Discretionary Review Abbreviated Analysis HEARING DATE: NOVEMBER 7, 2019   Date:  October 30, 2019  Case No.:  2018‐003910DRP  Project Address:  3252 19TH STREET  Permit Application:  2018.08.16.7612  Zoning:  UMU (Urban Mixed‐Use) Zoning District    58‐X Height and Bulk District  Block/Lot:  3591/025  Project Sponsor:  Philip Lesser, on behalf of Joey Mucha    555 Laurel Avenue #501    San Mateo, CA 94401  Staff Contact:  Rich Sucre – (415) 575‐9108    richard.sucre@sfgov.org    Recommendation:  Do Not Take DR and Approve     PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project includes legalization of a change in use of approximately 2,849 square feet on the first floor  and  an  associated  mezzanine  from  automotive  repair  to  amusement  game  arcade/restaurant  (dba.  Redemption).  The  project  includes  interior  alterations.  No  work  is  proposed  on  the  second  floor  level,  which is currently occupied by a professional service use.    SITE DESCRIPTION AND PRESENT USE The  subject  building at 3252 19th Street is  located  on a rectangular  corner lot (measuring approximately  2,852 square feet) at the northwest intersection of Shotwell and 19th Streets; Lot 025 on Assessor’s Block  3591. The property is developed with a two‐story industrial building, which measures 31 feet 4 inches in  height and 30 feet 6‐inches in width. Constructed in 1986, the subject building is not a historic resource.  The most recent use on the ground floor was automotive repair (dba. Giglers Auto Body & Painting).     SURROUNDING PROPERTIES AND NEIGHBORHOOD The subject property is located in the Mission neighborhood. To the west of the subject property is a two‐ story commercial building with a business service on the ground floor, while to the north of the subject  property is a two‐story, red brick industrial building.    The immediate neighborhood is mixed in character with two‐ and three‐story residential buildings to the  south,  commercial  and  industrial  properties  to  the  east,  and  the  San  Francisco  Fire  Department  to  the  southeast.          www.sfplanning.org Discretionary Review – Abbreviated Analysis October 30, 2019 RECORD NO. 2018-003910DRP 3252 19th STREET   BUILDING PERMIT NOTIFICATION   TYPE REQUIRED PERIOD NOTIFICATION DATES DR FILE DATE DR HEARING DATE FILING TO HEARING TIME 311 Notice  30 days  June 25, 2019 –  July 25, 2019  July 25, 2019  November 7,  2019  103 days   HEARING NOTIFICATION   TYPE Posted Notice  Mailed Notice  Online Notice  REQUIRED PERIOD 20 days  20 days  20 days  REQUIRED NOTICE DATE ACTUAL NOTICE DATE October 18, 2019  October 18, 2019  October 18, 2019  October 18, 2019  October 18, 2019  October 18, 2019  ACTUAL PERIOD 20 days  20 days  20 days    PUBLIC COMMENT Adjacent neighbor(s)  Other neighbors on the  block or directly across  the street  Neighborhood Groups  SUPPORT OPPOSED 1    NO POSITION         1        To date, the Department has received letters of support for the Project, including from:   Mark DeVito, 1025 Hampshire Street   Johnny Irwin, City Surf Project   Fiona Ma, California State Treasurer   Glenn Matthews, 592 South Van Ness Avenue   Julianne Murrell (Adventures & Biz), 670 Shotwell Street   Marlene Samson, Costless Maintenance Services, Inc. (CMSC), 3254 19th Street   Mission Merchants Association   Mike Earl, Timbuk2    To date, the Department has received letters of opposition to the Project, including from:   Spike Kahn    DISCTRETIONARY REVIEW REQUESTOR Kevin Ortiz, Cultural Action Network, 72 Woodward Street    DISCRETIONARY REVIEW REQUESTOR’S CONCERNS AND PROPOSED ALTERNATIVES See attached Discretionary Review Application, dated July 25, 2019.      2 Discretionary Review – Abbreviated Analysis October 30, 2019 RECORD NO. 2018-003910DRP 3252 19th STREET PROJECT SPONSOR’S RESPONSE TO DISCRETIONARY REVIEW APPLICATION See attached Response to DR @ 3252 19th Street – Request for Call Tomorrow, dated August 1, 2019.      ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The  Project  is  exempt  from  California  Environmental  Quality  Act  (“CEQA”)  as  a  Class  1  Categorical  Exemption.     DEPARTMENT REVIEW The proposed amusement game arcade (now general entertainment) and restaurant uses are prinicipally  permitted in the UMU Zoning District per Planning Code Section 843.    RECOMMENDATION:  Do Not Take DR and Approve     Attachments:  Block Book Map   Sanborn Map  Zoning Map  Aerial Photographs   Context Photographs  Section 311 Notice  CEQA Determination  DR Application  Public Correspondence  Reduced Plans  3 Parcel Map SUBJECT PROPERTY Discretionary Review Hearing Record No. 2018‐003910DRP 3252 19th Street Sanborn Map* SUBJECT PROPERTY *The Sanborn Maps in San Francisco have not been updated since 1998, and this map may not accurately reflect existing conditions. Discretionary Review Hearing Record No. 2018‐003910DRP 3252 19th Street Aerial Photo – View 1 SUBJECT PROPERTY Discretionary Review Hearing Record No. 2018‐003910DRP 3252 19th Street Aerial Photo – View 2 SUBJECT PROPERTY Discretionary Review Hearing Record No. 2018‐003910DRP 3252 19th Street Zoning Map 3591011 . I 1 3 59 1030-0 3 2 t3 mm 35913021 3 5940 29A Ell-31M? v' Ewar- I 13598015 3593014 am 4+ 3 59409 2-09 9 Discretionary Review Hearing Record No. 2018-003910DRP 3252 19th Street SAN FRANCISCO PLANNING DEPARTMENT Site Photo 3251 19th St Elan Fri." .13 Discretionary Review Hearing Record No. 3252 19th Street SAN FRANCISCO PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1 6 5 0 Mi s s i o n S t r e e t S u i t e 4 0 0 San Francisco, CA 94103 NOTICE OF BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION (SECTION 311) On April 23, 2019, Building Permit Application No. 2018.08.16.7612 was filed for work at the Project Address below. June 25th, 2019 Notice Date: Expiration Date: PROJECT INFORMATION Project Address: Cross Street(s): Block/Lot No.: Zoning District(s): Record No.: July 25th, 2019 APPLICANT INFORMATION 3252 19th Street Shotwell Street 3591/025 UMU / 58-X 2018-003910PRJ Applicant: Address: City, State: Telephone: Email: Philip Lesser 555 Laurel Avenue #501 San Mateo, CA 94401 (650) 346-2903 phnsan@msn.com You are receiving this notice as an owner or occupant of property within 150 feet of the proposed project. You are not required to take any action. For more information about the proposed project, or to express concerns about the project, please contact the Applicant listed above or the Planner named below as soon as possible. If you believe that there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances associated with the project, you may request that the Planning Commission review this application at a public hearing for Discretionary Review. Requests for a Discretionary Review hearing must be filed during the 30-day review period, prior to the close of business on the Expiration Date shown above, or the next business day if that date is on a week-end or a legal holiday. If no Requests for Discretionary Review are filed, this project will be approved by the Planning Department after the Expiration Date. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Commission or the Department. All written or oral communications, including submitted personal contact information, may be made available to the public for inspection and copying upon request and may appear on the Department’s website or in other public documents. PROJECT SCOPE  Demolition  New Construction  Change of Use  Façade Alteration(s)  Front Addition  Rear Addition  Side Addition  Vertical Addition PROJECT FEATURES EXISTING PROPOSED Building Use Front Setback Building Depth Height Rear Yard Number of Stories Number of Dwelling Units Off-Street Parking PROJECT DESCRIPTION Automotive Repair None See Plans 31-ft 4-in None 2 0 0  Alteration Amusement Arcade/Restaurant No Change No Change No Change No Change No Change No Change No Change The project includes legalization of a change in use of approximately 2,849 square feet on the first floor and an associated mezzanine from automotive repair to amusement game arcade/restaurant (dba. Redemption). The project includes interior alterations. No work is proposed on the second floor level. The issuance of the building permit by the Department of Building Inspection or the Planning Commission project approval at a discretionary review hearing would constitute as the Approval Action for the project for the purposes of CEQA, pursuant to Section 31.04(h) of the San Francisco Administrative Code. To view plans or related documents, visit sf-planning.org/notices and search the Project Address listed above. Once the property is located, click on the dot(s) to view details of the record number above, its related documents and/or plans. For more information, please contact Planning Department staff: Rich Sucre, 415-575-9108, richard.sucre@sfgov.org 中文詢問請電: 415.575.9010 Para Información en Español Llamar al: 415.575.9010 Para sa Impormasyon sa Tagalog Tumawag sa: 415.575.9121 GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT PROCEDURES Reduced copies of the proposed project plans have been included in this mailing for your information. If you have questions about the plans, please contact the project Applicant listed on the front of this notice. You may wish to discuss the plans with your neighbors or neighborhood association, as they may already be aware of the project. If you have general questions about the Planning Department’s review process, contact the Planning Information Center (PIC) at 1660 Mission Street, 1st Floor (415) 558-6377 or pic@sfgov.org. If you have specific questions about the proposed project, you should contact the planner listed on the front of this notice. If you believe that the impact on you from the proposed project is significant and you wish to seek to change the project, there are several procedures you may use. We strongly urge that steps 1 and 2 be taken. 1. 2. 3. Request a meeting with the project Applicant to get more information and to explain the project's impact on you. Contact the nonprofit organization Community Boards at (415) 920-3820, or online at www.communityboards.org for a facilitated discussion in a safe and collaborative environment. Community Boards acts as a neutral third party and has, on many occasions, helped reach mutually agreeable solutions. Where you have attempted, through the use of the above steps or other means, to address potential problems without success, please contact the planner listed on the front of this notice to discuss your concerns. If, after exhausting the procedures outlined above, you still believe that exceptional and extraordinary circumstances exist, you have the option to request that the Planning Commission exercise its discretionary powers to review the project. These powers are reserved for use in exceptional and extraordinary circumstances for projects which generally conflict with the City's General Plan and the Priority Policies of the Planning Code; therefore the Commission exercises its discretion with utmost restraint. This procedure is called Discretionary Review. If you believe the project warrants Discretionary Review by the Planning Commission, you must file a Discretionary Review application prior to the Expiration Date shown on the front of this notice. Discretionary Review applications are available at the Planning Information Center (PIC), 1660 Mission Street, 1st Floor, or online at www.sfplanning.org). You must submit the application in person at the Planning Information Center (PIC), with all required materials and a check payable to the Planning Department. To determine the fee for a Discretionary Review, please refer to the Planning Department Fee Schedule available at www.sfplanning.org. If the project includes multiple building permits, i.e. demolition and new construction, a separate request for Discretionary Review must be submitted, with all required materials and fee, for each permit that you feel will have an impact on you. Incomplete applications will not be accepted. If no Discretionary Review Applications have been filed within the Notification Period, the Planning Department will approve the application and forward it to the Department of Building Inspection for its review. BOARD OF APPEALS An appeal of the Planning Commission’s decision on a Discretionary Review case may be made to the Board of Appeals within 15 calendar days after the building permit is issued (or denied) by the Department of Building Inspection. Appeals must be submitted in person at the Board's office at 1650 Mission Street, 3rd Floor, Room 304. For further information about appeals to the Board of Appeals, including current fees, contact the Board of Appeals at (415) 575-6880. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW This project has undergone preliminary review pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). If, as part of this process, the Department’s Environmental Review Officer has deemed this project to be exempt from further environmental review, an exemption determination has been prepared and can be obtained through the Exemption Map at www.sfplanning.org. An appeal of the decision to exempt the proposed project from CEQA may be made to the Board of Supervisors within 30 calendar days after the project approval action identified on the determination. The procedures for filing an appeal of an exemption determination are available from the Clerk of the Board at City Hall, Room 244, or by calling (415) 554-5184. Under CEQA, in a later court challenge, a litigant may be limited to raising only those issues previously raised at a hearing on the project or in written correspondence delivered to the Board of Supervisors, Planning Commission, Planning Department or other City board, commission or department at, or prior to, such hearing, or as part of the appeal hearing process on the CEQA decision. Symbol Legend General Construction Notes 2 STANDARDS The project shall be constructed according to the locally adopted edition of the uniform building code, the state of california, local municipality amendments and all other applicable codes. Governing authorities and codes take precedence over drawings and specifications. The GC shall report all discrepancies to the architect immediately. The GC shall maintain a current copy of the 2016 CBC on site at all times. The GC shall install all materials and products in strict accordance with manufacturers' recommendations. all manufacturers' articles, materials and equipment shall be applied installed, connected, erected, cleaned, and conditioned as per the manufacturers' instructions and applicable icbo reports. All materials shall be new unless otherwise noted and like materials shall be consistent in appearance unless specified otherwise The GC and all subcontractors shall provide a one-year guarantee after project completion for all materials and workmanship. Mechanics, craftsmen, and workers skilled and experienced in the fabrication and installation of the work involved shall perform shop and fieldwork. all work on this project shall be performed in accordance with the best-accepted practices of the respective trades involved and in accordance with the drawings, submitted shop drawings, and these specifications. 3 DIMENSIONS Written dimensions on drawings shall take precedence over scaled drawings. Do not scale drawings at any time. Walls and partitions shown in plan or section are to face of finish material unless otherwise. Exterior dimensions are to outside face of CMU or plywood where applicable, u.o.n. Interior dimensions are to outside face of stud u.o.n. Interior elevation and cabinet dimensions are to face of finish material. 4 FIELD CONDITIONS The GC shall verify dimensions against field conditions. construction documents are based on observation and documentation of existing conditions by the architect and from documents provided by the owner. The architect makes no claim to the accuracy of hidden conditions or conditions inaccessible from direct observation. should the GC encounter field conditions that vary from these construction documents and that effect the intent of these drawings or the contract/ subcontract sum, the architect shall be notified immediately. 5 CONFLICTS The GC shall become familiar with the existing conditions of the site and project prior to commencing work and in the case of conflict with the documents, shall notify the architect immediately for clarification. The architect shall be notified immediately in the case of conflict between project documents and consultants', manufacturers' or other documents or recommendations. Elevation Reference (drawing #/ sheet #) 20 ENVIRONMENTAL TOBACCO SMOKE (ETS) CONTROL Where outdoor areas are provided for smoking, smoking shall be prohibited 25 feet of building entries, outdoor intakes and operable windows and within the building as prohibited by other laws or regulation per CBC Title 24, Part 11 5.504.7 Section Reference (drawing #/ sheet #) 21 DUST CONTROL MEASURES Water or dust palliative shall be sprayed on unpaved construction and staging areas during construction as directed by the County. Truck hauling soil, sand and other loose materials over public roads will cover the loads, or will keep the loads at least two feet below the level of the sides of the container, or will wet the load sufficiently to prevent dust emissions. Paved roads will be swept as needed to remove soil that has been carried onto them from the project site. Water or other dust palliative will be applied to stockpiles of soil as needed to control dust. ARCHITECT: 19th and Shotwell, LLC C/O Jeremy Walter Mucha, Manager 2952 NW 132nd Avenue Portland, Oregon 97229 MH Architects Matt Hollis David Castro Ernest Theurer T: 415-308-3711 E: joemucha@gmail.com Vantage Point E: becky@beckycarter.com E: sara@beckycarter.com Entire second floor ( E ) Professional Service Office (Sec. 8980.108) to remain Professional Service Office (Sec.890.108) Signage under separate permits. All work shall comply with 2016 versions of California Building Code (CBC), California Residential Code (CRC), California Plumbing Code (CPC), California Mechanical Code (CMC), California Electrical Code (CEC), California Energy Code, California Green Building Standards Code (CGBS), California Fire Code (CFC, if applicable), 2016 California Energy Efficiency Standards (CEES), San Francisco County and all applicable local codes. Project Consultant: Philip Lesser T: (650) 346-2903 E: phnsan@msn.com Detail Reference (drawing #/ sheet #) Site Information Room Name Room Number 100 D-01 Door Symbol W-01 Window Symbol P-01 Louver Symbol A Site Address: 3252 19th St San Francisco, CA 94110 Hom-Pisano Engineering, Inc. Mike Hom Jay Pisano 2265 31st Avenue, San Francisco, Ca 94116 T: 415.713.8087 T: 415.307.2750 F: 415.857.2117 E:hom@hompisano.com E:pisano@hompisano.com 2,851 SqFt Use Group/ Occupancy (e): B Use Group/ Occupancy (p): B, A, S-2 Building Type: Type VB Cover Sheet Ground Floor Plans Existing & Proposed Elevations Existing & Proposed Elevations Fire Protection Responsibility Area: Local, State Height & Bulk Districts: 58x Legislative Setbacks: None Historic Preservation: C-not eligible Year Built: 1986 END OF GENERAL NOTES Square Footage (Please see sheet A0.04 for Square Footage breakdown associated with each proposed occupancy classification.) Site Plan ACCESS EASEMENT GATE Any change, modification, or interpretation of the scope or requirements of these documents undertaken without consultation of the architect shall be the responsibility of the GC. The GC shall inspect, test, and disconnect utility services at the main source or main branch. The GC shall securely cap and/or valve-off utility service behind final finished surfaces of intended construction or, when noted, at finished face of exist. construction prior to demolition. utility service shall be defined as plumbing, hvac, electric, and fire protection. SUBJECT PROPERTY 3252 19TH ST. 3254 19TH ST. 2-STORY STRUCTURE 3260 19TH ST. 2-STORY STRUCTURE The owner may order extra work or make changes by altering, adding to, or deducting from the work. the contract sum shall be adjusted accordingly. Shotwell 7 REVISIONS AND CHANGES Revisions, and changes must be submitted to the architect for review in the form of a change order, prior to the purchase, fabrication, or installation of the work in question. 8 UTILITIES The architect does not assume responsibility for underground utilities or the existence of other buried objects. The locations of existing underground utilities and or facilities as shown on the drawings are approximate only. the gc shall contact the respective utility company and provide utility location services as required to obtain the exact depth of burial and horizontal location of utility lines, conduits, piping, etc... prior to performing underground construction the gc shall make necessary probes and explorations to identify areas of possible Lot Size: Stories: 2 (No Change) ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS: If human remains are encountered, all work must stop in the immediate vicinity of the discovered remains and PRMD staff, County Coroner and a qualified archaeologist must be notified immediately so that an evaluation can be performed. If the remains are deemed to be Native American, the Native American Heritage Commission must be contacted by the Coroner so that a "Most Likely Descendant" can be designated and the appropriate provisions of the California Government Code and California Public Resources Code will be followed. 3591 / 025 Zoning Group: UMU Urban Mixed Use Wall Tag A0.01 A1.01 A2.01 A2.02 APN #: 06 30 2019 Building Code Information Sheet Index The GC shall coordinate all work, including scheduling times and locations for deliveries, building access, etc. The commencement of work shall be deemed as an acknowledgement by the GC that all work of the project shall be completed in conformance with the contract documents and schedule. Vicinity Map Site Adhesives, sealants and caulks shall be complaint with VOC and other toxic compound limits. 9 PERMITS The GC shall arrange for all inspections and permits necessary to obtain a certificate of occupancy and or final permit sign-off & inspection. PUBLISH Admin. Change of Use DATE 04.23.19 Pre-app Request 05.06.19 Pre-app meeting minutes 06.03.19 311 Notification 06.17.19 19th St 10 EXISTING CONDITIONS Access panels, clean outs, and the like shall be maintained for existing building systems. The GC shall verify that existing walls and floors to remain are within expected tolerances. The GC shall report to the architect any variations in floor levels greater than 1/4" in 10'-0". The GC shall inform the architect of any existing threshold elevation variations greater than 1/2". 11 DEFINITIONS "Align" shall be defined as the accurate location of finish faces in the same plane. "typical" or "typ." shall be defined as conditions which are representative of similar conditions throughout. unless otherwise noted, details are usually keyed and noted. "typ." only once, when they first occur. "similar" or "sim." shall be defined as conditions which are comparable in characteristics for the conditions noted. verify dimensions and orientation on plans and elevations. "gc" refers to the general contractor, his agents and subcontractors. "architect" refers to the architect of record or his agent. 12 MATERIALS STORAGE AND PROTECTION OF WORK Improvements on the site, work in progress, stored materials on property shall be protected by the GC from damage arising during the work. all items damaged due to insufficient protection or otherwise shall be fully restored by the gc to their prior condition at no cost to the owner. No part of the structure shall be overloaded beyond its safe carrying capacity at any time. This drawing is the property of MH Architects. Any unauthorized use in part or in whole without written permission is prohibited. STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: Should conflicts occur between drawings and specifications, drawings shall govern in matters of dimension or quantity. Specifications shall govern in matters of materials or finishes. 6 SCHEDULE All work shall be performed during regular business hours, as permitted by local agencies. work involving excessive noise or dust, or which would otherwise interfere with the normal operation of the building, site or neighboring sites shall be coordinated with the owner. 426 (P) Addition of 561 sf mezzanine, which is less than 1/3 the 2,288 sf ( E ) ground floor E: matt@matthollis.com E: david@matthollis.com E: ernie@matthollis.com T: 510-922-8620 T: 650-799-8074 Grid Line (P) One roll-up door to be replaced with glazing systems to meet Planning Department transparency requirements. T: 415.977.0194 F: 415.977.0196 Studio Becky Carter Becky Carter Sara Reeble Datum or Spot Elevation Point Change of Use of the entire ground floor from (E) Automotive Repair (Sec. 890.15) to (P) Amusement Arcade -Mechanical Amusement Devises (Sec. 890.4) and (P) Bona Fide Restaurant (Sec. 843.45) to comply with Planning Code Section 171 and thereby abate Notice of Enforcement 2018-003910ENF. 2325 3rd St. Suite 426 San Francisco, CA 94107 Interior Design: 22 NOISE CONTROL MEASURES All internal combustion engines used during construction of this project shall be operated with mufflers that meet the requirements of the State Resources Code, and, where applicable, the Vehicle Code. Equipment shall be properly maintained and turned off when not in use. All construction activities, deliveries and equipment start-up shall be restricted to the hours of 7:00am and 7:00pm on weekdays and 9:00am and 7:00pm on weekends and holidays. A sign(s) shall be posted on the site regarding the allowable hours of construction, and including the developer's/construction manager's phone number for public contact. 23 ARCHAEOLOGICAL FINDINGS In the event that archaeological resources such as pottery, arrowheads, midden or culturally modified soil deposits are discovered at any time during grading, scraping or excavation within the property, all work shall be halted in the vicinity of the find and County PRMD - Project Review staff shall be notified and a qualified archaeologist shall be contacted immediately to make an evaluation of the find and report to PRMD. PRMD staff may consult and/or notify the appropriate tribal representative from tribes known to PRMD to have interests in the area. Artifacts associated with prehistoric sites include humanly modified stone, shell, bone or other cultural materials such as charcoal, ash and burned rock indicative of food procurement or processing activities. Prehistoric domestic resources include hearths, firepits, or house floor depressions whereas typical mortuary resources are represented by human skeletal remains. Historic artifacts potentially include all by-products of human land use greater than fifty (50) years of age including trash pits older than fifty (50) years of age. When contacted, a member of PRMD Project Review staff and the archaeologist shall visit the site to determine the extent of the resources and to develop and coordinate proper protection/mitigation measures required for the discovery. PRMD may refer the mitigation/protection plan to designated tribal representatives for review and comment. No work shall commence until a protection/mitigation plan is reviewed and approved by PRMD - Project Review staff. Mitigations may include avoidance, removal, preservation and/or recordation in accordance with California la. Archaeological evaluation and mitigation shall be at the applicant's sole expense. OWNER: APN 3591 - 025 These contract documents intend to describe a finished project ready for legal use. the GC shall furnish and install all required elements for a complete operating system. 19 MOISTURE CONTENT OF BUILDING MATERIALS Building materials with visible signs of water damage shall not be installled. Wall and floor framing shall not be enclosed when the framing members exceed 19% moisture content. Moisture content shall be measured, verified, and documented in accordance with CGBC Section 5.505. Tenant Improvement 3252 19th St. San Francisco, CA 94110 All work on this project provided by the general contractor (GC) shall conform to the contract documents which include the drawings, specifications, all addenda and modifications issued by the architect. Redemption 1 SCOPE Project Summary Project Team N REV DATE Site Photos Location Map Site 13 SECURITY The GC shall be responsible for securing the site during the course of the project. if the site is unattended at any time, it shall be locked. 14 TOXIC MATERIALS Any materials of unknown constitution uncovered during the course of construction shall be left untouched and immediately brought to the attention of the owner for testing. 15 CLEAN UP The site shall be kept broom clean and free of debris during the course of construction. At the completion of the work the GC shall clean the project and the surrounding area, remove all waste materials and rubbish from the project as well as tools, construction equipment, machinery and surplus materials. the gc shall remove caulk, putty, and paint from glass and mirrors and wash and polish the same. clean and remove all labels, grease, dirt, stains, etc. from finished surfaces and equipment to the extent required restoring the intended finish. Planters and landscape areas shall be cleaned of debris and rough grading shall be completed. Date: Drawn by: Project No: Scale: 16 COMMISSIONING Commissioning, Testing and Adjusting, shall be included in the design and by the GC during construction of the project to verify that the building systems and components meet the owner's project requirements. 17 PROTECTION OF DUCT OPENINGS AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT DURING CONSTRUCTION The GC shall provide protection for ducts, duct openings, permanent and construction mechanical equipment at the time of rough installation, storage, and untill completion of construction, using materials or methods acceptable to local enforcing agencies in order to reduce dust/ debris that may collect in building systems. 06.17.19 1907 As Noted Cover Sheet 18 BUILDING MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION At the time of final inspection, the GC shall provide a manual, compact disc, web-based reference or other media acceptable to the enforcing agency which includes an operation and maintenance manual as outlined in CGBC Section 5.410. N South East Corner South West Corner (entry) Entry SHEET NO: A0.01 3 A2.01 3 A2.01 01 02 5'-4 11/16" 03 5'-4 11/16" 04 7'-4 3/16" 05 5'-11 5/16" 06 01 6'-4 11/16" 02 03 5'-4 11/16" 04 5'-4 11/16" 7'-4 3/16" 05 06 5'-11 5/16" 01 6'-4 11/16" 02 03 5'-4 11/16" 5'-4 11/16" 04 05 7'-4 3/16" 5'-11 5/16" 06 6'-4 11/16" 3 A2.01 426 ACCESS EASEMENT Egress Court A G C Kitchen 11'-9" 4'-6" Mechanical / Storage 3'-5 3/4" C.H. 4'6" D A Hood Duct C E 3'-0" F E F 6'-6 7/8" Amusement Game Arcade with Resturant Mezzanine Space 6'-6 7/8" A 550 SqFt G H 4'-5 3/4" G C H H 3'-0" 18'-0 1/16" 18'-0 1/16" D A J J D-04 DATE 04.23.19 Pre-app Request 05.06.19 Pre-app meeting minutes 06.03.19 311 Notification 06.17.19 5'-2 5/8" Coat Room 5'-2 5/8" 5'-2 5/8" C PUBLISH Admin. Change of Use I A I A I D Bathroom Single Stall D-01 (e) HW Heater & Electrical Pannel to be relocated C 18'-0 1/16" Amusement Game Arcade with Resturant Redemption A D-05 A 4'-5 3/4" 4'-5 3/4" G C Self-service Food Counter 6'-6 7/8" F A 6'-3 7/8" G 6'-3 7/8" G C D G A E C APN 3591 - 025 A A D-06 Dry Storage 4'-11 1/4" A B 4'-11 1/4" A B 06 30 2019 6'-3 7/8" Bathrooms C 3'-5 3/4" D-07 4'-6" A D-08 Mechanical / Storage 3'-5 3/4" D-09 B D A Double Height Space D-10 B Storage Room D-11 B A B D-02 B Mech. Amusement Device Storage A Existing Automotive Repair 11'-9" D D W/D 4'-6" D-12 D A 4'-11 1/4" 11'-9" UP GATE A Janitors Closet A D-03 Tenant Improvement 3252 19th St. San Francisco, CA 94110 GATE A ACCESS EASEMENT This drawing is the property of MH Architects. Any unauthorized use in part or in whole without written permission is prohibited. Access Panels to Mechanical Rooms J C REV DATE A 3 A2.01 UP 3 A2.01 21'-7 3/8" C 21'-7 3/8" 21'-7 3/8" D Entry 3 A2.01 Prize Counter K D Refreshment Counter W-01 K K Gas Meter and Internet Entrance Date: Drawn by: Project No: Scale: 06.17.19 1907 As Noted Floor Plans 1 Existing Floor Plan Scale: 3/16" = 1'-0" 2 Proposed Floor Plan Scale: 3/16" = 1'-0" 3 Proposed Mezzanine Plan Scale: 3/16" = 1'-0" SHEET NO: A1.01 426 This drawing is the property of MH Architects. Any unauthorized use in part or in whole without written permission is prohibited. 01 02 03 04 05 01 06 02 03 04 05 06 06 30 2019 5'-4 11/16" 5'-4 11/16" 5'-4 11/16" 7'-4 3/16" 5'-11 5/16" 5'-4 11/16" 7'-4 3/16" 5'-11 5/16" 6'-4 11/16" 6'-4 11/16" T.O. Parapet T.O. Parapet 31'-4" 31'-4" Roof 28'-3" Roof 16'-8" 16'-8" (e) Stucco Finish to be Redone (n) Stucco Finish Color TBD Mezzanine Level Mezzanine Level 7'-8" 7'-0" (e) Roll Up Door to be Removed W-1 Entrance to A-2 Space (e) Existing Metal Doors to Remain Ground Floor Ground Floor 0" 0" 1 Existing Front Elevation Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0" 2 (n) Storefront System APN 3591 - 025 Second Floor Tenant Improvement 3252 19th St. San Francisco, CA 94110 Second Floor Redemption 28'-3" PUBLISH Admin. Change of Use DATE 04.23.19 Pre-app Request 05.06.19 Pre-app meeting minutes 06.03.19 311 Notification 06.17.19 Proposed Front Elevation Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0" REV DATE Date: Drawn by: Project No: Scale: 06.17.19 1907 As Noted Exterior Elevations SHEET NO: A2.01 K J 21'-7 3/8" I H 5'-2 5/8" 18'-0 1/16" G 4'-5 3/4" F 6'-6 7/8" E 3'-5 3/4" D 6'-3 7/8" C 4'-11 1/4" B 4'-6" A 11'-9" 426 T.O. Parapet 31'-4" Roof 28'-3" This drawing is the property of MH Architects. Any unauthorized use in part or in whole without written permission is prohibited. Hardie Board 06 30 2019 Second Floor 16'-8" (e) Gate to be replaced Mezzanine Level Redemption 0" CMU 2 Existing East Elevation Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0" K J 21'-7 3/8" I 5'-2 5/8" H 18'-0 1/16" G 4'-5 3/4" F 6'-6 7/8" E 3'-5 3/4" D 6'-3 7/8" C 4'-11 1/4" B 4'-6" A 11'-9" T.O. Parapet 31'-4" APN 3591 - 025 Ground Floor Tenant Improvement 3252 19th St. San Francisco, CA 94110 7'-8" PUBLISH Admin. Change of Use DATE 04.23.19 Pre-app Request 05.06.19 Pre-app meeting minutes 06.03.19 311 Notification 06.17.19 Roof 28'-3" REV DATE Second Floor 16'-8" (n) Signage LASERLASECUT R CUT COLLECTI COLLECTION ON LASER CUT COLLECTION Design GuiDesi de gn Guide Design Guide The Laser Cut col ThelectiLaser on allowsCut collection designers to seamleThesslLaseyr Cutdi cvoallows l eidctioen alspaces ows designers towidesigners seamtlhes lyadivireflecti de spaces with avreeflecnatural tive nato tural metaseamlessly lmetal or a bold or a bold divide spaces with a reflective natural metal or a bold colorful pattern colorful using a durabl pattern e and cost effecti using ve materi coalorful padurable t earnlussol ing a duruatibleoann.d coThi st ef eand cstiveversati material solucost tiloen.Thicols verslaetilecticoeffective l eoctionhahas s many usmany es – from anusesmaterial – from an solution. This versatile collection has many uses – from an (n) Rollup Door interior partiinterior tion or featurepartition wall to a stunninor g exteri feature inteoriorpafacade. rtition or featurewall wal to a stunning eto xterior facaade. stunning exterior facade. STANDARDSTANDARD PATTERNS PATTERNS STANDARD PATTERNS Available in Available 27 standard patterns in 27 with thestandard ability toAvcustomi ailable in 27patterns standazred pathe t erns wisith tzheeabiland ty towith custshape omize the size ofathe nd shthe ape of thmetal eability metal cuts tocuts control thtoe tocontrol customize the the size and shape of the metal cuts to control the amount of lamount ight and flow through of light the space. and Clickflow onamountpattern of light athrough nd flownames through the spabel ce. Clicok onwthe pattoern nabemes bespace. taken low to be taketon to aadetdetai aClick il page. l page.on pattern names below to be taken to a detail page. Mezzanine Level (n) Gate 7'-8" Date: Drawn by: Project No: Scale: (n) Rollup Door DOTS DOTS DOTS (n) Stucco Finish Ovals Bubbles Morph Ovals OvPebbl als es Bubbles Pebbles SkylinSke yline Bubbles Contrails Contrails Morph Morph 29% open area 29% 11% open open area area 28% open area 29% open 11% area 11%15% opeopen n areaopen 28% area openarea area 15% open10% area open 10% open aarea rea28% 12% open areopen a 12% openarea area Pebbles 15% open area Skyline 10% open area Contrails SHEET NO: 12% open area A2.02 Proposed East Elevation Option 1 EAR EAR Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0" EAR 4 1907 As Noted Exterior Elevations Ground Floor 0" 06.17.19 CEQA Categorical Exemption Determination PROPERTY INFORMATION/PROJECT DESCRIPTION Project Address 3252 19th Street Block/Lot(s) 3591025 Case No. Permit No. 2018-003910PRJ 201808167612 Addition/ Alteration Demolition (requires HRE for Category B Building) New Construction Project description for Planning Department approval. ADMINISTRATIVE ONLY CHANGE OF USE OF THE ENTIRE GR FL (E) AUTOMOTIVE REPAIR (SEC 890.15) TO (P) AMUSEMENT GAME ARCADE - MECH AMUSEMENT DEVICES (SEC 890.4) WITH ACCESSORY BONA FIDE RESTAURANT (SEC 843.45) TO COMPLY WITH PLANNING CODE SEC 171 AND THEREBY ABATE NOTICE OF ENFORCEMENT 2018-003910ENF; (P) STEP 1: EXEMPTION CLASS The project has been determined to be categorically exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Class 1 - Existing Facilities. Interior and exterior alterations; additions under 10,000 sq. ft. Class 3 - New Construction. Up to three new single-family residences or six dwelling units in one building; commercial/office structures; utility extensions; change of use under 10,000 sq. ft. if principally permitted or with a CU. Class 32 - In-Fill Development. New Construction of seven or more units or additions greater than 10,000 sq. ft. and meets the conditions described below: (a) The project is consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations. (b) The proposed development occurs within city limits on a project site of no more than 5 acres substantially surrounded by urban uses. (c) The project site has no value as habitat for endangered rare or threatened species. (d) Approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. (e) The site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. FOR ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING USE ONLY Class ____ STEP 2: CEQA IMPACTS TO BE COMPLETED BY PROJECT PLANNER Air Quality: Would the project add new sensitive receptors (specifically, schools, day care facilities, hospitals, residential dwellings, and senior-care facilities within an Air Pollution Exposure Zone? Does the project have the potential to emit substantial pollutant concentrations (e.g., backup diesel generators, heavy industry, diesel trucks, etc.)? (refer to EP _ArcMap > CEQA Catex Determination Layers > Air Pollution Exposure Zone) Hazardous Materials: If the project site is located on the Maher map or is suspected of containing hazardous materials (based on a previous use such as gas station, auto repair, dry cleaners, or heavy manufacturing, or a site with underground storage tanks): Would the project involve 50 cubic yards or more of soil disturbance ‐ or a change of use from industrial to residential? if the applicant presents documentation of enrollment in the San Francisco Department of Public Health (DPH) Maher program, a DPH waiver from the Maher program, or other documentation from Environmental Planning staff that hazardous material effects would be less than significant (refer to EP_ArcMap > Maher layer). Transportation: Does the project involve a child care facility or school with 30 or more students, or a location 1,500 sq. ft. or greater? Does the project have the potential to adversely affect transit, pedestrian and/or bicycle safety (hazards) or the adequacy of nearby transit, pedestrian and/or bicycle facilities? Archeological Resources: Would the project result in soil disturbance/modification greater than two (2) feet below grade in an archeological sensitive area or eight (8) feet in a non -archeological sensitive area? If yes, archeo review is requried (refer to EP_ArcMap > CEQA Catex Determination Layers > Archeological Sensitive Area) Subdivision/Lot Line Adjustment: Does the project site involve a subdivision or lot line adjustment on a lot with a slope average of 20% or more? (refer to EP_ArcMap > CEQA Catex Determination Layers > Topography). If yes, Environmental Planning must issue the exemption. Slope = or > 25%: Does the project involve any of the following: (1) square footage expansion greater than 500 sq. ft. outside of the existing building footprint, (2) excavation of 50 cubic yards or more of soil, (3) new construction? (refer to EP_ArcMap > CEQA Catex Determination Layers > Topography) If box is checked, a geotechnical report is required and Environmental Planning must issue the exemption. Seismic: Landslide Zone: Does the project involve any of the following: (1) square footage expansion greater than 500 sq. ft. outside of the existing building footprint, (2) excavation of 50 cubic yards or more of soil, (3) new construction? (refer to EP_ArcMap > CEQA Catex Determination Layers > Seismic Hazard Zones) If box is checked, a geotechnical report is required and Environmental Planning must issue the exemption. Seismic: Liquefaction Zone: Does the project involve any of the following: (1) square footage expansion greater than 500 sq. ft. outside of the existing building footprint, (2) excavation of 50 cubic yards or more of soil, (3) new construction? (refer to EP_ArcMap > CEQA Catex Determination Layers > Seismic Hazard Zones) If box is checked, a geotechnical report will likely be required and Environmental Planning must issue the exemption. Comments and Planner Signature (optional): Richard Sucre STEP 3: PROPERTY STATUS - HISTORIC RESOURCE TO BE COMPLETED BY PROJECT PLANNER PROPERTY IS ONE OF THE FOLLOWING: (refer to Property Information Map) Category A: Known Historical Resource. GO TO STEP 5. Category B: Potential Historical Resource (over 45 years of age). GO TO STEP 4. Category C: Not a Historical Resource or Not Age Eligible (under 45 years of age). GO TO STEP 6. STEP 4: PROPOSED WORK CHECKLIST TO BE COMPLETED BY PROJECT PLANNER Check all that apply to the project. 1. Change of use and new construction. Tenant improvements not included. 2. Regular maintenance or repair to correct or repair deterioration, decay, or damage to building. 3. Window replacement that meets the Department’s Window Replacement Standards. Does not include storefront window alterations. 4. Garage work. A new opening that meets the Guidelines for Adding Garages and Curb Cuts, and/or replacement of a garage door in an existing opening that meets the Residential Design Guidelines. 5. Deck, terrace construction, or fences not visible from any immediately adjacent public right -of-way. 6. Mechanical equipment installation that is not visible from any immediately adjacent public right-of-way. 7. Dormer installation that meets the requirements for exemption from public notification under Zoning Administrator Bulletin No. 3: Dormer Windows. 8. Addition(s) that are not visible from any immediately adjacent public right -of-way for 150 feet in each direction; does not extend vertically beyond the floor level of the top story of the structure or is only a single story in height; does not have a footprint that is more than 50% larger than that of the original building; and does not cause the removal of architectural significant roofing features. Note: Project Planner must check box below before proceeding. Project is not listed. GO TO STEP 5. Project does not conform to the scopes of work. GO TO STEP 5. Project involves four or more work descriptions. GO TO STEP 5. Project involves less than four work descriptions. GO TO STEP 6. STEP 5: CEQA IMPACTS - ADVANCED HISTORICAL REVIEW TO BE COMPLETED BY PROJECT PLANNER Check all that apply to the project. 1. Project involves a known historical resource (CEQA Category A) as determined by Step 3 and conforms entirely to proposed work checklist in Step 4. 2. Interior alterations to publicly accessible spaces. 3. Window replacement of original/historic windows that are not “in-kind” but are consistent with existing historic character. 4. Façade/storefront alterations that do not remove, alter, or obscure character-defining features. 5. Raising the building in a manner that does not remove, alter, or obscure character -defining features. 6. Restoration based upon documented evidence of a building’s historic condition, such as historic photographs, plans, physical evidence, or similar buildings. 7. Addition(s), including mechanical equipment that are minimally visible from a public right -of-way and meet the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation . 8. Other work consistent with the Secretary of the Interior Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties (specify or add comments): 9. Other work that would not materially impair a historic district (specify or add comments): (Requires approval by Senior Preservation Planner/Preservation Coordinator) 10. Reclassification of property status. (Requires approval by Senior Preservation Planner/Preservation Reclassify to Category A a. Per HRER or PTR dated Reclassify to Category C (attach HRER or PTR) b. Other (specify): Note: If ANY box in STEP 5 above is checked, a Preservation Planner MUST sign below. Project can proceed with categorical exemption review. The project has been reviewed by the Preservation Planner and can proceed with categorical exemption review. GO TO STEP 6. Comments (optional): Preservation Planner Signature: STEP 6: CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION DETERMINATION TO BE COMPLETED BY PROJECT PLANNER No further environmental review is required. The project is categorically exempt under CEQA. There are no unusual circumstances that would result in a reasonable possibility of a significant effect. Project Approval Action: Signature: Building Permit Richard Sucre If Discretionary Review before the Planning Commission is requested, the Discretionary Review hearing is the Approval Action for the project. 10/30/2019 Once signed or stamped and dated, this document constitutes a categorical exemption pursuant to CEQA Guidelines and Chapter 31of the Administrative Code. In accordance with Chapter 31 of the San Francisco Administrative Code, an appeal of an exemption determination can only be filed within 30 days of the project receiving the approval action. Please note that other approval actions may be required for the project. Please contact the assigned planner for these approvals. STEP 7: MODIFICATION OF A CEQA EXEMPT PROJECT TO BE COMPLETED BY PROJECT PLANNER In accordance with Chapter 31 of the San Francisco Administrative Code, when a California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) exempt project changes after the Approval Action and requires a subsequent approval, the Environmental Review Officer (or his or her designee) must determine whether the proposed change constitutes a substantial modification of that project. This checklist shall be used to determine whether the proposed changes to the approved project would constitute a “substantial modification” and, therefore, be subject to additional environmental review pursuant to CEQA. PROPERTY INFORMATION/PROJECT DESCRIPTION Project Address (If different than front page) Block/Lot(s) (If different than front page) 3252 19th Street 3591/025 Case No. Previous Building Permit No. 2018-003910PRJ 201808167612 Plans Dated Previous Approval Action New Building Permit No. New Approval Action Building Permit Modified Project Description: DETERMINATION IF PROJECT CONSTITUTES SUBSTANTIAL MODIFICATION Compared to the approved project, would the modified project: Result in expansion of the building envelope, as defined in the Planning Code; Result in the change of use that would require public notice under Planning Code Sections 311 or 312; Result in demolition as defined under Planning Code Section 317 or 19005(f)? Is any information being presented that was not known and could not have been known at the time of the original determination, that shows the originally approved project may no longer qualify for the exemption? If at least one of the above boxes is checked, further environmental review is required. DETERMINATION OF NO SUBSTANTIAL MODIFICATION The proposed modification would not result in any of the above changes. If this box is checked, the proposed modifications are categorically exempt under CEQA, in accordance with prior project approval and no additional environmental review is required. This determination shall be posted on the Planning Department website and office and mailed to the applicant, City approving entities, and anyone requesting written notice. In accordance with Chapter 31, Sec 31.08j of the San Francisco Administrative Code, an appeal of this determination can be filed within 10 days of posting of this determination. Planner Name: Date: ~~~ COUIy~,yO ~ ;`~ ~ S8n ~'ARC~SCO .~ ~ DISCRETIONARY REVIEW APPLICATION ~~GEIV~C ~u` 25 2019 -~ of S~F~ C~~ &NOGP~jMENT Property Owner's Information Name: PNIL ~ P P~' ~$SEQ Address: S~ ~~R~ L ~5~~ ~vE ~n1 ~AtEa,CA ~yyo~ ~ Applicant Information (if applicable) Name: `~(~1►l~ Email Address: Telephone: PNjl1~A~ ~~s^f~ ~M _ ds~ ~ 3 (~~~ ~9d3 0~.~~ Z Company/Organization: Same as above C j~ l{' ~l'~ ~'~~~ Address: ~~ P~~ ~C'~~k Email Addres ~Op~~~~ ~'}" Please Select Billing Contact: Name: Telephone: ❑ Owner C~-t~~ ~D— ~~~`3 ~ Applicant Email: Please Select Primary Project Contact: ❑Other(see below for details) Phone: ❑owner ~ Applicant n Billing Property Information Project Address: 3~5'~ /g~ST~~~ Plan Area: Block/Lot(s): ~~/Q~ J~Irj(J/~~ Project Description: Please provide a narrative project description that summarizes the project and its purpose. The project includes legalization of a change in use of approximately 2,849 square feet on the first floor and an associated mezzanine from automotive repair to amusement game arcade/restaurant(dba. Redemption). The project includes interior alterations. No work is proposed on the second floor level. PAGE2 ~ PLANNING APPLIfATION-gXRETIONARV REVIEW V. U7.2U.2o IB SAN FRANCISCO PLANNING DEPARTMENT Project Details: ❑ New Construction Change of Use Additions ❑ Demolition ❑Legislative/Zoning Changes [~ Facade Alterations ❑ Lot Line Adjustment-Subdivision U ROW Improvements ~i Other Estimated Construction Cost: Residential: ❑Special Needs ❑Senior Housing ❑ 100~/o Affordable ❑Student Housing ❑Dwelling Unit Legalization ❑ Inclusionary Housing Required Non-Residential: ❑State Density Bonus ❑Accessory Dwelling Unit ❑Formula Retail ❑Medical Cannabis Dispensary ❑ Financial Service ❑Massage EStabli5hment Related Building Permits Applications Building Permit Applications No(s): PAGE 3 ~ PLANNING APPLICATION- DISCRETIONARY REVIEW ❑Tobacco Paraphernalia Establishment ~ Other: AJ7b/~.rA~R , dr~VSENIE till ~RcADE/ ~STAJR.~~JT ~(g ~ O g,f6.~6(Z w. U1.2U.1U1B SAN FNANCISCO PLANNING OEPAFTMENT ACTIONS PRIOR TO A DISCRETIONARY REVIEW REQUEST In reviewing applications for Certificate of Appropriateness the Historic Preservation Commission, Department staff, Board of Appeals and/or Board of Supervisors, and the Planning Commission shall be governed by The Secretary ofthe Interior's Standards for the Treatment ofHistoric Properties pursuant to Section 1006.6 of the Planning Code. Please respond to each statement completely (Note: Attach continuation sheets, if necessary). Give reasons as to how and why the project meets the ten Standards rather than merely concluding that it does so. IF A GIVEN REQUIREMENT DOES NOT APPLYTO YOUR PROJECT, EXPLAIN WHY IT DOES NOT. PRIOR ACTION YES NO Have you discussed this project with the permit applicant? Did you discuss the project with the Planning Department permit review planner? Did you participate in outside mediation on this case?(including Community Boards) CHANGES MADE TO THE PROJECT AS A RESULT OF MEDIATION If you have discussed the project with the applicant, planning staff or gone through mediation, please attach a summary of the result, including any changes that were made to the proposed project. VAGE d ~ PLANNING APPLICATION - DISCRETIONPRY REVIEW V. U7.20.2U18 SAN FFANCISCO DLANNING DEVARTMENT DISCRETIONARY REVIEW REQUEST In the space below and on seperate paper, if necessary, please present facts sufficient to answer each question. 1. What are the reasons for requesting Discretionary Review? The project meets the standards of the Planning Code and the Residential Design Guidelines. What are the exceptional and extraordinary circumstances thatjustify Discretionary Review of the project? How does the project conflict with the City's General Plan or the Planning Code's Priority Policies or Residential Design Guidelines? Please be specific and site specific sections of the Residential Design Guidelines. SSE 1a'IT Act~ED 2. The Residential Design Guidelines assume some impacts to be reasonable and expected as part of construction. Please explain how this project would cause unreasonable impacts. If you believe your property, the property of others or the neighborhood would be unreasonably affected, please state who would be affected, and how. SEA ~r~~~N ~D ~~ ~,~ Ar►~(3 J 3. What alternatives or changes to the proposed project, beyond the changes (if any) already made would respond to the exceptional and extraordinary circumstances and reduce the adverse effects noted above in question #1? SEE ~~C~~t~~.t~ PAGE 5 ~ PUNNING APVLICATION •DISCRETIONARY REVIEW V. 07.20.2018 SAN FRANCISCO PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPLICANT'S AFFIDAVIT M U nder penalty of perjury the following declarations are made: a) The undersigned is the owner or authorized agent of the owner of this property. b) The information presented is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. c) Other information or applications may be required. ~i~ ~~~ Signature Name (Printed) ~ ~ ,P~,,y~ Relationship to Project 0- ~3 one 1(~ z Email (i.e. Owner, Architect. etc.) APPLICANT'S SITE VISIT CONSENT FORM herby authorize City and County of San Francisco Planning staff to conduct a site visit of this property, making all portions of the interior and exterior accessible. Signature Name (Printed) Date Foy Department Use Only Application received by Planning Department: By: PAGE 6 ~ PLANNING APVLICATION - D~SCREiIONARV NEVICW Date: V. U7.N.2U 78 SAN FFANCISCO PLANNING DEVARTMENT Discretionary Review Request for 3252 19th Street 1. What are the reasons for requesting Discretionary Review? This unauthorized conversion of Production, Distribution, and Repair space is in direct conflict with Mission Area Plan Objective 1.7: "Retain the Mission's role as an important location for production, distribution, and repair (PDR) activities." This area is soon to be part of the expanded Latino Cultural District, and PDR is critical for entry-level jobs and higher earnings for workers without college educations including our immigrant populations. One of the main threats to the Mission and its working-class and Latino families who are being driven out by gentrification right now is the conversions from blue-collar work sites and community-serving sites to destination and party sites for wealthier newcomers to the city. This proposal is a quintessential example of this problem and will contribute to further displacement i mpacts - converting a site that has been an auto shop and arts space into a party space for principally u pscale workers, as epitomized by the photos of the unauthorized conversion already online. Groups like Google and Uber are already using the space for illegal parties at this point. W hile we are not aware that this site has been providing these kinds ofjobs most recently, after displacing the popular arts space Shotwell Studios from the space, this conversion will further add to price pressure on our disappearing PDR parcels. 3. What alternatives or changes to the proposed project...would reduce the adverse effects noted above in question number 1? This project should remain community-stabilizing industrial space. If the tenant wishes to open a party space there are many such available spaces in the city they could utilize. We would ask that they consider ways they can make their new space elsewhere affordable and welcoming to the working class if they decide to open in a similarly sensitive area. Joey The on Like Thie Pege - June 3, 2017 -0 Shoutout to @lizi.beth for this great photo at our venue. Send in your photos for chance to be featuredE. #teambuilding #of?iiceparties 03 Like 6 Comment Share Joey The Get Like This Peqe - September 16, 2016 ?0 Calling all Office Managers, Executive Assistants, and corporate Event Planners! Our last open house of the year is at the end of the month. Enjoy free food. drinks, and check out our event space. Message us for an invite/details! 4 3 Shares to Like C) Comment Share a a [Response to DR 3252 19th Street Request for Call Tomorrow Joey Mucha Thu Bil/20191035 PM You; Sucre, Richard Rachna Rachna i-li Kevin - Rich Sucre Rachna Rachna from SF Planning, Phil Lesser) I?ve received your application for Discretionary Review and would like to provide my thoughts, see below. Additionally, I look fowvard to discussing this with you over the phone. 1. Unauthorized conversion of PDR space. ArcadeIRestaurant is in fact a permitted use (no conditional use required) in the UMU zoning of our building. My arcade rental business has an immediate component of PDR as all of the arcade machines will constantly need repair services which my company provides. We also provide arcade machines repair services at 17 establishments throughout the San Francisco Bay Area. When my family purchased this vacant building, one of the deciding factors was that Arcade is a permissible usage (UMU zoning). t" A (a BECOME . 2. Latino Cultural District pending expansion All of our employees to date have been Mission residents and the expansion to becoming a public space will generate additional job opportunities for Mission residents ranging from restaurant staff to arcade repair technicians. 3. Wealthy Newcomers and Google Uber Clients In addition to corporate clients which help us keep our lights on, we have hosted birthday parties, non-profits, and community groups. Some of the groups we've partnered with include City Surf Project, LEAP Arts in Education, Fiona Ma for Treasurer, Madeline's Movement, and more. Our immediate next-door neighbors, a latino?owned janitorial business has rented arcade games from us for their holiday parties and loves working with us. Opening this space to the public shows that we care more about serving the neighborhood rather than profiting off ofjust wealthy newcomers. If we were trying to only serve a specific audience we would create a private space. We want to provide wholesome and safe fun for the neighborhood, including a range of patrons. For some brief background, I started my arcade business afterjoining a San Francisco Skee-Ball leaguelcommunity over 10 years ago. I've slowly built the busmess by restoring old Skee-Ball machines and partnering with local businesses. I plan to continue building this community where all are welcom 4. Displacement of an auto shop and arts space When this building was purchased, it was entirely vacant. Absolutely no displacement occurred. The three years prior to the transaction, the upstairs space was used as a marijuana-grow operation and subsequently caught on fire a few years later. The building is zoned UMU where Arcade and Restaurant are permitted uses. Are you available tomorrow (Friday) to chat about this further? If not, please suggest a time (preferably before tomorrow that works for you. Cheers, Joey Joey Mucha iocmucha?lgmailcom May 31, 2019 Richard Sucre San Francisco Planning Department Re: Endorsement of Game Arcade and Restaurant at 3252 19th Street Mr. Sucre, Yesterday Mr. Joey Mucha spoke at the Mission Merchants Association board meeting about his desire to build a game arcade and restaurant in the space at 3252 19th Street that was formerly an automotive repair shop. The project is seen by the MMA board to be a tremendously perfect ?t for that part of the Mission district. It therefore received a unanimous vote of approval. Kindly place this endorsement letter in the project file. Best regards{,/ 'Ryen Otzek Board Member Mission Merchants Association - - - PO Box ?30288. San Francisco: {33: @148-8288 - 415-483.814o Richard Sucre San Francisco Planning Department 1650 Mission Street, Suite 400 SF, CA 94103 richard.sucre@sfgov.org Dear Richard Sucre, I am the Executive Director of City Surf Project, an SF based non-profit that connects youth to the ocean and themselves through surfing. In late July of 2018 we hosted a volunteer appreciation and fundraiser at Joey the Cat located at ​3252 19th Street. The space was donated to us for at a very low price to benefit our program. The staff were all very professional and we even had security guards. I am writing to offer my support for this business as a community events space so that other non-profits, like ours, can use the space in the future. It will make a great addition to the neighborhood where the community can come together. Please do not hesitate to contact me with further questions. Sincerely, Johnny Irwin- Executive Director Johnny Irwin Executive Director 1633 VALENCIA STREET, SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94110 hello@citysurfproject.com / CITYSURFPROJECT.COM 316?}: FIONA MA, CPA TREASURER STATE OF CALIFORNIA June 21, 2019 San Francisco Planning Department Attn: Mr. Richard Sucre 1650 Mission Street, Suite 400 San Francisco, CA 94103 RE: Endorsement of Proposed Change of Use at 3252 19th Street, San Francisco 2018-003910PRJ Dear Mr. Sucre: I am pleased to write this letter to offer my endorsement of Mr. Joey Mucha?s proposed conversion of property located at 3252 19th Street in San Francisco from an automotive repair Shep to an arcade and restaurant. I had the pleasure of meeting Mr. Mucha in 2017 and took an interest in his personal story of how he grew his arcade rental business from one Skee-Ball machine in his Mission District apartment to currently over 100 arcade games. He now wishes to expand his business even further by opening a pubic arcade space. I am impressed by Mr. Mucha?s entrepreneurship and I support his Vision to transform the Space at 3252 19th Street into an arcade, which will not only improve neighborhood employment and commerce, but will also spread joy to community members of all ages. In Peace and Friendship, Fiona Ma, CPA California State Treasurer 91?! Capitol Mali. Suite 110. Sacramento, 05314 a PI), Bax 942809. Sacramento, CA 05814 (010) {353-2095 . i'i?iki {916) (153-3135 300 S. Spring Street. Suite 8501). 1.0% Angcics, 900 i 3 (213) (320-440? 0 151m: {213) {320-6309 5U .30? I I I 2 Timbuk2 Designs, Inc. 583 Shotwell Street. San CA 941 10 Tel. 415.252.4300 Fax. 415.520.0473 June 2019 - Letter of Support for Arcade at 3252 19th Street richard.sucre@sfgov.org Mr. Sucre, work for Timbuk2 20th and Shotwell street. Joey Mucha of Joey the Cat reached out to us with information about his plans to open an arcade at 3252 19th Street. Mr. Mucha has rented Skee-Ball machines and hosted Skee-ball tournaments at our retail location. It?s been great having his business in the neighborhood. My colleagues and are excited at the prospect of having a public arcade one block away from our manufacturing and retail location. I think it will boost commerce in the immediate vicinity and provide a wonderful place of entertainment for all ages. I?m in full support of the change of use from Auto Repair to Arcade Restaurant at 3252 19th Street. Timbuk2 has been a part of the small business and manufacturing community in San Francisco for 30 years and we support other small businesses in our neighborhood who are striving to make it a great place for families to visit and hang out. Cheers, Timbuk2 Designs, Inc. 583 Shotwell St, San Francisco, CA 94110 (800) TIMBUK2 ine or clean. June 21, 2019 San Francisco Planning Department 1650 Mission Street, Suite 400 San Francisco. CA 94103 Regarding: Arcade@3252 19?h Street Dear Mr. Sucre, My name is Marlene Samson, my company is CMSC and my address is 3254 19th street, San Francisco, CA 94110. I am pleased to provide you my input regarding ?Joey the Cat" expanding their business venue to the public. From my perspective this plan will provide a community-based arcade for both business and private parties to enjoy at reasonable prices. We?ve known Joey Mucha and his staff for many years and have rented entertainment machines from his company for our annual company parties. My family, friends and 2 of my clients have planned several birthday parties some for children and some exclusively for adults and enjoyed the events enormously. My 2 clients told me when they were heading to the event, that they thought it would be boring and childish but soon realized they were reliving their childhood memories and the competitions immediately began, aftenNard the complaint was the parties ended to quickly hence the repeat business. I personally love the pin ball machines. When Joey recently told me that he?s applying to open an arcade to the public thought what a fantastic idea. We're always looking for fun establishment to have family parties and get togethers in the neighborhood especially after work. We think this would be a wonderful and welcome addition to the corner of 19?h and Shotwell. This improvement will go a long way to improve our neighborhood?s reputation. I hope you will venture into Joey's and see what an asset the business will be to our neighborhood. Regard, /x/u?wc?ak Marlene Samson Owner/CEO EOSNESS maintenance EILJIIC. 3254190: Street 0 San Francisco, CA 94110-1917 . Phone 4155598819 . Fax 415-550-8831 mxostlessmalntonancacom . unc, ms, DEE Joey Mucha Support of Arcade Space @ 3252 19th Street 1 message Mark DeVito To: richard.sucre@sfgov.org Cc: Joey Mucha Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 6:25 PM Hello Mr. Sucre, I am writing this evening to show my support of the proposed arcade game and restaurant space at 3252 19th St. I am a 15 year resident of the Mission District (1025 Hampshire St., Unit A for all of those years!). I have also been a business owner in the neighborhood since 2010. I currently have one business at 280 14th St. and one at 2323 Mission St. Over my time in the Mission I have watched many things change, and I believe that this change will greatly benefit the neighborhood. The proposed project fits very well in that area. Furthermore, I have come to know Mr. Mucha through this project and from the neighborhood, and I cannot speak highly enough about his character. He is a kind and caring man, who seeks to embrace and support his community. Please add this letter to your file for support of the project and let me know if you'd like any more information. Best, Mark DeVito -- Mark DeVito Owner Standard Deviant Brewing www.standarddeviantbrewing.com mark@standarddeviantbrewing.com 415.509.4230 Joey Mucha Support of Arcade Space @ 3252 19th Street Julianne Murrell To: richard.sucre@sfgov.org Cc: Joey Mucha Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 8:19 AM Hi Richard, I'd like to write-in advocating for the corner of 19th and Shotwell to allow for a public arcade space. I've been a resident on 21st and Shotwell for 9 years (670 Shotwell Street), and believe we need more wholesome businesses like this to turn around the safety and clientele of the street. An arcade will attract families, friends, and fun to an otherwise desolate, and often trafficked (by prostitutes) part of Shotwell. I truthfully have been picking up condoms (weekly - still), crack pipes, whip-its and more paraphernalia for years... something has got to give. This would be a step in the right direction. Given the success of Urban Putt just a few streets away, I think it's clear that this type of business will be a success. I know I would frequent the arcade! I've been involved in a handful of community meetings when I can make it, and would happily meet to push for the use of this space in a positive manner. Please let me know if there are any other ways I can further advocate for the support of the arcade. Best, -- Julie Murrell Adventures & Biz 412.302.9925 @jollymurrell Joey Mucha Change of Use Joey the Cat 3252 19th Street, SF, CA 94110 Glenn Matthews To: richard.sucre@sfgov.org Cc: Joey Mucha Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 7:03 AM To : Richard Sucre San Francisco Planning Department 1650 Mission Street, Suite 400 SF, CA 94103 From : Glenn Matthews 592 South Van Ness, SF, CA 94110 Project Address: 3252 19th Street, SF, CA 94110 Proposed Project: Change of Use, Joey the Cat Skeeball Arcade Hello Richard, I writing this on behalf of Joey Mucha and the proposed Joey the Cat Skeeball Arcade. I’d like to offer my support for the change of use from an Auto Body Shop to an Arcade / Restaurant at the corner of 19th & Shotwell. I’ve been a business owner in the Mission, and I’m also a long term resident of San Francisco. I'm currently working with Luke Spray, helping to develop and activate business within public and private spaces in SOMA. I couldn't be more excited to support the change in usage proposed by Joey the Cat. The businesses that have been centered around games and sport have been very successful in the Mission. I believe that having a Skeeball Arcade at this location would only strengthen the Mission. From a personal standpoint, Joey Mucha has been very effective in creating a Skeeball community here in San Francisco. He is one of the best "rollers" in the country. He has brought 3 National Skeeball Championships to San Francisco. And what he's been able to translate that into is building a community of people that are enthusiastic about playing Skeeball. His enthusiasm for the sport of Skeeball is contagious. I've watched his enthusiasm for the sport catch fire in others, and it's this enthusiasm for Skeeball that is going to make this business a success. The corner of 19th & Shotwell is currently an inactive corner. The process of converting this corner into an active space with members of the community coming and going will help increase positive traffic in the area. Skeeball and Arcade games currently are very popular. They are a large draw for a large demographic. I believe what Joey is proposing is a family friendly establishment that centers around bringing people of all ages to this area. And that's important, not just financially, but for our community. From a business standpoint, Skeeball has become popular, as are Arcade games. I believe having a Skeeball Arcade will be successful in the Mission. I think it will bring more people to the Mission. Businesses that have been centered around a sport have spouted in our community, which is evident by the success of Mission Bowling and Urban Putt. The more things of this nature we have in the Mission, the more that people will stay and spend their dollars here. That translates to more revenue being brought into the Mission in general. I understand the hesitancy of the planning department to commit more spaces into restaurants and public spaces, especially here in the Mission. But, I can only see the benefits. The benefits of bringing more community spaces to the Mission, more places for people to go and congregate with each other. The benefits of creating more spaces that are family friendly. The benefit of bringing more revenue to the Mission. The benefits of create safety in our neighborhood. The benefits of bringing people from other neighborhoods in SF here to the Mission. And It's this thinking that promotes positivity and change here in our community. We need more spaces that are family friendly establishments in the Mission. We need spaces to gather and congregate together. I think that helping to bring more people of all ages into our community helps make our community more vibrant. For me personally, I think it's this foresight and resolve that helps create the foundation for a healthy community. Thank You for your time! Best, Glenn Matthews