State of California- City of San Francisco SEARCH WARRANT AND AFFIDAVIT (AFFIDAVIT) Sergeant Joseph Obidi #2328 swears under oath that the facts expressed by her in the attached and incorporated Statement of Probable Cause, are true and that based there on he has probable cause to believe and does believe that the person(s), property, and/or thing(s) described below islare lawfully seizable pursuant'to Penal Code Section 1524, as indicated below, and is/are now located at the locations set forth below. Wherefore, af?ant requests that this Search Warrant be issued. HOBBS SEALING REQUESTED: YES (XX) N0 5 NIGHT SERVICE REQUESTED: YES N0 (XX) (SEARCH WARRANT) THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA TO ANY SHERIFF, POLICE OFFICER OR PEACE OFFICER IN THE CITYIAND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, proof by af?davit having been made before me by Sergeant Joseph Obidi #2328, that there is probable causeto believe that the property, person(s), and/or things described herein may be found at the locations set forth herein and that it is lawfully seizable pursuant to Penal Code Section 1524 as indicated below by in that it: Mignature of Af?alnt) tends to show the property was stolen or embezzled. YOU ARE THEREFORE COMMANDED TO SEARCH: Verizon; Attn: VSAT 180 Washington Valley Road Bedminster. NJ 07921 Fax: 888?667-0028 And Wireless; Global Legal Demand 11760 US Highway 1, Suite 600 North Palm Beach, FL 33408 888?938?471 5 gldc@att.com FOR THE FOLLOWING PERSON AND For the cell phone number?_ and *related records, Verizon Wireless and Wireless shall provide San Francisco Police epartment the following: See Exhibit A and Additionally, it is the ORDER of this court that: . Peace Officers and anyone enlisted to aid the searching officers in the service of this search warrant pursuant to California Penal Code Section 1530 are authorized to conduct remote monitoring of the Subject Telephone Number device, day or" night, including those signals produced in public, or locations not Open to public or visual surveillance. if necessary, searching Officers are authorized to employ the use of outside experts, acting under the direct control of the investigating Officers, to access and preserve any electronic data. - Non-Disclosure Ordered pursuant to 18 USC and California Penal Code 1524.3 Verizon and Wireless SHALL NOT disclose to USER, OTHER USERS or any other person of the IIOBISQI '1 existence or content of this search warrant for a period of ninety days. All information obtained through the execution of the warrant that is unrelated to the object of the warrant shall be sealed and not subject to further review, use or disclosure without court order. I request that this information be delivered to me via e?mail at: or. if in disk format, please mail to San Francisco Police Department, 1245? Third Street San Francisco, CA. 94158, Attn. Joseph Obidi (Internal Affairs Criminal Division). AND IN THE CASE OF PROPERTY, INFORMATION, THINGS, TO SEIZE THEM IF FOUND and bring it/them forthwith before me, or this court, at the courthouse of this court. This Search Warrant and incorporated Statement of Probable Cause was sworn to as true a ubscribed before me this day of fiwv I . 2019 at AM. I Wherefore, I ?nd probable cause for the issuance of this Search Warrant and do issue it. HOBBS SEALING AUTHORIZED: YES (A NIGHT SERVICE AUTHORIZED: I ?udge Christopher C. We Honorable Judge of the Superior Court City and County of San Francisco, CA, fl?nlnn'l STATE OF CALIFORNIA- CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO RETURN TO SEARCH WARRANT Sgt. Joseph Obidi #2328, being sworn, says that she conducted a search pursuant to the below described search warrant: Search Warrant/Case number: issuing Magistratez'The Honorable Judge . Magistrate's Court: Superior City and County of San Francisco. Date of issuance: Date of Service: and searched and seized the following items: further swear that this is a true and detailed account of all the property taken by fne pursuant to the search warrant and that pursuant to Penal Code Sections 1528 and 1536 this property will be retained in my. custody, subject to the order of this court or of any other court in which the offense in respect to which the seized property is triable. Be advised that pursuant to California Penal Code Sections 1539 and 1540, you may file awritten motion in the court of the above?named magistrate who issued the search warrant, seeking the return of the property seized pursuant to this warrant. For further information concerning this search warrant contact Sgt. Obidi #2328 at telephone number? (Signature of Affiant) - Sworn to and subscribed before me this day of I 2019. (Signature of Magistrate) Honorable Judge Judge of the Superior Court, Department City and County of San Francisco, California ((06199) 3 Statement or Probable Cause of Sergeant Joseph Obidi #2328 Your Affiant Joseph Obidi is a Police Officer in and for the City and County of San Francisco, California. Your Affiant has been so employed since 2008 and is currently assigned to the Internal Affairs Criminal Investigation Division holding the rank of Sergeant. I was previously assigned to Mission Station Housing Team. During this time, I have investigated crimes related to burglaries and thefts, I have conducted investigations in the field of narcotics, including but not limited to arrests, buy/bust operations, and buy/walk operations. I have also worked directly and indirectly with more experienced officers in the field of narcotics. Additionally, I have successfully completed the following training courses: San Francisco Police Academy Robert Presley Institute of Criminal Investigation Basic Core Course . Search Warrants 101 (POST) - Sex Crimes Investigation (SFPD Academy) Basic Narcotics Course (SFPD Academy) The facts alleged in this affidavit do not necessarily represent all facts known or gathered to date regarding this investigation, but the affidavit does include all known exculpatory information and has not had any illegal conduct or observations redacted or exercised from it. The facts averred herein I believe are those necessary to establish probable cause necessary to search and seize the things identified in this warrant application. I am familiar with the facts set forth below from personal observations. The observations and investigations by other law enforcement of?cers was relayed to me in conversation and through written reports, from records and/or other documents and other evidence obtained as a result of this investigation. The below information is set forth solely for the purpose of establishing probable cause for the search warrant and does not represent the entire universe of information I possess about the facts of this case. Crimes being investigated: Every person who willfully resists, delays, or obstructs any public officer, peace officer, or an emergency medical technician, as defined in Division 2.5 (commencing with Section 1797) of the Health and Safety Code, in the discharge or attempt to discharge any duty of his or her office or employment, when no other punishment is prescribed, shall be punished by a fine not exceeding one thousand dollars or by imprisonmentin a county jail not to exceed one year, or by both that fine and imprisonment. lin?rnn?. ?484(a) Every person who shall feloniously steal, take, carry, lead, or drive away the personal property of another?, or who shall fraudulently appropriate property which has been entrusted to him or her, or who shall knowingly and designedly, by any false or fraudulent representation or pretense, defraud any other person of money, labor orreal or personal property, or who causes or procures others to report falsely of his 'or her wealth or mercantile . character and by. thus imposing upon any person, obtains credit and thereby fraudulently gets or obtains possession of money, or property or obtains the labor or service of another, is guilty of theft. In determining the value of the property obtained, for the purposes of this section, the reasonable and fair market value shall be the test, and in determining the value of services received the contract price shall be the test. If there be no contract price, the reasonable and going wage for the service rendered shall govern. For the purposes of this section, any false or fraudulent representation or pretense made shall be treated as continuing, so as to cover any money, property or service received as a result thereof, and the complaint, information or indictment may charge that the crime was committed on any date during the particular period in question. The hiring of any additional employee or employees without advising each of them of every labor claim due and unpaid and everyjudgment that the employer has been unable to meet ,shall?be prima facie evidence of intent to defraud. Initial lncident:' On 02/28/2019 I was assigned by Acting Lieutenant Watts #1594 to investigate the theft of a San Francisco incident- report #190-134-636 and interference and obstruction of the confidential suspicious death investigation of the high ranking elected public official Jeff Adachi. JeffAdachi was the elected Public Defender for the City and County of San Francisco. He was pronounced dead on Friday February 22nd 2018 at approximately 1854. Acting Lieutenant Watts provided me with a copy of SF PD Incident Report #19'0-134-6361 reviewed the SP-FD incident report and learned the following: On 2/22/2019 at approximately 2037 hours Ofc. Stoffel #2739 and Officer Milligan #1254 responded to 46 Telegraph Place to meet with a Medical Examiner regarding the death of the public defender. While enroute, Officers Stoffel and Milligan were notified by dispatch that they were no longer needed and the call was cancelled. Based on the suspicious nature of the call, Officer Milligan phoned the Medical Examiner to determine if the police were needed to assist. Officer Milligan spoke with Wirowek #101, the Director of Operations for the Medical Examiner Office. Wirowek confirmed the death of the Public Defender, Jeff Adachi, with his death being pronounced at 1854 hours. Wirowek stated he did not have reason to believe 46 Telegraph Place contained a crime scene but the death was still under investigation. Based on the informationprovided, Officer Milliigan, along with Ofc. Stoffel, Sgt. L. Ng #4290, Sgt. Toomey #1262, Sgt. Chan #1484 and Sgt. O'Mahoney #1928 responded to 46 Telegraph Place in an attempt to locate a possible crime scene. 46 Telegraph Place is a 3 story apartment building with a metal gated entrance. Upon their arrival, the metal gate was open. The Officers' knocks on the door to 46 Telegraph Pl. went unanswered. Officer Milligan was advised that Night investigations Unit would be responding to investigate. Ofc. Stoffel and Officer Milligan, along with other officers on scene froze 46 Telegraph Place to maintain the integrity of a possible crime scene and preservation of evidence. While on scene. Of?cers were approached by- who identified herself as a neighbor living at- stated on 02/22/2019 at'approximately 1720 hours she was on her way to her apartment to get a handbag. stated as she was .walking by 46 Telegraph Pl, she observed a female which she did not recognize. described the female as either a white or Hispanic female between the age of 38 and 48 years old with dark brown curly hair. stated the female on the phone appeared to be "frantic" and asking questions to whomever she was talking to. stated she has lived on the street for approximately 1 1/2 years and has her handbag and then exited. stated she was in her apartment for approximately 10 seconds and when she went back outside. the female she had seen was gone. .?stated she did not think much of the female and her observations lasted probably less than 10 seconds. When NIU arrived on scene. Sgt. Payne was able to obtain the following time line based on San Francisco Fire Department (SFFD) CAD entries: At 1741 hours a 911 call was placed by a female who identified herself as "Caterina" and told the dispatcher that a male had drank 2 glasses of wine. Had a stomach ache. Took a pill and was now not breathing. At 1751 hours King American 11 medic unit arrived on scene. King American was operated by Joe Ramirez and Anthony Sossa. At 1818 hours CPR was in progress. At 1829 hours King American was enroute with the male subject. At 1839 hours King American arrived at CPMC. it was later discovered that Dr. Chandra determined the time of death to be 1854 hours. Sgt. Payne spoke with Medical Examiner investigator Wirowek who was at the hospital. Wirowektoid Sgt. Payne that he was speaking with a female who had been on scene. Wirowek advised that he would be responding to 46 Telegraph Pl with the female. Wirowek advised that his office had confirmed the identity of Adachi and taken custody of his body pending further investigation. Wirowek along with medical examiner investigator (1 C81) Barbrich #114 arrived on scene with a female, identified as ?-stated at approximately 1743 hours she received a phone call from a female identified as "Caterina" from Adachi?s cell phone. -stated "Caterina" sounded hysterical and told her "something was wrong with Jeff'. - -stated she wasn't too far away and to 46 Telegraph PL. -stated a ?re engine and an ambulance was already on scene when she arrived. -stated she-went into the apartment where medic units were working on Adachi in the bedroom. stated she observed "Caterina" in the hallway who was crying! stated she waited in the living room area or a short time until she saw medics wheel Adachi out on a stretcher an into the ambulance. stated "Caterina" told her the two of them had been out to dinner at a nearby unspeci?ed restaurant. "Caterina" told - that Adachi began to complain of stomach pains at the restaurant so they took an UBER ride back to 46 Telegraph Pl. "Caterina" told - Adachi told her to go to the store and get him an unspeci?ed medication. "Caterina" told -that Adachi then became unresponsive and she called for medics on Adachi's phone. -stated she has known Adachi as a friend for approximately 10 years-stated Adachi asked to use the apartment on 02/15/2018 and she gave him the keys. -stated Adachi told her he was going to be staying in the apartment for approximately 2 days and had also mentioned the name "Caterina".- stated she has heard Adachi mention "Caterina" a "couple of times" in the past but this was her first time meeting her in person. stated she gave "Caterina" her cell phone number and told her to call her if she needed anything. stated she did not get "Caterina's" phone number. stated "Caterina" was left alone in the apartment after she and all other medical personnel had gone. -stated the building is owned by who has authorized her to stay in the apartment at her leisure. stated she had no objections to a search of the apartment and signed a consent to search form. called on the phone who gave a verbal consent to search the apartment on the phone. used a house key lock box to obtain the keys to the apartment which she had the code for. Sgt. Saw, Sgt. Payne, Sgt. Chan, Ofc. Wilson, Ofc. Stoffel and Ofc. Milligan conducted a search of the apartment. The apartment appeared clean and well kept. A search of the apartment did not reveal any obvious signs of foul play. Medical Examiners investigator's Wirowek and Barbrich conducted their own investigation inside the apartment. Ofc. Wilson took 22 photos of the apartment. At Central Station Ofc. Stoffei transferred Ofc. Wilson's photo?s to a (EVD2) CD photo disk and booked it into evidence along with the consent to search form. copy of the disk was placed into the Central Station team evidence drop box. The photos and consent to search form were scanned and uploaded to this report. The SFPD incident report was completed and signed by the reporting Officer Milligan on 02/23/19 at 0515. The Report was signed by the Officer in Charge O?Mahony at 0521 hours. At the time of the authoring of this affidavit, the death investigation of Public Defender Jeff Adachi is currently open and under investigation by the San Francisco Police Homicide Detail. Secondary Incident: - On Saturday February 23? 2019 at 2244 hours, Dan Noyes, a reporter for News, posted a picture that was taken by SFPD Officers at the scene of the death investigation on his Twitter social media account (@dannoyes). The picture depicted a living room area with a couch, chair and a table, on his Twitter account stating, ?According to police report, a woman said SF Public Defender Jeff Adachi fell ill at dinner yesterday and became unresponsive later at this apartment. More of that witnesses say coming up at 11. #ABC7now" On Sunday February 24th 2019 at 0112, Dan Noyes posted the same picture mentioned above on his . Twitter account stating, ?Police report sheds light on SF Public Defender Jeff Adachi?s last hours. #ABC7now". . Acting Lieutenant Watts informed me that on Saturday February 23rd 2019 at 2300 hours, he witnessed the News lead story showingDan Noyes holding a copy of an SFPD incident report with the word printed in red at the upper right hand corner. On Sunday February 24'h 2019 at approximately 0758 hours, news station posted a report titled, obtains San Francisco police report on death of Public Defender Jeff Adachi?. During this report, Dan Noyes was seen holding pages of the con?dential San Francisco Police Report related to the death investigation of Adachi. Noyes states that the incident report was obtained by the Team. Noyes referenced to the police report and then shows the first page'of the report which bares the SFPD incident report number and all markings that identifies the report to be the authentic police report. The incident report shown by also has a stamp on the upper right hand of the page, indicating that the report was copied from a police station. Acting Captain Braconi informed me that he knows that the police report possessed by Dan Noyes is a station copy due to the fact that it had the word printed in the upper right hand corner. Lt. Braconi informed me that the red stamp in the upper right hand corner indicates that the document was a "station copy?. Noyes also made references to specific details listed in the unpublished confidential police report. Noyes also makes detailed references to a witness and possible person of interest listed in the report as ?Catarina?. Noyes listed specific times that were listed in the police report. Furthermore, Noyes- showed several colored photos of the scene that were taken by the investigating officers. The photos have printer line streaks throughout and distorted coloring as if copies .had been made. Noyes also made references to specific statements made by a witness who was on scene. On Sunday February 24th 2019 at 1349 hours, Noyes posted on Twitter again, "Where is Caterina? Witness to last hours of San Francisco Public Defender Jeff Adachi disappears. Adachi sought medical help during last trial he worked. Noyes also posted a picture of a white page that contained 2 colored photos that were taken by the reporting officers. The page also has the police report number handwritten in marker ink at the bottom ofthe page. On Sunday February 24th 2019 at approximately 0903 hours KTVU 2 News posted a news report titled "Police report contains new details into death of San Francisco Public Defender JeffAdachi" on their website. During the ?lmin 36 seconds long news report clip, reporter Sara Zendenham referred to a police report which listed details-contained in the death investigation police report. At approximately 50 seconds into the report, a grainy video of a subject flipping through the police?report .is shown. . - The clip appeared to have been recorded via cellular phone video. The subject flipped through four pages of the reports quickly. Based on the pages that observed the subject flipping through, I believed that the report was the same as the SFPD death investigation report that was not authorized for release. The police report was on dark brown desk. The subject flipped through the pages with a left hand. The hand was light in color. observed the subject to be wearing a two tone gold watch with shinny watch wristband on the subject?s left wrist. Based on the fact that Noyes had obtained the complete death investigation police report prior to it being authorized for release, i believe that Noyes obtained it by illegitimate means. Noyes had gained access of the police report which contained details of a confidential suspicious death investigation of an elected official that was being investigated by the San Franbisco Medical Examiner's of?cer with the assistance of the SFPD Homicide unit. Any information regarding any open deaths and suspicious death investigations shall not be released to the public or the media without prior expressed approval from the Police Chief or designee. Release of the report is prohibited by SFPD policy listed in DB 18~040. - The release of details contained in the stolen SFPD police report have jeopardized and interfered with the investigation by compromising the investigator's ability to identify and locate witnesses and suspects, and'jeopardizing the collection of evidence. Due to the details of the death investigation police report being released I believe that the likelihood of evidence collection has been compromised. . I believe that the individual released the police report for financial gain and as a means of defamation of Public Defender Jeff Adachi?s image and to interfere with the criminal investigation into his death. I also believe that the individual who released the death investigation report is a San Francisco Police Officer or San Francisco Police Department employee (Suspect). I believe that the subject (hand) shown in the video clip shown on the KTVU news report is a San Francisco Police Officer, somebody employed by the San Francisco Police Department who had access to the completed police report or somebody that was provided the completed policereport by a San Francisco Police Officer or San Francisco Police Department employee. I believe that the San Francisco Police Officer had obtained the report and released it to Noyes without proper approval and authorization, and in violation of penal code 148(a)( 1) PC and By stealing the police report and illegally releasing it, the-San Francisco Police Officer compromised the investigation. Followup Investigation On 02/28/19, I was advised by Acting Captain Braconi #2246 that SF PD had not authorized the release of the death investigation report to the public and media outlets. The department had denied the release of the death investigation report because the release of the report may endanger the successful completion of the investigation. .The death investigation report was written by an officer from the Central Police district. lreviewed body worn camera footage from the officers who worked at Central Police station around the time of the death investigation. . . - At approximately 1230 hours, Acting Captain Braconi informed me that SFPD Media Director David Stevenson met with a confidential m?edia source . The confidential source informed Stevenson that a person known to source and Stevenson as Bryan Carmody had obtained the SF PD death investigation report and was offering to sell it to various Bay Area.News Media organizations. Per Stevenson two news organizations obtained copies of the death investigation report. Stevenson provided ?to be Bryan Carmody?s phone number. I conducted an internet search for Bryan Carmody and located a Linked In profile associated to Bryan Carmody which listed him as a ?Freelance Videographer/ Communications Manager, USO Bay Area?. Further internet research revealed that Bryan Carmody is not currently employed by any of the news organizations that obtained the death investigation report. Further internet search showed Bryan Carmody wearing a watch that is very similar to the one shown on the KTVU2 video clip. Based on the above information regarding Bryan Carmody, believe that the SFPD death investigation report was stolen by a San Francisco Police Officer. In doing so, the San Francisco Police Officer interfered with the investigation of the death of elected Public Defender JefiAdachi. Conclusion: . . Based on my investigation, I authored a search warrant for Carmody?s phone records from 02/22/2019 to 02/23/2019. The warrant was granted by the Honorable Judge East of San Francisco Superior Court Department 406. On 03/05/2019, I received the requested phone records from Verizon. On 03/06/2019, i conducted a review of the records and learned that Carmod was in contact with two San Francisco Police Officers from 02/22/19 to 02/23/2019. Carmody was also in contact with Bay Area News stations (KWU Television and KGO TVABC 7). Between 02/22/2019 2100 hours and 02/23/2019 2040 hours, Carmody and were communicating via telephonic calls and text messages-is a San Francisco Police Officer that is currently assigned to the -- . ?was assigned to the . Carmod ?s hone records also re?vealed that he was in contact with* via telephone calls on 02/23/2019 between 1400 hours and 1520 hours. a a San Francisco Police Officer that is currently assigned to the On 03/01/19, I obtained video surveillance from Central Police Station. Upon viewing the video, Officer 'dentified entering Central Police Station at 1430 hours on 02/23/1 approximately thirty minutes (14:01 hours) after a call is registered between Carmody and was seen on surveillance leaving the Police Station approximately twenty minutes later (14:49). Carmody's phone records registered a call from- th?lnnl . ?to Carmody approximately thirty minutes (15:20) after left Central Station. I checked call history for 02/23/19 and did not see any assignments or respond to calls for service near Central Police Station. I believe that visit to Central Police Station was for the purpose of accessing the death investigation report. Approximately one hour and twenty minutes later, Carmody?s phone records registered a call between him and KGO TV. . Base on HRMS scheduling (Human Resources Mana-ement know each other that Carmody was in communication with report. I believe that after Carmod learned that ystem) history, I believe that - ltismy belief in efforts to obtain the oeath investigation - Carmdy and with obtaining the report. has _listed- as .contact information on HRMS. I confirmed that it lists under name in Accurint Law Enforcement search. has - listed as. one number in HRMS. I confirmed that it is lis ed under name in Accurint Law Enforcement search. On 04/12/19, Acting Lieutenant Watts and I made contact with Mr. Carmody and conducted an interview at his residence. During the interview, Mr. Carmody stated that he cannot tell us who was involved in releasing the police report. Mr. Carmody further stated that the people involved in getting him the report are ?good people?. He further stated, ?Its good people, these aren?t assholes?, Carmody that, ?these people had the right intentions?. Based on the statements made by Mr. Carmody and the fact that only police officers would have access to the report at the that time, it is my belief thatthe ?good people" that Mr. Carmody was referring to are police officers. Based on his' statements, I believe that more than one San Francisco Police Officer assisted him in obtaining the police report. also believe that Mr. Carmody would contact the involved officers in order to inform them of this ongoing investigation, our attempts to interview him and the outcome of the interview. I believe that obtaining historical phone record data from Mr. Carmody,? and phone service providers will assist me in this investigation. Based on my training and experience, I know that Verizon Wireless and Wireless keep records of incoming and outgoing telephone calls, missed calls, electronic alphanumeric (text) messages, voicemails, video recordings, photos, geo location data as well as deleted content. I am requesting phone record from the periods oprril 12, 20191313 hours, to April 15, 2019 2359 hours. I believe that Mr. Carmody would have contacted the involved officers within this short period of time. AFFIANT swears the information in this document to be true to the best of his knowledge. Your Affiant requests this Search Warrant sought pursuant to the Search Warrant Affidavit, Statement of Probable Cause, and Return to Search Warrant and all documents relevant to this Search Warrant be ordered sealed by the Magistrate in order to implement the privilege under Evidence Code 1040 to 1042 and to protect theidentity of any confidential informant(s) and/or official information, pursuant to the Supreme Court decision in People v. Hobbs (1994) 7 Cal.4"' 948, and California Rules of Court It is further requested that pursuant to the preclusion of notice provisions of Penal Code 1546.2 and '18 U.S.C., 2703(b), Verizon and be ordered not to notify any person (including the subscriber, customer or owner of the electronic communications or device information to which the materials relate) of the existence of this warrant for ninety days. Your affiant is aware that Penal Code 1546.2 mandates that the law enforcement agency serving this warrant notify the target of the warrant contemporaneously with the service of the warrant unless an order delaying notification is granted. It is further requested pursuant to the delayed notice provisions of Penal Code an order delaying any notification to the target/ party that maybe required by 1546.2(b) about this warrant, for a period of ninety days. Such an order is justified because providing prior notice to the target/ party in this matter would lead to an adverse result which may result in endanger the life or physical safety of an individual; lead to flight from prosecution; lead to destruction of or tampering with evidence; lead to intimidation of potential witnesses; or otherwise seriously jeopardize an investigation or unduly delay atrial. Due to the ongoing Internal Affairs investigation and search for possible co?conspirators, your affiant - further states that this search warrant and all documents relevant to. this search warrant; relate to an ongoing investigation into an Internal Affairs Investigation, lam requesting that they be sealed in their entirety including the return. If the information contained in the above listed documents is made public it would compromise the investigation to have a positive outcome in the location of the suspect(s) and/or co-conspirators. - It is expected that additional search warrants will be sought relating to this investigation. lrequest that this search warrant and all documents related to this search warrant remain sealed in the custody of the clerk of court until order of this court or other competent court having jurisdiction over this matter. I request that a search warrant be issued based upon the aforementiOned facts, commanding the search of the items designated above for the property or things described or any part thereof, and that such items or property be brought before this magistrate or retained subject to the order of the court pursuant to Section 1536 of the Penal Code. It is prayed that a search warrant be issued commanding the search of the phone information - ?and requested from Verizon and You Af?ant declares under penalty or perjury, under the law of the State of California that this Affidavit is true and correct. AFFIANT . Judge of thevSuperior Court In and for the City and County of San Francisco -, alifo nia Juoge nsrop: er C. Hlte Exhibit A The following information, including the information seizable under 18 USC 2703d, whether in electronic storage or on backup copies of said data, for the phone number and for the following time period: 04/12/19 1313 hours to 04/15/2019 2359 hours, Pacific Standard Time. - Subscriber Information: Verizon provide whether listed or unlisted, blocked or unblocked, including . but not limited to: general account billing information, periods of telephone activation, contact information, and all data identifying the handset(s) device such as ESN MEID IMEI and MSID MIN associated to this account. Call Detail Records SMS Usa and Mobile Data Usa with Cell Site Data: Verizon SHALL provide, geo location, SCAMP data records, which include Call Detail Records, SMS Usage with content and Mobile Data usage, showing incoming/outgoing communications and connectivity information with cell tower data location from 04/12/19 1313 hours to 04/15/2019 2359 hours, Pacific Standard Time. 1. Verizon SHALL include a letter verifying the authenticity of the records provided. 2. Verizon SHALL include a listing of Cell Tower Locations showing, but not limited to, the location, orientation, azimuth, and beam width as it pertains to the records requested. 3. Verizon SHALL provide all stored communications or files including voicemail, text messages, emails and email addresses, di ital images, videos, contact lists, call logs, and any other files from the phone number dam 2/19 1313 hours to 04/15/2019 2359 hours, Paci?c Standard Time. 4. Verizon SHALL provide any other records or account information related or associated to the account holder, including any and all numbers associated with the billing account number corresponding to the account holder. - 5. Verizon SHALL be compensated by the San Francisco Police Department for reasonable expenses incurred in complying with the court's order. Exhibit The following information, including the information seizable under 18 USC 2703d,whethe?r in electronic storage or on backup copies of said data, for the phone number for the following time period: 04/12/19 1313 hours to 04/15/2019 2359 hours, Pacific Standard Time. - Subscriber Information: provide whether listed or unlisted, blocked or unblocked, including but not limited to: general account billing information, periods of telephone activation, contact . information, and all data identifying the handset(s) device such as ESN lMEl and MIN associated to this account. Call Detail Records SMS Usa and Mobile Data Usa with Cell Site Data: provide, geo location, SCAMP data records, Which include Call Detail Records, SMS Usage with content and Mobile Data usage, showing incoming/outgoing communications and connectivity information with cell tower data location from 04/12/19 1313 hours to 04/15/2019 2359 hours, Pacific Standard Time. 1. SHALL include a letter verifying the authenticity of the records provided. 2. SHALL include a listing of Cell Tower Locations showing, but not limited to, the location, orientation, azimuth, and beam width as it pertains to the records requested. 3. SHALL provide all stored communications or files including voicemail, text messages, emails and email addresses, digital images, videos, contact lists, call logs, and any other files from the phone number ?04/1 2/19 1313 hours to 04/15/2019 2359 hours, Pacific Standard Time. 4. SHALL provide any other records or account information related or associated to the account holder, including any and all numbers associated with the billing account number corresponding to the account holder. 5. SHALL be compensated by the San Francisco Police Department for reasonable expenses incurred in complying with the court's order. State of Callfornia, City and County of San Francisco IN RE SEARCH OF ORDER TO DELAY NOTIFICATION OF SEARCH WARRANT AT Wireless 11760 US Highway 1, Suite 600 North Palm Beach, FL 33408 888-938-4 715 ORDER Your Af?ant, Sergeant Joseph Obidi'#2328rec1uests: This matter having come before the Court pursuant to an application ?under Penal Code - Section 1524 et seq, which af?ants requests that noti?cation of this warrant be delayed. Based upon the reading of the Search Warrant, and Af?davit in Support thereof; IT APPEARING that there is reason to believe that the noti?cation of the existence of the warrant to any person will result in endanger the life or physical safety of an individual; lead to ?ight from prosecution; lead to destruction of or tampering with evidence; lead to intimidation of potential witnesses; or otherwise seriously jeopardize an investigation or unduly delay a trial or otherwise lead to an adverse result. IT IS ORDERED that Wireless shall delay noti?cation of the existence of the application or this Order of the Court, or the existence of the investigation, to the listed subscriber or to any other person, for a period of (90) ninety days unless otherwise directed by the Court. - IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the noti?cation by the government otherwise required under Penal Code Section 1546.2 be delayed for a period of (90) ninety days. Lit/Ma . . . f1 I hof Magistrate) (Da e) tistopher c. Hite Judge of the Superior Court, Department City and County of San Francisco, California Order Delaying Notification State, of Canfomia, City and County 'of San Francisco IN RE SEARCH OF ORDER TO DELAY NOTIFICATION OF SEARCH WARRANT Verizon Wireless 180 Washington Valley Rd Bedminsrer, NJ 07921 800-451-5241 ORDER . Your Af?ant, Sergeant Joseph Obidi #2328requests: This matter having come before the Court pursuant to an application under Penal Code Section 1524 et seq, which af?ants requests that noti?cation of this warrant be delayed. Based upon the reading of the Search Warrant, and Af?davit in Support thereof; IT APPEARING that there is reason to believe that the noti?cation of the existence of the warrant to any person will result in endanger the life or physical safety of an individual; lead to ?ight from prosecution; lead to destruction of or tampering with evidence; lead to intimidation of potential witnesses; or otherwise seriously jeopardize an investigation or unduly delay a trial or otherwise lead to an adverse result. IT IS ORDERED that Verizon Wireless shall delay noti?cation of the existence of the application or this Order of the Court, or the existence of the investigation, to the listed subscriber or to any other person, for a period of (90) ninety days unless otherwise directed by the Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the noti?cation by the government otherwise required under Penal Code Section 1546.2 be delayed for a period of (90) ninety days. Lt/ I 6/10? (S ignature/of Magistrate) (Date) Judge Christopher'C. Hite Judge of the Superior Court, Department City and County of San Francisco, California Order Delaying Notb?i?cation STATE OF CALIFORNIA- CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO RETURN TO SEARCH WARRANT Sgt. Joseph Obidi #2328, being swo says that she conducted a search pursuant to the below described search warrant: Search Warrant/Case number: Issuing Magistrate: The Honorable Judqe Christopher Hite. Magistrate's Court: Superior 23 City and County of San Francisco. Date of Issuance: April 2019 Date of; Service: April 2019 and searched and seized the following Verizon Wireless and seized phcime record data for ?and I record data for Wireless and seized phone I further swear that this is a true and detailed account of all the property taken by me pursuant to the search warrant and that pursuant to Penal Code Sections 1528 and 1536 this properly will be retained in my custody, subject to the order of this court or of any other court in which the offense in respect to which the seized property is Be advised that pursuant to California items: triable. Penal Code Sections 1539 and 1540, you may file a written lg'zSS'ikN?g motion in the court of the above-name magistrate who issued the search warrant, seeking the return of the property seized pursuant to this warrant. For further information concerning this search warrant contact Sgt. Obidi #2328 at telephone 42232}? Ignature oiAf?ant) Sworn to and subscribed before me 1 I 27'. (eta/Cor"! 2'ng [?5be (Signature of Magistrate) I number?. - 71?4?" .. .. this 5 day of ?4463691 ,2019. - l. Honorable Judge ,i??n'leflgf, Chin Ema- (lit: 99'0?? Judge of the Superior Court, Department with? City and County of San Francisco, California