Opening Statement of Ambassador William B. Taylor - October 22, 2019 Mr. Chairman, I appreciate the opportunity to appear today to provide my perspective on the events that are the subject of the Committees? inquiry. My sole purpose is to provide the Committees with my views about the strategic importance of Ukraine to the United States as well as additional information about the incidents in question. I have dedicated my life to serving US. interests at home and abroad in both military and civilian roles. My background and experience are nonpartisan and I have been honored to serve under every administration, Republican and Democratic, since 1985. For 50 years, I have served the country, starting as a cadet at West Point, then as an infantry officer for six years, including with the 101St Airborne Division in Vietnam; then at the Department of Energy; then as a member of a Senate staff; then at then with the State Department here and abroad?in Afghanistan, Iraq, Jerusalem, and Ukraine; and more recently, as Executive Vice President of the nonpartisan United States Institute of Peace. While I have served in many places and in different capacities, I have a particular interest in and respect for the importance of our country?s relationship with Ukraine. Our national security demands that this relationship remain strong. However, in August and September of this year, I became increasingly concerned that our relationship with Ukraine was being fundamentally undermined by an irregular, informal channel of US. policy?making and by the withholding of vital security assistance for domestic political reasons. I hope my remarks today will help the Committees understand why I believed that to be the case. At the outset, I would like to convey several key points. First, Ukraine is a strategic partner of the United States, important for the security of our country as well as Europe. Second, Ukraine is, right at this moment?while we sit in this room?and for the last ?ve years, under armed attack from Russia. Third, the security assistance we provide is crucial to Ukraine?s defense against Russian aggression, and, more importantly, sends a signal to Ukrainians?and Russians? that we are Ukraine?s reliable strategic partner. And finally, as the Committees are now aware, I said on September 9 in a message to Ambassador Gordon Sondland that withholding security assistance in exchange for help with a domestic political campaign in the United States would be ?crazy.? I believed that then, and I still believe that. Let me now provide the Committees a chronology of the events that led to my concern. On May 28 of this year, I met with Secretary Mike Pompeo who asked me to return to Kyiv to lead our embassy in Ukraine. It was?and is?a critical time in U.S.-Ukraine relations: had just been elected president and Ukraine remained at war with Russia. As the summer approached, a new Ukrainian government would be seated, parliamentary elections were imminent, and the Ukrainian political trajectory would be set for the next several years. I had served as Ambassador to Ukraine from 2006 to 2009, having been nominated by George W. Bush, and, in the intervening 10 years, I have stayed engaged with Ukraine, visiting frequently since 2013 as a board member of a small Ukrainian non-govemmental organization supporting good governance and reform. Across the responsibilities 1 have had in public service, Ukraine is special for me, and Secretary Pompeo?s offer to return as Chief of Mission was compelling. I am convinced of the profound importance of Ukraine to the security of the United States and Europe for two related reasons: First, if Ukraine succeeds in breaking free of Russian in?uence, it is possible for Europe to be whole, free, democratic, and at peace. In contrast, if Russia dominates Ukraine, Russia will again become an empire, oppressing its people, and threatening its neighbors and the rest of the world. Second, with the annexation of the Crimea in 2014 and the continued aggression in Donbas, Russia violated countless treaties, ignored all commitments, and dismissed all the principles that have kept the peace and contributed to prosperity in Europe since World War II. To restore Ukraine?s independence, Russia must leave Ukraine. This has been and should continue to be a bipartisan US. foreign policy goal. When I was serving outside of government during the Obama administration and after the Russian invasion of Ukraine in 2014, I joined two other former ambassadors to Ukraine in urging Obama administration of?cials at the State Department, Defense Department, and other agencies to provide lethal defensive weapons to Ukraine in order to deter further Russian aggression. I also supported much stronger sanctions against Russia.