Case Document 20 Filed 08/08/19 Page 1 of 2 PagelD 72 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, SCHEDULING AND CASE vs. MANAGEMENT ORDER DAMON VINCENT JOBIN, Defendant. In order to comply with the Speedy Trial Act, 18 1.7.8.0. 3161 et seq, and to set forth orderly progression dates, it is ORDERED that the following deadlines will apply in this case: Discovery motions August 20, 2019 Suppression voluntariness motions August 27, 2019 Responses to motions due Within ?ve days after motion is ?led Subpoenas for suppression hearing August 27, 2019 Suppression voluntariness hearing before Magistrate Judge Veronica Duffy If nece'ssary,will be held prior to September 13, 2019 Applications for Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Testificandum September 24, 2019 Other motions October 1, 2019 Responses to motions due Within five days after motion is ?led Subpoenas for trial October 1, 2019 Plea agreement or petition. to plead and statement of factual basis October 1, 2019 Notify court of status of case October 1, 2019 Motions in limine October 8, 2019 Proposed jury instructions due October 8, 2019 Jury trial Tuesday, October 15, 2019, at 9 a.m. 1. Proposed jury instructions, with citations to authority, will be ?led. Submit only substantive instructions pertaining to the law of the case; do not submit standard or boilerplate instructions. Case Document 20 Filed 08l08/19 Page 2 of 2 PageID 73 10. 11. 12. No motions will be entertained unless they are accompanied by a reasoned memorandum setting forth the precise issues to be considered by the court, together with an explanation of the relevant law to the particular facts of the case. The ?ling of "boilerplate" motions or memoranda will not satisfy this requirement. Responses to motions will set forth speci?c points of law, together with supporting authorities relied upon. Counsel for the parties will confer, prior to the ?ling of motions, in order to reach agreement upon all pretrial motions, including motions for discovery and disclosure. The government provides a stipulation form to implement the court's standing discovery order. Upon request of the defendant, the plaintiff will forthwith comply with Rule If the defendant requests disclosure under Rule 16(a), such defendant will, upon request of the plaintiff, forthwith comply with Rule 16(b). The government will timely furnish all materials required by Brady v. Maryland, 373 US. 83 (1963) and Giglio v. United States, 405 US. 150 (1972). Any written statements of plaintiffs witnesses discoverable under the encks Act, 18 U.S.C. 3500, will be furnished to the defendant unless the government demands strict compliance with the encks Act. It will be the responsibility of defense counsel to notify defense witnesses not to report if the case does not go to trial. In the event a party fails to comply with the provisions of this order, the court may strike a motion, refuse to permit oral argument, rule against the offending party, impose ?ne, award payment of attorney's fees, or proceed in such other manner as justice requires. Upon a showing of good cause, the court may permit exceptions to the rules set forth in this order. Counsel is responsible for client's prompt attendance at all hearings and trial. If defense counsel or government counsel feel that an interpreter is needed in this case, counsel will file a motion with the court requesting an interpreter. Dated August 8, 2019. BY THE COURT: Karen E. SC?reier KAREN E. SCHREIER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case Document 1 Filed 10/23/18 Page 1 of 2 PagelD 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA. SOUTHERN DIVISION UNITED STATES 20F CR .44" Plainti?,? I Cansp'iracyto 1315111131113: a Contalled Subs. cc C-onsPiraey t6 DAMON VINCENT JOBIN . Launder Monetaxy mamments I D?fendant. 21 USC and 846;, . 18 and .1116 Jury charges COUNT 1i on! an '11 awn date: and. conhnuing until an or 1116111113- afthe: in the District cf South Dakcta and elsewhere Damon V111 Jabin 1y andmtentlonally combine, (301131311161 canfederate and agree tagether with omers known and I own to the. Grand Jury; 1:0 knomgly and intentimally distribute 1100. grams or more. of- a mixture and substance 0:3nt 1:3, fentanyl analue 11.1 wit: .cysl?yropyl fcntanyl, Scheduler-II centralted- substance analague as de?ned in 21 use 1 blowing the 51111511111111.- Wag intended for human consumptionmelation of-21 USC 1181(1)? and 84C. Case "Document 1 Filed 10/23/18 Page 2 of 2 PagelD 2 COUNT 2.. Begmning on an date and continuing. until an or about the date of the mdictment. in the District of South Dakota and elsewhere; Damon Vmcent chin. did and 'mten?0na?y combine, conspire confed?rate, and agree together, With others knew. and unknown to the Grand Jury to blow-?y mam and. attemgt to conduct-?nancial. transactions a?eeting mterstata and famign cemerce to; Mt: depositing. UTS. Currancy at. ?nancial ms?tutions. . which invved the. praceeda. of a speci?ed unlaw?? actiwty that is. censpirmy ta dismbute a 1310ng that the transactians Warn: aesigned in: whale and in part .110 Gama-3&1 and disguise: the. nature, location, Source, ownarship, and central of-thepifac?eeds 9f said Rpeci??d Maw?? acuvity and made. with mentto amid a. -transa?tion-rep-orting requirement Radar-*- State. got. Federal law: and that conducting and attempting: ta conduct such 7 5113110131 'it'ansa?tions I. knew that the pmperty mowed the ?nancial. transactions mpreamted the iprm?eds; of fem of unlawful activity, 311m ?01am of 1 USC ??1956(au1nmm and cm I I A TRUE Name Redwted? 'Foreperisnn United - -