SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON FOR KING COUNTY THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Plaintiff, v. No. 18-1-00672-1 SEA HELGA KAI-IR, PRESENTENCE STATEMENT OF Defendant. KING COUNTY PROSECUTING ATTORNEY CCN: 1961984 DOB: 02/14/1950 SEX: Female CNT Chagge Crime Date 1 Theft In The First Degree 09/03/2016 Conviction Date: 10/10/2019 Verdict: Guilty by Jury 2 Theft In The Second Degree 09/07/2016 Conviction Date: 10/10/2019 Verdict: Guilty by Jury SENTENCING DATE: December 6, 2019 SENTENCING JUDGE: The Honorable Kristin V. Richardson DEFENSE ATTORNEY: Miranda Lauren Maurmann ATTACHMENTS: THE FOLLOWING ATTACHMENTS ARE INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE INTO THIS STATEMENT: INFORMATION CERTIFICATION FOR DETERMINATION OF PROBABLE CAUSE PROSECUTING ATTORNEY SUMMARY AND REQUEST FOR BAIL PLEA AGREEMENT SENTENCING REFORM ACT SCORE SHEET APPENDIX SENTENCE RECOMMENDATION DANIEL T. SATTERBERG Prosecuting Attorney BY: Deputy Prosecuting Attorney CRIMINAL DIVISION 58342746 Iris 0 II ans SUPERIGR BY SUPERIOR COURT OF FOR Tl-lli OF Plaintiff, v. No. 1344306724 SEA HEI..GA R, Defendant. AM ENEMEII) 1N FORMATION Daniel Satierberg, Prosecuting Attornev for King County In the name and h} the author Ity of the State of Washington, do accuse llFl. GA of the lbilowing Cl imcfs], which are of'the same or similar character, and which are based on the same conduct or a series ol?acts connected together or constituting parts ol'a common scheme or plan: Theft in The First Degree-Theft In The Second Degree, committed as follows: Count i Theft in The First Degree [hat the defendant Helga Kahr at King C?ountv Washington on on about Septemberii 2016 with intent to deprive another of property, to- wit: lawlul U. currency did obtain such propct 1y belonging to .?Icttrey A. Bench; and did exert control over such belonging to Jelliey A. Barrett; and the value of such or oputy did exceed $5,000: ContraIv 020(1) and against the peace and dinnity ol the State 01 Washington. And Further (it) allege the defendant, Helga Kahr, knew or should have known that the victim ol?the current offense was particulallv vulnerable 0! incapable ohesistancc. and the victim? vulnerability was a substantial factor In the commission of the of lease. undeI the authoriti of RC 9 9.4A 535(3)(h) And further do atlege the crime involves the 't?ollowing aggravating Factor and accuse the defendant Helga Kahr used her position ol'trust. con?dence, or ?duciary? responsibility to facilitate the commission of the current oti?ensc. under the authority ol" RCW Daniel T. Prosecuting Attorney CRIMINAL 7 - W554 King CountyCourthouse AMENDED - 1 5m meme SCattls?. WA ?lm-2m i AX (20(1) 58342746 to 4 10 ll 23 24 And further do allege the crime was a major economic offense or series ofol'Tenscs, so identi?ed by consideration ol?the lbllowing: multiple incidents per victimt monetary loss substantially greater than typical for the offense, occurred over a long period oftime. and the defendant used her position oftrust to facilitate the commission ol?the Current. offense, under the authority Count 2 In The Second Degree That the defendant Helga Kahr in King ounty. Washington, on or about September 7, 2016, with intent to deprive another of property, to?wit: lawful US. currency, did wrongfully obtain such property belonging to Jeffrey A. Barrett; and did exert unauthorized control over- sueh property belonging to Jeffrey A. Barrett; and the value of such property did exceed $750; Contrary to RCW and 9A.Sti.t)20( and against the peace and dignity of the State of Washington. And further do allege the defendant, Helga Kahr knew or should have known that the victim of the current offense was particularly vulnerable or incapable of resistance, and the victim's vulnerability was a substantial factor in the commission ol?the offense, under the authority And further do allege the crime involves the following aggravating factor and accuse the defendant Helga Kahr used her position of trust, con?dence, or ?ljidueiary responsibility to facilitate the commission ofthe current offense, under the authority of RCW DAM l; T. Prosccul in Attorney By: QQM Amanda S. Froh. WSIBA #34045 Senior Deputy Prosecuting Attorney Daniel T. Salter-berg, Prosecuting Attorney CRIMINAL DWlSitiiN King; County Courthouse 516 'llurd Avenue Seattle, WA 93 Hid-23.35 (206) 477-3783 VAX (20m 296-90139 35438121 CAUSE NO. General Offense 2018-36393 CERTIFICATION FOR DETERMINATION OF PROBABLE CAUSE That l-l. Burr is a Detective with the Seattle Police Department and has reviewed the investigation conducted in Seattle Police Department Case Number 2018-36393 There is probable cause to believe that Helga Kahr (DOB 2/ 14/1950) committed the crime(s) of Theft in the First Degree within the City of Seattle, County of King, State of Washington. This belief is based on the following facts and circumstances: Barrett was severely injured in a motor vehicle collision in October 1995 which caused a traumatic brain injury. Barrett?s family hired S/Kahr to represent Barrett during this personal injury lawsuit and through his divorce. Barrett has had full guardianship of his ?nancial estate, and partial guardianship of his person since 1997; with his brotherjohn Barrett being appointed guardian (1997-2014), and then with Kahr being appointed interim guardian in September 2014, and then full guardian of his financial estate, and limited guardian of his person starting October 24, 2014. Barrett lived with his parents for more than ?fteen years; but when his-father died in August 2013 and his mother then had to go to an assisted living facility, he was unable to live alone and care for himself. Barrett then moved in with his guardian, S/Kahr, injanuary 2016 because he didn?t want to move into an assisted living facility. On September 6, 2017 the Guardianship Monitoring Program for the Superior Court of WA at Snohomish County ?led a report with the court citing concerns with the propriety of certain ?nancial transactions in relation to Barrett?s estate and in the related documentation and reporting of them by his Guardian, S/Kahr. On September 6, 2017 a new Guardian ad Litem was appointed for Barrett and on November 3, 2017, the Guardian ad requested records from the previous guardian, S/Kahr, and from the guardianship?s ?nancial institutions. On November 28, 2017 the Guardian ad Litem requested ?nancial records from Barrett?s financial institutions. On December 1, 2017 S/Kahr of?cially resigned as V/Barrett?s guardian. On 1 30/ 2018 Barrett?s new guardian, Denise Meador, went to the north precinct to report a theft. Meador said on 1/19/2018 she was appointed legal guardian of Barrett by the Snohomish COunty Superior Court. Meador said Kahr was appointed Barrett?s legal guardian in 2014 and in 2015, she moved Barrett into her house and an investigator with Snohomish County Court discovered $280,000 from Barrett?s account had been used to pay off S/Kahr?s mortgage. On 2/ 07 2018 I was assigned the above case and I spoke to C/Meador who said she has been in contact with S/Kahr and she expects a payment for the entire $280,000 from her by Friday. Meador said there is notice of a pending wire transfer from S/Kahr. Meador said she would let me know on Friday. Meador asked if we could hold-off on our investigation until the wire transfer goes through. On 2/ 14/ 2018 Meador told me she did receive a wire transfer from Kahr in the amount of $282,673.90, which has been deposited into the guardian account for Barrett. Documents provided by V/Barrett?s current guardian, Denise Meador, show S/Kahr?s payoff 35438121 amount on her current residence of $282,673.90, the entire amount taken by S/Kahr from V/Barrett?s . account. This money was originally wire transferred out of Barrett?s Wells Fargo Guardianship Account into accounts at]? Morgan Chase Bank on September 3 and September 7, 2016. The bene?ciary of those wire transfers were listed as ?Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.? On September 6, 2016 a mortgage payoff statement from ?Select Portfolio Servicing, INC for the property at 6007 Palatine AV N, S/Kahr?s residence, was issued. Copies of the wire transfers, one for $2002.40 on 9/ 07/ 2016 and one for $280,671.50 on 9/ 03/ 2016 made out to ?Select Portfolio Servicing were included. Also included~were the copies of the bank statement from Barrett?s Wells Fargo account that show where the money was transferred out ofspoke to Barrett who said he didn?t know of any ?nancial problems with S/Kahr and said they never spoke about money. Barrett said he never asked S/Kahr if she needed money or a loan. Barrett said he never knew about the money S/Kahr took from his account until his brother told him. Barrett said he needs the money he received from his lawsuit because he is unable to work and relies on others to pay his bills and manage his ?nances. Based on the above information, there is probable cause to believe that Helga Kahr ?nancially exploited Barrett who was exceedingly vulnerable to ?nancial exploitation given his cognitive impairment and developmental disabilities. Barrett trusted Kahr as his legal guardian and attorney and was reliant upon her to assist with all of his ?nances. Helga Kahr betrayed Barret?s trust as his attorney and as his guardian. Under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington, I certify that the foregoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Signed and dated by me this _18_ day of April 2018, at Seattle, Washington. Det. Heather Burr, Seattle Police Department 35438121 CAUSE NO. 18-1-00672-1 SEA PROSECUTING ATTORNEY CASE SUMMARY AND REQUEST FOR BAIL CONDITIONS OF. RELEASE The State incorporates by reference the Certi?cation for Determination of Probable Cause prepared by Detective Heather Burr of the Seattle Police Department for case number 2018- 36393. I, Amanda S. Froh, Senior Deputy Prosecuting Attorney, declare that I have reviewed the Certi?cation, discovery, and defendant?s criminal history; I further declare that the following events occurred, relevant to these charges: On August 24, 2017, Helga Kahr sent an email to Thomas Deacon, the assigned investigator from the Guardianship Monitoring Program of Snohomish County, stating the following: [S]ome of Jeff?s assets have been invested in a Seattle-based Real Estate Investment Trust to allow the guardianship estate to bene?t from the appreciating Northwest real estate market without having the responsibility of property maintenance. That investment has been doing well. I do not have the entire ?le in front of me at the moment, some of it is with the accountant for review. The information on the REIT should be of record in the court ?le; if for some reason it has not made it to the court ?le, I will see that it gets ?led. There was no information about this REIT in the court ?le, so Mr. Deacon then made several requests for further documentation. When he got no response, he requested the court to assign a Guardian ad Litem (GAL) to investigate. The GAL made numerous requests, both by email and eventually by court order, for the REIT documentation. Ms. Kahr produced bankers? boxes of ?nancial records to the new guardian, Denise Meador, in approximately February 2018, but according to Ms. Meador there was no documentation in those records regarding an REIT. In May 2018, Kahr?s attorney Sarah Atwood produced a response to the new guardian?s formal request for an accounting, and in that response she provided two letters relevant to the claim that the $283,000 in transfers from the Barrett guardianship account to Ms. Kahr?s mortgage servicing company was part of an REIT. These documents had never before been produced. The ?rst letter, dated 8/14/2017, is a letter from Helga Kahr to Jeff Barrett. It begins, ?This letter con?rms that we have discussed an investment and business deal involving you, me, and my house. This letter discusses the potential con?ict of interest that arises for me as an attorney because of this proposed business transaction and property investment.? It goes on to cite the relevant Washington Rules of Professional Conduct. In recognition of Jeff Barrett?s incapacity, it states: ?Because of your brain injury, you are considered to be a client with diminished capacity.? The letter goes on to describe that for the $283,000, Barrett would be purchasing a 40% interest in Kahr?s Phinney Ridge house (present FMV of $700,000 to $705,000), and in exchange he would live rent-free and Kahr would deed the property to a trust for his percentage Daniel T. Satterberg, Prosecuting Attorney Prosecutmg Attorney Case CRIMINAL DIVISION Summary and Request for Bar] W554 King County Courthouse d/ d't fR 1 516 rIllil'd Avenue (206) 477-3733 FAX (206) 296-9009 354 38121 owned. The letter goes on to state that Ms. Kahr had discussed with Mr. Barrett that she intended to retire in the next few years, and at that time sell the house, at which time he would be paid 40% of the sale price as a return on his investment. She then states: The ethics rules require that I recommend that you consult with another attomey in deciding whether or not your consent should be give [sic], and whether you should agree to this deal. Another attorney could talk with you about possible con?icts between us. I would suggest that you contact your brother, John Barrett, or his former attorney, Joe Chalverus, to see who they would recommend for you. You have told me that you trust me to do right by you and that you are not interested in hiring or paying another attorney. Please consider this carefully and decide if you want to do this business and make this investment and agree to my representing you and handling the paperwork in the transaction. At the bottom of the letter, Jeff Barrett has apparently signed his name, on August 16, 2016, to the following: Jeff Barrett, consent and agree to the legal representation, the terms of the business transaction or deal, and lawyer?s role in transaction as outlined in this letter. This has been explained to me, I have been able to ask whatever questions I wanted and Iunderstand the deal.? The second letter provided in May 2018, dated August 18, 2016, is merely a reiteration of the terms of the deal, including her ?intent to draft and perfect the documents to convey the 40% interest to you, the present idea being to set up a real estate investment trust, convey the property to the trust and convey your portion of the trust property to you, the idea being that you receive and [sic] equitable interest in the property propmtional to your contribution.? This letter is signed only by Helga Kahr. Detective Burr did a second interview with Jeff Barrett after receiving these two documents. He con?rmed he does not recognize either letter and has no memory of this agreement. The guardian, Denise Meador, confirms that these two letters were not in Jeff Barrett?s papers, either those kept by Jeff in his personal effects or those provided by Ms. Kahr in the course of the litigation before May 2018. There is no evidence that any deed was ever executed or recorded giving Jeff Barrett or a trust for his benefit a 40% interest in Kahr?s home. Additionally, according to Denise Meador, bank records show that Kahr continued to charge Barrett rent to live in her home after this agreement was purportedly executed. Kahr collected $9,600 in rent between September 2016 and December 2017. Under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, 1, Amanda S. Froh, Senior Deputy Prosecuting Attorney, certify that the foregoing is true and correct. Signed and dated by me this 11th day of June, 2018. Daniel T. Sntterberg, Prosecuting Attorney Prosecuting Attomey Case can/111w. DIVISION Summary and Request for Bail ws54 King County Courthouse . . 516 Third Avenue and/or Conditions of Release 2 Seattle, WA 98104-2385 (206) 477-3733 FAX (206) 296-9009 35438121 Mala/?xing? Amanda S. Froh, WSBA #34045 The State requests the court to issue a summons directing the defendant to appear in court. As of June 11, 2018, the State is unaware of any prior criminal convictions. The State requests that the court order that the defendant have no contact with victim Jeff Barrett for the duration of this case. Signed and dated by me this 11th day of June,? 2018. QM Mata/mm?" Amanda S. Froh, WSBA #34045 Senior Deputy Prosecuting Attorney Daniel T. Satterberg, Prosecuting Attorney Prosecuting Attorney Case CRIMINAL DIVISION Summary and Request for Bail W554 King County Courthouse - 516 Third Avenue and/or Conditions of Release - 3 Seattle, WA 93104?2335 (206) 477-3733 FAX (206) 296-9009 POST-TRIAL STATEMENT: CONVICTIONS AND PENALTIES Date: November 21, 2019 Defendant: AHELGA KAHR Cause No.: 18-1-00672-1 SEA Trial Judge: Verdict Date: Jury trial CI Bench trial Guilty as charged (verdict on 10/10/2019) Count 1 The}? First Degree Count 3 Count 5 (name of crime) Count 2 Theft Second Degree Count 4 Count 6 SPECIAL Firearm, RCW 9.94A.533 Count(s) m- Deadly Weapon other than ?rearm, RCW 9.94A.533 Count(s) Sexual Motivation, RCW 9.94A.835 Count(s) m" 13 Domestic Violence, RCW 10.99.020 Count(s) Aggravating circumstances, RCW and Vulnerable Victim, Maior Economic Offense, and Abuse of Trust Count(s) grumble Victim andAbage of Trust Count(s) i] Methamphetamine Offense, Minor Present, RCW 9.94A.605 Count(s) Cl Other: Count(s) vouch-?I- Cl DISMISSAL: Upon sentencing for Count(s) the State moves to dismiss Count(s) in this cause. CONDITIONS OF RELEASE ON APPEAL: Pursuant to 3.2(h) and RCW 9.95.062 the State recommends denial of conditions of release/ stay of sentence pending appeal. Reasons: N0 likely issues to Erevail on aggeal; age at ease; vulnerability}; otjvictim Cl that appeal bond be set at 3 cash or surety and the following additional conditions: supervision by the Department of Corrections subject to standard Dept. of Corrections rules, appropriate no contact provisions, not possess any ?rearms, no law violations, other: MAXIMUM TERMS: Maximum on Count(s) 1 is not more than 10 years each and 20! 000 ?ne each. Maximum on Count(s) 2 is not more than 5 years each and 10, 000 ?ne each. Maximum on Count(s) is not more than years each and ?ne each. MANDATORY MINIMUM pursuant to RCW 9.94A.540 only for Count(s) . is years each. El MANDATORY ENHANCEMENT pursuant to RCW 9.94A.533 for Count(s) is months each; for Count(s) ?mum is months each. This/these additional term(s) must be served consecutively to each other and to any other term. MANDATORY LICENSE REVOCATION. RCW 46.20.285; RCW 69.50.420. SENTENCE RECOMMENDATION is incorporated in attached form(s). ?Andk?/L?lal/ Amanda S. Froh, WSBA #34045 Senior Deputy Prosecuting Attorney KING COUNTY PROSECUTING ATTORNEY Revised 9/2013 gage 46061294 Theft First Degree Excluding Firearm And Motor Vehicle RCW 9A.56.030 CLASS - NONVIOLENT OFFENDER SCORING RCW If it was found that this offense was committed with sexual motivation (RC on or after 7/01/2006, use the General Nonviolent O?'ense with a Sexual Motivation Finding scoring form on page 193. if the present conviction is for a felony domestic violence offense where domestic violence was plead and proven, use the General Nonviolent O??ense Where Domestic Violence Has Been Plead and Proven scoringform on page 191. ADULT Enter number of felony convictions JUVENILE Enter number of serious violent and violent felony dispositions I Enter number of nonviolent felony dispositions V: OTHER CURRENT OFFENSES: (Other current o?'enses thatdo notencompass the some conduct count in oji'endcr score] Enter number of other felony convictions . . .. .. . .. STATUS: Was the o?'ender on community custody on the date the current offense was committed? (ifyes) 1 Total the last column to get the Offender Score (Round down to the nearest whole number) SENTENCE RANGE OffenrdeSore LEVEL 6m 8m 13m 16m 19.5m 25.5m 38m 50m . 12:- 141413 4? For attempt, solicitation, conspiracy (RCW 9.94A.595) see page 23 or for gang-related felonies where the court found the offender involved a minor (RCW 9.94A.833) see page l86 for standard range adjustments. For deadly weapon enhancement, see page 190. For sentencing alternatives, see page [77. For community custody eligibility, see page 187. For any applicable enhancements other than deadly weapon enhancement, see page 183. The Caseload Forecast Coundl is not liable for errors or omissions in the manual. for sentences mat may be lnapproprlately calculated as a result of a practitioner's or court's reliance on the manual, or for any other written or verbal Information related to adult or juvenile sentencing. The scoring sheets are Intended to provide assistance in most cases but do not cover all permutations of the scoring rules. If you ?nd any errors or omissions, we encourage you to report them to the Caseload Forecast Council. 2016 Washington State Adult Sentencing Guidelines Manual Ver. 20161220 395 . o. NVV lone?t Theft Second Degree Excluding Firearm And Motor Vehicle RCW 9A.56.040 CLASS - NONVIOLENT OFFENDER SCORING RCW If it was found that this o??ense was committed with sexual motivation (RC 9. on or a?er 7/01/2006, use the General Nonviolent Offense with a Sexual Motivation Finding scoringform on page 193. If the present conviction is for a felony domestic violence offense where domestic violence was plead and proven, use the General Nonviolent O?ense Where Domestic Violence Has Been Plead and Proven scoring form on page 191. ADULT HISTORY: Enter number of felony convictions JUVENILE HISTORY: Enter number of serious violent and violent felony dispositions Enter number of nonviolent Felony dispositions V: OTHER CURRENT OFFENSES: [Other currento?'enses thotda natencomposs the some conduct count in offender score] I Enter number of other felony convictions - STATUS: Was the offender on community custody on the date the current offense was committed? (if yes) Total the last column to get the Offender Score (Round down to the nearest whole number) SENTENCE RANGE Offender Score il?VELl 3m 4m 5.5m 8m 13m 16m 19.5m 25.5m i 2-5 4~12 19-14 14-18 ??17-22 22-29 'lit J?lmJn?lh..04 we For gang-related fel where the court found the offender involved a minor (RCW 9.94A.833) see page 186 for standard range. adjustment. . For deadly weapon enhancement, see page 190. For sentencing alternatives, see page For community custody eligibility. see page 187. For any applicable enhancements other than deadly weapon enhancement, see page 183. The Caseload Forecast Council Is not liable for errors or omissions in the manual, for sentences that may be inappropriately calculated as a result of a practitioner's or court's reliance on the manual, or for any other written or verbal information related to adult or juvenile sentencing. The scoring sheets are intended to provlde assistance In most cases but do not cover all pen-nutatlons of the scoring rules. if you find any errors or omissions. we encourage you to report them to the Caseload Forecast Council. 2016 Washington State Adult Sentencing Guidelines Manual Ver. 20101220 396 APPENDIX To PLEA AGREEMENT UNDERSTANDING OF CRIMINAL HISTORY (SENTENCING REFORM ACT) DEFENDANT: HELGA KAHR FBI No: State ID No.: DOC No.: This criminal history was compiled on: June 14, 2018 None known. Recommendations and standard range assumes no prior felony convictions. Cl Criminal history not known and not received at this time. last received on: Offense Score Disposition Type* Comments: Prepared by: Chantavy San Adult Felony AM Adult Misdemeanor JF Juvenile Felony JM Juvenile Misdemeanor SENTENCE RECOMMENDATION . (USE FOR NON-SEX OFFENSE, NON-DOSA SENTENCES OF OVER ONE YEAR ONLY) Date of Crime: September 3, 2016 Date: November 21, 2019 Defendant: HELGA KAHR Cause No: 18-1-00672-1 SEA The State recommends that the defendant be sentenced to a term of total con?nement in the Department of Corrections as follows: Cl Crime was committed when under 18 and defendant is under 25, so con?nement will begin at the Department of Children, Youth and Families (RCW 72.01.410). 36 Months on Count 1 Days/months on Count 90 Days on Count 2 Days/months on Count with credit for time served as provided under RCW 9.94A.505. Terms to be served concurrently with each other. Terms to be served . El Terms to be consecutive to any other term(s) not speci?cally referred to in this form. Cl WEAPONS ENHANCEMENT - RCW 9.94A.533: The above recommended terrn(s) of con?nement do n_ot?include the following weapons enhancement time: months for Count months for Count months for Count which is/are mandatory, served without good time and served consecutive to any other term of con?nement. Cl ENHANCEMENT months for Count TOTAL LENGTH OF CONFINEMENT recommended in this cause, including all counts and enhancements, is months. This is an agreed recommendation. N0 DRUG OFFENDER SENTENCE ALTERNATIVE (DOSA) - RCW 9.94A.660: Defendant is not legally eligible for DOSA because Cl current sex/ violent offense; prior violent offense within 10 years or any prior sex offense; El weapon enhancement; El subject to ?nal deportation order; Cl not small quantity of drugs; more than one prior DOSA within 10 years; felony DUI or physical control. Cl Defendant is eligible but DOSA is not recommended because EXCEPTIONAL SENTENCE: Substantial and compelling reasons for departing from the presumptive range are set out in the State?s Sentencing Memorandum. The defendant was convicted bevond a reasonable doubt at trial of three aggravating factors under RCW 9. 94A. 535. each of which on their own iustifv an exceptional sentence in this case: Vulnerable Victim (RCW 9. 94A.535 (3) Maior Economic Offense (RCW 9. 94A.535(3l(d2; and Abuse of Trust (RCW 9. Cl MOTOR VEHICLE FELONY ALTERNATIVE on Count(s) pursuant to 2019 Wash. Laws Ch. 191 Court to. impose 6 to 12 months of community custody to be supervised by incarceration shall not exceed the midpoint of the standard range less one-third of the community custody term imposed. NO CONTACT: For the maximum term, defendant shall have no contact, direct or indirect, in person, in writing, by telephone, or through third parties, with: Jeffrey A. Barrett KING COUNTY PROSECUTING ATTORNEY Revised 7/30/2019 Page 1 of 2 and pursuant to RCW 10.99 or RCW 26.50. El Count(s) is a FELONY FIREARM OFFENSE (de?ned by RCW 9.41.010) as to which, pursuant to RCW 9.41.330: ?rearm offender registration is mandatory; El firearm offender registration may be required and the State recommends it. MONETARY PAYMENTS: Defendant shall make the following payments: Mandatory $500 Victim Penalty Assessment: 3100 DNA collection fee (mandatory unless the State has previously collected DNA as a result of a prior conviction). Restitution as set forth in the ?Plea Agreement? page and El . El Court costs; recoupment of cost for appointed counsel. Cl Other: . COMMUNITY CUSTODY: for qualifying crimes the defendant shall serve a term of community custody for: Count(s) Serious violent offense: 36 months each (a range of 24 to 36 months if crime committed before 8/1/2009). Ci Count(s) Violent offense: 18 months each. El Crimes against persons or violation of Ch. 69.50 or .52: 12 months each (a range of 9-12 months if crime committed before 8/1/2009). Cl Count(s) Motor-vehicle related sentence alternative: months each (must be between 6 and 12 months). Community Custody includes mandatory statutory conditions as well as discretionary conditions set by the court or Dept. of Corrections. The State recommends the court impose these discretionary conditions: Obtain an alcohol/substance abuse evaluation within 30 days of release and follow all treatment recommendations. Enter into within 30 days of release, make reasonable progress in, and successfully complete state- certi?ed Domestic Violence treatment. Other: OTHER: Defendant shall not hold a position of trust (such as power of attornev, as the executor of an estate. or representative pavee, or as a signatory on a ioint account with a financial institution) or work (paid or volunteer in an ca act or an vulnerable adult or or an or out ation that rimaril rovides services to vulnerable adults during the term of the sentence. MANDATORY CONSEQUENCES: HIV blood testing for any prostitution related offense, or a drug offense associated with needle use. DNA testing. Revocation of the right to possess a FIREARM. LICENSE REVOCATION (RCW 46.20.285; RCW 69.50.420). REGISTRATION is required pursuant to RCW 9A.44.130 for some kidnap/ unlawful imprisonment offenses. State?s Sentence Recommendation Cause No. 18-1-00672-1 SEA Amanda S. roh, Senior Deputy Prosecuting Attorney KING COUNTY PROSECUTING ATTORNEY Revised 7/30/2019 Page 2 of 2