DES MOINES REGISTER/CNN/MEDIACOM IOWA POLL SELZER & COMPANY 500 likely Democratic caucusgoers Margin of error: ±4.4 percentage points Study #2202 November 8-13, 2019 2,012 active registered voter contacts weighted by age and congressional district Percentages may not add to 100% due to rounding. [Ask all.] How likely is it you will attend one of the caucuses scheduled for February of 2020 when presidential candidates will be on the agenda—will you definitely attend, probably attend, might or might not attend, or probably not attend? (If definitely or probably attend, ask:) Will you attend the Democratic or the Republican caucus? Dec-18, Mar-19: How likely is it you will attend one of the caucuses scheduled for February of 2020 when presidential candidates will be on the agenda—will you definitely attend, probably attend, or probably not attend? (If definitely or probably attend, ask:) Will you attend the Democratic or the Republican caucus? [Mar-19: Note to interviewer: If respondent asks, virtually or in person? The words I have are “attend.” In other words, offer no further clarification.] #Jun-19: This year the Democratic caucuses will be a little different. In addition to the regular meetings on caucus night, the Democratic Party of Iowa will convene virtual caucuses to take place online or by phone on several days leading up to the traditional, in-person caucus meetings on February 3rd. Do you think you would definitely participate in the 2020 caucuses— either in person or in a virtual caucus—probably participate, might or might not participate, or probably not participate? Sep-19: First, how likely is it you will attend the Democratic party caucuses scheduled for February of 2020—will you definitely attend, probably attend, might or might not attend, or probably not attend? Definitely attend Democratic caucus Nov-19 Sep-19 #Jun-19 Mar-19 Dec-18 Among likely Democratic caucusgoers Probably Definitely Probably Might or attend attend attend might not Democratic Republican Republican attend a caucus caucus caucus caucus Probably not attend a caucus Don’t know which caucus will attend Not sure 63 37 - - - - - - 60 62 50 57 40 38 50 43 n/a n/a - n/a n/a - n/a n/a n/a n/a - - - ___________________ SELZER & COMPANY PAGE 1 OF 9 [Ask all.] How likely is it you will attend one of the caucuses scheduled for February of 2020 when presidential candidates will be on the agenda—will you definitely attend, probably attend, might or might not attend, or probably not attend? (If definitely or probably attend, ask:) Will you attend the Democratic or the Republican caucus? Dec-18, Mar-19: How likely is it you will attend one of the caucuses scheduled for February of 2020 when presidential candidates will be on the agenda—will you definitely attend, probably attend, or probably not attend? (If definitely or probably attend, ask:) Will you attend the Democratic or the Republican caucus? [Mar-19: Note to interviewer: If respondent asks, virtually or in person? The words I have are “attend.” In other words, offer no further clarification.] Among Registered Republicans Definitely attend Democratic caucus Nov-19 Mar-19 Dec-18 Probably attend Democratic caucus Definitely attend Republican caucus Probably attend Republican caucus Might or might not attend a caucus Probably not attend a caucus Don’t know which caucus will attend Not sure - - 15 15 15 50 2 2 - - 19 23 27 24 n/a n/a 47 47 3 3 3 3 Have you in the past attended party caucuses to show your preference for presidential candidates, or would this be your first time to participate? (If attended in the past, ask:) Was that a Republican caucus, a Democratic caucus, or both? Among likely Democratic caucusgoers. Mar-19, Jun-19: Have you attended caucuses in the past or will this be your first caucus? (If attended in past, ask:) Was that a Republican caucus, a Democratic caucus, or both? Attended Republican caucus in the past Attended Democratic caucus in the past Attended both First caucus Not sure 4 57 9 30 - 8 4 6 11 64 72 62 60 9 7 7 7 19 17 25 21 1 - Nov-19 Sep-19 #Jun-19 Mar-19 Dec-18 Now, I’m going to mention some candidates for the Democratic nomination for president. For each, please tell me if your feelings are very favorable, mostly favorable, mostly unfavorable, or very unfavorable. If you don’t know enough about the person to answer, just say so. (Record “don’t know” as “not sure.” Rotate list.) Comparisons to the final poll of the 2016 caucus cycle are included where available. Among likely Democratic caucusgoers in late Jan-16: Now, I’m going to mention some prominent politicians, including presidential candidates. For each, please tell me if your feelings are very favorable, mostly favorable, mostly unfavorable, or very unfavorable. Among likely Democratic caucusgoers. Michael Bennet, U.S. senator from Colorado Joe Biden, former vice president of the United States Joe Biden Fav Unf Very Mostly Mostly Very Not Favorable Favorable Unfavorable Unfavorable Sure Nov-19 Sep-19 #Jun-19 Mar-19 5 20 19 8 47 3 3 3 17 16 15 15 9 5 7 3 2 57 70 75 Nov-19 Sep-19 #Jun-19 Mar-19 Dec-18 late Jan-16 24 40 19 14 3 29 34 45 47 41 38 38 37 35 40 17 14 8 11 7 12 10 6 4 5 5 4 4 4 7 ___________________ SELZER & COMPANY PAGE 2 OF 9 Among likely Democratic caucusgoers. Michael Bloomberg, former mayor of New York City Fav Unf Very Mostly Mostly Very Not Favorable Favorable Unfavorable Unfavorable Sure Nov-19 Mar-19 Dec-18 late Jan-16 5 14 28 30 23 3 8 2 24 32 15 27 20 17 11 11 9 34 29 57 Cory Booker, U.S. senator from New Jersey Nov-19 Sep-19 #Jun-19 Mar-19 Dec-18 14 38 20 9 19 18 20 13 18 42 35 39 31 14 13 9 6 8 6 5 6 18 26 33 39 Steve Bullock, governor of Montana Nov-19 Sep-19 #Jun-19 Mar-19 Dec-18 5 19 18 8 50 4 5 2 2 14 14 8 9 16 8 8 5 7 2 3 3 59 71 79 82 Pete Buttigieg, mayor of South Bend, Indiana Nov-19 Sep-19 #Jun-19 Mar-19 42 30 10 6 12 33 32 5 35 29 12 8 7 7 5 5 4 18 26 73 Julián Castro, former U.S. secretary of Housing and Urban Development Nov-19 Sep-19 #Jun-19 Mar-19 Dec-18 8 26 24 11 30 5 7 7 6 30 27 27 21 24 10 5 7 12 4 3 3 29 53 58 63 John Delaney, former U.S. representative from Maryland Nov-19 Sep-19 #Jun-19 Mar-19 Dec-18 3 15 22 12 48 3 6 5 6 14 21 22 19 23 13 8 7 11 5 5 4 49 55 61 64 Tulsi Gabbard, U.S. representative from Hawaii Nov-19 Sep-19 #Jun-19 Mar-19 7 18 28 17 30 6 5 5 20 18 17 21 11 9 10 9 6 43 57 64 Kamala Harris, U.S. senator from California Nov-19 Sep-19 #Jun-19 Mar-19 Dec-18 16 39 16 15 13 23 31 23 19 40 32 35 29 15 8 4 6 9 5 5 4 13 23 33 41 Amy Klobuchar, U.S. senator from Minnesota Nov-19 Sep-19 #Jun-19 Mar-19 Dec-18 20 33 16 8 24 17 12 13 16 36 32 30 22 16 14 9 5 6 4 6 3 26 38 41 54 Nov-19 Sep-19 #Jun-19 Mar-19 Dec-18 late Jan-16 31 30 23 12 4 26 32 37 43 42 33 37 34 31 40 24 17 16 12 8 13 8 9 10 4 5 5 4 4 6 Nov-19 Sep-19 2 6 16 7 69 2 5 14 8 72 Michael Bloomberg John Delaney, U.S. congressman from Maryland Bernie Sanders, U.S. senator from Vermont Bernie Sanders Joe Sestak, former U.S. representative from Pennsylvania ___________________ SELZER & COMPANY PAGE 3 OF 9 Among likely Democratic caucusgoers. Tom Steyer, businessman Tom Steyer, hedge fund manager and activist Elizabeth Warren, U.S. senator from Massachusetts Elizabeth Warren Marianne Williamson, author Marianne Williamson, author and activist Andrew Yang, businessman Fav Unf Very Mostly Mostly Very Not Favorable Favorable Unfavorable Unfavorable Sure Nov-19 Sep-19 Dec-18 10 27 24 15 24 7 5 19 15 21 14 11 6 41 61 Nov-19 Sep-19 #Jun-19 Mar-19 Dec-18 late Jan-16 36 34 14 11 5 44 38 25 30 30 31 33 38 353 17 11 10 12 7 4 7 7 8 16 3 8 12 17 14 46 Nov-19 Sep-19 #Jun-19 Mar-19 4 7 22 25 41 2 2 1 7 7 7 25 11 7 23 7 4 42 73 80 Nov-19 Sep-19 #Jun-19 Mar-19 Dec-18 11 33 23 10 24 7 5 2 1 29 14 5 4 22 10 7 6 10 5 5 6 32 66 81 83 ___________________ SELZER & COMPANY PAGE 4 OF 9 Which one of the following Democrats would be your first choice for president? (Read list and rotate.) And who would your second choice be? (If None of these or Not sure in first choice question, record “No first choice” in second choice question and do not ask. Read list only if necessary.) (Ask all.) I’m going to read the list one more time, excluding any names you may have already mentioned. This time, please tell me if the person is someone you are actively considering or not. Just answer yes or no. (Read list, excluding answers to first and second choice questions. Mark all yeses. Same order as first choice question.) Among likely Democratic caucusgoers. First Choice Second Choice Michael Bennet Total selecting as either first or second choice (added across columns, not recalculated) Actively considering Candidate footprint (Added across columns, not recalculated: 1st/2nd choice and actively considering) Nov-19 1 * 1 10 11 Sep-19 * 1 1 8 9 #Jun-19 1 * 1 8 9 Mar-19 1 1 2 n/a n/a Nov-19 Joe Biden 15 13 28 30 58 Sep-19 20 10 30 30 60 #Jun-19 23 13 36 25 61 Mar-19 27 19 46 n/a n/a Dec-18 32 18 50 n/a n/a Nov-19 Michael Bloomberg 2 1 3 11 14 Dec-18 3 3 6 n/a n/a Nov-19 Cory Booker 3 3 6 30 36 Sep-19 3 4 7 35 42 #Jun-19 1 6 7 36 43 Mar-19 3 3 6 n/a n/a Dec-18 4 7 11 n/a n/a Nov-19 Steve Bullock * * * 8 8 Sep-19 1 * 1 8 9 #Jun-19 * 1 1 9 10 Mar-19 1 0 1 n/a n/a Dec-18 0 0 0 n/a n/a Nov-19 Pete Buttigieg 25 14 39 29 68 Sep-19 9 9 18 37 55 #Jun-19 15 9 24 28 52 Mar-19 1 1 2 n/a n/a Nov-19 Julián Castro * 1 1 17 18 Sep-19 1 1 2 20 22 #Jun-19 1 * 1 20 21 Mar-19 1 2 3 n/a n/a Dec-18 1 * 1 n/a n/a Nov-19 John Delaney 0 * * 7 7 Sep-19 1 * 1 9 10 #Jun-19 1 1 2 16 18 Mar-19 1 * 1 n/a n/a Dec-18 1 * 1 n/a n/a Nov-19 Tulsi Gabbard 3 3 6 11 17 Sep-19 2 1 3 12 15 #Jun-19 * 2 2 12 14 Mar-19 * 2 2 n/a n/a A zero (0) in the horserace question indicates the candidate received no responses. An asterisk (*) indicates at least one respondent selected the candidate, but the percentage rounds down to zero (<0.5%). ___________________ SELZER & COMPANY PAGE 5 OF 9 Among likely Democratic caucusgoers. First Choice Second Choice Kamala Harris Total selecting as either first or second choice (added across columns, not recalculated) Actively considering Candidate footprint (Added across columns, not recalculated: 1st/2nd choice and actively considering) Nov-19 3 7 10 36 46 Sep-19 6 10 16 39 55 #Jun-19 6 14 20 32 52 Mar-19 7 11 18 n/a n/a Dec-18 5 6 11 n/a n/a Nov-19 Amy Klobuchar 6 6 12 27 39 Sep-19 3 4 7 30 37 #Jun-19 2 1 3 29 32 Mar-19 3 3 6 n/a n/a Dec-18 3 2 5 n/a n/a Nov-19 Bernie Sanders 15 13 28 26 54 Sep-19 11 10 21 29 50 #Jun-19 16 11 27 29 56 Mar-19 25 13 38 n/a n/a Dec-18 19 14 33 n/a n/a Nov-19 Joe Sestak * 0 * 3 3 Sep-19 0 * * 4 4 Nov-19 Tom Steyer 3 3 6 20 26 Sep-19 2 1 3 18 21 Dec-18 * 1 1 n/a n/a Nov-19 Elizabeth Warren 16 20 36 30 66 Sep-19 22 20 42 29 71 #Jun-19 15 14 29 32 61 Mar-19 9 12 21 n/a n/a Dec-18 8 10 18 n/a n/a Nov-19 Marianne Williamson 0 1 1 6 7 6 6 Sep-19 * * * 6 6 #Jun-19 0 * * n/a n/a Mar-19 * 0 * Nov-19 Andrew Yang 3 2 5 28 33 Sep-19 2 2 4 20 24 #Jun-19 1 1 2 13 15 Mar-19 * * * n/a n/a Dec-18 * 1 1 n/a n/a Nov-19 None of these (VOL) 2 2 13 Sep-19 2 1 13 #Jun-19 7 2 8 Mar-19 3 2 n/a Dec-18 4 3 n/a Nov-19 Not sure 5 3 2 Sep-19 14 7 2 #Jun-19 6 5 5 Mar-19 10 6 n/a Dec-18 6 6 n/a Nov-19 No first choice n/a 7 Sep-19 n/a 16 #Jun-19 n/a 13 Mar-19 n/a 13 Dec-18 n/a 10 A zero (0) in the horserace question indicates the candidate received no responses. An asterisk (*) indicates at least one respondent selected the candidate, but the percentage rounds down to zero (<0.5%). ___________________ SELZER & COMPANY PAGE 6 OF 9 Among likely Democratic caucusgoers. How would you describe your level of enthusiasm for your first-choice candidate [CANDIDATE NAME]—are you extremely enthusiastic, very enthusiastic, mildly enthusiastic, or not that enthusiastic? (Asked only of those who selected a first-choice candidate, but total based on all.) Extremely enthusiastic Nov-19 Sep-19 #Jun-19 Very enthusiastic Mildly enthusiastic Not that enthusiastic Not sure No first-choice candidate 31 42 17 2 1 7 28 31 39 41 16 12 2 1 1 16 13 Among likely Democratic caucusgoers. Regardless of your level of enthusiasm, would you say your mind is made up to support [FIRST CHOICE CANDIDATE] or could you still be persuaded to support another candidate as your first choice? (Asked only of those who selected a first-choice candidate, but total based on all.) Mind is made up Nov-19 Sep-19 Could be persuaded Not sure No first-choice candidate 30 62 1 7 20 63 1 16 I’m going to mention these candidates again. For each, I’d like you to tell me if you think the person’s political views are too liberal, about right, or too conservative. (Rotate list.) Too Liberal Among likely Democratic caucusgoers. Joe Biden Nov-19 Mar-19 Nov-19 Nov-19 Mar-19 Nov-19 Mar-19 Pete Buttigieg Bernie Sanders Elizabeth Warren Among likely Democratic caucusgoers. Which is Too Conservative Not Sure 7 55 28 11 6 70 14 10 7 53 63 37 13 3 17 6 44 48 2 7 38 48 4 10 23 54 4 19 more important to you personally: (Read items. Rotate.) That the winner of the Iowa Democratic caucus be a candidate for president with a strong chance of beating Donald Trump Nov-19 Sep-19 #Jun-19 Dec-18 About Right That the winner of the Iowa Democratic caucus be a candidate for president who shares your positions on major issues Not Sure 63 32 4 63 65 54 31 31 40 6 4 6 Among likely Democratic caucusgoers. Thinking about the way a candidate for president might approach their policy positions, would you rather see the Democratic presidential nominee: (Read choices. Do not rotate.) 36 52 11 Advocate for policies that would result in big changes, even if they have a lower chance of becoming law Advocate for policies that have a good chance of becoming law, even if the changes they make aren’t as big Not sure ___________________ SELZER & COMPANY PAGE 7 OF 9 For each of the following potential Democratic nominees, please tell me how confident you are the person could beat Donald Trump—do you feel almost certain the person will beat Donald Trump, fairly confident, not very confident, or are you almost certain that the Democrat will lose? (Read list. Rotate.) Almost Certain to Beat Among likely Democratic caucusgoers. Joe Biden Pete Buttigieg Bernie Sanders Elizabeth Warren Nov-19 Nov-19 Nov-19 Nov-19 25 16 17 15 Fairly Confident 27 30 23 31 Not Very Confident 22 24 22 22 Almost Certain to Lose 21 19 31 24 Not Sure 5 10 6 8 Likely Democratic caucusgoers Compared to: Study #2196 602 likely Democratic caucusgoers September 14-18, 2019 3,510 active registered voter contacts Margin of error: ±4.0 percentage points weighted by age, sex, and congressional district Study #2190 433 Likely in-person Democratic caucus attenders Margin of error: ±4.7 percentage points June 2-5, 2019 3,776 active registered voter contacts weighted by age, sex, and congressional district Study #2185 401 likely Democratic caucusgoers Margin of error: ±5.0 percentage points March 3-6, 2019 1,618 active registered voter contacts weighted by age and sex Study #2182 455 likely Democratic caucusgoers Margin of error: ±4.6 percentage points December 10-13, 2018 1,838 active registered voter contacts weighted by age and congressional district Study #2133 602 Democratic likely caucusgoers Margin of error: ±4.0 percentage points for January 26-29, 2016 3,019 contacts weighted by age, sex, and congressional district to conform to active voters in the Iowa voter registration list Study #1921 399 Democratic likely caucus-goers Margin of error: ±4.9 percentage points October 1-3, 2007 ___________________ SELZER & COMPANY PAGE 8 OF 9 ABOUT THE POLL The Iowa Poll, conducted November 8-13, 2019, for The Des Moines Register, CNN and Mediacom by Selzer & Co. of Des Moines, is based on telephone interviews with 500 registered voters in Iowa who say they will definitely or probably attend the 2020 Democratic caucuses. Interviewers with Quantel Research contacted 2,012 randomly selected active voters from the Iowa secretary of state’s voter registration list by telephone. The sample was supplemented with additional phone number lookups. Interviews were administered in English. Responses for all contacts were adjusted by age and congressional district to reflect their proportions among active voters in the list. Questions based on the sample of 500 voters likely to attend the 2020 Iowa Democratic caucuses have a maximum margin of error of plus or minus 4.4 percentage points. This means that if this survey were repeated using the same questions and the same methodology, 19 times out of 20, the findings would not vary from the true population value by more than plus or minus 4.4 percentage points. Results based on smaller samples of respondents—such as by gender or age—have a larger margin of error. Republishing the copyright Iowa Poll without credit to The Des Moines Register, CNN, and Mediacom is prohibited. ___________________ SELZER & COMPANY PAGE 9 OF 9