Message From: Sent: To: CC: Subject: GOLDSTEIN, DANIEL A 2/26/2015 8:08:31 PM VICINI, JOHN REYNOLDS, TRACEY SACHS, ERIC ACSH While I wouid Eove to have more friends and more choices, we don?t have 3 tot of supporters and can?t afford to Ease the few we i am weii aware of the chalienges with ACSH and know Eric has valid concerns~ so i can assure you i am not at! starry? eyed about: they have PLENTY of warts? but: You WSLL NOT GET A BETTER VALUE FOR YOUR DOLLAR than ACSH: They are working with us to respond if needed to IARC- Gii has asked for information feed. Today: They host TWO BOOKS and a Pamphlet that are EXTREMELY USEFUL: AND the recent pesticide review: Plaintiff Exhibit I 0321 I Kucewicz/dp/0615485162/refzsr 1 FIFTY THREE Recent examples of posting in NOT complete: 11/ From: VICINI, JOHN 1000] Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2015 1:12 PM To: GOLDSTEIN, DANIEL A REYNOLDS, TRACEY Subject: RE: IARC assessment Tracey .1 knew that ACSH if; a pain te werh with hut we eheeh? net gt) ?n ene year and ent the next - repeat as; t?rn net sure 5 can best judge new they are. Maybe the Fusien Center can teti whet vetnnte their wehe?te gets"? From: GOLDSTEIN, DANIEL A 1000] Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2015 9:33 AM To: REYNOLDS, TRACEY 1000] VICINI, JOHN 1000] Subject: FW: IARC assessment ACSH outreach.? her my eiecuee?en 30hn~ we had serne nteney set aside fer EARC and eheuie go ahead and make a centr?hutien. 5 had heped te etart a rneit?rzernpeny project with thern this; year but that eiearty wiEt net happen and they need centineed seppert: They had BGZENS et pron-anti g?yphesete nesting; Eest yeer. can eernpi?e thern-- keen meet in a fetder-- it anyene eeuhtg their etihty) Ban From: Gilbert Ross Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2015 6:40 PM To: GOLDSTEIN, DANIEL A 1000] Cc: CHERYL MARTIN Subject: Re: IARC assessment Dear Dan, Thanks for your prompt reply to our request for Monsanto's continued, and much needed, support in 2015. Responding to your email below: Yes, the issue was something we recently discussed in a meeting here at ACSH, so it is on our radar. (We are involved in a full-court press re: IARC, regarding ag-chemicals, DINP [phthalate] and diesel exhaust). As you know, ACSH is proactive in many areas of mutual interest, so we'd welcome any additional information you are willing to share with us that would help bring us further up-to-speed on the topic, particularly if ACSH's commentary is needed to critique an adverse outcome. This situation, however, further illustrates why Monsanto's ongoing support of ACSH is critical, for both Monsanto and ACSH. It ensures that we have the resources needed to advance ongoing and emerging educational initiatives and programs in a more dynamic way. Interestingly, I did just a quick google news search of Monsanto (see below) and it confirms why on many fronts a science-based organization like ACSH, which consistently debunks the junk-science attacks of activists, is needed. Let's find a way to secure Monsanto's renewed and continued funding of ACSH's ongoing work to provide a rational voice of scientific reason to the public. Your renewed commitment (prior to the close of our fiscal year budget on 6/30/2015) is critical. Thanks again. I look forward to receiving all the information on and I look forward to hearing from you regarding Monsanto's 2015 commitment to ACSH. Best Gil and Cheryl Hold Monsanto Responsible for Killiog Monarch Butterflies t- Care2.com Ca re2.com \x Monsanto makes Roundup and benefits handsomely from global sales, but Roundup also destroys 10. milkweeds, a plant critical to the survival of Qniine petition te save menarch buttertiv tram - Mensante Monsante Herbicide Wipind Out Monarch Butterflies Dispatches from Skip German?s Audiobleg: Monarch, milkweed and 3. a We Won? Meneante Ad has been Puiied tram (I) Magazine 51W in? a . .1 i. Monsanto states that ?we partner with farmers:? Monsanto requires farmers who use their seeds to sign an agreement that they will not save Meneante: Firind (3n AH Cyiinders. But Driving Toward A Ciitt?? (MON) Mensante Roundup Herbicide Triggers Autism in Ct in i 7 r7. xatt??r? tr 2.53193? This Hated Campany is Poised For An 80% Gain Meneantb readies for Mueeatine expansion, add ibbs M. i is: aft:- .- ST. LOUIS Monsanto is expanding its Muscatine, Iowa plant. This project will expand the formulations and packaging capacity at the plant to Meneantb needs it: eensider human health, tee . . he DeaMoinesRegister.com DesMornesRegretereem In the Feb. 15 Des Moines Register article "Monsanto nears its largest biotech trait launch," Michael Firko, the Animal and Plant Health 11Part of the Food 0 shared this. Printer-friendly version. 0 shared this. Printer-friendly version. 0. Printer-friendly version. By Advertisement by Monsanto Monsanto Shareholder Meeting Gets Heated 242/- Monsanto Co. has long been a lightning rod for debate, but at its annual shareholder meeting Friday, the biotech-seed company was tagged Monsanto sharehotders seek ability to nominate board com Na pa '5 Harrington wins vote at Monsanto Moms and Doctors Have a Message for Monsanto: 'You' re Making" Beetroot; Alon a :eois'h ation} Monsanto makes highly hybridized seeds available to home fr I 1 Monsanto's Seminis Home Garden has introduced ?for home growers, developed to be disease-resistant and easy to Monsanto Inches Closer To Biggest Biotech Launch ln Company's To counter a ?super weed? epidemic plaguing farmers, agribusiness giantMonsanto is steadily moving forward on the introduction of its next What Monsanto Doesn't Want You To See When consumers across Europe started campaigning for-labeling in the early 19905, Monsanto released a series of advertisements in From: DANIEL A To: Gilbert Ross Cc: JOHN Subject: IARC assessment "rosesh.or> Date: February 24, 2015 at 1:14:23 PM EST Gil- I wanted to give you and ACSH a head?s up on a issue for early March. As always, I fully understand that ACSH will decide both whether to respond and how to respond- I just want to make sure that you have the full array of information on the topic at your disposal either ahead of time or, if you prefer, on your request when/if needed. In the context of the re-registration of in the EU and the US, IARC has decided to take up The circumstances are quite odd. Sticking to established factual information, we know that was on the intermediate tier for future assessment (a list that IARC rarely gets to as the first tier is not empty), that was inexplicably combined with three selected organophosphate insecticides for collective consideration, and that the public announcement of the meeting to evaluate was made only in late 2014- about 4 months prior to the meeting, and AFTER the deadline for nomination of participants in the panel had passed. This event was presaged by an IARC review of pesticides and (Shinasi et al) which combined B?cell types and concluded on meta-analysis that there was an association of ever/never used with the occurrence of cell Much of the strength of this association comes from the Ag Health study paper on multiple myeloma and (DeRoos)? which has a fundamental problem. While the study reports an increased risk in the exposed population, a review of the entire data set indicates no such association. The association only becomes apparent when cases are dropped out of the control group as a result of missing personal habits history (smoking, etc). While the latter procedure was consistent with the stated method, the authors do not report the actual raw numbers, and thus it is not readily apparent in the DeRoos publication that the association hinges entirely on the fact that multiple cases were dropped from the control group and non from the exposed group as a result of missing data. We do not, of course, know what the outcome of the deliberations will be. If is classified as a possible or probably human carcinogen, this will obviously have a large impact on a molecule the EPA and the EU (German have recently concluded (preliminary EPA assessment and rapporteur report for the EU) is not a carcinogen. In the event of an adverse outcome, you may perhaps decide that some commentary is warranted. If so, I would like to provide you the full set of materials. As noted, lam happy to do so now or can provide as needed as it is all compiled in a single resource folder. We will also be preparing a number of epidemiology and clinical experts on the topic who might participate in a conversation with ACSH. My thanks? Dan Daniel A. Goldstein, MD. Senior Science Fellow Lead, Medical Sciences and Outreach Monsanto, Mail Zone C3ND 800 N. Lindbergh Blvd. St. Louis, MO 63167 Office: 314-? Cell: 314?- Gilbert Ross MD. Medical and Executive Director, Acting President The American Council on Science and Health 1995 Broadway NYC NY 10023 -@acsh.org 212- fax 212- cell 516 Website Facebook Twitter 52mg? mew