INDUSTRIAL HAZARDOUS
WASTE
(IHW)

FILE TYPE:f P

VOL#

INCL SIYEDATES'lOO
Media ode

I

rrnat: M

o Microfiche
181

Roll Microfilm

 _,_______________________
NOTICE
OF
DOCUMENT
QUALITY
TEXAS COMMISSION ON
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
INDUSTRIAL HAZARDOUS
WASTE (IHW)
THE QUALITY OF THE FOLL0\\/11\C DOCl.l\lENT(S) IS SUCH
T HAT LL OR P()RTl()NS OF Tl-IE l\1 1CROF IL MED I MAGE
MAY BE OIFFICl ' LT TO READ OR ILLEGIBLE.
Som(· n ' asons for poor yualitv :
There an· multiple densi1ics pc,· pagl'. diffrrcnl t, pes of ink. faded don1rn e nt, and some

documents are diffrrcnl co lors . .\Ian\ of th e ph otogra phs arc of poor qualitv .

 DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
HEADQUARTERS, U. S. ARMY AIR DEFENSE ARTILLERY CENTER AND FORT BLISS
1733 PLEASONTON ROAD
FORT BLISS, TEXAS 79916-6816

SW R #_-=-~
:<-=;__ 0_03
-=--REPLY TO

ATZ -DOE (200)

AP R l ·) 2001
t<I \llill\l1\
''

MEM RAND M FOR :

BJ E T :

Jd

CAS DOC II

ATTENTION OF:

j:

• 1

•

'

'll

1
~

I'

sss=

PROJ. MGR j_ PtJ.v >l.:l:G.£!

I',}( l '

9 April 2001

I

Allan Posnic k
D MOA Program Mdnagcr
Corrective ct ion cction. Attn . MC - I:..7
Te"1s atural Resllurce Con sen at ion l'o1111111s sion
P.O Bo, 13087
Au tin. -, c"as 78 71 1-3 08 7

Re pone Actton Completion Repon (RACR) for th e Montana Road Rubbl e Dump pill ite,
WM 16. FTBL-028. EPA TX l! SWA Permit I.D. 11 ~21' 7:..010 1, issued July 1991

I.
Attached f, r your review and approv al 1s the Re pon e Acti on Completion Report (R
Montana Road Rubble Dump pill ~ite, SWMlJ 16. FTBL.-0:..8

R) for the

2.
The discovery ofasbe ·to roofing shin gle and evi dcnct' th at unknown local personne l had discarded used
engine oil at the ite during the initial EPA in pection and survey of rort Bliss earned th i ite its de ignation as a
WM . ub ·equently in esti gation revealed th at thi s are a along side a power line ease ment was more properly an
informal , UJlauthorized dumping groun l for lorn I civ ili an contrnc tors and lanJs aper. s \ ell as iti zen from the
nearb. residential are acr
Montana Road from the re enation .
Previously. acce · wa not ontro llcd as tlm area of the Fon Blis Milit ar. Reser ation wa s not fen ced and
gated .
part of the response actions. fo rt Bliss has con tructcd a fence along Montana Road to control acce to
the area and pre enl future use of thi area a a dumpsi 1c rhe enclose;;d RA C R um mari ze the cleanup activities
and re ul of ampling th at\ ere performed al the propcri) Results pre en ted in the report demonstrate that the
conditions at the proper!)' meet the Remed) Standard /\ requirements under the T xas Risk Red uction Program (30
TA , hapter 3 0).
4.
Based on the completed response acnons . Fon Bliss is requesting a ··no furt her action·· letter fo r this ite
Plea e direct an que ti on to me by ca llin g 915-.568-7979 or email (g_od 1 ed(L..Q.!L_. arm .mil ).

I
I Da

id Dodge
l: ngineering and Environ ment . Inc.
IRI' Projc t Manager

f.

•

TBL-070 File
D
Di tri bution A

 AP 1 2001
REMED \flO OIVI 'ION
Corrective .\ction s 'etion

RESPONSE ACTION COMPLETION REPORT
FORT BLISS RUBBLE DUMP SITE- SM\\1U 16
Montana Road Near Site Monitor
Fort Bliss, Texas

Prepared for :
Fort Bliss Directorate of Environment
HQ USAADACENFB
ATZC - DOE B622
Fort Bliss, Texa 79916-6816

Prepared by :

Ro F. We ton, Inc.
5599 San Felipe
Houston, Texas 77056

March 2001

 Roy F. Weston, Inc. - Response Adion Completion Report - Rubble Dump Site; Fort Bliss, Texas

RESPONSE ACTION COMPLETION REPORT
RUBBLE DUMP SITE
FORT BLJSS, TEXAS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION

PAGE

TITLE

EXEXUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................... ES-1
1.0

IN'TRODUCTION ..... ................................................................................................. 1-1
1.1 FACILITY LOCATIO

AND DESCRIPTION ........ ...... .... .... ....... ... ... ... ..... .... ..... .. .... . 1-I

1.2 BACKGROUND INFORM.A TION .... ...... .... .... .... ... ..... ... ... ... ... .... ........ .. ....... ... .. ... ...... 1-2
1.2.1
1.2.2
1.2.3

•

Preliminary Site In estigation .................... .. ....... ....... ... .. ..... ..... ......... .. ....... .. .... 1-2
ite Characterization ... .. .. ... _............. _. .. .......... .......................... ................ .. ... 1-2
Re ponse Action s ..... ...... . ... ... ................... ..... .... .... .... .. ........................... ..... ... 1-3

1.3 REPORT ORGANIZATION ........ ........... ....... ................... .. ..... ........... ....... ... ..... .. ... ... .. 1-4

2.0

ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING ........................................... ..................................... 2-1

2 . 1 SITE SOILS ......... ......... .......... ....... ... ... ...... ....... .... .... ..... .. .... ....... .... ........ ......... ........ 2-l
2.2 SURFA E FEATURES ....... ............................ ... .......... .. ............... .................. .... ...... 2-I
2.3 LAND USE
2.4 SE
2.4. 1
2.4.2

.. .. .. .... ...... ...... ... ........................ .. .. .............................. .......... ..... ... .... .. 2-I

ITTVE RE

PT R

Water Well urve ........ ... .............. ........... .. ............. ...... .. ..... ....... .. ....... .. .. .... ... 2-2
Utilit A se sment ... ... .... .... ............ .............. ...... ...... .... ................ .... .............. ..2-3

2.5 E OLOGICAL A SE

3.0

RVEY .................. ................... ... ....... ................... .. .. ...... 2-2

ME T. ........... ........... ....... ... ...... ... ................... ... ............. ..... 2-3

RESPONSE ACTIONS .............................................................................................. 3-l

3 . I REMOVAL OF HYDROCARBON lMP ACTED SOIL ...... .............. ........... ........ ..... .. 3-1

3.2 REMOVAL OF ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIALS ................. .... .. ..... 3-2
3.3 REMOVAL OF CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS .... ...... ... ....... ... ... ..... .... ........ ....... ..... 3-2
3.4 WASTE CHARACTERJZATION AND DISPOSITION .......... ... .. ..... ......... .. 3-2
3.5 VERIFICATION ACTIVITIES .. ...... ... .......... .... .. .... .. .......... ....... ........ ..... ......... .. .... ... ... 3-3

•

3.5. I
3 .5.2

Laboratory Anal y es ........... ..... ........... .. .. .... ..... ... ..... ... ......... .... ... .. .. .. .......... . 3-4
Verification Sampling Results ...... ......... ...... .............. .... ........................... ..... 3-4

3.5.3 Evaluation of Re ults ........................ ............... ............... ... ...... .. .......... ........... .3-5

Ftbl iss:Monlllna:RAC R.doc

,i

 Roy F. Weston. Inc. - Response Action Completion Report - Rubble Dump Site; Fort Bliss. Texas

RESPO

E ACTION COMPLETION REPORT
RUBBLE DUMP SITE
FORT BLISS, TEXAS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION

4.0

TITLE

PAGE

IMPROVEM.ENT ACTIVITIES ............... ................................................................ 4-1

4 .1 EARTHEN BERM REPAIR .............. ........ .......... ....... .... ... ........... ...... .. .. .. ... ................ 4-I
4.2 SURVEYING AND FENCE INSTALLATION ............ ........... ....... ....... ....... .... .......... 4-I

5.0

CONCLUSIONS ......................................................................................................... 5-I

6.0

REFERENCES ........................................................................ ................................... 6-I

•

•
Ftbli ss: Moni.ana:RACR.doc

I ll

 Roy F. Weston, Inc. - Response Action Completion Report - Rubble Dump Spill Site; Fort Bliss. Texas

RESPONSE ACTION COMPLETION REPORT

•

RUBBLE DUMP SPILL SITE

FORT BLISS, TEXAS

LIST OF FIGURES

FIGURE

TITLE

1
2

Site Location Map
Land Use Map

3

Historical Sample Location Map

4
5

Surface Soil Excavation Areas and Verification Sample Locations Map
Aerial Photograph (Fence Installation)

•

Flbliss:Monta.nn:RACR.doc

1-4

 Roy F. Weston, Inc. - Response Action Completion Report - Rubble Dump Spill Site: Fort Bliss, Texas

RESPONSE ACTION COMPLETION REPORT

•

RUBBLE DUM P SPILL SITE

FORT BLISS, TEXAS

LIST OFT ABLES

TABLE

I
2

TITLE

ummary of Detected Concentration in Soil - 1995 and 1997 Investigations

Summary of Detected Concentration in Verification Samples

•

•
Ftbliss:11.fonl:in:i:R AC R.doc

1-S

 Roy F. Weston, Inc. - Response Adion Completion Report - Rubble Dump Spill Site; Fort Bliss, Texas

RE PON E A TION

OMPLETION REPORT
RUBBLE DUMP AND SPILL SITE
FT. BUSS, TEXAS

LIST OF APPENDICES

APPENDIX TITLE

A

B

C
D

E
F

Preliminary Site Investigation Report - Golder Associates, 1997
Site Characterization Report - Golder Associates, 1999
Environmental Technical Report - ENCON International Inc., 2000
Water Well Survey
Ecological Assessment - Tier I Exclusion Criteria Checklist
Laboratory Analytical Reports - Final Verification Soil Samples

•
F\ · :~1ontnna:R CR.doc

lll

 Roy F. Weston, Inc. - Response Action Completion Report - Rubble Dump Spill Site; Fort Bliss. Texas

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
INTRODUCTION
The purpose of the closure acti ities and this report is to provide environmental and physical site
data to support a Remedy Standard A. Tier I Closure of the site in accordance with the Texas

Risk Reduction Program (TRRP) promulgated as 30 Texas Administration Code (TAC) Chapter
350. This report also documents that steps taken to prevent that dumping at the site will not
occur in the future.

SITE DESCRIPTION
The site is located on the Fort Bliss Military Re ervation, and was used as an unauthorized
dumping area by unknown, but presumed local persons. Historically, access was not controlled
and this area of the Fort Bliss Military Reservation was not fenced or gated. The area was never

4t

used as a dump site by Fort Bliss, but could easily be accessed by others from Montana Road to
dispose of general refuse and construction debri s so as to avoid the disposal fees at the local
landfill.
RESPONSE ACTIONS

Response actions have been completed to restore the site conditions and to obtain regulatory
closure.

A variety of waste material including hydrocarbon contaminated soil, asbestos-

containing materials (ACM), and general construction/demolition debris and trash were removed
from the site and properly dispo ed at approved facilities. Reconnaissance and verification
sampling was performed to document that waste material is no longer at the site and the site
conditions are suitable for closure.

CONCLUSIONS
Based on the data and information presented m this report, the following conclusions are
provided for the Rubble Dump Site.

Fthliss:Montana:RACR..doc

ES-I

 Roy F. Weston, Inc. - Response Action Completion Report - Rubble Dump Spill Site; Fort Bliss. Texas

•

•

Approximate!

1•

cubi

yard

of h drocarbon- impacted soil were excavated and

transported to the Camino Real Landfill in

ew Mexico for di posal, and approximately

four cubic yards of ACM were removed and transported to the Otero County Landfill in
New Mexico for di posal.
•

Approximately 1,638 cubic yards of non-hazardous construction/demolition debris were
removed and transported to the Camino Real Landfill in New Mexico, and the Clint and
Fort Bliss Landfill s in Texas for disposal.

•

The horizontal and

ertical extent of impacted

oils ha

been delineated to

concentration either below the laboratory practical quantitation limits (PQLs, method
detection limit ) or the critical Tier I Protecti e Concentration Level (PCLs) for organic
and inorganic constituents.
•

An ecological evaluation was perfonned, and the results indicate that the site does not

pose unacceptable ri k to ecological receptors.
·-

•

Concentration of con titu nt remaining in the oils are below the Tier 1 Residential
PCLs. Therefore, the Rubble Dump Site is in compliance wi th a Remedy Standard A,
Tier 1 Clo ure and no further action i required

•

A fence was in tailed along Montana Road and the Site Monitor acce s road to control
acces and prevent future dumping

•

This Re pon e Action

o mpletion Report along with the associated appendices comply

with the requirements of the Affected Property As essment Report, 30 TAC §350.51
through 350.55 .

•
Ftbli :l\.lontana:RACR.do

ES-2

 Roy F. Weston, Inc. - Response Action Completion Report - Rubble Dump Spill Site; Fort Bliss, Texas

-~

1.0

INTRODUCTION

This report presents the results of response action associated with remediation and restoration of
the Rubble Dump Site at Fort Bliss, Texas. The purpose of the closure activities and this report
is to provide environmental and physical site data to support a Remedy Standard A, Tier 1
losure of the site in accordance with the Te a Risk Reduction Program (TRRP) promulgated
as 30 Texas Administration Code (TAC) Chapter 350. This report also documents that steps
taken to pre ent that dumping at the ite will not occur in the futu re. The remainder of this
section provide descriptive information on the site as well as a summary of previous activities
that ha e occurred at the site

1.1

FACILITY LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION

The Rubble Dump

ite i · I ated outhea t of Bi ggs Army Air Field just west of the Fort Bliss

Site Monitor (radar) facilit y. A location map i pro ided as Figure I . The site consists of an
approximate on -mile long

ection along a north-south trending power line easement that

originates off of Montana Road in El Pa o, El Paso Count , Texas. The site has been identified
as the area extending I 00-feet o n either side of the one-mile long ection of the power line
easement.

This site is located on the Fort Bliss Military Re ervation, and was u ed as an

unauthorized dumping area b unknown , local per ons. Historically, access wa not controlled
and this area of the Fort Bli s Military Reservation wa not fen ed or gated. The area was never
u ed as a dump site b Fort Bli , but could easil y be acces ed by other from Montana Road to
di pose of general refu, e and con truction debri s o as to avoid the dispo al fees at the loca l
landfill. A land u e map is provided a Figure 2, and thi map shows the site and surround ing
area.
The dumping area was di co ered during a 19 7 Re ource Conservation and Recovery Act

(RCRA) Facility As e sment (RF A), and the site was added to the Fort Bliss Installation Action
Plan. The ite is identified a Fort Blis
Unit (SWMU) No

•

16

Material

ite FTBL-028 and RCRA Solid Waste Management
that

have been dumped at the site consist of

construction/demolition debris, furniture, asphalt , plastic, wood , used building products
(shingle , tiles etc.), and general tra h

Petroleum/oil/lubricant (POL) stains have also been

identified within the site. The stains were ob erved lo be relativel y small and most likely the
fthli s : fonlllna:RA R.doc

1- l

 Roy F; Weston, Inc. - Response Action Completion Report - Rubble Dump Spill Site; Fort Bliss, Texas

•

result of automobile or imilar ehicle engine oil changes. In addition, areas of charred debris
also suggest that some of the debris piles were historically burned.
The site and surrounding area north of Montana Road is undeveloped and characteristic of the
local desert terrain. The area south of Montana Road is composed of both commercial and
residential properties. Other than the historical unauthorized dumping, the area identified as the
Rubble Dump Site is used only as a buffer between the public and military activities to the north.

1.2

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

1.2.1 Preliminary Site Investigation
Following discovery of the -ite during the 1987 RF A, the ite wa identified as a SWMU and
added to the Fort Bliss In tallation Re toration Program (IRP) for action. A Preliminary Site
Investigation wa

ub equentl

cheduled and completed in 1995, where a total of 15 soil

samples and 13 samples of p tential asbe o -containing material (ACM) were collected for
laboratory analy es (Golder, 1997 .

A cop

of the Preliminary Site Investigation Report is

provided as Appendix A Sampling locations were elected based on the result of a field survey
where high priority areas were identified . The high priority areas consisted of potential areas of
ACM, areas where ol ent or paint can were identified, and area where black stai ned soil
possibly as ociated with relea e of POL or from burnt con truction debris) were located . In
summary, the areas with the highe t potential for contamination were sampled during the
Preliminary Site Investigation.
Elevated level of semi- olatile organic compounds (SYOCs) and total petroleum hydrocarbons
(TPH) were reported in everal of the soil samples, and everal samples were reported positive as
ACM. Soil sample locations from the Preliminary ite Investigation are shown in Figure 3, and
a summary of the sampling re ults is provided in Table 1.

1.2.2 Site Characterization
In August 1997, a Site Characterization ampling event wa conducted to further identify and
-~

quantify the presence of petroleum impacted soil and asbestos containing material at the site
(Golder 1999). A copy of the ite Characterization Report i provided as Appendix 8. As part
Ftbli s:Mont.ana:RA R.doc

l-2

 Roy F. Weston, Inc. - Response Action Completion Report - Rubble Dump Spill Site; Fort Bliss. Texas

•

of the Site Characterization, a review of aerial photographs and additional site reconnaissance
was performed. The result of the aerial photograph review were inconclusive since the scales of
the available photographs were too large, and features within the site were not distinguishable
from the surrounding desert . Site reconnais ance concluded that there were onJy two new waste
piles that were not previously identified during the Preliminary Site In estigation.
Based on the available information, a total of 50 samples of potential ACM and 18 soil samples
were collected for laboratory anal se .

The Site Characterization sampling locations were

elected to e aluate additional areas of waste d1 po al along the easement, further evaluate the
results of the Preliminary

ite In estigation, and investigate two new areas of waste that were

believed to have been created after the 1995 Preliminary Site Investigation. The soil sample
locations coincided with man of the initial sampling locations that are shown on Figure 3.
The sampling results revealed that 26 of the 50 construction debris samples were positive as

ACM. Low concentrations of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) were detected in 4 of the 18
soil samples. The YOCs mainl y con i ted of acetone. methylene chloride, and 2-butanone, and
·-

these were reported at concentrations below health ba ed tandards (TRRP) developed by the
Texa

atural Re ource Conservation Com mi ssion (TNRCC) SYOC were not reported in any

of the samples above the laboratory practical quantitation limit (PQL). Elevated concentrations
of TPH were reported in surface oils at five locations a illustrated on Figure 3. A summary of
the results of the 1997 Site Characterization is provided in Table I.

1.2.3 Response Actions
In December I 999, remediation and restoration activities were completed at the site. The results of
the response actions are summarized in the Environmental Technical Report that i provided as
Appendix C (Encon, 2000). The following activities were compieted as part of the response action:

•

•

Completed a ite reconnai sance visit to verify the extent of impacted soil ACM, and
con truction debri .

•

Repaired the existing earthen berm that extends approximately 1.7 miles along Montana
Road to make acces to the area more difficult.

•

In taJled a 5, 00-foot long. 4-strand barbwire fence along the Montana Road earthen berm
to control access to the area and reduce illegal dumping.

•

Excavated and dispo ed of approximate! 6 cubic yards (CY) of hydrocarbon impacted soil.

Ftb!Jss:Montana:RACR.doc

l-3

 Roy F. Weston, Inc. - Response Adion Completion Report - Rubble Dump Spill Site; Fort Bliss. Texas

•

•

Collected one erification compo it soil ample from the e cavation areas for benzene,

ethyl benzene, toluene, and xylenes (BETX) and TPH (TX Method l 005).
•

Removed and dispo ed of
construction/demol ition debris.

approximately

•

Removed and dispo ed of approximately four ards of ACM .

1,63 8

CY

of

non-hazardous

The specific objective of the remediation activities included the removal of hydrocarbon impacted
soil, ACM, and construction/demolition debris. The areas that were excavated correspond to the
areas where elevated levels of TPH and SVOCs were reported in characterization samples. The
excavation areas were labeled P 1 through P4 as shown on Figure 4 . Following excavation and
scraping, one verification ample was coll cted (as a composite of the four excavation areas) to
confirm removal

f th h dr

b n affe ted

ils.

eith r B

X n r TPH were reported in the

verification sample above the laboratory PQL. Di po al acti ities were conducted in accordance
with applicable Federal,

tate, and di posal facilit

requirements (additional discussion on the

removal and disposal acti vities is provided in Section 3)

1.3

REPORT ORGANIZATION

The remainder of this report is organized as Ii ted below, and ·upporting documentation 1s
provided as appendices for reference
•

Section 2 discu se the enviro nmen tal
investigation co nducted at the ite .

•

ection 3 present more detailed discus ion of the response actions that were
completed at the ite, and a summary of the analytical results from verification
samples collected from the site.

•

Section 4 presents ot her field activitie that were completed to prevent future access
to the site for unauthorized dumping .

•

Section 5 provides conclu sio ns drawn from the response actions that have been
completed at the ite.

Ftbli s:Montana:RACR.doc

etting based on current and previous

1-4

 - 1--------------------------------------------Roy F. Weston, Inc. - Response Action Completion Report - Rubble Dump Spill Site; Fort Bliss. Texas

•

2.0 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
The following subsections present discussions of the physical characteristics of the site,
information on soils, and the results of a sensitive receptor survey. The information describing
the site soils and sensitive receptor survey were taken from the Preliminary Site Investigation
Report (Golder, 1997) and the Site Characterization Report (Golder, 1999).

2.1 SITE SOILS
Soils encountered at the site consisted of medium to fine-grained sand extending to depths
ranging from the surface to 12-inches below gro und surface (bgs). the maximum depth explored.
Since the visual taining and waste material wa not identified at depth, information regarding
subsurface soils at the Rubbl e Dump Site is not known . However, information collected from
other similar areas of Fon Bli ss ind icates that the subsurface soils are characteristic of sands and
gravels with occa ional clay interbed

to depth

of up to several hundred feet.

Saturated

condition are not known to occur at shallow depth ·.

2.2

SURFACE FEATURES

The site i a relatively flat rectangular-shaped property con i ting of approximately 25 acres. The
United States Geological Survey ( SG ) quadrangle map, presented a Figure 2, indicates that
the ite lie at an elevati n of approximately 3,965 feet above mean sea level. The ground surface
at the site is mo tly unvegetated, wi th an estimated 20% being covered with small scrub brush .
Observations made during th field investigation indicate that drainage from the site varies along
power line road, but no ob ervable drainage pathways or channels exist at the site.

No natural gullies or creeks eras the site. The nearest receiving water bodies are an unnamed
pond located approximately l, -oo feet to the southwe t and Jesuit Draw located approxi mately
3-miles to the southea t. Both of these are on the opposite side (south) of Montana Road, and
runoff from the Rubbl e Dump ite would not be directed to these features .

•
Ftbliss: iontana:RACR.doc

2-1

 Roy F. Weston, Inc. - Response Action Completion Report - Rubble Dump Spill Site; Fort Bliss. Texas

2.3

LAND USE

The Rubble Dump Site is located on the Fort Bli ss Military Reservation. Since the area of the
Reservation where the Rubbl e Dump

ite i close to commercial and residential areas that are

south of Montana Road, it is not used by Fort Bli ss. Other than the power line easement, no
structures exist at or near the site.

The master plan for Fort Bliss shows that the area

encompassing the Rubble Dump Site as not currently nor expected to be used in the future. The
area is planned as a buffer zone between Fort Blis · and the developed areas south of Montana
Road.

2.4

SENSITIVE RECEPTOR SURVEY

The following is a summary of the Sen itive Receptor Survey (S RS) conducted during this
investigation. The SRS consisted of a water well search, a utility asses ment, and an ecological
assessment to evaluate what receptors, if any, and/ or exposure pathways exi t at the site or

•

within Y2-mile of the site .

2.4.1 Water Well Survey
A water well earch was conducted for the area wi thin 1/2-mile of the site, and a copy of the
report is included as Appendix D. The water well search included document review from the
following state and federal agencies:
•
•
•

Texas Water Development Board
Texas Natural Re ource Conservation Co mmission
United States Geological Survey

A total of four wells were identified by Enviro nm e ntal Data Resources, Inc. (EDI) within 'h-mile
of the site. Three of the wells (49-14-503, -51 I, and -512) are reportedly still in use and are
located southeast of the Rubbl e Dump Site. One well ( 49-14-505) has reportedl y been
abandoned. All of the wells are categorized as being domestic/public water supply wells, and
none of the wells are located on Fon Bliss .

•
Ftbli. :Monbna:RACR.doc

2-2

 Roy F. Weston, Inc. - Response Action Completion Report - Rubble Dump Spill Site.· Fort Bliss, Tex as

The completion depths of the three water well s remaining in use (49-14-503, -511 , and - 512) are
455, 430, and 440 feet bgs, respectively . The screened intervals are 365 to 455 feet bgs for well
503 , 340 to 440 feet bgs for well 5 11 . The screened interval for well 512 was not reported.
Based on these screened intervals and the location of the wells, impacts from the Rubble Dump
Site do not exist.

2.4.2 Utility Assessment
No subsurface utilities are located adjacent to or in the vicin ity of the site. Overhead electrical
lines are present within the rig ht-of-way easement on the west side of the power line road . In
addition, some utilities including underground telephone lines and overhead power lines are
present along the north side of Montana Road . Contamination has not been identified near
Montana Road, and impacts to utilities has not occurred.

2.5
•~

ECOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT

In accordance with the Texas Ri sk Reduction Program, a Tier I Exclusio n Criteria Checklist was
completed for the site to determine whether or not furt her ecological evaluation is necessary.
The completed Exclusion Criteria Checklist is included as Appendix E, and based on the
outcome of the check list, further ecological evaluation is not req uired .

ftbliss:Montmm:RACR.doc

2-3

 Roy F. Weston, Inc. - Response Action Completion Report - Rubble Dump Spill Site; Fort Bliss, Texas

3.0 RESPONSE ACTIONS
The following subsections describe the response actions that have been completed at the Rubble
Dump Site. As mentioned previously, Fort Bliss is pursuing closure of the site according to the
Texas Risk Reduction Program, specifically a Remedy Standard A (Residential) Closure. For
this, the Tier I Residential Protective Concentration Levels (PCLs) established under TRRP have
been used to evaluate the results of samples.

The PCLs are concentrations that have been

calculated by the TNRCC using conservative assumptions and exposure models to be protective
of human health and the environment. This closure approach, if approved by the TNRCC, will
allow for unrestricted use of the land and deed certification will not be required . Much of the
information presented below was taken from previously prepared reports to provide a summary
of the response actions that have been completed to restore the conditions at the site. Additional
information can be obtained by reviewing the reports that are provided in the appendices.

3.1

REMOVAL OF HYDROCARBON IMPACTED SOIL

Four oil stained areas were identified during the Site Characterization , and these were referred to
as Stations Pl through P4 . Since the stations were relatively small , excavation of the visibly
stained material was scheduled and completed . Approximatel y six (6) cubic yards of soil from
the four areas (P-1 through P-4) were excavated and disposed off-site. A site map illustrating the
areas of excavation is included as Figure 4 . The excavated soils were tored in 55-gallon drums
on-site pending laboratory analysis and waste characterization. Upon receipt of the sampling
results, the drummed waste material was disposed at an approved facility as non-hazardous
waste.

Each excavation was then backfilled to surface grade with clean soil from the

surrounding areas of the site.
One soil grab sample was collected from the base of each excavation before backfilling. The
four grab samples were composited to form one verification sample (Fort Bliss #I) that was
submitted for laboratory analyses . The sample was collected at a depth of approximately 0 .5- to
1-foot bgs. The soil sample was collected using clean stainless steel scoops and latex gloves.

•

Samples were placed into laboratory-supplied jars, labeled, and placed on ice in an insulated
cooler. Upon completion of the sampling activities, the sample was submitted to Trace Analysis,

Fthli ss:Mont.ana:RACR.doc

3-1

 Roy F. Weston. Inc. - Response Adion Completion Report - Rubble Dump Spif{ Site; Fort Bliss, Texas

Inc. in El Paso, Texas.

The

erification sample was submitted for benzene, toluene,

ethylbenzene, and xylenes {BTEX, EPA Method 8021) and TPH {TX Method I 005) analyses.
Based on t he results, BTEX and TPH were not reported above the laboratory PQL in the
verification sample. The results are summarized in Table 2.

3.2

REMOVAL OF ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIALS

Seven ACM sites (0-3, 0-5 , 0-17, 0-32, 0-40, 0-54. and 0-85) were previously identified
during the 1997 Site Characterization ( ee Table 3, Site Characterization Report, Golder, 1999).

Many of the samples were reported to contain between 5% and 35% chrysotile asbestos. Based
on the asbestos testing, the identified floor tile and similar materials were removed from the site.
The material was properly bagged by a licensed asbestos contractor in six mi ll imeter polyvinyl
bags, labeled, and transported to an EPA approved landfill for disposal. A total of 20 bags, or
about four CY, of CM were rem

3.3

ed fr m the it and properly disposed .

REMOVAL OF CONSTRUCTION/DEMOLITION DEBRIS

Numerous pile of construction and other debris e isted along the power line ea ement. The
material wa not hazardou

but the presence of the material was visibly unattractive. As part of

the response acti ities, approximate!

1.638 CY of non-hazardous construction/demolition debris

was loaded into dump trucks and disposal at the Camino Real Landfill in New Mexico, and the
Clint and Fort Bliss Landfills in Texas. The removal activities occurred over a four week period
in early 2000.

3.4

WASTE CHARACTERIZATION AND DISPOSITION

The hydrocarbon impacted

oil was placed into 55-gallon drums and stored onsite pending

analytical results. Based on the analytical results for TPH, the soil was classified as a Class I,
non-hazardous, regulated waste. On January I I , 2000, approximately six CY of the Class I, nonhazardous soil were transported to the Camino Real Landfill in New Mexico. Manifests fo r
disposal of the oil i included are Appendix C.

•

Ftbl i .: Montnna: RA R.doc

3-2

 Roy F. Weston. Inc. - Response Action Completion Report - Rubble Dump Spill Site, Fort Bliss, Texas

On 29 December 199 , approximate\ fo ur ard of A M were transported by Environmental
Reconditioning to the Otero County Landfill in New Mexico . The TNRCC hazardous waste
manifest is included in Appendix C.
Since the construction debris wa classified as unregulated non-hazardous waste, manifests were
not required by the landfill. Trucking trip tickets were used to arrive at a total of 1638 CY of
material that was removed and di sposed at several approved landfills in the area.

3.5

VERIFICATION ACTIVITIES

Aft.e r reviewing the available data on the site, Fort Bli s decided to collect additional verification
samples to document that constituents of concern were not present at the site. In addition, Fort
Bliss wanted to conduct additional site reconnai ssance to document that additional waste
disposal had not occurred at the site si nce completion of the removal activities.

A site

reconnaissance visit was conducted in November 2000, and evi dence of additional waste
disposal was not ob erved . Verification samples were then coll ected fro m fo ur areas where
elevated level s of TPH and S O s were reported in previously collected samples.
locations also corresp nded to the area

These

crapped and excavated during the re ponse actions.

The samples were labeled R D-1\ , R D-6V, R D-I OV, and RSD- IIY so as to correlate to
previously established sample locations. The ve rification samples were collected from areas
where small amounts of gray stai ned oi l were located, and not in the excavation areas where
backfill material was added . One additional sample was collected from an area near historical
location RSD-24 where dark sand y was noticed during the November 2000 site reconnaissance.
The samples were collected in November 2000 and January 200 I, and the location are shown on
Figure 4.
The samples were collected at a depth of approximately 0.5-foot with new di sposable plastic
scoop . The samples were placed in clean and labeled sample contai ners, and the containers
were then placed in a cooler w ith ice. At the end of the sampling activities, the sample labels
were checked for completeness, additional ice was added to the cooler, and the samples were
shipped to Se em Trent Service

for analyses.

Proper chai n-of cu tody procedures were

implemented, and appropriate docu mentati on accompani ed the samp le shipment.

Ftbliss:Montann:RACR.doc

3-3

 ~'!llallll-.--------------------------------------------,
Roy F. Weston, Inc. - Response Action Completion Report - Rubble Dump Spill Site; Fort Bliss, Texas

•

3.5.1 Laboratory Analyses
The verification samples were submitted for pol ynucl ear aromatic hydrocarbons (P AHs) and
RCRA metals.

The e anal

es were elected becau e P AHs were the predominant fraction

reported in the earlier VOC re ult . Metals \ ere included in the analytical approach since these
One sample, RDS- I OV, was also submitted for

had not been analyzed previously.

polychlorinated biphen Is (PCB ) to confirm the ab ence of this constituent group at the site.
This location was selected ince it was reported with the most individual P AH compounds at the
highest observed concentrations. The erificat ion sample were analyzed for one or more of the
following parameters:
• PAHs in accordance with U. . EPA Method 8310 .
• PCBs in accordance with
. EPA Method 80 2.
• Eight RCRA metals in accordance with U. . EPA 60 I 0/7000 series methods .

3.5.2 Verification Sample Results
The verification sampling result are ummarized in Table 2, and indi idual laboratory reports
are provided in Appendix F. The data were alidated upon receipt, and no ignificant findings
were noted that affected the re ult ·

pecifi PQL

ere at or below the TNRCC Tier I PCLs

for individual oil analys s. One exception occurred for ample RD - I 00 where the PQL for
dibenz(a,h)anthracene (0 .
PCL of 0 . 5 mg/kg.

-o

milligram per kilogram [mg/kg]) wa reported abo e the Tier I

o PAH con tituents were reported in this sample, and the elevated PQL is

not considered significant.
As shown in Table 2. low concentration of a few PAH con tituents were reported in some of the
verification

sample .

benzo(g,h,i)perylene,

ln

parti ular,

phenanthrene, chrysene,

benzo(b)tluoranthene,

and

acenaphthylene

acenaphthalene, fluorene,
were

reported

at

low

concentrations, ome e. ti mated below the laboratory PQL, in sampl es RDS-IV, RSD-1 OV, and
RSD-11 V. None of the concentrations exceeded the cri tical PCL. PCBs were not reported in
RDS-IOV, the only ample ubmitted for th i anal si .
Regarding metal s, chromium, cadmium, lead. and silver were reported in the verifi cation
•

samples. The concentration of metal are below the Tier I PCL for soil expo ure, but some are

Ftblis :Montan :RA R.do

3-4

 Roy F. Weston, Inc. - Response Action Completion Report - Rubble Dump Spill Site. Fort Bliss. Texas

•

above the Tier I P L fi r gr undwater pr

t

ti n. Ba kgr und metal

on entrati n have been

established for the Fort Bli s cantonment area; however, it i uncenain whether they would apply
given the distance between the ba kground ampling location and the Rubble Dump Site.
Therefore, the sample with the highe t concentrations of metals (RDS- IOV) was further tested by
the Synthetic Precipitation L a hin , Pr cedure ( PLP)

The PLP result were all below the

PQL indicating that the metal s are not leachable at the concentrations reported at the site, and the
concentrations of metals are protective of groundwater.
3.5.3 Evaluation of Results

Historical investigation activities at the ite revealed that ome areas were affected primarily
with hydrocarbon constituents at concentrations that exceeded acceptable levels. Additionally,
ACM was present in areas of the ite that required action . The hydrocarbon affected areas and
the A M wa removed from the site and properly disposed. For the areas not excavated,
instance of VOCs, TPH, and

VO s were reported, howe er, the concentrations were all

reported below the critical Tier I PCLs.
•

erification ample , collected from the areas where

removal activities , ere completed, were not reported with constituent concentrations exceeding
the critical P Ls. Therefore, the ontamination ha been removed , r moval actions have been
completed, and the site atisfie the requirements of a Remedy

tandard A closure under the

TRRP . Under this clo ure approach. no further action i required at the ite.

-~
Ftbliss:M ntana:R

R.doc

3-5

 Roy F. Weston. Inc. - Response Action Completion Report - Rubble Dump Spill Site; Fort Bliss, Texas

•

4.0 IMPROVEMENT ACTIVITIES
T he fo llowing subsections describe the improvement activities that were completed m
association with the respon e actions to reasonably pre ent future dispo al at the site.

4.1

EARTHEN BERM REPAIR

Approximately a 1.7 miles stretch of the existing earthen berm along Montana Avenue and the
Site Monitor acces road was r paired. There were l l commonly u ed access points that were
identified that required repairs . These areas of the berm were repaired using a backhoe, mediumsize bobcat, shovels and hand tool . The impro ement to the earthen berm were conducted to
reduce access to the site and surrounding areas. Photographs of the berm repair activities are
described in Appendix C.

4.2
•~

SURVEYING AND FENCE INSTALLATION

Prior to the installation of the fen ce along Montana Avenue, a Texa -Licensed land surveyor was
retained to identif and stake the location of the east-west property line along Montana Avenue.
Once the property line was established, a 4-strand barbwire fence was installed along Montana
Road and the Site Monitor acce
originating along Montana Road

Road . The fence was constructed on Fort Bliss property
e t of the Rubble Dump Site where the fence for the El Paso

International Airport terminated . The fence wa extended along Montana Road to the Site
Monitor access road where it turned north . The fence was then extended to the Site Monitor
parking lot where nearby security per onnel are always on duty. Brace posts were incorporated
into the fence at approximate 300-foot intervals, and no trespassing signs were installed along
the fence at I 00-foot interval . The location of the fence is shown in Figure 5. One gate was
installed at the power line ea ement road in the event that access was required by the local power
company. The gate was ecured with a lock and chain, and Fort Bliss controls access to the gate
keys. Photographs of the fence are provided in Appendix C (photograph 3 and 4) .

•
Ftbliss:Montana:RACR.do

4-1

 Roy F. Weston, Inc. - Response Action Completion Report - Rubble Dump Spill Site; Fort Bliss, Texas

.•

5.0 CONCLUSIONS

•
Based on the data and information presented m this report, the following conclusions are
provided for the Ru bble Dump Site.
•

Approximately six cubic yards of hydrocarbon-impacted soil were excavated and
transported to Camino Real Landfill in New Mexico for disposal, and approximately four
cubic yards of ACM were removed and transported to Otero County Landfill in New
Mexico for disposal.

•

Approximately 1,638 cubic yards of non-hazardous construction/ demolition debris were
removed and transported to Camino Real Landfill in New Mexico, and the C lint and Fort
Bliss Landfill s in Texas for disposal.

•

The horizontal and vertical extent of impacted soils have been delineated to
concentrations either below the laboratory PQLs (method detection limits) or the critical

•

Tier 1 PCLs for organic and inorganic constituents.
•

An ecological evaluation was performed, and the results indicate that the site does not
pose unacceptable risks to ecological receptors.

•

Concentration of constituents remaining in the soils are below the Tier 1 Residential
PCLs. Therefore, the Rubble Dump Site is in compliance with a Remedy Standard A,
Tier I Closure and no further action is required .

•

A fence was installed along Montana Road and the Site Monitor access road to control
access and prevent future dumping.

•

This Response Action Completion Report along with the associated appendices comply
with the requirements of the Affected Property Assessment Report, 30 TAC §350.S 1
through 350.55 .

•
Ftblis :Montana:RACR.do

5-1

 t
Roy F. Weston, Inc. - Response Action Completion Report - Rubble Dump Spill Site; Fort Bliss, Texas

6.0 REFERENCES
Encon International Inc. (Encon). 2000. Environmental Technical Report, Fort Bliss Ruble Dump
and Spill Site lean up near Site Monilor - SWMU-16. 14 June 2000.
Golder (Golder Associates). 1997. Final Report. Preliminary Site Investigations. July 1997.
Golder. 1999. Final Report,
January 1999.

ite Characterization Rubble Dump/Spill Site, Fort Bliss, Texas.

TNRCC (Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission). 1999. Title 30, Texas
Administrative Code §350, Risk Reduction Program Rule. 23 September 1999 .

•

•
Ftbli s: fonlana:RA R.doc

6-1

 .

:.r,-:.-:-:- ,, . ;-;--.- \,'~,! ~~
I
,;:_

.

I ....
. . c,·,,_
. ,i. I~t;.•

. ,;;

I

,'
)

I .

,"
,I

j ('

I

REF: 7.5 IIIHVTE SERIES {TOPOGRN'HIC MAP )
FORT BUSS SE OUADRANCu:
SCM1: : 1:24,000
SOURCE; PRQ.JMINARY SITE ~
TION RO'OR'T , COlD[R ASSOC . INC
FOR DBS .N/BOHANN-'N - HUSTOH,INC .(JULY, 199 7 )

SITE LOCATION

... ... . ... . . .. .

'
·.v,

Fl

~.1[1 (; FT

 '

.•
\

'

-~

SITT: lifbN:roR
( ~ FACUTY) \ ; .

,

'·}. I

•

l

.,._

'< '

-

I'
~

,r -

•

.

~

- . . . ·,;.-:~ ~
'

·.

Jtll,

.RUBBl.£

'. -

\

..,

IOUMP ,
:.'

SPIU. SITE

·t ._,

r

.,.,

,,

FIGURE 1
SITE LOCATION

MAP

RUBBLE DU MP SPILL SITE
(SWMU
16 )
FORT BLISS, TEXAS
• 1.,

tf

•

t-~

~}·,,.Al I

MARCH 01 123 7 1002003 NOT TO SCALE
·•

. ' ""

• . .... Ht· ' ',

, ._, ·

• · .i.

~'

' i.A .,

~. ,, .

G1

 -~

., -:....-r

I'·"'

i

... .:..

--- -

•

''
~

..

.
.

..

,·;"' /

')
t
-::

......

'

.....
..

~

•,.

2

'

. ~4··
(' ,o

-

.,
I

.......

ll

·...r...,__

~-

.,,

..

)

h~

~

.........

J

!•,
9. . .
,,

RESE

1'

'\

t

{

·'

c··

!

~

../

~

t

f

.'

~

\

f

•. i,

· FORT BUSS

'

..,

l

•

""'\

.,._ - :lMWIT'f;
.
.
-.. 'Qf.,.
;

I

1

fl

/

. .::.,;

-·-

u

.- .

•1
J 11 .,,

...

'i

''

J
..- ,

•r

.

I

i
\

~

r

'

/ 'I

.

- -·,•.

....

r-

..

'

. (.

"-

w

. ,. .... re ,

..

.INTERNATIO
AIRPORT '

··.:~ ,.

f

,. ~r

' ,~

..<

EL PASO .

1'.l;,-

• J'J.iti

.t

,,

~TIOf:t
:,

J

(COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAJ..)
'

S( ' Al I·. I 2 ·1 IH )tl
• t

I 2

· --:::::-1
0

·- I
1 ()( ,

1

. . _ _____ ___ ~r-

. ..

-"-

'!

L

FIGURE 2

t '·"l.;.

LAND USE

( ( l'\ !Ot HI "\! fl,'\ \l 1n H ~ I

MAP

LEGEND
: 7 .5 WINVTt: SO!!ES (TOPOCAAPHIC MAP)
BUSS SE OUAOIWIGl£

RUBBLE DUMP SPILL SITE
(SWMU -16)
FORT BLISS, TEXAS

SITE LOCATI ON

: 1:2 4,000

INC

DA [

PC:)Jf (1

FEB 01

12371002003

NO

>< \DWG\rOR;

'.,( Alt

AS SHOWN

LISS\01.100115 30 TMG

01/ 30 /0 1

 ~N

II
II
II

1:

~
0

.300

I

1

I

600'

I

SCALE IN FEET

NOTES:
1) RDS-SERIES SAMPLES COLLECTED
DURING THE PRELIMINARY SITE
INVESTIGATION (1995) .

LEGEND
ELEVATED TPH/SVOC
CONCENTRATIONS

•

1111

CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS
SAMPLE
SURFACE SOIL SAMPLE
SURFACE SOIL EXCAVATION
AREAS (Pl, P2, P3, P4)
(SIZE DOES NOT REPRESENT
ACTUAL SIZE EXCAVATED)

FIGURE 3
.

SAMPLE LOCATION
MAP

..

. . ,. ~Jr"

\ 1 -

__ Jl_~-

RUBBLE DUMP SPILL SITE
{SWMU 16)
FORT BLISS, TEXAS
DATE
FEB 01

PROJECT NO.
SCALE
12371002003
AS SHOWN
lt:\OWG FORT BLJSS\01300116:lO.TMG

01 31 01

 -~
0

I

300'

600'

I

SCALE IN FEET
.... "'

...

• • <

NOTE:

1) VERIFICATION SAMPLE FORT BUSS

#1

WAS A COMPOSITE SOIL SAMPLE
COLLECTED FROM EXCAVATED AREAS
P1 , P2, P3, P4 UPON COMPLETION
OF THE EXCAVATION ACTIVITIES.

2) SU RFACE SOIL SAMPLE RDS - IV,
- 6V, - 1OV, - 1 1V, 100 WERE FINAL
VERIFICATION SAMPLES COLLECTED ON
NOVEMBER 6 , 2000 AND JANUARY 3, 2001.

•

1111

LEGEND
FINAL VERIFICATION SOIL SAMPLE
SURFACE SOIL EXCAVATION
AREAS {Pl. P2, P3, P4)
{SIZE DOES NOT REPRESENT
ACTUAL SIZE EXCAVATED)

FIGURE 4
SURFACE SOIL EXCAVATION

•

AREAS AND VERIFICATION
SAMPLE LOCATIONS

.•.
:

MAP

,~J,
\1

-,

RUBBLE DUMP SPILL SITE
(SWMU 16)
FORT BUSS. TEXAS

__ Ji -:~--

DATE

FEB 01

SCALE

AS SHOWN

 ~
'

NOTE:

•

FIGURE 5

Aerial photograph of the proj ct s,t a nd odjoin,ng
El Paso International airport proper y (Cooper Ae rial
Survey, 1995). Fence line for oirpor is illustro ed in
blue . The newly installed ence line or the rubble
dump/spill site is outl ined in green (a- lnd,co te s yp ico l
site access points hot were bloc ed by r pairing t e
earthen berm .

50ll!C£: ENWIONMENlAI. TECHNICAL REPORT. ENCON INT[RNATlONAL INC (JUN[ • • . 2000)

AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH
(FENCE INSTALLATION)
RUBBLE DUMP SPILL SITE
{SWMU -16)
FORT BLISS, TEXAS
DATE

PROJECT NO.

FEB 01

12371002003

SCALE

AS SHOWN

H:\DWG\fORl Bt1SS\01l10110J0.TMC

01/31/01

 Tahle 1
S wnmary o f DetectPd ConcPntrations is Soil

Rubble Dump Spill Sitl' (SWI\ I

16)

Fort Bliss. El P!lso. TelUls
Re ldent11ll Tier l
PCLs

Sample l.D.
RD ·-t

TocSoilc--b

cwSoll

120
260
3,400
9,500

Naphthalme
4ethylmc Chloride
Acetone

2-Butanon.e

16
0.0065
2.4
15

RDS-3

RDS-4

RDS-5

RDS-6

- t - -~(~0 -_1~) - - + - - -('0_- l-'-)- - + - - ' (-0_--'"
1)_--+--"( 0--'
l)'---

ll/4/95

11 /4/95

11/4/95

I 1/4/95

11 /4/95

ll/4/95

0.005LI
0.005ll

0.00 5U
0.005U

0.005U
o.oom

o.oom
o.oom

o.oom

0.005V

NA
NA
NA
NA

NA
NA
NA
NA

NA

NA
NA
NA
- -NA
----+--

?,;A

NA
NA

4-M ethyl·2-pent.anonc
4,900

NA
NA
NA

o.oosv
NA

NA
NA
NA
i
1--- ' - - - - + - - - - - - -----+--·-----+-------+· - - - - - - -. . ; - - - - - - f - - - - - - 2,600
,
4.1
0.005 U
0.005U
O.OOSU
0.005 U
0.005U
0.005 U

2-Hexanone
Toluene

~

RDS-2

t,__-~
(_O._
- I') --+---~(C_~_l ~) -

~~ ~=,~ifJ1i:1~,~~~t~i~~~ir~~t~1mttJt~i~rrt~t~ti~ti/\1f~]~i1?iit1~ijt%~@t1iti~t~tr~1J~iwr.~w.;1~(;$t~~~}#Jr~t~iit~i~1t,~1t~tj~1t~1r
21. 0
~600

Benzene
Toluene

j

Ethylbenz.ene

4,0()()i

3 .!l

Total Xylenes

3.300

61

Naphtha.lcne

=-_

--,------+------+-------,-------+-------+ - - - - - - -

0.0 13 ____ - . ___ .
1_ _
4._I _______

-=--·- r-· =---

'

120

= 0340U·-- 0.350 U
0.340U
0.340U
O.J30U
0. 1301
0.340U
0.350U
0.340U
0.340 U
0.330U
0.071J
~- L700! -_ :=-· c-CU 40l '--=:- - -o~3'soti-- , - -o-_3_4_o_u- ~ · - -o-.-3-~~- u- - - i - -o-.3-3_o_t _r-+---0-_·4--1o- ~

Phenanthrcne

Fluoranthene
PyrC11c
Bcnzo(a )anthraccnc
bis (2· Eth lhe,cyl) phthalau,
Chryscne
Di-n-octyl phthal&tc
Benzo(b )flu oranthene
£kll2o{g.h,i)peryl nc
1-Mcthylnaphthalcne
Acc:nAphthene

Q_j _

2.300

I

56

1

21 0 960
560

0 340ll

k. 9

0.350lJ
- O.J50U
0 . 350U

- -4:i__ , -R2 ___0 340\/
~

60

- 770___ -

1.300
~- 6

I

- -l,!WO
- - +l

!< I 0.000
JO

-- - - -

21.000

f---- 57-

J 50

3,400
3 10
3k
X7
76
220
1,300

-

__O)6 _ :
5.7

-

_

'

0.340 U

·t·-, - -

0.340U

0.330U

O 34- ~

0.330U

O 340l.'
o J -101 ·
()3401-;
O 3401'
0 H Ol '
0 J 40li

_

~ 3_::?~

0 330 U
0.330U
o.330u

I

0.340U
j_ 0.340U
0.330U
I
- u'.J50f1
o.34ou -- .. o 340 - , -0 _3301 1 1 ·
o.35ou
:
o.340U
o.340U
o.330L~ r
-03 ~- 0 340U - , - O 340U i O 330l' ,
1
0 3 0 ' ~-- 0 3401 1 --- .. 0.340U
0.330U
0.350U
I 0.340U
0.340lJ
,
0 3301 '
~.350L'
'
o 340U
, ~ -4_9~
o 3?0 U ·0.350 U
0.340 U
I
O340U
I
0.330U
0.350U

L

_j __

0.340l 1

0.0701
1.900
O. IJ OJ

0.330U
0. 140 J
0 330 U· - ~~
--

-- -

OJ50l'
! 0.340ll
O 340
0.350U
I
0.340l 1 1
0.3 40U
·-oJ 5oT" - - ~3oo- r __!):340U _ -

R5

__2,_!00 _ ~
1i< .ooo

&nzo{k)flu orantbcne
Benzo(a)pyrene
Indeno ( 1,2.3-cd) pyrenc
Dibenz (a.h) anthraccne
Acenaphthylcne
Butylbenzylphiha.latc

-

0.340U

·-,--034~ f -o.340c,- - - 0~6~ -

0 340U · - __o}SQT; _ I_ 0.3 40l 1 _ I __ 0.340lJ _ +
O 340 l '
0.350U
0.340L:
0 340U
'

(U 40l '
0 340L'
120- - - ~3 4~L' __

2.5 00 1
....
_ -3-.o-o_o ___,

Fluorcne
Anthnu:enc

0 -34_0_l' - -

0.1 IOJ
O.Ok5J
o.34-0U
0.340U
o.34ou
o.340U
0.340U
O.J40U
0.340U
o 340 U
0. 340U

~=;:~~'tlf~~~\tfltt.rr}1:~=£~?:·\:\(~J:tt:-{:!:1:\tit~r:tr::1ft[1:r1 :'.::;~\t?rit~Jt\J\ti~t\i~tf.ttttttf~~~~}~:M®lJMr~r)tf)t}Jttirtitt~Jtir:tiimri:~rlt~m~ttJ

,___

6

3 10

-

-

- -

0

1

- - - - - - - f - - · - _____

f

- - - +- - - - -

...

15
~----·io
___ - - -iI
- - ---- --- -- -1

95

----

---r-----

'

i:o ·· - - ·=- - ; ·· --= -- - t - · - - - - + - --- - - - -

I

__. ____L__.___ - - -~.:.42 0

TPH 418.l
TPH 1005
C 6 - C, 0

- , .600-1'
----

1.600

> C, o • Ca
C6. C1
Oil & Grease

•

soo

----·

I___-_· __ j_ ___ _:::-_

__

220
0.75
1~200
- - · - - ---·

'-- - - -

Lead
Mercury
Se.lcnium
Silver

1

..!}___ .._

__ ~4_ __ , _
2.800
43
,.. 23 ,000 - • ··

Anlcni
Barium
Cadmium
Chr mium

~-

l .600

I

- 20 _,____ .::- --·
20

r -

-

,- ---- -1

-

,--t

l

-

/

---------;,-.-

---r---

20

____
:::_,~--'
45.9

--,

40.2

-

· - -·-.,.I

-- 27 8

-

-

------L
I

61.7

~

~ 25.2

Sample RDS-29 was a trip blank

2

ample S-2 i a duplicate of sample S-1.

1

ample -8 is a dupl icate of sample S- 7.

I . Soil sample w

analyzed for VO
J = lndiClltcs an cstim 1.ed value.

hy EPA Method !< I CJ.

E mConcentration ex eeds the calibration range of the GC MS
B

= Analytc detected in method blank.

Bold = Detected concentrations exceed the <..Tilical T ier l PCL Ji.,r residential land use al a 30 a-.Te soun:c area .
232/1 <0.0 15 J = Total concentration (mg/kg) I SPLP concentration (mg·L)
1«1fi11al.J<lsfrable 1-Rm,dentlll/ll

J

Page I of 5

 TablE' I

Summa ry of 0Nl'CIE'd Con cE-ntrations i.~ Soil
Rubble Dump SpilJ Si te (S\\'~ll' 16)

•

F,,rt Bit~,. El Pa.~n. Te>.u,
Re id cnlial Ti<'r I
PC'Ls

S,unpl I.D.
RDS- to

Analytt

(0- 1)
11/4/95
Naphthalene
Meth lcne CW ride
A.cctonc

2-But.anonc
4-Meth 1-2-pen!Jlnonc
2-HeXllllOTIC
Toluene

RDS- I I
(0-1)
11 /4195

RDS-25
(0-1)
11/10/95

0.005U
0 005U
NA
NA

0.007U
0.005U

NA

'A
A

'A

NA

A
0.005U

0.005U
I

I
--r-

0 340U
O }40l l
• - 0 .340l '

0 3 OU

~

Phc1lJIIlthrcnc

Fluoranthene
Pyrene
8enzo( a )anthraocn~
his (2- Eth lhexyl) phU1alate

•

Cltryllcne
Di-n-octyl phthalate
Benzo(b )Jluonmthenc
Benzo(g.h,i)pcrylenc
2-Melhylnaphthalene

1.700
2.300
1.700
5.6
43
560
1,300

210
960
560

1.800

!<2
770
' 10,000
30
23 ,000

2.~o~

X5

.l .000
2,300
J!(.000

120

0 340l '
0 340l'
O .l40l '
0 075 J
0 340l '
0 340l '
0 140 \ '
0.3 40\
0 l40l '
CU 4ot ·

-"--

(,

Acenaphthene
Flu rcne
Anthraccne
Benz. )lluoranthen~
Benz.a( a )pyrcne
lndeno ( 1,2,3-cd) pynnc

5
0.56
5.7
0 55
.1 . '00
5,700

Barium
Cadmium

Chrnrruum
Lead
-fer ury

0 H O! '

-

~9

I 50

0 140\ '

1,400

0 )4 0l '

3 10
3~
87

1-101 ·
0 \401'
0 1401 '
0 \40! '
0 340! .
0 .340! '

7 (,

2.U
1.300

2.!<00
4\
D,000
500

0 75
1.200

6

10

3 10

I I

I

CJ

0 340l '
0.340! '
0 340 ! '
0 340l '
0 140\ '
0 .140l'

0.340l '
() \4011
0 3401'
0 340l '
0 340 \ '
0 140\
0 340l '
0 340l '
0 l4 0l'
0 340l
0 340! 1

-

0.330U
03 30U
0 330l I
0 3301 '
0 DO U
0.330U
0 30l '
0 .330l'
0. 330! 1
0 330U

-·----

I+

28.000
8.IIOOE 0 260J- T
ll 700E
l

1
---~

2 500

0 30! '

21 OOOE
5300
2 GOO

o:n ot:

13 OOOE

0 330l'
0 3301_:
0 330l '

I 5(JO

o:n ot '
-r

,

+

0 Bot '
0 1301'
0.330 U

---

17 {)00lJ

0 330U
8 400E

I

17-ooou ·
17 .000U
17 ooou
5 400)

__ ..._,

k OOOJ

6 6001

t

7.500F:
- - -t

2.000
I 100
0 330 \ 1
0.330 U

17 ooou
17.00ilU
17 OOOl '
17 000\ I
14 OOOJ
17 ooou

--,

-1

-

2.600
0 .340U
0 340\J
0 .340 U
0 340\i
O.J40lJ
0 .340U
03 40U
0 '40
0 .J40U
0 J40l1
0 40l '
0 .340! '
0 .340 U
0.340U

1-;
-1

I 5

I

-- 'l

....j.

1,700
TP II 1005
C 6 • C io

1.600

> 10 • C2
C 6 -C 21

l ,t,00
1.600

Oil&GreMC
1

•

''

20
20

20
57!<

145

250

11 5

2.0 30

7.690

ample RDS-29 was" tnp blanl.

2

Sample S-2 is a dupli

J

Sample S-8 is n duplicate of sample S-7

te of. mple . - I

oil sample was analyzed for SVOCs hy J:.Pi\ 1-.fcthod k.l 10
J c Ind icates an estimated va lue
E = Concentration exceed! the calibration range of U1e <,C /\ IS
B • Analyte dctc...'1.cd in method blank.
Bold = Detected concentrallons exceed the cnttcal Tier I l'CI f tor rc.sadenltal land
23211<0 .0151 Total con cntration (mg,ki;) ' SPLP conccntrat,

u.S<:

al a 30 a..-rc source area

c

Page 2 of 5

 Ta ble 1
Summary of lktectf'<I Concentrations i. Soil
Rubble Dump Spill Site (S\\ 'M

16)

Fort Bh , El Pa.~o. Texas
RHldential T ier I
PCLs

To4Soilc...h

Sample 1.D.
RDS-27
(0-1)
11 /10/95

RDS-26
(0- 1)
11110/95

CWSoil

RDS-29 1
(0-1)
11/ 10/95

RDS-28
(0-1)
11 /10/95

S- 1
(0-2)
8/97

S-2'
(0-2)
8/97

S-J
(4-6)
8/97

·~~¥\~~{~:~ ~Y4-i.lii@lmf~~t11tl~t~~%t}1i[i1ilt.1~it1ttlJ~~t~~t1ifttit~i~\~~t@ft~®l!WJil!~i~iil1%:~'***1Wt%W.li®fu\ffi~1
. Naphthalene

120
260
3.400
9,500

Methylene Chloride
Acetone
2-Butanonc
4-Methyl-2-pentanonc

2-Hexanone

16
0.0065
2.4
15

4,900
2,600

Toluene

O.OOSU
0.00 5U
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.005U

4. 1

0.005U
O.OOS U
NA
NA
NA

NA
0.005U

0.005U
0.00 5U
NA
NA

NA
NA
0.005 U

I

0.005U
0.230 E
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.005U

0.005
0.005
0.020
0.020
0.020
0.020
0.005

U
U
U
U
U
U
U

0.005 U
0.009 B
0.020 U
0.020 U
0.020 U
0.020 U
0.005 U

0.0051 U
0.0054 B
0.020 U
0.020 U
0.020 U
0.020 U
0.005 1 U

I· .~ ~-v · ~,~=-~~:=;;s.1i~i~~"l;~~~t~l®.~l~~t1t~~t\iitt~tt~i~m.t;~~~~1~;1~1tit¥.i1~~$t$W.t~~,~%~~irI111m:i~~1·R ~ti~t*~Jt~w.
·0enune

21.0
2,600

Toluene

•

=·

J ,300

Phenanthrene

Fluoranthc:M
Pyr-ene
Benzo(a)llnthracenc
hi (2- Ethylhc I) phthalale
Chr)-'llCrlC
i-n-octyl phthalate
emo(b)fluoranthcne
•zo(g.h.i)pcry lene
/-Mcthylnaphthalene
o\cenaphthene
Pluorene
Anthracene
Bcnzo(k)fluoranthene
13enzo(a)pyrene
Jndeno ( 1,2 ,3-cd) pyrene
Dibenz (a,b) anthracene
,\cenaphthylene
!lutylbenzylphthalatc

Barium

Cadmium
Chromium
Mercury
~elenium
fli lver

-

-

-

-

61

6

t5
1.0

310
95

I.I
0 .240

-1--

-----,,--------+--------+-----+----+----+----I

~
,'."'"!·';~~
.,~
. . . :,;
. ,=
~-.~--:·)~" ~~11,Z
,-~,,.'i:l:~:~
~;~.-=-·~
~ ::.K~-:--~
~-;!s
..~~-.x,.~·~:::-;.::
.~,•\'~
.'-t.:
l ......::;::
,,,,:'.'J
,.""
;.::
......~
i ,,.
,1;.::
~~~~"':-J~~-.:~
:::
.~
""<
.~~;~~~
.::~~:;.::
t:~~
t1*
~~:~"'~:~~r;.::;t"}~
'~
:~t;t~~
.::".J::-:
':j'W
:".~·l~t~~
r~~J~::;l1r
t-!~.w
~i!;,;;
@~f.~~~:~
}~r.t~
:<:,1~
:;: l ~-~~:J~~
i;: :l}..:~
_: :_~
~1f"
~fa~~jt:::?·t!:~
';~-t:·~\:o.~
\~;::!
t ""
~?.=~f~t~i;~~
l~~~~~&:::,t~
J :rit
::,~J'!_t
':'~
t ~~~~:J:::,
:o.J ~r~~;~.:::,
?".m
:,::::,·r~,~~,t~t~~
. }""
·1:::,
;1~~;~
¥:::,
;~~
*~1~:::,
.t~r~
t~i:i:~:?}i:~
::,~
i ~f
1

1'PH 418. l
1fPU 1005

775
64.7
I
42.7
- - - - ~------<•------~--------l.-_____
...,_______.______._____....____

C6- C10
> C1 0 -~•
C6 -~I
Oil & Grease

•

-

16
0.340U
340U
0.330U
0.340 U
NA
340 U
6.70 U
120
0. 340U
21 0
0.330U
1.700
0.340U
NA
340 U
340 U
6.70 U
0 .340U
2,300
960
0.330U
340 U
0 .340U
NA
340 U
6.70 U
03 40U
1.700
560
0.330U
0.340U
NA
340 U
340 U
6.70 U
0 .340 U
5.6
8.9
0 330 U
0.340U
340 U
340 U
6.70 U
NA
340 U
43
81
0 770
0.078J
O. I 60J
NA
340 U
6.70 U
1
560
0 - --0)40U
O 330U
O.J40U
340 U
6.70 U
340 U
NA
~ 0 ~10:000 - - 03 40- - - -0 . ~
0.340{)
340 lJ
6.70 U
340 U
NA
6
30
0.340l
O 330 U
0.3 40U
340 U
340 U
6.70 U
NA
1.800
I 23.000
0 340 l '
0 330U
0.340U
340 U
340 U
6.70 U
NA
2,500 - -~
~
0 .340U 0 330U
0.340U
340 U
340 U
6.70 U
NA
3,000
120
>----0.340U
0 .330lJ
0.340U
NA
340 U
340 U
6 .70 U
2,300
150
0.340 U
0.330U
0.340U
NA
340 U
340 U
6.70 U
1- - - - - + - - - -1- - - - - - - - - · - - - - - - - l - - - - - - - - i i - - - - - - - i - - - - . . . - - - - 1 - - - 18,000
3,400
0 .340U
0.330U
0.3 40U
NA
340 U
340 U
6.70 U
57
31 0 -1--0.340U __
0 .330U
0.340U
NA
340 U
340 U
6.70 U
0 .56
3.8
0.3 40ll ___ 0.330U
0.340U
NA
340 U
340 U
6.70 U
5.7
R7
0 .340U
0.330U
0 .340U
NA
340 U
340 U
6.70 U
0 .5~
'
7.6
0 .340U
0 .33UU
0 .340U
NA
340 U
340 U
6.70 U
3,800
220
0 340U
0.330U
0.340U
NA
340 U
340 U
6.70 U
5,700
1.300
1700.000
0.330U
0.340U
NA
340 U
340 U
6.70 U

~o

Lead

1

-

I

24
13
I
2,800
220
- - - - - - - - - 1 - - - - - - - - - 1- -- - - - 1 - - - - f - - - - - f - - - - ,.......__.. -f------+-- - 43
0 75
1 - -- - - + - · - - - - ~ -·-- - - - - -------------+-·23 ,000
1.200

1\rseni

Ir

-

~=r<~~~~~~~li~J~~tk~1ti~¥1Jtiffu~l11f~J\JM~~~hWti1il1il\ttlt&tit~i%Jlif!11N.Wf#.~¥¥Jtl1$£f.4t~;w11+!ffJfili\Wtt.filM

Naphthalene

•

0 .013
4. 1

,___4_,o_o_o___
3._s_ _,_____- + - - - - - - - - - - - + - - - - + - - - - - + -- - - - -- -

Ethylbcnzcne

Tota.l Xylencs
,..

I

1,600

20

1,600
1.600

20
20
~

I

796

70.6

49.7

Sample RD -29 was a trip blank.

1

Sample S-2 is

J

Srunple S-8 is a duplicate of sample S-7.
Soil 51llllple \

J • lndi

duplicat of sample - 1.

analyzed for SVOCs b EPA Meth.od K 10

tes an estimated value.

E = Con cntration c ·ceeds the calibration range of the GC MS.
= Analytc detected in method blank.
B.oJd • Det.ecicd concen.t rations exceed the critical Tier I PC L f for residcnti I land use
232/l <O.O15 f = Total concentration (mg/kg) / SPLP concentrati

al

a 30 at-Te source area.
Page 3 of 5

 T,ihle I
Summ ary of Detected Cnnn nlralicms i.• Suil
Ruhhle Dump Spill Site (S \\'\1\ ' 16)
FClrt Hhs,. El l'asn, Texa,
R.-sldmlial Tier I
PC'Ls

Sa mple l . D.

An.alytc

_.!22.._ __~-

Naphthalene
ethylene C hloride
Acetone
-Butanone

260
3.400
9, 500

_l]_O_ ! -

1.700
;
- - -- r
2.300
,

Fluoranthene
Pyrene
Benz.o( a )anthra=ne
hi (2- Ethylhe>.')'I) phthalatc

_

1.100 __L
56
4J
560

!< 9

x~

770
S 10.000
----- ·~
(,
30
1.800
21 .000
2.500
!<5
3.000
120

Chrysene

.l

1.300

Di-n-octy l phthalate
Benzo(h )flu oranthene
Eknzo(g.h.i)pery lcn"
Meth lnaphthalenc
cenaphthem:
Fluorcne
Anthracenc
Benzo(k )fluoranthene
Benzo(a)pyrcnc
lndeno ( 1,2,3-cd) p:,,Tene

:uoo
lk .000
57
0 ~6

57

Dibenz (a.h) anthracene

220

5.700

u oo

___ ,.

41
23.000

uad

500

6
31 0
95

C6- C1 0

Ci,

c.-c,

150
3.400
310
3 !(
in

O 55
3.!<00

24
2.!<00

Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromi um

> C 10 .

-

960
_ 560

7 (,

1

( 11-2)

8/97

8/97

40.0 l '

-

~) ~I

-

--

.

-- 4 00 l '

40 0 l '

4 00 l '

40 o l '
40.0 I
40 (1 I '

4 00 \ .

0 .0053 ll
0.0 12 B

40 0 \
40.111
4 () 0 l '

7 IOt·

7 10
7 10
7 10
7 10
7. 10

l'
l'
1·

l'
l'
1. 10 l '

411 .tl l '

4 00 1 ·

40 0 l '

00 l '

40 0 l '

4

7. 101 '
7 10 l '

40 0 1 '
40 0 l '
40 0 1 ·

4 00 l '
4.0\1 l '

4 0 .11 1'

7. 10 l '
7 10 1 I
710 1' ,
1 1o t '

4 () 0 l '

40 0 I .
411.111 '
411.0 1·

4 .1111 1'

40.0 I '
40 0 l '
40 0 \ '

8/97

0 .0056 U

40 0 l ' ~- 7 IO l 1
-IO.O I
40 0 l'
40 0 \ .

4 00 \ .
4 001'
4 00 I '
4 00 l '
4 00 l
4 00 l'
4 00 l '

40 O I '
40 0 l '
40 0 l
40 ll \
-UUI I

S- 10
(2-4)

S- 11

S- 12

(0-2)
8/97

(0-2)
8197

0.0052 U 0.005 2 U 0.0064 U 0.006 1 U
0.011 B 0.0074 B 0.012 B 0.0066 B
0.230 E
0.021 U
0.0 26 U
0 .02 5
0.07 1
0.02 1 U
0 .026 U
0.025 U
0 . 120
0.013
0.026 U
O O12
0.02 1 U
0.026
0 .0052 U 0.0052 U

4 00 l '

l'

40 0 l '

3

S-8

cu-2) .:_- J o--2T
H/97
H/97

l~J 400 l '_ ,

40.0 l .
4 00 l '
--·-'-40 0 l ' , 4 00 l .
+
411.0 I '
4 00 l .

- 4-0 0

S-1
+

4. 10
3.40 U
R5 .0 U
4. 10 U
3.40 U
RS.OU
4. IO U
35.0 U
3.40 U
85.0 U
4. 10 U
· - 3 5 0 l ' t - 3 40 L'
85.0 U
4. IO U
--- - 370 l ' 1 35.0ll
).40U
85 .0U
4. IO U
:i 10 1·
350 \ :-;-- 3-.4
- 0- ~ - -R
- 5-.o- u - ·4. 10

u

370ll I 35:0l!~- T 40U , 85.0 U
4. IO U
3701 -;-- 3s.oc'-- 34o u 41o u
:1 70 l ' ' 35JJU -~ T 4UC 4. IOU
, :I 70 ll -,- 35 0 lJ I 3.40 LJ--+-----+-·4.lOLJ
1701 ' ' f 5 0- 1! 1 3 40U
S50C
4. IOU
n o t·
35 0 l '
340 l '~ !<5 0U
41 0U
370l :-- - 35 .0 l ' ·- ]40 V - K5 .0 l '
4. IOU
3.70 1·
35.11 \ 1
85.0 U
4. 10 U
J 101 · T
85.11 U
4. 10 U
iis.o-u--+·-4_
-1_0
3.70 t.:

_u_

__ , ----

-- ____.,._

-

O 240

I.GOO

20

1.600

20

1.600

20

t-

-

I

-,

-+

--- ---!!

Sample RDS-29 wa, a tnp hll\lU,.
,

ample S-2 is a dupli ate of si mple S-1

Sample -8 is a duplicate of sample S- 7

,
•

S-6

(0- 2)
8/97

13
22 0
0 75
1.200
l 5
10
-I I

Oil & Grease

1

S-5

0_QO<, l ' . O.Ojtb ~- • 0 006 l 1
0.0_! 6 ~ 00~ 1:.:_ , 0.0 15 B
0 02 4 l' I O 0 24 l '
0 0 24 l '
0 024 l ' -+-Q~:1j_·-=~0 024 l-;O 0 24 U

16
0.0065
2.4
15

,1- Methyl-2-pentanone
'.2-Jle>.'aflonc

_

S-1
surfac~

J Soil sample was ana lyzed for
J

VOCs hy FPA t.t ethod !<31 o

lndi ales an estimated \'aluc
E = Concaitration ex ·eeds the calihrahon range of the GC !> IS
B = Analyte detected in method b lank.
Bold ~ Detected oncentrnlions e cecd the ,-nt1cal Tier I PCI f lor re;.1dcnt1al land use at a
23 2/J <0.0 15) = Total concentration (mg'J.. g) SPLP con.:cntrall
c

l<'llfinal.xls/Table I-Resida1

. _..0 1

l (J

a.:rc , nur.:c area

Page 4 of 5

 Ta ble I
Summary of Detected Concenlntiuns is Soil
Rubble Dump Spill SitP (SW !\IU 16)

F , n Bh~s. El Pa,o. Te"X as
ResiM11rial T ie r I

Sampl e I.D.

PCL.•
Amdytr

S- 13
Toe ., uI'&<'omb

J

c;w.,,
_ ·1
.,..,u

I

AJ:etone

i 20
_I61J _
3_,4oo _
9.500

_

2-Butan nc
4-Mcthyl-2-pcntanone
2-Hc anonc

S- 14

c1i: 1>_!_

\

-8/9 7: · - k/97

2t 0

0 0 13

4.000

4 1

H

Bcnzo(b )fluoranthene
Bcnzo(g,h. i)peryl ene

16
210
960
60
89

120
t.700
2.:WO
1.700
5 (,

Bcnz.o( 11 )anthraccne
bis (2- ·thylhcxyl) phthalate
Chrysenc
Di-n-octyl phthalatc

-n

!<2

5(,0

770
810.000
.-,.- - 30

0ou
-

2-Mcthylnaphthalene
Acenaphthcnc

Ftuorcnc
Anthraccne
Benzo(k )fluoranthene
Benzo( a )pyrcne
Jndcno ( 1.2,3-cd) p)tene

Dibenz (a,h) anthra enc

Arseni
Barium
Cadmium

Chromium
Lead
icrcury
Selenium
ilvcr

-6 -

1.kOO
2.500
1,000
2.100
tk .000

57
0 5(,
57
0 ~5
3.!WO

2.XOO
4.1
D.000
500
(,

-

- •- -

23 .00(J
8~
120
150
.l.400
11 0
38
!<7

7 <,
220

13
22 0

!

S- IH

J

(4-6)

Trip Blank

co-n

t-'8/9'7'--+-- 8-/ 9--7-+--'-8/
- 9_7:.._-ll----'-8-/9_7.:._+_.,c
8/9
:_::.7,___

---- r
·--+-----

+

! - -

3(, 0 l '
0 360 l '
36.0 l '
0 360 l '
7 40 J
O 04!! J
1
36 0 l '
0 360 l 1
36 0 l
O 360 l .
36.ll l '
0 60t·
.160l '-.L0360l .-r
l6._Ql.'._LQ 360t ·
.160l'
0.360{ '
l(,Ol'
0360\ '

J(,Ol '
0360
36 ~- ~ ()_ 3_!,0
36.0 , .
0 360
36.0 1 · • 0:160
-+-36.0 , .
03(,0
16 0 l '
0 360
36 O l '

\'
l ':

l.
l'
l
l'

._

NA
---NA
A

l·
0 37 LT
J'.' A
- - --36.0ll
0 .37\ '
- - - ~L.1_i~
360U
037 1'
3.50 U
037C
NA
1
}60_ll_ 037lJ
f50 11 j ·cj-37l1~ _0',
360U
0 .371 '
3.50l l
037U I
NA
360~ 6]7 1) ·--35_0 _l'_ ~ 037l ' I
NA
)6 0 U

O 37

l.

360l! I -QJ7l /
3.5ot ·
0 .37L1
NA
360 l-;--· - 0~371 ;
3.50 U
O 37 l ' ,
!'IA
36.0 l '
0.37 I '
3.50 t.:
O.J?C ____A
36.0l'
I 037l ' - - 1 50l-;- . 017 l '
~A
- - - - --.--· ·:_
..,__ -._
___ _j__
•
I _._
36.0 U
0.37l'
3.SO l l , 0.37 ! ' 1
Ni\
1

1

- -l

- l

I I

95

0 240

c •. C 10

1.600

20

> C 1o -C2,

1.600
1.600

20
20

- ----

_j__

:S: ,\
NA

---

-- ~

- · - -t- - · -

1.200
15
I 0

-

3~50 U_ : _ 0 3'._L~ ;
3.50 U , 0 .37 U ;

0 75

.11 0

~
1 f•~™MKily. ..·.

S-17

co-1)

u

I

PyTene

S- 16

1_6_ _._0c....0 0 53 L' 0.00 54 L' 0 .005 4
0 .0055 U 0.0052 U 0 .0055 U
0.005 U
0.0097 B , 0 0054 L' _o ._0_19
_ B_ O
_ ._
o _o5_5_ U__,__o_.O
_ J_9_ B
___,_o_.0_0_5_6_B_ _
o._
o _o5__;_
U_
24
o 0 54
0.022
I 0.022 u 0.022 u o 038
0.022 u
0.020 u
I5
0.020 lJ
0.021 U
O 022 U
0.020 U
0 0 21 U
0.022 U
0.020 U
0 .003 8 I 0.00 55 ·-:+0.00_5_U_

..__Q_ 006~

2.600
---·-

Fluoranthcne

S- 15

c2-:.f r c-0--1---<
> '-- 4

:-:. _ _l__···
I

~--

TPH 4111.1
TPH 1005

C• · Ci,
Oil & GTease

1-- - - - -

Sample RDS-29 was a lnp bla nk

•

Sample S-2 is a dupl11::a1e of samples. I
Sample S-!1 is a duphcau of sample S-7

oi l sample was analyzed for SVOCs h) EP,\ ~fethod kl IO
J • Indi cate, an ~ im!ltcd rnlue
E = Concentration exceeds the calihrat1on range ol the(,(' ~IS
8 ~ Anal yte detected in method hlaru. .
Bold = Detected conc.!ntrallon., exceed the ~Tlh.::al T ier I PCL. f for resi den1 1al land us., at a 30 a,·re source area
232/f <O.O15 j = Total com:cntral1 on (mg. l.g) SPI .I' conccntrat1
Page 5 of 5

 Ta hle 2

Summary of Detected Concent rations in \'erfi ca lion Samples
Ruhhle Dump Spill Si te (SWJ\1 11 16)
f"t1 Rh,, . Fl l'u,o. T~xus
RC'sid~nlia l Tirr 1
p

Samph· 1.D.

RDS- toO• ' RD S- Iv•

F L l:lliss tl l

T°'Soilcorn I

c w Soll

I

Naphthalene
Methylene Chloride
Acetone
2-Butanonc
4-M ethyl-2-pentanonc
2-Hcxanonc
Toluene

Fl uoranthene

•

12/20/99

120
260
3. 400
9, 500

16
0 .006~
24
15

120
1.700
2,300

2 10
960

1.700 T
56

Pyrcne

(0-1)

-

560

X9
X2
770
--1.300 ' X 10.000
30
...!>_ _~
l .!lOO
23.000
2.500
5
1.000
120
2.300
150
I ,000
3.-100
1
57
3 10
0 56
3X
!(7
57
0 55
76
3.800
22 0
5,700
1.300

Bcnz.o(a)anthra enc
bis (2- Ethylhe;i.-yl) phth.alate
hrysenc
Di-n-oct l ph1halate
Benzo(b )flu oranthenc
Benzo(g.h.i)perylene
2-Methylnaphlha.lenc
Acenaphthene
Fluorene

4:1
560

- ,...

ND
--:S:D

\'D
:S:D -

Bcnzo(k)fluoranthene
Bcnzo(a)py,-en
lndeno ( 1.2.3-cd ) pyrene
Dibenz (a.,h ) anlhrncen
Accnaphthylene

Ancnic
Barium

24
--·
2.kOO

Cadmium

43
----·
23 .000

:S:D
\'I)

-

-

-

-

RDS- t0V•

RDS-11 v•

(0.. 1)
J/3/2001

(0- 1)
l/3/01

(0-1)
1/3/200 1

0.0 43 U
0.003
0.004 U
0 .009 U
0.004 U

0.0 44 U
0.003 J
0 .004 J
0 .009 U
0 .004 U

0.21 0U
0.02 1
0.02 1 U
0.02 1 U
0.02 1

1/3 /200 1

2 100 l '
0 170 l '
0 21 0 l'
- - 0 42 0l ' j

0 .086 LI
0.009 l '

----t-

0 21 0 l '

'

. ',\

\'D

0 21 0l:---

\'I)

\'..\
0 0!<6 l '
0 34() t '
;,,:A

\'I)
\'D
\'D
\'I)
;'\I)

\D
\'D
'' I)

\'D

:-sn
:-SD
\'I)

13

37
47 6
0 73
70
70.1

500
6

-r----

3 10

10

95

I. I
0 2-10

C6 -C1 0

1,600

20

, 50

> C,o - Ci,

1.:.6 ~ :
1.(,00

20
20

< 50
, 50

-=-----...l

TPH 418.1

TPH 1005

~-Ci
Oil & Grease

NA
0.004 U

A

0.012
NA
0.009 U
0.03 4 IJ

A
---

0.002

NA

--

0 2 10 l.'
0 2 10 l '
IIJISO l '
2 100 l '
\' A

NA
0.004 li
NA

0 0 17

4 200 t;
0 ·H O l'
0 0!< 6 l '
0 0!<6 l '

22 0
0 75

- - -1.200
1.5

Chromium
Lead
Mercury

•

I

RDS-6V•

(0- 1)

(0- 1)
J /3/2 00 1

~

Anthraccne

-- ,

0- 170 C
0 0 17 l '

I
1

NA

A

0 .086-L'
0.009 lJ
- --1---0.003 U
~--- · -0 .00 2 U
0 003 l 1
0 .00 2 l '
0- 009l'
·10 .004 lJ
-~ - 1 - - - 0 043 l' I 0.004 li
"t'
0 0 1-1 J
0 .0 17 l '
0 086 l'

0.730
0.073
0.009 U
0.009
0 .02 1 U
0.02 I lJ
0.084 U
0.620

----+- --

0.044 U

NA

A

--4-

-- ~ q___

1

_ 22._
I 2.9
3.6
49.3
:
45 .0
106
45.0
----- + - - -- - -- - --'3 . I /[ <0.005 j
2. I
•
0.21
007 B
I 9.2/ <0.050
78
I
5.6
8.3
220
16.6
23 2/[ <0.0 151
7.1
- - -+-~'----0.02 U
0 .03
0.0 2
0.02 U
0.37
0.23
O.SI
0.33
O.S7
0 16
0. 12
0 .11 U

- - --

---·----'-=+=

0 03
0.23

0 20

- --r--

! --

1

1

Sample RDS-2 9 was a trip hlank

2

Sample S-2 is a duph.:atc of . l\111ple S- 1

1

_

Sample S-8 v a dupli

tc of sample S-7

Soil sample was analyzed for SVOCs by EPA 1-.lethod !(1 10
J = Indicates an estimat d value.
E = Concentration exceeds the calibration range oflhe C,C MS

B = Analyte detected in method blank.
Bold = Detected concentrations c ccd !he cnt,cal Tu:r I PCL for residc-ntial land use at a 30 acre source area
232/ [<0.0 151 = Total ncentralion (mg/kg) SPLP conc:entration (mg.IL)
ullinal.xWTable 2-Resodm

. :IOI

Page I of I

  

 

APPENDIX A

PRELIMINARY SITE INVESTIGATION REPORT Golder Associates

 

 

Final Report
Preliminary Site Investigations

•

Directorate of Environment
·Fort Bliss, Texas
and

Fort Worth District
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

•

By

AII\Golder
~Associates
2201 Buena Vista Dr. SE, Suite 400
Albuquerque, New Mexico 87106

For

DBS JOINT \fENTURE / BOHANNAN-HUSTON INC.
7500 Jefferson NE
il\V5J~
Albuquerque, New Mexico 87109
l.!3~

A_

JOINT

•

V'ENTURE
July 1997

 FINAL

•

21

5.0

RUBBLE DUMP SITE

5.1

Description of Field Ac1ivities

954-2025003

On November 4 and 10, 1995, samples were collected at the Rubble Dump Site as part of a PSI in
order to determine the nature and ex1ent of potential contaminants of concern associated with the
two reported releases of petroleum/oil/lubricant (POL) and/or septic material, construction debris
(specifically roof shingles), and to provide a preliminary assessment of any hazardous materials or
contaminants present in the dumping area. The site is located along Power Line Road, southeast of
Biggs Anny Air Field, east of the El Paso Airport, and north of Montana Road. Two previous
reports of release events at the site were documented in the USAEHA 1988 survey and during a
July 1989 site survey (Ft. Bliss/WP 1-3 .8, '}}26/90) . The two releases include: I) release of an
unknown liquid which covered an estimated area of 50 feet by l 00 feet, and 2) release of POL
which covered an estimated one-mile stretch along both sides of Power Linc Road . The
documentation does not include specific information on where the spills were located along Power
Line Road.

•

Prior to the detailed site survey of the dumping area, aerial photos from two different sources were
reviewed. The first aerial photos of the area were obtained from a group within Fort Bliss but did
not reveal enough detail of the site to identify any release areas . In addition, a 1986 aerial photo
comprised of approximately two-thirds to three-<}uarters of the area investigated, was obtained
from the City of El Paso, Planning, Research and Development Department. The scale of this
photo was better and fi ur separate possible release areas west of Power Line Road were identified
on the aerial photo.
Field activities were conducted in accordance with the Sampling and Analysis Plan (October 1995)
except for the following changes : l) only fifteen surface soil samples were collected; 2) only
thirteen different construction debris (roofing material, floor and ceiling tiles, etc) samples were
collected; and, 3) sampling locations equally spaced along Power Line Road as described in the
Sampling and Analys is Plan were not collected. A fewer number of samples were collected than
stated in the Sampling and Analysis Plan because field observations suggested that a smaller
number of samples collected were adequate for a preliminary assessment of the site.
The main area of the detailed site survey covered an are.a approximately 1.5 miles north-south
along Power Line Road and I 00 feet to the east and west of Power Line Road. In some cases, the
distance to the west extended as far as 500 feet from Power Line Road. The areas surveyed at
greater distances from the road were determined by fi eld observations or suspect areas on the 1986
aerial photo. N inety percent of the unauthorized dumping appeared to be within I 00 feet from the
east and west edges of Power Line Road . The additional ten percem of the unauthorized dumping
occurred at greater distances from Power Line Road as observed in the field and on the 1986 aerial
photo.

•

During November 2 through 4, 1995 , the si te survey was conducted in the following manner.
Colored pin fl ags were utilized to ma rk the potential sample locations . The highest priority
category was marked \\ith pink fl ags and included possible asbestos shingles, other construction
debris which might contain asbestos, solvent cans, paint cans, and other debris which might contain
regulated substances. The medium priori ty category was marked with orange flags and it included
other roofing materials, other construction debris, and any other debris whi ch may be of concern.

GOLDER ASSOCIATES INC. FOR DBS JV/BOHANNAN-HUSTON, INC.

 FINAL

22

954-2025003

The lowest priority category was marked \\1th green flags and it included other types of household
items which may be of concern . A I 00-foot grid was set up along Power Line Road so that
estimated locations could be detenni.ned when marking sampling locations and other information on
a map.
It is estimated from the detailed site survey that 80 percent of the materiaJ dumped aJong Power
Line Road is construction and/or demolition debris. The remaining 20 percent consists of
household trash, empty paint cans, empty solvent cans, broken glass, landscaping debris, plastic,
furniture, wood and other miscellaneous household trash.
Two of the four dark stained areas previously reported., were found in the detailed site survey of the
area. Two additional dark areas on the 1986 aerial photo were checked in the field to detennine if
a release was the potential cause of the discoloration detected on the photo. The field check
confirmed this making a total of four different release areas observed and sampled in the field .

•

Fifteen soil samples (RDS-I through RDS- I 1, and RDS-25 through RDS-28) were collected from
black stained soil associated '"'ith releases of POL or other unknown Liquids, and from beneath
burnt construction debris . Thirteen samples (RDS-12 through RDS-24) were collected from
roofing shingles and other construction materials . Sample type and location details are presented
in Table 6. All sampling locations are illustrated on the index map for approximately two-thirds of
the area of investigation for the Rubble Dump Site in Figure 3. The map only illustrates part of
the area of investigation because no samples were collected north of power pole #9 . The index
map is broken down into four additional figures (Figures 4 through Figure 7) to illustrate more
detail and sample location numbers .

5.2

Sample Analy es

All samples were submitted to an approved ACOE MRD laboratory for analyses . Soil samples
RDS-I through RDS-I I and RDS -25 through RDS-28 were submitted for VOC anaJysis by EPA
SW 846 Methods 5030/8260, SVOC analysis by EPA SW 846 Method 8270, total petroleum
hydrocarbons (fPH) by EPA Method 418 . 1, and oil and grease by EPA Method 413 .2. Samples
RDS-12 through RDS-24 were submitted for asbestos analysis by EPA Method 600/R-93/116. A
trip blank, sample RDS -29 was submitted for VOC anal ysis by EPA SW 846 Methods 5030/8260.
A minimal level of data validation was perfonned on the data. lb.is included verification of
requested deliverables and verification that holdi:-ig times were met for e>..'traction and analyses . No
other validation, transcription or calculation checks were perfonned.

5.3

Analytical Resu/Js

The detectable concentrations of all anal)tcs are presented in Table 7. The organic and inorganic
qualifiers are defined at the bottom of Table 7. VOCs were detected in samples RDS-25 and RDS26 . Naphthalene concentrations in these samples ranged from 5 to 7 µg/kg . Methylene chloride
was detected in the trip blank sample (RDS-29) at 230(£) µg/kg . It is possible that this compound
is a lab contaminant and not actually present in the sample.
SVOCs were detected in samples RD -5 . RDS-6, RDS-7 , RDS-10 , RDS-I I, and RDS-25 through
RDS-28 . Ranges of concentrations for detected SVOCs are as follows : ND to 2600 µg/kg bis(2ethylhexyl) phthalatc; ND to 9900(E) µg/k g naphthalene; ND to 75000(E) µg/kg phenanthrene;
ND to 16000(£) µg/kg fluoranth ene; ND to 28000(£) µg/kg p)Tene; ND to 8800(E) µg/kg
benzo[a]anthracene: ND to 8700(E) µg/kg chrysene: ND to 140(J) µg/kg di-n-octy l phthalate; ND

GOLDER ASSOCIATES INC . FOR DBS JV/BOHANNAN~USTON, INC.

 FINAL

•

23

954-2025003

to 8400 µg/kg benz.o[b]fluoranthene; ND to 250 µg/kg bcnz.olg,h,i]perylene; ND to 21000(E)
µg/kg 2-methylnaphthalene; ND to 5300 µg/kg acenaphthene; ND to 8000(J) µg/kg fluorene ; ND
to I3000(E) µg/kg anthracene; ND to 1500(E) µg/kg benzo[k]fluoranthene; ND to 7500(E) µg/kg
benzo[a]pyrene; ND to 2000 µg/kg indeno[ 1,2,3-cd]pyrene; ND to 1300 µg/kg
dibenz(a,b)anthracene; ND to 14000(1) µg/kg acenaphthylene; and, ND to 1700 µg/kg butylbenzyl
phthalate.
TPH and oil and grease were detected in samples RDS-I through RDS-5, RDS-7 , RDS-8 , RDS10, RDS-11 and RDS-25 through RDS-28 . The TPH concentrations ranged from ND to 3700
mg/kg and the oil and grease concentrations ranged from ND to 7690 mg/kg.
Asbestos \Vas detected in samples RDS-19 and RDS-21 . The asbestos type detected in both
samples was chrysotile and the percentages detected were 25% and 60%, respectively.

5.4

I

Summary and Recommendations

A summary of field observations and analytical results is as follows:
• asbestos was identified in floor tiles but not roofing materials as originally expected;
• the asbestos floor tiles were randomly scanered across the site;
• all the roofing material appeared to be the same type and the samples collected did not
contain asbestos;
• four POL releases were observed on the west side of Power Line Road and sampled;
• naphthalene was detected in two samples from one POL release area;
• a wide range of SYOCs were detected in seven of the 15 samples from the POL
release areas;
• TPH and oil and grease were detected in 13 samples from the POL release areas;
•
it is possible that these POL release areas ma be older than originally suspected, as
suggested by the absence of YOCs ; and,
• soil samples were not anal yzed for metal s, pesticides, herbicides and PCBs .
Based upon the PSI results for this site, the limited data set suggests there are data gaps fo r metals ,
pesticides, herbicides and dioxins for the releases areas and there may be additional release areas
which have not been identified . The TNRCC does not set action level concentrations (i .e. ·a
specific concentration, that wht:n exceeded, requires remedial action) for those YOCs, SYOCs,
TPH, and oil and grease identified at the Rubble Dump site . For comparison purposes, the
identified compounds are relalcd to " Medium Specific Concentrations for Health-Based
Closure/Remediation" identified in Chapter 335, Subchapter S (Risk Reduction Standards) ofihe
Industrial Solid Waste and Municipal Hazardous Waste Code set by the TNRCC and to " RiskBased Concentrations" ( mith , 1995) established by the EPA. This comparison is made per the
request of Ft. Bliss, Directorate of Environment draft report review. As shown in Table 8, RDS10, a stained soil sample, is above EPA ' s residential land use standard for benzo[a]anthracene,
benzo[b ]fluoranthene, bcnzo[a ]pyrene, and indeno[ 1,2,3 -cd)pyrene but below the
commercial/industrial land use standard . In addition, sample RDS-I O exceeds both res idential and
commercial/industrial land use standards fo r dibenz[a,h)anthracene

•

Other compounds whi h were detc led in the soi ls but are below both residential and
commercial/industrial land use standa rds for the TNRCC and/or EPA are .

GOLDER ASSOCIATES INC . FOR DBS JV/BOHANNAN~USTON, INC.

 •

•
•
•
•
•
•

954-2025003

24

FINAL

indeno[l.2,3-cdjpyrene
naphtha/en
bis(2-ethy/heryl)phthalate
benzo[ajanthracene
chrysene
benzo [bJjluoranthene

•
•
•
•
•

fluoranthene
pyrene
di-n-octyl phthalate
benzo{k}jluoranthene
benzo[a}pyrene

•
•
•
•
•

acenaphthene
fluorene
anthracene
butylbenzyl
dibenz(a,h)anthracene

The following compounds are not listed in the TNRCC ' s " Medium Specific Concentrations for
Health-Based Closure/Remediation" table or EPA ' s "Risk-Based Concentration" table:

•
•
•

phenanthrene
benzo[g,h,i)perylene
asbestos

•
•
•

2-methylnaphrhalene
acenaphthylene
various TJCs

•

TPH

•

oil and grease

1b.is comparison with TNRCC's " Medium Specific Concentrations for Health-Based
Closure/Remediation" and EPA 's " Risk-Based Concentrations" is not presented in lieu of a risk
assessment and does not make inference to bow clean or contaminated the site is based on these
values. It is strictly for comparison purposes only and should not be used or interpreted as a risk
assessment .
The recommendations listed below are in order of highest priority. Additional site investigation
activities can be stopped at any time if it is dctennined that the contaminants do not pose an
environmental risk. The following activities are recommended at the Rubble Dump Site: J)
perform a higher level of data validation to verify analytical results; 2) remove the construction
debris which contains asbestos and dispose of it according to regulations; 3) collect additional soil
samples from the four known release areas and analyze them for metals, PCBs, pesticides, dioxins,
and herbicides ; 4) obtain additional aerial photos prior to and after J986, if possi ble, to identify
addjtional suspect release areas and veri fy the additional suspect release areas in the field, if any;
5) if aerial photos are not available to assist with identifying possible release locations, then a
detailed site survey may have to be extended to greater distances away from Power Line Road; 6)
evaluate all construction deb ri s at the site to detennine if any additional asbestos containing
construction debris is present, since the asbestos res ults for the floor tiles suggest that roofing
material is not the main construction debris of cc,ncem fo r asbestos; 7) detennine a screening
action le el so that a risk assessment can be conducted in order to detennme if any of the
contaminants will pose a ri sk to human health or the environment; 8) collect additional samples, if
required, to adequately define any newly identified release areas; and, 9) if the contamination for
any release area is detennined to be a risk, then a remedial action plan can be prepared to
adequately address the issues

GOLDER ASSOCIATES INC. FOR DBS JV/BOHANNAN-HUSTON, INC.

 TABLi: 6
RUBBLE DUMP SITE SAMPLE LOCATIONS

DATE
COLLECTED

SAMPLE ID

11 /4 /9 5

RDS- 1

11 /4 /95

RDS -2

11 /4/95

RDS-3

11 /4 /95

RDS-4

::0
J>

11 /4 /95

RD S-5

g

l l /4 / 95

RDS -6

11 /4/95

RDS -7

11 /4 / 95

RDS -8

11 /4 / 95

RDS -9

11 /4/9S

RDS- 10

z
z

11 /4 /9S

RDS - 11

~

(i)

0

6
m

V,
V,

~

m

V,

zC')
'Tl

0
::0
0
CD

V,

!i::
ai

0

::c
J>

~

l 1/4 /95

RDS- 12

-t
0
~

11 /4 / 9S

RDS -13

fl

l 1/4 / 95

RDS -14

11 /4 /95

RDS - 15

11 /4 /9S

RDS- 16

11 /4 /9S

RDS -17

C

V,

z

•

•

•

APPROXIMATE SAMPLE
I ncAT.ION
Black stained sand with dark gray crust on
220 feet N of pole 12 and 84 feet
surface of sand, 0 to 6 inches bgs
W of road
Orange sand below the stained sand at a depth of 220 feet N of pole 12 and 84 feet
about 1 ft bas
W of road
Black stained sand w ith black crust on surface of
180 feet N of pole 12 and about
sand , 0 to 6 inches bgs
220 feet W of road
Orange sand below the stained sand at a depth of 1 80 feet N of pole 12 and a.b out
about 1 ft bgs
220 feet W of road
Bla ck stained sand w i th oily odor and dark stained 400 feet N of pole 12 and 1 to 2
gravel
feet W of road
Black stained sand and co ncrete w ith crusty
525 feet N of pole 13 and 2 to 3
feet W of road
residue on sand
Black stained sand w ith oily odor and black crust
1 80 feet N of pole #4 and 25 to
on surface; 0 to 2 inches bas
30 feet W of road
Surface 0 .5 inc hes of sand was not st ai ned, next
185 to 1 90 feet N of pole 14 and
1.5 inches of sand was stained bla ck ; 0.5 to 2.0
40 to 45 feet W of road
inches bas
300 feet N of pole 15 and 45 feet
Black oil y stained sand ; 0 .0 to 1 .5 Inches bgs
W of road
Grayish brown crust w ith black stained sand , 2 ft
299 feet N of pole 15 and 40 feet
by 3 ft area; cru st was ve ry solid and difficult to
W of road
break· 0 to 0 .5 inches
Burned yell ow styrofoam or plastic w ith bad odor ;
555 fe et N of pole #7 and 25 feet
underlying sand was stained gray to black; 0 to
W of road
1 S inch"" bas
650 feet N of pole #3 and 10 to
Black tar paper and roof shingles
1 S feet W of road
90 to 95 feet N of pole #4 and 65
Black roof shingles
to 70 f eet W of road
270 feet N of pole 14 and 25 feet
Red , green and black roof shingles
W of road
455 foet N of pole 14 and 60 fee t
Black and white roof shingles
W of road
455 to 460 feet N of pole #4 and
Dark brown and black roof shingles
SO feet W of road
200 feet N of pole IS and SO feet
Bleck roof shingles
W of roed
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION

COMMENTS
Photo IA-6; PIO = 0 .0 ppmv
PIO = 0 .0 ppmv; Photo I A-7 •
overview of stained area
PIO = 0.0 ppmv; Photo #A - 8
PIO = 0 .0 ppmv; Photo #A -8
Photo #A-9 ; PIO = 0 .0 ppmv
Photo I A- 1O; PIO = 0 .0 ppmv
Photo IA -11; PIO .. 0 .0 ppmv
Photo #A - 12; PIO

= 0 .0 ppmv

Photo #A - 13; PIO

= 0 .0 ppmv

tv

V,

Photo #A - 14; PIO= 0 .0 ppm

Photo #A -14; PIO

= 0 .0 ppm

Photo IA-1 S
Photo #A -16
Photo IA-17
Photo IA- 18
Photo #A -19

'°

Photo #A-20

0

V,
~
I

tv
N

V,

0
0

w

 •

•

•

I

TABLES
RUBBLE DUMP SITE SAMPLE LOCATIONS

DATE
COLLE CTED

SAMPLE ID

SAMPLE DESCR IPTION

11 /4 /95

RDS- 18

Black roof shingles (visibl e fibers)

11 /4 /9 5

RDS - 19

I 1 /4 /95

RDS - 20

Bla ck roof shingles (visibl e fibers)

11/4 /95

RDS -21

Bla ck floor til e

11/4/95

RDS- 22

W hi te wa ll bo ard or ceiling tile fo und w ith other
construction debr is

590 feet N of pole 15 and 25 feet
W of road
380 feet N of pol e #2 and 6 to 8
feet E of road
197 feet N of pol e #2 and 15 feet
W of road

g

11 /4 /95

ROS -23

Ye ll owish br own material w ith black ba ck, f ound
with other types of co nstru ction debris

195 fee t N of pole #2 and 15 fee t
W of road

Photo #A -2 6

~

11 /4 / 5

RDS- 24

Black, unkno wn type of c onstru ction m11terial .
found in same pile as broken til es and shingles

50 0 feet N of pole #1 and 75 f eet
W of road

Photo #A -27

1 1/ 10 /95

RDS - 25

Black stained sand

44 0 to 450 feet N of pole # 3 and
40 fe et W of road

Identified on 1986 ae n al photograph
fr om City of El Paso Plannina Dep t.

1 1/10/95

RDS -26

Bla ck stai ned sand

4 50 to 460 feet N of pole # 3 and
5 10 t o 5 15 feet W of road

Identi fied on 1 986 aerial ph otog raph
fro m City of El Paso Planning Dep t.

11 / 10/95

RDS - 2 7

Bla ck stained sand

90 feet N of pole #6 and 21 5 feet
W of road

11 / 10/95

RDS -28

Black sta ined sand

50 feet N of pole #6 and 29 0 feet
W of roa d

Identified on
fr om City of
Identified on
from Cit v of

Wh ite with multicolored spot fl oo r tiles, some tiles 48 5 fee t N of pole #5 end 55 feet
have black backi na
W of road

C)

0

r

0

m
~

l>

(/1
(/1

s

m
en

z

(')

"Tl

0

~

0

co

(/1

~

iil
0
:r

?zz
~

:!I:

C

(/1
~

0
~

z
0

APPROXIM ATE SAMPLE
LO CATION
390 feet N of pole #5 end 40 feet
W of road

COMMENTS
Photo IA-21
Photo IA-22
Photo IA-23
Photo #A -24
Ph ot o #A - 25

1 986 aerial photograph
El Pa so Planni ng Dep t.
1986 aerial photograph
El Paso Plannino Dep t .

Notes:
road = Po wer Line Road

pole # 1

=

N

=

W

= Wes t
= Ea st

E

Powe r Pole # 1

North

v,
'°
-""
I

N
0

N

V,

0
0

<.,J

 954-2025003

27

FINAL
"

•

-

San'C)le location

Area ol stained 90i

===

Oirtroad

- - - EOgeold#l""°'*Mr

D Builoog
Agure7

Rgure 6

•

Flgure 5

,.'---:s'll,
..,,,,._ ....

Agure 4

•

-

---

-.:.:~ o t-i"TANA f\OAD ·,;

••~

Figure 3. Index map for area of investigation at the Rubble Dump Site, Fort Bliss, Texas.
GOLDER ASSOCIATES INC. FOR DBS JV/BOHANNAN-MUSTON, INC.

 -

0

~

\\
II
//

954-2025003

28

FINAL

\If

Sample location
Area of stained soil

11

6 I] Major paved road

//
'I
I
\
\\

11
11
11

---

Dirt road

---

Edge of dirt shoulder

L]
f

\\

JJ

Ib

Rossr.i

iRDS21

11

Bu~ding

11

Power pole

(:j Jos 22. 23
11

~.;::::-~~

II

....,,~,,_

'l°"'="''>-s,,

~~

----::::--::::-

_I I

~--- ;) I

•

Power pole #2

~I

SCALE: 1 inch = 200 feet
400 ft

200

0

f

'-"--~< 11

~~===-::::-,..

100

Power pole #3

RDS240

11
11

11

Sou,ce: City of El Paso, Dept. of Planning, Research,
and Development, 1986, Sh. 20 No. 8
Modllied by: cARTography by A. Kron, 12/8/95

11

11
11

~

fI

JI

II

\\

\\
II
ll

/ ' II

11

11
/
11 /

~
~

\\
II
II
II

--::::===~\\
--=====--

--- - - -- ~'----::::::::-==--------- - - --II

\\

\~

~::::.::::::::::--

-:::::=--

-

J'II

Power pole #1

.
ij'~~
(
-;:::--:::::-";/
lv
I r·:: :; .: ;: ---:. ::::,-::::::==========~
--V

1 (,

---- -- ----

:.- - -

- - - - ___-

---- --

•

Figure 4. Estimated sampling locations between power poles #1 through #3 for the Rubble Dump Site,
Fort Bliss, Texas.
GOLDER ASSOCIATES INC. FOR DBS JV/BOHANNAN~USTON, INC.

 954-2025003

29

FINAL
ll~===~

tr

RDS 18

,1-'::::::::::-::--..

~"- -7//
,:::;,

":::::::::::::::::::::=::-

~

RDS170

-

0

Dirt road

11
11
11
11
11

Edge of dirt shoulder

II

Major paved road

RDS 15, 16

Building
Power pole

---:::::::::;:;..,::::-I/

- : :- "

//

~~

"~

~

/;
r~

II

//"

//

jl

/; ..--.

/

--

I~-::=:::::::;--

//'

--_/I

:::;--- --

''

II

11

t

II
ROS12st I
11
I
TL ~
~II
· 11

Power pole #4

RDS~

I/

~ !RDS26
\\// • rP
)j

\\

;/r

\\\\

11
00 RDS 7

RD~13
•

~\'""7
-7
,f

''

\\II

1/

/,'f

I

RDS 140I

RDSB

I/

'\

ll-===-:::::::i
/J~

11

~~~

~~

~

~r
~--=.::
///
/

-----;;;.--

•

f

11
11

//

---=======--::--..

~

0

Power pole #5

JI I k./f::.~.,,..

--·::::;:::::----

---~~

I

11

Area of stained soil

r

~
~~

:::::::iI

Sample location

u
~

11
11

RDS 9, 100

/

ROS2s

''
/)//
''\\n//r

11
11

11

;:~,;,,

11

11
11

II~
11 /

SCALE: 1 inch = 200 feet
100
~

,,

~

II

0

200

Source: City of El Paso. Dept. of Planning, Researeh,
and Development, 1986, Sh. 20 No. 8
Modified by: cARTography by A . Kron. 1218195

400 ft

Power pole #3

II
11

11

Figure 5. Estimated sampling locations between power poles #3 through #5 for the Rubble Dump Site,
Fort Bliss, Texas.

GOLDER ASSOCIATES INC. FOR DBS JV/BOHANNAN~USTON, INC.

 954-2025003

30

FINAL

0

-

Sample location

11

Area of stained soil

11
11

f f • Major paved road

11
11

Dirt road

11

- - - Edge o1 d;rt shoulde,

fJt

"°"""-

11

-::::::~~%<j1
If
,
~II I

Building

Power pole

Power pole #7

11

11

II
11
11

JI

~:::::~=====~~11
q =::::::::::::-~~

•

1;

_...,:::::::::: ~ /"
11 'l'~ ~-==-;..1

11

-

~

RDS27

I

RDS28 ~ ~:

~

--~~
~~~~~~

?~
-~=---

~~

i

If

Power pole #6

II
11

RDS 19

11'.::::::::::

/.~

-

ROS20 0

"':::::::./;
)
II

~

11

11
11

1;

1J

~~=~-~~

0

~

~--

-::::::.:::::-

;;~==~

RDS 18

11
0 11

i(
~'::::~~
8
~~--YI/
~~~::::~

11

RDS 9, 10 •

-

SCALE: 1 inch = 200 feet

11

~::--.1

RDS 17

0

"'1

I

11
11

Source: City of El Paso, Dept. of Planning , Research,
and Development. 1986, Sn. 20 No. 8
Moditied by: cARTography by A. Kron. 12/8195

Power pole #5

II~
II/

Figure 6. Estimated sampling locations between power poles #5 through #7 for the Rubble Dump Site,
Fort Bliss, Texas.
GOLDER ASSOCIATES INC. FOR DBS JV/BOHANNAN-ttUSTON, INC.

 FINAL

954-2025003

31

• -

0

Sample location
Area of stained soil

f

II
11
11

11

Edge of dirt shoulder

11
11
11
11
11
11

Building
Power pole

SCALE: 1 inch = 200 feet

100

0

Power pole #9

11

I 5 I Major paved road
-- Dirt road
--

u

f

11

II~
11 /

400 ft

200

Source: Cl1y of E1 Paso. Dept of Planning. Research.
and Development. 1986, Sh. 20 No. 8

Power pole #8

11
11

MOdilled by: cARTognaphy by A. Kron, 12/8/95

RDS r,

011
11
11
11

11
11

11
-::::=~~

II
II

~::-...
-.....;-===.::::::--

--JI
--.::::::-.::::::-~11f
,

Power pole #7

~I
11
11

11
11
11
11

•

-:::::=========

JI

Figure 7. Estimated sampling locations between power poles #7 through #9 for the Rubble Dump Site,

Fort Bliss, Texas.

GOLDER ASSOCIATES INC. FOR OBS JV/BOHANNAN~USTON, INC.

 •

•

•

TABLE 7
RUBBLE DUMP SITE
ANALYTICAL RESULTS

Sample ID

Dote

km!>!•

Number

Sampled

Deacrtptlon

ROS-1

11/4 /95

RDS- 2

RDS-3

RD S· 4

RDS · 5

11 14195

11/4 /95

11/4/95

11 / 4/95

VohrtRe Orgenlc Compoundo

blect 11 eined
land

TIC1:
Unknown TIC

orange tend

Not Oellcted

black 1t1lned
H nd

o,a,,ge

••net

block ttau-.d

BIJ I

TIC1:
Cydo tttr11tilox11ne, octemeth

421Jl

TIC1:
CvclotetrnJlow1ne, o c-umeth
1 Unkno wn TIC

18 1JI
100!JI

Not Detect ed

1-1nd and

grovel

RDS-8

11/4/95

bl11d. at111ned

u nd

TICa:
1 Unkno wn TIC

381JI

Ol andO,._

Seml-Vollltlle Orgenlc co,,._,nde

EPA SW 84 8 Method 11280
Conatltuent
(u/akal

EPA SW IM8 Method 11270
Cor,ttltuent
TICo:
1 Unkno wn acid methyl H itt
Cyclopentniloune, deumett,y!
e Uni<no wn o rganic acid TIC,
10 Unknown T IC•
TIC1 :
Cyclopen N lloxano, decamet hvl
I Uknown organic acid TIC
S Unknown t,ydroc11bon TIC,
S Unltnown TIC a
TIC1:
CyclopentNiloxane, decamet hyl
CyclohaxHlloune, dodecamtthyl
1 Unkno wn hydrocatbon TIC
e Unltno wn TIC,
TICt:

Cyclo pe nt n Uoxane, decemethyl
CyclohaxNlloune, dodec omethyf
7 Unk nown t,ydrocorbon TIC•
S Unknown TIC t
bl112·£thylhexyll pht htlote
TICt :
CyclopentHlloune, decamethy l
9 Unk nown hydroc11bon TIC1
9 Unknown TIC1
Naphtholtno
Phanonthr1no
Fluor anthene
Pyreno

l!onrol t ltnthracene
b t l2· Ethylhexyll phth.iote
ChryMne
DJ.n.octyt phth.iote
Bonrolb)ftuoranthene
Benrolg ,h,f)per ylene
TICt:
Cyclopenuoilox ane , decamtthyt
CyclohaxH lloune, dodocamethyl
Blphenyl
ltomer of trimethyln1phti,11ene
ltome, of C7H5NS
1 Ur*nown hydroco,bon TIC
1 Unltnown o,gank acld TIC
1 3 Unknown TIC,

Toul Peuoleum Hydrocwbone
ma/Ira (dry)
C-lt.....i

(ualka)

011 and greH•
2001JI
1100(JNI
1501Jl to 99001JI
I SO(Jl to 2000IJI
1701JNI
190(Jl
200(Jl to 8401Jl
2101JI to 27001JI
1BOOIJNI
1300(JNI
IS01Jl
190IJI to 22001Jt
230(JNI
1401JNI
I 501JI to 5401JI
270(JJ to 1 700(JJ
580
280IJNI
140(J I to 4IOOIJI
140(JJ to 25001JI
9SIJI
130(Jl
71!JI
410
70(Jl
1900
1 JO(JI
1401JI
1201JI
1101Jt
4701JNI
290(JNI
280IJNI
1701J l
2101JI
170IJI
2901JI
1701JI to 3SOOIJI

Aobff1oe
CO<W!ltuent

3100
2420

Not>.n.lYted

Oil and grono
TPH

40.2

Not Ano!Ytod

Oll tndgrouo
TPH

45 .1
34 .I

Not Ma!Ytod

Ori end gr• TPH

27 .1
31 .8

Not AM/yiod

TPH

,,.,,

29 .1

w
N

0 11 Ind 9 t e111

81 . 7

TPH

48 .8

0 ~ and g r• -

<25 .2
<25 .0

T PH

Not AMlvzed

Not Analvred

\0

V,

.i:,.
I

N
0

N

V,

0
0

w

 •

•

TABLE 7
RUBBLE DUMP SITE
ANALYTICAL RESULTS

lfflll!l• 10

OM•

Number

s~

110S· 7

111• 19!1

IIOS-8

11,,195

........
0Hc,tpdon

Vo!aclle Otgenc Compounde

'"'" aw au M11hod 12110

C"'*""-

black11alned
und

Not Oetec1ed

bl·· " 11ainad

Nol Detected

•end

(u/..a.a)

ot_o,-

s.m1.vo1ot111 o,...,ic co.._,,..
IPA IW 148 M.thod 1270
Tot• '°'ICIMII"' ~
(
C"""""COMtlNenl
- " • ldtvl
bi9t2· Ethylhftyll phthlfatt
7StJ)
571
Off Mldg1•TICt:
TPH
551
CyclopentNiloune, de <Ml\lthyl
320IJN)
Cyclohex..aox-. dodacome hvt
170IJN)
2 Unlnown hydrocarbon TICS
190IJI to 200IJl
4 Unl<nown TICe
980(Jl to 2300IJI
TIC,:
14!1
Oil - g r Cydoperrt•flox-, deceme1hyl
270(JN)
TPH
142
Cyc.lohex11iloune, c!od1camt1hyl
170CJNI

.......,

• Unt.nown TICS
F\0S·9

F\OS, \O

11 /4/95

111,/8&

black 1lalned
oily u nd

Not Ottec ed

black 11ainad

Not Oeloc:ted

•end

TIC,:
Cydopen1tellox-. de cemelhyt
Cyclohun,loll- . dodecem11hyl
• Untnown TICI
Naohthalene
2-Mathylnaphthalene
Acenaphthent
Fluorena
PhtnonthrAnttvacene
Fluoramhene
Pyrone
Benro[a)anttvaceno
b1112·Elhylhe•yll p tholatt
Ctvyoene
Benro[b)lluoronthlno
Benro[kJnuorontheno
8enro[1)pyr1n11

"!1

Aebe1100

c~

,,.,

z>
r

Not Analyzed

Not ANlyied

11 OO(Jl to 21100(JJ
1 IOOIJN)
53DtJNl
180(Jl to 3400IJ)
99ootEI
2100ot£l
6300
21100
7500otEI
13000lEl
1800otEI
2BOOotEl
8800(£)

2IIOIJI
8700IEI

uoom
1500
7500tEl
2000
1300
2500

lndeno[ 1,2,3·cd)pyrene
Dibtnr(a,h) tnthrocene
Benro(a,h,l)perylene
TICt:
leorMr ol 1thyldimethylbtnr1ne
,..,,,.... of tthylnaohthtlona

89ootJl
3300(JJ

2 loo,,,.,. ol mothylptopylbenrene

2100IJ I lo 3500(J)

, t90m1ro ol dtmethylnaphth.llene
1... ,,,., of dimethylphenanttvene

330otJ) to C300(J)
SSOOIJI

2 loomero of tr lmethylbeNene

25001Jl to 3300(Jl

2 loo me,. of C 1OH 14
1 loomer of Cl 2H10
1Unknown of C 1 SHI 2
1 l90m1101C10H1'

31001Jl 10 4900(J)
CSOOIJI
COOO(J)
2800IJI

2 Unltnownt of Cl 7H12
1 Unl<nown PAH TIC
1 Unknown TIC

2SOOIJI lo 2t00(JI
3500(J)
320otJl

O~ondgreHt
TPH

<25 .0
<2S .O

Oi1 ondgro111
TPH

....
115

No1AM«yzed

Not Ar,olyzed

w
w

 •

•

TABLE 7
RUBBLE DUMP SITE
ANALYTICAL RESULTS

........ ,o

Dote

Number

,....,..ct

R0S·11

11/4/9S

Semple

Oeocnptlon

gray to black
tteined und

,...,.vo1e111e Organic C-ncle

lloiotle Orgenlo Co.m poundt
IPA IW 848 Method 11280
Conrnlt\Mnl
lu/atal
TIC,:
Cvctotatrn ilox.,..., octameth

1 SIJI

Conittltuenl

Aceneohlhylone
Acanaphthene
Fuorene

"'-.mhrene
Anlh<acene
TICo;
1, 1'·11 ,3-propenedl'(llbl• ·b
loomerolC8H8
5 Unknown hydrourbon TIC,

ROS-12
R0S· 13
ROS- 14
R0S· 1S
ROS-16
ROS- 17
ROS-1 8
ROS-19
ROS· 20
ROS- 21
1105-22
R0S· 23
R0S· 24
ROS-25

111'/95
11/4/95
11/4/95
I 1/4/95
11/4/95
11/4/95
1 1/4/95
11/4/9S
11/4/95
1 1/4/95
11/4/95
1 1/4/95
11/4/95
11/10/95

R0S· 28

1 11 10/95

ROS- 27

11/1 0/95

R0S· 2B

ROS-29

I 111 0195

11/1 0195

ohinglff
t hingltl
thlnateo
-"lnaln
ohlnalet
ehlnglet
•hlnalet
floor tlln
1hlnal11
floo r tiln
cefllna tile
unknown

unknown
bl..,_ IU!ned
und

·-

black llllned

black 11elned
und

black 11alned
llnd

lrlp blri

Not Anelyied
Not Anolyied
Not AnalYted
Not AnalYted
Nol Anelyted
Not Anelyied
Not Analyzed
Nol AnalYtMI
Not An,tvzed
Not Anelyted
Nol Antlyted
Not Anllyred
Not AnllYted
N~thalene
TICt:
Cydot1trNiloxM"e. octarneth
I Unltnown TIC
Naphthalene
TICa:
CyclotelrNiloune, octameth
2 Unkno wn TICt
TICt:
CyclotttrnUo,c:ane, octameth

TIC1:
Cydotetrtalloxene, oc11rneth
2 Unknown TICt
Methylene Chloride

7
S(JI

13 Unl< nown TIC,
Not Anolyted
Not Analyted
Not Ar,alYted
Not Analyzed
No t Anelyied
Not Ar,alvred
Not Anolytod
Not Antlyted
Not Anelyzed
Not Analyzed
Not AnelYttd
Nol Analyzed
Not Analyted
blol2·Ethylhe><vll phth1t11,
TIC• :
Cyclopentuilo ,c ene, decam1thyl

1t Unknown TIC,
&,ty1benrylphthal11e
ble(2·Ethylhe><vll phthal,11
TICe:
12IJI
SIJI to 721J 12 Unk nown TICS
b!tl2· Ethylhe><vll phthalate
TICa :
101J I
Cyclo pentulloxena, decernethyl
CyclohexNlloxano, dod.e cMnethyl
12 Unknown TIC•
blt12· Ethylhe><yll phthalete
TICo:
231JI
111J110 17 1 Unknown acid methyl "'"
8 Unknown TIC1
2301EI
Not Anatvred

31(JI
51JI

OI endOt•Totel Petrohouffl H ~ n e
,,,.,.. (dtyl
C..-ltuenl

IPA SW 1148 Mtthod 8270
IUGllr•l
1•0001Jl
54001JI
BOOOIJI
IIIIOOIJI

OQ and
TPH

er•-

2030
2030

..........
Conot!tuent
NotAnolyud

,,.,

8800IJI

2500001JNI
230000CJI
1800001JI to
770000IJI
83000IJI 10
1700000Ul

2800

Not Anolyted
Not Anelvud
No t AnalYted
Not Anelyted
Not Ar,alyttd
Not Anelyted
Not Ar,alvted
Not Analyzed
Not Analyted
Not Ar,olyted
Not AM!vred
Not Ane!Yted
Not Antlyred
Oil and gre••
TPH

7890
3700

Nol Detected
Not Oet1c1ed
Not Detected
Not Detected
Not Detected
Not Detected
Not Oetocted
Chryeotilt
Nol o,,ected
Ch<yeotil•
Not Detected
Not Oet1cted
Not Oetected
Not Antlyud

25
80

3301J NI
290(JI to 31000IJI
1700
Oil .ndgro770
TPH
1 501J1 to 8901JI
781JI
3 301JNI
290IJNI
1 SOIJI 10 1900(JI
1801JI

7H
775

Not Anal'(ted

0 11 and gre-

70.8

Nol An• l'fled

TPH

e•.7

Oll endgre-

0 .7
42 .7

TPH

Nol Anal'(ted

Not Anel'(ted

'°

V,
~
I

•OOIJI
18otJI 10 1800(JI
Not Anatvred

N
0
N

V,

Organic Ouellli<lre :
IJI lndicatet en n1im1ted · -·
(NI lndict!et preeumptive e vidence ol • com-,nd . Thlt flag 11 used only fo r TIC1.
IE I It used 10 identllly compeund1 who11 cor,untrationt exceed the ,'8hbr11ion renga ol the QC MS lnotrument for that - •Ilic enolyeie.

8
w

 •

•

'Tl

z
>
t""

TABLE 8
RUBBLE DUMP SITE
COMPARISON WITH TNRCC AND EPA STANDARDS

Sample ID
Number
RDS-10

Sample Description
black stained sand

Contaminant
Constituent
benzo[a)anthracene
benzo[b)fluoranthene
benzo[a]pyrene
indeno[1 ,2,3-cd]pyrene
dibenz[ a,h]anthracene

¥ - soil/air and ingestion standard for residential use (TNRCC)
§ - soil/air and ingestion standard for industrial use (TNRCC)
£ - residential soil (EPA)
a - commercial/industrial soil (EPA)
nr - not reported

mg/kg
8.80E+OO
8.40E+OO
7.SOE+OO
2.00E+OO
1.30E+OO

SAi-Res"

SAi-ind§

mg/kg
nr
nr
nr
nr

mg/kg

nr

nr

nr
nr

nr
nr

RSOIL£

CSOIL•

mg/kg
mg/kg
8.80E-01 7.80E+OO
8.80E-01 7.80E+OO
8.80E-02 7.80E-01
8.SOE-01 7.80E+OO
8.80E-02 7.80E-01

w

Vt

 954-2025003

FINAL

B3 - Rubble Dump Site

GOLDER ASSOCIATES INC. FOR DBS JV/BOHANNAN-HUSTON, INC.

 U::.
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DAT A SHEET
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPO UNDS

Lab Name: EA LABO RA TORIES
Lab Code:

Matrix: (soil/waicr)

5.0
-----

---

ID:

0.53

(mm)

-----(uL)
0

tAS Number
1.
2.
3.

11/11/95

Date Analyzed: 11/18/95

0

RTX 502.2

Number TICs found :

----

Lab File ID: VE5A6455.D
Date Received:

Soil Extract Volume:

SDG No. :

-------

ML

(low/med)

GC Column:

8260
------

Lab Sample ID: 9516203
(g/ mL)

% Moisture: not dee.

·•~

Method :

WATER

Sample wt/vol:
Level:

Contract:

Case No. :

EA ENG

RSD29

Dilution Factor:
Soil Aliquo1 Volume:

1.0

----

(uL)

Concentration Units:
(ug/L or ug/Kg)
ug/ L
Compound Name

RT

Est. Cone.

Q

4.
5.
6.
7.
8.

9.
IO.
11.

12.
13.
14 .

15.
16.
17.

18.
19.
20.
21.
22 .
23 .
24 .
25 .
26.
27 .

28.
29 .
30.

FORM I VOA-TIC

3/90

040020

 EPA SAMPLE NO .

IA
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DAT A SHEET

IRSD29

•

Lab Name:

EA LABORATORIES

Lab Code:

EA ENG

Matrix : (soil /water)
Sample wt/vol:
Level :

Case No .:

Method :

Lab File ID: VE5A6455 .D

0

--------

CAS No .
t75-71 -8
t74-87-3
rTS-01-4
r]4-83-9
75-00-3
t75 -69-4
t75-35-4
75-09-2
156-60-5
75-34-3
594-20-7
156-59-2
~7-66-3
t74-97-5
t7I -55-6
1563-58-6
56-23-5
107-06-2
t7I-43-2
179-01 -6
t78-87-5
t75-27-4
t74-95-3
108-88-3
179-00-5
106-93-+
142-28 -9 .• ·
127-18-4
124-48-1
108-90-7
k,30-20-6
100-41 -4
106-42-3

SDG No . :

(g/mL)
5.0
---- ML
--

GC Column: RTX 502.2
Soil Extract Volume:

8260

Lab Sample ID: 9516203

WATER

(low/med )

% Moisture: not dee.

•

Contract:

ID:

0 .53

(mm)

----(uL)

Date Received:

11/11/95

Date Analyzed:

11/18/95

Dilution Factor:

1.0

Soil Aliquot Volume:
Conccmration Units:
(ug/L or ug/Kg)

Compound
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Chloromethane
Vinyl Chloride
Bromomethane
Chloroethane
Trichlorofluoromethane
1. 1-Dichloroethene
Methylene Chloride
trans- 1,2-Dichloroethene
l , 1-Dichloroethane
2. 2-Dichloropropane
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
Chloroform
Bromochloromethane
l , l. l -Trichloroethane
l , 1-Dichloropropene
Carbon Tetrachloride
1.2-Dichloroethane
Benzene
T richloroethene
1,2-Dichloropropane
Bromodichloromethane
Dibromomethane
Toluene
I . 1.2-Trk hl oroet hane
l .2- Dibromoe1i1:mc1 EDI3 .
1.3-Dichloropropane
Tet rachIoroethene
Chlorodibromomethane
Chlorobenzene
1. 1. l .2-Tetrachloethane
Ethyl benzene
m&p Xylenes

5
5
5
5
5
5
5
230
5

ug/L

---Q

u
u
u
u
u

u
u
E

u

5

u

5
5
5
5

u

5
5
5
5
5

5

5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5

5
5
5

(uL)

u
u
u
u
u

-

u

u
u
u

u
u
u
u
L!
. ..

u

u
u
u
u

u
u

Page I of 2
FORM 1 VOA

3/90

040018

 lF
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS .2\NALYSIS DATA SHEE7
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS

Case No :

Code: EAENG

Matrix:

SAS No.:

{soil/water} SOIL

(low/med}

% Moisture:

Injection Volume:

1. o

(Y/N) N
1000 (uL)

Date Analyzed:

CONCENTRATION UNITS
(ug/L or ug/Kg) ug/Kg

9

COMPOUND NAME

1.-----------2.------------

Unknown_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

4.------------

Unk:nown_a_c~1~a-m_e_t~h-y~l-e_s_t_e_r__
Unknown _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

· ============
7.-----------8.-----------9.------------

•

1.0

pH: - -

CAS NUMBER

•

11/20/95

Dilution Factor:

RT

------ -================= ============================ --------

3.------------

11/07/95

Date Extracted: 11/14/95

(uL}

(Y/N}N

Number TICS found:

SA1A7l65

Date Received:

C<:>ncentrated Extract Volume:

Gl>C Cleanup:

Lab File ID:

G

LOW
decanted:

4

SDG No:
Lab Sample ID: 9516202

30.0 {g/ml}

Sample wt/vol:

Level:

RDS-28

Contract:

Name : EA LABS
•

EPA SAMPLE NO:

Unknown

Unknown
Unknown~---------Unknown

FORM I

SV-TIC

4.31
9.44
10.67
17.40
17.77
18.55
18.59
19.48
20.94

EST. CONC.

------------160
290
220
400
1600
1200
530
540
510

Q

=====
J

J
J

J
J
J
J

J
J

3/90

050715

 lB
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

jljl Name:

EA LABS

~f Code:

EAENG

Ma1:rix:

SAS No.:

Case No:

t Moisture:

30.0 (g/ml)

GPC Cleanup:

CAS NO.

1. o

(Y/N)N

SA1A7165

Date Received:

Concentrated Extract Volume:
In:jection Volume:

Lab File ID:

G

LOW
decanted:

4

SDG No:
Lab Sample ID: 9516202

(soil/water) SOIL

(low/med)

RDS-28

Contract:

Sample wt/vol:

Level:

EPA SAMPLE NO:

(Y/N) N

11/07/95

Date Extracted: 11/14/95

1000 (uL)

Date Analyzed:

11/20/95

Dilution Factor:

(uL)

1.0

pH:

CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg)ug/Kg

COMPOUND

108-95-2----- ----Phenol
111-44-4---------bis (2-Chloroethyl)ether
95-57-8----- -----2-Chlorophenol
541-73-1--- ------1,3-Dichlorobenzene
106-46-7---------1,4-Dichlorobenzene
100-51 -6-- -------Benzyl Alcohol
95-50-1----- -----1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene
95-48-7-- --------2-Methylphenol
108-60-1---------2,2'-oxybis(l-Chloropropane) 106-44-5-- -------4-Methylphenol
621-64-7 ---------N-Nit roso-Di-n-propylamine
67-72-1--- -------Hexachloroethane
~98-95-3-- --------Nitrobenzene
78-59-1-- - -------Isophorone
88-75-5 - ---- -----2-Nitrophenol
105-67-9---------2,4-Dimethylphenol
65-85-0---- ----- -Benzoic acid
111-91-1----- ----bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane
120-83-2 ---------2,4-Dichlorophenol
~120-82-1----- -- --1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
91-20-3----------Naphthalene
106-47-8---------4-Chloroaniline

87-68-3---- ------Hexachlorobutadiene
59-50-7----------4-Chloro-3-methylphenol

91-57-6- ---------2-Methylnaphthalene
77-47-4--- -------Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
88-06-2- ---------2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
~~
95-95-4----- -----2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
91-58-7-- --------2-Chloronaphthalene
88-74 -4----------2-Nitroaniline
131-11-3----- - ---Dimethylphthalate
208-96-8---------Acenaphthylene
99-09-2------- ---3- Nitroaniline
83-32-9--- --- - ---Acenaphthene
51-28-5----------2,4-Dinitrophenol
FORM I

SV-1

340
340
340
340
340
340
340
340
340
340
340
340
340
340
340
340
1800
34·0
340
340
340
340
340
340
340
340
340

1800
340

1800
340
340

Q

u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u

u
u
u
u

u
u
u
u

u

1800
340
1800

u

3/90

050713

u

 EPA SAMPLE 1'iU .

IA

VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

IRDS28
Lab Name:

EA LABORATORIES

Lab Code:

EA ENG

Matrix: (soil/water)
Sample wt/vol :
Level :

(low/med)

% Moisture:

not dee .

Case No .:

Method :

Lab File ID : VH8A7170 .D

(g/mL)
G
5.0
-------

LOW

Date Received :

11/11 /95

4

Date Analyzed :

11/22/95

Dilution Factor:

1.0
----

Soil Aliquot Volume:

----

-------- ID :
Soil Extract Volume:
----(uL)

0 .53

(mm)

Concentration Units:
(ug/L or ug/Kg)

CAS No .

Compound

195-47-6
100-42-5
75-25-2
98-82-8
t79-34-5
196-18-4
103-65-1
108-86-1
108-67-8
95-49-8
106-43-4

o-Xylene
Styrene
Bromoform
lsopropylbenzene
1, J ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,2 ,3-Trichloropropane
n-Propylbenzene
Bro mo benzene
1,3 ,5-Trimethylbenzene
2-Chlorotoluene
4-Chlorotoluene
ten-Butyl benzene
1.2.4-Trimethylbenzene
sec-Butyl benzene
p-Isopropyltoluene
1,3 -Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
n-Butylbenzene
1.2-Dichlorobenzene
l ,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Hexachlorobutadiene
Naphthalene
1,2.3-Trichlorobenzene

98-06-6
95-63-6
135-98-8
~-87-6
1541 -7 3-1
106-46-7
104-51 -8
195-50-1
196-12-8
120-82-1
187-68-3
191 -20-3
~7-61 -6

SDG No .:

8260

Lab Sample ID : 9516202

SOIL

GC Column: RTX 502.2

•

Contract :

ug/Kg

Q

5

u

5
5
5

u
u
u

5

u
u

5
5
5
5

(uL)

u

u

u

5

u

5
5
5

u
u

u

5

u

5
5
5

u
u

5

u

u

5

u

5

u

5
5
5
5

u
u

u
u

030058

Page 2 of 2
FORM I VOA

3/90

 FORM I
SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
T--iame: EA Laboratories
Case No.: 9542025
_ _ .;ample No.: RDS-27
, Sample matrix: SOIL
Total Solids:
98-7%

Lab

ID

Parameter

9'516:rnl OIL AND GREASE
TOT PETROL HYDROCARB

Contract: FORTBLISS
SDG No.: 9516199
Lab Sample ID No.:
9516201
Date Received: 11/11/95

Sample
Cone.
70.6
64.7

Concentration
Units

Analyzed
Date

mg/kg (dry)
mg/kg (dry)

11/28/95
11/28/95

(tf:O·J OS

 lB
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

EPA SAMPLE NO:
RDS

I

Name: EA LABS
I

Contract:
Case No:

Code: EAENG

Mat:C'ix:

SAS No.:

{soil/water) SOIL

(low/med)

LeVt:!l:

t Ml:>isture:

GPC Cleanup:

CAS NO.

1.0

(Y/N)N

SAl.A7164

Date Received:

Concentrated Extract Volume:
Injection Volume:

Lab File ID:

G

LOW
decanted:

l

SDG No:
Lab Sample ID: 95162 0 1

30.0 (g/ml)

Sample wt/vol:

-27

(Y/N) N

11/11/95

Date Extracted: 11/16/ 95

1000 (uL)

Date Analyzed:

11/20/95

Dilution Factor:

(uL)

1.0

pH:

COMPOUND

CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg)ug/Kg

100-02-7---------4-Nitrophenol
132-64-9---------Dibenzofuran
121-14-2---- -----2 ,4 - Dinitrotoluene
606-20-2-------- -2 ,6-Dinitrotoluene
84-66-2--------- - Diethylphthalate
7005-72-3--------4-Chlorophenyl - phenylether
86-73-7------ - - -- Fluorene
~100-01-6---------4-Nitroaniline
S34-52-l------- -- 4,6-Dinitro -2- methylphenol
86-30-6--------- -N- Nitrosodiphenylamine
~101-55-3---------4-Bromophenyl-phenylether
118-74-1------- --Hexachlorobenzene
~~
87-86-5----- -- -- -Pentachlorophenol
85-01-8--------- -Phenanthrene
120-12-7------- -- Anthracene
84-74-2--------- - Di-n-butyl phthalate
206-44-0---- ----- Fluoranthene
129-00-0---------Pyrene
85-68-7----------Butylbenzylphthalate
91-94-1----------3,3' -Di chlorobenzidine
56-55-3----------Benzo(a)anthracene
117-81-7-------- - bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
218-01-9---------Chrysene
~117-84-0---------Di -n-octyl phthalate
205-99-2---------Benzo{b)fluoranthene
207-08 - 9------ ---Benzo(k)fluoranthene
50-32-8----------Benzo(a)pyrene
193-39-5-------- - Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene
53-70-3- - --------Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
191-24-2------- --Benzo(g,h,i)perylene

•~

FORM I

SV-1

Q

1700
330
330
330
330
330
330
1700
1700
330
330
330
1700
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
78

330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330

u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u

u
J

u

u
u
u
u
u
u
u

3/90

oso::.1.s

 J.t

C.t'/\ :::.AMt'LC. 1'U .

VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS

RDS27

Contract:

Lab Name: EA LABORA TORlES
Lab Code:

% Moiswrc:

GCColumn:

Lab File ID: VH8A7169.D
Date Received:

LOW

(low/med)

11/11/95

Date Analyzed: 11/22/95

not dee.
ID:

RTX 502.2

0.53

(mm)

-----(UL)

Soil Extract Volume:

SDG No. :

-------

(g/mL)
G
5.0
-------

Sample wt/vol:

8260
------

Lab Sample ID: 9516201

SOIL

Matrix: (soil/water)

Level:

Method :

Case No.:

EA ENG

Dilution Factor:

1.0
---Soil Aliquot Volume:
---- (uL)

Concentration Units:
(ug/L or ug/Kg)
ug/Kg

Number TlCs found :

:CAS Number
1. 556-67-2
2.
3.

Compound Name
icyclotetrasiloJtane. octameth

RT Est. Cone.
22.43
10

Q
<:. ..;J ..

4.

•

5.
6.
7.
8.

9.
10.
11.

12.
13.
14.
15 .
16.
17.
18.
19.
20 .
21.
22 .
23.
24 .

25 .
26 .
27 .
28.
29 .

30.

030049
FORM I VOA-TIC

3/90

 IA
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

EPA SAMPLl:. NO .

IROS27

•

•

•

Lab Name:

EA LABORATORIES

Lab Code:

EA ENG

MatriJt: (soil/water)
Sample wt/vol :
Level :

(low/med)

% Moisture:

Contract :
Method:

Case No .:

Lab File ID: VH8A7169.D

(g/mL)
G
5.0
------LOW

-------- ID:
Soil Extract Volume:
----(uL)
GC Column: RTX 502.2

'r75-71-8

74-87-3
75-01-4
4-83-9

i75-00-3
i75-69-4
i75-35-4
5-09-2
156-60-5
75-34-3
~94-20-7
156-59-2
7-66-3
!74-97-5
71-55-6
563-58-6
56-23-5
107-06-2
[71-43-2
!79-01-6
178-87-5
r75-27-4
i74-95-3
108-88-3
9-00-5
106-93-4
142-28-9
127-18-4
124-48-1
108-90-7

1630-20-6
100-41-4
106-42-3

SDG No.:

Lab Sample ID: 9516201

SOIL

not dee.

CASNo.

8260

0.53

(mm)

Date Received:

11/11/95

Date Analyzed:

11/22/95

Dilution Factor:

1.0
---Soil Aliquot Volume:
----

Concentration Unirs:
(ug/L or ug/Kg)

Compound
Dichlorodifluoromelhane
Chloromcthane
Vinyl Chloride
Bromomeihane
Chlorocthane
Trichlorofluoromethane
l, 1-Dichlorocthene
Methylene Chloride
trans -I, 2-Dichloroethene
1.1 -Dichloroethane
2,2-Dichloropropane
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
ChJoroform
Bromochloromethane
I .1. 1-TrichJoroethane
I, I -Dichloropropene
Carbon Tetrachloride
1,2-DichJoroelhane
Benzene
Trichloroethene
1.2-Dichloropropane
Bromodichloromethane
Dibromomethane
Toluene
1. 1.2-Trichloroethane
1.2-Dibromoethane(EDB)
1.3-Dichloropropane
Tetrachloroethene
Chlorodibromomethane
Chlorobenzene
l, l, l ,2-Tetrachloethane
Ethy Ibenzene
m&p Xylenes

5

5

5
5

5

5
5

ug/Kg

Q

u
u
u
u

u
u
u

5
5

u
u
u
u
u

5

u

5
5
5

5

u

5

u

5
5

u
u

5

t:J

5

u
u

5
5

u

5

u

5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5

u
u

5

5
5

(uL)

u
u
u
u
u

u
u
u
u

030047

Page I of 2
FORM I VOA

3/90

 lF
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
~ Name :

-

Case No:

SAS No.:

(soil/water) SOIL
30.0

Sample wt/vol:

Level:

( low/med)

% Mc:>isture:

(g/ml)

1. O

(Y/N) N
1000 (uL)

Date Analyzed:

:i.---------- --

<4. • - - - - - - - - - - - -

CONCENTRATION UNITS
(ug/L or ug/Kg) ug/Kg

12
COMPOUND NAME

Unknown

Unknown~~~~~~~~~~~

Unknown

Unknown~~~~~~~~~~~

Unknown

Unknown~~~~~~~~~~~

~~============
8.-----------9.------------

1().-----------l l. . - - - - - - - - - - - 1;! . - - - - - - - - - - - -

•

1.0

pH:

CAS NUMBER

1.------------

11/20/95

Dilution Factor:

RT

==~============== ============================ ========

;~.------------

11/11/95

Date Extracted: 11/16/95

(uL)

(Y/N)N

Nurllber TICS found:

SA1A7163

Date Received:

Concentrated Extract Volume:

GPC Cleanup:

Lab File ID:

G

LOW

Injt~ction Volume:

SDG No:

Lab Sample ID: 9516200

decanted:

4

RDS -26

Contract:

EA LABS

Code: EAENG

MatJrix:

EPA SAMPLE NO:

Unknown

Unknown~~~~~~~~~~~

Unknown

Unknown~~~~~~~~~~~

Unknown

Unknown~~~~~~~~~~~

FORM I

SV-TIC

4.01
6.10
6.33
6.93
9.45
10.68
11.82
12.80
14.10
15.19
15.92
17.91

EST. CONC.

------------190
290
620
180
610
690
200
180
150
170
190
390

3/90

Q

=====

J
J

J
J

J
J

J
J

J
J

J
J

 lB
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
··

name: EA LABS

u

Code: EAENG

Matrix:

Case No:

t Moisture:

3 O.

o (g/ml )

Injection Volume:

GPC Cleanup:
CAS NO.

Lab File ID:

G

LOW

1.0

(Y/N)N

SA1A7163

Date Received:

decanted:

4

SDG No:
Lab Sample ID: 9516200

Concc!ntrated Extract Volume:

•

SAS No.:

(soil/water} SOIL

(low/med)

RDS -26

Contract:

Sample wt/vol:
Leve:. :

EPA SAMPLE NO:

(Y/N) N

11/11/95

Date Extracted: 11/16/95

1000 (uL)

Date Analyzed:

11/20/95

Dilution Factor:

(uL)

1.0

pH:
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg)ug/Kg

COMPOUND

108-95-2---------Phenol
111-44-4---------bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether
95-57-8----------2-Chlorophenol
541-73-1---------1,3-Dichlorobenzene
106-46-7---------1,4-Dichlorobenzene
100-51-6------- - -Benzyl Alcohol
95-50-1----------1,2-Dichlorobenzene
95-48-7----- -----2-Methylphenol
108-60-1--- ------2,2 '-oxybis(l-Chloropropane)
106-44-5---------4-Methylphenol
621-64-7---------N-Nitroso-Di-n-propylamine
67-72-1----------Hexachloroethane
--98-95-3-------- - -Nitrobenzene
78-59-1----------Isophorone
88-75-5-------- - -2-Nitrophenol
105-67-9---------2,4 - Dimethylphenol
65-85-0----------Benzoic acid
111-91-l---------bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane
120-83-2---------2,4-Dichlorophenol
--120-82-1---------1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
91-20-3----------Naphthalene
106-47-8---------4-Chloroaniline
87-68-3----------Hexachlorobutadiene
59-50-7----------4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
91-57-6----------2-Methylnaphthalene
77-47-4----------Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
88-06-2----------2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
---95-95-4----------2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
91-58-7----------2-Chloronaphthalene
88-74-4----------2-Nitroaniline

131-11-3---- --- - -Dimethylphthalate
208-96-8------ --- Acenaphthylene
99-09-2----- ---- -3 -Nitroaniline
83-32-9----------Acenapht h ene
51-28-5----------2, 4-Dinitrophenol
FORM I

SV-1

340
340
340
340
340
340
340
340
340
340
340
340
340
340
340
340

1800
340
340
340
340
340
340
340
340
340
340

1800
340

1800
340
340
1800
340
1800
3/90

Q

u

u
u

u
u

u

u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u

 !:.PA !>AMPLI:. l',U .

IA

VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

•

Lab Name:

EA LABORATORIES

Lab Code:

EA ENG

Matrix : (soil/water)

Sample wt/vol :
Level:

(low/med)

% Moisture:

not dee .

Case No. :

•

Lab Sample ID: 9516200

Lab File ID: VH8A7168.D
Date Received :

11/11/95

4

Date Analyzed:

11 /22/95

ID:

0 .53

(mm)

---- (uL)

95-47-6
100-42-5
75-25-2
l-}8-82-8

o-Xylene

195-50-1
196-12-8
120-82-1
7-68-3
191-20-3
187-61-6

SDG No. :

8260

LOW

CAS No.

(79-34-5

Method:

__5_.o_ _ (g/mL) __G_ _

Compound

196-18-4
103-65-1
108-86-1
108-67-8
95-49-8
106-43-4
198-06-6
5-63-6
135-98-8
99-87-6
541-73-1
106-46-7
104-51-8

----

SOIL

GC Column: RTX 502.2
Soil Extract Volume:

IRDS26

Contract :

Dilution Factor:

1.0
---Soil Aliquot Volume:
----

Concentration Units:
(ug/L or ug/Kg)

Styrene
Bromoionn
lsopropylbenz.ene
l, l .2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
n-Propylbenzene
Bromobenzene
1,3 ,5 -Trimethylbenzene
2-Chloroioluene
4-Chlorotoluene
tert-Butylbenzene
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
sec-Butyl benzene
p-lsopropy I101 uene
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
n-Butylbenzene
1.2-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Hexachlorobutadiene
Naphthalene
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene

ug/Kg

(UL)

Q

u
u

5
5
5
5
5

u

5

u

u
u
u

5
5
5
5
5
5
5

u
u

5

u

5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5

u

u

u
u
u

u

u

u
u
u

u
u
J

u

030022
Page 2 of2
FORM I VOA

3/90

 FORM I
SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS

_~

.ame: EA Laboratories
.ase No.: 9542025
ample No.: RDS-25

ample matrix: SOIL

otal Solids:

ab
D

97.3%

Parameter

516199 OIL AND GREASE

TOT PETROL HYDROCARB

•

Contract:
FORTBLISS
SDG No. :
9516199
Lab Sample ID No.:
9516199
Date Received: 11/11/95

Sample
Cone.
7690

3700

Concentration
Units

Analyzed
Date

mg/kg (dry}
mg/kg (dry)

11/28/95
11/28/95

 lB
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
~ Name:

•

(soil/water) SOIL

GPC Cleanup:
CAS NO.

•

Lab File ID:

1.0

(Y/N)N

SA1A71 62

Date Received:

Conc,entrated Extract Volume:
Injection Volume:

G

LOW
decanted:

3

SDG No:
Lab Sample ID : 9516199

30.0 (g/ml)

(low/med}

% Moisture:

•

SAS No.:

Case No:

Sample wt/vol:
Level:

RDS -25

Contract :

EA LABS

Code: EAENG

Matrix:

EPA SAMPLE NO:

(Y/N) N

11/11/95

Date Extracted: 11/16/95

1000 (uL)

Date Analyzed:

11/20/95

Dilution Factor:

(uL}

1.0

pH:
COMPOUND

CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg)ug/Kg

100-02-7------ - --4-Nitrophenol
132-64-9---------Dibenzofuran
121-14-2---------2,4-Dinitrotoluene
606-20-2---------2,6-Dinitrotoluene
84-66-2----------Diethylphthalate
7005-72-3--------4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether
86-73-7-------- - -Fluorene
~100-01-6------ --- 4-Nitroaniline
.534-52-1---------4,6-Dinitro - 2 - methylphenol
86-30-6----- - - - - - N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
~101-55-3------- - -4 - Bromophenyl-phenylether
118-74-1---------Hexachlorobenzene
--~
87-86-5-------- - -Pentachlorophenol
85-01-8-- - ----- - -Phenanthrene
120-12-7------- - -Anthracene
84-74-2-------- - -Di-n-butyl phthalate
206-44-0---------Fluoranthene
129-00-0---------Pyrene
85-68-7----------Butylbenzylphthalate
91-94-1----- - ----3,3' - Dichlorobenzidine
56-55-3----------Benzo(a)anthracene
117-81-7------- - -bis(2-Ethylhexyl ) phthalate
218-01-9---------Chrysene
--117-84-0------- - -Di - n-octyl phthalate
205-99-2---- - ----Benzo(b)fluoranthene
207-08-9------- - -Benzo(k)fluoranthene
50-32-8----------Benzo(a)pyrene
193-39-5------- - -Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene
53-70-3----------Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
191-24-2---------Benzo(g,h,i)perylene

FORM I

SV- 1

1800
340
340
340
340
340
340

1800
1800
340
340
340

1800
340
340
340
340
340
340
340
340

2600
340
340
340
340
340
340

340
340

Q

u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u

u
u

u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u

3/90

o:-001a

 It:.

VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DAT A SHEET
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS

•

Lab Name: EA LABORATORIES
Lab Code: EA ENG

(g/mL)

---

Date Received:

11/11/95

3

Date Analyzed:

l l /22/95

Dilution Factor:

1.0

ID:

RTX 502 .2

----2

CAS Number
l. 556--67-2

2.

Lab File ID: VH8A7165.D

G

LOW

% Moisture: not dee.

Number TICs found :

SDG No. :

-------

-----

Soil Extract -Volume:

8260
------

Lab Sample ID: 9516199

5.0

(low/med)

GCColumn:

Method :

SOIL

Sample wt/vol :
Level:

Contract :
Case No .:

Matrix: (soil/water)

RDS25

0 .53

(mm)

Soil Aliquot Volume:

(uL)

----

(uL)

Concentration Units:
(ug/L or ug/Kg)
ug/Kg
Compound Name
ICyclotetrasiloxane, octamelh
Unknown

3.
4.

RT
22.43
25.91

!Est. Cone.
5
31

Q
.. J

J
' ¥

5.
6.

•

7.

8.
9.

-

10.
11.

-

12.
13.
14 .
15.

16.

17.
18.
19.

20.
21.

22.
23.
24 .

25 .
26.
27.

28.
29.
30.

030011
FORM I VOA-TIC

3/90

 EPA SAMPLE NO.

JA

VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

•

Lab Name:

EA LABORATORIES

Lab Code:

EA ENG

Matrix : (soil/water)
Sample wt/vol :
Level :

(low/ med)

% Moisture: not dee .

CAS No .

•

75-71-8
t74-87-3
75-01-4
r74-83-9
r75-00-3
r75-69-4
75-35-4
75-09-2
156-60-5
75-34-3
t594-20-7
156-59-2
7-66-3
4-97-5
71 -55-6
563-58-6
156-23-5
107-06-2
t71-43-2
t79-0I -6
t78-87-5
t75-27-4
4-95-3
108-88-3
179-00-5
106-93-4
142-28-9
127-18-4
124-48-1
108-90-7
1630-20-6
100-41-4
106-42-3

Method:

Case No .:

SDG No. :

8260

Lab Sample ID : 9516199

SOIL

Lab File ID: VH8A7165.D

(g/mL)
G
5 .0
------LOW

Date Received :

11/11/95

3

Date Analyzed:

11/22/95

ID :

GC Column: RTX 502.2

Soil Extract Volume:

IRD525

Contract :

0 .53

(mm)

----(uL)

Dilution Factor:

1.0
---Soil Aliquot Volume :
----

Concentration Units:
(ug/L or ug/Kg)

Compound
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Chlorornethane
Vinyl Chloride
Bromomethane
Cbloroc1hane
Trichlorofluoromethane
l , 1-Dichlorocthene
Methylene Chloride
trans-1,2-Dichlorocthene
l, 1-Dichlorocthane

5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5

5
5
5
5

2 .2 -Dichloropropane
cis- 1,2-Dichloroethene
Chloroform
Bromochloromethane
l, l . I -Trichloroethane
I , 1-Dichloropropene
Carbon Tetrachloride
1,2-Dichloroethane

5
5
5
5

Benzene

5

Trichloroethene
1,2- Dichloropropane
Bro mod ich loromethane

5
5
5
5

Tetrachloroethene
Chlorodibromomethane
Chlorobenzene
1, 1. 1,2-Tetrachloethane
Ethyl benzene
m&p Xylenes

Q

u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u

u
u

u
u

5

u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u

5

u

5
5

u
u

5

u

5

Dibromomechane
Toluene
l , l ,2 -TrichJoroethane
1,2-Dibromoethane(EDB)
1,3-Dichloropropane

ug/Kg

5

5
5

(uL)

5

u

5

u

030009

Pagel of 2
FORM I VOA

3/90

 EL~
1.~

PllalaaaJ. ~

Culo-.llT

••..-..

,...,.ns1

•

....._ IIT
uzsaz

AMAIN". Nl

Salllllaa.N. CA

ll~ I O

'1U7U401

-ms.,,.a."'

,_,.,

-n

'11-Zf7-Ul7

71Ul5,JQ5

EA laboratories

Tuesday, November 14, 1995

l 9 Loveton Circle
Sparks. MD 211 52

Ref Number: W9S7S3

POLARIZED LIGHT MICROSCOPY (PLM)
Project 951757

~IIPLE

I

SAMPLE
TREATMENT

APPEARANCE

LOCATION

Teased

; Blade/Grey

RDS.18

I

ASBESTOS
TYPE

"

None Detected

35% Cellulose

"

55% Other

10% Synthetic

Fibrous
I
. Homogeneous

!

"

tl.Qtl.~SBESTQS
FIBROUS
NONFIBROUS

L__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

,RD~m--'------~--, Teased/Crushed

: Grey/Black

!Fibrous
!Layers#
i Black

RDS-21

! Teased

Fibrous
: Homogeneous

!

!Grey/Black

! Teased

None Detected

I

! Tan/Beige

i reased

60% Chrysotile

None Detected

I

I

1Brown

10% Cellulose

40% Other

3% Cellulose
2% Synthetic

35% Other

65% Cellulose

25% Other

10% Synthetic.

Fibrous
I
! Homogeneous
I

ROS-23

68% Other

50% Glass

I

Fibrous
Homogeneous

5% Cellulose
2% Synthetic

2

!
I

25% Chrysotile

Teased

None Detected

70% Cellulose

25% Other

5% Synthetic

Fibrous
1Homogeneous

I

:orm.trlS: For all obviously heterogeneous samples easily separated into subsamples . and for layered samples. each component is analyzed separately.
Uso, "# cf Layers" refers to number of separable subsamples.

,~,

r-<·1~
Essie J. Spencer

aalvst
~ PLM

ha1 -

laboratory
Supervisor

-n

known 10 miss asbestos .-, a lffl8ff Pll<cenutQe of samples which cont.110, aSl>eSlos Thus negatr,e PLM results canno1

vuer--floor ltlH - - · lhOuld De lasted wllh · - SEM °' TEM. The IHI reoort
only IO · - · tesle<I Th,s repgn
may only De r-,,ouced ., full wen wnnen appro,,al l>y EMSL. The aboYe test must not De UffCI by me doent to darn pnidud enocnemem by
be

NV1.AP nor ..., age<,ey ct tne Unite<l Stales Go-,vnent

All "N\I\.AP" '9l)O<U with NVI.AP 1oQO must ecru.-. a1 lusi one sq,ature to 1>e valid
L-to,y ti not ~~C>le lo, IN ec:cu-acy cl ,~suns <.ciuested to ot,ysocally se-•'• ana enetyze la,....o ....-,

A

2

 FORM I
SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS

r.name: EA Laboratories
Case No.: 9542025
.... Sample No.: RDS-11
Sampl e matrix: SOIL
rotal Solids:
97. 4\-

Parameter
9516050 OIL AND GREASE
TOT PETROL HYDROCARB

Contract: FORTBLISS
SDG No.:
9516032
Lab Sample ID No.: 9516050
Date Received: 11/07/95

Sample
Cone.
2030
2030

Concentration
Units

mg/kg {dry)
mg/kg (dry)

Analyzed
Date

11/28/95

11/28/95

•

06001.8

 (

,·

lB
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYS:S DATA SHEET

Case No:

Code: EAENG

SAS No.:

Matrix : (soil/water) SOIL

(low/med)

t- Mo,isture:

GPC Cleanup:

CAS NO.

•

1.0

(Y/N}N

(Y/N) N

11/07/95

Date Extracted: 11/14/95
Date Analyzed:

50000 (uL)

11/23/95

Dilution Factor:

(uL)

5 0 .0

pH:
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg)ug/Kg

COMPOUND

100-02-7---------4-Nitrophenol
132-64-9---------Dibenzofuran ~ - - - - - - - 121-14-2--- - -----2,4-Dinitrotoluene
606-20-2---------2,6-Dinitrotoluene~----~
84-66-2----------Diethylphthalate
7005-72-3------- - 4-Chlorophenyl-p~h-e_n_y-r-e~t~h-e-r-~
86-73-7----------Fluorene
-100-01-6---------4-Nitroaniline
534-52-1---------4,6-Dinitro-2--m-e-t~h-y~l-p_h_e_n_o_l~86-30-6------- --- N-Nitrosodiphenylarnine
-101-55-3---------4-Brornophenyl-phenylether
118-74-1---------Hexachlorobenzene
-87-86-5----------Pentachlorophenol
85-01-8----------Phenanthrene
~-----120-12-7---------Anthracene
84-74-2----------Di - n-butyl~p~h~t~h-a~l~a~t-e----~
206-44-0---------Fluoranthene
129 - 00 - 0 - - - - - - - - - Pyre n e
85-68-7------- - --Butylb_e_n_z_y~l-p~h-t~h-a~
· I~a-t_e_ _ _ __
91-94-1----------3,3' - Dichlorobenzidine
56-55-3-- - -------Benzo(a)anthracene
---117-81-7---------bis{2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
218-01-9---------Chrysene
-117-84-0---------Di - n-octyl phthalace
205-99-2---------Benzo{b)fluoranthene _ _ _ __
207-08-9---------Benzo{k)fluoranthene
50-32-8----------Benzo(a)pyrene
----193-39-5---------Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene
53-70-3------ - ---Dibenz{a,h)anthracene - - - 191-24-2---------Benzo(g,h,i)perylene

---------

-----

•

SA1A7209

Date Received:

Concentrated Extract Volume:
Injection Volume:

Lab File ID:

G

LOW
decanted:

3

SDG No:
Lab Sample ID: 9516 0 5 0

30.0 (g/ml)

Sa mple wt/vol:

Level:

RDS-llRE

Contract:

Name : EA LABS
•

EPA SAMPLE NO:

FORM I

SV-1

88000
17000
17000
17000
17000
17000
12000
88000
88000

17000
17000
17000
88000
11000
16000
17000
17000
17000
17000
17000
17000
17000
17000
17000
17000
17000
17000
17000
17000
17000

Q

u

u
u
u
u
u
J

u
u

u
u
u

u
J
J

u

u

u

u

u

u

u

u
u
0
u
u
u
u
u

'
'

3/90

0 5 0598

'
'

,

 lF

EPA SAMPLE NO:

SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS

r_a Name:

Case No:

. . Code: EAENG

Matr:Lx:

InjeJ::tion Volume:

GPC Cleanup:

1. O

(Y/N)N

Number TICS found:

NUMBER

=·-· ------------

SA1A7208

Date Received:
(Y/N) N

decanted:

3

SDG No:

Lab File ID:

G

LOW

Conc«?ntrated Extract Volume:

11/07/95

Date Extracted: 11/14/95
Date Analyzed:

50000 (uL)

11/23/95

Dilution Factor:

(uL)

5C.O

pH: - CONCENTRATION UNITS
(ug/L or ug/Kg) ug/Kg

20
COMPOUND NAME

RT

EST. CONC.

Q

z:a:==---------- ============================ ======== =============

=====
J·

. ------------

J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J

1"
2 ..1081-75-0--3

No.:

Lab Sample ID: 9516050

30.0 (g/ml)

(low/med)

t Moisture :

( ::AS

SAS

(soil/water) SOIL

Sample wt/vol:
Level:

RDS-11

Contract:

EA LABS

--------------------------------------------8. -----------9. -----------10. -----------11. -----------12. -----------13. -----------14. -----------15. -----------16. -----------17. -----------18. -----------19. -----------20. -----------4.

ti:

Isomers of C8H8
1,1'-(l,3-propanediyl ) bis-b
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown hydrocarbon
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown hydrocarbon
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown hydrocarbon
Unknown
Unknown hydrocarbon
I
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown hydrocarbon
Unknown
Unknown

FORM I

SV-TIC

5.59
15.00
15.62
15.67
20.19
20.86
21.40
21. 57
22.03
22.12
22.17
22.23
22.85
23.44
24.07
24.74
25.38
25.57
26.48
27. 37

230000
250000
240000
86000
180000.
180000
1700000
310000
520000
770000
320000
310000
770000
170000
530000
240000
83000
350900
170000
400000

JN

3/90

050567

 lB
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
-

Mat:rix:

Case No:

EAENG

GPC Cleanup:
CAS NO.

1.0

(Y/N)N

SA1A7208

Date Received:

Concentrated Extract Volume:
Injection Volume:

Lab File ID:

G

LOW

decanted:

3

SDG No:

Lab Sample ID: 9516050

30.0 (g/ml)

(low/med)

I M:>isture :

•~

SAS No .:

(soil/water) SOIL

Sam;ple wt/vol:
Level:

RDS-11

Contract:

Name: EA LABS

ll!' Code:

EPA SAMPLE NO:

(Y/N) N

11/07/95

Date Extracted: 11/14/95
Date Analyzed:

50000 {uL)

11/23/95

Dilution Factor:

(uL)

50.0

pH:
COMPOUND

CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg)ug/Kg

108-95-2---------Phenol
111-44-4---------bis{2-Chloroethyl)ether
95-57-8- - --------2-Chlorophenol
541-73-1---------1,3-Dichlorobenzene
106-46-7-- ------- 1,4 -Dichlorobenzene
100-51-6---------Benzyl Alcohol
95-50 - 1- --------- 1,2 - Dichlorobenzene
95-48-7----------2-Methylphenol
. 108-60 -1- --------2,2'-oxybis(l-Chloropropane) 106-44-5-- - ------4-Methylphenol
621-64-7---------N-Nitroso-Di-n - propylamine
67-72-1--- - - - ----Hexachloroethane
~98-95-3------ --- -Nitrobenzene
78-59-1----------Isophorone
88-75-5----------2-Nitrophenol
105-67-9---------2,4-Dimethylphenol
65-85-0 --- -- ----- Benzoic acid
lll-91-l---------bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane
120-83-2---------2,4-Dichlorophenol
~120-82-1-- ------- 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
91-20-3----------Naphthalene

17000
17000
17000

17000
17000

17000
17000

17000
17000
17000

17000
17000

88000
17000
17000
17000
17000

106-47-8---- ---- -4-Chloroaniline
87-68-3--------- - Hexachlorobutadiene
59-50-7----------4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
91-57-6----------2-Methylnaphthalene
77-47-4----------Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
88-06-2----------2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
~~
95-95-4------- ---2, 4,5 -Trichlorophenol
91-58-7----------2-Chloronaphthalene
88-74-4 -- --------2-Nitroaniline
131-11-3------- -- Dimethylphthalate
208-96-8---- -----Acenaphthylene
99-09-2----------3-Nitroaniline
83-32-9--------- - Acenaphthene
51-28-5- ------ ---2,4-Dinitrophenol

FORM I

17000
17000
17000
17000

SV-1

17000
17000
17000
17000

17000
17000

88000
17000
88000
17000
14000

88000
5400

88000

Q

u
u

u
u
u
u
u
u
u

u

u
u
u
u
u

u
u

u

u

u
u

u
u

u
u

u

u

u
u
u
u
J

u
J

u

3/90

050565

 IA
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DAT A SHEET

•

Lab Name:

EA LABO RATORIES

Lab Code:

EA ENG

Matrix: (soil/water)

Sample wt/vol :
Level :

Oow/med)

% Moisture: not dee.

Contract :

(g/mU

Date Received:

l ln/95

2

Date Analyzed:

11/17/95

0.53

Compound

195-47-6

98-82-8

a -Xylene
Styrene
Bromofonn
lsopropy Ibenzene

79-34-5
96-18-4

l, 1,2,2-Tetrachloroelhane
1,2,3-TrichJoropropane

103-65-1
108-86-1

n-Propylbenzene
Bromobenzene
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
2-Chlorotoluene
4 -Chloroioluene
ten-Bucy Ibenzene
1,2,4 -Trimethylbenzene
sec-Butyl benzene
p-lsopropyltoluene
1,3-Dichlorobenzene

108-67-8
95-49-8
106-43-4
98-06-6
95-63-6
135-98-8
99-87-6
541-73-1
106-46-7
104-51-8
95-50-1
96-12-8
120-82-1
87-68-3
91-20-3
87-61-6

(mm)

Dilution Factor:

1.0
----

Soil Aliquot Volume:

----

Concentration Units:
(ug/L or ug/Kg)

CAS No .

~5-25-2

Lab File ID: VE5A6447 .D

G
----

LOW

-------- ID:
Soil Extract Volume:
----(uL)
100-42-5

SDG No. :

8260

Lab Sample ID: 9516050

SOIL

GC Column: RTX 502.2

•~

Method :

Case No .:

- -5.0- -

1:.PA ~AM.PU:. .NU .

1.4-Dichlorobenzene
n-Butylbenzene
1.2-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Hexachlorobutadiene
Naphthalene
1.2.3-Trichlorobenzene

5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5

ug/Kg

(uL)

Q

u
u

u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u

-

u
u

u
u
u

u
u
u

u
u

5

u
u

5

u

5

u

030184
Page 2 of 2
FORM I VOA

3/90

 FORM I
SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS

I·-=
· ame:
EA Laboratories
se No.: 9542025
_

ample No.: RDS-10

Sample matrix: SOIL
Totc:11 Solids:

Lab

ID

Contract: FORTBLISS
SDG No.:
9516032
Lab Sample ID No.:
9516049
Date Received: 11/07/95

98. 7%

Parameter

9516049 OIL AND GREASE

TOT PETROL HYDROCARB

Sample
Cone.
115
94.9

Concentration
Units

Analyzed
Date

mg/kg (dry)
mg/kg (dry)

11/28/95
12/01/95

060017

 1B

EPA SAMPLE NO:

SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
T
•

~b Name: EA LABS

t· Code:

Matrix:

EAENG

Case No:

t Moisture:

CAS NO.

1.0

(Y/N)N

SA1A7205

Date Received:

Cot1centrated Extract Volume:
Inj ection Volume:

Lab File ID:

G

LOW
decanted:

1

GPC Cleanup:

Lab Sample ID: 9516049

30.0 {g/ml)

(low/med)

SDG No:

No.:

SAS

(soil/water) SOIL

San,ple wt/vol:

Level:

RDS-10DL

Contract:

(Y/N) N

11/07/95

Date Extracted: 11/14/95

1000 (uL)

Date Analyzed:

11/22/95

Dilution Factor:

(uL)

50.0

pH:

COMPOUND

CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg)ug/Kg

100-02-7---------4-Nitrophenol
132-64-9---------Dibenzofuran
121-14-2--- ------2, 4-Dinitrotoluene
606-20-2---------2,6-Dinitrotoluene
84-66-2---- ------ Diethylphthalate
7005 -7 2-3-- ------4-Chlorophenyl -phenylether
86-73-7-------- -- Fluorene
~100-01-6------ --- 4-Nitroaniline
534-52-1--- ------4 ,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol
86-30-6 ----------N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
~101-55-3---- -----4-B romophenyl-phenylether
118-74-1--- --- - -- Hexachlorobenzene
~~
87-86-5----------Pentachlorophenol
85-01-8----- -----Phenanthrene
120-12-7---------Anthracene
84-74-2 ----------Di-n- butyl phthalate
206-44-0---------Fluoranthene
129-00-0---------Pyrene
85-68-7-------- - -Butylbenzylphthalate
91-94-1----------3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
56-55-3--- - ------Benzo(a)anthracene
117-81 - 7------- -- bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
218-01-9---------Chrysene
~117-84-0-------- - Di-n-octyl phthalate
205-99-2------- -- Benzo{b)fluoranthene
207-08 -9---------Benzo(k)fl uoranthene
50-32-8---- ------Benzo(a)pyrene
193-39-5---------Indeno{l,2,3-cd)pyrene
53-70-3-------- --Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
191-24-2---- -----Benzo{g,h ,i)perylene

FORM I

SV-1

86000
17000
17000
17000
17000
17000
33000
86000
86000
17000
17000
17000
86000
230000
34000
17000
38000

11000-0
17000
17000
21000
17000
29000
17000
7700
17000
8300
17000
17000
17000

Q

u

u
u
u
u

u

D

u

u
u
u
u
u

D
D

u
D

D

u
u
D
u
D
u
DJ
u
DJ

u

u
u

3/90

0~0530

 lF
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
T

~b Name: EA LABS

•

Case No:

SAS No.:

(soil/water) SOIL

(low/med)

\ Moisture:

Injection Volume:

1.0

(Y/N) N
1000 (uL)

..

2
3
4
5

~

. -----------. ------------

. ------------

. ------------

. -----------. -----------9 . ------------

10 .

11 .

------------

-----------12 -----------13 -----------14 . -----------15 . ----------- 16 -----------17 -----------18 -----------19 . -----------20 . ------------

11/07/95

Date Analyzed:

11/23/95

Dilution Factor:

1.0

pH: - CONCENTRATION UNITS
(ug/L or ug/Kg) ug/Kg

20

COMPOUND NAME
CAS NUMBER
:m=s::=z========= ==~=========================

--·... -----------------------

SA1.A7207

Date Extracted: 11/14/95

(uL}

(Y/N)N

Nwnber TICS found:

l

Lab File ID:
Date Received:

Concentrated Extract Volume:

GPC Cleanup:

G

LOW
decanted :

1

SDG No:
Lab Sample ID: 9516049

30.0 (g/ml)

Sample wt/vol:
Lev·el:

RDS-10RE

Contract:

Code: EAENG

Matrix:

EPA SAMPLE NO:

Isomers
Isomers
Isomers
Isomers
Isomers
Isomers
Unknown
Isomers
Isomers
Isomers
Isomers
Isomers
Isomers
Isomers
Isomers
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown

of trimethylbenzene_
of C9Hl2
of methylpropylbenze
of ethyldimethylbenz
of ethyldimethylbenz
of ClOH14
C. ,c I-I,~
of Cl2Hl0
of ethylnaphthalene
of dimethylnaphthale
of dimethylnaphthale
of dimethylnaphthale
of dimethylnaphthale
of trimethylnaphthal
of trimethylnaphthal
PAH 1_ C11H1L)
PAH(c:'111t rz.)
P..<\H {C.l,1-t1L~

PAH

~

c. n

RT

7.10
7.50
7.89
7 . 98

2500
3300
3600
6800

8.24

4400

8.29
8.58
12.18
12.36
12.51
12.68
12.93
13.10
14.04
14.23
19.51
19.80
19.99
20.41

4200
1600
4500
3100
4600
3900
4100
3900
2000
2700
1500
2900
1700
2100
1800

20.47

11 , 1.

EST. CONC.

Q

======== ======n======= =====
J
J
J

J

J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J

J
J
J

J
J

l ..;C: ·-JZ./ I /S ~

•

FORM I

SV-TIC

3/90

0~0491

 lB
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

:.iii Name :
•

Case No:

l

GPC Cleanup:

CAS NO.

•

1. O

(Y/N)N

SA1A7207

Date Received:

Concentrated Extract Volume:
Inj iection Volume:

Lab File ID:

G

LOW
decanted:

1

SDG No:
Lab Sample ID: 9516049

30.0 (g/ml)

(low/med)

Mc:>isture:

•

SAS No.:

(soil/water) SOIL

Sample wt/vol:
Levc!l:

RDS-lORE

Contract:

EA LABS

Code: EAENG

Matrix:

EPA SAMPLE NO:

(Y/N) N

11/07/95

Date Extracted: 11/14/95

1000 (uL)

Date Analyzed:

11/23/95

Dilution Factor:

(uL)

1.0

pH:

COMPOUND

CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg)ug/Kg

108-95-2---------Phenol
lll-44-4---------bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether
95-57-8----------2 -Chlorophenol
541-73-1-------- -1,3- Dichlorobenzene
106-46-7---------1,4 -Dichlorobenzene
100-51-6---------Benzyl Alcohol
95-50-1----------1,2-Dichlorobenzene
95-48 - 7----------2-Methylphenol
108-60-1---------2,2' - oxybis(l-Chloropropane)
106-44-5---------4-Methylphenol
621-64-7---------N-Nitroso -Di-n-propylamine
67-72-1 ---------- Hexachloroethane
~98 - 95-3----- --- --Nitrobenzene
78-59-1---- ------Isophorone
88-75-5 ----------2-Nitrophenol
105-67-9---------2,4-Dirnethylphenol
65-85-0------- ---Benzoic acid
lll-91-l---------bis(2-Chloroechoxy ) methane
120-83-2----- ----2, 4-Dichloropheriol
~120-82-1---------1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
91-20-3----------Naphthalene
106-47-8---------4-Chloroaniline
87-68-3---- - -----Hexachlorobutadiene
59-50-7------- - --4-Chloro-3 - methylphenol
91-57-6----------2-Methylnaphthalene
77-47-4----------Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
88-06-2---- ------2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
~~
95-95-4---- ------2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
91-58-7--- -------2-Chloronaphthalene
88-74-4-- - ------- 2- Nitroaniline
131-11-3 ------- --Dimethylphthalate
208-96-8-------- - Acenaphthylene
99-09-2---- --- - --3- Nitroanil i ne
83-32-9------ ----Acenaphthene
51-28-5----------2,4 -Dinitrophenol
FORM I

SV- 1

Q

140
330

330
330

330
330

330
330

330
180
330
330

330
330

330
330

1700
330
330
330

13000
330

330
330
22000
330
330
1700

330
1700
330
330
1700
9500
1700
3/90

J

u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
J
u

u
u

u

u

u
u
u
u
u
E

u

u

u

E

u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
E

u

 - ~"'-------------------------------------EPA SAMPLE NO:

lB
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

I

Code: EAENG

MatidX:

SAS No .:

Case No:

{soil/water) SOIL

(low/med)

% Moisture:

GPC Cleanup:
CAS

NO.

1. O

(Y/N)N

(Y/N) N
1000

11/07/95

Date Extracted: 11/14/95
Date Analyzed:

(uL)

11/20/95

Dilution Factor:

(uL)

1.0

pH:

COMPOUND

CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg)ug/Kg

100-02-7---------4-Nitrophenol
132-64-9-------- -Dibenzofuran
121-14-2---------2,4 -Dinitrotoluene
606-20-2- --- ---- -2,6-Dinitrotoluene
84-66-2--------- -Diethylphthalate
7005-72-3- -------4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether
86-73-7------ ----Fluorene
-100-01-6 ---------4-Nitroaniline
534-52-1---------4,6 - Dinitro-2-methylphenol - 86-30-6--- -------N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
101-55-3---------4-Bromophenyl-phenylether
118-74-1---------Hexachlorobenzene
-87-86-5 - ---------Pe ntachlorophenol
85-01-8 ----------Phenanthrene
120-12-7----- -- --Anthracene
84-74-2-- -- - -----Di-n-butyl phthalate
206-44-0 --- --- ---Fluoranthene
129-00-0---------Pyrene
85-68-7--------- -Butylbenzylphthalate
91-94-1----- -----3,3 ' -D ichlorobenzidine
56-55-3----------Benzo(a)anthracene
117-81-7-------- -bis(2-Et hylhexyl)phthalate
218-01-9- --------Chrysene
-117-84-0---------Di-n-octyl phthalate
205-99-2-- -------Benzo(b)fluoranthene
207-08-9- --------Benzo(k)fluoranthene
50-32-8----- -----Benzo(a)pyrene
193-39-5----- --- -Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene
53-70-3------ ----Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
191-24-2---------Benzo(g,h,i)perylene

•

SA1A7168

Date Received:

Concentrated Extract Volume:
Inji?ction Volume:

Lab File ID:

G

LOW
decanted:

1

SDG No:
Lab Sample ID: 9516049

30.0 (g/ml)

Sample wt/vol:

Level:

RDS-1,0

Contract:

Name : EA LABS

FORM I

SV - 1

Q

u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u

1700
330
330
330
330
330
2600

1700
1700
330
330
330
1700
75000

E
E

13000
330

u

16000
28000

E
E

u

330
330
8800
260

8700 ... ,
330
8400
1500
7500
2000
1300
2500

u
'

E
J
.. E ..

u
E
E

3/90

050450

 VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DAT A SHEET
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
Contract:

Lab Name: EA LABOR ATORIES
Lab Code:

Matrix: (soil/water)

% Moisture:

GCColumn:

_G_ __

Lab File ID : \"E5A6443 .D

Date Received:

LOW

ID:

RTX 502.2

0 .53

(mm)

-------

. (uL)

Number TJCs found :

I ln/95

Date Analyzed: 11/17/95

not dee.

SoiJ Extract Volume:

SDG No. :

-------

_ _s_._o_ _ tglmL)

{low/med)

8260

Lab Sample JD: 9516049

SOIL

Sample wt,vol :
Level:

Method :

Case No .:

EA ENG

RDS10

0

icAS Number

Dilution Factor:

l.O
----

Soil Aliquot Volume:

----

(uL)

Concentration Units:
(ug/ L or ug/Kg)
ug/Kg
Compound Name

RT

Est. Cone.

Q

l.
2.
3.

4.

5.

•

6.
7.

8.
9.

10.
11.

12.

13 .
14 .
15 .
16.

17 .
18.
19 .

...20.
21.

22 .
23 .
24 .
25 .

26 .
27 .
28 .

•

29 .

30.

030176
FORM I VOA -TIC

3190

 EPA SAMPLE 1'10.

IA

VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DA TA SHEET

•

Lab Name:

EA LABORATORIES

Lab Code:

EA ENG

Matrix: (soil/water)
Sample wt/vol :
Level :

(low/med)

% Moisture:

Contract :

Case No .:

CAS No.
75-71-8
174-87-3
175-01-4
r,4-83-9
r75-00-3
i75-69-4
75-35-4
75-09-2
156-60-5
r,5.34.3
~94-20-7
156-59-2
~7-66-3
:74-97-5
r, 1-55-6
563-58-6
56-23-5
107-06-2
171-43-2
t79-0l -6
178-87-5
175-27-4
174-95-3
108-88-3
179-00-5

106-93-4
142-28-9
127-18-4
124-48- 1
108-90-7
1630-20-6
100-41-4
106-42-3

SDG No.:

8260

Lab Sample ID: 9516049
Lab File ID: VE5A6443.D

(g/mL)
G
5.0
-------

LOW

not dee.

Soil Extraet Volume:

•·

Method :

SOIL

ID:

GC Colunm: RTX 502.2

•

----

----

rDSIO

0.53

(mm)

Date Received :

11/7/95

Date Analyzed:

11/17/95

Dilution Factor:

1.0
----

Soil Aliquot Volume: - - - - (uL)

(uL)

Concentration Units:
(ug/L or ug/Kg)

Compound
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Chloromethane
Vinyl Chloride
Bromomethane
Chlorocthane
Trichlorofluoromethane
l, 1-Dichloroelhene
Methylene Chloride
trans- 1,2-Dichloroethene
1.1-Dichloroethane
2,2-Dichloropropane
cis-1 ,2-Dichloroethene
Chloroform
Bromochloromethane
l, l, 1-Trichloroethane
l, 1-Dichloropropene
Carbon Tetrachloride
1,2-Dichloroethane
Benzene
Trichloroethene
1.2-Dichloropropane
Bromodichloromethane
Dibromomethane
Toluene
l, l ,2-Trichloroethane
1,2-Dibromoethane(EDB)
1,3-Dichloropropane
Tetrachloroelhene
Chlorodibromomethane
Chlorobenzene
I, l , l.2-Tetrachloelhane
Ethyl benzene
m&p Xylenes

5
5
5

5
5

5
5
5
5
5
5
5

s
5
5

s
5
5

5
5
5
5
5
5
5

5
5

ug/Kg

Q

u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
tJ

u
u
u
u

u
u
u
u
u

5

u

5
5
5

u
u
u

5

u

5

u

0301?4

Page I of 2
FORM l VOA

3190

 lF
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS

TA Name:

Case No:

SAS

No.:

Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL
(low/med)

Inje•c.tion Volume:

{Y/N) N

Number TICS found:
CAS NUMBER
sa:..c:1 : : - - - -

=- - -- =- -

l.541-02-6---2.540-97-6----

3.------------

•

4.------------

-----------• -----------------------

.

8.------------

9 -----------10 . ------------

•

1. o

SA1A7l6l

Date Received:

11/07/95

Date Extracted: 11/14/95

(Y /N) N

Conc,entrated Extract Volume:

GPC Cleanup:

Lab File ID:

G

LOW
decanted:

1

SDG No:
Lab Sample ID: 9516048

30.0 (g/ml)

Sample wt/vol:

\ Moisture:

RDS-9

Contract:

EA LABS

~Code: EAENG

Level:

EPA SAMPLE NO:

Date Analyzed:

1000 (uL)

11/20/95

Dilution Factor:

(uL)

1.0

pH: - -

CONCENTRATION UNITS
(ug/L or ug/Kg) ug/Kg

10
COMPOUND NAME

================= ==========
Cyclopentasiloxane tu., "1:<4,.1I

Cyclohexasiloxane · Hc:d., m,1f,ril Unknown
'
Unknown
Unknown---------------------Unknown
Unknown--------------------Unknown
Unknown--------------------Unknown

FORM I

SV-TIC

RT

-------8.94
11.02
18.55
18.58
18.72
19.22
19.48

EST. CONC.

Q

===========-= =====
1100
530
3400

JN
JN

J

1500

J

210
210
1800

J
J
J
J
J
J

20.10

250

20.62
20.93

190
1500

-.

3/90

050433

 lB
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

T,& ;Name:
-

Case No:

GPC Cleanup:

CAS NO.

J

•

I

1.0

(Y/N)N

SA1A7161

Date Received:

Conct?ntrated Extract Volume:
Injec::tion Volume:

Lab File ID:

G

LOW

decanted:

1

SDG No:
Lab Sample ID: 9516048

30.0 (g/ml)

(low/med)

t Mo:lsture:

;

No.:

SAS

(soil/water) SOIL

Samp1e wt/vol:
Level:

RDS-9

Contract:

EA LABS

.Code: EAENG

Matr;ix:

EPA SAMPLE NO:

(Y/N) N

11/07/95

Date Extracted: 11/14/95

1000 (uL)

Date Analyzed:

(uL)

11/20/95

Dilution Factor:

1.0

pH:
COMPOUND

CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg)ug/Kg

108-95-2---------Phenol
111-44-4---------bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether
95-57-8----------2-Chlorophenol
541-73-1---------1,3-Dichlorobenzene
106-46-7---------1,4-Dichlorobenzene
100-51-6---------Benzyl Alcohol
95-50-1----------1,2-Dichlorobenzene
95-48-7----------2-Methylphenol
108-60-1---------2,2' - oxybis(l-Chloropropane)
106-44-5---------4-Methylphenol
621-64-7---------N-Nitroso-Di-n-propylamine
67-72-1----------Hexachloroethane
~98-95-3----------Nitrobenzene
78-59-1----------Isophorone
88-75-5----------2-Nitrophenol
105-67-9---------2,4-Dimethylphenol
65-85-0----------Benzoic acid
lll-91-1---------bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane
120-83-2---------2,4-Dichlorophenol
~120-82-1---------1,2,4 -Tri chlorobenzene
91-20-3- - --------Naphthalene
106-47-8---------4-Chloroaniline
87-68-3----------Hexachlorobutadiene
59-50-7----------4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
91-57-6----------2-Methylnaphthalene
77-47-4----------Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
88-06-2----------2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
~~
95-95-4----------2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
91-58-7----------2-Chloronaphthalene
88-74-4----------2-Nitroaniline
131-11-3---------Dimethylphthalate
208-96-8- - -------Acenaphthylene
99-09-2 ------ - ---3-Nitroaniline
83-32-9- ----- - - --Acenaphthene
51-28-5------ ----2 ,4 -Dinit rophenol
FORM I

SV-1

330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
1700
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
1700
330
1700
330
330
1700
330
1700

3/90

Q

u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u

u

u
u

u

u
u
u
u
u

u

u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u

u

 IA
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

•

Lab Name:

EA LABORATORIES

Lab Code:

EA ENG

Matrix: (soil/water)
Sample wt/vol :
Level:

{low/med)

Contract :

Case No. :

---

Method :

Lab File ID: VE5A6442.D

LOW

ID:

•

----

0 .53

(mm)

(uL)

Date Received:

lln/95

Date Analyzed:

11/17/95

Dilution Factor:

- -1.0- Soil Aliquot Volume:
----

Concentration Units:
(ug/L or ug/Kg)

CAS No.

Compound

95-47-6

o-Xylene
Styrene
Bromoform
lsopropylbcnzene
l, l ,2,2-Tetrachloroctbane
1,2.3-Trichloropropane
n-Propylbcnzenc
Bromobcnzene
1,3,5-Trimethylbcnzenc
2-Chlorotoluene
4-Cblorotoluene
ten-Butyl benzene
1,2.4-Trimethylbenzenc
sec-Butyl benzene
p-lsopropyilolucnc
1.3-Dichlorobenz.ene
I .4-Dichlorobenzene
n-Butylbcnzene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
l .2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane
1,2.4-Trichlorobenz.ene
Hexachlorobutadiene
Naphthalene
1,2.3-Trichlorobenzene

75-25-2
98-82-8
r79-34-5
196-18-4
103-65-1
108-86- 1
!08-67-8
95-49-8
106-43-4
198-06-6
~5-63-6
135-98-8
99-87-6
541 -73-1
106-46-7
104-51-8
195-50-1
196- 12-8
120-82-1
187-68-3
191 -20-3
187-61-6

SDG No.:

(g/mL)
G
5.0
------

GC Column: RTX 502.2

10042-5

8260

Lab Sample ID: 9516048

SOIL

% Moisture: not dee.

Soil Extrac1 Volume:

r.PA SAMPLt i\lU .

5
5
5

5
5
5

ug/Kg

Q

u
u
u

u
u
u

5

u

5

u

5
5
5

u

5
5
5

5

{uL)

u
u
u
u
u
u

5

u

5

u

5
5
5
5
5
5
5

u
u
u
u

u
u
u

UJU 166

Page 2 of 2

FORM I VOA

3/90

 FORM I

SAMPLE ANAI..YSIS RESULTS
,1me: EA Laboratories
•
.:-

i1Se No.: 9542025
ilmple No.: RDS-8

ampl•? matrix: SOIL
otal Solids:
98.5%

Contract: FORTBLISS
SDG No.:
9516032
La.b Sample ID No.:
9516047

Date Received: 11/07/95

--------------------------------------

ab
D

Parameter

5160•l7 OIL AND GREASE
TOT PETROL HYDROCARB

Sample
Cone .

145
142

Concentration
Units

Analyzed

mg/kg (dry)
mg/kg (dry)

11/28/95
11/28/95

Date

•

060015

 EPA SAMPLE NO:

lB
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
'.~ame: EA LABS
•

Case No:

Code: EAENG

Matrix:

GPC Cleanup:
CAS NO.

•

1.0

(Y/N)N

SA1A7184

Date Received:

Concentrated Extract Volume:

Injection Volume:

Lab File ID:

G

LOW

decanted:

2

SDG No:

Lab Sample ID: 9516047

30.0 (g/ml)

(low/med}

t Moisture:

•

No.:

SAS

(soil/water} SOIL

Sample wt/vol:

Level:

RDS-8 RE

Contract:

(Y/N) N

11/07/95

Date Extracted: 11/14/95

1000 (uL)

Date Analyzed:

11/21/95

Dilution Factor:

(uL)

1.0

pH:
COMPOUND

CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg)ug/Kg

100-02-7---------4-Nitrophenol
132-64-9---------Dibenzofuran
121-14-2---------2,4-Dinitrotoluene
606-20-2---------2,6-Dinitrotoluene
84-66-2----------Diethylphthalate
7005-72-3--------4-Chlorophenyl - phenylether
86-73-7----------Fluorene
~100-01-6---------4-Nitroaniline
534-52-1---------4,6-Dinitro-2 - methylphenol
86-30-6----------N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
~101-55-3---------4-Bromophenyl-phenylether
118-74-1---------Hexachlorobenzene
~~
87-86-5----------Pentachlorophenol
85-01-8----------Phenanthrene
120-12-7---------Anthracene
84-74-2----------Di - n-butyl phthalate
206-44-0---------Fluoranthene
129-00-0---------Pyrene
85-68-7----------Butylbenzylphthalate
91-94-1----------3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
56-55-3----------Benzo(a)anthracene
117-81-7---------bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
218-01-9---------Chrysene
~117-84-0---------Di-n-octyl phthalate
205-99-2---------Benzo(b)fluoranthene
207-08-9---------Benzo(k}fluoranthene
50-32-8----------Benzo{a)pyrene
193-39-5---------Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene
53-70-3----------Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
191-24-2---------Benzo(g,h,i)perylene

FORM I

SV-1

1700
340
340
340
340
340
340
1700
1700
340
340
340
1700
340
340
340
340
340
340
340
340
340
340
340
340
340
340
340
340
340

Q

u
u

u

u
u
u
u
u

u

u

u

u
u
u

u

u

u

u

u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u

u

3/90

05041\)

 lF
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS

&_ :riTame:

J

.

RDS-8
Contract :

EA LABS

Code: EAENG

Matr.ix:

Case No:
(g/ml)

Injec:tion Volume:

C::AS NUMBER

l .. 541-02-6---2 .. 540-97-6----

3.------------

4 , ------------

:~ .-----------------------

11/07/95

Date Extracted: 11/14/95
Date Analyzed:

1000 (uL)

(uL)

(Y/N)N

Number TICS found:

•

l. o

SA1A7160

Date Received:

LOW

Conc,~ntrated Extract Volume:
GPC Cleanup:

Lab File ID:

G

decanted: (Y/N) N

2

SDG No:

Lab Sample ID: 9516 047

30.0

(low/med)

I" Mo:lsture:

.

SAS No.:

(soil/wat.er) SOIL

Samp:Le wt/vol:
Level:

EPA SAMPLE NO :

11/20/95

Dilution Factor:

1.0

pH: - -

CONCENTRATION UNITS
(ug/L or ug/Kg} ug/Kg

6

COMPOUND NAME

RT

EST. CONC.

==-========================= ======== ==========-v=

Cyclopenta~iloxane,c/.;ff,ms. i...11Cyclohexasiloxane ri,:¢;, c .. 5 n'1 IUnknown
•
Unknown
Unknown~~-~~~----Unknown

-----------

FORM I

SV-TIC

8.93
11.02
18.55
18.59
19.48
20.94

270
170
2600
1100
2600
1900

Q
=====

JN
JN

J
J

J
J

3/90

0 5040 3

~,
,:;..

.""

,i'

 lB
SEMIVOLATILE ORGAN~CS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

EPA SAMPLE NO:
RDS-8

-

Name : EA LABS

~

Code: EAENG

Matrix:

Contract:

(soil/water) SOIL

(low/med)

t Moisture:

GPC Cleanup:

1.0

(Y/N)N

SA1A7160

Date Received:

Concentrated Extract Volume:
InjE~ction Volume:

Lab File ID:

G

LOW
decanted:

2

SDG No:
Lab Sample ID: 9516047

30.0 (g/ml)

Sample wt/vol:

Levt~l:

SAS No.:

Case No:

(Y/N)

11/07/95

Date Extracted: 11/14/95

N

1000 (uL)

Date Analyzed:

(uL)

11/20/95

Dilution Factor:

1.0

pH:

CONCENTRATION UNITS:
CAS NO.

•

•

COMPOUND

(ug/L or ug/Kg ) ug/Kg

108-95-2---------Phenol
ll1-44-4---------bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether
95-57-8-------- --2-Chlorophenol
541-73-1---------1,3-Dichlorobenzene
106-46-7- --------1,4-Dichlorobenzene
100-51-6-------- -Benzyl Alcohol
95-50-1--------- -1 ,2 -Dichlorobenzene
95-48-7----------2-Methylphenol
108-60-1---------2,2'-oxybis(l-Chloropropane) 106-44 -5--- -- ----4-Methylphenol
621-64-7------- --N-Nitroso-Di-n-propylamine
67-72-1-------- --Hexachloroethane
~98-95-3--------- -Nitrobenzene
78-59-1----------Isophorone
88-75-5------ ----2-Nitrophenol
105-67-9-------- -2 ,4 -Dimethylphenol
65-85-0-------- --Benzoic acid
lll-91-l---------bis(2-Chlorcethoxy)methane
120-83-2---------2,4-Dichlorophenol
~120-82-1---- -----1 ,2,4 -Trichlorobenzene
91-20-3----------Naphthalene
106-47-8------- --4-Chloroaniline
87-68-3----------Hexachlorobutadiene
59-50-7----------4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
91-57-6----------2-Methylnaphthalene
77-47-4-------- --Hexachlorocrclopentadiene
88-06-2----------2,4,6-Trich orophenol
~~
95-95-4----------2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
91-58-7------- ---2-Chl oronaphthalene
88-74-4----------2-Nitroaniline
131-11-3---------Dimethylphthalate
208-96-8---------Acenaphthylene
99-09-2----------3 -Nit roaniline
83-32-9------ ----Acenaphthene
51-28-5----------2,4 - Dinitrophenol
FORM I

SV-1

340
340
340
340
340
340
340
340
340
340
340
340
340
340
340
340

1700
34{)
340
340
340
340
340
340
340
340
340
1700
340

1700
340
340

1700
340
1700
3/90

Q

u

u

u

u

u

u

u
u
u

u

u
u
u
u
u
u
u

u

u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u

 EPA ~AMPU: 1'<0.

IA

VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

•

Lab Name:

EA LABORATORIES

Lab Code:

EA ENG

Matrix: (soil/water)
Sample wt/vol :
Level :
~

(low/med)

Moisture: not dee.

Method :

Case No .:

Lab File ID : VE5A6441.D

LOW

Date Received:

lln/95

2

Date Analyzed:

11/17/95

Dilution Factor:

1.0

ID:

0.53

(mm)

Soil Aliquot Volume:

(uL)

•

Concentration Units:
(ug/L or ug/Kg)

CAS No.

Compound

&5-47-6
100-42-5

o-Xylene
Styrene
Bromofonn
lsopropy I benzene
1.1 .2,2-Tctrachlorocthane
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
n-Propylbenz.ene
Bromobcnz.ene
1,3.5-Trimethylbenz.ene
2-ChJorotoluene
4-Chlorotoluene
ten-Butyl benzene
1.2.4-Trimethylbcnz.ene
sec- ButyI benzene
p-lsopropy Itoluene
1.3-Dichlorobcnzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
n-Butylbcnz.ene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane

r79-34-5
196-18-4
103-65- 1
108-86-1
108-67-8
95-49-8
106-43-4
98-06-6
&5-63-6
135-98-8
99-87-6
541 -73-1
106-46-7
104-51-8
195-50-1
196-12-8
120-82-1
187-68-3
191-20-3
187-61-6

SDG No.:

(g/mL)
G
5.0
-------

-------Soil Extract Volume:
----

98-82-8

8260

Lab Sample ID: 9516047

SOIL

GC Column: RTX 502.2

175-25-2

rDS8

Contract :

1.2. 4-Trichlorobenzene
Hexachlorobutadiene
Naphthalene
1,2,3 -Trichlorobcnzene

5
5
5
5
5

5
5
5

ug/Kg

---Q

u

u
u

u

u

u

5

u

5

u

5
5

u
u

5

u

u
u
u
·u

5

u
u

5
5

u

5
5

-

u
u
u

5

5
5
5
5
5

(uL)

u
u
u

Page 2 of2

FORM I VOA

O:J01S7

3190

 FORM I
SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
1me: EA Laboratories

1se .N o. : 9542025
•
lmple No. : RDS-7
ample matrix: SOIL

otal Solids:

98.3%

ll)

D

Parameter

S160~l6 OIL AND GREASE
TOT PETROL HYDROCARB

Contract:
FORTBLISS
SDG No .:
9516032
Lab Sample ID No.:
9516046
Date Received: 11/07/95

Sample
Cone.
578
556

Concentration

Units
mg/kg (dry)
mg/kg (dry}

Analyzed
Date
11/28/95
12/01/95

•

060014

 lB
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
Mame: EA LABS
•

Case No :

~

2

CAS NO.

Lab File ID:

1. O

(Y/N}N

SAl.A7183

Date Received:

:onct?ntrated Extract Volume:

:;pc Cleanup:

G

LOW
decanted:

tnje<:tion Volume:

SDG No:
Lab Sample ID: 9516046

30.0 (g/ml)

(low/med}

Mo;l sture:

•

SAS No.:

(soil/water) SOIL

Sample wt/vol:

r..evel:

RDS-7 RE

Contract:

Code: EAENG

~atrix:

EPA SAMPLE NO:

(Y/N) N
1000

11/07/95

Date Extracted: 11/14/95
(uL)

Date Analyzed:

11/21/95

Dilution Factor:

(uL}

1.0

pH:
COMPOUND

CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg)ug/Kg

100-02-7------ - --4-Nitrophenol
132-64-9---------Dibenzofuran
121-14-2---------2,4-Dinitrotoluene
606-20-2---------2,6-Dinitrotoluene
84-66-2----------Diethylphthalate
7005-72-3------ -- 4-Chlorophenyl - phenylether
86-73-7----------Fluorene
~100-01-6---------4-Nitroaniline
534-52-1---- ----- 4,6-Dinitro - 2-methylphenol
86-30-6--------- - N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
~101-55-3---------4-Bromophenyl-phenylether
118-74-1---------Hexachlorobenzene
~~
87-86-5----------Pentachlorophenol
85-01-8----------Phenanthrene
120-12-7---------Anthracene
84-74-2----------Di-n-butyl phthalate
206-44-0------- - -Fluoranthene
129-00-0---------Pyrene
85-68-7-------- - -Butylbenzylphthalate
91-94-1---- - --- -- 3,3' -Dichlorobenzidine
56-55-3----------Benzo(a)anthracene
117-81-7---------bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
218-01-9---------Chrysene
~117-84-0---------Di-n-octyl phthalate
205-99-2---------Benzo(b}fluoranthene
207-08-9---------Benzo(k)fluoranthene
50-32-8----------Benzo(a}pyrene
193-39-5---------Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene
53-70-3----------Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
191-24-2---------Benzo(g,h,i)perylene

FORM I

SV-1

1700
340
340
340
340
340
340
1700
1700
340
340
340
1700
340
340
340
340
340
340
340
340
77
340
340
340
340
340
340
340
340

Q

u

u
u
u

u

u

u

u
u
u
u
u
u
u

u
u
u
u
u
u
u
J
u
u
u
u
u

u
u

u

3/90

050383

 lF
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
Name: EA LABS
•

Case No:

:njection Volume:

1.0

(Y/N) N

Number TICS found:
CA.S NUMBER
ccsR=============

1 . 541-02-6---2.540-97-6----

3.------------

4 . ------------

.____________
============_

8.------------

11/07/95

Date Extracted: 11/14/95

1000 (uL)

Date Analyzed:

(uL)

(Y/N)N

SA1A71S9

Date Rec eived:

:o ncentrated Extract Volume:

IPC Cleanup:

Lab File ID:

G

LOW
decanted:

2

SDG No :
Lab Sample ID: 9516046

30. 0 (g/ml)

(low/med)

r Moisture:

..,~

SAS No.:

(soil/water) SOIL

,ample wt /vol :

.ev e.l:

RDS-7

Contract:

Co de: EAENG

~at1·ix:

EPA SAMPLE NO:

11/20/95

Dilution Factor:

1.0

pH: - -

CONCENTRATION UNITS
(ug/L or ug/Kg) ug/Kg

8

COMPOUND NAME

RT

EST. CONC.

==-========================= ======== ======-======
8.93
Cyclopentasiloxane, ,!,u,n.-:+f..320
/1

Cyclohexasiloxane ,·1c&,s .-,&.,/Unknown hydrocarbon
Unknown hydrocarbon- - - - Unknown
~---Unknown~---------~
Unknown
Unknown~ - -- - - - - - - ~

FORM I

SV-TIC

11.03
15.41
16.36
18.54
18.58
19.48
20.94

170
200
190
2300
980
1600
1300

Q
ilf:.'
===== • \It

JN
JN
J
J
J
J
J
J

3/90

050 367

;l-

 lB
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

I
_,

Code: EAENG

SAS No.:

Case No:

(soil/water) SOIL

(low/med)

\ M<>isture:

GPC Cleanup:
CAS NO.

1.0

(Y/N) N

SA1A7159

Da·te Received:

Concentrated Extract Volume:
Injt!ction Volume:

Lab File ID:

G

LOW
decanted:

2

SDG No:
Lab Sample ID: 9516046

30.0 (g/ml)

Sample wt/vol:
LeVt!l:

RDS-7

Contract:

I Name: EA LABS

Mat~rix:

EPA SAMPLE NO:

(Y/N)

11/07/95

Date Extracted: 11/14/95

N

1000 (uL)

Date Analyzed:

11/20/95

Dilution Factor:

(uL)

1.0

pH:
COMPOUND

CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg)ug/Kg

108-95-2---------Phenol
lll-44-4---------bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether
95-57-8----------2-Chlorophenol
541-73-1---------1,3-Dichlorobenzene
106-46-7---------1,4-Dichlorobenzene
100-51-6---------Benzyl Alcohol
95-50-1----------1,2-Dichlorobenzene
95-48-7----------2-Methylphenol
108-60-1---------2,2'-oxybis(l-Chloropropane) 106-44-5---------4-Methylphenol
621-64-7---------N-Nitroso-Di-n-propylamine
67-72-1--------- - Hexachloroethane
~98-95-3----------Nitrobenzene
78-59-1----------Isophorone
88-75-5----------2-Nitrophenol
105-67-9---------2,4-Dimethylphenol
65-85-0----------Benzoic acid
lll-91-l------- - -bis(2-Chloroethoxy ) methane
120-83-2---------2,4-Dichlorophenol
~120-82-1---------1,2,4 - Trichlorobenzene
91-20-3----------Naphthalene
106-47-8---------4 - Chloroaniline
87-68-3----------Hexachlorobutadiene
59-50-7----------4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
91-57-6----------2-Methylnaphthalene
77-47-4----------Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
88-06-2----------2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
~~
95-95-4----------2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
91-58-7----------2-Chloronaphthalene
88-74-4----------2-Nitroaniline
131-11-3-- - ---- - -Dimethylphthalate
208-96-8---------Acenaphthylene
99-09-2----------3 - Nitroaniline
83-32-9----------Acenaphthene
51-28-5----------2,4-Dinitrophenol
FORM I

SV- 1

340
340
340
340
340
340
340
340
340
340
340
340
340
340
340
340
1700
340
340
340
340
340
340
340
340
340
340
1700
340
1700
340
340
1700
340
1700

3/90

Q

u
u
u
u

u
u
u
u
u

u

u
u

u

u
u

u
u

u
u

u

u
u
u
u
u

u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u

u

u

 r

•

Lab Name:

EA LABORATORIES

Lab Code:

EA ENG

Matrix: (soil/water)
Sample wt/vol:
Level :

(low/med)

% Moisture: not dee.

Contract:
Method :

Case No. :

8260

rD~

SDG No.:

Lab Sample ID : 9516046

SOIL
5 .0
----

(g/mL)

Lab File IO : VE5A6440.D

G
----

LOW

Date Received:

11 n 195

2

Date Analyzed:

11/17/95

-------------

GC ColuDU1: RTX 502.2

ID:

0 .53

(mm)

(uL)

Soil Extract Volume:

•

.t:.PA SAMPLE 1'0.

lA

VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

Dilution Factor:

l.O
---Soil Aliquot Volume:
----

Concentration Units:
(ug/L or ug/Kg)

CAS No.

Compound

195-47-6
100-42-5
i75-25-2
98-82-8
79-34-5
96-18-4
103-65-1
108-86- 1
108-67-8
95-49-8
106-43-4
98-06-6
95-63-6
135-98"8
()9-87-6
541 -73-1
106-46-7
104-51 -8
1'15-50-1
196-12-8
120-82- l
7-68-3
91-20-3
7-61 -6

o-Xylene
Styrene
Bromoform
lsopropylbenzene
l, 1,2,2-Tetrachlorocthane
1.2,3-Trichloropropane
n-Propylbenzene
Bromobenzene
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
2-Chlorotoluene
4-Chlorotoluene
1en-Butylbenzene
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
sec-Butylbenz.cne
p-lsopropy l10 Iuene
l ,3-Dichlorobenzene
1.4-Dichlorobenzene
n-Bu1ylbenz.ene
1.2-Dichlorobenz.cne
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane
1.2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Hexachlorobutadiene
Naphthalene
1.2 ,3-Trichlorobenzene

ug/Kg

Q

5
5
5
5

u
u
u
u

5
5

u

5

5
5
5
5
5
5

5
5
5
5
5

u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u

u
u

5

u
u
u
u

5
5

u
u

5
5

5

(uL)

030148
Page 2 of 2

FORM I VOA

3/90

 FORM I
SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS
~ame: EA Laboratories
:ase No.: 9542025
_
iample No.: RDS-6
;ample matrix: SOIL
rotal Solids:
98.0\

:.ab
(0

Parameter

Contract: FORTBLISS
SDG No.:
9516032
Lab Sample ID No.: 9516045
Date Received: 11/07/95

Sample
Cone.

Concentration
Units

Analyzed
Date

mg/kg (dry)

12/01/95

·~516045
~--.~---------------------- -------- -----------------------------------------<25.2
mg/kg (dry)
OIL AND GREASE
11/28/95
TOT PETROL HYDROCARB

<25.0

060013

 lB

EPA SAMPLE NO:

SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
Jab Name: EA LABS
Case No:

.Code: EAENG
Mat:r.:·ix:

SAS No.:

(soil/water) SOIL

(low/med)

t Mo,isture:

GPC Cleanup:

1.0

{Y/N)N

SA1A7182

Date Received:

Concentrated Extract Volume:
Injection Volume:

Lab File ID:

G

LOW
decanted:

2

SDG No:
Lab Sample ID: 9516045

30.0 (g/ml)

Sample wt/vol:

Level:

RDS-6 RE

Contract:

(Y/N)

Date Extracted: 11/14/95

N

1000

11/07/95

Date Analyzed:

(uL)

(uL)

11/21/95

Dilution Factor:

1.0

pH:
CONCENTRATION UNITS:

CAS NO.

COMPOUND

(ug/L or ug/Kg)ug/Kg

100-02-7---------4-Nitrophenol
132-64-9---------Dibenzofuran
121-14-2---------2,4-Dinitrotoluene
606-20-2---------2,6-Dinitrotoluene
84-66-2----------Diethylphthalate
7005-72-3--------4-Chlorophenyl - phenylether
86-73-7----------Fluorene
--100-01-6------- -- 4-Nitroaniline
534-52-1---------4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol
86-30-6----------N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
--101-55-3---------4-Bromophenyl-phenylether
118-74-1---------Hexachlorobenzene
---87-86-5------- --- Pentachlorophenol
85-01-8------ ----Phenanthrene
120-12-7---------Anthracene
84-74-2------ ---- Di-n-butyl phthalate
206-44-0---------Fluoranthene
129-00-0-------- - Pyrene
85-68-7----- ----- Butylbenzylphthalate
91-94-1----------3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
56-55-3----------Benzo(a)anthracene
117-81-7---------bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
218-01-9---------Chrysene
--117-84-0---------Di-n-octyl phthalate
205-99-2---------Benzo(b)fluoranthene
207-08-9------- - -Benzo (k)fluoranthene
50-32-8----------Benzo(a)pyrene
193-39-5------ --- Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene
53-70-3----------Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
191-24-2---------Benzo(g,h,i)perylene

FORM I

SV-1

1700
340
340
340
340
340
340

1700
1700
340
340
340

1700
110
340
340
340
430
340
340
340
2100
340
340
340
340
340
340
340
340

Q

u
u
u
u

u
u

u
u
u
u

u

P'

u
J
u

u
u

u

u
u
u
u
u

u

u
u

u

u

3/90

050335

 lF
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS

•

T-.b Name: EA LABS

Case No:

Injection Volume:

1.0

(Y/N)N

Number TICS found:
CAS NUMBER
=•••==a:========:

-· 2.------------

1.541-02 - 6----

3.-------- ----

4.540-97-6---5.92-52-4---- -

. -----------. ------------

8.------------

9.-----------·o. - - - - - - - - - - - ]. 1.----- --- ---].;

l :2.-----------1 :3.-----------1 •l.-----------1 s.-----------1 6.------- ----l '1.------- ----1 0.---------- - 1
2

!}.------------

().----- -------

SA1A7158

Date Received:
(Y/N) N

CO:ncentrated Extract Volume:

GPC Cleanup:

Lab File ID:

G

LOW

decanted:

2

SDG No:
Lab Sample ID: 9516045

30.0 (g/ml)

(low/med)

t Moisture:

•

SAS No.:

(soil/water) SOIL

Sample wt/vol:

Level:

RDS-6

Contract:

Code: EAENG

Matrix:

EPA SAMPLE NO:

1000

11/07/95

Date Extracted: 11/14/95
Date Analyzed:

(uL)

11/20/95

Dilution Factor:

(uL)

1.0

pH: - CONCENTRATION UNITS
(ug/L or ug/Kg) ug/Kg

20
COMPOUND NAME

RT

Isomer~ of C7H5NS
Unknown ~ "~~"' 1(. c . <.. , cI
Cyclohexasi oxane <"1t;£':t\ ,. ,-rw \:&I·
Bi phenyl
'
Isomeri of trimethylnaphtha~ r\i.
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown hydrocarbon
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown

10.45
10.68
11.02
12.27
13.94
14.43
14.55
14.75
15.27
15.38
15.45
15.64
16.08
16.22
17.46
18.20
18.56
19.49
20.94

EST. CONC.

Q

------ -- =-=========== •==-==
============================ -------Cyclopentasiloxane .·J.u, ""'' il 18.93
470
JN
I
210
290
290
260
170
350
170
220
1100
170
180
300
550
220
. 580
1500
2000
3800
2400

J
J

JN
JN
J
J
J

J
J
J
J
J
J

J
J
J
J
J
J
'.

-·
1

(,..:;{ ..

ti

FORM I

SV-TIC

., ·

1.: ,~":,

3/90

osoJoo

 lB
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

.•

Code: EAENG

Case No:

GPC Cleanup:
CAS NO.

1.0

(Y/N)N

SA1A7158

Date Received:

Concentrated Extract Volume:
Inj ,ection Volume:

SDG No:

Lab File ID:

G

LOW
decanted:

2

No . :

Lab Sample ID: 9516045

30.0 (g/ml)

(low/med)

t Moisture:

•

SAS

(soil/water) SOIL

Sample wt/vol:

Level:

RDS-6

Contract:

• Name : EA LABS

Matrix:

EPA SAMPLE NO:

(Y/N) N

11/07/95

Date Extracted: 11/14/95

1000 (uL)

Date Analyzed:

(uL)

11/20/95

Dilution Factor:

1.0

pH:
COMPOUND

CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg)ug/Kg

108-95-2---------Phenol
111-44-4---------bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether
95-57-8----------2-Chlorophenol
541-73-1---------1,3-Dichlorobenzene
106-46-7------- -- 1,4 - Dichlorobenzene
100-51-6---------Benzyl Alcohol
95-50-1----------1,2-Dichlorobenzene
95-48-7----------2-Methylphenol
108-60-1-------- - 2,2' - oxybis(l - Chloropropane)
106-44-5------ - --4-Methylphenol
621-64-7---------N-Nitroso-Di-n-propylamine
67-72-1----------Hexachloroethane
--98-95-3-------- -- Nitrobenzene
78-59-1-------- - -Isophorone
88-75-5----------2-Nitrophenol
105-67-9---------2,4-Dirnethylphenol
65-85-0-------- - -Benzoic acid
111-91-l---------bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane
120-83-2-------- - 2,4-Dichlorophenol
--120-82-1---------1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
91-20-3----------Naphthalene
106-47-8---------4-Chloroaniline
87-68-3----------Hexachlorobutadiene
59-50-7----------4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
91-57-6----------2-Methylnaphthalene
77-47-4-------- - -Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
88-06-2----------2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
---95-95-4----------2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
91-58-7----------2-Chloronaphthalene
88-74-4-------- -- 2-Nitroaniline
131-11-3---------Dimethylphthalate
208-96-8---------Acenaphthylene
99-09-2---------- 3 -Nitroaniline
83-32-9---- - --- - -Ace naphthene
51-28-5----------2,4-Dinitrophenol
FORM I

SV-1

Q

340
340
340
340
340
340
340
340
340
340
340
340
340
340
340
340

87.0
340
340
340
95
340
340
340

85
340
340
1700
340

1700
340
340

1700
340

1700

u
u

D

u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
J

u
u
u
J

u
u
u
J

u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u

u
u

3/90

050298

 lA
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
Lab Name:

EA LABO RA TORIES

Lab Code:

EA ENG

Matrix: (soil/waxer)
Sample wt/vol :
Level :

(low/med)

% Moisture:

not dee .

Contract :

CAS No.
95-47-6
100-42-5
75-25-2
98-82-8
9-34-5
196-18-4
103-65-1
108-86-1
108-67-8
5-49-8
106-43-4
&8-06-6
&5-63-6
135-98-8
99--87-6
541-73-1
106-46-7
104-51-8
195-50-1
196-12-8
120-82-1
7-68-3
191-20-3
7-61-6

rDS6
SDG No.:

8260

Lab Sample ID : 9516045

SOIL

Lab File ID : VE5A6431.D

(g/mL)
5.0
G
-------

LOW

Date Received :

I In/95

2

Date Analyzed:

11/16/95

Dilution Factor:

1.0
----

Soil Aliquot Volume:

----

lD:

GC Column: RTX 502.2

Soil Extract Volume:

Method :

Case No . :

1:.PA !>AMPU:. ;\U.

0 .53

(mm)

(UL)

----

Concentration Units :
(ug/ L or ug/Kg)

Compound
o-Xylenc
Styrene
Bromofonn
Jsopropylbenzcnc
1, 1,2.2-Tetrachloroethane
1,2,3-Trichloropropanc
n-Propylbenz.cne
Bromobcnzcne
1.3.5-Trimethylbenzcne
2-Chlorotoluene
4-Chlorotoluene
ten-Butylbenzene
1.2.4 -Trimethylbenzene
sec-Butylbenzcne
p-Jsopropyltolucne
1,3-Dichlorobenzcne
1.4-Dichlorobenzcne
n-Butylbenzene
I .2-Dichlorobenzcne
1.2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane
1,2.4-Trichlorobenzene
Hexachlorobutadiene
Naphthalene
1,2 ,3-T richlorobenzene

ug/Kg

Q

5
5

u

5

u

5
5
5
5

u

5
5
5
5
5
5
5

(uL)

u
u
u

u
u
u
u
u
u

u
u

5

u

5

u

5
5
5
5
5

u
t:J

u
u

u

5

u

5

u

5

u

030138
Page 2 of 2
FORM I VOA

3/90

 FORM I
SAMPLE ANALYSI S RESULTS
Name: EA Laborator i es
1Case No . : 9542025
Sample No.: RDS-5
Samp,le matrix: SOIL
Total Solids:
99 . 3%
·
~

Lab

ID

Parameter

9516044 OIL AND GREASE

TOT PETROL HYDROCARB

Contract:

FORTBLISS

SDG No . : 9516032
Lab Sample ID No.:
9516044
Date Received : 11/07/95

Sample
Cone .
61.7
46.6

Concentration
Units

Analyzed
Date

mg/kg (dry}

11/28/95
12/01/95

mg/kg {dry)

060012

 lB

EPA SAMPLE NO:

SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
~~ Name: EA LABS

Case No:

. . Code: EAENG

Mat:rix:

SAS No.:

(soil/water) SOIL

{low/med)

\' Moisture:

GPC Cleanup:
CAS NO.

Lab File ID:

1.0

(Y/N)N

SA1A7181

Date Received:

Co:r.centrated Extract Volume:
Injection Volume:

G

LOW
decanted:

1

SDG No:
Lab Sample ID: 9516044

30.0 (g/ml)

Sample wt/vol:
Level:

RDS-5 RE

Contract:

(Y/N) N

11/07/95

Date Extracted: 11/14/95

1000 (uL)

Date Analyzed:

11/21/95

Dilution Factor:

(uL)

1.0

pH:
COMPOUND

CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg)ug/Kg

100-02-7---------4-Nitrophenol
132-64-9---------Dibenzofuran
121-14-2---------2,4-Dinitrotoluene
606-20-2---------2,6-Dinitrotoluene
84-66-2----------Diethylphthalate
7005-72-3--------4-Chlorophenyl-phenylecher
86-73-7----------Fluorene
--100-01-6---------4-Nitroaniline
.534-52-1---------4,6-Dinitro-2-mechylphenol
86-30-6----------N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
--101-55-3---------4-Bromophenyl-phenylether
118-74-1---------Hexachlorobenzene
---87-86-5----------Pentachlorophenol
85-01-8----------Phenanthrene
120-12-7---------Anthracene
84-74-2----------Di-n-butyl phthalate
206-44-0---------Fluoranthene
129-00-0---------Pyrene
85-68-7----------Butylbenzylphthalate
91-94-1----------3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
56-55-3----------Benzo(a)anthracene
117-81-7---------bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
218-01-9---------Chrysene
--117-84-0---------Di-n-octyl phthalate
205-99-2---------Benzo(b)fluoranthene
207-08-9---------Benzo(k)fluoranthene
50-32-8----------Benzo(a)pyrene
193-39-5---------Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene
53-70-3----------Dibenz(a,h ) anchracene
191-24-2---------Benzo(g,h,ilperylene

1700
330
330
330
330
330
330
1700
1700
330
330
330
1700
330
330
330
330
33'0
330
330
330
=610

330
330
330
330
330
330
]30
330

Q

..

. :....,.

u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u

u
u

u
u

050269
FORM I

SV-1

3/90

..()S05G9

 lF
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
Name : EA LABS

i

Case No:

SAS

No.:

(soil/water) SOIL

(low/med)

t Moisture:

Injection Volume:

1.0

{Y/N)N

Number TICS found:
CAS NUMBER

SA1A7157

Date Received:
(Y/N) N

Coicicentrated Extract Volume:

GPC Cleanup:

Lab File ID:

G

LOW
decanted:

1

SDG No:
Lab Sample ID: 9516044

30.0 (g/ml)

Sample wt/vol:
Le'i7el:

RDS-5

Contract:

Code: EAENG

Matrix:

EPA SAMPLE NO:

1000

11/07/95

Date Extracted: 11/14/95
Date Analyzed:

(uL)

(uL)

11/20/95

Dilution Factor:

1.0

pH: - -

CONCENTRATION UNITS
(ug/L or ug/Kg) ug/Kg

19
COMPOUND NAME

RT

EST. CONC.

Q

••cs--==•----==-= ============================ ======== ==-==-======= ====z=
1.541-02-6----

2.------------

3.------------

4.------------

•

5.-----------. ------------

. ------------

8.-----------9.------------

10.----------- -

11.------------

12.------------

13.-----------14.-----------15.-----------16.-----------17.-----------18.-----------19.------------

cyclopentasiloxane. cJ .. , ..........,tf_, \ Unknown
'
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown hydrocarbon
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown hydrocarbon
Unknown hydrocarbon
Unknown hydrocarbon
Unknown hydrocarbon
Unknown hydrocarbon
Unknown hydrocarbon
Unknown hydrocarbon
Unknown hydrocarbon

8.93
18.55
18.58

18.72
18.92
19.22
19.48
20.09
20.32
20.63
20.93
21.71
22.36
22.99
23.60
24.24
24.95
25.80
27.94

280
2200
1000
160
140
170
2500
230
140

JN
~

'J
J
J
J
J

J
J
J
J

:

370
2200
230
140
640
360
3500
270
4800
1600

J

J
J
J
J
J
J

J
~

•

FORM I

SV -TIC

3/90

0502·11
l.,n<., , 11, I'r J

-OSOS·l-1

 lB
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

I

Case No :

Code: EAENG

SAS No.:

30.0 (g/ml)

(low/med)

% Moisture:

GPC Cleanup:
CAS NO.

1.0

(Y/N)N

SA1A7157

Date Received:

Concentrated Extract Volume:
Injection Volume:

Lab File ID:

G

LOW
decanted:

1

SDG No:
Lab Sample ID: 9516044

(soil/water) SOIL

Sample wt/vol:

Le·vel:

RDS-5

Contract:

Name: EA LABS

Matrix:

EPA SAMPLE NO:

(Y/N) N

11/07/95

Date Extracted: 11/14/95

1000 (uL)

Date Analyzed:

11/20/95

Dilution Factor:

(uL)

1.0

pH:
COMPOUND

CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg)ug/Kg

108-95-2---------Phenol
111-44-4---------bis(2-~C~h~l-o_r_o_e~t~h-y~l~)-e~t~h-e-r~~~95-57-8----------2-Chlorophenol
541-73-1---------1,3-Dichlorobe_n_z_e_n_e~~~~~106-46-7---------1,4-Dichlorobenzene
100-51-6---------Benzyl Alcohol
~~~~~
95-50-1----------1,2-Dichlorobenzene
95-48-7----------2-Methylphenol
~~~~~
108-60-1---------2,2'-oxybis(l-Chloropropane)
106-44-5-------- - 4-Methylphenol
621-64-7---------N-Nitroso-Di-n___p_r_o_p_y~l~a-m-i~'n-e~~
67-72-1----------Hexachloroethane
~98-95-3----------Nitrobenzene
78-59-1----------Isophorone ~~~~~~~~~
88-75-5----------2-Nitrophenol
105-67-9---------2,4-Dimethylprh-e_n_o~l~~~~~~
65-85-0----------Benzoic acid
111-91-1---------bis(2-Chloro-e~t~h-o-xy--.)~m-e-t~h~a~n-e~120-83-2---------2,4-Dichlorophenol
~120-82-1---------1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
91-20-3----------Naphthalene
~~~106-47-8---------4-Chloroaniline
87-68-3----------Hexachlorobutad~i-e_n_e~~~~~59-50-7----------4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
91-57-6----------2-Methylnaphthalene
~~~
77-47-4----------Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
88-06-2----------2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
~~
95-95-4----------2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
91-58-7----------2-Chloronaphthalene ~~~~
88-74-4----------2-Nitroaniline
131-11~3---------Dimethylphthal-a~t-e~~~~~~208-96-8- - - -- ----Acenaphthylene
99-09-2----------3 -Nitroaniline~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
83-32-9----------Acenaphthene
51-28-5----------2,4-Dinitrop~h-e_n_o~l~~~~~~-

Q

330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
1700
33U
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
1700
330
1700
330
330
1700
330
1700

U

U

u

U

U
U
U
U

U
U

U
U
U
U

U

U
U
U

u
U
U
U

U
U

U
U

U
U
U
U

U

U

U
U

U

• - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FORM I

SV-1

3/90

~~v.-u~

 f:.PA !>AMt'Lc. i\U.

lA

VOLA TrLE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
Lab Name:

EA LABO RA TORIES

Lab Code:

EA ENG

Matrix: (soil/water)
Sample wt/vol:
Level:

(low/med)

% Moisture:

Case No .:

---

SDG No.:

Method :

Lab Sample ID: 9516044

SOIL

__5_.o_ _ (g/mL) _ _G_ _

Lab File ID: VE5A6430.D

LOW

not dee.
ID:

GC Column: RTX 502 .2
Soil Extract Volume:

IRDS5

Contract:

0 .53

(mm)

----(uL)

Date Received:

I tn/95

Date Analyzed:

11/16/95

1.0
---Soil Aliquot Volume:
---Dilution Factor:

Concentration Units:
(ug/L or ug/Kg)

CAS No.

Compound

5-47-6
100-42-5

o-Xylcnc
Styrene
Bromoform
lsopropylbcnzene
I , l , 2 ,2-Tctrachlorocthane
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
n-Propylbcnzcnc
Bromobcnzcne
1,3,5-Trimethylbcnzene
2-Chlorotolucnc
4-Chlorotoluenc
tcn-Bu1ylbcnzcnc
1,2,4-Trimcthylbcnzcnc
scc-Butylbcnz.cnc
p-Isopropyltolucne
1,3-Dichlorobcnzcne
1.4-Dichlorobcnzcne
n-Butylbenzcnc
I ,2-Dichlorobcnzcnc
l ,2-Dibromo-3<hJoropropane
1,2,4-Trichlorobcnzcne
Hcxachlorobutadicne

5

Naphthalene

5

1,2,3-Trichlorobcnzcne

5

175-25-2
8-82-8
79-34-5

196-18-4
103-65-J
108-86-1
108-67-8
95-49-8
106-43-4
98-06-6

195-63-6
135-98-8
~-87-6
S41-73-1
106-46-7
104-51-8

5-50-1
196-12-8
120-82-1
187-68-3
1-20-3
87-61-6

5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5

5
5
5

5
5
5

5
5

5
5
5

ug/Kg

(uL)

Q

u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u

-

o:;01:9 .
Page 2 of 2

FORM I VOA

3/90

 FORM I
SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS

T. •ame: EA Laboratories
ase No.: 9542025
__
ample No.: RDS-4
Saq~le matrix: SOIL
Total Solids:
96.9\

Contract: FORTBLISS
SDG No.:
9516032
Lab Sample ID No.:
9516043
Date Received: 11/07/95

--------------------------------------Lab
ID

Parameter

951(;043 OIL AND GREASE
TOT PETROL HYDROCARB

Sample
Cone.
27.8
31.6

Concentration
Units

Analyzed
Date

mg/kg (dry)
mg/kg (dry)

11/28/95
12/01/95

060011

 EPA SAMPLE NO:

l.B

SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
~

Name: EA LABS

•

Code : EAENG

Matrix:

Case No:

SAS

30.0 (g/ml)

(low/med)

% Moisture:

Gl>C Cleanup:

CAS NO.

1. o

(Y/N)N

SA1A7156

Date Received:

Concentrated Extract Volume:
I:ujection Volume:

SDG No:

Lab File ID:

G

LOW
decanted:

3

No.:

Lab Sample ID: 9516043

(soil/water) SOIL

Sample wt/vol:
Lt!vel:

RDS-4

Contract:

{Y/N) N

11/07/95

Date Extracted: ll/14/95

1000 (uL)

Date Analyzed:

11/20/95

Dilution Factor:

{uL)

1.0

pH:

COMPOUND

CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg}ug/Kg

100-02-7---------4-Nitrophenol
132-64-9---------Dibenzofuran
121-14-2---------2,4-Dinitrotoluene
606-20-2---------2,6-Dinitrotoluene
84-66-2----------Diethylphthalate
7005-72-3--------4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether
86-73-7----------Fluorene
--l00-0l-6---------4-Nitroan1l1ne
534-52-1---------4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol
86-30-6----------N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
--101-55-3---------4-Bromophenyl-phenylether
118-74-1---------Hexachlorobenzene
---87-86-5----------Pentachlorophenol
85-01-8----------Phenanthrene
120-12-7---------Anthracene
84-74-2----------Di-n-butyl phthalate
206-44-0---------Fluoranthene
129-00-0---------Pyrene
85-68-7----------Butylbenzylphthalate
91-94-1----------3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
56-55-3----------Benzo{a)anthracene
117-81-7---------bis{2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
218-01-9------- -- Chrysene
--117-84-0---------Di-n-octyl phthalate
205-99-2---------Benzo(b)fluoranthene
207-08-9---------Benzo {k)fl uoranthene
50-32-8----------Benzo(a ) pyrene
193-39-5---------Indeno{l,2,3-cd)pyrene
53-70-3----------Dibenz (a,h) anthracene
191-24-2---------Benzo{g,h,i)perylene

FORM I

SV-1

Q

1800
340
340
340
340
340
340

1800
1800
340
340
340

1800
340
340
340
340
34·0
340
340
340
340
340
340
340
340
340
340
340
340

3/90

u
u

u

u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u

 VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
Contract :

Lab Name: EA LABOR ATORIES

•

Lab Code:

EA ENG

Mauix: (soil/water)

Level:

Lab File ID: VE5A6429.D
Date Received:

10:

0 .53

(mm)

(UL)

2

1.0

Dilution Factor:
Soil Aliquot Volume:

-----

Number TtCs found:

11nt9S

Date Analyzed: l l/16/9S

3

RTX 502.2

Soil Extract Volume:

SDG No.:

-------

G

(g/ mL)

LOW

% Moisture: not dee .

8260
------

Lab Sample 10: 9516043

5 .0

(low.'med)

GCColumn :

Method :

Case No. :
SOIL

Sample wt/vol :

RDS4

----

(uL)

Concentration Units:
(ug/L or ug/ Kg)
ug/Kg

CAS Number

Compound Name

l . 556-67-2
2.

ieyclotetrasiloxane. octamctb
Unknown

RT

22.50
26.07

Q

Est. Cone.

18

u

100

J

'

3.

4.

•

5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13 .

14 .
15 .
16.
17.
18.
19 .
.20.
21.
22 .
23 .
24 .
25 .
26.
27 .
28 .
29.
30.

030119
FORM I VOA -TIC

3190

 t.t'A ~AMt'Lt:. ~U .

lA

VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DAT A SHEET
Lab Name:

EA LABORATORIES

Lab Code:

EA ENG

Case No.:

---

Method :

8260
------

(low/med)

'

SDG No.:

'

Lab File ID: VE5A6429 .D

(g/mL)
G
5.0
-------

Sample wt/vol :

fo~

Lab Sample ID : 9516043

SOIL

Matrix: (soil/water)

Level:

Contract:

\

LOW

Date Recxived:

l ln/95

3

Date Analyzed:

11/16/95

Dilution Factor:

1.0

J

"
J

'

~
1,

Moisture: not dee.

--------

GC Column: RTX 502.2
Soil Extract Volume:

1,
I>

1,

1,

I'

Concentration Units:
(ug/L or ug/Kg)

Dichlorodifluoromcthanc
Chloromctbanc
Vinyl Chloride

Trichlorofluoromcthanc

5

I, 1-Dichlorocthene
Methylene Chloride

5

u

157-66-3
74-97-5

Bromochloromethanc

1-55-6

I , I , I -Trichloroethane

5

l, 1-Dichloropropene

63-58-6
156-23-5
107-06-2
171-43-2
9-01-6
r78-87-5
~5-27-4

1,2-Dichloroethane
Benzene
Trichloroethene
1,2-Dichloropropanc
Bromodichloromcthanc

174-95-3

Dibromomcthanc

108-88-3
~9-00-5

Toluene
l , 1,2-Trichlorocthanc
1,2-0ibromocthane(EDB)
1,3-Dichloropropane

108-90-7

30-20-6
HXHI-4
106-42-3

Carbon Tetrachloride

TeLrachloroeLhcnc
Chlorodibromomethane
Chlorobenzene

l , l, 1,2-Tetrachloethane

·.,

-~

..

.,

.
.

u
u
u

5

u

5
5

u
u

5

u
u

'

u
u

'

u

u

5
5
5

u

5

u

5
5

u
u
u

u

'

u
u

Elhylbenzene

5
5

u

m&p Xylenes

5

u

FORM I VOA

)

u

u

5

!

u
u

5
5
5
5
5

5

Page I of 2

··-

u
u
u

u
u

2.2-Dichloropropanc
cis-1 ,2-Dichloroctbcnc
Chloroform

127- 18-4
124-48-1

5

5

l, 1-Dichlorocthane

142-28-9

u

Bromomcthanc

S-34-3
94-20-7
156-59-2

J

Q

5

5
5
5
5
5

(uL)

·,

ug/Kg

Chlorocthanc

trans-1.2-Dichlorocthcnc

..

----

5
5

)56~-5

106-93-4

1:.)

Soil Aliquot Volume:

175-71-8
174-87-3
5-01-4
r74-83-9
~5-00-3

5-09-2

(mm)

----(uL)
Compound

75-35-4

•

0.53

CAS No.

S-69-4

r:

ID:

,
''!:

.
u30117
3/90

'

'.,•

 lF
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
-~

Name: EA LABS

•

Code : EAENG

Matrix:

RDS-3

Contract:
SAS No .:

Case No:

SDG No:
Lab Sample ID: 951 604 2

(so il/water) SOIL
30.0 (g/ml)

Sample wt/vol:

Levul:

(low/med)

t Moisture:

Injf!ction Volume:

l. O

(Y/N)N

Nutnber TICS found:
CAS NUMBER

Lab File ID:

SA1A7155

Date Received:
(Y/N) N

Concentrated Extract Volume:

GPC Cleanup:

G

LOW
decanted:

2

EPA SAMPLE NO:

1000

11/07/95

Date Extracted: 11/14/95
(uL)

Date Analyzed:

11/20/95

Dilution Factor:

(uL)

1.0

pH: - -

CONCENTRATION UNITS
(ug/L or ug/Kg) ug/Kg

9
COMPOUND NAME

RT

EST. CONC.

Q

---··===a:::==:========= ============================ ======== ======-======= =====
5.18
190
J
:L.------------ Unknown
Cyclope_n_t_a_s_i_l_o_xa
__n_e___(_.le-,--~-,-,-,~-,-,
;?.541-02-6---:3.540-97-6- ---

4.------------

'

'5.------------

i.-----------) -----------13.-----------~3. ------------

4

Cyclohexasiloxane cfoctt>( (. ~ ,(~/Unknown
Unknown---------------------Unknown
Unknown---------------------Unknown
Unknown__.h-y~d~r-o_c_a_r_b_o_n__________

8.93
11.02
12.90
18.54
18.58
19.48
20.94
22.99

1800
1300
270
1300
530
2200
1900
150

JN
JN
J
J
J
J
J

J
ii'

•

. FORM I

SV-TIC

3/90

,· - :\ ' ,ti'>
•j~VNiV -

~,~'

\/

 lB
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

1

1

Name : EA LABS
Case No:

Cleanup:
CAS NO.

•

1.0

{Y/N)N

SA1A7 l55

Date Received:

Con.centrated Extract Volume:
Injection Volume:

Lab File ID:

G

LOW

decanted:

2

SDG No:
Lab Sample ID: 9516 042

30.0 (g/ml)

(low/med)

t Moisture:

GPC

SAS No.:

(soil/water) SOIL

Sample wt/vol:
Lev-el:

RDS-3

Contract :

• Code: EAENG

Matrix:

EPA SAMPLE NO:

{Y/N) N
1000

11/07/9 5

Date Extracted: 11/14/95
Date Analyzed:

(uL)

11/20/95

Dilution Factor:

(uL)

1.0

pH:
COMPOUND

CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg}ug/Kg

108-95-2---------Phenol
111-44-4---------bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether
95-57-8----------2-Chlorophenol
541-73-1---------1,3-Dichlorobenzene
106-46-7---------1,4-Dichlorobenzene
100-51-6---------Benzyl Alcohol
95-50-1----- - ----1,2-Dichlorobenzene
95-48-7--------- - 2-Methylphenol
108-60-1---------2,2'-oxybis(l-Chloropropane)
106-44-5------- - -4-Methylphenol
621-64-7---------N-Nitroso-Di-n-propylamine
67-72-1----------Hexachloroethane
~98-95-3----------Nitrobenzene
78-59-1----------Isophorone
88-75-5----------2-Nitrophenol
105-67-9---------2,4-Dimethylphenol
65-85-0----------Benzoic acid
111-91-1---------bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane
120-83-2---------2,4-Dichlorophenol
~120-82-1---------1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
91-20-3----------Naphthalene
106-47-8---------4-Chloroaniline
87-68-3----------Hexachlorobutadiene
59-50-7----------4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
91-57-6----------2-Methylnaphthalene
77-47-4----------Hexachlorocrclopentadiene

88-06-2----------2,4,6-Trich orophenol
95-95-4----------2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
91-58-7----------2-Chloronaphthalene
88-74-4----------2-Nitroaniline
131-11-3---------Dimethylphthalate
208-96-8--- -- ----Acenaphthylene
99-09-2 - ------- -- 3-Nitroaniline
83-32-9------- - - - Acenaphthene
51-28-5--------- - 2,4-DinitrophenoI
FORM I

SV- 1

~~

340
340
340
340
340
340
340
340
340
340
340
340
340
340
340
340

1700
340
340
340
340
340
340
340
340
340
340

1700

Q

u
u
u

u

u
u
u

u
u

u
u
.u
u

u
u
u
u

u

u
u
u
u

u
u
u

u

u

u

340

u

340

u
u
u
u

1700
340
1700
340
1700
3/90

u

u

 IA
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

•

Lab Name:

EA LABORATORIES

Lab Code:

EA ENG

Matrix: (soil/water)

Sample wt/vol:
Level:

Oow/mcd)

% Moisture: not dee.

Contract :

Case No .:

Method :

8260

ES3
SDG No .:

Lab Sample ID : 9516042

SOIL

Lab File ID: VE5A6426 .D

(g/mL)
G
5.0
-------

LOW

Date Received:

11n/9S

2

Date Analyzed:

11/16/95

ID:

GC Column: RTX 502.2
Soil Extract Volume:

---

EPA SAMPLE. l'IU.

----

0. 53

Dilution Factor:

1.0
----

Soil Aliquot Volume:

----

(mm)

(uL)

(uL)

Concentration Units:
Compound

5-47-6
100-42-5
r75-2S-2

a-Xylene
Styrene
Bromofonn
Isopropyl bcnz.cne
l, l ,2,2-Tetrachloroethanc
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
n-Propylbenzene
Bromobenzenc
1,3,5-Trimcthylbenzcne
2-Cblorotolucnc
4 -Chlorotoluene
ten-Butyl benzene
1,2,4-Trimethylbenz.cne
sec-Butyl benzene
p-lsopropyltoluene
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
l ,4-Dichlorobenzene
n-Butylbenz.ene
1.2-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropanc
1,2 ,4 -Trichlorobenzcne
Hexachlorobutadiene
Naphthalene
1.2.3-Trichlorobenzene

98-82-8

•

79-34-5
196-18-4
103-65- 1
108-86-1
108-67-8
95-49,8
106-43-4
8-06-6

!95-63-6
135-98-8
99-87-6
541 -73-1
106-46-7
104-51 -8
5 -50- l
196- 12-8
120-82-1
7-68-3
191-20-3
187-61-6

•

(ug/L or ug/Kg)

CAS No.

ug/Kg

Q

5
5

u
u

5
5

u

5

u
u

u

5
5
5

u
u

5
5

u

5

u

5

u
u
u

5
5
5
5
5
5
5

5
5

5
5
5

-

u

u
u
u
·U

u
u
u
u
u
u

O:i0108
Page 2 of 2
FORM I VOA

3/90

 FORM I

SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS

TiiName: EA Laboratories
ase No.: 9542025
ample No. : RDS-2
Sample matrix: SOIL
Totcl Solids:
95.1%

Lab

ID

Parameter

95161)41 OIL AND GREASE
TOT PETROL HYDROCARB

Contract:

FORTBLISS

SDG No.:
9516032
Lab Sample ID No.:
9516041
Date Received: 11/07/95

Sample
Cone.
40.2
29.1

Concentration

Units
mg/kg (dry)
mg/kg (dry)

Analyzed
Date
11/28/95
12/01/95

•

060009

 1B
SEMIVOLATILE ORGAN~CS ANALYSIS DATA

..ai Name :
•

Case No:

No.:

SAS

{soil/water) SOIL

t Moisture:

GPC Cleanup:
CAS NO.

1. o

(Y/N) N

SA1A7154

Date Received:

Conc::entrated Extract Volume :
Injt!ction Volume:

Lab File ID:

G

LOW

decanted:

5

SDG No:

Lab Sample ID: 9516041

30.0 (g/ml)

Sample wt/vol:
(low/med)

RDS-2

Contract:

EA LABS

Code: EAENG

Mat1:-ix:

EPA SAMPLE NO:
SSEET

(Y/N) N

11/07/95

Date Extracted: 11/14/95

1000 (uL)

Date Analyzed:

11/20/95

Dilution Factor:

(uL)

1.0

pH:
COMPOUND

CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg)ug/Kg

100-02-7---------4-Nitrophenol
132-64-9---------Dibenzofuran
121-14-2---------2,4-Dinitrotoluene
606-20-2---------2,6-Dinitrotoluene
84-66-2----------Diethylphthalate
7005-72-3--------4 - Chlorophenyl-phenylether
86-73-7----------Fluorene
--100-01-6----- - ---4-Nitroaniline
534-52-1---------4,6-Dinitro - 2-methylphenol
86-30-6----------N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
--101-55-3---------4-Bromophenyl-phenylether
118-74-1---------Hexachlorobenzene
---87-86-5----------Pentachlorophenol
85-01-8----------Phenanthrene
120-12-7---------Anthracene
84-74-2----------Di-n-butyl phthalate
206-44-0---------Fluoranthene
129-00-0---------Pyrene
85-68-7----------Butylbenzylphthalate
91-94-1----------3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
56-55-3----------Benzo(a)anthracene
117-81-7---------bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
218-01-9---------Chrysene
--117-84-0------- - -Di-n-octyl phthalate
205-99-2---------Benzo(b)fluoranthene
207-08-9---------Benzo(k)fluoranthene
50-32-8----------Benzo(a)pyrene
193-39-5---------Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene
53-70-3----------Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
191-24-2---------Benzo(g,h,i)perylene

FORM I

SV-1

1800
350
350
350
350
350
350
1800
1800
350
350
350
1800
350
350
350
350
35·0
350
350
350
350
350
350
350
350
350
350
350
350

3/90

Q

u
u
u
u
u

u
u
u

u
u
u
u
u

u

u
u
u

u
u
u

u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u

 VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS

.t

Contract:

Lab Name: EA LABORATORIES
Lab Code:

Matrix: (soil/water)

5 .0

(low/med)

GCColumn:

Lab File ID: VE5A6398.D

G

Date Received:

5
ID:

-----

Number TICs found :

0

tAS Number

11n195

Date Analyu:d: 11/13/95

RTX 502.2

Soil Exrract Volume:

SDG No.:

-------

(g/ mL)

LOW

% Moisture: not dee.

8260

L:tb Sample ID: 9516041

SOIL

Sample wt/vol:
Level :

Method :

Case No.:

EA ENG

RDS:?

0 .53

(mm)

Dilution Factor:

Soil Aliquot Volume:

(UL)

1.0

----

(ul)

Concentration Units:
(ug/L or ug/Kg)
•Jg/Kg

Compound Name

RT

Est. Cone.

Q

l.

2.
3.
4.

5.
6.

•

7.
8.
9.

10.
11.

12.

13.
14.

15.

16.
17.
18.

19 .
.20.
21.
22.
23 .

24 .
25 .
26 .

27 .

•

28.
29.
30 .

O:iOlOO
FORM I VOA -TIC

3.' 90

 EPA SAMPLE NO.

IA

VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

•

Lab Name:

EA LABORATORIES

Lab Code:

EA ENG

Matrix: (soil/water)
Sample wt/vol :
Level:

(low/med)

% Moisture:

not dee.

Method :

Case No. :

8260

rDS2
SDG No.:

Lab Sample JD: 9516041

SOIL

Lab File ID: VE5A6398.0

G
5.0
(g/mL)
-------

LOW

Dace Received:

I ln/95

5

Date Analyzed:

11/13/95

--------

GC Column: RTX 502.2
Soil Extract Volume:

Contract :

ID:

0 .53

Dilution Factor:

(mm)

_ _ _ _ (uL)

1.0
----

Soil Aliquot Volume: - - - - (uL)

Concentration Units:
CAS No.

•

•

75-71-8
74-87-3
t75-0l-4
74-83-9
r,s-00-3
rlS-69-4
r,5. 35-4
r,5-09.2
156-60-5
75-34-3
594-20-7
156-59-2
67-66-3
74-97-5
71 -55-6
563-58-6
56-23-5
107-06-2
71-43-2
79-01 -6
78-87-5
t75-27-4
r,4.95.3
108-88-3
79-00-5
106-93-4
)42-28-9
127-18-4
124-48-1
108-90-7
630-20-6
100-41-4
106-42-3

(ug/ L or ug/Kg)

Compound
Dichlorodifluoromethane

Chloromethane

ug/Kg

5
5

Vinyl Chloride

5

Bromomethane
Chloroe thane

5

Trichlorofluoromethane
1.1-Dichloroechene
Methylene Chloride
trans- 1.2-Dichloroethene
1.1-Dichloroethane
2,2-Dichloropropane
cis- 1,2-Dichlorocthene
Chlorofonn
Bromochloromethane
I, 1.1 -Trichloroelhane
l, 1-Dichloropropcne
Carbon Tetrachloride
1,2-Dichloroethane
Benzene
Trichloroethene
1,2-Dichloropropane
Bromodichloromethane

5
5

5

Dibromomethane
Toluene
l, l ,2-Trichloroechane
1.2-Dibromoethane(EDB)
1,3-Dichloropropane
Tetrachloroelhene
Chlorodibromomethane
Chlorobenzene
I , l , 1,2-Tetrachloethane
Ethy Ibenzene
m&p Xylenes

Page 1 of 2
FORM I VOA

5

5

Q

u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u

5

u

5
5

u
u

5

u
u

5
5
5

u
u
u

5

u

5
5

u
u

5
5

u

5

5

u
u

5

u

5
5
5
5
5

u
u
u
u
u
u

5
5
5

u
u

5

u

030098

3/90

 lF
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
?fa me: EA LABS
•

Case No:

SAS

No. :

(soil/water) SOIL

lampl.e wt/vol:
,evel.:

njection Volume:

1.0

(Y/N}N

Number TICS found:
CAS NUMBER

SA1A7l80

Date Received:
(Y/N) N

:oncentrated Extract Volume:

IPC Cleanup:

Lab File I D:

G

LOW
decanted:

2

SDG No:
Lab Sample ID: 951604 0

30.0 (g/ml)

(low/med}

: Moisture:

RDS-1 RE

Contract :

Code: EAENG

latr1x:

EPA SAMPLE NO:

11 / 07/95

Date Extracted: 11/14/95

1000 (uL)

Date Analyzed:

11/21/95

Dilution Factor:

(uL}

1.0

pH: - -

CONCENTRATION UNITS
{ug/L or ug/Kg) ug/Kg

11
COMPOUND NAME

RT

EST. CONC.

Q

••••••=========== ===== =========-=======-==============-----=--=cc=====

-

1.------------

2.-----------3.-----------4.541-02-6---_,_,

_________ _

• 8.:-··===
=== == ====
----------9. - -----------

10. ··-----------

11. ·-------------

•

Unknown
Unknown--------------------Unknown
Cyclope-n~t-a-s-1~1-o_x_a_n_e__c_lt-~-..--n-,-t~.,...-,-IUnknown o""cic~"",c. c:~ ,'c\.
Unknown
Unknown--------------------Unknown acid methyl ester___
Unknown
Unknown--------------------Unknown

---------------------

FORM I

SV-TIC

4.30

5.16
7.26

8.91
10.64
11.00
16.11
17.36

240
180
140
1000

J
J
J

220

J
J
J
J
J
J
J

570

18.51

160
200
2100

19.45
20.91

2000
1500

3/90

JN

 lB
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

SAS No.:

Case No:

Code: EAENG

llatrix: (soil/water) SOIL

r

(low/med)

Mo,isture:

;pc Cleanup:
CAS NO.

(Y/N)N

(Y/N) N

11/07/95

Date Extracted: 11/14/95

1000 (uL)

Date Analyzed:

11/21/95

Dilution Factor:

(uL)

1.0

pH:
COMPOUND

CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg)ug/Kg

108-95-2---------Phenol
111-44-4---- - ----bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether
95-57-8--------- - 2-Chlorophenol
541-73-1---------1,3-Dichlorobenzene
106-46-7------- - -1,4-Dichlorobenzene
100-51-6---------Benzyl Alcohol
95-50-1----------1,2-Dichlorobenzene
95-48-7--------- -2- Methylbhenol
108-60-1-------- -2 ,2'-oxy is(l-Chloropropane)
106-44-5------- -- 4-Methylphenol
621-64-7-------- - N-Nitroso-Di-n-propylamine
67-72-1----------Hexachloroethane
--98-95-3----------Nitrobenzene
78-59-1----------Isophorone
88-75-5-------- -- 2-Nitrophenol
105-67-9---------2,4-Dimethylphenol
65-85-0----------Benzoic acid
lll-91-1---------bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane
120-83-2---------2,4-Dichlorophenol
--120-82-1------ ---1 ,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
91-20-3----------Naphthalene
106-47-8---------4-Chloroaniline
87-68-3----------Hexachlorobutadiene
59-50-7----------4-Chloro-3-methrlphenol
91-57-6-- - -------2-Methylnaphtha ene
77-47-4----------Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
88-06-2----------2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
---95-95-4----------2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
91-58-7----------2-Chloronaphthalene
88-74-4----------2-Nitroaniline
131-11-3------- -- Dimethylphthalate
208-96-8---- ----- Acenaphthylene
99-09-2- ---------3-Nitroanil ine
83-32-9----------Acenaphthene
51-28-5------- ---2,4-Dinitrophenol

•

•

1. o

SA1A7180

Date Received:

:oncientrated Extract Volume:
:njec::tion Volume:

Lab File ID:

G

LOW

decanted:

2

SDG No:

Lab Sample ID: 9516040

30.0 (g/ml)

;ample wt/vol:

..evel:

RDS-1 RE

Contract:

.....rame: EA LABS

.

EPA SAMPLE NO:

Q

340

340
340
340
340
340
340
340
340
340
340
340
340
340
340
340
1700
340
340
340
340
340
340
340
340
340
340
1700
340
1700
340
340
1700
340
1700

FORM I

SV-1

o'-10101.

3190

u

u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u

 lB

EPA SAMPLE NO:

SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
~ Name :

-

Case No:

Code : EAENG

Matx·ix:

GPC Cleanup:
CAS NO.

1.0

{Y/N)N

(Y/N) N

11/07/95

Date Extracted: 11/14/95

10-00 (uL}

Date Analyzed:

11/20/95

Dilution Factor:

(uL)

1.0

pH:
COMPOUND

CONCENTRATION UNITS:

(ug/L or ug/Kg)ug/Kg

100-02-7---------4-Nitrophenol_------------132-64-9---------Dibenzofuran
121-14-2---------2,4-Dinitrot_o..,..l_u_e_n_e---------606-20-2---------2 , 6-Dinitrotoluene
84-66-2------ - ---Diethylphthalate --------7005-72-3- - - - - - - -4-Chlorophenyl-p.,...h_e_n_y..,..l_e...,..t.,..h_e_r--86-73-7- - - - - - - - - -Fluorene
-100-01-6---------4-Nitroaniline
534-52-1---------4,6-binitro-2--m-e~t~h-y..,..l_p.,..h_e_n_o..,..l--86-30-6----------N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
--101-55-3---------4-Bromophenyl-phenylether
118-74-1----- ---- Hexachlorobenzene
---87-86-5----------Pentachlorophenol
85-01-8----------Phenanthrene
----------120-12-7---------Anthracene
84-74-2----------Di-n-butyl~p-h-t~h-a_l_a_t_e_______
206-44-0---------Fluoranthene
---------------129 - 00 - 0 - - - - - - - - - Pyre n e
85-68-7--------- - Butylb_e_n_z_y..,..l-p-h-t-h_a..,..l_a...,..t_e_________
91-94-1----------3,3' -Dichlorobenzidine
56-55-3----------Benzo{a)anthracene
-----117-81-7---------bis{2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
218-01-9---------Chrysene
-117-84-0---------Di-n-octyl phthalate
205-99-2---------Benzo(b)fluoranthene-------207-08-9---------Benzo(k)fluoranthene
50-32-8----------Benzo(a)pyrene
-------193-39-5---------Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene
53-70-3----------Dibenz(a,h)anthracene -----191-24-2---------Benzo(g,h,i)perylene

------

•

SA1A715 3

Date Received:

Concentrated Extract Volume:
Injection Volume:

Lab File ID:

G

LOW

decanted:

2

SDG No:
Lab Sampl e ID: 951604 0

30. O (g/ml)

(low/med)

t Moisture:

•

SAS No. :

(soil/water) SOIL

Sample wt/vol:
Leve·l:

RDS-1

Contract:

EA LABS

FORM I

SV-1

Q

1700
340
340
340

340
340

340

1700
1700
340

340
340
1700
340
340
340
340
340
340
340
340

340
340
340
340

340
340

340
340

340

u
u
u
u

u
u
u
u
u
u

u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u

 VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DAT A SHEET
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS

Contract :

Lab Name: EA LA.B ORATORIES

•

Lab Code:

Matrix: (soil/water)

~

5.0

(low/med)

(g/mL)

SDG No.:

Lab File ID: VESA6439.D

G

Date Received:

llnl9S

Date Analyud: ll/17/95

2
ID:

RTX 502.2

0.53

(mm)

(uL)

Soil Extract Volume:

8260

Lab Sample :D: 9516040

LOW

Moisture: not dee.

GCColumn:

Method:

SOIL

Sample wt/vol:
Level :

Case No. :

EA ENG

RDS1

Dilution Factor:

1.0

Soil Aliquot Volume:

(uL)

Concentration Units:
(ug/L or ug/Kg)
ug/Kg

Number TICs found :
ICAS Number

l.
2.
3.
4.

Compound Name

RT

26.08

Unknown

Est. Cone.
6

Q
J

5.
6.
7.
8.

9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19 .

..20.
21.
22.
23 .
24 .
25.
26.
27 .
28 .
29.
30.

030090
FORM I VOA · TIC

3/90

 IA

t:.t'A ~AMt'Lt:. ~U.

VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
Lab Name:

EA LABORATORIES

Lab Code:

EA ENG

Matrix: (soil/water)
Sample wt/vol :

Level:

(low/med)

% Moisture: not dee.

Case No .:

•

156-60-5

5-34-3
594-20-7
156-59-2
67-66-3
174-97-5
1-55-6
563-58-6
~6-23-5
107-06-2
171-43-2
179-01-6
178-87-5
17.5-27-4
174-95-3
108-88-3
179-00-5
106-93-4
142-28-9
127-18-4
124-48-1
108-90-7
30-20-6
100-41-4

106-42-3

rDSI
SDG No.:

8260

Lab Sample ID: 9516040
Lab File ID: VE5A6439.D

(g/mU
G
5.0
-----

LOW

Date Received:

11n195

2

Date Analyzed:

11/17/95

Dilution Factor:

- -l.O- -

Soil Aliquot Volume:

----

-------- ID:
Soil Extract Volume:
----(uL)
175-71-8
174-87-3
175-01-4
74-83-9
175-00-3
175-69-4
175-35-4
175-09-2

Method :

---

SOIL

GC Column: RTX 502.2

CAS No.

Contract :

0.53

(mm)

Concentration Units :
(ug/L or ug/Kg)

Compound
Dichlorodi fluoromethane
Chloromethane
Vinyl Chloride
Bro mo methane
Chloroethane
Trichlorofluoromethane
1, 1-Dichloroethene
Methylene Chloride
trans-1,2-Dichlorocthcne
1.1-Dichloroethane
2 ,2-Dichloropropane
cis-1 ,2-Dichloroethene
Chlorofonn
Bromochloromethane
1, l , l -Trichloroethane
l, 1-Dichloropropcne
Carbon Tetrachloride
1,2-Dichloroethane
Benzene
Trichloroethene
I .2-Dichloropropanc
Bromodichloromethanc
Dibromomethane
Toluene
l, l ,2-Trichloroethane
I ,2-Dibromoethane(EDB)
I ,3-Dichloropropane
Tetrachloroethene
Chlorodibromomethane
Chlorobenzene
I, l, l .2-Tetrachloe1hane
Ethyl benzene
m&p Xylenes

5
5
5
5
5

5
5
5
5

5
5
5
5
5

5
5

ug/Kg

Q

u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u

u
u
u
u
u
u
u

u

5

u

5

u
u

5
5

5
5
5

5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5

(uL)

u

u
u
u
u
u

u
u
u
u
u

u
u
u

O:i0088

Page I of 2
FORM I VOA

3/90

  

 

APPENDIX 

SITE CHARACTERIZATION REPORT Golder Associates

 

 

: ....

·,

•

Prepared for:

Fort Worth District
Army Corps of Engineers
and

Directorate of Environment
Fort Bliss, Texas

Site Characterization
Rubble Dump/Spill Site
Fort Bliss, Texas
,
Final Report
January 1999

,

,
,

,
,
,

,
,

Prepared by:

'
~
•
•
•

-~

Albuquerque, New Mexico
954 2025.012

In Association with:

DBS-JV/Bohannan-Huston, Inc.
Albuquerque, New Mexico

 .-

.,

..
.,
..
..•
.
•~~
.•
iif

IC

!II

•

-

7 January, 1999
Fort Worth District
Army Corps of Engineers
P.O. Box 17300
Fort Worth, TX 76102

ATfN: HENRY KASTEN
RE: Final Report: Site Characterization Rubble Dump/Spill Site, Fort Bliss, Texas
Dear Herny:

On behalf of DBS Joint Venture (Bohannan-Huston, Inc.), Golder Associates Inc. (Golder) is
pleased to provide the Fort Worth District Anny Corps of Engineers with the included 5 copies of
the Final Report entitled Site Characterization Rubble Dump/Spill Site, Fort Bliss, Texas. With
the submittal of th.is report DBS Joint Venture has completed all requirements called out in the
Scope of Work for contract DACA63-95-D-0052, delivery order no. 0012 .
During the field investigation Golder conducted waste pile mapping beyond the stated 200 feet east
and west of the Power Line Road. This mapping, beyond that called for in the Scope of Work, was
necessary to complete volumetric calculations on rubble piles which exist along side dirt roads . In
addition, a detailed section describing several engineering control methods to limit access to the site
has been added to the report at the request of Mr. Kelly Blough . Golder feels that this additional
information provides a more complete understanding of the nature and volume of wastes at the site
and necessary measures to restrict access .

~

~
~

.,""'_'

We hope this report meets your needs, the needs of Fort Bliss as well as the TNRCC. lfwe may
be of further service on this project or others please do not hesitate to call.
Sincerely,

GOLDER AS SOCIATES INC.

R-J?aw~
R. Bruce Hallett, Ph.D.

Project Manager
cc:

G . Walhood (BHI, 1 copy ofreport)

E:\L_HKutai-fmal rq>ort.doc

 •
•
•

.•
.
.

.•
•
•
•
•
•

.

•

.
,

.

•.

'

.

'

.

FINAL

954-2025 .012

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Site characterization acti ities were successfully conducted at the Rubble Dump/Spill Site
during August 1997 in accordance with the approved Work Plan and Health and Safety
Plan. The objectives of these activities were to identify and quantify the presence of
hazardous substances in soil, identify and quantify the presence of asbestos in floor tiles
and roofing shingles, map and describe the rubble piles, prepare a cost estimate for the
removal and proper disposal of illegally dumped material, and identify potential
engineering controls to limit future access to the site
Of the 50 suspected asbestos containing material samples that were collected, 26 samples
contained visible quantities of a bestos; 25 of these samples were floor tiles and one was
tar paper roofing material. Small quantities of VOCs (acetone, 2-butanone, 4-methyl-2pentanone, and toluene) were det cted in 4 of the 18 oil sample . Concentrations of all
VOC analytes are 4 to 6 orders of magnitude lower than TNRCC's Medium Specific
Concentrations for residential and industrial land use. There were no SVOCs detected in
the soil samples, however, there are problems in interpreting the detected analyte
concentrations on several samples because of the field sampling objectives and laboratory
sample preparation method .
Ninety-one stations containing tar paper roofing material and floor tiles were mapped and
described . With the exception of one pile. all tar paper roofing material is considered nonhazardous. All floor tile piles are considered to contain asbestos and are therefore
classified as regulated waste. A total of 70 stations containing non-hazardous
construction/demolition debris (i .e., rubble) were mapped and described . This material
consists primarily of landscaping rocks, yard brush, household trash, etc.
There is an estimated 9 yd3 of asbestos containing material and 1200 yd of various rubble
types including landscaping rock, concrete, yard brush, tires, glass, empty paint cans, and
household trash . The total olume of tar paper roofing material is estimated at 136 yd 3 .
The analytical results from soil amples collected in this study are unclear in the level of
VOC and SVOC contamination, however, it is reco mmended that the estimated 3 yd 3 of
stained soil be removed and properly disposed .

.

New engineering control methods are proposed fo r implementation in order to curtail
future illegal dumping in the area . Dirt barricades, concrete banicades, and chain link
fence were evaluated as po sible solutions, however, it is recommended that barbed wire
fencing and "NO DUMPlNG" ign be used , which will provide the most effective, long
term, cost-effective solution to prevent future illegal dumping at this site.

•

•

The cost of removal and disposal of the asbestos containing material to a permitted
disposal facility is estimated at $5,154 . The cost of removal and disposal of the stained
soil to an appropriately perrrutted facility is estimated at $3 ,000. The range of cost for the
removal of all rubble to a commercial waste landfill is estimated at $20,800 to $56,700.

Golder Associates Inc for DBS Joint Venture

 •

•

FINAL

•

Based upon the site characterization activities conducted at the Rubble Dump/Spill Site,
the following actions are recommended to remediate and protect the site:

•

•

•

•
•

•

•

•

.•

II

1) Remove and dispose of all asbestos containing material (the bulk of which is
floor tiles) at a permitted disposal facility ;
2) Remove and dispose of all non-hazardous construction/demolition material, tar
paper roofing material, yard brush, household trash, etc., at the Fort Bliss
landfill;
3) Remove and dispose of all stained soil to a properly permitted
treatment/clisposal facility; and
4) Construct a barbed wire fence and place '~O DUMPING" signs along Montana
Avenue and adjacent to the OST A access road to prevent/deter future illegal
dumping at the site .

a

•
•
•

-•~.
•

"

.
•
"

..
'

....

...
....

....
....

954-2025 .012

Golder Associates Inc. for DBS Joint Venture

 ,
,
,
,

·•
'

'

•
•

•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

•
•

•
•

•

.
.
.
.
.

•
•
•

•
...

·•.

FINAL

954-2025.012

111

TABLE OF

ONTENT

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................. .. ......... .... .... ....... ......... ....... ...... .. .... ... ... .. ........ .... .. . 1
1.0 INTRODUCTION .. ...... .. ...... ........... .... ...... ..... .... ... .... ......... ... .... .... .. .. ..... ... .. ... ........ . 1
2.0 PREPARATION OF WORK PLAN AND HEALTH AND SAFETY PLAN .. ........ . 2
3.0 REVIEW OF EXISTING DATA ..... ............. ...... ........ ... ... .... ..... ....... ....... .. ........... ... 3
3 .1 Site Location ......................... ......... .. ...... ............................. .... ......... ....... .. ... ..... .. 3
3.2 liistorical Data ...... ........ ........... ...... ........ .. .... ...... ...... ...... .. .... ..... ................. ...... .. .. 3
3.3 Aerial Photograph Review ............. ... ....... ..... ................ .. ... .. ....... ..... .... .. .... ....... ... 4
4.0 DESCRIPTION OF FJELD ACTIVITIES .............. ............ ..... ........... ..... ..... .... ..... .. 9
4.1 Site Reconnaissance ........ ......................... .. ... ..................... ..... ...... ....... ....... .. ..... .. 9
4.2 Floor Tiles and Tar Paper Roofing Material Sampling ................. ...... ............. .... .. 9
4.3 Soil Sampling ........... ... ............. ... .... ..... .......... .. ... ...... .... ... ..... .. ... .......... ...... ........ 10
4.4 Waste Management.. ..... .... ...... ... ............... ..... .......... ........ ........ ...... ..... .. ..... ........ 10
4.5 Mapping of Debris Piles and Spills ... .. ...... ..... ... ... .. .... .... ... ..... ... ......... ...... ... ....... . 11
4.6 Volume Estimation ... .... . . .. ... ....... .. .... . ...... ... .. .... .......... .. ... ....... ... ..... ......... . .. ... ... . 11
5.0 SAMPLE ANALYSES ... .... ................................................................................. .. 13
5.1 Asbestos ..... ... ... ...... .. .. .. ....... .. ... .. ............. ... ....................... ......... .... ............. ... ... 13
5.2 Soil ............... ... ........... .. ...... ................... ....... .. .. ........ ..... .... .... ... .. ........... ... ... ...... 13
6.0 ANALYTICAL RESULTS .. .... .... ... ... ..... ... .... ..... .. ... .......... .. ..... ... .. ...... .... ... ........ ... 14
6.1 Asbestos ..... ... ........ ...... .. ..... ... ......... .......... .... .. ............... ......... ............... ......... ... 14
6.2 Soil ........... ... ...... .. .. ........................................ ... .. .................. . ....... ............. .... ... 14

6.3 Quality Assurance/Quality Control ...... ..... .... .. ....... ....... .. ......... .. .............. .. .. .... ... 15
6.3.1 Asbestos ... .... ... ..... ...... .... ... ................. ... ........ ...... ....... ... .. .. .. ................... .. . 15
6.3.2 Soil .............. ... ........... ........ .... .. .... ... ... .. ... ............... ...... ... .... .. .... .. .. .. ......... .. 15
6.3.3 Trip Blank .. .. .... .. ............ ... .. ... ...... ..... .. ... .. ..... ..... .... ... .... ....... .... .............. .... 16
6.4 Data Validation ............ ... ........ .... ....... .... ..... ..................... .... ...... ...... ...... ...... .... .. 16
6.4 .1 Data Quality Objectives ......... .. .. ... ................ .. ..... .... ..... ......... ....... ........... ... 16
6.4.2 Major Deficiencies ........ ...... ... .. .... .......... .............. .. .... ... .. ........ ... ... ..... ... ..... 17
6.4.3 Minor Deficiencies .. ........... ...... ............... ...... ..... .. ...... ..... ....... .. ...... ......... ... 17
6.4.4 Field QC .. ........... ..... ........ ... .... ........ ....................... .. .. .... ....... .... .... ............. 18
6.4.5 Tentatively ldentified Compounds .................. ...... ... .. .. ........... ... ......... ........ 18
6.4.6 Quantitation Limits and Reported Results ... ... .... ...... ......... .. ... ...... ..... ....... .. . 18
7.0 COMPARISON OF SOIL RESULTS WlTH TNRCC ACTION LEVELS .... ........ 24
8.0 MAPPING OF DEBRIS PILES AND VOLUME ESTIMATION ........ ... .... ... ........ 26
8.1 Previously Mapped Spill Sites ... ................. .. ......... ...... .... ........ ... .. ... .. ...... ...... ... .. 26
8.2 August 1997 Observations ..... ... . ........ .. .. .......... ...... .. ....... ... ... ... ...... ............... .. .. 26
8.3 Volume Estimation .. .... ..... ... ...... .. .... .... ....... ..... .. .................. .... ......... ... .. .. ..... ... .. 27
9.0 COST ESTIMATE FOR REMOVAL AND DISPOSAL ......... .. ... .. .... ....... ..... ....... 30
9.1 Soil ... .. .......... .... .... .... .. ..... ....... ..... ... ...... .... ......... ........ .. .. ...... ......... ... .... ..... .. ..... .. 30
9.2 Asbestos ....... ........ .. .... ... ........ .. ... .... .... .. ... ... ... .. ...... ..... .. .. .... ..... .. .. .. ......... ... .... .... 30
9.3 Other Rubble .... .............................. .. ..... ..... .... ......... ......... ......... .. ........ .... .... ...... 31
10.0 ENGINEERING CONTROLS TO LIMIT ASSESS .......... ... ........... ...... .. .......... 32
10.1 Current Method of Access Control. ... ... .......... ... .. ......... .. ... .... .... ... ....... ...... ... .. 32
10.2 Dirt Barricades ................................. ........ ... .. ......... .. ..... ....... .. ...... ........... ... .... 32

•

•
•

Golder Associates Inc. for DBS Joint Venture

 FINAL

•
•

IV

10.3 Concrete Barricades ...... .......................... .... .. .... ... ....... .. ........................ ... ...... 33
10.4 Barbed Wire Fence ...... .......... ... ......... .... ......... ..... ...... .. .......................... ........ . 33
10.5 Chain Link Fence ....... .. .. ............................. .................... ..... .................. ... ..... 34
11.0 SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS .. ........ .. .... .... ....... ............ .. .......... .. 36
12.0 REFERENCES .. ............ ......... ...... .. .... .... ............ ... ....... .... ..... .......... ... .... .. .. .. .... . 37

•
II

•
•

•
•
•

.

•
•

•

.

.
.
.
"

•

•

•
...'

.
...
...

...

.
...

...

•

.

954-2025 .012

Golder Associates Inc. for DBS Joint Venture

 •
•

FINAL

V

954-2025 .012

LIST OF TABLES
Table 1. Listing of aerial photographs reviewed ..... .... .... ........ .... ..... ... .... ..... ..... .. .... ....... .. 8
Table 2. List of Hazardous/Regulated and Non-Hazardous material categories identified
during the field investigation ............ .... ... ..... ... ............................... .. ..... ... ..... .... .. ... 12
Table 3. Asbestos analytical results ............. ..... ...... .. ........ .... ....................... ...... .. ........ .. 19
Table 4. Soil analytical data .............. ........ ......................... ........ ...... ........... ... ... .. ... ....... 21
Table 5. Analyses perfonned on each soil sample ...... ... ... .. .. ..... ................... ... ... ........ ... . 23
Table 6. Comparison of soil analytical results with TNRCC Action Levels ... .... ...... ... ..... 25
Table 7. Volume estimates of dumped materials ............................ ........... .. .. .. ....... .. ...... 28

Golder Associates Inc. for DBS Joint Venture

 •
•
•

FINAL

V1

954-2025 .012

LIST OF FIGURES

•

•

.•
•

•
•
•

.

•

•.

Figure 1. Topographic location map of the Rubble Dump/Spill field site. Each square
equals 1 square mile (after Defense Mapping Agency, 1978) . ... ..... ...... ......... ........... . 6
Figure 2. Aerial photograph of the Rubble Dump/Spill field site. The boundary of the
study area is outlined in white (Cooper Aerial Survey, 1986) ......... ...... ..... .. ... ...... ..... 7
Figure 3. Rubble Dump/Spill Site field investigation area showing the location of PA field
sampling points and spills . ..... ... .... ............. ..... ...... ... ......... .. ..... ..................... ........ .. 29
Figure 4. Aerial photograph of the study area and adjoining El Paso International Airport
property (Cooper Aerial Survey, 1995). Fence line for airport is outlined in blue.
Proposed fence line for the Rubble Dump/Spill Site is outlined in red (a - indicates
site access points) . ........ ..... .... ....... .......... ...... ....... .......... ..... .... ....... ..... ................... 35

.

'
•

.
•

•
•

'
'
'
"'

....

....
Golder Associates Inc. for DBS Joint Venture

 ..,
•

FINAL

vu

954-2025 .012

LIST OF PLATES

Plate 1

Aerial photograph field map showing station and sampling locations.

•

..•
•.

•
•
•

•
•

•
•

•

...
.
•

..
.

...•
•

..

•
•

·•
.
•
•

•

Golder Associates Inc. for DBS Joint Venture

 ,

'

.

•
.,

vm

FINAL

·•~

'

•
t

'

•
•
•

954-2025 .012

APPENDICES

Appendix A Detailed Statement of Work: Site Characterization of Contaminated Soil
and Waste Materials, Power Line Road Rubble Dump/Spill Site, Fort Bliss Texas
Appendix B

USAEHA 1988 Survey and July 1989 Site Survey

Appendix C

Sample Collection Logs

Appendix D

Station Description Sheets

Appendix E

Asbestos Sample Analytical Data

Appendix F

Soil VOC and SVOC Sample Analytical Data

Appendix G

Field Photographs

Appendix H

Data Validation Supporting Documentation

Appendix I

Safety KJeen Asbestos Removal Cost Estimate

·•
I

•
Golder Associates Inc. for DBS Joint Venture

 I

I

IX

FINAL

•

·•t
•

•
•
'

•

-•
"

"
•
I.\

...

-"
...

.-...

~

'
..."

ACRONYMS AND DEFINITIONS

CESWF

U .S. Anny Corps of Engineers, Fort Worth District

CFR

Code of Federal Regulations

CRQL

Contractor Required Quantitation Limits

DOE

Directorate of Environment

EPA

Environmental Protection Agency

MRD

Missouri River District

PPE

Personal protective equipment

PA

Preliminary Assessment

QC

Quality Control

RCRA

Resource Conservation and Recovery Act

svoc

Semivolatile organic compound

SWDL

Southwestern Division Laboratory

TNRCC

Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission

TPH

Total petroleum hydrocarbon

voe

Volatile organic compound

9'

...
'•
'

....
....

....

...
...
...

-

-•
-..

......

Golder Associates Inc. for DBS Joint Venture

954-2025 .0 12

 '

'

FINAL

·•

1.0

954-2025 .012

It

•

•

•
I
I

•
I

•
•

.

INTRODUCTION

During August 1997, site characterization activities were conducted at the Rubble
Dump/Spill Site at Fort Bliss, Texas for the Fort Worth District Anny Corps of Engineers
(CESWF) Office, under contract DACA63-95-D-0052, delivery order no . 0012. Trus
work was performed by Golder Associates Inc. (Golder) under subcontract to DBS Joint
Venture. The objectives of trus site characterization were to identify and quantify the
presence of hazardous substances in soil, identify and quantify the presence of asbestos in
floor tile and tar paper roofing material, map and describe the rubble piles, prepare a cost
estimate for the removal and proper disposal of illegally dumped material, and identify
potential engineering controls to limit future access to the site .
The site characterization activities were successfully conducted in accordance with the
Work Plan (Golder Associates Inc., 1997a) and Health and Safety Plan (Golder Associates
Inc., 1997b). These plan were reviewed and approved by CESWF and the Fort Bliss
Directorate of Environment (DOE). All laboratory analyses were performed in
accordance with approved Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) test methods by a
Missouri River District (MRD) validated analytical laboratory. Disposal cost estimates are
based on the estimated volumes of the different waste types, local labor costs, and
estimated duration of the removal work .

•

•
•

.

"'

.

Execution of trus delivery order included the following tasks :
1) Preparation of a Work Plan and Health and Safety Plan
2) Review of existing site data and aerial photographs;
3) Collection and analysis of suspected asbestos containing materials;
4) Collection and analysis of surface and subsurface soil samples at spill sites;
5) Location mapping of debris piles,
6) Waste volume estimation;
7) Identification of potential engineering controls to limit access to the site;
8) Preparation of a cost estimate for removal and disposal of iJlegally dumped material;
and
9) Preparation of this report which documents the results of the above tasks .

•

•

'

.
.
...

.
•
•

.
•
...

..
.
.

~
Golder Associates Inc. for DBS Joint Venture

 _,______________________________________
FINAL

2.0

2

954-2025 .012

PREPARATION OF WORK PLAN AND HEALTH AND SAFETY PLAN

A Draft Work Plan containing a Sampling and Analysis Plan was submitted in July 1997 in
accordance with Section 3.3 of the Statement of Work (Appendix A). This plan was
reviewed by Kelly Blough of DOE and Beverly Post ofCESWF. Comments were faxed
to the Golder office on 23 July, 1997 . The comments were addressed by Golder and a
revised Work Plan was submitted on 29 July, 1997 and subsequently approved .
A Draft Health and Safety Plan was submitted in July 1997 in accordance with Section 3 .4
of the Statement of Work (Appendix A) . This plan was reviewed internally by Golder
Certified Industrial Hygienist, Michael Cannon prior to being sent the DOE and CESWF .
Dennis Ostrander, Safety and Occupational Health Specialist with the Fort Bliss Safety
Office reviewed the Draft Health and Safety Plan and provided several recommendations
for revision . Madeline Morgan, Industrial Hygienist with the CESWF also reviewed the
Draft Health and Safety Plan and recommended several revisions. Comments were faxed
to the Golder office . The comments were addressed by Golder and a revised Health and
Safety Plan was submitted on 22 July, 1997 and was subsequently approved .

...

...
...

.
...

.
...

.
.
...
.
..
..

Golder Associates Inc . for DBS Joint Venture

 - 1---------------------------------3

FINAL

•

3.0

REVIEW OF EXISTING DAT A

3.1

Site Location

954-2025 .012

The power line road Rubble Dump/Spill Site is located in El Paso County in far west
Texas on Fort Bliss property in the area immediately north of Montana Avenue at latitude
31 ° 48' 05 ' north and longitude 106° 1 ' 50" west (Figure I) This site consists of a
large discontinuous area of unauthorized and illegal dumping and has uncontrolled public
access. According to a DOE report (Appendix B) the initial start of dumping is not
known. Over the 21 month time period between the field work for a Preliminary
Assessment (PA; in November 1995) and this field investigation (August 1997) illegal
dumping appeared to be continuing and consisted primarily oflandscaping debris (e.g .,
landscaping rock, yard brush) and construction/demolition material (e.g. concrete blocks,
wood paneling, roofing shingles).

•

The area of investigation as defined in the Statement of Work for this delivery order
(Appendix A) is an approximately l mile stretch of dirt road between power poles I
though 9 and 200 feet east and we~i. of the road (Figure 2). This area of investigation
covers approximately 48 acres, however, nearly twice that acreage was visited and
mapped in order to evaluate the complet e extent of illegal dumping at this site .

3.2

Historical Da ta

A review of e.x.isting Fort Bliss hi tori cal record s was conducted to detennine the use and

past environmental studies conducted at the site. Summarized below in chronological
order is a history of the use and study of the Rubble Dump/Spill Site:

1988 - Site listed in a Fort Bliss environmental database indicating the site ' s location,
description, operation dates, waste description, suspected releases, and environmental
recommendations (Appendi. B).
1989 - Site listed in a Fort Bli s environmental database stating similar information as
above, as well as scheduling a site investigation for April 1995 (Appendix B).
1995 (Dec.) - A PA of the site reports soils contaminated with semi volatile organic
compounds (SVOC), TPH, and oil and grease, and several ceiling and floor tiles
containing a bestos (Golder Federal ervices, 1997)

'

In the PA a number of VOCs were detected in 7 of the 15 oil samples collected at 4

'

areas of stained soil; TPH and oil and grease were detected in all 15 of the soil samples;
and asbestos was detected in 2 floor tile samples but was not detected in 8 roofing shingle
sample .

"

·•~

The PA report found only I of the 7 contaminated soil samples exceeded both the EPA
residential and commerciaVindustrial land use standards for dibenzo[ a,h ]anthracene (EPA,

.

Golder Associates Inc. for DBS Joint Venture

 4

FINAL

•

954-2025 .012

1995). This same sample was also above EPA s residential land use standard for
benzo[ a]anthracene, benzo[b ]fluoranthene, benzo[a]pyrene, and indeno[ 1 2,3-cd]pyrene
but below the commercial/industrial land use standard for these compounds.
Other compounds which were detected in the soils but were below residential and
commercial/industrial land use standards for the Texas Natural Resource Conservation
Commission (TNRCC) and/or EPA are:

•

•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

indeno[ 1,2,3-cd)pyrene
naphthalene
bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
benzo[a]anthracene
chrysene
benzo[b]fluoranthene
fluoranthene
pyrene
di-n-octyl phthalate
benzo[k]fluoranthene
benzo[a]pyrene
acenaphthene
tluorene
anthracene
butylbenzyl phthalate
dibenzo(a,h)anthracene

The following compounds were detected at the Rubble Dump/ Spill Site but are not
currently listed in the TNRCC' s "Medium Specific Concentrations for Health-Based
Closure/Remediation" table or EPA's "Risk-Based Concentration" table (EPA, 1995):
•
•
•
•

phenanthrene
benzo[g,h,i]perylene
2-methylnaphthalene
acenaphthylene

•

TPH

•

oil and grease

3.3

Aerial Photograph Review

During the Fall of 1995, in preparation for the PA, all available aerial photographs were
searched in the Fort Bliss DOE archives with the assistance of Ms. Kelly Poche. This
search did not tum up any relevant photographs.

In the Fall of 1996 a database search of available aerial photographic images was
conducted by the University ofNew Mexico ' s Earth Data Analysis Center in
Golder Associates Inc. for DBS Joint Venture

 FINAL

6

954-2025 .012

•

•

Figure 1. Topographic location map of the Rubble Dump/SpiU field site. Each
square equals 1 square mile (after Defense Mapping Agency, 1978).

Golder Associates Inc. for DBS Joint Venture

 FINAL

•

5

954-2025 .012

Albuquerque, New Mexico . Their search pro ided a list of 66 images ranging from color
infrared to black and white stereo pairs. The images listed in Table 1 were evaluated
because their scale was most appropriate for this study .
This evaluation concluded that at a scale of l :20,000 to 1:24,000 the resolution of
individual waste piles was not po sible and limited these images from being used to study
the history of illegal dumping.
A final search was conducted with the City of El Paso Planning, Research, and
Development Department which identified a 1986 Cooper Aerial photograph was taken at
a scale of 1: 12,000. This photo had sufficient resolution to use as a field map (see Plate
I), however, the re oluti n i n t great enough to identify individual waste piles or
evaluate a chronologic evolution of illegal dumping activities. Cooper Aerial had also
taken one photo of the study area in October 1995 . This photo is at a scale of 1:24,000
and does not provide adequate resolution for waste pile mapping.
The various searches for aerial photographic co erage of the Rubble Dump/Spill Site were
successful in finding a photograph suitable as a field map . However, no existing
photographs were at a large enough scale to evaluate the history and patterns of illegal
dumping .

•

•
Golder Associates Inc . for DBS Joint Venture

 •

•

Figure 2. Aerial photograph of the Rubble Dump/ pill field site. The boundary of
the stud~· area is outlined in white (Cooper Aerial S urvey, 1986).

 FINAL

954-2025 .012

8

•

Agency

U.S. Geoloirical Survey

•

•

Texas Dept. of Transportation
Cooper Aerial
Texas Dept. of Transportation

Date
Sept. 1991
May 1988
April 1981
Sept. 1979

Scale
1:24,000
1:24,000
1:20,000
1:24,000

Table 1. Listing of aerial photographs reviewed.

Golder Associates Inc. for DBS Joint Venture

Film Type

Color
Black and White
Black and White
Black and White

 9

FINAL

•

4.0

DESCRIPTION OF FIELD ACTIVITIES

4.1

Site Reconnaissance

954-2025 .012

A site reconnaissance was conducted 11-12 August, 1997 prior to sampling to confirm the
results of the PA (Golder Federal Services, 1997) and determine if additional wastes had
been dumped since the PA field investigation was conducted in November 1995. Rubble
piles of suspected asbestos containing floor tiles and tar paper roofing materials were
marked with orange pin flags . Rubble piles oflandscaping and construction/demolition
materials were marked with green pin flags . Stained soil locations were marked with pink
pin flags .

4.2

Floor Tiles and Tar Paper Roofing Material Sampling

The sampling effort concentrated on collecting samples from items such as floor tiles and
less on roofing shingles, as none of the 8 roofing shingles collected for the PA contained
asbestos. However several old piles of roofing material, which appeared to have a fibrous
texture, were sampled.

•

A Sample Collection Form (Appendix C) was completed for each asbestos sample
collected. Information recorded included:

•

•
•
•

•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

,.
•

Date
Time
Sample ID
Sampling Location
Media
Station
Sample Type
Sample Depth
Sample Description
Aliquot Amount
Sample Container
Preservation Method
Sampler (signature and date)

All sampling locations were staked and numbered with orange pin flags for subsequent
field identification and plotted on a field map. Sample preparation of suspected asbestos
containing material consisted of placing the sample in a plastic zip lock bag. All asbestos
sampling was conducted in Level D personal protective equipment (PPE), in accordance
with the Health and Safety Plan (Golder Associates Inc., 1997b).

Golder Associates Inc. for DBS Joint Venture

 10

FINAL

•

4.3

954-2025 .012

Soil Sampling

A priority was placed on collecting soil samples from previously undefined and unsampled
spill sites. Only two new spill sites were discovered . Additional samples were collected
from topographic depressions (e.g., dips in the road or pot holes) to evaluate if any
organic compounds had migrated from adjacent spill sites. Samples were also collected
from spills previously identified in the PA in order to determine the vertical depth of
contamination. All soil sampling was conducted in Level D PPE, in accordance with the
Health and Safety Plan (Golder Associates Inc., 1997b).
A Sample Collection Form (Appendix C) was completed for each soil sample collected.
The information recorded on each form is the same as previously described for the
suspected asbestos containing samples in Section 4.2.
All soil sampling location were staked and numbered with pink pin flags for subsequent
field identification, and plotted on a field map . All samples were collected utilizing
stainless steel sampling spoons and stainless steel mixing bowls.

•

All SVOC samples were thoroughly mixed and homogenized in a clean, stainless steel
mixing bowl. Following homogenization, the SYOC soil sample was placed in a 125 rn1
gJass jar. AJI voe samples, upon collection, were immediately placed in 125 rn1 amber
glass sample containers. Each VOC jar was filled to capacity to eliminate any headspace .
All VOC and SVOC samples were labeled, sealed, and shipped so that the integrity of the
samples was maintained. Each voe and SYOe sample jar was labeled with the sample
identification number, date and time sampled. analytical parameter, preservation method,
and sampler's initials.
All sampling equipment was decontaminated between each use to prevent cross
contamination, as described below.

4.4

Waste Management

Two types of waste were generated during asbestos and soil sampling activities. These
included:
•
•

PPE; and
decontamination fluids.

PPE and disposable sampling upplies (e.g., latex gloves, plastic bags) utilized during field
activities were collected in several large plastic ziplock bags. At the end of the project
these bags were disposed of at the city landfill.

•

All reusable sampling equipment such as the stainless steel bowls and stainless steel
sampling spoons were decontaminated between samples to prevent cross contamination.
Two spray bottles were filled , one with an Alconox ™/deionized water mixture and the

Golder Associates Inc. for DBS Joint Venture

 I

FINAL

11

954-2025 .012

other with only deionized water. After each sampling episode the bowl and spoon were
washed using the Alconox ™/deionized water mixture and a paper towel, then double
rinsed with deionized water and allowed to air dry . Decontamination fluid was captured in
a large wash tub and allowed to completely evaporate over a period of two days. All paper
towels used in the decontamination process were placed inside a ziplock plastic bag which
was disposed at the city landfill .

4.5

Mapping of Debris Piles and Spills

All rubble piles within the study area boundary were flagged and plotted on a 36-in wide
aerial photograph (Plate 1). A Station Description Sheet (Appendix D) was completed for
each waste pile and spill site and the following information was recorded :
•
•
•
•

Station Number
Waste Description
Volume Estimation
Hazardous/Non-Hazardous Constituents

Individual rubble piles were isolated and easily distinguished between power poles 7 and 9
in most cases and one Station Description Sheet was completed for each rubble pile.
Between power poles 1 and 7 the rubble piles were more concentrated and several piles
were typically grouped on one Station Description Sheet. To the degree possible the
"Hazardous/Non-Hazardous" category was determined while in the field . If soil or
asbestos samples were being collected from that station, then the "Hazardous/NonHazardous" category was not completed until the analytical results were obtained.
Waste materials were categorized in the field into the different types of
Hazardous/Regulated or Non-Hazardous materials listed in Table 2.

During field sampling sufficient infom1ation was gathered on suspected asbestos
containing material to classify it as either friable or nonfriable (TNRCC, 1996a).
Contaminated soils were classified as hazardous wastes (based on RCRA definition, 40
CFR 261) after analytical results had been received . Form codes were assigned to the
various waste materials based on "Guidelines for the Classification and Coding of
Industrial Waste and Hazardous Wastes (TNRCC, 1995).

4.6

Volume Estimation

Volume estimates of the rubble piles and stained soil were tabulated during the site
reconnaissance phase of the field project. Volumes were visually estimated based on the
number of 55-gallon drums needed to contain the material and were recorded on Station
Description Sheets (Appendix D)

Golder Associates Inc. for DBS Joint Venture

 12

FINAL

954-2025 .012

•
Bazardous/Reirnlated
Asbestos containing material (analytical
results reciuired)
Contaminated soils (analytical results
required)

•

•

Non-Hazardous
Construction and/or demolition debris
(including tar paper roofing material)
All other rubble (i.e., household trash, glass,
landscaping debris, plastic, furniture, and
wood)

Table 2. List of Hazardous/Regulated and Non-Hazardous material categories
identified during the field investigation .

Golder Associates Inc. for DBS Joint Venture

 13

FINAL

•

s.o

SAMPLE ANALYSES

5.1

Asbestos

954-2025.012

All suspected asbestos containing samples were shipped to Paragon Analytics, lnc., in Fort
Collins, Colorado for analysis by EPA Method 600/R-93/116. This is a visual estimation
method using electron microscopy. Analyses were completed by Reservoirs
Environmental Services, lnc. a subconsultant to Paragon Analytics, lnc. The analytical
results are included in Appendix E.

S.2

Soil

All soil samples were shipped to Paragon Analytics, Inc., in Fort Collins Colorado for
analysis ofVOCs using SW-846 Method 8260 and SVOCs using SW-846 Method 8270.
Paragon Analytics, Inc. is MRD validated to perform both of these analyses. The
analytical results are included in Appendix F.

•

On 21 August, 1997 two quality control (QC) soil samples (QA-1 and QA-2) were
collected. Because of potential shipping delays caused by the UPS strike and in order to
assure sample delivery, these samples were shipped via Southwest Airline air freight under
chain of custody to the U.S. Anny Corps of Engineers Southwestern Division Laboratory
(SWDL) in Dallas Texas and held for counter pick-up at Dallas Love Field. Both samples
were marked on the chain of custody for analysis of VOCs using SW-846 Method 8260
and SVOCs using SW-846 Method 8270.

Golder Associates lnc. for DBS Joint Venture

 14

FINAL

•

6.0

ANALYTICAL RES ULTS

6.1

Asbestos

954-2025 .012

Results for asbestos analyses are presented in Table 3. Fifty samples of floor tile, roofing
material and sheet rock were sampled . Chrysotile, one form of asbestos, was detected in
25 of the 30 floor tile samples, in l of the 17 roofing material samples, and in none of the
3 sheet rock samples. Floor tiles were analyzed both on the top and bottom of the sample
(see Layer A and Bin Table 3). Asbestos concentration ranges from trace to 35% for the
25 floor tile samples that tested positive for asbestos . The one roofing material sample
contained 25% asbestos.
According to TNRCC regulations (TNRCC, 1996a) "non-friable asbestos-containing
material that contains greater than 1 percent asbestos but has been subjected to sanding,
grinding, cutting, or abrading, or that has a high probability of being reduced to powder in
the course of demolition or renovation" is considered a regulated waste. Of the 26
asbestos containing samples, all are non-friable, greater than 1 percent asbestos, have been
subjected to cutting, and are therefore considered a regulated waste. All samples and their
associated waste piles have been assigned a TNRCC Form Code of311-1 (classification of
TNRCC, 1995) indicating the waste is asbestos solids and/or debris (311 designation) and
a non-hazardous industrial Class 1 waste ( 1 designation) . All samples testing positive for
asbestos and their associated waste piles are further classified as a Category I non-friable
asbestos-containing material (per TNRCC, 1996a).

6.2

•

'

...

Soil

The detectable concentrations of all organic analytes are presented in Table 4 . VOCs were
detected in 4 of the 18 soil samples. The most common analyte detected is acetone,
occurring in 3 of the 4 samples and ranging in concentration from 38 to 230 µg/kg .
Toluene (6.8 µg/kg) was found in one sample and 2-butanone (71 µg/kg) and 4-methyl-2pentanone (120 µg/kg) were found in the same sample that had the highest acetone
concentration. Methylene chloride was detected in every soil sample and is considered to
be a laboratory contaminant as it also appears in the method blank (Appendix F). All
methylene chloride results have been flagged with a "B" in Table 4 indicating that this
analyte was present in the method blank .
No SVOCs were detected in any of the 18 soil samples collected from the Rubble
Dump/Spill Site. However, because of the potential high concentrations of SVOCs,
Paragon Analytics, Inc., needed to dilute the following samples prior to analysis to avoid
gas chromatograph machine failure:
S-1, S-2, S-4, S-6, S-9, S-11 , S-13 , and S-15 .

Golder Associates lnc. for DBS Joint Venture

 15

FINAL

954-2025 .012

,

·•

Although there were non-detect for all of the analytes in each of the above samples,
individual quantitation report and spectrographs how peak s of some analytes, albeit, at
or below the ( elevated) reporting limit . These spectrographs indicate contamination is
present but not quantifiable. ln an effort to identify the contaminant Paragon Analytics,
lnc ., the contract laboratory, can reprocess the data to determine tentatively identified
compound (TICs). However, the proces ing will likely only resolve the spectra to a class
of compounds and not specifically identify individual compounds, therefore it is felt the
reprocessing will be of little value The quanti tation reports and spectrographs are
included in Appendix F.
Only 18 soil ample were collected, instead of the 25 proposed in the Work Plan. The
decision to collect fewer sample · wa based on the field information available after the site
area had been mapped and only two new spill sites had been discovered . The paucity of
new spill sites and the diffi ulty of id entifyi ng the old pill sites from the 1995 PA made it
impossible to complete the proposed soil sampling. The two new spills, Stations P-2 and
P-3 , appear to be motor oil spills (Appendix G) and represent a small volume of waste.

·•
I

·•

An attempt was made at several locations to evaluate the vertical leaching of individual
spills by collected both a near surface ample (0-2 inches depth) and a deeper sample ( 4-6
inches depth) . This was done at Station P-2 (samples S- 1 and S-3), P-3 (samples S-9 and
S-10), 0 -52 (samples S-13 and S-14 ). P-4 (samples S-15 and S-1 6), and 0-80 (samples S17 and S-18) . Samples S-1 and S-3 at Station P-2 did not contain organic compounds.
For the other 4 station , OCs were detected in the surface sample (0-2 inch depth), but
in every case the deeper sample contained no VOCs . This indicates that voes are
currently not leaching below the surface spill
Four samples, S-4, S-5 , -6. and S-11 were collected near rubble piles at lower elevations
or in depres ions. These samples were collected to determine if seasonal rains could
transport voes and SVOCs away from their originating rubble pile. No contaminants
were detected in any of these 4 samples indicating a low probability of voe transport by
this mechanism .

6.3

Quality Assurance/Quality Control

6.3.l

Asbestos

No quality control (QC ) samples were req uired to be collected for asbestos per the Work
Plan.

6.3.2

Soil

Two sets of QC oil samples were collected and sent to Paragon Analytics, lnc . for VOC
and SVOC analyses . Analytical results are presented in Table 4 One set was collected in
triplicate from station P-2 at a depth of 0-2 inches, with one sampl e submitted as an
Golder Associates Inc. for DBS Joint Venture

 16

FINAL

954-2025 .012

unknown (S-1 ), the second sample submitted as a QC duplicate (S-2), and a third sample
submitted to SWDL (QA-1 ). Results for amp Ies S- I and S-2 showed that no VOCs and
SVOCs were detected (Table 4). The second set of QC soil triplicates included samples
S-7, S-8, and QA-2. Sample S-7 was submitted as an unknown and S-8 as a QC
duplicate. QA-2 was sub111jtted to SWDL Results for samples S-7 and -8 showed that
no VOCs and SVOCs were detected (Table 4)
Two QC soil sample were collected and shipped to the SWDL, as discu ssed in Section
5.2. These two samples QA-1 and QA-2 were triplicates of the samples collected above.
The analytical results for these two ample are not included in thi report .

6.3.3

Trip Blank

One trip blank was anal yzed by Paragon Analytics, Inc. for VOCs . This trip blank was
prepared by Paragon prior to the beginning of field sampling, shipped to Golder in a
sample cooler, and kept in the cooler throughout the field project . No YOCs were
detected in the trip blank (Table 4). A method blank, different from the trip blank, did
detect methylene chloride as de cribed in ection 6.2 .

6.4

·•
I

Data Validation

This section presents the result of data validation of the data packages from Paragon
Analytical, Inc. Sample informati on is summarized in Table 5.

I

•

•

'
•
I

•
Iii

.

Data validati on and analytical data management was conducted in accordance with the
USEPA Contract Laboratory Program National Functional Guidelines for Organic Data
Review (EPA, 1993) and Golder Associates technical procedure TP-2 .2-12 (Golder
Associates Inc., 1995), respecti vely. The data review process provides information on
analytical limitations of the data based on specific quality control (QC) criteria outlined in
the referenced documents. Attachments l and 2 in Appendix H provide the following
information:
Attachment 1. Glossary of Data Reporting Qualifiers
Attachment 2. Summary of Data Qualifications

•

.
•
•

6.4.1

Data Quality Objectives

This section presents a summary of the data quality for this project in terms of the
referenced validation criteria

•
•

Precision. Goals for preci ion were met, with the exception of those deficiencies listed
below .

.
.

Accuracy. Goals for accuracy were met, with the exception of those deficiencies listed

·•~
•

.

below .
Golder As ociates Inc for DBS Joint Venture

 17 .

FINAL

954-2025.012

Completeness. The data package was complete for alJ requested analyses. A total of 19
samples were validated in this data package with a total of 2572 determinations reported,
all of which were deemed valid. This results in a completeness of 100 percent.

6.4.2

Major Deficiencies

No major deficiencies were identified during data validation which required qualification
of data as unusable.

6.4.3

Minor Deficiencies

The following minor deficiencies were identified during data validation which required
qualification of data.
VOC Initial Calibration
The initial calibration percent RSD was greater than 30% for the following constituents:
vinyl acetate, chloromethane, vinyl chloride, acetone, methylene chloride, 2-chloroethyl
vinyl ether, trichlorofluoromethane, 2-butanone, 4-methyl-2-pentanone, m,p-xylene, and
naphthalene. Attachments l and 2 of Appendix H provide a summary of the samples
affected, data qualifications applied, and supporting documentation.
VOC Continuing Calibration
The continuing calibration percent di.fference was greater than 25% for the following
constituents: trichlorofluoromethane, methyl-t-butyl ether, vinyl acetate, 2-chloroethyl
vinyl ether, 1 3-dichloropropane, 1,2-dibromoethane, 1,2,3 trichloropropane.
Attachments 1 and 2 of Appendix H provide a summary of the samples affected, data
qualifications applied, and supporting documentation.
SVOC Continuing Calibration
The continuing calibration percent difference was greater than 25% for the following
constituents: 2,4-dinitrophenol, 4-nitrophenol, 4-nitroaniline, bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate,
indeno( 1,2,3-c,d)pyrene, dibenzo( a,h)anthracene, benzo(g,h,i)perylene. Attachments l
and 2 of Appendix H provide a summary of the samples affected, data qualifications
applied, and supporting documentation.
VOC Method Blank

•

Methylene chloride was detected in the method blank so sample results less than 10 times
the associated blank result were qualified B and raised to the detection limit. Attachments

•
Golder Associates Inc. for DBS Joint Venture

 18

FINAL

954-2025.012

I and 2 of Appendix H provide a summary of the samples affected, data qualifications
applied, and supporting documentation.
·
voe Surrogates
The surrogate recoveries were outside the accuracy control limits for samples S-4, S-6, S7, S-9, S-11, S-15, and S-17. Attachments I and 2 of Appendix H provide a summary of
the samples affected, data qualifications applied, and supporting documentation.
voe lnternal Standards

•

'
•

•
•
I

•
•

•

The internal standard areas were outside the control limits for samples S-2, S-4, S-17, S15, S-6, S-7, S-9, S-10, S-11 , S-12, and S-13 . Attachments l and 2 of Appendix H
provide a summary of the samples affected, data qualifications applied, and supporting
documentation.
SVOC Internal Standards
The internal standard areas were outside the control limits for samples S-13 , S-11, S-10,
S-6, S-18, S-17 S-16, S-15 and S-14 . Attachments I and 2 of Appendix H provide a
summary of the samples affected data qualifications applied, and supporting
documentation .

6.4.4

Field QC

Trip Blanks
One VOA trip blank was identified and analyzed. No compounds were detected .

6.4.5

Tentati\'ely Identified Compounds

I

No tentatively identified compounds (Ties) were reported by the laboratory.

.

6.4.6

.

.•
•
•
•
•

•
.
•

Quantitation Limits and Reported Results

eRQLs have not been established for this project, therefore, detection limits have not been
evaluated. According to validation procedures qualification of data is not required .
The analytical data discussed in this report in support of the Rubble Dump/Spill Site
characterization are acceptable for their intended use .

Golder Associates Inc. for DBS Joint Venture

 ~~~,-~0-!'-.t-i!"___

!!_e.t_____-_-----'--------------~•,__-----------'---~---_..:::=.:-===..!.
Sample# Station#

Layer

Material

Physical Description

A-26

Q.32

A
B

Floor tile

A-27
A-28
A-29
A-30
A-31
A-32

Q.34
0 -J.4
Q.38
0-38
Q.39
Q.54

A
A
A
A
A
A
B

Floor lile
Roofina
Floor Ille
Roofina
Floor tile
Floor Hie

A

Floorlile

A-33

0 -53

A-34

0 -52

A-35

0-58

A-36
A-37

0 -58
0 -59

A-3 8

B
C
A
B

A
B
A

Floor Ille
Floor tile

A

Roofina
Floor tile

0-68

B
A

Roofing

A-39

0 -61

A

Floor tile

A-40
A-41
A-42

G-65
0 -75
0-75

A
A
A

Roofina
Floor tile
Roofing

A-43

Q.74

A

Floor tile

B
A-44
A-45

0 -70
0 -65

A-46
A-4 7
A-48

0 -64
0-87
0 -87

A-49
A-50

0 -87
0 -91

A
A
B
A
A
A
B
A
A

Floor tile
Floor Ille
Roofina
Roofina
Floor tile
Floor Ille
Floor tile

Black fibrous tile
Brown granular cement-like
tile
Tan aranular tile
Black fibrous aranular tar
Whih>lnreen Ille
Black fibrous tar
Grav w/whlte swirl tile
Black tar
Grav/white Ille
Clear yellow resin
White fibrous tile
Black backlna material
Black tar
Red fibrous Ille
Black fibrous tar
Licht red fibrous tar
Black/brown fibrous material
Pink plaster wnight green
paint
Red Ille
Black fibrous tar wtwhite
material
White tile wlblack backing
material
Black fibrous tar material
White aranular material
Black fibrous tar material
wired paint
Black fibrous tar
Whitetlle
Blue tile
Black fibrous tar
Beiaetlle
Black fibrous tar material
Black fibrous tar material
Black fibrous tar
Whitetile
Red fibrous floor tile
Gray cement-!lke fibrous
material w/whlte paint

Aabestos Method &OOIR-931116 Regulated' Tt'IIRCC Form Category'
Mineral

Visual Estimate (%)

Chrysotile
Chrysotile

15
15

Yes

311 -1

I

Chrvsotile

5
ND

Yes
No
Yes
No
No
Yes

311 -1
390
311-1
390
390
311 -1

I

No

390

Yes

311 - 1

I

Yes

311-1

I

No
Yes

390
311-1

I

2
ND

No

390

ND

No

390

Chrvsolile
Chrvsotile

25
2
NO

Yes
Yes
No

311 -1
31 1-1
390

I
I

Chrysotile
Chrvsotile

15

Yes

311 -1

I

No
Yes

390
31 1- 1

I

No
No
Yes

390
390
311 -1

I

Yes
Yes

311-1
311 -1

I
I

Chrvsotlle

Chrvsotile

Chrysotile
Chrvsotile
Chrysotile
Chrvsotile
Chrysotile
Chrv sotile

Chrysotlle
Chrvsolile

Chrysotile
Chrvsollle
Chrvsotile
Chrysotlle

5
ND
ND
ND
5
ND
ND
ND
5
20
10
15
ND
2

Code'

l

I

2
ND
10
5
ND
ND
8

5
10
25

ND • not detected; TR - lrace
A. B, C • different sides or surfaces of the same sample
r.. Regulated vs. non-regulated based on definition In 30 TAC 330.2 (definitions)
v • 311 - 1 is asbestos solids and debris, Category 1 waste; 390 is nonhazardous concrete/c:emenVconstructlon debris (TNRCC, 1995)
c . Category I includes gaskets. packing, resilient ftoor covering and asphalt roofing products (TNRCC, 1995)

Golder Associates Inc. for DBS Joint Venture

 •

•

•

P

P

•

r

~

•

~

,

•

~

•

.. . . . . . . .

Table 3. Asbest os ana1y
I f1ca resu Its.
Layer

Material

A

Floor tile

Physical Dffcrtptlon

0 -2

B
A-2

0-5

A

B
A

Floor tile
Floor tile
Floor tile

A-3
A-4

0 -6
0 -3

A-5
A-6
A-7
A-8
A-9

0 -12
0-13
0 -9
0 -11
0-7

A-10

0 -7

A-11

0-16

A

Roofing

A-12

0 -17

A

Floor tile

A-13

0 -17

A

Roofing

A-14

0-18

A

Floor tile

A-15
A-16

0 - 18
0 -19

A
A

Roofinci
Roofing

A-17

0 -20

A
B
A
B
A
B
A

Floor tile

A-18

0 -20

A-19

0 -20

A

B
A
A

A
A
A
B
A
B

Sheet rock
Sheet rock
Sheet rock
Roofing
Floor tile
Floor tile

Floor 1ile
Floor tile
Roofing

A-20

0 -14

A-21
A-22

0 -15
0 -29

A

A-23

0 -26

A
B
A

Floor tile

A
B

Floor tile

A-24

0 -26

A-25

0-40

A

• • • • • •

. . . . . . . .. . .

Roofing
Roofing

Roofing

Brown fibrous material
White material
Black fibrous tar
Off-white tile
:Beioe aranular Ille
Black tar
Whltetite
White fibrous ofaster
White fibrous olaster
White fibrous olaster
Black fibrous tar
Black tar
Grav fibrous aranular tile
Black fibrous tar
Off-white tile
Black fibrous tar w/green and
white Qranutar material
Green fibrous material
w/black tar
Black fibrous tar w/wh ite
granular material
Brown fibrous cement -like
material wired paint
Black fibrous material
Black fibrous tar w/whlte
aranular material
Black fibrous tar
Tan fibrous tile
Black fibrous tar
Grav/black fibrous tile
Black tar
BeiQetile
Black fibrous tar w/white
,aranular material
Black fibrous tar
Black fibrous tar material
w/whlte aranular material
Black tar
Brown and white tile
Black fibrous tar material
w/brrNlfl and white granular
material
Black fibrous tar
Gray granular cement-like tile

954-2025.01.

Asbestos Method IOO/R-93/116
Mineral

A-1

..

-

FINAL.
Samptet Station t

•

~

Chrysotlle
Chrvsotile
Chrvsotlle
Chrvsotile

Chrysotile
Chrvsotile
Chrysotlle
Chrysolile

Chrysotile

Chrysotile

Chrysotile
Chrvsotile
Chrysotile
Chrvsotile
Chrysotile
Chrysolite

Chrvsotile

Chrysotile
Chrysotile

~gulated< THRCC Form

Code'

Visual Estimate (%)

NO
NO
10
2
5
TR
5
NO
ND
ND
ND
2
15
10
2
ND

Category•

No

390

Yes

311-1

I

Yes
Yes

311 -1
311 -1

I
I

No
No
No
Yes

390
390
390
390
311 -1

I

Yes

311 -1

I

No

390

25

Yes

311 - 1

ND

No

390

35

Yes

311 -1

ND
NO

No
No

390
390

15

Yes

311 -1

I

20
20

Yes

311 -1

I

5

Yes

311 -1

I

3
ND

No

390

ND
ND

No
No

390
390

ND
3
ND

Yes

311 -1

No

390

20
15

Yes

311-1

No

I

I

5

Golder Associates Inc. for DBS Joint Venture

I

I

-

 -. --.

FIN•---------·

. .

S-1
S-2

S-3
S-4

Location

Physical Description

stained, dark orangishbrown sand
stained, dark orangish0-2
Duplicate of S-1
brown sand
stained , orangish-brown
4-6
Station P-2
sand
brownish-black sand; ru nsurface Station G-17, in the
vicinity of a burned-out tire off
0-2

S-5

0-2

S-6

0-2

S-7

0-2

S-8
S-9

0-2
0-2

Station P-2

Volatile Organic Compounds
EPA SW 846 Method 8260
(µg/kg)
Constituent

methylene chloride

(J ,8)

methylene chloride

9 (8)

methylene chloride

5.4 (8)

methylene chloride

16 (8)

(J,8)
Near station G-14, sample dark orangish-brown sand ; methylene chloride
from a depression in the run-off
road (ru n-off from waste
IPiles)
brown sand ; run-off
15 (8 )
methyle ne chloride
Station 0 -30, sample
taken down slope of a ta r
paper rubble pile
(J)
toluene
12
(8)
methylene
chloride
stained , medium black
Station 0 -29, sample
sand ; same as RDS -27 site
taken in middle of dirt
road
CJ 8)
methvlene chloride
oranaish-brown sand
Duolicate of S-7
stained
,
brownish-black
·\
23~·(6)
Station P-3, obvious motor
ti -~.r.·
.t-;l'a. ;,
•~ ''.;
:j;_
sand
oil spill
~ t{ •
.. ~' '
11 (8)
methylene chloride

~SalBit:·· .;JJ;!:;.
"'i2!,," rr·
''.+"rilb•~«fY.ti·11lE i\~iY·4
~
:~~
I

..

,·•'

S-10

2-4

Station P-3, deeper than S orangish-brown sand
9, to evaluate leaching

S-11

0-2

Station 0 -47

-

954-2025.012.

Table 4. Soil analytical data.

Sample# Sample
Depth
(in)

. ... .

0

'1

I

'

;..t1•' .. t •ga;r...

~P.e .. . . ' . :. ,·z,....\, ~

2-hexanone
methylene chloride

4-methvl-2-oentanone
medium black sand; run-off methylene chloride

-

(J)
7.4 (8)
{J)
12 (8)

Golder Associates Inc. for DBS Joint Venture

TNRCC
Form
Codet

301 -H

Semlvolatlle Organic Compounds
EPA SW 846 Method 8270
(µg/kg)
Constituent

bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate

(J)

 "

,.

,.

"

r

r

,,.

,

,.

.,

..

.,.

•

.. .

,

. .. .

. . .

.,

I

954-2025 .012 .
Table 4. Continued ...

Sample# Sample
Location
Depth
(in)
S-12
0-2
Station 0 -53, near empty
aint cans
S-13
0-1
Station 0-52

Physical Description

Volatile Organic Compounds
EPA SW 846 Method 8260
(µg/kg)
Constituent

stained, brownish-black
methylene chloride
sand
medium black, crusted
sand ; same as RDS-13 site

TNRCC
Fonn
Codet

Semivolatile Organic Compounds
EPA SW 846 Method 8270
(µg/kg)
Constituent

6.6 (B)

301-H

bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate

(J)

bis(2-ethylhexyl}phthalate

(J)

bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate

(J)

bis(2-ethylhexyl}phthalate

(J)

bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate

(J)

..

S-14

2-4

S-15

0-1

S-16

4

S-17

0-1

S-18

4-6

methylene chloride
2-butanone
toluene
methylene chloride

Station 0 -52 , deeper than orangish-brown sand
S-13 to evaluate leachin
medium brown , crusted
methylene chloride
Station P-4
sand ; same as RDS-25 site

Station P-4 . deeper than S orangish-brown sand
15 to evaluate leachin
Near station 0-80
medium black , crusted
sand ; same as RDS-1 site

Near station 0-80, deeper orangish-brown sand
than S-17 to evaluate
leachin

toluene . . . . .. ·. ·- J,·
methylene chloride

19 (8)

6.8

301-H

methylene chloride

5.6 (8)

QA Sample

Tri Blank

water

301-H

(J ,B)

meth lene chloride

Result Qualifiers:
B - analyte is found in the method blank as well as in the sample ; indicates blank contamination
E - concentration exceeds the upper level of the calibration range of the instrument
J - estimated value
£ - 301-H is soil contaminated with organics and a hazaradous classification (TNRCC, 1995)

Golder Associates Inc. for DBS Joint Venture

J,8

 '

,
'

.,

23

FINAL

954-2025 .012

I,
I
I
I

I

'
I

•
•

•
•

•
I

SAMPLE ID
S-1

COMMENTS

ANALYSIS

fvlEDlA

TRlPBLANK

VOA 8260/SVOA 8270
VOA 8260/ SVOA 8270
VOA 8260/SVOA 8270
VOA 8260/SVOA 8270
VOA 8260/SVOA 8270
VOA 8260/SVOA 8270
VOA 8260/SVOA 8270
VOA 8260/SVOA 8270
VOA 8260/SVOA 8270
VOA 8260/SVOA 8270
VOA 8260/SVOA 8270
VOA 8260/SVOA 8270
VOA 8260/SVOA 8270
VOA 8260/SVOA 8270
VOA 8260/SVOA 8270
VOA 8260/SVOA 8270
VOA 8260/ SVOA 8270
VOA 8260/SVOA 8270
VOA 8260

SOIL
SOIL
SOIL
SOIL
SOJL
SOIL
SOJL
SOIL
SOIL
SOIL
SOIL
SOIL
SOIL
SOIL
SOIL
SOIL
SOIL
SOIL
WATER

S-2
S-3
S-4
S-5

S-6
S-7
S-8
S-9
S-10

S-11
S-12
S-13

S-14

II

.

S-15
S-16
S-17
S-18
Trip Blank

."
•

.

•

•

..

•

.

Table 5. Analyses performed on each soiJ sample.

Golder Associates Inc. for DBS Joint Venture

 FINAL

7.0

24

954-2025 .012

COMPARISON OF SOIL RESULTS WITH TNRCC ACTION LEVELS

The soil analytical results are compared to TNRCC's Medium Specific Concentration for
Risk Reduction Standard 2 (TNRCC, 1993) in Table 6. Medium specific concentrations
for acetone 2-butanone, 4-methyl-2-pentanone, and toluene, four analytes detected in this
investigation, are 4 to 6 orders of magnitude lower than the stated residential and
industrial land use soil values and 3 to 5 orders of magnitude lower than the stated
groundwater protection standards for both residential and industrial water use. Results
from PA soil samples are discussed in Section 3.2 .

I

•
•

•

•
•
•

•

•
•
•

Golder Associates Inc. for DBS Joint Venture

 25

FINAL

954-2025 .012

•

Sample#

•

S-9

voes
TNRCC Action Levels'
EPA SW U6 Method 8260
SAi-ind
SAi-Res
Constituent
(µg/kg)
(µg/kg)
(µg/kg)
4.16E+07
acetone
230
3.82E+07
71
7.58 E+06
1.40 E+07
2-butanone
1.02 E+08
4-methyl-2120
1.37 E+07
pentanone
54
4.16E+07
3.82E+07
acetone
6.8
3.58E+07
3.63E+07
toluene
38
3.82E+07
4.16E+07
acetone

S-13
S-15
S-17
£ - Action levels from TNRCC, 1993.
nr - not reported

TNRCC Action Levels£
GWD-Res
GWD-lnd
(µg/kg)
(µg/kg)
3.65E+05
4.16E+06
1.83 E+OS
5.11 E+OS
1.83 E+05
5.11 E+OS
1.83E+05
1.00E+OS
1.00E+OS

Table 6. Comparison of soil analytical results with TNRCC Action Levels.

Golder Associates Inc. for DBS Joint Venture

5.11 E+OS
1.00 E+OS
1.00E~07

 •
•

•

FINAL

26

.

8.0

MAPPING OF DEBRL PILES AND VOLUME ESTIMATION

•

8.1

Previously Mapped Spill Sites

•

•
•

I!

•

•
•

•

•

•

1111

•

=

•
•

•
•
•
•

.
.
.

•
•

•

•
•

.

•

Two of the four mapped spills located during the November 1995 PA field activities were
not visible during the August 1997 site characterization (Figure 3). Wind blown fine sand
and silt has covered these site. These two sites were eventually located after digging 0.250. 5 inches below the soil surface. Both sites are located on a dirt road which is
topographically 0.5 to 1.0 feet below adjacent debris piles and mounded soil. This
situation allows for sand and silt from the adjacent high areas to blow and accumulate into
the low dirt road .

8.2

August 1997 Observations

Based upon recollections from the 199 5 PA field team and field notes taken during the
PA, minor dumping has occurred in the last 21 months. This material consists primarily of
landscaping debris such as granite pebbles, limestone cobbles, and yard brush, and
remodeling materials such as concrete, wood paneling, and ceramic tile. Only two new
3
spills were discovered, consisting of less than 1 yd of contaminated soil. These two sites,
P-1 and P-2, are located on the west side of the dirt road between power pole 8 and. 9
(Plate 1) .
A total of91 stations were logged and mapped for roofing shingles and floor tiles (Plate
1). Tar paper roofing material typically was found in large, semi-rounded piles. Older
piles of roofing material have welded together due to the sun and have taken on a burnt
appearance. With the exception of one tar paper roofing pile (G-65) all tar paper roofing
material is considered to be free of asbestos based on the analytical results (Table 3) Floor
tile piles are generally small in volume, with older tiles having upturned and broken edges.
Some floor tiles have become brittle while others remain flexible. Every occurrence of
floor tiling was sampled and aU floor tiles are considered to contain asbestos based on the
analytical results (Table 3) .
A total of 70 stations were logged and mapped under the category of non-hazardous
construction/demolition debris, landscaping rocks, yard brush, household trash, etc.,
(collectively termed rubble in this report) . Construction/demolition debris and landscaping
debris piles are typically large to medium sized. Yard brush and household trash generally
form low standing piles with significant dispersion surrounding the original point source.
Scattered debris consisting primarily of wind dispersed household trash and yard brush
forms a zone that typically extends 50 to 200 ft beyond the point source. On the field map
(Plate 1) these zones are identified as "Scattered Debris." The zone of " Scattered Debris"
becomes wider near Montana A venue due to the larger volume of dumped material in this
area .

.

•

•

954-2025 .012

Golder Associates Inc. for DBS Joint Venture

 27

FINAL

•

954-2025 .012

A majority of rubble is concentrated between power pole l and 7. Rubble piles are so
close together in this area and of similar content that they are often lumped together and
mapped and described as a single station. Thi i especially the case between power poles
1 and 3.
Mapping of rubble piles has in some cases extended more than 200 feet east and west of
the power line road . During the initial reconnaissance of the area Golder decided that
mapping would extend beyond those boundaries in order to characterize and provide more
complete volumetric calculations on rubble piles which exist along side dirt roads. Dirt
roads, besides the main north-south power line road, are numerous in the area. Dumpers
have taken ad antage of thi and ha e driven several hundreds of feet off the power line
road to dump their loads.

8.3

Volume Estimation

The volume of waste per station was visually estimated in terms of the number of 55gallon drums needed to contain the wastes and was recorded on the Station Description
Sheets (Appendix D). The volumes of three different waste types are summarized in
Table 7. The number of drums were then converted to cubic yards .

•

Golder Associates Inc . for DBS Joint Venture

 28

FINAL

Material
Rubble
Stained Soil
Tar Paper
Asbestos containing
waste

954-2025 .012

55-Gallon Drums

Cubic Yards

4400

1200
3
136
9

IO

500
30

''

Table 7. Volume estimates of dumped materials.

Golder Associates Inc. for DBS Joint Venture

 954-2025 .012

29

FINAL

•

_·---

---__
=

111' -

..,...,,_.,.

II

Olrl"*'

II

II
llII
II

,

- - E<lgoolllirl-

II

D n.-.;

100 0

_.,,

II

II

__ __
lOO

pole ,e

-·

l\r
II

pole ee

.ll

l:,!

., .

-ar11e-.o.,,.11......,..

............ ~1-.a..»•• 11

~~-polef7

II

II

II

II

NOT EASILY SEEN
INAUGUST1997
FIELD INVESTIGATION

~

-

~.l

~

I~

-

~ !:,-polel6

----~ ~ ·\\

II

:::

II

• 11

:, n

II _ p o l e ~

l / ;--

•

·•

-:~_/

\.r'.__,..---... - ,,/.\.. 1
, .\. ' /~ ! ,-pole ..
11

-y~

~!

'-. ; - ~I ('.....
_.,y
::
\/

I
II

f

II

11r--·3

~
\

NOT EASILY SEEN IN
AUGUST 1997
FIELD INVESTIGATION

-...._

II

:

\\

~~

{

I_= ..

_., ~\

~

jr-~•'2

\

• II\

\

I

.'
:

~--- ·--:::--------t

-

{

-

'\ _,/
/ pole,,
!l,,
:~~

-, ~ . . . ----

....

::::-------

-

ll

~

·

~{

\

Figure 3. Rubble Dump/Spill Site field investigation area showing the location of
PA field sampling points and spills.

Golder Associates Inc. for DBS Joint Venture

 30

FINAL

•

9.0

COST ESTIMATE FOR REMOVAL AND DISPOSAL

9.1

Soil

954-2025 .012

The concentration of volatile compounds detected in this latest round of sampling when
compared with TNRCC action levels do not indicate high enough concentrations to
warrant remedial action of soil at this site (see Section 7.0). However, the concentrations
of semivolatile compounds detected are "falsely" low due to the elevated reporting limits
(see Section 7.0) for S-1 , S-2, S-4, S-6, S-9, S-11 , S-13 , and S-15 . The latest sampling
results indicate that there has been no vertical or lateral migration of VOC or SVOC
compounds from the spill sites (see Section 6.2). Based on results from this study and
VOC and SVOC results from the PA, it is recommended that the spill site soils be
removed by an appropriately licensed disposal contractor (e.g., Safety Kleen, Waste
Control Specialists, Inc.). The cost would be approximately $3 ,000.

9.2

•

Asbestos
The total estimated volume of all floor tiles at the Rubble Dump/ Spill Site is 9 yd 3 .
It is recommended that all floor tiles, as well as the one occurrence of asbestos in
roofing material, be removed and disposed of at a permitted disposal facility . Two
local hazardous waste disposal firms were contacted regarding the disposal of
asbestos materials. These two firms were Safety Kleen and Waste Control
Specialists, Inc. both with El Paso offices. Both firms are listed as licensed and
permitted handlers and disposers of hazardous wastes in TNRCC's listing of
Commercial Hazardous and Industrial Solid Waste Management Facilities
(TNRCC, 1996b). Only Safety Kleen was willing to provide a cost estimate (see
Appendix I).

Assuming that there is only 9 yd 3 of asbestos floor tiles and it would take no longer than 5
days to remove the tiles, the total cost to collect, transport, and dispose of the asbestos
containing material is estimated to be:
Asbestos removal
Waste Approval Fees
Drop Fee
Line Haul to Houston., TX
Box Rental for 5 days
Box Liner
Total

$1 ,224
125
900
2,800
70
35
$5,154

•
Golder Associates Inc. for DBS Joint Venture

 •

9.3

Other Rubble

The city of El Paso was contacted regarding the disposal of all non-hazardous
construction/demolition material. Ms Melinda Ca bra of the Solid Waste Group advises,
as she says she has on a number of previous occasions, that large quantities of trash
generated on Fort Bliss property be disposed of at the Fort Bliss landfill due to the
shrinking capacity at the city ' s McComb commercial landfill. It is recommended that
DOE negotiate directly with the Fort Bliss landfill for the disposal of all the illegally
dumped non-hazardous and non-regulated waste (excluding soil and asbestos tiles)
currently present at the Rubble Dump/Spill Site. Although the cost for actual disposal is
not known, estimates for the removal and transportation of waste to the Fort Bliss landfill
was sought from several local firms The rates for the heavy equipment and operators
needed to complete the job are listed below
$60-80/hr
60-80/hr
70-100/hr

Front-end Loader
Bulldozer
Dump Truck

•

954-2025 .012

31

FINAL

It is estimated to take 2-4 weeks to complete the removal, transportation, and disposal of
the rubble and roofing material wastes . It is assumed that these wastes will be disposed of
at the Fort Bliss landfill. The above rates do not included transportation mileage or field
supervision which may be required by the contractor to complete the job . The basic cost
of waste removal, assuming a 2-4 week completion period and a crew of one front-end
loader, one bulldozer, and 2 dump trucks is:

1 Front-end Loader
l Bulldozer
2 Dump Trucks
Total

2 weeks
$4,800
4,800
11,200
$20,800

4 weeks
$12,800
12,800
32,000
$57,600

•
Golder Associates Inc for DBS Joint Venture

 32

FINAL

•

10.0

954-2025.012

ENGINEERING CONTROLS TO LlMIT ASSESS

Several engineering control methods are presented in th.is ection which could be
implemented to prevent illegal dumping at this site. Only methods which require no fulltime security personnel (i .e., ecurit guard, surveillance camera) and are low maintenance
were considered most applicable for th.is site.
First and foremost, "NO DUMPfNG" signs should be placed along the current fence line
approximately every I 00 ft .. In order for the engineering controls to be effective, they will
need to be placed from the omer of the airport fence. then east along Montana Avenue to
the comer of Montana Avenue and the access road to OST A, and then north to the
personnel gate at OST A This area is outlined in red on Figure 4 and identified as the
"Proposed fence line.' Thi would control access all along Montana Avenue and west of
OST A. The current method of access control at th.is site, as well as several more effective
methods, a.re described in the following ections .

IO.I

•

•

Current Method of Access Control

Fort Bliss currently discourages access to the site area by dirt barricade which are present
from the comer of the El Paso International Airport fence line (Figure 4 ), east to the
OST A access road, and several hundreds of ya rds north from the comer of the OST A
access road and Montana A enue. The dirt barricade does not continue the full length
along the OSTA access road . Dirt barricades are typically 2 to 5 feet tall and 5 to l O feet
wide. It is not known when these were placed along the road . Five low-hill access points
are located just off the north shoulder of Montana Avenue (see Figure 4). These access
points are the main routes of entry for illegal dumpers onto Fort Bliss property from
Montana Avenue. A one lane dirt frontage road exists behind the dirt barricade and runs
parallel to Montana Avenue (see Plate 1) This frontage road gives access to the northsouth power line road . Only one gate currently exists in the study area and it is located at
the intersection of power line road and Montana A venue . Th.is is a locked steel gate
approximately l O feet wide and 4 feet tall. It is hinged to allow vehicles into the area.

10.2

Dirt Barricades

One option to controlling a e s is to continue, but expand, the u e of dirt barricades.
This would essentially be a low-cost option involving the improvement of old barricades
and construction of new ones. If dirt barricades are selected as the engineering control
method it i recommended that:
•

•

Barricades be extended from the comer of the El Paso International Airport fence line
to the comer of the Montana A venue and OST A access road, then north to the OST A
employee parking lot;
The 5 access points along Montana Avenue be filled in;

Golder As ociates Inc . for DBS Joint Venture

 33

FINAL

•

•
•
•
•

954-2025 .012

Barricades maintain a 4 foot minimum height to discourage low-clearance cars and
light-duty trucks from driving over the barricades·
A zigzag pedestrian gate be installed so that walkers and recreational bicyclists can
continue to use the area;
Five to 10 individual barricades be constructed to stretch across the frontage road to
further discourage access; and
Visual inspections be performed on the site twice a year for the first several years to
evaluate effectiveness.

This engineering control method is not considered to be a long term solution. Heavy duty
trucks and other high-clearance motor vehicles may still be able to access the area.
Inevitably, the dirt barricades will have to have future maintenance.

10.3

•

Concrete Barricades

Another option to controlling access to the area is to assemble a series of concrete
construction barricades similar to the types used to separate highway traffic. The cost of
this option would be considerably more than the dirt barricades, however, the maintenance
is not expected to be as great. A concrete barrier surrounding the Ft. Bliss property may
be aesthetically undesirable and may generate a negative public image. lf concrete
barricades are selected as the engineering control method it is recommended that:
•
•

•
•
•

The barricades be placed in front of the ex.isting dirt barricades;
Barricades be extended from the corner of the El Paso International Airport fence line
to the comer of the Montana Avenue and OSTA access road, then north to the OSTA
employee parking lot;
A zigzag pedestrian gate be installed so that walkers and recreational bicyclists can
continue to use the area;
Five to 10 individual barricades be constructed to stretch across the frontage road to
further discourage access; and
Visual inspections be performed on the site once a year for the first several years to
evaluate effectiveness.

10.4

Barbed Wire Fence

Another option to control access to the area is to install a barbed wire fence. This fence
would be similar to cattle fences which are typically 4 feet in height with three or four
strands of barbed ,:vire running between metal posts set at 6-10 foot intervals. The cost of
this access control method may be comparable to the dirt barricades. The aesthetics of
this option may be more acceptable than the concrete barricade option. If barbed wire is
selected as the engineering control method it is recommended that:
•

•

The fence be placed in front of the existing dirt barricades;

Golder Associates Inc. for DBS Joint Venture

 •

34

FINAL

•

•
•
•

954-2025 .012

The fence be constructed from the corner of the El Paso International Airport fence
line to the corner of the Montana Avenue and OSTA access road, then north to the
OST A employee parking lot;
A zigzag pedestrian gate be installed so that walkers and recreational bicyclists can
continue to use the area;
Five to IO individual barricades be constructed to stretch across the frontage road to
further discourage access; and
Visual inspections be performed on the site once a year for the first several years to
evaluate effectiveness.

10.5

Chain Link Fence

Another option to consider is the installation of a chain link fence . This fence would be 6
to 8 feet high and similar to the fence currently in place at the adjacent El Paso
International Airport property. The cost of the cha.in link fence would likely be more than
the barbed wire fence option but maintenance is likely to be lower. A possible
disadvantage of this option is that medium-sized desert game may not be able to roam the
site, a factor not likely to be a problem with a barbed wire fence . If chain link fence is
selected as the engineering control method it i recommended that:
•
•

•
•
•

The fence be placed in front of the existing dirt barricades;
The fence be constructed from the corner of the El Paso International Airport fence
line to the comer of the Montana Avenue and OSTA access road, then north to the
OSTA employee parking lot;
A zigzag pedestrian gate be installed so that walkers and recreational bicyclists can
continue to use the area;
Five to l O individual barricades be constructed to stretch across the frontage road to
further discourage access; and
Visual inspections be performed on the site once a year for the first several years to
evaluate effectiveness.

Golder Associates Inc. for DBS Joint Venture

 :.·,·
. .,,

FINAL

35

954-2025.012

Figure 4. Aerial photograph of the study area and adjoining El Paso International
Airport property (Cooper Aerial Survey, 1995). Fence line for airport is outlined in
blue. Proposed fence line for the Rubble Dump/Spill Site is outlined in red (a indicates site ace~ points).

Golder Associates Inc. for DBS Joint Venture

 FINAL

•

•

11.0

954-2025 .012

36

SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Site characterization acti ities were successfully completed at the Rubble Dump/Spill Site
in August 1997 in accordance with the approved Work Plan and Health and Safety Plan.
Of the 50 suspected asbestos containing material samples collected, 26 contained visible
quantities of asbestos; 25 of these samples were fl oor tiles and one was tar paper roofing
material . Small quantities of voes (acetone, 2-butanone, 4-methyl-2-pentanone, and
toluene) were detected in 4 of the 18 soil samples collected Concentrations for all VOC
analytes are 4 to 6 orders of magnitude lower than TNReC's Medium Specific
Concentrations for residential and industrial land use . o SVOCs were detected in these
soil samples howe er, detection limits were artificially high due to elevated reporting
limits.
3

There is an estimated 9 yd 3 of asbestos containing material and 1200 yd of various rubble
types including landscaping rock, concrete, yard brush, tires, glass, empty paint cans, and
3
household trash at the site. There is also an e timated 13 6 yd of tar paper roofing material
at the site. The analytical results from soil samples collected in thjs stud indicate that
SVOCs ma be resen!_at _CO!:JCentra~ons worthy of remediation The latest sampling
results indicate that there has been no vertical or lateral migration of voe or SYOe
compounds from the spill sites
The cost of removal and disposal of the asbe tos containing material to a permitted facility
is estimated to be $5 , 154. The cost for removal and proper disposal of stained soil is
estimated to be $3,000. The range of cost for the removal of the other wastes to the Fort
Bliss landfill is estimated to be $20, 800 to $5 6, 700
Four potential engineering control method were evaluated to prevent future illegal
dumping at the site. These included dirt barricades, concrete barricades, barbed wire
fencing, and chain link fencing .
Based upon the site characterization activities conducted at the Rubble Dump/Spill Site,
the following actions are recommended to remediate and protect the site:
l. Remo e and dispose of all asbestos containing material ( the bulk of which is floor
tiles) at a permitted di posal facility ,
2. Remove and dispose of all non-hazardou s construction/demolition material, tar
paper roofing material, yard brush , household trash, etc , at the Fort Bliss landfill;
3 . Remo e and dispo se of all stained soil to a properly licensed treatmenUdisposal
facility; and
4. Construct a barbed wire fe nce with ''NO DUMPING" signs along Montana
Avenue and adjacent to the OST A access road io prevent future illegal dumping at
the site .

•
Golder Associates Inc . for DBS Joint Venture

 37

FINAL

•

12.0

954-2025 .012

REFERENCES

Cooper Aerial Survey, 1986. Aerial photograph, scale 1: 12,000.
Cooper Aerial Survey, 1995 . Aerial photograph, scale 1:24,000.
Defense Mapping Agency, 1978. Fort Bliss South, Scale 1:50,000.
EPA, 1993 . USEPA Contract Laboratory Program, National Functional Guidelines for
Organic Data Review, EPA-540/R-94-012, February 1993 .
EPA, 1995. Risk-Based Concentration Table. Memo from Roy L. Smith, Office of
RCRA, Technical and Program Support Branch (3HW70)
Golder Associates Inc., 1995. Golder Associates Inc. Technical Procedure TP-2.2-12
"Analytical Data Management."
Golder Associates Inc., August 1997a. Work Plan for the Site Characterization of the
Rubble Dump/Spill Site, Fort Bliss, Texas.
Golder Associates Inc., August 1997b. Health and Safety Plan for the Site
Characterization of the Rubble Dump/Spill Site, Fort Bliss, Texas.
Golder Federal Services, Inc., July 1997. Final Report - Preliminary Site Investigations;
Former Dry Cleaners (Building 2019), Solvent Spill (Building 1116), Rubble Dump Site,
and McGregor Borrow Pit.
TNRCC, 1993 . Risk Reduction Standards, Subchapter S of Chapter 335 . Prepared for
Title 30, Texas Administrative Code.
TNRCC, 1995 (revised). Guidelines for the Classification and Coding oflndustrial Waste
and Hazardous Waste, RG-22 .
TNRCC, 1996a. Asbestos Waste Disposal, TNRCC Regulatory Guidance RG-4 .
TNRCC 1996b. Commercial Hazardous and Industrial Solid Waste Management
Facilities, GI-225 .

Golder Associates Inc. for DBS Joint Venture

  

 

APPENDIX 

ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNICAL REPORT ENCON International Inc.

 

 

 

ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNICAL REPORT
Fort Bliss Rubble Dump and Spill Site Clean Up
Near Site Monitor - SMWU 18
Contract # DABT 51-99-P-0893

Prepared For:

Mr. David Dodge
DERA Program Manager
HQ USAADACENFB
ATTN: ATZC-DOE 8622 Dodge
Fort Bliss, TX 79916-6816

Prepared By:

ENCON International, Inc.
7307 Remcon Circle, Suite 101
El Paso, Texas 79912

June 14, 2000
ENCON Project #144-9

·

' O FFICE: 7307 Rcmcon

irclc. Suite IOI • El Pa.,o. Tcxa~ 7991 2 • rax 915-58 1-2049 • Phone 915-833-3740

 TABLE OF CONTENTS

A.

PURPOSE ............................................................................................................ 1

8.

INITIAL ACTIONS COMPLETED .................................................................. 1
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.

C.

•

Document Review ............................................................................................ 1
Field Inspection ............................................................................................... 1
Project Planning and Management ................................................................ 2
Surveying and Staking .................................................................................... 2
Earthen Berm Repair ....................................................................................... 2
Initial Perimeter Clean Up ............................................................................... 3
Fence Installation ............................................................................................ 3
Field Monitoring and Sampling .....................................................................• 3
Laboratory Results .......................................................................................... 4

CLEAN-UP ACTIONS COMPLETED ........................................................... 5
1.
2.
3.
4.

Hydrocarbon Contaminated Soil .................................................................... 5
Asbestos-Containing Materials ...................................................................... 5
Construction Debris ........................................................................................ 5
Photo Documentation ..................................................................................... 6

D.

CONCLUSIONS ................................................................................................. 6

E.

RECOMMENDATIONS .................................................................................... 7

ATTACHMENTS:
A. Project Task Completion Schedule
8. Aerial Photograph of the Project Site
C. Laboratory Results
D. Non-hazardous Manifest-Soil
E. Non-hazardous Manifest-Asbestos
F. Photographic Documentation

 June 14, 2000

Mr. David Dodge
DERA Program Manager
HQ USAADACENFB
ATTN: ATZC-DOE B622 Dodge
Fort Bliss , El Paso, TX 79916-6816

Phone: 568-7979
Fax: 568-1313

RE:

ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNICAL REPORT
Fort Bliss Rubble Dump and Spill Site Clean Up
(Near Site Monitor - SWMU 18)
Contract# DABT 51-99-P-0893
ENCON Project #144-9

A.

PURPOSE

•

ENCON was retained by the Fort Bliss Directorate of Environment
to provide environmental restoration services. The intent of this
project was to perform clean-up and restoration actions to address
illegal dumping at the above-referenced Fort Bliss property. The
purpose of this Environmental Technical Report is to briefly
summarize the status of restoration actions completed, and to detail
the status of reported hydrocarbon-contaminated soil, asbestos , and
construction debris previously located at the subject site.

B.

INITIAL ACTIONS COMPLETED
1. Document Review. Existing Fort Bliss historical records and the
1999 Golder Associates "Site Characterization Report" were
reviewed to determine the areas of primary environmental
concern at the subject site.
2. Field Inspection. The approximately 1 mile by 1. 7 mile subject
site is located north of Montana Avenue near Site Monitor
(SWMU 18) within Fort Bliss , Texas. The purpose of the site
reconnaissance
was
to
observe
the
existing
general

•

 •

environmental property conditions, and to verify the extent of
soil contamination, asbestos-containing materials (ACM's), and
construction debris. Field inspection and document review
facilitated follow-up planning activities for corrective actions.
No drums or containers of paints. solvents, oil or other
chemicals were o bserved on-site. Also, no batteries. which may
contain hazardous metals i.e .. cadrrlium or lead, were observed
at the subject site.

3. Project Planning and Management. ENCON personnel met
with Mr. David Dodge (Fort Bliss DERA Program Manager) on
October 23, 1999, to update and revise the original Scope of
Work and to establish a tentative schedule for initiating project
tasks. A project task completion schedule was developed and
submitted for review by Mr. Dodge.
The project task
completion schedule chart is included as Attachment A.

•

4. Surveying and Staking. A Texas-Licensed land surveying firm
was retained to mark and stake the locati on of the east-west
property line along Montana Avenue for a distance of 5800 feet
in order to determine the location for the subsequent fence
installation along the existing earthen berm .
5. Earthen Berm Repair. The existing earthen berm was repaired
for the entire project area length of about 1. 7 miles along
Montana Avenue. ENCON personnel repaired t he berm using a
backhoe , a medium-size bobcat . as well as shovels and hand
tools.
Since this berm structure serves as an important
physical barrier and deterrent to future unauthorized dumping,
Mr. Dodge requested that the berm be a dequately repaired.
ENCON identified 11 commonly-used access points during the
initial site inspection activities , which were subsequently closed
during the earthen berm repair activities . Several other berm
repairs were necessitated by the deteriorated berm condition.
The entire berm structure was repaired in about six working
days .

2

 •

•

•

6. Initial Perimeter Clean Up. ENCON field personnel manually
picked up glass, cardboard, paper. and miscellaneous rubbish
and debris from both inside and outside the berm along the
entire 1.7-rnile Montana border. The debris was bagged in 44gallon industrial-type bags for disposal at the Clint Landfill.
Periodically, Texas Department of Transportation assigned
personnel removed some bagged debris as part of ongoing
upkeep along Montana.
7. Fence Installation. The original proposal detailed a 4000-foot
long, 4-strand barbwire fence placed within the graded roadway
inside the berm. However. the linear footage was increased to
provide for a 5800-foot fence installed on the berm, itself, to
better serve as a more formidable barrier to further dUinping.
That change resulted in 1800 additional feet of berm repair,
pruning the desert shrubs growing on the berms, a 16-foot
spacing of fence posts rather than the original 20-foot spacing,
and using cross-beamed galvanized break posts approximately
every 300 feet. The closer spacing and t he galvanized break
posts provided extra strength for the fence which was
constructed on the unconsolidated soil of t he berm rather than
in the packed soil of t he graded pathway .

ENCON retained a fencing contractor to install the 4-strand
barbwire fence for a distance of 5800 feet. The actual fence
installation was completed in five work day s. The fence was
located within Fort Bliss property , typically varying from 2-10
feet north of and \vithin the property line . Attachment B shows
the newly installed fence at the subject site.
8 . Field Monitoring and Sampling. Soils near the vicinity of the
four reportedly contaminated areas (labeled Pl , P2. P3 , and P4
in the 1999 Golder Associates Survey Map) were monitored for
any existing hydrocarbon vapors using a photo-ionization
detector (PID). The field PID did not record any detectable
volatile hydrocarbon vapors from the contaminated soils (see
Table 1 below) and so , did not detect any remaining volatile
organic compounds (VOC's) in the four previously contaminated
areas. The field PID results suggested either a heavier nonvolatile organic compound (e.g . waste oil) had been present or if
a volatile organic compound had been released , the VOC ' s had
already volatized from the previously contaminated areas .

3

 ---------------------------------

•

One composite soil grab sample was collected to provide a valid ,
representative sample from the four reportedly contaminated
source areas . The sample was sealed in a 180 milli-liter VOA
vial with no headspace, immediately chilled to approximately 4°
C (Centigrade) , and delivered the same day for laboratory
analysis.
Table 1 . Field Findings

Map

I
I

Location

I
I

Pl
P2
P3

P4
Notes:

PID

Field

M easurement s
Observatio ns
Brownish silty sand with mild
ND
i hydrocarbon odors
I
j Black sandy soil with strong
ND
hydrocarbon odors
I
Brownish silty sand with no odors I
ND
I Black sand and silty sand with
ND
1 mild hydrocarbon odors
1. Map locations based on Golder Assoc. Survey
2. ND = no significant VOC's detected ( < 1 ppm)

I

9. Laboratory Results. The composite sample (FB-1) collected
from the four reportedly contaminated areas was analyzed for
TPH (total petroleum hydrocarbons) and for BTEX (benzene,
toluene . ethyl benzene. and total xylenes) using E P A Methods
8021 and 1005, respectively.
The composite soil sample
indicated TPH concentrations below 50 ppm, far below the
Texas Natural Resources Conservation Commission (TNRCC)
action level of 500 ppm for similar fine-grained soils. The
laboratory analytical results for the composite soil sample also
indicated benzene concentrations below the detection limit of 50
ppb , suggesting lighter gasoline-type substances were not the
likely source of soil contamination at this subject site. Complete
laboratory results of the analyzed soil sample are included in
Attachment C of this report .

1

I
I

I
I

I

 •

•

C.

CLEAN-UP ACTIONS COMPLETED

Approximately six cubic yards
of soil from the four previously-desc r i bed contaminated areas
(Pl, P2, P3 , and P4) were excavated for proper sampling ,
laboratory analyses, clean-up and disposal activities.
The
excavated contaminated soils were stored in six 55-gallon drums
on site pending laboratory analyses and waste characterization.
Clean soil from the vic inity was used as backfill material. The
clean, uncontaminated soil was placed evenly to mininrize
differential settling of sand grains at the four remediated
locations. Because of the low TPH concentrations, the soil was
characterized as "non-hazardous , r egulated wastes (Class l)."
The drums of soil were later transported (January 11 , 2000) to the
permitted Camino Real Landfill in New Mexico . A non-hazardous
disposal manifest is included in Attachment D .

1. Hydrocarbon-Contanlinated Soil.

2. Asbestos -Containing Materials (ACM).
Texas Department of
Health-licensed asbestos professionals from ENCON identified
the location of the asbestos c ontaining materials (ACM 's) . A
Licensed Asbestos Contractor was retained to properly remove ,
transport , and dispose of the ACM 's at the subject site. A total of
seven ACM sites (0 -3 , 0 -5 , 0 - 17 . 0 -32 , 0 -40 , 0 -54 , and 0 -85) were
previously identified in Table 3 of th e G older Associates , 1999
Report. The ACJvl's containing 5 - 15% chrysotile asbestos were
identified along the north -south earthe n pathway. These ACM 's
were properly bagged in six-millimete r polyvinyl bags , labeled ,
and transported t o th EPA -approved O t ro County Landfill in
New Mexico . Approximately four yards of ACM 's were removed
and disposed of from the subject site. No further ACM-related
environmental actions appear warranted at t his time. A nonhazardous manifest is i n c luded in Attachment E .
3 . Construction Debris.
ENCON field personnel performed the
removal and disposal of non-hazardous construction/demolition
debris over a p e riod of approximately four w eeks using a frontend loader and five dump trucks. A total of 1638 cubic yards of
non-hazardous construction/d e molition debris was removed,
transported , and disposed of at the Camino Real Landfill in New
Mexico , and the Clint and Fort Bliss Landfills i n Texas .

•
5

 4. Photo Documentation. Photographic documentation of the subject
site before, during , and after clean-up activities is included in
Attachment F.

D.

CONCLUSIONS
1. Approximately 1638 cubic yards of non-hazardous construction-

type debris were disposed of at the Camino Real Landfill in New
Mexico and Clint and Fort Bliss Landfills in Texas.
2. Six yards of hydrocarbon-contaminated soils were properly
disposed at the Camino Real Landfill in New Mexico as nonhazardous regulated waste (Class 1 ).
3. Four yards of ACM's were properly disposed at the NMED-

approved Otero County New Mexico Landfill.
4. The repair of the entire earthen berm and the installation of

5,800 linear feet of 4-strand barbwire fence along Montana
Avenue should greatly reduce illegal dumping at the subject site ,
and reduce potential financial liability to Fort Bliss.
5. No other hazardous waste was identified or disposed during

ENCON's remedial activities within the Golder Study area at the
subject site.
6. No further environmentally related corrective actions concerning
asbestos or hydrocarbon contaminated soil within the Golder
Report's study area appear warranted at the subject site.

6

 ---------------------------------.....
E.

•

RECOMMENDATIONS

1. Additional funding should be secured to facilitate final TNRCC
Project Closure actions.
2. The Fort Bliss Directorate of Environment should maintain a
copy of this Report for a period of at least five years.

3. Provide a courtesy copy of this Report to the TNRCC-El Paso
Office, attention Mr. Terry McMillan.
Prepared By:

Reviewed By:

f:.t£'m'a?:.lj;

~a._~

Env. Professional
TDH Asbestos #60-1898

Reviewed By:

/ " John Knopp
Project Manager
TDH Asbestos # 60-1117

Approved by:

~~{lLJ lils<¥-! ,,,
c7-l1

Alex Woelper, P.E. t,' ~
Vice-President
TDH Asbestos #10-5441

ATTACHMENTS:
A. Project Task Completion Schedule
B. Aerial Photograph of the Project Site
C. Laboratory Results
D. Non-hazardous Manifest - Soil
E. Non-hazardous Manifest - Asbestos

F. Photographic Documentation

m111

~

l:'oiTER'.'11 ..\TIO'.'IIAL. l'.\C.

7

  

 

ATTACHMENT A

 

. Project Task Completion Schedule

.D

 



 

•

•

FORT BLISS RUBBLE DUMP/SPILL SITE
(Start Nov. 30, 1999)

PROJECT TASKS
/

di

[

10) CLEAN-UP OF NON-HAZARDOUS
MATERIAL

/

"

I

8) DISPOSAL OF ASBESTOS

/

/

I

5) STAKING OF CLEAN-UP AREAS

/

I

7) SAMPLING ANO LAB ANALYSIS

I

-

9) DISPOSAL OF CONT. SOIL

/

I

3) CLEAN-UP ALONG BERM

I

- -

jJ

-

/

6) INSTALL FENCE

-

/

L

4) REPAIR BERM

a

2) ORDER STAKING

/

I

1) GET A COPY OF SURVEY
0

if)
5

~ - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ---~- - -----

I
10

,.

I

15

20

25

30

I
35

40

45

50

  

ATTACHMENT 

 

. Aerial Photograph of the Project Site

 

nc.

 

•

•
Attacl1111L·n1 B :\cri;tl pl111l() :,'. 1;1ph ()I lhL· 111t1IL'LI , rl L' and adJ01 111ng l ·l l\1'-0 lntcrna11on:tl
/\1rrlH1 rrnpcr1_\ ( l ' o111)L· r ALTl :1' SunL' \ , l</L/ '11
I L' lll'L' lrn(· for :11rport I'. illU'. (ratcd 111
blue rlie llL''' I, 1nqalkJ knl' c l111L' ltH thL· Ruhbk I )limp Srill s. 1tc 1:-- outlined in ::'. rccn
(a-rnJ1ca1c:-- t\rrcal , 11 c ;KL'L' " :s pornh th.it \\ L' I L' '1101: kcd h, rcp;11rrng the c:1rthcn berm)
J{ccummendcd add1t1t111,rl kr1( 1_' lrnc 1, illu , tralL' ~l 111

•

rn!

  

ATTACHMENT 

 

- Laboratory Results

0

 



 

_J

:

'942J 800 • 378• 1296
exas ~9922 888 • 588 • 3.U3
i: -1• 3 ab G':raceanalys1s c:;

oc k e~2;;
0 aso

806• 794• 1296

FAX 806• 794 • 298

9 5• 585• 3443

FAX 9 5• 585 • 494j

REPORT SUMMARY

December 31. 1999

CLIENT:

ENCONI~TERNATIONAL
T07 RE\1CON CIR TE 101
ELP. 0 TX 79912

SA~IPLE D_A_TE:

•

PROJECT ID:

Ft Bliss Disposal

..\NAL YSIS REQl;E TED:

TPH TX 1005 and BTEX

PO~ RECEIPT :
-1 ° Ce! ius
Temperature ac ept::mce range for most analysi i 2 - 6 degrees Celsiu .

TEIVIPER.\T RE

There \ ere no unu ual oc urr nee - with these anal. se .
Laboratory analy ·e - ,.,,·ere performed on amp! s utilizing procedures published in
randards ~lethod for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 18th Edition 1992:
PA Te t :\Jeth ds fr baluating olid \Va re rd dition. through December 1996
revisi n ; r EP. \lethod fo r the Chemical Analysi of Water and Wastes[EPA-600/49-020), March 19 "'. and the lat t promulgated updates. This is an integral part of the
n:porl and mu t be induct.:d ·.:iih u!l l..'.opi.: -.

-,

, · <. ()
~ ~-. - ~ :.-- __. ./

,....,
! ....-.-

.

/

Karen M. Costa
Technical Director
Page 1 of 4

•

 1

1llTRAcEAi'--\LYSIS,

6701 Aberdeen Ave ue. Sui e 9

~ubbock. fexas 79d2J

ENC.ON RiilN'J'BRJilA(Il[©NALc1Paso. Texas 7992:

7 3 0 7 REMCON CIR # O1
EL PASO TX 79912

500• 278 • 296
888 • ~88 • 34113

1Rfi1
INcF~~

806 • 94 • 296 FAX 806• 794 • 1298
9 5• 585• 34~AM~°!? · ~ ~9~

E-rv ad 1ac ;;··aceara ,~,s com

995574
INVOICE NO. : 22104992

REPORT DATE: l~-~-99
'-PAGE
1 OF 2

REVIEWED BY: . <....

CL:.ENT SA1"1PLE ID : Ft Bliss #1
SAMPLE TYPE . . . . . : soil

AUTHORIZED BY

SAMPLED BY . . .... : R . K.
SUBMITTED BY .... : R. K.
SAMPLE SOURCE ... : Montana Ave

SAMPLE DATE .. . : 12-20-99
SUBMITTAL DATE : 12-20-99
EXTRACTION DATE: 12-20-99
ANALYSIS DATE . : 12-22-99

R.K.

CLIENT P.O.

ANi\LYST . . . . . . . . . : F. Marti::--ez

Petro_eum Contami nants by 8021B

r

' · - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -D_A_ T_A
____
T_A_B_L_E_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _-l

Detection
Parameter

B,enzene
Toluene

. . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . ..... .. .

thylbenzene
otal Xylenes

Result

Unit

Limit
50.

<50.

ug/Kg
u g/Kg

.. . .. . .... .. . . .. . .... .

<50.

ug/Kg

50.

. . . . . . . ..... .. . . . . . . .

<50.

ug/ Kg

(1) Copy to Client

<50.

so.
so.

 6701 Aberdeen Avenue. Sui e 9

•

ubbcc.. Texas 79 24

800 • 378 • 1296

~!ENT ='.~COM RiilN'l\BRNAGJiI©NAill Pase ,exas 79922 888 • 588 • 3.143
7 3 0 7 REMCON CIR # 1 Q 1
E-, ail lab<~traceanalys1s com
3L PASO TX
79912

806 • 794 • 29
FAX806 • 794 • 1298
915 • 585 • 3.l-§A.M~· ~ .49~

995574
I NVOICE NO . : 22104992
REPORT DATE: 12-29-99
REVIEWED BY: 2_ '2.-PAGE

D A T A

s~~~ogate Information aaa- Trifluorotoluene
4 - Bromofluorobenzene

(1) Copy to Client

T A B L E

: 2 OF

(Cont. )

Percent
Recovery
87.9
91 . 5

Range
67-122
64-113

2

 1 ;~ ~ ~.1
~CTR\cEAi~Ys1s, 1~c ttlli11tUJVuLLJUJLU

LJL...IL"\...L..3 U\--ll...Ao.· ....

6701 Aberdeen A erue. Su, e 9

LubbocK. :-exas 79424 800 • 378 • 1296
~exas 79922 888 • 588 • 3443
E- ,,la1I lab~traceanalys1s corn

ENGON Ati~ElRNAlla4) Alli Paso.
7 3 O7 REMCON CIR # 1 O1
EL PASO TX 79912

CLIENT SAMPLE ID :
SAMPLE TYPE .. . ...
SAMPLED BY . . . . . . .
SUBMITTED BY . . ...
SAMPLE SOURCE ....

Ft Bl i ss # 1

806 • 794 • 296 FAX 806 • 794 • 298
9 5• 585 • 34'SAMm8i · N~ ~944:

AUTHORIZED BY
CLIENT P.O.
SAMPLE DATE ....
SUBMITTAL DATE :
EXTRACTION DATE:

so il
R.K .
R . K.
Montana Ave

995574

INVOI CE NO. : 22104992
REPORT DATE: 12...-2 9- 99
REVIEWED BY: ·' z -z:__
PAGE
1 OF 1
R.K.
12-20-99
12-20-99
12-20 -99

TPH TX1005
T A B L E

D A T A

Pa:::-amete::C6-Cl0
>Cl0-C28
C6 - C28

(1) Copy to Client

Resu lt
<50 .
<50.
<50 .

Unit
mg / Kg
mg / Kg
mg / Kg

Detection
Limit
50 .

so.
50 .

Analysis
Date
12-24-99
12-24-99
12 - 24 - 99

 .. _5 Ripley

6701 Aberdeen Avonue, Ste \I
Lubbock, loxa s 79424
Tel (806) 794 - 1296
Fax (806 ) 794 - 1298
1 (800) 378- 1296

Company Name:

ft!.J

C, ,-_)

(Street , City, Zip) /..

Address:

/ '\:) 7

~ (.JN..

/:.Av\

\<' ~ n

Contact Person:

.

~~(

l(/

l ,\

'7-7
·"

<oI·-

Fax# :

(>I\Jl t::t: 16 t,

7""JC.:1 1'"J

LAB Order ID #

1 (668) 586 ·3443

s -~

Phone II :

CHAiN-OF-CUSTOOY At~O Ai~ALVSIS ncCUEST

El Paso . Texa s 79922 · 1028
Tel (915) 585·344
~ax (!115) 585- 4 44

TraceAnalysis, Inc.

j:- ~ (_

o, . SI" A

),-,:,y

ANALYSIS REQUEST

(1

(Cir cle or Specify Method No.)

i

,.._

~

A- :h ._s ·'/ v LA-

H

en
0

C1>

Pro1cc t Name: /

rl 1vcf

v\.', ~ -

Sa111pl /

Alt c-w--<.

---

·-

-

-

-

E
::,

r --4

Relinquished by:

- -

~

,..,

(_')

::!
0
CJ)

0
:i

(I
<{

w

z

N

0
~ I "'
0

0

--

-

u

(.1>

!P

<f

<t
0

-

-. -

w

~

rn

i==

~

I'

---

-

:x:

:x:

ll.

rn

12"'

<(

ll.

I-

--

- -

-

j J

! -~,.,
- ---

CD

<I

X

w

I-

:?

()

--- --

~
,o
co

"'~

O>

iii
>
E

Q
;;;

<fl

Cl.

0

"'~

.

iii
>
0

Cl.
...I

I-

ll.

ll.

u

u

I-

·-

----- - ---

-

·--

.

>

en

n.

<fl
~

<fl

0

-- -

- - --

·-

.

-

w

>

f

!I>

0

<D

a)
C')

N
a,
0
CD

a)

"'
rn

~

i3 u u u
.__...a:_ c:, c:, ll.
u

I-

<--

0
<O
<(

-- -

.,,
<V

Q

;;;
Q)

n.

""..,

E
f:'.

:x:a

u

C
:,
0

<n
I~

~

0

--

-- ----

--

-

.

·-

T,me:

-----

-

-·

--

·-

-

-- ,_
--

---

--- ·-

·-

>--

,_

.__

CD

·-- -- -

Received ~.,.... -

-

-

-

-

>--·

:x:

1 -- ·

1-- >--1--

I- I--

-

-

--

·-

-

-

-·

-- -

- -- -

--

·-·

·-

-

-

-

- -- -· -- --

.

---

1---

--

- ·-

·- - f . - >--

f.-.

--

-

-·

-

- -- -- --- -

Tim e:

Date:

0

,_,....

I-

-

- - - ,. . _

-- -

,. . _

-- ,_

·-

0

E
::,

0

-- <--

-

.J"J-/,,. ,i} v- /n

-

~ --

- --

-

LAB USE

,_

-

- --

1--

-· -

--

-

I-

-- -

-

·-

- - ·-

- - l --

~

·-·

--

·-

-

REMARKS:

ONLY
TimcA~

l~ d b y:

Da te:

Tim e:

Date:

Time:

Intact

{l I

Headspace
Received at Laborat ory by :

Rel inquished by:
Oat~/

!I>

I-

- -

--

- -- -

-

-

----- - -

-

-

-·-

..

Date:

<O
N
a)

c.o

N

"'0

"'0!I>

...I

...I

...I

0

,0

-

--

- -- --

-

-·

0

N

<(

u

I:

-i=.,
"="'

.,.,
"'

ll.

0

~
"'
;:;,
0
"'
,_ ;,;"',i, ;,;'"
0
~ ~
CD
.<
N

w

I-

,1~J.·

--

C

"'

" ",o
(I)
"' co
"' <("'
<(

,\

<O

Ill

0

..J

;;;

<fl

()

SAMPLING

u z uw 0
I
I
- z

....J
Cf)

.,

:x:

a)

I

-

- --·

Date:

I

l )

u

-

- ---

- -----

(viv-·,t:, ..

<t

>

- - - ! . -- -

------- -------

Rel inquished by:

w

l

----·--- - - - - -

-v

,
<(

0

ll.

~

O>

--

- - · - - -·-

llJ

a

0

l<

---------

.:::>'--

,,
in co

<1>

0

f> _I :;5- I:!- (

/),-.jJ.:\, l

E

u

Cfi'7J7L{ -- (!

' ' '- _.._.{ ) - ·, l

PREScnv,.1rvE
METHOD

MATRIX

<f

z

(LAB USE)
ONLY

~

0

z<f

FIELD CODE

1,'/ ,~

e,, 9 11atu 1 ·

I

c::,

a:
w
LAB#

I

I.. V I
Cf)

-

.
en
J:

I~ 'I - <' I-

Project Location:

u

g

Invoice to:
(If d ifferent from above)
Project# :

-

u

ra

f,-;-..

I,

-

.r;,./J/KO'
;;::r;y~
..
~

......

,1
C

,,

/'-

-,

--

r:J
'"""

Submittal of samples constitutes agreement to Terms and Conditions listed on reverse side ol C.O.C.

kv,~/<; 9

-

N

.-*, N

tc._

Temp --= __

I l/ ,-;)(' 1

Log-in Review
Carner#

f ,1--

0
_ ___

_'l,JW._

I

/,L-a!£.ff... ct.~1 -

..

·-

--- -- - ..
-

  

ATTACHMENT 

 

. Non-hazardous Manifest - Soil

 

[a INTERN INC.

 

 

--FR0-1 CAMI~ REAL ENV_CNT_

6-03-1999 9 : 08AM

505 589 2d27

P.3

CAi."\'llNO REAL ENVIRONMENTAL CENn:RS, INC•

•

sons PROFILE

1. GENERATOR

CHECK HERE FOR BILLING

Name of Company _ _;_F_f
_ - __!?_/_,·_.s>
_______________
Addres.s

fJ U/1

Telephone #

z.

{ ; f '-

,lp-,,,; f-v't - S vJ H

%,
7

r ?if.//,~ .s, $

CHECK HERE FOR BILLING

CONTACT PERSON

Name

f.. fr V I

Company

G~coN

AH H

Jv.)---v. ~ ~

/?Yr Cfi1

_v_

A-J DS'j u LA
~< .

C r'~ ~ F I O I

1

/

I

Fax #

Telephone #

·•

T 8L - 2

5 68 - 711 9

Address / J o 2

•

- F

l} I '2

7 7'11.:?,.
Sf! - ~f: z
/ /f.

3. lYPE Al°'l> SO{JRCE OF CONI'Al\-llNATION / PHYSICAL SITE LOCATION

Cit1-! ,),·- - ~

4AV' •

~J

4. ESTl.i-"IATED VOLUME OF SOIL

s

O ; /

/-

-

3

,//1fr-1 ~{) :,y

cubic yards

5. S1.JPPORTING ~"'lALYTICAL DOCUMENTATION (please attach)
· Required:
(Additional TCLP, reactivity, pH, ignitability, PCBs)

6. CERTIFICATION

I BEING
I HEREBY CERTIFY TIIAT THIS IS AN ACCURATE DESCRIPTION OF THE SOIL
NOT
P~0Fl1..ED MT> THAT TIIE SOIL IS

CONTAMINATED Wlffi OTHER

I MATERIALS lHAT WOULD PROHIBIT IANDFARM REMEDIATION AND

ULTIMATE

NON-RCRA DISPOSAL.

Position
Date

f&;: UJ:: r1/11/00
1
~

 CAMINO REAL LANDFILL
P.O. Box 580

Sunland Park, N.M . 88063

17677

(505) 589-9440

Plense prtnt or type. (Form designed tor use on ehte (12-p1tch1 typewr iter )

•

NON HAZARDOUS
WASTE MANIFEST

11 .

\A•N l f:"C ST

Generat or 's US EPA ID No

2 . Page 1 1lntormat 1on in the shaded areas
of
1s not reQu ired by Federal law.

OOCU"4f'o T ~O

I

~I. Generator' s Name and Mailing Address

r'

_t /;c._s
,,

.".,,:,

41. Generator' s Phone (

-· -

.,,.. Transporter 1 Company Name _..,
:z,_ +- I

ffr_ I' ( • r ..'

/ _

f( - --:-

~

/

/-;,

10.

...

,: \.y • •

..,,,.

-

t:.-z. _..._ \I

:;,v.

I

,,.

'' i

.

E. State Transporter's ID

F.

Transporter's Phone

US EPA ID Number

G.

/

State Facility's ID

I

l/

H . Facility's Phone

- I

12. Containers

11A. 11 . US DOT Descript ion (i ncluding Proper Sh ipping Name . Non Hazard
C l ass , and ID Number)

HM
a.

0
E

.

-

-

- ""·

,: .•, '.

. -·

No

..1

-

State Generator' s ID

US EPA ID Number

I
9. Designated Facility Name ~nd Site Add ress

B.

D. Transporter's Phone

8.

'7. Transporter 2 Company Name

State Man ifest Document Number

C. State Transporter's ID

US EPA ID Number

6.

I

C

A.

!... -t"~,'\.-·- C;.\ r'-~
ff'- '

Type

-

14.

Unit
Wt/Vol.

> ...

~

i

~

13.

Tota l
Quantity

! i,.

I.
Waste No.

I

C'-:

b.

E

,.II

T
0
R

c.

d.

J . Additional Descriptions for Materials llsted Above

K. Handling codes for Wastes Listed Above

15. Speci al Handling Instructions and Ad ditional In fo rmat ion

16. GENERATOR'S CERTIFICATION: I hereby declare that the contents of th is consignment are fully and acc urately descnbed abo•e by proper sh1pp1ng name and
are ctas.sit,ed. packed. marked , and la beled , and are

,'
..

T

in

a ll respects I n proper co nd1t 1on for tra nsport b y h ighway accord i ng to app licab le internationa l and naltonal

go"4trnmen t regulations. including appltcabte state regulations.
II I am a large auantlty g.enerator, I cen1fy th at I ha•• a program 1n place to re<luce the ,oiume and toxicity of waste generated to 1he degree I ha•e determined to
be economic.ally practicable and that I have selected the pract1c.t>le method of trutmen t. storage. or disposal currently ava.ilable lo me wh1cn m1n1m1..tes the presen t
and future threat to human health and the environment. O R , if t am a small quantity generat or. I ha•e made a gooo faith elfon to min1m1ze my waste generation
and select the best waste management method that 1s available to me and th at t can afford

I

PrintedfTyped Name

R.. '1- ~

I

r

· t-" 1 ,

,;~5cs.'

~

Signature£

l._.;...

17. Transporter 1 Acknow ledgement of Rece ipt of M ateria ls
PrintedfTyped Name

sp

II

T
£
A

,

(

'

-

I

-----·-

18. Transporter 2 Ack nowledgement of Rec eipt of Mate ria ls
Pri ntedfTyped Name

Month Da y Year

I -· (

L- / I

I

V

Date

Month Day

Signature

M

0

.

L - .__--'- r - ~ ;(,,~.'....1

t:-._,

I
I

I

I

I
Date

Month Day

Signature

I

Year

I

Year

I

19. Di screpancy Indicat ion Space

I

T

20. Facili t y Owner or Operator. Certificat ion of rece ipt of haza rdou s m ate ria l s covered b y th is man i fes t ex c ept as noted in Item 19.

y

PrintedfT~d Name

ll 4A. )

(rn..r-c-l

I') ,

J

A-

White · orig inal

/!

I

f

Signature
•

Yellow,Transporter

I

I

-

~

Pink -TSO Facil it y

~

Date
Mo nth Da y

Year

I c ·/1 1 / ~

Gold -Rod -Generator' s first copy

 ____,....__
'

....,.._

___- - - - -------··-----CAMINO REAL LANDFILL
Sunland Park , N.M . 88063

P.O. Box 580

22801

(505) 589-9440

Jeate print or type. (Form des gned lor use on ehte ( 12,pitchi typewrit er l
Generator' s US EPA ID N o .

NON HAZARDOUS
WASTE MANIFEST

2. Pa ge 1 1 lnforma1 1on in the shaded areas
of

A. State Man i fest Document Number

3 Generator' s Name and Mailing Addre ss

-!,
:_,

.l,.

..s:

, . Generator's Phone (

B. State Generator' s ID

'1 .("

5 . Transporter 1 Company Name

~

_":;r-' .-· ~ ,-..:,

+t I

US EPA ID Number

6

-

C. State Transporter's ID
0 . Transporter's Phone

I

, -..;__, , '

8.

7. Transporter 2 Company Name

US EPA 10 Number

E. State Transporter's ID

I
s,.

~::: :~

F. Transoorter's Phone
US EPA 10 Number

10.

Designated Facil ity N~me and Site Address

:•,"'

.

H . Facility's Phone

: I

I
12. Con1a1ners

"·

No.

i.-. _{'

l,· (" .

·...

G. State Facility's ID

I

•. .- ; '

11A. 11 . US DOT Description (i ncluding Proper Sh i pping Name. Non Hazard
t~M
Class. and 10 Number)
a.

1s not re quired by Federal law .

..... '\'

. ' - l _ _C-"

Type

13

14 .

To ta l
Ouan t1 tv

Unit
Wt/Vo l.

~

3

I.
Waste No.

1_.,LJ

al---4-------------------------------~
.....---f'--t------+---f--------l
b.
"
E
I:

""T 1---+-c-.- - - - - - - - - - -- -- - - -- - - - - - - - - - - --l-----!..___..,.______l'-_-+- ------1
g

d.

K. Handli ng codes for Wastes Listed Above

,I. Additional Descriptions tor Materials Li sted Above

5. Spec ia l Ha nd ling Instruct ions and Addi tiona l Informat ion

'16. GENERATOR'S CERTIFICATION: I hereby declare !hat the con lents of this consignment are fully and accurately described above Oy proper sh ipping name and
are ctassiHad, packed, marked . and 1a1>eleel. and are in all respecis 1n proper condition for !ranspon oy highway according to applicab le interna t,onal and na11ona1
go-.mment regulations. ,nctuaing applicable stale regulations.
ti t am a large quantity generator. l certity thal I have a program in place to rl!Ouce the •olume and !oxicily ot waste genera1ea 10 tne deg ree I have determined to
o. economically practicable and that I have selecll'd the pracllc aO le method of treatment. storage. or disposal currentl y a,a,lallle to me wh ich minimizes tt<e present
and future threat to human health and the env11onment: OR. if i am a small quantity generaior. I have made a good faith eftor, to minimize my waste generation
and select th e Oest waste management me!hod that 1s ava ilable to me and th at I can afford.

H

Printf~d:,V~ed Name C.. ~- ;-

.

~:_\ _... __ .::..

1

_.

~-+-

I

Signa:u_r:

......

ls

='---_
_ '. -·..-... .-'"-

IMonth
: , I Day; IYear
.- · ,-:

17. Transport er 1 Acknowledgeme n t of Re c eipt of Mater i a ls
- - -· J
Date
: ~---=P..,ri-n-te_d_/T=-y-p_e..,d..,N~a-m-e------ - - - - - - ----,1- s=-i-g_n_a_t_
u_re_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _·-_ _,_ _ _ __ _ __ _ _._M_o_n_rh--O-a_y_Y_e_a-1,

: t18.-Transporter
- - - -- - - - - - - - - - ~ -- - -- - - - - - - - - - 'I~1-~'2 Acknow ledgement of Re ceipt of Mat eri als
Date

~

t

PrintedfTyped Name

I

Month Day

S ignature

I

R

I

Year

I

19. D iscrepancy Ind ication Spac e

'iT' :w.

Facility Owner or Operator: Certif ic at ion of rece ipt of hazardo us materi al s cove red by this m ani fest ex c ep t as noted in It em 19.

•

PrintedfTyped

White • O riginal

N~"l!
'l UA-.V
Green · Transoorier 1

I

S ignat ure

Yellow . T ansoorter 2

I

_ / ~A
Pin k · TSO F~cilitv

Date

Month Da~ YfaL.,

ICOfi f 1llf

  

ATTACHMENT 

 

. Non-hazardous Manifest - Asbestos

 

 



 

 

_,____________________________________
:.:.-. -2, -2000

08 : 02A FRO- :

P: : , 3

•
:.:·PARTdl:;.:,_.-.._. ·:·. ·· · · ·
CONTRACTOR
: NAME·'.OF CONTRACTOR!nvironmental Bocanr:H ti on 1og

.· ·Ao6Aess':,. i• 863°0

CITY/ST~TE/ZI~: ti · Pno Tx 79925
. RC:Hazardous' Substance, Solid, N.o .s .• ORM-€.
. NA 2212, (AS~ESTOS)

•

RESPONSIBLE:AGENCI~

.

·

. ... _/.

,\::,.,;· '·. '"'
tX Natural leeoetr, ......C:.nt.e

Boeing St 12

PHONE: 22a.1e1 J

'

l 100 N

Oregga; 'it

Aust in, TX

)8711

..._

o·o r'c'~de·ol, Federal Regulations
· The CFR 49 ol Transpiirution R•gu l•tions for asbestos .ire n follows :
171 ;2; 171 .3, 172.1 0, 172..101 , 172.:ZOS, 173.1090, 173.1300 .ind CFR 40-260 ,
-261, 262.22 .(60 P.ut Hl); 61 .
.
· • i:.'' _-,. :, ·. .
. CERTIFlCATION
.
·1 hereby declare that.the c:ontents·ol this consignment are tully and
accurately.descritied above by proper shipping name and are classified . ·
packaged ind labeled, and are in all respects in proper con dition for
transport by highway according to applicable int•mational and government
. regulatlons arid.are not·a h'azardous waste as defi ned by CFR 40, Part 261 ."

Fri.able_·- - - - Non-Friable lt~
- -· ·
Blue ; Brown(221'2)_ _ __
White (ZS90)_'·- ·-· :- --'--

Bags · .lo · · ·
Barre ls._ - --'----'--- _ _
Weight._ · - - - - Cu.Yds.

l/ y 2>· .

... · SPEC1AL HANDLING INSTRUCTIONS AND ADDITIONAL INFORMATtON:_ _ _ _ __

-~-..-......d----"''--LA""'.l.._c......__rt:_ _ _ _ _ __
~--4/.~7*'1~LL....,A.J..~q;~~sst=~-- - .f.L_1Ii_1_ r.L
. N ~ f Authori.~ed Agent
. ; •;
..

/

Signature

Date Received
. ' ·.

\

-' PART 111 ·~..- · · :·..

TRANSPORT R .

. : · '·.-i·. ·.: . , :.:_

· :. N~ME Of. ~~'NS~O~TER #1 :!nv 1ronmcnu 1 Becoo·d ft, anJ>ERMIT#:._..=..::;...¥-=-'-,;...A..:.- _..:...

, ·ADDRESS: ,S6H .Boefng St 12
.. CITV/STATE/Zl~.:·1u Pua, tx 19925

· TRUCK#: ·.' . -',
· PHONE: · · . ·

· - '\ :. · ·

< :. · ·:c-", ....,
...•.· ~·· ~
..:.;\.t-!•.· •t ', ..'. - • - ··· -·- -·- ---·--·- - · - - - -·-----··- ·- -·- -· _·-·---~ --- - . ___. ------' . '\ - . .
. NAME';Of: °fRANSPORTER #2:
PERMli #: '·
·, .ADDRESS·:.~·:'.'/. ' (
#: .
·- - - -!"-.-.-.-.
..·· CITY1STATE/ZIP: • .

' :. ···.·· ··,>''. i.J•: 1:.

~

E:

.

._ _ _ __..:.._..:.._______

The foltowtng stlf-nt INlfl be slqned by IN IN<k driver prior lo unload
• ,'REOIOMAL;°l.ANDFILL lac:Ully: •1 certil'y INt no other rNluial ~s
aced In

d1icr1bed.'!'f.~! ol _!Mtorm,wal/Weft loaded.• ·

k

1lnct the cont•lntrlsl · ·.'

SIGNATURE:OF~Z,RANSPORTER #1 :_ ___::...---.;,,;w.---_:__ DAT_E:J.2:./ZJ_i~

L.

DATE:_. :_ /_. ._: _·/_ _
.-

; S!~~~ t~.~~?f.~~~-S~ORTER_#2:

. .... . . . ..
·-. ------------------------------------_
..
DISPOSAL SITE·- OfflCIAL··
,
,

~

,"

<
,. for the .disposal or

. ,.

Thl1 la _
t o.cer;tJfy that lht _OTEROIUNC_O UI COUMTY REGIONAL LANOFIU.. Operating undn USEPA l'rnnlt No. 14607 Ml _....,, &pprowcl

Albesto• Wutc, h•• rwcelved 1r,., •bow tndicaled west• tu"pt

·: -~,~Jii.e~Ak~~~TIC*:.
' 'Cell."~.Cell Grid#:

ro, noled discre,..nclu) •nd has di-ad or II II foll,

••:

~...~ ·ii,ie·~ ,:·.

.
Depth From:...a_: ToC

NM Eiwb-~

Depl

--'Ir Control Buitau

,·

21410.0iteo

.. ...

$.tnla

Ft. MM 17H6 .

(1011127-i~M ·

 TEXAS NATURAL RESOURCE

\

CONSERVATION COMMISSION
P.O. e.ox 13087
Austin, Texas 78711 -3087
~ase )r,nt or tylle. (Form de$1gneo or use on elne ( 2-pr.c~ 1 :YC<!Wnter )

UNIFORM HAZARDOUS
WASTE MANIFEST

Form aporoved 0MB No.

Ger.erator·s US EPA ID No

I

11
J . Generator's Name and t iling Addresr
F+ \3\,ss , r: e A z.c..
~o7.I C /:,,~ ?..J.. 1 F"t ~J...,~ / 'l' y.-,<:> ,1 4 ll
4. Generator's P hone ( C, I\ ) ~( V - / ~I CJ

Manife st
Doc ument No

2. Page 1
of

P"<r i r .... ,... ... o ,..._ -., o-,... """ """
7 Transporter 2 Company Name

~.;

a..

~

-- . ---

I
8

-.

o. T ransporter's Phone ·••it ;_\;._;.,-~~:: ., 0 •11 ·~ -·
E. State Transporter's ID :; -; . ,.... _...

V S'EPA IC1'Jumber

I

F. Transporter's Phone • · ·

Ot ~ = ~ Lin c cln C~n . t f r.an:::l : i l l
.., ':l
:~i lec; s Cn 1-i:..r:., ) ~ frGr.:?
C. -

o.,, , r

"'flt

.\ 1 <! ;-; C ,.. • • C r ri n
IIA . 11 . US DOT Descnp 1cn (includin g Prc c er Sr 1co1ng
liM

Number and Pa

a.
G
E
N
E
R

I

.

c·.r, ,

H. Facility's Phone
c_nc:;_,t~o

ame . Ha zard Class ID

12 Con1a1ners
Type
0

.

I

!-~ ·,..- ; ,-:-~-.~ :.

..

_. · .':'.··

• • i, _ .. . - .....

G . State .Facility's ID

t'".:' . ""I I

ng G roup )

H.1 za r-cou s ~ :.i ,... .; t.::::ce,
C? :-~ - !:
{ l, s b e . :!:'. '
t( t:)

US EPA ID Number

10

9 Designated Facility Name and Site Aco ress

fr,.n ~·., ·.., . +·,

4 /;;

C. State Transporter's ID {

,. . ,...,..,r, . , - . ., .- . . ,
..

'"

0.2108986 ·
. . -t(~f\[): :··.. ,.

8 . State Generator's ID

·US EPA 10 Number

6

ame

lnforma1ton 1n th e shaded areas
1s not requir ed by Federal law.

A. State Manifest Document Number !

-

5. Transpor1er 1 Company

I

2050-0039

'

,t

{°b::

13

,~

Total
Ouant1tv

Unit
Wt. Vol

'-I

":oli,:: ~ \"OS

I.
Waste No.

.~
,..,., .
I

b.

~

C
R

c.

C:

. Additional Descriptions for Materials Listed A!:,ove

K. Handling Codes for Wastes listed Above

4

· 5 Specral Harclrng lnstruc: .::ns and ..l .:: 1,cra .... :, - aricn

16 GENERATOR'S CERTIFICATION: I ~e ·e:y ce~ a·e ·ra: .- e ~or1en1s ot rn,s c:r s,c;r,rre· : a•e ·~11y ar,c accc.•a1e1y .::1esc'1ceo aoo•,e :v orooer sr1cc,r g name ano are
cl• ss,hed packaged. mar a arid 1ace ec p ar2 ·: c d"O are ,n all respc.: i s n prop ' ::~01: or. tor :ransoort oy nigh ,av accora,n!i :o aopt1ca::•e ,nterrat.onal anc
national govemment reguta:,ons. 1ncil.. c r<; ape ca: e s:a:e ·egulat1ons
If I am a larc;e Quantity ge era lor I ce •:.:v :r,a; I ·a·.e a :rogram 1n ;:,lace ro reauce the ,c,u-e ana 1oxic1t ot wasre genera1eo :o :ne aec;ree I r a•,e determined 1c oe
econom1cally ;:ract1cable ar,o ! at I :"la·.e ;elec:e: :~a : r3c:,cao1e me11100 of treatment . s1c•age or disposal currently ava 11ao1e :o me .v•uc~ min,l'T' :,s the pre sen1 arc
h.:ture threat to 'iuman hea1:, and the ei-i. ·rcrre-: C ~ f I a a sma ll Qu.u ,rny gereratc, ! ave r-'!ade a good a,tn etton o 'Tlin1n ,z:e " .vaste ;;e '"' e.. ar1on ana seic:'::
ne best was:e managen-er: -net oo ·ra· s a,a c.: e ·: - e ano mat I can .11torc

'

K.

T

A
~

N

sp

0

R

T

Printed/Typed Name
/

.Y'"'

-

'
17. Transporter 1 Acknowledgement of Receipt ,: ii Materi als
.A inted/Typed
{./
r)_

/7 ,Q/.._J /']

Naml~ . ;
I

I

S1c;nat ur;

. '.
-

,---. r1 >

;

,

/

) h,c.·ML f. J

18 Transporter 2 Ackno.:111edgemen1 ol Rec eipt cf Ma te nals
PnntedfTyped Name

I I_

-

.

.............

./.J;'(/

I

-

I

- -·

Day

Mon th

I

.I

I

'

.

~

I

Year
t

..

,W

Date

•1

Year

Day

fo.lonth

I

I

','1,/

Date

"

Sign atu re

E

~

.

~t/
" 1·

S,gna tu re

'

1~/ j C

I

. .

I

R

Year

Day

Mon th

I

I

19. Discrepancy Indication Space
\
I
L
I

20. Fac1hty Owner or Operator: Cert1f1ca t1on of receipt of haza rdous m.11enals covered by this manifest except as noted 1n Item 19.

.

T

y

Printed/Typed Name

'- JI·J.. /1. // , .

TNHCC-0311 (Rev. 0110~/97)
/

/'/l

£

r'

~~

1

r,r J

I

r·

Signature
...,_.__ t;-

.

j'I ./)-· '

White. original -' Pink-TSO Fa®
(

Date

~

YY
f •

' /;/
l

Yellow-lf:atisporter

'-

):~

Month Day

Year

1.1-c.· l.?0 t:, '1

G reen- Generator's first copy

 ATTACHMENT F

•

• Photographic Documentation

-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

. 1[1 111.ml ;

l:\"TER.~ ..\TIO'.',;Al. l'.',;C.

 •

Photograph No. 1:

View of the subject site from Montana Avenue's main gate looking north
along the north-south pathway .

•

Photograph No. 2:

Typical view of a stockpile consisting of concrete debris/rubble before
clean up .

 •

Photograph No. 3:

The surveying was done to determine the east-west property line along
Montana Avenue. Note the red-colored survey stake near the Montana
right-of-way .

Photograph No. 4:

The repaired earthen berm and the newly installed barbwire fence along
Montana Avenue .

 Photograph No. 5:

Typical view of the subject site with concrete debris and roofing materials
before clean-up actions were initiated .

Photograph No. 6:

General view of the field operations at the subject site where a mediumsize bobcat was used to relocate the heavier debris to various collection
areas.

•

•

 -·1!11111----------------------------------------------

•

•

•

Typical view of the subject site with a backhoe loading the construction
debris .

A medium-size backhoe was used to load the dump trucks for disposal
activities.

 Photograph No. 9:

View of disposal activities where hydrocarbon contaminated soil is being
removed from the subject site .

Photograph No. 10:

View of the asbestos disposal activities at the subject site.

•
I'

•

 Photograph No. 11 :

View of the north-south pathway of the subject site after completing cleanup activities .

Photograph No. 12:

General view of the remediated subject site near the main entrance.

 •

Photograph No. 13:

View of remediated area near power pole 6. which previously contained
large quantities of construction debris (May 25. 2000) .

Photograph No. 14:

View of remediated area between power poles 8 and 9, near northern
portion of the north-south pathway (May 25, 2000).

  

APPENDIX 

THE EDR WATER WELL REVIEW

 

 

 

R :

Environmental

:Data

: Resources, Inc.
•

: an..edrcompany

The EDR-Water Well
Review

Fort Bliss Rubble Dump Spill S
Montana Avenue
El Paso, TX 79916

The Source
For Environmental
Risk Management
Data

3530 Post Road
Southport, Connecticut 06490
January 31, 2001
Inquiry Number: 587617-1

Nationwide Customer Service
Telephone: 1-800-352-0050
Fax: 1-800-231-6802

 Environmental Data Resources, Inc.

Water Well Review Report
EDR reviewed available records made public by the state of Texa at the Texas Water
Development Board (TWDB) and the Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission
(TNRCC) and obtained information identifying the approximate location of public and private
water wells within the rcque ted Area of Review (AOR). EDR researched the located and plotted
water wells identified on county highway map or USGS 7 .5 minute topographic maps at the
TWDB. EDR transferred the approximate water well locations onto a map for the client's review.
EDR cannot guarantee the accuracy of the infom1ation provided by state agencies. This review is intende.d
to provide the user with a "working approximation" of reported well locations. The following are
guidelines used to review available driller logs for water wells associated with client site information within
theAOR.
•

ldentify Located Wells within the AOR according to the TWDB files.

•

Identify Plotted Wells within the AOR according to the TWDB files .

•

Identify Partially Numbered Wells within the AOR according to the TNRCC files containing records
submitted by the well driller.

•

Identify Unnumbered Well within the AOR accorcling to the TNRCC files containing records
submilted by the well driller.

Description of Te~

Area of Review-(AOR):
Standard area of review is a 1/2 mile circumference around client speci fied target property.

Located Water Well:

Well locations that have been field checked by a TWDB or USGS staff member, spotted on a USGS 7.5'
Topographical or county highway map, as igned a unique identification number, and filed at the TWDB.

Plotted Water Well:

Approximate well locations spotted on county highway maps by the TWDB staff members according to
information submitted on the driller's log. The accuracy of the location for these wells is dependent on the
driller. The state assigned unique identification numbers to these wells, but in high-density areas, a single
identification number may represent multiple well locations. The TWDB eliminated this plotting activity in
June 1986.

Partially Numbered Water Well:
Water well locations established to within a 2.5 minute topographic quadrangle and identified by the
TNRCC according to maps ubmitted with the driller's log. Each water well was assigned a State ID
number by the TNRCC. Note: This method for recording water well locations was procedure from 1986
to 1991.
Unnumbered Water Well:
Well locations identified on the driller's logs and corresponding driller's maps maintained by the TNRCC
records. Note: The TNRCC implemented this procedure in 1991 .

 Please call EDR Nationwide Customer Service al
1-800-352-0050 (8am-8pm ET)
wilh questions or comments about your report.
Thank you f or your business!

Disclaimer
Copyright and Trademark Notice
This reporr contains infonnation obtain ed from a variety of public and other sources. NO WARRANTY,
EXPRESSED OR IMPUED, IS MAD£ WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH Tli/S REPORT.
eNVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIF/CA/LY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH
WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT UM/TAT/ON. WARRANTIES AS TO NON-INFRINGEMENT OF
THIRD PARTY
RIGHTS, ACCURACY, VA UDITY, COMPLETENESS, SUITABIUTY, CONDITION,
QUALITY, MERCHANTAB1U1Y. OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE OF THIS REPORT
OR THE INFORMATION CONTAINED OR REFERENCED TIIEREIN OR USED IN CONNECTION WITH
THE PREPARATION THEREOF. AU RIS K IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. No liability to anyone is assumed,
whether arising out of errors or omissions, negligence, accident or any other cause, for any loss or damage,
including, without limitation, special. incidental, consequential, or exemplary damages.
Entire contents copyright 1998 by En vironmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in
any media or fonnat, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, In c., or its
affiliates, is prohibited without prior written pem1ission.
EDR and the edr logos are trademarks of J::11vironmental l>ata Resources. Ill e. o r its affiliates. All other
trademarks used herein are the property of their re.<,pecti ve o wners. Use of such trademarks does nor
constitute an endorsement by Environmental Data Resources. In c. , or its affiliates, of the organizations
claiming ownership thereof or the info nnation obtained f rom such organizations and contained herein .

•

 Environmental Data Resources, Inc.
Water Well Review

·•~

Site Name: Fort Bliss Rubble Dump Spill S
Address: Montana Avenue
State: TX
City: El Paso

WELL CLASSIFICATION

Inquiry #:587617-1
Zip: 79916

NUMBER IDENTIFIED
WITHINAOR

LOCATED

4

PLOTIED

0

PARTIAllY NUMBERED

0

UNNUMBERED

0

TOTAL NUMBER
IDENTIFIED

4

Located Water Wells:

49-14-503,505,511, 512
Plotted Water Wells:
NONE

Partially Numbered Water Wells:
NONE
Unnumbered Water Wells:

NONE

••
587617-1
1

 l

i

I

I

I

I

,'

I

i

I

I

I

;'

:'

I

i'

I

l

\

.,
.

I

I
I

/

'I

I

I

I

\

I

l

I

\I

I

'

_,,
.-

,, . /

/

~----

l

I

~

--,
I

l

I

'

',

I

/.

I
r

.

I

I
I

.

\

•

-,__

-=tL--~

I

D

\

~~

f-

\

l

I _ f-....
/
.,_

I

Af>PROX IM TE
LOC T IO , • ONLY

WATER W ELL LOC TION i\ l P

WELL WITH IN A 1/2 i\ ll LE RADI US

rotn BLISS RC IIBLE DU1vtl' .'PII.I. SITE
MOJ'\T NA A VEN ' E
El. I' SO. TX 79 16

u . I' so cou :r

t; ,

C

7.5 i\ llN TE QUA DR NC LE
Fon Blis SE TX

• : Environmental
: Data
: Resources, Inc.
E V!RONMENTA L DATA
RESOURCES
1000 WEST AVE. SU ITE A
AUSTIN. Tl:X/\S 7870 1
800-352-00:'ill FAX : 00-231 -6H02

 •

T t lAS

l.q.uler ______________ _

lo' A T [ l

DI VtL O PH!~t

l,I _ Qt.l

1'1.elclNo.

- - - _ 141_ - y_:1. 7 - ~
o-r·• Well llo. _ _,t~- _ ~:.

•

.•

90A1D

111.•t.e llell lo ._~~_-_

-

...-

l'l.: _S.O~- __ _

f,.J_ J~~Q _________ _

l _

Caw,t7___

Surft1J'_JL£itJ.t?.. d-'./.PJ-.!8t.Z,J_ ________ .
IAlaJlD,f*'-K\n...Kck~~'"_-:...?_·'l_t!:\.!.:..~.:-.!''!_tri(.f~e<ju,r_~~-!.,).!~'-~l.:1-a\w,,____l/1,._ __ ~ ~ - - - .- ;,.-' lloak___ _ ____

,,.

~ry .s.~,--_-__ _________ _

0-ri_ - _

.lddNN I __ - _ - - _ - - - _ - - - - __ - - - - ___ -

T - t · - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - .lddreH •_ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dril.l.eJ'i_ - ~ .J. ~
Adcln•• •- ~ ~.A. ____ __ _________ _

.ilWA - - _______________
.f
llant.icn or _____________ £.J,p_ __ 1a_ .:.3.'l1~__
n.. 1bo.,. • l , 4et.era1.ned b7_ _ ::r.;,/",. ___ _____ _
~ · - ____ J1~·- ____ 1.9_~1 _; Dq, Cable Tool,(Jl..!!?17J ___ _ _____ _

).

Ii.

S, ~ ·

llept._

~M- __tt. •

......________ tt.

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

-+- -+-

-+- -+tt..

tt. to

Cn&nhcl Prca

6, c,iet.1an1 Open Hole, Sueial)t Vall, tlnde,.,...-,(OrJft]. Paclr14) _____ _ _____ _
? , ~ : . ::~---------~ ; : :

0

;;_~_-_-_-_:~.-s:i:~ ~:~J../t:_ - - - - - -

_ !_ __

__4/. __ __9_ _ 45s

CGllla\ Dua.________ in., ~Tailpipe_________ tt .

II. ~ hel../=(_t!_c.f~,~ _____ _Xaka
9, ~ '

w.

Flow____ _ P,

,.,.ro..-a• r.n.,
SwUc

U. Vn.er Lewd,

~:s =~-~
_rLJ:!!:.A'_-::~f

•

___________ rt .

----- -------- ----- ------

_ 19_?]

i,, _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Or_ovn____ _ tt. .

Specjlic Capacity

=

____ _ f/Z"'f1_ __ n..

r,n.___ __ "-

1'11-.,itll Le'Nl.___ _ tt. .

p

HP. __, (__

lieu., Kept . , Eat ._ ____ _ _____ _ _ _

Daw___ _ ____Wllllh o!

w..i____ tt.

Proolac1.1on

6 Nodal______________

Pu4>_8 5... __P,

~

_19_-a..:'.::- _

,s./tt .

==- ________ ______________

tt.. rept .

19

=~
=

rt. ::~: nrhce.

It.

ffrhce.
l\lr!aca .

= 1~_,,~=~=U-~:;~:§.:a~•t?,4

11>""'

~ ~~

"211.Ch

u

rt . ol>ove nr!ece .

(a-Juo an un.e, oder, oolcr, .i.e. ) _____ ____ _____ ____ _ _ _ _ __ _ ___ _ _______ _ ____________ _

T•~·- __ °P, Daw •...,.i.d tor
rei,p.___ "1, D•te 1-.,1.ed

:r...-.___ •r,
14,

u _____

b _ _ _ _ _ rt.

::!:- ______19_ _ -:!i~- __ __ __ _____ ___ ___ __ _______ llhich u _____

12. ~® ;t:c~.-Qtl::ij:,;~ ;~.~~r: ~ ;:;;~~.:,~!~~ ~b::r:a;1:n~ ~:t -U
~e:.lJ . 0u•l1t;r,

which

~,c~-i'_,_'1. ,c~or. ~_dot_ _which

__ _ _ __ _ _ _
1. ..

Date elll!Pled tor 111&1,..1.o_ ________ L•l>or•tOl7_____ _ _____

Ot.l\ar data nauable

,_uon 5-.,1••,

~ a - ________Labont0?7__

tor a n ~ b - __ _____ _ Laboratory__ _ _ __ _ _ __ _

N

circled•

1--1.in~~·'--+-----+--'"--=~~-.....::.:to:....-1

Dr1ll.ar ' 1 LOI, &adioacUrtty Loe, ll1ct.ric L D1,

Pnllp1nC T11t, ______ _ ___ __ _____ _ ____ _ _ _ __ _ _ _

"Z• GlL_ J.BEYlZ.Q_ -- - - - - - -- - -- - _o.t.e_ -~--3 _ - 19?}_
s....,,...,. or o-a //._S:..,~ 5:.. _J;,t,~~ _~ h;- __-C".: ~!..~'11/L-!. _ _8_·7.!:feZ _

--~ -

lS . lec:ffd

l~~~·- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

1~"'3llJ.:-...

_wdf~B!d.,_'1.c="-".:~i:A.~J.JUL ~d~$- .s,{__ _

iA.t:;,r.. -~~L-A j-,.~(.l~~a-z.+.el-&.AJ

___

---------------------- -------------------- -- -- .______._______,_
.......____,
-------------------------------------- ------ --- --- -- ------------------- -------------------~-./.'--- ------------------------ ---- ---- --------- -- -----------

~

y-r'";
y'I--'-

I
T\!lfD9E·W0·2

(S ketch)

ff-!~-$03

!

J

   
 

oJ

barf" 

. 3 {Rial
amosm mm 2530
$9 

8m 31? 3.w?g-Iia




\ns?c. kl.

 

 

GW 1

•

TIX .A S

WAt! l

DtVILO PN&•T

v1..· 1 [ _

'1Al4 h.__ _ _ _ _ _ _

lqld.bir - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

o-r'• v.u

l o. ___

1041 0

State

-:tf../ _____ _

v.n ...._ £9- -Lti-.:~~ - -

C-',~ --- .e:t.~~ --------

:~.----~~ ---~
~ -----------.t
-+- -+~~-------L2Ju----- -----------rt/"',Ll- ---- --- ---- ,.wr-,_ --- - --- --- __ -- ----- --- --

~·- -- __.:J'i.m
1'nllar,_ - - - -

.l.

--B~"--;.Lesl.£~s1..- -- ---..__.__ ------ ------ ---- ---- ---

ll:m'im ot - - - - - - - --- - -- ~ -

_1a_

.a2~ - .tt . • - .

al, detaJCned

.... ~·------------ --l9-k'2.1 l > q ~ ._,,.,__ _ ____ _ _ - s. .!!!I!:!!• ...___/pi 9 __n..
6. C'!99:nie.l
1.

!!!!•

0pm llal•,

Ms,.___

117__7~_,. __ ---- ---

at.re~ v.u,

l h l d e n 1 " 8 C I , ~ ___ ___ ______

!Sll<iu~ ef/.lr-4/dJ( _-_-rn-__ ':i-£~L~P/4::-___

i--------+------4--==-----:.•:......-l

os..._ _ ~ _ -/''.·•

0

1-cth tu.ip1pe___ __ ____ tt.

8. ~ ' 1-1__ _ ___ {q.('~ - _ _llelre 4 Jlodel___ - - _________ HP._ ~

,. ~ · n.______ , ~- -----11'9· .......
10.

r,r:r....... Ttffl

_n.. '-1"' i...-i_ - - _n..

Pro•cu. ._______ _ P

•

ll. VIit.er

.1.a ...1,

UCM _t't.

-----------

Dr....i __ - - -

_n..
,

=::-./P_-.J__ J.9_?-,-{.'i:..?iA,c:...n £ 1~
19

rt. J:WP'.

19

----- -------- ----- ------

b7 __________ _

SpeaWe Capac1t1_______ p/tt..

tt. ""'·

__

lept.., let. . __________ ___ _

n.i..________1-c\ll GI ?Ht__ _ __ -

S\aUC t..ftl_ - -

I

...•._ - - - - - - _n..

ID. S1a9N_ ____, BOide DS...____ :I.D., 5•UiDC._ ~ __ tt..

c.i-

I

-t- -t-

/ ,

~,!",-,_~,wl'L~-

•bow

u _ ____ n .

=

ai.rlec• •

e.1.ch i.e

t\. Iii>"'
bel""

aarteoe.

~

n..

...-z.....

....- - - - - - - - - -be]..,.,- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ----n.
r,,pt .
u
•boff
ldl1c.b u
- Art-.
- - - - - - - - - - - - .- - - - - - - - - -beJ..,.,- - - -·- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - tt . ·
btlw
a

12. ~~ -;,.~:;t:,~.-.;,Jj:;~:ID ;..:.~~r:~;!';!~~.:,~!:a~ ~b~:..:~1::. ::t-U:e~.~ ~~ .br=-6..l...7'"'~/6t.(e%
13, Q,aallt.7'

.-

{ a-1m cm ust., oc1... , <>ol..-, -'-'>. ) ___________ _ ________________ __ _ ____ _ _____________ _

r..,.___ ..,,.Dew ~ tar -i.,..1a_________

?..,.___ "7, Dew alllpl..S tar ~

Lal>ar8'C.Gr1_

- ________L ~

.£/7.P./f:l___ _

- __ __ __ ___ _

T - .___ •r, Dt1w a-.,1.ed Zor ...i.,,,a_________wboratary__________ _

U.

abaft

ot.bel' c1,at.a aftt.uble u cll'Gl..S• Driller '• L• , Aadio•c:Urlty i.oe, tlac:1.nc LOI,
1-tim Seaplae, ~inc t ..t., __ __ ____ __ __ __ _______________ _

l.S • ....GNI !Ir• __________ ________________ o.te _ - - _____ 19 __

1n.

0

-~e,, - -- -- -- - ----

------------------------- ----- ----------------

---------·-------------- -------- ----- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

•

I

TWD8E-OVM9

j

(Su \.cb)

---------49-14-s~

  

 

1M 30 "633 $2131

 

 

 

 

. 3 ?9?an
r! ?or, 6:4; nv
BLEL L19
(W 44
0' l?i? 
2./

7

l

• WD8E-GW ONLY
Proar-n No.

,

~ G;.cJ. - S7>

7,

l'roj. No.

:A'It

CHEMICAL WATER ANALYSIS REPORT

. .. ;

,.
SfllllNPOftto:

G,round Water Dau end Protection Division

1 txas Water -Oe11elopnlent Board
· · P.O. Box 13087

JMtin. Ttiw ffl11

T.mperau,re

OOFITDC

CHEMICAL ANALYSIS
Date Recei-;,ed u · ~V t

Labort1'KV No.

'

,
..

Alffi 19. i Yi 6
:; J , )

MGIL

SB

•

• •

MEIL

ll icart>onete

I • J_ :t.

$ulfei. •

J. • ~ 3

-·--·- 7

Chloride

•

?•I

Fl\toric»

.

,..._,,,, .

Ni trm ·

[)...,.,.. .

pH • •

[)

[)loro~

~J

.

.

,tienolphdletein AIUlinity • C .C03 •

I.

.

O_____

0111,* Cotlductei,ce ''"~cmJ1 ___
"I) "

/ 1.,t,o

iteffll Mii be -'vied if dledtld.

.~ T M ~ ..-ned lro 1111e ~ . 11 , . . , _ . ltv c-..itnl1111lt1p1yl,.. l>Y G..19171 to ...

eq.,,.....,., .,_..

rot

of carbonet•, •ncl ffW

~ Ii
TOlal HllldMlf • C .C03
~ Ni"091"
A,,_lt • N .

CVde

Nitrite · N ·
N l tr.U • N

......._ 11fWre t. ..... 11'11M COffllNl.UOl'I of \hie 1 - .

;l , ~ c v c.. _

iftTolel

i._ _.,.~....,....

Iron.._,"• Ml*••_.....

•

· 1-WOBE ·W0-1 ffle,,. 2·11•?el

~0

0

EJ focherl ·- - - - - - - MG/L

..'f..__x,.I_LJ:
·l ldd~d
__

.~

I o•5

j, Oiaolwlf Solidi fa,m In MG/L> •

Tolelhon •

.

·-

0

c.tionet•.

ct

---

01te Reported------

. Ml:/L

°'llf'lc Nhro,en .

AfWYWI --------CMCII~ a.,

I 1l3

--• -•

•

..... -

 •

T E XAS

&-.uter

W A YE&

______________ _
1'1.eld lo. _ - - _

o,,ner'• v.u
s.c._ - - - -·

1.., Loea\ta,_ - - _l/ll._ - - _l/ll

2.

D~\" ILOP"INT

I OA I I>

[4./-,./-c~)

w=:cl -----*'- ------

5\.&t.• 111.U lo. _~
~
~
CWDt.7 _ E:. L
~S(t _________ _

9 - l t.t .: - '5 {)_ - - t

lo. - - -

lllock_ - - - - - - - su.._._ ~ e~_7_ ~5 11..Jti '1 J'? ~~ d. - - - - - - - - .

-t-

--r-

I

I

I

I

1'J1cilJ,IJ_/11,y. ____ r.- ------ - --- - - - ----- -- - -- -- - - - - - - - -- - --- - -------o-r,_.., .ll-a.rr.v-1!as..~~v - __ ____ -- ____ ____ ..lddJ"Hl•~ z L ~ ~ u --~-i..J,_+_,~t,>_ t\1(ljtA.o_Tc~---+---+--~--I
r....,t., ___________________ _ __ _______

Addn.. ,

-t-

r ______ __ _ -t-

Dr1.llon_.J2.ut4 ___ -- --- ----- ---- -- -- "-··Su -~jl, ~~- --- -- --- -- J.

lleffl.icn

~- ~

or _______________

!:-~~_i._ ..;3J:7.£ __
ft..

obo ...

-1.

dot.•rwined by_ _

'----- ----- ----l!J~'f._1 llut, C•hl•Tool,~~ - - - - --- - --

..:,~p--

S,

E!E:!!•

6.

C"9'?:!1:1-•

7,

!!!!£•

a.pt. ._ _
_n.. ,-•·- - - - - - - -"'·
~ Kole, S\ra1&1>1. Vall, lloden"e•-,dlr:-n.1
- -P
-ac- -~nd[2-

IU'sr,__________________ - - - -

n..

___________ _

Cal-

-~--- _-s/~- -

DiN.________ 111., Lqth hUpis,._________ n. .

e. ~ · h&l.-~~~bo~- ___ ___Ku•, 11ode1_~Ql~t- _____ _

0

3¢.o

F.P , _ ___ _

· n .._ - - - _a-, l'wil'_ - - - - _a-.

l!aaa . , l\ept. •• tat. ._ - - - - - - - - - - - - o.t..____ ____L.,,.U, o! TH t _____ Kade b.r __________ _

10. l'orto-• Teet.,

Strtic 14-1_ ___ ti.

'-1nc !Aftl ____ rt . Dr""hnm__ __ _ n..

ProducU..,_______ _

•

"

-rn,._0u~.r-_ _______ _

I•. S"6••- _ _ __ , llOlda Dua.____ in. , s.1.t.~ ______ n. .

,. ~

~

a-

Spec l..t1c c~~7_ __ __ __ r?lln. .

11. llokr i..-1 : ~.t- _ r t ~ ______1v7'-::ic:- __________________ ________ which i.o_____ tt.. :!f:: ... rr •••.
___________ n.. !:!!:- ___ ___ 19__ - :.~ : - _ _____________________ _ __ _ Which u ____ _ n..
wrtfc• .
___ _ _ __ ____ti . ::~:- ______19__

n.. ropt ·

-:!i.":- _____ _____________ ________ whi.ch

~=

a __ _ __ n. .

::r:
•bo1o•

ourtoce .

12. ~~ -.:;r:c~.cm-.;amsi:~~:
~~-~ ~r:.~ ~~~:o:!~~ ~b~:r~~!=n~~ -u
:;_;::.,~:;~ !:~c!-~~- _-odor, color, et.c.)1;~de/-~.H- -~fo- __ ___ __ ____ ___ ___ ______ ____ __ ___ __
19

ab Oft

ldlich 1e

t\ .

nrt•••.

=-:_

1). Qu• litr•

(llwrb

r...,.___ •r,

une,

Dete ~ • d t or

-'c!l~ 2tH

~•ta-~: ~ :ifq _L•bor•t"'7_ --j(-=-~

rt''""
__

· - · - __ •p, n.te •-1ed t or a>alywU__ _ ______l •bor-'-« 7 - ~ ;:..~;JS __

r•..,. ___ •r,

Jl&te ~ a d

tar -17a1.a_________wbor~"'7_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

,----------r-......a.__.--------,

1-~~S
~c..:.n;:;enf()peninp=,~;====,c::~~~~~=::j
I
ua.
1n.

to

i.

I

I
I

•

II
i

i

"See

we I I •

(S l<ot.ch)

"2.

l4't-)4"'5o~)

'
I

J

 a

•

L
..":; ~
.- ~
H

•

I

•

I
'

·~ -

•

I

./O•~o

,.

-·

- ,, .·../--· ~
-.
./ . ,
/

.

•

.,,.,.

+

. J'!1'

'

.' -

/

.. .

,.\

-·

i

. ,~,,
.~r

••

I

,:,-

..J

_,,

 ..

r-..
3c..t ~-. ~-cSTATIC LEVEL
PUMPING
LEVEL

11 : ..3£!

() --f.. !\0
t') ~ I

'1
~

l.

I

,I"\

·.;_I')

., • '? .....

v,~ :

·,n

,,.,q :

-tn

i

r· '. ~ ,.......

••=~o
.
3
ll:

0 ' :

t,

~o

o,-: 30
03: ~o

o~ : ~o
o~· ~o
D't. ;

~O

D1: ~O

,,

ti B:-JO
. 0 f.>: '7, (>

~37
o .~:>1J

. 7

I) .~

"/', .~ /~"

DRAW
f,'; "3 ( 1

x-)

·f.t .

('l' .

SP.
CAP.

r 1·1't')

.II 11'

:?

lf () . ..,., I")
1//, 2 0
4 J. () zj·
'-II. o, 0

~

{., . ,') 0

.1 t;? ,... 70
3 f?l:. . s .5""
3 ~ '7 . -.+o
"J . ~0

. ~s
.<<:I'.,
" .,

,

7R
("

~~
LI<"

11:.

1

7Z
, r .....

I ' i.

,: ,;

~qo,1 ID

,.

~o. er--..

~sq .~s3'1~.

~qo_
..,.,Qo_

I

I-/ t.1~
q .5'
I /; .f'0
... ..
. ?.O
1.1'\

1-/ 1; , i l_;
,....,

I

'St' ""'A
_:), . ,.......

1·1,

goo

.

~-

.

~Oo

J/ J.,, l-l O

7~

~, !1' -;

~

~

, /n

Ae,r.,,

, I':,' 8 n

~

I./ J./. ~-:->

1-ll

'l
/ J.f, ,
.J:

(7(1: JO

;50. q7
'35 ') . t '?

7

I ?15

7 ~: C

i

/)·\..,
r:: -:-

I '

I

I.

/ 8.0

!13·.?
_., :-r ·
i : -·

17,/.
I -. ~ .:.,

,-1, 7
.

l

/7,7
7.7, ,

I ? f.5'

I ?'j~,.,
I ·13:'·

1·f?7)

13.,,

I .

fioo

t 7.4

I Cf 7:5

~

/8,0

! 7 7 '?

.,,.

)

I

I

i
i

I

iI
l

..I

/t"> ,- - - ...

I

~

, ,.._'-'C.IVt:U~
1111,

.

-·
r e1:as

'--

.

1

I?. q

18 I

J~~, I/_ q1/
3!.· ~, 6rr

I

I 110

,-1, 1
. - ·... ,.

:-, , . · :,
..

"~ ( )

f',")!.30':
~, I

I I • . ,.

,z.,

Q ./, . ...,

t:10

'-f 1 /.

'l'-i.!J'

!-q3~ .

.I

8

~orl
lP,o~

~"

'i'/0'
q30·,·
'f?.0

'.i.:~. '

~

;.; ~. ·~· .·

JI ~

.

'. ~

irzr·

:

I--!. a

9,~

~q·o. '--,..,
~q /.
YI(),~
31!J, (?0
/J.,. ,,, "' ()f.(

.

~/")!."')

Ir; .

' #

fq 7
1qll-{
I 9. !:> ·
I 1. l

</,D /'J

' IL l , ...
1-Jt-f. 11 (>
I/ 1 /,

•

~{/G
<2 t:J n

I Ji I

,
~Cfn _ L.,.,
;:

I

. ~-.

t -:, - .•

RoD

,r,

f-

....,. ~,...

·'(..#
··, , I" )

f;trY •

11,1"

1
µ.-

Lt":

f'J

P.ot ,

7-;;,,...

j<"/,2

l?oo ·
':'; ~ ~
~no

l:le- J I"

-

•

DATE

GPM

DOWN

'-I J. 7 !.

l''f. ~{) ()

10: 00

~

?11 ·1 :> 53R,,. tb

IC : 3l°'

oJ : :;o

Mf

I

l/ : 3c.'
1.>- :3 0
0 i · ·:1 ti
o -; : ~o

ff

./:, of ," , ,, et

.

Sl>.5;
? !; ,(),:,<,

T:-

5 ·.,.,,~ i lei

,. ,

r

V-1 E L L

TIME

t- I f
(

r"'\

..

C

-

I

·.

r

V . at)

~ater r,.._ . .
- "::J

-

-I
!

--r----------------------------------'

 •

~

~

~

WELL
WELL

DATA
HUMBER °£05

MATERIALS

.PUMP DATA

Male.
Type

0

Stages

Tubi

Shaft

100

Col""'"
Setiol NUMl,er

/

Setting

0. D. Bowls

200

GPM
I

I

Capacity,

•

'feet Head

300

MOTOR DATA
..,
Mole•

V.olt•--------

400

A,,,pa _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

30.60'

--------·-- ------

0

0.

-

Type~-------~~...-------.......

(\J

0

Moto, H.P. _ _ _ _ _ __,__
. .$peed _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

~

2 0 86 .
ater Commission

Serlol Number _ _..;..__ _ __

00

Date Installed _ _ _ _ _ __

SCALE
Vertlcol _ _
J"'_=_I_O_o_' ____

I''=
Horlaontol _ _
_~o''
c..
_ _ _ __

Z'1 11 3£ .oo' Q 250'' 5tee.l
16" 3'f 0. '10' o. 28 t'' 5 tee.I
- / v.
rt ec.I
16 ,, 30.60' o.~c...v0 1'1 'ua
~

· Sc.teen

16"' 1'11.00' 3S /b$f
I I

G-o.f v. 5ttt-J Jo~n.son
WW H:- Gy.; Sfot'=al~

 ....,...._"'$

,••-•=--""------- -·----

IIIClllwt.MIII
. 4. . U!a.
. MSI..J,l l!IIMQ!llt. . .,...••o"'
t ~•••..

•. ; ·.· :':

I

mu LLERS •
WELL No.
,1013 NO.

'l

LOG

. .;.;.t . :·

So£
/qok

,.)t

t!Ji/1

LOCATION ,~Jl'{t'q~

C

c}o -

I

..·,·, ... .
.•

'

.

"'

I
i

\
\

- . ~,:

,,:J. p

~- .3 If

I

.. . . .,-,:

/

.•

L). ~
.,

--

I

fl)

>or
a,

"'

:D
S! · m

~

N

~
. . a,

n
0
3
3
l,; .
VI

o·

::,

C,

~

.I

-. .. . .

0
rn

-

<
m

0

·( .·

..
.

..
•' ..

.. ,.

;_

,:

:a..

.....

.•.:::J

 .

~+;.. _.1:., -: -.:.:. . .......

.,

Move On

Started Finished De th Bit Size
I/

"Rat Hole

I

:iz.est

£3%''

Hole

Electric Log
1

Surface Bole

., .

·.c ompletion

_Move Off
_ _...__.....___--L--___,,__ -(_

(

OtJ'l'SIDE SERVICES
'

./c ementing:

Date._ _ _ _ _Company_ _ _ _ __
No. of Sacks_.......~__Mix....._____

Service Charge.~-----Mileage.~ - - - - - - - ~

Welding :

Date /

r

-8:-fs

Company

Surface Pipe 2 LJ
,
Liner Pipe

(

Screen

.,

/6 11

II

1)/ J

00;
00:

--""'6...6r..'-'___oo :_

>~

/,,.,,.S'

{.Q

4 J {)

ft.

ft.( .

_.I...
"' '-22-£ t. ·

GRAVEL
Yds. Ordered--------I

;Yds. Uaed - - - - - - - -

'

,Date Graveled

/ -

B - K:6

,. .

I

t

I

 ,r
. WATER SAMPLES

I

J2BILL 'STEM

'l'At'LY

-~

Sample Depth Interval Sp. Cond. Date
Rematk~-'-\
Bit Size R';~
_:.:.;N°::::...:...•--+---------+-----+---+--....i..
' - - go:.!in~t::..£!N~o:..•,+-=J:.::::o~i!!.n.::.t~L~e~n:.:11cr..:t:.:.h+T:.:o::..:t:.::a~l:...L::.e;;.;n_tq;1..;t.h,_R;;..;;e__m_
· a_r=k--:s

~

2J

---4----------1~----+---+-----~.,!.tn.i.:,Jt.:S~-+-..,,,25,..,_?,!_!;'D::.--_+------+------~-'-+:
----+---------+------+----4----·f'/Jki..14J.1.Ll4-·~+.:.t..~l•L~1.t-lil,~0=:....-~~·~~7~.._111L,ln~-+-""----·'\)~.~
---+-------+----.f---......---...!.' ',l;:.n:l.l ~....,{..L..,_,...+,112:a..-....L.!.-~._._q..,..(i--_+--'1...~,....
·<..a...2A,._._c,_~v:---_-r·,; IL C.~~
~ C,' ~ ~
C/ '!> •., IJ
~ t . . ~1,;r
.j nc~I ~3.~o
/.I 7,2...()
:~\
!
---r--------4-----4---~-_;'-'l'-l:V__:3...;;.-i__,.s;,_,i>..,__..;;..3_.~_o_ _-+-1~-•_._c1-_o_~~~i_,.,.___ ___.. { I

----t--------+----~---1----' · ·. .JJ.
r
.;,,

., .

~- ·

-.:I~·
••/

J

S' · IO
;}'3, . .f6"' :.

,;A.

tP-1, ·~o

(

-I !i' , 5'"0

JI, 'f ,'-IS
/ t/~, .bS

~

~

\
t::'u1o:t · ~".-,.

<V/

l1

 .·r-

!.J

s

12. ' '

(!;,"

~

DRILL STEM TA~LY
I

Bit; Size

Joint Lenqth

·;. o .

3 ff),

<!'JO

Total Lenath
'1
J:J ()

tJ'

Remarks I'
/1

Bit' Size ~3 6

!

i,.~

Joint Lenath

(Joint No.

LJ .~ ~

' R d.S

/£t:. LI~
, I· f>,., i'4.

I

,.I

..,,;_

2

r,l f},/J
_. . -:!1,
.~·--

I

...~

I

.
-

I":,

J"J

..10

t

.10 . '25-

~1 ri~ 5"<..'
3 3 5 . Bo
3bS · qs-(J_~

S'

. -~~

nt"J

f'> 0

...1 !> • I

1"

'R 0

.fl..

°J. l"'J,

~, {'\

·1,.

I •

/ )I

·.¥

LJ t)

--1S
.3 "· I? t"J
.·~__11t__ ,.:-_1fl, ~r.
t

.

I

rt f V ',,'. 2§"

; L/ 6\ L(,

,.,u
,..: I I

t:' ,, I

I ..,

~

--

·r-I
·~

1\,.

I

\~
~

",

\o y

.

i

... ,
.~· J

i)

,

'

----

I

I

U

I

,.

't ~
. ",..,-.

.

~

-

.\...

-

~-

, s'

$.,'72. , 'I (

~----·,,r---·· ,,.. ·····-···-·-··. ·--- - ··- "· - ·-- ·. ··- ------- ----- -

r

<"1

......

liLo~'-1Ll

~

;·

,,, • .c .- - ·· ·

,

o

I 't,

-

1 -rti.l •

3D . I S

I

I •

~

(

.'i'

• go~

;

·--

J~L:

i 7.c:;

I'

·:I

/~ft,• D~

J~. at)

r-~d1~

~;

80
,a· 6 o

/p ,

)•

;

'IS.:;~

.,14 "S. 55'

i

. . \1..

~o ,35

.3".

'

Remarks

0

ge), 80

-

·"r

> •

1~. 2rl
;

I

~

i.,4,qo

o,

•
t

. ? If, 9

0

.f.
~

/re"' _., t!'f

. 2S
~ It-+ • 1S

)

. ~ ;,

_'":T .

JO •

'

.

\ ~ ,'.

<

. ,., ~- e, ~,
I

11

T'otal Lencrth

3L.t . t..n

I ;

.

(,, II 1'

t,()i'(

DRILt STEM TAL1,Y

l
I

Joint No.

1e./l'I

C /I' - ...

7 (I

I.'

7'0 ,,,,

1 J, • S

1'

-

- ·---·- - - ·- ---..,- ------·
I.
I
---/11

 .. .
~

';

---:--'--'-'"\···

--- - - ..

.

..
' j

i

.... . . --

c.,ri

)t~\

.

"l

I

! .
'I ,

f-.Jo13 "

I:

DRILL STEM TALLY

Bit Size-~---

l ~~o

'<~

I.

Tota 1 Len th ·

I

(
; I
, I
t

I

Remarks

·i
...- .. -···---· ·--· - ---·---f--,------+-- --------'~-........_~..-......__--t___._..._..,_,
_ _ _ __ ·---· - ·-·--------- --·· ----- 1 - --~ --·• .Jh~_::,._' _._I..___._.."-------I
- ----- ---·------

- . ·- -

-

I

-----,

I!
, I

l;

I\

, I

l·

I

---------------- ------

·~ -~~-+~~-~~--t--~-.-..;~----'-4~---...__...__~.._-.Q]~3-P~--+------. -----+-----+---------i
Ts3,
_
_
____
_5}
_
__
']_~.L -LS.-- ___ 3.t>.1.J.r2_ · - - -- - ----------

s.s___.., _____

J.Q.uW
LL __ _3.rL..J.O

- - - - --- -,------i·-------'--- - - -- -·
_
· .-1'2..L.i.o_
- -- ·- ---- ·----·-·- ------·----------- - -- .--L___ _Ll___ ....JQ• _ ,.,

___

·- ~ - .

·- ---··.

,.r.. · 0,

I

-

.

---- --·- · -

- -

- -- - - -

-

-- -

-

L-.

rt:L5:, Io
, .. -

fl., SO ··-- - - - - -----

'i:':B~ S.D- --

C. jj

.

--· ·-··--- - ---•

13..i' 9 ____ _ _
·6P------,- .~ ~

, ,.,

;!J.)~O

-.--.---

.

.

I

--- -.. - . ~-- .. ~·. ···· -· - -·- -..-·-- -···----t'--"-., ...._ . ____
- - --

~.ui.n,______

~~s
7---- --c-· - - · ·----··. -··--- -- - -

·-- --- ·-J.
'

2 CJ_

_/.!l_

- - --·-.+ ---- ....&

.'

.

..____t_:Q_ __

.......,._~......-- -- - ·- -----l - -- ---·- -- - ---,,..

I!

. g_ ______

7

.. ··- -·- ·------ - -- ·

..._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 1.. _ _ __

I

••
::)--- .
...._
.

j

!

I

r

I

i. I

·(

~:
\.r-i ~.:.•
~

' ..:
~
--------;:s- .:

•

I

'

,.

Bit Si ze___
l 2-........S.. :• :(3,

1

~J!::.o.!;..:
i n~t~N:.::O:.:.·....,._;J::.,;o::::.;1.::.:
· n.:.:t:....:L:.;::e.;.;.n;;i.t;:;.;h~...::T~o-t.;;;.a.::.1...:L.e;.;;.n.;.i..;;t...
h-t-R
...e__m...,a....r __
kti0 int No.
I

~

0

DRILL STE.M .Tl\LI,Y

•

•

.
---····--.. ·---··
;

--·- ·---···

·--

-------- - :

- -- -. -- -

'( ~.-----+---~--+ -~~- ·I

.
i
'

. --·- .

.' ~1-,;,:-~-------J

l~~--:--~i:Le--·t J-

 .

..
. '

;

J

..

: !

:

•

I I

Joint Lenath

Joint No.

.
.
, . I! . - -·.
I:

.

I

l .

Remarks Joint· No.

.

I

l
t

-

!

I

I

!I
\

·- --------

- ~ -·r---·· --·

- ·- ---· ·- ······- ·
'

'

I \i

-

·--··
~

..

- ······------·

-

i

,

-

--

--- ------ -·- - - - ·-

____ ,_. _____
-----

•

I

I

I

•

"{o,

to

I

J.

' 1,/)

aO

lt'1 .'.l.D

,,

I

'

'!,
-,I

-

--

___ ------

- ---- ·---- ---- . . ...
i ! -------- ... -----·- ·I~
I-' I :
. ! ! ------ -·- . . --. -:---~

t:ll . llt,

.
-

'
?t)

\t

r:. ()

?lj

.

'

·- - ~

------ ·-

i

r,,.,..; . 1 r;

?./'J . Ni1

~f)""

'I

Jl

I

·- ·· ·---

'-12?.l'JI'\

IC

------

-·

-~-,

I
'

S?.

'----+

~~

:

-

- ,
k~
r'

!cj

j

{-

;l. iL1!I
,,,

;

-

,..
'f

:

xn

ttii. ".2.o
~,, · 7a.

-

\_ -

,,

·- '

'

l
•.

i
'

S'-1'7-?o

t; ·1 g.~o

16,{/. .

I

---·

--

~

_J
I

--··- ~ -

..

-

- .
~l-I
:

~

'

i.--.-

l

"·' ~

--·

-

,.,'.

•.

/

I

- --·--·--+----.

'-/ ()

~

,D.t..,0

. ------·;

--

1."U) Jl"J

1-

.....................

-

·'

,

LL

J Cf

'

io

-:, J·. (•• )•'
..
'
·1,"J
·-: /.(. I

3C,~ .Ctn

ILi

(

L/L t; 0
'.)7l.('o
111l .t:. ()

uo

-LL 7a_.So

~
....

~

I

lu

1..ll /'J1'

'

i~

~."J D

to

,,,

;

j

i'~:> . ~ o
-~ D . O 0
·'. D .

'
~~
Remarks ~

21. ?o

i" r.i

- ________ .:t_ :£'. I l.

--·

Ii

?,~

"6

-..i.... -.,..........:...
.. ~ ..,,- -- ------·

..

"

~~.

.

- - -··

-----t,.·,.I·,:·

t:

~

- - --, '
·---·----·- -·-._

-------- -- -- -

· ··· --- ·

'1

.: /

:

-.

')~

Lin.lo
J. I.. I')~

•'.\

·-··--- - --;

!. i I
.. ( . .
I :

:

---

.~
.
}

l,..,

·11 }

~

I;.., ':t

Total Lenath

14

l. ti I

~ J)

---. -- ------

I :.

=.

I,

'I

--·· ··- - ·- ·- ··- -

Joint Lencrth
5'.(D

J?o!Ct

I

------"____
-~.. ---

~

..

l. ;
I

Si1-

:

:

I

I

Bit Size ') '"$,,.

'·

Total t,enqth

~ i:.{

DRILL STEM TALLY

:·

DRILL STEM T1\LT.,Y
Bit Size

• !
C

~

'
I

I

:

..

•

I

--·

I

 . .,
DRILL STEM TALLY
FORMATION LOG

Dit Size~~~
:

Joint Lenqth

Joint No.

Thickness

\~

,,,,

5
5

.t ,

10

J

'1

2

I

1

., ?

ID

1/
\

L

(

To

1,...,,

!

'I

I:. ,,

Total Lenath · Remerks rom

'I

'

.!

----- ·----,.....__- - ·---·- ·-·- --·-----__._
------~,__ __
-

:1 -·!I -Ii
I '.
- ·------ ... _.' I

Ii

I - -----

\.

I

-

\

'J-·

- -·

.

}

~
.....

·(

'?

B3
'I I
q5

o(

-

?,?

,e.1

I

I

I

'
- - - ~.c;.;....u.,~
..-.:

-=--··· ··

·.

----- ·- ·

- - -·-

.

-~ ...-...;...... __..

·-

,-

..... ......

., I .'\

7

.'? J \

I
8

~? 2. I

8

.'?n S'

7 I ,. i' ~, Sl'
'

··- ·- - - ....

-

I

'?

') £. I.I

4<'

- --

,_

...

--··-·----- ·- -·--·
.

--=---1 " 9"' .i ., "'

I

L- ·· -·- --'?-i 14 .'l. ~ '
I
11.:iq
'tt ;

I

I

I

- -- _iJ~q
IrJ , ., ,

I l

1-

t.J.31
"3'1

l/~Q .!Pl-£

~r

V

J..f

27

26
I 'I
3/,
2

/4 £) __

i Q_

,.

u

"

I

~

s~

-,., , - ...,
.•

--

~~

Jtil./ . .
....,_
7

,

-

S'~,<

s~

/0

16
3/

'

'-1

~

I 2.
73

I

9. j

R

I 5'1

,;..,~

LI
/

z.

<:61

r
!"'~/,;,.Li

\,._

20

~()/0

, ___

'3Z

/tJ-'5
~lo

li»b
:

!~5

I

'J S
-· '!>1

t~

I

s,

,qI
-q ,..
. ' ~

I
\

'

s-z...

r~

-·-,,

~

··- - ~--·. ·- -

s'I-

'i 4./

0

1

., '

I'-. -·

___._

<;"

Formation Material

~

~

V

~o-(__

S'o,(t-- ~ ..1

s--..t u
~

Sc#

. - ;(
>-'

r."-.
v

(

-

-

.2/J

.,,,,..4
JJ' '/}

.,...

,

,;

(j.

__p_. ,d -

,,
p -- _/
,.:,,# '"- ,../ ·'- - p .'
0 ti

/~--5'"1d'

8

-:;;7,. .•

'

(Y~.-J

5.,.1/ ,/
-,

I

 I

•

r,

I'.
!

.From

Ii·
:. I

'

:i/1, ~

<//,, '?,

</7€"

'f'l/i
'I~../.

'-16./
<1-n1
4t//

.-

I. .

: i·
''

·- c/97
..

:!

ll

Ii .
11:· '

vC/1

.'-i-?!J

Z..7

~·?I)

t_-~ ...-

ZS

<-'i~

b3/

3/,

., '

. h31

·(

JI'. -

t

h31
t,t,o
1

/,t,O

/;u,

~r,?

11B

770

7Cf/,

7qtt:,

77(:,

23
7
J

II

IB

•

~I'.

(!/,. ~~

\

5-.lr ) ~

"";~

,/

-

I

'Ll~

·- .

~

1/,Je/ ~,-ol
d~,,

~

p

I
/'£. / ~-

-

l~

0--

p

~

J .

m~~~

5,,,.... ;{'

-

;

~~,

j

£"--..'t.

•I

~

-

5~

I'

(

I

'-

I

I'/.>-',1,,- r

?7b

Formation Material

I

,'/,J~I ~.,l

25"

~'sLl3

..-

l (J.lt.,(

e

5«/.3

Thickness

To

I

&~~~"~

1
~

..J

'V

£,-. J_

q

,lq~

' J:,}.

Formation Materiatom

12.

5:>./.

,,

l)l
l.

4q3
,"5 J A

,~

. .

r

Thickness

SIS

. 4'13

r·. ..• "~,
1:

To

'l'IS"

!

I ,
''
i I

C

FORMATION LOG

FORMATION LOG

:
I

i

I
1

.

.

{

I

-

I

.

-

.-- I

I

 --·- --·

- - ··- ... -

--··

.

. .

I

I

.f

\

..

'

•

I

SUR.FACE PIPE;

FORMATION LOG

From ·

To

Thickness

OD

Wall

..

Formation Material

Joint No.
I

. I,
·'

\ I'"\

,o
~

~
~

-;:r-

"

Total Lenath

,? ~ 7/'J

"'
5'

4,1 .,, ~ :~

(.

'-10. 3 0

?~ .::? ~

79, Cf(')
JJq,2/"J

n

J .t,q. h-f)

LJ

Remarks

/'J . '; /'.J

?
.?

0 . . '? t) I"'
' ·re'

~;· "'n

~.,.,-

0

-

J t)

"?

~c;. t./0 .2 ~.. ;,.,-},

R'

7. '-'to 1..1 ~?.• ·4110
J ..........- .. - . . ..
.~?.
~

,

~

Lenath

.

/I

'2. ~1. .

c,;,~

. I.J.

/0

"" ¥.~~.·~o
7f'J J 6·o. oo
~

I

i

I

..

'I
-i

r-

!
.

.

I,

-·

'I

_

11
I

.

~

•

,,

.

• . ·1

. I

.

"'=

,] :tlL-LI--t--t-__;,_;.·1 - - -.•
~

l
I
;

I

I'

•

 ..

.

.I

. ~. i
•

\

•

..

I

.

•

j·

SURFACE;

I .:
. ·! !

:

',

Wall

Tntal tenath

Lenath

Joint No.

.

OD

· Joint No.

.

I

.

I

I

; j i

Lenath

I

~

•

·'"·

7

.

.!

..

J

.

,. r •·.,-

~·-

-

.

...
..
..

-

.

-

.

.

\

•.~r

,, /") . ri ,,

fr

,t?

~() .. I '71

I)

C)

C)

?,·1~

~o

t.

n

?<'1

?a
6·-o

y

l) '

,')

,~

J

J

I ... ,
/

~-,

;>

L, (")

2

~C)

} ,..

(

1",Q

~
I":," / • ..,. .., ; r I

/ ) /.

11

'I . 6 D ~.? I I --~D
-;, q q n 311?. ?O

\

... 39, . 1' o

(

~.-· ?

3~.

)

S"c? - ,.,~ I . ~-0
!) v •/ ~ '}

."{'); yl)

I;,

~o

1.21: g-111.

•?

r)

~tJ?.

(') (')

~!>f I

vn

~- ?o. I'}

I

u.

I
I

·,,t

J

.

.

I

!

'
..

I

•

I

\

I
i

-

. .. /,·

(

~

t-

.

J~

?<.

It,.

.. .,,. ,.,

r·

At')

-?riJ •

"7 J?". YO

~

I' C;

./

,)

<:: c::

?

,

.

,..,

?

I/

'

.s -~

J ()

"-a 'It\/,

I ,,

.

c:>n

.,...

/<./.,,.,,. I~

("';)

? l'J.

./

;..J

,.,

6

~

..

? /')

t,,/4J .

,,, I'!, • I

G;
~

~

\.~C...,_ •

~ /'l • I) I")

..

.

JI

Remarks

.

' /'1

~
·,

.,

.,,..., ro

<,--

...

/)

., ~

4/

,, I

Total Lenath

?"', l':J6

7

,I.
,

OD 16
Wall

SURFACE PIPE l

I

Remarks

· 1·' .'

'

.

.

i
!
I
I

..

•

 ,.-- ---·-

-

SCREEl',l_;

I

I

..srs--o -5:H)
Remarks

I

5').o · -

41:o·

400· -

0

-rorA

/f/

L

I

I

{) - "!(io

..
I

·· ---... -- ·-

-

~

'

~

.

~

I

I

I

-

___ _ ...:.___~1·f-----~!-----i-1
-----+-1--i
·-j
---- - __, ___
_ __ - ~

-· -··- ·-··-

___.__
•

e,d"'* ;

Po, /J/ I .Joi

3t!>'

5tt~t,1; /)O 't>/ 6.J~111f
847~k.j 40?'
1

5wr

- ·- -------

--

'
, Sc,e,,,,, i
..570-sso
f

j Length Total Length

.

-·· - - . ····- - - ··- - ----~

. .

-r D

OD

Wall
Slot
Joint No.

..

..570 ·

bet? 8J!.t {,;J. 4- ") C

B/c711 /c: ;

"260
~.

1

 hWATER ANALYSIS REPORT ~

•

~v._~---,-.-----

DATE SAMPLE COLLECTW

Well Number _ _ __

DAT• Rac•uvEO AT LABORATORY

Lab. Number_.i..C.:.!O..::::::~~AA:..c...{,~.:.J'/'--__;~~---

location _______________

DATE ANALVSIS CO ... PLETl!:D

MILLIOflAMI '811 LITEII

Owner

TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS

TOTAL ALKAUNfTY AS

TOTAL HARDNESS AS
CHLORIDU AS

Ca COa

Ca CO

M~SUREO DILUTED 1£.C.
CALCULATED DILUTED E.C.

SU\.PATU AS SO•

'II, ERROR

F

./>

as NOa

TOTAL PHOSPHATES AS

l\,tg/1

CARBONATES •

MAGNDIUM

PO•

as Mg

SuL.FATC as

FLUOAIOl!:S

as K

u

as ·c,

CHLORIDES

as N1

FoTASSIUM

C03

!IICARNONATU
HCO

CAl.CIUM "I ('.a

SOOIUM

/. /

ANION · CATION BALANCE
ANIONS

NITRATE

A.auk.

£.. ~e:A
COAAECTNES7i>F~LYSIS

CHECKING

Cl

F&.UORIOES AS

R

Sample Taker
Delivered By

~PHENOL A&.KALINlTV AS C. CO

~

so,

as

N1TRAT£S as

F

NO,
PO,

Pl-tosPHATES Bl

•

CHLOAINI!: RESIDUAL (Mg/I)

TUR8101TY (N.T.U.)

CATIONS

pH

.

CALCIUM IS

Cl

MA~NESIUM

as

LAS ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY at pml'IOS/t:rn

•

•c

SoOIUM a5

-------------~-~~~

1"11£~ ELECTRICAL CONOUCTIVITV at JJmftOI/Cffl

PoTASSIUM

l.ANGELll!:R INOl!:X

AQGADSIVITV INOE:><

JUN 2 -0 86
I\

'

,-ORM 4171-4US
;

.

Na

as K

.j
i

- I
.!

iI
. !

,Ii ~ Of' TOTAL CATIONS

•

Mg

, ic ,

Commission

 GW 1

•

TEl[AS

WAYE&

DEV&LOPll&NT

IOA& D

1'1ald lo.

A.,Ua - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

0 - 1 1 Veil lo. ____

k_ ___ _

s.c._____ , na______ __ ~ - ________________________ .

l.

i..ns.,_ ___114._ ___l./11

2.

-+--- - --;;-?~.fl_ /)JdA. /k.c. _e7.u-~ -------- _/!fntiff~ - - - - - - - - - - - - '--+I
I
.f.cktrau ,_____ -'1,'-~.!"_____ ________ __
______ -:!:_____ __ ____ ___ ____ __ .f.dareea,-------------------------

Drillar,_ - _____ :Ac..,_~~.J~'\..,:d._ - _ - __ - _ .&do!ru11__ - - _____ J. ~ 1 a ~ ____ - - - - _____

i?~P- __1 a _ ~ ~ _ .n..

~·------;;i,7r:- ____19_ 7[_1

s. !!!I!:!!•
6.

I

I

I

I

I

I

o...r,____ -~#.f'.h~-6_'!1!..~-'<-- _ _____

f-'•

Ii.

I

I

OJIID laa, Sv•11b\ Vall, lhldN'I . . . . .

1• .15, xtar,_ ___
lo,

abcnw ..i, c1e\era1Aed

1'7_ ~ . 1 - ________ _

1--~ciii~i;::.::::,."'-~:::;ii;;;?=:.:;-=::::::;r.iin::=:=i~tt.:.:._....j

0r.....1 PIICbd ____________ _

-~~'f,:-,1'_ _____ tn-_ -~"'-~~t.J'6 ___

S\elff__ __ _, Jolil• Dia.___ _ 1a., S.t.t.1.11(_ _

c . i - OS-.__

?£_ _1a.,

1-tJI

--+-'--+I
I

Cable T o o l ~ _________ _

_'"l"1:ff?>__n. ,....._ - - - - - - _n..

a.,t._ -

Caplet,S.1

Dae,

_ - - - - - _ - - - - - -- -

~t'.£1\,

TaUpip._________

0

_-~ _ _';J_4./__

0

n. .

2
J::;/Rr.rl~__w.. • xodel______________ HP. _ s;:__

e. ".wr•

hal_ _

,. n.u,

n.__ ___.... ......

_~J__a-. ......

10, P w t - feA•

b]>t., ht._____________ _

o.t._ ______ _1-ltb of Tut_____ II- b7 _ ____ _____ _

1~1.a i..-i_ ___ I\.

1'\1111111& Leftl__ __ n. .

frodlae1.1al_ ______ _ a:a

nr-i-_ ____ f'\.

Spec1.t1a Cepec1t.1_______ p/tt. ,

• 1). Ou=/!!::D:::d =1a~7p71,_~~~~=======

=
=

.t/7.Jf1. _ I \ ~ - _L'l-:/P_19_~-:-:!i":- ___________________ __ _____ ~ 1a_____ n.
art- .
_______ :;.l~n
.- ___ :Z _19_7.1~:- __________________________ eJ.ch ,.._____ I\. :f: aa.rtaca .

U. Vnar Le'ftl, _

___________ n..

::!:- ____ __19__ - ~ : - __________________________

,m1cb

11_____

tt.,

....-tau.

"· ~~-f;J~;,:;_-B.;,~~-~~~;:$~~~:.:~:.:a~-;:.-~.r::.~~~w.:;$A'i~aJ
f~

====- --- --------- --- -------- --- -

,_.,,___ ., , Dat.e 1.,.iled tor malTn,e_ ________l.abora't""J'___________

~-.cr-=S::.01->:.::;;:..:0PIDi:::~';;;•;;:====-q==-=""r'=fi"i:,r::==.---~

,...,.___ •r,

1---""=-'---+-------+---==:..__,.-...:.:•:......-l

:U.. ou.r

Dllt.a --.,led f o r ~ - __ ______l.abora't.<»7___________

dl\e affiJ.eba u

clrcl.ed•

E ·•9

Aadioact11ru:, l.a&, tlenri.c i.oe,

P~S11'1'lH, ...,.T~,-~---- ---------------------lS,

.,.,Cll'd t,z, - - - _ A,,l_~J¥-fffli.'! k_ - - - - - - _.Det.e_ - .1!?=7 - - - 19_'1'3

_,g___ :/._~

--~~Q- _'f."f. t;.,_

..r-·---~-6.r.rJUg __.!?-~'! Jf:'.r..,+_~ -- - - - - - 16. ~
·- - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - __ "'B-'-", l~_ ~~-\:~ __ _r _ &8 ::h: ~~ \.t- 1 _pJ""" _____ _
-- _1($,J._~.TQ,~ - ~-1- -~.A-!.~t'~)-~'t-~;r.c.s- .> _ - - - - s-

- ·..--..:-~ - /lfr- _1": ____ -..;.,,;

--~

£.v.-7 ,-

----"....L_'f!.rf.11!,~ ~ ~~

:;.,- ------- -----------------------------

--------------------------------------------- ------------------------------

•-·-----------------------------------------------------1'WDBE-GW-49

 n

•

Sew .. lliM I <en ...

urtlll•il - u to tlw
1 .... 11.c.er 0...1.,...., 6oar4
P . O . . . . 12)11 6

Watte ,

t•_,

117U

i..uu '7 •ll•cc '- . _
~

J

•llowl_
.,.

,loo ' .:f"4vil

~, . . 1..-1 lec•U• .,.,. tllat-... _, •uecti.aM tna
.,,J~t
..,,.7 lta.,,..

1...-..b . . . . . . . er-...

..... r.•t.•.•
/>f , I c
F/1$ 1" t:JV /I)'

~r

h/

••cc,.........

/{fO

'--------------

@t1•f,:J.cc1C< ,td

j
))ffN

or wau.

,.., h1 l

•>- c on <~

(~e• >:

s-,-

0..,.•• Laa:

>,

-'.I

:t

....

tlll• lct ,•1

....

- - - - er, ...

THt Ve ll

tnt aet l'"'

,Ul . . ._..r..,..t•

,

S) n " o, WU (0....> ,

O...ettc.;,,,,-- t ~ t r t a l

Ph,gb.1

....... ---------

,._. :;i ..JY. ~ ·--·------

/ '60

O
ff"Cle

It .

a..,• el

• -•••••

_..,t>-.
___._.,(,_.___ h

- u ___,.._
__~_o
__.rt.

lleu 4r ll h4

• ....-. , ...... t r.·a l •

•
J ) CQlPU'Tt a.'

O,.o Sol •

....

Ti a l• ·

Uffl. ·

lta&lc l ne \ ~ t t . ~1 . . l a.:1111 ... rt•u

.,-, . . 1 . .

, r.,...,r.___ t••· ,,.r .....,..

O.t·•·- -- - --

a.at ht

·-

..,Z V

,,. "1t2'_ _ _ _ rt. ,,......,. •her _ _1'r, .
, . . t______J:Pa vttll _ _ _ _ tt.•,..,._ dter _ _ ll n .

-

1..r, ... 1.
n ..
Oat•- ----..,_h . cyh twle r, Jet . etc. ·-~/t~J2._f,____ lt · 1-_ _:T-=:"'::"':.:..:.:•:_:•.:.'_:"::•:::<-:•:_:==================

c..,r•

«.• ,....

wi..

1..., ~-,·• - · ·

j.tl,

Il l ,u.n;a QUAl.l'l'I ,
w.. a c~cal .....irate Mile !

TJ'1HI •f ..ier ?_ __ _ _ _ __

. . . .l:l"IC t t . . . -

...

..,t'II

of urMo._ _ _ _ _ __

., . . . . . . . . . . . . .

'"' . -.,. , ~ - - - - - - - -..- - - - - - -- - · -- - - -- - ..· - -· - - - • . _ _. -• •- • '""-- ' , - _ ~ _, . .. _ ..... .,,.. - , ••T • -

- ..

- .. ..

··.:

-··.. • .. .. ~-,- . :

.. ,,.

--,----------------------------------------------------------

 ,,...,
,~

. . . . . . . . . _ , OI'

f'rtM .........

_____________

-~
"°'palla.
- ...,,
.....,.""''
INlft

1.-h

Do

QfllllCAI. WATIII ANALVIII IIIJIORT
lilnd...-,tlD!

Clround Water o.t, end Ptotee1i0n Division
1:.X. w... 0.Vllopment Boent
f 1.0 . IOlll 130l7

,.

l~n.T-78711

CHEMICAL NIAL VIII

llboralOt'Y No.

Date R. .Md

Alli 19.1971 \

_.tUl 2 i l9t6

MEIL

Date Reported------

. _.,_

0

C..... ·

58
.............

Cilcluffl .

........ .

MEIL

MG/L

....iuffl •

NI~ •

. Cl PGb1111um

"" . .

a ......... .

c,eoron . .

J,

~ . . . . 4all'lllnMG/LI •

,ICI Toal!,_ •

.,.

ti lolMrl - - - - - - MOIL

-11,1,1~,1
'J...__.x+f-'l:~0:;.....__

.ICM!utld c..-.e1a1w Cllllcrom,'Mlllcmll _ _ _

"(]• . . . . . .~

lf diedim.

'~to

Total H.,.._ • C aCOJ

A--,. - N .

_9._8 $_

a,~Cyde

Nltrtlit • N •

Nin. · N

TWDN-WD-1 U19!J. 2 ·17-'NII

• · •

,,,.
__...

..

 r.,.-,.. ,.~ ,.__, ~,........,, ,,,..-.

.

f••h .,.flCII ., 1111..ai
o._,
.............. _ '

.JL-

:{' II

TWDBE-GW ONLY.

'f 'f- / ' ( - ~

Pn,gn,n

,

' °·

"1Jj. No.

(~t;;o.,t - ~

7 (, "'I I -

CHEMICAL WATER ANALYSIS REPORT

,..,,.....to:
( iround w,ter D1u •nd Proteetlon Dwilion
ltH1 W11er Development BCNlld

P'.O. Box·13087
lwstin. Tu• 78111

/ -U-

a.outtoa

,_,

5..,,. ,..,.. .. ....,, S\..c.Gn,e;R.rlR?t.€
ciw ~

-

01p1t1

...:..·· . . --·
. . .
~

ClldUM •

•

-----------GPM P
..

CHEMICAL ANALVSIS

Date Received : !
. MEIL

MG/l

..

. .
. ..

l •

I
Toual

'·

..

..

()

-.,

I • 5 3.
7•I

--

.. .
I
.

- .... - ..

-- .....

---

a..c..oon.te ..,.ol'ted

t . lfl'IY"'iJ l'V OA9171 to -

.

.

.

1::z.,o .

,.. 11\i9 .-lyaie ie ~ . . . - . . IIIY ~ ,....,.
e.Qwt- letlt ..... of ca,Mtl.... .... .._

~,,...._,. II~•• " ..... ,,. ,,.. comp.,telior, of th•• a-,.
;If Nm°""' " YCI• , _,,.. _

...,.........

:~'Toul lroft•-'"'-....---.-,

•

.

Tow...,....c~ ·

.

Totet Alll..iftity .. C .COJ

·--'
...

-..,J

7
0

r1 17

I 1l3

. i,"""""" Cyde
•

0

·--l Y. 0

"°" •

'f xJ 'fO

--

·--

• • • •

14 flW!IIOftle • H •

.

I • '! rt

J, e>.ato rad lotidl CIUffl In MG/L) •

. . ·I llh lild
Tw

.

"4 . •

.

CJ fothe,J ·- - - - - - - MG/L

•

CNortde

Nitn19.
.

MEIL

MG'l

·~
....... .

Jc.

. c, .......,,. .
t) ...~. . . . . .

D,te Repomd - - - - - -

' .- J : J

. .. ____ __ . : • .

58

. .

··--- - · ··~··· -~··· ·

~J Tout

';Ct.

Atm19.i9i6

· · · ·. ~ ·

C....... ,

.• .

M....-um .. •

[)~

ft.

I

.'1 •'\). 11••,('
't
' _ _,

llbor•torf No.

"· we,--'-'..;..;:;~=;._...-.;;;;;.;..;;;;:;

. . ._. UT>-l

.

···:

•-

-

-

¥:Y:0

•

'""'

Nitrite - N •
N it r • • N .

C~i/
'i9- l'I-SJ}

....

-·-• --• -._....

-------------.J••••t••._.-------------------

1·111wo::11~t\:-1111~0~-'~'":-::;-,.?,~-1~,-~,e!l>~......
_cqs

 tlltAI

VATI&

DlVILor•1,r

ao1.1.,

1.

2.

___ l/\ ...

~l __ £.s_t _______ _
I

si,u._ _______ ..__

I

-+-I

O..r•~-11. u.JJ..«ut __.fA'CJl.;:l.._.,._~ _- - - ·-··- - n-,.~:r- ---------- ---- --ey~w.0--A - _J..~J.Av:J_ --- - ___ '4dreN•_ -

· ...__ !/3.1).. __t\.

s. ~

,o1.:~P_,

et __ - - - - - ______ _

_a_

Dl'Ul ...,_ - - - - - - - - - - - -

_1.a_

JJ,J.... _ n . . - .

~

-·- - - - - - -

,. c,itH~ o,. 1.i.., Sveitlll v&U,

_n..

_______________ - - - - - __ _

1, ~ "1__ fo,,_~

~

..i. lvJ,.r.,;.c,._ ___ _11aa • 11oo1a1______________ » ._,S__ _

fMl_

Ts.14•

Pl•___ __. ., , ______ - - · lie•,, lqa,, ht. ,_ - - - _____ _ _ __ _

10.

t,rr.,,... ,_, ~ - ~ - - ~ otr..i_____ . _ " " - - - - - - - - - - s.-1_ ___f\..

11. Vat.r

i....i,

J.(Jft.J __ n.

___ - _______ n.
- - - - - - - - - - -

n.

I

•

__,__ -~~~-- __ .()_ __t3~-

ra.UFs,._________ n .

e• .!!!!!rt

,,,.._ i.n..i___ _ n..

~ l a - ______ - •

I

,.....,. _.,~----~-- ___________ _

,.

suua

I

'--+-- -+-I
I

_______ _
'
,-------,~,_-r,ri,ir,-...------......

. . ----------

~ 111,._e'tll.Ji.t.Jt_€_~-'-l(. ___ tn>e_~l.~err.s~1J-..._
••· •1ae1•_____, a-ta Dia.____,...., s.c.u~ _'f tJ _o_ _t\.
c ~ Ota._______ _ i.a.,

•

c-,1__

..-, ~A."-->-;ill01 _ _HarLJ:u.n. _...._,,___ - _____ -- _____ - ___ --- __

). u-u..

1.

'fl,_ J____ ___

. ____. f..,t l!,/:3~ '(or•JL• 611__, .s~ __,, _bt.4•__,r__, 6'5__., . -,I
____ C4.~/~+ul__.)Jala.·1-.ilNn,_J..~1t--~---..P.1a.ot~IUS....----------------- '--+-I
i-.11.a,____l/\,._

'llrS.Uer-,__

...

' • lkll k. __

_tf.:.. !(:Al~ __ _

auw v.u ••·-

ri.1• 1o._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

~

a,-1r10

----- -------- -----

------

- - - ____ n..

c,,...u7_______ a,11/n.

J,11.-.._
...n.,
=:-______ -=-__________________________
:::-Lt..::-_! _1,:,~- _ w.;.t'~- _.n,. _ &_

t~~c..:J-V.~-

1,__

•1•

~ _J._•J~n.

s.a_____ n .

-r-.,,t..- - - - - - - i ,- - -1oo1
..- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - llb1ch 111- - - - -

=-~
=

Arlee,.
llllrlece.

n . "bel•
· - are-.

12. ~~-~~:;~~-;,,;-~~~:~Er:~1~::~.-.::1:..~~:-u~.:.;:~::J::==~==j:~=~f:: [.
)J.

~

c-- -

t.eno, .......i...

t~·- ~ _ ., , ll-.. -.W

etc, , ) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

f • ~ i a - ________IAar•\OIT__

------~!- ~~:, '""'

~.r.._iy_4' ___ ,--------------------,

_i.e--.,....,_ - - -- - - -- - line~,_~---- - --- _!Abwe\a,__ - - - - - - - - -

, ....._ - - .,, %19\e ~ , .. ~ - - - - - - - -

t ____ .,.

u,.

lltM1' - .

.,..U•"1a • •1Nld' 11r111ar •,

, ...u. •-.ie•, "-IPl.ac ,_,_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
15 •

•

:i.... ~ 1 n t 1 :i.•, Uwtna :i. ...

_ __ (._

_,S j.._v_~•-'1 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _

.!:!!.!:1..llr1------------ ----- __ -- --- __

Dn._ - - - - _ - - _it__ _

'/ 'I •

I'/ - 5 I 2..

...
,-

---------------------------------------------------------·,.'{;-.,

  

 

APPENDIX 

ECOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT TIER 1 EXCLUSION CRITERIA
CHECKLIST

 

 

•

•

TIER 1: Exclusion Criteria Checklist
This exclusion criteria checkl i t is intended to aid the person and the TNRCC in detennining whether
or not further ecological evaJ uation is necessary at an affected property where a response action is
being pursued under the Texa Ri k Reduction Program (TRRP). Exclu ion crit eria refer to those
conditions at an affected property which preclude the need fo r a fonnal ecologicaJ ri sk assessment
(ERA) because there are incomplete or insignificant ecological exposure pathways due to the nature
of the affected property setting and/or the condit ion of the affected property media. This checklist
(and/or a Tier 2 or 3 ERA or the equivalent) must be completed by the per on for all affected property
subject to the TRRP. The per on should be famil iar with the affected property but need not be a
professional scientist in order to re pond, although some questions will likely require contacting a
wildlife management agen y (i .e. , Texa Parks and Wildlife Department or U.S . Fish and Wildlife
Service) . The checklist is des igned fo r genera l applicabilit y to all affected property ; however, there
may be unusual circum stances which require professiona l j udgement in order to determine the need
for further ecological evaJuation (e.g . . cave-dwelling receptors) . In the e ca es, the per on is strongly
encouraged to contact TNRCC before proceed ing.
Be ides some preliminary infonnation , the checkli t con ist s of th ree major parts, each of which must
be completed unless otherwise instructed. PART I requests affected property identification and
background information. PART II contains the actual exc lu sion criteria and supportive infonnation.
PART ill i a qualitative ummary tatement and a cert ification of the infonnation provided by the
person. Answer to both PARTS I and II should reflect existing conditions and should not
consider future remedial actions at the affected property, although it is understood that, at a
minimum , human health will always be protected . Completion of the checklist should lead to a
logical conclusion as to whether fu rther eva luation is warra nted. Definitions of terms used in the
checklist ha e been provided and use rs are trongly encouraged to fa miliarize them elves with these
definition s before beginning the checkli st.
Name of Facil ity:

Rubble Dump Spill Site - Near Site Monitor (SWMU 16)

Affected Property Location :

J J(X)() Monrana A venue
El Paso. Texas

Maili ng Addres :

Fr Bliss, D OE A 7ZC

Building 622
Ft . Bliss, Te.xas 79916

•

TNRCC Case Tracking #s:

Not applicable

Solid Waste Reg istration #s:

SWMU 16

Voluntary Cleanup Program#:

Not applicable

EPA I.D . #s:

Not applicable

:' 1Delm.:rt 1Fort 81i,s1E oRisk Checkh!a • Ruhh lc Dump doc

 PART I. Affected Property Identification and Background Information

•

L) Provide a description of the spec ific area of the response action and the nature of the release .
Include estimated acreage of the affected property and the facility property , and a description of the
type of facility and/o r operation associated with the affected property . Also describe the location of
the affected property with respect to the facility property boundaries and public roadways.

The Rubhle Dump Spill Site is located southt!ast uf Biggs Army Air Field just west of the Fort
Bliss 'ite Monitor (radar) facility. A location map 1s pro vided as FiK7tre 1. The site consists of an
approximate one-mile section along a north-south tre11di11g power line easement that originates off of
Mo11tana Road in El Paso, El Paso County, Texas. The site has been identified as the area extending
JOO-feet 011 either ide of the 011e-mile section of the poll'er l111e easement. The site is located on the
Fort Bliss Military Reservation, and was used as a11 111w11thon=ed dumpi11g area by 11nh10wn but
presumed local persons. Historically, access was 1101 co11trolled a11d this area of the Fort Bliss Military
Reservation was not f enced or gated 771e area was 11eva used as a du mp site by Fort Bliss, but could
easily be accessed by others.from Mo11tana Ruad to di.\pose of xe11eral re.fuse and construction debris so
as to avoid the di!>posal fees at the local landfill.
Response actions have been conducted at the site a11d include the following:
•

•

•
•
•
•
•

Repaired the existing earthen berm that exte11Js approx1mate~v J. 7 miles along Mo11ta11a Road
and the Site Monitor access road to make access to the area more difficult.
Installed a 4-strand barbwire fe nce alOJJK Montana N.oad and the Site Monitor access road to
control access to the area and prewlll fut ure dump111g
Excavated and disposed of approximately 6 clf hic yard,· (CY) (~( hydrocarbon impacted soil.
Removed and di posed of approximately I. 638 C'Y <~( 11011-hazardous cu11str11ctio11 debris.
Removed and dfaposed of approximately.four yard\· of AC'/1.1.
Collected verification soil samplesfrom the excamtwn areas and the site to document successful
restoration of the site.

Attach avaiJable USGS topographic maps and/or aerial or other affected property photographs to this
fonn to depict the affected property and surrounding area . Indicate attachments:

12:J Topo map

12:J Aerial

D Other

photo

2) Identify environmental media known or suspected to contain chemicals of concern (COCs) at the
present time. Check all that apply:

Known/Suspected COC Location

Based on ampLing data?

12:J Soil

12:J Yes

D
D
D

•

5 ft below ground surface
Soil > 5 ft below ground surface
Groundwater
Surface Water/Sediments
:$

0
0
0
0

0 Yes
0 Yes
D Yes

Explain (previously submitted infonnation may be referenced) :

H: !l.ll>d,ncn\f

Bli slEcoRisk Check list - Rubble Dump do,-

2

No
No
No
No

 •

Visibly impacted soils associated with the Rubble Du.mp Spill Site ha ve been excavated and
transponed off-site for disposal. Based on the analyrical results of venfication soil samples, no
constituents were detected above the critical Tier 1 PCLs for reside,uial land use .
3) Provide the infonnation below for the nearest urface water body wh1ch has become or has the
potential to become impacted from migrating COCs via surface water runoff, air deposition ,
groundwater seepage, etc. Excl ude wastewater treatm ent facilities and stonnwater
conveyances/impoundments authorized by pem1it. Al o exclude conveyances, decorative ponds ,
and those portions of process facilities which are :
a.
Not in contact with surface waters of the State or other surfa e waters whlch are
ultimately in contact with surface waters of the State; and
b.
Not consistently or routinely utilized as va luable habitat for natural communities
including birds, mammals , reptiles , etc.
The nearest surface water body is approximarely 1,500 fee t to the sourhwest of the property and is a
small pond. The wate r body is best described as a:

D freshwater stream :

D
D
t8J
D
D
D

•

perennial (has wate r all year)
_ _ _ intermittent (dries up completely for at least l week a year)
_ _ _ inte rmittent wi th perennial pools
freshwater swamp/ marsh/ wetland
saltwater or brack1sh marsh/s wamp/ wetland
reservoir, lake , o r pond ; approxim ate surface ac res: (less rhan ~-acre)
drainage ditch
tidal tream ' bay ' e tuary
other; specify

Is the water body }jsted as a State classified segment in Appendix C of the current Texas Surface
Water Quality Standards; §§307 .1 - 307 . 10?

0

Ye Segment # Use Clas ification:

(8J No
If the water body i not a State class ified segment , identify the first downstream classified segment.
Name:

Rio Grande below International Dam

Segment #:

2308

U e Classification :

•

Warer body nor suitable for contact recreation

As necessary , provide further description of surface wate rs in the vici nity of the affected property :

See Attachment.
H: 1Dehnert\Fort Bliss\Eco R, sk Ched.l ,st - Rubble Dump.doc

3

 •

PART II. Exclusion Criteria and Supportive Information
Subpart A. Surface Water/Sediment Exposure (Complete in all cases.)
1) Regarding the affected property where a response action is being pursued under the TRRP, have
COCs migrated and resulted in an unauthorized release or imminent threat of unauthorized release
to either surface waters or to their associated sediments? Exclude wastewater treatment facilities
and stonnwater conveyances/impoundments authorized by pennit. Also exclude conveyances,
decorative ponds , and those portions of process facilitie which are:
a.
Not in contact with surface waters of the State or other surface waters which are
ultimately in contact with surface waters of the State; and
b.
Not consistently or routinely utilized as valuable habitat for natural communities
in luding birds , mammals , reptiles, etc.
~No

0Ye
Explain:

•

The ground surface at the "ite 1s 011/y covered with approximately 10% - 20% vegetaled.
Oh ·e rvations made during the fie ld im·estigalion indicate that drainage from the site varies
along the power line ea ·ement. No natural gullies or creeks cross the site .

If the an wer is Yes to Subpart A above, the affected property does not meet the exclusion criteria.
Skip Subparts B - D and complete PART m - Qualitative Summary and Cenification . If the answer
is No , go to Subpart B.

Subpart B. Affected Property Setting (Complete only if "No" provided in Subpart A.)
In answering "Yes" to the following question, it is unde rstood that the affected property is not
attractive to wildlife or livestock , including threatened or endangered species (i.e. , the affected
property does not serve as valuable habitat , foraging area , or refuge for ecological communities).
(May require consultation with wildlife management agencies .)

I) Is the affected property wholJy contained within contiguous land characterized by : pavement,
buildings, land caped area , functioning cap , roadways , equipment storage area, manufacturing or
process area , other surface cover or structure or otherwise disturbed ground?
0Yes
Explain :

[8J

No

The si1e is undeveloped land which previously had public access. During the response
actions, a -I-strand barbwire f ence was constmcted to limit access to the site for further
dumping. The site is located 011 Ft. Bliss and has restricted acces .

•

If the answer to Subpart B above i Yes, the affected property meets the exclu ion criteria. Skip
Subparts C and D and complete PART ID - Qualitative Summary and Certification. If the answer to
Subpart B above is No , go to Subpart C .
H:

Dchn.:rt ort BlisslEcoRi k hccklist - Rubhle Dump.doc

4

 •

Subpart C. Soil Exposure (Complete only if "No" provided in Subpart B.)
1) Are COCs which are in the soil of the affected property solely below the first 5 feet beneath
ground surface or does the affected property have a physical barrier present to prevent exposure of
receptors to COCs in surface soil?
0Yes

~No

Explain: Impacted soils have been ex.cavated and disposed off-site. Based on analytical results of soil
verification samples, concentration of constituents remaining in place are below the critical Tier 1
PCLs for residential land use.

If the answer to Subpart C above is Yes , the affected property meets the exclusion criteria. Skip
Subpart D and complete PART ill - Qualitative Summary and Certification . If the answer to Subpart
C above is No, proceed to Subpart D.

Subpart D. De Minimus Land Area (Complete only if "No" provided in Subpart C.)
In answering "Yes to the question below , it is understood that all of the following conditions apply:
•

•

•
•

•

The affected property is not known to sen1e as habitat , foraging area, or refuge to
threatened/endangered or otherwise protected pecies. (Will likely require consultation with
wildlife management agencies .)
Similar but ml.impacted habitat exist within a half-mile radiu .
The affected property is not known to be located within one-quarter mile of sensitive
environmental areas (e.g. , rookeries , wildlife management areas , preserves). (Will likely
require consultation with wildlife management agencies.)
There is no reason to suspect that the COCs associated with the affected property will migrate
such that the affected property will become larger than one acre.

1) Using human health protective concentration levels as a basis to determine the extent of the COCs,
does the affected property consist of one acre or less and does it meet all of the conditions above?

[;8J Yes

0No

Explain how conditions are met/not met:

If the answer to Subpart D above is Ye , then no further ecological evaluation is needed at this
affected property .
Complete PART m - Qualitative Summary and Certification. If the answer to Subpart D above is No,
proceed to Tier 2 or 3 or comparable ERA.
C:

y Documents GSB FTBLISS nontana Eoo Ri . k Che kli st • Rubble Dump.doc

5

 PART

•

m. Qualitati ve Summary and Certification (Complete in all cases.)

Attach a brief tatement (not to exceed I page) summarizing the info nnation you have provided in this
form . This summary should in lude sufficient infom1ation to erify that the affected property meets or
does not meet the ex lu ion criteria. The per ·on hould make the initial decision regarding the need
for further ecological evaluation (i.e .. Tie r 2 or 3) ba ed upon the results of this checklist. After
review , TNRCC will make a final determination on the need for furt her assessment. Note that the

person bas the continuing obligation to re-enter the ERA process if changing circumstances
result in the affected property not meeting the Tier 1 exclu ion criteria.
The ite is a relatively flat rectangular- haped pro pert con i ting of approximately 25 acres. The
United States Geological Survey (U GS) quadrangle map. presented a Figure 1, indicates that
the site lie at an elevation of approximatel y 3,96 5 feet above mean sea level. The ground surface
at the ite is covered with approximately 80% oils and 20% vegetation . Observation s made
during the fi Id in e tigation ind icate that drainage from the site varie along the power line
ea ement.
No natural gullie or creek cross the si te The neare t receiving body of water is an unnamed
pond located approximate! 1,500 feet south wes t of the site The first downstream classified
egment ha been identified as the Rio Grande bel ow the Internati o nal Dam (Segment No . 2308).

•

The ite i not attractive to wildlife or live_tock, in luding threatened or endangered specie . The
ite doe not appear to serve as valuab le habi tat. fo raging area. or refuge for ecological
communitie .
Impacted oil exceeding the Tier l PCL · have been e cavated and tran ported off-site for
di po al. The excavati on areas were backfi lled to urface grade
Based on this infonnation , the
evaluation i warranted .

ite meet

the exc lu ion c riteria and no further ecological

Completed by: ___G
=.c.reco.-,S
. = =.-"B
=-,1.·a=
. :: d=
d.,_'_ _ __

(Typed/Printed Name)

Pro ·ecr Mana er

(Title)

(Date)

I believe that the infonnation ubmitted is true, accurate , and complete, to the best of my knowledge .
David Dodge
Ft Bliss Resrorarion Pro ram Mana er

•

(Typed/Primed Name of Person)
(Title of Person)

( ignmure of Person)
(Date Signed)
1y Do uments\G ' B FTBLI- S1montana l:coRi<I- C h~.:1- li ~t . Ruhhle Dump doc

6

 Page 1 of 2

Stdyarea

•

Texas Clean Rivers Program
Rio Grande Basin
Study Area

The tudy area of the C RP Ri o Grande Ba in encompas e the international reach of the Rio
Grande/Rio Bravo from the New Mex ico exas/ C hihuahua border (E l Paso/ uidad Juarez area) to
the Gulf of Mexico(Brown, ville/ Matamoros area) . The entire Ri o Grande/Rio Bra o watershed
co ers an area approximately 924,300 quare kilometer (335,000 quare mi le ), with approximately
half the water hed in the United tale and the other half in Mexico. For the purpose of coordination
and planning, the Rio Grande/Ri o Bravo has been divided into four sub-ba ins: the Upper Sub-Basin
extending from the New Me. ico/ Texas state line down trcam to International Ami stad Reservoir;
the Pecos River Sub-Basin; the Middle uh-Basin from International Ami tad Reservoi r down trearn
to International Falcon Re ervoir and including the Devil' Ri er: and the Lower Sub-Basin from
International Falcon Re crvoir do\vn trearn to the Gulf of Mexico.

2314

•
Felipe Creek

Re servo ir

Reservoir

http://www.ibwc. tale .go / RP/Stdyarea.htm

1/25/01

 •

2117 Frio River Above Choke Canyon Reservoir- from a point 4.2 kilometers (2 .6 miles) downstream of SH 16 in
McMullen County to a point 100 meters (110 yards) upstream of US 90 in Uvalde County
2201 Arroyo Colorado Tidal - from the confluence with Laguna Madrein Cameron/Willacy County to a point 100
meters (110 yards) downstream of Cemetery Road south of Port Harlingen in Cameron County
2202 Arroyo Colorado Above Tidal - from a point 100 meters (110 yards) downstream of Cemetery Road south of
Port Harlingen in Cameron County to FM 2062 in Hidalgo Countyiincludes La Cruz Resaca. Llano Grande Lake, and
the Main Floodway)
2203 Petronila Creek Tidal - from the confluence of Chiltipin Creek in Kleberg County to a point 1 kilometer (0 .6
mile) upstream of private road crossing near Laureles Ranch in Kleberg County
2204 Petronila Creek Above Tidal - from a point 1 kilometer (0.6 mile) upstream of private road crossing near
Laureles Ranch ln Kleb rg County to th confluence of Agua Dul e and Banquet Creeks in Nu ces County

Rio rande Tidal - from the conflu ence with th ulf of M xico In Cam ron County to a point 10.8 k.ilom ters
(6.7 miles) downstream of the international Bridge in Cameron County

2301

2302 Rio Grande Below Falcon Reservoir- from a point 10.8 kilometers (6 .7 miles) downstream of the International
Bridge in Cameron County to Falcon Dam in Starr County

•

2303 International Falcon Reservoir - from Falcon Dam in Starr County to the confluence of the Arroyo Salado
(Mexico) in Zapata County. up to the normal pool elevation of 301 .1 feet (impounds Rio Grande)
2304 Rio Grande Below Amistad Reservoir - from the conflu ence of the Arroyo Salado (Mexico)in Zapata County
to Am.istad Dam in Val Verde County
2305 International Amistad Reservoir - from Amistad Dam in Val Verde County to a point 1.8 kilometers (1.1 miles)
downstream of the confluence of Ram ey Canyon on the Rio Grande Arm in Val Verde County and to a point 0. 7
kilometer (0.4 mile) downstream of the conflu ence of Painted Canyon on the Pecos River Arm in Val Verde County and
to a point 0.6 kilometer (0.4 mile) downstream of the confluence of Little Satan Creek on the Devils River Arm in Val
Verde County, up to the normal pool elevation of 1117 feet (impounds Rio Grande)
2306 Rio Grande Above Amistad Reservoir - from a point 1.8 kilometers (1 .1 miles) downstream of the confluence
of Ramsey Canyon in Val Verde County to the confluence of the Rio Conchas (Mexico) in Presidio County
2307 Rio Grande Below Riverside Diversion Dam - from the confluence of the Rio Conchas (Mexico) in Presidio
County to Riverside Diversion Dam in El Paso County
2308 Rio Grande Below International Dam - from the Riverside Diversion Dam in El Paso County to International
Dam in El Paso County
2309 DevHs River - from a point 0.6 kilometer (0 .4 mile) downstream of the confluence of Little Satan Creek in Val
Verde County to the confluence of Dry Devils River in Sutton County
2310 Lower Pecos River - from a point 0.7 ki lometer (0 .4 mile) downstream of the confluence of Painted Canyon in
Val Verde County to a point immediately upstream of the confluence of Independence Creek in Crockettfferrell County

 •

•

USES
RIO GRANDE BASI

Segment No.

Recreation

Aquatic
Life

•

CR ITERIA
Domestic
Water
Supply

Other

c 1·1

(mg/L)

SO/
(mg/L)

TDS

Dissolved
Oxygen

Range

lndicatof
Bacteria
#/ IOOml

Temperature

(mg/L)

(SU)

5.0

6.5-9.0

35/ 200

95

pH

(mg/L)

(°F)

SEGME TNAME

2301

Rao Grande Tida l

CR

E

2302

Rao Grande Below Fa lcon Reservo ir

CR

H

PS

270

350

80

5.0

6.5-9 .0

126/200

90

2303

lnrernauonal Falcon Reservoir

CR

H

PS

200

JOO

I 000

50

6.5-9.0

126/200

93

2304

Rio Grande Below Amrstad Resen, 01r

CR

H

PS

200

300

1,000

5.0

6.5-9.0

126/200

95

2305

lnrcrnauonal Am1stad Reservoir

CR

II

PS

150

270

800

5.0

6 5-9.0

1261200

88

2306

Rro Grande Above Amrstad Reservoir

CR

II

PS

JOO

570

1.5 50

50

6.5-9 0

1261200

93

1

CR

II

PS

JOO

55 0

1,5 00

s.o

6 5-9.0

126/200

93

NC R

L

PS

250

450

1,400

3.0

6 5-9.0

605/2 000

95

Devils River

CR

I·

PS

so

50

300

6.0

6.5-9.0

126/200

90

2310

!Lower Pecos River

CR

II

PS

I 700

1.000

4 000

5.0

6.5-9.0

126/200

92

2311

l! Jnner Pecos Rrvcr

CR

II

7 000

J 500

15 ,000

5.0

6 5- 9.0

1261200

92

2312

Red Bluff Reservoir

CR

II

3 200

2,2 00

9,400

50

6 5-9 0

126/200

90

2313

San Felioc Creek

CR

II

PS

50

50

400

50

6 5-9.0

126/200

90

231 4

Rio Grande Above lnremallonal Dam

CR

H

PS

340

600

1,800

5.0

6 5-9.0

12 6/200

92

230 7

Rio Cirandc Below Ri verside D1vers1on Dam

2308

Rio Grande Below lntema11onal Dam

2309

The indicator bactena for freshwater as£ col, and Entcrococci for saltwater Fecal cohform as an alternati ve 1nd1ca1or
The disso lved oxygen criterion in the upper reach of Segment 2307 (R1vers1de Diversion Dam lo the end of the rectified channel below Fon Quitman) shall be 3.0 mg/L when headwater now over the Riverside Diversion
Dam is less than 35 fr'is.

  

 

APPENDIX 

LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORTS - Final Verification Soil
Samples

 

 

APPENDIX F
DA TA VALIDATION REPORTS FOR RUBBLE
DUMP SPILL SITE VERIFICATION SAMPLES
FORT BLISS TEXAS

Data validation was performed on the verification samples that were collected from the Fort
Bliss Rubble Dump Spill. For the validation, analytical performance criteria (i .e. holding times,
spike recoveries, etc.) were compared to prescribed control limits which are specified in the
method or are generally accepted in the field . Each of the sample batches were evaluated with
respect to accuracy, precision, representativeness, and completeness. Accuracy has been
evaluated according to surrogate recoveries, matri x spike and matrix spike duplicate recoveries
(MS/MSD) and laboratory control samples and/or blank spikes and thei r duplicates (LCS and/or
BS/BSD). Precision has been evaluated according to the results of relative percent difference
(RPO) calculations. The validation did not include a review of chromatographs or recalculation
of surrogate recoveries. The results of thi s evaluation are listed below for each sample batch. It
should be noted that the validation effort has identified occasional samples with biased results as
reflected in Table 2 of the Response Action Completion Report.

BATCH 200970
The samples were recei ved intact and chain-of-custod y documentation and seals were in place
upon arrival at the laboratory Internal cooler temperatures associated with the sampling event
were noted below 4°±2 Centigrade This batch contained five samples for metals analysis, and
one sample for PCBs analy 1s.

HOLDlNG TIMES
The extraction and analysis holding tim es were met for all samples associated with this batch.

REPORTING LIMITS
The reporting limits for the samples were appropriate for the project. The reporting limits
utilized for the collected samples are below the Texas Ri sk Reduction Program (TRRP)
Protective Concentration Levels (PCLs)

ACCURACY
Calibration Verification
Initial and second source calibration logs were within prescribed control limits.

Montana vahdabon doc

Page 1 of 4

03/01/2001

 MS/MSD Recoveries
The spike recoveries (MS) for barium, cadmium, and chromium were reported above the
prescribed upper control limits (UCLs). The spike duplicate recovery (MSD) for arsenic was
reported above the UCL, and the spike duplicate recovery for chromium was reported below the
lower control limit (LCL). Since both the spike and spike duplicate recoveries for chromium
were outside of the prescribed control limits, the verification sample results have been qualified
as estimated with no bias direction (high or low).
The MS/MSD recoveries associated with the PCB analysis were reported within the prescribed
control limits.

LCS Recoveries
The LCS recoveries were within the prescribed control limits.
Surrogate Recoveries

The surrogate recoveries associated with the PCB analysis were reported within the prescribed
control limits.
PRECISION
A replicate analysis was performed, and the RPDs for barium, cadmium, chromium, lead, and
silver were reported above the prescribed control limit of 20%. The associated results for these
samples within the batch have been qualified estimated.

REPRESENTATIVENESS
All method blanks were reported with no detectable levels of analyzed constituents.
COMPLETENESS
The 95% overall completeness goal for the project was met for this sample batch.

BATCB 201609

The samples were received intact and chain-of-custody documentation and seals were in place
upon arrival at the laboratory. Internal cooler temperatures associated with the sampling event
were noted below 4°±2 Centigrade. This batch contained one sample for SPLP metals analysis.

Montana.validation.doc

Page 2of ~

03/01/2001

 BOLDING TIMES

The extraction and analysis holding times were met for the sample associated with this batch.
REPORTING LIMITS

The reporting limits for the samples were appropriate for the project. The reporting limits
utilized for the collected samples are below the Texas Risk Reduction Program (TRRP)
Protective Concentration Levels (PCLs).
ACCURACY
Calibration Verification

Initial and second source calibration logs were within prescribed control limits.
MS/MSD Recoveries

The spike recoveries were within the prescribed control limits.
LCS Recoveries

The LCS recoveries were within the prescribed control limits.
PRECISION
A replicate analysis was performed, and the RPDs were within the prescribed control limits.
REPRESENTATIVENESS

All method blanks were reported with no detectable levels of analyzed constituents.
COMPLETENESS
The 95% overall completeness goal for the project was met for this sample batch.

BATCH 201497

The samples were received intact and chain-of-custody documentation and seals were in place
upon arrival at the laboratory. Internal cooler temperatures associated with the sampling event
were noted below 4°±2 Centigrade. This batch contained five samples for PAH analysis.
BOLDING TIMES

•

The extraction and analysis holding times were met for the sample associated with this batch.

Montana:validation da::

03/01/2001

 REPORTING LIMITS
The reporting Jimits for the samples were appropriate for the project. The reporting limits
utilized for the collected samples are below the Texas Risk Reduction Program (TRRP)
Protective Concentration Levels (PCLs). One exception was for sample RDS-100 where the
reporting limit for dibenz(a.h)anthracene (0.85 mg/kg) was reported above the TRRP PCL of
0.55 mg/kg due to a diluted run.

ACCURACY
Calibration Verification

Initial and second source calibration logs were within prescribed control limits.
MS/MSD Recoveries

The MS/MSD analyses were performed on sample RDS- I 00, and the spiked compounds were
diluted out The laboratory control sample recoveries were reported within limits, and the nondetected results within the normal sample analysi s have been accepted at the higher reporting
limits arrived at after dilution.
LCS Recoveries

The LCS recoveries were within the prescribed control limits.
Surrogate Recoveries

The surrogate recoveries were diluted out.

PRECISION
Duplicate or replicate analyses were not performed for this batch.

REPRESENTATIVENESS
The method blanks were reported with no detectable levels of analyzed constituents.

COMPLETENESS
The 95% overall completeness goal for the project was met for this sample batch.

P~g 4 of 4

03/01/2001