ORLEANS, 1.0??5 Facilities Plan Update: High Schools April 9, 2019 Overview  Review of Post-Katrina High School construction  Community Engagement Overview  Data Overview  Enrollment Projections  Program Capacity  Site Size  Educational Adequacy  Facility Condition Index (FCI) 2 Community Engagement We have been working with Bright Moments and the OPSB Facilities Advisory Group (comprised of community leaders) to review planning data. During the April Facilities Advisory Group meeting we will discuss the most effective strategies to fully engage the community in this conversation. Expert Engagement Jan 2019 Feb 2019 Initial Community Engagement/School Leader Engagement Mar 2019 Apr 2019 Community/School Leader Engagement May 2019 June 2019 July 2019 Editing/Board Approval Process Aug 2019 Monthly School Leader Engagement Meetings on Facilities Plan Sept 2019 Oct 2019 Post-Katrina Overview – High Schools New Schools 4 10 Refurbished Schools 7 Renovated With Or Without Addition 2 Stabilized 1 No Project 4 24 10 1 2 7 New Schools Renovated w/ or /wo Addition No Project Refurbished Schools Stabilized 4 Enrollment Projections Catchment Area 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Total By Area WB EB NO East 2016 Enrollment (9-12) 2016 Enrollment (Total) 2025 Enrollment 9-12 (High) 2025 Enrollment 9-12 (Mod) 2025 Enrollment 9-12 (Low) 1,364 962 487 1,821 1,980 3,886 2,340 12,840 5,419 4,019 1,921 6,864 7,058 12,927 8,317 46,524 1,570 1,072 531 2,052 2,375 4,181 2,439 14,219 1,491 1,022 514 1,945 2,200 4,069 2,373 13,615 1,412 972 498 1,837 2,025 3,958 2,308 13,010 2,340 6,614 3,886 8,317 25,281 12,927 2,439 7,599 4,181 2,373 7,172 4,069 2,308 6,745 3,958 5 Program Capacity  Program capacity = # of teaching stations X students per teaching station X % utilization  Currently   West Bank: program capacity is higher than enrollment projections  East Bank: program capacity is higher than enrollment projections  New Orleans East: program capacity is lower than enrollment projections Program capacity vs. enrollment projection influencers  Optimal school size/enrollment  Classroom sizes in older buildings  Legacy demand for certain programs  Location of school  Flexibility for future needs (planned and emergency) 6 Site Size Site Acreage To determine acreage needed: 70.00 65.00 60.00 55.00 • • • • • • • Footprint of building Parking for staff & visitors Bus pick-up/drop-off Car pick-up/drop-off Green space Play fields Service deliveries Ideally, site size would be at least 3.5 acres, but the school’s location and school program focus also strongly influence site size requirements. 50.00 45.00 40.00 35.00 30.00 25.00 20.00 15.00 10.00 5.00 0.00 7 Educational Adequacy   For high schools the following spaces are typically used in analyzing educational & functional adequacy:  Gymnasium/physical education  3 buildings currently used as high schools have no gymnasium  Performing arts/visual arts  All high schools have rooms that could support the arts, but many do not have important features such as sound proofing (band) or a sink (visual arts)  Cafeteria size  2 high schools have cafeterias that will not seat 1/3 of average program capacity A major consideration for addressing educational adequacy is whether the site is large enough to support an addition if one is needed. 8 Facility Condition Index (FCI)  The Facility Condition Index (FCI) formula is: Cost to Repair/Cost to Replace = FCI %  Examples: Cost to Repair = $8,000,000 Cost to Replace = $10,000,000 $8,000,000/$10,000,000 = 80% Cost to Repair = $2,000,000 Cost to Replace = $10,000,000 $2,000,000/$10,000,000 = 20% The higher the FCI, the worse the condition Assessment Overview Rabouin High School Walker High School McMain High School (not including Gym) Clark High School McDonogh 35 (Old) High School Karr High School Bauduit Douglass High School Schwarz High School Easton High School 68.5% 62.0% 60.6% 60.1% 60.0% 59.6% 59.2% 56.1% 55.0% 54.6% Reed High School Franklin High School Kennedy HS Lusher (Fortier) High School L B Landry High School MLK Jr. Charter School Carver HS McDonogh 35 HS Edward Livingston HS Abramson HS 51.0% 40.6% 40.1% 39.1% 34.2% 26.0% 25.5% 25.2% 25.0% 24.7% 10 Assessment Overview 8 7 FCI Number of Sites 6 100% - 61% 4 4 60% - 46% 7 3 45% - 31% 4 2 30% - 16% 5 1 15% - 0% 0 0 5 100% - 61% 60% - 46% 45% - 31% 30% - 16% 15% - 0% 11