Case 2:19-cv-07693 Document 1 Filed 09/05/19 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 RUSSELL P. BROWN (SBN: 84505) JAMES F. KUHNE, JR. (SBN: 251150) GORDON REES SCULLY MANSUKHANI LLP 101 W. Broadway, Suite 2000 San Diego, CA 92101 Telephone: (619) 696-6700 Facsimile: (619) 696-7124 Attorneys for Plaintiffs TRUTH AQUATICS, INC. AND GLEN RICHARD FRITZLER AND DANA JEANNE FRITZLER, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS TRUSTEES OF THE FRITZLER FAMILY TRUST DTD 7/27/92 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani, LLP 101 W. Broadway, Suite 2000 San Diego, CA 92101 11 12 13 14 15 16 In the Matter of the Complaint of Truth ) Aquatics, Inc. and Glen Richard Fritzler and ) Dana Jeanne Fritzler, individually and as ) Trustees of the Fritzler Family Trust DTD ) 7/27/92 as owners and/or owners pro hac vice ) of the dive vessel CONCEPTION, Official ) Number 638133, for Exoneration from or ) Limitation of Liability ) ) ) CASE NO. 2:19-cv-07693 COMPLAINT FOR EXONERATION FROM OR LIMITATION OF LIABILITY 17 18 COME NOW Plaintiffs TRUTH AQUATICS, INC. and GLEN RICHARD 19 FRITZLER and DANA JEANNE FRITZLER, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS 20 TRUSTEES OF THE FRITZLER FAMILY TRUST DTD 7/27/92, as owners 21 and/or owners pro hac vice of the dive vessel CONCEPTION, Official Number 22 638133, (“Plaintiffs”) in this admiralty action, alleging as follows: 23 1. This is an action for exoneration from or limitation of liability as 24 provided by 46 U.S.C. § 30501 et seq. and is a case of admiralty and maritime 25 jurisdiction, as hereinafter more fully appears, and is within the meaning of 28 26 U.S.C. § 1333, Rule 9(h) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and Rule F, 27 Supplemental Rules for Admiralty and Maritime Claims of the Federal Rules of 28 Civil Procedure. -1COMPLAINT FOR EXONERATION FROM OR LIMITATION OF LIABILITY Case 2:19-cv-07693 Document 1 Filed 09/05/19 Page 2 of 6 Page ID #:2 1 Plaintiff Truth Aquatics, Inc. is, and at all times relevant to this action 2 was, a business entity doing business within Santa Barbara County, in the State of 3 California, and was the alleged owner or owner pro hac vice of the 4 CONCEPTION. 5 Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani, LLP 101 W. Broadway, Suite 2000 San Diego, CA 92101 2. 3. Plaintiffs Glen Richard Fritzler and Dana Jeanne Fritzler, individually 6 and as Trustees of the Fritzler Family Trust DTD 7/27/92 (“Fritzler”) were, at all 7 times relevant to this action, individuals residing within Santa Barbara County, in 8 the State of California, and are or are alleged to be the legal and equitable owner of 9 the CONCEPTION, Official Number 638133, a 75 foot, wooden hulled, 97 Gross 10 Registered Tons, dive vessel (“CONCEPTION”), which was at all times relevant 11 to this action located within the jurisdictional waters of Santa Barbara or Ventura 12 County in the State of California. As alleged below the wreck and/or wreckage of 13 the CONCEPTION is located in either Ventura and/or Santa Barbara County. 14 4. Plaintiffs are informed and believe and thereon allege that thirty-three 15 passengers (“Passengers”) and six crewmembers (“Crewmembers”) were on board 16 the CONCEPTION at the time of the Fire on September 2, 2019, and at all times 17 relevant to this action, and were injured or died as a result of the below-described 18 Fire on the CONCEPTION and are potential claimants in this action. 19 5. Plaintiffs are informed and believe and thereon allege that no 20 Passengers or Crewmembers have filed suit in for alleged personal injuries, 21 property loss, death, damages and/or losses arising out of the below-described Fire 22 on the CONCEPTION on September 2, 2019. 23 6. Plaintiffs are unaware of the true names and identities of fictitiously- 24 named DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, and therefore sue them under such fictitious 25 names. 26 27 28 7. There are no known liens or mortgages on the CONCEPTION, nor is there any pending freight or hire. 8. Following the Fire on the CONCEPTION, only the wreck and -2- COMPLAINT FOR EXONERATION FROM OR LIMITATION OF LIABILITY Case 2:19-cv-07693 Document 1 Filed 09/05/19 Page 3 of 6 Page ID #:3 1 wreckage of the CONCEPTION was recovered, which was transported via barge 2 to Ventura Country, where it is presently located. 3 The wreck and wreckage of the CONCEPTION was determined to 4 have zero residual value and the CONCEPTION is a total loss due to the Fire and 5 has zero value as a result of the Fire. 6 10. At all relevant times, Plaintiffs used reasonable care to make the 7 CONCEPTION seaworthy, and she was, at all relevant times, tight, staunch, and 8 strong, fully and properly manned, equipped and supplied and in all respects 9 seaworthy and fit for the service in which she was engaged. 10 Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani, LLP 101 W. Broadway, Suite 2000 San Diego, CA 92101 9. 11. On information and belief, on August 31, 2019, at approximately 11 10:00 PM, CONCEPTION’s voyage commenced in Santa Barbara, California with 12 33 Passengers and six Crewmembers on board for a three-day dive trip on the 13 navigable waters off the coast of California in the area of the Channel Islands. The 14 CONCEPTION, prior to and at the inception of the voyage, was tight. staunch and 15 seaworthy and fit for the intended trip. The CONCEPTION was not under charter, 16 had no cargo aboard and thus earned no freight or hire for the voyage within the 17 meaning of Rule F of the Supplemental Rules for Admiralty and Maritime Claims 18 and Asset Forfeiture Actions of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and 46 U.S.C. 19 § 30501 et seq. 20 12. On information and belief, at approximately 3:30 AM on the morning 21 of September 2, 2019, while the CONCEPTION was anchored on the navigable 22 waters of the Pacific Ocean off Santa Cruz Island, a fire of unknown cause and 23 origin broke out on board the vessel (“Fire”). The Fire on the CONCEPTION 24 allegedly resulted in the death of all the Passengers and forced the Crewmembers 25 to abandon the vessel. 26 27 28 13. Plaintiffs are informed and believe and thereon allege that no Passengers or Crewmembers have filed suit against Plaintiffs. 14. On information and belief, one or more of the Passengers and/or -3- COMPLAINT FOR EXONERATION FROM OR LIMITATION OF LIABILITY Case 2:19-cv-07693 Document 1 Filed 09/05/19 Page 4 of 6 Page ID #:4 1 Crewmembers have submitted a written notice that they may assert claims and/or 2 bring a suit for alleged injuries and/or property damages and/or death arising from 3 the aforementioned Fire. 4 The aforesaid Fire and all consequent alleged injuries, damages and 5 deaths occurred without the privity or knowledge on the part of Plaintiffs, and was 6 not caused or contributed to by any negligence, fault or knowledge on the part of 7 Plaintiffs, or anyone for whom Plaintiffs may be responsible, at or prior to the 8 commencement of the above-described voyage. 9 Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani, LLP 101 W. Broadway, Suite 2000 San Diego, CA 92101 15. 16. Plaintiffs desire to invoke the benefits of exoneration from or 10 limitation of liability as provided by 46 U.S.C. § 30501 et seq., and in the same 11 proceeding Plaintiffs desire to contest their liability and the liability of the 12 CONCEPTION for any alleged loss or damages arising out of the aforesaid Fire. 13 17. Since the vessel had no value at the conclusion of the voyage, 14 Plaintiffs are not required to post security in the amount of the owners’ interest in 15 the vessel and pending freight as required by Rule F(1) of the Supplemental Rules 16 for Admiralty and Maritime Claims and Asset Forfeiture Actions of the Federal 17 Rules of Civil Procedure. 18 19 20 18. Plaintiffs will provide security for costs in accordance with Local Admiralty Rules, Rule F.1.(83-F.1.) in an amount of $1,000, if the Court so orders. 19. Not more than six months has elapsed between Plaintiffs’ receipt of 21 notice of any written claim or suit arising out of the aforementioned Fire and the 22 filing of this action for exoneration from or limitation of liability. 23 WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs pray as follows: 24 1. That the Court enter an order directing the issuance of a monition to 25 all person asserting claims against Plaintiffs and/or the “CONCEPTION” with 26 respect to the Fire and for which this Complaint seeks exoneration from, or 27 limitation of, liability, admonishing them to file their respective claims with the 28 Clerk of this Court, to serve a copy thereof on the attorneys for Plaintiffs, and to -4COMPLAINT FOR EXONERATION FROM OR LIMITATION OF LIABILITY Case 2:19-cv-07693 Document 1 Filed 09/05/19 Page 5 of 6 Page ID #:5 1 appear and answer the allegations of this Complaint, on or before a date to be fixed 2 by the Court in the notice; Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani, LLP 101 W. Broadway, Suite 2000 San Diego, CA 92101 3 2. That the Court enter an order directing the execution of the monition 4 and publication of notice thereof in such newspapers as the Court may direct, once 5 a week for four (4) consecutive weeks prior to the date fixed by the Court for the 6 filing of such claims, all as provided for in the law and Rule F(4) of the Federal 7 Rules of Civil Procedure, Supplemental Rules for Certain Admiralty and Maritime 8 Claims; 9 3. That the Court, upon issuance of the monitions, enter an order 10 restraining the prosecution of any and all suits against Plaintiffs and/or the 11 “CONCEPTION”, which may have been already commenced by any person or 12 entity to recover damages as a result of the Fire on or about September 2, 2019, 13 and for which this Complaint seeks exoneration from, or limitation of, liability, and 14 restraining the commencement and prosecution of any additional or unknown 15 lawsuits, whether new or old, or any legal proceedings, against Plaintiffs and/or the 16 “CONCEPTION”, with respect to any claims arising from the Fire, and for which 17 this Complaint seeks exoneration from, or limitation of, liability; 18 4. That the Court permit Plaintiffs to contest their liability, if any, for all 19 injuries and/or damages and/or deaths arising out of the Fire of September 2, 2019, 20 and for which this Complaint seeks exoneration from, or limitation of, liability, and 21 that this Court, in this proceeding, adjudge that Plaintiffs and the 22 “CONCEPTION”, are to be completely exonerated from liability arising out of the 23 Fire of September 2, 2019, and for which this Complaint seeks exoneration from, 24 or limitation of, liability, and that no liability exists on the part of Plaintiffs and 25 “CONCEPTION” for any injuries or damages or deaths resulting from the Fire of 26 September 2, 2019, and for which this Complaint seeks exoneration from, or 27 limitation of, liability; 28 5. In the event it is found by this Court that liability exists on the part of -5- COMPLAINT FOR EXONERATION FROM OR LIMITATION OF LIABILITY Case 2:19-cv-07693 Document 1 Filed 09/05/19 Page 6 of 6 Page ID #:6 1 Plaintiffs or the “CONCEPTION”, by reason of the injuries and damages and 2 deaths, the Court adjudge that such liability shall in no case exceed the amount of 3 value of Plaintiffs’ interest in the “CONCEPTION”, if any, as the same existed 4 immediately following the Fire, and that a decree be made discharging Plaintiffs 5 from any further liability beyond that amount; and 6 6. That Plaintiffs receive such other and further relief as this Court may 7 deem just and proper under the circumstances. 8 Dated: September 5, 2019 9 GORDON REES SCULLY MANSUKHANI LLP 10 Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani, LLP 101 W. Broadway, Suite 2000 San Diego, CA 92101 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 By: /s/ Russell P. Brown Russell P. Brown James F. Kuhne, Jr. Attorney for Plaintiffs TRUTH AQUATICS, INC., AND GLEN RICHARD FRITZLER AND DANA JEANNE FRITZLER, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS TRUSTEES OF THE FRITZLER FAMILY TRUST DTD 7/27/92 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 6000804/47226728v.1 -6COMPLAINT FOR EXONERATION FROM OR LIMITATION OF LIABILITY