Kenned
Lexington

570

New York
New York

Hand

Via

The

USA

Delivery

Andrea

Honorable

Supreme
Part

60

Courtroom

Centre

New

242

www.kennedyslaw.

Christopher.Carroll

New

York,

York

10007

Please

accept

enjoin

subpoenas

that

this

be

addressed

Teams

the

20

meet

and

and

delay
the

documents),

Insurance

Company,

Football

L

fact

minority

of

the

Insurers

&

teams

The

Casualty
Travelers

The

Insurance
Indemnity

and

produced

Teams

Non-Party
of

North

River

Company,
Company,

a

failed

valid

each

to

now

cou

that

the

state-issued

home

Teams

were

at

ANY

produce
insurance

compel

in

foul

and

st

the

regarding

mostly

cry

due

in

team's

letters

to

few,

substance

N

an

documêiits

and

each

of

come

the

to

st

this

a TRO.

!nsurance
St.

law

h

their

relief

Non-Party

motions

filing

baseless-relief

Company,

from

and

have

of

issuing

teams

Insurers

teams

began

issued.

began

in
(the

extraordinary

conferences

most

order

Non-Par

compel

to

Teams

protective

the

for

The

motions

memorandum

member

the

that

a

for

response

in

("TRO").

Non-Party

separate

telephone

Insurers'

the

the

Insurers

NFL

documents,

extraordinary-and

Property

League.,

National

Order

to

standard

the

32

the

confer

the

subpoenas

the

ago,

of

a

in

of

with

motion

Insurers

months

produce

to

TIG

Football

v.

proceeding

issued

their

meet

each

to

from

validly

upon

cannot

documents

1

al.

Restraining

Insurers

Insurers

rules

by

Over

the

et

Co.,

behalf

a Temporary
the

the

Court

until

(and

Cas.

on

letter

this
for

temporarily

the

National

v.

652933/2012E

No.:

application

failure

Co.

Masley:

Justice

several

&

Property

Index

Party

Insurance

2019

29,

652813/2012E

No.:

Discover

to

April

America

Alterra
Index

Teams'2

F +1 646.625.40

York

Street

Re:

Dear

T +1 646.625.40

Masley

New

of

Court

48,

10

Paul
Travelers

Company,
Protective
Property

United
Insurance
Casualty

States

Fire

Company,

Company

!nsurance
Travelers
of

A

ACE

 Kennedys
The

Andrea

Honorable

April

29,

Page

2

Masley

2019

The

I.

Legal

Standard.

movant

can

and

68

Inc.,

the

papers.");

see

also

and

one

of

every

Doe

Inc.

Stores,

the

TRO

a

Here,

harm

that

will

merits

of

their

be

The

As

Non-Party

harm,

Hempstead

Res.

&

Recoverv

relief

a

426

success
N.Y.

be

that

N.Y.S.2d

movant
on

Futures

afforded

52,
failed

the

merits

Exch.,

only

in

Inc.,

those

be

a

Court

should

granted

threshold

movant
granted.

54

(2d

Dep't

establish

to

a

Irreparable

after

all

not

me

that

be

or

o
weighs

equity

settled

the

cannot

immediate

likelihood

and

only

is

236

order.

well

is

harm"

injunction
Corp.,

of

will

it

may

a

this

Immediate

TRO

showing

where

v.

a

"irreparable

a preliminary

Trading

of

and

protective

Sustain

Thus,

absent

and,

likelihood

addressing

Not

evidence.

a

for

that

appropriate

N.Y.2d

1)
2)

denied

the
Thus,

79

York,

3)

absence

until

establish

to

and

be

motion

relief

rather,

New

order;

the

with

individually);

should

Will

extreme

injunction

preliminary

TRO

the

Teams

but

irreparable

on

clear

relief

protective
a

for

argument

by

injunctive

("Injunctive

request

or

(ccilectively

a

v.

f

not

trial.").

plenary

fail

completely

was

granted

accordance

must
request

("In

be

in

Assoc.

Teams

for

the

only

Firefighters

motion

Non-Party

and

after

burden

its

prong

1984)
not

found

relief

merits

should

granted

facts

(denying

Dep't

resolved

cautiously

the

(1st

relief

matter

them

befall

inconvenience,

Research

used

the

satisfied

728

727,

entire

on

be

only

injunctive

(1988)

435

433,

meet

to

Fabrication

v.

undisputed

for

750-51

relief

A.D.2d
will

fails

request

success

injunctive

Uniformed

noted,

of

the

movant

748,

A.D.2d

See

and

briefing

N.Y.2d

and

law

the

the

and

as

provisional

Corp.

285

remedy

the
If

Likelihood

the

the

Accordingly,

II.

73

the

must

under

it

dements,

demanded,

safeguards.

of

these

and

drastic

6312(a).

Singh,101

v.

explored

are

CPLR

a

if

Phillips,

b

only

conclusory

Preston

J.A.

v.

may

not

injury

See

Koultukis

6301

and

irreparable

favor".

is

to

Axetrod,

relief

fully

for

right

where

injunction

his

relief

clear

v.

in

CPLR

to

evidence

(2)

(1986);

injunctive

a

of

406

actual

merits,

are

397,

establishes

to

the

equities

N.Y.2d

("Preliminary

e.g.,

on

success

that

(3)

with

demonstrate,

of

likelihood

pursuant

relief

injunctive

Preliminary

requirement
will

imminently

See

Haulage

1980)
irreparable

balancing

of

N.Y.S.2d

280,

446
extraordinary

(reversing

situations

the

eq

282

wh

 Kennedys
The

Andrea

Honorable

April

29,

Page

3

home

individual

them

the

in

a

for

Masley

2019

first

order

a

as

collectively,

single

them

to

22

in

received
there
to

no

is

team.
an

the

irreparable
(N.Y.

from

Sup.

team

any

it

one

Dec.
to

having

in

TRO

the

of

32

the

face

a

be.

No

single

motion

compel

that

particular,

a single

even

alone

let

client

purporting

v

h

irreparable

compel

to

home

Welsh-Ovcharov

e.g.,
-

the

its

by

Teams

harm

2017).

with

to

al

subpoena

to

supported

See,

such
a

seeking

Non-Party

should
18,

not

is

howeve

than

harm

3

in

sustain

other

prote

issues

comply

any

a

for

received

motion
in

result

that

Importantly,

that

court

any

statement

even

property

any
of

would

properly

Ct.

to

7.

could

team

failure

disposition

for

any

as

harm,

6450547

the

application
of

No

anything

a subpoena

employee

actual

its

at

that

entity.

for

litigate

with

Indeed,

a jural

that

comply

simply

not

a

discovery

Br.

Moving

contention

their

application

identical

"Non-Party

to

evidence

litigate

states."

practice

have

will

to

their

Teams"

is

motion

of

when

and

"having

the

Teams"

"Non-Party
subject

now

on

whic

Teams,

rest

harm

of

resolution

Non-Party

jurisdictions,

irreparable

facing

different

called

entity

are

32

pursue

Insurers

pending

the

Indeed,

separate

in

the

enjoined

immediately

this

-

demanded

they

case.5

between

due

proceedings

in

group

apparently

addressed,

not

domicited

entities

occur,

are

place)

protective

corporate

(where

jurisdictions

home

the

in

stat

domicited.

the

Importantly,

Court

quite

is

amazing

them

with

the

was

jurisdiction

be

Teams'

addressed

numerous

It

is

important
each

states,

to

discovery

varies

those

See
at

Ex.

page

A

laws

attached

note

with

applicable

in

those

to

to

own

widely
the

event

herewith

and
they
(October

3.

Teams'

the

the

and

foremost

in

subject

2018

letter

they

among

and
which

laws

that

certain

intend

motion

from

in

reside

[Teams]

Clubs
to

th

following:

rules

Non-Party

11,

which

Non-Member

manner

are

when

issues
first

discovery

The

Subpoenas.

various

each

in

practice
Specifically,

was

32

the

to

responses

motion

time),

efforts

that

their

the

that

(at

collectively

objections

about

h

attempted

deficient

preference.

their

Teams

Non-Party

Insurers

that

counsel

single

the

individually
insisted

was

and

Non-Party
could

faith

required

Teams'

the

their

Clubs

Non-Party

when

that

about

the

application

unitary

considering

collectively

subpoenas,

to

current

are

vie

states
to

take

full

practice."

Proskauer

Rose

 Kennedys
The
April

29,

Page

4

Insurers
to

resist

year

ago,

and

all

to

the

considerably
particular

Team

obtain

to

teams

are

the

(i.e.,

did

hurdles

of").

to

respond

in

necessary

tike

that

in
to

respond

was

compel

to

in

one

only

motion

backyard

to

in

compet,

home

eac

should

n

produc

to

Philadelphia

compel

to

Each

Florida.

its

the

a subpoen

must

separately

Non-Party

Team

Buccaneers

Bay
in

refusat

on

where

jurisdiction

the

re

being

f

issued.

numerous

to

irrespective

of

they

Proskauer

same

the

law

the

irreparable

a

has

firm

sophisticated

the

Rose
teams'

harm"

any

corporation

one

is

responding
of

choice

voluntary
to

while

(or

all)

worth

of

the

more

to

that

all

may

counsel

cannot

Teams.
$1

hom
the
is

billion,

of

only

Teams

Non-Party

within

than

their

it

certainly

Non-Party

Non-Pa

what

exactly

The

here.

response

in

And

country.

is

each
of

Unquestionably,

burden

them

that

(albeit

ago.

each

of

brethren,

months

represent

laws

are

allow

to

!ndeed,
the

their

potential

any

to

states.

of"
of

six

that

"Non-Party

various

rights

than

throughout

Proskauer

handle),

that

Teams"

the

advantage

separate

more

not
in

full

the

wanted

jurisdictions
for

"take

Rose

is

disputes

discovery

opportunity

said

it

then,

Critically,

is

own

their

Tampa

the

all

compel

and

i

they
with

they

motion

a

to

inte

Subpoenas

that

that

example,

court

more.

any

respond

to

having

because

Philadelphia

motion

for

obligations

comply
to

delay

countenanced

contend,

by

"irreparably

be

to

complains
of

oppo

actually

relevant

motions

strategy

league

stated

forced

and

teams

the
previously

were

subpoenas

not

to

Teams

Insurers

collective

should

logic

the

which

show

their

seek

to

issue

(the

with

Insurers
in

collective

The

the

to
to

not

comply

proce

This

NFL

despite
to

and

needed

the

its

issued

orders

of

refusat

Non-Party

valid

the

fashion.

defies

possible

in

ago.

bring

issuance,

forced

were

were
to

failed

the

serve

the

to

jurisdictions

after

harmed"
them

the

in

for

discovery

It

as

easy

subpoena

months

8

Least

forced

their

to

Teams

Now,

counsel

Team,

Party

due

unabashedly

so

and

issue

as

issued

commissions

were

stipulate

courts

advantage

full

it

Subpoenas

at

where

Insurers

Non-Party

various

make

a duty
the

served

commissions

Having

of

majority

that

to

property

and

with

served

were

extent

such

the

Insurers

vast

the

cause.

Subpoenas,

was

them

of

members)

show

to

The

jurisdiction,

Court

documents

to

production).

Each
Non-Party
"Subpoenas").6

(the

access

gain

to

Teams

Party

Masley

2019

the

for

a

Andrea

Honorable

the

Subpoenas

present

certain

its

resources

constitute

Each

and

of
surely

the

h

 Kennedys
The

Andrea

Honorable

April

29,

Page

5

are

Insurers

in

from

arising

here.

doing

corporation

illogical.

effort

there

Third,

for

rules

To
them

put

and

it

the

resources

Teams

discovery

demands

of

Court

deny

should

The

in

prongs
the

the

direct

necess

with

to

comply

not

to

all

such

which

that

the

(which

to

commêiice
proceedings

procaadings

before

this

are

likely

to
the

the

fail

They

withdr

Non-Pa

against

Court.

C

under

of

any

nee

still

Insurers

against

more

any

hypothetically

they

the

direct

commenced

have

that

entirety.

Merits

relief

establish
(1)

its

would

they

satisfy
analysis.

could

injunctive

must

order

they

cannot),

in

the

Teams

preliminary

Teams

on

to
this

a TRO,

m

have

fail
of

Succeed

very

they

dispositive
for

that

frankly,

Teams

Non-Party

they

for

test

is

to

Non-Party

harm

which

Non-Party

Likely

the

to,

application

Not

protective

that

consolidate

(3)

have

irreparable

respond

the

Are

the

for

Insurers

N

comply

that

jurisdictions,

Team's

Non-Party

proceediiigs

their

harm,

harm

motion

their

in

Non-Party

of

the

and

will

everything

to

having

arguendo,

two

and

team

team

main

the

relevant

each

conceivable

Accordingly,

Teams

irreparable

prong,

discovery

and

the

of

sacond

Court

proving

no

is

irreparable

assuming,

type

remaining

doing.

Non-Party

Even

There

requires.

done

have

Insurers

Non-Party

requirement

Team
entities

NFL's

of

Each

to

Non-Party

in

the

is

having

privilege.

jurisdiction

approp

state.

the

muster

to

III.

own

its

law

the

of

and

to

that

litigating

play

due

perfectly

non-party

foreign,

production

forestall

and

the

(as

avoid

at

inconsistency

plainly,

straightforward

the

of

logging

from

ruling

some

risk

production,

court's

each

no

is

suggest

to

of

Law

from

shopping
"strategy"

and

delay

the

To

only

to

practice

apply

discovery

forum

of
the

Rather,

continued

pursuing

means

or

and

subpoena).

(or

of

common

is

jurisdiction

suit

method

it

!ndead,

home

its

that

acceptable
"strategy"

of

Masley

2019

to

N

satisfy

well.

The

issues

and

all

governed

of

contend

York

for

where
the

cases
by

a

that

federal

where

need

cases
in

are

forum
the

federal

(including

courts

the

in

disputes

four

New

because

specifically

the

Teams

Non-Party

main

the
that
this

federal
occurred).7

cited
single

the

by
set

of

the

relief

courts

routinely

action

is

court

to

The
Non-Party

rules,

the

are

they
require

located

manage

given

reason

this

Teams)

is

Federal

parties

that

to
court's

docket.

its

Rules

sh

seeking

Moving

happens

in

because,

obvious

of

Proce

Civil

 Kennedys
The

Andrea

Honorable

April

29,

Page

6

of

manufactured

the

notion

New

that

York

would

they

jurisprudence

state

foreign

each

of

s

the
teams'

belies

of

themselves

avail

from

matters

transfer

to

Not

rulings.

among

consistency

ability

under

Division

stated

ensuring

about

theory

Cammêrcial

initial

or

resources

preserving

York

Masley

2019

the

N

jurisdictions.

the

Moreover,

same

general

with

the

potential

the

foreign

Non-Party

Teams'

attorneys

Party

motion
the

motion

for

TRO

is

IV.

they

not

simplified

Rose.

This

As

order

there

such,

and

,

the

no

is

the

second

of

to

as

the

possibl

gran

to

of

the

th

compliance

for

basis

prong

Court

wanted

supposedly
sound

subpo

reason

seek

of

(all

the

context

and

Teams

Non-Party

is

this

a valid

in

Subpoenas

it

as

convenient

not

is

especially

foreign

for

and

a

to

explanation

enforce

a plea

com

to

Court

why

to
is

are

the

in

the

granting
for

test

N

establishing

satisfied.

The

Eauities

The

Non-Party

Weigh

Insurers

have

Subpoenas

Since
a

produced

documents.

The

Despite
arising

from

to

the

of

18

time
confer"

the

Teams

Teams'

sudden

Non-Party
Subpoenas,

it

is

clear

the

served
of

have

that

m

re

of

the

t

2017,

Te

Non-Party
of

solely

produced

the

in

course

consist

to

20

responses

32

the

desire

abo

and

August

in

Teams

Non-Party

8

initial

over

for

test

Teams

their

14

the

explained

Non-Party

efforts

from

As

between

provide

to

of

prong

favor.

Teams

were

Non-Party

last

their

with

documents

these

by

the

in

Subpoenas

189

the

satisfy

Non-Party

and
of

Insurers

weigh

extra

round

remaining

the

the

patient

each

total

documents

of

"meet

first

grand

fail

incredibly

them

of

equities

each

extensive
the

also

any

on

giving
in

participate

that

been

,

Favor

in

Teams

prove

Subpoenas

disputes

the

ways.

protective

served

received

both

it

cannot

half.

that

the

or

permitted

as

order,

pursue

to

proceedings
have

Proskauer

protective

for

Insurers

cannot

motions

at

be

(which

this

any

teams

Insurers

motions

providing

argument

essential

teams

before

separate
to

Insurers'

the

to

responding

separate

jurisdictions

the

separate

Without
the

because

various

adjudicated

9-10.
for

Teams'

the

forcing

pg.

problematic

is

various

Teams'

at

the

Insurers'

the

be

should

Brief

Moving

rulings

issued,

of

Subpoenas

that

from

of

all

objections),

various

See

rulings.

for

same

contend

documents

of

categories

the

virtually

Teams

Non-Party

discuss

Non-Party

nothing.

a

plan

Teams

 Kennedys
The

Andrea

Honorable

April

29,

Page

7

V.

C_onclusion

For
the

Masley

2019

of

all

the

foregoing

Teams'

application

Non-Party

We

took

reasons,

forward

to

for

the

matter

order.

restraining

with

Respectfully

Yours

request

respectfully

a temporary

this

discussing

Insurers

the

Court.

Submitted,

sincerely,

Christopher

Carroll

Partner
For

cc:

All

of

Counsel

John
Seth
Steven

E.
B.

Failla

Record
(via

Schafter
H.

Holinstat

(via

email)

email)
(via

email)
(via

email)

Kennedys

CMK

that