l.
A

‘4‘
'

J

FELON

STATE OF INDIANA

COUNTY 0F ALLEN

IN

}SS=

THE

I

02D06-2002-MC-000605
v. Cameron Blake

State of Indiana

Hallett

C.

FWPD

STATE 0F INDIANA

Control # 20F019 105

VS.

Cameron Blake

Hallett

P

AFFIDAVIT FOR PROBABLE CAUSE

r}

The undersigned swears and affirms, under the

penalties for perjury, that he has

good cause

V

m
03

q:

w

91%;

to believe
;,.

thaw

,3

r

Ant

or about the 19th, day of February,

in the

2.

3.

County of Allen and

in the State

The Defendant, Cameron Blake

2020

is

W

described as being: White, Male,

T0

I‘

n.-

U

1W

criiléf(s);of

DOB 7/1 8/97 SS#

'

UI

w-i

’

w:1:

Wrder

'

Wit;

police department received 2 calls indicating that a male was shot in an
hereafier refened to as the
arrived and located ‘hcAv'xM
Officers
alley behind the 2800 block of Euclid Avenue.
Authority Medic
Ambulance
Rivers
Three
wound.
gunshot
1
least
from
at
suffering
he
was
victim, in the alley and confirmed that

On 2/19/20

at

approximately 7:08

pm.

Wayne

the F011

FWPD

ll Cert

0272 arrived

to treat the victim.

Medic

11

f

determined that the victim was

to Lutheran Hospital. Doctors at Lutheran Hospital

S.

f

Afi'lant believes and
The Affiant, Detective Matthew Cline 1785F, is an officer of the Fort Wayne Police Department. The
his belief on the fact
bases
has good cause to bclieve that the said Defendant committed the aforesaid offense(s). The Afflant
ofFort Wayne,
.City
that on Wednesday, February 19, 2020 at approximately 7:04 pm. in the

Allen Count, Indiana the above mentioned defendant committed Murder.

4.

1.“

g

of Indiana said Defendant did knowingly commit the

Hallett,

M

L

7“

On

ifs

~r-.

?3

,

Hg:

l.

g

ff;

32*

began

,

in critical condition.

1W

to treat the victim,

The affiant viewed video footage from an exterior camera on the rear of
victim being assaulted by 2 subjects and then being shot in the alley. Just

however

The victim was

a short time later

transported

he died from his

injuries.

The video footage captured

the

be seen walking
he can be seen using a
walking
was
victim
the
While
Street.
McKee
on
vehicle
southbound in the alley and meeting a light colored
in the alley. 2 persons can
northbound
back
walking
be
seen
can
victim
the
vehicle,
cellular device. Afier meeting the light colored
males was holding an item inside ofa bag. It
be seen waiting for the victim and then assaulting him. It appeared that one of the
seen coming fi‘om the item. The firearm was
appeared that this item was a firearm, because later in the video, muzzle flash can be
seen using what appears to be a cellular device. A
discharged toward the victim. Afier the victim was assaulted and shot, he can be
here afier referred to as Witness #1 comes to the victim’s aid.
\J‘J-Msgl
short time later a person, who was later identified as
used afier being assaulted and shot. Witness #1
Witness #lcan be seen taking possession ofthe cellular device that the victim
assaulted and later shot the victim appears to be
who
person
The
leaves view with the cellular device and returns a short time later.
fi'om
scene.
the
recovered
above average height, and slim. 9mm shell casings were
prior to the assault, the victim can

,

6.

assaulted and shot he stated “Blake shot me, Blako
Witness #1 told detectives that when he first approached the victim afier he was
“Blako’s” first name is possibly “Cam”. Witness #1 told detectives that “Blako”
shot me, Blako shot me”. Witness #1 stated that
detectives that “Blake” drives around in a red Ford
threatened the victim recently for allegedly stealing fi'om him. Witness #1 told
#1 was shown a photo array containing the
Mustang, and that he has been stopped by the police recently in that vehicle. Witness
“Blake”.
as
Defendant. Witness #1 positively identified the Defendant from the photo array

the victim

7.

“Blako

say
\J.LM45 Lhercafier Witness #2 told detectives that he approached the victim afier he was shot and heard
Witness #2 positively
containing the Defendant.
shot me, blako shot me, blako shot me”. Witness #2 was shown a photo array
“Blake”.
as
array
photo
identified the Defendant from the

8.

computer system and noted that he has had recent involvements in which he was
Detectives located the Defendant in the
name 0f Blake was close to the nickname “Blako”.
driving a red Ford Mustang. Detectives noted that the Defendant’s middle
6’4”
with the above average height ofthe shooter on
consistent
This
is
l701bs.
Detectives also noted that the Defendant is listed as

FWPD

the video.

9.

The affiant

located an Instagram profile for the Defendant with the screen

name “boy.blako".

 HkueH'

-

c
'
s

r10.

Detectives conducted a recorded interview of \dlkmssg hereafier Witness #3, who is good fi'iends with the victim. Witness #3
“Blako” and “Forrest” were responsible for the assault and shooting of the victim. Witness #3 stated that
‘,

stated that he heard that

he has had recent involvements with “Blake”. Witness #3 stated that he has seen “Blake” 2 times face to face, but he does not
know his legal name. Witness #3 was shown a photo array that contained the Defendant. Witness #3 positivity identified the
Defendant fiom the photo array as “Blake”.
11.

On

2/20/20 Dr.

Wagner performed an autopsy on

the victim and determined that he died

fiom

wound and ruled

a gunshot

his death

a homicide.

12.

On

2/21/20 detectives observed the Defendant exit

ytwpao/

and enter a Toyota Camry that was registered to him.

Detectives stopped the Defendant for a traffic violation, and to serve an active search warrant for DNA/Body Standards. The
Defendant had the barrel ofa Glock handgun tucked in his underwear. Detectives noticed the smell 0f Marijuana coming fiom
inside the vehicle. Detectives searched the vehicle prior to it being towed and located a large amount of US cunency. Under the
driver’s seat Detectives found a

noted that the bag had a hole
13.

14.

15.

in

brown
it,

and

bag that contained a black lower/receiver portion ofa Glock handgun. Detectives
had an odor of bleach.

plastic
it

detectives located the upper slide and spring t0 a Glock handgun, which
During search warrant service of
were the missing parts of the handgun that the Defendant had in the vehicle when he was stopped. The parts were for a 9mm
handgun. Another firearm was also located during the search.
‘

During a recorded interview, the Defendant admitted that “boyblako” was his Instagram screen name. The Defendant stated
has a child in common with degqhereafier Witness #4.

made contact with Witness #4, who stated that she knows
buying “Vape” products, and met him near his house on 2/19/20.
Detectives

the victim,

made telephone

/m“ ”‘4“

contact with the victim about

K

{72’916

Affiant

STATE 0F INDIANA
COUNTY 0F ALLEN
Subscribed and sworn to

#ss:
before me in

«aw
F-

and for said County and

State Lhis

M- C't‘vf;

'

F‘LNM".

1

.

MyTerrn/Commission

”C; i

2
;

4:;
.

,.
’

f

N:

a

r

x.

'

-‘

nu

‘r

v1

-

—

'

Deputy Froseculor/Notary Pubiic

‘

f

,

ORDER
Review of probable cause held. The Court now finds probable cause docs exist for arrest of Defendant.
Defendant appears in person.
for Formal Charges.
r sevent -t
inued
(72) hours, excluding intervening Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays,
cause
o
On motion ofthe State,
Bail

fixed

in the

sum of$

.

ORDER
is examined
files Affidavit for probable cause
Hearing on issue of probable cause held. State of Indiana, by Prosecuting Attorney Karen E. Richards,
0r the rime(s) of
Defendant, and orders Clerk lo issue a warrant for arrest of Defend
by the Court. Court finds probable cause does exist for mast of

fl

{M J2

—:~

“I

"
gém/ 4/, NM“: f
z/

Expires:

r

lo

fl

f

j

5,:

1;,

day of

I
{f}:r:

45
'

rL‘

that

/

@020

Ufidge,

.

.

MtefiWSuperior Court

_>

;
,\

he