps at the north approach but a stair/elevator tower will be needed at the south approach, to minimize wetland impacts. Stairs - Cast-in-place or precast concrete stairs contained within an access tower with a roof are envisioned for the proposed project. Use of steel stairs is not considered desirable due to the outdoor nature of the project. Elevator - An elevator shaft with a lift to the overpass level. This structure would require a mechanical room for housing the elevator hydraulic and electrical equipment in conjunction with the elevator and elevator shaft structure. The mechanical room would be located directly under the end platform and its roof would serve as the landing for the elevator and stair terminus. The use of elevators does introduce some maintenance needs. Additionally, stairs would provide access from ground level in the event of power failure or for access for those wishing to walk. Ramps - These are commonly constructed with concrete pier columns and cap with concrete walkway, with handrail and fencing. This option for a ramp is a more traditional access for pedestrian overpasses. The decking is formed and poured in place. MSE wall can be utilized for ramps but creates edifices which tend to block the open view and do not appear desirable at the proposed crossing. Three different Construction Types have been evaluated for the pedestrian bridge crossing, based on review of similar pedestrian crossings, which satisfy varying Page 13 PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE CROSSING FEASIBILITY STUDY: FREEDOM PARK TO GORDON RIVER GREENWAY PARK Collier County Project No. 60109.2 degree of aesthetic needs for the proposed structure. (Ref. to Exhibit 2 and 6 thru 9) Utilitarian Aesthetics (FDOT Level 1). This type of bridge will consist of conventional prestressed concrete girder type structure such as Florida I-Beams. A single as well as two span structure is possible. A two-span span structure will allow use of shallower beams but will introduce a median pier which will be in the clear zone and will require vehicular protection. The concrete deck would be poured in place with curbing, fencing, and railing system. The approach ramp to the north will provide ADA compliant accessibility, whereas the stair/elevator tower will provide ADA compliant access to the south. This option will be consistent with FDOT Aesthetic level 1 which is defined as, Level One: Consists of cosmetic improvements to conventional Department bridge types, such as the use of color pigments in the concrete, texturing the surfaces, modifications to fascia walls, beams, and surfaces, or more pleasing shapes for columns and/or caps. Mid-level Aesthetics (FDOT Level 2) This type of bridge will consist of a prefabricated or custom designed Steel truss type structure. A poured in place concrete deck with railing and fencing will be placed within the through box-type truss. This structure would be single span and will not require a pier in the median. The approach ramp to the north will provide ADA compliant accessibility, whereas the stair/elevator tower will provide ADA compliant access to the south. The access tower to the north will be slightly different than the utilitarian option in that it will also have a stair option and both the towers at each end will have consistent looks with a similar footprint and roof structure for enhanced aesthetics. Steel truss can be painted based on the selected aesthetic theme. This option will be consistent with FDOT Aesthetic level 2 which is defined as, Level Two: The emphasis is on full integration of efficiency, economy and elegance in all bridge components and the structure as a whole. Consideration should be given to structural systems that are inherently more pleasing, such as hammerhead or "T" shaped piers, oval or polygonal shaped columns, integral caps, piers in lieu of bents, smooth transitions at superstructure depth change locations, box-type superstructures, concealed drain pipes, conduits and utilities, etc. Signature Aesthetics (FDOT Level 3) This alternative will involve architectural input for carefully integrating the entire theme with careful attention to the neighborhood and an overall fit in the Page 14 PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE CROSSING FEASIBILITY STUDY: FREEDOM PARK TO GORDON RIVER GREENWAY PARK Collier County Project No. 60109.2 surroundings including use of landscaping and lighting. This type of bridge can consist of a signature concrete option or some iconic structure using a combination of arch shape and cable supported structure. This structure would be single span and will not require a pier in the median. The approach ramp to the north will provide ADA compliant accessibility, whereas the stair/elevator tower will provide ADA compliant access to the south. The access tower will serve similar purpose as the Mid-level option but will complement the finish treatments on the overpass superstructure while the entire overpass will showcase an integrated theme and will provide highest level of aesthetic appeal. This option will be consistent with FDOT Aesthetic level 3 which is defined as, Level Three: The emphasis in this level applies more to the overall aesthetics when passing through or under an interchange or at other sites such as historic or highly urbanized areas where landscaping or unique neighborhood features must be considered. The bridge itself shall comply with Level Two requirements. This level of work may require, at the County's option, a subconsultant (architect to consider adjacent building styles, and landscape themes) with the necessary expertise and credentials to perform the desired work 4.2.2 Pedestrian Underpass The desirable size of an underpass is 14 ft wide and 10 ft high as per FDOT Plans Preparation Manual Section 8.6.6. The seasonal high groundwater is likely 2 or 3 feet below the pavement sub-base and is subject to verification of assumptions from the original roadway design and groundwater data. The underpass will have to be partially depressed below the seasonal high groundwater table in order to minimize raising of Golden Gate Boulevard. An underdrain and pumping system will be required to keep the structure dry and functional at all times. This raises a pedestrian safety and maintenance concern. It is envisioned that Golden Gate Parkway profile will have to be raised approximately 10 ft with a crest vertical curve to accommodate placement of an FDOT cast-in-place concrete box culvert sections with considerations for waterstops (Ref. to Exhibit 2). Given the fact that the roadway profile will need to be raised, locating the underpass near alternative location 3 will necessitate reconstructing the at-grade connections at access drives to Freedom Park and Gordon River Greenway Entrances. This may also necessitate the replacement of Bridge Culvert No. 030172 which conveys the Gordon River under Golden Gate Parkway. Moving the underpass to location 4 will help with the connection to Freedom Park but will be too close to Gordon River Greenway. According to FDOT PPM Section 8.7.1, Pedestrian underpasses are generally undesirable for safety reasons. Local law enforcement personnel should also be consulted to assure public safety, emergency accessibility in the case of an underpass option. Page 15 PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE CROSSING FEASIBILITY STUDY: FREEDOM PARK TO GORDON RIVER GREENWAY PARK Collier County Project No. 60109.2 A conceptual underpass layout which was evaluated is shown in Exhibit 4. 4.2.3 On-Street Pedestrian Crossing FDOT provides special signals to indicate when pedestrians may safely cross. These may be "ped-heads" attached to conventional traffic signals or pedestrianonly signals such as the "Rapid Rectangular Flashing Beacon" or "HAWK" signals.” Rapid Rectangular Flashing Beacons may be inappropriate for this situation because the location near a curve, number of lanes and traffic volume. Coordination with the County to investigate opportunities to employ Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon “HAWK” signals or additional traffic signal options should be considered. FIG. 15- Example of Hawk Treatment Page 16 PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE CROSSING FEASIBILITY STUDY: FREEDOM PARK TO GORDON RIVER GREENWAY PARK Collier County Project No. 60109.2 4.3 Other Considerations 4.3.1 Constructability & Maintenance of Traffic (MOT) The study included a limited analysis of MOT requirements for each option. The overpass option primarily involves construction of the access towers and ramps and bridge abutments which are outside of the Golden Gate Parkway typical section. There appears to be adequate room near each access to position a conventional crawler crane for any necessary pile driving and foundation work. Hydraulic cranes can be subsequently used to finish the poured in place ramp and tower construction. Bridge superstructure erection can be accomplished by delivering the beams along Golden Gate Parkway and using two cranes to pick the superstructure with nighttime closures. Any need for detour for this limited closure and associated traffic impact will have to be evaluated in the subsequent phase of the project. The underpass option will create the biggest challenge and will have the greatest impact on the existing 6-lane traffic. Raising Golden Gate Parkway will have to be accomplished in two or three phases by re-constructing one half at a time which makes it impossible to maintain 6-lanes of traffic and is considered prohibitive. 4.3.2 Impacts The proposed crossing will impact potential wetlands to the south. The exact delineation of jurisdictional wetlands is unknown at this time and will need to be investigated in the subsequent phase of the project. Use of an elevator tower inlieu of a switch-back ramp aims to minimize these impacts to the south as discussed earlier. The proposed crossing will also have drainage and utility impacts. The biggest impact will be to the high voltage transmission lines to the north, as discussed earlier. At a minimum three of the transmission poles will need to be relocated to the north to facilitate construction of the north end of the bridge crossing. Impact to the lower voltage distribution lines can be minimized at the selected location. Detailed analyses and refinement of ramp, elevator and stair tower footprints will need to be conducted after more complete utility information is collected in the subsequent phase of the project. Page 17 PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE CROSSING FEASIBILITY STUDY: FREEDOM PARK TO GORDON RIVER GREENWAY PARK Collier County Project No. 60109.2 4.4 Alternative Crossings Comparison The following table provides a comparison of the three crossing options using a qualitative grading criteria described below. It is evident that the Underpass option is not desirable. The overpass option provides an aesthetic and safer crossing alternative than the on-street crossing. In the subsequent project phase, the construction cost, utility and environmental impact needs to be carefully weighed against the on-street option with the level of anticipated use of the proposed crossing. TABLE 2: Alternatives Comparison Proposed Improvement Issue Roadside Safety Pedestrian Safety Future Accommodations Constructability and MOT Environmental Impacts Utility Impacts Ease of Use Aesthetics Construction Cost Maintenance Overpass Option B Underpass Option C On-Street Option B Bridge Towers/Ramps will be located outside Clear Zone Guardrail needed to protect users from MSE wall drop-off(s) Vehicle/Pedestrian Conflict Point B C C Climb/Fall Concerns Crime, Flood, Illumination, Railing Fall Concern Vehicle/Pedestrian Conflict Point B D/F A Can add future lane if needed by using barrier wall Relocate MSE Walls, MOT, Significant cost Minor costs B D/F A Minor Lane closures Significant Issues - Lane Closures/Phased Construction Minor Issues B/C C/D A Ramp vs. Stair/Elevator Evaluation will Determine Wetland, Groundwater Pumping, Raised Profile - Noise Impacts No Issues C C/D A FPL Transmission/Distribution Impact(s) Isolated location(s) Underground Utility Impacts 1800 LF N/S sides, Potential FPL No/Minor Impacts C B A Ramps Inconvenient/Circuitous Ramps Inconvenient/Circuitous Push Button - No Issues A/B D B/C Dependant on Type of Structure selected - "Landmark Consideration" No signature appeal, MSE Walls, Railings, Guardrails Typical Application C/D D/F A Dependant on Type of Structure selected - "Landmark Consideration" Initial Construction and Long Term Maintenance Costs Significant Minimal Costs B/C D/F A Routine Inspection, Painting, Elevator/Ramp/Railing Maintenance Routine Inspection, Painting, Ramp/Railing Maintenance, Pumping System, Lighting, MSE Walls Minor - Typical Maintenance B = Desirable F = Unacceptable C = Satisfactory Grading Scale: A = Most Desirable D = Less Desirable Page 18 PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE CROSSING FEASIBILITY STUDY: FREEDOM PARK TO GORDON RIVER GREENWAY PARK Collier County Project No. 60109.2 4.5 Probable Construction Costs The focus of this feasibility study was to compare order of magnitude budgetary costs for viable crossing alternatives. Cost data was also compared with available historical data from completed similar projects. Pedestrian overpass costs reflect the cost of access features and the bridge crossing. General contingency has been used to account for Mobilization, MOT and any site/civil work pertaining to the overpass alternatives. The cost estimates cover construction only and do not include costs of Right-of-way acquisition, subsequent design and construction engineering services or annual operating and maintenance expenses for the project. The costs of special safety and security features such as emergency call stations, closed circuit TV, audio surveillance, central station monitoring etc. are not included. Refer to Appendix D for preliminary cost backup information. TABLE 3: Estimate of Probable Construction Cost Crossing Option Description Overpass Utilitarian Aesthetics (FDOT Level 1) $ 2 to $ 3 M Mid-level Aesthetics (FDOT Level 2) $ 3 to $ 4 M Signature Aesthetics (FDOT Level 3) $ 4 to $ 5 M Golden Gate Parkway Elevated with phased construction Across from Freedom Park $8M Underpass On-Street Across from Gordon River Greenway Probable Cost $ 200 K $ 200 K K=Thousands ; M=Millions Page 19 PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE CROSSING FEASIBILITY STUDY FREEDOM PARK TO GORDON RIVER GREENWAY PARK OVER GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY APPENDIX A – EXHIBITS LOCATI ON ALT.4 LOCATI ON ALT.3 LOCATI ON ALT.2 LOCATI ON ALT.1 FREEDOM PARK GORDON RIVER GREENWAY EXHIBIT 1 ALTERNATIVE CROSSING LOCATIONS 12'-0" 12'-0" Min. Bridge Chain Link Handrail ¡ Pedestrian Bridge Fencing Handrail 8' -0" M in. Clr. ¡ Pedestrian 8' -0" M in. Clr. Handrail 8' -0" M in. Clr. Steel Truss Chain Link Fencing Chain Link Fencing ¡ Pedestrian Bridge CIP Concrete Concrete CIP Concrete Deck Deck Slab PC/PS Concrete Special Beam with Aethestic Treatment PC/PS Concrete SIP Form Standard Deck Stay-In-Place Form Florida I-Beam 12'-0" Min. TYPICAL SECTION TYPICAL SECTION TYPICAL SECTION UTILITARIAN AESTHETICS MID-LEVEL AESTHETICS SIGNATURE AESTHETICS (CONCRETE BEAM OPTION) (STEEL BOX TRUSS OPTION) (SPECIAL CONCRETE BEAM OPTION) 10' -0" M IN. 14'-0" MIN. UNDERPASS OPTION TYPICAL SECTION EXHIBIT 2 ALTERNATIVE CONCEPTUAL BRIDGE AND UNDERPASS SECTIONS OPTIONAL BOARDWALK CONNECTION 2 D. Ln an EXHIBIT 3 OVERPASS OPTION LAYOUT 0112/ng CZUm_N_u>mm I. FREEDOM PARK EXHIBIT 5 ON-STREET OPTION LAYOUT 0112/ng I I I 1'EXHIBIT 6 OVERPASS RENDERING - UTILITARIAN AESTHETICS Chm: .ississi?ll?m H52 I- If" I 1 EXHIBIT 7 OVERPASS RENDERING - MID-LEVEL AESTHETICS Chm: EXHIBIT 8 OVERPASS RENDERING - SIGNATURE AESTHETICS (CONCRETE) 4Mi'EXHIBIT 9 Overpass Rendering Signature Aesthetics (Tied Arch) Chm: PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE CROSSING FEASIBILITY STUDY FREEDOM PARK TO GORDON RIVER GREENWAY PARK OVER GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY APPENDIX B – SITE PHOTOS PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE CROSSING FEASIBILITY STUDY FREEDOM PARK TO GORDON RIVER GREENWAY PARK Collier County Project No. 60109.2 Entrance to Gordon River Greenway Entrance to Freedom Park PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE CROSSING FEASIBILITY STUDY FREEDOM PARK TO GORDON RIVER GREENWAY PARK Collier County Project No. 60109.2 Vegetation near Gordon River Greenway Vegetation along Golden Gate Parkway South Edge PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE CROSSING FEASIBILITY STUDY FREEDOM PARK TO GORDON RIVER GREENWAY PARK Collier County Project No. 60109.2 View of Powerlines PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE CROSSING FEASIBILITY STUDY FREEDOM PARK TO GORDON RIVER GREENWAY PARK Collier County Project No. 60109.2 Collier Area Transit Route 25 Stop PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE CROSSING FEASIBILITY STUDY FREEDOM PARK TO GORDON RIVER GREENWAY PARK Collier County Project No. 60109.2 Curve West of Freedom Park Entrance (Above) Freedom Park Entrance looking East on GG Parkway PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE CROSSING FEASIBILITY STUDY FREEDOM PARK TO GORDON RIVER GREENWAY PARK Collier County Project No. 60109.2 Buried Fiberoptic Line PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE CROSSING FEASIBILITY STUDY FREEDOM PARK TO GORDON RIVER GREENWAY PARK Collier County Project No. 60109.2 Existing Roadway Lighting PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE CROSSING FEASIBILITY STUDY FREEDOM PARK TO GORDON RIVER GREENWAY PARK Collier County Project No. 60109.2 Wetland Vegetation South of Golden Gate Parkway PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE CROSSING FEASIBILITY STUDY FREEDOM PARK TO GORDON RIVER GREENWAY PARK OVER GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY APPENDIX C – REFERENCE PHOTOS OF OTHER PEDESTRIAN CROSSINGS PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE CROSSING FEASIBILITY STUDY FREEDOM PARK TO GORDON RIVER GREENWAY PARK Collier County Project No. 60109.2 1. Lake Mary Pedestrian Overpass, Orlando, FL PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE CROSSING FEASIBILITY STUDY FREEDOM PARK TO GORDON RIVER GREENWAY PARK Collier County Project No. 60109.2 PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE CROSSING FEASIBILITY STUDY FREEDOM PARK TO GORDON RIVER GREENWAY PARK Collier County Project No. 60109.2 PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE CROSSING FEASIBILITY STUDY FREEDOM PARK TO GORDON RIVER GREENWAY PARK Collier County Project No. 60109.2 PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE CROSSING FEASIBILITY STUDY FREEDOM PARK TO GORDON RIVER GREENWAY PARK Collier County Project No. 60109.2 PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE CROSSING FEASIBILITY STUDY FREEDOM PARK TO GORDON RIVER GREENWAY PARK Collier County Project No. 60109.2 PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE CROSSING FEASIBILITY STUDY FREEDOM PARK TO GORDON RIVER GREENWAY PARK Collier County Project No. 60109.2 PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE CROSSING FEASIBILITY STUDY FREEDOM PARK TO GORDON RIVER GREENWAY PARK Collier County Project No. 60109.2 2. Pacific Coast Highway Overpass, Dana Point, CA PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE CROSSING FEASIBILITY STUDY FREEDOM PARK TO GORDON RIVER GREENWAY PARK Collier County Project No. 60109.2 PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE CROSSING FEASIBILITY STUDY FREEDOM PARK TO GORDON RIVER GREENWAY PARK Collier County Project No. 60109.2 PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE CROSSING FEASIBILITY STUDY FREEDOM PARK TO GORDON RIVER GREENWAY PARK Collier County Project No. 60109.2 3. W. Ridge Road Pedestrian Bridge, Rochester, NY PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE CROSSING FEASIBILITY STUDY FREEDOM PARK TO GORDON RIVER GREENWAY PARK Collier County Project No. 60109.2 PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE CROSSING FEASIBILITY STUDY FREEDOM PARK TO GORDON RIVER GREENWAY PARK Collier County Project No. 60109.2 PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE CROSSING FEASIBILITY STUDY FREEDOM PARK TO GORDON RIVER GREENWAY PARK Collier County Project No. 60109.2 4. MOSI Pedestrian Overpass, Tampa, FL PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE CROSSING FEASIBILITY STUDY FREEDOM PARK TO GORDON RIVER GREENWAY PARK Collier County Project No. 60109.2 PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE CROSSING FEASIBILITY STUDY FREEDOM PARK TO GORDON RIVER GREENWAY PARK Collier County Project No. 60109.2 PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE CROSSING FEASIBILITY STUDY FREEDOM PARK TO GORDON RIVER GREENWAY PARK Collier County Project No. 60109.2 5. Curlew Road Pedestrian Bridge, Clearwater, FL PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE CROSSING FEASIBILITY STUDY FREEDOM PARK TO GORDON RIVER GREENWAY PARK Collier County Project No. 60109.2 PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE CROSSING FEASIBILITY STUDY FREEDOM PARK TO GORDON RIVER GREENWAY PARK Collier County Project No. 60109.2 PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE CROSSING FEASIBILITY STUDY FREEDOM PARK TO GORDON RIVER GREENWAY PARK Collier County Project No. 60109.2 6. Sample Info on Variety of Other Pedestrian Bridge Options Maitland pedestrian bridge over 1-4 (Proposed as part of 1-4 Reconstruction under construction) Under hung Floor Beam When clearance below the bridge is critical, this parallel chord style offers the shortest superstructure depth. An Under hung truss has its floor beams welded to the bottom of the bottom chords. It’s best suited for pedestrian bridges with spans up to 70', but is available in spans up to 120'. H-Section Floor Beam For spans up to 240', the H-Section is often selected for the most efficient superstructure. This parallel chord truss design has its floor beams welded to vertical members of the side trusses. As with all styles, the H-Section can be created with additional camber for a more graceful look. Bowstring With elegant top chords arching up from its base, the Bowstring is the perfect combination of visual appeal and design efficiency. Bowstring is available with spans up to 100' in an Underhung configuration and up to 200' as an HSection. Modified Bowstring Available in similar spans as the Bowstring, the Modified Bowstring is a more economical choice when an arched top chord is desired. The less-pronounced arch still adds some beauty to the superstructure, while keeping the budget in check. Box For grade separations and enclosed walkways, the Box style is the preferred choice as it allows easy attachment of fencing or glazing on the sides and/or top, when required. Numerous architectural screen, roofing and branding options can also be incorporated ww- . 52;: 3., 'R'mbzl??zw :2 o- 1) Unknown 2) Tavistock Road 3) Phyllis Tilley Footbridge (Fort Worth, TX) 4) Over N2 @Plettenberg Bay, Garden Route 5) Farmdale and Harvard 6) Unknown 7) Overlake Village from Redmond and South Transit 8) Rannoch Railway Station (Scottland) 1) 2nd paseo- corss6 2) St. Erth Station 3) Footbridge Crossing L’Areuse 4) SegerothstraBe Footbridge 5) Briggs Station PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE CROSSING FEASIBILITY STUDY FREEDOM PARK TO GORDON RIVER GREENWAY PARK OVER GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY APPENDIX D – MISCELLANEOUS BACKUP DATA PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE CROSSING FEASIBILITY STUDY: FREEDOM PARK TO GORDON RIVER GREENWAY PARK By Date BAG 6/5/2015 Collier County Project No. 60109.2 Order of Magnitude Estimated Probable Cost - Overpass (Utilitarian Aesthetics) Item 1 Description Remark Florida I-beam superstructure with 133.5 Foot Long-, 12 Foot Wide conventional concrete deck on SIP Single Span Overpass forms, Rail, Vinyl Fence Units Quantity Cost/Unit Cost/Item SF 1602 $150 $240,300 2 North Approach Ramp Approx. 150 long by 25 ft wide SF 3750 $150 $562,500 3 South Towers including foundations Approx. size 25 ft x 25 ft EA 1 $200,000 $200,000 4 Elevator Elevator and Equipment with power EA 1 $75,000 $75,000 5 Utility Relocations 3 Transmission poles LS 1 $500,000 $500,000 6 Site/Civil Grading, sidewalk, drainage, signing LS 1 $150,000 $150,000 7 MOT Maintenance of Traffic LS 1 $50,000 $50,000 8 Miscellaneous Items (10%) Additional Items not specifically listed LS 1 $177,780 $177,780 9 Contingency (10%) Unforseen conditions and changes in scope of work LS 1 $195,558 $195,558.00 10 Mobilization (10%) LS 1 $215,114 $215,113.80 Total $2,366,252 -----------> Say 2-3 M Approx. Order of Magnitude Probable Cost Note: The cost estimates cover construction only and do not include Right-of-way aquisition, subsequent design and construction engineering services or annual operating and maintenance expenses for the project. The costs of special safety and security features such as emergency call stations, closed circuit TV, audio surveillance, central station monitoring etc. are not included. PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE CROSSING FEASIBILITY STUDY: FREEDOM PARK TO GORDON RIVER GREENWAY PARK By Date BAG 6/5/2015 Collier County Project No. 60109.2 Order of Magnitude Estimated Probable Cost - Overpass (Mid-level Aesthetics) Item 1 Description Remark Painted Steel Structure, Rail, Vinyl 133.5 Foot Long-, 12 Foot Wide Fence, metal deck pan, Single Span Overpass Lightweight Concrete Deck Units Quantity Cost/Unit Cost/Item SF 1602 $300 $480,600 2 North Approach Ramp Approx. 150 long by 25 ft wide SF 3750 $175 $656,250 3 North & South Towers including foundations, Aesthetic treatment Approx. size 25 ft x 25 ft EA 2 $250,000 $500,000 4 Elevator Elevator and Equipment with power EA 1 $75,000 $75,000 5 Utility Relocations 3 Transmission poles LS 1 $500,000 $500,000 6 Site/Civil Grading, sidewalk, drainage, signing LS 1 $150,000 $150,000 7 MOT Maintenance of Traffic LS 1 $50,000 $50,000 8 Miscellaneous Items (10%) Additional Items not specifically listed LS 1 $241,185 $241,185 9 Contingency (10%) Unforseen conditions and changes in scope of work LS 1 $265,304 $265,303.50 10 Mobilization (10%) LS 1 $291,834 $291,833.85 Total $3,210,172 -----------> Say 3-4 M Approx. Order of Magnitude Probable Cost Note: The cost estimates cover construction only and do not include Right-of-way aquisition, subsequent design and construction engineering services or annual operating and maintenance expenses for the project. The costs of special safety and security features such as emergency call stations, closed circuit TV, audio surveillance, central station monitoring etc. are not included. PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE CROSSING FEASIBILITY STUDY: FREEDOM PARK TO GORDON RIVER GREENWAY PARK By Date BAG 6/5/2015 Collier County Project No. 60109.2 Order of Magnitude Estimated Probable Cost - Overpass (Signature Aesthetics) Item 1 Description Remark Special Concrete beams with deck 133.5 Foot Long-, 12 Foot Wide supported near the bottom flange on precast deck panels, Rail, Vinyl Single Span Overpass Fence, Units Quantity Cost/Unit Cost/Item SF 1602 $500 $801,000 2 North Approach Ramp Approx. 150 long by 25 ft wide SF 3750 $225 $843,750 3 North & South Towers including foundations, Aesthetic treatment Approx. size 25 ft x 25 ft EA 2 $300,000 $600,000 4 Elevator Elevator and Equipment with power EA 1 $75,000 $75,000 5 Utility Relocations 3 Transmission poles LS 1 $500,000 $500,000 6 Site/Civil Grading, sidewalk, drainage, signing LS 1 $200,000 $200,000 7 Landscaping Enhancements LS 1 $75,000 $75,000 8 MOT Maintenance of Traffic LS 1 $50,000 $50,000 9 Miscellaneous Items (10%) Additional Items not specifically listed LS 1 $314,475 $314,475 10 Contingency (10%) Unforseen conditions and changes in scope of work LS 1 $345,923 $345,922.50 11 Mobilization (10%) LS 1 $380,515 $380,514.75 Total $4,185,662 -----------> Say 4-5 M Approx. Order of Magnitude Probable Cost Note: The cost estimates cover construction only and do not include Right-of-way aquisition, subsequent design and construction engineering services or annual operating and maintenance expenses for the project. The costs of special safety and security features such as emergency call stations, closed circuit TV, audio surveillance, central station monitoring etc. are not included. PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE CROSSING FEASIBILITY STUDY: FREEDOM PARK TO GORDON RIVER GREENWAY PARK By Date BG 6/5/2015 Collier County Project No. 60109.2 Order of Magnitude Estimated Probable Cost - On-Street Crossing option Item 1 Description Signal Mast Arms Remark Two installations Units EA Quantity 2 Cost/Unit $40,000 Cost/Item $80,000 2 Site/Civil Grading, sidewalk, drainage, signing, striping LS 1 $40,000 $40,000 3 MOT Maintenance of Traffic LS 1 $15,000 $15,000 4 Miscellaneous Items (10%) Additional Items not specifically listed LS 1 $13,500 $13,500 5 Contingency (10%) Unforseen conditions and changes in scope of work LS 1 $14,850 $14,850.00 6 Mobilization (10%) LS 1 $16,335 $16,335.00 Total $179,685 -----------> Say 200 K Approx. Order of Magnitude Probable Cost Note: The cost estimates cover construction only and do not include Right-of-way aquisition, subsequent design and construction engineering services or annual operating and maintenance expenses for the project. The costs of special safety and security features such as emergency call stations, closed circuit TV, audio surveillance, central station monitoring etc. are not included. PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE CROSSING FEASIBILITY STUDY: FREEDOM PARK TO GORDON RIVER GREENWAY PARK By Date BG 9/23/2015 Collier County Project No. 60109.2 Order of Magnitude Estimated Probable Cost - Underpass Item Description Remark Units Quantity Cost/Unit Cost/Item 1 CONCRETE BOX 14'x10' inside opening LF 122 $3,000 $364,500 2 APPROACH RAMPS/STAIRS Access at each end SF 4200 $80.00 $336,000 3 BRIDGE #030172 REPLACEMENT Due to added height of fill, existing structure may need to be replaced SF 6014 $200 $1,202,850 4 SITE/CIVIL 1800 LF of roadway reconstruction with driveway connections LS 1 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 5 PUMPING STATION DRAINAGE Tunnel grade will likely be depressed in the water table to minimize raising GG Pkwy LS 1 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 6 PERMANENT MSE WALLS Required on each side of Golden Gate Parkway SF 18000 $26 $468,000 7 TEMPORARY MSE WALLS Required for phased construction SF 10800 $10.00 $108,000 8 TEMPORARY-SHEET PILING Required for cofferdams for dewatering and box construction SF 6250 $15.00 $93,750 9 MOT Phased construction required LS 1 $500,000.00 $500,000 10 Miscellaneous Items (10%) Additional Items not specifically listed LS 1 $607,310.00 $607,310 11 Contingency (10%) Unforseen conditions and changes in scope of work LS 1 $668,041.00 $668,041 12 Mobilization (10%) LS 1 $734,845 $734,845 Total $8,083,296 Note: Assume raising Golden Gate Parkway profile by 10 ft. requiring walls on each side approx. 900 ft to allow reasonable grades. Connections to Freedom park and Gordon River Greenway will have to be elevated. PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE CROSSING FEASIBILITY STUDY: PARCEL OWNER MAP BUECHEL FAMILY LTD PARTNERSHIP BUECHEL FAMILY LTD PARTNERSHIP REFERENCE ONLY WILDERNESS COUNTRY CLUB INC ¨ BARNETT BANKS TRUST CO N A GREY OAKS COUNTRY CLUB INC ESTUARY AT GREY OAKS LTD COLLIER COUNTY COLLIER CNTY       Moorings Inc (April 2014) COLLIER COUNTY FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF NAPLES GREY OAKS COUNTRY CLUB INC FLEISCHMANN ET AL TR, CHARLES COLLIER COUNTY FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF NAPLES FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF NAPLES FLEISCHMANN ET AL TR, CHARLES FLEISCHMANN ET AL TR, CHARLES FLEISCHMANN ET AL TR, CHARLES     BEARS PAW COUNTRY CLUB INC HODGES TR, EARL G FLEISCHMANN ET AL TR, CHARLES FLEISCHMANN ET AL TR, CHARLES FLEISCHMANN ET AL TR, CHARLES STONEBURNER, CRIS STONEBURNER, CRIS SKIZAS, ALEX=& EVELYN STONEBURNER TR, DONALD L FLEISCHMANN III, CHARLES FLEISCHMANN ET AL TR, CHARLES FLEISCHMANN ET AL TR, CHARLES 1 inch = 300 feet Godbole, Bhushan/JAX From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Ahmad, Adam/SWF Friday, June 05, 2015 12:14 PM Godbole, Bhushan/JAX Gramer, Bill/SWF RE: 2014 Parcel Data   It appears that the parcel to the south was sold to Moorings Inc in April of last year.      Adam Ahmad P.E.  Civil Engineer  Licensed General Contractor  1   Godbole, Bhushan/JAX From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Ahmad, Adam/SWF Friday, June 05, 2015 12:17 PM Godbole, Bhushan/JAX Gramer, Bill/SWF FW: Emailing: IRTH One Call.htm See below for the one call.    Adam Ahmad P.E.  Civil Engineer  Licensed General Contractor  Transportation Business Group  D 1 239 431 9212   M 1 239 273 8894     CH2M  5801 Pelican Bay Blvd  Naples, Fl, 34119    www.ch2m.com   LinkedIn   Twitter   Facebook    From: Chandler, Donna/WPB   Sent: Friday, June 05, 2015 12:16 PM  To: Ahmad, Adam/SWF  Subject: Emailing: IRTH One Call.htm  Ticket : 156503361 Rev:000 Taken: 06/05/15 10:58ET State: FL Cnty: COLLIER GeoPlace: NAPLES CallerPlace: NAPLES Subdivision: Address : Street : GOLDEN GATE PKWY Cross 1 : GOODLETTE FRANK RD N Within 1/4 mile: Y Locat: STARTING APPROX 1/2 MILE E OF THE INTER OF GOODLETTE FRANK RD N FOR DESIGN COVER A 500FT RADIUS AROUND THE CENTER LINE OF GOLDEN GATE PKWY : Remarks : IN RESPONSE TO RECEIPT OF A DESIGN TICKET, SSOCOF PROVIDES THE ORIGINATOR OF THE DESIGN TICKET WITH A LIST OF SSOCOF MEMBERS IN THE VICINITY OF THE DESIGN PROJECT. SSOCOF DOES NOT NOTIFY SSOCOF MEMBERS OF THE RECEIPT BY SSOCOF OF A DESIGN TICKET. IT IS THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE DESIGN ENGINEER TO CONTACT SSOCOF MEMBERS TO REQUEST INFORMATION ABOUT THE LOCATION OF SSOCOF MEMBERS' UNDERGROUND FACILITIES. SUBMISSION OF A DESIGN TICKET WILL NOT SATISFY THE REQUIREMENT OF CHAPTER 556, FLORIDA STATUTES, TO NOTIFY SSOCOF OF AN INTENT TO EXCAVATE OR DEMOLISH. THAT INTENT MUST BE MADE KNOWN SPECIFICALLY TO SSOCOF IN THE MANNER REQUIRED BY LAW. IN AN EFFORT TO SAVE TIME ON FUTURE CALLS, SAVE YOUR DESIGN TICKET NUMBER IF YOU INTEND TO BEGIN EXCAVATION WITHIN 90 DAYS OF 1 YOUR DESIGN REQUEST. THE DESIGN TICKET CAN BE REFERENCED , AND THE INFORMATION ON IT CAN BE USED TO SAVE TIME WHEN YOU CALL IN THE EXCAVATION REQUEST. *** LOOKUP BY MANUAL *** : Grids : 2610B8146A 2610B8147D 2610C8146A 2610C8147D Work date: 06/05/15 Time: 10:59ET Hrs notc: 000 Category: 6 Duration: UNKNOWN Due Date : 06/09/15 Time: 23:59ET Exp Date : 07/06/15 Time: 23:59ET Work type: DESIGN Boring: N White-lined: N Ug/Oh/Both: U Machinery: N Depth: UNK Permits: N N/A Done for : DESIGN Company : Co addr : Co addr2: City : Caller : Contact : BestTime: Fax : Email : CH2M HILL Type: CONT 3001 PGA BLVD SUITE 201A PALM BEACH GARDENS State: FL Zip: 33410 DONNA CHANDLER Phone: 561-904-7400 DESIGN Phone: 8-6 561-904-7401 DONNA.CHANDLER@CH2M.COM Submitted: 06/05/15 10:58ET Oper: PRI Mbrs : CC1255 CN1745 CON762 CPW592 CTV413 FPLCLR FPLFOW KC1538 LS1104 PGSSW Mbrs : UTI303 Service Area Service Area Name Code Contact Phone Numbers Utility Type CC1255 COLLIER COUNTY TRAFFIC OPERATIONS SECTION PAM WILSON Day: (239) 252 - 8260 ELEC & FIBER CN1745 CITY OF NAPLESSEWER ALICIA ACEVEDO Day: (239) 213 - 4712 SEWER CON762 CITY OF NAPLESWATER ALICIA ACEVEDO Day: (239) 213 - 4712 WATER CPW592 COLLIER COUNTY STAKE & LOCATES NATHAN BEALS Day: (239) 252 - 2583 ELEC AND SEWER CTV413 COMCAST WILLIAM STANTON Day: (239) 432 - 1861 Alt: (239) 707 - 4168 CATV FPLCLR FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT--COLLIER TRACY STERN Day: (800) 868 - 9554 Alt: (386) 329 - 5152 ELECTRIC FPLFOW FPL FIBERNET LLC DANNY HASKETT** Day: (305) 552 - 2931 Alt: (786) 246 - 7827 FIBER KC1538 SUMMIT BROADBAND INC. MIKE REBER Day: (239) 325 - 4105 x261 FIBER Alt: (239) 631 - 9251 2 PGSSW TECO PEOPLES GAS - FT BROCK MYERS DANIELS Day: (239) 690 - 5517 Alt: (239) 896 - 0812 GAS UTI303 CENTURYLINKNAPLES Day: (239) 263 - 6234 PHONE & FIBER OPTIC JIGS SLIANG 3 Existing Bridge Culvert No. 030172 over Gordon River . 6/1/2015 Uglybridges.com   GOLDEN GATE PKWY over GORDON RIVER, Collier County, Florida GOLDEN GATE PKWY over GORDON RIVER Collier County, Florida Enlarge map Map  Google Maps Yahoo! Maps Bing Maps MSR Maps OpenStreetMap Coordinates: +26.17361, ­81.78417 26°10'25" N, 81°47'03" W Map data Report ©2015 a mapGoogle error Facts  Source: National Bridge Inventory Information not verified. Use at your own risk. Name: GOLDEN GATE PKWY over GORDON RIVER Structure number: 030172 Location: 1.18MI WEST OF CR­31 Purpose: Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway Route classification: Local (Urban) [19] Length of largest span: 11.5 ft. [3.5 m] Total length: 49.5 ft. [15.1 m] Skew angle: Owner: Year built: http://uglybridges.com/1078088 29° County Highway Agency [02] 1963 4/6 6/1/2015 Uglybridges.com   GOLDEN GATE PKWY over GORDON RIVER, Collier County, Florida Historic significance: Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] Design load: MS 18 / HS 20 [5] Number of main spans:4 Main spans material: Concrete [1] Main spans design: Culvert [19] Deck type: Not applicable [N] Latest Available Inspection: March 2012  Status: Open, no restriction [A] Average daily 27,904 [as of 2012] traffic: Truck 5% of total traffic traffic: Structural Better than present minimum criteria [7] appraisal: Water adequacy Equal to present minimum criteria [6] appraisal: Roadway alignment Better than present minimum criteria [7] appraisal: Channel Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection protection: have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] Shrinkage cracks, light scaling and insignificant spalling which does not expose reinforcing Culvert steel. Insignificant damage caused by drift with no misalignment and not requiring corrective condition: action. Some minor scouring has occured near curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth symmetrical curvature with superficial corrosion and no pitting. [7] Scour Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] condition: Operating 87.7 tons [79.7 metric tons] rating: Inventory 52.5 tons [47.7 metric tons] rating: Sufficiency 72.3 rating: Previous Inspections  Date March 2012 March 2010 March 2008 March 2006 March 2004 Suff. rating 72.3 72.3 72.3 80.1 78.1 Evaluation Not deficient Not deficient Not deficient Not deficient Not deficient ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ADT 27904 27904 27904 10800 10800 January 2003 78.1 Not deficient ­ ­ ­ 10800 http://uglybridges.com/1078088 Deck Super. Sub. 5/6 6/1/2015 January 2001 January 1999 January 1997 January 1995 January 1993 December 1990 Uglybridges.com   GOLDEN GATE PKWY over GORDON RIVER, Collier County, Florida 78.1 69.2 70.2 71.3 66.5 88.7 Not deficient Not deficient Not deficient Not deficient Functionally obsolete Not deficient ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ 10800 10800 10800 10000 10000 10000 Uglybridges.com: National Bridge Inventory data [ Locations   Search   Cities   Forum   About   Bridgehunter.com ] © Copyright 2012­14, James Baughn Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified. This page's URL is http://uglybridges.com/1078088 http://uglybridges.com/1078088 6/6 DISTRICT COUNTY OWNER Southwest Florida Southwest Florida Southwest Florida Collier Collier Collier County Highway Agency State Highway Agency County Highway Agency 030147 030148 030149 Southwest Florida Southwest Florida Southwest Florida Southwest Florida Southwest Florida Southwest Florida Southwest Florida Southwest Florida Southwest Florida Southwest Florida Southwest Florida Southwest Florida Southwest Florida Southwest Florida Collier Collier Collier Collier Collier Collier Collier Collier Collier Collier Collier Collier Collier Collier County Highway Agency County Highway Agency County Highway Agency County Highway Agency County Highway Agency County Highway Agency County Highway Agency County Highway Agency County Highway Agency County Highway Agency County Highway Agency County Highway Agency County Highway Agency County Highway Agency Southwest Florida Southwest Florida Southwest Florida Southwest Florida Southwest Florida Southwest Florida Southwest Florida Southwest Florida Southwest Florida Southwest Florida Southwest Florida Southwest Florida Southwest Florida Southwest Florida Collier Collier Collier Collier Collier Collier Collier Collier Collier Collier Collier Collier Collier Collier Southwest Florida Southwest Florida Southwest Florida Southwest Florida Southwest Florida Southwest Florida Southwest Florida Southwest Florida Southwest Florida Southwest Florida Southwest Florida Southwest Florida Southwest Florida Southwest Florida Southwest Florida Southwest Florida Southwest Florida Southwest Florida Southwest Florida Southwest Florida Southwest Florida Southwest Florida Southwest Florida Southwest Florida Southwest Florida YEAR LAST SUFFICIENCY HEALTH NBI BUILT RECONSTRUCTED INSPECTION RATING INDEX RATING ROADWAY ADT FACILITY CROSSED CR-841 OVER HALFWAY CREEK JUDGE JOLLY MEMORIAL BLUEBILL AVE / NAPLES PARK CANAL BIRDON RD - CR-841 SR-951 NB(COLLIER) BLUEBILL AVE CR846 100 14,250 5,000 HALFWAY CREEK BIG MARCO PASS NAPLES PARK CANAL 1971 1969 1969 1/6/2015 4/12/2013 2/4/2015 93.5 92.3 81.1 87.39 90.37 95.30 030150 030153 030154 030155 030156 030157 030158 030160 030161 030165 030166 030168 030169 030172 CR-858/FAKA UNION CANAL CR 858/OKALOACOOCHEE SLOUGH CR 858/OKALOACOOCHEE SLOUGH CR 858 /OKALOACOOCHEE SLOUGH CR 858 / OKALOACOOCHEE SLOUGH CR-837 OVER FAKAHATCHEE STRAND CR 858 OVER OBIE CANAL CR-846 OVER GATOR CANAL CR-29 OVER CHOKOLOSKEE BAY CR-837 / DEEP LAKE STRAND CR 839 / COPELAND PRAIRIE CR 839 / EAST HINSON MARSH CR 839 / EAST HINSON MARSH GOLDEN GATE PKWY/GORDON RIVER CR-858 CR 858 CR 858 CR 858 CR 858 CR-837 CR 858 CR-846 CR-29 (COPELAND AV CR 837 TURNER RIVER ROAD CR 839 CR 839 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 2,880 1,070 1,440 1,000 1,000 1,500 110 5,777 2,500 200 20 20 20 27,904 FAKA UNION CANAL OKALOACOOCHEE SLOUGH OKALOACOOCHEE SLOUGH OKALOACOOCHEE SLOUGH OKALOACOOCHEE SLOUGH FAKAHATCHEE STRAND OBIE CANAL GATOR CANAL CHOKOLOSKEE BAY DEEP LAKE STRAND COPELAND PRAIRIE EAST HINSON MARSH EAST HINSON MARSH GORDON RIVER 1966 1951 1951 1951 1951 1955 1953 1955 1955 1959 1960 1962 1962 1963 3/12/2015 3/12/2013 3/12/2013 3/12/2013 3/12/2013 1/7/2015 3/12/2015 4/25/2013 1/6/2015 4/17/2013 4/17/2013 4/17/2013 4/17/2013 3/5/2014 73.6 68.1 67.2 68.1 68.1 62.6 79.2 87.7 45.9 74.5 80.7 78.3 78.3 72.3 94.98 94.53 90.64 96.29 99.25 91.18 90.49 72.83 83.84 84.54 77.20 90.86 67.01 80.07 County Highway Agency County Highway Agency County Highway Agency State Highway Agency State Highway Agency County Highway Agency County Highway Agency County Highway Agency State Highway Agency State Highway Agency State Highway Agency State Highway Agency State Highway Agency State Highway Agency 030174 030177 030178 030181 030183 030184 030185 030186 030189 030190 030193 030194 030195 030196 CR-951/BIG CYPRESS BASIN CANAL VANDERBILT DR/LITTLE HORSE PASS VANDERBILT DR/CR901OVER CANAL US-41 OVER DUNRUSS CREEK US-41 NB OVER HALDEMAN RIVER GOODLAND BRIDGE/STAN GOBER MEMORI AIRPORT PULLING ROAD/BIG CYPRESS BAS CR-31 OVER ROCK CREEK I-75 SB OVER ROCK CANAL I-75 NB OVER ROCK CANAL US 41 SB/TAYLOR GLEAM CANAL US 41 OVER GATOR HOLE I-75 NB OVER SR-951 I-75 SB OVER SR-951 CR951/COLLIER BLVD VANDERBILT DR VANDERBILT DR US-41 (SR-45) US 41NB TAMIAMI TR CR-92 SAN MARCO RD AIRPORT PULLING RD AIRPORT RD.(CR-31) I-75 SB (SR93) I-75 NB (SR93) US-41SB TAMIAMI TR US 41 (SR 90) I-75 NB (SR-93) I-75 SB (SR-93) 10,000 11,500 15,000 35,500 16,500 3,000 53,363 45,473 43,500 43,500 17,250 2,400 10,111 10,111 BIG CYPRESS BASIN CANAL LITTLE HORSE PASS CANAL DUNRUSS CREEK HALDEMAN RIVER MARCO CHANNEL BIG CYPRESS BASIN CANAL ROCK CREEK ROCK CANAL ROCK CANAL TAYLOR GLEAM CANAL GATOR HOLE SR-951 SR-951 1973 1964 1964 1974 1976 1975 1978 1979 1980 1980 1976 1976 1984 1984 3/4/2014 2/4/2015 2/4/2015 4/18/2013 3/11/2015 2/11/2015 3/5/2014 3/5/2014 4/10/2013 4/10/2013 4/23/2013 3/27/2014 3/4/2015 3/4/2015 81.8 56.7 81.2 70 82 96 63.8 65.3 96.3 96.3 98.2 91.2 94 93 88.50 86.76 70.89 99.76 99.50 86.64 99.52 85.35 92.71 98.20 98.60 66.67 99.73 99.87 Collier Collier Collier Collier Collier Collier Collier Collier Collier Collier Collier Collier Collier Collier Collier State Highway Agency State Highway Agency State Highway Agency State Highway Agency State Highway Agency State Highway Agency State Highway Agency State Highway Agency City or Municipal Highway Agency City or Municipal Highway Agency County Highway Agency State Highway Agency State Highway Agency State Highway Agency State Highway Agency 030197 030198 030199 030200 030201 030202 030203 030205 030207 030209 030210 030211 030212 030213 030214 I-75 SB/GOLDEN GATE CANAL I-75 NB / GOLDEN GATE CANAL GOLDEN GATE PKWY OVER I-75 I-75 SB over CR 896 I-75 NB OVER CR 896 I-75 SB OVER CR 862 I-75 NB OVER CR 862 SANTA BARBARA BLVD / I-75 N COLLIER BLVD OVER CLAM BAY N COLLIER BLVD OVER SMOKEHOUSE BAY W PLANTATION PKWY OVER EVERGLADES SR-29 / WERE OUTA DOUGH CANAL SR-29 OVER GRASSY POND SR-29 OVER ZLOTY CANAL I-75 NB/GOLDEN GATE CANAL I-75 SB (SR-93) I-75 NB (SR-93) CR886(GLDN GT PKY) I-75 SB (SR 93) I-75 NB (SR 93) I-75 SB (SR 93) I-75 NB (SR 93) SANTA BARBARA BLVD N COLLIER BLVD N COLLIER BLVD W PLANTATION PKWY SR-29 SR-29 SR-29 I-75 (SR-93) NB 17,250 17,250 40,500 29,000 29,000 32,712 32,712 32,000 15,800 9,800 673 2,200 2,200 2,200 10,111 GOLDEN GATE CANAL GOLDEN GATE CANAL I-75 AND CANAL C-1 CR 896/PINE RIDGE RD CR 896/PINE RIDGE RD CR862(VANDERBILT BCH RD) CR862(VANDERBILT BCH RD) I-75 (SR 93) CLAM BAY SMOKEHOUSE BAY EVERGLADES DRAIN CANAL WERE OUTA DOUGH CANAL GRASSY POND ZLOTY CANAL GOLDEN GATE CANAL 1984 1984 1984 1983 1983 1983 1983 1984 1979 1971 1985 1986 1986 1986 1990 3/5/2015 3/5/2015 3/10/2015 3/3/2015 3/2/2015 3/3/2015 3/12/2013 3/13/2013 1/14/2015 1/29/2015 1/6/2015 3/12/2014 3/12/2014 3/11/2014 3/14/2013 91.6 92.6 88.5 94 94 91.4 83 73.6 95.8 57.1 88.1 94.3 93.2 94.3 96.2 92.45 93.01 99.48 99.95 99.84 99.90 99.96 99.99 97.88 96.79 99.22 98.36 97.24 99.10 96.12 Collier Collier Collier Collier Collier Collier Collier Collier Collier Collier State Highway Agency State Highway Agency State Highway Agency State Highway Agency State Highway Agency State Highway Agency State Highway Agency State Highway Agency State Highway Agency State Highway Agency 030215 030216 030217 030218 030219 030220 030221 030222 030223 030224 I-75 SB/STUMPY STRAND I-75 SB / WILDLIFE XING I-75 NB / FAKA UNION CANAL I-75 NB / LUCKY LADY STRAND I-75 NB/STUMPY STRAND W.L. XING I-75 NB / WILDLIFE XING I-75 SB/PENNINGTON CAMP I-75 NB/PENNINGTON CAMP I-75 NB OVER KOJAK CREEK I-75 SB OVER WEST HINTON I-75 SB (SR-93) I-75 (SR-93) I-75 (SR-93) NB I-75 NB (SR-93) I-75 NB (SR-93) I-75 (SR-93) NB I-75/SR-93 SB I-75/SR-93 NB I-75/SR-93 NB I-75/SR-93 SB 10,111 10,111 10,111 10,111 10,111 10,111 10,111 10,111 10,111 10,111 STUMPY STRAND W.L. X-ING TURNBACK SLOUGH FAKA UNION CANAL LUCKY LADY STRAND STUMPY STRAND W.L. X-ING TURNBACK SLOUGH PENNINGTON CAMP WC X 4 PENNINGTON CAMP WC X 4 KOJAK CREEK WILDLIFE CROSSING NO-6 1990 1990 1990 1990 1990 1990 1989 1989 1989 1989 3/11/2015 5/21/2013 3/5/2013 3/11/2015 3/5/2013 5/21/2013 5/21/2013 5/21/2013 5/21/2013 5/30/2013 96.2 97.2 96.2 96.2 96.2 97.2 80.5 80.5 86 86.3 100.00 100.00 99.98 84.07 99.89 99.96 98.87 100.00 99.65 98.73 Wednesday, April 01, 2015 BRIDGE STRUCTURE NAME Page 148 of 216 1977 1984 1999 2009 2009 2002 2006 2009 2010 2008 2009 2009 NBI=National Bridge Inventory ADT=Average Daily Traffic SD=Structurally Deficient FO=Functionally Obsolete FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO