7/29/2019 Indicator 11: Child Find (Early Childhood Transition)

a Trams [itiatrei-vnorq Amway

 

Divisions

State 2018-
Performance School Year: 19 Username: Hector.Garzal4 Role: Certi?er
Plan

Home Data Entry District Admin Instructions and FAQ Exit

Indicator I Child Find (Timely Initial Evaluation)

Data from School Year 2018-19 

District UNITED ISD (240903) Go
District: UNITED ISD

Region: 0]

Data from School Year: 2018-19

Data Entry Open and Close Period: 6(1/2019 - ?lx?l 7/2019

Status: Incomplete

Shou-il-Iide Instructions
Data Collection

Required Field 

TEA Home TEA A-Z Index TEA Locator TEA

District Number: 240903

 

Help

 

received.

a. Number of students aged 3-21 for whom a verbal or written request for 918
a FIIE was received: (prior written notice must be provided in each
request and in compliance with CFR ?300.503)

31.1. Number of students counted in in which the reason for request 2
indicates the child should have been referred prior to the current
school year

21.2. Number of students ages 3-21 for whom signed, written parental 879
consent to evaluate was received (TEC ($29004)

21.3. Number of students determined not eligible: 21.4.) Must 132

?14. Number of students determined eligible: a4.) Must 747

a5. Number of students determined eligible and the ARD committee 2
determined additional services are needed, taking into consideration
support and services previously provided must be equal to or less
than 

a.6. Types of additional services documented in the IEP (a student may
count in multiple service types)

i. Related services 0
ii. Supplementary aids services 2
Program modi?cations 2

 



Section One: Students ages 3-21 for whom a request for a Full and Individual Initial Evaluation (FIIE) was

 

1l3

7/29/2019 indicator 11: Child Find (Early Childhood Transition)
iv. Supports for personnel 1

a7. Timeline to implement additional services (a student may count only
once for longest service(s) duration) a.7. ii.) Must 21.5.]

i. Up to six months 0

ii. More than six (6) months, up to one (1) year 2

 

 

Section Two: Evaluation and eligibility determined WITHIN State
established timelines

b. Number ot?students with evaluation report written within State 879
established timelines from receipt ot?signed, written parental consent 
district maintained detailed records ofreason for delay described in
CPR 

c. Number of students with eligibility determined by ARD committee 879
within 30 calendar days from date ofevaluation report (TAC
district maintained detailed records ofreason for delay
described in CPR 

 

 

Section Three: Evaluations NOT within State established timelines

d. Number of students with evaluation report NOT written within State 0
established timelines from receipt of signed. written parental consent.
d2.) [Must (21.2. - 

d. 1. 1?30 calendar days over timeline
d2. 31 or more calendar days over timeline
e. Reasons for delay: l. e.2. e3. e4. e.5. [Must 
e. 1. LEA delay due to scheduling
e2. LEA delay due to lack of available assessment personnel
e3. LEA delay due to late report from contracted personnel

e4. Parent delay (No detailed records maintained by LEA)



e.5. Student transfer/enrollment into district prior to completion oftimelint
begun in previous district (No detailed records maintained by LEA of
agreement with parent to speci?c timeline for completion)

(3.6. Other 0

rBrictl} Describe}:

100 characters maximum)

District Percentage against 100% State target 100.0

 

 

 

Return History:

2/3