Summary of PT Allegations board members Minutes No. 18 of 28/9/2008 in which Pacheco de Melo formally appointed Minutes No.25 of 18/6/2012. Unanimity over board representation (albeit only 4 of 5 appointed at that stage) Pacheco de Melo resignation letter of 22/7/2014 Angolan shareholders objecting to PT insistence on 3 directors. See also Baptista ?compromise? in which PT would not push for appointment but without accepting that the rule had changed Minutes No. 13 of 15/6/2006. PT opposes proposal for reduction of representation as a violation of rights Minutes No.31 of 15/12/2014 where PT board member nomination rejected (Chairman referring to suspension of rights, IDS referring to nomination unsuitable) Unitel letter to PT of 4/1 1/2014 referring to suspension of PT rights PT letter of protest of 24/11/2014 PT letter of protest of 30/1/2015 PT Vidatel Helpful Unhelpful Not seen Allegation Response PT blocked from PT have not sought Minutes No.15 of 18/ 10/2006 Minutes No. 11 of 4/2/2006 PT exercising to exercise that consensus of shareholders as to 2 resisting proposal that they be Responses to letters contractual right but instead new appointments (Baptista and limited to only 2 directors of protest (if any) entitlement under approved board Safeca) SHA to appoint 3 composition Minutes No.12 of 18/5/2006, Any relevant board minutes Any relevant email exchanges PT Vidatel Helpful Unhelpful Not seen Allegation Response Unitel purported Had no practical PT allowed to attend next general Minutes No. 26 of 22/10/2012 (at ?Text addressed to to suspend PT's consequence meeting (Minutes No. 27, p.6) purporting to pass majority Angolan shareholders? if PT had been liaising directly) PT letter to Unitel of 29/9/2013 (apparently not responded to) BNA letter of 13/2/2014 authorising payment (and yet still no payment made) Press release of 25/3/2014 (or thereabouts) justifying non-payment by reference to name change rather than exchange control issues rights as 30/11/2012) resolution suspending rights as read out by Zeinal shareholder Bava on 30l11l2012 Minutes No.31 of 15/12/2014 where PT board member Record of discussions nomination rejected referred to by Zeinal Bava in 30l11l2012 minutes, p.1 Unitel email to Manuela Cunha of 5/5/2015 referring to suspension Minutes of May 2015 shareholder meeting (did Unitel letter to PT of 20/1 1/2015 this proceed on the basis referring to suspension that PT rights suspended?) dividends Delays are due to 24/4/2013 Unitel letter to PT Unitel letters to BFA and Vidatel dealings with have been exchange control referring to foreign exchange writing on behalf of PT commercial banks withheld issues issues unhelpful as would have been better Vidatel loan agreement with Unitel PT Allegation Vidatel Response Helpful Unhelpful Not seen Unitel loan to UIH diverted funds from Unitel to IDS Aggressive tax- planning solution which PT was well aware of (also knowing that IDS owned UIH) but which could not be fully documented UIH originally called Jadeium not a deliberate confusion with Unitel International) Minutes of board meeting of 24/5/2013 de Melo complaining, General Dino referring to ?commitments between the shareholders? Shareholder minutes No.28 of 12/6/2013 in which PT query approval PWC reservation to audit report in respect of FY2013 accounts (in relation to UIH loans/Tokeyna assignment 10. Tax advice Board approval (including whether IDS abstained as an interested party) Documents presented to internal Fiscal Council Approval by Fiscal Council Record of discussions with Central Bank to permit export of USD Evidence that PT knew that UIH was owned by IDS Evidence of Zeinal Bava approval as referred to in Minutes No.28 Correspondence with in order to explain UlH/Tokeyna to remove reservation Minutes of any relevant PwC/Unitel audit committee meetings audit report re FY2012 was this clean in relation to 2012 UIH loans?) PT Vidatel Helpful Unhelpful Not seen Allegation Response Sale of UIH loan Part of the tax 1. Tax advice to Tokeyna planning, also 2. Restructuring advice caused further giving Unitel bene?t 3. Evidence of board or loss to Unitel of access to USD if shareholder approval required 4. Evidence of ?informal? board meeting at which Unitel requested role of Tokeyna was that IDS act as discussed nominee owner of 5. Evidence of Fiscal Tokeyna with Council approval Tokeyna remaining 6. Responses to PT under Unitel?s correspondence control 7. Any other documents showing ownership interest of Unitel in Tokeyna 8. Any correspondence showing the intention that Isabel was not intended to be the ultimate beneficial owner of Tokeyna. Services Agreement is an Evidence of IDS ownership (as 1. Tax/restructuring advice Agreement with arm?s length revealed on Norwich Pharmacal 2. Evidence of Tokeyna?s Tokeyna is contract, properly application) ability to provide ??ctitious? and approved management services has no legitimate Minutes No. 30 of 4 November 2014 3. Board approval commercial Unitel requested refer to ?hiring of strategic 4. Fiscal Council approval purpose that IDS act as consulting and managing services" nominee owner of (is this a reference to Tokeyna? Tokeyna with Tokeyna remaining under Unitel?s control which prior minutes read out and approved Minutes No.23 of 30/5/2011 discussing and approving compensation to Unitel for the use of its funds for the acquisition inconsistent with outright ownership) BFA acquisition recorded in Unitel accounts (most recently 31/12/2014) Board minutes of 21/2/2011 [Exhibit C-25 to ICC Request], with Pacheco de Melo appearing to accept that BFA dividends should n_ot be treated as earnings of Unitel Unitel accounts 31/12/2014) do not explain the custody arrangement and explanation of funding arrangements PT Vidatel Helpful Unhelpful Not seen Allegation Response Unitel has not Unitel was never Minutes No.19 of 26 May 2009 Minutes No. 18 of 29/9/2008 1. PWC advice received intended to benefit referring to BFA transaction and referring to BFA as a ?business 2. Agreement Memorandum dividends from from dividends approving board to proceed opportunity" for Unitel and with PT 3. Documents presented to BFA offering to participate in analysis Fiscal Council and Minutes No.21 of 16/11/2010 both suggesting that Unitel subsequent approval (if it approving ?neutral? structure and would benefit from the investment went through this referring to HoldFinance role rather than merely acting as a process) (although unhelpful that PT acting temporary custodian) 4. Financing Documents as through proxy given to IDS) to provision of the Minutes No.21 of 16/11/2010 in Minutes No.22 of 18/5/2011 in which PT represented by IDS 5. Agreements between Unitel and HoldFinance as to the basis on which Unitel would hold the stake PT Vidatel Helpful Unhelpful Not seen Allegation Response PT have not been They have had Minutes No.30 of 4/1 1/2014 Evidence of when board supplied with access everything packs were sent information they are entitled to Minutes No.31 of 15/12/2014 with PT protesting Evidence of when information distributed Minutes of board meeting of prior to shareholder 24/5/2013 complaining about meetings late information Correspondence from PT PT requests for information of to Unitel and Unitel 22/10/2014 and 30/10/2014 response as referred to in Minutes No. 30 of 4/1 1l2014 Unitel responses (if any) to letters of 22 and 30I10I2014 Angolan properly Minutes of May 2015 shareholders authorised meeting (challenged by have amended PT in Angolan by-laws/SHA proceedings)