Case 3:20-cv-00981-JCS Document 1 Filed 02/07/20 Page 1 of 15 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 DAVID P. MASTAGNI (SBN 57721) GRANT A. WINTER (SBN 266329) BRETT D. BEYLER (SBN 319415) MASTAGNI HOLSTEDT, A.P.C. 1912 I Street, Sacramento, California 95811 Telephone: (916) 446-4692 Facsimile: (916) 447-4614 Email: bbeyler@mastagni.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs ALAN STRICKLAND and KELLY STRICKLAND 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 14 ALAN STRICKLAND, an individual; and KELLY STRICKLAND, an individual, 15 COMPLAINT FOR PERSONAL INJURIES AND DAMAGES: Plaintiffs, 16 v. 17 MASAI UJIRI, an individual; TORONTO RAPTORS, a business entity; MAPLE LEAF SPORTS & ENTERTAINMENT, a business entity; NATIONAL BASKETBALL ASSOCIATION, INC.; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, 18 19 20 21 Case No.: Defendants. (1) ASSAULT (2) BATTERY (3) INTENTIONAL INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS (4) NEGLIGENCE (5) NEGLIGENCE (6) LOSS OF CONSORTIUM DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL 22 23 24 Plaintiffs ALAN STRICKLAND and KELLY STRICKLAND complain and allege of 25 Defendants MASAI UJIRI, TORONTO RAPTORS, MAPLE LEAF 26 ENTERTAINMENT, NATIONAL BASKETBALL ASSOCIATION, INC., and DOES 1 through 27 100, (hereinafter the foregoing defendants are referred to collectively as “Defendants”) inclusive, and 28 each of them, as follows: -1COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL SPORTS & Case 3:20-cv-00981-JCS Document 1 Filed 02/07/20 Page 2 of 15 PARTIES 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 1. At all times herein mentioned, Plaintiff ALAN STRICKLAND was, and is now, an individual adult natural person residing in the State of California. 2. At all times herein mentioned, Plaintiff KELLY STRICKLAND was, and is now, an individual adult and natural person residing in the State of California. 3. Plaintiffs are informed and believe, and thereon allege, that Defendant MASAI UJIRI was, and is now, an individual adult and natural person residing in Toronto, Canada. 4. Plaintiffs are informed and believe, and thereon allege, that Defendant TORONTO RAPTORS was, and is now, a business entity of a type not currently known, doing business in the United States of America, including in the State of California. Plaintiffs are informed and believe that the TORONTO RAPTORS is a citizen of Canada and has its principal place of business in Canada. 5. Plaintiffs are informed and believe, and thereon allege, that Defendant MAPLE LEAF SPORTS & ENTERTAINMENT was, and is now, a business entity of a type not currently known, 14 doing business in the United States of America, including in the State of California. Plaintiffs are 15 informed and believe that the MAPLE LEAF SPORTS & ENTERTAINMENT is a citizen of Canada 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 and has its principal place of business in Canada. 6. Plaintiffs are informed and believe, and thereon allege, that Defendant NATIONAL BASKETBALL ASSOCIATION, INC. was, and is now, a business entity of a type not currently known, doing business in the State of California. Plaintiffs are informed and believe and thereon allege that the NATIONAL BASKETBALL ASSOCIATION, INC. has its principal place of business in New York City, New York. 7. The true names and capacities, whether individual, corporate, associate or otherwise, 24 of the Defendants DOE 1 through 100, inclusive, are unknown to Plaintiffs, who therefore sues such 25 Defendants by such fictitious names, and Plaintiff will amend this Complaint to show their true names 26 and capacities when the same have been ascertained. 27 8. Plaintiff is informed and believes and thereon alleges that each of the Defendants 28 -2COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Case 3:20-cv-00981-JCS Document 1 Filed 02/07/20 Page 3 of 15 1 designated as DOE are responsible under law in some manner and liable herein by reason of 2 negligence, negligence per se, strict liability, and in other manner, and by such wrongful conduct that 3 was a substantial factor in causing the events and happenings herein referred to and thereby caused 4 the injuries and damages to Plaintiff as herein alleged. 5 9. Plaintiff is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that at all times relevant hereto, 6 each Defendant, whether designated by name or as a DOE, was the agent, servant and employee of 7 every other Defendant, who was a principal, master, and employer of each other Defendant, and every 8 Defendant was acting within the course and scope of said agency, authority, and employment. 9 10 11 12 13 14 Furthermore, each of the Defendants was a partner and was engaged in a joint venture with every other Defendant, and each Defendant was acting within the course, scope, and in furtherance of said partnership and joint venture; and each Defendant was a principal, master, or employer authorized, ratified, directed, and approved the acts, omissions, and conduct of each other Defendant; and each Defendant assumed the liabilities of every other Defendant with respect to the conditions, incident, events, injuries, and damages referred to herein. 15 10. Whenever in this Complaint reference is made to any act or omission of Defendants, 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 or any of them, such allegations shall be deemed to mean that the officers, directors, agents, trustees, and employees of said Defendants did or authorized or ratified such acts or omissions while actively engaged in the management, direction, control, and employ of the affairs of said Defendants, and were acting within the course and scope of their employment, authority, and agency. Whenever in this Complaint reference is made to any act or omission of Defendants, and each of them, such allegation shall be deemed to mean the act or omission of each Defendant, acting individually, jointly, in concert, and severally, and in furtherance of their joint activity. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 24 25 11. This Court has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332 as the matter 26 in controversy exceeds the value of $75,000.00 and is between citizens of different States and/or of 27 a foreign state. 28 12. Venue is proper pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391 given that the subject matter of this -3COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Case 3:20-cv-00981-JCS Document 1 Filed 02/07/20 Page 4 of 15 1 litigation occurred at Oracle Arena which is located in the City of Oakland, County of Alameda, State 2 of California. 3 4 5 6 FACTS COMMON TO ALL CAUSES OF ACTION 13. Plaintiffs incorporate herein, as though fully set forth at length, each and every allegation set forth in paragraphs above, inclusive of this Complaint. 14. Plaintiffs ALAN STRICKLAND and KELLY STRICKLAND allege that 7 DEFENDANTS, and each of them, were the legal (proximate), actual, and substantial cause of the 8 damages to Plaintiffs. By the following acts or omissions, Defendants and each of them, intentionally, 9 10 11 12 13 14 negligently, and/or by breaches of the duties identified herein, caused the damage to Plaintiffs. 15. Plaintiffs ALAN STRICKLAND and KELLY STRICKLAND hereby make a claim for personal injuries and damages arising from an incident involving Plaintiff ALAN STRICKLAND and DEFENDANTS occurred on or about June 13, 2019, at or about the hour of 9:00 P.M., at or near the basketball court perimeter at or near the southgate tunnel of the Oracle Arena (hereinafter “Subject Incident”). 15 16. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Plaintiff ALAN STRICKLAND was assigned to the Oracle Arena for game number 6 of the NATIONAL BASKETBALL ASSOCIATION, INC. (hereinafter “NBA”) Finals between the Golden State Warriors and the Toronto Raptors. 17. NBA officials issued instructions to Plaintiff ALAN STRICKLAND, and all other law enforcement and/or security personnel working security at this game. Specifically, these instructions included, but were not limited to, stopping and preventing any and all individuals from accessing the basketball court unless that individual was wearing a specific security “credential.” 18. NBA officials instructed Plaintiff ALAN STRICKLAND, and all other law 24 enforcement and/or security personnel working security at this game, to prevent any unauthorized 25 person from accessing the court and cause a disturbance, cause harm to a player or coach or commit 26 a crime. 27 28 19. NBA officials informed Plaintiff ALAN STRICKLAND, and all other law enforcement and/or security personnel working security at this game, that a recent security breach -4COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Case 3:20-cv-00981-JCS Document 1 Filed 02/07/20 Page 5 of 15 1 occurred wherein an unauthorized person presented fictitious credentials to access the court, 2 bypassing multiple layers of security. NBA officials instructed Plaintiff ALAN STRICKLAND, and 3 all other law enforcement and/or security personnel working security at this game, they did not want 4 this security breach to occur again. 5 20. NBA officials assigned Plaintiff ALAN STRICKLAND to his post at or near the 6 basketball court perimeter on the date of the Subject Incident. At or around 9:00 P.M., Plaintiff ALAN 7 STRICKLAND was at his assigned post when he saw an unidentified male wearing a dark suit and 8 neck tie approaching his post. Plaintiff ALAN STRICKLAND later learned the identity of the male 9 10 11 12 13 14 in the dark suit and neck tie was MASAI UJIRI. 21. MASAI UJIRI had no visible credentials, as was required by NBA security regulations. MASAI UJIRI attempted to circumvent the security checkpoint and evade Plaintiff ALAN STRICKLAND and access the basketball court without showing security personnel, including ALAN STRICKLAND, his credential. MASAI UJIRI repeatedly ignored Plaintiff ALAN STRICKLAND’s orders to stop and return to the arena security official. 15 22. MASAI UJIRI then attacked Plaintiff ALAN STRICKLAND and hit him in the face 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 and chest with both fists. The force of from MASAI UJIRI’s attack sent Plaintiff ALAN STRICKLAND backwards several feet. And/or MASAI UJIRI negligently hit Plaintiff ALAN STRICKLAND and hit him in the face and chest with both fists. 23. At no point during this confrontation between MASAI UJIRI and Plaintiff ALAN STRICKLAND did MASAI UJIRI stop trying to advance towards the court or present his credentials for inspection as required by NBA security regulations. 24. Plaintiff is informed and believes and thereon alleges that each and every Defendant 24 are legally responsible in some manner for the events, happenings, omissions and/or occurrences 25 causing damages referred to herein, and legally and proximately caused damage to Plaintiff. 26 25. At all times relevant herein, Defendants, each of which are vicariously liable for the 27 harm Plaintiff suffered resulting from the conduct of each other Defendant, had actual knowledge 28 and/or should have known of MASAI UJIRI’s violent predisposition and propensity for physical -5COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Case 3:20-cv-00981-JCS Document 1 Filed 02/07/20 Page 6 of 15 1 2 violence prior to his assault on Plaintiff ALAN STRICKLAND. 26. As a result of the Subject Incident, Plaintiff ALAN STRICKLAND suffered, and will 3 continue to suffer, physical, mental, emotional, and economic injuries, including, but not limited to, 4 lost wages, lost opportunity for financial gain, future earning capacity, and past and future medical 5 care and expenses. 6 27. As a substantial result of the wrongful conduct and/or omissions of each and every 7 Defendant named herein, and their employees and/or agents, and of each of them, Plaintiff ALAN 8 STRICKLAND was hurt and injured in his health, strength, and activity, sustaining injury to his body 9 10 11 12 13 14 and shock of injury to his nervous system and person, all of which said injuries have caused and continue to cause Plaintiff ALAN STRICKLAND great mental, physical, and nervous pain and suffering. Plaintiff is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that said injuries will result in some permanent disability to Plaintiff ALAN STRICKLAND, all to his general damage in an amount well in excess of $75,000, and, as such, in accordance with California law, he is entitled to prejudgment interest on that amount when determined. 15 28. As a further substantial result of the wrongful conduct and/or omissions of the 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 defendants, and of each of them, Plaintiff ALAN STRICKLAND was required to, did, and will employ physicians and surgeons to examine, treat and care for him and did incur medical and incidental expenses. The exact amount of such expense is unknown to Plaintiff ALAN STRICKLAND at this time, and Plaintiff ALAN STRICKLAND will ask leave to amend his pleading to set forth the exact amount thereof when the same is ascertained by him, and any and all prejudgment interest in accordance with California law. 29. As a further substantial result of the said negligence and other wrongful conduct herein 24 alleged of the defendants, and of each of them, Plaintiff ALAN STRICKLAND was prevented from 25 attending to his usual occupation, and Plaintiff ALAN STRICKLAND is informed and believes, and 26 thereon alleges, that he will thereby be prevented from attending to his usual occupation for a period 27 of time in the future, all to Plaintiff ALAN STRICKLAND’s further damage in an amount unknown 28 at this time, and Plaintiff ALAN STRICKLAND will ask leave to amend his complaint to show the -6COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Case 3:20-cv-00981-JCS Document 1 Filed 02/07/20 Page 7 of 15 1 exact amount when determined, and any and all prejudgment interest in accordance with California 2 law. 3 30. Prior to the game, Defendants advertised and publicly represented that they would 4 provide security at the game and make the game safe for individuals present; however, Defendants 5 failed to implement reasonable security in the form of security personnel, staff, plans, strategies, 6 measures, systems, standards, procedures, schemes, personnel training, signs, warnings, physical 7 barriers, equipment, tools, and arrangements. Defendants failed to provide adequate safety and 8 security measures to protect members of the public including Plaintiff, failing to supervise MASAI 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 UJIRI, failing to employ adequate security personnel, failing to employ adequate physical barriers between the stage and the audience floor, failing to warn of danger, failing to post signs warning of danger, including the danger of MASAI UJIRI, failing to adequately train security personnel, and failing to adequately equip security personnel with tools to prevent injuries to individuals present at the game, including Plaintiff. 31. UJIRI’s propensity for violence. Defendants failed to use reasonable care to protect individuals present at the game from MASAI UJIRI’s intentionally harmful conduct. Such conduct was reasonably foreseeable based on MASAI UJIRI’s previous altercations involving similar circumstances and necessitated adequate security, which Defendants failed to provide. FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION 20 (Assault – Plaintiff ALAN STRICKLAND Against All Defendants, 21 including Does 1 through 100) 22 23 24 25 At all times relevant herein, Defendants knew or should have known of MASAI 32. Plaintiffs incorporate herein, as though fully set forth at length, each and every allegation set forth in paragraphs above, inclusive of this Complaint. 33. At the time of the Subject Incident, MASAI UJIRI acted, intending to cause harmful 26 and/or offensive contact with Plaintiff ALAN STRICKLAND’s head and/or body with his hands 27 and/or fists, which resulted in harmful contact with Plaintiff ALAN STRICKLAND. 28 34. Such harmful or offensive contact did, in fact, occur on June 13, 2019, without -7COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Case 3:20-cv-00981-JCS Document 1 Filed 02/07/20 Page 8 of 15 1 2 Plaintiff ALAN STRICKLAND’s consent. 35. MASAI UJIRI caused Plaintiff ALAN STRICKLAND imminent apprehension of 3 harmful or offensive contact with Plaintiff ALAN STRICKLAND’s head and/or body, which resulted 4 in direct contact with Plaintiff ALAN STRICKLAND. 5 36. Plaintiff ALAN STRICKLAND was harmed by MASAI UJIRI’s conduct. 6 37. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants’ conduct, Plaintiff ALAN 7 STRICKLAND suffered injury to his head, body, health, strength, nervous system, and person, all of 8 which caused and continue to cause Plaintiff great mental, physical, emotional and psychological 9 10 11 12 13 14 pain and suffering. As a result of the acts and omissions herein complained of, Plaintiff ALAN STRICKLAND suffered great anxiety, embarrassment, anger, loss of enjoyment of life, injury to reputation, and severe emotional and physical distress in an amount to be determined at trial. Plaintiff is entitled to recover all damages resulting from Defendants’ acts, including compensatory damages, general damages, personal injury damages, past and future medical expenses, attorney’s fees, costs, and any other damages the Court deems appropriate. 15 38. Defendants committed the acts herein described despicably, maliciously, fraudulently, 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 and oppressively with the wrongful intention of injuring Plaintiff ALAN STRICKLAND, for an improper and evil motive amounting to malice, and in conscious disregard of Plaintiff’s rights. Further, MASAI UJIRI knew that his conduct was illegal and acted with the specific intent to cause injury and damage to Plaintiff ALAN STRICKLAND, and Plaintiff ALAN STRICKLAND is entitled to recover exemplary and punitive damages from Defendants in an amount according to proof. 39. Defendants are vicariously liable for the conduct of each other defendant carried out 23 within the course and scope of their employment duties using the powers imparted to them as agents 24 for each other defendant. 25 SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION 26 (Battery – Plaintiff ALAN STRICKLAND Against All Defendants, 27 Including DOES 1 through 100) 28 40. Plaintiffs incorporate herein, as though fully set forth at length, each and every -8COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Case 3:20-cv-00981-JCS Document 1 Filed 02/07/20 Page 9 of 15 1 2 allegation set forth in paragraphs above, inclusive of this Complaint. 41. At the time of the Subject Incident, MASAI UJIRI acted, intending to cause harmful 3 and/or offensive contact with Plaintiff ALAN STRICKLAND’s head and/or body with his hands 4 and/or fists, which resulted in harmful contact with Plaintiff ALAN STRICKLAND. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 42. Such harmful or offensive contact did, in fact, occur on June 13, 2019, without Plaintiff ALAN STRICKLAND’s consent. 43. MASAI UJIRI caused Plaintiff ALAN STRICKLAND imminent apprehension of harmful or offensive contact with Plaintiff ALAN STRICKLAND’s head and/or body, which resulted in direct contact with Plaintiff ALAN STRICKLAND. 44. Plaintiff ALAN STRICKLAND was harmed by MASAI UJIRI’s conduct. 45. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants’ conduct, Plaintiff ALAN STRICKLAND suffered injury to his head, body, health, strength, nervous system, and person, all of which caused and continue to cause Plaintiff great mental, physical, emotional and psychological pain and suffering. As a result of the acts and omissions herein complained of, Plaintiff ALAN 15 STRICKLAND suffered great anxiety, embarrassment, anger, loss of enjoyment of life, injury to 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 reputation, and severe emotional and physical distress in an amount to be determined at trial. Plaintiff is entitled to recover all damages resulting from Defendants’ acts, including compensatory damages, general damages, personal injury damages, past and future medical expenses, attorney’s fees, costs, and any other damages the Court deems appropriate. 46. Defendants committed the acts herein described despicably, maliciously, fraudulently, and oppressively with the wrongful intention of injuring Plaintiff ALAN STRICKLAND, for an 23 improper and evil motive amounting to malice, and in conscious disregard of Plaintiff’s rights. 24 Further, MASAI UJIRI knew that his conduct was illegal and acted with the specific intent to cause 25 injury and damage to Plaintiff ALAN STRICKLAND, and Plaintiff ALAN STRICKLAND is entitled 26 to recover exemplary and punitive damages from Defendants in an amount according to proof. 27 28 47. Defendants are vicariously liable for the conduct of each other defendant carried out within the course and scope of their employment duties using the powers imparted to them as agents -9COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Case 3:20-cv-00981-JCS Document 1 Filed 02/07/20 Page 10 of 15 1 for each other defendant. 2 THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION 3 (Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress – Plaintiff ALAN STRICKLAND Against All 4 Defendants, 5 Including Does 1 through 100) 6 7 48. allegation set forth in paragraphs above, inclusive of this Complaint. 8 9 10 11 14 49. Defendants engaged in extreme and outrageous conduct as set forth herein. 50. Defendants extreme and outrageous conduct included, but was not limited to, the act of physically harming, assaulting and battering Plaintiff ALAN STRICKLAND in a forum open to the public which was warranted to be a safe and secure event. 12 13 Plaintiffs incorporate herein, as though fully set forth at length, each and every 51. Defendants recklessly disregarded the probability of causing severe and emotional distress to Plaintiff ALAN STRICKLAND which resulted from taking no steps to prevent MASAI UJIRI from assaulting and battering Plaintiff or engaging in other harmful and offensive contact with 15 Plaintiff ALAN STRICKLAND, and preventing Plaintiff ALAN STRICKLAND from defending 16 17 18 himself from MASAI UJIRI, despite Defendants having knowledge of MASAI UJIRI’s propensity for violent tendencies. 52. 19 20 21 Defendants intentionally caused severe and emotional distress to Plaintiff ALAN STRICKLAND by his extreme and outrageous conduct of assaulting, battering, and physically harming the head and body of Plaintiff ALAN STRICKLAND. 53. 22 Plaintiff ALAN STRICKLAND suffered severe emotional distress of such substantial 23 quantity and enduring quality that an individual in a civilized society should not be expected to endure 24 it. 25 26 27 28 54. Defendants conduct directly and proximately caused Plaintiff ALAN STRICKLAND severe emotional distress. 55. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants conduct, Plaintiff ALAN STRICKLAND suffered injury to his body, health, strength, activity, and person, all of which have - 10 COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Case 3:20-cv-00981-JCS Document 1 Filed 02/07/20 Page 11 of 15 1 caused and continue to cause Plaintiff great mental, emotional, psychological, physical, and nervous 2 pain and suffering. Plaintiff ALAN STRICKLAND suffered great anxiety, embarrassment, anger, 3 loss of enjoyment of life, injury to reputation, and severe emotional and physical distress in an amount 4 to be determined at trial. Plaintiff ALAN STRICKLAND is entitled to recover all damages resulting 5 from Defendants acts, including compensatory damages, general damages, personal injury damages, 6 past and future medical expenses, attorney’s fees, costs, and any other damages the Court deems 7 appropriate. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 56. Defendants committed the acts herein described despicably, maliciously, fraudulently, and oppressively with the wrongful intention of injuring Plaintiff, for an improper and evil motive amounting to malice, and in conscious disregard of Plaintiff ALAN STRICKLAND’s rights. Further, Defendants knew that this conduct was illegal acted with the specific intent to cause injury and damage to Plaintiff, and Plaintiff is entitled to recover exemplary and punitive damages from Defendants in an amount according to proof. 57. Defendants are vicariously liable for the conduct of each other Defendant which they 15 carried out within the course and scope of their employment duties using the powers imparted to them 16 17 as an agent of each other Defendant. FOURTH CAUSE OF ACTION 18 (Negligence – Plaintiff ALAN STRICKLAND Against MASAI UJIRI, 19 Including Does 1 through 100) 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 58. Plaintiffs incorporate herein, as though fully set forth at length, each and every allegation set forth in paragraphs above, inclusive of this Complaint. 59. Defendant MASAI UJIRI negligently hit Plaintiff ALAN STRICKLAND in the face and chest with both fists. 60. Plaintiff ALAN STRICKLAND was harmed as a direct result of MASAI UJIRI’s negligence. 61. Defendant MASAI UJIRI’s negligence was a substantial factor in causing Plaintiff ALAN STRICKLAND’s harm. - 11 COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Case 3:20-cv-00981-JCS Document 1 Filed 02/07/20 Page 12 of 15 62. 1 Plaintiff ALAN STRICKLAND suffered severe emotional distress of such substantial 2 quantity and enduring quality that an individual in a civilized society should not be expected to endure 3 it. 4 5 6 63. Defendants conduct directly and proximately caused Plaintiff ALAN STRICKLAND severe emotional distress. 64. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants conduct, Plaintiff ALAN 7 STRICKLAND suffered injury to his body, health, strength, activity, and person, all of which have 8 caused and continue to cause Plaintiff great mental, emotional, psychological, physical, and nervous 9 10 11 12 13 14 pain and suffering. Plaintiff ALAN STRICKLAND suffered great anxiety, embarrassment, anger, loss of enjoyment of life, injury to reputation, and severe emotional and physical distress in an amount to be determined at trial. Plaintiff ALAN STRICKLAND is entitled to recover all damages resulting from Defendants acts, including compensatory damages, general damages, personal injury damages, past and future medical expenses, attorney’s fees, costs, and any other damages the Court deems appropriate. 15 65. Defendants committed the acts herein described despicably, maliciously, fraudulently, 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 and oppressively with the wrongful intention of injuring Plaintiff, for an improper and evil motive amounting to malice, and in conscious disregard of Plaintiff ALAN STRICKLAND’s rights. Further, Defendants knew that this conduct was illegal acted with the specific intent to cause injury and damage to Plaintiff, and Plaintiff is entitled to recover exemplary and punitive damages from Defendants in an amount according to proof. 66. Defendants are vicariously liable for the conduct of each other Defendant which they 23 carried out within the course and scope of their employment duties using the powers imparted to them 24 as an agent of each other Defendant. 25 FIFTH CAUSE OF ACTION 26 (Negligence – Plaintiff ALAN STRICKLAND Against MASAI UJIRI, TORONTO RAPTORS, 27 MAPLE LEAF SPORTS & ENTERTAINMENT, NATIONAL BASKETBALL ASSOCIATION, 28 INC., - 12 COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Case 3:20-cv-00981-JCS Document 1 Filed 02/07/20 Page 13 of 15 Including Does 1 through 100) 1 2 3 4 5 6 67. Plaintiffs incorporate herein, as though fully set forth at length, each and every allegation set forth in paragraphs above, inclusive of this Complaint. 68. Defendants, and each of them, owed a duty to Plaintiff and are responsible for the harm caused by MASAI UJIRI because they negligently hired, supervised, and/or retained him. 69. Defendants owed a duty to Plaintiff to reasonably supervise and/or monitor MASAI 7 UJIRI, who they knew, or should have known, had a violent predisposition and propensity for 8 physical violence. MASAI UJIRI had engaged in prior similar criminal and/or violent conduct 9 10 11 12 13 14 towards third parties including, but not limited to, NBA fans, NBA officials, and/or NBA players, on previous occasions. Defendants owed a duty to Plaintiff to take reasonable steps to prevent such harm as was foreseeable. 70. Defendants breached their duties of care to Plaintiff ALAN STRICKLAND through their negligent conduct which included, but is not limited to, Defendants failure to implement reasonable security in the form of security personnel, staff, plans, strategies, measures, systems, 15 standards, procedures, schemes, personnel training, signs, warnings, physical barriers, equipment, 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 tools, and arrangements. Defendants failure to provide adequate safety and security measures to protect members of the public including Plaintiff, failing to supervise MASAI UJIRI, failing to employ adequate security personnel, failing to employ adequate physical barriers between the stage and the audience floor, failing to warn of danger, failing to post signs warning of danger concerning MASAI UJIRI, failing to adequately train security personnel, failing to adequately equip security personnel with tools to prevent injuries to the public including Plaintiff. 71. Defendants knew that MASAI UJIRI was unfit to perform the work for which he 24 was hired and/or they knew or should have known that he had become unfit for the work in which 25 he was hire to do, and that this unfitness created a particular risk of harm to others, including 26 Plaintiffs. 27 72. Defendants negligence was a substantial factor in causing Plaintiff harm. 28 73. Plaintiff suffered harm as a result of Defendants negligent actions or omissions. - 13 COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Case 3:20-cv-00981-JCS Document 1 Filed 02/07/20 Page 14 of 15 1 74. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants conduct, Plaintiff suffered injury to 2 his body, health, strength, activity, and person, all of which have caused and continue to cause 3 Plaintiff great mental, emotional, psychological, physical, and nervous pain and suffering. Plaintiff 4 further alleges that such injuries resulted in permanent disability. Plaintiff suffered great anxiety, 5 embarrassment, anger, loss of enjoyment of life, injury to reputation, and severe emotional and 6 physical distress in an amount to be determined at trial. Plaintiff is entitled to recover all damages 7 resulting from MASAI UJIRI’s acts, including compensatory damages, general damages, personal 8 injury damages, past and future medical expenses, attorney’s fees, costs, and any other damages the 9 Court deems appropriate. 10 11 SIXTH CAUSE OF ACTION (Loss of Consortium – Plaintiff KELLY STRICKLAND Against All Defendants, 12 Including 13 14 Does 1 through 100.) 75. Plaintiffs incorporate herein, as though fully set forth at length, each and every 15 allegation set forth in paragraphs above, inclusive of this Complaint. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 76. That at all times mentioned herein, Plaintiffs ALAN STRICKLAND and KELLY STRICKLAND were, and now are, married. 77. That as a substantial result of the harm caused by Defendants MASAI UJIRI, TORONTO RAPTORS, MAPLE LEAF SPORTS & ENTERTAINMENT, DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, and each of them, Plaintiff KELLY STRICKLAND is informed and believes, and hereon alleges, that the injuries to her spouse are of a permanent nature, and that she will be deprived of her 23 love, companionship, comfort, care, services, assistance, protection, affection, society, and moral 24 support, all to her further damage, and in excess of the minimum jurisdictional limits of this Court, 25 and that she is entitled to prejudgment interest on that amount in accordance with law. PRAYER FOR RELIEF 26 27 28 78. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff ALAN STRICKLAND and KELLY STRICKLAND prays for relief against Defendants MASAI UJIRI, TORONTO RAPTORS, MAPLE LEAF SPORTS & - 14 COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Case 3:20-cv-00981-JCS Document 1 Filed 02/07/20 Page 15 of 15 1 ENTERTAINMENT, NATIONAL BASKETBALL ASSOCIATION, INC., and DOES 1 through 2 100, inclusive, and each of them, as set forth below: 3 4 a. General damages in excess of the minimum jurisdictional amount of $75,000; 5 b. Punitive damages in an appropriate amount according to proof; 6 c. All medical and incidental expenses according to proof; 7 d. All future medical and incidental expenses according to proof; 8 e. All loss of earnings according to proof; 9 10 11 12 13 f. All prejudgment interest on general and special damages in accordance with law; g. All property damage and expenses, according to proof; h. All costs of suit; and, i. Such other and further relief as this Court may deem just and proper. 14 DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL 15 Plaintiffs ALAN STRICKLAND and KELLY STRICKLAND request a jury trial on all 16 17 issues raised in this complaint. 18 19 DATED: February 7, 2020 MASTAGNI HOLSTEDT, A.P.C. 20 21 22 By: /s/ BRETT D. BEYLER BRETT D. BEYLER Attorneys for Plaintiffs 23 24 25 26 27 28 - 15 COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Case 3:20-cv-00981-JCS Document 1-1 Filed 02/07/20 Page 1 of 2 JS-CAND 44 (Rev. 07/19) CIVIL COVER SHEET The JS-CAND 44 civil cover sheet and the information contained herein neither replace nor supplement the filing and service of pleadings or other papers as required by law, except as provided by local rules of court. This form, approved in its original form by the Judicial Conference of the United States in September 1974, is required for the Clerk of Court to initiate the civil docket sheet. (SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON NEXT PAGE OF THIS FORM.) I. (a) PLAINTIFFS DEFENDANTS Masai Ujiri, an individual; Toronto Raptors, a business entity; Maple Leaf Sports & Entertainment, a business entity; National Basketball Association, Inc.; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive Alan Strickland, an individual; and Kelly Strickland, an individual (b) County of Residence of First Listed Plaintiff County of Residence of First Listed Defendant (IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES ONLY) (EXCEPT IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES) NOTE: (c) Attorneys (Firm Name, Address, and Telephone Number) Grant A. Winter, SBN 266329 / Brett D. Beyler, SBN 319415 Mastagni Holstedt, A.P.C. 1912 I Street, Sacramento, CA 95811 II. Attorneys (If Known) T: (916) 446-4692 BASIS OF JURISDICTION (Place an “X” in One Box Only) 1 U.S. Government Plaintiff 3 2 U.S. Government Defendant 4 IV. NATURE OF SUIT CONTRACT 110 Insurance 120 Marine 130 Miller Act 140 Negotiable Instrument 150 Recovery of Overpayment Of Veteran’s Benefits 151 Medicare Act 152 Recovery of Defaulted Student Loans (Excludes Veterans) 153 Recovery of Overpayment of Veteran’s Benefits 160 Stockholders’ Suits 190 Other Contract 195 Contract Product Liability 196 Franchise REAL PROPERTY 210 Land Condemnation 220 Foreclosure 230 Rent Lease & Ejectment 240 Torts to Land 245 Tort Product Liability 290 All Other Real Property V. 1 VI. IN LAND CONDEMNATION CASES, USE THE LOCATION OF THE TRACT OF LAND INVOLVED. III. CITIZENSHIP OF PRINCIPAL PARTIES (Place an “X” in One Box for Plaintiff (For Diversity Cases Only) Federal Question (U.S. Government Not a Party) PTF 1 Citizen of This State Diversity (Indicate Citizenship of Parties in Item III) DEF 1 Citizen of Another State 2 2 Citizen or Subject of a Foreign Country 3 3 and One Box for Defendant) PTF Incorporated or Principal Place 4 of Business In This State Incorporated and Principal Place 5 of Business In Another State Foreign Nation 6 DEF 4 5 6 (Place an “X” in One Box Only) TORTS PERSONAL INJURY 310 Airplane 315 Airplane Product Liability 320 Assault, Libel & Slander 330 Federal Employers’ Liability 340 Marine 345 Marine Product Liability 350 Motor Vehicle 355 Motor Vehicle Product Liability 360 Other Personal Injury 362 Personal Injury -Medical Malpractice PERSONAL INJURY 365 Personal Injury – Product Liability 367 Health Care/ Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability 368 Asbestos Personal Injury Product Liability PERSONAL PROPERTY 370 Other Fraud 371 Truth in Lending 380 Other Personal Property Damage 385 Property Damage Product Liability PRISONER PETITIONS CIVIL RIGHTS 440 Other Civil Rights 441 Voting 442 Employment 443 Housing/ Accommodations 445 Amer. w/Disabilities– Employment 446 Amer. w/Disabilities–Other 448 Education HABEAS CORPUS 463 Alien Detainee 510 Motions to Vacate Sentence 530 General 535 Death Penalty FORFEITURE/PENALTY 625 Drug Related Seizure of Property 21 USC § 881 690 Other LABOR BANKRUPTCY 422 Appeal 28 USC § 158 423 Withdrawal 28 USC § 157 PROPERTY RIGHTS 710 Fair Labor Standards Act 720 Labor/Management Relations 740 Railway Labor Act 751 Family and Medical Leave Act 790 Other Labor Litigation 791 Employee Retirement Income Security Act IMMIGRATION 462 Naturalization Application 465 Other Immigration Actions 820 Copyrights 830 Patent 835 Patent─Abbreviated New Drug Application 840 Trademark SOCIAL SECURITY 861 HIA (1395ff) 862 Black Lung (923) 863 DIWC/DIWW (405(g)) 864 SSID Title XVI 865 RSI (405(g)) FEDERAL TAX SUITS 870 Taxes (U.S. Plaintiff or Defendant) 871 IRS–Third Party 26 USC § 7609 OTHER 540 Mandamus & Other 550 Civil Rights 555 Prison Condition 560 Civil Detainee– Conditions of Confinement OTHER STATUTES 375 False Claims Act 376 Qui Tam (31 USC § 3729(a)) 400 State Reapportionment 410 Antitrust 430 Banks and Banking 450 Commerce 460 Deportation 470 Racketeer Influenced & Corrupt Organizations 480 Consumer Credit 485 Telephone Consumer Protection Act 490 Cable/Sat TV 850 Securities/Commodities/ Exchange 890 Other Statutory Actions 891 Agricultural Acts 893 Environmental Matters 895 Freedom of Information Act 896 Arbitration 899 Administrative Procedure Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision 950 Constitutionality of State Statutes ORIGIN (Place an “X” in One Box Only) 2 Original Proceeding CAUSE OF ACTION 3 Removed from State Court Remanded from Appellate Court 4 Reinstated or Reopened 5 Transferred from Another District (specify) 6 Multidistrict Litigation–Transfer 8 Multidistrict Litigation–Direct File Cite the U.S. Civil Statute under which you are filing (Do not cite jurisdictional statutes unless diversity): 28 U.S.C. Section1332 Brief description of cause: Plaintiff was injured by Defendants while providing security detail at NBA Game VII. REQUESTED IN COMPLAINT: CHECK IF THIS IS A CLASS ACTION UNDER RULE 23, Fed. R. Civ. P. VIII. RELATED CASE(S), IF ANY (See instructions): IX. DEMAND $ JUDGE DIVISIONAL ASSIGNMENT (Civil Local Rule 3-2) SAN FRANCISCO/OAKLAND (Place an “X” in One Box Only) DATE 02/07/2020 Print CHECK YES only if demanded in complaint: JURY DEMAND: Yes No DOCKET NUMBER SAN JOSE SIGNATURE OF ATTORNEY OF RECORD Save As... EUREKA-MCKINLEYVILLE /s/ BRETT D. BEYLER Reset JS-CAND 44 (rev. 07/19) Case 3:20-cv-00981-JCS Document 1-1 Filed 02/07/20 Page 2 of 2 INSTRUCTIONS FOR ATTORNEYS COMPLETING CIVIL COVER SHEET FORM JS-CAND 44 Authority For Civil Cover Sheet. The JS-CAND 44 civil cover sheet and the information contained herein neither replaces nor supplements the filings and service of pleading or other papers as required by law, except as provided by local rules of court. This form, approved in its original form by the Judicial Conference of the United States in September 1974, is required for the Clerk of Court to initiate the civil docket sheet. Consequently, a civil cover sheet is submitted to the Clerk of Court for each civil complaint filed. The attorney filing a case should complete the form as follows: I. a) Plaintiffs-Defendants. Enter names (last, first, middle initial) of plaintiff and defendant. If the plaintiff or defendant is a government agency, use only the full name or standard abbreviations. If the plaintiff or defendant is an official within a government agency, identify first the agency and then the official, giving both name and title. b) County of Residence. For each civil case filed, except U.S. plaintiff cases, enter the name of the county where the first listed plaintiff resides at the time of filing. In U.S. plaintiff cases, enter the name of the county in which the first listed defendant resides at the time of filing. (NOTE: In land condemnation cases, the county of residence of the “defendant” is the location of the tract of land involved.) c) Attorneys. Enter the firm name, address, telephone number, and attorney of record. If there are several attorneys, list them on an attachment, noting in this section “(see attachment).” II. Jurisdiction. The basis of jurisdiction is set forth under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a), which requires that jurisdictions be shown in pleadings. Place an “X” in one of the boxes. If there is more than one basis of jurisdiction, precedence is given in the order shown below. (1) United States plaintiff. Jurisdiction based on 28 USC §§ 1345 and 1348. Suits by agencies and officers of the United States are included here. (2) United States defendant. When the plaintiff is suing the United States, its officers or agencies, place an “X” in this box. (3) Federal question. This refers to suits under 28 USC § 1331, where jurisdiction arises under the Constitution of the United States, an amendment to the Constitution, an act of Congress or a treaty of the United States. In cases where the U.S. is a party, the U.S. plaintiff or defendant code takes precedence, and box 1 or 2 should be marked. (4) Diversity of citizenship. This refers to suits under 28 USC § 1332, where parties are citizens of different states. When Box 4 is checked, the citizenship of the different parties must be checked. (See Section III below; NOTE: federal question actions take precedence over diversity cases.) III. Residence (citizenship) of Principal Parties. This section of the JS-CAND 44 is to be completed if diversity of citizenship was indicated above. Mark this section for each principal party. IV. Nature of Suit. Place an “X” in the appropriate box. If the nature of suit cannot be determined, be sure the cause of action, in Section VI below, is sufficient to enable the deputy clerk or the statistical clerk(s) in the Administrative Office to determine the nature of suit. If the cause fits more than one nature of suit, select the most definitive. V. Origin. Place an “X” in one of the six boxes. (1) Original Proceedings. Cases originating in the United States district courts. (2) Removed from State Court. Proceedings initiated in state courts may be removed to the district courts under Title 28 USC § 1441. When the petition for removal is granted, check this box. (3) Remanded from Appellate Court. Check this box for cases remanded to the district court for further action. Use the date of remand as the filing date. (4) Reinstated or Reopened. Check this box for cases reinstated or reopened in the district court. Use the reopening date as the filing date. (5) Transferred from Another District. For cases transferred under Title 28 USC § 1404(a). Do not use this for within district transfers or multidistrict litigation transfers. (6) Multidistrict Litigation Transfer. Check this box when a multidistrict case is transferred into the district under authority of Title 28 USC § 1407. When this box is checked, do not check (5) above. (8) Multidistrict Litigation Direct File. Check this box when a multidistrict litigation case is filed in the same district as the Master MDL docket. Please note that there is no Origin Code 7. Origin Code 7 was used for historical records and is no longer relevant due to changes in statute. VI. Cause of Action. Report the civil statute directly related to the cause of action and give a brief description of the cause. Do not cite jurisdictional statutes unless diversity. Example: U.S. Civil Statute: 47 USC § 553. Brief Description: Unauthorized reception of cable service. VII. Requested in Complaint. Class Action. Place an “X” in this box if you are filing a class action under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23. Demand. In this space enter the actual dollar amount being demanded or indicate other demand, such as a preliminary injunction. Jury Demand. Check the appropriate box to indicate whether or not a jury is being demanded. VIII. Related Cases. This section of the JS-CAND 44 is used to identify related pending cases, if any. If there are related pending cases, insert the docket numbers and the corresponding judge names for such cases. IX. Divisional Assignment. If the Nature of Suit is under Property Rights or Prisoner Petitions or the matter is a Securities Class Action, leave this section blank. For all other cases, identify the divisional venue according to Civil Local Rule 3-2: “the county in which a substantial part of the events or omissions which give rise to the claim occurred or in which a substantial part of the property that is the subject of the action is situated.” Date and Attorney Signature. Date and sign the civil cover sheet.