1191 Secondmenue. Suite 2000 FAG. F. CA LAW GROUP Matthew J. Segal Jessica A. Skelton Jessica. VIA FED EX AND E-MAIL November 8, 2019 The Honorable Bob Ferguson Attorney General of Washington 1125 Washington Street SE PO. Box 40100 Olympia, WA 98504-0100 Re: Request for the Attorney General to Investigate and Institute Legal Proceedings on the Unconstitutionality of Initiative Measure N0. 976 Dear Mr. Attorney General: We represent a group of Washington taxpayers as well as organizations and entities with taxpayer members and constituents. We request that your office investigate and institute legal proceedings to remedy the constitutional violations arising from Initiative Measure No. 976 I-976 violates the Washington Constitution on multiple grounds, including but not limited to the following: First, I-976 violates the single-subj ect requirement in article 11, section 19 of the Washington Constitution. The initiative contains numerous unrelated subjects joined together in a blatant attempt at unlawful ?logrolling?. Second, I-976 violates the subj ect?in-title requirement in article II, section 19 of the Washington Constitution. There is no reference in the I-976 ballot title to many of the subjects within the initiative. Additionally, the title misleadingly suggests that voters will retain the authority to approve vehicle charges, but several provisions of I-976 then repeal statutes that provide for voter-approved charges. Attorney General Ferguson November 8, 2019 Page 2 Third, 1-976 violates article 11, section 37 of the Washington Constitution because it improperly amends or attempts to amend existing law without setting forth the amendments in full. Fourth, 1-976 violates home rule principles in the Washington Constitution, including the provision in article XI, section 12 that prohibits the state Legislature from imposing local taxes for local matters. Fifth, 1-976 violates article 11, section 1 of the Washington Constitution because it exceeds the scope of the initiative power. Sixth, 1-976 violates article 1, section 23 of the Washington Constitution in that it impairs multiple preexisting bond and other contracts. In sum, 1-976 is an unconstitutional law designed to mislead voters about its actual provisions and to interfere with funding mechanisms and projects previously approved by local governments and/or voters. We therefore request that you pursue immediate measures to address the unconstitutional provisions of 1-976. ayer to demand that the Attorney General bring suit on behalf of all taxpayers). Please let us know at your earliest convenience whether your of?ce will initiate legal proceedings against 1-976. Sincerely yours, PACIFICA LAW GROUP LLP 2 Matthew J. Segal Jessica A. Skelton cc: Noah Purcell, Solicitor General for the Washington State Attorney General?s Of?ce