11-. Add?? 1-. b52272 taf?p?t? Tahiti-tee ?fig 11;. tat 'h ?e is ails-asst Essie . ?w ?l SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFURNIA 1 1.. COUNTY or so: FnAnersco - in the matter of season WARRANT for: I REQUEST Ase PERSON son SEALING WARRANT, VEHICLE AFFIDAVIT EOR SEARCH WARRANT, OR Positron or THE WARMNT PHONE CARRIER: Verizon Wireless PURSUANT TO PENAL CODE 15418 i INCIDENTREPORT 190' 149 152 EWDENCE cope teas, 11141, 11142; and SEARCH WARRANT - CALIFORNIA ROLES or COURT 3.550(d) INVESTIGATING OFFICER: Joseph Obidt . CONTACT 415?882?8431 MUST CHECK 01? OTHER INFORMATION: . 1) SEALED 2) SEALED sermon Your Affiant, Sergeant Joseph Obidi #2323Lrequests that: 1) This Search Warrant sought pursuant to the Search Warrant Affidavit! Statement of Probable Cause and Return to Search.Warrant and. all documents relevant to this Search Warrant be ordered sealed; 2) This portion of the Search Warrant Affidavit and Statement of Probabie Cause he ordered sealed; Bi, i'e Magistrate in order to implement the privilege under Evidence Code 1040 to 1042 and to protect the identity of an}r con?dential infonnant(s) and/or of?cial nifonnation, puissant to the Supreme Court decision in the People Hobbs (1994) 7 Cal. 4th 948, and California Rule of Court 2 550(d) If an}r of the information within the requested sealed Search Warrant o1 portion of the Affidavit and Statement-of Probable Cause is made public, it will reveal or tend to reveal the identity of any confidential infortnant(s), impair ?lrther 1eiated investigations and endanger the iife of the con?dential informant(s). I declare under penalty of perjury that the related fo1egoing 13 true and correct to the best ofmy knowledge - ORDER Based upon'a review of the Search Warrant Af?davit, this court ?nds that there exists an overriding interest that overcomes the right of the public access to the record; the overriding interest supports sealing the record, a substantial probability exists that the overriding interest will be prejudiced if the record is not sealed, the proposed scaling is narrowly tailored, and no less restrictive means exists to achieve the overriding interest. Therefore it is ordered that the Search Warrant andtor pottion of the Search Warrant Af?davit} Statement of Probable Canoe, Retu AI - . ch Warrant and all relevant documents be sealed and maintained in'a secure Signature of Affiant: . ?fomia, County of San Francisco. IE .4 #453131? (Printed Name of Magisti ate) I REARCR WARRANT ISSUED WARRANT RETURN DATE State of Gatifornia? Gity of San Francisco season wannaur nun asslonvn mannaoni i" i Sergeant Joseph Obidi #2328 swears under oath that the facts expressed by her in the attached and incorporated Statement of Probable Cause, are true and that based there on he has probable cause to believe and does believe that the personfs), property. andior thingls] described below isiare lawfully seizabie pursuant to Penal Code Section 1524, as Indicated below, and isr'are nowiooated at the locations set forth below. Wherefore, attiant requests that this Search, Warrant be issued. HOBBS EEALING REQUESTED: YES (XX) N0 NIGHT SERVICE REQUESTED: YES i i N0 Signature trans-rs (sensor-i wannanri THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA TO ANY SHERIFF. POLICE OFFICER OR PEACE OFFICER THE COUNTY OF SAN GA: proof by affidavit having been made before me by Sergeant Joseph #2328,- that there is probable cause to believe that the property, personts), andior things described'herein may be found at the locations set forth herein and that It Is lawfully saleable pursuant to Penal Code Section 1524 as indicated below by in that it: tends to show the property Was stolen or embezzled. YOU titRE THEREFORE CQMMANDEQ TO Verizon; Attn: ?80 Washington Valley Road 'Bedminster. NJ 07921 Fax: 8386610028 FOR THE PERSON AND For the cell phone number 415-699-7381 related records, Verizon shall provide the San Francisco Police Department the following: See Exhibit A Additionally, it is the ORDER of this court that: Peace Officers and anyone enlisted to aid the searching officers in the service of. this search warrant pursuant to California Penal Code Section 1530 are authorized to conduct remote monitoring of the Subject Telephone Number device, day or night, including these signals produced in public, or locations not open to public or visual surveillance. if necessary, searching officers are authorized to employ the use of outside experts, acting under the direct control of the investigating officers. to access and preserve any electronic data. That searching officers ma}I delay receipt requirement of Penai'Code section _1 535, untii the conclusion of the investigation, or titles contents of this Search Warrant are sealed, at such time as ordered by the Court or any competent court. Non-Disclosure Ordered pursuant to 13 USC and California Penal Code 1524.3 Verizon SHALL NOT disclose to USER, OTHER USERS or anyr other person of the existence or content of i *?searoh warrant until further order of this court. "i request that this information be delivered to me via e~maii'at: Joseph.A.Obidi@sfgov.org. or if in disk format, please mail to San Francisco Police Department, 1245 Third Street San Francisco, CA. 94158, Attn Joseph Obidi (Internal Affairs Criminal Division). . nearest 1 AND EN THE CASE 3? PRQPERTV, ANDIQR THINGS, Ti) SEIZE THEM iF FOUND and bring itithem forthwith before me, or this court. at the courthouse of this court. This Search Warrant and ed Statement Probe ie Cause was swowe? scribed before me - I 33115 day of (245 r/ . 2019 at 5 . M. herefcre, I find probable cause for the issuance of this SearcFi W?errant and do issue it. . eemme YES i i NIGHTSERVSCE AUTHORIZED: "re 1 1 Q, City and County of San Francisco. CA. ((06:99) - I 2 . QF CITY AND CQUNTY GI: SAN RETURN TO SEARCH WARRANT Sgt. Joseph Qbidi #2328, being sworn, says that she conducted a search pursUant to the below described search warrant: .- Search Warrant/Case number: issuing Magistrate: The Honorable Judge East. Magistrate's Court: Superiortt 466 City and County oi San Francisco. Date of Issuance: 0310112019 Date of Service: 03f01/2019 and searched and seized the? followingitems: Subscriber Information Call Detail Records, 8M8 Usage. and Mobile Data Usage with can Site (Data I further swearthat this is a true and detailed account'of all the property taken by me pursuant to the search warrant and that pursuant to Penal Code Sections 1528 and 1536 this property will be retained in my Custody. subject to the order of this court or of any other court in Which the offense in g- 0? tipect to which the seized property is triable. - i; a: to" Be advised that pursuant to California Penal Code Sections 1539-and 1540, you may file a written motionin the court of the above?named magistrate who issued the search warrant, seeking the return of the property seized pursuant to this warrant. For further information concerning this search warrant contact Sgt. Obidl #2328 at telephone number '415?882~843?l. (erg/nature eminent) .gzotsu Honorable 3. . Judge of the Superio. Department ?824: (i jgy and County of San Francisco, California nos/sat 3' Statement Of Probable Cause of Sergeant Joseph Dbidl #2323 Your Affiant Joseph Obidi is a Police Officer in and for the City and County of San Francisco, California. Your Afflant hasbeen so employed since 2008 and is currently assigned to the internal Affairs Criminal investigation Division holding the rank of Sergeant. was previously assigned to Mission Station Housing Team. During this time, i have investigated crimes related to burglaries and thefts. I have conducted investigations in the field of narcotics, including but not llmited to operations, and buyi?walk operations. I have also worked directly and indirectly with more experienced officers in the field of narcotics. Additionally, I have successfully completed the following training courses: . San Francisco Police Academy Robert Presley Institute of Criminal Investigation (iCl) Basic Core Course Search Warrants 101 (POST) Sex Crimes investigation (SFPD Academy) Basic Narcotics Course (SFPD Academy) 6 a 0 The facts alleged in this affidavit do not necessarily represent all facts known or gathered to date - :gsgarding this investigation, but the affidavit does include all known exculpatory information and has not had any illegal conduct or observations redacted or exercised from It. The facts averred herein i believe are those necessary to establish probable cause necessary to search and seize the things identified in this warrant application. lam familiarwith the facts set forth below from personal observations. The observations and investigations by other law enforcement officers was relayed to me in conversation and through written reports, from records andlor other documents and other evidence obtained as a result of this investigation. The below information is set forth solely for the purpose of establishing probable cause for the search warrant and does not represent the entire universe of information i possess about the facts of this case. . Crimes being investigated: 148(ail'l) Every person who willfully resists, delays, or obstructs any public officer, peace officer, or an emergency medical technician, as defined in Division 2.5 (commencing with Section of the Health and Safety Code, in the discharge or attempt to discharge any duty of his or her office or employment, when no other punishment is prescribed, shall be punished by a fine not exceeding one thouaand dollars or by imprisonment in a county jail not to exceed one year, or by both that fine and imprisonment. - 484(a} Every person who shall feloniously steal, take, carry, lead, or drive delay the personal property of another, or who shall fraudulently appropriate property which has been entrusted him or her, or who shall knowingly and designedly, by any false or fraudulent ~-f"epresentation or pretense, defraud any other person of money, labor or real or personal property, or who causes or procures others to report falsely of his or her wealth or mercantile character and by thus imposing upon any person, obtains credit and thereby fraudulently gets {resins} or obtains possession? of money, or property or obtains the labor or service of another, is guilty of theft. in determining the valne of the property'obtained, for the purposes at this section, the-reasonabie and fair'rnarltet value shall be the test, and in determining the value of "?iaervices received the contract price shall be the test. if there beno contract price, the reasonable and going wage for the service rendered shail govern. For the purposes of this section1 any false or fraudulent representation or pretense made shall be treated as continuing, so as to cover any money, property or service received as a result thereof, and the complaint, information or indictment may charge that the crime was committed on any date during the particuiar period in question. The hiring of any additional employee or employees without advising each of them of every labor claim due and unpaid and every judgment that the employer has been unable to meet shalt be prima facie evidence of intent to defraud. initial incident: On 62128f2019 was assigned by Acting Lieutenant Watts #1594 to investigate'the theft of a San Francisco incident report #190~134-636 and interference and obstruction of the confidential suspicioUs death investigation of the high ranking elected public official Jeff Adaohi. Jeff Adachl was the elected Public Defender for the City and County of San Francisco. He was pronounced dead on Friday February 22?? 2018 at approximately 1654. Acting Lleutenant Watts provided me with a copy of SFPD incident Report #190?134-636. I reviewed the SPFD incident report and learned the following: On 2r'22f2019 at approximately 2637 hours Ofc. Stoffel #2736 and Officer Miliigan #1254 responded to 46 __Telegraph Place to meet with a Medical Examiner regarding the death of the public defender. While itflicers Stoffel and Milligan were notified by dispatch that they were no longer needed and the call was dancelled. Based on the. suspicious nature of the call, Officer phoned the Medical Examiner to determine if the police were needed to assist. Officer spoke with Wirowek #101, the Director of Operations for the Medical Examiner Office. erowek confirmed the death of the Public Defender, Jeff Adachi. with his death being pronounced at 1854 hours. Wirowek stated he did not have reason to believe 46 Telegraph Place contained a crime scene but the death was still under investigation. Based on the information provided, Officer atong with Ofc. Stofiel, Sgt. L. Ng #42901 Sgt. Tourney #1262. Sgt. Chan #1464 and'Sgt. O'Mahoney #1928 responded to 45 Telegraph Piece In an attempt to locate a possible crime scene. 46 Telegraph Place is a 3 story apartment building with a metal gated entrance. Upon their arrival. the metal gate was open. The Officers? knocks on the door to 46 Telegraph Pl. went unanswered. Officer Milligan was advised that Night lnvestigatlons Unit wonfd be responding to investigate. Ofc. Staffs! and Officer Milligan, along other of?cers on scene froze 46 Telegraph Place to maintain the integrity of a possible crime scene and preservation of evidence. While on scene, Officers were approached by The Le who identified herself as a neighbor living at 36 Telegraph Place. Le stated on 02f22f2619 at approximately 1?20 hours she was on her way to her apartment to get a handbag. Le stated as she was walking by 46 Telegraph Pl. she observed a female which she did not recognize. Le described the female as either a white or Hispanic female between the age of 38 and 48 years old with dark brown curly hair. Le stated the female on the phone appeared to be "frantic" and asking questions awhcmever she was taiklng to. Le stated she has lived on the street for approximately 1 NZ years and has --l-iiaver seen anybody at 46 Teiegraph Pl. Le came to her own conclusion that 46 Telegraph place was an Air and the female was having a problem with the apartment. Le stated she went into her own apartment, got her handbag and then exited. Le stated she was in her apartment for approximateiy 10 seconds and when she . 5 . . went back outside. the female she had seen was gone. Le stated she did not think much of the female and her observations lasted probably lees than 10 seconds. iivhen NIU arrived on scene. Sgt. Payne was able to obtain the foilowing time line based on San Francisco Fire Department (SFFD) GAD entries: At 1741 hours a 911 call was placed by a female who identified herself as "Caterina? and told the dispatcher that a male had drank 2 glasses of wine. Had a stomach ache. Took a pill and was now not breathing. At 1751 hours King American 11 medic unit arrived on scene. King American was operated by Joe Ramirez and Anthony Sossa. At 1315 hodrs CPR was in progress. At 1829 hours King American was enroute with the male subject. At 1839'hours King American arrived at CPiviC. itwae later discovered that Dr. Chandra determined the time of death to be 1854 hours. Sgt. Payne spoke with Medics! Examiner investigator Wirowek who was at the hospital. Wirowektold Sgt. Payne that he was speaking with a female who had been on scene. Wirowek advised that he would be responding to 45 Telegraph Pl with the female. Wirowek advised that his office had confirmed the identity of Adachi and taken custody of his body pending further investigation. Wirowek along with medical examiner investigator (1681) #114 arrived on scene with a female, identified as (R3) Susie Knits. Kurtz stated at approximately 174-3 hours she received a phone cat! from a female identified as "Caterina" from Adachi's cell phone. Kurtz stated "Caterina" sounded hysterical and told her "something was wrong with Jeff?. Kurt: stated she wasn't too faraway and responded to 48 Telegraph PL. Kurtz stated a fire engine and an ambuiance was already on scene when she arrived. Kurt: stated she went into the apartment where medic units- Were working on Adaohi in the bedroom. Kurt: stated she observed "Caterina" in the hallway who was crying. Kurt: stated she waited in the living room area for a short time untlt she saw medics wheel Adachi out on a stretcher and into the ambuiance. Kurtz stated "Caterina" told her the two of them had been out to dinner at a-nearby unspeci?ed restaurant. "Caterina? toid Kurtz that Adaohi began to complain of stomach pains at-the restaurant so they took an ride back to 46 Telegraph Pi. "Caterina" toid Kurtz Adachi told her to go to the store and get him an tnspecliied medication. "Caterina? told Kuriz that Adactil then became unresponsive and she called for medics 6h Adachis phone. Kurtz stated she has known Adaohl as a friend for approximately 10 years. K?urtz stated Adaohi askedto use the apartment on 02i15i2018 and she gave him the keys. Kurt: stated Adachi told her he'was going to be staying in the apartment for approximately 2 days and hadalso mentioned the name "Caterina". Kurt: stated she has heardAdachl mention "Caterina" a "couple of times" in the pastbut this was her first time meeting her in person. Kurtz stated she gave "Caterina" her cell phone number and told her to call her if she needed anything. Kurt: stated she did not get "Caterina's" phone number. Kurt: stated "Caterina" was left alone in the apartment after she and all other medical personnel had gone. - Karts stated the building is owned by Jesse Kaplan who has authorized her to stay in the apartment at her leisure..Kuriz stated she had no objections to a search of the apartment and signed a consent to search form. 'Kurtz called Jesse Kaplan on the phone who gave a verbal consent to search the apartment on the phone. Kurt: need a house key lock box to obtain the keys to the apartment which she had the code for. Sgt. Saw. Sgt. Payne. Sgt. Chan. Oio. Wilson. Ofc. Stoffel and Ofc. conducted a search ?ofthe apartment. The apartment appeared clean and weii kept. A search of the apartment did not reveal any obvious signs of foul play. Medical Examiners Investigators Wirowek and Barbrich conducted their own Investigation inside the apartment. Ofc. Wilson took 22 photos of the apartment. At Central Station Ofo. Stoffet transferred Oic. Wilson?s photo's to a (EVDZ) CD photo disk and hooked it into evidence along with the consent to search form. A copy of the disk was pieced into the Central Station team evidence drop box. The photos and consent to perch form were scanned and uploaded-to this report. The incident report was completed and signed by the reporting Officer Miiligan on 02i23i19 at 0515. The Report was signed by the Officer in Charge O?iti?iahony at 0521 hours. At the time of the authoring of this {mares} I . affidavit, the death investigation of Public Defender Jeff Adachi is currently open and under investigation by the San Francisco Poiice Homicide Detail. "essentiary incident: On Saturday February 239d 2019 at 2244 hours, Dan Noyes, a reporter tor News, posted a . picture that was taken by SFPD Officers at the scene of the death investigation on his Twitter social media account (@dannoyes). The picture depicted a living room area with a couch. chair and a table, on his Twitter account stating, ititre-cording to police report, a woman said Public Defender Jeff - Adachi feil ill at dinner yesterday and became unresponsive later at this apartment. More of that witnesses say coming up att?l. On Sunday February 24?? 2019 at 0112, Dan Noyes posted the same picture mentiohed above on his Twitter account stating. ?Police report sheds light on SF Public Defender Jeff Adachi?s last hours. #ABG?now". Acting Lieutenant Watts informed me thatch Saturday February 23rd 20-19 at 2.300 hours, he witnessed the News lead story showing Dan Noyes holding a copy of an SFPD incident report with the word printed in resist the upper right hand corner. . On Sunday February 24?? 2019 at approximately 0758 hours, new station posted a report titled, obtains San Francisco police report on death of Public Defender Jeff Adachi?. During this report, Dan Noyes was seen holding pages of the confidential San Francisco Police Report related to the death investigation of Adachi. Noyes states that the incident report was obtained by the i Team. Noyes referenced to the . -- olice report and then shovrs the first page of the report which bares the SFPDincident-repori i dumber and all markings that identifies the report to be the authentic police report. The incident report shown by also has a stamp on the upper right hand ofthe page, indicating that the report was copied from a police station. Acting Captain Braconi informed me that he knows that the police report possessed by Dan Noyes is a station copy due to the fact that ithad the word printed in the upper right hand corner. Lt. Braconi informed me that the red stamp in the upper right hand corner indicates that the document was a ?station copy?. Noyes also made references to specific details listed in the unpublished confidential police report. Noyes also makes detailed references to a witness and possible person of interest listed in the report as ?Catarina". Noyes listed specific times that were listed in the police report. Furthermore, Noyes showed several colored photos of the scene that were taken by the investigating officers. The photos have printer line streaks throughout and distorted coloring as if copies had been made. Noyes also made references to-specific statements made by a witness who was on scene. On Sunday February 24?? 2019 at 1349 hours, Noyes posted on Twitter again, ?Where is Caterina? Witness to last hours of San Francisco Public Defender Jeff Adachi disappears. Adachi sought medical help during last trial he worked. #A807now Noyes aiso posted a picture of a white page that contained 2 colored photos that were taken by the reporting officers. The page also has the police report number handwritten in marker ink at the bottom of the page. On Sunday February 24*" 2019 at approximately 0903 hours KTVU 2 News posted a news report titled ?Police report contains new details into death of San Francisco Public Defender Jeff Adachi" on website. During the 1min 36 seconds tong news report clip, reporter Sara Zendenharn referred to a police report which listed details contained in the death investigation police report. At approximately 50 seconds into the report, a grainy video of a subject flipping through the police report is shown. {(09199} I I 7 The clip appeared to have been recorded via cellular phone video. The subject flipped through four pages of the reports quickly. Based on the pages that I observed the subject flipping through, i ."believed that the report was the same as the SFPD death investigation report that-was not authorized for release. The police report was on dark brown desk. The subject fiipped through the pages with a left hand. The hand was light in color. 1 observed the subject to be wearing a tvvo tone gold watch with shinny watch wristband on the subject's left wrist. Based on the fact that Noyes had obtained the complete deathtinvestigaticn police report prior to it being authorized for release, i believe that Noyes obtained it by illegitimate means. Noyes had gained access of the police report which contained details of a confidential suspicious death investigation of an elected official that was being investigated by the-San Francisco Medical Examiner?s officer with the assistance of the SFPD Homicide unit. Any information regarding any open deaths and suspicions death investigations shall not be released to the public or the media without prior expressed approval from the Police Chief or designee. Release of the report is prohibited by SFPD policy listed in DB 18-040. - The release of details contained in the stolen SFPD police report have jeopardized and interfered with the investigation by compromising the investigator's ability to identify-and locate witnesses and suspects, and jeopardizing the collection of evidence. Due to the details of the death investigation police report being released i believe that the llketihood of evidence collection has been compromised. I believe that the individual released the police report for financial gain and as a means of defamation of Public Defender Jeff Adachi?s image and to interfere with the criminal investigation into his death. I also believe that the individual who released the death investigation report is a San Francisco Police bfficer or San Francisco Police Department employee (Suspect). I believe that the subject (hand) shown in the video clip shown on the KTVU news report is a San Francisco Police Officer, somebody employed by the San Francisco Police Department who had access to the completed police report or somebody that was provided the completed police report by a San Francisco Police Officer or San Francisco Police Department employee. I believe that the San Francisco Police Officer had obtained the report and released it to Noyes without proper approval and authorization. and in. violation of penal code Pt: and - By stealing the police report and illegally releasing it, the San Francisco Police Officer compromised the investigation. - Follow up investigation On D2i28f19, was advised by Acting Captain Braconi #2246 that SFPD had not authorized the release of the death investigation report to the pubiic and media outlets._The department had denied the release of the death investigation report: because the release of the report may ,endangerthe successful completion of the investigation. - . The death investigation report was written by an officerfrom the Central Police district. 1 reviewed pdy worn camera footage from the officers who worked at Central Police station around the time of the death investigation. ((csiss} . leenduetad an interest searei'r ter Bryan Garmedy and leeated a Linttadln pre?te asseeiated in Bryan Earmedy whieh listed him as a "Freelanee yideegrabhsri tlemInunieatterIs ivlanager, LIED Bay titres"~ Further interest researeh revealed that Bryan ilian?nedy is net eurrentty smpleyed by any et'tI'Ie news erganizatierts that ebtained the death investigatien repert. Further internet seareh shewed Bryan Cannedy wearing a wateh that Is very similar is the ene shewn en the ltT?v'tJtl videe eiip. Based en the ab'eve intermatien regarding Bryan Garmedy, I believe that the SFPD death Investigatien repett was stelen by a San Franelsee Peliee'?t?eer. In deing se, the San Franelsee . Feliee Utiiser interfered with the investigatien ef the death et' eleeted Publle Defender Jeff Adaehi. Eeneleslen: Based en the abeve Intennatien I believe that News reperter Dan Neyes vvas effered the death investigatien pellee repert by Bryan lElarmedy whe ebtained the repert frem a San FIaneisee Fellee Dtiieer betieve that Bryan Cannedy ebtained the peliee repert trern a San Fransisee Felipe D?ileer. Based an my training and experience I believe that Bryan Earmedy weuld have been eentasted by the San Fralteisee Peliee lt'jitiieer via veiee sail er instant message. I believe that the San Fransisee Ui?iieer eentaeted Bryan Garmedy en er between 2033 beers and 19 2244 heurs. eased an my training and esperienee Itnew that 1'v'erleen Iteeps et ineeming and eutgeing telephene balls missed ealls eleetrenie alphanumerie {test} messages veieemails1 videe reserdings phetes gee leeatien data as Well as deleted sentent It is my belief that ebtaintng fer the phene number 41 used by Bryan'?armedy. frem item 21133 to Hitter-ft treats will assist me in determining the identity et the persenis} whe state the petiee raped: and may have interfered with the epen death tnvestigatien by previding it te Bryant Garmedy swears the infeImatien in this deeument is be true te'the best ef his ttnewledge. ?r?eer Afitant requests this Search Warrant seught pursuant in the Seareh thiarrantsriidavlt. Statement at Prebable Gauss, and Fteturn te Search Warrant and all deeuments relevant te this Seareh Warrant be erdered. sealed by the Magistrate In erder te implement the privilege under Evidenee Eede test: te and id pretest the identity at any eenfidential andier intermatien. pursuant te the Supreme Geurt deeisien' In Peeple Hebbs {?1994} Cal. 4a 943 and Califemia Ftutes ef Ceurt 2 It' Is further requested that pursuant te the preeIUsien e?i netiee previsiens ei Penal Beds 1548 E'and ?ts U. S. stasis} yeriaen be erdered net te netity any persen {ineluding the subseriber eustemer a?r ewner ef the eleetrenie eemmunieatiens er devise infermatien te whieh the materiats relate} ef the esistenee at this warrant tel ninety days ?r'eur afiiant is aware that Penal Cede 1546.2 mandates that the law entereement agency serving this geese} warrant notify the target of the warrant contemporaneously with the service of the warrant unless an order delaying notification is granted. It is further requested pursuant to the delayed notice provisions of Penal Code an order delaying any notification to the target! party that may be required {Why 1546.2(b) about this warrant, for a period of ninety days. Such an order is justified because providing prior notice to the targeti party in this matter would lead to an adverse result which may result in endanger the life or physical safety of an individual; lead to' flight from prosecution; lead to destruction of or tampering with evidence; lead to intimidation of potential witnesses; or otherwise seriously jeopardize an investigation or unduly delay atrial. Due to the ongoing internal Affairs investigation and search for possible rte?conspirators, your affiant- further states that this search warrant and all documents relevant to this search warrant; relate to an ongoing investigation into an Internal Affairs Investigation, I am requesting that they be sealed in their entirety including the return. If the information contained in the above listed documents is made public it would compromise the investigation to have _a positive outcome in the location of the suspect(s) andior It is expected that additional search warrants will be sought relating to this investigation. I request that this search warrant and all documents related to this search warrant remain sealed inithe custody of the clerk of court until order of this court or other competent court having jurisdiction over this matter. I request that a search warrant be issued based upon the aforementioned facts, commanding the search of the items designated above for the property or things described or any part thereof, and that such items or property be brought before this magistrate or retained subject to the order of the court pursuant to Section 1536 of the Penal Code. - it is prayed that a search warrant be issued commanding the search of the phone information 415? 699~7381, requested from Verizon. You Affiant declares under penalty or perjury, under the law of the State of California that this Affidavit is true and Correct. AFFIANT . Swor i cribs-d before me- . 0ft 1.. ?ora '?gzhew?? . [rewir? ah?lui? 1 II curt '3 start Francisco, California (roses) . 'iU Exhibit A The iolicwing information, including the information seizable under "i 8 USE arose, whether in electronic storage or on backup copies of said data, for the phone number 5a699~i?381 for the following time period; 02123201 9 2033 to 0212312019 2244 hours, Pacific Standard Time. Subscriber Information: Verizon provide whether listed or unlisted, blocked or unblocked, including but not limited to: general account billing information, periods of telephone activation, contact information, and all data identifying the handsetis) device such as ESN i MEID lMEl and lltiiSli MSID i MIN associated to this account. Caii Detail Records, SllriS Usage, and Mobile Data Usable with Cell Site Date: Verizon SHALL --~nrovlde SCAMP data records. which include Call Detail Records, 8M8 Usage with content and .ivlobile Data usage, showing incomingioutgoing communications and conneCtivity information with cell tower data location from SEIZZIZMB 2033 to 03232019 2244 hours, Pacific Standard Time. 1. Verizon SHALL include a letter verifying the authenticity of the records provided. - 2. Verizon SHALL include a listing of Celt Tower Locations showing, but not limited to, the location. orientation, azimuth, and beam width as it pertains to the records requested. 3. Verizon SHALL provide all stored communications or files including volcemaii, text messages, emails and emaii addresses, digital images, videos, contact lists, call logs, and any other files from the phone number 415?699-7381 02i22i2019 2933 to 02i23i2019 2244 hours, Pacific Standard . Time. 4. Verizon SHALL provide any other records or account information related or associated to the account holder, including any and all numbers associated with the billing account number corresponding to the account holder. 5. Verizon SHALL be compensated by the-San Francisco Police Department for reasonable expenses incurred in compiying with the court's order. - (inane) 11 State of California City and County of San Francisco IN RE SEARCH OF ORDER TO DELAY - NOTIFICATION OF SEARCH WARRANT Verizon Wireless 130 Washington Voiisy ital. Bedminsrer; NJ ?33792} Sad?4514242 ORDER Your Af?ant, Sgt. Joseph Ojbidi #2323 requests:- This matterhaving come before the Court pursuant to an application under Penal Code Section 1524 et seq, which affiants requests that noti?cation of this warrant be delayed. Based upon the reading of the Search Warrant, and Affidavit in Support thereof; IT APPEARING that there is reason to believe thatth'e noti?cation of the existence of the warrant to any person will result in endanger the life or physical safety of an individual; lead to ?ight from prosecution; lead to destruction of or tampering with evidence; lead to intimidation of potential Witnesses; or otherwise seriously jeopardize an investigation or undulydelay a trial or otherwise lead to an adverse result. IT IS ORDERED that Verizon Wrasse shall delay notification of the existence of the application or this Order of the Court, or the existence of the investigation, to the listed subscriber or to any other person, for a period of (90) ninety days unless otherwise directed by the Court. . . IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the noti?cation'by the government otherwise required .2 be delayed for a period of (90) ninety days. ?owed, a Judge of the Superior Court, Departmenbj City and County of San Francisco, California Order Delaying Notification