AGENDA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING May 12, 2020 5:00 PM, City Council Chambers 130 S Galena Street, Aspen I. CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL III. SCHEDULED PUBLIC APPEARANCES IV. CITIZENS COMMENTS & PETITIONS (Time for any citizen to address Council on issues NOT scheduled for a public hearing. Please limit your comments to 3 minutes) Meeting number (access code): 620 499 038 Meeting password: 81611 Tuesday, May 12, 2020 4:30 pm (UTC-06:00) Mountain Time (US & Canada) 6 hrs Join by phone Tap to call in from a mobile device (attendees only) +1-720-650-7664 United States Toll (Denver) +1-469-210-7159 United States Toll (Dallas) Global call-in numbers V. SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY a) Councilmembers' and Mayor's Comments b) Agenda Amendments c) City Manager's Comments d) Board Reports VI. CONSENT CALENDAR (These matters may be adopted together by a single motion) 1 1 VII. VI.A. Resolution #36, Series of 2020 - Aspen Water Integrated Resources Plan (IRP) – Phase 1 Update and Phase 2 Contract for Professional Services VI.B. Resolution #038, Series of 2020 - Adoption of an updated IGA for Mental Health Services between Pitkin County, the City of Aspen, the Aspen School District and Aspen Valley Hospital VI.C. Draft Minutes of April 28th, 2020 NOTICE OF CALL-UP VII.A. Notice of Call Up, HPC approval for 134 E. Bleeker Street – Minor Development, Relocation, and Setback Variations VIII. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES IX. VIII.A. Ordinance #06, Series of 2020 – First Reading, 920 East Hyman Avenue, Establishment of Transferable Development Rights (TDR) VIII.B. Ordinance #07, Series of 2020 - First Reading of 2020 Spring Supplemental PUBLIC HEARINGS IX.A. Resolution #041, Series of 2020 - Extension of Vested Rights Request for Aspen Valley Hospital (AVH), 401 Castle Creek Road X. ACTION ITEMS XI. ADJOURNMENT 2 2 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Raquel Flinker, Project Manager Steve Hunter, Utilities Resource Manager THROUGH: Tyler Christoff, Director of Utilities MEMO DATE: 05/04/2020 MEETING DATE: 05/12/2020 RE: Aspen Water Integrated Resources Plan (IRP) – Phase 1 Update and Phase 2 Contract for Professional Services (Resolution #36, Series of 2020) REQUEST OF COUNCIL: Staff seeks to update Council on the completion of Phase 1 of the IRP. Staff also seeks Council’s approval of the Aspen Water Integrated Resource Plan Phase 2 contract for professional services with Carollo Engineers, Inc. (Carollo) in the amount of $220,896.00. SUMMARY AND BACKGROUND: The City operates an Integrated Water Supply System (IWSS) to ensure a safe, legal and reliable water system for our community, now and into the future. This IWSS includes various water rights, infrastructure, and demand management techniques that work together to meet the City’s goals. The City is undertaking an Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) process to update the City’s long-term water supply goals, review the City’s water supply portfolio, and determine the best management techniques for long-range planning. This large effort is being accomplished in two phases. Phase 1, the planning phase, was recently completed and involved meetings with staff, various stakeholders, and City leaders to determine the appropriate methods and goals for the IRP. Phase 2 will include the implementation of the Scope of Work (SOW) developed in Phase 1. DISCUSSION: Phase 1 of the IRP began in November 2019 and its activities focused on developing water planning goals and opportunities specific to Aspen’s water supplies as well as identifying information gaps. Phase 1 crafted strategies for engaging stakeholders during Phase 2. Phase 1 of the IRP recently concluded with the development of a detailed workplan to help guide Phase 2. A summary of Phase 1 is included in Exhibit A. Building off the goals and outcomes developed in Phase 1, staff and the consultant team intend to develop a long-term vision for the City’s integrated water supply system in Phase 2. Anticipated outcomes of Phase 2 are: 3 1 1. Roadmap for the City’s water strategy to provide long‐term water supply resiliency and reliability, 2. Clear path forward for implementing the City’s conditional storage rights, 3. Water supply capital program, and 4. Community outreach and Council consideration of the IRP recommendations. Carollo has been the consultant for Phase I of this project. They were selected through the competitive RFP process in the fall of 2019. Five proposals were received and the top three teams went through extensive interviews with the selection committee. Carollo has demonstrated a thorough understanding of our system and needs. To date Carollo’s deliverables have been of professional quality and exceeded all staff expectations. The team holds specific knowledge regarding the City’s water portfolio, complex water system and they are an industry leader in the development of Integrated Resource Plans. Staff recommends that it is in the City’s best interests to award Phase II of the Integrated Resource Plan to Carollo. FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Staff intends to use 2020 Utilities funding for this Project. Total Project Expenditures Carollo Professional Services Contract $220,896.00 Total Funding Budgeted Aspen IRP – Phase 2 (acct #421.322.81200.50942) Pre-Project Engineering Services (acct #421.322.81200.50930) Total $220,896.00 $211,887.95 $ 9,008.05 $220,896.00 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: By more efficiently managing its Integrated Water Supply System, the City will also increase its efficiency in energy management and continue its dedication to environmental stewardship of the watersheds we depend on for sustaining our community. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that Council approve the Aspen Water Integrated Resource Plan Phase 2 contract for professional services with Carollo in the amount of $220,896.00. PROPOSED MOTION: “I move to approve Resolution No. 036, Series of 2020.” CITY MANAGER COMMENTS: 4 ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A – Project memo IRP Phase 1 summary Exhibit B – Resolution #36, Series of 2020 Exhibit C – Carollo Professional Services Contract for Phase 2 of the IRP 5 PROJECT MEMORANDUM INTEGRATED RESOURCE PLAN Date: Project No.: City of Aspen Prepared By: John Rehring, P.E. Reviewed by: Inge Wiersema, P.E. Subject: Synopsis of Integrated Resource Plan Phase & Activities and Findings April &9, 1212 &&352A.22 Overview of IRP Development The City of Aspen (City) is developing an Integrated Resource Plan (IRP), which will provide a roadmap for the City’s long‐term water strategy. The City seeks to develop an IRP to analyze its water rights portfolio and develop a robust plan to provide a safe, legal and reliable water supply to its customers through at least 1234, while respecting the City’s commitment to environmental stewardship. Phase & of IRP development recently concluded with the development of a detailed workplan for IRP development in Phase 1. Through a competitive process, the City engaged the consulting team of Carollo Engineers, Element Water Consulting, and Ross Strategic to support the City’s IRP development efforts. IRP Phase & activities focused on developing water planning goals and opportunities specific to Aspen’s water supplies and identifying information gaps. The Phase & work also crafted strategies for engaging a wide range of stakeholders in developing the IRP, including community members and City departments. In‐depth interviews and discussions conducted in late 12&5 provided a foundation for the IRP, including: • • • A series of in‐person meetings and interviews with staff from numerous City departments, Focused dialogue with Community Relations staff to develop engagement strategies, and Input from City leaders and City Council. These interactions provided insights into previous plans and studies that have guided the City’s water supply strategies to date, supply threats and opportunities, planning tactics and milestones, and priorities for guiding the City’s water supply strategies. They also set a foundation for planning by obtaining input on existing studies and information relevant for IRP development. As part of Phase & efforts, input was gathered and documented for the following planning areas: &. 1. 8. 9. 4. 3. ;. =. Planning Logistics, Practices, and Coordination with Other Initiatives Environmental and Recreational Considerations Demand Forecasts Characterization and Mitigation of Threats to Supply Raw Water Storage Treated Water Transmission, Distribution, and Storage Source Water and Transmission System: Miscellaneous Projects and Operational Considerations Engagement Considerations 6 pw://Carollo/Documents/Client/CO/Aspen/11690A00/Deliverables/Project memo IRP Phase 1 summary_041420.docx PAGE 1 of 2 PROJECT MEMORANDUM Drivers and Goals for IRP Planning Elements of the City’s drivers, vision, and goals for the IRP were evidenced in the input provided through the course of these discussions. The City has many drivers for developing the IRP. Examples of drivers that were illuminated via the staff workshops include: • • • • • Clear direction on raw water storage (size, siting and implementation) for Castle Creek and Maroon Creek conditional storage rights. Enhanced plans for optimized use of the City’s various water rights. Need for increased community awareness regarding water reliability and scarcity. Community and City interest in securing a sustainable, reliable water supply for decades to come, in the face of threats such as extended drought and climate change. Leveraging relevant elements of previous studies regarding water supply challenges and opportunities. Elements of the City’s vision and goals for the IRP include the following: • • • • • • Comprehensive assessment of future demands, existing supply capabilities, future supply opportunities. Identification and mitigation of water supply threats for a resilient, reliable supply system. Assessment of future raw water storage siting and assessment of the infrastructure and operational implications of storing water lower in the system. Use of a transparent, inclusive process and clear documentation of the analyses, rationale for decision‐making, and results. Engagement of key stakeholders and community members, including a “consultative” approach to interacting with key stakeholders. Integration of water planning via the IRP with other key City planning efforts, such as conservation and efficient landscaping programs, Parks initiatives, Community Development planning processes, the Climate Action Plan, and the River Management Plan. Potential future sources of water supply were identified for assessment in Phase 1. The planning team will consider the reliability, water quality, and treatability of each water supply source, as well as the ability to utilize each source in emergencies (e.g., avalanches, wildfires). IRP Outcomes Anticipated key outcomes of Phase 1 of the IRP in 121& include: • • • • Roadmap for the City’s water strategy to provide long‐term water supply resiliency and reliability, Clear path forward for implementing the City’s conditional storage rights, Water supply capital program, and Community support and Council consideration of the IRP recommendations. The IRP will be developed in Phase 1 through execution of the following tasks: Stakeholder Engagement Basis of Planning Demand Forecast Characterize Existing Water Supply System and Forecast Future Supply Future Supply Strategy Documentation Development of the IRP is expected to culminate in documentation and City Council consideration of the plan in late spring 121&. PAGE 1 of 1 7 RESOLUTION #036 (Series of 2020) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO, WHICH AUTHORIZES THE CITY OF ASPEN TO ENTER INTO A PROFESSIONAL AGREEMENT WITH CAROLLO ENGINEERS FOR CONSULTANT ASSISTANCE WITH ASPEN WATER DEPARTMENT’S INTEGRATED RESOURCE PLAN (IRP) PHASE 2. WHEREAS, the City operates an Integrated Water Supply System (IWSS) that uses various water rights, infrastructure and management techniques to best serve its customers; and WHEREAS, the City released a Request for Proposals for consultant assistance with developing an Integrated Resource Plan to provide long-range planning for the City’s IWSS; and WHEREAS, the Carollo Engineers Team was determined by the selection committee to provide the most comprehensive professional services for this project; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO, That the City Council of the City of Aspen hereby authorizes the professional agreement to Carollo Engineers in the amount of $220,896.00, and authorizes the City Manager to execute said agreement on behalf of the City of Aspen. INTRODUCED, READ AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Aspen on the 12th day of May, 2020. Torre, Mayor I, Nicole Henning, duly appointed and acting City Clerk do certify that the foregoing is a true and accurate copy of that Resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of Aspen, Colorado, at a meeting held May 12, 2020. Nicole Henning, City Clerk 8 CITY OF ASPEN STANDARD FORM OF AGREEMENT V 2009 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES City of Aspen Contract No.: 2020-59042 AGREEMENT made as of 12 day of May, in the year 2020. BETWEEN the City: Contract Amount: The City of Aspen c/o Sara Ott 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Phone: (970) 920-5079 Total: If this Agreement requires the City to pay an amount of money in excess of $50,000.00 it shall not be deemed valid until it has been approved by the City Council of the City of Aspen. And the Professional: Carollo Engineers c/o John Rehring 390 Interlocken Crescent, Suite 800 Broomfield, CO 80021 Phone: (303) 635-1220 $220,896.00 City Council Approval: Date: ___________________________ Resolution No.:___________________ For the Following Project: City of Aspen Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) Strategic Consulting Services – Phase 2 Exhibits appended and made a part of this Agreement: Exhibit A: Scope of Work. Exhibit B: Fee Schedule. Exhibit C: Schedule. The City and Professional agree as set forth below. Agreement Professional Services 9 Page 1 1. Scope of Work. Professional shall perform in a competent and professional manner the Scope of Work as set forth at Exhibit A attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein. 2. Completion. Professional shall commence Work immediately upon receipt of a written Notice to Proceed from the City and complete all phases of the Scope of Work as expeditiously as is consistent with professional skill and care and the orderly progress of the Work in a timely manner. The parties anticipate that all Work pursuant to this Agreement shall be completed no later than June 1, 2021. Upon request of the City, Professional shall submit, for the City's approval, a schedule for the performance of Professional's services which shall be adjusted as required as the project proceeds, and which shall include allowances for periods of time required by the City's project engineer for review and approval of submissions and for approvals of authorities having jurisdiction over the project. This schedule, when approved by the City, shall not, except for reasonable cause, be exceeded by the Professional. 3. Payment. In consideration of the work performed, City shall pay Professional on a time and expense basis for all work performed. The hourly rates for work performed by Professional shall not exceed those hourly rates set forth at Exhibit B appended hereto. Except as otherwise mutually agreed to by the parties the payments made to Professional shall not initially exceed the amount set forth above. Professional shall submit, in timely fashion, invoices for work performed. The City shall review such invoices and, if they are considered incorrect or untimely, the City shall review the matter with Professional within ten days from receipt of the Professional's bill. 4. Non-Assignability. Both parties recognize that this Agreement is one for personal services and cannot be transferred, assigned, or sublet by either party without prior written consent of the other. Sub-Contracting, if authorized, shall not relieve the Professional of any of the responsibilities or obligations under this Agreement. Professional shall be and remain solely responsible to the City for the acts, errors, omissions or neglect of any subcontractors’ officers, agents and employees, each of whom shall, for this purpose be deemed to be an agent or employee of the Professional to the extent of the subcontract. The City shall not be obligated to pay or be liable for payment of any sums due which may be due to any sub-contractor. 5. Termination of Procurement. The sale contemplated by this Agreement may be canceled by the City prior to acceptance by the City whenever for any reason and in its sole discretion the City shall determine that such cancellation is in its best interests and convenience. 6. Termination of Professional Services. The Professional or the City may terminate the Professional Services component of this Agreement, without specifying the reason therefor, by giving notice, in writing, addressed to the other party, specifying the effective date of the termination. No fees shall be earned after the effective date of the termination. Upon any termination, all finished or unfinished documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps, models, photographs, reports or other material prepared by the Professional pursuant to this Agreement shall become the property of the City. Notwithstanding the above, Professional shall not be relieved of any liability to the City for damages sustained by the City by virtue of any breach of this Agreement by the Professional, and the City may withhold any payments to the Professional for the purposes of set-off until such time as the exact amount of damages due the City from the Professional may be determined. 10 Agreement Professional Services Page 2 7. Independent Contractor Status. It is expressly acknowledged and understood by the parties that nothing contained in this agreement shall result in, or be construed as establishing an employment relationship. Professional shall be, and shall perform as, an independent Contractor who agrees to use his or her best efforts to provide the said services on behalf of the City. No agent, employee, or servant of Professional shall be, or shall be deemed to be, the employee, agent or servant of the City. City is interested only in the results obtained under this contract. The manner and means of conducting the work are under the sole control of Professional. None of the benefits provided by City to its employees including, but not limited to, workers' compensation insurance and unemployment insurance, are available from City to the employees, agents or servants of Professional. Professional shall be solely and entirely responsible for its acts and for the acts of Professional's agents, employees, servants and subcontractors during the performance of this contract. Professional shall indemnify City against all liability and loss in connection with, and shall assume full responsibility for payment of all federal, state and local taxes or contributions imposed or required under unemployment insurance, social security and income tax law, with respect to Professional and/or Professional's employees engaged in the performance of the services agreed to herein. 8. Indemnification. Professional agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, employees, insurers, and self-insurance pool, from and against all liability, claims, and demands, on account of injury, loss, or damage, including without limitation claims arising from bodily injury, personal injury, sickness, disease, death, property loss or damage, or any other loss of any kind whatsoever, which arise out of or are in any manner connected with this contract, to the extent and for an amount represented by the degree or percentage such injury, loss, or damage is caused in whole or in part by, or is claimed to be caused in whole or in part by, the wrongful act, omission, error, professional error, mistake, negligence, or other fault of the Professional, any subcontractor of the Professional, or any officer, employee, representative, or agent of the Professional or of any subcontractor of the Professional, or which arises out of any workmen's compensation claim of any employee of the Professional or of any employee of any subcontractor of the Professional. The Professional agrees to investigate, handle, respond to, and to provide defense for and defend against, any such liability, claims or demands at the sole expense of the Professional, or at the option of the City, agrees to pay the City or reimburse the City for the defense costs incurred by the City in connection with, any such liability, claims, or demands. If it is determined by the final judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction that such injury, loss, or damage was caused in whole or in part by the act, omission, or other fault of the City, its officers, or its employees, the City shall reimburse the Professional for the portion of the judgment attributable to such act, omission, or other fault of the City, its officers, or employees. 9. Professional's Insurance. (a) Professional agrees to procure and maintain, at its own expense, a policy or policies of insurance sufficient to insure against all liability, claims, demands, and other obligations assumed by the Professional pursuant to Section 8 above. Such insurance shall be in addition to any other insurance requirements imposed by this contract or by law. The Professional shall not be relieved of any liability, claims, demands, or other obligations assumed pursuant to Section 8 above by reason of its failure to procure or maintain insurance, or by reason of its failure to procure or maintain insurance in sufficient amounts, duration, or types. Agreement Professional Services Page 3 11 (b) Professional shall procure and maintain, and shall cause any subcontractor of the Professional to procure and maintain, the minimum insurance coverages listed below. Such coverages shall be procured and maintained with forms and insurance acceptable to the City. All coverages shall be continuously maintained to cover all liability, claims, demands, and other obligations assumed by the Professional pursuant to Section 8 above. In the case of any claims-made policy, the necessary retroactive dates and extended reporting periods shall be procured to maintain such continuous coverage. (i) Workers’ Compensation insurance to cover obligations imposed by applicable laws for any employee engaged in the performance of work under this contract, and Employers' Liability insurance with minimum limits of ONE MILLION DOLLARS ($1,000,000.00) for each accident, ONE MILLION DOLLARS ($1,000,000.00) disease - policy limit, and ONE MILLION DOLLARS ($1,000,000.00) disease - each employee. Evidence of qualified self-insured status may be substituted for the Workers' Compensation requirements of this paragraph. (ii) Commercial General Liability insurance with minimum combined single limits of ONE MILLION DOLLARS ($1,000,000.00) each occurrence and ONE MILLION DOLLARS ($1,000,000.00) aggregate. The policy shall be applicable to all premises and operations. The policy shall include coverage for bodily injury, broad form property damage (including completed operations), personal injury (including coverage for contractual and employee acts), blanket contractual, independent contractors, products, and completed operations. The policy shall contain a severability of interests provision. (iii) Comprehensive Automobile Liability insurance with minimum combined single limits for bodily injury and property damage of not less than ONE MILLION DOLLARS ($1,000,000.00) each occurrence and ONE MILLION DOLLARS ($1,000,000.00) aggregate with respect to each Professional's owned, hired and nonowned vehicles assigned to or used in performance of the Scope of Work. The policy shall contain a severability of interests provision. If the Professional has no owned automobiles, the requirements of this Section shall be met by each employee of the Professional providing services to the City under this contract. (iv) Professional Liability insurance with the minimum limits of ONE MILLION DOLLARS ($1,000,000) each claim and ONE MILLION DOLLARS ($1,000,000) aggregate. (c) Except Workers’ Compensation and Professional Liability, the policy or policies required above shall be endorsed to include the City and the City's officers and employees as additional insureds. Every policy required above shall be primary insurance, and any insurance carried by the City, its officers or employees, or carried by or provided through any insurance pool of the City, shall be excess and not contributory insurance to that provided by Professional. No additional insured endorsement to the policy required above shall contain any exclusion for bodily injury or property damage arising from completed operations. The Professional shall be solely responsible for any deductible losses under any policy required above. Agreement Professional Services Page 4 12 (d) The certificate of insurance provided to the City shall be completed by the Professional's insurance agent as evidence that policies providing the required coverages, conditions, and minimum limits are in full force and effect, and shall be reviewed and approved by the City prior to commencement of the contract. No other form of certificate shall be used. The certificate shall identify this contract and shall provide that the coverages afforded under the policies shall not be canceled, terminated or reduced in coverage until at least thirty (30) days prior written notice has been given to the City. (e) Failure on the part of the Professional to procure or maintain policies providing the required coverages, conditions, and minimum limits shall constitute a material breach of contract upon which City may immediately terminate this contract, or at its discretion City may procure or renew any such policy or any extended reporting period thereto and may pay any and all premiums in connection therewith, and all monies so paid by City shall be repaid by Professional to City upon demand, or City may offset the cost of the premiums against monies due to Professional from City. (f) City reserves the right to request and receive a certified copy of any policy and any endorsement thereto. (g) The parties hereto understand and agree that City is relying on, and does not waive or intend to waive by any provision of this contract, the monetary limitations (presently $350,000.00 per person and $990,000 per occurrence) or any other rights, immunities, and protections provided by the Colorado Governmental Immunity Act, Section 24-10-101 et seq., C.R.S., as from time to time amended, or otherwise available to City, its officers, or its employees. 10. City's Insurance. The parties hereto understand that the City is a member of the Colorado Intergovernmental Risk Sharing Agency (CIRSA) and as such participates in the CIRSA Property/Casualty Pool. Copies of the CIRSA policies and manual are kept at the City of Aspen Risk Management Department and are available to Professional for inspection during normal business hours. City makes no representations whatsoever with respect to specific coverages offered by CIRSA. City shall provide Professional reasonable notice of any changes in its membership or participation in CIRSA. 11. Completeness of Agreement. It is expressly agreed that this agreement contains the entire undertaking of the parties relevant to the subject matter thereof and there are no verbal or written representations, agreements, warranties or promises pertaining to the project matter thereof not expressly incorporated in this writing. 12. Notice. Any written notices as called for herein may be hand delivered or mailed by certified mail return receipt requested to the respective persons and/or addresses listed above. 13. Non-Discrimination. No discrimination because of race, color, creed, sex, marital status, affectional or sexual orientation, family responsibility, national origin, ancestry, handicap, or religion shall be made in the employment of persons to perform services under this contract. Professional agrees to meet all of the requirements of City's municipal code, Section 15.04.570, pertaining to non-discrimination in employment. Agreement Professional Services Page 5 13 14. Waiver. The waiver by the City of any term, covenant, or condition hereof shall not operate as a waiver of any subsequent breach of the same or any other term. No term, covenant, or condition of this Agreement can be waived except by the written consent of the City, and forbearance or indulgence by the City in any regard whatsoever shall not constitute a waiver of any term, covenant, or condition to be performed by Professional to which the same may apply and, until complete performance by Professional of said term, covenant or condition, the City shall be entitled to invoke any remedy available to it under this Agreement or by law despite any such forbearance or indulgence. 15. Execution of Agreement by City. This Agreement shall be binding upon all parties hereto and their respective heirs, executors, administrators, successors, and assigns. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, this Agreement shall not be binding upon the City unless duly executed by the Mayor of the City of Aspen (or a duly authorized official in his absence) following a Motion or Resolution of the Council of the City of Aspen authorizing the Mayor (or a duly authorized official in his absence) to execute the same. 16. Illegal Aliens – CRS 8-17.5-101 & 24-76.5-101. (a) Purpose. During the 2006 Colorado legislative session, the Legislature passed House Bills 06-1343 (subsequently amended by HB 07-1073) and 06-1023 that added new statutes relating to the employment of and contracting with illegal aliens. These new laws prohibit all state agencies and political subdivisions, including the City of Aspen, from knowingly hiring an illegal alien to perform work under a contract, or to knowingly contract with a subcontractor who knowingly hires with an illegal alien to perform work under the contract. The new laws also require that all contracts for services include certain specific language as set forth in the statutes. The following terms and conditions have been designed to comply with the requirements of this new law. (b) Definitions. The following terms are defined in the new law and by this reference are incorporated herein and in any contract for services entered into with the City of Aspen. “Basic Pilot Program” means the basic pilot employment verification program created in Public Law 208, 104th Congress, as amended, and expanded in Public Law 156, 108th Congress, as amended, that is administered by the United States Department of Homeland Security. “Public Contract for Services” means this Agreement. “Services” means the furnishing of labor, time, or effort by a Contractor or a subcontractor not involving the delivery of a specific end product other than reports that are merely incidental to the required performance. (c) By signing this document, Professional certifies and represents that at this time: (i) Professional shall confirm the employment eligibility of all employees who are newly hired for employment in the United States; and Agreement Professional Services Page 6 14 (ii) Professional has participated or attempted to participate in the Basic Pilot Program in order to verify that new employees are not illegal aliens. (d) Professional hereby confirms that: (i) Professional shall not knowingly employ or contract new employees without confirming the employment eligibility of all such employees hired for employment in the United States under the Public Contract for Services. (ii) Professional shall not enter into a contract with a subcontractor that fails to confirm to the Professional that the subcontractor shall not knowingly hire new employees without confirming their employment eligibility for employment in the United States under the Public Contract for Services. (iii) Professional has verified or has attempted to verify through participation in the Federal Basic Pilot Program that Professional does not employ any new employees who are not eligible for employment in the United States; and if Professional has not been accepted into the Federal Basic Pilot Program prior to entering into the Public Contract for Services, Professional shall forthwith apply to participate in the Federal Basic Pilot Program and shall in writing verify such application within five (5) days of the date of the Public Contract. Professional shall continue to apply to participate in the Federal Basic Pilot Program and shall in writing verify same every three (3) calendar months thereafter, until Professional is accepted or the public contract for services has been completed, whichever is earlier. The requirements of this section shall not be required or effective if the Federal Basic Pilot Program is discontinued. (iv) Professional shall not use the Basic Pilot Program procedures to undertake pre-employment screening of job applicants while the Public Contract for Services is being performed. (v) If Professional obtains actual knowledge that a subcontractor performing work under the Public Contract for Services knowingly employs or contracts with a new employee who is an illegal alien, Professional shall: (1) Notify such subcontractor and the City of Aspen within three days that Professional has actual knowledge that the subcontractor has newly employed or contracted with an illegal alien; and (2) Terminate the subcontract with the subcontractor if within three days of receiving the notice required pursuant to this section the subcontractor does not cease employing or contracting with the new employee who is an illegal alien; except that Professional shall not terminate the Public Contract for Services with the subcontractor if during such three days the subcontractor provides information to establish that the subcontractor has not knowingly employed or contracted with an illegal alien. Agreement Professional Services Page 7 15 (vi) Professional shall comply with any reasonable request by the Colorado Department of Labor and Employment made in the course of an investigation that the Colorado Department of Labor and Employment undertakes or is undertaking pursuant to the authority established in Subsection 8-17.5-102 (5), C.R.S. (vii) If Professional violates any provision of the Public Contract for Services pertaining to the duties imposed by Subsection 8-17.5-102, C.R.S. the City of Aspen may terminate the Public Contract for Services. If the Public Contract for Services is so terminated, Contractor shall be liable for actual and consequential damages to the City of Aspen arising out of Professional’s violation of Subsection 8-17.5-102, C.R.S. (ix) If Professional operates as a sole proprietor, Professional hereby swears or affirms under penalty of perjury that the Professional (1) is a citizen of the United States or otherwise lawfully present in the United States pursuant to federal law, (2) shall comply with the provisions of CRS 24-76.5-101 et seq., and (3) shall produce one of the forms of identification required by CRS 24-76.5-103 prior to the effective date of this Agreement. 17. Warranties Against Contingent Fees, Gratuities, Kickbacks and Conflicts of Interest. (a) Professional warrants that no person or selling agency has been employed or retained to solicit or secure this Contract upon an agreement or understanding for a commission, percentage, brokerage, or contingent fee, excepting bona fide employees or bona fide established commercial or selling agencies maintained by the Professional for the purpose of securing business. (b) Professional agrees not to give any employee of the City a gratuity or any offer of employment in connection with any decision, approval, disapproval, recommendation, preparation of any part of a program requirement or a purchase request, influencing the content of any specification or procurement standard, rendering advice, investigation, auditing, or in any other advisory capacity in any proceeding or application, request for ruling, determination, claim or controversy, or other particular matter, pertaining to this Agreement, or to any solicitation or proposal therefore. (c) Professional represents that no official, officer, employee or representative of the City during the term of this Agreement has or one (1) year thereafter shall have any interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement or the proceeds thereof, except those that may have been disclosed at the time City Council approved the execution of this Agreement. (d) In addition to other remedies it may have for breach of the prohibitions against contingent fees, gratuities, kickbacks and conflict of interest, the City shall have the right to: 1. Cancel this Purchase Agreement without any liability by the City; 16 Agreement Professional Services Page 8 2. Debar or suspend the offending parties from being a Professional, contractor or subcontractor under City contracts; 3. Deduct from the contract price or consideration, or otherwise recover, the value of anything transferred or received by the Professional; and 4. Recover such value from the offending parties. 18. Fund Availability. Financial obligations of the City payable after the current fiscal year are contingent upon funds for that purpose being appropriated, budgeted and otherwise made available. If this Agreement contemplates the City utilizing state or federal funds to meet its obligations herein, this Agreement shall be contingent upon the availability of those funds for payment pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. 19. General Terms. (a) It is agreed that neither this Agreement nor any of its terms, provisions, conditions, representations or covenants can be modified, changed, terminated or amended, waived, superseded or extended except by appropriate written instrument fully executed by the parties. (b) If any of the provisions of this Agreement shall be held invalid, illegal or unenforceable it shall not affect or impair the validity, legality or enforceability of any other provision. (c) The parties acknowledge and understand that there are no conditions or limitations to this understanding except those as contained herein at the time of the execution hereof and that after execution no alteration, change or modification shall be made except upon a writing signed by the parties. (d) This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Colorado as from time to time in effect. Venue is agreed to be exclusively in the courts of Pitkin County, Colorado. 20. Electronic Signatures and Electronic Records This Agreement and any amendments hereto may be executed in several counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, and all of which together shall constitute one agreement binding on the Parties, notwithstanding the possible event that all Parties may not have signed the same counterpart. Furthermore, each Party consents to the use of electronic signatures by either Party. The Scope of Work, and any other documents requiring a signature hereunder, may be signed electronically in the manner agreed to by the Parties. The Parties agree not to deny the legal effect or enforceability of the Agreement solely because it is in electronic form or because an electronic record was used in its formation. The Parties agree not to object to the admissibility of the Agreement in the form of an electronic record, or a paper copy of an electronic documents, or a paper copy of a document bearing an electronic signature, on the grounds that it is an electronic record or electronic signature or that it is not in its original form or is not an original. 20. Successors and Assigns. This Agreement and all of the covenants hereof shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the City and the Professional respectively and their agents, Agreement Professional Services Page 9 17 representatives, employee, successors, assigns and legal representatives. Neither the City nor the Professional shall have the right to assign, transfer or sublet its interest or obligations hereunder without the written consent of the other party. 21. Third Parties. This Agreement does not and shall not be deemed or construed to confer upon or grant to any third party or parties, except to parties to whom Professional or City may assign this Agreement in accordance with the specific written permission, any right to claim damages or to bring any suit, action or other proceeding against either the City or Professional because of any breach hereof or because of any of the terms, covenants, agreements or conditions herein contained. 22. Attorney’s Fees. In the event that legal action is necessary to enforce any of the provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to its costs and reasonable attorney’s fees. 23. Waiver of Presumption. This Agreement was negotiated and reviewed through the mutual efforts of the parties hereto and the parties agree that no construction shall be made or presumption shall arise for or against either party based on any alleged unequal status of the parties in the negotiation, review or drafting of the Agreement. 24. Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility, and Voluntary Exclusion. Professional certifies, by acceptance of this Agreement, that neither it nor its principals is presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible or voluntarily excluded from participation in any transaction with a Federal or State department or agency. It further certifies that prior to submitting its Bid that it did include this clause without modification in all lower tier transactions, solicitations, proposals, contracts and subcontracts. In the event that Professional or any lower tier participant was unable to certify to the statement, an explanation was attached to the Bid and was determined by the City to be satisfactory to the City. 25. Integration and Modification. This written Agreement along with all Contract Documents shall constitute the contract between the parties and supersedes or incorporates any prior written and oral agreements of the parties. In addition, Professional understands that no City official or employee, other than the Mayor and City Council acting as a body at a council meeting, has authority to enter into an Agreement or to modify the terms of the Agreement on behalf of the City. Any such Agreement or modification to this Agreement must be in writing and be executed by the parties hereto. 26. Authorized Representative. The undersigned representative of Professional, as an inducement to the City to execute this Agreement, represents that he/she is an authorized representative of Professional for the purposes of executing this Agreement and that he/she has full and complete authority to enter into this Agreement for the terms and conditions specified herein. 18 Agreement Professional Services Page 10 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed, or caused to be executed by their duly authorized officials, this Agreement of which shall be deemed an original on the date first written above. CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO: PROFESSIONAL: ________________________________ ____ __ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ __ ______________________________ [Signature] By: _____________________________ [Name] [Sig igna ig natu na ture tu re [Signature] By: John Rehring / Vincent Hart [Name] Title: ____________________________ Title: Vice President / Executive Vice President Date: ___________________ Date: 5/4/2020 Approved as to form: _______________________________ City Attorney’s Office 19 Agreement Professional Services Page 11 EXHIBIT A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT Scope of Work The City of Aspen initiated work on its Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) in 2019 with an initial phase of work (Phase 1) focused on defining needs, goals, and strategies for development of the IRP. The scope of work to be conducted to complete the IRP in 2020-2021 (Phase 2) is detailed in this document, and will be completed via the major tasks indicated in the table below. Task Title 1 Project Coordination 2 Stakeholder Engagement 3 Basis of Planning 4 Demand Forecast 5 Characterize Existing Water Supply System and Forecast Future Supply 6 Future Supply Strategy 7 Documentation Task 1 – Project Coordination 1.1 Project Management x Project staffing, budget, and schedule management. x Subconsultant coordination and management. 1.2 Monthly Reporting x Develop and submit a monthly progress report to accompany monthly invoices, summarizing project activity for the reporting month and identifying any scope, schedule, or budget issues and proposed resolution. 1.3 Project Coordination Calls x Conduct up to 8 monthly project coordination calls with City Project Management team to coordinate project progress and track and address action items. In lieu of meeting notes, the project action and decision item log will be updated as necessary after each call. 1.4 Progress Meetings x Conduct up to 3 progress meetings to gather data, discuss progress, resolve outstanding issues, and solicit input at key project milestones (e.g., water demands, supply portfolios, and supply evaluation results). Assumptions: x 12-month project duration Agreement Professional Services 20 Page 12 x Project coordination calls will be held via teleconference / web meeting; each meeting will be up to one hour in duration. x Project coordination calls (Task 1.3) will not take place in months with in-person progress meetings (Task 1.4). x Two of the three progress meetings will be conducted remotely, and one will be conducted in Aspen. Deliverables: x Monthly Progress Reports (up to 12, one per month, delivered electronically). Task 2 – Stakeholder Engagement 2.1 Getting Ready for Engagement x Complete stakeholder landscape assessment (issues and actors) and power mapping (influence and dependencies). x Provide support to development of communications materials (e.g., Q&A flyer, How to Get Involved, public service announcement). x Conduct and prepare synthesis of community influencer interviews. Assumptions: x Community engagement consultant will work in close collaboration with City staff to develop communications materials and stakeholder management methods. x City staff will have direct responsibility for conducting communications activities and administering stakeholder tracking and day-to-day responsiveness. x Aspen communications staff will take the lead on creating project branding and look and feel for project engagement materials. x Community engagement consultant will conduct up to 15, 45-minute interviews with key community influencers (identified by City staff) to understand key priorities, needs, and interests related to the IRP. The community engagement consultant will utilize this information in preparing materials for the Task 2.2 virtual meeting #1 and open house webinar #1. Deliverables: x Draft and final stakeholder landscape assessment. x Review and comment on City staff prepared communications materials. x Draft and final synthesis of community influencer interviews. 2.2 Focused Engagement Virtual Meeting and General Public Open House Webinar Task activities listed below cover a series of three engagements, two virtual meetings with corresponding open house webinars, and a final, in person meeting. The format of third meeting (virtual vs. in-person) will be confirmed later in the year. 21 Agreement Professional Services Page 13 Focused Engagement “Virtual Meetings” Audience: Focused engagement virtual meetings will target water professionals and other interested and impacted parties that track and engage regularly on water-related topics. The target attendance will be between 20 and 30 individuals for each workshop. Anticipated virtual meeting duration is 90-120 minutes. Open House Webinars Audience: General public open house webinars will be open to the general public and advertised widely. The sessions will be designed to accommodate a large attendance. Anticipated duration is 60-90 minutes. A recording of the online open house webinar will be posted to the online open house platform to allow the community to engage as their schedules allow. Topic 1: x Getting to know one another x Provide background on: x System basics x Existing conditions x Overview of the planning process x Get Input on community priorities Topic 2: x Provide Overview: x Scope of alternatives x Evaluation methods x Provide initial thinking on alternatives Topic 3: Review evaluation results x Selection of Preferred Alternative x Assumptions: x City staff will have responsibility for obtaining the virtual meeting and open house webinar platform, providing logistics support for the meetings, participant recruitment, invitations, registration, and communications. x Preparation, support, and follow up to the virtual meetings and open house webinars will include: x o Preparation of agendas and engagement approach o Support for materials development o Attendance (virtual), facilitation, and documentation o Preparation of draft and final synthesis summaries Preparation, support, and follow up to the in-person focused engagement workshop and in-person open house will include: o Preparation of agendas and engagement approach o Support for materials development 22 Agreement Professional Services Page 14 o Provide support to staff to Aspen City Staff to facilitate and document o Review draft and final synthesis summaries prepared by Aspen City Staff x Technical content for the focused engagement virtual meeting will match technical content for the accompanying open house webinar for each of the three topic areas. Engagement and open house meetings will be held at concurrent project milestones for Topic 1, Topic 2, and Topic 3. x Remote meeting participation will include Ross Strategic staff for all Task 2.2 meetings and one Carollo staff for Topic 1 and Topic 2 engagement meetings. Topic 3 meetings will be conducted in person in Aspen, led by City staff. One Carollo staff member will attend the Topic 3 meetings in person to answer questions regarding water supply alternatives. x Deliverables: o Draft and final agendas for workshops and open houses. o Review and comment on City staff prepared workshop and open house materials. o Draft and final summaries of perspectives shared by virtual meeting participants and webinar participants. 2.3 Support to City of Aspen’s Online Open House (OOH) x Provide support for initial development of materials x Support preparation of content updates for online open house (assumes 2 updates) Assumptions: x The Online Open House will use the Aspen Community Voices Platform x Community engagement consultant will work in close collaboration with City staff to develop communication materials for webpage and OOH content. x Materials for webpage will be based on content generated for Open House Webinar x City of Aspen staff will lead developing and administering OOH. x The OOH will leverage and make a direct tie into Aspen’s existing email list management software. x The OOH will host a recording of the open house webinars for public access x New media content will be developed and provided by City staff. Deliverables: x Initial materials for placement on the OOH x Material updates to OOH content x Online Open House Webinar recording 23 Agreement Professional Services Page 15 Task 3 – Basis of Planning 3.1 Prepare Basis of Planning Memorandum x Develop a study area description for the City’s existing service area, including undeveloped portions, as well as potential additional extensions beyond City limits. x Prepare a GIS map of the study area to supplement the narrative and annotations of key water related features and landmarks x Establish the planning horizon for the study and select interim planning years (e.g., years ending in 0 and/or 5) and select the format for summarizing data by calendar, fiscal, or water year. x Present the population forecast and assumed occupancy rates through the planning horizon and for interim planning years, separating permanent and transient population estimates. x In collaboration with City staff, develop goals for supply reliability. x Prepare planning Class 5 cost estimating assumptions and associated mark-ups. Assumptions: x City will provide pertinent information for the study area description, population estimates, historical water use, and bid tabs in native electronic format (GIS, Excel, etc.) x Planning will include an assessment of GIS platforms; deliverables will be provided in a format compatible with standard City GIS platform. x The Basis of Planning memorandum will be submitted as a chapter of the Draft IRP report. For budgeting purposes, it is assumed that this chapter will not exceed 10 pages. Deliverables: x The findings of this task will be submitted as a draft chapter of the IRP report (electronic MS Word format). Task 4 – Demand Forecast 4.1 Adapt Demand Forecast for Use in IRP x Incorporate updated demand forecast prepared by the City in a separate 2020 project effort. x Assess and summarize the demand forecasts to be used for IRP development. Assumptions: x Demand forecasts will be developed outside this scope of work, including monthly patterns, peaking factors, and potential climate change impacts on demands. Deliverables: x The findings of this task will be submitted as a draft chapter of the IRP report. For budgeting purposes, it is assumed that this chapter will not exceed 10 pages. Task 5 – Existing and Future Water Supplies 5.1 Characterize Existing Water Supply Sources x Utilize the City’s raw water inventory to prepare a summary of the surface water, ground water, and any other water supplies owned by the City and a general description of legal 24 Agreement Professional Services Page 16 terms and conditions (e.g. amount, timing, and location of use) on the City’s right to use the supplies. x Prepare a summary of how each of the City’s water supplies have historically (up to ten years) been diverted and used within the City’s potable water and/or raw water systems; used to enhance streamflow; reused through water rights accounting procedures; exchanged or used to augment other uses; and for any other uses. Include all major sources of surface water diverted from streams and ground water diverted from wells. x Prepare a description of how the City may utilize its water supplies in new ways, such as using storm water and wastewater return flows, irrigating with raw versus potable water, etc. Document any known operational, water quality, or other factors. x Utilize information and data from the City’s water rights inventory to summarize the historical and future projected yield of the City’s water supplies. To the extent existing yield estimates are readily available, quantify the amount, timing, and locations of water supply yields. If information is not readily available, prepare a general description of the water supply, the relative magnitude of associated yield, and the general location of the supply so that it may be considered for the future water supply strategy. 5.2 Characterize Existing Water Supply Infrastructure x Prepare a summary of the general locations and capacities, and typical operational status of the City’s existing raw non-potable, treated water, stormwater, and reclaimed water infrastructure. This will include river diversion structures, wells, raw water storage and conveyance system, water treatment plant, treated water storage and distribution system, and plans to use reclaimed water. x Describe any existing major operational constraints within the City’s raw and potable water systems. x Prepare or update the existing water supply infrastructure map to show the geographic extent of the City’s service area and key water facilities. 5.3 Future Supply Projection x Utilize information and data from the City’s recent water shortage assessment to summarize the future projection of the City’s supplies. If there are additional supplies identified under Task 5.1 that were not included in the recent water shortage assessment, prepare an estimated range or order of magnitude estimate of potential future yields for use in the future water supply strategy evaluation. x To the extent readily available from the existing studies, prepare a summary table to document the estimated future supply capacities (annual total, monthly or seasonal, and peak day estimate) of the amount of water available from existing and potential future water supplies through the planning horizon and for interim planning years. 5.4 Prepare Water Supply Vulnerability Assessment x Identify major vulnerabilities associated with potential climate change impacts, wildfires, avalanches, aging infrastructure, geotechnical mining history, and other near and long- 25 Agreement Professional Services Page 17 term factors that could affect water quality and quality. Document the supply vulnerabilities in a table. 5.5 Prepare Future Supply Gap Analysis x Prepare future water supply gap analysis using projected future demand with projected future supply of the City’s existing water supply sources under existing water supply infrastructure. Assumptions: x Prior estimates of historical and projected water supply yields will be relied upon and detailed water supply yield analyses will not be prepared for this study. x The supporting input data and information as well as the results from the analytical model prepared by Headwaters Corporation and documented in the report entitled “Aspen’s Water Future: Estimating the Number and Severity of Possible Future Water Shortages” will be made available in native digital format (MS Excel) and will provide the basis for yield information in this study. A water rights inventory with yields will be provided by the City in electronic and editable format to characterize each water supply in terms of relative amount, timing, and location of supply and general legal terms and conditions that control the use of each supply. x The City will facilitate any necessary communication between the Carollo team and the City’s water rights consultant and legal counsel. Detailed water rights investigations will not be prepared for this study. x The 1984 City of Aspen Raw Water Supply Update, Comprehensive Water Management Plan will be relied upon where new information is not otherwise readily available or provided by the City. x The City does not own or operate the wastewater system. Details related to wastewater collection and treatment will not be included in this study, aside from general information needed to describe the potential to utilize the City’s wastewater return flows. The potential for future use of the City’s wastewater return flows will focus on uses within the vicinity of the existing pipe that the City has installed for this purpose. Deliverables: x The findings of this task will be submitted as a draft chapter of the IRP report. For budgeting purposes, it is assumed that this chapter will not exceed 25 pages. Task 6 – Future Supply Strategy 6.1 Describe Future Supply Options x Prepare a summary of previously-studied future raw water storage options, including potential sites, capacity requirements to buffer demand fluctuations under the scenarios defined in the Basis of Planning memorandum. Describe major infrastructure components that would need to be constructed along with capital cost estimates and annual energy needs for conveyance to/from the potential sites. 26 Agreement Professional Services Page 18 x Estimate the amount of additional conservation that could be achieved on a seasonal basis. x Describe future options to modify the current use of raw water supplies, including the estimated changes in annual yield, major infrastructure components, high level capital cost estimates, and operational considerations. Describe the hydrologic variability and resiliency of each option. x Describe future options to implement a water reuse program, including non-potable reuse, indirect potable reuse with groundwater recharge, and/or direct potable reuse. Describe pros and cons of each option, including operational, institutional, and regulatory considerations, as well as the hydrologic variability and resiliency assessment. x Describe potential other infrastructure solutions, as well as new local or regional water supply sources. Describe pros and cons of each option, including operational, institutional, and regulatory considerations, as well as the hydrologic variability and resiliency assessment. x Create a GIS map that depicts the locations of the future supply options, building on the map of existing sources developed earlier in the project. 6.2 Future Supply Evaluation x Develop up to about five (5) draft water supply evaluation criteria. These criteria are anticipated to be a mix of both qualitative and quantitative metrics that can be utilized. Refine and finalize the criteria with input from City staff. x Define up to three (3) future water supply portfolios or strategies, along with a “do nothing” alternative, also referred to as the “status quo” option (total of 4 portfolios). Prepare high level descriptions for each portfolio and a summary table of the total supply capacity of each portfolio. x Compare the new water supply portfolios with the “status quo” using the water supply evaluation criteria. 6.3 Preferred Supply Strategy x Develop a preferred water supply portfolio based on the evaluation results and discussions with City staff. Prepare a description of all portfolio components and a GIS map that depicts the locations and elements of the recommended combination of longterm supply strategies for the City. x Prepare a water supply capital improvement program (CIP) with Class 5 planning cost estimates and project phasing. Assumptions: x The water supply options and portfolio descriptions will be at a conceptual level. x Cost estimates will only be prepared for major project components (e.g., anticipated to exceed $1 million or similar threshold). 27 Agreement Professional Services Page 19 x Both quantitative and qualitative criteria will be used in the portfolio evaluation. The qualitative criteria may include low/medium/high or be simplified scores ranging from 1-3 or 1-5. Project benefits will not be monetized. Deliverables: x The findings of this task will be submitted as a draft chapter of the IRP report. For budgeting purposes, it is assumed that this chapter will not exceed 30 pages. Task 7 – Documentation 7.1 Draft IRP Report x Prepare a draft Executive Summary x Prepare a draft Introduction Chapter and other information needed to augment the draft chapters previously prepared in Tasks 2-6. x Prepare lists of abbreviations, acronyms, and references. x Compile supporting materials in appendices. x Compilation, document processing, and production of Draft IRP report for City review. 7.2 Final IRP Report x Prepare Final IRP report by incorporating City comments on the Draft IRP. x Compilation, document processing, and production of the Final IRP report. Assumptions: x City staff will provide one consolidated set of comments using track changes in MS Word for all report chapters. Comments on figures and other non-text report elements will be submitted as PDF markups. x At the City’s discretion, City staff will solicit, review, and consolidate comments from the general public and stakeholders prior to submittal to Carollo (to avoid conflicting comments) and provide guidance where needed. x Individual report chapters will be submitted in native MS Word and PDF format only. Deliverables: x Draft IRP report (3 hard copies, and 1 electronic copy in MS Word and PDF format) x Final IRP report (10 hard copies, and 1 electronic copy in MS Word and PDF format) Project Assumptions x Third Parties. The services to be performed by the Professional are intended solely for the benefit of the City. No person or entity not a signatory to this Agreement shall be entitled to rely on the Professional’s performance of its services hereunder, and no right to assert a claim against the Professional by assignment of indemnity rights or otherwise shall accrue to a third party as a result of this Agreement or the performance of the Professional’s services hereunder. x Standard of Care. The Professional shall complete the services required hereunder in accordance with the prevailing engineering standard of care by exercising the skill and ability ordinarily required of engineers performing the same or similar services, under the same or similar circumstances, in the State of Colorado. Agreement Professional Services Page 20 28 x City-Provided Information and Services. The City shall furnish the Professional available studies, reports and other data pertinent to the Professional’s services; obtain or authorize the Professional to obtain or provide additional reports and data as required; furnish to the Professional services of others required for the performance of the Professional’s services hereunder, and the Professional shall be entitled to use and rely upon all such information and services provided by the City or others in performing the Professional’s services under this Agreement. x Estimates and Projections. The Professional has no control over the cost of labor, materials, equipment or services furnished by others, over the incoming water quality and/or quantity, or over the way the City’s plant and/or associated processes are operated and/or maintained. Data projections and estimates are based on the Professional’s opinion based on experience and judgment. The Professional cannot and does not guarantee that actual costs and/or quantities realized will not vary from the data projections and estimates prepared by the Professional and the Professional will not be liable to and/or indemnify the City and/ or any third party related to any inconsistencies between the Professional’s data projections and estimates and actual costs and/or quantities realized by the City and/or any third party in the future. 29 Agreement Professional Services Page 21 EXHIBIT B PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT Fee Schedule 30 Agreement Professional Services Page 22 EXHIBIT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT ASPEN IRP PHASE 2 5f1f2020 ask 1 Coordination Task 1.1 - Ma nt Task 1.2 - Task 1.3 - ess Calls Task 1.4 - ask 2 Stakeholder Task 2.1 - for nt Task 2.2 - Focused Virtual Gen Public House We binar Task 2.3 - Deve and Administration of Online 0 House Initial ask 3 - Basis of Task 3.1 - Basis of Plann Memorandum Doc um en tot-'0 ask 4 Demand Forecast Task 4.1 - Demand Forecast for Use in IRP Doc um en tot-'0 ask 5 Characterize 81 Forecast Future Task 5.1 - Characterize Water Su Sources Task 5.2 - Characterize Water Su Infrastructure Task 5.3 - Future Su Task 5.4 - Water Su Vulnera Assessment Task 5.5 - Future Su Ana Doc um en tot-'0 ask 6 - Future Task 6.1 - Describe Future Su Task 5.2 - Future Su Evaluation Task 6.3 - Preferred Su Strat Doc um en tot-'0 ask 2 - Documentation Task 2.1 - Draft IRP Re rt Task 2.2 - Final IRP Agreement Professional Services Page 23 MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: THRU: DATE OF MEMO: MEETING DATE: RE: Mayor and City Council Richard Pryor, Chief of Police Sara Ott, City Manager April 17, 2020 May 12, 2020 Resolution # 038, Series of 2020, Approving an update to the Intergovernmental Agreement between Pitkin County, Aspen Valley Hospital, Aspen School District and City of Aspen for Mental Health and Substance Use Services REQUEST OF COUNCIL: Staff requests approval of Resolution # 038, Series of 2020 (Attachment “A”), authorizing the execution of a 1-year intergovernmental agreement (Attachment “B”) between Pitkin County, Aspen Valley Hospital, Aspen School District, and City of Aspen to continue offering mental health and substance use services to Pitkin County by Mind Springs Health in collaboration with Mountain Family Health Centers. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION: In December 2017 Council approved an initial IGA for calendar year 2018 bringing together multiple community stakeholders and respective funding to collaborate with a single vendor, Mind Springs Health to provide a “Mental Health Continuum of Care.” The IGA was subsequently approved in April 2019 for 2019 calendar year services. BACKGROUND: As stated by Pitkin County Health and Human Services staff, “…mental health and substance use have long been identified as the most significant health issues facing the people who live, work and play in Pitkin County. High rates of suicide, mixed messages surrounding the promotion of our ‘party town’, high rates of depression and anxiety, sleep disturbances, financial pressures, lack of psychiatric care, lack of specialized support for marginalized populations and the high cost of treatment, as well as other issues have inspired several different non-profit and private providers to try to step up and respond. The result has been a community perception of a fragmented and uncoordinated system of care.” DISCUSSION: The same partnership is to be continued through 2020 as defined in the IGA, with some adjustments to cost sharing noted as follows: 1. An additional $33,420 in funds that the City of Aspen has collected through the tobacco tax. This would be used to increase the funding for a school counselor from a .6 FTE to a 1 FTE and to have that counsellor assigned to the Aspen School District. This would 32 Page 1 of 3 provide for a total of 2 FTE’s dedicated to the Aspen School District. Interim Aspen School District Superintendent Tom Heald provided the following comment: “The additional .4 contribution has been significant in two distinct ways; 1) when we add the existing .6 fte to this position it elevates the position to 1.0 and allows us to be able to advertise and offer full time employment that has made it much easier to attract qualified candidates and 2) our needs exceeded our capacity to respond in a timely manner in the prior year and we now have the staffing to respond quickly and efficiently to our students and families in crisis.” 2. An increase of $31,000 from Pitkin County for employee incentives for the three Minds Springs positions funded through this agreement. The 2020 cost sharing breakdown is as follows: Community Mental Health-$171,468  1.0 FTE Licensed Therapist: Rapid Response Mobile Unit Team Member- intensive, community based, outpatient treatment focused on high risk individuals who might not come into a clinic setting. Includes case management, therapy services and 1/3 cost of a vehicle. Intensive Stabilization Program Team Member- after crisis intervention, serve as a bridge between crisis services and standard outpatient services.  1.0 FTE Case Manager: Rapid Response Mobile Unit Team Member (see above). Intensive Stabilization Program Team Member (see above).  60 Hours/year of Advanced Psychiatric Nurse Practitioner time for jail: individuals who need mental health interventions but did not meet the state’s JBBS criteria. Nurse can prescribe to individuals needing medication management. Integrated Care Program - $197,818  2.0 FTE Behavioral Health Specialists: This staff will work in the MFHC Basalt Clinic and expand the current behavioral health program there. They will provide outpatient (6 sessions) services for families, substance use disorders, trauma, hypnosis, animal assisted and other evidence-based therapies.  2.0 FTE Patient Care Coordinators: will work in the MFHC Basalt Clinic, one will be a patient educator, and the other a social health advocate. The patient educator will advocate for the patient and family, facilitating culturally appropriate communication between patient and providers and will identify and decrease barriers to behavior change and improve access to needed services. The social health advocate will provide care coordination to patients who are at most risk for health deterioration sentinel events and/or poor outcomes. The social health advocate will assess the determinants of health and assist the patient in addressing barriers and increase access to services.  Tele psych (4 hours) virtual meeting with psychiatrist School Based Therapists – $155,715  2.0 FTE Aspen School District Therapist: on-site student and family therapy and 33 Page 2 of 3 consultation with school staff to facilitate assessment by a multidisciplinary team available to all three schools Incentive program for provider staff - $31,000  Hiring bonuses and housing allowances At the time of writing, the Pitkin County Board of County Commissioners had approved the IGA at second reading at a public hearing on March 25 th, 2020. The Aspen School District and Aspen Valley Hospital have also approved this IGA. FINANCIAL/BUDGET IMPACTS: This intergovernmental agreement is for a third year of service. Pitkin County will serve as the fiscal agent through the Public Health Department and a single contract has been executed with Mind Springs Health as the lead agency for $556,332. Mind Springs Health will then subcontract to Mountain Family Health Centers. Participating members agree to provide 2020 funding contributions as follows: Aspen School District Aspen Valley Hospital City of Aspen Pitkin County Healthy Community Fund Total $ 40,000 $ 73,275 $107,550 $335,507 $556,332 Additionally, Pitkin County is providing office space at no cost at the Schultz Health and Human Services building and Aspen School District is providing office space for a school therapist at the Aspen Middle School at no cost. It should be noted that City Council continues to fund approximately $99,000 per annum for the Human Services Officer (HSO) position within the Aspen Police Department. The HSO works closely with at-risk populations, including individuals with mental health conditions and has a very close working relationship with Mind Springs Health in implementing aspects of the Mental Health Continuum of Care as well as the Co-Responder Program (PACT). RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council enter into the intergovernmental agreement and provide Pitkin County, as fiscal agent, payment of $107,550. ALTERNATIVES: City Council could elect to revert to a system of fragmented funding to mental health and substance use organizations or could elect to not distribute funds to any organization. CITY MANAGER COMMENTS: ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A: Resolution # 038, Series of 2020 Attachment B: Proposed Intergovernmental Agreement 34 Page 3 of 3 ATTACHMENT A RESOLUTION NO. 038 SERIES OF 2020 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO, APPROVING AN UPDATED INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO, ASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL, ASPEN SCHOOL DISTRICT, AND PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO FOR MENTAL HEALTH AND SUBSTANCE USE SERVICES AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE SAID DOCUMENT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO. WHEREAS, there has been submitted to the City Council an updated intergovernmental agreement for mental health and substance use services, a copy of which document is annexed hereto and made a part thereof. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO: That the City Council of the City of Aspen hereby approves an updated intergovernmental agreement between the City of Aspen, Aspen Valley Hospital, Aspen School District, and Pitkin County for mental health and substance use services, a copy of which document is annexed hereto, and does hereby authorize the City Manager of the City of Aspen to execute said document on behalf of the City of Aspen. RESOLVED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this ____th day of May 2020, by the City Council for the City of Aspen, Colorado. ___________________________ Torre, Mayor I, Nicole Henning, duly appointed and acting City Clerk do certify that the foregoing is a true and accurate copy of that resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of Aspen, Colorado, at a meeting held May ____, 2020. _____________________________ Nicole Henning, City Clerk 35 ATTACHMENT B INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT TO PROVIDE FUNDING FOR MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE PROVIDED BY MIND SPRINGS HEALTH (MOUNTAIN FAMILY HEALTH SERVICES) THIS INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT (the “Agreement”) is made this ______ day of ____________________, 2020 by and between the Board of County Commissioners of Pitkin County, Colorado, whose address is 530 East Main Street, Suite 302 Aspen, Colorado 81611 ("the County”) and Aspen Valley Hospital ("AVH'), Aspen School District (“ASD"), and the City of Aspen. (“COA"), and hereinafter severally referred to by name or collectively as the "Participating Members". RECITALS WHEREAS, This Agreement is entered into pursuant to, inter alia, C.R.S. §§ 29-1-201, et seq., and Article XIV, Section 18 of the Colorado Constitution. WHEREAS, Mental Health and Substance Use (“Mental Health”) were again identified in the 2017 Regional Community Health Assessment as the top health priority to address for those who live, work, and play in Pitkin County. High rates of suicide, mixed messages surrounding the promotion of a “party town”, high rates of depression and anxiety, sleep disturbances, financial pressures, lack of psychiatric care, lack of specialized support for marginalized populations and the high cost of treatment, as well as other issues have inspired a number of different non-profit and private providers to step up and respond. Although there are many assets within the community along the continuum of care (prevention, intervention, treatment, aftercare), gaps still remain in the continuum, and some of our most vulnerable, fall through the cracks. WHEREAS, Funding stakeholders of Pitkin County engaged in a focused strategic planning process in 2017 with the purpose of rapidly improving access to Mental Health programs and services by changing the way funding is allocated to programs. These Funders (Pitkin County, Aspen School District, Aspen Valley Hospital – “Participating Members”) have committed to using funding strategically to strengthen the system of care and improve service delivery. WHEREAS, Participating Members agreed to collectively pool their funding in 2018 to support a Mental Health Services proposal submitted by Mind Springs Health and Mountain Family Health Services (“Vendor”) for specified community mental health, crisis stabilization, integrated behavioral health care and school based services. WHEREAS, in 2018, Participating Members participated in quarterly Steering Committees with the Vendor. The Vendor convened funder organization staff monthly to participate in both a medical/law enforcement operations group, and a school-based operations group. Key Performance Metrics were designed and reported on during Steering Committee meetings. WHEREAS, Participating Members have agreed to renew the same contract with the current Vendor, at the same funding levels from each organization. 36 1 WHEREAS, Participating Members do hereby collectively determine and declare that this Intergovernmental Agreement is necessary, proper and convenient for the continued fostering and preservation of the public health, safety and wellbeing. AGREEMENT NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual promises and agreements of the parties and other good and valuable consideration, the adequacy and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: 1. Effect of IGA. Except as expressly provided herein, this IGA shall replace and supersede all prior agreements of any kind between all or any of the Participating Members and any or all other Participating members hereto, to the extent and for the limited purpose as such other agreements may be related to the provision of funding collaborative and integrated mental health and substance abuse prevention, intervention, crisis stabilization, treatment and case management programs. 2. Fiscal Agent. Pitkin County agrees to be the fiscal agent providing payment to Mind Springs Health (and Mountain Family Health Centers) in the amount of $556,332 in 2020 for collaborative and integrated mental health and substance use prevention, intervention, crisis stabilization, treatment, and case management programs per the contract and approved in the County's 2020 budget (See Exhibit A - Mental Health Services 2020 Scope of Work and Exhibit B - Change Order). Once invoiced by Pitkin County in Quarter one, Participating Members agree to pay in full. 3. Funding Allocation. The Participating Members agree to provide funding in return for collaborative and integrated mental health and substance use prevention, intervention, crisis stabilization, treatment and case management programs as follows. By October each year Mind Springs Health (and Mountain Family Health Centers) will provide the County with a budget to fund collaborative and integrated mental health and substance use prevention, intervention, crisis stabilization, treatment, and case management programs for the next fiscal year. The share for each entity will be determined as follows: a. In-Kind Contributions: i. Pursuant to an annual lease agreement with Mind Springs Health, Pitkin County shall provide, at no cost, space in the Schultz Health and Human Services Building to Mind Springs Health for collaborative and integrated mental health and substance use prevention, intervention, crisis stabilization, treatment and case management programs. The value of this space is recognized as $59,766 per year. ii. Aspen School District shall provide, at no cost, space in the Aspen Middle School for Mind Springs Health a youth and family clinician. The value of this space is recognized as $45,000 per year. 37 b. Cash Funding: 2 i. Aspen Valley Hospital agrees to pay $73,275 of the provision of collaborative and integrated mental health and substance use prevention, intervention, crisis stabilization, treatment and case management programs provided by the Vendor. ii. Aspen School District agrees to pay $40,000 for the provision of a school based youth and family clinician provided by the Vendor. iii. City of Aspen agrees to pay $107,550 for the provision of collaborative and integrated mental health and substance use, prevention, intervention, crisis stabilization, treatment and case management programs provided by the Vendor. iv. Pitkin County agrees to pay $335,507 for the provision of collaborative and integrated mental health and substance use prevention, intervention, crisis stabilization, treatment and case management programs provided by the Vendor. 4. Quality Assurance. Participating Members are committed to working together to ensure that relevant performance measures are utilized for the purpose of on-going evaluation of services in accordance with the developed 2019 Key Performance Indicators. a. Pitkin County Public Health will be responsible for contract compliance with the Vendor. b. The Steering Committee agrees to meet quarterly to review performance measures, financial expenditure and budget compliance. c. Participating Members agree to assign staff to participate in formal quarterly operational groups (protocols, issues, needs, communication, debriefs, etc) with the Vendor. d. Participating Members agree to commit staff to participate in rapid case debrief outside of the quarterly operations groups. e. Participating Members agree to support by gathering key performance indicators necessary from the perspective of each member's operations. 5. Term and Extensions. This Agreement shall commence upon the date first written above, and shall continue through the 30th day of December 2020. This Agreement may be extended for successive one-year terms upon mutual written agreement of the parties 10 days prior to the expiration date. 6. Assignability. This agreement is not assignable by either party. 7. Modification. This Agreement may be changed or modified only in writing, by an agreement approved by the respective Boards of the Governments and signed by authorized officers of each party. 8. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire Agreement between the parties and all other promises and agreements relating to the subject of this Agreement, whether oral or written, are merged herein. 9. Severability. Should any one or more sections or provisions of this Agreement be judicially adjudged invalid or unenforceable, such judgment shall not affect, impair, or 38 3 invalidate the remaining provisions of this Agreement, the intention being that the various sections and provisions hereof are severable. 10. Termination Prior to Expiration of Term. Any Party has the right to terminate or withdraw from this Agreement, with or without cause, by giving written notice to the other Parties of such termination and specifying the effective date thereof. Such notice shall be given at least ten (10) days before the effective date of such termination. Termination of the Agreement relieves the cancelling or withdrawing Party of any further responsibility under this Agreement except for specifically identified obligations of a continuing nature based upon past performance under the Agreement. 11. Notice. Any notice required or permitted under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be provided by electronic delivery to the e-mail addresses set forth below and by one of the following methods 1) hand-delivery or 2) registered or certified mail, postage pre-paid to the mailing addresses set forth below. Each party by notice sent under this paragraph may change the address to which future notices should be sent. Electronic delivery of notices shall be considered delivered upon receipt of confirmation of delivery on the part of the sender. Nothing contained herein shall be construed to preclude personal service of any notice in the manner prescribed for personal service of a summons or other legal process. To: Pitkin County Jon Peacock, County Manager 530 East Main Street, Ste. 302 Aspen, CO 81611 Jon.peacock@pitkincounty.com With copies to: Pitkin County Attorney’s Office 530 East Main Street, Ste. 301 Aspen, CO 81611 attorney@pitkincounty.com To: Aspen Valley Hospital Dave Ressler, Chief Executive Officer 0401 Castle Creek Road Aspen, CO 81611 970-544-1261 With copies to: Aspen Valley Hospital Attorney 0401 Castle Creek Road Aspen, CO 81611 970-925-1142 To: City of Aspen Sara Ott, City Manager 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 970-920-5212 With copies to: City of Aspen Attorney 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 970-920-5212 To: Aspen School District Tom Heald, Interim Superintendent 235 High School Road Aspen, CO 81611 970-925-3760 With copies to: Aspen School District Attorney 235 High School Road Aspen, CO 81611 970-925-3760 7. Government Immunity. The parties agree and understand that both parties are relying on and do not waive, by any provisions of this Agreement, the monetary limitations or terms or any other rights, immunities, and protections provided by the Colorado Governmental Immunity Act, C.R.S. 24-10-101, et seq., as from time to time amended or otherwise available to the parties or any of their officers, agents, or employees. 4 39 8. Current Year Obligations. The parties acknowledge and agree that any payments provided for hereunder or requirements for future appropriations shall constitute only currently budgeted expenditures of the parties. The parties’ obligations under this Agreement are subject to each individual party’s annual right to budget and appropriate the sums necessary to provide the services set forth herein. No provision of this Agreement shall be construed or interpreted as creating a multiple fiscal year direct or indirect debt or other financial obligation of either or both parties within the meaning of any constitutional or statutory debt limitation. This Agreement shall not be construed to pledge or create a lien on any class or source of either parties’ bonds or any obligations payable from any class or source of each individual party’s money. 9. Binding Rights and Obligations. The rights and obligations of the parties under this Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the parties and their respective successors and assigns. 10. Agreement made in Colorado. This Agreement shall be construed according to the laws of the State of Colorado, and venue for any action shall be in the District Court in and for Pitkin County, Colorado. 11. Attorney Fees. In the event that legal action is necessary to enforce any of the provisions of this Agreement, the substantially prevailing party, whether by final judgment or out of court settlement, shall recover from the other party all costs and expenses of such action or suit including reasonable attorney fees. 12. No Waiver. The waiver by any party to this Agreement of any term or condition of this Agreement shall not operate or be construed as a waiver of any subsequent breach by any party. 13. Authority. Each person signing this Agreement represents and warrants that said person is fully authorized to enter into and execute this Agreement and to bind the party it represents to the terms and conditions hereof. 40 5 The foregoing Agreement was approved by the Board of County Commissioners of Pitkin County, Colorado at its regular meeting held on the _____ day of, 2020. The foregoing Agreement was approved by Aspen Valley Hospital at its regular meeting held on the _____ day of, 2020. The foregoing Agreement was approved by the Aspen School District at its regular meeting held on the _____ day of, 2020. The foregoing Agreement was approved by the City of Aspen at its regular meeting held on the _____ day of, 2020. In Witness whereof, the parties hereto have caused this agreement to be executed as of the day and year first above written. ASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL By:_________________________ [Title] ASPEN SCHOOL DISTRICT By:_________________________ [Title] CITY OF ASPEN By:_________________________ [Title] BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO By: ________________________ Steven F. Child, Chair APPROVED AS TO FORM __________________________ John Ely, County Attorney Manager Approval: By:______________________ Jon Peacock, County Manager 41 6 REGULAR MEETING ASPEN CITY COUNCIL APRIL 28TH, 2020 At 5:00 p.m. Mayor Torre called the regular meeting to order with Councilmembers Richards, Mesirow, Mullins and Hauenstein joining via video conference. PUBLIC COMMENT: Jeffrey Stromberg – Mr. Stromberg said he is calling on behalf and in support of Lee Mulcahy. He said council should review Lee’s hours as it relates to his work approval having to do with his property. Mr. Mulcahy is currently in non-compliance and would like to pay the fines to be brought back to a state of compliance. on compliance. If council were not to do a review of his hours, it would be him losing his due process. Lee Mulcahy – Mr. Mulcahy said his friend Tom Coggins is having difficulty getting through, so he read a statement from Mr. Coggins asking how the situation got so out of control. He said that Mr. Mulcahy has not been given credit for construction hours and is asking for compromise. APCHA had a retreat recently and discussed obeying applicable laws. Peter Grenney – Mr. Grenney asked when will there be a public discussion on how the 13 million dollar budget shortfall will affect the new city building and remodel of the Armory building. He said the new city project should be suspended now until the community can weigh in. Mayor Torre said there will be a budget update work session coming soon. COUNCIL MEMBER COMMENTS: Councilwoman Mullins showed off her mask which she got from the city. Last night we did quite a bit to help one of our largest business sectors. She has an idea which would benefit restaurants and people in need of meals by doing a restaurant voucher program. Avon and Silt both have them currently. It might be something to look into and benefit a lot of people in town. Councilman Mesirow thanked Ann for her suggestion. He’s also thinking about how we invest in the future that we want. Councilwoman Richards thanked everyone watching. She thanked people who have been isolating and thinking twice before leaving the house and using face coverings. She follows the national news and said it is interesting to see the trouble that all states have had with obtaining accurate testing. She said they are currently doing everything within our powers and abilities to help the city. Councilman Hauenstein said he took a ride through town today and it was nice to hear a jackhammer and see some activity in town. He thanked the engineering department for the 700-site safety plans they processed to get things going again and emphasized how important it is for the contractors. Mayor Torre said he wished everyone health and happiness during these times. The stay at home order and social distancing still in place and these are important days. The city did put in a mask mandate and it’s up to each of us to do our part. Thousands of masks have been ordered by the city and should be here by the end of the week. He supported the mask ordinance because this community is still seeing arrivals from out of town. A return to work is on the horizon and there are more social contacts going on, but we don’t want to see a resurgence. CITY MANAGER COMMENTS: 42 1 REGULAR MEETING ASPEN CITY COUNCIL APRIL 28TH, 2020 Sara Ott said that last Thursday she made a disbursement of 200,000 to Pitkin County as part of the financial economic assistance that city council authorized. This was run through Aspen Community Foundation and an anonymous donor matched us dollar for dollar on that. The budget update is scheduled for May 4th this coming evening and have some updated revenue estimates to make everyone aware of. She also wants to share that Jeff Woods, after 23 years of service, will be retiring on June 30th. He is known for some of the most iconic features of our parks amenities including Sky Mountain and the John Denver Sanctuary designed. He personally helped design most of that. She will be making an interim appointment but won’t fill that position for the rest of the year. She has hired an Assistant City Manager, Diane Foster. She is most recently City Manager of Park City, Utah. Work ethic and technical skills. Councilman Hauenstein thanked Sara for burning the candle at both ends. Mayor Torre thanked her for her hard work as well. BOARD REPORTS: Mayor Torre said ACRA met this morning in its first teleconference. A lot went on regarding the hospital, airport, tourism recovery plan, etc. He said he will get council the notes on that very soon. Councilwoman Mullins said RFTA is meeting tomorrow morning and the Board of Health on Thursday. She said they saw an educational presentation about the state of our county today. She said they had a CORE meeting a week or so ago discussing budget and next week she will have a RFTA report. Councilman Mesirow said that last Friday, they held an APCHA retreat. It was a successful retreat. He said they went through their mission statement, vision statement and values and plugged them into ten areas of focus. We will have a plan which APCHA will review and will share with the council. We will have 5 big picture priorities. Councilwoman Richards dittoed what skippy said on the APCHA retreat and said there will be a zoom call Friday with club 20. CONSENT CALENDAR: No items were pulled for review. Councilwoman Richards motioned to adopt the consent calendar as presented, Councilwoman Mullins seconded. Roll call vote: Hauenstein, yes; Mesirow, yes; Mullins, yes; Richards, yes; Torre, yes. 5-0, motion carried. NOTICE OF CALL UP: 227 E. Main Street Amy Simon Ms. Simon said it’s a 3000 square foot lot. There is a Victorian era miner’s cottage on the property and will be converted to a single-family home. They will restore the house and expand it. HPC approved this unanimously 7-0. 43 2 REGULAR MEETING ASPEN CITY COUNCIL APRIL 28TH, 2020 Councilwoman Mullins asked if it’s a mixed-use property and Ms. Simon said yes. Councilwoman Mullins asked if the house is remaining in its original location and Ms. Simon said yes. Councilwoman Mullins said she doesn’t support calling this up. Councilman Hauenstein said he did a site visit and it needs some tender loving care as it’s in bad shape. He asked about the trees in the back being removed and Ms. Simon said yes, the parks department has given permission for this. He’s comfortable with this and said he has no desire to call up. Councilwoman Richards said she sees no need for call up. Mayor Torre said he has a concern on Main Street with residential taking over commercial. He wondered if there is an opportunity to talk about this and asked if community development is also concerned. Ms. Simon said with the recent code amendments, council did discuss the uses and what is most acceptable on Main Street. There are a lot of historic homes which line that street and the square footage allowed for residential is much lower. There are a lot of upsides to the restoration. Councilman Mesirow said he’s not interested in calling this up and we need to respect our boards and commissions vote and is in the scope of what we allow. To him, however, this does not meet the best outcomes for the community. Councilwoman Richards said she’d be happy to look at the zoning on Main Street for better outcomes. Councilwoman Mullins said its city council’s fault because we’ve been scared to death to touch residential guidelines. It’s not HPC’s fault. This is something that this council should look at in the future, not now obviously. We do need to approach it at some point. Phillip Supino said community development is happy to have this conversation moving forward and are prepared to come to a work session to facilitate this. Councilman Mesirow said he puts the blame with the decision makers of the past. He’s ready for this conversation. Mayor Torre told Ms. Simon there will be no call up on this item. PUBLIC HEARING: Ordinance #03, Series of 2020 – Second Reading of Wireless Communication Facilities Design Ben Anderson Mr. Anderson said they postponed this from March 24th and said the city has spent extensive amount of time on this. public outreach campaign. HR Green, an engineering consultant group, has been really helpful. The primary thing this ordinance does is adopt design guidelines for wireless infrastructure for small cell facilities. He said they amended chapter 26 of the land use code to reference these guidelines. Mr. Anderson summarized that was presented previously and the adjustments that have been made. The carriers think our set up won’t be feasible. We certainly heard their comments on dimensions and underground vaulting but think that what is going on in the industry. Denver is on version three of the guidelines in response to these things and there will continue to be changes. There is a variation process with HPC and P&Z. If the carrier can make the case for the variation, we will grant it. 44 3 REGULAR MEETING ASPEN CITY COUNCIL APRIL 28TH, 2020 Staff recommends approval on second reading. Mr. Anderson read a public comment from Ruth Krueger received last minute. She’s opposed to having dangerous technology in her backyard. She’s satisfied with the level of service she has now. She mentioned invasion of privacy. Many cities are refusing this to be allowed. It’s not compatible with our special environment. Stand fast and just say no. Councilwoman Richards said council received an email from John Bush regarding the original historic streetlights. We need to keep the older street lights and use them in other places and preserve them. She also wondered how we build a defense in advance because she doesn’t want every location to receive a variation. It makes her nervous. Mr. Anderson said the carrier would have to make a convincing case on our design guidelines not allowing their service to work. We have to be reasonable in what we are asking of these folks and find an appropriate balance. Andrea Bryan said that at present under our guidelines and using the AT&T master license as an example, the providers are required to comply with federal law regarding emissions and health concerns. Locally we don’t have the ability to regulate this. Unless the federal standards change, we just need to comply with this and we can’t use health concerns to revoke a permit. Councilwoman Richards said they are hearing a lot about carrier requirements, but we need to be equally as strong about our community requirements. We are the first in the country to introduce the parking system we have now. We didn’t want standard parking meters. There are a lot of examples of the extent we’ve gone too on these things. We do we need to put into the ordinance that they need to preserve our historic streetlights. Mayor Torre agreed that is what he is concerned about as well. Tyler Christoff, Utilities Director, said that would be spelled out for the carriers from the get go. Councilwoman Mullins said this is a really tough project with obstacles put forth by the feds and big businesses. She thanked them for working so hard on this. She asked how we hold strong against the creep of height or size. Mr. Anderson said there is discouragement on going in front of a board. AT&T has wanted to work with us and they’ve been pretty close to what we want. Our guidelines force them to be creative, and no one wants this to be adversarial. We do have a precedent for doing things differently in Aspen. We work hard to protect things over time. It’s our blood, sweat and tears used to make these things happen. Councilman Hauenstein asked if we can cap this at 25 feet. Ms. Bryan said we may be able to but could expose us to more risk. According to federal law, small cell towers go up to heights of 50 feet. Having a variance process will reduce some of our legal exposure. Councilman Hauenstein said he wants to hear public comment. He’s really sensitive to the invasion of privacy comment as Ruth mentioned and he does think that is a valid concern. Councilman Mesirow asked about public noticing. Mr. Anderson said that most applications will have to submit for an administrative review since they don’t meet the guidelines. There won’t be a notice, but after approval, it shows up in a box ad in the paper. There is a poster on site which explains what is transpiring and a notice to the homes within 300 feet. The requirements are the same but will be administrative with no public hearing. Councilman Mesirow said he accepts the 25-foot height instead of the 20 feet. He’s concerned that all of this may backfire though. He said we need to alert people to what 45 4 REGULAR MEETING ASPEN CITY COUNCIL APRIL 28TH, 2020 is happening and asked to take care with how we put this forward. He wants to make sure the public is aware and wants to confirm that on generating reports, there’s a report generated which matches what has been disclosed. Mr. Anderson said this is something we are still working on logistically and will require us to build some staff expertise or hire out to a 3rd party consultant. It is our intention that following installation and looking at facilities around town, we will do exactly what you described. We can’t go beyond the FCC regulations, but we would be testing for compliance. Mayor Torre asked Andrea for explanation for the public that she has previously shared with him. Ms. Bryan said that longstanding laws and federal code dictates that local governments cannot regulate wireless communications facilities based on health concerns. We can’t take a report regarding emissions and use that to stop these facilities. Mayor Torre asked her for the “what if” council didn’t approve the guidelines or if we denied installation and what would happen. Ms. Bryan said we would expose ourselves to legal risk and it would be quite costly with not a very good outcome. She has taken a look at all local Colorado cities and in the U.S. as a whole and examples of banning. None of those actually have been able to ban it. Mill Valley is probably closest to a ban. We don’t have the ability under our state law to ban small cell in any zone district. Mayor Torre said we are concerned and have looked at this with a microscope and what our abilities are to regulate this in our community. PUBLIC COMMENT: Dr. Tom Lankering – Dr. Lankering said there are 40 cities and counties that have made steps to slow down the installation of 5G and he is working with Coloradans for safe technology. The FCC is a captured agency so the laws they put in are nothing more than bullies. There is an absence of safety studies currently and it’s a real David vs. Goliath situation. Fiber optics already is an alternative to 5G and the health concerns are very real. It is important for the health of our community to stand up against Goliath. Until we have the safety studies, we don’t want to move forward with this. It’s a real and serious concern. Councilman Hauenstein said the frustration continues, and if we take on Goliath, we will incur tremendous legal expenses. If there was a class action suit, we could want to participate in that to challenge this. We do need the studies to show safety first, however, and then we can move forward. Councilwoman Mullins said that she would reluctantly move forward with this and keep in mind that we need to encourage any studies which look into the health risks. I suspect there are, but we don’t have the studies. We will be accommodating what is required and nothing more and we will continue to follow closely the federal guidelines and if they change at all, we will change with them. Councilwoman Richards asked if there are any amendments to the resolution in the packet and Mr. Anderson said no, they are recommending approval as presented. Councilwoman Richards motioned to approve Ordinance #03, Series of 2020, Councilman Hauenstein seconded. Councilwoman Richards said this is something we are doing under duress. A federal shot clock, as it were. If we do not pass this tonight, it wouldn’t stop someone from coming in to build out their 5 G 46 5 REGULAR MEETING ASPEN CITY COUNCIL APRIL 28TH, 2020 system. Without our guidelines, it would be more of the wild west out there with no way to review the way we hope to. It’s important to have guard rails in place on this and we need to be prepared. Councilman Mesirow said he is grateful to be on this council with people who are focused on health and aesthetic concerns. We’ve heard from everyone in the community and we are on the cutting edge always. It’s important to have protections of our history and community aesthetic and community values. We’ve made a good faith effort with this. We have a nation leading a system in place to identify and measure and relate to the best science of the day. We can take our public health in our hands. Roll call vote: Hauenstein, yes; Mesirow, yes; Mullins, yes; Richards, yes; Torre, yes. 5-0, motion carried. Councilwoman Richards motioned to adjourn, Councilman Mesirow seconded. Roll call vote: Hauenstein, yes; Mesirow, yes; Mullins, yes; Richards, yes; Torre, yes. 5-0, motion carried. ______________________ Nicole Henning, City Clerk 47 6 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Torre and Aspen City Council THROUGH: Phillip Supino, Community Development Director FROM: Sarah Yoon, Preservation Planner; Community Development MEMO DATE: May 4, 2020 MEETING DATE: May 12, 2020 RE: Call Up Notice, HPC approval for 134 E. Bleeker – Minor Development, Relocation, and Setback Variations APPLICANT: Otis Real Estate Holdings LLC, c/o Good Property Company REPRESENTATIVE: BendonAdams LOCATION: Street Address: 134 E. Bleeker Street Legal Description: Lot S and the East ½ of Lot R, Block 65, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado PROCESS SUMMARY: Certain land use approvals granted by HPC or P&Z require that Council be notified of the decision through a brief staff summary. The notification is not a public hearing and no applicant presentation or public comment has been accepted in the past. During the Call Up Notice, City Council may uphold the HPC or P&Z decision. Alternatively, Council may request more detailed information be provided through a presentation by staff and the applicant at a future meeting. After hearing the additional project description, Council may uphold the boards’ decision or may remand it to require reconsideration of specific issues at a new public hearing. HPC’s or P&Z’s decision on remand shall be final. BACKGROUND: 134 E. Bleeker is a locally designated historic landmark on a 4,500 sf lot in the R-6 zone district. The lot includes a Victorian home and a historic secondary “barn” structure. Records indicate that these two structures were relocated from Main Street to this site in the 1960s. The existing non-historic addition was added during the 1992 redevelopment. Parcel Identification: PID# 2737-073-15-002 CURRENT ZONING & USE: R-6 (Medium-Density Residential); Singlefamily home PROPOSED USE: No change 134 Site Locator Map – 134 E. Bleeker Street 48 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The applicant first submitted a proposal for Major Development that involved demolish of the existing nonhistoric addition and construction of a new addition. This proposal also included a request for a parking reduction and parking dimension variances. The applicant was given direction by HPC on March 11th to restudy the form of the new addition and provide code compliant on-site parking. Following the HPC meeting, the applicant returned with a revised scope of work that maintained the existing non-historic addition and provided two full on-site parking spaces. The revised scope of work qualified for a Minor Development review and was re-noticed. On April 22nd, by a 4-0 vote, HPC approved the proposal for Minor Development, Relocation, and Setback Variations with conditions. Approval was granted to underpin the historic home to excavate a basement addition and make exterior changes to existing building materials and fenestration. Excavation for the basement addition requires the historic home to be underpinned, which triggers historic preservation relocation criteria, but no buildings will be moved for this proposal. The request for setback variations is to memorialize the current location of the historic “barn” which currently sits in the east side yard setback and the rear yard setback. The existing curb cut from Aspen Street will be removed and sidewalks are proposed as required by the Engineering Department. The conditions of approval outline specific elements that need staff and monitor approval, and the applicant will continue to work closely with relevant City Departments regarding various elements in the tree dripline. Staff recommends Council uphold HPC’s decision. Figure 1 – Approved East Elevation (from Aspen Street) FINANCIAL IMPACTS: N/A ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: N/A ALTERNATIVES: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommended approval of the project with conditions, and HPC agreed by a vote of 4-0. Staff recommends Council uphold HPC’s decision. Recommended Motion for Call-up “I move to call-up HPC’s approval for 134 E. Bleeker Street – Minor Development, Relocation, and Setback Variations.” 49 CITY MANAGER COMMENTS: _______________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________. EXHIBITS: A – HPC memo, April 22, 2020 B – HPC approved plans C – Draft HPC meeting minutes, April 22, 2020 D – Draft HPC Resolution #11, Series of 2020 50 Memorandum TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Sarah Yoon, Historic Preservation Planner THROUGH: Amy Simon, Interim Planning Director/Historic Preservation Officer MEETING DATE: April 22, 2020 RE: 134 East Bleeker – Minor Development Review, Relocation, and Setback Variations, PUBLIC HEARING APPLICANT /OWNER: SUMMARY: In March, HPC reviewed a Major Development Otis Real Estate Holdings LLC, application that involved demolition and replacement of the existing c/o Good Property Company addition to this historic resource. The Commission expressed a number of concerns and continued the hearing. The applicant subsequently revised the project scope and requests a Minor REPRESENTATIVE: Development review for proposed exterior material and BendonAdams fenestration changes to the existing non-historic addition and the secondary “barn” structure and underpinning the historic home to LOCATION: enlarge the basement addition. The applicant seeks setback Street Address: variations for the “barn” structure to remain in its current location. 134 E. Bleeker Street Legal Description: Lot S and the East ½ of Lot R, Block 65, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval conditions identified on page 7 of this memo. with Parcel Identification: PID# 2737-073-15-002 CURRENT ZONING & USE R-6 (Medium-Density Residential); Residential PROPOSED ZONING & USE: No change 134 Site Locator Map – 134 E. Bleeker St. Page 1 of 8 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611-1975 P: 970.920.5197 cityofaspen.com 51 BACKGROUND: 134 East Bleeker Street is a designated historic landmark in the R-6 zone district on a 4,500sf corner lot. This property contains a miner’s cabin and a historic barn structure that were both moved to this site from 418 E. Main Street in the 1960s. The spatial relationship between the two historic structures were maintained on the new receiving site. 134 E. Bleeker was landmarked and redeveloped with the addition that exists today in 1992. Figure 1 – 134 E. Bleeker, 1980 Figure 2 – 134 E. Bleeker, 2020 REQUEST OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION (HPC) The Applicant is requesting the following land use approvals: • Minor Development (Section 26.415.070.C) for materials and fenestration changes to the existing non-historic addition and secondary historic resource. • Relocation (Section 26.415.090.C) for underpinning the historic house to enlarge the basement. • Setback Variations (Section 26.415.110.C) for the existing historic secondary “barn” structure to remain in its current location. The HPC is the final review authority, however, this project is subject to Call-Up Notice by City Council. PROJECT SUMMARY: Since the last March 11th HPC meeting, the applicant has revised the scope of work which now qualifies for a Minor Development review. The applicant proposes to maintain the existing non-historic addition with changes to exterior materials and fenestration. Excavation to expand the existing basement is proposed and will require the underpinning of the historic home. The secondary “barn” structure is to remain detached with alterations to materials and fenestration to the east and north elevations of the secondary structure. Two full on-site parking spaces are proposed with this revised design, and setback variations are requested to maintain the location of the historic secondary resource which is currently in the rear and east side yard setbacks. Page 2 of 8 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611-1975 P: 970.920.5197 cityofaspen.com 52 STAFF COMMENTS: This corner lot property is highly visible from both Bleeker Street and Aspen Street, and as part of this project, the applicant is asked to remove the existing garage and driveway curb cut from Aspen Street, which is a benefit to the streetscape. Staff supports the applicant’s proposal to restore the roofs on both historic resources to wood shingles and to paint existing siding, and the request for setback variations to memorialize the existing location of the secondary “barn” structure. Staff recommends HPC further discuss the proposed secondary entrance to the home and exterior details regarding the changes proposed to the barn structure. The following points go into more detail regarding the proposal for HPC discussion: 1. Site Planning & Landscape Design: The proposed expansion of the basement requires excavation and underpinning of the historic house which triggers Relocation review. According to Design Guideline 9.1, underpinning the historic resource for excavation is appropriate, and the structural assessment and financial assurance for the historic resource will be required. Additionally, details regarding excavation and waterline locations will need to be reviewed by the relevant City Departments. (See Exhibit B for details.) All subgrade living space, including lightwells, are within the setbacks, as proposed. In compliance with Design Guideline 9.6, staff recommends a curb height of 6” or less for the proposed lightwell. The proposed landscape plan introduces two new cottonwood street trees along Aspen Street, and on-site planting beds and shrubs. Concerning the plantings along the west side of the property, staff recommends reducing the shrubs closest to the historic house for the protection of the resource (Design Guideline 1.13). An existing non-historic fence is to be removed and replaced with a more contemporary 42” tall wooden fence. Design Guideline 1.19 requires a low vertical picket fence allowing a level of transparency for Victorian properties. The proposed horizontal board fence would be appropriate around the addition, but staff recommends a vertical picket fence around the historic home to meet the Design Guidelines. The proposal introduces new sidewalks along both streets since the property is in a mandated sidewalk zone. Related to these improvements, the applicant plans to reconfigure the front walkway to the historic resource and the secondary walkway from Aspen Street. Due to the dripline of an exiting tree, a meandering front walkway is considered appropriate (Design Guideline 1.6). The proposed secondary walkway leads to a vestibule located in the two-story connector. The pathway is incorporated into an expanded patio area. While the applicant has addressed staff concerns related to having the historic front door enter into a bedroom as indicated in the March Page 3 of 8 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611-1975 P: 970.920.5197 cityofaspen.com 53 plan set, staff is still concerned that the secondary pathway will look and function as the primary entry for the home. Staff recommends this pathway be restudied to better meet Design Guideline 10.9 & 4.1. Figure 3 – Proposed Landscape Plan Staff supports the overall site plan and the provision of two full parking spaces. The proposed landscape plan is appropriate with the recommendation to reduce plantings that are too close to the historic home. Staff recommends the further restudy of the proposed secondary walkway to better meet the Design Guidelines 10.9 & 4.1. 2. Historic Resource – Secondary Structure: The historic secondary “barn” structure is two stories tall with livable space on the top floor and a parking space on the ground floor. This space was previously approved as an ADU which the applicant is in the process of removing with a cash-inlieu payment through a separate administrative process. This structure was relocated with the historic home and significant areas of exterior material was replaced during the 1990’s remodel. The revised design maintains the secondary structure as a detached structure above grade with a new subgrade connection proposed to access the rest of the house. On the ground level, the design incorporates a large garage door opening on the north (alley) elevation to accommodate for a full-sized parking space within the structure. Staff supports the adaptive reuse of the “barn” with the garage door facing the alley, but recommends further study on if the garage door can be pulled in slightly at the corners and still provide adequate clearance. With the removal of the curb cut along Aspen Street, the existing single-car garage door on the non-historic shed roof addition to the “barn” is to be replaced with siding and new windows. The Page 4 of 8 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611-1975 P: 970.920.5197 cityofaspen.com 54 siding is proposed to match existing conditions. Two 4 over 4 windows are proposed on the east elevation. The Design Guidelines call for new features to be distinguished from historic features through subtle changes to style and/or detail. The proposed 4 over 4 design detail closely mimics historic window design making it difficult to distinguish new and historic windows. Figure 4 – Proposed East Elevation (Secondary “barn” Structure) Figure 5 – Proposed North Elevation (Secondary “barn” Structure) Staff supports the adaptive reuse of the secondary “barn” structure and the alterations to material and fenestration with the recommendation to further study the window details on the east elevation and the overall length of the garage door on the north elevation. 3. Non-Historic Addition: Materials & Fenestration: The applicant has made the decision to maintain the existing non-historic addition to the historic house and make minor changes to materials and fenestration. These changes include updating existing glazing and painting the siding. According to Design Guideline 10.6, the additions needs to be recognized as a product of its own time, but visual compatibility must be achieved by relating to two of the following characteristics: form, material and fenestration. No changes are proposed to the existing scale and form of the addition. Materials: Horizontal wood siding is the unifying material seen throughout the entire project. The applicant proposes to paint the wood siding, which is considered an appropriate finish. New roofing material is proposed for the entire project. Fenestration: The proposed fenestration changes deviates from what is found on the historic resources. The most significant areas for change are concentrated on the west elevation which faces the adjacent lot. Page 5 of 8 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611-1975 P: 970.920.5197 cityofaspen.com 55 Staff finds the proposed changes to material and fenestration maintains a compatible relationship with the historic resources. Staff requests additional information regarding exterior vents and flues, and gutters and snow stops that may be added to all of the roofs. 4. Setback Variations: The applicant proposes to maintain the existing footprint of the secondary structure in its current location. No new development is proposed beyond the setbacks. Staff supports the request for setback variations to memorialize the current location of the resource. No historic resources are being moved and the historic home will remain in its location 5’ behind the front yard setback. The historic secondary “barn” structure is currently in the rear and east side yard setbacks. The following setback variations are requested to maintain its current location: • 8’-4” rear yard setback reduction • 3’-3” east side yard setback reduction In granting a variance, the HPC must make a finding that such a variance: a) Is similar to the pattern, features and character of the historic property or district; and/or b) Enhances or mitigates an adverse impact to the historic significance or architectural character of the historic property, an adjoining designated historic property or historic district. Staff supports the request for setback variations to maintain the existing location of the historic secondary structure since it meets all of the required criteria. REFERRAL COMMENTS: The application was referred out to other City Departments who have requirements that will significantly affect the permit review. The following is a summary of comments received. See Exhibit B. Engineering Department: 1. Coordinate with the Electric Department ensuring transformer upgrade is feasible. (Resolved) 2. At building permit, the following needs to be addressed: • City of Aspen compliant survey is required • Sidewalks required on both sides of the property • Inspect curb and gutter and replacement of damaged areas required • Emergency overflow path for drywell must be called out in civil plans and drainage report • Water service line location in the front yard needs to stay out of tree drip line. Parks Dept. approval needed. • Submit soils report containing percolation test Page 6 of 8 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611-1975 P: 970.920.5197 cityofaspen.com 56 • Submit letter from structural engineer stating location of drywell will not compromise the integrity of the structures. Any redesign of the drywell needs to adhere to City Standards. Parks Department: 1. Snow melted sidewalk must be 5’ away from the tree trunk (#6917 on City of Aspen tree inventory) on Aspen Street. 2. Relocate waterline out of the tree dripline to the west property line. Parks to review revised waterline plans. 3. More details on how excavation of the basement will occur. 4. Review of CMP when available. Zoning Department: 1. Comments on floor area calculations. 2. Clarification of setbacks on sub-grade drawings. Building Department: 1. Gross fire area over 5,000 sf triggers fire sprinklers. 2. Areas where roof projections are less than 3 feet from the property line need to be 1 hour fireresistance rated on the underside. 3. Snow stops required at all roof pitches that shed to walkways, driveways and window wells. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the HPC approve this application with the following conditions: 1. The following setback variations are approved for the existing historic secondary “barn” structure: • 8’-4” rear yard setback reduction above and below grade • 3’-3” east side yard setback reduction above and below grade 2. Restudy the secondary walkway to minimize its visual presence and meet Design Guidelines 10.9 & 4.1, to be reviewed and approved by staff and monitor prior to building permit submission. 3. Provide detailed information regarding vents and flues, gutters and snow stops, to be reviewed and approved by staff and monitor prior to building permit submission. 4. Design the lightwell curb height to be 6” or less in height. 5. Revise window details on the east elevation of the secondary structure to meet Design Guideline 10.6, to be reviewed and approved by staff and monitor. 6. Work closely with relevant City Departments regarding work in the dripline of trees, particularly the location of the waterline and sidewalks. 7. Minimize the length of the proposed garage door on the north elevation, to be reviewed and approved by staff and monitor. Page 7 of 8 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611-1975 P: 970.920.5197 cityofaspen.com 57 8. Restudy the fence design around the historic home to meet Design Guideline 1.19, to be reviewed and approved by staff and monitor. 9. Reduce plantings on the west side of the historic home, to be reviewed and approved by staff and monitor. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution #____, Series of 2020 Exhibit A.1 – Historic Preservation Design Guidelines Criteria /Staff Findings Exhibit A.2 – Setback Variations Review Criteria /Staff Findings Exhibit B – Referral Comments Exhibit C – Application Page 8 of 8 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611-1975 P: 970.920.5197 cityofaspen.com 58 134 EAST BLEEKER ASPEN, CO These documents are the property of EAD. Any unauthorized use without the written consent of EAD is prohibited by law. EAD disclaims responsibility for these documents if they are used whole or in part at any other location and for any other application other than the original intent. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or reproduction of these documents is prohibited by law. BIM 360://19017 -134 Bleeker/19017_134 E Bleeker St_CENTRAL.rvt Exhibit N - revised drawings 4/22/2020 CLIENT REVIEW: REVIEWED AND APPROVED FOR DESIGN INTENT: CLIENT UNDERSTANDS THE DESIGN INTENT OF THE DOCUMENT. CLIENT APPROVES DESIGN INTENT. ARCHITECT W ILL PROCEED WITH DETAILS AND COORDINATION WITH CONTRACTOR PER SIGN OFF ON DOCUMENT. NOTE: ANY CHANGES TO THE APPROVED DRAWINGS BY CLIENT ARE ADDITIONAL SERVICE PER CONTRACT. ARCHITECT TO PICKUP CORRETIONS AS NOTED CLIENT SIGNATURE: ___________________________ DATE OF APPROVAL: __________________________ 10.31.2019 350 MARKET STREET SUITE 309 BASALT, COLORADO 81621 PHONE: 970.300.3423 FAX: 415.358.5771 INFO@EIGELBERGER.COM Plot Date 4/20/2020 6:40:07 PM Drawn By Author Checked By Checker Project No. 19017 Date Issue Copyright c 2018 by EIGELBERGER ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN 1/17/2020 HPC SUBMITTAL COVER SCALE: A.1.00 59 These documents are the property of EAD. Any unauthorized use without the written consent of EAD is prohibited by law. EAD disclaims responsibility for these documents if they are used whole or in part at any other location and for any other application other than the original intent. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or reproduction of these documents is prohibited by law. BIM 360://19017 -134 Bleeker/19017_134 E Bleeker St_CENTRAL.rvt 4 5 6 7 8 100' - 0" SETBACK 5' - 0" PROPERTY LINE SETBACK A B PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE A B 14' - 11" ASPEN, CO 3 134 EAST BLEEKER 2 3' - 1" EXISTING SETBACK 1 EXISTING SETBACK 1' - 8" EXISTING SETBACK CLIENT REVIEW: REVIEWED AND APPROVED FOR DESIGN INTENT: CLIENT UNDERSTANDS THE DESIGN INTENT OF THE DOCUMENT. CLIENT APPROVES DESIGN INTENT. ARCHITECT W ILL PROCEED WITH DETAILS AND COORDINATION WITH CONTRACTOR PER SIGN OFF ON DOCUMENT. 45' - 0" 45' - 0" 5' - 0 1/2" DISTANCE BETWEEN BUILDINGS NOTE: ANY CHANGES TO THE APPROVED DRAWINGS BY CLIENT ARE ADDITIONAL SERVICE PER CONTRACT. E. BLEEKER ST. C ARCHITECT TO PICKUP CORRETIONS AS NOTED C CLIENT SIGNATURE: ___________________________ 10' - 0" DATE OF APPROVAL: __________________________ D D 10.31.2019 E E 1' - 8" EXISTING SETBACK 10' - 0" 5' - 0" SETBACK F 350 MARKET STREET SUITE 309 BASALT, COLORADO 81621 PHONE: 970.300.3423 FAX: 415.358.5771 INFO@EIGELBERGER.COM F PROPERTY LINE Plot Date 4/20/2020 6:40:09 PM Drawn By Author Checked By Checker Project No. 19017 7895.0' 100' - 0" Date 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 HPC SUBMITTAL N. ASPEN ST. (E) SITE PLAN 0 1 (E) SITE 1/4" = 1'-0" 4' 8' 16' N Copyright c 2018 by EIGELBERGER ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN 1 Issue 1/17/2020 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" A.1.01 60 These documents are the property of EAD. Any unauthorized use without the written consent of EAD is prohibited by law. EAD disclaims responsibility for these documents if they are used whole or in part at any other location and for any other application other than the original intent. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or reproduction of these documents is prohibited by law. BIM 360://19017 -134 Bleeker/19017_134 E Bleeker St_CENTRAL.rvt 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 134 EAST BLEEKER 100' - 0" PROPERTY LINE 78 95 SETBACK SETBACK A SLOPE 4" : 12" SLOPE 12" : 12" B CLIENT REVIEW: REVIEWED AND APPROVED FOR DESIGN INTENT: CLIENT UNDERSTANDS THE DESIGN INTENT OF THE DOCUMENT. CLIENT APPROVES DESIGN INTENT. ARCHITECT W ILL PROCEED WITH DETAILS AND COORDINATION WITH CONTRACTOR PER SIGN OFF ON DOCUMENT. 45' - 0" SLOPE 13 1/2" : 12" SLOPE 12" : 12" SLOPE 13 1/2" : 12" SLOPE 13 1/2" : 12" SLOPE 13 1/2" : 12" SLOPE 13 1/2" : 12" SLOPE 13 1/2" : 12" SLOPE 12" : 12" SLOPE 12" : 12" SLOPE 12" : 12" SLOPE 13 1/2" : 12" SLOPE 12" : 12" SLOPE 13 1/2" : 12" 45' - 0" SLOPE 13 1/2" : 12" SLOPE 13 1/2" : 12" SLOPE 10 1/2" : 12" SLOPE 13 1/2" : 12" SLOPE 13 1/2" : 12" SLOPE 13 1/2" : 12" PROPERTY LINE 95 78 SLOPE 12" : 12" PROPERTY LINE SLOPE 4" : 12" A NOTE: ANY CHANGES TO THE APPROVED DRAWINGS BY CLIENT ARE ADDITIONAL SERVICE PER CONTRACT. E. BLEEKER ST. C SLOPE 13 1/2" : 12" SLOPE 10 1/2" : 12" ASPEN, CO 1 SLOPE 13 1/2" : 12" ARCHITECT TO PICKUP CORRETIONS AS NOTED C SLOPE 13 1/2" : 12" CLIENT SIGNATURE: ___________________________ DATE OF APPROVAL: __________________________ 14' - 11 3/4" D E SLOPE 3 1/2" : 12" SETBACK E SETBACK 7 8 95 F 10.31.2019 350 MARKET STREET SUITE 309 BASALT, COLORADO 81621 PHONE: 970.300.3423 FAX: 415.358.5771 INFO@EIGELBERGER.COM F PROPERTY LINE Plot Date 4/20/2020 6:40:11 PM Drawn By Author Checked By Checker Project No. 19017 100' - 0" Date 3 4 5 6 7 8 N. ASPEN ST. (P) SITE PLAN 0 1 (P) SITE 1/4" = 1'-0" 4' 8' 16' N Copyright c 2018 by EIGELBERGER ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN 2 HPC SUBMITTAL 7895 95 78 1 Issue 1/17/2020 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" A.1.02 61 These documents are the property of EAD. Any unauthorized use without the written consent of EAD is prohibited by law. EAD disclaims responsibility for these documents if they are used whole or in part at any other location and for any other application other than the original intent. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or reproduction of these documents is prohibited by law. BIM 360://19017 -134 Bleeker/19017_134 E Bleeker St_CENTRAL.rvt LIGHT WELL COVER AREA = 597 SF AREA = 579 SF 134 EAST BLEEKER AREA = 597 SF GARAGE AREA = 405 SF AREA = 503 SF UP OPEN TO BELOW LIGHT WELL COVER AREA TO BE REMOVED = 56 SF AREA TO BE ADDED = 0 SF AREA TOTAL = 1704 SF 1 UP DN AREA = 67 SF AREA TOTAL = 1648 SF (E) MAIN LEVEL - Area Calculations 1/8" = 1'-0" 2 (P) MAIN LEVEL - Area Calculations 1/8" = 1'-0" ASPEN, CO AREA = 604 SF CLIENT REVIEW: REVIEWED AND APPROVED FOR DESIGN INTENT: CLIENT UNDERSTANDS THE DESIGN INTENT OF THE DOCUMENT. CLIENT APPROVES DESIGN INTENT. ARCHITECT W ILL PROCEED WITH DETAILS AND COORDINATION WITH CONTRACTOR PER SIGN OFF ON DOCUMENT. OPEN TO BELOW OPEN TO BELOW NOTE: ANY CHANGES TO THE APPROVED DRAWINGS BY CLIENT ARE ADDITIONAL SERVICE PER CONTRACT. ARCHITECT TO PICKUP CORRETIONS AS NOTED DN CLIENT SIGNATURE: ___________________________ AREA = 448 SF AREA = 623 SF AREA = 333 SF OPEN TO BELOW DN DATE OF APPROVAL: __________________________ DN AREA = 428 SF AREA = 627 SF AREA = 332 SF DN 10.31.2019 OPEN TO BELOW AREA TO BE REMOVED = 39 SF AREA TO BE ADDED = 22 SF AREA TOTAL = 1404 SF 3 350 MARKET STREET SUITE 309 BASALT, COLORADO 81621 PHONE: 970.300.3423 FAX: 415.358.5771 INFO@EIGELBERGER.COM AREA TOTAL = 1387 SF (E) UPPER LEVEL - Area Calculations 1/8" = 1'-0" 4 (P) UPPER LEVEL - Area Calculations 1/8" = 1'-0" Plot Date 4/20/2020 6:40:15 PM Drawn By Author Checked By Checker Project No. 19017 Date Issue HPC SUBMITTAL AREA CALCULATION HISTORIC/PROPOSED EXISTING REMOVED ADDED N Copyright c 2018 by EIGELBERGER ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN 1/17/2020 SCALE: As indicated A.1.03 62 These documents are the property of EAD. Any unauthorized use without the written consent of EAD is prohibited by law. EAD disclaims responsibility for these documents if they are used whole or in part at any other location and for any other application other than the original intent. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or reproduction of these documents is prohibited by law. C1 14' - 3 1/2" 5' - 10 1/4" 10' - 4 1/2" C 11' - 10 1/8" 8 1/2" LIGHT WELL A A1 8' - 9 1/2" 8' - 1" 8' - 9 1/2" B1 9' - 7 1/4" D 5' - 3" 2 1/2" 1' - 7 1/4" 2' - 10" 5' - 1 3/4" 7" B B1 UP BASEMENT AREA 694 SQFT SUB GRADE WALL AREA = 259 SF EXPOSED WALL AREA = 42 SF EXPOSED WALL AREA = 64 SF C1 134 EAST BLEEKER C 5' - 0 3/8" 8' - 11" 1' - 4 1/4" 9' - 7 1/4" 7' - 5 3/4" (E) BASEMENT - FAR - SUBGRADE WALL COVERAGE 1 1/8" = 1'-0" 7 7/8" 6' - 4 3/4" 8' - 9 1/2" A1 7' - 0 1/2" 9' - 8 3/4" A 2' - 3 1/2" 1' - 3 3/8" D D1 SUB GRADE WALL AREA = 290 SF SUB GRADE WALL AREA = 230 SF EXPOSED WALL AREA = 3 SF EXPOSED WALL AREA = 20 SF ASPEN, CO B 1' - 3 1/2" 11 1/2" D1 SUB GRADE WALL AREA = 336 SF 8' - 9 1/2" BIM 360://19017 -134 Bleeker/19017_134 E Bleeker St_CENTRAL.rvt 12' - 2 1/2" CLIENT REVIEW: REVIEWED AND APPROVED FOR DESIGN INTENT: CLIENT UNDERSTANDS THE DESIGN INTENT OF THE DOCUMENT. CLIENT APPROVES DESIGN INTENT. ARCHITECT W ILL PROCEED WITH DETAILS AND COORDINATION WITH CONTRACTOR PER SIGN OFF ON DOCUMENT. NOTE: ANY CHANGES TO THE APPROVED DRAWINGS BY CLIENT ARE ADDITIONAL SERVICE PER CONTRACT. ARCHITECT TO PICKUP CORRETIONS AS NOTED CLIENT SIGNATURE: ___________________________ DATE OF APPROVAL: __________________________ 10.31.2019 350 MARKET STREET SUITE 309 BASALT, COLORADO 81621 PHONE: 970.300.3423 FAX: 415.358.5771 INFO@EIGELBERGER.COM Plot Date 4/20/2020 6:40:16 PM TM Drawn By Checked By Checker Project No. 19017 Date Issue Copyright c 2018 by EIGELBERGER ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN 1/17/2020 HPC SUBMITTAL (E) FLOOR AREA CALCULATION SUBGRADE SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" A.1.04 63 I G LIGHT WELL H 11' - 6" 10' - 9" J These documents are the property of EAD. Any unauthorized use without the written consent of EAD is prohibited by law. EAD disclaims responsibility for these documents if they are used whole or in part at any other location and for any other application other than the original intent. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or reproduction of these documents is prohibited by law. 22' - 6" 12' - 9" L 20' - 8 1/2" 134 EAST BLEEKER F C M B N D BASEMENT FLOOR AREA = 2412 SF E A (P) BASEMENT - SUBGRADE WALL COVERAGE 1 1/8" = 1'-0" 12' - 2" 14' - 10" 48' - 4 3/4" 8' - 4 5/8" 6' - 9 1/2" CLIENT REVIEW: REVIEWED AND APPROVED FOR DESIGN INTENT: CLIENT UNDERSTANDS THE DESIGN INTENT OF THE DOCUMENT. CLIENT APPROVES DESIGN INTENT. ARCHITECT W ILL PROCEED WITH DETAILS AND COORDINATION WITH CONTRACTOR PER SIGN OFF ON DOCUMENT. NOTE: ANY CHANGES TO THE APPROVED DRAWINGS BY CLIENT ARE ADDITIONAL SERVICE PER CONTRACT. 3' - 8" 10' - 5 1/2" 6' - 9 1/2" 3' - 8" 10' - 5 1/2" 11' - 10" 3' - 0" 3' - 0" 10' - 5 1/2" ASPEN, CO BIM 360://19017 -134 Bleeker/19017_134 E Bleeker St_CENTRAL.rvt K ARCHITECT TO PICKUP CORRETIONS AS NOTED TOTAL WALL AREA = 127 SF EXPOSED WALL AREA = 20 SF TOTAL WALL AREA = 155 SF EXPOSED WALL AREA = 20 SF TOTAL WALL AREA = 506 SF EXPOSED WALL AREA = 0 SF CLIENT SIGNATURE: ___________________________ TOTAL WALL AREA = 54 SF EXPOSED WALL AREA = 0 SF DATE OF APPROVAL: __________________________ A (P) Subgrade Wall Elevation - A 1/4" = 1'-0" B 3' - 0" (P) Subgrade Wall Elevation - B 1/4" = 1'-0" C (P) Subgrade Wall Elevation - C 1/4" = 1'-0" D 33' - 8 1/2" 29' - 6" (P) Subgrade Wall Elevation - D 1/4" = 1'-0" 6' - 0 1/2" 3' - 0" 10' - 5 1/2" 350 MARKET STREET SUITE 309 BASALT, COLORADO 81621 PHONE: 970.300.3423 FAX: 415.358.5771 INFO@EIGELBERGER.COM 3' - 8" 10' - 5 1/2" 10' - 5 1/2" 10' - 5 1/2" 5' - 10" 10.31.2019 F (P) Subgrade Wall Elevation - F 1/4" = 1'-0" (P) Subgrade Wall Elevation - H 1/4" = 1'-0" I (P) Subgrade Wall Elevation - I 1/4" = 1'-0" Date Issue 9' - 3 1/2" 11' - 7" 22' - 0 1/2" 10' - 5 1/2" 10' - 5 1/2" H 3' - 8" 10' - 5 1/2" (P) Subgrade Wall Elevation - G 1/4" = 1'-0" 31' - 7" 3' - 0" Copyright c 2018 by EIGELBERGER ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN G Plot Date 4/20/2020 6:40:20 PM Drawn By Author Checked By Checker Project No. 19017 10' - 5 1/2" (P) Subgrade Wall Elevation - E 1/4" = 1'-0" WALL AREA = 24 SF EXPOSED AREA = 24 SF WALL AREA = 31 SF EXPOSED AREA = 20 SF 10' - 5 1/2" E TOTAL WALL AREA = 353 SF EXPOSED WALL AREA = 0 SF TOTAL WALL AREA = 236 SF EXPOSED WALL AREA = 0 SF TOTAL WALL AREA = 31 SF EXPOSED WALL AREA = 0 SF WALL AREA = 330 SF EXPOSED AREA = 0 SF WALL AREA = 31 SF EXPOSED AREA = 20 SF J (P) Subgrade Wall Elevation - J 1/4" = 1'-0" K (P) Subgrade Wall Elevation - K 1/4" = 1'-0" WALL AREA = 121 SF EXPOSED AREA = 0 SF WALL AREA = 231 SF EXPOSED AREA = 0 SF L (P) Subgrade Wall Elevation - L 1/4" = 1'-0" M (P) Subgrade Wall Elevation - M 1/4" = 1'-0" WALL AREA = 97 SF EXPOSED AREA = 0 SF N (P) Subgrade Wall Elevation - N 1/4" = 1'-0" (P)FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS SUBGRADE SCALE: As indicated A.1.05 64 These documents are the property of EAD. Any unauthorized use without the written consent of EAD is prohibited by law. EAD disclaims responsibility for these documents if they are used whole or in part at any other location and for any other application other than the original intent. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or reproduction of these documents is prohibited by law. BIM 360://19017 -134 Bleeker/19017_134 E Bleeker St_CENTRAL.rvt (E) DECK LIGHT WELL COVER AREA = 45 SF GARAGE EXEMPTION = 328 SF OPEN TO BELOW 134 EAST BLEEKER OPEN TO BELOW AREA = 604 SF AREA = 597 SF AREA = 579 SF AREA = 597 SF GARAGE AREA = 405 SF AREA = 54 SF AREA = 503 SF AREA = 40 SF AREA = 40 SF AREA = 85 SF AREA = 85 SF UP (E) PORCH (E) PORCH LIGHT WELL COVER (E) PORCH (E) PORCH 1 (E) MAIN LEVEL - FAR 1/8" = 1'-0" EXEMPT = 500 SF EXEMPT = 552 SF FLOOR AREA = 1329 SF FLOOR AREA = 1320 SF GROSS FLOOR AREA = 1829 SF GROSS FLOOR AREA = 1872 SF 3 AREA = 67 SF (P) MAIN LEVEL - FAR 1/8" = 1'-0" ASPEN, CO GARAGE EXEMPTION = 375 SF CLIENT REVIEW: REVIEWED AND APPROVED FOR DESIGN INTENT: CLIENT UNDERSTANDS THE DESIGN INTENT OF THE DOCUMENT. CLIENT APPROVES DESIGN INTENT. ARCHITECT W ILL PROCEED WITH DETAILS AND COORDINATION WITH CONTRACTOR PER SIGN OFF ON DOCUMENT. NOTE: ANY CHANGES TO THE APPROVED DRAWINGS BY CLIENT ARE ADDITIONAL SERVICE PER CONTRACT. ARCHITECT TO PICKUP CORRETIONS AS NOTED CLIENT SIGNATURE: ___________________________ DATE OF APPROVAL: __________________________ 10.31.2019 350 MARKET STREET SUITE 309 BASALT, COLORADO 81621 PHONE: 970.300.3423 FAX: 415.358.5771 INFO@EIGELBERGER.COM Plot Date 4/20/2020 6:40:22 PM Drawn By Author Checked By Checker Project No. 19017 Date Issue Copyright c 2018 by EIGELBERGER ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN 1/17/2020 HPC SUBMITTAL FLOOR AREA CALCULATION - MAIN LEVEL SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" A.1.06 65 These documents are the property of EAD. Any unauthorized use without the written consent of EAD is prohibited by law. EAD disclaims responsibility for these documents if they are used whole or in part at any other location and for any other application other than the original intent. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or reproduction of these documents is prohibited by law. BIM 360://19017 -134 Bleeker/19017_134 E Bleeker St_CENTRAL.rvt OPEN TO BELOW OPEN TO BELOW AREA = 48 SF AREA = 48 SF DN AREA = 333 SF AREA = 332 SF 134 EAST BLEEKER AREA = 623 SF OPEN TO BELOW DN AREA = 428 SF AREA = 627 SF AREA = 448 SF DN AREA = 51 SF AREA = 67 SF OPEN TO BELOW 1 (E) UPPER LEVEL - FAR 1/8" = 1'-0" EXEMPT = 115 SF EXEMPT = 99 SF FLOOR AREA = 1404 SF FLOOR AREA = 1387 SF GROSS FLOOR AREA = 1519 SF GROSS FLOOR AREA = 1486 SF 2 (P) UPPER LEVEL - FAR 1/8" = 1'-0" ASPEN, CO DN CLIENT REVIEW: REVIEWED AND APPROVED FOR DESIGN INTENT: CLIENT UNDERSTANDS THE DESIGN INTENT OF THE DOCUMENT. CLIENT APPROVES DESIGN INTENT. ARCHITECT W ILL PROCEED WITH DETAILS AND COORDINATION WITH CONTRACTOR PER SIGN OFF ON DOCUMENT. NOTE: ANY CHANGES TO THE APPROVED DRAWINGS BY CLIENT ARE ADDITIONAL SERVICE PER CONTRACT. ARCHITECT TO PICKUP CORRETIONS AS NOTED CLIENT SIGNATURE: ___________________________ DATE OF APPROVAL: __________________________ 10.31.2019 350 MARKET STREET SUITE 309 BASALT, COLORADO 81621 PHONE: 970.300.3423 FAX: 415.358.5771 INFO@EIGELBERGER.COM Plot Date 4/20/2020 6:40:25 PM Drawn By Author Checked By Checker Project No. 19017 Date Issue Copyright c 2018 by EIGELBERGER ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN 1/17/2020 HPC SUBMITTAL FLOOR AREA CALCULATION UPPER LEVEL SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" A.1.07 66 These documents are the property of EAD. Any unauthorized use without the written consent of EAD is prohibited by law. EAD disclaims responsibility for these documents if they are used whole or in part at any other location and for any other application other than the original intent. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or reproduction of these documents is prohibited by law. BIM 360://19017 -134 Bleeker/19017_134 E Bleeker St_CENTRAL.rvt 3 4 5 6 7 8 PROPERTY LINE SETBACK A SETBACK PROPERTY LINE A PROPERTY LINE B B ASPEN, CO 2 134 EAST BLEEKER 1 CLIENT REVIEW: REVIEWED AND APPROVED FOR DESIGN INTENT: CLIENT UNDERSTANDS THE DESIGN INTENT OF THE DOCUMENT. CLIENT APPROVES DESIGN INTENT. ARCHITECT W ILL PROCEED WITH DETAILS AND COORDINATION WITH CONTRACTOR PER SIGN OFF ON DOCUMENT. C NOTE: ANY CHANGES TO THE APPROVED DRAWINGS BY CLIENT ARE ADDITIONAL SERVICE PER CONTRACT. C ARCHITECT TO PICKUP CORRETIONS AS NOTED CLIENT SIGNATURE: ___________________________ DATE OF APPROVAL: __________________________ D D 10.31.2019 E E SETBACK F F 350 MARKET STREET SUITE 309 BASALT, COLORADO 81621 PHONE: 970.300.3423 FAX: 415.358.5771 INFO@EIGELBERGER.COM PROPERTY LINE Plot Date 4/20/2020 6:40:26 PM Drawn By Author Checked By Checker Project No. 19017 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Date Issue HPC SUBMITTAL (E) BASEMENT FLOOR PLAN 1 (E) BASEMENT 1/4" = 1'-0" N Copyright c 2018 by EIGELBERGER ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN 1/17/2020 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" A.2.00 67 These documents are the property of EAD. Any unauthorized use without the written consent of EAD is prohibited by law. EAD disclaims responsibility for these documents if they are used whole or in part at any other location and for any other application other than the original intent. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or reproduction of these documents is prohibited by law. BIM 360://19017 -134 Bleeker/19017_134 E Bleeker St_CENTRAL.rvt 3 4 5 6 7 8 100' - 0" 10' - 0" PROPERTY LINE SETBACK A SETBACK PROPERTY LINE A PROPERTY LINE B B 5' - 7 5/8" ASPEN, CO 2 134 EAST BLEEKER 1 UP DN 45' - 0" CLIENT REVIEW: REVIEWED AND APPROVED FOR DESIGN INTENT: CLIENT UNDERSTANDS THE DESIGN INTENT OF THE DOCUMENT. CLIENT APPROVES DESIGN INTENT. ARCHITECT W ILL PROCEED WITH DETAILS AND COORDINATION WITH CONTRACTOR PER SIGN OFF ON DOCUMENT. UP C NOTE: ANY CHANGES TO THE APPROVED DRAWINGS BY CLIENT ARE ADDITIONAL SERVICE PER CONTRACT. C ARCHITECT TO PICKUP CORRETIONS AS NOTED CLIENT SIGNATURE: ___________________________ DATE OF APPROVAL: __________________________ UP D D 10.31.2019 E E SETBACK F F 350 MARKET STREET SUITE 309 BASALT, COLORADO 81621 PHONE: 970.300.3423 FAX: 415.358.5771 INFO@EIGELBERGER.COM PROPERTY LINE Plot Date 4/20/2020 6:40:33 PM Drawn By Author Checked By Checker Project No. 19017 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Date Issue HPC SUBMITTAL (E) MAIN FLOOR PLAN 1 (E) MAIN LEVEL 1/4" = 1'-0" N Copyright c 2018 by EIGELBERGER ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN 1/17/2020 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" A.2.01 68 These documents are the property of EAD. Any unauthorized use without the written consent of EAD is prohibited by law. EAD disclaims responsibility for these documents if they are used whole or in part at any other location and for any other application other than the original intent. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or reproduction of these documents is prohibited by law. BIM 360://19017 -134 Bleeker/19017_134 E Bleeker St_CENTRAL.rvt 3 4 5 6 7 8 PROPERTY LINE SETBACK A B SETBACK PROPERTY LINE B PROPERTY LINE 4' - 7 1/4" A ASPEN, CO 2 134 EAST BLEEKER 1 OPEN TO BELOW DN DN CLIENT REVIEW: REVIEWED AND APPROVED FOR DESIGN INTENT: CLIENT UNDERSTANDS THE DESIGN INTENT OF THE DOCUMENT. CLIENT APPROVES DESIGN INTENT. ARCHITECT W ILL PROCEED WITH DETAILS AND COORDINATION WITH CONTRACTOR PER SIGN OFF ON DOCUMENT. OPEN TO BELOW C NOTE: ANY CHANGES TO THE APPROVED DRAWINGS BY CLIENT ARE ADDITIONAL SERVICE PER CONTRACT. C ARCHITECT TO PICKUP CORRETIONS AS NOTED CLIENT SIGNATURE: ___________________________ DATE OF APPROVAL: __________________________ D D 10.31.2019 E E SETBACK F F 350 MARKET STREET SUITE 309 BASALT, COLORADO 81621 PHONE: 970.300.3423 FAX: 415.358.5771 INFO@EIGELBERGER.COM PROPERTY LINE Plot Date 4/20/2020 6:40:36 PM Drawn By Author Checked By Checker Project No. 19017 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Date Issue HPC SUBMITTAL (E) UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 2 (E) UPPER LEVEL 1/4" = 1'-0" N Copyright c 2018 by EIGELBERGER ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN 1/17/2020 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" A.2.02 69 These documents are the property of EAD. Any unauthorized use without the written consent of EAD is prohibited by law. EAD disclaims responsibility for these documents if they are used whole or in part at any other location and for any other application other than the original intent. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or reproduction of these documents is prohibited by law. BIM 360://19017 -134 Bleeker/19017_134 E Bleeker St_CENTRAL.rvt 3 4 5 6 7 8 PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE SETBACK A SLOPE 4" : 12" SLOPE 4" : 12" SLOPE 12" : 12" SLOPE 12" : 12" B SLOPE 10 1/2" : 12" CLIENT REVIEW: REVIEWED AND APPROVED FOR DESIGN INTENT: CLIENT UNDERSTANDS THE DESIGN INTENT OF THE DOCUMENT. CLIENT APPROVES DESIGN INTENT. ARCHITECT W ILL PROCEED WITH DETAILS AND COORDINATION WITH CONTRACTOR PER SIGN OFF ON DOCUMENT. SLOPE 13 1/2" : 12" SLOPE 13 1/2" : 12" SLOPE 13 1/2" : 12" SLOPE 13 1/2" : 12" SLOPE 13 1/2" : 12" SLOPE 12" : 12" SLOPE 13 1/2" : 12" SLOPE 12" : 12" SLOPE 13 1/2" : 12" SLOPE 13 1/2" : 12" SLOPE 13 1/2" : 12" SLOPE 12" : 12" SLOPE 13 1/2" : 12" SLOPE 13 1/2" : 12" C SLOPE 12" : 12" SLOPE 13 1/2" : 12" SLOPE 10 1/2" : 12" SLOPE 13 1/2" : 12" SLOPE 13 1/2" : 12" SLOPE 12" : 12" PROPERTY LINE B A ASPEN, CO 2 134 EAST BLEEKER 1 SLOPE 13 1/2" : 12" NOTE: ANY CHANGES TO THE APPROVED DRAWINGS BY CLIENT ARE ADDITIONAL SERVICE PER CONTRACT. C SLOPE 13 1/2" : 12" ARCHITECT TO PICKUP CORRETIONS AS NOTED CLIENT SIGNATURE: ___________________________ DATE OF APPROVAL: __________________________ D D SETBACK 10.31.2019 E SLOPE 3 1/2" : 12" E SETBACK F F 350 MARKET STREET SUITE 309 BASALT, COLORADO 81621 PHONE: 970.300.3423 FAX: 415.358.5771 INFO@EIGELBERGER.COM PROPERTY LINE Plot Date 4/20/2020 6:40:39 PM Drawn By Author Checked By Checker Project No. 19017 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Date Issue HPC SUBMITTAL (E) ROOF PLAN 1 (E) Roof 1/4" = 1'-0" N Copyright c 2018 by EIGELBERGER ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN 1/17/2020 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" A.2.03 70 These documents are the property of EAD. Any unauthorized use without the written consent of EAD is prohibited by law. EAD disclaims responsibility for these documents if they are used whole or in part at any other location and for any other application other than the original intent. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or reproduction of these documents is prohibited by law. BIM 360://19017 -134 Bleeker/19017_134 E Bleeker St_CENTRAL.rvt N Q P O CC U M DN A F G B AA I J R H C 134 EAST BLEEKER K T E D S BB 1 DEMO PLAN - MAIN LEVEL 1/8" = 1'-0" 2 DEMO PLAN - UPPER LEVEL 1/8" = 1'-0" ASPEN, CO L CLIENT REVIEW: REVIEWED AND APPROVED FOR DESIGN INTENT: CLIENT UNDERSTANDS THE DESIGN INTENT OF THE DOCUMENT. CLIENT APPROVES DESIGN INTENT. ARCHITECT W ILL PROCEED WITH DETAILS AND COORDINATION WITH CONTRACTOR PER SIGN OFF ON DOCUMENT. NOTE: ANY CHANGES TO THE APPROVED DRAWINGS BY CLIENT ARE ADDITIONAL SERVICE PER CONTRACT. ARCHITECT TO PICKUP CORRETIONS AS NOTED 3 Elevation 1 - A 1/8" = 1'-0" 4 WALL AREA = 243 sf FENESTRATION = 51 sf Elevation 2 - B 1/8" = 1'-0" 5 WALL AREA = 106sf Elevation 3 - C 1/8" = 1'-0" WALL AREA = 94 sf FENESTRATION = 50 sf 6 Elevation 4 - D 1/8" = 1'-0" WALL AREA = 285 sf FENESTRATION = 55 sf 7 Elevation 5 - E 1/8" = 1'-0" WALL AREA = 161 sf FENESTRATION = 31 sf 8 Elevation 6 - F 1/8" = 1'-0" WALL AREA = 113 sf FENESTRATION = 40 sf 9 Elevation 7 - G 1/8" = 1'-0" WALL AREA = 27sf 10 Elevation 8 - H 1/8" = 1'-0" WALL AREA = 294 sf FENESTRATION = 152 sf 11 Elevation 9 - I 1/8" = 1'-0" WALL AREA = 12sf 12 Elevation 10 - J 1/8" = 1'-0" WALL AREA = 12sf 13 Elevation 11 - K 1/8" = 1'-0" WALL AREA = 75 sf FENESTRATION = 24sf 14 Elevation 12 - L 1/8" = 1'-0" CLIENT SIGNATURE: ___________________________ WALL AREA = 46 sf DATE OF APPROVAL: __________________________ 10.31.2019 350 MARKET STREET SUITE 309 BASALT, COLORADO 81621 PHONE: 970.300.3423 FAX: 415.358.5771 INFO@EIGELBERGER.COM 15 Elevation 13 - M 1/8" = 1'-0" WALL AREA = 340 sf FENESTRATION = 58 sf 16 Elevation 14 - N 1/8" = 1'-0" WALL AREA = 517 sf FENESTRATION = 93 sf AREA TO BE REMOVED = 70 sf 17 Elevation 15 - O 1/8" = 1'-0" WALL AREA = 62 sf AREA TO BE REMOVED = 29 sf 18 Elevation 16 - P 1/8" = 1'-0" 26 WALL AREA = 113 sf FENESTRATION = 17sf Elevation 17 - Q 1/8" = 1'-0" 19 WALL AREA = 445 sf FENESTRATION = 77 sf Elevation 18 - R 1/8" = 1'-0" WALL AREA = 488 sf FENESTRATION = 70 sf AREA TO BE REMOVED = 18.5 sf 20 Elevation 19 - S 1/8" = 1'-0" WALL AREA = 144 sf AREA TO BE REMOVED = 88.5 sf Plot Date 4/20/2020 6:40:50 PM Drawn By TM Checked By Checker Project No. 19017 Date Issue Copyright c 2018 by EIGELBERGER ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN 1/17/2020 Elevation 20 - T 21 1/8" = 1'-0" WALL AREA = 488 sf FENESTRATION = 122 sf AREA TO BE REMOVED = 169 sf Elevation 21 - U 22 1/8" = 1'-0" Elevation 22 - AA 23 1/8" = 1'-0" WALL AREA = 308 sf FENESTRATION = 33 sf WALL AREA = 49 sf Elevation 23 - BB 24 1/8" = 1'-0" WALL AREA = 113 sf FENESTRATION = 17 sf Elevation 24 - CC 25 1/8" = 1'-0" HPC SUBMITTAL WALL DEMOLITION PLAN WALL AREA = 162 sf FENESTRATION = 44 sf SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" A.2.04 71 P E Q R L G H D X I M B V S T Z U AA J F W Y BB ASPEN, CO C O 134 EAST BLEEKER A N These documents are the property of EAD. Any unauthorized use without the written consent of EAD is prohibited by law. EAD disclaims responsibility for these documents if they are used whole or in part at any other location and for any other application other than the original intent. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or reproduction of these documents is prohibited by law. BIM 360://19017 -134 Bleeker/19017_134 E Bleeker St_CENTRAL.rvt K CLIENT REVIEW: REVIEWED AND APPROVED FOR DESIGN INTENT: CLIENT UNDERSTANDS THE DESIGN INTENT OF THE DOCUMENT. CLIENT APPROVES DESIGN INTENT. ARCHITECT W ILL PROCEED WITH DETAILS AND COORDINATION WITH CONTRACTOR PER SIGN OFF ON DOCUMENT. NOTE: ANY CHANGES TO THE APPROVED DRAWINGS BY CLIENT ARE ADDITIONAL SERVICE PER CONTRACT. (E) Roof - FAR 1 1/4" = 1'-0" ARCHITECT TO PICKUP CORRETIONS AS NOTED CLIENT SIGNATURE: ___________________________ DATE OF APPROVAL: __________________________ 10.31.2019 350 MARKET STREET SUITE 309 BASALT, COLORADO 81621 PHONE: 970.300.3423 FAX: 415.358.5771 INFO@EIGELBERGER.COM Plot Date 4/20/2020 6:40:51 PM Drawn By TM Checked By Checker Project No. 19017 Date Issue Copyright c 2018 by EIGELBERGER ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN 1/17/2020 HPC SUBMITTAL ROOF DEMOLITION PLAN SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" A.2.05 72 These documents are the property of EAD. Any unauthorized use without the written consent of EAD is prohibited by law. EAD disclaims responsibility for these documents if they are used whole or in part at any other location and for any other application other than the original intent. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or reproduction of these documents is prohibited by law. BIM 360://19017 -134 Bleeker/19017_134 E Bleeker St_CENTRAL.rvt 3 4 5 6 7 8 PROPERTY LINE SETBACK A A B PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE B ASPEN, CO 2 134 EAST BLEEKER 1 SETBACK CLIENT REVIEW: REVIEWED AND APPROVED FOR DESIGN INTENT: CLIENT UNDERSTANDS THE DESIGN INTENT OF THE DOCUMENT. CLIENT APPROVES DESIGN INTENT. ARCHITECT W ILL PROCEED WITH DETAILS AND COORDINATION WITH CONTRACTOR PER SIGN OFF ON DOCUMENT. NOTE: ANY CHANGES TO THE APPROVED DRAWINGS BY CLIENT ARE ADDITIONAL SERVICE PER CONTRACT. C C ARCHITECT TO PICKUP CORRETIONS AS NOTED CLIENT SIGNATURE: ___________________________ SETBACK DATE OF APPROVAL: __________________________ D D 10.31.2019 E E SETBACK F 350 MARKET STREET SUITE 309 BASALT, COLORADO 81621 PHONE: 970.300.3423 FAX: 415.358.5771 INFO@EIGELBERGER.COM F PROPERTY LINE Plot Date 4/20/2020 6:40:52 PM Drawn By Author Checked By Checker Project No. 19017 Date 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 (P) CRAWLSPACE PLAN 1 (P) CRAWLSPACE 1/4" = 1'-0" N Copyright c 2018 by EIGELBERGER ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN 1 Issue SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" A.2.06 73 These documents are the property of EAD. Any unauthorized use without the written consent of EAD is prohibited by law. EAD disclaims responsibility for these documents if they are used whole or in part at any other location and for any other application other than the original intent. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or reproduction of these documents is prohibited by law. BIM 360://19017 -134 Bleeker/19017_134 E Bleeker St_CENTRAL.rvt 3 4 5 6 7 8 83' - 4" 12' - 3" 16' - 0" 10' - 7 1/2" 22' - 8 1/2" 5' - 7" 7' - 10" 8' - 4" 1' - 8" 5' - 0" PROPERTY LINE SETBACK A 3' - 9" 2' - 9" 16' - 0" 6' - 3" 2' - 0" 2' - 0" BEDROOM 2 10' - 11" B BATH 2 MUDROOM 6' - 7" T.O.F.F. @ BASEMENT EL. = 89' - 0" 19' - 2" 2' - 1" 5' - 0" 22' - 6 1/2" 5' - 7" 3' - 7" 3' - 0" 9' - 0" 3' - 3" 16' - 0" 10" 6' - 4" 2' - 1 1/2" 3' - 0" 6' - 0" 10' - 6 1/2" NOTE: ANY CHANGES TO THE APPROVED DRAWINGS BY CLIENT ARE ADDITIONAL SERVICE PER CONTRACT. C 3' - 0" 3' - 5" 10' - 7 1/2" 38' - 3 5/32" W04 6' - 8" T.O.F.F. @ BASEMENT EL. = 87' - 0" CLIENT REVIEW: REVIEWED AND APPROVED FOR DESIGN INTENT: CLIENT UNDERSTANDS THE DESIGN INTENT OF THE DOCUMENT. CLIENT APPROVES DESIGN INTENT. ARCHITECT W ILL PROCEED WITH DETAILS AND COORDINATION WITH CONTRACTOR PER SIGN OFF ON DOCUMENT. UP ARCHITECT TO PICKUP CORRETIONS AS NOTED 4' - 10" CLIENT SIGNATURE: ___________________________ 1' - 0" 3' - 9" 9' - 8 1/2" BASEMENT GALLERY W03 CLOSET 3' - 7 7/8" 10' - 0 1/2" 3' - 4" 3' - 10" 7' - 2" 2' - 0" 4' - 10 1/2" 5' - 2" 9' - 1" 14' - 4" 16' - 1" UP 11' - 11 1/2" 8' - 3 1/2" C CLOSET 1 2' - 7" 2' - 1" LAUNDRY 9' - 2" SETBACK 4' - 10" 12' - 9" PROPERTY LINE BEDROOM 1 5' - 6" PROPERTY LINE 6' - 2" 11' - 6" 3' - 0" B 10' - 9" BATH 1 5' - 7 1/2" 5' - 9 1/4" 8' - 6" 5' - 5" 9" 2' - 0" 3' - 0" A ASPEN, CO 2 134 EAST BLEEKER 1 BEDROOM 3 12' - 9" D 11' - 11" SETBACK 16' - 0" BATH 3 3' - 0" 8' - 11" RECREATION ROOM 16' - 0" 11' - 2" 9' - 2" DATE OF APPROVAL: __________________________ D 2' - 0" 5' - 11 1/2" 3' - 0" 3' - 2" E 1' - 0" 10' - 5 1/2" 11' - 0" DRYWELL 10.31.2019 E 6' - 3" 1' - 2" 10' - 0" 5' - 0" SETBACK F 350 MARKET STREET SUITE 309 BASALT, COLORADO 81621 PHONE: 970.300.3423 FAX: 415.358.5771 INFO@EIGELBERGER.COM F PROPERTY LINE Plot Date 4/20/2020 6:40:55 PM Drawn By Author Checked By Checker Project No. 19017 Date 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 HPC SUBMITTAL (P) BASEMENT FLOOR PLAN 1 (P) BASEMENT 1/4" = 1'-0" N Copyright c 2018 by EIGELBERGER ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN 1 Issue 1/17/2020 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" A.2.07 74 These documents are the property of EAD. Any unauthorized use without the written consent of EAD is prohibited by law. EAD disclaims responsibility for these documents if they are used whole or in part at any other location and for any other application other than the original intent. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or reproduction of these documents is prohibited by law. BIM 360://19017 -134 Bleeker/19017_134 E Bleeker St_CENTRAL.rvt 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 12' - 3" 16' - 0" 10' - 7 1/2" 22' - 8 1/2" 5' - 7" 7' - 10" 8' - 4" 5' - 7" 7' - 10" 8' - 4" 134 EAST BLEEKER 83' - 4" PROPERTY LINE LIGHT WELL COVER SETBACK A A 2 10' - 0" A.6.00 3' - 10" 11' - 10 7/8" 6' - 11" W12 DN 3' - 6" 14' - 10" OPEN TO BELOW (P) FIREPLACE KITCHEN 5' - 1" 6' - 6" LIVING ROOM 3' - 9 5/8" T.O.F.F. @ MAIN LEVEL EL. = 100' - 0" VESTIBULE 12' - 1 3/4" T.O.F.F. @GARAGE EL. = 100' - 0" 14' - 6 1/8" D01 D02 CLIENT REVIEW: REVIEWED AND APPROVED FOR DESIGN INTENT: CLIENT UNDERSTANDS THE DESIGN INTENT OF THE DOCUMENT. CLIENT APPROVES DESIGN INTENT. ARCHITECT W ILL PROCEED WITH DETAILS AND COORDINATION WITH CONTRACTOR PER SIGN OFF ON DOCUMENT. NOTE: ANY CHANGES TO THE APPROVED DRAWINGS BY CLIENT ARE ADDITIONAL SERVICE PER CONTRACT. C 3' - 0" C GARAGE 3' - 0" 0" 24' - 11 1/4" 32' - 0 1/8" SETBACK DINING ROOM 23' - 5 11/16" 5' - 6" UP 11' - 7 1/2" 15' - 2 7/8" PROPERTY LINE 9' - 3 3/4" B 15' - 1 3/4" A.6.00 1' - 8" 9' - 10 1/2" 1 3' - 9 5/8" B PROPERTY LINE 5' - 9 5/32" 15' - 6 7/8" ARCHITECT TO PICKUP CORRETIONS AS NOTED 6' - 6 1/2" 1' - 5" CLIENT SIGNATURE: ___________________________ T.O.F.F. @ VICTORIAN EL. = 101' - 0" 11' - 11" DATE OF APPROVAL: __________________________ LIGHT WELL COVER D D 15' - 0" 3 _______ A.6.00 10.31.2019 E 9' - 0 5/16" E DN 4' - 0" UP SETBACK F 350 MARKET STREET SUITE 309 BASALT, COLORADO 81621 PHONE: 970.300.3423 FAX: 415.358.5771 INFO@EIGELBERGER.COM F W10 12' - 3" 16' - 0" 10' - 7 1/2" 22' - 8 1/2" 5' - 7" PROPERTY LINE W11 16' - 2" Plot Date 4/20/2020 6:40:56 PM Drawn By Author Checked By Checker Project No. 19017 83' - 4" Date 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Issue 1/17/2020 HPC SUBMITTAL (P) MAIN FLOOR PLAN 1 (P) MAIN LEVEL 1/4" = 1'-0" N Copyright c 2018 by EIGELBERGER ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN ASPEN, CO 1 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" A.2.08 75 These documents are the property of EAD. Any unauthorized use without the written consent of EAD is prohibited by law. EAD disclaims responsibility for these documents if they are used whole or in part at any other location and for any other application other than the original intent. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or reproduction of these documents is prohibited by law. BIM 360://19017 -134 Bleeker/19017_134 E Bleeker St_CENTRAL.rvt 3 4 5 6 7 8 83' - 4" 22' - 8 1/2" 5' - 7" W21 3' - 4" 5' - 9 1/4" 7' - 3" MASTER BATH A 4 1/2" 3' - 0" W20 A 16' - 2" B 2' - 1" B 20' - 1 5/32" 2' - 1" 4' - 7 3/8" 7' - 2 1/4" 11' - 2 3/4" 6' - 10" 6' - 7" ASPEN, CO 2 134 EAST BLEEKER 1 2' - 0" GUEST BEDROOM MASTER BEDROOM MASTER HALLWAY 10' - 3 3/4" MASTER CLOSET 11' - 0 5/8" OPEN TO BELOW OPEN TO BELOW 8' - 5" 15' - 9" DN 3' - 0 1/2" T.O.F.F. @ UPPER LEVEL EL. = 110' - 8 1/2" CLIENT REVIEW: REVIEWED AND APPROVED FOR DESIGN INTENT: CLIENT UNDERSTANDS THE DESIGN INTENT OF THE DOCUMENT. CLIENT APPROVES DESIGN INTENT. ARCHITECT W ILL PROCEED WITH DETAILS AND COORDINATION WITH CONTRACTOR PER SIGN OFF ON DOCUMENT. 3' - 4" DN NOTE: ANY CHANGES TO THE APPROVED DRAWINGS BY CLIENT ARE ADDITIONAL SERVICE PER CONTRACT. 5' - 10" C ARCHITECT TO PICKUP CORRETIONS AS NOTED 6' - 10" C 2' - 6 5/8" 5" 3' - 10" 3' - 0" 4' - 10" 7' - 8 53/128" 23' - 5 3/4" OPEN TO BELOW 3' - 0" 32' - 0 1/8" T.O.F.F. @ UPPER LEVEL EL. = 110' - 8 1/2" T.O.F.F. @ UPPER LEVEL EL. = 109' - 6 3/4" 3' - 0" 2' - 0" CLIENT SIGNATURE: ___________________________ DATE OF APPROVAL: __________________________ 4' - 9 1/2" D 4' - 0" 8' - 6 1/2" 4' - 0" 3' - 5" 11' - 11" GUEST BATH D 5' - 6" 3' - 2 1/2" POWDER 10.31.2019 E E 16' - 0" 10' - 7 1/2" 22' - 8 1/2" 5' - 7" 16' - 2" F 350 MARKET STREET SUITE 309 BASALT, COLORADO 81621 PHONE: 970.300.3423 FAX: 415.358.5771 INFO@EIGELBERGER.COM F Plot Date 4/20/2020 6:40:57 PM Drawn By Author Checked By Checker Project No. 19017 Date 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 HPC SUBMITTAL (P) UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 1 (P) UPPER LEVEL 1/4" = 1'-0" N Copyright c 2018 by EIGELBERGER ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN 1 Issue 1/17/2020 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" A.2.09 76 These documents are the property of EAD. Any unauthorized use without the written consent of EAD is prohibited by law. EAD disclaims responsibility for these documents if they are used whole or in part at any other location and for any other application other than the original intent. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or reproduction of these documents is prohibited by law. BIM 360://19017 -134 Bleeker/19017_134 E Bleeker St_CENTRAL.rvt 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE SETBACK A SLOPE 4" : 12" A SLOPE 4" : 12" SLOPE 12" : 12" SLOPE 12" : 12" B SLOPE 10 1/2" : 12" CLIENT REVIEW: REVIEWED AND APPROVED FOR DESIGN INTENT: CLIENT UNDERSTANDS THE DESIGN INTENT OF THE DOCUMENT. CLIENT APPROVES DESIGN INTENT. ARCHITECT W ILL PROCEED WITH DETAILS AND COORDINATION WITH CONTRACTOR PER SIGN OFF ON DOCUMENT. SLOPE 13 1/2" : 12" SLOPE 13 1/2" : 12" SLOPE 13 1/2" : 12" SLOPE 13 1/2" : 12" SLOPE 13 1/2" : 12" SLOPE 12" : 12" SLOPE 13 1/2" : 12" SLOPE 12" : 12" SLOPE 13 1/2" : 12" SLOPE 13 1/2" : 12" SLOPE 13 1/2" : 12" SLOPE 12" : 12" SLOPE 13 1/2" : 12" SLOPE 13 1/2" : 12" C SLOPE 12" : 12" SLOPE 13 1/2" : 12" SLOPE 13 1/2" : 12" PROPERTY LINE SLOPE 10 1/2" : 12" SLOPE 12" : 12" B SLOPE 13 1/2" : 12" ASPEN, CO 134 EAST BLEEKER (E) SKYLIGHT TO REMAIN, NEW GLASS AS NEEDED SLOPE 13 1/2" : 12" NOTE: ANY CHANGES TO THE APPROVED DRAWINGS BY CLIENT ARE ADDITIONAL SERVICE PER CONTRACT. C SLOPE 13 1/2" : 12" ARCHITECT TO PICKUP CORRETIONS AS NOTED CLIENT SIGNATURE: ___________________________ DATE OF APPROVAL: __________________________ D D 10.31.2019 E SLOPE 3 1/2" : 12" E SETBACK F 350 MARKET STREET SUITE 309 BASALT, COLORADO 81621 PHONE: 970.300.3423 FAX: 415.358.5771 INFO@EIGELBERGER.COM F PROPERTY LINE Plot Date 4/20/2020 6:40:57 PM Drawn By TM Checked By Checker Project No. 19017 Date 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 HPC SUBMITTAL (P) ROOF PLAN 1 (P) Roof 1/4" = 1'-0" N Copyright c 2018 by EIGELBERGER ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN 1 Issue 1/17/2020 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" A.2.10 77 E D C B These documents are the property of EAD. Any unauthorized use without the written consent of EAD is prohibited by law. EAD disclaims responsibility for these documents if they are used whole or in part at any other location and for any other application other than the original intent. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or reproduction of these documents is prohibited by law. A (E) ROOF 125' - 2 1/2" T.O.F.F. UPPER LEVEL (E) GARAGE 109' - 8 1/2" ROOF HEIGHT CALC. B.O. HEADER @ UL ADDITION 118' - 4 1/2" 20' - 1" B.O. HEADER @ UL ADDITION 118' - 4 1/2" T.O.F.F. UPPER LEVEL (E) GARAGE 109' - 8 1/2" 3' - 3 41/64" MAIN LEVEL 100' - 0" 1 ASPEN, CO (E) ROOF 125' - 2 1/2" 134 EAST BLEEKER BIM 360://19017 -134 Bleeker/19017_134 E Bleeker St_CENTRAL.rvt F MAIN LEVEL 100' - 0" CLIENT REVIEW: REVIEWED AND APPROVED FOR DESIGN INTENT: CLIENT UNDERSTANDS THE DESIGN INTENT OF THE DOCUMENT. CLIENT APPROVES DESIGN INTENT. ARCHITECT W ILL PROCEED WITH DETAILS AND COORDINATION WITH CONTRACTOR PER SIGN OFF ON DOCUMENT. (E) NORTH ELEVATION 1/4" = 1'-0" NOTE: ANY CHANGES TO THE APPROVED DRAWINGS BY CLIENT ARE ADDITIONAL SERVICE PER CONTRACT. ARCHITECT TO PICKUP CORRETIONS AS NOTED F E D C B CLIENT SIGNATURE: ___________________________ A DATE OF APPROVAL: __________________________ (E) SIDING TO BE REPAINTED, TYP. (N) ROOFING TO REPLACE EXISTING. TYP (N) WINDOWS TO REPLACE (E) U.O.N. PER HISTORIC PRES. 10 5/8" 10.31.2019 (N) Roof 125' - 2 1/2" (N) Roof 125' - 2 1/2" 350 MARKET STREET SUITE 309 BASALT, COLORADO 81621 PHONE: 970.300.3423 FAX: 415.358.5771 INFO@EIGELBERGER.COM 12 6 21' - 11" T.O.F.F. UPPER LEVEL (E) VICTORIAN 110' - 8 1/2" Copyright c 2018 by EIGELBERGER ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN T.O.F.F. UPPER LEVEL (E) GARAGE 109' - 8 1/2" D01 MAIN LEVEL 100' - 0" (N) GARAGE DOOR TO MATCH HORIZONTAL SIDING 2 (P) NORTH ELEVATION 1/4" = 1'-0" ROOF HEIGHT CALC. Plot Date 4/20/2020 6:41:10 PM Drawn By TM Checked By Checker Project No. 19017 T.O.F.F. UPPER LEVEL (E) VICTORIAN 110' - 8 1/2" Issue 1/17/2020 HPC SUBMITTAL T.O.F.F. UPPER LEVEL (E) GARAGE 109' - 8 1/2" MAIN LEVEL 100' - 0" (E) SIDING TO BE REPAINTED, TYP. Date NORTH ELEVATIONS SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" A.3.04 78 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 B.O. HEADER @ UL ADDITION 118' - 4 1/2" B.O. HEADER @ UL ADDITION 118' - 4 1/2" T.O.F.F. @ UPPER LEVEL ADDITION 110' - 10 1/2" T.O.F.F. @ UPPER LEVEL ADDITION 110' - 10 1/2" T.O.F.F. @ (E) VICTORIAN 101' - 0" ASPEN, CO (E) ROOF 125' - 2 1/2" 134 EAST BLEEKER (E) ROOF 125' - 2 1/2" T.O.F.F. @ (E) VICTORIAN 101' - 0" MAIN LEVEL 100' - 0" 1 These documents are the property of EAD. Any unauthorized use without the written consent of EAD is prohibited by law. EAD disclaims responsibility for these documents if they are used whole or in part at any other location and for any other application other than the original intent. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or reproduction of these documents is prohibited by law. BIM 360://19017 -134 Bleeker/19017_134 E Bleeker St_CENTRAL.rvt 8 MAIN LEVEL 100' - 0" CLIENT REVIEW: REVIEWED AND APPROVED FOR DESIGN INTENT: CLIENT UNDERSTANDS THE DESIGN INTENT OF THE DOCUMENT. CLIENT APPROVES DESIGN INTENT. ARCHITECT W ILL PROCEED WITH DETAILS AND COORDINATION WITH CONTRACTOR PER SIGN OFF ON DOCUMENT. (E) WEST ELEVATION 1/4" = 1'-0" NOTE: ANY CHANGES TO THE APPROVED DRAWINGS BY CLIENT ARE ADDITIONAL SERVICE PER CONTRACT. ARCHITECT TO PICKUP CORRETIONS AS NOTED 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 CLIENT SIGNATURE: ___________________________ 1 DATE OF APPROVAL: __________________________ (E) SIDING TO BE REPAINTED, TYP. (N) ROOFING TO REPLACE EXISTING. TYP (N) SIDING TO MATCH (E) TYP. (N) WINDOWS TO REPLACE (E) U.O.N. PER HISTORIC PRES. 10.31.2019 (N) Roof 125' - 2 1/2" 3' - 6 7/8" 11 1/4" (N) Roof 125' - 2 1/2" 350 MARKET STREET SUITE 309 BASALT, COLORADO 81621 PHONE: 970.300.3423 FAX: 415.358.5771 INFO@EIGELBERGER.COM Plot Date 4/20/2020 6:41:23 PM Drawn By TM Checked By Checker Project No. 19017 T.O.F.F. UPPER LEVEL (E) VICTORIAN 110' - 8 1/2" W21 T.O.F.F. UPPER LEVEL (E) VICTORIAN 110' - 8 1/2" Date Issue 1/17/2020 HPC SUBMITTAL CEILING HEIGHT - MAIN LEVEL 109' - 8 1/2" T.O.F.F. UPPER LEVEL (E) GARAGE 109' - 8 1/2" Copyright c 2018 by EIGELBERGER ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN W20 T.O.F.F. @ (E) VICTORIAN 101' - 0" T.O.F.F. @ (E) VICTORIAN 101' - 0" MAIN LEVEL 100' - 0" MAIN LEVEL 100' - 0" WEST ELEVATIONS (E) SIDING TO BE REPAINTED, TYP. 2 (P) WEST ELEVATION 1/4" = 1'-0" SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" A.3.05 79 C D E F T.O.F.F. UPPER LEVEL (E) VICTORIAN 110' - 8 1/2" T.O.F.F. @ (E) VICTORIAN 101' - 0" ASPEN, CO B.O. HEADER @ UL ADDITION 118' - 4 1/2" ROOF HEIGHT CALC. T.O.F.F. UPPER LEVEL (E) VICTORIAN 110' - 8 1/2" 134 EAST BLEEKER (E) ROOF 125' - 2 1/2" B.O. HEADER @ UL ADDITION 118' - 4 1/2" T.O.F.F. @ (E) VICTORIAN 101' - 0" MAIN LEVEL 100' - 0" 1 These documents are the property of EAD. Any unauthorized use without the written consent of EAD is prohibited by law. EAD disclaims responsibility for these documents if they are used whole or in part at any other location and for any other application other than the original intent. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or reproduction of these documents is prohibited by law. B (E) ROOF 125' - 2 1/2" 20' - 1" BIM 360://19017 -134 Bleeker/19017_134 E Bleeker St_CENTRAL.rvt A MAIN LEVEL 100' - 0" CLIENT REVIEW: REVIEWED AND APPROVED FOR DESIGN INTENT: CLIENT UNDERSTANDS THE DESIGN INTENT OF THE DOCUMENT. CLIENT APPROVES DESIGN INTENT. ARCHITECT W ILL PROCEED WITH DETAILS AND COORDINATION WITH CONTRACTOR PER SIGN OFF ON DOCUMENT. (E) SOUTH ELEVATION 1/4" = 1'-0" NOTE: ANY CHANGES TO THE APPROVED DRAWINGS BY CLIENT ARE ADDITIONAL SERVICE PER CONTRACT. ARCHITECT TO PICKUP CORRETIONS AS NOTED A B C D E CLIENT SIGNATURE: ___________________________ F DATE OF APPROVAL: __________________________ (N) WINDOWS TO REPLACE (E) U.O.N. PER HISTORIC PRES. (E) SIDING TO BE REPAINTED, TYP. (N) ROOFING TO REPLACE EXISTING. TYP 10.31.2019 (N) Roof 125' - 2 1/2" 3' - 6" 9 7/8" (N) Roof 125' - 2 1/2" 350 MARKET STREET SUITE 309 BASALT, COLORADO 81621 PHONE: 970.300.3423 FAX: 415.358.5771 INFO@EIGELBERGER.COM Plot Date 4/20/2020 6:41:37 PM Drawn By TM Checked By Checker Project No. 19017 Date Copyright c 2018 by EIGELBERGER ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN T.O.F.F. UPPER LEVEL (E) VICTORIAN 110' - 8 1/2" ROOF HEIGHT CALC. CEILING HEIGHT - MAIN LEVEL 109' - 8 1/2" 15' - 8 3/8" T.O.F.F. UPPER LEVEL (E) VICTORIAN 110' - 8 1/2" Issue 1/17/2020 HPC SUBMITTAL CEILING HEIGHT - MAIN LEVEL 109' - 8 1/2" W12 T.O.F.F. @ (E) VICTORIAN 101' - 0" MAIN LEVEL 100' - 0" 2 (P) SOUTH ELEVATION 1/4" = 1'-0" T.O.F.F. @ (E) VICTORIAN 101' - 0" MAIN LEVEL 100' - 0" SOUTH ELEVATIONS SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" A.3.06 80 2 3 4 5 6 7 These documents are the property of EAD. Any unauthorized use without the written consent of EAD is prohibited by law. EAD disclaims responsibility for these documents if they are used whole or in part at any other location and for any other application other than the original intent. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or reproduction of these documents is prohibited by law. 8 (E) ROOF 125' - 2 1/2" B.O. HEADER @ UL ADDITION 118' - 4 1/2" B.O. HEADER @ UL ADDITION 118' - 4 1/2" T.O.F.F. @ UPPER LEVEL ADDITION 110' - 10 1/2" T.O.F.F. @ UPPER LEVEL ADDITION 110' - 10 1/2" T.O.F.F. @ (E) VICTORIAN 101' - 0" ASPEN, CO (E) ROOF 125' - 2 1/2" 134 EAST BLEEKER BIM 360://19017 -134 Bleeker/19017_134 E Bleeker St_CENTRAL.rvt 1 T.O.F.F. @ (E) VICTORIAN 101' - 0" MAIN LEVEL 100' - 0" MAIN LEVEL 100' - 0" (P) BASEMENT CEILING 98' - 0" 1 (E) EAST ELEVATION 1/4" = 1'-0" CLIENT REVIEW: REVIEWED AND APPROVED FOR DESIGN INTENT: CLIENT UNDERSTANDS THE DESIGN INTENT OF THE DOCUMENT. CLIENT APPROVES DESIGN INTENT. ARCHITECT W ILL PROCEED WITH DETAILS AND COORDINATION WITH CONTRACTOR PER SIGN OFF ON DOCUMENT. NOTE: ANY CHANGES TO THE APPROVED DRAWINGS BY CLIENT ARE ADDITIONAL SERVICE PER CONTRACT. ARCHITECT TO PICKUP CORRETIONS AS NOTED 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 CLIENT SIGNATURE: ___________________________ 8 DATE OF APPROVAL: __________________________ (E) SIDING TO BE REPAINTED, TYP. (N) WINDOWS TO REPLACE (E) U.O.N. PER HISTORIC PRES. (N) ROOFING TO REPLACE EXISTING. TYP (N) PORCH 10.31.2019 (N) Roof 125' - 2 1/2" 3' - 6 7/8" 11 1/4" (N) Roof 125' - 2 1/2" 350 MARKET STREET SUITE 309 BASALT, COLORADO 81621 PHONE: 970.300.3423 FAX: 415.358.5771 INFO@EIGELBERGER.COM Plot Date 4/20/2020 6:41:49 PM Drawn By TM Checked By Checker Project No. 19017 Date T.O.F.F. UPPER LEVEL (E) VICTORIAN 110' - 8 1/2" HPC SUBMITTAL T.O.F.F. UPPER LEVEL (E) GARAGE 109' - 8 1/2" CEILING HEIGHT - MAIN LEVEL 109' - 8 1/2" Copyright c 2018 by EIGELBERGER ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN Issue 1/17/2020 CEILING HEIGHT - MAIN LEVEL 109' - 8 1/2" W10 T.O.F.F. @ (E) VICTORIAN 101' - 0" D02 MAIN LEVEL 100' - 0" W11 T.O.F.F. @ (E) VICTORIAN 101' - 0" MAIN LEVEL 100' - 0" EAST ELEVATIONS (E) SIDING TO BE REPAINTED, TYP. 2 (P) EAST ELEVATION 1/4" = 1'-0" SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" A.3.07 81 TYPE B EGRESS WINDOW SINGLE PANE FIXED Width Height Sill Height A A A B EGRESS WINDOW EGRESS WINDOW EGRESS WINDOW FIXED SINGLE PANE 3' - 0" 3' - 0" 3' - 0" 3' - 0" 6' - 9 1/2" 6' - 9 1/2" 6' - 9 1/2" 6' - 9 1/2" 4' - 2 1/2" 4' - 2 1/2" 4' - 2 1/2" 4' - 2 1/2" B B B FIXED SINGLE PANE 2' - 3" FIXED SINGLE PANE 2' - 3" FIXED SINGLE PANE 3' - 11 3/16" 5' - 0 1/2" 5' - 0 1/2" 4' - 1 1/2" 2' - 0" 2' - 0" 3' - 5 1/2" 8' - 6" 6' - 0" 1' - 0" 1' - 0" T.O.F.F. UPPER LEVEL (E) VICTORIAN W20 MASTER BATH B FIXED SINGLE PANE 5' - 0" W21 MASTER BATH B FIXED SINGLE PANE 2' - 6" Window Exterior Finish Window Interior Finish Black Out Shade 5% Shade Detail Head Detail Jamb Detail Sill Glazing Hardware Group Remarks PER SCHED. PER SCHED. PER SCHED. PER SCHED. PER SCHED. F.F. +0'-0" PER SCHED. TYPE C DIVIDED LITE FIXED TYPE D DOUBLE HUNG ASPEN, CO PER SCHED. TYPE A Description Window Frame Material 134 EAST BLEEKER +0'-0" Type Mark Room Name (P) BASEMENT W01 BEDROOM 1 W02 BEDROOM 2 W03 BEDROOM 3 W04 HALLWAY MAIN LEVEL W10 GARAGE W11 GARAGE W12 LIVING/KITCHEN PER SCHED. PER SCHED. F.F. These documents are the property of EAD. Any unauthorized use without the written consent of EAD is prohibited by law. EAD disclaims responsibility for these documents if they are used whole or in part at any other location and for any other application other than the original intent. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or reproduction of these documents is prohibited by law. Proposed Window Schedule Window ID PER SCHED. BIM 360://19017 -134 Bleeker/19017_134 E Bleeker St_CENTRAL.rvt PER SCHED. PER SCHED. CLIENT REVIEW: REVIEWED AND APPROVED FOR DESIGN INTENT: CLIENT UNDERSTANDS THE DESIGN INTENT OF THE DOCUMENT. CLIENT APPROVES DESIGN INTENT. ARCHITECT W ILL PROCEED WITH DETAILS AND COORDINATION WITH CONTRACTOR PER SIGN OFF ON DOCUMENT. NOTE: ANY CHANGES TO THE APPROVED DRAWINGS BY CLIENT ARE ADDITIONAL SERVICE PER CONTRACT. ARCHITECT TO PICKUP CORRETIONS AS NOTED CLIENT SIGNATURE: ___________________________ DATE OF APPROVAL: __________________________ 10.31.2019 350 MARKET STREET SUITE 309 BASALT, COLORADO 81621 PHONE: 970.300.3423 FAX: 415.358.5771 INFO@EIGELBERGER.COM Plot Date 4/20/2020 6:41:51 PM Drawn By Author Checked By Checker Project No. 19017 Date Issue Copyright c 2018 by EIGELBERGER ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN 1/17/2020 DOOR/WINDOW NOTES 1. 2. 3 SIZES GIVEN ARE NOMINAL. SEE DETAILS TO DETERMINE UNIT SIZES AND ROUGH OPENING DIMENSIONS. ALL DIMENSIONS TO BE VERIFIED IN FIELD PRIOR TO ORDERING/MANUFACTURING DOORS AND WINDOWS. ALL DOORS AND WINDOWS TO MEET .32 U-VALUE PER PITKIN COUNTY HPC SUBMITTAL WINDOW SCHEDULE SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" A.4.00 82 These documents are the property of EAD. Any unauthorized use without the written consent of EAD is prohibited by law. EAD disclaims responsibility for these documents if they are used whole or in part at any other location and for any other application other than the original intent. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or reproduction of these documents is prohibited by law. SCHEDULE Door Schedule - Exterior F.F. +0'-0" PER. SCHED. PER SCHED. DOOR ID Location Type Mark New Construction D01 GARAGE A D02 D05 D06 B B B VESTIBULE Width 21' - 4 11/16" 3' - 0" 2' - 6" 2' - 6" Height Thickness Door Finish 8' - 0" 0' - 1 3/4" 6' - 10" 9' - 0" 9' - 0" 0' - 0 1/2" 0' - 0 1/2" 0' - 0 1/2" Frame Material Frame Exterior Finish Frame Interior Finish Black Out Shade 5% Shade Roman Shade Detail Head Detail Jamb Detail Sill Glazing Hardware Group Remarks TYPE A GARAGE DOOR TYPE B GLASS DOOR ASPEN, CO PER. SCHED. 134 EAST BLEEKER PER SCHED. PER SCHED. BIM 360://19017 -134 Bleeker/19017_134 E Bleeker St_CENTRAL.rvt DOOR TYPE CLIENT REVIEW: REVIEWED AND APPROVED FOR DESIGN INTENT: CLIENT UNDERSTANDS THE DESIGN INTENT OF THE DOCUMENT. CLIENT APPROVES DESIGN INTENT. ARCHITECT W ILL PROCEED WITH DETAILS AND COORDINATION WITH CONTRACTOR PER SIGN OFF ON DOCUMENT. NOTE: ANY CHANGES TO THE APPROVED DRAWINGS BY CLIENT ARE ADDITIONAL SERVICE PER CONTRACT. ARCHITECT TO PICKUP CORRETIONS AS NOTED CLIENT SIGNATURE: ___________________________ DATE OF APPROVAL: __________________________ 10.31.2019 350 MARKET STREET SUITE 309 BASALT, COLORADO 81621 PHONE: 970.300.3423 FAX: 415.358.5771 INFO@EIGELBERGER.COM Plot Date 4/20/2020 6:41:52 PM Drawn By Author Checked By Checker Project No. 19017 Date Issue Copyright c 2018 by EIGELBERGER ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN 1/17/2020 GENERAL DOOR/WINDOW NOTES KEY DOOR/WINDOW NOTES 1. 1 2 2. 3 SIZES GIVEN ARE NOMINAL. SEE DETAILS TO DETERMINE UNIT SIZES AND ROUGH OPENING DIMENSIONS. ALL DIMENSIONS TO BE VERIFIED IN FIELD PRIOR TO ORDERING/MANUFACTURING DOORS AND WINDOWS. ALL DOORS AND WINDOWS TO MEET .32 U-VALUE PER PITKIN COUNTY MANUFACTURER LEVEL 1 : "FRONT OF HOUSE" TO INCLUDE ALBERTINI (STEEL OR ALUMINUM), DYNAMIC ALUMINUM, MHB, OPTIMUM OR SIM. STEEL MANUFACTURER MANUFACTURER LEVEL 2 : "BACK OF HOUSE" TO INCLUDE SIERRA PACIFIC, MARVIN, EUROLINE, AND PELLA HPC SUBMITTAL DOOR SCHEDULE EXTERIOR SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" A.4.01 83 These documents are the property of EAD. Any unauthorized use without the written consent of EAD is prohibited by law. EAD disclaims responsibility for these documents if they are used whole or in part at any other location and for any other application other than the original intent. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or reproduction of these documents is prohibited by law. 3" OF SPRAY IN RIGID INSULATION & BATT INSULATION TO FILL REMAINING WALL CAVITY (2) LAYERS OF BUILDING PAPER, LAP OVER FLASHING RIGID INSULATION AT PERIMETER OF GYPCRETE EXISTING WOOD SIDING 3/4" FINISH WOOD FLOORING , ALLOW 1/2" GAP TO FOUNDATION WALL METAL BASE FLASHING UNDER BUILDING PAPER, LAP OVER S.A.F. 6" MIN. GYPCRETE & 2X2 NAILER LEVEL 1 - MAIN LEVEL F.F. NAVD DOOR PER SCHEDULE LEAD PAINTED COPPER FLASHING AT BASE WEATHER STRIPPING 1X WOOD TRIM BASEBOARD S.A.F. O/FOUNDATION WATER PROOF MEMBRANE, LAP OVER DRAIN MAT, MIN 6" FINISHED OPENING GARAGE DOOR TRACK AND ROLLERS FLOOR JOIST , S.S.D. GRADE SLOPES AWAY FROM BUILDING MIN. 2% 2X CASING FOR MOUNTING DOOR HARDWARE AS REQ. (E) WOOD SIDING BLOCKING FOR DOOR JAMB DRAINAGE PLANE ON (2) LAYERS OF GRADE 'D' BLDG. PAPER INT. FINISH PER SCHEDULE PLYWOOD SHEATING S.S.D. FOUNDATION DRAIN MAT 2" RIGID INSULATION W/DRAINAGE CHANNELS FOUNDATION WATER PROOF MEMBRANE FOUNDATION DETAIL @ HISTORIC STRUCTURE 1 1 1/2" = 1'-0" 3 ASPEN, CO LAYER OF T&G PLYWD., S.S.D. 3X8 TREATED SILLPLATE OVER CONTINUOS SILL GASKET 134 EAST BLEEKER BIM 360://19017 -134 Bleeker/19017_134 E Bleeker St_CENTRAL.rvt DRAINAGE PLANE GARAGE DOOR JAMB DETAIL 1 1/2" = 1'-0" CLIENT REVIEW: REVIEWED AND APPROVED FOR DESIGN INTENT: CLIENT UNDERSTANDS THE DESIGN INTENT OF THE DOCUMENT. CLIENT APPROVES DESIGN INTENT. ARCHITECT W ILL PROCEED WITH DETAILS AND COORDINATION WITH CONTRACTOR PER SIGN OFF ON DOCUMENT. NOTE: ANY CHANGES TO THE APPROVED DRAWINGS BY CLIENT ARE ADDITIONAL SERVICE PER CONTRACT. ARCHITECT TO PICKUP CORRETIONS AS NOTED CLIENT SIGNATURE: ___________________________ DATE OF APPROVAL: __________________________ (E) WOOD SIDING 1. GROW MEDIA AND PLANTING PER LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 2. ROOT BARRIER PER MFR. 3. 1/2": DRAINAGE MAT 4. HOT APPLIED ASPHALTIC MEMBRANE PER MFR 5. COVERBOARD PER MFR 6. TAPARED EPS FOAM INSUL. - 2" MIN. - SLOPE PER PLANS 7. PLYWD., S.S.D. 8. CONCRETE DECK., S.S.D. 9. REINFORCING MESH 10. SHEAR STUD - WELDED ON BEAM TOP FLANGE 11. CONCRETE 12. GALVANIZED STEEL FLOOR DECKING 13. GIRDER 10.31.2019 LEVEL 1 - MAIN LEVEL F.F. NAVD (E) BASEBOARD 350 MARKET STREET SUITE 309 BASALT, COLORADO 81621 PHONE: 970.300.3423 FAX: 415.358.5771 INFO@EIGELBERGER.COM GRADE SLOPES AWAY FROM BUILDING MIN. 2% Plot Date 4/20/2020 6:41:54 PM Drawn By Author Checked By Checker Project No. 19017 Copyright c 2018 by EIGELBERGER ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN Date GREEN ROOF DETAIL 2 1 1/2" = 1'-0" Issue DETAILS EXISTING CONDITION SCALE: 1 1/2" = 1'-0" A.6.00 84 ASPEN, CO 134 EAST BLEEKER These documents are the property of EAD. Any unauthorized use without the written consent of EAD is prohibited by law. EAD disclaims responsibility for these documents if they are used whole or in part at any other location and for any other application other than the original intent. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or reproduction of these documents is prohibited by law. BIM 360://19017 -134 Bleeker/19017_134 E Bleeker St_CENTRAL.rvt CLIENT REVIEW: REVIEWED AND APPROVED FOR DESIGN INTENT: CLIENT UNDERSTANDS THE DESIGN INTENT OF THE DOCUMENT. CLIENT APPROVES DESIGN INTENT. ARCHITECT W ILL PROCEED WITH DETAILS AND COORDINATION WITH CONTRACTOR PER SIGN OFF ON DOCUMENT. NOTE: ANY CHANGES TO THE APPROVED DRAWINGS BY CLIENT ARE ADDITIONAL SERVICE PER CONTRACT. ARCHITECT TO PICKUP CORRETIONS AS NOTED CLIENT SIGNATURE: ___________________________ DATE OF APPROVAL: __________________________ 10.31.2019 350 MARKET STREET SUITE 309 BASALT, COLORADO 81621 PHONE: 970.300.3423 FAX: 415.358.5771 INFO@EIGELBERGER.COM Plot Date 4/20/2020 6:41:54 PM Drawn By Author Checked By Checker Project No. 19017 Copyright c 2018 by EIGELBERGER ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN Date Issue PERSPECTIVES (NO LANDSCAPE) SCALE: A.9.00 85 ASPEN, CO 134 EAST BLEEKER These documents are the property of EAD. Any unauthorized use without the written consent of EAD is prohibited by law. EAD disclaims responsibility for these documents if they are used whole or in part at any other location and for any other application other than the original intent. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or reproduction of these documents is prohibited by law. BIM 360://19017 -134 Bleeker/19017_134 E Bleeker St_CENTRAL.rvt CLIENT REVIEW: REVIEWED AND APPROVED FOR DESIGN INTENT: CLIENT UNDERSTANDS THE DESIGN INTENT OF THE DOCUMENT. CLIENT APPROVES DESIGN INTENT. ARCHITECT W ILL PROCEED WITH DETAILS AND COORDINATION WITH CONTRACTOR PER SIGN OFF ON DOCUMENT. NOTE: ANY CHANGES TO THE APPROVED DRAWINGS BY CLIENT ARE ADDITIONAL SERVICE PER CONTRACT. ARCHITECT TO PICKUP CORRETIONS AS NOTED CLIENT SIGNATURE: ___________________________ DATE OF APPROVAL: __________________________ 10.31.2019 350 MARKET STREET SUITE 309 BASALT, COLORADO 81621 PHONE: 970.300.3423 FAX: 415.358.5771 INFO@EIGELBERGER.COM Plot Date 4/20/2020 6:41:55 PM Drawn By Author Checked By Checker Project No. 19017 Date Issue Copyright c 2018 by EIGELBERGER ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN 1/17/2020 HPC SUBMITTAL PERSPECTIVES W/ LANDSCAPE SCALE: A.9.01 86 ASPEN, CO 81301 134 EAST BLEEKER STREET DESCRIPTION HPC SUBMITTAL UPDATED HPC SUBMITTAL UPDATED HPC SUBMITTAL UPDATED HPC SUBMITTAL DATE 01.17.2020 03.24.2020 04.14.2020 04.17.2020 DRAWN BY JKE JKE JKE JKE 592 HIGHWAY 133 CARBONDALE COLORADO, 81623 PH: (970)340-4130 F:(866)876-5873 ROARING FORK ENGINEERING SITE # 1 2 3 4 134 EAST BLEEKER STREET ASPEN, CO 81301 CHECKED BY: RBG DRAWN BY: JKE JOB #: 2020-05 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION COVER SHEET C1 OF 4 TOTAL PAGES 87 88 (TYP .) TELE PHO X TRASH ENCLOSURE ELECTRIC (TYP.) #5 REBAR FOUND BEARS S66°16'31"W 1.92' TYP GAS LINE UPPE R LE DEC VEL K X GRA DRIV VEL EWA Y (TYP #5 REBAR & CAP FOUND L.S. #ILLEGIBLE 45.00 ' RIDGE 7918.9' RIDGE 7918.83' TWO STORY WOOD FRAME HOUSE WITH GARAGE R-6 B RIDGE UILD ING SETB 7918.8' ACK RIDGE CHIMNEY 7918.78' 7919.2' F.F. 7894.80' DRIVEWAY W CO G CON CRE IDEW ALK X D FE NCE 0' 100.0 SETB ACK GUT CRE TE C U CON L FE NCE T4 T5 X 45.00 ' 7895.3' X RETE EAST RLIN E CON C P CUR B&G WAT E C.O.A. GPS MONUMENT #3 #5 REBAR & CAP FOUND L.S. #ILLEGIBLE TBM EL=7894.95' STONE SIDEWALK STREET SIGN BLEE 74.78 KER STR 'R EET ASPH -O-W ALT UTTE DRAWN BY JKE JKE JKE JKE "W 50'49 S 14° CK ENC E 7895.0' 7895.4' R JOB #: 2020-05 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ASPEN, CO 81301 S17° 13'5 2226 1"W .65' X "W MET A STREET SIGN 134 EAST BLEEKER STREET X °09'1 1 10' X T3 N 75 P MET 7894.9' AL F ING T2 C.O.A. GPS MONUMENT #7 7895.0' R-6 B UILD T1 ETBA LOW ER L EVEL ING UILD R-6 B 7895.2' R-6 B S89°26'01"W 2452.65' DECK ING S CK SETB A WO X CE MET X AL FEN RIDGE 7916.2' 7894.9' 5' X #5 REBAR FOUND BELOW GROUND 7894.9' WOO D DRAWN BY: JKE T6 X OD FEN CE RIDGE 7916.2' UILD X 4,500 S.F.± TWO STORY WOOD FRAME HOUSE WITH BASEMENT RIDGE 134 EAST BLEEKER STREET 7916.3' F.F. 7895.78' 5' CHECKED BY: RBG WOOD/METAL FENCE TRANSITION DATE 01.17.2020 03.24.2020 04.14.2020 04.17.2020 LOT S AND EAST HALF OF LOT R, BLOCK 65 TER F.F. 7895.66' STONE SIDEWALK RB & N 14 WOO °50'4 9" E WOO X D FENC E F.F. 7895.66' LOWER LEVEL STONE PATIO 7894.6' 7894.7' CHIMNEY 7921.6' WIN DO WEL W L UPPE CAN TILE CK 7894.1' CHIMNEY 7921.6' F.F. 7894.68' D DE X F.F. 7894.69' R LE DEC VEL K STONE PATIO WOO 100.0 0' RIDGE 7920.1' DESCRIPTION HPC SUBMITTAL UPDATED HPC SUBMITTAL UPDATED HPC SUBMITTAL UPDATED HPC SUBMITTAL HOU SE 7894.6' VER WOOD/METAL FENCE TRANSITION P STREET SIGN RIDGE 7919.9' ADJO INER W1/2 LOT R TE S NOR TH A S 75.30 PEN STR EET 'R ASPH -O-W ALT GAS METER # 1 2 3 4 E FENC WOO D E E 09'11 "E X SEWER CLEANOUT CATV PED. (TYP.) .) .) ALLE Y BL OC 20.69 ' R-O K 65 -W GRA VEL S 75° ELEC. METER WATER METER NE ( 592 HIGHWAY 133 CARBONDALE COLORADO, 81623 PH: (970)340-4130 F:(866)876-5873 TELE. PED. (TYP.) ROARING FORK ENGINEERING E TV 10' CABL EXISTING CONDITIONS C2 OF 4 TOTAL PAGES ASPEN, CO 81301 134 EAST BLEEKER STREET # 1 2 3 4 DESCRIPTION HPC SUBMITTAL UPDATED HPC SUBMITTAL UPDATED HPC SUBMITTAL UPDATED HPC SUBMITTAL DATE 01.17.2020 03.24.2020 04.14.2020 04.17.2020 DRAWN BY JKE JKE JKE JKE CHECKED BY: RBG DRAWN BY: JKE JOB #: 2020-05 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION BASINS AND DRAINAGE C3 OF 4 TOTAL PAGES 592 HIGHWAY 133 CARBONDALE COLORADO, 81623 PH: (970)340-4130 F:(866)876-5873 ROARING FORK ENGINEERING 89 ASPEN, CO 81301 134 EAST BLEEKER STREET # 1 2 3 4 DESCRIPTION HPC SUBMITTAL UPDATED HPC SUBMITTAL UPDATED HPC SUBMITTAL UPDATED HPC SUBMITTAL DATE 01.17.2020 03.24.2020 04.14.2020 04.17.2020 DRAWN BY JKE JKE JKE JKE CHECKED BY: RBG DRAWN BY: JKE JOB #: 2020-05 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION GRADING AND UTILITIES C4 OF 4 TOTAL PAGES 592 HIGHWAY 133 CARBONDALE COLORADO, 81623 PH: (970)340-4130 F:(866)876-5873 ROARING FORK ENGINEERING 90 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 91 1 9 DESIGNWORKSHOP Landscape Architecture · Land Planning Urban Design · Tourism Planning LEGEND Asheville · Aspen · Austin · Chicago · Denver · Dubai Houston · Lake Tahoe · Los Angeles MATERIAL CONCRETE 120 East Main Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 (970) 925-8354 (970) 920-1387 A RETAINING WALL W W W.D E S I G N W O R K S H O P.C O M PLANTING CTV CTV CTV 134 EAST BLEEKER ST. COTTONWOOD TREE CTV CTV CTV CTV 78 95 CTV CTV LILAC 6 - 8' CTV CTV CTV CTV CTV Shrub no greater than 36" CTV CTV TURF CTV PRO P ERT Y B PERENNIAL BED 1 LINE GROUNDCOVER BUIL DING SET BAC K PRELIMINARY PLANTING LIST ABBR. 2 NEW STREET TREES (COTTONWOOD) BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE SPACING Count TREES WIND O WEL W L PA-3 Populus angustifolia Narrowleaf Cottonwood 3"-cal AS SHOWN 2 MS-3 Malus Spring Snow Spring Snow Crabapple 3"-cal AS SHOWN 1 SG-5 Syringa hyacinthiflora White Lilac 5 gal. 36" O.C. 8 RA-5 Rhus aromatica Grow-Low Sumac 5 gal. 16" O.C. 43 SF-5 Spiraea froebelii Froebell Spiraea 5 gal. 30" O.C. 53 SHRUBS TER RAC E 2% WIND OW WEL L C LIGHTING LEGEND 2% SYMBOL WALL SCONCE 2 N ST . 5 QTY. PER TY L INE N. A TURF SPE 789 DESCRIPTION Aspen, CO CTV 95 78 9 78 W PRO D B 5 UILDING SET BA CK AY W TUR F WAL KW ISSUE DATE: April 20, 2020 # DATE DESCRIPTION W 95 78 REVISIONS 95 W 78 W E SAND SET STONE PAVER W HL/JS REVIEWED: MA EXISTING 36" DBH SILVER MAPLE . 42" WOODEN FENCE W E. BL EEK ER S T W DRAWN: HPC SUBMISSION W W W W W PROJECT NUMBER: 6271 LANDSCAPE PLAN F SHEET NUMBER NORTH 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 5 10 ORIGINAL SCALE: 1"=10'-00" 8 LX-01 20 9 C C O P Y R I G H T D E S I G N W O R K S H O P, I N C. 1.5" GAP 3'-6" 1.5" PICKET Wood Picket Black Finish ELEVATION FENCE AXON FENCE DESIGNWORKSHOP 134 Bleeker St. Client / Location Sheet Description Drawn/Checked Proj. Num. JS 6271 Comment: Date Sheet Scale 04/17/2020 00 OF 00 1/2"= 1'-00" Comment text... 92 REGULAR MEETING HISTORICAL PRESERVATION COMMITY APRIL 22, 2020 Chairperson Greenwood opened the meeting at 4:30 p.m. Commissioners in attendance: Gretchen Greenwood, Nora Berko Roger Moyer, Jeffrey Halferty, Scott Kendrick, Sheri Sanzone Commissioners not in attendance: Kara Thompson, Bob Blaich Staff present: Amy Simon, Interim Planning Director/Historic Preservation Officer Sarah Yoon, Historic Preservation Planner Andrea Bryan, Assistant City Attorney Wes Graham, Deputy City Clerk APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Mr. Moyer motioned to approve the minutes of April 8th, Ms. Sanzone seconded. All in Favor, Motion carried. PUBLIC COMMENT: None. COMMISSIONER COMMENTS: None CONFLICTS: Ms. Berko and Ms. Sanzone stated that they both have a conflict with 134 E. Bleeker. STAFF COMMENTS: Ms. Bryan stated that there was a memo and resolution attached to the HPC packets outlining Code of Conduct. Ms. Bryan stated that this was not in response to anything that happened with HPC however with another board. Ms. Bryan said that this was an outline of rules and conduct that both the board and public must follow. Ms. Bryan stated that there wasn’t anything controversial in this resolution but can answer any question one might have. Ms. Greenwood asked if everyone took the time to read the resolution. Ms. Sanzone asked if HPC should hold board members to this standard as well. Ms. Bryan stated in a way we already do. She further explained how it was written it can be applied to public and commissioners. Mr. Moyer motioned to approve code of conduct resolution Ms. Berko seconded. Roll Call Vote Ms. Greenwood, YES, Ms. Berko, YES, Mr. Halferty, YES, Mr. Moyer, YES, all in favor motion carries. Note Ms. Simons internet went down and HPC had to go out of order on the agenda until Ms. Simon could rejoin. CERTIFICATES OF NO NEGATIVE EFFECT: Ms. Yoon stated that a Certificate of No Negative Effect was issued for 419 E. Hyman Avenue to replace all non-historic windows for the residential unit on the second floor. CALL UPS: Ms. Yoon stated that 125 W. Main St. did not get called up. 93 REGULAR MEETING HISTORICAL PRESERVATION COMMITY APRIL 22, 2020 Ms. Berko and Ms. Sanzone left the meeting. NEW BUSINESS: 134 East Bleeker, Minor Development Review, Relocation, and Setback Variations. Representative Sara Adams from BendonAdams Ms. Adams stated that the project that was last presented was much bigger in scope and she took HPC comments to heart and now has a revised project. Ms. Adams reviewed the history of the historic cabin and barn. Ms. Adams pointed out that there was a large remodel in the 90s and all the siding was removed from the barn and cabin. Ms. Adams further explained that there was a curb cut and direct access to the garage from Aspen St. Ms. Adams stated that the new plan is a minor HP review, and would include landscape touch ups, replacement of nonhistorical fence, addition of trees on Aspen St., adding of sidewalks. Ms. Adams stated that there will be an update to the no historic porch that faces Aspen St. Ms. Adams stated that the asphalt roof will be replaced with wood shingles. Ms. Adams said that they are required to remove the curb cut and replace the current garage door with windows. Ms. Adams stated that they were able to create two onsite parking spaces. Ms. Adams stated that they will be keeping the walkways the same however providing new hardscape. Ms. Adams showed the main entrance walkway being slightly moved from the dripline of the silver maple tree. Ms. Adams stated that the secondary walkway from Aspen St. will be skinner and detached from the patio. Ms. Adams showed the flower beds and vegetation being pulled away from the building. Ms. Adams stated that the fence is not original referencing photos. Ms. Adams points out that part of the fence does not meet code and is more of a privacy fence. Ms. Adams proposed the removal of both fences and replaces them with white picket fence. Ms. Adams recommended replacing the light fixture on the front main entrance and secondary entrance with a gooseneck fixture Ms. Adams showed the proposed elevation changes from each side. Ms. Adams stated the only thing happening to the landmark are minor repairs. Ms. Adams showed the alley view elevation change and pointed out in the new proposed plan the garage door now is twenty-one inches long. Ms. Adams explained with extra inches given to the garage, a car could parallel park with more ease. Ms. Adams pointed out that HPC has the new renderings in their packets for references. STAFF COMMENTS: Ms. Yoon pointed out that this project has gone from a major to a minor review. Ms. Yoon stated that there is relocation being triggered due to the under pinning under the historic cabin. Ms. Yoon stated that the guidelines are very specific in making the primary walkway the true primary walkway and maintained as such. Ms. Yoon stated that staff was concerned with the secondary walkway, she further explains that the applicant has address this concern by making that path more narrow and detached. Ms. Yoon stated that staff was concerned about the landscaping and vegetation to close to the historic building. Ms. Yoon pointed out that the applicant addressed this by removing the shrubs closest to the historic home. Ms. Yoon stated that the existing fence is not historic and the revised fence proposal meets the design guidelines. Ms. Yoon stated that the light fixture detail is a new and staff would like to further discuss appropriate scale as a condition for staff and monitor. Ms. Yoon stated that the two new windows on the east facing side of the barn addition need to be distinguishable from the historic windows as a feature of its own time. Ms. Yoon stated that staff recommends HPC further discuss the details pertaining to the garage door and if possible, reduce the length of the 94 REGULAR MEETING HISTORICAL PRESERVATION COMMITY APRIL 22, 2020 door to reveal the corners of the structure. Ms. Yoon outlined the conditions that are attached that staff would like to see. Mr. Moyer asked how old is the iron fence and what is staff asking for with the garage. Ms. Yoon stated that staff is not sure how old the fence is but it is not original to the site. Mr. Moyer asked when was the house relocated to the current site. Ms. Yoon stated it was relocated in the 1960s. Christoff stated the garage is determined by a larger car turning radius. He pointed out that the door tracks that point inward take up a few inches. Mr. Kendrick stated that he is in support of the garage parking being fully utilized. He asked if anyone has done a mockup of the garage with a real car to see how tight it can be and if the door itself will be matching the siding. Ms. Yoon stated the garage door will match the siding. Ms. Greenwood asked why they don’t have to meet the residential design standards. Ms. Yoon stated that all historic land properties are exempt from residential design standards. Mr. Halferty asked how does the garage door open. Christoff stated that it opens overhead five panel. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Ms. Yoon stated that three letters were sent in. Ms. Yoon summarized each letter. Community Church support of changes that have been made. Denise Dryers does not have further abjections but had comments related to the construction management plan and other topics related to Engineering. Howey Mallery echoes support in parking on site, but objects to the removal of the existing fence. COMMISSIONER COMMENTS: Ms. Greenwood stated that this is a really good project and commended the applicants for their hard work. Ms. Greenwood said that the architect has handled the garage door beautifully. Ms. Greenwood stated that she is favor this project with conditions and add lighting for staff and monitor approval. Mr. Moyer stated that he is ok with the conditions. Mr. Moyer added imagine if you were walking in the west end and you see the iron fence, you will know this house is a historic. Mr. 95 REGULAR MEETING HISTORICAL PRESERVATION COMMITY APRIL 22, 2020 Moyer stated that he is adamantly opposes the white picket fence. Mr. Moyer asked if it is possible to remove the frame from garage door to make it flush. Mr. Halferty stated support moving this project forward. Mr. Halferty stated that he agrees with Mr. Moyer about the fence. Mr. Halferty said he would like to see staff and monitor. Mr. Kendrick stated that he is in favor of revised staff comments. Ms. Greenwood stated that a new fence is appropriate and needed. Also, an iron fence is not historically appropriate for a miner’s cabin. Ms. Yoon requested that HPC add a new condition requesting a financial insurance of $30,000 for the historic home. Mr. Moyer asked if there is any way they could deny the picket fence. Ms. Yoon stated that there is nothing in the guidelines saying we can say they have to keep the iron fence since it is not historic to the site. MOTION: Mr. Halferty motioned to approve resolution #11 with conditions attached, Mr. Kendrick seconded. Roll Call Vote: Ms. Greenwood, YES; Mr. Halferty, YES; Mr. Kendrick, YES; Mr. Moyer, YES. All in favor motion carries. Mr. Halferty will be the monitor. ANNUAL AWARDS: Ms. Simon presented the annual HPC award nominees and categories. The commissioners agreed to review offline and send Ms. Simon their picks. Presentation of winners will be held first in person city council meeting. Ms. Simon announced that there will be no meeting May 13th. Mr. Moyer moved to adjourn Mr. Kendrick seconded, ALL in favor, Motion carried. 96 RESOLUTION #11, SERIES OF 2020 A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION (HPC) GRANTING MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW, RELOCATION, AND SETBACK VARIATIONS FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 134 EAST BLEEKER, LOT S AND THE EAST ½ OF LOT R, BLOCK 65, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO PARCEL ID: 2737-073-15-002 WHEREAS, the applicant, Otis Real Estate Holdings, LLC, c/o Good Property Company, represented by BendonAdams, has requested HPC approval for Minor Development, Relocation and Setback Variations for the property located at 134 East Bleeker, Lot S and the East ½ of Lot R, Block 65, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado. As a historic landmark, the site is exempt from Residential Design Standards review; and WHEREAS, Section 26.415.070 of the Municipal Code states that “no building or structure shall be erected, constructed, enlarged, altered, repaired, relocated or improved involving a designated historic property or district until plans or sufficient information have been submitted to the Community Development Director and approved in accordance with the procedures established for their review;” and WHEREAS, for Minor Development Review, the HPC must review the application, a staff analysis report and the evidence presented at a hearing to determine the project’s conformance with the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines per Section 26.415.070.C of the Municipal Code and other applicable Code Sections. The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny; and WHEREAS, for approval of Relocation, the application shall meet the requirements of Aspen Municipal Code Section 26.415.090.C, Relocation of a Designated Property; and WHEREAS, for approval of Setback Variations, the application shall meet the requirements of Aspen Municipal Code Section 26.415.110.C, Setback Variations; and WHEREAS, Community Development Department staff reviewed the application for compliance with the applicable review standards and recommends restudy; and WHEREAS, HPC reviewed the project on April 22, 2020. HPC considered the application, the staff memo and public comments, and found the proposal consistent with the review standards and granted approval with conditions by a vote of 4 to 0. HPC Resolution #11, Series of 2020 Page 1 of 4 97 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That HPC hereby approves Minor Development, Relocation, and Setback Variations for 134 East Bleeker, Lot S and the East ½ of Lot R, Block 65, City and Townsite of Aspen, CO as follows: Section 1: Minor Development Review, Relocation, and Setback Variations. HPC hereby approves Minor Development, Relocation, and Setback Variations with the with the following conditions: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. The following setback variations are approved for the existing historic secondary “barn” structure: • 8’-4” rear yard setback reduction above and below grade • 3’-3” east side yard setback reduction above and below grade Provide detailed information regarding vents and flues, gutters and snow stops, to be reviewed and approved by staff and monitor prior to building permit submission. Design the lightwell curb height to be 6” or less in height. Work closely with relevant City Departments regarding work in the dripline of trees, particularly the location of the waterline and sidewalks. Review exterior light fixtures, to be reviewed and approved by staff and monitor. Provide a financial assurance of $30,000 for the historic house until the basement construction is complete. The financial security is to be provided with the building permit application. Section 2: Material Representations All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Community Development Department, the Historic Preservation Commission, or the Aspen City Council are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by other specific conditions or an authorized authority. Section 3: Existing Litigation This Resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 4: Severability If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. HPC Resolution #11, Series of 2020 Page 2 of 4 98 Section 5: Vested Rights The development approvals granted herein shall constitute a site-specific development plan vested for a period of three (3) years from the date of issuance of a development order. However, any failure to abide by any of the terms and conditions attendant to this approval shall result in the forfeiture of said vested property rights. Unless otherwise exempted or extended, failure to properly record all plats and agreements required to be recorded, as specified herein, within 180 days of the effective date of the development order shall also result in the forfeiture of said vested property rights and shall render the development order void within the meaning of Section 26.104.050 (Void permits). Zoning that is not part of the approved site-specific development plan shall not result in the creation of a vested property right. No later than fourteen (14) days following final approval of all requisite reviews necessary to obtain a development order as set forth in this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall cause to be published in a newspaper of general circulation within the jurisdictional boundaries of the City of Aspen, a notice advising the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan and creation of a vested property right pursuant to this Title. Such notice shall be substantially in the following form: Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan, and the creation of a vested property right, valid for a period of three (3) years, pursuant to the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertaining to the following described property: 134 E. Bleeker Nothing in this approval shall exempt the development order from subsequent reviews and approvals required by this approval of the general rules, regulations and ordinances or the City of Aspen provided that such reviews and approvals are not inconsistent with this approval. The approval granted hereby shall be subject to all rights of referendum and judicial review; the period of time permitted by law for the exercise of such rights shall not begin to run until the date of publication of the notice of final development approval as required under Section 26.304.070(A). The rights of referendum shall be limited as set forth in the Colorado Constitution and the Aspen Home Rule Charter. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 22nd day of April, 2020. Approved as to Form: _________________________________________________________________ Andrea Bryan, Assistant City Attorney Approved as to Content: _________________________________________________________ Gretchen Greenwood, Chair HPC Resolution #11, Series of 2020 Page 3 of 4 99 ATTEST: _________________________________________________________________ Wes Graham, Deputy City Clerk HPC Resolution #11, Series of 2020 Page 4 of 4 100 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Torre and Aspen City Council THROUGH: Phillip Supino, Community Development Director FROM: Sarah Yoon, Preservation Planner; Community Development MEMO DATE: May 4, 2020 MEETING DATE: May 12, 2020 RE: Ordinance No. 6, Series of 2020; 920 East Hyman Avenue, Establishment of Transferable Development Rights (TDR) Applicant: Larian, LLC Representative: Zone 4 Architects, LLC Location: 920 E. Hyman Ave.; Legally described as Lot N, Block 32, City of Aspen, County of Pitkin, State of Colorado. PID# 2737-182-06-005. Current Zoning & Use: RMF – Residential Multi-Family; Single-family home 920 Vicinity Map – Aerial Image Summary: The owner of 920 E. Hyman proposes to convert unused floor area into one Transferable Development Right (TDR) Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends City Council approve the establishment of one TDR, on first reading 920 E. Hyman Avenue 101 REQUEST OF COUNCIL: The Applicant is requesting the following approval from City Council. • Transferable Development Rights (Section 26.535) for the establishment of one TDR, representing remaining residential development allowed on this historic parcel. The Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) is a recommending body and Aspen City Council is the final review authority. SUMMARY AND BACKGROUND: As a historically designated landmark, the historic preservation benefit to sever and sell unused development rights from the parcel in the form of Transferable Development Rights (TDRs) is available. TDRs are calculated in increments of 250 sf of floor area. The applicant proposes to remove the remaining residential development rights left on the property in the form of one Transferable Development Right (TDR). Background 920 E. Hyman is a designed landmark on a 3,000 sf lot in the RMF zone district. This single-family residence is a one-story miner’s cabin with an existing non-historic addition to the rear of the property. According to the floor area calculations provided in the application, one TDR may be established from this site. All calculations must be verified by Zoning prior to the issuance of TDR certificates. • • • Lot Size = 3,000 square feet Maximum Allowed Floor Area = 2,400 square feet Proposed Floor Area = 2,149.66 square feet The remaining floor area that may be converted into a TDR equals 250.34 square feet (2,400 sf – 2,149.66 sf = 250.34 sf). The applicant requests approval for one TDR, which will consume all but 0.34 square feet of allowed development rights on the site. HPC Meeting Summary The Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) met on January 22, 2020 to discuss the application for Minor Development, Relocation, Setback Variations and Transferrable Development Rights (TDRs). HPC voted unanimously (6-0) in support of the design proposal and recommended in favor of establishing one TDR. See Exhibit B – HPC meeting minutes for more details. DISCUSSION: The standard of review for the establishment of TDRs is in Section 26.535.070 of the Land Use Code. The applicant demonstrates the existence of unused development rights of two hundred fifty square feet of floor area on the historic property. The establishment of one TDR will not create and/or increase any non-conformities, and the applicant has provided all necessary documents including a draft deed restriction as part of the application. Staff finds that all applicable criteria for establishing TDRs are met. (See Exhibit A for review criteria and staff findings.) FINANCIAL IMPACTS: N/A ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: N/A ALTERNATIVES: N/A Page 2 of 3 Establishment of TDR 920 E. Hyman Avenue 102 RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff and the HPC Recommendation Staff and the HPC recommends approval of Ordinance No. 6, Series of 2020 on First Reading and setting the public hearing for June 6, 2020. Recommended Motion “I move to approve Ordinance No. 6, Series of 2020 and setting Seconding Reading for June 6, 2020.” CITY MANAGER COMMENTS: _______________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________. EXHIBITS: A – Review Criteria & Staff Findings B – HPC Meeting Minutes from January 22, 2020 C – Land Use Application Page 3 of 3 Establishment of TDR 920 E. Hyman Avenue 103 ORDINANCE NO. 6 (SERIES OF 2020) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ASPEN CITY COUNCIL APPROVING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF ONE TRANSFERABLE DEVELOPMENT RIGHT FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 920 EAST HYMAN AVENUE, LOT N, BLOCK 32, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO PARCEL ID: 2737-182-06-005 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from the applicant, Larian LLC, for the property located at 920 East Hyman Avenue, Lot N, Block 32, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado, requesting approval for the following: • Transferable Development Right (TDR) - Section 26.535 for the establishment of one (1) TDR, representing the remaining residential development allowed on this historic parcel. WHEREAS, the Community Development Department reviewed the proposed application, found that the review standards were met, and recommended in favor of establishing one (1) TDRs for this site; and WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission reviewed the application on January 22, 2020, during which the recommendations of the Community Development Department were heard by the Historic Preservation Commission (HPC), and the Commission recommended in favor of the establishment of one (1) TDR through Resolution #3, Series of 2020, by a vote of six to zero (6 – 0). WHEREAS, City Council has reviewed and considered the development proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as identified herein, has reviewed and considered the recommendations of the Community Development Director and the Historic Preservation Commission; and, WHEREAS, City Council finds that the development proposal meets or exceeds all the applicable development standards; and, WHEREAS, the City Council finds that this Ordinance furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safety, and welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF ASPEN CITY COUNCIL AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: Transferable Development Rights (TDR) Pursuant to the findings set forth above, the City Council does hereby authorize the creation of one (1) TDRs from the 920 East Hyman Avenue with the following conditions: Ordinance No. 6, Series of 2020 920 East Hyman Avenue Page 1 of 3 104 1. Commencing with the severing of the first TDR from the property, the maximum floor area for the lot shall be 2,400 square feet minus 250 square feet for each TDR Certificate issued. 2. Upon satisfaction of all requirements, the City and the applicant shall establish a date on which the respective Historic TDR Certificates shall be validated and issued by the City and a deed restriction on the property shall be accepted by the City and filed with the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder. The property owner may decide when and if, as warranted by the TDR market, the development rights will be converted into certificates and sold. 3. On the mutually agreed upon date, the Mayor of the City of Aspen shall execute and deliver the applicable number of Historic TDR Certificates on the property owner and the property owner shall execute and deliver a deed restriction lessening the available development right of the Sending Site by 250 square feet per TDR together with the appropriate fee for recording the deed restriction with the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder’s Office. 4. All calculations shall be verified by The City prior to the issuance of Historic TDR Certificates. Section 2: Existing Litigation This ordinance shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 3: Severability If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. Section 4: Vested Rights The development approvals granted herein shall constitute a site-specific development plan vested for a period of three (3) years from the date of issuance of a development order. However, any failure to abide by any of the terms and conditions attendant to this approval shall result in the forfeiture of said vested property rights. Unless otherwise exempted or extended, failure to properly record all plats and agreements required to be recorded, as specified herein, within 180 days of the effective date of the development order shall also result in the forfeiture of said vested property rights and shall render the development order void within the meaning of Section 26.104.050 (Void permits). Zoning that is not part of the approved site-specific development plan shall not result in the creation of a vested property right. No later than fourteen (14) days following final approval of all requisite reviews necessary to obtain a development order as set forth in this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall cause to be published in a newspaper of general circulation within the jurisdictional boundaries of the City of Aspen, a notice advising the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan and creation of a vested property right pursuant to this Title. Such notice shall be substantially in the following form: Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan, and the creation of a vested property right, valid for a period of three (3) years, pursuant to the Land Use Ordinance No. 6, Series of 2020 920 East Hyman Avenue Page 2 of 3 105 Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertaining to the following described properties: 920 East Hyman Avenue. Nothing in this approval shall exempt the development order from subsequent reviews and approvals required by this approval of the general rules, regulations and ordinances or the City of Aspen provided that such reviews and approvals are not inconsistent with this approval. The approval granted hereby shall be subject to all rights of referendum and judicial review; the period of time permitted by law for the exercise of such rights shall not begin to run until the date of publication of the notice of final development approval as required under Section 26.304.070(A). The rights of referendum shall be limited as set forth in the Colorado Constitution and the Aspen Home Rule Charter. Section 5: A duly noticed public hearing on this Ordinance was held on the 6th day of June, 2020 at 5:00 PM in the City Council Chambers, Aspen City Hall, Aspen, Colorado. INTRODUCED, READ AND ORDERED PUBLISED as provided by law, by the City Council of the City of Aspen on the 12th day of May, 2020. Attest: Approved as to content: ____________________________ Nicole Henning, City Clerk ____________________________ Torre, Mayor FINALLY, adopted, passed and approved this _____ day of __________, 2020. Approved as to form: Approved as to content: ____________________________ James R. True, City Attorney ____________________________ Torre, Mayor Attest: ____________________________ Nicole Henning, City Clerk Ordinance No. 6, Series of 2020 920 East Hyman Avenue Page 3 of 3 106 Exhibit A Review Criteria & Staff Findings 26.535.070. Standard of Review – Establishment of TDRs A historic TDR certificate may be established by the Mayor if the City Council, pursuant to adoption of an ordinance, finds all the following standards met: A. The sending site is a historic landmark on which the development of a single-family or duplex residence is a permitted use, pursuant to Chapter 26.710, Zone Districts. Properties on which such development is a conditional use shall not be eligible. Staff Findings: The sending site, 920 E. Hyman, is in the RMF zone district which allows for single-family residential use and is a designated historic landmark. Staff finds this criterion is met. B. It is demonstrated that the sending site has permitted unbuilt development rights, for either a single-family or duplex home, equaling or exceeding two hundred and fifty (250) square feet of floor area multiplied by the number of historic TDR certificates requested. Staff Findings: The maximum floor area for a single-family home on a 3,000 sf lot is 2,400 sf. The applicant has provided floor area calculations indicating 250.34 sf of unbuilt floor area remains on this lot which results in one TDR. All calculations will be verified prior to issuance. Staff finds this criterion is met. C. It is demonstrated that the establishment of TDR certificates will not create a nonconformity. In cases where a nonconformity already exists, the action shall not increase the specific nonconformity. Staff Findings: The establishment of a TDR certificate will not create or increase a non-conformity on this site. Staff finds this criterion is met. D. The analysis of unbuilt development right shall only include the actual built development, any approved development order, the allowable development right prescribed by zoning for a single-family or duplex residence, and shall not include the potential of the sending site to gain floor area bonuses, exemptions or similar potential development incentives. Properties in the MU Zone District which do not currently contain a single-family home or duplex established prior to the adoption of Ordinance #7, Series of 2005, shall be permitted to base the calculation of TDRs on 100% of the allowable floor area on an equivalent-sized lot in the R-6 zone district. This is only for the purpose of creating TDRs and does not permit the on-site development of 100% of the allowable floor area on an equivalent-sized lot in the R-6 zone district. If the additional 20% of allowable floor area exceeds 500 square feet, the applicant may not request a floor area bonus from HPC at any time in the future. Any development order to develop floor area, beyond that remaining legally connected to the property after establishment of TDR Certificates, shall be considered null and void. Exhibit A – Review Criteria Page 1 of 3 107 Staff Findings: This property is in the RMF zone district where residential floor area is 100% of the allowable floor area of an equivalent-sized lot located in the R-6 zone district. The applicant is calculating 2,400 sf as the maximum allowable floor area for this lot. Staff finds that this criterion is met. E. The proposed deed restriction permanently restricts the maximum development of the property (the sending site) to an allowable floor area not exceeding the allowance for a single-family or duplex residence minus two hundred and fifty (250) square feet of floor area multiplied by the number of historic TDR certificates established. For properties with multiple or unlimited floor areas for certain types of allowed uses, the maximum development of the property, independent of the established property use, shall be the floor area of a single-family or duplex residence (whichever is permitted) minus two hundred fifty (250) square feet of floor area multiplies by the number of historic TDR certificates established. The deed restriction shall not stipulate an absolute floor area, but shall stipulate a square footage reduction from the allowable floor area for a single-family or duplex residence, as may be amended from time to time. The sending site shall remain eligible for certain floor area incentives and/or exemptions as may be authorized by the City Land Use Code, as may be amended from time to time. The form of the deed restriction shall be acceptable to the City Attorney. Staff Findings: The applicant has provided a draft deed restriction in the application, as required. TDR certificates are established in increments of 250 sf. All documents shall be reviewed by the City Attorney prior to execution. Staff finds this criterion is met. F. A real estate closing has been scheduled at which, upon satisfaction of all relevant requirements, the City shall execute and deliver the applicable number of historic TDR certificates to the sending site property owner and that property owner shall execute and deliver a deed restriction lessening the available development right of the subject property together with the appropriate fee for recording the deed restriction with the County Clerk and Recorder's office. Staff Findings: This is a mandatory process that the applicant must pursue. Staff finds this criterion is met. G. It shall be the responsibility of the sending site property owner to provide building plans and a zoning analysis of the sending site to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director. Certain review fees may be required for the confirmation of built floor area. Staff Findings: The applicant has provided the needed plans and analysis to review the application. The floor area calculations indicate that 250.34 sf of unbuilt floor area remains on this lot. Final calculations shall be reviewed by The City prior to the issuance of the TDR certificates. Staff finds this criterion is met. Exhibit A – Review Criteria Page 2 of 3 108 H. The sale, assignment, conveyance or other transfer or change in ownership of transferable development rights certificates shall be recorded in the real estate records of the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder and must be reported by the grantor to the City of Aspen Community Development Department within five (5) days of such transfer. The report of such transfer shall disclose the certificate number, the grantor, the grantee and the total value of the consideration paid for the certificate. Failure to timely or accurately report such transfer shall not render the transferable development right certificate void. Staff Findings: This is a mandatory process that the applicant must pursue. Staff finds this criterion is met. I. TDR certificates may be issued at the pace preferred by the property owner. Staff Findings: n/a J. City Council may find that the creation of TDRs is not the best preservation solution for the affected historic resource and deny the application to create TDRs. HPC shall provide Council with a recommendation. Staff Findings: The applicant’s request to establish one TDR from this site has been reviewed by staff and the HPC. A recommendation in favor of establishing one TDR has been provided to City Council. City Council is the final authority for granting TDRs. Exhibit A – Review Criteria Page 3 of 3 109 REGULAR MEETING HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION JANUARY 22, 2020 Ms. Greenwood asked if everyone is okay with the siding materials. She thinks it’s a better choice from a color standpoint. Ms. Thompson stated that she is happy with the materials. They look appropriate. Mr. Halferty stated that he is also happy with the materials. Mr. Moyer stated that he’s happy with the bamboo. Ms. Sanzone stated that she finds that the landscape plan and the fence are compliant with the HPC guidelines. She would support the design. Ms. Greenwood stated that it is compliant with the guidelines. She wishes that most of the fence would be 42-inches for the length of the historic resource. Since that’s not in their guidelines, she can’t really ask the applicants to do it. She thinks it’s important. Little details like that make a difference in a community when everyone wants to see the historic resource. Mr. Halferty stated that he agrees with the landscape plan. What’s proposed is compliant with the HPC guidelines. He echoed the same comment as Ms. Greenwood regarding being able to see the historic resource. Ms. Greenwood stated that applicants don’t always have to go with the guidelines. They should be sensitive to all the effort that’s gone into restoring the historic resource. The right thing to do would be to keep the fence low until it reaches the new addition. It’s not like it’s creating a whole lot of space. STAFF COMMENTS: Ms. Simon stated that there are a lot of people attending the meeting. She encouraged the commissioners to speak closely into their microphones. She reminded everyone to state their name when they speak for the benefit of the clerk producing minutes remotely from the recording. Ms. Simon stated that staff and several commissioners are going to be at the Colorado Preservation Inc. conference next week from Wednesday to Friday. CERTIFICATES OF NO NEGATIVE EFFECT: None. CALL UPS: None. OLD BUSINESS: None. NEW BUSINESS: 920 E Hyman Avenue – Minor Development, Relocation, Setback Variations, and TDR Ms. Yoon introduced the project. 920 E Hyman is a 3,000 square foot lot, historically designated, has a one-story miner’s cabin to the front of the property and it’s connected with an above-grade addition that was approved by HPC back in 1999, so it doesn’t have the traditional connecting element that we see today. Looking at the Sanborn Maps from 1904, it appears to be roughly in the same location. It currently has a setback, which is approximately 22-feet from the property line in a district where 10-feet is required. The site also has a number of large trees that are located towards the front of the property. It is located in the RMF zone district. With this application, the applicant wishes to convert an existing crawl-space into a full basement, add new lightwells, make some exterior material changes and fenestration changes. The fenestration changes are concentrated on the above-grade addition, not the historic resource. 110 4 REGULAR MEETING HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION JANUARY 22, 2020 Ms. Yoon stated that the request for the relocation is needed because any work that requires underpinning of the structure is considered relocation according to the design guidelines. No new above-grade or structures are proposed. Nothing is essentially being moved. The applicant plans to make modifications to the front walkway with this proposal. There is a step towards the front of the property that is large, so they are going to make that modification there. In relation to stormwater mitigation, they are proposing to use pervious walkway pavers. The applicant does need to work more with the Engineering and Parks Departments to hone in on the requirements for drainage and stormwater, but those are underway. The material that the applicant was providing this week related to the pervious pavers is going to be a brick paver. In the process, staff recommends that the applicant try to meet the Design Guideline 1.6. Currently, the existing walkway is not perpendicular. More investigation into why that is is needed. It is staff’s recommendation to try and meet Guideline 1.6 as this walkway is being restudied. Ms. Yoon stated that it was represented in the drawings provided by the architects that footers are already existing. Two new lightwells are abutting the historic resource towards the rear to provide egress for the rooms on the sub-grade level. They are slightly larger than what is required by minimum building code. The modifications to the size of the two existing lightwells are also proposed. Ms. Yoon stated that fenestration changes are proposed on the north east west elevations of the nonhistoric addition. No fenestration changes are proposed on the historic resource. The applicant also included the addition of new downspouts along the east and west elevation. Staff did provide a recommendation for additional re-study of where the downspouts are to be located. Ms. Yoon stated that the applicant does plan to change the roofing material of the existing addition and the historic resource. It was represented in the application that the historic resource would be restored to cedar wood shingles. The addition would be changed to a standing seam metal roof. Staff does find that both of these materials, and in combination with what is existing, meet the criteria and design guidelines. Since the proposal does trigger relocation, new setback variations will be necessary to memorialize the location of the existing historic resource, which is currently encroaching into the east and west setbacks. Additionally, the lightwells are proposed in the setbacks and the applicant is asking for setback variations for these features. Staff does find that the criteria for granting setback variations are met with this request. In addition, the applicant is also requesting the establishment of one TDR. Staff supports the establishment of the TDR that will reduce developable floor area on the site. It does meet the criteria, as shown in the packet. It is important to note that the establishment of TDRs can only be done by City Council. HPC is a recommending body for the TDRs. All floor area calculations must be verified prior to the creating of the TDR certificates. Those all need to be considered. Ms. Yoon stated that staff does recommend approval of the project. They ask that the applicant restudy the walkway to be perpendicular if possible, utilizing the pavers and material that’s historically appropriate. They should work with staff and monitor to find that balance. This is to be done before the submission of building permit. Also the restudy of the downspouts, which are on the non-historic addition. That final configuration to also be reviewed by staff and monitor. In the responses that the applicant sent on Tuesday, they did provide a roof plan. It does show the dimensions and locations of 111 5 REGULAR MEETING HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION JANUARY 22, 2020 new flues and vents. They also provided additional information about snow clips, so Condition Three has been met and can be taken off. Staff ask that the lightwell curb heights be six inches or less to make sure that it’s not too high. There was a request in the application related to the stained glass window. Additional research and investigation of the materials themselves will be necessary. Staff encourages the applicant to explore the stained glass that’s there to see if it is historic. It’s unclear at this moment. Staff do not have enough documentation to support its removal. Working with all relevant City departments regarding storm water mitigation and urban runoff management plans, the referral agencies, the Engineering and Parks Departments did provide some comments indicating more conversation needed related to the drainage and the stormwater mitigation. Those final plans are to be reviewed and approved by staff and monitor prior to building permit submission. The setback variations are to be granted to memorialize the location of the historic resource. It also encompasses the proposed lightwells. The setback variation applies to above and below grade. Staff is in support of the establishment of one TDR with the finalized floor areas to be verified by the appropriate City departments before its establishment. Nine is the financial assurance required for relocation. Ms. Thompson asked if the rear yard setback needs to be reestablished or if that’s set from the old ordinance. Ms. Yoon stated that the rear yard setback is set from the old ordinance. There is no work being done in that area. That one will remain as well as what was approved previously. Ms. Sanzone asked if the application was submitted after the board required concepts about site drainage. Ms. Yoon stated that their guidelines ask for preliminary concepts. She believes that the applicant did reach out to Engineering and had a preliminary discussion. Since then, staff referred it to the Engineering Department. There’s been more discussion related to that. Ms. Sanzone stated that she thought HPC clarified that it was a plan or some sort of drawing that would be a part of the application that the Commission could review. Ms. Simon stated that the applicant did provide that and their intention was to tear up the existing sidewalk and use pervious pavers. Engineering had a change of opinion about the extent of mitigation, which is why they are now less certain. Ms. Greenwood asked if they need a rear-yard setback for excavation below-grade. Ms. Yoon stated that they’re not doing any excavation on the rear. It’s all concentrated to the front where the historic resource is. Ms. Thompson stated that they are changing the size of the lightwells. She would anticipate the grading around them changing. She thinks that that is important to look at, too. 112 6 REGULAR MEETING HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION JANUARY 22, 2020 APPLICANT PRESETNATION: Mark Janion of B2 Builders introduced himself. He introduced Colleen Loughin and Bill Pollock of Zone 4 Architects. He stated that the applicants are meeting with the necessary departments at the City next week to hash out drainage and parks issues that Ms. Simon mentioned. Regarding the excavation, there’s already an existing basement under the entire addition and about half the historic asset. The applicants are going to hand-dig out the remaining half, take the dirt out. It’s already a full-height crawlspace. They are only taking out a small portion. The design from the engineer goes straight down on the existing foundation, which is why they need the setback variation. The original house was in the setback and they are just going straight down. They are not going outside of the original perimeter. Mr. Halferty asked if Jack discussed the underpinning and foundation extensions, regarding the excavation. Mr. Janion stated that it would be four-foot sections. Mr. Halferty asked if it will all be dug from inside the structure. Mr. Janion stated that it will be. Mr. Kendrick asked about the excavation on the window wells. It appears that, on the east side, it goes past the footprint of the house. On that side of the house, it’s very tight with the adjoining property. Mr. Janion stated that they would hand-dig that as well and try to work with the engineer to see if they can come up with a detail to not go over the property. Everything that they do will be on their property. Mr. Kendrick asked if the window well goes past their property line. Mr. Janion stated that it does not. Ms. Sanzone asked if the soil will be wheelbarrowed to the back of the property. Mr. Janion replied that it will be. Ms. Sanzone asked how the applicants propose to remove the soil and get it through the area with the existing tree. Mr. Janion stated that they can cover the window well and take it over to the driveway in the back. Ms. Sanzone asked how they plan to do that with the tree in between. Mr. Janion stated that they will do it with buckets and carry it around. Ms. Sanzone asked if they have talked with the Parks Department about how they might accomplish work in that area. 113 7 REGULAR MEETING HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION JANUARY 22, 2020 Mr. Janion stated that they have not. Ms. Sanzone stated that she would like them to include that as a part of their conversation. Ms. Greenwood asked if the applicants are in agreement with what the City is asking them for. Mr. Janion replied that they are. Mr. Moyer asked if the applicants foresee any problems with various pipes protruding through the roof, as related to staff Condition Three. Mr. Janion stated that it’s not an issue. Mr. Moyer asked if they know whether the stained glass window is historic or not. Mr. Janion stated that he does not know. The oldest photos they could find have the window. Ms. Thompson asked why the lightwells behind the historic bump out past the existing wall instead of just continuing straight back. Mr. Pollock stated that it’s related to constructability. They also do need some room. They could bring it in a bit, but for code reasons they need to be minimum 3x3. Mr. Janion stated that they will bring it in as small as they can. Mr. Pollock stated that it was recommended that way by the structural engineer. Ms. Sanzone asked if the large spruce tree that was added back in the site plan is to remain. Mr. Janion stated that it is to remain. Ms. Sanzone asked how the front path will be both snow melted and pervious. Mr. Janion stated that it will be accomplished with sand and drilled insulation to let the water through the insulation and then the insulation protects from heating the ground. Ms. Sanzone asked if the reason that’s proposed to be pervious is to accomplish the additional drainage requirements or if that’s only related to the walkway. She asked if that includes any impacts with the other sitework including the two new window wells. Mr. Janion stated that the roof currently just sheds. There’s a dry well that’s in the right of way that Engineering doesn’t want them to keep. So they are proposing taking their drainage through that walkway. 114 8 REGULAR MEETING HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION JANUARY 22, 2020 Ms. Sanzone asked if it’s a new pipe connection under the walkway. She asked if the drywall would be in the right of way or in the street. Mr. Janion stated that it would just be the rock bed below the pervious pavers. Ms. Sanzone asked what they think the excavation depth is going to be. Mr. Janion stated that he thinks it was seven by three feet. Ms. Sanzone asked if protections for trees that might come up in their discussions with Parks would alter the design. Mr. Janion stated that trying to get the walkway straight is impacted by the trees, so they are going to work with Parks, Engineering, and Ms. Simon to figure out what the final alignment looks like. Ms. Sanzone asked if they are married to the width of the walk that they’re showing in the plans. Mr. Janion stated that they are not. Ms. Sanzone stated that she would suggest narrowing that to help reduce the impact on the trees. It may be that they can do deeper versus wider to accomplish the drainage requirements. Mr. Janion stated that they would be fine with that. Ms. Sanzone asked if they are confident that they will be able to protect the trees on the neighbors’ property during their work. Mr. Janion stated that they are. Ms. Sanzone asked if that will be discussed with the Parks Department. Mr. Janion stated that that is. PUBLIC COMMENT: Ms. Yoon stated that staff did receive public comment on the project that was sent out to the commissioners. COMMISSIONER DELIBERATION: Ms. Greenwood stated that there are conditions in the application for this project to move forward. Mr. Moyer stated that he is in concurrence with staff’s recommendation. 115 9 REGULAR MEETING HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION JANUARY 22, 2020 Mr. Halferty stated that he concurs with the recommendations of staff and the guidelines are met. They’ve thought about the constructability and conservation of the trees. He could support this application as is. Mr. Kendrick stated that he concurs with staff recommendations. The applicant has done a good job addressing the concerns. Ms. Thompson stated that she agrees. Ms. Sanzone asked if they are coming back for a Final. Ms. Greenwood stated that this is a minor development, so this is their only hearing. Ms. Sanzone asked if the irrigation control box is in a yard box. Mr. Janion stated that it is. Ms. Sanzone asked what will happen with the path lights if they straighten the path. Mr. Janion stated that they will do whatever staff, the board, and the guidelines recommend. Ms. Sanzone stated that, in general, the guidelines wouldn’t support this marching of lights to the front door. She suggested eliminating those. Ms. Greenwood stated that they have a lot to work out with the stormwater and landscaping. It might be a simple situation where a monitor could work with staff on it. They are more landscaping issues than they are building issues. Ms. Sanzone stated that, with that, she would support the application and staff’s recommendation. Ms. Greenwood stated that she does not see any problem with this application. Mr. Kendrick motioned to approve Resolution Three as written. Mr. Moyer seconded. Role Call Vote: Ms. Greenwood, yes; Ms. Thompson, yes; Mr. Kendrick, yes; Mr. Halferty, yes; Mr. Moyer, yes; Ms. Sanzone. Ms. Sanzone volunteered to be the monitor for this project. 620 Gillespie Avenue and 845 Meadows Rd, Aspen Institute – Historic Designation and Benefits, Conceptual Major Development and Commercial Design, Growth Management, Planned Development, Special Review, Transportation Impact and Trash Storage 116 10 October 29, 2019 HAND DELIVERY Amy Simon, Historic Preservation Officer City of Aspen Community Development Department 130 S. Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 Re: 920 East Hyman Ave. Pre-Application Summary Dear Amy: On behalf of B2 Builders (Applicant), Zone 4 Architects would like to present an application to consider a Relocation review, Variation review, Minor Development review, and Transferable Development Right review for the purposes of remodeling an existing home located at 920 East Hyman Avenue. The property is currently a landmarked site. For this application, the Applicant is proposing to excavate a basement below the existing historic cottage, re-roof the existing roofs, add a new window well, new storm windows, and to sever one TDR from the property. Per the pre-application summary, this application is subject to the following provisions of the City of Aspen Land Use Code. Individual responses to these sections will follow. ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ 26.304: Common Development Review Procedures 26.415.070.C: Development involving designated historic property, or property within a _________________historic district, Certificate of Appropriateness for a minor development 26.415.090: Relocation of designated historic properties 26.415.110.C: Variations 26.535: Transferable Development Rights 26.575.020.E: Measuring Setbacks 26.710.090: Residential Multi-Family (RMF) Responses to Review Criteria: ▪ 26.304: Common Development Review Procedures ▪ Pre-application conference between the applicant and Amy Simon, of the Community Development Department, occurred to discuss the project scope and goals. 117 ▪ ▪ The applicant intends to comply with all requirements under section 26.304 including the following: • Application fees will be paid upon submittal of each step of the application; • Compliance with the City of Aspen Charter and the Land Use Code; • Application will undergo review of applicable Decision-making bodies 26.415.070.C: Development involving designated historic property, or property within a historic district, Certificate of Appropriateness for a minor development 1. The review and decision on the issuance of a certificate of appropriateness for minor development shall begin with a determination by the Community Development Director that the proposed project constitutes a minor development. Minor development work includes: a) Expansion or erection of a structure wherein the increase of the floor area of the structure is two hundred and fifty (250) square feet or less or ▪ 26.415.070.C.1.a: The proposed project reduces the existing FAR from 2,174.40 square feet to 2,119.78 square feet. b) Alterations to a building façade, windows, doors, roof planes or material, exterior wall materials, dormer porch, exterior staircase, balcony or ornamental trim when three (3) or fewer elements are affected and the work does not qualify for a certificate of no negative effect or ▪ 26.415.070.C.1.b: The historic cottage is largely unaltered in the proposed remodel. One of the existing entry doors will be removed and replaced with a window in a similar style as the existing cottage windows. The existing roof will not be altered, and existing exterior siding is to remain. The work does not qualify for a certificate of no negative effect. c) Erection or installation of a combination or multiples of awning, canopies, mechanical equipment, fencing, signs, accessory features and other attachments to designated properties such that the cumulative impact does not allow for the issuance of a certificate of no negative effect or ▪ 26.415.070.C.1.c: No awnings, canopies, mechanical equipment, fencing, signs, or accessory features and other attachments to the designated property are proposed. d) Alterations that are made to non-historic portions of a designated historic property that do not qualify for a certificate of no negative effect or ▪ 26.415.070.C.1.d: The non-historic main house will have new windows which do not qualify the proposal from a certificate of no negative effect. e) The erection of street furniture, signs, public art and other visible improvements within designated historic districts of a magnitude or in numbers such that the cumulative impact does not allow for the issuance of a certificate of no negative effect. ▪ 26.415.070.C.1.e: No street furniture, signs, public art and other visible improvements are proposed. 2. An application for minor development shall include the following: a) The general application information required in Section 26.304.030. ▪ 26.415.070.C.2.a: The application will comply with code section 26.304.030. ▪ 26.415.070.C.2.b: The application includes ¼”:1’-0” elevations and plans depicting its relationship to the designated historic cottage. b) Scaled elevations and/or drawings of the proposed work and its relationship to the designated historic buildings, structures, sites and features within its vicinity. c) An accurate representation of all building materials and finishes to be used in the development. ▪ 26.415.070.C.2.c: Elevations and renderings depict the exterior materials and finishes to be used. The existing cottage finish materials are not proposed to change from the existing condition. The existing siding is proposed to be repainted. d) Photographs and other exhibits, as needed, to accurately depict location, extent and design of proposed work. ▪ 26.415.070.C.2.d: Photograph exhibits show the lot for redevelopment as well as the surrounding neighborhood context. A site plan and vicinity map locate the property in the larger context of downtown Aspen. e) Verification that the proposal complies with Chapter 26.410, Residential design standards or a written request for a variance from any standard that is not being met. 118 ▪ ▪ 26.415.070.C.2.e: The proposed development is not changing or modifying any of the existing exterior except for a couple of window replacements. Due to the nature of the work, this application is exempt from RDS per code section 26.410.010.C.1. 26.415.090: Relocation of designated historic properties A. Application. An application for relocation shall include: 1. The general application information required in Section 26.304.030 ▪ 26.415.090.A.1: The application complies with the information required in section 26.304.030. 2. A written description and/or graphic illustrations of the building, structure or object proposed for relocation. ▪ 26.415.090.A.2: Refer to drawing set for graphic illustrations of the existing building proposed for minor development. 3. A written explanation of the type of relocation requested (temporary, on-site or off-site) and justification for the need for relocation. ▪ 26.415.090.A.3: The minor development proposes to excavate under the existing historic cottage’s existing crawlspace. This proposed basement will require structural support and underpinning to conduct the work necessary to excavate under the historic cottage. 4. A written report from a licensed engineer or architect regarding the soundness of the building, structure or object, its ability to withstand the physical move and its rehabilitation needs, once relocated. ▪ 26.415.090.A.4: Refer to the Structural Engineer’s report regarding the integrity of the structure and ability to withstand the excavation work. 5. A conceptual plan for the receiving site providing preliminary information on the property boundaries, existing improvements and site characteristics and the associated planned improvements. ▪ 26.415.090.A.5: Not applicable to this application. ▪ 26.415.090.A.6: Not applicable to this application. ▪ 26.415.090.A.7: Not applicable to this application. ▪ 26.415.090.A.8: Refer to the Applicant’s documentation outlining their financial means for the proposed development, preservation of the historic cottage during excavation, and site preparation. 6. If the applicant does not own the receiving site, proof from the site's property owner of the willingness to accept the relocated building, structure or object. 7. Evidence that the applicant has or is seeking the necessary approvals to place the building on the identified receiving site. If the site is outside of the city limits, verification that the building will be preserved on its new site through a formal action of the other jurisdiction or a preservation easement. 8. Evidence of the financial ability to undertake the safe relocation, preservation and repair of the building, structure or object; site preparation and construction of necessary infrastructure through the posting of bonds or other financial measures deemed appropriate. 9. Supplementary materials to provide an understanding of the larger context for the relocated property and its impact on adjacent properties, the neighborhood or streetscape. ▪ 26.415.090.A.9: Not applicable to this application as the work is not relocating the property. 26.415.090.C.Standards for the relocation of designated properties. Relocation for a building, structure or object will be approved if it is determined that it meets any one of the following standards: 1. It is considered a noncontributing element of a historic district and its relocation will not affect the character of the historic district; or ▪ 26.415.090.C.1: The proposed relocation is to excavate under the existing crawlspace under the historic cottage. This will not have any effect on the character of the historic district as the work is entirely subgrade. 2. It does not contribute to the overall character of the historic district or parcel on which it is located and its relocation will not have an adverse impact on the Historic District or property; or ▪ 26.415.090.C.2: The proposed relocation is to excavate under the existing crawlspace under the historic cottage. This will not have any effect on the character of the historic district as the work is entirely subgrade. 3. The owner has obtained a certificate of economic hardship; or 119 ▪ 26.415.090.C.3: Not applicable. ▪ 26.415.090.C.4: The proposed relocation is to excavate under the existing crawlspace under the historic cottage. This will not have any effect on the character of the historic district as the work is entirely subgrade, and the relationship to adjacent properties is maintained. 4. The relocation activity is demonstrated to be an acceptable preservation method given the character and integrity of the building, structure or object and its move will not adversely affect the integrity of the Historic District in which it was originally located or diminish the historic, architectural or aesthetic relationships of adjacent designated properties; and Additionally, for approval to relocate all of the following criteria must be met: 1. It has been determined that the building, structure or object is capable of withstanding the physical impacts of relocation; ▪ 26.415.090.C.1: Refer to the Structural Engineer’s letter stating the integrity of the structure and proposed construction methods. 2. An appropriate receiving site has been identified; and ▪ 26.415.090.C.2: The relocation is temporary while the basement is excavated. There is no receiving site as the historic cottage is remaining in the existing location. 3. An acceptable plan has been submitted providing for the safe relocation, repair and preservation of the building, structure or object including the provision of the necessary financial security. ▪ ▪ 26.415.090.C.3: Refer to the submission drawings showing the existing and proposed plans, structural engineer’s letter, and owner letter stating financial ability to undertake the safe relocation. 26.415.110.C: Variations Variations. Dimensional variations are allowed for projects involving designated properties to create development that is more consistent with the character of the historic property or district than what would be required by the underlying zoning's dimensional standards. 1. The HPC may grant variations of the Land Use Code for designated properties to allow: a) Development in the side, rear and front setbacks; ▪ 26.415.110.C.1.a: A new egress window well is proposed in a side yard setback. The existing property has window wells in the side yard setbacks, and a portion of the historic cottage is 4.3’ within the east side yard setback and 3.4’ within the west side yard setback. The existing addition attached to the cottage conforms to front, year, and side yard setbacks. b) Development that does not meet the minimum distance requirements between buildings; ▪ 26.415.110.C.1.b: No development is proposed that doesn’t meet the minimum distance requirements between buildings. c) Up to five percent (5%) additional site coverage; ▪ 26.415.110.C.1.c: No additional site coverage is proposed. ▪ 26.415.110.C.1.d: The temporary relocation does not require any public amenity as it is not a commercial historic property. d) Less public amenity than required for the on-site relocation of commercial historic properties. 2. In granting a variation, the HPC must make a finding that such a variation: a) Is similar to the pattern, features and character of the historic property or district; and/or ▪ 26.415.110.C.2.a: The proposed variation is in-line with existing features and character on the site. The variance would allow for an expansion under the existing crawlspace of the cottage, which is currently non-conforming to side-yard setbacks. Additionally, the Applicant’s request to sever a TDR from the property would enhance the historic lot by limiting developable FAR on the site. b) Enhances or mitigates an adverse impact to the historic significance or architectural character of the historic property, an adjoining designated historic property or historic district. ▪ ▪ 26.415.110.C.2.b: The proposed variations do not have an adverse impact on the existing historic character of the property as the work is entirely subgrade. 26.535: Transferable Development Rights 120 Review criteria for establishment of a historic transferable development right A historic TDR certificate may be established by the Mayor if the City Council, pursuant to adoption of an ordinance, finds all the following standards met. A. The sending site is a historic landmark on which the development of a single-family or duplex residence is a permitted use, pursuant to Chapter 26.710, Zone Districts. Properties on which such development is a conditional use shall not be eligible. ▪ B. The sending site is a historic landmark on which a single-family residence is a permitted use per the R/MF zone district. It is demonstrated that the sending site has permitted unbuilt development rights, for either a single-family or duplex home, equaling or exceeding two hundred and fifty (250) square feet of floor area multiplied by the number of historic TDR certificates requested. ▪ The Applicant requests to sever one TDR from the site for the single-family home, equaling or exceeding 250 s.f. of floor area x 1 TDR. C. It is demonstrated that the establishment of TDR certificates will not create a nonconformity. In cases where a nonconformity already exists, the action shall not increase the specific nonconformity. ▪ The severance of one TDR will not create a nonconformity. This will bring the existing property into further compliance with allowable FAR on the site. D. The analysis of unbuilt development right shall only include the actual built development, any approved development order, the allowable development right prescribed by zoning for a singlefamily or duplex residence and shall not include the potential of the sending site to gain floor area bonuses, exemptions or similar potential development incentives. Properties in the MU Zone District which do not currently contain a single-family home or duplex established prior to the adoption of Ordinance #7, Series of 2005, shall be permitted to base the calculation of TDRs on 100% of the allowable floor area on an equivalent-sized lot in the R-6 zone district. This is only for the purpose of creating TDRs and does not permit the on-site development of 100% of the allowable floor area on an equivalent-sized lot in the R-6 zone district. If the additional 20% of allowable floor area exceeds 500 square feet, the applicant may not request a floor area bonus from HPC at any time in the future. ▪ E. Any development order to develop floor area, beyond that remaining legally connected to the property after establishment of TDR Certificates, shall be considered null and void. ▪ F. 2. The severance of one TDR will lower the allowable FAR on the site to be less than the current condition. The proposed deed restriction permanently restricts the maximum development of the property (the sending site) to an allowable floor area not exceeding the allowance for a single-family or duplex residence minus two hundred and fifty (250) square feet of floor area multiplied by the number of historic TDR certificates established. ▪ 1. The Applicant requests to sever one TDR applies to the existing built development and minor below-grade expansion under the existing historic cottage. The severance of one TDR will lower the allowable FAR on the site to be less than the current condition. Additionally, the proposed FAR will be greater than 250 s.f. under the allowable FAR on the site, which on this property is 2,400 s.f. For properties with multiple or unlimited floor areas for certain types of allowed uses, the maximum development of the property, independent of the established property use, shall be the floor area of a single-family or duplex residence (whichever is permitted) minus two hundred fifty (250) square feet of floor area multiplies by the number of historic TDR certificates established. The deed restriction shall not stipulate an absolute floor area, but shall stipulate a square footage reduction from the allowable floor area for a single-family or duplex residence, as may be amended from time to time. The sending site shall remain eligible for certain floor area incentives and/or exemptions as may be authorized by the City Land Use Code, as may be amended from time to time. The form of the deed restriction shall be acceptable to the City Attorney. G. A real estate closing has been scheduled at which, upon satisfaction of all relevant requirements, the City shall execute and deliver the applicable number of historic TDR certificates to the sending site property owner and that property owner shall execute and deliver a deed restriction lessening the available development right of the subject property together with the appropriate fee for recording the deed restriction with the County Clerk and Recorder's office. H. It shall be the responsibility of the sending site property owner to provide building plans and a zoning analysis of the sending site to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director. Certain review fees may be required for the confirmation of built floor area. 121 I. J. K. ▪ ▪ The Applicant has included building plans and a zoning analysis as part of the Land Use Application. The sale, assignment, conveyance or other transfer or change in ownership of transferable development rights certificates shall be recorded in the real estate records of the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder and must be reported by the grantor to the City of Aspen Community Development Department within five (5) days of such transfer. The report of such transfer shall disclose the certificate number, the grantor, the grantee and the total value of the consideration paid for the certificate. Failure to timely or accurately report such transfer shall not render the transferable development right certificate void. TDR certificates may be issued at the pace preferred by the property owner. City Council may find that the creation of TDRs is not the best preservation solution for the affected historic resource and deny the application to create TDRs. HPC shall provide Council with a recommendation. 26.575.020.E: Measuring Setbacks 5. Allowed Projections into Setbacks. Setback areas shall be unobstructed above and below ground except for the following allowed projections: e) Foundation footers, soil nails or below-grade tiebacks, and similar improvements necessary for the structural integrity of a building or other structures. ▪ The property has established setbacks as determined by the City of Aspen Land Use Code. The existing historic cottage encroaches on both the 5’-0” side yard setbacks. In order to excavate under the existing cottage crawlspace, foundation footers will be in the 5’-0” side yard setbacks. h) The minimum projection necessary to accommodate light wells and exterior basement stairwells as required by adopted Building or Fire Codes as long as these features are entirely recessed behind the vertical plane established by the portion of the building façade(s) closest to any Street(s). ▪ ▪ The proposed egress wells will be the minimum projection necessary to meet the Building and Fire Codes. The historic cottage facades screen these window wells from East Hyman Avenue. 26.710.090: Residential Multi-Family (RMF) B. Permitted uses. The following uses are permitted as of right in the Residential Multi-Family (RMF) Zone District: 1. Detached residential dwelling. 2. Two (2) detached residential dwellings. 3. Duplex dwelling. 4. Multi-family dwellings. 5. Home occupations. 6. Accessory buildings and uses. 7. Dormitory. 8. Accessory dwelling units and carriage houses meeting the provisions of Chapter 26.520. 9. For historic landmark properties: bed and breakfast. 10. Vacation Rentals. Pursuant to Section 26.575.220 ▪ 26.710.090.B.1: The proposed application is permitted as of right in the RMF Zone District as a detached residential dwelling. C. Conditional uses. The following uses are permitted as conditional uses in the Residential Multi-Family (RMF) Zone District, subject to the standards and procedures established in Chapter 26.425: 1. Arts, cultural and civic uses. 2. Academic uses. 3. Recreational uses. 4. Group home. 5. Child care center. ▪ 26.710.090.C: This is not applicable to the application. ▪ 26.710.090.D.1: The historic landmark lot is 3,000 s.f. +/-. D. Dimensional requirements. The following dimensional requirements shall apply to all permitted and conditional uses in the Residential Multi-Family (RMF) Zone District: 1. Minimum Gross Lot Area (square feet): six thousand (6,000). For lots created by Paragraph 26.480.030.A.4, Historic landmark lot split: three thousand (3,000). 122 2. Minimum Net Lot Area per dwelling unit (square feet): a. Detached residential dwelling: four thousand five hundred (4,500). For historic landmark properties: three thousand (3,000). ▪ 26.710.090.D.2.a.: The historic landmark lot is 3,000 s.f. +/- with a detached residential dwelling. b. Duplex dwelling unit: four thousand five hundred (4,500). For historic landmark properties: three thousand (3,000). c. Multi-family dwellings: No requirement. d. Bed and breakfast: No requirement. 3. Minimum lot width (feet): sixty (60). For lots created by Paragraph 26.480.030.A.4, Historic landmark lot split: thirty (30). ▪ 26.710.090.D.3.: Refer to the Survey which shows the lot is 30’-0” in width pursuant to 26.480.030.A.4. 4. Minimum front yard setback (feet): a. Detached residential and duplex dwellings: Same as R-6 Zone District. ▪ 26.710.090.D.4.a.: Refer to the Survey which shows a front yard setback of 10’-0” which meets R-6 Zone District requirements for principal buildings. b. Multi-family: five (5). 5. Minimum side yard setback (feet): a. Detached residential and duplex dwellings: same as R-6 Zone District. ▪ 26.710.090.D.5.a.: Refer to the Survey which shows a side yard setback of 5’-0” which meets R-6 Zone District requirements for principal buildings. The west side yard setback is in conformance, but the east side yard setback has a portion of the existing historic cottage within the setback. b. Multi-family: five (5). 6. Minimum rear yard setback (feet): a. Detached residential and duplex dwellings: same as R-6 Zone District. ▪ 26.710.090.D.6.a.: Refer to the Survey which shows a rear yard setback of 5’-0” which meets R-6 Zone District requirements for the portion of a principal building used solely as a garage. b. Multi-family: five (5). 7. Maximum height (according to density) (feet): a. Detached residential and duplex dwellings: same as R-6 Zone District. ▪ 26.710.090.D.7.a.: The existing and proposed development meet the requirements of the maximum height limit of 25’-0”. Reference elevation drawings in submittal package. b. Multi-family – parcel density less than one (1) unit per one thousand five hundred (1,500) square feet of Gross Lot Area: twenty-five (25). c. Multi-family – parcel density equal to or greater than one (1) unit per one thousand five hundred (1,500) square feet of Gross Lot Area: thirty-two (32). 8. Minimum distance between buildings on the lot (feet): a. Detached residential and duplex dwellings: same as R-6 Zone District. ▪ 26.710.090.D.8.a.: This is not applicable to the lot as there is only one building. ▪ 26.710.090.D.9.: The adjacent parcels are multi-family developments and don’t have business operations adjacent to/on the same parcel as the outdoor space. The existing public right-of-way is not proposed to be altered. b. Multi-family: No requirement. (Building and Fire Codes may apply.) 9. Pedestrian amenity space: Pursuant to Section 26.575.030. 10. Floor area ratio (FAR). This Paragraph applies to each type of use according to density and applies to conforming and nonconforming lots of record: a. Existing detached residential and duplex dwellings: one hundred percent (100%) of the allowable floor area of an equivalent-sized lot located in the R-6 Zone District. (See Section 26.710.040, R-6 Zone District.) City historic transferable development rights shall not permit additional floor area for detached residential and duplex dwellings. ▪ 26.710.090.D.10.a.: The proposed minor development is an existing detached residential dwelling which is entitled to 100% of the allowable FAR of an equivalent sized lot located in the R-6 Zone District. This lot is entitled to 2,400 square feet of FAR. The historic landmark is a legally non-conforming structure, and the FAR and dimensional improvements that are proposed are below-grade. While floor area is 123 being added below-grade, there is a net reduction in FAR. This is reducing the nonconforming situation because of the FAR reduction. b. New or replacement after demolition detached residential and duplex dwellings: eighty percent (80%) of the allowable floor area of an equivalent-sized lot located in the R-6 Zone District. (See Section 26.710.040, R-6 Zone District.) City historic transferable development rights shall not permit additional floor area for detached residential and duplex dwellings. ▪ 26.710.090.D.10.b.: Not applicable. ▪ 26.710.090.D.10.c.: Not applicable. ▪ 26.710.090.D.10.d.: Not applicable. ▪ 26.710.090.D.10.e.: Not applicable. ▪ 26.710.090.D.11.: Not applicable. ▪ 26.710.090.D.11.a.: This is not applicable as the property is a single-family lot. c. Multi-family – parcel density of less than one (1) unit per one thousand five hundred (1,500) square feet of Gross Lot Area: 0.75:1. d. Multi-family – parcel density equal to or greater than one (1) unit per one thousand five hundred (1,500) square feet of Gross Lot Area: 1.25:1. e. Multi-family – parcel density equal to or greater than one (1) unit per seven hundred fifty (750) square feet of Gross Lot Area: 1.5:1. 11. Maximum multi-family unit size (square feet): For properties in the Aspen infill area, two thousand (2,000) square feet of net livable area. For properties outside the Aspen infill area, two thousand five hundred (2,500) square feet of net livable area. a. The property owner may increase individual multi-family unit size by extinguishing historic transferable development right certificates ("certificate" or "certificates"), subject to the following: 1) The transfer ratio is five hundred (500) square feet of net livable area for each certificate that is purchased. 2) The additional square footage accrued may be applied to multiple units. However, the maximum individual unit size attainable by transferring development rights is two thousand five hundred (2,500) square feet of net livable area for properties within the Aspen infill area and three thousand (3,000) square feet of net livable area for properties outside the Aspen infill area (i.e., no more than five hundred [500] additional square feet may be applied per unit). 3) This incentive applies only to individual unit size. Transferring development rights does not allow an increase in the floor area ratio (FAR) of the lot. Thank you for your consideration, Bill Pollock Zone 4 Architects Cc: File Applicant 124 DEED RESTRICTION AND AGREEMENT FOR ESTABLISHMENT OF A HISTORIC TRANSFERABLE DEVELOPMENT RIGHT PURSUANT TO ASPEN CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE #___ , SERIES OF 20__ THIS DEED RESTRICTION AND AGREEMENT is made and entered into this _____ day of ______________, 20__, by_________________, (hereinafter referred to as “Owner”), whose address is___________________________________, and The City of Aspen, a body politic and corporate pursuant to its Home-Rule Charter and the Constitution of the State of Colorado, acting through its City Council, (hereinafter the “City”); WITNESSETH WHEREAS, Owner owns real property more specifically described as 920 E Hyman Ave. Subdivision: EAST ASPEN ADDITION Block: 32 Lot: N; Parcel ID 2737-182-06-005, Pitkin County, Colorado, (hereinafter referred to as “Real Property”), which Real Property is designated as a Historic Site, as such are defined in the City of Aspen Land Use Code (“City Code”); and WHEREAS, Owner has submitted an affidavit, duly notarized, in compliance with Section 26.535.090.A.2 of the City Code, and supplied the necessary application materials identified in Section 26.535.090 showing compliance with the criteria set forth in Section 26.535.070 of the City Code; and WHEREAS, The Community Development Department has reviewed Owner’s application according to the review standards identified in 26.535.070 of the City Code, and has recommended approval of the application and the establishment of one (1) approved Historic TDR Certificates as set forth herein; and WHEREAS, City Council Ordinance #____, Series of 20___ (the “Ordinance”) was approved on ___(date)__________, establishing the above referenced Historic TDR Certificates, and requiring that a Deed Restriction be recorded in real property records of Pitkin County, designating the Real Property as a Sending Site and permanently restricting the development of the Real Property (the Sending Site) to an allowable Floor Area not exceeding the allowance for a single-family residence or duplex if allowed, minus two hundred and fifty (250) square feet of Floor Area multiplied by the number of Historic TDR Certificates established; and WHEREAS, in consideration of the establishment of one (1) Historic TDR Certificates pursuant to the Ordinance and City Code, Owner agrees to restrict the Real Property as set forth herein. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and obligations contained herein, Owner and the City hereby covenant and agree as follows: 1. Development of the Real Property (the Sending Site) is hereby permanently restricted to an allowable Floor Area not exceeding the allowance for a single125 1 family residence or duplex as otherwise permitted by the City Code on the Real Property, minus any deductions resulting from previous issuance of TDR certificate(s) and minus 250 square feet, that being two hundred fifty (250) square feet of Floor Area multiplied by the one (1) Historic TDR Certificate hereby established. 2. In consideration of the foregoing, and pursuant to the City Code and the Ordinance, the City shall cause the issuance of one (1) Historic TDR Certificate, executed by the Mayor, allowing the transfer of development rights to a Receiver Site to be determined pursuant to the City Code. This Historic TDR Certificate may be sold, assigned, transferred, or conveyed. Transfer of title shall be evidenced by an assignment of ownership on the actual certificate document. Upon transfer, the new owner may request the City re-issue the certificate acknowledging the new owner. Reissuance shall not require adoption of a new ordinance. The market for such Historic TDR Certificates shall remain unrestricted and the City shall not prescribe or guarantee the monetary value of any Historic TDR Certificates. 3. This deed restriction shall not be construed to stipulate an absolute Floor Area on the Real Property, but only a square footage reduction from the allowable Floor Area, as that allowable Floor Area may be amended from time to time. 4. The Real Property (Sending Site) shall remain eligible for Floor Area incentives and/or exemptions as may be authorized by the City Code, as it may be amended from time to time. 5. This restriction may be modified only in a writing signed by both the Owner and the City. 6. Unless modified as stated above, this Agreement shall constitute a covenant running with the Real Property as a burden thereon for the benefit of, and shall be specifically enforceable by, the City Council of the City of Aspen by any appropriate legal action including, but not limited to, injunction or abatement. [SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGES] 126 2 IN WITNESS HEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this instrument on the date and year above first written. OWNER: By:___________________________ (property owner) STATE OF COLORADO COUNTY OF PITKIN ) )ss. ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ________ day of ______________, 20___, by ___________ Witness my hand and official seal. My commission expires:___________________ _____________________________ Notary Public 127 3 APPROVAL OF CITY ATTORNEY By:___________________________ James R. True, City Attorney THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO a body politic and corporate pursuant to its Home-Rule Charter and the Constitution of the State of Colorado By:____________________________ Torre, Mayor STATE OF COLORADO COUNTY OF PITKIN Date:______________ ) )ss. ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _____ day of _________________, 20__, by_____________, as Mayor of the City of Aspen, Colorado. Witness my hand and official seal. My commission expires:___________________ _____________________________ Notary Public 128 4 129- LARIAN, L.L.C. Joel Schenkman Manager 920 E. Hyman Aspen CO 81611 AFFIDAVIT The undersigned being?rst duly sworn upon oath, swears and af?rms as follows: 1. Larian, L.L.C., is a Florida limited liability company (?Owner?) and is the owner of the following property: Lot N, Block 32, EAST ASPEN ADDITION to the City and Townsite of Aspen, TOGETHER WITH an easement for improvements as set forth In Easement Agreement recorded July 111995 in Book 786 at Page 618, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO, also known as 920 E. Hyman Aspen CO 81611 (?Sending Site?). 2. The undersigned as the Manager of the Owner and has full authority to execute and deliver this Af?davit. 3. The Owner acknowledges that in consideration of the issuance by the City of Aspen of certain historic TDR certi?cate(s) that a deed restriction will permanently encumber the Sending Site and restrict that property's development rights to below that allowed by right by zoning according to the number of historic TDR certi?cate(s) established from that Sending Site. 4. For each certi?cate of development right issued by the City for the Sending Site, that property shall be allowed two hundred and ?fty (250) square feet less of ?oor area, as permitted according to the property's zoning, as amended. 5. The Sending Site?s Owner shall have no authority over the manner in which the Certi?cate(s) of development right is or are used by subsequent owners of the historic TDR The undersigned certi?es under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Ale? Joel Schenkman 50837343.1 130 STATE OF ss. COUNTY 0FK7141111 A4155, On 25, 6202:?? before me 5K4/c?m/ M48 5/ ?ags 411A a Notary Public in and for the State of #7051 5,1,1 personally appeared Joel Schenkman, proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) Whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the Within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY of PERJURY under the laws of the State of 3 that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and of?cial seal. SHARON MAE UTTERBACK ,r Commission#GG 944570 6. S1 gnature?N WU (S eal) ?Sop 3011,33; gamma: Notary Public 50837343.1 City of Aspen Community Development Department Aspen Historic Preservation Land Use Packet ATTACHMENT 2 - Historic Preservation Land Use Application PROJECT: Name: 920 E. HYMAN AVE Location: 920 E. HYMAN AVENUE ASPEN, CO 81611 LOT N, BLOCK 32 (Indicate street address, lot & block number or metes and bounds description of property) Parcel ID # 2737-182-06-005 (REQUIRED)___________________________________________________________ Applicant: Name: Joel Schenkman Larian, LLC Address: 11301 S. Dixie Highway Unit 566418 Miami, FL 33256 Phone #: ian@obppartners.com _______________________Fax#:___________________E-mail:_______________________________________________ 305.463.9838 REPRESENTATIVE: Name: ZONE 4 ARCHITECTS, LLC. Address: 432a E. HYMAN AVE. ASPEN, CO 81611 Phone #: 970.429.8470 BPOLLOCK@ZONE4ARCHITECTS.COM _______________________Fax#:___________________E-mail:________________________________________________ TYPE OF APPLICATION: (please check all that apply): Historic Designation X X Relocation (temporary, on Certificate of No Negative Effect or off-site) Certificate of Appropriateness Demolition (total demolition) -Minor Historic Development -Major Historic Development Historic Landmark Lot Split -Conceptual Historic Development -Final Historic Development -Substantial Amendment EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description of existing buildings, uses, previous approvals, etc.) An existing landmarked site with historic cottage connected to a single-family home. ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________ PROPOSAL: (description of proposed buildings, uses, modifications, etc.) Excavation below existing historic cottage crawlspace for a basement, continued use as single-family ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ home, exterior materials are to remain, new storm windows, a new egress window well, replacement of roofing. City of Aspen 130 S. Galena Street. (970) 920 5090 Historic Land Use Application Requirements, Updated: March 2016 131 City of Aspen Community Development Department Aspen Historic Preservation Land Use Packet General Information Please check the appropriate boxes below and submit this page along with your application. This information will help us review your plans and, if necessary, coordinate with other agencies that may be involved. YES NO  X  Does the work you are planning include exterior work; including additions, demolitions, new construction, remodeling, rehabilitation or restoration?  X  Does the work you are planning include interior work, including remodeling, rehabilitation, or restoration?   X Do you plan other future changes or improvements that could be reviewed at this time?  X  In addition to City of Aspen approval for a Certificate of Appropriateness or No Negative Effect and a building permit, are you seeking to meet the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation or restoration of a National Register of Historic Places Property in order to qualify for state or federal tax credits?   If yes, are you seeking federal rehabilitation investment tax credits in Conjunction with this project? (Only income producing properties listed on the National Register are eligible. Owner-occupied residential properties are not.)   If yes, are you seeking the Colorado State Income Tax Credit for Historical Preservation? Please check all City of Aspen Historic Preservation Benefits which you plan to use:  Rehabilitation Loan Fund  Conservation Easement Program  Dimensional Variances  Increased Density  Historic Landmark Lot Split  Conditional Uses  Tax Credits  Waiver of Park Dedication Fees  Exemption from Growth Management Quota System 132 City of Aspen 130 S. Galena Street. (970) 920 5090 Historic Land Use Application Requirements, Updated: March 2016 City of Aspen Community Development Department Aspen Historic Preservation Land Use Packet ATTACHMENT 3 - Dimensional Requirements Form (Item #10 on the submittal requirements key. Not necessary for all projects.) Project: Applicant: Project Location: Zone District: Lot Size: Lot Area: 920 E. Hyman Ave. Joel Schenkman Larian, LLC. 920 E. Hyman Ave. Aspen, CO 81611 R-MF +/- 3,000 S.F. +/- 3,000 S.F. (For the purposes of calculating Floor Area, Lot Area may be reduced for areas within the high water mark, easements, and steep slopes. Please refer to the definition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.) Commercial net leasable: Number of residential units: N/A Existing:__________Proposed:_________________ N/A 1 1 Existing:__________Proposed:_________________ Proposed % of demolition: __________ +/- 2.14% DIMENSIONS: (write N/A where no requirement exists in the zone district) Floor Area: 2,400 2,119.78 Existing:_________Allowable:__________Proposed:________ 2,174 Height Principal Bldg.: +/-24'-5 3/4" 25' +/-24'-5 3/4" Existing:_________Allowable:__________Proposed:________ Accessory Bldg.: N/A N/A 25' Existing:_________Allowable:__________Proposed:________ On-Site parking: 2 car garage 2 car garage Existing:_________Required:___________Proposed:________ none % Site coverage: Existing:_________Required:___________Proposed:________ none +/- 53% +/- 53% % Open Space: +/- 47% none Existing:_________Required:___________Proposed:________ +/- 47% Front Setback: Rear Setback: 10' S. Existing:_________Required:___________Proposed:________ 22.7' 22.7' 5' N. Existing:_________Required:___________Proposed:________ 5' 5' Combined Front/Rear: Indicate N, S, E, W Side Setback: Side Setback: Combined Sides: 15' Existing:_________Required:___________Proposed:________ 27.7' 27.7' 0.7' 5' E. Existing:_________Required:___________Proposed:________ 0.7' W. Existing:_________Required:___________Proposed:________ 5' 1.6' 1.6' 2.3' 10' Existing:_________Required:___________Proposed:________ 2.3' Distance between Existing:_________Required:___________Proposed:________ N/A N/A 5' buildings: Existing non-conformities or encroachments and note if encroachment licenses have been issued: The existing historic cottage encroaches on both the East and West side yard setbacks by 4.3' _____________________________________________________________________________ and 3.4' respectively. The remaining home complies with the side yard setbacks. _____________________________________________________________________________ Variations requested (identify the exact variances needed): The ______________________________ Applicant requests a variance for the ______________________________________________________________________________ side yard setbacks to accommodate the existing aforementioned non-conformities. A variance is needed to allow for excavation under the footprint of the existing cottage's crawlspace. 133 City of Aspen 130 S. Galena Street. (970) 920 5090 Historic Land Use Application Requirements, Updated: March 2016 134 Joel Schenkman Larian, LLC 305.463.9838 ian@obppartners.com 920 E. Hyman Ave. Aspen, CO 81611 Larian, LLC. 11301 S. Dixie Highway Unit 566418 Miami, FL 33256 N/A N/A N/A N/A 1,300 4 N/A N/A 1924 PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY DATE: October 11, 2019 PLANNER: Amy Simon, amy.simon@cityofaspen.com PROJECT NAME AND ADDRESS: 920 E. Hyman Avenue REPRESENTATIVE: bill.pollock@zone4architects.com DESCRIPTION: A new property owner proposes the following scope of work for this landmarked site: Relocation review to excavate a basement below the historic cottage (where there is currently only a crawl space), Variation review for sideyard setback variations for the new basement, Minor Development review for modifications to the site and cottage (including re-roofing, new storm windows, changes to the front doors, a new lightwell and possibly a new front walk), and Transferable Development Right review to sever one TDR from the property. This review (with the exception of the TDR) is a one-step hearing, meaning that all details of the proposal will be presented to HPC in one application. Staff will review the project and make a recommendation to HPC, based on the Historic Preservation Design Guidelines. HPC will make a decision to approve, approve with conditions, or deny the proposal. Regarding the TDR, HPC will make a recommendation to City Council, who will determine whether criteria have been met. Below are links to relevant documents and a list of information needed to submit an application. RELEVANT LAND USE CODE SECTIONS: Section Number Section Title 26.304 Common Development Review Procedures 26.415.070.C Development involving designated historic property or property within a historic district, Certificate of Appropriateness for a minor development 26.415.090 Relocation of designated historic properties 26.415.110.C Variations 26.535 Transferable Development Rights 26.575.020.E Measuring Setbacks 26.710.090 Residential Multi-Family (RMF) For your convenience – links to the Land Use Application and Land Use Code are below: Historic Preservation Design Guidelines Historic Preservation Land Use Application Packet 135 Land Use Code REVIEW BY: • Staff for Application Completeness and Recommendations • Historic Preservation Commission and City Council for decisions PUBLIC HEARING: Yes, at HPC and Council PLANNING FEES: $1,300 Deposit for 4 hours of staff time (additional/lesser hours will be billed/refunded at a rate of $325/hr.) REFERRAL FEES: No, however staff will seek referral comments from the Building Department, Zoning and Parks regarding any relevant code requirements or considerations. TOTAL DEPOSIT: $1,300 APPLICATION CHECKLIST – These items should first be submitted in a paper copy. 1. Completed Land Use Application and signed Fee Agreement.  2. Pre-application Conference Summary (this document).  3. Street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur,  consisting of a current (no older than 6 months) certificate from a title insurance company, an ownership and encumbrance report, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner’s right to apply for the Development Application. 4. Applicant’s name, address and telephone number in a letter signed by the applicant that states  the name, address and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. 5. HOA Compliance form (Attached to Application)   6. A site plan and survey showing property boundaries, the location and orientation of existing and proposed improvements and predominant site characteristics. 7. A written description of the proposal and an explanation in written, graphic, or model form of how  the proposed development complies with the review standards relevant to the development application and relevant land use approvals associated with the property. 8. Scaled elevations and/or drawings of the proposed work and its relationship to the designated  buildings, structures, sites and features within its vicinity. 136 9. A floor area analysis of the existing and proposed development.  10.  An accurate representation of all building materials and finishes to be used in the development. 11.  Photographs and other exhibits, as needed, to accurately depict location, extend and design of proposed work. 12.  A written explanation of the type of relocation requested (temporary, on-site or off-site) and justification for the need for relocation. 13.  A written report from a licensed engineer or architect regarding the soundness of the building, structure or object, its ability to withstand the physical move and its rehabilitation needs, once relocated. 14.  Evidence of the financial ability to undertake the safe relocation, preservation and repair of the building, structure or object; site preparation and construction of necessary infrastructure through the posting of bonds or other financial measures deemed appropriate. 15.  A notarized affidavit from the sending site property owner signifying acknowledgment of the following: o A deed restriction will permanently encumber the sending site and restrict that property's development rights to below that allowed by right by zoning according to the number of historic TDR certificates established from that sending site. o For each certificate of development right issued by the City for the particular sending site, that property shall be allowed two hundred and fifty (250) square feet less of floor area, as permitted according to the property's zoning, as amended. o The sending site property owner shall have no authority over the manner in which the certificate of development right is used by subsequent owners of the historic TDR certificate. Once the application is deemed complete by staff, the applicant/applicant’s representative will receive an e-mail requesting submission of an electronic copy of the complete application and the deposit. Once the deposit is received, the case will be assigned to a planner and the land use review will begin. During review of the case, additional items may be requested. The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The summary is based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The summary does not create a legal or vested right. 137 CERTIFICATE OF OWNERSHIP The undersigned, an Attorney licensed to practice law in the State of Colorado under Colorado Supreme Court Registration No. 10240, hereby certi?es the ownership of the following real property located at 920 E. Hyman, Aspen, Pitkin County, Colorado (the ?Property?). A. PROPERTY Lot N, Block 32, EAST ASPEN ADDITION to the City and Townsite of Aspen, TOGETHER WITH an easement for improvements as set forth in Easement Agreement recorded July 11, 1995 in Book 786 at Page 618, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO, also known as 920 E. Hyman, Aspen CO 81611. B. The names of all owners of the property are as follows: LARIAN, L.L.C., a Florida limited liability company C. I hereby further certify that as of the date hereof, the Property is subject to the following encumbrances of record (all references are to the Pitkin County, Colorado Clerk Recorder?s Records): Reservations and exceptions as contained in United States Patent recorded October 21, 1955, in Book 180 at Page 454. Right of way for ditches or canals constructed by the authority of the United States, as reserved in United States Patent recorded August 29, 1658, in Book 185 at Page 69. Terms, agreements, provisions, conditions and obligations as contained in Easement Agreement recorded July 11, 1995, in Book 786 at Page 618. Terms, agreements, provisions, conditions and obligations as contained in Resolution No. 2, Series of 1999 of the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission Approving an Application for Landmark Designation recorded February 18, 1999, at Reception No. 427862. Terms, agreements, provisions, conditions and obligations as contained in Resolution No. 991 of the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission Recommending Landmark Designation of 920 Hyman Avenue recorded March 4, 1999, at Reception No. 428448. Terms, agreements, provisions, conditions and obligations as contained in Resolution No. 5, Series of 1999 approving an application for Landmark Designation, Final Development, Partial Demolition, Residential Design Review and a Variance at 920 E. Hyman Avenue recorded March 30, 1999, at Reception No. 429352. Terms, agreements, provisions, conditions and obligations as contained in Ordinance No. 1, Series of 1999 recorded August 2, 1999, at Reception No. 433966. 138 508201941 All matters as set forth on Improvement Survey Plat No. 19063, dated September 9, 2019 and prepared by Peak Surveying, Inc., including but not limited to: a) encroachment of boulder retaining wall along the West property line, and b) structure in the setback Dated: October 25, 2019. B. oseph?Krabacher Attorney at Law 730 E. Durant Avenue, Suite 200 Aspen CO 81611 STATE OF COLORADO ss COUNTY OF PITKIN The foregoing Certi?cate of Ownership was acknowledged before me, a Notary Public in and for the State of Colorado, by B. Joseph Krabacher, personally known to me to be the person who subscribed the within instrument this 25th day of October, 2019. Witness my hand and seal. My Commission Expires: CHERYL HEIBERGER 4? ?7?;va NOTARY PUBLIC Notary 'Public (1 STATE OF COLORADO NOTARY iD 19964002721 MY COMMESSION EXPIRES 02.252020 50820194.] 139 140 October 23, 2019 Aspen Community Development 130 South Galena Street, 3rd Floor Aspen, CO 81611 RE: 920 East Hyman Ave Lot N, Block 32 To Whom it May Concern: Zone 4 Architects has the authorization of Larian LLC, the property Owner, to meet with Aspen officials as well as submit any required land use applications, permit applications, and change orders for the sole purpose of remodeling an existing residence on the property currently designated by the address 920 East Hyman Avenue in Aspen Colorado and having a Parcel ID 273718206005. Sincerely,? 54/: CW 5? ?f U, Larian LLC, Owner Manager COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Homeowner Association Compliance Policy iand use applications within the City of Aspen are required to inciude a Homeowner Association Compliance Form (this form) certifying the scope of work inctuded in the land use application complies with alt appiicabie covenants and home-owner association poticies. The certification must be signed by the property owner or Attornev reloreoer-Hint;r the property owner. Name: Joel Schenkman Property Larian. LLC Owner?! ll Email: jan@obppartners.com Phone No.: 305.463.9838 Adde-SS Of Property: 920 E. Hyman Ave. (subject of ASpen, co appricatiem 81611 i certify as foilows: (pick one) This property is not subject to a homeowners association or other form of private covenant. This property is subject to a homeowners association or private covenant and the improvements proposed in this tend: use appiicatton do not require approval by the homeowners association or covenant beneficiary. This property is subject to a homeowners association or private covenant and the improvements proposed in this land use appiication have been approved by the homeowners association or covenant beneficiary. i understand this policy and i understand the City of Aspen does not interpret. enforce. or manage the applicability. meaning or effect of private covenants or homeowner association wise or bylaws. I understand that this document is a peptic document. 1 .t E: 1 Cf Owner date: (:3er 02-91. Owner Printed name: :3 csC?\ or. Attorney signature: state: Attorney printed name: 141 142 IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT LOT N, BLOCK 32, EAST ASPEN ADDITION TO THE CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN CITY OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO N 0 5' WIN DO WEL W L NOU T G L WEL WIN SE HOU PLA BLOCK 32 3,000S.F.± 2 STORY WOOD FRAME HOUSE WITH BASEMENT 920 E. HYMAN AVE. INER 1.6' LOT O BLOCK 32 WATER METER GAS METER EAVE 12.00 W 0.3 0.6'' G 23.70 ' 3.60' ' 14.90 ' X ADJO 3.20' X LOT N, BLOCK 32, EAST ASPEN ADDITION TO THE CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, CITY OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO. WIN DO WEL W L LOT N TIE NTE R WOO LOT M BLOCK 32 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 4.3' GAS METER ' 40 48.50 20 D DE CK 10 CONCRETE DRIVEWAY DOW 5' 5 E ELEC. METER 5' CO 0 ' CLE A S #5 REBAR & YELLOW PLASTIC CAP L.S. #15710 BEARS N76°08'24"W 0.38' 30.00 CONCRETE DRIVEWAY "E BASI S OF °50'4 9 N 14 150 180 10 5' 100.0 0' TIE STEPS "E BUIL PER DING SE T REC. NO. 4 BACK 2786 2 20.20' GS E BEA RIN 90 120 210 09'11 CONCRETE DRIVEWAY 5.1' 240 S 75° ' 270 AL 20.89 LEY 'R ASPH -O-W ALT #5 REBAR & RED PLASTIC CAP L.S. #25947 60 c . In W vey in r g , Su Pea k 300 30 48.10 330 0' 100.0 15.00 IRRIGATION CONTROL BOX 2) THE DATE OF THIS SURVEY WAS SEPTEMBER 03, 2019. 3) BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS SURVEY IS A BEARING OF S14°50'49"W BETWEEN THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF LOT N, BLOCK 32, A #5 REBAR & RED PLASTIC CAP L.S. #25947 FOUND IN PLACE AND THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF LOT N, BLOCK 32, A #5 REBAR & RED PLASTIC CAP L.S. #25947 FOUND IN PLACE. 4) UNITS OF MEASURE FOR ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN HEREON IS U.S. SURVEY FEET. 5) THIS SURVEY IS BASED ON THE SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED RECORDED OCTOBER 14, 2005 AS RECEPTION NO. 516269, THE IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT PREPARED BY JOHNSON LONGFELLOW AND ASSOC., DATED OCTOBER 02, 1978, RECORDED IN BOOK 760 AT PAGE 532 IN THE PITKIN COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER'S OFFICE, AN IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT PREPARED BY SEXTON SURVEY COMPANY, DATED OCTOBER 07, 1998, JOB NO. 98137 AND CORNERS FOUND IN PLACE. CON CRET E CON CRET E 10' 50'49 "W BUIL D SETB ING ACK 30.00 ' SIDE CUR B&G WAL K IMPROVEMENT SURVEY STATEMENT YARD EASEMENT PER BK 356 PG 116 & PERMANENT PERPETUAL EASEMENT PER BK 786 PG 618 I, JASON R. NEIL, HEREBY CERTIFY TO LARIAN, LLC., A FLORIDA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, ACHIM BUERKLIN AND TITLE COMPANY OF THE ROCKIES AS AGENT FOR CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, THAT I AM A PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR LICENSED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF COLORADO; THAT THIS IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT IS TRUE, CORRECT AND COMPLETE BASED ON MY KNOWLEDGE, INFORMATION AND BELIEF AS LAID OUT AND SHOWN HEREON; THAT THIS IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT IS NOT A GUARANTY OR WARRANTY, EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, THAT THIS IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT WAS MADE BY ME FROM AN ACCURATE SURVEY OF THE REAL PROPERTY PERFORMED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ON SEPTEMBER 03, 2019; THAT, IN THE PREPARATION OF THIS IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT, I RELIED UPON TITLE COMPANY OF THE ROCKIES AS AGENT FOR CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, COMMITMENT NO. 0706046-C DATED EFFECTIVE AUGUST 16, 2019; THAT THE LOCATION AND DIMENSIONS OF ALL BUILDINGS, IMPROVEMENTS, EASEMENTS, RIGHTS OF WAY IN EVIDENCE OR KNOWN TO ME AND ENCROACHMENTS BY OR ON THE REAL PROPERTY AND MATTERS REFERENCED IN SAID TITLE COMMITMENT CAPABLE OF BEING SHOWN ARE ACCURATELY SHOWN, AND THAT THIS PLAT IS IN ACCORDANCE OF AN IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT AS SET FORTH IN C.R.S. §38-51-102(9). #5 REBAR & YELLOW PLASTIC CAP L.S. #15710 BEARS S68°01'17"W 0.28' UTTE R EAST HYM 74.80 AN AVE NUE 'R ASPH -O-W ALT DATED: SEPTEMBER 09, 2019 COL J AS 6) ACCORDING TO RECEPTION NO.'S 428448 AND 433966 THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS DESIGNATED AS A HISTORIC LANDMARK. L PROF ES S IO Surv ey i ng , Inc k a e . P N W JRN Checked By: P.O. Box 1746 Rifle, CO 81650 Phone (970) 625-1954 Fax (970) 579-7150 www.peaksurveyinginc.com S S i nc e 2007 Drawn By: JRN Date: SEPT. 04, 2019 Computer File: E 063.DWG NO. Date 1 09/09/19 Revision UPDATE SURVEY D EI BY:___________________________________ JASON R. NEIL, P.L.S. NO. 37935 FOR AND ON37935 BEHALF OF PEAK SURVEYING, INC. 7) THIS PROPERTY IS ZONED R/MF ACCORDING TO THE CITY OF ASPEN WEBSITE. BUILDING SETBACKS ARE AS FOLLOWS: FRONT=10' PRINCIPAL BUILDING AND 15' FOR ACCESSORY BUILDING; REAR=10' PRINCIPAL BUILDING AND 5' FOR ACCESSORY BUILDING; SIDES=5'. BUILDING SETBACKS SHOULD BE VERIFIED WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PRIOR TO ANY PLANNING, DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION. NOTICE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW, YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY WITHIN THREE YEARS AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY ANY ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS FROM THE DATE OF THE CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON. SE ADO L I CE OR N R . N N O EYOR 1) THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO RESERVATIONS, RESTRICTIONS, COVENANTS, BUILDING SETBACKS AND EASEMENTS OF RECORD, OR IN PLACE AND EXCEPTIONS TO TITLE SHOWN IN THE TITLE COMMITMENT PREPARED BY TITLE COMPANY OF THE ROCKIES AS AGENT FOR CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, COMMITMENT NO. 0706046-C DATED EFFECTIVE AUGUST 16, 2019. BOULDER RET. WALL CONIFER 10" 18' N 75 °09'1 1" W #5 REBAR & RED PLASTIC CAP L.S. #25947 I 0.7' S 14° NOTES: 22.7' CONIFER 16" 20' 0.5 0.1' ' RV CONCRETE SIDEWALK CONIFER 18" 5' LK ' FLAG STON E WA 9.50' COVERED WOOD DECK CONIFER 12" 20' GUTTER N A L L A N D SU By JRN ACHIM BUERKLIN CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT LOT N, BLOCK 32, EAST ASPEN ADD. 920 E. HYMAN AVENUE Project NO. 19063 1 OF 1 920 EAST HYMAN AVE HPC APPLICATION S C A L E : 1 /4 " = 1 ' VICINITY MAP 1 1 /4 /2 0 1 9 143 Floor Area Calculations Allowable Floor Area AREA LEGEND No easements have been calculated for reductions in Net Lot Area. TBD 2,400.00 EXPOSED WALL SURFACE AREA stair Existing Lower Level Wall Calculations BURIED WALL AREA Wall Label Total Wall Area (Sq.Ft.) W.I.C. BED #2 Exposed Wall Area (Sq.Ft.) 822.51 sq ft A B C D E F G H I J 425.72 160 464.56 34.29 71.47 38.29 27.52 217.95 108.07 31.84 Overall Wall Areas (Sq.Ft.) FAR 0 0 138.69 2.23 4.65 2.49 1.79 14.19 1.24 0 W.I.C. GARAGE AREA ROOF DECK MASTER BEDROOM DECK 175.54 sq ft MASTER BATHROOM BATH #2 DECK/PORCH AREA WWW.ZONE4ARCHITECTS.COM 1,579.71 Exposed Wall Areas (Sq.Ft.) 165.28 Existing Lower Level Floor Area Calculations Lower Level Gross Floor Area (Sq.Ft.) Lower Level Countable Floor Area (Sq.Ft.) 3 1,244.79 130.24 UPPER LEVEL AREA PLAN SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 0 4' 8' 16' 8' 16' 1,244.79 X 17.51% = 218.0 1,041.84 Main Level Countable Floor Area (Sq.Ft.) 1,041.84 Existing Garage Area Calculations DS Garage at Main Level 448.69 (Actual Area) Garage Countable Floor Area (Sq.Ft.) 99.35 (448.69-250 = 198.69) (198.69 X %50 = 99.35 Existing Upper Level Floor Area Calculations Upper Level Gross Floor Area (Sq.Ft.) HISTORIC LIVING RM 822.51 2-CAR GARAGE Upper Level Countable Floor Area (Sq.Ft.) 822.51 1,041.84 sq ft RD 448.69 sq ft DINING KITCHEN Existing Deck/Porch Floor Area Calculations Deck/Porch Gross Floor Area (Sq.Ft.) 360 Exempt (2,400 X %15 = 360) 266.21 Deck/Porch Countable Floor Area (Sq.Ft.) HISTORIC DINING PDR W 0.00 90.67 sq ft DS Total Existing Floor Area Calculations Lower Level Floor Area (Sq.Ft.) 130.24 Main Level Floor Area (Sq.Ft.) 1,041.84 Garage Floor Area (Sq.Ft.) 99.35 Upper Level Floor Area (Sq.Ft.) 822.51 Deck/Porch Floor Area (Sq.Ft.) 0.00 Total 5 2 2,093.94 AREA SUMMARY 920 East Hyman Avenue Aspen, CO 81611 City of Aspen, Pitkin County Main Level Gross Floor Area (Sq.Ft.) 920 EAST HYMAN Existing Main Level Floor Area Calculations MAIN LEVEL AREA PLAN SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 0 4' -306.06 -306.06 1.24 sq ft 1.79 sq ft 14.19 sq ft 2.49 sq ft 4.65 sq ft 2.23 sq ft +/-98'-9 99' BO STRUCTURE 7/8" BO STRUCTURE MAIN LEVEL MAIN LEVEL +/-97'-3" BO STRUCTURE GARAGE E 31.84 sq ft 106.83 sq ft 203.77 sq ft 25.73 sq ft 66.82 sq ft 35.8 sq ft J I H G F E C window well 32.06 sq ft F G D window well BY REVISIONS DATE +/-89'-3" LOWER LEVEL D CRAWL <5'-6" (EXEMPT) BATHROOM LAUNDRY B BEDROOM Z4A 50% PERMIT 12.12.19 Z4A PERMIT PRE APP 01.21.20 Z4A PERMIT 03.04.20 H BEDROOM BATHROOM W.I.C. +/-98'-9 99' BO STRUCTURE 7/8" BO STRUCTURE MAIN LEVEL MAIN LEVEL +/-97'-3" BO STRUCTURE GARAGE Y:\Shared\Data\_Z4 Projects\1924 920 East Hyman\Model\920 E Hyman.pln 138.69 sq ft 325.63 sq ft MECH 425.72 sq ft 160 sq ft C B A A LOWER LEVEL WALL AREAS SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 0 4' 8' J Drawn by: Z4A Date: 3/4/2020 Scale: AS NOTED I +/-89'-3" LOWER LEVEL 1 4 1,244.79 sq ft 16' LOWER LEVEL AREA PLAN SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 0 4' 8' 16' EXISTING FAR CALCULATION S A101 Plotted On: 3/4/2020 ZONE 4 ARCHITECTS LLC. SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW STATUTORY AND ALL OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING COPYRIGHT THERETO. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 10.46% ZONE 4 ARCHITECTS IS NOT LIABLE OR RESPONSIBLE AT ANY TIME FOR ANY CHANGES TO THESE DRAWINGS OR SPECIFICATIONS WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION. c 2017 ZONE 4 ARCHITECTS, LLC. THE INFORMATION AND DESIGN INTENT CONTAINED ON THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF ZONE 4 ARCHITECTS LLC. NO PART OF THIS INFORMATION MAY BE USED OR COPIED WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN PERMISSION OF ZONE 4 ARCHITECTS LLC. % of Exposed Wall (Exposed/Total) 144 Floor Area Calculations AREA LEGEND Allowable Floor Area 2,400.00 EXPOSED WALL SURFACE AREA HALL PRIMARY BED Proposed Lower Level Wall Calculations Total Wall Area (Sq.Ft.) Exposed Wall Area (Sq.Ft.) A B C D E F G H I J 425.72 160 464.57 37.1 224.47 192.89 29.03 63.67 201.91 31.84 19.22 0 107.89 24.83 14.61 14.14 1.89 5.74 7.35 21.31 GUEST BED 820.83 sq ft Overall Wall Areas (Sq.Ft.) stair 303 BURIED WALL AREA Wall Label 300 FAR DECK 175.54 sq ft GUEST BATH PRIMARY BATH PRIMARY CLOSET GARAGE AREA 301 302 304 305 DECK/PORCH AREA WWW.ZONE4ARCHITECTS.COM 1,831.20 Exposed Wall Areas (Sq.Ft.) 216.98 Proposed Lower Level Floor Area Calculations Lower Level Gross Floor Area (Sq.Ft.) 3 1,583.58 Lower Level Countable Floor Area (Sq.Ft.) 187.64 UPPER LEVEL AREA PLAN SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 0 4' 8' 16' 8' 16' 1,583.58 X 13.16% = 208.32 1,041.84 Main Level Countable Floor Area (Sq.Ft.) 1,041.84 Proposed Garage Area Calculations DS Garage at Main Level 448.69 (Actual Area) Garage Countable Floor Area (Sq.Ft.) 99.35 (448.69-250 = 198.69) (198.69 X %50 = 99.35 PANTRY Proposed Upper Level Floor Area Calculations LIVING Upper Level Gross Floor Area (Sq.Ft.) 820.83 1,041.84 sq ft Upper Level Countable Floor Area (Sq.Ft.) GARAGE 448.69 sq ft 820.83 RD MUD Proposed Deck/Porch Floor Area Calculations Deck/Porch Gross Floor Area (Sq.Ft.) Deck/Porch Countable Floor Area (Sq.Ft.) KITCHEN 360 Exempt (2,400 X %15 = 360) 266.21 HISTORIC PORCH DINING PDR W 0.00 90.67 sq ft DS Total Proposed Floor Area Calculations Lower Level Floor Area (Sq.Ft.) 187.64 Main Level Floor Area (Sq.Ft.) 1,041.84 Garage Floor Area (Sq.Ft.) 99.35 Upper Level Floor Area (Sq.Ft.) 820.83 Deck/Porch Floor Area (Sq.Ft.) 0.00 Total 5 2 2,149.66 AREA SUMMARY 920 East Hyman Avenue Aspen, CO 81611 City of Aspen, Pitkin County Main Level Gross Floor Area (Sq.Ft.) 920 EAST HYMAN Proposed Main Level Floor Area Calculations MAIN LEVEL AREA PLAN SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 0 4' -250.34 -250.34 21.31 sq ft 7.35 sq ft 5.74 sq ft 1.89 sq ft 14.14 sq ft 14.61 sq ft 24.83 sq ft +/-98'-9 99' BO STRUCTURE 7/8" BO STRUCTURE MAIN LEVEL MAIN LEVEL +/-97'-3" BO STRUCTURE GARAGE E 194.56 sq ft 57.93 sq ft 27.14 sq ft 178.75 sq ft 12.27 sq ft 10.53 sq ft J I H G F C window well 209.86 sq ft E D +/-89'-3" LOWER LEVEL D window well BED 2 POWDER BY REVISIONS DATE BATH 2 F BATH 1 BED 1 Z4A 50% PERMIT 12.12.19 Z4A PERMIT PRE APP 01.21.20 Z4A PERMIT 03.04.20 B MECH 19.22 sq ft Y:\Shared\Data\_Z4 Projects\1924 920 East Hyman\Model\920 E Hyman.pln 107.89 sq ft 356.44 sq ft LAUNDRY +/-98'-9 99' BO STRUCTURE 7/8" BO STRUCTURE MAIN LEVEL MAIN LEVEL +/-97'-3" BO STRUCTURE GARAGE BAR G BED 3 406.5 sq ft 160 sq ft BATH 3 1,583.58 sq ft TV / MEDIA A H J Drawn by: Z4A Date: 3/4/2020 Scale: AS NOTED I C B A +/-89'-3" LOWER LEVEL 1 4 LOWER LEVEL WALL AREAS SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 0 4' 8' 16' LOWER LEVEL AREA PLAN SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 0 4' 8' 16' PROPOSED FAR CALCULATION S A102 Plotted On: 3/4/2020 ZONE 4 ARCHITECTS LLC. SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW STATUTORY AND ALL OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING COPYRIGHT THERETO. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 11.85% ZONE 4 ARCHITECTS IS NOT LIABLE OR RESPONSIBLE AT ANY TIME FOR ANY CHANGES TO THESE DRAWINGS OR SPECIFICATIONS WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION. c 2017 ZONE 4 ARCHITECTS, LLC. THE INFORMATION AND DESIGN INTENT CONTAINED ON THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF ZONE 4 ARCHITECTS LLC. NO PART OF THIS INFORMATION MAY BE USED OR COPIED WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN PERMISSION OF ZONE 4 ARCHITECTS LLC. % of Exposed Wall (Exposed/Total) 145 MEMORANDUM TO: City Council FROM: Sara Ott, City Manager Pete Strecker, Finance Director MEETING DATE: May 12, 2020 RE: First Reading – 2020 Spring Supplemental Request of Council: Staff is requesting Council consideration of needed budgetary adjustments to address a combination of events including: (1) the lapse of annual appropriations at the end of 2019 for which there is still capital and operational project work to complete; (2) unforeseen changes that have occurred since the original 2020 Budget was adopted in November last year; and (3) technical actions to address internal transfers, one-time grant supported items, and equipment replacement funding. In total, the Spring Supplemental requests an increase of $42,066,758. Previous Actions: Council adopted the original 2020 Budget in November 2019, when there was a different economic environment than the present. With the COVID pandemic reaching the mountain communities in early March and severely limited economic activity in the Valley and beyond, City Council took emergency action and adopted two ordinances (Ord. #4 and #5, Series 2020) to appropriate $6 million in relief and recovery funding. The Council also adopted Resolution #34, Series 2020 to soften the immediate impact to the General Fund of carrying $3.5 million of this $6 million relief and recovery package, allowing for an interfund advance from the City’s Wheeler Opera House Fund with repayment terms for a 10 year period and at a rate equal to the current Treasury rate for the same duration. Summary and Background: Staff held a work session with Council on May 4, 2020 to walk through the combined “routine” Spring Supplemental items as well as the impact of COVID on both revenue expectations and recommended cost cutting measures proposed by the Administration to limit the impact to the financial health of the organization. The attached documents reflect the summarized Spring Supplemental package, separated by type of request. Given that the Council already took action within Ordinances #4 and #5, those impacts have been shown separately from the proposed supplemental request presented today, leaving a revised supplemental request of $42,066,758. To support the increased authority within the Spring Supplemental request, note the opening balance change for 2020 equal to $89.3M and is predominately a reflection of the unspent appropriation authority for 2019 capital projects that extended beyond the one fiscal year. Additionally, it does also reflect 2019 revenue collections above initial conservative projections when the budget was developed and includes savings from underspent operational budgets. The proposed revised annual spending plan results in an ending fund balance across City funds equal to $144.3M – this is greater than the original $127.4M anticipated and allows for some additional buffer in the event that current actions are not sufficient in this uncertain economy. 1 146 Original Budget Proj. Opening Balance Ord #4 & Ord #5 (Series 2020) Spring Supplemental Revised Budget $123,305,817 $0 $89,290,241 $212,596,058 $151,495,585 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,500,000 $0 $617,380 $199,590 ($25,016,960) $0 $151,495,585 $617,380 $199,590 ($25,016,960) $3,500,000 $151,495,585 $3,500,000 ($24,199,990) $130,795,595 Base New Requests (Exh B) Savings Program (Exh C) Carry Forwards (Exh D) Technical (Exh F) COVID Increases COVID Reductions (Exh H) $74,897,470 $1,979,440 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,000,000 $0 $0 $198,270 $3,826,330 $1,049,930 $468,980 $0 ($9,136,060) $74,897,470 $2,177,710 $3,826,330 $1,049,930 $468,980 $6,000,000 ($9,136,060) Operating Budget Original New Requests (Exh B) Carry Forwards (Exh E) Technical (Exh F) COVID Reductions (Exh H) $76,876,910 $28,660,750 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ($3,592,550) N/A $1,050,980 $51,324,198 $101,760 ($4,909,700) $79,284,360 $28,660,750 $1,050,980 $51,324,198 $101,760 ($4,909,700) Capital Outlay $28,660,750 $0 $47,567,238 $76,227,988 $7,408,320 $0 $0 $7,408,320 $112,945,980 $6,000,000 $43,974,688 $162,920,668 $34,501,270 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,500,000 $0 $199,590 ($2,107,520) $0 $34,501,270 $199,590 ($2,107,520) $3,500,000 $34,501,270 $3,500,000 ($1,907,930) $36,093,340 Total Appropriations $147,447,250 $9,500,000 $42,066,758 $199,014,008 Proj. Ending Balance $127,354,152 ($6,000,000) $23,022,953 $144,377,645 Original Revenues New Revenues Transfers COVID Reductions (Exh G) COVID Increases Revenues Debt Service Net Appropriations Original Transfers Technical (Exh F) COVID Reductions (Exh H) COVID Increases Transfers Recommendations: Staff recommends first reading approval of the revised spending plan for 2020, allowing for the re-appropriation of one-time capital and operational project budgets that lapsed at the end of 2019, approval of new requested funding, and to also reduce spending in other areas to respond to a new economic environment. City Manager Comments: 147 2 CITY OF ASPEN 2020 APPROPRIATIONS BY FUND Revenues Fund Name General Governmental Fund        001 ‐ General Fund Subtotal General Gov't Funds Projected  Opening  Balance 2020 Adopted  Ordinances  2020 Spring  Revenue #4 & #5 Supplemental 2020  Amended  Revenue  Budget Exhibit A Expenses 2020 Adopted  Ordinances  2020 Spring  Expense #4 & #5 Supplemental 2020  Amended  Expense  Budget 2020 Ending  Balance $21,738,324 $21,738,324 $36,091,050 $36,091,050 $3,500,000 $3,500,000 ($3,493,260) ($3,493,260) $36,097,790 $36,097,790 $36,709,130 $36,709,130 $3,500,000 $3,500,000 ($481,000) ($481,000) $39,728,130 $39,728,130 $18,107,984 $18,107,984 $7,722,372 $32,616,443 $103,630 $0 $5,238,857 $7,714,320 $48,525,279 $6,279,775 $1,673,013 $109,873,689 $13,692,910 $5,865,220 $2,993,610 $2,920,000 $914,010 $5,404,090 $21,687,160 $2,334,325 $1,436,490 $57,247,815 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ($4,214,700) ($1,972,000) ($1,240,900) ($823,000) $0 ($1,325,100) ($4,359,000) ($679,000) $0 ($14,613,700) $9,478,210 $3,893,220 $1,752,710 $2,097,000 $914,010 $4,078,990 $17,328,160 $1,655,325 $1,436,490 $42,634,115 $14,180,960 $5,459,320 $2,991,800 $2,920,000 $1,945,400 $6,809,520 $16,488,840 $2,709,290 $1,364,030 $54,869,160 $0 $3,500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,000,000 $1,500,000 $0 $6,000,000 ($1,202,628) $1,084,691 ($1,240,900) ($823,000) $0 ($1,157,860) $13,695,697 ($432,440) $75,507 $9,999,067 $12,978,332 $10,044,011 $1,750,900 $2,097,000 $1,945,400 $5,651,660 $31,184,537 $3,776,850 $1,439,537 $70,868,227 $4,222,250 $26,465,652 $105,440 $0 $4,207,467 $6,141,650 $34,668,902 $4,158,250 $1,669,966 $81,639,577 $1,026,470 $1,026,470 $6,244,110 $6,244,110 $0 $0 $6,244,110 $6,244,110 $6,238,030 $6,238,030 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,238,030 $6,238,030 $1,032,550 $1,032,550 Capital Projects Governmental Funds 000 ‐ Asset Management Plan Fund Subtotal Capital Fund $47,271,740 $47,271,740 $9,723,680 $9,723,680 $0 $0 ($111,000) ($111,000) $9,612,680 $9,612,680 $3,502,700 $3,502,700 $0 $0 $28,535,156 $28,535,156 $32,037,856 $32,037,856 $24,846,564 $24,846,564 Enterprise Proprietary Funds 421 ‐ Water Utility Fund 431 ‐ Electric Utility Fund 451 ‐ Parking Fund 471 ‐ Golf Course Fund 491 ‐ Truscott I Housing Fund 492 ‐ Marolt Housing Fund Subtotal Enterprise Funds $8,189,182 $5,161,141 $7,082,783 $576,062 $894,922 $2,041,095 $23,945,185 $10,162,120 $10,169,550 $4,939,030 $2,578,450 $2,401,400 $1,453,120 $31,703,670 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ($699,300) ($1,106,600) ($1,522,500) ($856,110) $0 $0 ($4,184,510) $9,462,820 $9,062,950 $3,416,530 $1,722,340 $2,401,400 $1,453,120 $27,519,160 $11,973,150 $10,083,450 $8,429,050 $2,341,270 $2,268,290 $2,457,590 $37,552,800 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,266,455 $1,772,840 ($145,137) ($312,535) $323,467 $266,680 $3,171,770 $13,239,605 $11,856,290 $8,283,913 $2,028,735 $2,591,757 $2,724,270 $40,724,570 $4,412,397 $2,367,801 $2,215,400 $269,667 $704,565 $769,945 $10,739,775 $3,867,693 $3,902,169 $970,788 $8,740,650 $5,538,880 $2,576,640 $2,369,740 $10,485,260 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ($1,797,520) $0 ($1,797,520) $5,538,880 $779,120 $2,369,740 $8,687,740 $5,806,600 $421,410 $2,347,420 $8,575,430 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $666,775 $174,990 $841,765 $5,806,600 $1,088,185 $2,522,410 $9,417,195 $3,599,973 $3,593,104 $818,118 $8,011,195 $212,596,058 $151,495,585 $3,500,000 ($24,199,990) $130,795,595 $147,447,250 $9,500,000 $42,066,758 $199,014,008 $144,377,645 $34,501,270 $116,994,315 $3,500,000 $0 ($1,907,930) ($22,292,060) $34,501,270 $112,945,980 $3,500,000 $6,000,000 ($1,907,930) $36,093,340 $43,974,688 $162,920,668 Special Revenue Governmental Funds 100 ‐ Parks and Open Space Fund 120 ‐ Wheeler Opera House Fund 130 ‐ Tourism Promotion Fund 131 ‐ Public Education Fund 132 ‐ REMP Fund 141 ‐ Transportation Fund 150 ‐ Housing Development Fund 152 ‐ Kids First Fund 160 ‐ Stormwater Fund Subtotal Special Revenue Funds Debt Service Governmental Fund 250 ‐ Debt Service Fund Subtotal Debt Service Fund Internal Proprietary Funds 501 ‐ Employee Benefits Fund 505 ‐ Employee Housing Fund 510 ‐ Information Technology Fund Subtotal Internal Service Funds ALL FUNDS Less Interfund Transfers NET APPROPRIATIONS $0 $0 $36,093,340 $94,702,255 148 3 Revenue 2020 SPRING SUPPLEMENTAL REVENUE DETAIL Department/Description Amount Asset Management Plan Fund: Because of CDOT grant funding requirements, the timeline for completion  of the Garmisch Bus Stop and Pedestrian Improvements project was advanced one year. The grant  redistributed cost sharing between the Transportation fund and the Asset Management fund, reducing the  original transfer amount of $156,000 from Transportation to $45,000. 000 ‐ Asset Management Fund Total: Transfer from Wheeler Opera House Fund: Transfer from the Wheeler Fund to cover a portion of the grant  review process assessment and overhaul, managed by the Quality Office within the Manager's Office.  See  "New Requests" for further specifics around this ask. Transfer from Multiple Funds: Transfers from non‐General Fund departments associated with the Central  Savings program per City Financial Policies, equal to 10% of operational savings in the preceding year. ($111,000) ($111,000) $9,000 $93,590 City Manager Subtotal: $102,590 Net Zero Impact ‐ 100% Grant funded Food Safety Program: The Environmental Health and Sustainability  Department was awarded two grants for a total of $6,000 to enhance the food safety program in the City of  Aspen.  The first provides $3,000 to go towards providing food safety trainings for restaurants which can  cover costs such as language translation services, materials and supplies, and refreshments for the  trainings.  The second, also for $3,000, goes to cover travel and lodging expenses plus registration for the  Food Program Manager to attend two conferences on food protection. One is put on by the FDA and the  other by the state of Colorado.  This request is to extend spending authority in the lines listed to allow for  the use of the awarded grant dollars $6,000 Net Zero Impact ‐ 100% Grant funded Radon Program: EH&S requests the budget authority for a Radon  Reimbursement Grant budget of $4,880.  With this grant, staff provides radon test kits and education to  residents in Aspen. Staff will provide training to the public on radon awareness in real estate transactions.   As part of the City's Radon Program staff will assistant homeowners with high radon by providing  information on how they can lower their lung cancer risk by installing radon mitigation and lowering radon  levels below the EPA action level of 4 pCi/L. Radon grant dollars also cover the cost of the department's  multi‐media outreach campaign on radon, including social media, newspaper ads, banners on Main Stand  informational post cards and posters posted throughout the community. $4,880 Environmental Health Subtotal: $10,880 001 ‐ General Fund Total: $113,470 Wheeler: Aspen Public House Pipe Repair & On Going Maintenance: An unexpected repair to the pipe  that carries grease from the restaurant floor drains and dishwashing stations was required in order for the  restaurant to continue  running efficiently and safely. This pipe must be maintained and pumped monthly  in order to abide with the required building code. In order to ensure that the tenant properly maintains this  item, Wheeler will schedule and oversee vendor in the monthly process ($750/month) and will charge the  cost back to the tenant in the monthly rent bill. $9,000 120 ‐ Wheeler Opera House Fund Total: $9,000 4 149 Revenue Department/Description Amount Updated revenue projection: Based on current trends revenue projections for  Fire Charge ($25,500) and  Raw Water ($54,000) were increased. Grant Funded: The Bureau of Reclamation grant will be used to implement water AMI and meter  replacement projects. 421 ‐ Water Utility Fund Total: $79,500 $500,000 $579,500 Updated revenue projection: Based on current trends revenue projections for Electric Development Fee  ($18,000) were increased. $18,000 Transfer from Water Utility Fund:  Revised apportionment of the automated metering (AIM) project  between the two utility funds based on the benefits provided to each fund.  A corresponding expense is  shown in the "Technical" section of this Spring Supplemental, with the result being a slightly smaller cost  burden to the Electric Utility. $208,000 431 ‐ Electric Utility Fund Total: $226,000 Total Revenue: $816,970 New Revenue Transfers Total Revenue: $617,380 $199,590 $816,970 150 5 Exhibit B ‐ New Requests 2020 SPRING SUPPLEMENTAL NEW REQUESTS Department/Description 50486 Garmisch Bus Stop and Pedestrian Improvements: CDOT awarded the City of Aspen a $600,000  grant for the Garmisch Bus Stop and Pedestrian Improvements project.  This is a reimbursement grant that  requires the project be completed by the end of 2021.  The design work needs to be completed by fall of  2020, in order to solicit bids, conduct public outreach, and start construction in 2021.  Funding and project  timelines need to be accelerated in order to meet the grant deadline. $156,000 was planned to be spent in  2021; however, this will need to be moved up to 2020 and the planned construction ($939,000) will be  moved to 2021.  The current funding requirement from the Transportation fund and the AMP fund will be  reduced by $300,000 each. One‐time Amount $156,000 Ice Garden Sanitary Sewer Replacement: The discharging sanitary sewer on the north east corner of the Ice  Garden Center is in poor condition and could shut down the center if a break occurs. Funds would replace  approximately one block of pipe. Roots and age have minimized the current capacity of discharge and staff  anticipates this section of pipe to have remaining limited life. The project originally started under the Asset  group to finalize design and was transferred to Engineering for construction in the summer of 2019. One‐ time $134,000 Airport Signal Repair: City Council approved the placement of a foundation and replacement of the light  pole that was damaged by a City vehicle on April 14, 2020 by Resolution #027. CDOT requested the City  proceed with the contracting and management of the project to reduce the cost by up to 25% and decrease  the time needed for placement of the signal. An insurance claim will be potentially required to cover cost  after placement is complete. One‐time $75,980 000 ‐ Asset Management Fund Total: $365,980 City Manager Administrative Assistant (0.7 FTE): The City Manager’s Office previously shared a position  with the Finance Department to perform two full time functions, that of an Administrative Assistant for the  Manager’s Office as well as the City’s Procurement Officer.  With the departure of this tenured individual,  the City has evaluated the needs of the organization and requests that these two roles be separated and  funded at a higher level to allow for a net increase of 1.0 FTE across the organization.  Given the City's  volume of procurement and the needs of the Manager’s Office (including Council support), broadening the  expectations of these two positions to match the demands associated with both roles necessitates two full  time staff. On‐going $61,640 Arts, Nonprofit, HHS Grant Program Evaluation: Based on feedback through previous award cycles, City  Staff has initiated a RFQ to seek out an organization to help administer an evaluation of the City’s grant  application and award process. This evaluation will include all grant awarding, including health and human  services (HHS), parks, recreation and the arts.  The cost of the evaluation is estimated at $18,000 and is  proposed to be split between the General Fund and the Wheeler Opera House Fund. One‐time $18,000 City Manager Subtotal $79,640 151 6 Exhibit B ‐ New Requests Department/Description Amount Procurement Officer (0.3 FTE): The City Manager’s Office previously shared a position with the Finance  Department to perform two full time functions, that of an Administrative Assistant for the Manager’s  Office as well as the City’s Procurement Officer.  With the departure of this tenured individual, the City has  evaluated the needs of the organization and requests that these two roles be separated and funded at a  higher level to allow for a net increase of 1.0 FTE across the organization.  Given the City's volume of  procurement and the needs of the Manager’s Office (including Council support), broadening the  expectations of these two positions to match the demands associated with both roles necessitates two full  time staff.  $32,830 The Procurement Officer role has changed to require a much higher level of engagement, including  increased audit and compliance, legal, and award disclosure requirements.  Because of these changes and  of the separation from the administrative roles previous layered on this position, the cost of this FTE is  higher than previously budgeted. On‐going Software Hosting Costs: Due to the delay in implementing new sales and lodging tax software, the Finance  Department is covering the maintenance and hosting costs for the legacy system longer than expected.   The additional cost for the year is slightly less than $9,000 and provides for technical assistance with the  system that continues to be "temperamental".  Ultimately, Finance would like to turn on the new system in  Oct/Nov to take advantage of the functionality of the new system, but understands that the current  environment is not the right moment to make the system live. One‐time. $8,800 Finance Subtotal: $41,630 Fee‐in‐Lieu Study Extension: In August of 2019, City Council approved a professional services contract with  White and Smith, in partnership with TischlerBise, for a study of Aspen's Fee‐in‐Lieu (FIL) for affordable  housing mitigation.  The study is evaluating the calculation, updates methods, legal sufficiency of related  code language and methodology, and relationship of the FIL to the Affordable Housing Credits Program.   The report will make recommendations for improvements to the program.  Per Council direction following  discussion of the report, a new contract with the consultant team would provide direction on any  additional requested analysis. One‐time $25,000 Planning Subtotal: $25,000 001 ‐ General Fund Total: $146,270 Theater Project Study Phase II ‐ Organizational Assessment: Following input from City Council in Fall 2019,  the Wheeler Opera House staff increased the scope of work for the Theatre Projects 2019 contract (Phase I  Feasibility Study). Phase II will include conducting an organizational/departmental review of the Wheeler  Opera House to determine the Wheeler's success in meeting its strategic goals over the last five years as  well as a review and recommendations for the long‐term sustainability and organization of the department.  This additional scope of work will include operations analysis, staff interviews and final recommendations.    The study beings on March 29 and will be completed by July 1, 2020. One‐time $35,000 152 7 Exhibit B ‐ New Requests Department/Description Aspen Public House Pipe Repair and Maintenance: An unexpected repair ($9,000) to the pipe that carries  grease from the restaurant floor drains and dishwashing stations was required in order for the restaurant  to continue running efficiently and safely. This pipe must be maintained and pumped monthly in order to  abide with the required building code. In order to ensure that the tenant properly maintains this item,  Wheeler will schedule and oversee vendor in the monthly process ($750/month) and will charge the cost  back to the tenant in the monthly rent bill. 120 ‐ Wheeler Fund Total: Yellow Brick Entrance Concrete Repair: The entrance landings and stairs have been deteriorating for a  number of years. The plan calls for removing the existing paint, patching, and cleaning the concrete stairs  and landings at east and west main entrances, repairing and encapsulating the steel stair nosing’s in an  epoxy paint, and adding a clear protective coating to the concrete surfaces. With a focus on historic  sensitivity, this process will improve the aesthetics at the entrances and protect the stairs from further  deterioration. This work is expected to last for ten years with minor touch ups. One‐time Amount $17,000 $52,000 $45,000 152 ‐ Kid's First Fund Total: $45,000 50745 Drying Bed Maintenance and Rebuild: The backwash pond for the clarifier residuals needs to have  the materials removed and taken to the landfill. The second piece of the project is to rebuild the drying bed  for placement of the new materials stored from the plant. One‐time $160,000 421 ‐ Water Utility Fund Total: $160,000 Renovations of Existing Employee Housing Units: Units within the current City of Aspen inventory have  been occupied for decades without significant improvements.  As these units turnover, the City needs to  perform renovations to make them livable for new tenants.  The prior City Manager unit on Cemetery Lane  will be renovated and converted into two units, providing additional housing in the city.  Units at Water  Place need carpet, paint, and countertop replacements, plus one unit needs changes to plumbing for  kitchen and laundry locations.  The proposed renovations will give these units new or extended useful life  and help the City  to ensure an appropriate level of housing for its staff.  One‐time. $480,000 505 ‐ Employee Housing Fund Total: $480,000 Total New Requests ‐ First Reading: Total New Requests ‐ Second Reading: Total Requests: $1,249,250 $0 $1,249,250 153 8 Exhibit C ‐ Savings 2020 DEPARTMENTAL SAVINGS Fund/Department City Clerk (113) City Manager (114) Human Resources (115) City Attorney (116) Central Savings "10%" Department Savings "50%"  $20 $27,290 $455,550 $285,650 $8,920 $44,120 $3,530 $80,380 Finance (117) Asset Management (119) Planning (122) Building (123) Police (221) Streets (321) Engineering (327) Environmental Health (431) Special Events (532) Recreation / ARC / AIG (Based on Subsidy) ‐ 542 Red Brick Center for the Arts (552) 001 ‐ General Fund  100 ‐ Parks and Open Space Fund 120 ‐ Wheeler Opera House Fund 141 ‐ Transportation Fund 152 ‐ Kids First Fund 160 ‐ Stormwater Fund 421 ‐ Water Utility Fund 431 ‐ Electric Utility Fund 451 ‐ Parking Fund 471 ‐ Golf Fund 510 ‐ Information Technology Fund $12,910 $8,420 $6,050 $2,430 $8,920 $4,180 $7,210 $5,230 $6,220 $10,680 $7,290 $547,560 $960 $0 $6,410 $5,950 $24,110 $0 $42,950 $0 $5,210 $0 $321,960 $41,580 $144,800 $32,520 $44,120 $290,080 $35,070 $102,210 $133,070 $109,500 $78,150 $1,770,500 $104,970 $0 $161,980 $127,460 $122,790 $252,830 $356,870 $55,550 $73,210 $167,020 Total Savings to Be Appropriated $633,150 $3,193,180 COVID19: 50% Reduction  in  Department Savings $13,650 $142,830 $22,060 $40,190 $160,980 $20,790 $72,400 $16,260 $22,060 $145,040 $17,540 $51,110 $66,540 $54,750 $39,080 $885,280 $52,490 $0 $80,990 $63,730 $61,400 $126,420 $178,440 $27,780 $36,610 $83,510 $1,596,650 The purpose of allowing carryforward savings is to provide an additional incentive for frugality by  operating departments. Unlike traditional governments, which have a “use it or lose it” approach to  annual operating budgets, Aspen’s policy encourages departments to create savings in their annual  operating budgets. Savings in annual operating budgets are distributed as follows: 50% of the savings are carried forward into the appropriate department’s savings account. 10% is allocated to a Central Savings account. 40% is returned to the appropriate fund balance. Carryforward Savings represent 50% of the previous year’s operating budget savings from individual  Departments or Funds. Departments and Funds are allocated these amounts as a reward for finding  efficiencies in their operations that meet their operating goals while spending less than their  appropriations. Prior year savings that are not expended are maintained in full and appropriated every  year unless directed otherwise by the City Manager. These appropriations can be spent on items  related to the Department’s or Fund’s mission but may not be used for ongoing expenditures. If a  particular expenditure was denied as part of the budget process, departmental savings may not be used  for this purpose without City Manager approval. Expenditures of $10,000 or more must be approved by  the City Manager. Departments and Funds can accrue these savings to a maximum of 15% of their  operating budgets. Financial constraints related to the COVID19 pandemic mean that the normal 50% departmental  carryforward amount has been reduced by 50%. 154 9 Exhibit D ‐ Operation Carry Forwards 2020 OPERATIONAL CARRY FORWARDS Department/Description Amount ERP ‐ Support Contract ‐ Funds will be used to support benefits/payroll configuration, benefits self‐service,  open enrollment, and other Human Resources related systems. $15,000 Human Resources Subtotal: $15,000 ERP ‐ Support Contract ‐ Funds will be used to support payroll, procurement, reporting, and configuration  of various finance related systems. $41,700 Finance Subtotal: $41,700 Historic Preservation Review Sheets ‐ Approved by Council on November 27, 2017.  In 2017, Community  Development Staff undertook enforcement on a historic preservation project where work was taking place  contrary to HPC approvals and building permits.  The enforcement action resulted in a $30,000 financial  assurance the owner was required to post during construction that would  not be refunded.  Council  approved moving the forfeited funds into ComDev's operating budget to create new processes to prevent  future violations.  Phase 1 of this project was completed in 2018, and resulted in a number of suggested  Phase 2 implementation steps.  Progress was made in 2019, but other workload, in particular Council  directed amendments to preservation benefits, took priority.  One‐quarter of the original budget remains  and will be used to conclude the project in 2020. $6,980 Historic Preservation Benefits Outreach ‐ Approved by Council May 29, 2018. City Council identified  amendments to historic preservation benefits as a priority in 2018, and authorized staff to conduct public  outreach.  Although outreach, such as an online survey, was completed, staff did the work in‐house and  funding was not used.  Adoption of the requested amendments took until summer 2019 to complete.  Staff  would like to focus the unspent funds, plus additional savings in the Community Development Department  budget, promoting remaining benefits.  This could include developing a technical assistance program on the  care of historic buildings and public education tools about Aspen's designated properties,  such as creating  a book, brochures, or marker program. $35,000 Electronic Permit System Training ‐ Council approved funds for the design, build, and implementation of a  new permits management system for the City.  All development permits are live in the system, and land use  applications are just starting to be put into the system.  These funds will be used to train both staff and  stakeholders in the system's operation.  In addition, we need to invest funds to train staff involved with  system administration to increase internal capacity to address ongoing maintenance and system issues.  $30,870 Wireless Facilities Design Guidelines and Public Outreach ‐ Approved August 8, 2019. Staff request funds  be carried forward  to complete the final work on the Wireless Communications Facilities Design Guidelines  to ensure the City has robust requirements related to wireless facilities, particularly in the right‐of‐way.  Funds have thus far enabled staff to provide information to the community about the changed local  regulations in response to state and federal rules, as well as provided an opportunity for the community to  weigh in on other changes they desire.  Council passed Ordinance #3 Series 2020 on April 28, 2020. $30,260 155 10 Exhibit D ‐ Operation Carry Forwards Department/Description Census Organizing Project ‐ Approved on April 9, 2019. In 2018, Council approved the Census Organizing  Project to develop and execute a plan for the City of Aspen to assist with the 2020 U.S. Census.  These funds  need to be carried forward in order to complete the project and support the City's collaborative efforts  with Census project partners valley‐wide. Amount $16,190 Affordable Housing Fee‐in‐Lieu Update ‐ Approved on August 26, 2019. The land use code requires an  update to the cash‐in‐lieu charged for affordable housing mitigation every five years.  City Council  requested this study be accelerated by a year and completed in 2019.  The project focuses on more Aspen‐ specific costs, rather than national or statewide averages as the current fee does.  Additionally, the fee will  be updated to reflect the elimination of categories 6 and 7 in the Housing Guidelines. The rollover of these  funds from 2019 will allow the contract for White and Smith, in partnership with TischlerBise, to complete  the FIL report.  $33,450 Lift 1A Planning ‐ Approved by Council in 2019 as a supplemental funding request. Staff requests carryover  of the  supplemental funding to address potential additional review and partnership needs that may arise  as part of the ongoing Lift 1 process.  All stakeholders are working together in moving forward with final  development applications for the project.  As the City is heavily involved in this effort, funds will assist the  City in covering miscellaneous additional expenses that may arise, including any costs related to seeking a  tramway board variance, community outreach, and additional work that may be needed as the proposal is  revised and finalized.  $15,000 Community Development Subtotal: $167,750 001 ‐ General Fund Total: $224,450 Aggregate Equipment/Maintenance/Repair Carry Forwards $466,780 Aggregate PC Replacement Carry Forwards $339,480 Aggregate Workstation Replacement Carry Forwards $19,220 Other Operational Carry Forward Requests Total: Total Operational Carry Forward Requests: $825,480 $1,049,930 156 11 Exhibit E ‐ Capital Carry Forwards 2020 CAPITAL CARRY FORWARDS Lifetime  Budget Project Title 50922 HWY 82 Roundabout Evaluation 50486 Garmisch Bus Stop and Pedestrian Improvements 50473 Paving 4th Street Design and Construction 50903 Summer Road Improvements ‐ 2019 50488 Ute Avenue Traffic Calming and Trail Connection 50844 Phase 1 Main St Improvements to signals with CDOT Coordination 50842 City Survey Monument Maintenance Engineering Subtotal: 50952 ARC Downstairs Remodel 50360 AIG Cooling Tower replacement 50956 Water Feature Replacement 50945 Sound Baffling 50797 ARC Siding $128,000 $1,416,000 $110,000 $70,000 $240,000 $40,000 $20,000 $450,000 $85,000 $95,000 $90,000 $15,000 2019 Carry  Forward Completion  Estimate $128,000 Fall 2020 $111,365 Fall 2022 $0 Fall 2020 $22,000 Fall 2020 $52,500 Spring 2021 $40,000 Spring 2021 $8,961 Summer 2020 $362,826 12/1/2020 11/1/2020 12/1/2020 10/1/2020 10/31/2020  Recreation Subtotal: $100,000 $84,728 $44,277 $34,617 $10,522 $274,144 50064_APD Project 50074_Pedestrian Mall ‐ Planning and Design (ONLY) 50060_Old Powerhouse Preservation Project 51112 City Offices ‐ 425 Rio Grande 51113 City Offices ‐ Armory Renovation 51114 City Offices ‐ Existing Rio Grande Building  Asset Management Subtotal: $22,861,668 $9,758 $1,942,000 $923,782 $3,551,700 $0 $33,040,260 $26,307,409 $13,911,660 $200,000 $1,200,000 $1,200,000 $28,640,949 9/1/2020 12/31/2020 12/31/2024 12/31/2021 12/31/2024 12/31/2021 51059 Core City Network ‐ AMP ‐ 2019 $195,700 $195,700 $195,700 7/1/2021 50259_Electronic Permitting System Community Development ‐ Planning Subtotal: $719,350 $19,262 $19,262 6/1/2020 50829 Electrical Restraint Device and Cameras 51012 Dispatch Center Equipment ‐ 2019 $89,000 $113,200 $31,055 $113,200 $144,255 12/31/2020 12/31/2020 $585,800 $54,200 $48,200 $237,600 $0 $0 $237,600 2/29/2020 11/30/2020 11/30/2020  Information Technology Subtotal: Police Subtotal: 51014 Fleet ‐ 2019 51016 Electrical ‐ Streets Facilities ‐ 2019 50834 Exterior Streets Facilities 2018  Streets Subtotal: $29,874,736 000 ‐ Asset Management Fund Total: 50309_Castle Creek Music School Trail 51186 Galena Plaza and Pedestrian Corridor 50974 Parks Campus Drainage and Paving 50285_Cozy Point Grading/Drainage Improvements 50977 Cozy Point Ranch Management Plan Implementation* 51001 Tiehack / Maroon Creek Bridges Concrete Repairs 50971 Fleet ‐ Parks ‐ 2019 50779 Oklahoma Flat Trail Railing Replacement $1,109,000 $1,226,120 $150,000 $180,000 $250,000 $60,000 $349,000 $55,000 $1,109,000 $163,598 $0 $0 $0 $0 $47,721 $0 9/30/2020 10/31/2021 10/31/2020 10/31/2020 10/31/2020 10/31/2020 6/30/2020 8/31/2020 12 157 Exhibit E ‐ Capital Carry Forwards Project Title 50872 John Denver Sanctuary 50078_Hunter/Smuggler Co‐Op Implementation ‐ Recreation 50322 Glory Hole Park 51111 Lift 1A/Dolinsek Planning 50986 Irrigation Efficiency Improvements 50772 Archery Range Improvements 100 ‐ Parks and Open Space Fund Total: Lifetime  2019 Carry  Completion  Budget Forward Estimate $94,579 $30,834 8/31/2020 $125,000 $0 11/30/2020 $225,000 $0 10/31/2020 $30,000 $5,000 10/31/2021 $200,000 $17,839 10/31/2020 $15,000 $0 10/31/2020 $1,373,992 51036 Production Improvements ‐ 2019 51030 Interior ‐ Wheeler Opera House ‐ 2019 51042 Core City Network ‐ Wheeler ‐ 2019 51041 Wheeler Building and Site Improvements 51031 Electrical ‐ Wheeler Opera House ‐ 2019 120 ‐ Wheeler Opera House Fund Total: $166,550 $57,000 $6,000 $2,283,420 $124,000 $106,577 $15,277 $6,000 $1,775,415 $103,722 $2,006,991 5/1/2020 6/1/2020 12/31/2020 11/1/2020 12/31/2020 51109 CMAQ Grant for WE‐Cycle Stations and Equipment 51085 Rubey Park Maintenance ‐ 2019 141 ‐ Transportation Fund Total: $180,000 $138,400 $180,000 $0 $180,000 12/31/2020 12/31/2020 $25,650,000 $13,595,215 $76,675,000 $61,960 $500,000 $38,102 $13,695,277 12/31/2020 12/31/2028 12/31/2024 50542_PPP Development Rental Housing 51225 Lumber Yard Housing Development 51088 Burlingame Phase 3 ‐ Public Outreach and Design 150 ‐ Housing Development Fund Total: 51020 Park Avenue Stormwater Conveyance ‐ 2019 50849 Master Planning ‐ River Management Plan Phase II 51021 Mud and Debris Flow Alert System ‐ 2019 50129_Aspen Mtn Drainage Basin Improvements 50126_SW Master Planning 2016 50850 Master Planning ‐ Riparian Area Master Plan 160 ‐ Stormwater Fund Total: $100,000 $60,000 $50,000 $250,506 $225,000 $60,000 $0 $60,000 $50,000 $30,896 $31,637 $19,134 $191,667 12/1/2020 12/1/2020 12/1/2020 4/1/2020 12/1/2020 6/1/2020 50135_Reclaimed Waterline Completion at ACSD 50132_New Equipment Storage Building 50565 Castle Creek Headgate/Pipeline 50568 Reservoir and Water Treatment Plant and Improvements 50745 Backwash Pond ‐ Master Plan & Solids Mitigation 50566 Maroon Creek Headgate/Pipeline 50939 Maroon Creek Hydro Building Repairs 50942 Integrated Resource Plan 50573 Altitude Valve at Tiehack Tank 50937 WTP Campus ‐ Exterior Building Improvements 50927 Fleet ‐ Water ‐ 2019 50755 USGS Gaging Stations ‐ 2018 50556_Water Site Maintenance 51079 Core City Network ‐ Water ‐ 2019 50571 12 Inch Line to Tiehack Tank Feed 50933 Kayak Course Improvements ‐ 2019 50265_Core City Network ‐ Water ‐ 2016 421 ‐ Water Utility Fund Total: $1,742,910 $880,000 $160,000 $120,000 $1,110,000 $160,000 $60,000 $275,000 $50,000 $645,000 $45,000 $40,000 $125,000 $12,700 $1,835,000 $10,000 $8,240 $0 $312,733 $124,950 $119,915 $81,778 $67,401 $59,024 $51,895 $50,000 $47,600 $45,000 $40,000 $34,872 $12,700 $12,614 $10,000 $1,163 $1,071,645 2022 ‐ 2023 12/31/2020 12/31/2020 12/31/2020 12/31/2020 12/31/2020 12/31/2020 2020‐2021 12/31/2020 12/31/2022 12/31/2020 12/31/2020 12/31/2020 12/31/2021 12/31/2020 12/31/2020 12/31/2021 158 13 Exhibit E ‐ Capital Carry Forwards Project Title 50594 Electric AMI ‐ Mesh Network 50891 Electric System Replacement ‐ 2019 50595 Other Renewable Opportunities ‐ 2018 50897 Core City Network ‐ Electric ‐ 2019 50266_Core City Network ‐ Electric ‐ 2016 431 ‐ Electric Utility Fund Total: 51119 30 Additional Parking Spaces 50605 Kiosk ‐ Airport 51026 Core City Network ‐ Parking ‐ 2019 50267_Core City Network ‐ Parking ‐ 2016 Lifetime  2019 Carry  Completion  Budget Forward Estimate $1,800,000 $1,776,620 2021‐2022 $200,000 $35,000 12/31/2020 $50,000 $26,065 2021‐2022 $3,500 $3,500 12/31/2021 $2,580 $1,395 12/31/2021 $1,842,580 $95,000 $110,000 $6,000 $5,600 $0 $16,673 $6,000 $5,600 $28,273 12/31/2020 7/20/2020 12/31/2020 12/31/2020 $154,000 $135,250 $10,350 $7,400 $10,000 $104,400 $5,600 $0 $0 $10,350 $0 $0 $0 $2,045 $12,395 12/31/2020 12/31/2020 12/31/2020 12/31/2020 12/31/2020 12/31/2020 12/31/2020 51072 Truscott Phase I ‐ 400‐1000 Roof and Gutter Replacement 50624 Truscott Asphalt Overlay 51073 Truscott Boiler in Clubhouse 51074 Truscott Clubhouse Deck Replacement 50854 Truscott Snow Removal Equipment Replacement 491 ‐ Truscott I Housing Fund Total: $657,427 $40,000 $25,000 $25,000 $10,000 $319,057 $0 $0 $0 $0 $319,057 12/31/2020 12/31/2020 12/31/2020 12/31/2020 12/31/2020 51066 Marolt ‐ Full Exterior Paint & Repair $275,000 $275,000 $275,000 11/1/2020 50231_540 Employee Housing ‐ Construction 50681_Water Place Phase II ‐ Design 505 ‐ Employee Housing Fund Total: $5,426,830 $3,350,000 $124,775 $62,000 $186,775 12/31/2020 12/31/2021 50237_Galena Plaza Fiber 51055 Small Cell ‐ 2019 51043 Fiber Investments ‐ 2019 51044 Network Services ‐ 2019 50819 Microsoft Active Directory Upgrade 51048 CitySource Refresh ‐ 2019 50879 Community Broadband – Create Aspen MeetMe Center 51107 Streets Generator 510 ‐ Information Technology Fund Total: $125,000 $60,000 $115,000 $86,000 $18,150 $8,000 $86,000 $30,000 $80,177 $60,000 $55,736 $50,000 $11,635 $0 $4,193 $4,069 $265,810 7/1/2021 12/31/2020 12/31/2020 12/31/2020 12/31/2020 12/31/2020 12/31/2020 9/1/2020 451 ‐ Parking Fund Total: 50783 Fleet ‐ Golf ‐ 2018 50203_Fleet ‐ Golf ‐ 2016 51008 Core City Network ‐ Golf ‐ 2019 50198_Exterior ‐ Golf and Nordic Clubhouse 51007 Golf Course Annual Improvements ‐ 2019 50784 Facility Work ‐ Golf and Nordic Clubhouse 50271_Core City Network ‐ Golf ‐ 2016 471 ‐ Golf Course Fund Total: 492 ‐ Marolt Housing Fund Total: Grand Total: $51,324,198 159 14 Exhibit F ‐ Technical Adjustments 2020 TECHNICAL ADJUSTMENTS Department/Description Net Zero Impact ‐ The GIS flyover project (51252 GIS Aerial Photography ‐ 2020) update came in under  budget.  The unspent authority (plus additional departmental savings) is requested within the Engineering  operational budget to pay for temporary labor costs to incorporate the updated data into the GIS layers. 000 ‐ Asset Management Fund Total: Tobacco Tax for Human Services: Revenues collected from the City's tobacco tax will be used to pay for a  portion of an intergovernmental agreement for the provision of mental health services in Pitkin County.  The adopted 2020 budget included $74,078 in funding for this IGA. The total cost to the City of the IGA is  $107,550. The resolution to adopt the agreement is scheduled to go before Council on May 12, 2020. Amount ($29,560) ($29,560) $33,420 Mayor and Council Subtotal: $33,420 Net Zero Impact ‐ 100% Grant funded Food Safety Program: The Environmental Health and Sustainability  Department was awarded two grants for a total of $6,000 to enhance the food safety program in the City of  Aspen.  The first provides $3,000 to go towards providing food safety trainings for restaurants which can  cover costs such as language translation services, materials and supplies, and refreshments for the  trainings.  The second, also for $3,000, goes to cover travel and lodging expenses plus registration for the  Food Program Manager to attend two conferences on food protection. One is put on by the FDA and the  other by the state of Colorado.  This request is to extend spending authority in the lines listed to allow for  the use of the awarded grant dollars $6,000 Net Zero Impact ‐ 100% Grant funded Radon Program: EH&S requests the budget authority for a Radon  Reimbursement Grant budget of $4,880.  With this grant, staff provides radon test kits and education to  residents in Aspen. Staff will provide training to the public on radon awareness in real estate transactions.   As part of the City's Radon Program staff will assistant homeowners with high radon by providing  information on how they can lower their lung cancer risk by installing radon mitigation and lowering radon  levels below the EPA action level of 4 pCi/L. Radon grant dollars also cover the cost of the department's  multi‐media outreach campaign on radon, including social media, newspaper ads, banners on Main Stand  informational post cards and posters posted throughout the community. $4,880 Net Zero Impact ‐ 100% Grant Funded: In late 2019, the Colorado Department of Local Affairs (DOLA)  awarded a $24,740 grant to the City of Aspen in support of ComDev's Uphill Economy initiative.  The  Department requests that Council increase the Community Development Department's appropriation in  the amount of the grant to enable the Department to further the goals of the Uphill Economy program.   $24,740 Environmental Health Subtotal: $35,620 Net Zero Impact ‐ GIS Flyover Temporary Labor Support: In order to incorporate the scheduled 2020   flyover data, the City needs to bring in temporary labor to update the multiple GIS layers.  Each  department's savings were reduced, as was project 51252 GIS Aerial Photography ‐ 2020 for the unneeded  authority that remained once the bids were collected. $47,840 Engineering Subtotal: $47,840 001 ‐ General Fund Total: $116,880 160 15 Exhibit F ‐ Technical Adjustments Department/Description Amount Transfer ‐ Arts, Non‐Profit, & HHS City of Aspen Grant Program Evaluation (50% Contribution)The City of  Aspen, led by the Quality Office, is completing an assessment of the overall grants program and has  completed vendor selection. The allocated amount needed to cover the cost of administering this  evaluation is estimated at $18,000 to be split between the City of Aspen General Fund and the Wheeler  Opera House Fund. The Wheeler's 50% project contribution ($9,000) was authorized but not budgeted for  in the 2020 planning cycle.  The Wheeler Arts Grants account for approximately 25% of the overall grant  pool. 120 ‐ Wheeler Opera House Fund Total: Transfer ‐ Reduced the transfer to the Asset Management fund based on the timing and grant funding of  the 50486 Garmisch Bus Stop and Pedestrian Improvements project.  See new requests for additional  details. $9,000 $9,000 ($111,000) 141 ‐ Transportation Fund Total: ($111,000) 50568 Reservoir and Water Treatment Plant and Improvements: (Resolution #29 Apr 14, 2020)  Replacement of slide gates, overflow piping at reservoir, chara weed removal, East WTP flocculator rebuild,  replacing two filter inlet valves, and concrete repair work. $131,320 Transfer ‐ Revised apportionment of the automated metering (AIM) project between the two utility funds  based on the benefits provided to each fund resulting in a slightly smaller cost burden to the Electric Utility. $208,000 421 Water Utility Fund Total: $339,320 Workers' Compensation was not loaded in the system when the 2020 Budget Resolution was calculated for  adoption.  This action corrects this oversight.  001 ‐ General Fund 100 ‐ Parks and Open Space Fund 120 ‐ Wheeler Opera House Fund 141 ‐ Transportation Fund 150 ‐ Housing Development Fund 152 ‐ Kids First Fund 160 ‐ Stormwater Fund 421 ‐ Water Utility Fund 431 ‐ Electric Utility Fund 451 ‐ Parking Fund 471 ‐ Golf Course Fund 491 ‐ Truscott I Housing Fund 492 ‐ Marolt Housing Fund 510 ‐ Information Technology Fund $185,760 $70,260 $14,130 $1,940 $1,330 $2,170 $6,900 $27,200 $13,880 $15,850 $9,610 $1,220 $1,130 $720 161 16 Exhibit F ‐ Technical Adjustments Department/Description Transfer: The City is updating its GIS maps with an updated flyover and costs are being distributed to  various user departments. 572 ‐ Parks and Open Space 132 ‐ Transportation 421 ‐ Kids First 328 ‐ Stormwater 322 ‐ Water 323 ‐ Electric 136 ‐ Parking 582 ‐ Golf Course 118 ‐ Information Technology Transfer: To Central Savings. 100 ‐ Parks and Open Space Fund 141 ‐ Transportation Fund 152 ‐ Kids First Fund 160 ‐ Stormwater Fund 431 ‐ Electric Utility Fund 471 ‐ Golf Fund Amount $1,000 $1,000 $500 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $500 $1,000 $960 $6,410 $5,950 $24,110 $42,950 $5,210 Total Technical Adjustments $770,330 Transfers Operations Capital Total Technical Adjustments $199,590 $439,420 $131,320 $770,330 162 17 Exhibit G ‐ COVID Revenue Adjustments 2020 COVID REVENUE ADJUSTMENTS Fund 001 ‐ General Fund 100 ‐ Parks and Open Space Fund 120 ‐ Wheeler Opera House Fund 130 ‐ Tourism Promotion Fund 131 ‐ Public Education Fund 141 ‐ Transportation Fund 150 ‐ Housing Development Fund 152 ‐ Kids First Fund 421 ‐ Water Utility Fund 431 ‐ Electric Utility Fund 451 ‐ Parking Fund 471 ‐ Golf Course Fund 505 ‐ Employee Housing Fund Taxes Fees Transfers Total Reductions ($2,331,000) ($1,275,730) $0  ($3,606,730) ($4,114,700) $0  ($100,000) ($4,214,700) ($1,981,000) $0  $0  ($1,981,000) ($1,240,900) $0  $0  ($1,240,900) ($823,000) $0  $0  ($823,000) ($1,325,100) $0  $0  ($1,325,100) ($4,359,000) $0  $0  ($4,359,000) ($679,000) $0  $0  ($679,000) $0  ($1,278,800) $0  ($1,278,800) $0  ($1,332,600) $0  ($1,332,600) $0  ($1,522,500) $0  ($1,522,500) $0  ($646,110) ($210,000) ($856,110) $0  $0  ($1,797,520) ($1,797,520) Total Across Funds (16,853,700) (6,055,740) (2,107,520) (25,016,960) 163 18 Exhibit H ‐ COVID Expense Adjustments 2020 COVID EXPENSE ADJUSTMENTS Fund 000 ‐ Asset Management Plan Fund 001 ‐ General Fund 100 ‐ Parks and Open Space Fund 120 ‐ Wheeler Opera House Fund 130 ‐ Tourism Promotion Fund 131 ‐ Public Education Fund 141 ‐ Transportation Fund 150 ‐ Housing Development Fund 152 ‐ Kids First Fund 160 ‐ Stormwater Fund 421 ‐ Water Utility Fund 431 ‐ Electric Utility Fund 451 ‐ Parking Fund 471 ‐ Golf Course Fund 491 ‐ Truscott I Housing Fund 492 ‐ Marolt Housing Fund 510 ‐ Information Technology Fund Total Labor / GOMs Operating / Savings Capital Transfers $0  $0  ($1,676,000) $0  ($1,478,410) ($1,812,270) $0  ($892,910) ($245,480) ($233,200) ($1,835,300) ($443,250) ($33,080) ($181,000) ($703,000) ($86,180) $0  ($1,240,900) $0  $0  $0  ($823,000) $0  $0  ($8,280) ($1,367,880) $0  ($33,150) ($1,650) $0  $0  $0  ($89,230) ($83,730) ($406,700) ($50,400) ($34,190) ($101,610) $0  ($138,480) ($19,490) ($451,870) $0  ($165,450) ($58,140) ($345,280) $0  ($87,830) ($23,140) ($184,970) $0  ($95,930) ($39,340) ($137,670) ($198,700) ($48,750) ($2,140) $0  $0  ($8,930) ($2,010) $0  $0  ($8,330) ($11,580) ($126,520) ($90,000) ($47,930) ($2,046,160) Total ($1,676,000) ($4,183,590) ($2,757,230) ($1,003,260) ($1,240,900) ($823,000) ($1,409,310) ($1,650) ($630,060) ($274,280) ($636,810) ($491,250) ($304,040) ($424,460) ($11,070) ($10,340) ($276,030) ($7,089,900) ($4,909,700) ($2,107,520) ($16,153,280) 164 19 ORDINANCE No. 7 (Series of 2020) AN ORDINANCE APPROPRIATING AN INCREASE IN THE  ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN FUND EXPENDITURES OF $28,535,156;  WHEELER OPERA HOUSE FUND OF $1,084,691;  HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND OF $13,695,697;  STORMWATER FUND OF $75,507;  WATER UTILITY FUND OF $1,266,455;  ELECTRIC UTILITY FUND OF $1,772,840;  TRUSCOTT I HOUSING FUND OF $323,467;  MAROLT HOUSING FUND OF $266,680;  EMPLOYEE HOUSING FUND $666,775;  INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FUND OF $174,990. AN ORDINANCE DECREASING AN APPROPRIATION IN THE  GENERAL FUND OF $481,000;  PARKS AND OPEN SPACE FUND OF $1,202,628;  TOURISM PROMOTION FUND OF $1,240,900;  PUBLIC EDUCATION FUND OF $823,000  KIDS FIRST FUND OF $432,440;  TRANSPORTATION FUND OF $1,157,860;  PARKING FUND OF $145,137;  GOLF COURSE FUND OF $312,535. WHEREAS, by virtue of Section 9.12 of the Home Rule Charter, the City Council may make supplemental appropriations; and WHEREAS, the City Manager has certified that the City has unappropriated current year revenues and/or unappropriated prior year fund balance available for appropriations in the following funds: Asset Management Plan Fund, General Fund, Parks And Open Space Fund, Wheeler Opera House Fund, Tourism Promotion Fund, Public Education Fund, Transportation Fund, Housing Development Fund, Kids First Fund, Stormwater Fund, Water Utility Fund, Electric Utility Fund, Parking Fund, Golf Course Fund, Truscott Housing Fund, Marolt Housing Fund, Employee Housing Fund, Information Technology Fund. WHEREAS, the City Council is advised that certain expenditures, revenue and transfers must be approved. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO: 165 Section 1 Upon the City Manager’s certification that there are current year revenues and/or prior year fund balances available for appropriation in the above-mentioned funds, the City Council hereby makes supplemental appropriations as itemized in the Exhibit A. Section 2 If any section, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this ordinance is for any reason invalid or unconstitutional by any court or competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion thereof. INTRODUCED, READ, APPROVED AND ORDERED PUBLISHED AND/OR POSTED ON FIRST READING on the 12th day of May 2020. A public hearing on the ordinance shall be held on the 26th day of May 2020, in the City Council Chambers, City Hall, Aspen, Colorado. ATTEST: ________________________ Nicole Henning, City Clerk ________________________ Torre, Mayor FINALLY ADOPTED AFTER PUBLIC HEARING on the 26th day of May 2020. ATTEST: ________________________ Nicole Henning, City Clerk ________________________ Torre, Mayor Approved as to Form: ________________________ Jim True, City Attorney 166 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Torre and Aspen City Council FROM: Kevin Rayes, Planner THRU: Phillip Supino, Community Development Director MEMO DATE: May 4, 2020 MEETING DATE: May 12th, 2020 RE: Extension of Vested Rights Request – Aspen Valley Hospital (AVH), 401 Castle Creek Road: Resolution No. 041, Series of 2020 APPLICANT: Aspen Valley Hospital STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that City District, a Special District (Health Council approve Resolution No. 041, Series 2020 thereby approving the request for an extension of vested District) rights. REPRESENTATIVE: Chris Bendon, Bendon Adams LOCATION: 401 Road Castle Creek CURRENT ZONING: Public (PUB) with a Planned Development Overlay SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The Applicant seeks an extension of vested property rights for the development of Phase IV of the Aspen Valley Hospital District Master Facilities Plan. The applicant is requesting a five (5) year extension that would extend vesting until May 23rd, 2025. This application represents the 1st extension of vested rights request by the Applicant. Figure 1: Master Site Phasing Diagram 167 REQUEST OF CITY COUNCIL: The Applicant is requesting a five (5) year extension of vested rights for phase IV of the hospital development (phases I-III are complete). The request would extend the approvals granted from Ordinance No. 6, Series of 2013, which granted a seven-year vesting period. This request will be reviewed in accordance with Chapter 26.308.010.C, Extension or Reinstatement of Vested Property Rights. City Council is the final review authority. LOCATION/BACKGROUND: The Aspen Valley Hospital District Master Plan approved a large-scale, multi-year project involving significant expansions of the main hospital building, along with infrastructure and campus improvements. The project was approved via City Council Resolution No. 3, Series 2009, granting a total of 214,000 sq. ft. of gross floor area for development, which anticipated as much as a 20-year build-out timeline for the hospital. The approval divided construction into four phases. Phases I-III are complete. Phase IV has yet to begin and is the subject of this application. Phases III and IV received final approval simultaneously via Ordinance No. 6, Series 2013, which granted a seven-year vesting period (to expire on May 23, 2020). Phase IV represents just four percent of the total project scope and is considered the smallest phase of the development. 8,575 sq. ft. of floor area was approved for this phase; 1,854 sq. ft. of floor area is allocated to the basement and 6,721 sq. ft. is allocated to “Level One”. The development consists of an outpatient clinic, a central registration area, a new main entrance, AVH Foundation Offices, a chapel and a café expansion. The Aspen Valley Hospital Expansion has been funded through a variety of mechanisms, including a Hospital Taxing District mill levy and significant funding donations. To date, approximately $148 million has been invested in the campus, and was allocated accordingly to fund phases I through III. Phase III alone required an investment of $64.8 million. For the completion of Phase IV to begin, additional fundraising is needed, which in turn necessitates additional time. All other aspects of the Phase IV Aspen Valley Hospital District Master Facilities Plan remain unchanged and no amendments are requested. Phase IV will be constructed as approved by City Council Pursuant to Ordinance No. 6, Series of 2013. REQUEST: The applicant requests a 5-year extension of vested rights. Approval of the request would provide the applicant additional time for fundraising, to refine estimates and to evaluate financial costs associated with initiating the final phase of construction. If a 5-year extension is granted, vesting would extend until May 23rd, 2025. If the extension request is not granted and the applicant does not submit for a building permit within the established vesting period, the existing approvals would expire on May 23rd, 2020 and further City review under new land use code standards would be required. An extension of vested rights is a discretionary review by the City Council. Staff responses to the required code criteria for an extension can be viewed in Exhibit A. 168 Page 2 of 3 STAFF FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION: Staff has reviewed the applicant’s request against the relevant review criteria and finds the following: Since Council approved Resolution No 3, Series 2009, project Phases I through III have been completed. It is worth noting that Section 3 of the Council Resolution anticipated a 20-year timeline to complete the project, which would end extend to 2029. The applicant posits that extending the vesting period to May 23rd, 2025 (5-years) would provide sufficient time to pursue additional funding and to refine estimates. With vesting for Phase IV expiring on May 23rd, building permit submittal is imminent if an extension is not granted. Significant financial investments that have been made thus far in the hospital expansion. The applicant has paid all applicable impact fees associated with the first three phases of development and plans to pay all required fees associated with Phase IV. Staff acknowledges the progress that has been made thus far on the project. Phase IV consists of only four percent of the total floor area of the entire campus development. Staff believes that a 5-year extension of vested rights would provide the applicant enough time to raise the required funds to finish the project, while remaining within the 20-year timeline that was anticipated in Resolution No. 3, Series 2009. Granting the extension will provide a clear community benefit that will serve Aspen and the greater Roaring Fork Valley. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the request for an Extension of Vested Rights, finding that the application does comply with the applicable review criteria. PROPOSED MOTION (WORDED IN THE AFFIRMATIVE): “I move to approve Resolution No. 041, Series of 2020 granting a five-year extension of vested property rights for Phase IV of the Aspen Valley Hospital.” Attachments: Exhibit A – Staff Findings – Extension of Vested Rights Exhibit B – Council Resolution No. 3, Series 2009 Exhibit C – Ordinance No. 6, Series 2013 Exhibit D – Application Exhibit E – Affidavit of Public Notice 169 Page 3 of 3 RESOLUTION NO. 041 (Series of 2020) A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN CITY COUNCIL APPROVING AN EXTENSION OF THE VESTED RIGHTS ASSOCIATED WITH COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 3 (SERIES OF 2009), PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2, SERIES 2013, ORDINANCE NO. 6 (SERIES OF 2013), ASSOCIATED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (RECEPTION NO. 608884), TWO ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE APPROVALS (RECEPTION NO. 622520 & RECEPTION NO. 633493) AND PHASE III & IV FINAL PLAT (RECEPTION NO. 608883) FOR THE ASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL 401 CASTLE CREEK ROAD, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS ASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL SUBDIVISION PARCEL C AND TRACK F, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY COLORADO Parcel No. 2735-123-07-801 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from the Aspen Valley Hospital District (represented by Chris Bendon of BendonAdams, LLC) for property located at 401 Castle Creek Road, requesting an extension of vested rights for the previously approved Phase IV expansion; and, WHEREAS, the Applicant has submitted a request to extend the vested rights for the property for a period of 5 years. Current vested rights for the subject property expire on May 23rd, 2020; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 26.308.010 Vested Property Rights of the Land Use Code, City Council may grant a reinstatement or extension of vested rights after a public hearing is held and a resolution is adopted; and, WHEREAS, the Community Development Director has reviewed the application and finds that from the time of the adoption of the Aspen Valley Hospital District Master Facilities Plan, the Land Use Code has not been amended in such a way that it would significantly or fundamentally change phase IV of the development from its current vested approval; and, the Director recommends approval for a 5 year extension; and, WHEREAS, the Community Development Director further finds that the Applicant has made significant progress and financial investment in completing Phases IIII of the Aspen Valley Hospital Expansion; and, WHEREAS, the Aspen City Council has reviewed and considered the extension of vested rights for Phase IV of the Aspen Valley Hospital District Master Facilities Plan under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as identified herein, has reviewed and considered the recommendation of the Community Development Director, and has taken and considered public comment at a public hearing; and, 170 WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the extension of vested rights proposal meets or exceeds all applicable land use standards and that approval of a 5- year extension of vested rights meets regulatory requirements; and, WHEREAS, the City Council finds that this Resolution furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safety, and welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF ASPEN, COLORADO, THAT: Section 1: The Aspen City Council does hereby approve an extension of the vested rights for Phase IV of the Aspen Valley Hospital District Master Facilities Plan granted by City Council Resolution No. 3 (Series of 2009), Planning and Zoning Commission Resolution No. 2 (Series of 2013), Ordinance No. 6, (Series of 2013), associated Planned Unit Development Agreement (Reception No. 608884), two administrative land use approvals (Reception No. 622520 & Reception 633493) and Phase III & IV Final Plat (Reception No. 608883). Vesting for these approvals shall expire on May 23rd, 2025 if the following conditions are met: A. That the reinstatement and extension herein of a vested property right shall not preclude the applications or regulations which are general in nature and are applicable to all property subject to land use regulation by the City of Aspen including, but not limited to, building, fire, plumbing, electrical and mechanical codes, and all adopted impact fees that are in effect at the time of building permit, unless an exemption therefrom is granted in writing. B. Housing mitigation and required parking shall comply with Land Use Code regulations in place at the time of the amendment submission. C. If the above conditions are satisfied, vested rights shall expire on May 23rd, 2025. Section 2: If the above conditions are not satisfied, vested rights shall expire on May 23rd, 2020. Section 3: All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the City Council, are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity. Section 4: This Resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. 171 Section 5: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. Section 6: A duly noticed public hearing on this Resolution was held on the 12th day of May 2020 at 5:00 PM in the City Council Chambers, Aspen City Hall, Aspen, Colorado. FINALLY, adopted, passed, and approved by a __ to ___ (X-X) vote on this 12th day of May 2020. Approved as to form: __________________________ James R. True, City Attorney Approved as to content: ______________________________ Torre, Mayor Attest: _______________________ Nicole Henning, City Clerk 172 Exhibit A – Extension of Vested Rights Review Criteria EXTENSION OR REINSTATEMENT OF VESTED RIGHTS REVIEW CRITERIA & STAFF FINDINGS Section 26.308.010.C., Extension or Reinstatement of Vested Rights, of the City Land Use Code provides that development applications for an extension of vested rights may be approved in accordance with the following standards and requirements. 1. In reviewing a request for the extension or reinstatement of vested rights the City Council shall consider, but not limited to, the following criteria: a. The applicant’s compliance with any conditions requiring performance prior to the date of application for extension or reinstatement; Staff Finding: The applicant has secured all required land use approvals for the final phase of construction and, to date has fulfilled all conditions of the development order. Any outstanding requirements identified in the Subdivision Improvement Agreement and Planned Unit Development Agreement will be fulfilled, as required. Any other remaining matters are detailed issues typically addressed as part of the building permit review or construction observation. Staff finds this criterion met. b. The progress made in pursuing the project to date including the effort to obtain any other permits, including a building permit, and the expenditures made by the applicant in pursuing the project; Staff Finding: Approximately $148.8 million has been invested in the hospital expansion, bringing phases I through III to completion. The significant financial investments that have been made thus far support the case that substantial progress has been made. It is worth noting that the Hospital Facilities Master Plan approved a total of 214,000 sq. ft. of gross floor area, most of which has been built. Phase IV represents only 4 percent of the total floor area for the entire campus development. Staff finds this criterion met. c. The nature and extent of any benefits already received by the city as a result of the project approval such as impact fees or land dedications; Staff Finding: The Applicant, thus far, has paid the costs associated with all land use reviews associated with the project and has paid all applicable impact fees required for Phases I through III. Any outstanding impact fees associated with Phase IV will be exacted at the time of building permit submittal. Staff finds this criterion met. d. The needs of the city and the applicant that would be served by the approval of the extension or reinstatement request. Staff Finding: Granting this extension will serve the City of Aspen by providing additional time for the full completion of the Aspen Valley Hospital Facilities Master Plan, as approved by City Council. Constructing Phase IV will complete the expansion of the hospital facilities and will provide a clear community benefit that will serve Aspen and the greater Roaring Fork Valley. Staff finds this criterion met. 173 2. An extension or reinstatement may be in the form of a written agreement duly authorized and executed by the applicant and the City. Reasonable conditions may be imposed by the City Council including, but not limited to, compliance with any amendments to this Title adopted subsequent to the effective date of the development order and associated vested rights. Staff Finding: Staff has included conditions requiring the applicant to comply with any applicable regulations, including but not limited to building, fire, plumbing, electrical and mechanical codes, and all adopted impact fees that are in effect at the tim of building permit. Staff finds this criterion met. 3. If the request is for reinstatement of a revoked development order, the City Council shall determine the financial impacts of the investigation and may require the applicant to pay the reasonable costs of investigation, enforcement and reporting by City staff. Staff Finding: This is not a request for reinstatement of a revoked development order. 174 RESOLUTION N0. 3 (SERIES OF 2009) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN CITY COUNCIL APPROVING CONCEPTUAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR THE ASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL DISTRICT FACILITIES MASTER PLAN, LOCATED ON PARCEL C, ASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL DISTRICT SUBDISVION, COMMONLY DESCRIBED AS 401 CASTLE CREEK ROAD, CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. Parcel ID: 2735-121-29-809 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from the Aspen Valley Hospital District (Applicant), represented by Leslie Lamont of Lamont Planning Services, requesting approval of a Conceptual Development Plan for a Planned Unit Development (PUD) for the Aspen Valley Hospital District Facilities Master Plan; and, WHEREAS, the application for the Aspen Valley Hospital District, proposed a redeveloped and expanded multi-story hospital building and parking garage on parcel of the Aspen Valley Hospital Subdivision, as more fully described in Exhibit A of this resolution; and, WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received referral comments from the Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District, City Engineering, Fire Protection District, Pitkin _C0unty Community Development Department, Environmental Initiatives Team, Parks Department, Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority, the Roaring Fork Transportation Authority, and the Transportation Department as a result of the Development Review Committee meeting; and, WHEREAS, said referral agencies and the Aspen Community Development Department reviewed the proposed Conceptual PUD and recommended approval with conditions; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 26.445 of the Land Use Code, Conceptual PUD approval may be granted by the City Council at a duly noticed public hearing after considering recommendations by the Planning and Zoning Commission, the Community Development Director, and relevant referral, agencies; and, WHEREAS, Conceptual PUD review by the Planning and Zoning Commission requires a public hearing and this application was reviewed at multiple public hearings where the recommendations of the Community Development Director and comments from the public were heard; and, WHEREAS, during a regular meeting on July 1, 2008, the Planning and Zoning Commission opened a duly noticed public hearing to consider the project and continued the public hearing to July 15, 2008 for further discussion. At the July 15, 2008 public hearing, the Planning and Zoning Commission Opened a duly noticed public hearing to consider the project and continued the hearing until August 5, 2008 for further discussion. At the August 5, 2008 public hearing, the Planning and Zoning Commission opened a duly noticed public hearing to consider the project and continued the project to August 19, 2008 for further discussion. At the August 19, 2008 public hearing, the Flaming and Zoning Commission opened a duly noticed public hearing to consider the project and recommended City Council approve the Conceptual Flamed Unit Development application by a six to zero (6-0) vote, with the ?ndings and conditions listed hereinafter; and, 559342, 05126l2009 at City Council Resolution No. 3, 02:21 :26 Series 2009. Page 1 Of6 1 OF 24, $121.00 Doc Code RESOLUTION Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO 175 WHEREAS, the Aspen City Council has reviewed and considered the Aspen Valley Hospital Facilities Master Plan on January 12, 2009, January 26, 2009, February 9, 2009, April 13, 2009, April 27, 2009, and May 11, 2009, according to the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as identi?ed herein, has reviewed and considered the recommendation of the Community Development Director and the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission, and has taken and considered public comment at a public hearing; and, WHEREAS, the Council ?nds that the development application meets the review standards for a Conceptual PUD approval as long as certain conditions are implemented; and, WHEREAS, the City Council ?nds that this Resolution furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safety, and welfare. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approves the Conceptual Planned Unit Development for Aspen Valley Hospital Master Facilities Plan, subject to the conditions listed herein. Section 1: Master Facility Plan The Aspen Valley Hospital Facilities Master Plan is granted Conceptual PUD approval as depicted and described in Exhibit A to this resolution. Section 2: Revisions and Considerations In addition to the elements of the project that the City Council felt met the Code standards for a PUD review, the Applicant shall consider the following revisions and requests for further analysis: A. Overall Building Size, Uses, Architecture, and Site Design. The proposed building size, massing and scale are appropriate for the site and the proposed uses. The parking garage aesthetics should be evaluated and treated to minimize visual impact. The proposed materials and architecture of the building are appropriate for the site. The site plan for the proposed expansion of Whitcomb Terrace and on-site affordable housing shall be reconsidered to enable a less auto-centric living environment. See Exhibit A Site plan and renderings. B. Green Technologies. The Applicant shall continue to collaborate with the City of Aspen to explore ways to incorporate environmental ?green? technologies into the project. The energy conservation plan for AVH shall include program(s) to encourage transit usage by employees and customers. C. Employee Generation Mitigation. The consideration of volume, support services, decompression and increased ef?ciency as outlined in the Conceptual Application dated January 2008 is appropriate in determining Employee Generation for the Hospital. On-Site medical of?ce space employee generation should be evaluated by using the Mixed-Use Zone District standards for of?ces. The APCHA board and City Council recommends that credits be allowed to be used for the employee mitigation requirement. A credit shall be applied recognizing existing employees housed by AVH through efforts prior to the Master Facilities Plan. A detailed inventory of the total number of employees expected to be generated by each phase and applicable credits is attached as Exhibit B. The credit is based on actual FTEs housed in 2009. The credit may be used in future phases as determined by AVH. City Council Resolution No. 3, Series 2009. Page 2 of 6 176 Applications for each phase shall include an updated actual employee generation from the previous phase of development. Discrepancies between expected and actual employee needs shall be assessed to the phase of development being considered for approval. D. Nordic Trail Location. Any relocation of the Nordic trail will be ?nalized with the input of neighbors and the City of Aspen Parks Department. E. Drainage Snow Storage. The Applicant has developed several proposals for snow storage and drainage. The location and design depicted in Exhibit A is one possible solution, but further analysis is needed. The Applicant shall continue to work with the City Engineer and the City Parks Department on acceptable snow storage and drainage locations and designs that minimize operational con?icts with pedestrians, trail users, and vehicular circulation. All drainage and snow storage issues shall be resolved during the review of Phase 2 improvements. F. RF TA Bus Stop Re?nement. The Applicant shall continue to re?ne the design of the RFTA bus stop to enable queuing of two busses and ensuring that wheel paths and turning radiuses work appropriately. The Applicant should consider installing the improvements to the bus stop and pedestrian crossing during Phase 2 rather than Phase 4 of the redevelopment. G. Trail Improvements. Related to the Master Facilities Plan improvements the Applicant shall propose improvements to the pedestrian/bicycle trail along Castle Creek Road that address changes to vehicle circulation patterns and minimizes auto/bicycle con?icts to the extent possible. The Applicant shall work with the City Parks Department on signage, trail dimensions and design speci?cations, adjacent grading and drainage, and landscape designs. This shall be part of the Phase 2 review. Pedestrian pathways and crossings within the site (which will change as development occurs in phases) will be reviewed and evaluated for safety and con?icts during construction of that phase and in their ?nal con?guration. H. Castle Creek Road Trail Crossing Improvements. The Applicant shall continue to work with the City Engineer and the City Parks Department on possible Castle Creek trail crossing improvements. The Applicant shall ?nancially participate in the construction of improvements made to the Castle Creek crossing in an amount that accounts for the proportionate increase in trail use and auto trips on Castle Creek Road south of the facility and any remaining quality of service de?ciency after improvement to the pedestrian/bicycle trail parallel to Castle Creek Road (See item G). The proportionate share for this improvement shall be determined during review of Phase 2. Funds for this improvement shall be either held by the City, in an interest bearing account, or shall be bonded or otherwise secured and payable to the City prior to construction of the improvement. If improvements to the crossing are not commenced by the City within seven years of the issuance of a development order for Phase 2, the proportionate share obligation shall expire and any funds held by the City shall be returned to the AVH with accrued interest. I. Highway 82/Roundabout and Cemetery Lane Intersections. The vast majority of existing and projected traf?c within the State Highway 82 corridor is not associated with the expansion of facilities at Aspen Valley Hospital. However, the AVH facility expansion does have an impact on the roundabout and Cemetery Lane intersections and is expected to ?nancially contribute to capital projects to improve capacity. The total impact associated with the AVH expansion and proportionate ?nancial contribution for capacity improvements to either of these two 177 City Council Resolution No. 3, Series 2009. Page 3 of 6 . .. .. . human-m intersections is 3% (.003) of funds the City of Aspen spends on the proj ect(s). The per-phase proportionate share for capacity improvements shall be determined during the review of each phase. If a capital project has been identi?ed and construction expenses have been determined, the per-phase contribution shall be payable to the City and held in an interest bearing account until the time of construction. If the capital project does not proceed within seven years of the issuance of a development order for the particular phase, the funds shall be returned to the AVH with accrued interest. If no capital project is yet identi?ed for one of these two intersections at the time of ?nal review of a phase, a future ?nancial contribution shall be bonded or otherwise secured and payable to the City prior to construction of the improvement. If improvements to either the roundabout or the Cemetery Lane/Highway 82 intersections are not commenced by the City with seven years of the issuance of a development order for each phase, the proportionate share obligation for that phase shall expire. J. Castle Creek Road Elevation. Based upon the concerns voiced by the City Engineer with regard to raising the height of Castle Creek Road and the associated construction impacts, staff recommends that the Applicant continue evaluating options that that are less impactful and meet the goals of the master plan. The Applicant shall continue to work with staff on the improvements associated with development of the service road. K. Transportation Demand Management Program The AVH shall be subject to a TDM Program approved by the City of Aspen as part of the Phase 2 approvals. The purpose of this plan is to minimize single-occupant auto trips to or from the hospital campus. The Applicant and City Transportation Department staff shall jointly develop a reliable methodology for measuring the effects of the TDM Program, including baseline data. The TDM Program shall be re-evaluated and adjusted from time to time but not more frequently than once per year or as may be necessary during the review for each phase. Elements of the TDM program should include increased transit service, van pooling, carpooling, preferential HOV parking, paid parking, car sharing, and other strategies. The TDM Program may be amended from time to time as needed and as agreed upon by the AVH and the City Transportation Department as an Insubstantial PUD Amendment. L. Subdivision Platting and PUD Documents. Phase 2 approvals shall include a re-?ling of a subdivision plat and recording of PUD Plans for all phases. The affordable housing ?parcel? designation shall be vacated as part of the re-platting. The 100-foot trail easement shall be vacated as part of the re-platting and replaced with an easement(s) that coincides with actual trail locations. Section 3: Conceptual Approval Approval of this conceptual development plan does not constitute ?nal approval or permission to proceed with any aspect of the development. Approval of this conceptual development plan authorizes the Applicant to submit an application for a ?nal PUD development plan in accordance with the City Council Resolution granting conceptual PUD approval. The Aspen Valley Hospital Facilities Master Plan contemplates four (4) phases of development over time to enable the hOSpital to maintain daily operations of the facility as development occurs. The Applicant anticipates as much as a 20-year build-out timeline. Each Phase shall City Council Resolution No. 3, Series 2009. Page 4 of 6 178 require Final PUD approval and associated land use reviews as applicable. Future phases shall continue to be reviewed as an Essential Public Facility. Components of the Conceptual PUD plan shall be con?rmed or amended in conjunction with the ?nal approval of each phase. Development program, components, operational characteristics, or design characteristics of future phases or of the entire facility plan may be amended in conjunction with ?nal approval for each phase. In consideration of the phased aspect of the Facilities Master Plan, City Council hereby exempts the development from the limitations of Conceptual Development Plan approval as speci?ed in Section 26.445.030.D of the Land Use Code. No prescribed limit or timeframe for submitting a ?nal development plan for the project, or phases thereof, shall apply until or unless the Applicant withdraws the conceptual application. Section 4: Final PUD Applications: General Conditions of Approval The Final PUD application for each phase shall re?ect and demonstrate compliance with the Conceptual approval, as may be amended. The Final PUD application for each phase shall include: 1. An application for Final PUD and associated land use review approvals pursuant to the Municipal Code. A pre-application conference with a member of the Community Development Department is required prior to submitting an application. 2. Delineation of all dimensional provisions for the phase and any amendments to the overall build-out dimensions. 3. Final PUD Plans showing existing and planned development and remaining future phases. 4. A proposed PUD Agreement. 5. An employee generation summary which includes actual employee generation for the prior phase and number of credits to be assigned to the current phase. 6. An architectural character plan showing the character and materials of proposed buildings. This may be a model, digital model, detailed elevations, 0r renderings. 7. A proposed Subdivision Plat (Phase 2) highlighting proposed amendments to the plat of record. 8. A drainage report and grading drainage plan developed using the criteria and speci?cations of the City Engineer. This analysis must account for all off site basins and must consider facilities and whether these facilities are sized appropriately. The report must also include the analysis of drainage along Castle Creek Road associated with project improvements. 9. A snow storage and snow removal operations plan. 10. A detailed civil plan showing the geometric design for improvements to Castle Creek, vehicle and ped/bike path intersections, and improvements to RFTA bus stops, including bus staging and turning radii. 11. Proposed TranSportation Demand Management Program, or amendments thereto as applicable. 12. A detailed landscape plan for all areas affected by that phase. A formal vegetation protection plan shall be required with building permit application. An approved tree City Council Resolution No. 3, Series 2009. Page 5 of 6 179? permit will be required before any demolition or access infrastructure work takes place. Final layout of the plantings and park designs require Parks Department approval. Section 5: School Lands Dedication and Impact Fees School Land Dedication is not required for the hospital facilities or the medical of?ce space, but shall be required for on-site affordable housing development. Quality Impact Fees for the hospital facilities and medical of?ce space are hereby waived in recognition of the proposed capital improvements to the RF TA bus stop and the proposed TDM Program. Quality Impact Fees shall be assessed on the development of residential units, unless otherwise waived by City Council during the review of that phase. Parks Development Impact Fees shall not be assessed on the hospital facilities. Parks fees shall be assessed on the medical of?ce space and on any residential development, unless otherwise waived by City Council during the review of that phase. The Parks fee may be reduced commensurate with on- and off-site improvements to the trail system. The ?nal approval for each phase shall detail the dedication and impact fees due according to the fee schedule in effect at the time of submission. All dedication and impact fees for the phase shall be paid at building permit issuance. Section 6: This Resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by Virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 7: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. FINALLY, adopted, passed and approved this 1 1th day of May, 2009. Attest: I my Em WMz/?z?v/ S. 19kb, City Clerk Michael C. Ireland, M'ayor. Approved as to form: cester, City Attorney Exhibit A Summary of A VH Master acilitv Plan Exhibit Employee Generation Expectations and Credits 1 80 City Council Resolution No. 3, Series 2009. Page 6 of 6 AVH Resolution No. 3 Series of 2009 EXhibitA 181 ALTNACSM LAND TITLE SURVEY OF: PARCEL C, ASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL A PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN THE OF SECTION 12 TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH, RANGE 85 WEST OF THE 61h PM. SHEETZOFE XGWUIWI A .1 Wm 250 mesmm a moral: TRAN. mm WE ANNEXATIM 70 THE GIT 0' ASPEN Pm REC. N05. 492515 I 51282.! TITLE W. NOS. 2? 28 mow. Fm 0.15115 WEEK VARIES or "we" Rfr' . ME nuarmonmo. a? II . ORDER NO. 45626. EFFECTIVE DATE - DECEMBER 21. 2005 Ia .3 a. Rig? of tho arapn'utar of a nil of talk to "haul cad runava his one ttlarafrulrl. I?lalld the was be found to palatal or Thank tutor-mt tho prim flu-ally want-d. an mound Mad Stat-I Pullout: NW Ducal-HM J. 1092 Soul! 55 a! Pool 36Page 45. [mum a: mam] 5 I I 9. Emt and "our? January 1966 Goal: 218 at Pogo 3&5. uld instrument Home 10. 1361 'Il Boat at Pogo 220 an ?Ha ?uqtian Na 2.57049. [10' ME FROM WE CASTLE ROAD 9mm] H- . mxm??'r?for tlla pun-pan of hauling. um ma a mar trml'nm run on sat forth In alum-at "Hm. II 10. and right of any for the at a nomination I?Itm. an want? to the Mountain Slat-s Imam Go. by Fall: .llarai't. ?lm-It ?cord? Doc-m? 11, 1929 in M152 at P09- 172. ems GIVE EASEIDIT. mm" 5 ALMS ROADS. STREETS rim-MAE] RH. II 11. Forms. condition: rIntrictkl?a, mums and oasullorlt: as contain-d and at ?oral Monty raced-d Octabu 23. 1975 ?rl Book .304 at Paw 725. 91?0?. BY EXCEPTIW NO. N. 8110111} 12. A ofiaIdS [anti-161mm Motaomu?inabahg krthapln'pauofamlillaarlhuaaut Will rhoardod' Apr! 1.3. 1976 in Book .511! at Page 716 cut an out forth in [awn-at Want mm ?ay 10. 1976 i1 Baal: .311 at Ea Pug. an slam} N0. "11' .11 If} 13. FIrl'norlant Eon-malt! an grantod to the City of Man an out forth in ham-manta worm Nam 19. 198! Book 417 at Page 221 a! ?xation No. 2.57050 ma? ?carded Homer 10. 1981 Ecol: 41? at Page 222 as Relocation Na. 2.37051. 9mm] 14. forms. :arldiliana. abllgatiana. pralhianl and want: a! Agra-moat an so! forth in ham-um! mm may 20. 1932 in ?nal! ?20 at P099 552 at Hawaiian PM 250661. EASEIIENT DEW ih? EXCIPMN HO. 1 MOVE. EISEMENI DEW 1N Ell-?811 PER 'i'Hl'S NOT WOT 15. Farm. mama. obligations and promo ol' Ruoiutim of Lilo am of Cow-t; Commission?: of Pmlill County. 0010mm. Gin-Ilka a Running of ?pan Mall-y Hospital Prop-?y hm lF-v2 PUD. Growth Ito-amt Emulation (or 5mm Community Faelltin and Sandal Ravio- Approlda for the Construction at an Wald, .1000 Swan Fool Pap-lad Thom? Expansion Quotation No. 67?61. as at forth in wood Far-nary 2.1. 1955 i1 Book 557 at Page 020 OI mlion No. 297700. at mm] 23. forms. obligation and prawiollc of Wham of tho am of Guilty Carnmiulallarl of Flash Cant}. Colorado. Mg on County Land Us: cu- Arid-w Section 5450.145 ?Ea-mu Amy um In Emile Gown-M or Nan?Pro?t mm Emu-malty Faclitlu" and Rounding out Ila-mm Section 5-15111313 "Intro and Non-Hm was Situations" Ominmcu Na. on lot lar??l WM Octabar 14. 1997 at N0. 40942I. BE QWY SHOW) 15- obligation: and provisions of Orri'norlan of the Board of County mission? of Fitllil County. Colorado. harm-nu! Aqraarnarlt with the haul Va?oy Hound to Provide a Hadth all! Hma'l Campus at tho Alp-I My Howltni'. a Moat-r Planning Praom. and Author-king a Land Eureka-lac. Or?lanal No. 88-15. a! 24. Ulla-rmd WI of Way Eaurnant who unto Hal)! Om ?octric Amalallarln Inc. as not forth #1 tantrum-ll meal-dad tart?! ill hatrumrll racorlhd' any 2.). 1969 in Book 59.! at Page 135 a: Roomtioll No. 311756. BE MY Fabrllary 4. 1992 in Book 655 at Pag- 625 as ?oatation No 34127.5. snow; right at any Eon-man! grunt-o unto Holy G'aas Elialric Anacta?tlan um. at u: in rocardad July 6. 1909 In Book 595 at Page 957 as Rmtloll No. 313157. [amt ran an LOCATION. new Locum" or POIER LINE PER amt-tr swam] 21 rams. auditions. obligations. provident and wants at Norah: Troll Eon-malt Agra-mull as not thrill in ham-null recorded Marl lQ?illBaall MatPagcmeacaptim?o. mus-10mm THIS 15. TIMI. W301i. Obligations and pro?cient al? R'uol'utlorl at the Board of County Gunmlaaiarln a! Pillth County. Colorado. "It lip-n Vail-y Hospital nest-r Pia". ?nalullon No. 69-79. a: at form In recorded August 24. 1m in Book 500 at P09- zm an allocation No. 314457. [mmor as snow] 26. Eon-manta. Halls of any and an: man? at ?lo-ll and Gullah-d all Plots at the Iubjld oraalrty would in Flat am atPagaM. 42atPa9aI [Emma mm Fm a- SETBICKS. 910m B?r SCAN 19. Formula? Ens-mall qrontad unto the Cit):I of Aspen as set forth in instrument racorded' Apr! J. 1990 in Book 51'? at Page .190 27. Turn?. coalitions. obligations and prolislanl of Orl?lwlca Na. 50 (Sari-I of 2005), All Graham! al' Illa City Coal-4d of the City at Equation No 521414. mom] of Alain. Colorado. Approving tho Inoculation al' Curtain Iorrltory to ?lo CityI of Ann. Colorado. to ho Km ma animator! (In tho 'au?lorl May Hoopitd District Ahmatiarl" as not racardod Mr 24. 200.3 at Rmtioll No 492nm. [Minnow 301.1"an snow] EJGSTING CONDITIONS LEGEND 20. [Wants round unto the Aspen Cmaaliaatad Sanitation District. 0 qua-municipal corporation of the State of Colorado as set forth i-l him-1!: mid Apri 3. 1990 8'1 Book 6I7 at Pool 455 {ll No. 321447, and new? April .1. 1990 In and: 61? at Fags 455 as Racoplkm No. 521446 and ra-racard'acl Apr-1' 4, 1990 in Book 517 at Page 555 as Racqulion Na. 321475. on suaz? mm EXISTING EECTRK: HANHOLE ?ua 01151146 FRE HOSTING WATER VALVE (MR3 SHIP EXJSIING ELECTRIC TRARSFWER Somalia. Mia of Ivy and otlur malt? as moan and aarllahad an Mall leoy Blob-tot Ann-notion In the City of Mg: uo EXISTING ELECTRIC maMMy?Mh?alMMalPaqa? as Rue-paw No. 512323. [manna MARY slam. N0 0R name in Damn EMINIERIM. 502 IINN SHEET. 917E A3 MALE. 00 8102.3 It -- 90511146 Firms. ?will"! 051590110"! ?vision: of Rnotntioll of tho Baum of County commissioners of Filth County. Colorado. Granting a Ila-Itar Plan Amanda-"Ml ?Wald la the algal Howital District. Resolution No. 92-? on set forth i'l instruma'lt Hoard-d April 30. 1992? in Book 676 at Pag- 259 an Hawaiian No. 544179. BE WWICAILY WTOCOLM mini 112mm 9&1sz Marl-c S. Heckler LS. (2564.5 (910) "304-03! 1 182 CITY OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO .. - - - - - - - - mmasuhn m.mm 970.700.0311 7970704031311: 1553 51;. Elk 310 ?.mm 125 Winston m. CO 01? 9711.H3.W lemmas" h: Wm issued for data CONCEPTUAL P.U.D. APPLICATION Horn 3 WHIHHIW IQBI a a m- SCALE: 1'=50? EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY ?Ilium-mud-? Maw-rm? Mammal-ul- ?an-um: 4 an mum-aw rm ?In ?man snowsronmsm: I SNOW STORAGE NOTES: 1. TOTAL SNOW PLOW AREA INCLUDES ALL ROADS. SURFACE PARKING, UPPER DECK OF PARKING STRUCTURE, SIDEWALKS a BIKE PATH. 2. REQUIRED SNOW VOLUMES LISTED BELOW WERE BASED ON TWO CONSECUTIVE 3' ACCUMMLLATED STORM EVENTS WIN-IN 2? HOURS AND A COMPACTION CF 40 3. SNOW STORAGE LOCATED ON THE SURFACE WAS ASSUMED TO BE PILEU 4? HIGH. 4. SHOW STORAGE LOCATED WITHIN THE STORMWATER TREATMENT FACILITY WAS ASSUMED 5' ABOVE TOP OF ME. TOTAL SNOW PLOW AREA =143.2ao SP: TOTAL SNOW PLOW AREA REQUIRED VOUJME: 42,960 OF: TOTAL snow STORAGE VOLUME PROVIDED 153.044 mac-w am much mm Pm: u: - .1, . 2'21? ll. 1 I I "am Lamond (5.745: gr.) muse? ASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL PARCEL SITE INFO: EXIS I commons: FINAL BUILD-OUT WNDITIONS: TUTALSITEAREA 332.0% SF. 332.005: S.F. BUILDING FOOTPRINT $1.849: S.F. AREA 1903M: Sf. 189,854: S.F. OPEN SPACE 550.51%: 471.0671 S.F. SURFACE PARKING 1?5 SPACES '110 SPACES FINAL BUILD-OUT SURFACE PARKING DOES NOT NCLUDE PARKING STRUCTURE PARKING SPACES. 183 Sums ENGINEERING. 1.11:. an mm STREET. SUITE n3 WDALE. ca 31623 (910] ?304?0311 jib-mu? Ihq'?unm??w waxw? . macaw LINE {rm} Wm. W.WW1S ASPEN VALLEY EH 0 SPILAL MASTER FACILITIES PLAN umcomu managers WWII: m: cm.ml.m mamas-n mac-M15 may? gunman? cm.oom Ismmnataiu Drum-inn scams; sauna mnemm m.mm:m.naamm elm-5m: 1mm 5. M310 MJDW m. CO 81623 m.m.u34 mammal-n ?Signature mued Tor data CONCEPTUAL APPLICATION imam SCALE: 1'=40' 3 MASTER SITE PLAN 08-101 mm JKS mad by NM mu?lmarmmn-nnmam . .. .m memv Wr-?w?MW-?P077 yak[manic TRAI . . . avou x3311: 3115? fr 4. PARKING - . 51' CIURE same; I ACCESS PATIENT CARE UNIT ENTRANCE ,n EMERGENCY DROP-OFF ASPEN VALLEY I A CONCEPTUAL MASTER PLAN HEERY - LAMONT PLANNING - DHM DESIGN - SOPRIS ENGINEERING 184 :4 .3 . mm 935 oxmmx no.6 I. [I'll I'll II mad??5 $5me >419: 5.130025 Amman?m 1834? 9:520 819:2 >4 IE. mcFobcd ZONEO Hg>zmcr>20m @931 i- mar?#2 . . 5.35201 _umOmZU 2012mm? ?owV n1>mm A 185 8 En 5.2933 gh?hn?wiu :3 Sum mos: 9. m5! .8 on. EN: 39.8938 E. omnm?om .9 a >mvmzmumz n52 fan-503:2! 538.5: 93.3 Ding 2.3.8" Ema?a?imc?ga?co? reign-5.5.3 DISABE nun?Pushing E?ggb?i .m . Sui?mal gal-.883 5.3.8: 33.8.3de 3:019 mar-59.353 9-563: . Uni-5888? Elan?:3 as as. U: Ens. BS if m?m Mg 050325 1-2: gm? agillill l?l M3: 2' Hulk nix-1.12.4 186 PEDESTRIAN TRAIL STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PONDS CEO RESIDENCE NORDIC TRAIL FINAL ALIGNMENT T.B.D. SURFACE PARKING PARKING STRUCTURE . 1 LOADING PHASE 2 WHITCOMB TERRACE BARN LEGEND NOTES: SEE SHEET SITE PHASING PLAN FOR ADDITIONAL ?a SITE PHASING INFORMATION PHASE 1 PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PHASE 4 EXISTING HOSPITAL FOOTPRINT FUTURE HOSPITAL FOOTPRINT AT FULL BUILDOUT AMBULANCEI Wall: 472.58% ?-0051, 9h 1m ??00323? WW 05284.06 1'51 I 9 I9 ASPEN VALLEY 0 I TAL ASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL MASTER FACILITIES PLAN Ava-?mm M01 Gallo Gut RIM ?.0031611 damn/mm unis-agor- mum-mm meow 303309 5154:3033319501m mm.mranam.m1fax 3mm mammal-u m.oowm 970.701.0311Im.m.0313ln CONCEPTUAL PUD APPLICATION Ibm dl?la PIAN NORTH BUILDING CONTEXT DIAGRAM I NUPDHITRAK TBTL [OI-Flinn? 3831MB arm Jasumeu pua In: Unlq-HI L. quid-IaIt: Hk?fh?xD 1 r- I v.5 Linn *mxx?? LEGEND V??k?fi SERVICE LOOP ROAD I PHASE 2 LEVEL PHASE 3 LEVEL PHASE 4 LEVEL EXISTING AND FUTURE FOOTPRINT LEVEL 1* AMBULANCE RANK EmanG HOSMTAL FOOTPRINT FUTURE HOSPITAL FOOTPRINT AT FULL BUILDOUT AND FUTURE FOOTPRINT SHOWN FOR REFERENCE. . he, IN 7 nk?deT] II ASPEN VALLEY a? HOSPITAL ASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL MASTER FACILITIES PLAN mmumuw mmama?mm M. 00 31811 mm?m?mmw IMMHM ?110 macaw Gin-8am Imnmunmn mmwmu MMIMWM I huh an CONCEPTUALPUD Mm ?mama LEVEL PHASING DIAGRAM A-101 I 2 WW m1" two-thin? 187 .II In 2] u- [11.44 AIL. LEGEND PHASE 1 PHASE 2 .- PHASE 3 PHASE 4 EXISTING HOSPITAL FOOTPRINT FUTURE HOSPITAL FOOTPRINT AT FULL BUILDOUT . I . Wot: scum 05284.06 IN ASPEN VALLEY a? HOSPITAL ASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL MASTER FACILITIES PLAN ii Min. CO 81811 cm?! pruloct number manger! mmum manly-nuance In: em. Rum. luau. 503 Mil SIN 110 CO I183 970.963.6620 I ?0.981.852? In: Gian-6mm 1553 HID 51. 3143 Dana: 00 303.43% IWAMII 1.: ?limit"! Issued for CONCEPTUAL PUD APPLICATION 2003 Ram 80. PLAN NORTH LEVEL 1 69 PHASING DIAGRAM A-102 i 188 ?on? tumult!? WIND ar?muwunmu? "murmur-mam" no? Ramon?n >mu?p 80 WVEIOVIG mm MOI?lVOt'lch and grail-Ilium moo'mu wasn?t-mm mum-13mm all-aim ll minimum 1 moo ?mm-o arms mm? macaw mama-mute manna-v I NV'ld HELSVW ASTNA . 1V.le SCJH ,9 '34 mosh-Ina I [71 I r? I xx? 303 NMOHS iNHdiOOd 33mm .NH inoomna 110d iv ~0htn?? ideiOOj aaninj xx iNWdiOOd owusma iNlHdiOOd 38010:] CINV ONILSIXEI GNEOHW Iznmn am am: ,1 ana 4; msam um (Ida and 1133ou NHU 90' pun sam aulqmweuasou Kellen nansmmalmU-luaunnuemewu med Ian I: v-I F?s-4m I mun mm ?qu? nun?ungmd-u-y-uu?u an alumni?- nan-? Mug-on ?nun-unnu?muu?y I ?comm ASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL MASTER FACILITIES PLAN Mt ?all? rami?mrmmum In ?1th 1mmanl 8m magmas a' ?0315522 In Gina:- 1mmama1a ?mm ?Mr-tum land in on CONCEPTUAL P.U.D. 1 APPLICATION Elam ?it. 1mm; shoot titl- EAST ENTRY PERSPECTIVE VIEW K557 191 mun-na- I?ll-ulnar- l-Im nu qumpup Mum?: ?Wanna-Ila mum luau: MEIIA "Cl-l3 ?GT'l'd WFLIJBONOO qua um Minnow-mu mull-um Inna-1 mush-mum moon-o menu-um; Mm ?1 015 mama-am mum-mm moor-cane wan mum Win-ins NV'ld HELSVW A311VA nausv 0' smumnmm'rnuamum .u-I-Iu-o qumpalp Mm mun an?u-?n?M?m? my GNV .oc=.1 131108 II 0 HMON NY'ld 11? 411111 . Ill? . - El 11111 141.111 Blip . '3 mm ?U'n'd Inn 191 panel! mm?mm 11. moms mrrM?mm WISDOM mil-mm ?$53513 moa'MI-a Dlim?mml 2299296016 I WIN 015 $2910 11mm ow 00 'm - swans '19 am an: Immune magnum: 1 .v-v want-magmas .1QN??d 13111121 113113! a? Hit a? . 1 ?Link 1 a. an In in! ?hm?d?imi?'l?nuliu?hw "MJ?WNW1-a-m?i-m?u?hu?p? WW mus-mu mm r? un?unn?uu 1. mwpw-un won-u 183M CINV HEW - - - 5130 Will 'z mp an; non?! mw?snm m?mma! EZBLR 03 3081 m1 ?1 moguls mun 0096?69'808 03 TOM-IO DIE FMS '38 mm ?99l WNW.) ?190 tlED'l'W. 016 9590803 'm '15 was mm Hmos ua?uum meow tom (3 mum-1mm HELSVW .n lispen Valley Hospital 4 i5! MFP Space Program Feb-09 Area Description Existing DGSF MFP Program DGSF De?ciency (DGSF) Administration 1407 1725 I318 Admissions 690 700 10 Easiness Office 1040 2000 960 Cardiac Rehab 635 4300 3665 Cardiology/Physicians Sleep 1890 1050 -840 Cardiopulmonary 791 2700 1909 Central Planti?Faclities 6035 19.500 13465 Central Sterile 1292 2200 908 Community Relations 313 313 0 Emergency 4440 9700 5260 Food Service 3113 6400 3287 Foundation Office 316 316 0 Human Resources 230 850 620 imaging 4666 6500 1834 Infectious Control 89 100 11 intensive Care Unit 930 3300 2370 Laboratory 2440 5250 2810 490 2200 1710 Mail/ Copy 140 175 35 Medical Records 790 1100 310 Meeting Rooms 1275 3100 1825 Nuclear Medicine 305 600 295 Obstetrics Unit (existing) 1720 9100 7380 Patient Care Unit 11,235 18,500 7265 Pharmacy 865 900 35 Physical Therapy 2635 7200 4565 Same Day Surgery 1965 (in Phase 3 Surgery) (in Phase 3 Surgery) Surgery 7100 13.500 6400 Volunteer/Gift Shop 865 1200 335 Total Existing DGSF 59702 Total Deficiency 66742 Occupational health 853 Outpatient Clinic 2900 Oncology Clinic 2440 Breast Center 2325 AmbulanceIMaintenance 2190 Medical Of?ces 22600 Chapel 308 Total MFP DGSF 158095 Perimeter Wail 12" 1800 6000 Stairs. Elevators, Lobbies 400 13500 Circulation. Storage, M, 13798 36500 Existing 1st GSF (70700) Exist Basement GSF (5000) Existing GSF 75700 MFP GSF 214095 Ef?ciency 0.738433873 194 ELW k3 GENDISEO AB GENOSHO Lorz, mm A .4 I spa: nun HOSPIML answer mm Pasta 1 . 4 4 4m mun nomm Sim sou soonWideOH - . 00mm; on. 50? now. ma soon 27 PAGE 6 La. .L amt-(016) :xv: (maHEW 30! N019 alumna GRAPHIC SCALE ?8 E. 5.: 33 HAV TILLHOOCI MIC) BOA J.0N . 28111.01 Wm 195 196 FTE Impact of MFP Based on 2009 budgeted FTE's Department Current 2009 Facilities Driver Current Build-out FTE's Max. Capacity Current Max Capacity Build-out Impact Phase 1 Obstetrics Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Overhead InpatienUPTICPRi?Caf? EDi?Rad/Surgery LablOPlAdmissions Total Administration Admissions Cardiac Rehabilitation Cardiopulmonary Central Sterile CT ED Endoscopy Engineering Finance Housekeeping HR ICU IT Lab Laundry Mammography Materials Management Medical records MRI Nuclear medicine Nursing administration Nutritional services OB Other (Combined) Outpatient/Oncology Pain management PCU PFS Pharmacy PT Radiology PACU SDS Surgery Ultrasound Case manangent 12.77 1.8 4.08 1.48 17.51 1.19 11 6.25 11 15 2.5 2.5 12 1.87 1.2 5.2 12.78 12.72 49.78 2.85 1.55 15.93 6.51 7.69 9.62 3.78 3.47 10.6 2.69 Fixed 1 Allocated Cardiac Rehab Visits Beds 25 OR's 3 CT machines 1 ED Beds 14 Endo Suites 1 Allocated Fixed 1 Square Footage Employees 301.8 ICU Beds 3 Employees Allocated Allocated Mammo Machines 1 Allocated Allocated Allocated Nuc. Machines 1 Fixed 1 Allocated Beds 9 Fixed Daily Clinics Fixed 1 PCU Beds 16 Fixed 1 Allocated Therapy Visits General Rad. Machines Recovery Beds 808 Beds OR's Machines 350.16 27 4 18 1 .8 9.46 4.49 1.6.25 12 15 2.5 2.5 5 17.3 1 .87 1 .2 5.2 14.058 12.72 50 2.85 1.55 17.523 1 7.2 7.69 9.62 3.78 3.47 10.6 2.69 1 .6 4 21 2.4 10.03 4.73 1.48 19.92 2.4 10.1 14.5 10.39 5.2 15.3 12.72 50 3.27 1.55 23.81 7.8 8.93 9.62 5.95 5.77 16.6 2.69 2.4 Total 283.02 301.801 350.16 0.0 16.1 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.5 0.0 1.2 0.6 4.4 12.2 0.0 3.0 0.6 0.2 0.0 1.9 1.1 0.0 3.5 0.0 1.0 2.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 4.4 1.1 1.2 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.287 0.0 0.6 1.2 0.0 2.2 2.3 6.0 0.0 0.8 48.4 Legend: Altocated 5512009 1 - Exhibit Employee Generation ChartSheeti AVH Resolution No. 3 Series of 2009 Exhibit 197 I #15 - Employees Currently Housed in AVH Units Inventory Unit #1 Bedrooms Employees Mountain Oaks 102 studio 1 104 studio 111 studio 1 112 studio 208 studio 1 209 studio 1 Beaumont 1 BR 1 #3 studio 1 studio 1 102 studio 1 103 studio 1 104 studio 1 110 studio 1 111 studio 1 122 studio 1 123 studio 1 124 studio 1 125 studio 1 126 studio 1 127 studio Apr 102 studio Apt 202 studio 1 Apt 203 2 BR 2 Apt 204 studio 1 CEO House 3 BR 2 Total Employees Housed 198 ORDINANCE NO. 6 SERIES OF 2013) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ASPEN CITY COUNCIL APPROVING A EASPENT, GROWTH FINA REVIEW, MANAGEMENT AND VESTED PROPERTY RIGHTS FOR PHASE III AND IV OF TH VALLEY ON MASTER DISTRICT HOSPITAL PARCEL C, ASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL DISTRICT SUBDIVISION, COMMONLY DESCRIBED AS 401 CASTLE CREEK ROAD, CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. Parcel ID: 2735- 121- 29- 809 WHEREAS, Aspen Valley Services, of a approval represented by Leslie Lamont of Lamont Pla ing Planned Unit Development ( PUD) for Phase III and V of the Aspen Valle Master Facilities Plan; and, conceptually Conceptual the WHEREAS, approved a PUD and redeveloped from the Plan Development Final application Department Development Applicant), District ( Hospital requesting Community the multi- expanded garage, affordable housing and site improvements o Resolution via approval ( n story rcel C No. hospital of y Hospital 3, District Series of 2009) parking pen Valley Hospital Subdivision, to be developed in four phases; and, WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received referral comments from CiAspen/Pitkin ty EngineeriCounty ng, FireHousing ProtectioAuthority, n District, the EnviTransportation ronmental HealDepartment, th Department,andParks Department, the City Utilities Department as a result of the Development Review Committee meeting;Development and, WHEREAS, said referral agencies and the Department IV reviewed the proposed Final PUD and associated use reviews recommending approval with conditions; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 26.445 of the Land Use Code, Final PUD approval hearing and after reviews associated may be granted by the City Council oninduCommissaonubthe by recommendations considering the g Planning Community Development Director, and relevant referral agencies; and, WHEREAS, prior to City Council approval, Final PUD and associated land use reviews by the Planning and Zoning Commission requires a public hearing and this application was of reviewed at Development public multiple Director and hearings comments wherewereheard; from the public the Community and, 2012 WHEREAS, during meetings on January 8, 2013, the Planning and Zoning and October lssion opened a duly noticed public hearings to consider the project and approved a growth management quota system review and recommended City Council approve the Final Planned Unit Development application and associated reviews for Phase III and IV by a six to one ( 6- 1) vote, with the findings and conditions listed within Resolution No. 2 ( Series RECEPTION#: of 2013); 600720, and, 199 06/ 28/ 2013 at Cite 09: 54: 29 AM, 1 OF 64, Ordinance R $ 326. 00 Doc Code Paz, ORDINANCE Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin No. 6, Sr County, CO WHEREAS, once the land use approvals and recommendation the Planning and Zoning Commission, the Applicant requested approval G were gapproval, Final Planned Unit Development (PUD) approval and Vested Property Rights approval of the City Council; and, WHEREAS, upon review of the application awiphlconditions approval, Community Development Department re Final PUD request and associated land use reviews; and, of the proposed WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing on March 11, 2013, March 18, 2013, April 2013 8, application; and May 13, 2013, the City Council opened the hearing and review of the and, WHEREAS, the Aspen City Council finds that the development proposal meets or exceeds all the applicable development standards and that the approval of the development proposal, with conditions; and, WHEREAS, the City Council finds that this ordinance furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safety, and welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF ASPEN CITY COUNCIL AS FOLLOWS: In approving this ordinance, the City Council recognizes and supports the Aspen Valley Hospital' s aspiration and mission to assure access to health care and" to deliver extraordinary healthcare in an environment of excellence, compassion, and trust." Section 1: Approvals Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the City Council hereby approves Growth Management Review for an Essential Public Facility, Final Planned Unit Development, and Vested Property Rights for Phase III and IV of the Aspen Valley Hospital Master Facilities Plan. Specifically, these approvals permit the Applicant to develop Phase III and IV of a four phase master facilities plan inclusive of 10, 187 sq. ft. of net leasable commercial and office space for the development of medical offices which are considered accessory to, and part of the hospital function as well as an expansion of the hospital facility as shown in Exhibit 1 of this ordinance. These new improvements represent additional square feet to be constructed on the site and are divided into two phases, with the associated gross square feet outlined below: Basement Level One 133, Level Two Medical 280 Phase IV 1, 854 6, 721 0 O 0 ace Ambulance 200 0 City Council Ordinance No. 6, Series 2013 Page 2 of 11 8, 575 74, 440 Subtotal Section 2: Dimensional Re uirements of Phase III and IV The following approved dimensions of the project shall be reflected in the Final PUD plans for Phase III and IV: FMinimum ot As represented on the Final PUD plans Size ot Width ront Yard Side Yard Minimum Rear Yard Maximum Site Coverage Minimum Distance between Buildings Maximum Height Hospital/ a. a. Medical Office Space As noted depicted by above Roof Plan" the grade spot on elevations the " Overall as detailed in Exhibit 2 of this ordinance Other b. b. Mechanical equipment as detailed in Exhibit 3 of this ordinance may exceed the requirements of the land use code. All other structure shall meet the requirements of the land use code. New gross sq. ft. ( including medical office space) Net Maximum Office Note: * Leasable space ( medical Commercial and 83, 015 square feet* 10, 187 square feet office) Hospital gross square footage shall be measured from exterior wall to exterior wall, inclusive of basements Section 3• Voluntary Deed Restriction The Applicant agrees to record a deed restriction prohibiting the condominiumization of the 10, 187 sq. ft. medical office space approved for Phase III. The deed restriction shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy of the hospital/ medical office component of the project. Section 4: Design elements to be incorporated into Phase III and IV Based upon recommendations of the Planning Commission, City Council requires the following be incorporated into the Final PUD approval. A. Pedestrian Access. An additional pedestrian access way is incorporated into the site plan as shown in Exhibit 4. 201 City Council Ordinance No. 6, Series 2013 Page 3 of 11 B. Lighting Plan. A lighting plan, as presented in Exhibit 5 of this ordinance shall be implemented to provide remediation techniques for lighting that has been installed on the site as well as the design of any additional outdoor lighting in Phases III and IV to minimize undesirable brightness and light trespass. Any upper story on the hospital or medical office space shall include automated window shades to limit the impact of indoor lighting. C. Enhanced Landscaping. An enhanced landscape plan is approved as shown in Exhibit 6. There are certain constraints on the landscape plan, most notably, a utility easement paralleling Castle Creek Road that is located on the hospital' s property with a water main located within it. The plan commits to avoid the planting of trees within ten feet of the water service line. All plantings will be field located with representatives from the Parks and Utilities department present to provide final approval. Within this utility easement corridor, the hospital has agreed to do a like replacement (not based upon the diameter or gallon size of the plant) of plantings in the event the Utilities- department has to remove or cut down plantings for maintenance purposes. This replace requirement shall be outlined in the PUD agreement. Additional landscaping requirements are noted in section 13 of this ordinance. D. Amended Lobby Design. As shown in Exhibit 1 of this ordinance, an amended lobby design is approved for Phase IV of the project. E. Mechanical Screening. Two mechanical units from Phase II and one mechanical unit from Phase III are required to be wrapped in screening as shown in Exhibit 3 of this ordinance. Section 5: Parking The total number of parking spaces approved for the site as a whole, upon completion of Phase IV shall be as follows: 219* Parking Structure 77 II New Surface Phase Parking New West Side Employee New main entry Parking at Surface for Affordable under 5 16 31 Whitcomb Surface Tuck Parking 2 for housing housing 6 affordable 356 Notes: 10 parking spaces in the parking garage shall be reserved for the affordable housing units Not included in this tally is the parking for the existing ambulance barn, the proposed ambulance garage and existing CEO residence. Due to the phased construction of the project there will be more parking spaces available at the end of Phase II construction than upon completion of Phase IV. Therefore 79 parking spaces shall be decommissioned until the issuance of a building permit for Phase III is issued. In the event that the Applicant does not undertake construction of Phase III within the vested rights period for Phase 111, the hospital will be required to remove the 71 parking spaces located along the western side of the hospital and detailed in Exhibit B of Ordinance No. 12 ( Series of 2010). Any existing paving in this area that is not necessary to use as a connection for the service loop City Council Ordinance No. 6, Series 2013 Page 4 of 11 202 road shall be removed. Once the surface parking spaces are removed, the decommissioned garage spaces may be used if a building permit for Phase III is not issued. Section 6• Affordable Housing A. Affordable Housing Credit Balance. As required by City Council Resolution No. 3 ( Series of 2009), each phase of development shall verify the number of employees generated. An audit within 1 year of a C.O. being issued for each phase of development is required to verify the projected and actual employee generation of the project. The audit shall be conducted during the hospital' s high season of operation ( winter) as agreed upon by the Applicant and APCHA. Any Balance Available" to difference between the audit and what was be updated through an administrative shall anticipated require the " approval. B. Off-site Housing Requirement. Ordinance No. 12 ( Series ofFTEs). 2010) requires the provision of offThe Applicant has asked that site affordable housing to house six( 6) Full Time Equivalents ( this requirement be rescinded. As the existing credit and on-site housing for the campus meets the land use code' s affordable housing mitigation requirements, City Council hereby rescinds any offsite affordable housing requirement. Employees Balance Housed Generated Available 57 0 Employees Beaumont, Mountain Oaks & CEO House No. 3, 2009) Credit( Council Resolution 0 Phase I 19. 98 28. 5 Phase II 20. 16 Phase II! 8. 46 Phase IV 36. 9 48. 6 85. 5 Total to be mitigated for in Phases III and IV is the greater of two uses on the The emp site: Mece or the hospital function as permitted by the land use code with the by provisio ofon-site affordable housing. The audit will verify the employees generated the employees generated by the hospital function in Phases III and IV. MOS in Section 7• Plat and Agreement The Applicant shall record a subdivision/PUD plat and agreement that meets the requirements of Land Use Code Section 26.445. 070, Recording a Final PUD Development Plan,-within 180 days of- - approval by City Council. Section 8• Building Permit Application The building permit application shall include the following: a. b. A copy of the final Ordinance and recorded P& Z Resolution. The conditions of approval printed on the cover page of the building permit set. City Council Ordinance No. 6, Series 2013 Page 5 of l 1 203 c. A completed tap permit for service with the Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District. d. A drainage plan, including an erosion control plan, prepared by a Colorado licensed Civil Engineer, An e. which meets adopted city standards. excavation stabilization plan, construction management plan ( CMP), and drainage and soils reports pursuant to the Building Department' s requirements. 1) As part of the construction management plan for Phase III and IV improvements, provisions shall be made to ensure that parking for Aspen Valley Hospital visitors, staff and construction workers will be accommodated to prevent overflow in the Health and Human Services lot. A fugitive dust control plan to be reviewed and approved by the Environmental Health f. Department. g. A detailed excavation plan for review and approval by the City Engineer. h. Accessibility and ADA requirements shall be addressed to satisfactorily meet adopted building codes. Section 9: Engineering Final design and analysis for drainage shall be compliant with all sections of the City of Aspen Municipal Code, Title 21 and all construction and excavation standards published by the Engineering Department prior to issuance of a building permit. Section 10: Fire Mitigation All codes adopted by the Aspen Fire Protection District shall be met2003 per Edition, building Section permit. 503), This includes but is not limited to access ( International Fire Code ( IFC), approved fire sprinkler and fire alarm systems ( IFC, as amended, Section 903 and 907). Section 11• Utilities Department Requirements The Applicant shall comply with the City of Aspen Water System Standards, with Title 25, and with the applicable standards of Title 8 ( Water Conservation and Plumbing Advisory Code) of the Aspen Municipal Code, as required by the City of Aspen Water Department. Section 12• Sanitation District Requirements Service is contingent upon compliance with the District' s rules, regulations, and specifications, which are on file at the District office at the time of construction. The applicant shall provide the district with proper representation that will show all means and methods to preclude any and all pathological, radioactive, heavy metals, and any other hazardous material on the list of EPA prohibited toxic discharges. Section 13: Parks A. An approved tree permit will be required before any demolition or access infrastructure work Please contact the City Forester at 920- 5120. Mitigation for removals will be takes place. 204 City Council Ordinance No. 6, Series 2013 Page 6 of 11 paid cash in lieu or on site. The overall mitigation for removals during this phase of improvements already has a carry-over from the construction of the Obstetrics Unit. A vegetation protection fence shall be erected at the drip line of each individual tree or groupings of trees on site. The vegetation fence shall be installedDiagram. at the edge of the This fence B. construction impact depicted as on page P101, Master Site Phasing must be inspected by the city forester or his/ her designee ( 920- 5120) before any construction activities are to commence. No excavation, storage of materials, storage of construction backfill, storage of equipment, foot or vehicle traffic allowed within the drip line of any tree on site. There should be a location and standard for this fencing denoted on the plan. General Landscaping notes: C. Parks requests the opportunity to field locate all of the plantings proposed for Phases III and The areas proposed for new plantings are heavily planted with existing trees and All new plantings must be planted appropriately in a manner that landscaping. IV. other doesn' t jeopardize the health of existing trees and provides appropriate space for projected D. Landscape mature growth. The hospital shall be required to provide a landscape guarantee Guarantee. adequate to assure completion of the enhanced landscape plan set forth in Exhibit 5 or otherwise represented by applicant and for any incremental increase in landscaping approved which is beyond the scope of the recorded Phase II landscape plan. The Parks department may agree to a reduction in the standard amount of the landscape guarantee which shall be memorialized in the required improvements agreement. No building permit for Phase III or IV will be issued until the guarantee is accepted by the Parks Department. Section 14: Transportation Series As noted in Ordinance No. 12 ( of 2010), a Transportation Demand Management ( TDM) plan requires a traffic analysis to be completed every two years. For clarification purposes the first traffic analysis shall be completed within 6 months of the Certificate of Occupancy being issued for Phase 1I. As part of the Conceptual PUD approval, AVH agreed to financially contribute to improvements to the roundabout and Cemetery Lane intersections to improve capacity. The proportionate financial 003) of funds contribution the City of for capacity Aspen improvements spends on to either of these the project( s.) two intersections is . 3% (. As no projects have been identified, the Applicant will be required to outline in the subdivision improvements agreement its ability to contribute to any projects that occur to the two intersections within seven years of approval of this ordinance. Section 15: Impact Fees The Parks Development impact fee shall not be assessed on the hospital facilities for Phases III and IV. Pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.610, Impact Fees, theTheApplicant shall pay a Parks Transportation Demand fee for the medical office space. Development impact Management ( TDM)/Air Quality impact fee for Phases III and IV has been waived. Any solely applicable impact fees shall be assessed at the time of building permit application submittal and paid at building permit issuance. The amount shall be calculated using the methodology and fee schedule in effect at the time of building permit submittal. City Council Ordinance No. 6, Series 2013 Page 7 of I 1 205 Section 16: School Lands Dedication Fee As no residential development is proposed during Phases III and IV, a school lands dedication fee shall not be assessed. Section 17: Vested Rights The development approvals granted pursuant to Planning and Zoning Commission Resolution Number 2, Series of 2013 and herein shall be vested for a period of seven ( 7) years from the date of issuance of the development order. No later than fourteen ( 14) days following the final approval of all requisite reviews necessary to obtain a development order as set forth in this ordinance, the City Clerk shall cause to be published in a newspaper of general circulation within the jurisdictional boundaries of the City of Aspen, a notice advising the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan and creation of a vested property right pursuant to this Title. Such notice shall be substantially in the following form: Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of a vested property right, pursuant to the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertaining to the following described property: Parcel C of the Aspen Valley Hospital District Subdivision and commonly known as 401 Castle Creek Road, City of Aspen, CO, by Ordinance No. 6, Series of 2013, of the Aspen City Council. Section 18: Cost and Financial Assurances A. Proof Phase III of Financing. or IV, and as Before the issuance of a building permit for the development of either a Department, City Building of such condition Finance Aspen Valley Hospital shall provide to the and City Attorney for review and approval, approval, Director, satisfactory evidence that Aspen Valley Hospital has in place sufficient financing to accomplish and complete the construction of the development of the Aspen Valley Hospital Master Facilities Plan, Phases III or IV covered by the building permit and any public improvements identified within this SIA and required under this ordinance; provided, if there is no loan with respect to development of Phases III or IV, then Aspen Valley Hospital shall provide a letter from a financial institution stating that Aspen Valley Hospital has funds available inIIIan amount that Such IV. for the covers estimated cost of the construction development of or phases financing may include without limitation, a construction loan from an institutional lender or lenders and equity capital investments and/or donations from Aspen Valley Hospital or third party investors Hospital may or contributors. provide a In lieu of evidence of such requirements, the Aspen Valley completion bond sufficient to the complete project. Such bond shall be subject to the review and approval of City Building Department, Finance Director, and City In addition, before issuance of a building permit for Phases III or IV, Aspen Valley Hospital shall provide supporting cost estimates for all improvements covered by the requested Attorney. building permit prepared by Aspen Valley Hospital' s general contractor for review and approval by the City of Aspen Building Department. B. Cash Escrow for Site Enhancement Fund. Before the issuance of a building permit for Aspen Valley Hospital Master Facilities Plan Phases III or IV, and as a condition of such issuance, the Aspen Valley Hospital HUNDREDTHOUSAND will deposit DOLLARS with AND a title company NO/ 100THS ($ the sum 100, 000. 00) ( ONE of the " Site City Council Ordinance No. 6, Series 2013 Page 8 of 11 206 Enhancement Escrow Funds") in the form of cash or wired funds pursuant to an Escrow Agreement made and entered into between Aspen Valley Hospital and the City which shall provide as follows: i. In the event construction work on the development of Aspen Valley Hospital Master Facilities Plan, Phases III or IV shall cease for ninety (90) days or longer, prior to a final inspection by the City of the work authorized by a foundation/structural frame permit F/ SFP") on said Parcel C, Aspen Valley Hospital District Subdivision, and cessation of such construction work continues for a period of one hundred twenty ( 120) days after notice from the City to Aspen Valley Hospital specifying the subject work in reasonable detail, or if such breach cannot be cured reasonably within such one hundred twenty 120) day period and Aspen Valley Hospital fails to commence and proceed diligently to cure such breach within a reasonable time period, then the City, in its reasonable discretion, may draw upon the Site Enhancement Escrow Funds from time to time as needed for the purposes of improving the appearance of any construction work not already on completed the exterior of Hospital the Building only. This work may not in any way impact the operation or access to the Hospital. ii. The Site Enhancement Escrow Funds or any remaining balance thereof shall be returned to Aspen Valley Hospital, upon completion by the City of a final inspection and issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for Aspen Valley Hospital Master Facilities Plan, Phases III or IV or when otherwise agreed to by Owner of Aspen Valley Hospital and the City. C. Cash Escrow for Site Protection. Before the issuance of a building permit for Aspen Valley Hospital Master Facilities Plan, Phases III or IV, and as a condition of such issuance, the owner of Aspen Valley Hospital will deposit with a title company the sum of ONEin HUNDRED the form of 00)(" THOUSAND DOLLARS AND NO/ 100THS ($ Escrow 100, 000. Funds") cash or wired funds pursuant to an Escrow Agreement made and entered into between Aspen Valley Hospital and the City which shall provide as follows: i. In the event construction work on the development of Aspen Valley Hospital Master longer (" Work 60) days for Facilities Sto_"), foundation/ Plan, Phases III or IV shall or sixty ( cease prior to a final inspection by the City of the work authorized by a structural frame permit (" F/ SFP") on such lot, and cessation of such construction work continues for a period of thirty ( 30) days after notice from the City to Aspen Valley Hospital specifying the subject work in reasonable detail, or if such breach cannot be cured reasonably within such thirty( 30) day period and Aspen Valley Hospital fails to commence and proceed diligently to cure such breach within a reasonable time period, then the City in its reasonable discretion may draw upon the Escrow Funds from time to time as needed for the purposes of protecting and securing the construction site and improvements thereon from damage by the elements and/or from trespass by unauthorized persons, and for purposes of improving the site to a safe condition such that it does not become an attractive nuisance or otherwise pose a threat to neighbors or other persons. The work provided for in this paragraph shall only be permitted on the exterior of the Hospital Building and this work may not in any way impact the operation or access to the Hospital. 207 City Council Ordinance No. 6, Series 2013 Page 9 of 11 Half of the Escrow Funds shall be returned to Aspen Valley Hospital upon completion by ii. the City of a final inspection of the work authorized by the Foundation/ Structural Frame Permit on the project. The balance of funds shall be returned to Aspen Valley Hospital once exterior finishes to the building have been installed. Section 19: All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council, are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity. Section 20: This ordinance shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 21: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. The City Clerk is directed, upon the adoption of this ordinance, to record a copy of this ordinance in the office of the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder. Section 22: A public hearing on this ordinance shall be held on the I I' h day of March, 2013, at a meeting of the Aspen City Council commencing at 5: 00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, Aspen City Hall, Aspen, Colorado, a minimum of fifteen days prior to which hearing a public notice of the same shall be published in a newspaper of general circulation within the City of Aspen. INTRODUCED, READ AND ORDERED PUBLISHED as provided by law, by the City Council 25th of the City of Aspen on day of February, 2013. the Attest: Kathryn S. I FINALLY, c , Ci Michael C. Ireland, Mayor Clerk and adopted, passed approved this day of -- 013. Atte i Kathryn S. Ko , City Clerk Mic ael C. Ire and, Mayor 208 City Council Ordinance No. 6, Series 2013 Page 10 of 11 Approved as to form: ames R. True, City Attorney List of Exhibits Exhibit 1 — Site plan, floor plans, elevations, amended lobby entry Exhibit 2— Roof plan, height detail Exhibit 3- Mechanical plan, height detail, retrofitted screening for certain mechanical Exhibit Exhibit 5 — 4 - Amended pedestrian access Clanton and Associates, lighting plan Exhibit 6— Enhanced landscape plan 209 City Council Ordinance No. 6, Series 2013 Page 11 of 11 A8801 ?In - .. . 210 211 100WO II C E', SI E f L Haery Inlernenanal Man, Street 110161h i Inc. Su11e201, i 3219 nve6CO80202. De 0... 720. 9. 8. r,•,• I I number project 711• 1 1121900 1 f CASTLE CRE EK ROAD A I 1 I ' 1 1 1 1SURFACE PEDESTRIAN 111111 I PARKING r STRUCTURE SHOY J E Ty 2 STORM f' O'SPI N UILDIN-. 1 1 MNAGEMENT 1- ` EMPLOYEE l 1 HOUSING sr; a, i[ J LOADING I 1 1 1 r r, p.., DOCK l31) 11 ulou,+ t tll 127J7J11}) N7/ n,,, OgHL3 k,*1,,[ n: lynnr rry s, Honran,+. 1 q. Jy, k)71 v q' EAEv-! 1,',- I w dw DeiT I2 111 Vi 645y'+ W'a. EOE" 17 u HC 7E00114105S7E'. jj1959Stgllf) p e wh,-1, agers cl"wrman tanlscons consu! BASIN Road C061611 Aspen, i ER - WAT__ 1 Creak Castle 0401 1 BUILD- OUT) FULL AT 1 I i' I} I r 1 11111 ! ! ' 111 PARKING 3 AND 4 ADDITIONIEXPANSION 1.;' l 1 11 L A T I P S O j-j 6 DRIVE = PHASE I I I USSTOP DOOLITTLE L A V N L P S A ill)) Oct l colJ ggJli) i1/ 7lEEN 1j111 lr 1 SC34' SURFACE PARKING 1 f TERRACE 1 I j RESIDENCE 1 t I i-/ CEO 1 y VYHITCOMB I 1 BNTRY 1 I 1 1 t 1 R N 114iJT. 1WU seallsignature I) 1 ` 1 V ,^ NORDICTRAIL LT E11t 11 t. OB9Y 1 I SlSi< i+ q/ J li-1 1 1 I hESwA^ S. 1 a/ I I I 1' date I Issued 1 for PHASE FINAL 314 date lien) AMBU LOApINO RAMP \ I DOCK AVH 2012 10, AUGUST PUD 1 EXIS TING LOOP ROAD d 11, teULANCE I BARN q NORTH PLAI Y CASTLE CREEK ROAD_ DOOLI Q) RyNE 1196 1111 K1NG. l I 111 11 = II 1 ! LEGEND - I1111I' fill 11 IIII' f PHASE PHASE 1 o 1\ \ NOTE:' iH15 BUILDING ILLUSTRATE 1 3 / PHASE J BUILDING HOSPITAL SHOVIN 1VHITCOMB BUtLD• TERRACE EJ BUILDING AT FULL PHASE 3 PHASE 4 TO PROVIDED OF PHASES OF RENOVATION AND IS HOSPITAL sboetFUe AS A DIAGRAMATIC ONLY. MASTER 3 PHASING BUILDING PHASE OUT) IS VARIOUS AND VALLEY REFERENCE PHASE EMPLOYEE HOUSING THE EXPANSION ASPEN it I RESIDENCE SITE 2 1 CEO L„ THE PHASE2 t SHEET 4 el) I EXISTING HOSPITAL BUILDING PRE- AVHLOOPROAD AMBULANCE BARN DIAGRAM BUILDING I DIAGRAM t10TTOTOSC SITE y PUD) LIMITS eel""'"` P- 101 PHASE LIA11TSf OF DISTURBANCE hcaa. drambv er..vT,_., L•„-_'...,. n.-.+,",,, i,, e, e. eY. sr•. . . c,•._, C. drC u= i. y,• C• N"•• sYi e r. 6. a,-::;.' ke r Fri,.• x,.......... b 212 I design F LEGEND I LOADING PUBLIC CIRCULATION. STAFFIPATIENT J I") 3219 8ozoz• C Deaver,, 720. 2o. sas. o27s rhL er prgednum ELEVATOR: PUBLIC o ii 1121900 STAMPATIENT ELEVATOR: EXTENT OF PHASE I' PARKING GARAGE FOOTPRINDRENOVATION CURRENT BUILDING Streetfdail, s DOCK WMEXPANSION NEYI BUILDING FOOTP onallnc. Heerytntemat' 82016th GIRCULATION 1 9 VIN I j EXTENTOFPIIASE2 APPROVED EXTENT OF APPROVED AND CURRENTLY PHASE AND UNDER UNDER P Y L A T I CONSTRUCTION PHA SE 3 AND 4 3 CURREtULY S O P I L A V N G P S A APPROVEDANDCOtdPLETEU NSION CONSTRUCTION Y EXIENTOFPHASE4 APPROVED AND CURRENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION CasL' 0 i Creek e Road 81011 Co Aspen, f i J i I consu'. lants7consWCl' on managers 1 3+: J E1.iUf+) co F7H 5`. C08'. f7I 7111!]:• A. t,=}!) c* riNl157: 531 515111 4'' . I 51: 7 j T9 0' h'yP•_ X3127) I e_ ttFRFr¢- f. A' ilSl hw: ti7)' i)) SS.'- o,,, 1)+ 1: 011) N7. 727:•: 0 7 i: LO!! 5: 1ff71 011)?)/) 1 t CO LO I g. eyfn x. 7Aar) s¢ aVcgnaturo 0 I 1 MECHANICAL dale issuedfor PHASE 314 FINAL PLID oho OBBY 41AL. ngIIN RY AUGUST MEE' ING t ROO 2012 date uern T 10, 1S --- I_ R LETINC OOM NORTH pLAN SHELL SPACE SCALE: V=: 1 keYp? an sheet 4l e BASEMENT LEVEL she¢ checked YY ,..•, fT+ a. W+ a, eY. KFi'• JYrrl°" f- lN.:!> 1 a- dire R•:<-..• •• AfYt mYS+ rJ 1l+ v wn, nb9 onarnHr, Y.• 7., jf<', 4Y. 1fM f 1. c number 213 AF- 10 T•+ 1 ma b' LEGEND i 7— CIRCULATION PUBLIC CIRCULATION STAFFIPATIE14T NEVI FOOTPRi. VTIEXPANSION BUILDING CURRENT BUILDING design FOOTPRINTIRENOVATION 02016th Suite ELEVATOR: STAFFIPATIENT 1 APPROVEOANDC01, EXTENT OF Denver, r. 0O°° Co 00202. 3219 e~ CK SPLETED Street Matt, 720.948. 0276 LOADING EXTENTOFPHASE I Inc. lntemationat Heery ELEVATOR- PUBLIC project number PHASE 2 1121900 r APPROVED AND CURRENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION EXT ENT OF PHASE APPROVED HI 3 AND CURRENILY UNDER T p CO: HEALING ISTRUCTION L EXTE14TOFPfME4 — GARDEN H PPO S RVIC i7- BIKE N I B 114 YENS J 1 IT r( I i a 0 A L consu' lantslconstruction KI 3e,) a rr Y v IT C. I__{_ I- R- I—_ ' tl COURT D31YiISt5111»)» P eCfRbyt3hy 37)/ LOBBY I 6° w: bX62 11 ii:91177747t{, ftii S -_ v r C a I date AUGUST 10, 2012 Item date AP I' O f LOBBY r - Y C for PHASE 314 FINAL PLID AF n ARAGE& r) IC issued NI l ` G6) CU ENTRANCE B V J T unr w.° J— DROP- f TR 3ES22 cowcllaN seaVstgnature J 9 I 1710" 5+ e• G. 1+. 11 BORATPW a 120/ S70*)( gq7 e,. yy c, I t.t vi. al5aYA7 I S scsln i l:` C1bw 7Y.C1 oYLn7 Srr71Yco RD Derj. E7rIWxA An. t7pp P I _ managers pv rCs+ a; tebYS EatL _ J ZT Cese Creek Road Co 0116111 I CA f IEI T Aspen, Asp TRAIL C ROP OFF I ADDITION/ EXPANSION T MBULANCE P 3 AND 4 PHASE T S O APPROVED AND CURREIITLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION S VALLGY ASrr: N r— J DINING A EA - d r 0 LIC . V I• 1 IN PLAN NORTH ENTRANCE____ SCALE: 1'= 3ry• l 0 DP THE T DROP- OF -kev sheet Plan Otle LEVEL ONE 6heet AF- 101 T+ Y: L'> s+:. tYl. i-. µY. s rrir- N-+ ra' yeJ• lanb. w/• s t. et wW. ti-- s ry Jn r. tec.. TJ. , '. vrut< v. n T.. nw.• wr/ 17v4 bf. c. y.../ sr7 +... c drann fry.+ Y. rc O• by YVrrlrrq• N>, vfr. O.' checked virsyshliY'•[+ iIITJLtn 1[ u.Slf by nt ir'. Y number 214 LEGEND design CIRCULATION. PUBLIC CIRCULATION STAFFIPATIENT NEW BUILDING FOOTPRINDEXPANSION Inc. Intemaronal CURRENT BUILDING FOOTPRNUREI: OVATIOlI HeeFy ELEVATOR:-PUBLIC Suite 200, Denver, CO 80202. 3219 720. 946. 0276 820 16th Street Mall, ELEVATOR STAFFiPATIENT EXTENT OF PHASE APPROVED AND 1 OD 0 O q 7 COMPLETED AEXTENT OF PI[ ASE J number protect Oo 1121900 2 r APPROVEDAND aEXTENT UNDER CONSTRUCTION OF PI- ASE 3 APPROVEDAND EXTENT CURRENTLY CURRENTLY OF PHASE A ROOF UNOE. 6 RCONSTRUCTION E P S O H V N S L A I P T L f Y L A 0 4 APPROVED AND CURRENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION PHASE 3 AND 4 QJ b ADDITION/ EXPANSION CID 64 ROOF b UVJ 0401 Cede Creek Road Aspen, Co 81611 0 ruction managers consullanlslcona VN . ccWN9)!))) I, I f 1109f) R.) Or1iN5flF' 77 t7 00- 16v. ncrhifn<..' I i NIIM'+$ fuY k! rJt FxlarjvlAw. WO O COURTS COURTYARD 11 I11=LI YARD _. I I r ... I i aioasaan yo A a w c' Olr}! 7N71727h: h Er: 3i) F!) l r7275CJ Jll U) U): sFl f rFeaanro G!rwih, COlM) 3 seaVs[ pnalure h MEDICAL i i OFFICE I SPACE S ROOF 1 / Olem date Issued for 3/ 4 PHASE I FINAL PLID AUGUST 10, 2012 Item date ROOF i O-PF OPEN TO BELOW cito LO BY HE4- AD PLAN NORTH f' L t• I --• rr SCALE: 1'= 3T key sheet plan 09 LEVEL TWO sheet number F. 1 02 rT\ rla. brL/ L- J. I L4V< av' f• 1tiv•• SnYT1n Wn\ l wy,' MS•. vr Lr. M•.wa\. i,> w• n-( w1.,•- i, VC. e.., v+ l.. ayrla r:< N H!• i r Lai = rp , bryr"+•• FT+• drawn b M1\ b, t. n, Checked r• vAti LI[ r- ya, YYn. by W iC d1Lw_ Ll:• n} 215 design Internal: onal Inc. 82016th Slrocl R1all, Heery Suite 200. Denver, CO 80202- 3219 720. 946. 0276 number project 1121900 A F- i I I I i! t U f t ' III !. I I i I, I I S OH I i I' P E O L VA N I P S L T E A Y L PHASE 3 AND 4 ADDITION/ EXPANSIOt ti OdOl Castle Creek Road Aspen, Co 61611 I NOTE: OXYCEN P ID SiRUGTU. SE UOT SHMW FOR CURRY consuMans/ conslruchon 4 — 7 X?) EtyEx, sgA. e, 1) V S. 114x, 6•, e. 7 ) 1" eb4v. Ye, G0617) Gn.«, W) S, J) v13o)) managers pF41 N, yi uftl:c Sholocc- 1' ARS) UA, tiI fll? JS'. 1r5M 113) o) b5>) a, EGErtFni uM7 0+) 3N' r-/ Rs,, S):• 1 20 3U ) V+z+ e St S. NORTH ELEVATION 1 Vi a e: aGae) Ecya V{>'r_% V aiv. ns, Y, s. u ax et..corxn 974 03111 WO 7N 031) 7u Seal/ Issued for Sl9nalure data PHASE 314 FINAL PUD AUGUST 10. 2012 Item dale r y II F II il,l I I -- I I,( i II r n Ilr IT-II f M: L - 111Ij li aj- F' F, i EAST ELEVATION SCALE I= 20 kev o! an wheal title JJ NORTH AND EAST ELEVATIONS sheet 216 number A-201 checked ny-,...,,, r•. w,. yrr•,= v,++, n•,•r,.:. w.,.:,...-,.,.,.<..., uvr.,. rtrn+ ur+„ h• m, cxi,., m:. neme. n ...• rrw e.,... anr• arrr, by nr...,., r! sr., v r.: design Inc. eery International 620 161h Street t'lall, Suite 200• CO 60202. 3219 Denver, 720. 036. 0276 number protect 1121900 L S F V. Illi' I . I _-`. - SnP O v1nT A L t r r°[-- a - - t r r -- r- r' f , , :. 1_ _ yr ` Road e Co Aspen, z ppp J'( Creek 81611 Casl: 0301 r •— ` NSION EXPANSION ADDITION/ TI SOUTH ELEVATION 3 AND 4 PHASE a 1- l l managers n cosutlantslconslruc6on Etcof, a- df M 5341 711))) ill?- 3 ECEa f,ytcfJ V2)' 3': 9%0 GI'- W,. lFnJ. S.'; \ V , C 11) 37+ 5-. M2 cw 7 r.' Cz-. Iv/ i142i/: 2711973%) 9575! 221:• 7 c.. CO f?251 7: d1U5.': JlIYi3)))!`.:! Y. r. i 7 E: r' S ET 7 S+ Y Ff S_ 2 V2: i h': lt6 CO 97)) 7i4 Nt] 1 P% 4: J?.- 4 67111 seaYskdnalure I Issued date for 314 PHASE PUD FINAL dale iten 7t,amll , I' 10, 2012. AUGUST llll rr SCAtE:' 3- 1 WEST EL_1-. VATION sheet We SOUTH AND WEST ELEVATIONS sheet number A- 202 rr x:.:,<-,.-.,:>• r.--...::,..-.., .-[, s r.. •- --.. o.. o- .. a. rWi. Y..... y,e. eirs dra'.vn by checked by 217 Phase 4 Lobby Redesign EEE n I. I Original Design- Approved 20% EFFECTIVE Conceptual BULK REDUCTION 40% EFFECTIVE GLASS, gEDUCTION 7_1711- I 1 at FT IF i-' Proposed Redesign- Approved by Hospital Board 3 218 OR G ti 17 i8 I I 1 PARAPET T. O. 132'- I I I 2 0' ROOF I I I I I I I T. O_ HELIPAD 121'- i 0' ` p I T O. TO 3 PARAPET ET Roof 71T 0' 114'- 10' 1''.. 114' 1_ 2' I I I I I I m I I LEVEL i 01 I 5 219 220 LEFT ELEVATION: CLADDING DETAIL A um Tem tro t PO BOX 409 MARCHE, OK 73762 JOB NAME i The Children' s Hospital Behavioral Health Building T Warn AHU- 7- 1 AHU- 7- 1 tl Zoos 2 i_ OWMESR" CFM M Company SEB Pre sav air+" a Pre 221 END VIEW: OUTSIDE AIR CLADDING DETAIL RIGHT L EFT IMT OB t PO BOX 409 OKARCHE, SIDE SIDE o! OK 73762 NA — The Children' s Hospital Behavioral Health Building AHUDRMMG AHU- 7- 2 7- 2 Oct. i WP. KO DAME 75 A TAG SE9 2006 Pre MPF& SWAnYE SNOB' CFM Pre Company 11, OM fSt ' ORDS N0, 222 LEGEND I' CAFETERIA PATIO OUTDOOR CHAPEL CHAPEL GARDEN) TUMBLED CONCRETE PERVIOUS PAVING) i k ': 1 a" Yr: EASTERN I. tx- I! i;•'•' 1 C coN ORL E SURFACE PARKING i PHASE f I CRUSHER 2 IMPROVEMENT) f LANDSCAPE I PUBLIC PUBLIC OM ENTRY ^ l a ; y; . t, I,- - f, ENTRY/ DIRECTIONAL SIGNAGE MELD 16 SURFACE PARKING SPACES K':. PAINTED CROSSWALK p y k y i V WIDE CONCRETE IDE WALK WITH ADA CURB RAMP$ OF RENOVATION) THIS DIAGRAM IS FROM SHEET L- 20 PHASE 3/ 4 FINAL PUD APPLICATION SUBMITTAL EXCERPTED I s AREA THE I I INTERIOR NOTE: r F'' PAT, EXCLUDES LIMITS i CURB RAMP f_ FINES PHASE 3- 4 APPROXIMATE LIMIT' S OF DISTURBANCE SEE GRADING PLAN 4 MER z u SPECIALTY PAVING( INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE) ENTRY MAIN ENTRY PAVERS® w f• 1 AND ILLUSTRATES PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIVITY AT FU LL OUT. Yr' r. PAINTED CROSSWALK I9 LOOP ROAD AVH Ii SEROADE LOOP r r I H. iO `_, 20 ' H.S. PARKING 40 Pedestrian access r evision phses 3/ 4 exhiZM. aF ASPEN VALLEY HOSPIT KEY PLAN P. 223 12 . 2012 2of2 ICJ GUAJA OUTDOOR DINING TERRACE SEE PCU ENTRY ENLARGEMENT PLAN, L- 1. 3 ALONI LE RETAWAL CIVL STRU j O r_'-} EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS TO REMAIN ENGINEER' S DRAWINGS. --__ J lil I SURFACE PARKING PHASE 2 I MPROVEMENT) i 77 i PARKING SPACES 1 NOTE: i 1 ., 24 EXISTING PARKING SPACES TO REMAIN I! I l 1) THIS DIAGRAM IS FROM SHEET 0 OF THE PHASE 2 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENT SET. EXCERPTED l L- I 1. I t CURB RAMP& EXISTING HEUPAD TO REMAIN PAINTED LOOP CROSSWALK IMPROVEMENTS AS PROPOSED FOR COMPLETION WITH PHASE 2 CONSTRUCTION. I WIDE CONCRETE SIDEWALK WITH ADA CURB RAMPS 6 f. AVH DIAGRAM PEDESTRIAN AN CONNECTIVITY SIDEWALK I RAW WATER CONNECTION AND IRRIGATION PUMP PAD: SEE IRRIGATION SHEET 11. 2 PAINTED`CROSS- ,. WALK TRAIL STOP SIGN, ROAD REALIGNED GNED I SEE NOTES REALIGNED HOSPITA L ENTRY ROAD, SEE CIVIL SHEET CS- 102 PEDESTRIAN TRAIL 1 Jhi I 1 y IMPROVED PEDESTRAIN TRAIL CROSSING TRAIL STOP SIGN. GUARD 1'= pedestrian 2040 access revision AT DOOU7TLE SEE NOTES GC DRIVE REQUIRED AT CONCRETE RETAINING WALE ATER THAN 30" IN HEIGHT AT HHS PARKING LOT AND NEW RFTA STOP. SEE CIVIL GRADING PLAN FOR TOW/ BOW. 70 DETERMINE EXTENTS OF-, GUARD RAIL COORDINATE STEEL GUARD RAIL INSTALLATION WITH PREFABRICATED SHELTERS TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH FALL PROTECTION CODES. 40' 0 — RAIL exhibit- phase 2 3 z8 r( I y 1 220 I o ti CASTLE CRE IMPROVEMEN SEE CI% SHEET CS- 1- KEY PLAN ASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL M. F. P. 12 . 2012 1 of 2 224 MMLN& ASS LIGHTING DESIGN AND ENGINEERING Aspen Valley Hospital Light Trespass Mitigation Options The purpose of the Light Trespass Mitigation is to reduce the brightness of the lights for neighbors. There are five different areas of concern: Whitcomb Terrace traffic circle area and parking, hospital parking lot, hospital parking garage, wall mounted sconces and loop road. Options to mitigate undesirable brightness and light trespass and AVH' s intended resolution for each area include: 1. Replacing the LED light bars with built- in shielding bars to reduce brightness of the luminaire when viewed from off the site; RESOLUTION: AVH will replace light bars at exterior pole and wall lights as recommended. 2. Reduce LED light bar quantities in order to lower average lighting levels; RESOLUTION: AVH will reduce the light bars from 3 to 2 at all remaining pole and wall lights, pending new and final photometrics using the recommended light bars. 3. Change color temperature of the LED light bar to a warmer 2700K color; RESOLUTION: AVH will change all light bars in pole-mounted lights to the recommended 4. 2700K color. Install LED light bars in the wall sconces with backlight shielding to reduce the amount of brightness on the wall; RESOLUTION: AVH will replace the light bars as recommended. 5. Selectively identify and remove some poles and replace with lower height bollards; RESOLTUION: AVH will selectively remove poles and replace with bollards, pending 6. new and final photometrics using recommended light bars. Turn off lights that are not needed after a designated curfew; RESOLUTION: AVH has already implemented lighting controls including motion sensors, dimmers, and timers for the parking garage, the top level parking deck, and the entry lobby. tier n 1; P/ Figure reduces 1— Black apparent cover plate Figure 2— Spill light shielding on bottom LEDs 225 i' Aspen Valley Hospital— Lighting Design Ideas December 28, 2012 Heery International Page 12 2700K High pressure 3000K Sodium 4500K 6500K Metal Halide[ Quartz, Ceramic] Cold LED I 6000- 6500K] 2000K) Cooper LED LightBAR"[ 4000K] s Figure 3— The color appearance of various light sources can be defined in terms of color temperature, measured in" degrees" Kelvin( K). The Cooper Light Bar is the current specification. Recommend 2700K. AccuLEDOptics5 Asymmetric Distributions A— lyp. Z N ft+ y lyw3 A— TW4 s Eliminator a su 3 Distributions N T tejwM, µ. ms 5 Spill Light Distrilxitons P_ 3 lyp. s14 sie Symmetric wfis'.. lyw 5* Squaa. W. N.. lyp,+ S I. 14almn fFigure 4— The picture above compares the various light distributions and spill light control 226 t` r SLOPED 1 OVERFRAMINIG W/ LY MEMBRANE PLYA£ MBRANE ROOF ROOFW/ EXTRUDED RIBS 1,;.. r. xxi n, i ELEVATION r SLOPED W/ SINGLE- PLY ROOF WI OVERFRAMING MEMBRANE EXTRUDED RIBS li:.,';' : Il:! l l.il ifLllf!lil! iii I' III illi ill ELEVATION 18- 0 AFG 1- 0 i iilll I Illiil' i I: AEC) I, I l..l II: I' i I! I III;,,:. I!! II! ill Lill!!; i! IIIIIIIIIIIi!I 1i Iji! i! it I II EXISTING SLOPED OVERFRAMING SINGLE- PLY MEMBRANE ROOF W/ EXTRUDEDR BS i q.!'! I' I". 4 ' -; f '..:. II:'::.{,.:, III! lll! ir I;! 2 i s d W/ 77 1 III R t I I• n I I, I ti"!`; l I' I aI, l rU i I; I f I ITliI I l! f{ i' r lI ELEVATION i is I I; T;.: j r I, i IIi l II, I EXIST. i. i y' iIt i fN l' N COURTYARD l 32'-0' AFG ti.. EXISTING SLOPED OVERFRAMING SINGLE- PLY MEMBRANE ROOF W/ W/ EXISTING RIBS EXTRUDED rr SOLAR PANELS I I I !......._. SLOPED ELEVATION I I 3T- e' AEG) r kr OVERFRAMING W/ SINGLEPLY ROOF W/ EXTRUDED MEMBRANE ArT RIBS Ill..._ ELEVATION I 32- 0 AEG) l I xa 8 LOPED ADHERED TPO ADHERED ROOFING OVERFRAMNG WISINGLEFLY ...._.... _. .. ......_... MEMBRANER MEMBRANE ° TAPERED ROOF W1 EXTRUDED RIBS I#.• / SKYLIGHT ON/ ELEVATION I I 1T- 0' AFG EXIST. U. ... .. .. I RTU EXIST. ELEVATION 10' 4' AFG QESAAG) F 1 SCREEN II!,! Q GETAT OOFlNG'// 7, 4. 10- AEG) ( I WALL i6'-0' AEG) ELEVATION .. I! I! IIIIII! I: Ili I!. II': i: ADHERED 1/ TAPERED INSULATION r _ i I TPO MEMBRANE ROOFINGW/ NEW RTU i i. . . ._. . i ELEVATION I 16'-0' AFG ADHEREDTPO ELEVATION T-6' AFG EGETATIVE 6'-0' AEG) OOFlN/ ! !. a....!._.. i_..-!__ L.......- L.... l...l/{' ..........................._.......... I I EIEVATION 1 6b' AFG L.. . I HELIPAD SAFETY ELEVA ELEVATION ION 6'-0' AEG) 1 TAPERED INSUUIDON/ HELIPAD ./ a........ i ji -- 1.. I ( i i ADHERED TPO ROOFING W/ MEMBRANE TAPERED' ELEVATION 15'- 6' AFG 16'-0' AEG i V INSULATION. d 4'-0' AEG 2 RAMP r. _: HELIPAD NET ELEVATION 5'-0' AFG I! ELEVATION ELEVATION AFG ELEVATION O' AEGI ELEVATION 14- 10 AF 15'- 6- AEG) ELEVATION 33- 4- AEG) HELIPAD ELEVATION ELEVATION AFG 24'-0' AFG 16'- 0- AEG) 21'-0' AEG) HELIPAD SAFETY j• NET ELEVATION 17' E' AFG 13b- AEG) ELEVATION 13'- 6' AFG 7'- 0' AEG) ELEVATION 16'- 6' AFG 6'-0- AEG) 227 END VIEW: OUTSIDE AIR CLADDING DETAIL LEFT SIDE RIGHT UNT p Te m t X01 JOB NAME TAG The _ Children' s Hospital Bshoviorol Heolth Building AHUMUMMG AHUPO BOX 409 OKARCHE, OK 73762 7- 2 REPRESENWIVF y— CFM DATE WP. PURCHAW SEB Pre 7- 2 NO Company SIDE PR NTS opt. SWW T, Zoos ORUEA OFWM NO NO Pre 228 M 1 G design KG, uto T: O.' HI,; iM1. xl NN4 000. a00TC 1121900 ASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL PHASE 3 ADDITION/ EXPANSION M. o. CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS w•... my a. x a.< j worearawrro, PHASE 2 t PHASE3 v PHASE4 t I- hv if LEGEND m C[[ nose nw..+ iC/ nT10M Yd avr• NO• uaas r, s AEOK p,' rnCWnm, L IM14NpIN00 OOSTIIOOM OE 4 NM+ n1n tl14 OVERALL ROOF PLAN PUD 229 0 MM SLOPED OVERFRAMING SINGLE- PLY MEMBRANE ROOF W/ W/ EXTRUDED RIBS HT ABOVE SLOPED OVERFRAMING SINGLE- PLY MEMBRANE WI EXTRUDED RIBS I I W/ i 1 t ROOF I J tI I,+ I I, fl I I+!{ I; )+It+" EXISTING SLOPED OVERFRAMING SINGLE- PLY MEMBRANE ROOF W/ EXTRUDED RIBS i'.: ROOF 6" f W/ j I f) i,, I ill I, i.- I I(• f I: ,; t lN J F EXIST i 1411 !! Ilf j l i COU COURTYARD i EXIST. IV COURTYARD EXISTING SLOPED OVERFRAMINGW/. MEMBRANE ROOF W/ EXTRUDED RIBSY SINGLE- JL 7 PLY 34- 0" 34'-T L r l HT ABOVE ROOF T- 6" SLOG OVERFRAMING W/ SINGLE- PLY MEMBRANE ROOF W/ EXTRUDED RIBS ADHERED TPO MEMBRANE ROOFING Wl TAPERED INSULATION HT ABOVE ROOF 10'- 6' SLOPED OVERFRAMING W/ SINGLE- PLY MEMBRANE ROOF W/ EXTRUDED RIBS SKYLIGHT 40'-(" HT ABOVE ROOF 10 i 6 REPLACED RTU ' ELEVATION 14'-0' AEG) j. I lill1 f' " ILA SCREEN WALL ELEVATION 1. 16'- 6' AFG 6'- 0' AEG) GETS 1 HT ABOVE ROOF 1a-6' GETATI OOFING/ 230 HELIPAD EXHIBIT 3 THREE ROOF TOP UNITS TO BE SCREENED MM design am.,, e ° Tm. fiyf rtA.• aw cornmasw wenas waoa. mb. JOp e r Sop 4 1 S.. P_ v A f 4 c 7 A e r 1. PHASE 3 AND 4 ADDITION/ EXPANS70N tea` as Me n, quw 00 s aW 4" wtp' up WeWe BR eaau o iiv'. T. aA.-;" FINAL —• .. Pt/ 0 wcvano mu ai+ a" r or a/AM7KCRTH n. ew LEGEND e nr. iar. x ae, ma issnom ROOF PLAN AF- 103 231 232 LADDING DETAIL %4 Temtro/ PO BOX 409 OKARCHE. OK 73762 233 EXHIBIT 3 Aspen Valley Hospital— Lighting Design Ideas December Heery International 28, 2012 Page 1 3 Specific Mitigation Ideas and AVH' s Intended Resolution 1. Whitcomb Terrace The pole mounted luminaires on this property have the greatest visibility to properties and street below. So, lowering the height of the luminaires will make the greatest impact by reducing visual line of site from the property to the offending luminaire. Mitigation options and AVH' s intended resolution, pending new and final photometrics include: Remove some or all luminaires, poles and bases at the traffic circle; Replace some or all light poles with round bollards with fully shielded bollard without louvers; Review additional landscape and exterior architectural lighting; Fully shielded bollard alternate Current exterior lighting 2. Hospital Parking Lot The hospital parking lot has 12- foot high poles with LED luminaires. Mitigation options and AVH' s intended resolution include: Replace LED light bars in parking lot luminaire with 2700K LED bars with Type III distribution and spill light control; Use black finish light bar cover; Reduce the number of light bars from 3 to 2, pending new and final photometrics. 234 Aspen Valley Hospital— Heery International Lighting Design Ideas December 28, 2012 Page 4 2700K LED color temperature with spill light shielding on right pole 3. Hospital Parking Garage The parking garage LED lighting is currently controlled with motion sensors that switch from a low light level to high as people walk or drive near. Since some of the lighting is visible off site, below are mitigation ideas and AVH' s intended resolution: Turn off upper deck pole mounted luminaires at a designated curfew as an additional control step beyond the motion sensors already installed;. Use black finish light bar cover to control luminaire brightness where light bars are being replaced as recommended on the top deck only; Shield perimeter mounted interior garage lighting with permanent shields at fixture locations which are fully visible to the exterior; Shielding demo for garage light Install a permanent mesh fabric at openings at the perimeter to reduce garage luminaire brightness. 235 Aspen Valley Hospital— Heery International Lighting Design Ideas December 28, 2012 Page 15 4. Rear Loop Drive Navigation on the service loop road can easily be accomplished with lower height bollards. Mitigation options and AVH' s intended resolution include: Install non- louvered bollards at each location previously planned to receive vertical light poles. 5. Hospital Wall Sconces The wall sconces have similar issues as the parking lot lighting, such as color and brightness and should be included in the overall mitigation effort. Options for mitigation and AVH' s intended resolution include: Replace light bars with 2700K LED and spill light control bars; Use black finish light bar cover; Sconces on the east wall have been disconnected. Sconces at the stair wells will be retrofitted. 236 Aspen Valley Hospital— Lighting Heery International Design Ideas December 28, 2012 Page 1 6 Future Lighting Design Strategies for Phases III and IV There are many human factors related to lighting in the built environment. These factors will be the primary drivers of the lighting design for the Hospital in order to deliver a high quality visual environment, increased occupant comfort, and foster wellness and productivity. A successful electric lighting design will provide a system of lighting layers ( ambient, task, and accent) which respond to the needs of the occupants. This strategy is particularly effective in energy- aggressive, high performance buildings. Separating lighting into layers will increase visual comfort, provide additional flexibility, and create visual interest. Additionally, exterior and lobby interior lighting design will be designed consistent with the principles of minimizing light trespass and brightness to the neighborhood. Exterior Specify 2700K light sources; Specify Type III distribution with spill light control for pole- mounted luminaires;; Use retaining walls and other hardscape features as lighted elements( face towards building); Use fully shielded bollards without louvers; Minimize use of poles in general. When used, specify 2700K LED light bars with built- in shielding as recommended above; Specify wall sconces with deeply regressed light sources; and Provide dimming for all lighting and establish a nighttime schedule with automated controls. Use low lumen ( light) output luminaires for reduced brightness and minimum acceptable safe light levels( footcandles). The success of most lighting designs lies in the selection of the correct equipment. Luminaires are built differently in order to optimize specific performance characteristics for which they are applied. Selecting luminaires cannot be done on aesthetics alone, but must also consider photometric performance, energy use, and project goals. Interior Lobby Specify 2700K light sources; Specify only non- luminous or non " glowing" luminaires; Use luminaires with fully shielded light sources; Do not allow direct illumination through exterior windows; Provide a low mounting height layer of light such as step lights, and wall washing( below 8'); Light between windows such that lighted surfaces are not reflected out the windows; and Provide dimming for all lighting and establish a nighttime schedule with automated controls. Tune ( set) minimum acceptable lighting( footcandle) levels. If ceiling is lighted, aim lights towards interior and either turn off or dim the lights to a low level at night. 237 ASPEN TYPE EBN7 VALLEY HOSPITAL - PHASE 3 & 4 LUMINAIRE SCHEDULE DESCRIPTION MOUNTED GRADE SOLID STATE CANTILEVERED LUMINAIRE, WITH ELV TYPE LINE VOLT SOURCE BOLLARD CUTTOFF TYPE IV DIMMER, MATTE BLACK 36" HEIGHT, UNIVERSAL VOLTAGE, LIGHTBAR OUTBOARD POSITION. BAKED MODIFIED 50, 000 HR ENAMEL > WITH SAME AS TYPE EPN4 POLE MOUNTED EBN1, SINGLE LUMIERE Driver: CONTROL FINISHED BAKED TYPE II STATE AREA LUMINIRE, WITH SAME AS WITH TWO TYPE LIGHTBAR ARM AND POLE, 50, 000 HR SAME AS TYPE EPN4, LUMIERE 303- B1- LEDB2- 2700- UNV- T2- DIMELV- BK- 36 COVER FOR 12' LEFT SPILL LIGHT EXCEPT SPILL RIGHT LIGHT ONLY LM79 per Driver: ? INVUE VXS- B02- LED- E1- SL4- BK- 2700K VXS- B02- LED- EI- SLL- BK- 2700K 0. 9 PF ELLIMINATOR DISTRIBUTION EPNR EBN2 70 CRI SUPPLY s EXCEPT EPN4, AS TYPE 2700° K LED HOUSING, > WARRANTY. BOLT SPILL COVERPLATE 13 X 23 X 6" CAST ALUMINUM IP 66, 5 YEAR IV HEIGHT. TYPE ONLY LIGHTBAR MODIFIED: OUTBOARD LIGHTBAR FINISH, STRAIGHT ROUND MOUNTING EPNL NOMINAL ENAMEL UNV- T4- DIMELV- BK- 36 OUTBOARD THD DISTRIBUTION BARS DISTRIBUTION BLACK, BLACK LEDB2- 2700- MODIFIED: SAME LIGHT 303- B1- 0. 9 PF EXCEPT SOLID LM79 per 70 CRI 20% EBN2 CATALOG NUMBER 2700° K LED DISTRIBUTION, DIMMABLE FINISH, LED WITH MANUFACTURER 20% THD SAME AS TYPE EPN4 INVUE SAME AS TYPE EPN4 INVUE VXS- B02- ELLIMINATOR DISTRIBUTION LED- EI- SLR- BK- 2700K EWN7 WALL RECESSED DISTRIBUTION, ENAMEL 12" X5" FINISH, STEPLIGHT, LED HARDWARE, CUT SHEET CUT- OFF ALUMINUM FACEPLATE, INTEGRAL TEMPERED GLASS LENS WARRANTY, FULL LONG BAKED THROW DIMMING DRIVER, MODIFIED TAMPER RESISTANT FASTENING AND 2700° K LED BLACK 0- 10V FOR WET CONCRETE INSTALLATION( REQUIREMENTS) LOCATIONS, 5 YEAR WINONA Driver: SUITABLE POURED- IN- LM79 per 70 CRI > FOR FOR J- BOX 50, 000 HR WITH FULL PLACE z SEE 0 9 PF 20% LED- STEP13- 9- L- 27K- MOD: FACEPLATE MOD: TAMPER ND120- SGB- WL- 216751 RESISTANT THD IA XICATO RECESSED SOLID STATE ACCENT LIGHT, NOMINAL 6" DIAMETER SPECULAR CLEAR SELF FLANGED CONE, INTEGRAL ELECTRONIC 0- 10 VOLT DIMMING DRIVER. 5 YEAR WARRANTY. REMOTE PHOSPHOR SEMI- 2700° 50, 000 HOURS LUMEN IC SURFACE MOUNTED LINEAR ASYMMETRIC DISTRIBUTION, 6" X 2" H, FOR CONTINUOUS INTEGRAL ELECTRONIC WARRANTY. SOLID STATE COVE UPLIGHT 0- 10 VOLT KURT VERSEN A5145- 27- SS AT 70% MAINTENANCE 2700° K LED WITH 50, 000 HR MCP RUNS, LED K, 80 CRI LM79 per NOMINAL @ 110° FROM NORMAL,, 80 CRI LENGTHS AS SHOWN ON PLANS, > Driver: DIMMING DRIVER. 5 YEAR WINONA SCV1- SLC- LEDI- X- 27K- DM24V- P1- RA- X- STD 0. 9 PF 5 20% THD ID XICATO RECESSED SOLID STATE SPECULAR CLEAR SELF 10 VOLT DOWN DIMMING DRIVER. NOMINAL 6" DIAMETER SEMICONE, INTEGRAL ELECTRONIC 0- 2700° WARRANTY. 50, 000 LIGHT, FLANGED 5 YEAR K, 80 CRI HOURS LUMEN IG LED KURT VERSEN A4134- 27- SS AT 70% MAINTENANCE 2700° K LED RECESSED LINEAR NOMINAL 6" WIDE SOURCE MASKING ELECTRONIC SOLID STATE APERTURE, DEVISE 0- 10 VOLT WALL LENGTHS TO AVOID DIMMING GRAZING LUMINAIRE, AS SHOWN ON PLAN, VIEW DRIVER. OF LEDS, 5 50, 000 HR > 0- 10V DIMMING WINDOW YEAR ALUMINUM HOUSING, COLOR YEAR WARRANTY. DRIVER, MULLION, WARRANTY. MODIFIED MODIFIED WITH TO BE MOUNTING z TO ALUMINUM GLARE SHIELDS. LITECONTROL THD 50, 000 HR 80 CRI Driver: 5 >- WS- L60- X- MO- 27K- CWM- DP- D10- V- LCD 0. 9 PF 2700° K LED SELECTED, INTEGRAL > BACKLIGHT LM79 Driver: SURFAC MOUNTED SOLID STATE UPLIGHT, TWO ASYMMETRIC FORWARD THROW LED LIGHT BARS, NOMINAL 12" DEEP X 14" WIDE X 4" HIGH per 80 CRI INTEGRAL 20% IS PHOSPHOR REMOTE LM79 AMETRIX WL- IN- N- B02- AI- 27- UNVMOD: 0. 9 PF 20% per THD MOUNTING, TBD- D10 2700K, SHIELDS, 2 BARS 238 lumiere DESCRIPTION Eon 303- B1 and 303bollards that B2 are compact, low profile, dimmable, LED downlight provide one side head integrated headd s coming a single and 303- B2 come only via off opposite standard fixed head. a luminaire the of with and sides universal JASPEN 61 has 303- 82 has - two, of the he luminaire. 303input LED drivers( 120- B1 VALLEY HOSPITAL BN 277V, 50/ 60 Hz). Dimming is achieved with a standard ELV, reverse phase dimming driver. Eon fixtures may be used indoors or outdoors and carry an IP66 rating. Our patented LumaLevelTM leveling system provides quick installation, easy adjustment, secure mounting and protection from vibration. SPECIFICATION FEATURES Material A... Head is corrosion- mounting base resistant 6061- T6 extruded is silicone tory alumi- aluminum from cast and corrosion aluminum alloy. mounting base are double protected by a RoHS compliant and undercoating and powdercoat paint finish, polyester the surpassing the outdoor base is and head are black. five the in available breakage due to thermal shock. EDGE LIT option: when specified 50/ 60Hz). to the Finish and the detail for EDGE more in thicker, in the sealed light clear, will The offer the around will accentuate and styling. a glass added of the fixture' the are by also other as out- Invue. the ordering information. with G... glass LED optics. Both color temperature 3/ 4" IP66 rated. mounting It entry. quick provides adjustment, and protection side for details 303- 62 comes standard mini lightbars. H... easy see reverse standard with two mini lightbars and Luma- mounting chassis, 70 shore neoprene base, stainless steel hardware and conduit and distribution must be specified when and catalog logic. 303- 61 comes LeveITM leveling system that includes installation, xj 3000K& 4000K) and a variety of that glass s aesthetics patented ref three color temperatures( 2700K, of base is mounting the dimmable. i ordering- aluminum equipped 120- 277, driver is ELV LEDs are included and available in line Cast to input LED drivers( The standard phase will tempered brigher edge reverse manner same above. referenced thickness the option, variety a offered such water D... Adjustable Mounting Base match section prevent Mounting housing addition colors door Cooper brands, See in In Eon bollards colors of Fixture available colors. standard Lumiere, demands rigorous environment. painted of standard the film chemical Both models come standard with temperature universal and Fixture Electrical intrusion to be slightly Finish high with sealed adhesive with B F... Clear, tempered glass lens, fac- from machined resistant Body is num. Lens C... precision- Labels& v, with four Approvals UL and cUL listed, standard wet label. secure ED["'1 from vibra- tion. Stainless to I... Hardware E... steel provide hardware is maximum Warranty Lumiere warrants it' s fixtures against standard 303- B 1 / 303- B2 defects in materials& workmanship corrosion- for five( 5) years. resistance. such as drivers Auxiliary transformers, carry the equipment ballasts original and manufac- LED 15. 5 W LED 31 W LED turer' s warranty. LED 303- B1 303- 132 BOLLARD 0 0 7. 72" 0 0 12. 70" 196mm 323mm 1. 40" 1 40 35mm 35mm 24. 00" 24. 00" 609mm 36. 00" - - 36. 00" 914mm 914mm 3. 43" 87mm - 609mm 3 139mm 139mm 87mm 239 COOPER www. Lighting cooperlighting. com Specification and Dimensions subject to change without notice. Consult your representative for additional options and finishes. LED INFORMATION LED Watts Distribution LED132- 2700- T2 15. 5 Type II- LED132- 2700- T4 15. 5 Type IV- LEDB2- 2700- T5X 15. 5 LED132- 3000- T2 15. 5 Type II- LED82- 3000- T4 15. 5 Type IV- T5X 15. 5 LED132- 3000- LED82- 4000- T2 LEDB2- 4000- LEDB2- 4000- T5X LED134- T4 CRI oK Life( hrs.) 725 95 2700 50000 Universal Input( 120- 277V, 50/ 601- 1z) Forward Throw 709 85 2700 50000 Universal Input( 120- 277V, 626 65 2700 50000 Universal Input( 120- 277V, 50/ 601- 1z) Lateral Throw 95 3000 50000 Universal Forward Throw 85 3000 50000 Universal Input( 120- 277V, 50/ 601- 1z) Type Flood V- Type V- Flood Volts Input( 120- 277V, 50/ 601- 1z) 50/ 601- 1z) 65 3000 50000 Universal Input( 120- 277V, 50/ 601- 1z) 15. 5 Type II- Lateral Throw 1209 95 4000 50000 Universal Input( 120- 277V, 50/ 601- 1z) 15. 5 Type IV- Forward Throw 15. 5 1181 85 4000 50000 Universal Flood 1044 65 4000 50000 Universal Input( 120- 277V, 50/ 601-1z) Lateral Throw 1436 95 2700 50000 Universal Forward 1410 85 2700 50000 Universal Input( 120- 277V, 50/ 601- 1z) Type V- 2700- T2 31 Type II- LEDB4- 2700- T4 31 Type IV- LEDB4- 2700- Total Lumens Lateral Throw T5X 31 LEDB4- 3000- T2 31 Type IIType IV- Throw Type V- Flood LEDB4- 3000- T4 31 LED134- 3000- T5X 31 LED134- 4000- T2 31 Type II- LED134- 4000- T4 31 Type IV- LEDB4- 4000- T5X 31 Input( 120- 120- 277V, 50/ 601- 1z) 277V, 50/ 601- 1z) 65 2700 50000 Universal 95 3000 50000 Universal Input( 120- 277V, 50/ 601- 1z) Forward Throw 85 3000 50000 Universal Flood 65 3000 50000 Universal Input( 120- 277V, 50/ 601- 1z) Lateral Type 1247 Input( V- Throw Input( Input( 120- 120- 277V, 50/ 601- 1z) 277V, 50/ 601- 1z) Lateral Throw 2393 95 4000 50000 Universal Forward Throw 2350 85 4000 50000 Universal Input( 120- 277V, 50/ 601- 1z) 2078 65 4000 50000 Universal Type V- Flood Input( Input( 120- 120- 277V, 50/ 601- 1z) 277V, 50/ 601- 1z) NOTES AND FORUMULAS Apply appropriate light loss factors where necessary. Photometry is LM- 79 compliant. ORDERING INFORMATION Sample Number: 303- B1- LEDB1- 3000- UNV- T2- BZ Color Series 303- Bt= LED 303- B2= LED dual head bollard single head bollard Optics Temperature 2700= 2700K - 3000= 3000K 4000= 4000K TB= Tvoe II. Lateral Throw - - T4= Type T5X= IV, Forward factory for other - Flood optics Input Voltage UNV= QuantityY LEDB2= Emitting Light Emitting 277V, Dimming DIMELV= Trailing Edge Phase Dimming Diode, Rev B., Two Mini Lightbar( LED84= 120- 50/ 60Hz f Mini Li 9 htbars Light Universal 131 only) MODIFIED: www. Lighting cooperlighting. com Driver Painted BK = Black BZ = Bronze CS = VE = City Silver Verde Height Options 24= 24" Height- EDGE= Edgelit Clear 36= 36" Height Tempered Glass Lens WT= White AP = Grey( Invue) DP = Dark Platinum( GM= Graphite Metallic( Invue) Invue) Diode, Rev B., Four Mini Lightbars( B2 only) WORM Finish Throw Type V, Extra Wide Consult - REMOVE INBOARD LIGHT BAR Specification and Dimensions subject to change without notice. Consult your representative for additional options and finishes. 240 O NVUE DESCRIPTION energy The classic lines and sophisticated construction of Vision Site LED makes it ideal to JJASPEN design. Offering LED technology across the family scaling in both physical form and lumen capability for architectural site lighting applications. UL/ cUL listed for use in wet locations. an VXS complement VXM, Vision and SPECIFICATION site provides true FEATURES Construction HOUSING: die- cast maintenance, Heavy wall one- tolerance control has and set repeatability in manufacturing. Housing features a partition wall that for isolates driver cooler heat in+ 40° C DOOR: One- less retained provided to gasket heat and with tool- seal two( than individually housing and internal housing match to for to electrical efficiency AccuLED featuring light designs collection distribution region. Each precision the arranged and line LED LightBARS'" and of mounted to surge. All drivers are mounting by easily replaced disconnects for ease wiring. Driver tray is hinged removable tools. separate is specified. for section See Invue complete Additional mounting accessories available. VXS VISION SITEE SMALL LE the without Options to savings battery circuit) are egress and pack use light control and available. super TGIC premium 1- stage polyester 4 LightBARS Solid State LED powder coat paint, 2. 5 mil nominal thickness cover for superior fade against and wear. protection LightBART"" ARCHITECTURAL are standard plates white AREA/ SITE LUMINAIRE and may be specified to match finish of luminaire housing. Standard colors include black, bronze, grey, white, dark platinum and graphite custom color metallic. RAL and matches available. D E S 1 6 N 16 N T S Consult Outdoor Architectural C O N S O R T I U M Colors brochure for a complete selection. Mounting via output pattern poles pre- drilled when Housing is finished in 5 circuit and are of quick capabilities( precisely on the board at> order seperately). Invue poles Finish to withstand dedicated levels, energy then LEDs: High ( selection. range application sealed 50, 000+ hours life and Lighting proprietary designed of maximize manufactured injection- molding media. high lens is optical greater than ambient temperature transient and directional and onto of OptiCST"", that factor, less power 10kV of patented, with dedicated accessory arms and structural mount option drill module use 13) finish electronic universal 120- 277V/ 50- 60hz), 0. 9 Cooper trays Optics thirteen( in luminaire of+ 40°C( 104° F) down to minimum allows access Choice potted of- 30° C starting temperature (- 22° F). Shipped standard with components. DISTRIBUTION: rod are provided feature to painted and structural life. Standard housing sealed construction, steel measures 112" in diameter and performance optimal prolonged 20% harmonic distortion IP66 rating. HARDWARE: Tool- less release door latch is stainless steel/ aluminum for sunk are Continuous tray. LENS: Downlight lens is LED board integrated acrylic overeach Stainless optical Product works in conjunction LED drivers voltage( 2) optic optics, of is provided drivers feature swings on hinges. GASKET: catch independent site, DRIVER: die- cast latch. Door is and or uniform product orientation color or optional natural finish. transfer construction release L90 MOUNT: Die- cast aluminum cleat factory mounted to luminaire and finished in luminaire color. factoryR901 Electrical provides heat piece, CRI. Optional rotation[ or wall surface. STRUCTURAL and orientation. ambient environments. aluminum down on 275K) CCT Integral sink superior thermal optic allows components operation. aluminum 70 nominal standard offered in 4000° K(+/- piece, housing aluminum precise EPN VALLEY HOSPITAL LEDs, ARM: One- piece aluminum arm standard extruded available in 5" lengths. Internal bolts Warranty VXS LED features a 5 year limited warranty. guides allow easy positioning of fixture during installation to pole 70% lumen CERTIFICATION DATA UUU LILis Listed ISO 9001 IP66 LightBARS ARRA Compliant LM79/ LM80 Compliant 1. 5G Vibration ENERGY DIMENSIONS Electronic Tested DATA LED Driver 0. 9 Power Factor 20% Total Harmonic 120- 277V/ 50& 60hz, Distortion 347V/ 60hz, 480V/ 60hz 6" 152, nm] 30° C Minimum Temperature 40° C Ambient Temperature 13 1/ 2" 1343mm] I Rating EPA Effective Projected Area:( Sq. Ft.) Single:— 1. 18 Warm included 23"[ 584mm] 5"[ 127mm] Single Structural:— 1. 27 Warm included SHIPPING DATA Approximate) Net Weight: Volume( 1 1I. T241 00 COOPER www. 35 lbs. cu. ft): 3. 00 Lighting cooperlighting. com AVU092101 2013- 02- 26 12: 57: 30 VXS POWER AND LUMENS VISION SITE SMALL LED BY BAR COUNT DISTRIBUTION Number of Power UghtBARs Curtent Watts] ; 1 Curtent @ T2 I IN 2' T3 T4 SL2 161, 0 i S1 3 L4 5M0 5W0 SXO RW SLR/ SL- 7 LED UGHTBAR C01 27 0. 23 0. 13 CO2 54 0. 46 1 1, 819 0. 21 3, 509 1 805 1, 798 1, 811 1, 1, 923 1, 930 1, 868 834 1, 660 3, 469 3, 495 3, 484 3, 368 3, 347 3, 711 3,724 3, 605 3, 540 3, 203 1, 746 1, 734 1, CO3 77 0. 65 0. 29 5, 291 5, 230 5, 269 5, 252 5, 078 5, 046 5, 594 5, 614 5, 436 5, 337 4, C04 101 0.86 0. 37 6, 983 6, 902 6, 954 6, 932 6, 703 6, 660 7, 383 7, 410 7, 174 7,043 6, 373 B01 27 0. 23 0. 13 2, 237 2, 211 2, 228 2, 2, 147 2, 133 2, 365 T-- 2. 256 T 2, 041 B02 51 0. 43 0. 20 4, 317 4, 267 4, 299 4,285 4, 4, 117 4, 564 4, 580 [ 4,435 B03 73 0. 62 0. 28 6, 508 6, 433 6, 481 6, 460 6,246 6, 207 6, 881 6, 906 6, 0. 81 0. 35 8, 589 8, 490 8, 554 8, 526 8, 244 8, 192 9, 081 9, 114 1 829 21 LED UGHTBAR 220 143 1 2, 374 1- 2, 29-8- 4,354 LUMEN MULTIPLIER Ambient Lumen Temperature Multiplier 10° C 1. 04 3, 940 15° B04 95 686 6, 8, 824 564 8, 663 C 1. 03 5, 939 25° C 1. 00 7,839 40° C 0. 96 MOUNTING VARIATIONS Wall Mount Arm Mount Single Arm Mount 2 @180° Arm Mount E. PA E. P. A EAA EAA EAA E. PA VXS 1. 18 VXS VXS 1. 72 VXS 2. 25 VXS 2. 35 VXS 2. 35 2. 20 2 @90° Arm IIII POLE DRILLING E") TYPE" @90° Arm Mount 4 @90° Mount ORIENTATION Street Side House Side Street Sid House Sid F`) 5/ 16"[ 213/ 16" 72mm) 3 IIII OPTIC VXS Structural Arm Mount IIII PATTERNS VXS TYPE" Mount 3 @120° 8mm] dia. hole 3/ 4"[ 20mm] 2 3/ 4" dia. hole 70mml 123mmJ 3 7/ 8" W. 99mm] 280mm] 3/ 8"[ 10mm] dia. holes 2) 3/ 4"[ 20mm) dia. holes Standard 3 7/ 8"[ 99mm] Street Optics Rotated Left @ 90°[ 1- 90] Side 3" non 77mml 12) 3/ 8" 110mml dia. holes House Side "- Optics Rotated Right @ 90°[ R90J MOUNTING OPTIONS AND ACCESSORIES Structural Pole Mount Extruded Arm Round or Square Structural Pole) Wall Mount Top Cap F0 0 12" 305 mmi L O Set Screws Direct Mount Round or Square VOOMR www. Pole) Lighting cooperlighting. com. Direct Wall Mount Wall NOTE: Specifications Visit our web and Bracket dimensions site subject at www. with to Arm change Tenon Adapter without cooperlighting. notice. com Customer First Center 1121 Highway 74 South Peachtree City, GA 30269 770. 486.4800 FAX 770. 486. 4801 242 AVU092101 2013- 02- 26 12: 57: 30 2013- 02- 26 16: 02: 45 VXS VISION SITE SMALL LED ORDERING INFORMATION Product VXS° Family '' Type Lamp Vision Site Small LED= Solid State Light Emitting Diodes Number 3. of El 603'[ 3] 21 LED LightBARs 480= 480V B04=[4] 21 LED LightBARs 7 LED LightBARs 514' Type IV w/ w/ w/ Spill Control Spill Control 90rr Eliminator Li ht Right fixture, does painted fixture, does include not PRCCR= Stainless Strut Rod and Direct WH= 213BQ Mount Kit Adapter for O. D. Tenon for 2 3/ 8" O. D. Tenon MA7103- WH= 3 @120 Degree Tenon Adapterfor 2 3/ 8" Q. D. Tenon MA11( 4-WH= 4 @90 Degree Tenon Adapter for 2 318" O. D. Tenon MA710SWH= 2 @90 Degree Tenon Adapter for 2 3/ 8" WRCP= Strut Rod and Clevis Set( fixture, does not Painted9 MA7106- not include MA1107- WH= MA7108- WH: 2 @120 Single31/ 2" arm) WH= Tenon Degree Adapter Tenon arm Tenon Adapterfor O. D. Tenon 2 @180 Degree Tenon Adapterfor 31/ 2" O. D. Tenon 6 MAI PC= Button Type Photocell( 2L=Two O. D. Tenon Degree Adapter for 23/ 8" O. D. Tenon 9 match 3 @90 for 2 3/ 8" O. D. Tenon MA7100- Options P Yi include BZ= Bronze Metallic Pole MA7102- WH= 2 @180 Degree' renon Seta Mount fixture, does DP= Dark Platinum Wall Adapter Clevis WRCS° Stainless Steel Strut Rod and Clevis Set( Clevis painted to WH= While for Round arm) Wall Ap= Grey Graphite WH= MA7101- arm) arm) GM= MA7200- a 5 BK= Black S" Arm MA1077- WH= Wall Bracketwith S' Arm for Round Pole( Clevis painted to match fixture, does not included to match Finish WN= MA1076- WH= Direct Mount for Round Pole to include not PRCPR= Strut Rod and Clevis Set for Round Pole( Painted to match Spill Control Degree Spill MA7074- arm SLL= 90 Degree Spill Li ht Eliminator a f5 MA7073- WH= Direct Mount far Square Pole PRCCS= Stainless Strut Rod and Clevis Set? match III 7 arm) 5XQ=Type V Square Extra Wide SL3= Type COW[ 4] 7 LED LightBARs does not include for Square Pole( Clevis SL2' Type If LightBARs Accessories 5WQ= Type V Square Wide RW= Rectangular Wide CO2=[ 2] 7 LED LightBARs LED IV 5MQ=Type V Square Medium 120- 277V 9 MA1071- WH= 5° Arm for Square Pole fixture, 347= 347V s. Options Mourn PRCPS= Strut Rod and Clevis Set for Square Pole( Painted to match Type III T4=Type B02=[2] 21 LED LightBARs CO3=[ 3] 7 Pole T3= Voltage 6 07=[ 1121 LED LightBAR 7] Structural II 4 Lightbars C01=[ Distribution T2= Type specify 11013 Degree Adapter voltage) Circuitsln @120 MA1111- WH= 4 @90 Tenon for 3 1/ 2" O. D. Tenon Degree Tenon Adapter for 3 1/ 2" O. D. Tenon LCF= LightBAR Cover Plate Matches Housing Finish 7080= 70 CRI/ 6000K 8030= CCT+ 1 80 CRI/ 3000K CC' L90= Optics Rotated Left MA1112- WH= 2 @90 Degree Tenon Adapter for 3 1/ 2" O. D. Tenon MA7113- WH= 3 @90 Degree for 31/ 2" I 90 Degrees R90= Optics Rotated Right 90 Degrees MA 7114- WH= 2 @120 Tenon Adapter O. D. Tenon Degree Tenon Adapter for 3 1/ 2" O. D. Tenon MA1253= 1okV Circuit Module Replacement ICB= Integral Cold Weather Battery Pack 12 Specify 120 or 277) MS- LXX= Motion Sensor for on/ off 13 operation MS/ X- LXX= Motion Sensor for bi- level+- switching Notes: 1 Design Lights'" Consortium Qualified. Refer to www. designlights. org Qualified Products List under 2 Arm not included. 3 Standard 4000 K CCT and greater than 70 CRI. Family Models for details. 4 5 Order separately. 21 LED LightBAR powered See accessories. at 350mA, 7 LED LightBAR powered at 1A. Custom and RAL color matching available upon request. Consult your customer service representative for further information. 5 Add 7 Compatible with 5" MA1071 arm only. as suffix in the order shown. 8 Compatible 9 Wall mount structual options do not include arm assembly( See Accessories). Compatible with 5" with 5" MA1074 arm only. MA1071 arm only. 10 Low- level output varies by bar count. Consult factory. Requires quantity two or more LightBARS. 11 Consult 12 Available with B01, B02, Cot or CO2 configurations only. Specify 120 or 277V. LED cold weather integral battery pack is rated for minimum operating temperature- 0°F(- 20° C). Operates( 1) lightbar for 90 mmutes. Not available in all configurations, consult factory. Rated for use in 25° C ambient. Sensor mounted to the luminaire. Available in 1301- B06 and C01- CDs configurations. Replace XX with mounting height in feet for proper lens selection,( i. e., MS- L25). Consult factory for additional 13 customer service for lead times and lumen multiplier. information. 14 Sensor mounted to luminaire. Available in B02- B06 and CO2- C06 configurations. Replace X with umber of bars operating in low output mode and replace XX with mounting height in feet for proper lens selection,( i. e., MS/ 3- 1_ 25). Maximum 4 bars in low output mode. Consult factory for additional information. 15 Order separately, replace XX with color suffix. 243 COOPER 9 Lighting 9 www. cooperlighting. com NOTE: Specifications and dimensions subject to change without notice. Visit our web site at www. cooperlighting. com Customer First Center 1121 Highway 74 South Peachtree City, GA 30269 770.486.4800 FAX 770. 486. 4801 Avuoszlol 2013- 02- 2612: 57: 30 2013- 02- 26 16: 02: 45 LED winona Project: Qty, MOUNTING DETAIL 7 x aj 11. 50" — — 11. 50" I 5. 50 5. 50 I X= dry No Option WL= location hidden fasteners) ( Wet Location wet location exposed Option fasteners) 7w 2. 125" box min wet Shown STEP13 9 Inch QUICK FIND#: QF- 2057 STEP13 9 Inch is Five LED Distribution: Long: a surface mount temperatures white and six One light distribution For large V i area LED module step light with a LED colors are concealed optic. Ribbed design pattern available. driver with matte Die- illumination. LED cast module with solid aluminum, brass, or stainless CROSS SECTION recommended faceplates. steel with optic — j black finish reduces glare Steel City H48D or equivalent Construction: concealed ntegral :: available. by others) Mounting: Luminaire is mounted to a standard multi- gang switch box supplied by others) with four fasteners. Steel City H4BD or equivalent by others) recommended. Integral Driver: Integral drivers Typical for 120V- 277VAC available in both Distribution dimming Grid in 1' Based on 30K increments and non- dimming versions. Finish: Recessed surfaces have a ribbed design with a matte black finish to reduce glare. Faceplates in natural metal finishes have protective clear topcoat. Faceplates in painted are finished with a two-part wet paint system. Primer only for field painting. True 0- 100% dimming 5 0 option allows Dimming: is compatible 10 OV- 10V fluorescent- type with z2° 0 dimmer. Power Consumption: consumes Non- dimming 8. 04W. unit consumes 18W. Dimming 80 unit 9 inch- ETL Listed: Dry Location, Wet Location optional Note: Winona Lighting reserves the to right make design changes without Long Distribution Lumen Output at 30K prior notice. 9 Inch 310 Long 38. 6 8. 04 PRODUCT SPECIFICATION LED STEP13 9 a,.... SOURCE til MOUNT LED t N,... STEP13 M FACEPLATE 9. 9 o. WC a ........, c ti a DISTRIBUTION ! LED CODE L• lon 9 inch 27K• ANSI- binned VOLTAGE Non- 2700k i I Dimming Natural Metal binned 3500k Dimming 40K• ANSI- binned 4000k ! 50K- 5000 ANSI- 003• binned DM120V• I' X• no 277V• ' STD options standard WL- brushed brass MODlocation modifed BSS• br ushed [s ain less steel PB- by others) ; SPECIAL aluminum wet i 0., 1 OVdhrmer required( amber OPTIONS Finishes BAL• brushed BB- ANSI- i j...., FINISH ND120V- 277V 30K- ANSI- binned 3000k 35K• x 7rra`" I polished brass i P SS Ppolished stainless steel CMF• custom consult metal finish i j factory) 004• blue Painted Finishes 005• Modification: cyan AB5• antique brass paint 006• green 007- red- 008• red j BBP• brushed brass paint LBPS• light bronze paint smooth orange LSP• light silver paint PGP- pale gold paint SGB• semkgloss black paint I IES report available on the SGW- j( Visit www. Wnonalighting. com for the most complete and current semi- gloss white paint rrebsde I PRM- primer only I CPF• i custom paint finish consult factory) I information. All fixtures ETL Ifsted, USA and Canada Winona I An" I Ac 1 t ,' t I s i I Company 3760 west www. winonalighting. fourth street- winona, minnesota 55987. 507- 454- 5113 - fax: 507- 452. 8528 com Revised: 09 11- 12 Pa g e 1 Of 2 244 ED winona Project: Qty: 4'. POWER SUPPLY/ a' DIMMING All STEPS models are available with Dimming and Non- Dimming internal drivers in both 120V and 277V input versions. Dimming drivers require a 0- 10V fluorescent- type dimming control. Read all instructions before installation. Do not make live connections! NON- DIMMING INSTALLATIONS Connect STEP WHITE wire to power NEUTRAL. Connect STEP BLACK wire to power HOT. Connect STEP GREEN wire to power GROUND. 120V - WHITE or — BLACK 277V —;; c.; F- To other STEP fixtures P W Y W Y DIMMING INSTALLATIONS The integral dimming driver is designed to the 0- 10V IEC dimming specification 60929 and is compatible with common 0- 10V dimmers and dimming systems. Do NOT connect line voltage to dimming input wires. Connect STEP WHITE wire to power NEUTRAL. Connect STEP BLACK wire to power HOT. Connect STEP VIOLET wire to POSITIVE INPUT of Dimming Control. Connect STEP GREY wire to NEGATIVE INPUT of Dimming Control. 120V - WHITE or — BLACK To other STEP 277V --- fixtures W 0- 10V(+) - Y W Y To other STEP VIOLET Dimmer(-) —— Jai fixtures o? c, 245 Winona I I I Y An1VxLdfV& t ands I e 3760 west fourth street• I Company www. winonalighting. com winona, minnesota 55987. 507- 454- 5113 - fax: 507- 452- 8528 Revised: 04- 04- 12 Page 2 of 2 Plug- in Connectors Cover Cover Housing Top Vent Slot Branch Circuit 1- ___ ASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL- TYPE IA , 45147 A5145 A5143 Junction Box Narrow Beam, 2000 Im A22 Medium Beam, 2000 Im Wide Beam 2000 Im Conoid Directional Downlight Xicato Remote Phosphor f I ry Flex Function, MultiSourceiM I— J" Technology Optics and Applications Directio360' nal systems are desi25°gned with lotrue ckingarchitectural capability to rrotate and angulate providing aiming and control capability. Optics designed to control sue the rigors Of sloped ceiling installations while maintaining a glare free environment. Electronic LED Driver Module Primary Reflector Alzak Cone Heat Sink Design Features- MultiSourceTM Thermal Protector Flex Function design allows future onto be changed in the field from below. Downlights/ Directionals can become designed wall washers and vice versa. Fixture housings are MultiSourceTM with plug and play connectors allowing field conversion to PAR LED and MH MR- 16 GX10 bases. Proprietary passive heat sinks ensure proper temperatures are thickness maintained.is 1%"Servi Maximum ceiling . ce from below only. Modules I' XicatoImremote are standard 2000 modulephosphor operatingpackages on 1 Adr' driver. ti 9 is standard. 2700K, 3500K is 50, 000 hours at 70% 400 lumen Dimming Driver Dimming is standard 0- 1 with CRI available. ailable. Rte Rated output OW10%. Life See accessories for additional dimming options. Specify voltage. Finish Dimensions and Specular Alzak cones are standard. SoftSheenTM is a new finish designed to mitigate the color over angle yellow streak" associated with remote phosphor sources. SOftglOw 1 and colors available, see accessories. Steel Parts are phosphate conditioned then painted matte black. Warranty Sources 00000 5 year limited. See KV website for manufacturers details. General 0 D A I C F- Fixture is P re- wired and thermal)y protected, o 1 13 wiring. All products are union made IBEW. Designed and manufactured in the USA. Marked spacing requires fixture centers to be 24" from adjacent luminaire and 12" from c A Depth Number B O D Aperture Width' Length A5147 A5143 A5143 For Lutron Energy 11 4'/ 279mm 111mm dimming and a" Lumens B Black cone. G H T 2000 Im xicato Gold cone. Mocha cone. W Y Accessories 163/ e" a° 416mm P WT SO LL Ordering Information Module Fixture 15'/ 403mm nearest wall. Allow 3" clearance above unit in the plenum. LED Module 161/.'. use System Am A5147 2000 1A A5145 2000 1A A5143 2000 1A s ley Order Code Model L K V 47 39. 6 A5147 20 1515 30 27 1A 46 32. 5 A5145 20 1743 30 27 1A 47 Lumens s atts 18611 A 37. 1 A5143 20 30 27 1A Fixture provided standard as 3000K 20 for 2000 Im. operating on 277V, specular cone. For other Kelvin Module lumens: color 35 for 3500K, temperatures: 40 for 4000K. For change 30 to 27 for 2700K, 120 volt change a 2727 add DE for or L to 12. Add D1 Lutron Eco to 1%. for Lutron to 1%, Finish, e. g.: add A5147- SS for SoftSheen' M, add S for 2030271ADISSforg514720001, t%. Soft 3000K277V1gWthSoftSheon jlndicates LM- 7g Test Data. Indicates Preliminary KV Test Data. Lutron aces L- 79 kurim Kurt Versen Company UL and C- UL listed, for damp location and eight wire, 75°C, branch circuit Mcone, Graphite cone. White trim flan Z e, Fine micro prism. P Linear lens. FR Frosted Lens. STC Straight top cone. R2 26" support rails. R5 52" support rails. Fuse. ° D1 Lutron t0 1% DE Point Source Lighting Westwood, New Jersey 07675 1012 FLC4 Full lens cone, specify lens. 27 2700 Kelvin temp. 35 3500 Kelvin temp. 4000 Kelvin temp. 40 3 wire control* O digital4wire' SpeCIfyVOlta e, REM Remote Bodine EM. Includes light, test switch minutes. M WHT White complete cone. FMR4 Fixed Flush downlight mount, contact factory. position. DP Lutron EcoS y stem to 1° and ver5en Titanium cone. Wheat Cone. Pewter cone. Bronze cone. Ceiling single access battery lamp required. at operation SS Softglow® SoftSheenTM add SS, e. g. SSW, SoftSheenTM S to S add color, e. 90er for 1 Wheat. 9• SC Softglow® clear. 246 A22 A5147 A5145 A5143 Performance Datachart Single Unit Initial Footcandles, 30" Work Plane A5145 Xicato 2000 Im 3000K 1 Amp Nadir FC 20° 30° 73 55 3' 28 5' 55 43 3' 22 6' Y 10' 44 34 3' 18 7' 1 11' 23 2' 38 4' 12 5' 8' 81, 2 Multiple Units Initial Footcandles, 30" Work Plane Walls 50% Floor 20% Spacing RCR Y RCR 3 4' 104 94 76 5' 78 71 57 5' 61 55 45 6' 49 44 36 33 30 24 RCR 8 91 2 9' 1 10' 11' 12' 13' 14' 2. Candlepower Distribution Floor Spacing is Maximum Over Work Plane FC Diam FC Diam FC Diam 71 note to Ceiling 80% 94 30 See 10° Ceiling 7' Candelas W 400 15* 800 r650 1200 1600 2000 2400 2800 3200 3600 4000 — 5° 15 A5145 Xicato 2000 Im 3000K Eff. 32. 5 S/ M. 64 5° 1 Amp Driver ° 75 80 0 0 90 p 71 96 1 1 5 9 Vertical Angles Luminaire Lumens Notes 1 Photometric Report: A5145 LTL Report No. 29190. 2 Datachart degree headings show one side of nadir. Diameter data includes both sides. Therefore the 10° column shows a 20° pattern diameter at the work plane. Footcandle values are at the diameter edge. 3 Specular colored cone multipliers, contact factory. 4 SoftSheenTM' cone multiplier: Clear x. 93. Softglow' cone multiplier: Clear x. 87. For colored cone multipliers, contact factory. 5 The luminous efficacy( Im/W) refers to the total measured luminous flux( lumens) of the fixture divided by the total measured electrical input power( watts) of the complete fixture. 247 is Kurt Versen Company, Westwood, New Jersey 1012 windirect Project: Qty. SCV1 SMALL ASYMMETRIC COVE . MOUNTING set Adjustment Range= 20' kacWtA 2- 1/ 8" 54mm) ---- ------ - --( 1 6- 1/ 2"( SCV1 Asymmetric QUICK FIND#: LED Cove MOUNTINGthe luminaire Integral front wireway allowing for without spaces between wiring. Individual aiming is the the length to housing with luminaire 12 Ibs 5 Ibs 72"= 14 Ibs 36"= 7 Ibis 84"= 16 Ibs 48"= 9 96"= 18 Ibs incorporating designed for high for through Ibs performance an extruded output LED linear small profile reflector The sources. specifically optical target plane and even cove or slot setback above. linear luminaire. profile For indoor Has applications. illumination aimable and utilizes white LEDs tunes. Model Model temperatures. optics, five use standard color ( t 5 Estimated LED lamp life life isis an industry standard 50, 000 incorporated that board/ heat sink A modular design has been field replacement allows assembly for this socket shadows. ensure performance and reliability. ELECTRICAL- of the LED Model SIC V1 ANSI- 3500K White 341 Imift 3501m/It 3711rMt ANSI- 4000K White 4271m/ fl non- ANSI- 5000K White 486 consumption length 28 feet). with is 15W/ R. Operates on commonly available low 24VAC arid FINISHES- Bright anodized specular reflector with mill finish aluminum components and stainless steel hardware. voltage magnetic dimming equipment. A wide range of remote transformers see Color Power be dimmed can product. ANSI- 2700K White ANSI- 3000K White luminaire shall not exceed- 22° F to 113° F(- 30° C to 45° C). Any application of this product should also take into consideration air flow and ventilation to maximum run features( 1 hours to 70' 1 depreciation. are available technical in 120V and Winona Lighting reserves the right to make design 277V primary revisions without P prior notice. section). SCVt listed for to This is complies a fordry dry location. with UL Standard 2108. T PRODUCT SPECIFICATION SCV1 TYPE LED1 " X ODE 27K RUN LENGTH CODE SCV1- Total fmntwireway label LED1 ( SLC• small 12) Nichia 183 high output/ ft. SCV1 27K2700K in Feet- offered nc ements ex. LED LED CODE Run Length dry IfiN$ C" PUA• T 319M SLC MOUNTING end Stainless steel hardware. ruggedly constructed and utilizes an extruded front wireway that allows low profile luminaires to be installed continuously, eliminating SC VI Cove Series t specular reflector with solid aluminum OPERATING TEMPERATUREMinimum and Maximum ambient air temperatures around this in tight lockable aluminum only. COLOR AND LIGHT OUTPUT- aluminum caps and wireway. is TYPE- Small PROFILE- PI( basic): Anodized, extruded high- purity design allows for maximum beam projection across the the See Mounting Detail mechanism. 60"= 24"= PERFORMANCE- High outs are allow achieved of row mount Knock sections. at each end of locking runs a continuous located adjustable Weight: QF- 1130 165mm)-- 60FT= in 12" startingg at 24' 60 foot run 30K3000K 35K- Preconfigured Length Code- 3500K P1 RA X VOLTAGE PROFILE FINISH OPTIONS ND24VANSI- binned non- RA- dimming I' ANSI- binned see submittal additional see technical STD CLASS X• STD- no options standard reflector components 24 volt AC 4000KANSI- information anodized anodized with mill finish MODmodified Nichia 183 LED 36' Luminaire 3000K 40Kat basic DM24V- ANSI- binned www.winonalighting. com ll dimming Run Modification: raw 24 volt AC cove or DM24V Report# 15314 binned 50K5000K non- ANSIbinned section) or To Be DeterminedTBD when run Visit th web for length detailed photometry unknown reports 248 Visit www. winonalighting. com for the most complete and current information. wifio® a I I An% 4a I I Ay& I w, I ds I C_ 3760 1 p_ y west fourth street• winona, minnesota 55987• 507- 454- 5113• fax: 507- 494- 0320• www. winofialighting. com Revised: 11- 17- 11 Page 1 of 6 M windirect` Project Q r, +, The Windirect Asymmetric Cove SCV1 Series Is available in lengths up to 96" to 12" increments starting at 24". kF " Anlocatinetdegralat each wirewayend runs e lengtnghtooftalhloewlufmior nthairough re allowiwirningg.forInadicont ions. Knock of thethhousi vidualinuous aiminrowg ismount achievedwithusioutngspaces adjustabetbleween lockinsectg mechani sms. outs are 9 k Nominal Length set Adjustment Range= 20` a i11Q=, de\,a fac ory a 24" 24 3/ 8" 619. 25mm 36" 36 3/ 16" 919. 23mm 48" 48" 59 7/ 8" 1219. 20mm 1520. 95mm 60" 72" peaK 71 11/ 16" 1820. 93mm 83 112" 2120. 90mm 95 5/ 16" 2420. 87mm 84" 2 1/ 8" 54. Installed Length 10mm 96" 0JJ 6 Luminaires can be mounted without space between 1/ 2" `` 165. 10mm length( watts) 24"- ( 30W) 36"- ( 44W) 48"- ( 59W) o 60"- ( 74W) 72"- ( 88W) 84"- ( 103W) 96"- ( 118W) Adjustment 200 Range= CtfttMiSfC7Na SIGHT j f- i I LINE +- ---0 5, 1 DIM H 2- 1/ 8" 1 9116" DIM( W) 9- _ I Recommended Cove Opening= 12" minimum 7- 1/ 2 I a 6 I 21/ 8" i 0° Sightline 5 _- i I r 54mm) tr F - 6- 1/ 2"( 65mm). H 1" 25mm) wireway -- " dust cover lens knock out 249 Winona I I An t t I t a t y/( 1.&; ids C'a^ipany 3760 west fourth street• Winona, minnesota 55987• 507- 454- 5113• fax: 507- 494- 0320• www.winonalighting. com Revised: 10- 27- 11 Page 2 of 6 windirett'"°Project: Qty The WINDIRECT SCV1 Series is to be powered by 24VAC only. Do not connect directly to line voltage under any circumstance. Connection to.line voltage will permanently damage internal components and void manufacturer' s warranty. POWER REQUIREMENTS WINDIRECT SCV1 consumes 15W/ft. Maximum single run length( from a single 24VAC tap) of WINDIRECT SCV1 is 28'( 420W). electronic The WINDIRECT SCV1 series must be powered by a magnetic transformer. Do not use Choose transformer transformers. a with adequate the rated output of the transformer at 24VAC. capacity. Total load should not exceed 80% of 24VAC Transformer Luminaires can be mounted without space between DIMMING Dimming if required) ! The WINDIRECT SCV1 Series is easily dimmed with Magnetic Low Voltage( MLV) Dimmers. Not all MLV dimmers are alike, even among the same manufacturer. Confirm with dimming equipment manufacturer by others that dimmer selected is designed to work with the transformer selected. 120V or 277V MOUNTING AND WIRING 10 B i Loosen Phillips head remove screws and 1 4 i 5 Lay in power feed wires and make electrical wireway cover. Mount in desired location. connections with supplied Luminaire is wired and ready for final aiming( if necessary). connectors, Screw wireway cover back in place. REMOTE MOUNTING CONSIDERATIONS The WINDIRECT SCV1 Series is powered from remote-mounted transformers. The maximum remote distance ofthe transformer is dependent onatmany factors including total LED load, wire size, distance from the transformer to the first fixture in each run, and starting voltage the transformer. The installer is to ensure that 24VAC is present at the beginning of the run. By using a combination of large-gauge wire and adjusting the output voltage of the transformer, the installer can compensate for voltage drop over long remote distances. The wiring from the start of the run to the last fixture on the run need only be 12 AWG. 250 Winona I I i t AnSM4wlf.& I ands I I q 3760 Crnpay west fourth street• winona, minnesota 55987• 507- 454- 5113• fax: 507- 494- 0320 wwwwinonalighting. com Revised: 10- 27- 11 Page 3 of 6 Project: windirerr, BALLTest Qty: 15314- Report: LM79- 08 Catalog SLC- LE01- 36A- 30K- ND24V- Number_ P1- RA- X- STD SCV1- Candlepower Distribution Description: 36 Nichia 3000K 183 LEDs/ 36" Windirect SCV1 Luminaire I Extruded Semi- Specular Reflector 3000K ClearAcrylic Lens 36" Luminaire- 1 3000K LM79 Data Windirect ANSI binned 2700K 1024 1. 00 ' ANSI- binnedd 3500K 06 1 4000K i 39 1 L 43. 1 1 1050 1 22 ANSI- binned d 5000K non- Long Luminaire 975 ANSI- binned 3000K i 36 SCV1 23. 8 43. 1 1113 43. 1 1280 43. 1 85. 7 }_ 24. 4 ! i 97 ' 8 7_4 25. 8 84. 29. 7_ 86 7 5 i 1459 43. 1 11 339 ZOnalLumen o Lumens / z Summary P Catalog Number: P1- SLC- LED1- 72A- 30K- ND24V- SCVI- RA- X- 0 p p o- 0 0 0 0_ 9 2 0 0 }- 0 9* 0 '- 0- 1_ 96 800 455 78 468 1 96 __ I oFixture 1 J} -- 1 0_ 0 786 442 32 I 46 1 4 - 1_.... 700 403} 61 s 3 603 367 76 507 337 - 1 5- 16 89 20 t 9 a37 31a 106 508 48A ; 384 299 109 685 65 2 347 281 117 I 64 fi 41_ 923 87. 9 322 262 123 257 223 130- 188 175 134 127 127 1050 Total Luminaire 0 0 359_ s 1 0' 0 522 q,, NiGhia 183 3000K 0 96 70. 1 _. i o 96 I Peak Candela 843cd o 100. 0 1050 1000 STD Candlepower Description: 72 Nichia 3000K 183 LEDs/ 72" Windirect SCV1 Luminaire t Extruded Semi- Specular Reflector/ 41 n- 53 1 i 29 72 _ 55 86 77 Y 103 94 L_ 4- 127 r 727 1 127 Distribution 3000K ClearAcrylic Lens 72" LuminaireI LM79 3000K Windirect SCV1 Data z" I t ANSI- binned All results based On BALL Test Report 15314. A 2. 0 multiplier was t0 provide 72' non- data. Peak Candela 72 Long Luminaire I P 0 D 0 2700K --- 975 __ 2048 86. 2 23 8 1 00 2100 86. 2 { I ANSI binned 3500K 1 06 2226 86. 2 ANSI- binned 4000K 1, 22 2560 86 2 ANSI- binned SOOOK 1 39 2918 a_--- 86. i 85 7 0 _ 0- 25. 8 [ 2 X33 s Total Luminaire 0 0 0 87 4 ; 96 1044 84, 5 1 . 71818 0 96 1600 910 0 -- 0._ 96 1686 2 0 29. 7 _- oil 97 24 4 1 86 9 -._ j. 7 6 70 1 .._-.- Lumens / o 884 . 806 oFixture i 1014 33 936 1572 1400 64 5z 178 674 L _ 0 8 2 92 Tu- 73a , 87 1016 K wfndired 0 D n4 . zos Zonal Lumen Summa Y Nichial$ 330vOK ', i 0 _ _ D ANSI binned 3000K 1686cd g fiti ng 0 f Note: Used lx£ F 18 32 40 1_- . 6-10 18 200 92 3a 218 106 58 562 234 128 524 - 246 744 110 172 154 206 188 484 768 1370 65 2 694 1846 87 9 644 5' 446 260 376 350 268 264 254 254 264254 2100 100. 0 2100 100. 0 ':. 598 82 faciscm 43.' 1 94 cam t t aalt 87 tom', all yl All results are woording to iESNA 6M- 792008; Approved Method for fto Electrical and FROr~ Hc Testing ofSolid-Stale ugnnng Ti Department of Energy MOEt verities product test data and resrdts. Visit www. fightingfacts. com for the Label Relererree Guide. Registration Number: 8404. GHHF6M Modal Number: P1SC- LED- 56HO. 30K- 24VNDSCVI- RA- STD Type' Cove light 251 Winona I An & I i I I 1 ands t t coapury 3760 west fourth street• winona, minnesota 55987• 507- 454- 5113 • fax: 507- 494- 0320- www.winOnalighting. com Revised: 10- 27- 11 Page 4 of 6 windireet- Project: Qty: DETERMINING THE CORRECT PRECONFIGURED RUN LENGTH CODE STEP 1: Determine which model is right for your project. See column 1 of the chart below In this example, model SCV1 has been selected. Find complete information( catalog, submittals, applications guide) at www.winonalighting. com. STEP 2: Determine how many feet are required. The second column of the chart below provides codes for Nominal Run Lengths between 1 and 28 feet. STEP 3: If the amount of product required exceeds the length in the last row of a chart, you should break the run into several lengths to arrive at the desired amount. For 48' a example run of SCV1 can be specified as: Quantity Run Length Code 2 L24 48 3 L16 48 Total Feet Note. Run length codes are nominal lengths. The exact dimensions column 4( actual are displayed in run length). Preconfigured L3 System Run Run indicates which By placing L3 in the field in length run of your specification have indicated SCV1 a you need 3 feet. of run Total Run Length in Feet L3 2' 3' SCV1 L4 4' SCV1 L5 5' 77-1 L6 6' SCV1 L7 7' SCVt L8 8' 1 1 1 1 to 1 100 Watt 150 Watt 2, 6- 111/ 1 T- 11 5116" 105 150 Watt 120 15o Waft SCV1 L9 9' 1 18'- 11718" 135 300 Watt SCVt L10 10' 2 9'• 11 3/ 4" 150 300 Watt 1 1 a SCV1 L13 13' 1 1 17- 113/ 16" 195 300 Watt SCV1 1- 14 14' 2 13'- 11" 7SCV1 210 300 Waft L15 15 1 1 14'- 1013116" 225 300 Watt SCV1 L16 16' 2 16- 105/ 8' 240 300 Watt SCV1 L17 17' 16- 10 1f4" 255 500 Watt SCV1 L18 18' 11 270 500 Watt 1 10'- 11 9/ 16" 111-- 113/ 8' run, reir_ th ue+ ka 6sY>+ Configuration size of luminaires the up run. of( 1) will In this 48" SCV1 L19 19' GGIA 629 20, and SCV1 L21 21' be SCV1 L22 22' SCV1 L23 23' SCV1 L24 24' used example, and( 2) 96" SCV1 L25 25' SCV1 L26 26' 1 1 2 3 1 11T- 1 run 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 SCV1 16" 13/ 16" 19'- 105/ 8" 1 Run Length 1 165 300 Watt 180 300 Watt 285 500 Watt 300 500 Watt 20'- 101/ 2" 315 500 Watt 2 21'- 10 330 500 Watt 2 22'- 101/ 8" 345 500 Watt 3 23'- 915/ 16" 360 500 Watt 2 3 28' L28 24'- 5/ 16" 101/ 2" 3 375 125'- 105/ 16" 27'- 915/ 16" 390 1 500 Watt 1 500 Watt 405 500 Watt 420 500 Watt Required Transformers row of each chart the 1 1/ 26- 101/ 8" length dimension. Single 118'- 10 2 1 Actual Run Length indicates 75 90 8" 1111/ 16" 6- Run Length Code luminaires. The last 75 Watt 2 of each which Maximum 60 12' made The final 75 Watt 4'-0" 50 Watt 11' configure L20 is 45 L12 Run Describes 30 T- 3/ 16" L11 To Be Determined quantities Required 2'-318" 4'- 117/ 1 h!+ System Transformer Run Wafts SCV1 see TED< 50,00 hours; L70 calculated at> 160,000 hours for Medium Output Since LM- 80 testing ended at 6048 hours, theTM- 21 reported L90 and L70 values are 36,288 hours. See litecontrol. com for detailed lumen maintenance statement These fixtures have a five- year warranty, with a detailed warranty statement available at litecontrol. com. Quick Find Questions to Ask 1. Row information, Temperature? including desired fixture lengths? 2. Output? 3. Color 4. Dimming? S. 120 or 277 volt? 6. Option? revised 11/ 8/ 2012 L60 litecontrol. com 256 12 Wall/ Slot 6000 WS- L60 Specifications FIXTURE SUPPORT RAIL. Extruded white aluminum, wall- mounted rail provides continuous support and true alignment of fixtures and components. Rail is designed to provide a reveal at the wall to compensate for irregularities in wall construction. Splines are included for continuous alignment. HOUSING. Steel housing, finished white. Ends provided with 7/ 8" diameter hole to accommodate wiring. Supplied with external brackets for ease of row mounting. LED MODULE. Extruded aluminum, finished matte white for high reflectance, easily removable for field replacement. Module has 12 Cree LEDs per foot. LENS. The LED module includes a lens comprised of highly efficient diffusion film optically bonded to pure acrylic sheet. SECONDARY OPTIC. Injection molded optical material that incorporates multiple total internal reflection lenses to shape and smooth the light. CEILING TYPE. Compatible with most types of ceiling systems, including grid and plaster. Fixture system must be installed prior to installation of ceiling. Finish of wall should extend 6" above finished ceiling height. CERTIFICATION. Fixture and electrical components shall be CSA, UL and/ or CUL Listed. WARRANTY. Five- year product warranty. See litecontrol. com for full warranty details. Note: Litecontrol reserves the right to change specifications without notice for product development and improvement. for Installation Planning Adjustable Ceiling Opening Fxiture lengths: Nominal Fixture Length Actual Fixture Length 2' 3' 4' 6' 8' 24"( 609) 36"( 914) 48'( 1219 72"( 1829) 96"( 2438) oz 6 1/ 2' 165) it 4"( 102)— J 5"( 127) 6"( 152 mm) System Connectors Catalog Number WS - L60- Mounting Series Ceiling WS L60 G CWM Option Type DP Connector LCD Finish EC End SE Straight IC Inside Corner OC Outside j CWM Cap Extension Matte z o White Corner see Connector Details WS- L60- G- OC- CWM is a typical catalog number for an outside corner connector for a grid ceiling fixture. Plan View Connector Details Corners, caps, when permit wall IC SE extensions, added to continuous installation. requires and end fixtures, Ceiling trim field cutting. Corner 70'- view for angles. Opening ( SE 4" Extension or Corner Dimensions Minimum- Maximum along wall in parenthesis) wall- to- angles are adjustable, see plan Ceiling Connector IC SE Straight Extension( OC 5" 140' SE Straight Extension( 2"- 12") IC Inside Corner- OC Outside Corner6" See web site for installation details. 70'- 160° 2"- 12") IC Inside Corner- 90°( 6"- 16"), 135°( 4"- 13' 1 OC Outside Corner- 90°( 2"- 12'), 135°( 2"- 12") SE Straight IC Inside Corner- 90°( 7"- 16'), 135°( 4"- 16") 90°( 2"- 12"), 135°( 2"- 12") Extension( 2"- 12") 90°( W- 16"), 135°( 5"- 16") OC Outside Corner- 90°( 2"- 12"), 135o( 2"- 12") OC LITECONTROL 781 2940100 f: 781 293 2849 litecontrol. Quick com Find L60 litecontrol. com 257 13 Photometric 3500K 4" opening Data ( 3500K LCD Across — 4" medium openi.no output) Wall/ Slot 6000 WS- G- L60, WS- R- L60 3500K 6" opening Across — 45----_180' Along— 3500K LCD 6" opening Across — 45----_- Across — 45------ 180ISO' Along--- 45 ISO, Along--- Along--- 1200 1500 1500 150' 150900 ll2 1200 I 150' 150' 12 0 120 5 900 5 120 120' I 120 3 375 300 375 90' 90- 90- 90` r 60 60- 60- 1 60- i ii 30' 30- WS- L6004- MO- 35K with 4" 53 LPW s 30 WS- L6004- MO- 35K- LCD Opening Efficacy with 40 4" Opening LOW Efficacy LITECONTROL 781 294 0100 f: 781 293 2849 litecontrol. WS- L6004- MO- 35K with 6" 54 LPW Opening Efficacy 30 WS- L6004- MO- 35K- LCD with 6" Opening 42 LPW Efficacy Quick Find com L60 litecontrol. com 258 AMETRIXTM er, DESCRIPTION yy The Ametrix Asyx is an LED asymmetric luminaire designed for both general illumination and highlighting architectural features. The sleek design minimal it makes ideal an to complement any modern space. Proprietary AccuLED optics offer precision to maximize light optical control collection collection and directional distribution onto the application area. The Asyx outperforms similar traditional HID fixtures with a 25% improvement in efficacy as well as a superior lifespan that will minimize maintenance costs. SPECIFICATION Electrical Heavy wall, die- formed aluminum housing and heat sink has precise LED control and in manufacturing. vents for air flow ambient repeatability thermal and for prolonged feature for rated 0. 9 polyester powder coat superior protection fade against and plates are may be and life. Standard power LightBAR? wear. standard to specified heat than and temperature Asyx luminaires voltage directional than application 20% [ patented, distribution region. onto the Each optical ens is precision manufactured via feature range feature injection- molding then precisely arranged and sealed on the board of to minimum media. LEDs: High output LEDs, of- 30° C starting temperature 22 1F). 0- 10V dimming option 50,000+ hours life at> 70% lumen available. 3000° K maintenance, white 3000k LEDs match 4000k offered standard 4000° K(+/- and nominal nominal in 275K) CCIT. 80 CRI, and w 70 CRI. ASYX- WL finish of luminaire housing. Standard include black, colors bronze, silver, custom color PIN high- efficiency AccuLED Optics that maximize light collection and and drivers greater factor, less harmonic distortion environment. and optimal performance 40° C( 104° F) down for cover potted 120- 277V/ 50- 60hz), Finish paint are electronic universal ambient Housing is C HOSPITAL LED Optics drivers sunk Housing features Fixture is management. 40° C VALLEY FEATURES Construction tolerance ASPEN and white. RAL Warranty and Standard available. matches five- year Wall Mount Indirect limited warranty. LED F12 5/ 7/ 14'/ e" a" 8" 1 2 2/ ORDERING INFORMATION WL r a IN ct B03 UL sx c 3 1/ 2" T 8" symmetric shape, tion Lens Rating IN= Ind oor age" Al damp loca- C= Clear Number acrylic Lens. rated of LightBARs B03=[ 3121 LED Lightbars, 70 Indirect UNV Watts, 6000 Color Temperature voltage Finish 30= 3000k UNV= Universal B= Bronze 40= lumens 4000k' MOD 2700K MOD B02 N= None W C= Custom RC Options D10= 0- 10V Dimming Color K= Black S= Silver W= White Light AI- TBD Distribution Indirect Asymmetric Light Mounting Pattern Note: 1 Consult MODIFIED factory for 80 CRI option in 4000K. RC= Rectangular WITH BACKLIGHT GLARE CONTROL LOUVERS Canopy CUSTOM 259 I/ COOPER Lighting Specifications Consult www. cooperlighting. com and your Dimensions representative for additional subject options and to change finishes. without notice. ADY121404 08/ 17/ 2012 10: 53: 09 AM PHOTOMETRICS 180* Ametrix 165' 150* - - Candela Zonal Lumen Summary 5400 Angle 0- Deg 1800 — 90 o- 180- N. A. 14. 4 90 0 0 0 90- 120 2648 N. A. 44. 1 95 145 118 36 90- 130 3616 N. A. 60. 2 327 494 58 90- 150 4948 N. A. 82. 4 105 827 2773 110 90- 180 6003 N. A. 100 110 3223 5089 497 110- 180 5141 N. A. 85. 6 0- 180 6003 N. A. 100 115 4223 4231 1561 3644 2346 1696 1380 125 2157 1421 130 1789 1327 877 135 1871 1391 843 140 1968 1464 920 145 2034 1522 1011 deg ------_ 150 2031 1563 1097 155 1943 1586 1162 160 1839 1607 1212 165 1773 1608 1289 170 1663 1560 1391 175 1553 1528 1468 180 1488 1488 1488 Asyx WL- IN- C- BO3- AI- 35- W- RC 6003 lumens 70 Watts 85. 8 Im/ W Test Report# Fixture Lamp % 862 deg_ LEGEND: Lumens % 90- 110 120 y Zone Deg 0 i 120• 90- 0 100 i i Deg 0 135° 3600 45- 0 ITL72651 Coefficients of Utilization Effective floor cavity reflectance 80% rc rw 70 50 30 20% 50% 70% 10 70 50 30 10 50 30 30% 10 50 30 10% 10 50 30 0% 10 0 RCR 0 95 95 95 95 81 81 81 81 56 56 56 32 32 32 10 10 10 1 87 83 79 76 747 71 68 65 48 47 45 28 27 26 9 9 8 0 2 79 72 66 62 67 62 57 53 42 40 37 24 23 22 8 7 7 0 0 3 72 63 56 51 61 54 49 44 37 34 31 21 20 18 7 6 6 0 4 65 56 48 43 56 48 42 37 33 29 26 19 17 16 6 6 5 0 0 5 60 49 42 36 51 42 36 32 29 25 22 17 15 13 5 5 4 6 55 44 36 31 47 38 32 27 26 22 19 15 13 11 5 4 4 0 7 50 39 32 27 43 34 28 23 23 19 17 14 11 10 4 4 3 0 8 47 35 28 23 40 30 24 20 21 17 14 12 10 9 4 3 3 0 9 43 32 25 20 37 28 22 18 19 15 13 11 9 8 4 3 3 0 10 40 29 22 18 34 25 19 16 17 14 11 10 8 7 3 3 2 0 260 COOPER www. Specifications Lighting cooperlighting. com Ametrix• Customer First Center• and 1121 Dimensions Highway 74 South• subject to change Peachtree City, GA 30269• without notice. TEL 770. 486. 4800• FAX 770. 486. 4801 ADY121404 08/ 17/ 2012 10: 53: 09 AM 80' No. 5 aw' SK- 0" 20' NORTH 10' 0' E HEIGHT FINSH M O U N T I G BOLARD BLACK FINSH M O U N T I G TYPE' STEPLIGHT FUL 270 K BLACK CUTOF EBN2' TYPE' FUL 270 K EPNL', CUTOF EWN1' 36" HEIGHT LUMINARE CUTOF MOUNTIG FINSH BLACK EPN4', TYPE' AREA FUL 270 K 24" 1"= SCALE: HOSPITAL LO P PNR',' HEIGHT Date: 40'- 40' RAW 13 2802- VALEY PARKING 12' ASPEN I r y r i N N, q ' iP Y' s: o lti4 RA3 a' 2) KEY PHASE N2 SYMBOL r PATERN SYMBOL DISTRBUON TYPE LUMINARE LUMINARE N2 EEPPN4 I Md. % BN2 I-- EBNr PNI- PNLI E „_. g EPN4 °,-, y J-..,_ Min EBN2 s EWN1 EWN1 EWN1 y = Min 00 38 f6-. 16. 23. 18 1. 45 1. 33 03 01 5 16 53 53 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0 74 98 66 2. 2. NR EP PNL EBM2 33 00 EPN4 t EBN2 79 Max/ 17. 172. Max 87 17 74 Avg 00 64 73 00 99" 76 10 5. 5. 3. 8. 0. 1. 0. 0. 3. 0. 2. 2. 3. 3. EBN Sum ary EB I EBN2 /. C' EBN2, WALK WALK WALK Planar E LO P PARKING W Calcution Label BUILDNG ENTRY PARK PARKING XWALK XWALK PA 261 EWN1 I I EWN1 SYMBOL EBN1 KEY DISTRIBUTION EWN1 \ \ \ EBN1 PATTERN LUMINAIRE SYMBOL LUMINAIRE TYPE EPN4 EBN1 TYPE' EBN1',' EBN2' TYPE' EWN1' TYPE' EDNR',' RA3' BOLLARD STEPLIGHT AREA LUMINAIRE FULL CUTOFF FULL CUTOFF FULL CUTOFF 2700K 2700K 36" MOUNTING BLACK HEIGHT FINISH 2700K 24" MOUNTING BLACK HEIGHT FINISH 12' MOUNTING HEIGHT BLACK FINISH EWN1 rNR o EWN1 RA3 E WN 1 a PHASE 2 EWN1 --- — EWN1 EWN1 j EBN2 j EWN1 EWN1 EWN1 Q1.00P 1"_ Roan 10' 40,_0„ 0' NORTH SCALE: 40' 20' 1"= 80' ASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL LOOP ROAD Drawing No. SK- 6 40'- 0" Date: 02- 28. 13 262 C11 v ID 11. 3 1129 p 11. iD r 1— _- o Is\ Z ( Di 1190 IS ID I i ID ID 11. 1 Is IS- O z 11. 31 1 IS- 1 Is IS Is A ID fC 33 ID it IS i IS D IG A) TYPE' IA' 114, 1 RECESSED F v ACCENT LIGHT 2700K LED 11. 41 1S J 1 TYPE' I IG' LINEAR WALL GRAZE 2700K LED TYPE' IC' COVE UPLIGHT f —- -- - 2700K LED f i z X TYPE'] A' RECESSED ACCENT LIGHT 2700K TYPE' ID' RECESSED DOWN LIGHT 2700K LED I i ATRIUM SCALE: LIGHTING 1/ 16"= 1'- 0" PLAN a 4--- ASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL ATRIUM LIGHTING PLAN Drawing No. SK- 8 Date: 02- 28- 13 263 i 0 r: 1141w-, 1. fir ' 1 iii AM i;,• a 7r„ i • i411 ' , Oil 1 f i r , 7, i, • t 1 IL jamat I ILL AWL Ell WHITCOMB TERRACE 1 i 264 o Ad Name: 8931511 A LEGAL NOTICE ORDINANCE# 6, 2013 PUBLIC HEARING Customer: Aspen ( LEGALS) Your 1 account number: City of Ordinance# 6, Series of 2013, was adopted on first reading at the City Council meeting February 25, 1013028 2013. This ordinance, if adopted willapprove afinal planned unit development for phases III and IV of the Aspen Valley Hospital. PROOF OF PUBLICATION on this ordinance is scheduled To text, see thei a tire gouto The public hearing for March hecity' 11, 2013, s legal notice website http:/ Avww. aspenpftkin. com/ Departments/ Clork/ Legal- Notices/ T31 A2: 1 TIM: 1 STATE If you would like a copy FAXed, mailed or e- mailed to you, call the city clerk' s office, 429- 2686. Published in the Aspen Times Weekly on February 28, 2013. [ 8931511] OF COLORADO, COUNTY OF PITKIN I, Jim Morgan, do solemnly swear that I am General Manager of the ASPEN TIMES WEEKLY, that the same weekly newspaper printed, in whole or in part and published in the County of Pitkin, State of Colorado, and has a general circulation therein; that said newspaper has been published continuously and uninterruptedly in said County of Pitkin for a period of more than fifty-two consecutive weeks next prior to the first publication of the annexed legal notice or advertisement. The Aspen Times is an accepted legal advertising medium, only for jurisdictions operating under Colorado' s Home Rule provision. That the annexed legal notice or advertisement was published in the regular and entire issue of every number of said daily newspaper for the period of 1 consecutive insertions; and that the first publication of said notice was in the issue of said newspaper dated 2/ 28/ 2013 and that the last publication of said notice was in the issue of said newspaper dated 2/ 28/ 2013. In witness whereof, I have here unto set my hand this 03/ 15/ 2013. Jim Morgan, General Manager Subscribed and sworn to before me, a notary public in and for the County of Garfield, State of Colorado this 03/ 15/ 2013. Mary E. Borkenhagen, Notary Public Commission expires: September 12, 2015 o y BO..... Gt NOTgRr i 0Y/ gLIC s COLOR* pnnmm, EeyirM b b 265 March 18, 2020 Amy Simon Interim Planning Director City of Aspen 130 So. Galena St. Aspen, Colorado 81611 RE: Aspen Valley Hospital (AVH) Extension of Vested Rights 401 Castle Creek Road Ms. Simon: Please accept this request to extend the period of statutory vested rights for Phase IV of the Aspen Valley Hospital District Master Facilities Plan. The Aspen Valley Hospital District Master Facilities Plan approval is a large scale, multi-year project that involves significant expansions of not only the main Hospital building but also infrastructure and campus improvements. The Project received multiple previous land use approvals, including amendments, to expand the Hospital in a series of four construction phases. Construction of Phases I through III are complete, with Phase IV construction still outstanding and in of need of completion. In total, the AVH Facilities Master Plan approved a total of 214,000 square feet of gross floor. Each of the four (4) phases were allocated specific amounts of the total gross floor area. Of the four phases, Phase IV represents the smallest amount with 8,575 square feet of floor area, or 4% of the project total. Figure 1: Site Plan of approved Phases I thru IV: The property is located at 0401 Castle Creek Road and is owned by the Aspen Valley Hospital District, a quasimunicipal corporation and political subdivision of the State of the Colorado. Elaine Gerson, General Counsel for Aspen Valley Hospital, has authorized BendonAdams to represent AVH’s interests in this vested rights extension request. The property is legally described as the Aspen Valley Hospital Subdivision Parcel C, and Tract F, with parcel ID no. 2735-123-07-801. 300 SO SPRING ST 202 ASPEN, CO 81611 970.925.2855 BENDONADAMS.COM 266 Aspen Valley Hospital, 401 Castle Creek Road Extension of Vested Rights The Aspen Valley Hospital expansion has been funded through a variety of mechanisms including a Hospital Taxing District mill levy and significant funding donations. For the completion of Phase IV to begin, additional fundraising is needed, which in turn, necessitates additional time. Given the large scope of the expansion project, AVH has invested significant funds in the implementation and construction of the Hospital Master Facilities Plan. The Aspen Valley Hospital District overall has approximately $148.8m invested in the campus. In completion of Phase 3 alone, approximately $64.8m has been invested. The completion of Phases I through III and the significant financial investments in the expanded campus show substantial progress made pursuing the project. Final City Council approval for Phases III and IV were combined into a single approval document, Ordinance 6, Series 2013. Phase IV is the subject of this extension request and was specifically approved for an 1,854 square foot basement level and 6,721 square foot “Level One” for a total of 8,575 square feet of floor area. This square footage translates into future Phase IV construction of the AVH Outpatient Clinic, a central registration area, a new main entrance, AVH Foundation Offices, a Chapel, and a Café expansion. Section 17: Vested Rights of Ordinance 6, Series 2013 granted a seven (7) year vesting period for Phases III and IV. Vesting for Phases III and IV are set to expire on May 23, 2020. We are requesting the vested rights associated with Phase IV only be extended for a five (5) year period to May 23, 2025. Approval of this extension would allow additional time for fundraising, to refine estimates, and evaluate financial costs associated with initiating the final phase of AVH construction. All other aspects of the Phase IV Aspen Valley Hospital District Master Facilities Plan remain unchanged and no amendments are requested. Phase IV will be constructed as approved by the City in 2013. The following details the land use history for Phases I through IV of the Aspen Valley Hospital District Master Facilities Plan: Conceptual PUD, Facilities Master Plan, and Rezoning: City Council Resolution 3, Series 2009 (approves 4 phases of development) Phase II Final PUD approval: • City Council Ordinance 12, Series 2010 (Reception No. 572613) • Subdivision Improvements Agreement (Reception No. 576523) • Notice of Approval for an Amendment to clarify off-site affordable housing requirements, Certificate of Occupancy issuance, and design changes (Reception No. 591369). • Notice of Approval for Amendments to solar panel height, increased height for mechanical, additional parking, clarification on parking counts, reduced spacing between lamp posts (Reception No. 580971) • Phase II Final Plat: B95 PG64 • Affordable Housing Agreement: Reception No. 593106 Phase III and IV Final PUD: • Planning and Zoning Resolution No. 2, Series 2013 • City Council Ordinance 6, Series 2013 (Reception. No. 600720) • Planned Unit development Agreement (PUD): Reception No. 608884 • Notice of Approval for Amendment to defer certain aspects of the project and Incidental design changes to the ambulance garage Reception No. 62250 300 SO SPRING ST 202 ASPEN, CO 81611 970.925.2855 BENDONADAMS.COM 267 • • Aspen Valley Hospital, 401 Castle Creek Road Extension of Vested Rights Notice of Approval for an Amendment to reconfigure floor area (Reception No. 633493) Phase III and IV Final Plat: BK106 PG27 (Reception No. 608883) General Amendments: • Notice of Approval for amending retaining walls, staircase, shorting, and access (Reception No. 651836) • Notice of Approval for parking size variation (Reception No. 651835) Master Signage Plan: • Notice of Approval for signs (Reception No. 622521) Wireless Communication Facility: • Notice of Approval (Reception No. 604775) • Notice of Approval: (Reception No. 644991) AVH Plats Amendments: • Minor Plat Amendment to create and vacate certain easements: BK123 PG69 Ambulance Facility: • Major Public Project Review approval: Ordinance No. 9, Series 2018 Attached please find the project approvals and relevant documents required for a complete application. Given the history and scope of the Aspen Valley Hospital Facilities Master Plan, to reduce the size of the application submittal, we have attached previous land use decisions pertaining only to Phases III and IV. Upon request, BendonAdams can provide copies of all previous land use decisions. We look forward to discussing this request with you and the City Council. Please contact us with any questions or concerns. Sincerely, Chris Bendon, AICP BendonAdams LLC Attachments: 1. Response to Review Criteria 2. Land Use Application and Dimensional Requirements Form 3. Pre-Application conference summary 4. Authorization to represent and disclosure of ownership 5. Agreement to pay form 6. HOA compliance form 7. Vicinity Map 8. List of owners within 300 ft. 9. Planning and Zoning Resolution No. 2, Series of 2013 10. City Council Ordinance No. 6, Series of 2013 11. Planned Unit Development (PUD) Agreement for Phase III and Phase IV Reception No. 608884 300 SO SPRING ST 202 ASPEN, CO 81611 970.925.2855 BENDONADAMS.COM 268 Exhibit 1 Response to Review Criteria 26.308.010.C.1 In reviewing a request for the extension or reinstatement of vested rights the City Council shall consider, but not be limited to, the following criteria: a. The applicant’s compliance with any conditions requiring performance prior to the date of application for extension or reinstatement; Response: We have secured all required land use approvals for the final phase of construction and, to date, have fulfilled all conditions of the development order. Any outstanding requirements identified in the Subdivision Improvements Agreement (SIA) and Planned Unit Development (PUD) Agreement will be fulfilled, as required. Any other remaining matters are detailed issues typically addressed as part of the building permit review or construction observation. In consideration of this request, Section 3 of City Council Resolution No. 3, Series 2009 anticipates as much as a 20 year build-out timeline for Aspen Valley Hospital. City Council at the time clearly acknowledged the timeframe associated with the full completion of the Hospital campus. As such, the current vested rights extension request is in concert with the 2009 approval. b. The progress made in pursuing the project to date including the effort to obtain any other permits, including a building permit and the expenditures made by the applicant in pursuing the project; Response: Phases I through III are complete with Phase IV in need of completion. We have invested significant funds in the implementation and construction of the Aspen Valley Hospital Master Plan. Overall, the Aspen Valley Hospital District has approximately $148.8m invested in the campus. Specifically, in completion of Phase 3, approximately $64.8m has been invested. The completion of Phases I through III and the significant financial investments in the campus show substantial progress made pursuing the project. Additionally, the entire Hospital Facilities Master Plan was approved for a total of 214,000 square feet of gross floor area. Phase IV, the last phase of the project, was allocated for 8,575 square feet which represents only 4% of the total floor area for the entire Hospital campus development. c. The nature and extent of any benefits already received by the City as a result of the project approval such as impact fees or land dedications; Response: With the construction and completion of Phases I through III, the City has exacted and received impact fees, including affordable housing mitigation. Appropriate and required impact associated with Phase IV will be exacted at the time of building permit submittal. 269 d. The needs of the City and the applicant that would be served by the approval of the extension or reinstatement request. Response: An additional 5 years is requested to refine estimates and evaluate financial costs associated with Phase IV. The requested extension will also allow additional time to explore fundraising mechanisms for the project. Granting this extension will serve the City of Aspen by providing additional time for the full completion of the Aspen Valley Hospital Facilities Master Plan, as approved by City Council. Completion of Phase IV and the full completion of the Hospital Facilities is a clear community benefit that will serve Aspen and the greater Roaring Fork Valley. 270 Exhibit 2 CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT LAND USE APPLICATION Extension of Vested Rights, Phase IV Aspen Valley Hospital. 401 Castle Creek Road Aspen, CO 81611 Project Name and Address:_________________________________________________________________________ 273512307801 Parcel ID # (REQUIRED) _____________________________ APPLICANT: Name: Address: Aspen Valley Hospital, Elaine Gerson-General Counsel for AVH ______________________________________________________________________________________________ 401 Castle Creek Road Aspen, CO 81611 _______________________________________________________________________________________________ 970-544-1422 egerson@aspenhospital.org Phone #: ___________________________ email: __________________________________ REPRESENTIVATIVE: Chris Bendon. BendonAdams, LLC Name: _________________________________________________________________________________________________ 300 S. Spring Street Suite #202 Aspen, CO 81611 Address:________________________________________________________________________________________________ 970-925-2855 chris@bendonadams.com Phone#: _____________________________ email:___________________________________ Description: Existing and Proposed Conditions A 5 year extension of vested rights is requested for land use approvals associated with Phase IV of the Aspen Valley Hospital Facilities Master Plan. Review: Administrative or Board Review City Council Review Required Land Use Review(s): Extension of Vested Rights Growth Management Quota System (GMQS) required fields: 0 0 0 Net Leasable square footage _________ Lodge Pillows______ Free Market dwelling units ______ 0 0 Affordable Housing dwelling units_____ Essential Public Facility square footage ________ 1,300.00 FEES DUE: $ ______________ Have you included the following? x x x x Pre-Application Conference Summary Signed Fee Agreement HOA Compliance form All items listed in checklist on PreApplication Conference Summary November 2017 City of Aspen 130 S. Galena St. (970) 920 5090 271 CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM Complete only if required by the PreApplication checklist Extension of Vested Rights, 401 Castle Creek Road Aspen, CO 81611 Project and Location ____________________________________________________________________ Aspen Valley Hospital Applicant: ____________________________________________________________________________ PUB Zone District: _______ See PD (attached) Gross Lot Area: __________ See PD (attached) Net Lot Area: __________ **Please refer to section 26.575.020 for information on how to calculate Net Lot Area Please fill out all relevant dimensions Per PUD Single Family and Duplex Residential Existing Allowed Proposed Multi-family Residential 1) Floor Area (square feet) 1) Number of Units 2) Maximum Height 2) Parcel Density (see 26.710.090.C.10) 3) Front Setback 3) FAR (Floor Area Ratio) 4) Rear Setback 4) Floor Area (square feet) 5) Side Setbacks 4) Maximum Height 6) Combined Side Setbacks 5) Front Setback 7) % Site Coverage 6) Rear Setback 8) Minimum distance between buildings 7) Side Setbacks Proposed % of demolition ______ Proposed % of demolition ______ Commercial Lodge Proposed Use(s)____________________ Existing Existing Allowed Proposed Existing Allowed Proposed Additional Use(s)____________________ Allowed Proposed 1) FAR (Floor Area Ratio) 1) FAR (Floor Area Ratio) 2) Floor Area (square feet) 2) Floor Area (square feet) 3) Maximum Height 3) Maximum Height 4) Off-Street Parking Spaces 4) Free Market Residential(square feet) 5) Second Tier (square feet) 4) Front setback 6) Pedestrian Amenity (square feet) 5) Rear setback Proposed % of demolition ______ 6) Side setbacks 7) Off-Street Parking Spaces 8) Pedestrian Amenity (square feet) Proposed % of demolition ______ Existing non-conformities or encroachments: None requested Variations requested: None requested 272 November 2017 City of Aspen 130 S. Galena St. (970) 920 5090 Exhibit 3 CITY OF ASPEN PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY LOCATION: 401 Castle Creek, Aspen Valley Hospital PROJECT: Extension of Vested Rights REPRESENTATIVE: Chris Bendon, BendonAdams, 925.2855 PLANNER: Jim Pomeroy, 970.429.2745 DATE: March 2, 2020 DESCRIPTION: The Applicant is desirous of extending the vested rights for Phase III & Phase IV of the Aspen Valley Hospital redevelopment. The vested rights for Phase III & Phase IV of the Aspen Valley Hospital redevelopment were established pursuant to Ordinance No. 6, Series 2013. Currently, vested rights for the project expire on May 23rd, 2020, unless further extended beyond this date. After the period of vested rights, current land use regulations become applicable to the project, unless an extension is granted. Land Use Code Section(s) 26.304 Common Development Review Procedures 26.308 Vested Rights Below are links to the Land Use Application form and Land Use Code for your convenience: Land Use Application Land Use Code Review by: Community Development Staff for complete application and recommendation, City Council for decision. Public Hearing: Yes, City Council Planning Fees: $1,300: Deposit for up to 4 billable hours. Lesser/additional hours will be refunded or billed at a rate of $325 per hour City C970 273 Referrals: No Total Deposit: $1,300 Please submit an electronic digital copy of all of the following documents in PDF file format to the Community Development Office:  Completed Land Use Application and signed fee agreement.  Pre-application Conference Summary (this document).  Street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur, consisting of a current (no older than 6 months) certificate from a title insurance company, an ownership and encumbrance report, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner’s right to apply for the Development Application.  Applicant’s name, address and telephone number in a letter signed by the applicant that states the name, address and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant.  HOA Compliance form (Attached).  A written description of the proposal and an explanation in written, graphic, or model form of how the proposed development complies with the review standards relevant to the development application and relevant land use approvals associated with the property.  An 8 1/2” by 11” vicinity map locating the parcel within the City of Aspen. If the copy is deemed complete by staff, the following items will then need to be submitted:  Total deposit for review of the application. Disclaimer: The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The summary is based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The summary does not create a legal or vested right. 274 Exhibit 4 BendonAdams March 10, 2020 Amy Simon Interim Planning Director City of Aspen 130 So. Galena St. Aspen, Colorado 81611 RE: Aspen Valley Hospital Ms. Simon: Please accept this letter authorizing BendonAdams LLC to represent our ownership interests in Aspen Valley Hospital and act on our behalf on matters reasonably associated in securing land use approvals for the property. I am an attorney licensed by the State of Colorado to practice law. This letter shall confirm and certify that the Aspen Valley Hospital District, a Special District (Health District) organized under the laws of the State of Colorado, is the owner of certain real property commonly known as Aspen Valley Hospital, as legally described below. If there are any questions about the foregoing or can assist, please do not hesitate to contact me. Property Aspen Valley Hospital; 401 Castle Creek Road; Aspen, CO 81611 Legal Description Aspen Valley Hospital Subdivision Parcel and Track Pitkin County, Colorado. Parcel ID 2735-123-07-801 Owner Aspen Valley Hospital District, 3 a Special District (Health District) Kind Regards, .- #3 Elaine Gerson, BSN, RN, CHC General Counsel, hief Transformation Officer, Administrator of AVH Ambulatory Clinics Aspen Valley Hospital 401 Castle Creek Road Aspen, CO 81611 egerson@a5penhospital.org 970.544.1422 300 so SPRING ST 202 ASPEN, co 81611 970.925.2855 BENDONADAMS.COM 275 Exhibit 5 CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMEN Agreement to Pay Application Fees An agreement between the City of Aspen (?City?) and Please type or print in all caps Address of property: 401 Castle Creek Road; Aspen PrOPertY Owner Name: ASpen Valley HOSpital Representative Name (if different from Property Owner) BendonAdamS Aspen Valley Hospital Stephen Selby; Project Director 401 Castle Creek Road; Aspen, CO 81611 55er as enhos ita .or Contact infoforbilling: e-mail: y@ 3 Phone:_ 970-544-1397 Billing Name and Address - Send Bills to: I understand that the City has adopted, via Ordinance No. 30, Series of 2017, review fees for Land Use applications and payment of these fees is a condition precedent to determining application completeness. I understand that as the property owner that I am responsible for paying all fees for this development application. For ?at fees and referral fees: I agree to pay the following fees for the services indicated. I understand that these flat fees are non-refundableflat fee for . 5. flat fee for For Deposit cases only: The City and I understand that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to know the full extent or total costs involved in processing the application. I understand that additional costs over and above the deposit may accrue. I understand and agree that it is impracticable for City staff to complete processing, review and presentation of suf?cient information to enable legally required ?ndings to be made for project consideration, unless invoices are paid in full. The City and I understand and agree that invoices mailed by the City to the above listed billing address and not returned to the City shall be considered by the City as being received by me. I agree to remit payment within 30 days of presentation of an invoice by the City for such services. I have read, understood, and agree to the Land Use Review Fee Policy including consequences for no-payment. I agree to pay the following initial deposit amounts for the speci?ed hours of staff time. I understand that payment of a deposit does not render and application complete or compliant with approval criteria. If actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, I agree to pay additional billings to the City to reimburse the City for the processing of my application at the hourly rates hereinafter stated. 1300 deposit for 4 hours of Community Development Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at $325.00 per hour. 5 deposit for hours of Engineering Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at $325.00 per hour. City of Aspen: Signature: MKM Phillip SuPino: PRINT Name: Ginette Sebenaler Community Development Director Chief Financial officer City Use: Title' Aspen Valley Hospital Fees Due: 5 Received 5? 276 Case it November 2017 City of Aspen I 130 S. Galena St. (970) 920 5090 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Homeowner Association Compliance Policy All land use applications within the City of ASpen are required to include a Homeowner Association Compliance Form (this form) certifying the scope of work included in the land use application complies with all applicable covenants and homeowner association policies. The certification must be signed by the property owner or Attorney representing the property owner. Name: Aspen Valley Hospital Property Owner Email: egerson@aspenhospital.org Phone No. 970.544.1422 Address of 401 Castle Creek Road (3:32:33 Aspen. CO 81611 application) I certify as follows: (pick one) This property is not subject to a homeowners association or other form of private covenant. This property is subject to a homeowners association or private covenant and the improvements proposed in this land use application do not require approval by the homeowners association or covenant beneficiary. IS prope IS su ec a omeowners assoc1a ion or priva covenan an improvemen rt' 't dth' 1 proposed in this land use application have been approved by the homeowners association or covenant beneficiary. I understand this policy and understand the City of Aspen does not interpret, enforce, or manage the applicability, meaning or effect of private covenants or homeowner association rules or bylaws. I understand that this document is a public document. Owner signature: date: Owner printed name: or, Attorney signature: K%kfu date; 3le ingO Attorney printed name: Elaine GersonLJD General Counsel, Aspen Valley Hospital 277 Exhibit 278 Exhibit 8 Pitkin County Mailing List of 300 Feet Radius From Parcel: 273512307801 on 03/12/2020 Instructions: This document contains a Mailing List formatted to be printed on Avery 5160 Labels. If printing, DO NOT "fit to page" or "shrink oversized pages." This will manipulate the margins such that they no longer line up on the labels sheet. Print actual size. Disclaimer: Pitkin County GIS presents the information and data on this web site as a service to the public. Every effort has been made to ensure that the information and data contained in this electronic system is accurate, but the accuracy may change. Mineral estate ownership is not included in this mailing list. Pitkin County does not maintain a database of mineral estate owners. Pitkin County GIS makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the completeness, accuracy, or reliability of the content at this site or at other sites to which we link. Assessing accuracy and reliability of information and data is the sole responsibility of the user. The user understands he or she is solely responsible and liable for use, modification, or distribution of any information or data obtained on this web site. http://www.pitkinmapsandmore.com 279 KELEHER LINDA BUREAU TRUST HEATHER LANE LLC CITY OF ASPEN 202 MEADOWOOD DR 5379 LYNBROOK DR 130 S GALENA ST ASPEN, CO 81611 HOUSTON, TX 77056-2004 ASPEN, CO 81611 CASTLE RIDGE ASSOCIATES LTD RINTOUL AMY V KRET LORI A & COLE JEFFREY M PO BOX 95 161 GROVE CT 262 GROVE CT ST ANN, MO 63074 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ANGUS CRAIG M & KAREN S ASPEN CHAPEL KREUTZER GARY REV TRUST PO BOX 7965 77 MEADOWOOD DR 109 TWIN RIDGE DR ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 LEE BRUCE LANDON MEANS GRAEME DONALD & ELIZABETH C TWIN RIDGE HOA 141 GROVE CT 189 MEADOWOOD DR 363 GROVE CT ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611-3341 ASPEN, CO 81611 PODHURST AARON S QPRT 50% WALLA JOHN D & JEAN D ASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL DISTRICT ONE S.E. THIRD AVE #2300 PO BOX 161 0401 CASTLE CREEK RD MIAMI, FL 33131 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 PATTERSON PATRICIA O REV TRUST POLOVIN DAVID L KIERNAN MARC 499 MEADOWOOD DR 363 GROVE ST 161 GROVE CT ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 816113140 ASPEN, CO 81611 KREUTZER DEBBIE REV TRUST CITY OF ASPEN MACLEAN ARCHIBALD JR & ANNE 109 TWIN RIDGE DR 130 S GALENA ST 90 TWIN RIDGE DR ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 RYMAN KAREN L FRIAS RAYMOND C & MARILYN F HOOD JEFFREY M 343 GROVE CT 100 MEADOWOOD DR 121 GROVE CT ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 MEADOWOOD METROPOLITAN DIST MOREHEAD RONALD L & ERLINDA M TWIN RIDGE HOA PO BOX 8774 128 TWINRIDGE CT 363 GROVE CT ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 JACKSON MEADOWS LLC HEGER FRANK & CARLA PROCHASKA JUDITH ELLEN 437 MEADOWOOD DR 222 GROVE CT 108 TWIN RIDGE LN ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611-3139 ASPEN, CO 81611 280 PITKIN COUNTY TWIN RIDGE TOWNHOMES ASSOC CITY OF ASPEN 530 E MAIN ST #301 121 GROVE CT 130 S GALENA ST ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 KELEHER JOHN GORRY TRUST FORD JOHN LAHR DANIEL & RACHEL 202 MEADOWOOD DR 188 MEADOWOOD DR 323 GROVE CT ASPEN, CO 816113336 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 CROSS SUSAN K GIBSONE ALEXANDER S PITKIN COUNTY 242 GROVE CT 303 GROVE CT # 9 530 E MAIN ST #301 ASPEN, CO 81611-3139 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 LYONS MICHAEL J & JENNIFER C MTN OAKS EMPLOYEE HSING PODHURST DOROTHY E QPRT 50% 74 TWIN RIDGE DR 200 CASTLE CREEK RD ONE S.E. THIRD AVE #2300 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 MIAMI, FL 33131 ASPEN CHAPEL WEISS CLIFFORD A & STACEY L PATTERSON PAUL T REV TRUST 77 MEADOWOOD DR 202 GROVE CT 499 MEADOWOOD DR ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 LOBO DA CUNHA MARINA G ONEIL DENNIS & SHARON 121 GROVE CT 101 GROVE CT ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611-3134 281 Exhibit 9 RESOLUTION NO. 2 SERIES OF 2013) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVING A COMMERCIAL GROWTH MANAGEMENT REVIEW, ESTABLISHING EMPLOYEE GENERATION FOR AN ESSENTIAL PUBLIC FACILITY, AND RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A FINAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR PHASES III AND IV OF THE ASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL DISTRICT MASTER FACILITIES PLAN, LOCATED ON PARCEL C, ASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL DISTRICT SUBDIVISION, COMMONLY DESCRIBED AS 401 CASTLE CREEK ROAD, CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. Parcel ID: 2735- 121- 29- 809 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from the Aspen Valley Hospital District ( Applicant), represented by Leslie Lamont of Lamont Planning Services, requesting approval of a Final Development Plan and associated land use reviews for a Planned Unit Development ( PUD) for Phases III and IV the Aspen Valley Hospital District Master Facilities Plan; and, WHEREAS, the Conceptual PUD approval ( via Resolution No. 3, Series of 2009) conceptually approved a redeveloped and expanded multi-story hospital building and parking garage, medical office space, affordable housing and site improvements on Parcel C of the Aspen Valley Hospital Subdivision, to be developed in four phases; and, WHEREAS, the Conceptual PUD approval outlined the employee generation rate to use in evaluation of the medical office space as well as the anticipated employees generated for the hospital function; and, WHEREAS, the Aspen Community Development Department reviewed the proposed Final PUD and associated land use reviews for Phases III and IV and recommended approval with conditions; and, WHEREAS, during a meeting on October 30, 2012, the Planning and Zoning Commission opened a duly noticed public hearing to consider the project and continued the public hearing to November 20, 2012 for further discussion. At the November 20, 2012 public hearing, the Planning and Zoning Commission opened a duly noticed public hearing to consider At the the project and continued the hearing until December 4, 2012 for further discussion. December 4, 2012 public hearing, the Planning and Zoning Commission opened a duly noticed public hearing to consider the project and continued the public hearing to January 8, 2013 for further discussion. At the January 8, 2013 public hearing, the Planning and Zoning Commission opened a duly noticed public hearing to consider the project and approved a growth management quota system review for Expansion or new commercial development, establishment of the employee generation rate for an essential public facility and recommended City Council approve the Final Planned Unit Development application for Phase III and IV by a six to one ( 6- 1) vote, with the findings and conditions listed hereinafter; and, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AS FOLLOWS: 282 Planning and Zoning Commission Resolution No. 2, Series 2013 Page 1 of 4 Section 1: General Approvals Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the Planning and Zoning Commission hereby approves Growth Management Review for Expansion or New Commercial Development for the medical office space and recommends City Council approve Growth Management Review for an Essential Public Facility as well as Final Planned Unit Development for Phases III and IV of the Aspen Valley Hospital Master Facilities Plan. Specifically, this approval and recommendations of approval permit the Applicant to develop Phases III and IV of a four phase master facilities plan inclusive of 10, 187 sq. ft. of net leasable commercial and office space for the development of medical offices and an expansion of the hospital facility by 72, 828 gross square feet( excluding the medical office space). Section 2• Growth Management Allotments The Applicant requested 27,000 sq. ft. of net leasable commercial and office space from the 2010 annual allotment allowance for commercial development. This allotment request represented the total net leasable square feet necessary to construct the entire master facilities plan over the course of the proposed four phases of development. The Planning and Zoning Commission granted 12, 000 sq. ft. of net leasable commercial and office space from the 2010 growth management year for Phase Il, leaving a balance of 15, 000 sq. ft. to potentially be requested in subsequent phases in later years. With this resolution, the Planning and Zoning Commission grants 10, 187 sq. ft. of commercial net leasable space for Phase III rather than the 15, 000 originally anticipated. The commercial space is determined to generate 16. 95 employees. An additional 64,253 gross sq. ft. of essential public facility for the hospital function of the building is requested for Phase III which generates 20. 16 employees. City Council determines the mitigation requirement for the Essential Public Facility Growth Management review, based on thethePlanning and Zoning Commission' sHousing finding Phase I1I. hospital function herein that 20. 16 Mitigation is employees required are for the generated greater of of by the two mitigation requirements, which will be memorialized in any City Council ordinance for Phase III. Phase IV proposes 8, 575 gross sq. ft. of essential public facility for the hospital function of the building which generates 8. 46 employees. Housing Mitigation for Phase IV will also be outlined in any City Council ordinance, based on City Council' s Essential Public Facility Growth Management review. As memorialized in the conceptual PUD approval for this project ( Section 2. 0 and Exhibit B of Resolution No. 3, Series of 2009), an existing credit shall be applied to the employee generation for each phase of development. Section 3• Dimensional Requirements and Other Recommendations The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends to City Council that the redevelopment of the property in Phases III and IV as presented shall meet the dimensional standards as outlined in the exhibits of this resolution. Additionally, the Commission recommends that the following suggestions be incorporated into the Final PUD approval. Planning and Zoning Commission Resolution No. 2, Series 2013 Page 2 of 4 283 a. An additional pedestrian access way is incorporated into the site plan as shown in Exhibit 1. b. A lighting plan, as presented in Exhibit K of the Planning and Zoning memo dated January 8, 2013, be developed and adopted that outlines all remediation techniques that will be undertaken for lighting that has been installed on the site as well as the design of any additional outdoor lighting in Phases III and IV to minimize undesirable brightness and light trespass. Additionally, the Commission recommends Council carefully consider requiring light shades on any new two story component and require an interior lighting plan be developed for the interior of the entry proposed for Phase IV as expansive amounts of glass are proposed and light trespass should be minimized. c. Carefully consider additional landscaping to screen the parking garage improvements and minimize visual impacts to neighbors and the community and as seen from Castle Creek Road. Section 4• All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission, are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity. Section 5• This resolution shall not effect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 6• If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. APPROVED BY the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Aspen on this 8th day of January, 2013. APPROVED AS TO FORM: PLANNING CO Deb Quinn, Assistant City Attorney 7 D ZONING IS J,Eripamer, Ch 'r ATTEST: ackie Lothian, Deputy City Clerk 284 Planning and Zoning Commission Resolution No. 2, Series 2013 Page 3 of 4 Pedestrian access improvement Exhibit I — Exhibit 2— Height plan Exhibit 3— Mechanical plan Exhibit 4— Master phasing plan Exhibit S— Floor plans Exhibit 6— Exterior elevations Planning and Zoning Commission Resolution No. 2, Series 2013 Page 4 of 4 285 j GUARD RAIL i 1 ALONG FULL LENGTH OF 1 DINING TERRACE SEE PCU ENTRY ENLARGEMENT PLAN, OUTDOOR 1 UPPER WALL P SHEET L- 1. 3 RETAINING WALLS SEE CIVIL SHEET CG- 105 AND STRUCTURAL 1 1 Lq l 1j ENGINEER' S DRAWINGS. 0 SURFACE PARKING' EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS TO TO 2 R REMAIN AIN 77 IMPROVEMENT) PARKING SPACES NOTE: 1) THIS DIAGRAM IS EXCERPTED FROM SHEET L- 1. 0 OF THE PHASE 2 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENT SET. 1 I I 24 EXISTING 1 1 PARKING SPACES TO REMAIN I 2) THIS DIAGRAM DEPICTS PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIVITY IMPROVEMENTS AS PROPOSED FOR COMPLETION WITH PHASE 1 2 CONSTRUCTION. T- CURB RAMP& SIDEWALK PAINTED CROSSWALK EXISTING EUPA 7/ 6' WIDE CONCRETE SIDEWALK TO O REMAIN WITH ADA CURB RAMPS RAW WATER AND IRRIGATION PAD; PAINTED j CONNECTION I PUMP SEE IRRIGATION SHEET 11. 2 1 j, CROSS- WALK AVH LOOP ' TRAIL STOP SIGN, SEE REALIGNED ROAD NOIES REALIGNED HOSPITAL SEE CIVIL SHEET CS- 102 ENTRY ROAD, PEDESTRIAN TRAIL 1 IMPROVED TRAIL CROSSING i TRAIL STOP SIGN, GUARD 40' 140 SEE NOTES RAIL AT DOOLITTLE DRIVE o a REQUIRED AT CONCRETE RETAINING WALLS GREATER o 30" IN HEIGHT AT HHS PARKING LOT AND NEW RFTA STOP. SEE CIVIL GRADING PLAN FOR TOW/ BOW. DETERMINE EXTENTS OF GUARD RAIL. TO COORDINATE STEEL GUARD RAIL INSTALLATION WITH PREFABRICATED SHELTERS TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH FALL PROTECTION CODES. m THAN E i pedestrian access revision exhibit - phase CASILE CRE IMPROV CMEN 1 KEY PLAN SHEET CS- 1 2 ASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL M. F. P. 12 . 2012 1 of 2 286 LEGEND TUMBLED CONCRETE PAVERS I! CAFETERIA LA` , PERVIOUS I S s PAVING) PATIO SPECIALTY PAVING ( INTEGRAL OUTDOOR COLOR CHAPEL CHAPEL GARDEN) O EENTTERRN Q CONCRETE) CONCRETE O O SURFACE PARKING I PHASE 2 IMPROVEMENT) FINES PATH LANDSCAPE AREA 3- 4 APPROXIMATE OF DISTURBANCE SEE GRADING PLAN PHASE I MAIN CRUSHER LIMITS ENTRY EXCLUDES PUBLIC 4 ENTRY 16 SURFACE PARKING ENTRY/ DIRECTIONAL CURB RAMP SIGNAGE ( T. B. D PAINTED CROSSWALK LIMITS OF RENOVATION) THIS DIAGRAM IS EXCERPTED FROM SHEET L- 2. 0 NOTE: gym...., I MERGENCY OM INTERIOR I l PHASE 3/ 4 FINAL PUD SUBMITTAL AND ILLUSTRATES PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIVITY AT FULL BUILD— OUT. OF THE I APPLICATION 1 SPACES I 6 WIDE CONCRETE SIDEWALK 1 WITH ADA CURB RAMPS C] PAINTED CROSSWALK I l r r I LOOP ROAD r AVH SERVICE LOOP ROAD W'a':.. i H. H. S. PARKING y h n7 Tr0l= ffl0=:=] 40 I I pedestrian access revision exhibit - phases ASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL M. F. P. KEY PLAN 3/ 4 12 . 2012 2 of 2 287 11%be AFG (19-0156) ELEVATION (1 SWEENWALL EHATION 1816' AFG (1330' AEG) ?r m. (amuse) F: ausmc amen smaamv mamwenaas mm? ammo? 1w AFG EEVATION 32-0- are 92'4"? aasms swan SINQE-PLY ROOF WI EXISTING acumen mas SLOPE) mus WI SNGLEPLY mm: RIBS EEVATION (32-0135] SLWE) mus WI WEE-FLY ROOF WI RIBS AEG) (14-10156) EEVATION 16?41' are (mamas) 19"??3 (15'3' ?56) ammo" [mm sew? EEVATION ROOFING WI Tm 15:43- ?9 . 3mm: (44-183) -. (3w AEG) ELEVATION me mm mm EIEVAUON 1mm; (13-0183) 288 design I{ pgty lnleNN, IpeN hk. B2018M Shoe, Mall, Suim 200, a CO W202 3219 MSa 20. 6. 02] 8 wqM 1121900 ASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL PHASE 3 ADDITION/ EXPANSION MGt n li ewtwu x. y.:: CLawI GeM ROeo Co Bt611 raper, t I wI wl anagen aanlcoern•ac EIIINe® m a,> ww o. ame a, a. suovenwlewww terwelavweelNm ausy etwe xr n w. R, Fa. aaol a w6wFpwlw mw wNNN9Im o' CONSTRUCTION r DRAWINGS Hell+ a w. aa>o a o, mre PHASE 2 PHASE 3 y PHASE 4 LEGEND fiT FI. 00X ELEV.., 00' L-• I16G4 901:. 5 E1: EIEVATIGN m r RF0• PfiOVE FINISH GR II1' A" PEGI— EXISTING OWE I: eS pWn sMet Mlle OVERALL ROOF PLAN eNeaI INNNer PUD waaa, hl, , N 289 l[ Rlf S LOPED OVERFRAMING W, SNGLE PLY MEMBRANE y/ 61 E ROOF W! EXTRUDED RIBS sT, T 6 Tl 73: F:Y- Y HT ABOVE ROOF 12'- T i'i7 EXISTING SLOPED OVERFRAMING Wl SLOPED OVERFRAMING W! SINGLE-PLY MEMBRANE ROOF SINGLE- PLY MEMBRANE ROOF WI FX` RUDED RIBS Wl EXTRUDED RIBS I 1 EXIST. EXIST. COURTYARD COURTYARD 10 EXISTING SLOPED OVERFRAMING W i SINC1E- PLY MEMBRANE ROOF W' EXTRUDEDRIBS 340 34- G' RERACEORTU REPLACED RTU § HT ABOVE ROOF iPa" SLOPED OVERFRAMING W! SINGLE- PLY MEMBRANE ROOF W/ EXTRUDED RIBS HT ABOVE ROOF T'$' ADHERED TPO MEMBRANE J ROOFING WI TAPERED NS" TION SLOPED OVERFRAMING WI SINGLE- PLY ;' 4q4r MEMBRANE ROOF WI EXTRUDED RIBS HT ABOVE ROOFIO SKYLIGHT ELEVATION 14 AEG) 40- W SCREEN WALL ELEVATION AFG 16. 0- AEG) ATI INC/ HT ABOVE ROOF 1 O r^ HELPAD -- r i" ie 290 I DfSIGN design Heery Inc. International 820 16th Street Mall, Suite 200, CO 80202- 3219 Denver, 720. 946. 0276 1 7th' project number 1 I ————— 1121900 CASTLE CREEK ROAD A BUS STOP PEDESTRIAN \ TRAIL 111111 II I II iIII III RI I STORM WATER VIT I -- -- A L L E A T I P Y L PHASE 3 AND 4 ADDITION/ EXPANSION\ I I V N 1 II PARKINHIM HI E S O H PAR KING STRUCTU_ E P S A 11.. DOOLITTLE DRIVE --- 1 I hIOSPITAL BUILDI1NG Ilu IMANAG Castle Creek Road BASIN o \ X1; 11 EMPLOY p / G Aspen, Cc 81611 r;:.; L—_ ., I,.. 0 r.®— 1 I Q ug 0401 SHOWN 1 LOADING i DOCK managers n 1 / yi/ consulC— swa / ual 340 j lrc. onto rx pe Ave.% 300 311 Main 51. corewla". 303 399 5157 11 703 373. 9601 B 1 I t WHITCOMB RESIDENCE J 1 v I CEO G TERRACE F I 1 j / 2G u1e 200 IV. Arvada CO 02 70] 422. 74001( 3034127900 1 1 —` 1 1 102 008 8020 C 970, 963 6520 If 910 963 6522 19201f, 1920 Ma" 1303433 1202 201 CO ew61 303/ 77. 9500 I 307437. 5624 R' 01JRFAOE ARKING iI a CarboMek, Caftn le, CO 8062 11 ro1o1a4. o717 wore sin/ seallsignature O iiii. NORDIC TRAIL I date issued for PHASE 3 LOADING FINAL PUD DOCK AUGUST 10, 2012 item E 4~ AVH LOOP ROAD date I EXISTING AMBULANCE/ I BARN_ CASTLE CREEK ROAD DOOLITTL = lit ARO RIVE I? PLAN NORTH I 7, 11 I LEGEND II SCALE: 1"_ B0' . O o t PHASE 1 a"/ PHASE 1 BUILDING I PHASE 2 CEO I RESIDENCE C EMPLOYEE O HOUSING WHITCOMB TERRACE PHASE 2 I PHASE 3 SHOWN AT FULL I BUILD- OUT) Wins] PHASE 3 sheet REFERENCE ONLY. BUILDING tine MASTER SITE BUILDING EXISTING PHASE LIMITS/ u HOSPITAL BUILDING I AMBULANCE AND RENOVATION OF PHASING DIAGRAM PHASE 4 \-- EXPANSION ASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL AND IS PHASE4 NOT TO SCALE AVH LOOP ROAD THE INTENDED AS A DIAGRAMATIC HOSPITAL BUILDING SITE DIAGRAM BUILDING NOTE: THIS SHEET IS PROVIDED TO ILLUSTRATE THE VARIOUS PHASES OF PRE- PUD) I a sheet number R LIMITS OF D 1— DISTURBANCE a" a BARN w" v drawn by O checked by 291 LEGEND design CIRCULATION PUBLIC CIRCULATION: STAFF/ PATIENT NEW BUILDING FOOTPRINT/ EXPANSION LOADING CURRENT BUILDING FOOTPRINT/ RENOVATION DOCK T Heery International Inc. 82016th Street Mall, PARKING GARAGE ELEVATOR: PUBLIC Suite 200, Denver, CO 80202-3219 ELEVATOR. STAFF/ PATIENT 720. 946. 0276 EXTENT OF PHASE 1 C APPROVED AND COMPLETED 1121900 I —^ APPROVED AND CURRENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION 13 project number r---..._._.... EXTENT OF PHASE 2 WIN E EXTENT OF PHASE 3 A APPROVED AND CURRENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION EXTENT OF PHASE 4 APPROVED AND CURRENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION 1 I P S H E O S V N P A I L L T E A Y L PHASE 3 AND 4 I ADDITION/ EXPANSION i 0401 Castle Creek Road E Aspen, Co 81611 consultants/ construction managers r Buuchfel C3400 East 3400 E 0 L_...___..._... 11I l, c d 123 CO 970.903.65201 f 970963 6522 BCEREn o.. GA- 5420 Wxd R. A- q d, SuiL 200 da. C060002 I...—....—... Saga EnpY.. 502M4n LOBBY S1920 Wftl Sl. SI201 Denver, C060202 303. 422. 74001 f 303. 422. 7900 I I Man St, Suite 102 Ci f t - o OHM Design 0300 CO a9299 303343. 51541 f 303 373, 9501 303433. 950011303433. 5624 Q 5100806 11 970 970 9mbmdeb, 970. 701-0311 I f i 7 704. 0317 O seal/ signature I MECHANI AL D OJ 5rr k DDElL, issued for EE ING UN OBBY R vl ROO date PHASE 314 FINAL PUD S AUGUST 10, 2012 item L----------.-...-- date RGE EETINC t......._._.__._.___. OOM SHELL SPACE PLAN NORTH SCALE: 1"= 30' key plan sheet title BASEMENT LEVEL sheet number AF- 100 drawn b Y erMw. na. rr,. y Nr, we, sam, wgwwa. ba. wat WO Croy, 0, 10mi checked r. 292 bY LEGEND design CIRCULATION. PUBLIC CIRCULATION STAFFIPATIENT NEW BUILDING FOOTPRINT/ EXPANSION Heery CURRENT BUILDING FOOTPRINTIRENOVATION Inc. International Mall, 820 ELEVATOR. PUBLIC Suite Denver, CO 80202- 3219 ELEVATOR. STAFF/ PATIENT LOADING EXTENT OF PHASE 1 iT DOCK APPROVED AND COMPLETED I 4w EXTENT OF PHASE 2 720948. 0276 project number i APPROVED AND CURRENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION EXTENT OF PHASE 3 HEALING L APPROVED AND CURRENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION L L\ EXTENT OF PHASE 4 1121900 A —" GARDEN APPROVED AND CURRENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION G E O S N V L A L T Pi E A Y L PHASE 3 AND 4 I\ — PPO P S H ADDITION/ EXPANSION RV BIKE N A TRAIL C 0401 Castle Creek Road Aspen, Co 81611 u U CA ENS c" nsultants, CAnstn OtiDn managers KI Design I B f' tl300 ya 311Main 311 SI, 0 De 3R5154 5154 l f 303. 333. 950' 3033 303 0097D3 970% 3. 652011970. 963. 652. BOER Ergi COURT ARD ww IMM. 1920 kaM145L SuAe 2D, 5020 Ward MeE, ll 5u:le 200 2 Ary da CO 8= Dewer, 0060202 30342214N 11303422. 7900 333. 433950011303433.5620 Sopis Erg--% 502 Main 5, Suite A3 Cmbdda a, CO 623 njj Y 970 la ml u l ro io 4 e3n 9LO L ED. seallsignature S CU ENTRANCE g r ' ! ' BORA RY 0 S J DROP- 0 ICI[ T date issued for NI PHASE 3/ 4 AF FINAL PUD AUGUST 10, 2012 G item MBULANCE 1 ARAGE 8 T jiff date Y C AP 1 OUTD00 ' LOBBY ROP OFF DINING ,' EA s EC r O LIC ILE PLAN NORTH IN ENTRANCE n i R SCALE: 1"= L o M D GENCY ZRTMENT 30' L nU DROP- OF kev plan sheet title LEVEL ONE sheet number AF- 101 drawn by checked 293 by LEGEND design CIRCULATION: PUBLIC CIRCULATION: STAFFIPATIENT NEW BUILDING FOOTPRINT/ EXPANSION Heery CURRENT BUILDING FOOTPRINT/ RENOVATION ELEVATOR: PUBLIC Street Mall, Suite 200 Denver, CO 80202- 3219 ELEVATOR: STAFF/ PATIENT 720. 946. 0276 EXTENT OF PHASE 1 I APPROVED AND COMPLETED 3 13 Inc. International 820 Oo project number 1121900 EXTENT OF PHASE 2 APPROVED AND CURRENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION EXTENT OF PHASE 3 E O H 1 P S A ROOF APPROVED AND CURRENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION N S V P A L I L T E Y L A EXTENT OF PHASE 4 APPROVED AND CURRENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTIONS PHASE 3 AND 4 ADDITION/ EXPANSION ROOF 0401 Castle Creek Road AB Aspen, Co 81611 0a O consullants/ constructionrnanagers 0 COURTYARD i COURT- SV dwrw Cgnsu4enb ii,. 3400 East SayaW Ave, 4300 OHM Desl9n Dei—„ caroa4ae. co61623 311 Main St, 5We102 303.399. 51541 f 303333. 9501 970. 963. 65AI f 9709636522 SE E q— s4z9wemanae. suim zoa Dens 3 YARD COWM fWt4001W1303.422.7900 Sef4k ErV- 7920 Na1kel SlSWe 201 439` 950001100.3433. SR4 303. rL g 502 Man Sl SuA A3 C090623 970 9707019Jif 11970. 704. 0313 seal/ signature MEDICAL OFFICE SPACE ROOF t® date issued for PHASE 3/ 4 T FINAL PUD AUGUST 10, 2012 item j i OPF date OOF OPEN TO BELOW o00 o LO BY l i HEL AD b PLAN NORTH SCALE: 1"= 1 30' key sheet plan title LEVEL Two she., AF- 102 r,.".: i.: b,. w- r,•+ M- drawn tom. K.. o, w.s...,°., x+ by ew„ y,.ero 294 checked w»........° w K.,° e m., number b by HEERY aaa aoaaaa. n-_-•• id aa so s oaaaa• ao. _•_--_a . a..a , sae_ iiinii. o v a. •. u uu. u. aaT u i A rp A A - ii g ,, iilii. L. i. itii p; u u ir 7 7 a i91 m a9_ 9 1 r W1a1 I„ I v , "".:. ' rds t li¢ s-• w.., _ I' ti 1". I., I '; I,,, IIII Illllill; lll:, l' 1111111, llllllllllllllll llllilllll __'' 11y11111111111111111111111111111111111111 a I_ . as I i , ll I i l ilt W 9111 1- 1 1 , 1 N111IIIW i1@ 111N , NIl/RlUl1 VIII IIIII011 IIIIIIIIBII I g I Iii! i I i. I I pp • IIIIIIWIIIIIIIIIII119111YIIIIIII01 , 1 1', dr ' ' '' ili'; I I j l' I i. l'!', I' I r El i NOTE: OXYGEN PAD STRUCTURE NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY I I WWI - 111 NORTH ELEVATION I lk llO II' f' Itl( n 9 bra .. I li TCL s®®L" n... uuua ® ice— ieiiii aaa.—i 1999u_ u. W_...:— ate% ate a . lava, i 9n_ I i EAST ELEVATION a 295 design Heery International Inc. 820 16th Street Mall, Suite 200, Denver, CO 80202- 3219 720. 946. 0276 project number 1121900 A i Ili l I i' I IIJ I P S H I• E O S N V L A I P L T E Y L A PHASE 3 AND 4 ADDITION/ EXPANSION IEL 0401 Castle Creek Road Aspen, Co 81611 SOUTH ELEVATION consultants/ construction managers sbeuo, lcenew•a, ho-o. DHMDaayn 3400 East Baydud Ave. 4300 311 Main 51. SuM 102 Demer, 0o 6o7o9 Carbondale, 0089823 303. 399. 51541 f 303. 333. 9501 97D 963.65201 f 970963. 8522 HCER Gellun- Snow ENineerku3 5420 Ward Road. Suile 200 1920 Madel SL Site 201 7wada, CO 80002 Denver, CO 80202 303433. 9500/ 13034335624 303. @2.740011303, 422. 7900 sapns Engineering 502 Mal, St, Sulle A3 Car dale, C080623 910. 704. 03111 t 910. 704. 0313 seal/ signature issued for date PHASE 3/ 4 FINAL PUD AUGUST 10, 2012 item date a A& SCALE101"= 20' WEST ELEVATION key plan sheet title SOUTH AND WEST ELEVATIONS sheet number A-202 drawn anpnu by checked Mvnwneons, by 296 600720, 06/28/2013 at 09:54:29 AM, 1 OF 64, $326.00 Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO EXthIt 10 ORDINANCE NO. 6 (SERIES OF 2013) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ASPEN CITY COUNCIL APPROVING A GROWTH MANAGEMENT REVIEW, FINAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, AND VESTED PROPERTY RIGHTS FOR PHASE AND IV OF THE ASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL DISTRICT MASTER FACILITIES PLAN, LOCATED ON PARCEL C, ASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL DISTRICT SUBDIVISION, COMMONLY DESCRIBED AS 401 CASTLE CREEK ROAD, CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. Parcel ID: 2735-121?29-809 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from the Aspen Valley Hospital District (Applicant), represented by Leslie Lamont of Lamont Plaming Services, requesting approval of a Final Development Plan and associated land use reviews for a Plamed Unit Development (PUD) for Phase and IV of the Aspen Valley Hospital District Master Facilities Plan; and, WHEREAS, the Conceptual PUD approval (via Resolution No. 3, Series of 2009) conceptually approved a redeveloped and expanded multi-story hospital building and parking garage, affordable housing and site improvements on Parcel of the Aspen Valley Hospital Subdivision, to be developed in four phases; and, WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received referral comments from City Engineering, Fire Protection District, Environmental Health Department, Parks Department, Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority, the Transportation Department, and the City Utilities Department as a result of the Development Review Committee meeting; and, WHEREAS, said referral agencies and the Aspen Community DeveIOpment Department reviewed the proposed Final PUD and associated land use reviews for Phase and IV recommending approval with conditions; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 26.445 of the Land Use Code, Final PUD approval and associated reviews may be granted by the City Council at a duly noticed public hearing after considering recommendations by the Flaming and Zoning Commission, the Community DeVelopment Director, and relevant referral agencies; and, WHEREAS, prior to City Council approval, Final PUD and associated land use reviews by the Planning and Zoning Commission requires a public hearing and this application was reviewed at multiple public hearings where the recommendations of the Community Development Director and comments from the public were heard; and, WHEREAS, during meetings on October 30, November 16, December 4, 2012 and January 8, 2013, the Plaming and Zoning Commission opened a duly noticed public hearings to consider the project and approved a growth management quota system review and recommended City Council approve the Final Plamed Unit Development application and associated reviews for Phase and IV by a six to one (6-1) vote, with the ?ndings and conditions listed within Resolution No. 2 (Series of 2013); and, City Councii Ordinance No. 6, Series 2013 Pagel.of11 297 600720, 06/28/2013 at 09:54:29 AM, 2 OF 64, Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO WHEREAS, once the land use approvals and recommendation of approval were granted by the Planning and Zoning Commission, the Applicant requested Growth Management approval, Final Planned Unit Development (PUD) approval and Vested Property Rights approval of the City Council; and, WHEREAS, upon review of the application and the applicable code standards, the Community Development Department recommended approval, with conditions, of the proposed Final PUD request and associated land use reviews; and, WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing on March 11, 2013, March 18, 2013, April 8, 2013 and May 13, 2013, the City Council Opened the hearing and review of the application; and, WHEREAS, the Aspen City Council ?nds that the development proposal meets or exceeds all the applicable development standards and that the approval of the development proposal, with conditions; and, WHEREAS, the City Council ?nds that this ordinance furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safety, and welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF ASPEN CITY COUNCIL AS FOLLOWS: In approving this ordinance, the City Council recognizes and supports the ASpen Valley Hospital?s aspiration and mission to assure access to health care and ?to deliver extraordinary healthcare in an environment of excellence, compassion, and trust.? Section 1: Approvals Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the City Council hereby approves Growth Management Review for an Essential Public Facility, Final Flamed Unit Development, and Vested Property Rights for Phase and IV of the Aspen Valley Hospital Master Facilities Plan. Speci?cally, these approvals permit the Applicant to develop Phase and IV of a four phase master facilities plan inclusive of 10,187 sq. ft. of net leasable commercial and of?ce space for the development of medical of?ces which are considered accessory to, and part of the hospital function as well as an expansion of the hospital facility as shown in Exhibit 1 of this ordinance. These new improvements represent additional square feet to be constructed on the site and are divided into two phases, with the associated gross square feet outlined below: Phase Phase IV Basement 19,385 1,854 Level One 33,280 6,721 Level Two 8,152 0 Medical Of?ce Space 10,187 0 Ambulance Garage 3,436 City Council Ordinance No. 6, Series 2013 Page 2 ofll 298 600720, 06/28/2013 at 09:54:29 AM, 3 OF 64, Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO Subtotal 74,440 8,575 Section 2: Dimensional Reguirements of Phase and IV The following approved dimensions of the project shall be re?ected in the Final PUD plans for Phase and IV: Minimum Lot Size As represented on the Final PUD plans Minimum Lot Width Minimum Front Yard Minimum Side Yard Minimum Rear Yard Maximum Site Coverage Minimum Distance between Buildings Maximum Height a. Hospital/Medical Of?ce Space a. As noted by the spot elevations depicted above grade on the ?Overall Roof Plan? as detailed in Exhibit 2 of b. Other this ordinance b. Mechanical equipment as detailed in Exhibit 3 of this ordinance may exceed the requirements of the land use code. All other structure shall meet the requirements of the land use code. New gross sq. ft. (including medical of?ce 83,015 square feet* space) Maximum Net Leasable Commercial and 10,187 square feet Of?ce space (medical of?ce) Note: Hospital gross square footage shall be measured from exterior wall to exterior wall, inclusive of basements Section 3: Voluntary Deed Restriction The Applicant agrees to record a deed restriction prohibiting the condominiumization of the 10,187 sq. ft. medical of?ce space approved for Phase The deed restriction shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a Certi?cate of Occupancy of the hospital/ medical of?ce component of . the project. Section 4: Design elements to be incorporated into Phase and IV Based upon recommendations of the Flaming Commission, City Council requires the following be incorporated into the Final PUD approval. A. Pedestrian Access. An additional pedestrian access way is incorporated into the site plan as shown in Exhibit 4. City Council Ordinance No. 6, Series 2013 Page 3 of 11 299 600720, 06/28/2013 at 09:54:29 AM, 4 OF 64, Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO B. Lighting Plan. A lighting plan, as presented in Exhibit 5 of this ordinance shall be implemented to provide remediation techniques for lighting that has been installed on the site as well as the design of any additional outdoor lighting in Phases and IV to minimize undesirable brightness and light trespass. Any upper story on the hospital or medical of?ce space shall include automated window shades to limit the impact of indoor lighting. C. Enhanced Landscaping. An enhanced landscape plan is approved as shown in Exhibit 6. There are certain constraints on the landscape plan, most notably, a utility easement paralleling Castle Creek Road that is located on the hospital?s property with a water main located within it. The plan commits to avoid the planting of trees within ten feet of the water service line. All plantings will be ?eld located with representatives from the Parks and Utilities department present to provide ?nal approval. Within this utility easement corridor, the hospital has agreed to do a like replacement (not based upon the diameter or gallon size of the plant) of plantings in the event the Utilities department has to remove or cut down plantings for maintenance purposes. This replace requirement shall be outlined in the PUD agreement. Additional landscaping requirements are noted in section 13 of this ordinance. D. Amended Lobby Design. As shown in Exhibit 1 of this ordinance, an amended lobby design is approved for Phase IV of the project. E. Mechanical Screening. Two mechanical units from Phase II and one mechanical unit from Phase are required to be wrapped in screening as shown in Exhibit 3 of this ordinance. Section 5: Parking The total number of parking spaces approved for the site as a whole, upon completion of Phase IV shall be as follows: Parking Structure 219* Phase II New Surface Parking 77 New West Side Employee Parking 5 New main entry Parking 16 Surface at Whitcomb 31 Surface for Affordable housing 2 Tuck under for affordable housing 6 356 Notes: 10 parking spaces in the parking garage shall be reserved for the affordable housing units Not included in this tally is the parking for the existing ambulance barn, the proposed ambulance garage and existing CEO residence. Due to the phased construction of the project there will be more parking spaces available at the end of Phase 11 construction than upon completion of Phase IV. Therefore 79 parking spaces shall be decommissioned until the issuance of a building permit for Phase is issued. In the event that the Applicant does not undertake construction of Phase within the vested rights period for Phase the hospital will be required to remove the 71 parking spaces located along the western side of the hospital and detailed in Exhibit of Ordinance No. 12 (Series of 2010). Any existing paving in this area that is not necessary to use as a connection for the service loop City Council Ordinance No. 6, Series 2013 Page 4 of 300 600720, 06/28/2013 at 09:54:29 AM, 5 OF 64, Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO road shall be removed. Once the surface parking spaces are removed, the decommissioned garage spaces may be used if a building permit for Phase is not issued. Section 6: Affordable How A. Affordable Housing Credit Balance. As required by City Council Resolution No. 3 (Series of 2009), each phase of development shall verify the number of employees generated. An audit within 1 year of a CO. being issued for each phase of development is required to verify the projected and actual employee generation of the project. The audit shall be conducted during the hospital?s high season of operation (winter) as agreed upon by the Applicant and APCHA. Any difference between the audit and what was anticipated shall require the ?Balance Available? to be updated through an administrative approval. B. Off-site Housing Requirement. Ordinance No. 12 (Series of 2010) requires the provision of off- site affordable housing to house six (6) Full Time Equivalents (FTEs). The Applicant has asked that this requirement be rescinded. As the existing credit and on-site housing for the campus meets the land use code?s affordable housing mitigation requirements, City Council hereby rescinds any off- site affordable housing requirement. Employees Employees Balance Housed Generated Available Beaumont, Mountain Oaks CEO House 57 0 Credit (Council Resolution No. 3, 2009) Phase I 0 Phase II 28.5 19.98 Phase 111 20.16 Phase IV 8.46 Total 85.5 48.6 36.9 The employees required to be mitigated for in Phases and IV is the greater of two uses on the site: Medical Of?ce Space or the hospital ?ll?lCthI?l as permitted by the land use code with the provision of on?site affordable housing. The audit will verify the employees generated by the MOS in Phase II and the employees generated by the hospital function in Phases and IV. Section 7: Plat and Agreement The Applicant shall record a subdivision/PUD plat and agreement that meets the requirements of Land Use Code Section 26.445.070, Recording 0 Final PUD Development Plan, within 180 days of approval by City Council. Section 8: Building Permit Application The building permit application shall include the following: a. A copy of the ?nal Ordinance and recorded Resolution. b. The conditions of approval printed on the cover page of the building permit set. City Council Ordinance No. 6, Series 2013 Page 5 of 11 301 600720, 06/28/2013 at 09:54:29 AM, 6 OF 64, Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO e. A completed tap permit for service with the Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District. d. A drainage plan, including an erosion control plan, prepared by a Colorado licensed Civil Engineer, which meets adopted city standards. C. An excavation stabilization plan, construction management plan (CMP), and drainage and soils reports pursuant to the Building Department?s requirements. 1) As part of the construction management plan for Phase and IV improvements, provisions shall be made to ensure that parking for Aspen Valley Hospital Visitors, staff and construction workers will be accommodated to prevent over?ow in the Health and Human Services lot. f. A fugitive dust control plan to be reviewed and approved by the Environmental Health Department. g. A detailed excavation plan for review and approval by the City Engineer. h. Accessibility and ADA requirements shall be addressed to satisfactorily meet adopted building codes. Section 9: Engineering Final design and analysis for drainage shall be compliant with all sections of the City of Aspen Municipal Code, Title 21 and all construction and excavation standards published by the Engineering Department prior to issuance of a building permit. Section 10: Fire Mitigation All codes adopted by the Aspen Fire Protection District shall be met per building permit. This includes but is not limited to access (International Fire Code (IFC), 2003 Edition, Section 503), approved ?re sprinkler and ?re alarm systems (IFC, as amended, Section 903 and 907). Section 11: Utilities Department Reguirements The Applicant shall comply with the City of Aspen Water System Standards, with Title 25, and with the applicable standards of Title 8 (Water Conservation and Plumbing Advisory Code) of the Aspen Municipal Code, as required by the City of Aspen Water Department. Section 12: Sanitation District Reguirements Service is contingent upon compliance with the District?s rules, regulations, and speci?cations, which are on ?le at the District of?ce at the time of construction. The appliCant shall provide the district with proper representation that will show all means and methods to preclude any and all pathological, radioactive, heavy metals, and any other hazardous material on the list of EPA prohibited toxic discharges. Section 13: Parks A. An approved tree permit will be required before any demolition or access infrastructure work takes place. Please contact the City Forester at 920-5120. Mitigation for removals will be City Council Ordinance No. 6, Series 2013 Page 6 of 11 302 600720, 06/28/2013 at 09:54:29 AM, 7 OF 64, Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO paid cash in lieu or on site. The overall mitigation for removals during this phase of improvements already has a carry-over from the construction of the Obstetrics Unit. B. A vegetation protection fence shall be erected at the drip line of each individual tree or groupings of trees on site. The vegetation fence shall be installed at the edge of the construction impact as depicted on page P101, Master Site Phasing Diagram. This fence must be inspected by the city forester or his/her designee (920-5120) before any construction activities are to commence. No excavation, storage of materials, storage of construction back?ll, storage of equipment, foot or vehicle traf?c allowed within the drip line of any tree on site. There should be a location and standard for this fencing denoted on the plan. C. General Landscaping notes: Parks requests the opportunity to ?eld locate all of the plantings proposed for Phases and IV. The areas proposed for new plantings are heavily planted with existing trees and other landscaping. All new plantings must be planted appropriately in a manner that doesn?t jeopardize the health of existing trees and provides appropriate space for projected mature growth. D. Landscape Guarantee. The hospital shall be required to provide a landscape guarantee adequate to assure completion of the enhanced landscape plan set forth in Exhibit 5 or otherwise represented by applicant and for any incremental increase in landscaping approved which is beyond the scope of the recorded Phase II landscape plan. The Parks department may agree to a reduction in the standard amount of the landscape guarantee which shall be memorialized in the required improvements agreement. No building permit for Phase or IV will be issued until the guarantee is accepted by the Parks Department. Section 14: Transportation As noted in Ordinance No. 12 (Series of 2010), a Transportation Demand Management (TDM) plan requires a traf?c analysis to be completed every two years. For clari?cation purposes the ?rst traf?c analysis shall be completed within 6 months of the Certi?cate of Occupancy being issued for Phase II. As part of the Conceptual PUD approval, AVH agreed to ?nancially contribute to improvements to the roundabout and Cemetery Lane intersections to improve capacity. The proportionate ?nancial contribution for capacity improvements to either of these two intersections is 3% (.003) of funds the City of Aspen spends on the project(s.) As no projects have been identi?ed, the Applicant will be required to outline in the subdivision improvements agreement its ability to contribute to any projects that occur to the two intersections within seven years of approval of this ordinance. Section 15: Impact Fees The Parks Development impact fee shall not be assessed on the hospital facilities for Phases and IV. Pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.610, Impact Fees, the Applicant shall pay a Parks Development impact fee solely for the medical of?ce space. The Transportation Demand Management Quality impact fee for Phases and IV has been waived. Any applicable impact fees shall be assessed at the time of building permit application submittal and paid at building permit issuance. The amount shall be calculated using the methodology and fee schedule in effect at the time of building permit submittal. City Council Ordinance No. 6, Series 2013 Page 7 of 11 303 600720, 06/28/2013 at 09:54:29 AM, 8 OF 64, Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO Section 16: School Lands Dedication Fee As no residential development is proposed during Phases and IV, a school lands dedication fee shall not be assessed. Section 17: Vested Rights . The development approvals granted pursuant to Flaming and Zoning Commission Resolution Number 2, Series of 201 3 and herein shall be vested for a period of seven (7) years from the date of issuance of the development order. No later than fourteen (14) days following the ?nal approval of all requisite reviews necessary to obtain a development order as set forth in this ordinance, the City Clerk shall cause to be published in a newspaper of general circulation within the jurisdictional boundaries of the City of Aspen, a notice advising the general public of the approval of a site speci?c development plan and creation of a vested property right pursuant to this Title. Such notice shall be substantially in the following form: Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of a vested property right, pursuant to the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertaining to the following described property: Parcel of the Aspen Valley Hospital District Subdivision and commonly known as 401 Castle Creek Road, City of Aspen, CO, by Ordinance No. 6, Series of 2013, of the Aspen City Council. Section 18: Cost and Financial Assurances A. Proof of Financing. Before the issuance of a building permit for the development of either Phase or IV, and as a condition of such approval, Aspen Valley Hospital shall provide to the City Building Department, Finance Director, and, City Attorney for review and approval, satisfactory evidence that Aspen Valley Hospital has in place suf?cient ?nancing to accomplish and complete the construction of the development of the Aspen Valley Hospital Master Facilities Plan, Phases or IV covered by the building permit and any public improvements identi?ed within this SIA and required under this ordinance; provided, if there is no loan with respect to development of Phases or IV, then Aspen Valley Hospital shall provide a letter from a ?nancial institution stating that Aspen Valley Hospital has funds available in an amount that covers the estimated cost of construction for the development of phases or IV. Such ?nancing may include without limitation, a construction loan from an institutional lender or lenders and equity capital investments and/or donations from Aspen Valley Hospital or third party investors or contributors. In lieu of evidence of such requirements, the Aspen Valley Hospital may provide a completion bond suf?cient to complete the project. Such bond shall be subject to the review and approval of City Building Department, Finance Director, and City Attorney. In addition, before issuance of a building permit for Phases or IV, Aspen Valley Hospital shall provide supporting cost estimates for all improvements covered by the requested building permit prepared by Aspen Valley Hospital?s general contractor for review and approval by the City of Aspen Building Department. B. Cash Escrow for Site Enhancement Fund. Before the issuance of a building permit for Aspen Valley Hospital Master Facilities Plan Phases or IV, and as a condition of such issuance, the Aspen Valley Hospital will deposit with a title company the sum of ONE HUNDREDTHOUSAND DOLLARS AND (the City Council Ordinance No. 6, Series 2013 Page 8 of 11 304 RECE PT 600720, 06/28/2013 at 09:54:29 AM, 9 OF 64, Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO Enhancement Escrow Funds?) in the form of cash or wired funds pursuant to an Escrow Agreement made and entered into between Aspen Valley Hospital and the City which shall provide as follows: i. ii. C. Cash Escrow for Site Protection. Before the issuance of a building permit for Aspen Valley- In the event construction work on the development of Aspen Valley Hospital Master Facilities Plan, Phases or IV shall cease for ninety (90) days or longer, prior to a ?nal inspection by the City of the work authorized by a foundation/structural frame permit on said Parcel C, Aspen Valley Hospital District Subdivision, and cessation of such construction work continues for a period of one hundred twenty (120) days after notice from the City to Aspen Valley Hospital specifying the subject work in reasonable detail, or if such breach cannot be cured reasonably within such one hundred twenty (120) day period and Aspen Valley Hospital fails to commence and proceed diligently to cure such breach within a reasonable time period, then the City, in its reasonable discretion, may draw upon the Site Enhancement Escrow Funds from time to time as needed for the purposes of improving the appearance of any construction work not already completed on the exterior of the Hospital Building only. This work may not in any way impact the operation or access to the Hospital. The Site Enhancement Escrow Funds or any remaining balance thereof shall be_returned to Aspen Valley Hospital, upon completion by the City of a ?nal inspection and issuance of a Certi?cate of Occupancy for Aspen Valley Hospital Master Facilities Plan, Phases or IV or when otherwise agreed to by Owner of Aspen Valley Hospital and the City. HOSpital Master Facilities Plan, Phases or IV, and as a condition of such issuance, the owner of Aspen Valley Hospital will deposit with a title company the sum of ONE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS AND Funds?) in the form of cash or wired funds pursuant to an Escrow Agreement made and entered into between Aspen Valley Hospital and the City which shall provide as follows: i. In the event construction work on the development of Aspen Valley Hospital Master Facilities Plan, Phases or IV shall cease for sixty (60) days or longer (?Work .Stoppage?), prior to a ?nal inspection by the City of the work authorized by a foundation/structural frame permit on such lot, and cessation of such construction work continues for a period of thirty (30) days after notice from the City to Aspen Valley Hospital specifying the subject work in reasonable detail, or if such breach cannot be cured reasonably within such thirty(30) day period and Aspen Valley Hospital fails to commence and proceed diligently to cure such breach within a reasonable time period, then the City in its reasonable discretion may draw upon the Escrow Funds from time to time as needed for the purposes of protecting and securing the construction site and improvements thereon from damage by the elements and/or from trespass by unauthorized persons, and for purposes of improving the site to a safe condition such that it does not become an attractive nuisance or otherwise pose a threat to neighbors or other persons. The work provided for in this paragraph shall only be permitted on the exterior of the Hospital Building and this work may not in any way impact the operation or access to the Hospital. City Council Ordinance No. 6, Series 2013 Page 9 of 11 305 600720, 06/28/2013 at 09:54:29 AM, 10 OF 64, Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO ii. Half of the Escrow Funds shall be returned to Aspen Valley Hospital upon completion by the City of a ?nal inspection of the work authorized by the Foundation/Structural Frame Permit on the project. The balance of funds shall be returned to Aspen Valley Hospital once exterior ?nishes to the building have been installed. Section 19: All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council, are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity. Section 20: This ordinance shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 21: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. The City Clerk is directed, upon the adoption of this ordinance, to record a copy of this ordinance in the of?ce of the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder. Section 22: A public hearing on this ordinance shall be held on the 11th day of March, 2013, at a meeting of the Aspen City Council commencing at 5:00 pm. in the City Council Chambers, Aspen City Hall, Aspen, Colorado, a minimum of ?fteen days prior to which hearing a public notice of the same shall be published in a newspaper of general circulation within the City of Aspen. INTRODUCED, READ AND ORDERED PUBLISHED as provided by law, by the City Council of the City of Aspen on the 25th day of February, 2013. Michael C. Ireland, Mayor Mic ael C. Ire and, Mayor City Council Ordinance No. 6, Series 2013 Page 10 of 11 306 600720, 06/28/2013 at 09:54:29 AM, 11 OF 64, Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO Approved as to form: Mk ?mes R. True, City Attorney List of Exhibits Exhibit 1 Site plan, ?oor plans, elevations, amended lobby entry Exhibit 2 Roof plan, height detail Exhibit 3- Mechanical plan, height detail, retro?tted screening for certain mechanical Exhibit 4 - Amended pedestrian access Exhibit 5 Clanton and Associates, lighting plan Exhibit 6 - Enhanced landscape plan City Council Ordinance No. 6, Series 2013 Pagell ofll 307 600720, 06/28/2013 at 09:54:29 AM, 12 OF 64, Pitkin County, CO Janice K. Vos Caudill, .?A8801 GEONQNV .LIBIHXB 308 600720, 06/28/2013 at 09:54:29 AM, 13 OF 64, Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO 309 14 OF 64, :29 AM, 54 600720, 06/28/2013 at 09: Vos Caudill, Janice K. CO Pitkin County, CAST LE CREEK ROAD a ti? l'I II - SIDRMWATER i 1 MANAGEMENT . BASIN . . I 8 1* (smwn FULL admoun CEO RESIDENCE . - came CREEK . i .5 Dooum-aiRwE- EHPARKING ?ml i 5 0% LEGEND g, 3 2.4} - \m?PHASE 1 i Enigma CEO 0 NOTE: THIS SHEET IS PROVIDED TO L, RESIDENCE HASE ILLUSTRATE THE VARIOUS PHASES OF PHASE 2 THE EXPANSION AND RENOVATION OF \qu Egg? ASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL AND :5 Max? mews my? BMW AS A DIAGRAMATSC SHE TERRACE (5mm AT FULIL PHASE 3 S??f?Nac-?I REFERENCE ONLY. sulmou?t - .. 1 PHASE 4 5 PHASE 4 EUILDING u. ., 33:395. .. PHASE \?Kk Bumme- LIMITS OF (PRE -PUD DISTURBANCE NJEULQNAEE. 310 i . Hcery lnluna?onal Inc. 820 16th Shel I la?. Sun: 200 CO 80202-3219 7213.96 0276 waged number 1121900 fF?Asvuu VALLEY LIOS PITAL PHASE 3 AND 4 MOI Caste Cle?k Road Aspen. Co 6161 I :onw tantsiconslruclm managers th? I 02:31 basin-11 Esq-2.44.5951} ?522 D. ale Issued fo( PHASE 3M FINAL PUD hem data senate)": sheat?le MASTER SITE PHASING DIAGRAM P-1 015M51numbzr o; .112: raw. H1. -r.uI.1 Pitkin County, 06/28/2013 at 09 600720, Vos Caudill, Janice K. LEGEND pum IG cmcumnou. aumm room CURRENT sumac Punuc I - man or PHASE I LE AFPROVEDNID COMPLETED 5mm of use 2 APPROVED AND cuaREImv UNDER cmsmucrm Ex (Em 0F PHASE 3 AFFROVED AND UNDER GORSTRUGTION - APPROVEDAND cum UNDER comment)? PARKING GARAGE gfr?nmiar HEERY design Hwy MbmaI'nnal Inc. 520 ram Shed Suite 200. Denver, on 30202-3219 720. 9-1 ?0276 pm; ed number 1121900 ASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL PHASE 3 AND 4 CasL's Cleek fined Aspen. Ga 816? on managen: k: 0:51-1ch my 1535395591111: mum seat?sEQnalum 155mm to: dale PHASE 3121 FINAL PUD AUGUST to. 2m: daIe PLAN NORTH m?J I I: h? SCALE: 1?43 ka ?an sheellil'e BASEMENT LEVEL sheet numbm' AF-100 311 16 OF 64, :29 AM, 54 600720, 06/28/2013 at 09: Vos Caudill, Janice K. CO Pitkin County, LEGEND CIRCULATION Puauc NEW nu CURRENT BUILDING FOOTPRINTIRENOVATIUN nmmowmg1 maven mo comma EXTENIOFPHASEZ Emsurorrmea APPROVEDAHD cumamv wanes: mnsmucnon EXTENTOFPHASE 4 APPROVED AND cunnamv UNDER cousmcnou HEALING GARDEN ENTRANC ENTRANCE 4? 1 '7 HEERY design Heery Inlemal'ma) Inc. 320 mm Street Mall. 5 200, Dem-er, C0 8020 2-3219 720.9} 6.0276 1121900 yuxsrlau VALLEY PHASE 3 AND 4 0401 Caslfz creek Road Aspen, Co 816? In anagels 11m: teak-1w; :52) new: M, um '31.ij 3:13?) am II 3mm yaw-n! 22-! km; a: mat-2 "1?11 154?} Eqr'sE-g'rehu El 5. SJ.- 05mm ca I am Ill?: seaL?slgnalma Issued [or dale PHASE 3M FINAL PUD AUGUST 10,2012 her? data A PLAN NORTH a, a a SCALE: 1530' LEVEL ONE sheet number AF-101 dram tr: checked rw? Eu l? "Nah-Ln ran 4pm . Wu.? r; 312 17 OF 64, :29 AM, 54 600720, 06/28/2013 at 09: Vos Caudill, Janice K. CO Pitkin County, LEGEND cmmnou PUBLIC swmm?m new BUILDING roowmrmEXPANsmu CURRENT Hummus EL PUBUC I ELEVATOR: STAFFIFATIEHT - mm OF PHASE I APPROVEDNIJ COMPLETED EXIENIOF PHASE 2 APPROVEDAHD CURRENILY ccusmum IOH OF PHASE 3 APPROVED AND cumamv umm cousmucnon EXTENT OF PHASE 4 APPROVEDNID cumnmv was: cormaucnou DUB j?r?v? Erin-5111b HEERY design Heefy Inlemal?onal In: 6213 1591 Sun! Ma?l. slim zoo. Dem-2t. CO 80202-3219 72079450276 pmgecl number 1121900 f7 ASPEN VALLEY PHASE 3 AND 4 D401 Caste Creek Rnad Aspen, Co 81611 manages 01-? De?; uw?'me? issued (at dam PHASE 13/4 FINAL PUD AUGUST 10, 20:: Item data PLAN NORTH . .. a; .. SCALE: r=srr ks sheemua LEVEL TWO sheet number . . 1 . a . Eis-s- r-rln?m . war-.1 r? r. . .1 - checked b: 947.11." ?a . 'Lsna-u) ru?u?r 313 18 OF 64, :29 AM, 54 600720, 06/28/2013 at 09: Vos Caudill, Janice K. CO Pitkin County, NORTH ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION NOTE OXYGEN PAD FRUCIURE HOTSHOWN OR CMRITY HEERY design Heery lnIa-nalional Inn 820 16m Shed Man. Shim 200. Denver. CO 60202-3219 720.946.0216 projed number 1121900 JASPEN VALLEY PHASE 3 AND 4 D401 Castre Creek Road Aspen. Co 31611 scalls'gnaluue Issued for date PHASE 13/4 FINAL PUD AUGUST 10,2012 ?em ale I 1 a 17:2? k! she-:5: me I NORTH ANDEAST ELEVAHONS sheel number (hedned Ex gran-a: Evin-rm! \?n?n?mu .1: 314 CO 600720, 06/28/2013 at 09:54:29 AM, 19 OF 64, Pitkin County, Janice K. Vos Caudill, RECE PT 5%ng HEERY design Heery .?nlema?onal Inc. 820 1501 S?Ieel MalL Suite 200. Dem-er. CO 50202-3215 7209463276 9:05:51 number 1121900 .7 11! 133?: a- - [hum l? MM xi", I 51?" '4 .: ?7 PHASEBAND4 asADDITIONIEXPANSION - . (HM meek Road . SOUTH ELEVATION mdm??) Wig: I Fax/I?aam sea'Jsignalura Issuedlw date PHASE 3/4 FINAL PUD item dam Inn.? l?l?l?lilli?' '2 i 77 7' .7173 43% wlmuL l' WEST ELEVATION ken!? Ghee! Ere SOUTH AN WEST ELEVKHONS A202 5 . 9%gw? 315 600720, 06/28/2013 at 09:54:29 AM, 20 OF 64, Janice K. Vos Caudill, CO Pitkin County, Phase 4 Lobby Redesign Proposed Redesign-Approved by Hospital Board Dewar 16? 316 600720, 06/28/2013 at 09:54:29 AM, 21 OF 64, Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO ism?? 317 600720, 06/28/2013 at 09:54:29 AM, 22 OF 64, Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO Ifqux? 318 600720, 06/28/2013 at 09:54:29 AM, 23 OF 64, Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO 5% that 3b LEFT ELEVATION: CLADDING DETAIL I mf'f .JOB The Children ospi 0 1 Oct. 11, 2006 7 2 NAME Behavioral Health Building ?mm mm", Pre mmuo. Po BOX 409 OKARCHE. OK 73762 cm Companl Pre 319 RECE PT 600720, 06/28/2013 at 09:54:29 AM, 24 OF 64, Janice K. Vos Caudill, CO Pitkin County, CAFETERI A PATIO OUTDOOR CHAPEL (CHAPEL GARDEN) EASTERN i- ENTRY SURFACE PARKING I (PHASE 2 I IMPROVEMENT) I PU BU MERGEN CY OM ENTRY ENTRY DIRECTIONAL SIGNAGE (T. B. PAINTED CROSSWALK 15 SURFACE PARKING SPACES .01: ?f7? .42- 5' WIDE CONCRETE SIDEWALK WITH ADA CURB RAMPS PAINTED CROSSWALK 4 LOOP ROAD u? .0 AVH SERVICE LOOP .. in?: L. r; I II H.H.S.PARKING A I I ?g 1*:40- I 20 40 - . pedestrian access revision exhibit - phases 3/4 ASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL M.F.P. (PERVIOUS PAVING) I r. t: SPECIALTY PAVING (INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE) COMM CRUSHER mes PATH LANDSCAPE AREA PHASE 3-4 APPROXIMATE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE A. SEE GRADING PLAN (EXCLUDES LIMITS OF INTERIOR RENOVATION) NOTE: THIS DIAGRAM IS EXCERPTED FROM SHEET OF THE PHASE 3/4 FINAL PUD APPUCATION SUBMITTAL AND ILLUSTRATES PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIVITY AT FULL 1: 'n . ,1 v. Mean: 12 . 2012 20f2 320 Pitkin County, CO 600720, 06/28/2013 at 09:54:29 AM, 25 OF 64, Janice K. Vos Caudill, RECE PT GUARD RAIL OUTDOOR DINING TERRACE 1 ALONG FW- 5 SEE PGU ENTRY I I LENGTH OF ENLARGEMENT PLAN. I 3 UPPER WALL SHEET 34-3 I . RETAINING WALLS SEE I CIVIL SHEET I AND I STRUCTURAL LLI I 3 DRAWINGS. ExIanG - SURFACE PARKING IMPROVEMENTS - (PHASEZ i T0 REMAIN PARKING IMPROVEMENT) - 3 SPACES NOTE: . 1) THIS DIAGRAM Is A 1 3; EXGERPTED FROM SHEET I 3 OF THE PHASE 2 j: I CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENT A SET. 24 EXISTING :2 PARKING ~r .- 2) THIS DIAGRAM OEPICTS SPACES To PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIVITY REMAIN CURB RAMPS SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS As PROPOSED A 55? FOR COMPLETION WITH PHASE 2 CONSTRUCTION. EXISTING HEUPAD TO REMAIN I 6' WIDE CONCRETE SIDEWALK 3 ADA CURB RAMPS RAW WATER CONNECTION I AND PUMP PAD: SEE IRRIGATION fg:. PAINTED - :3 SHEET I12 3 GROSS- .. f? 5' WALK TRAIL STOP SIGN. SEE REALIGNED PEDESTRIAN ENTRY ROAD. SEE CIVIL . TRAIL SHEET 1 IMPROVED PEDESTRAIN PI 3 I 'q-sz-m?E-m-m-maa??-m-mam TRAIL STOP SIGN, SEE NOTES i 52;: IMPROVEMEN SE KEY PLAN I GUARD RAIL AT DRIVE I I REQUIRED AT CONCRETE RETAINING WALLS GREATER :3 I 2?98 THAN 30" IN HEIGHT AT HHS PARKING LOT AND NEW 1; ?g 7 STOP. SEE CIVIL GRADING PLAN FOR 3 DETERMINE EXTENTS 0F GUARD RAIL COORDINATE A 9 2? 4? STEEL GUARD RAIL INSTALLATION WITH PREFABRICATED A CASTLE CR5 3 5.3 SHELTERS TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH FALL . PROTECTION CODES. pedestrian access revision exhibit - phase 2 ASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL M.F.P. 12 . 2012 1 of2 321 600720, 06/28/2013 at 09:54:29 AM, 26 OF 64, Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO LIGHTING DESIGN AND ENGINEERING Aspen Valley Hospital Light Trespass Mitigation Options The purpose of the Light Trespass Mitigation is to reduce the brightness of the lights for neighbors. There are five different areas of concern: Whitcomb Terrace traffic circle area and parking, hospital parking lot, hospital parking garage, wall mounted sconces and loop road. Options to mitigate undesirable brightness and light trespass and AVH's intended resolution for each area include: 1. Replacing the LED light bars with built-in shielding bars to reduce brightness of the luminaire when viewed from off the site; RESOLUTION: AVH will replace light bars at exterior pole and wall lights as recommended. 2. Reduce LED light bar quantities in order to lower average lighting levels; RESOLUTION: AVH will reduce the light bars from 3 to 2 at all remaining pole and wall lights, pending new and final photometrics using the recommended light bars. 3. Change color temperature of the LED light bar to a warmer 2700K color; RESOLUTION: AVH will change all light bars in pole-mounted lights to the recommended 2700K color. 4. Install LED light bars in the wall sconces with backlight shielding to reduce the amount of brightness on the wall; RESOLUTION: AVH will replace the light bars as recommended. 5. Selectively identify and remove some poles and replace with lower height bollards; RESOLTUION: AVH will selectively remove poles and replace with bollards, pending new and final photometrics using recommended light bars. 6. Turn off lights that are not needed after a designated curfew RESOLUTION: AVH has already implemented lighting controls including motion sensors, dimmers, and timers for the parking garage, the top level parking deck, and the entry lobby. Figure 1 Black cover plate Figure 2 Spill light shielding on reduces apparent bottom LEDs 322 600720, 06/28/2013 at 09:54:29 AM, 27 OF 64, Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO Aspen Valley Hospital Lighting Design Ideas Heery International December 28, 2012 Page 2 mok? 30m 4500K . . I . High Pressure Socium Metal Halide [Quartz? Ceramic] Cooper LED LighiBAR' 3a; 3a My,? 3" e?y? 9? Figure 3 ?The color appearance of various light sources can be defined in terms of color temperature, measured in ?degrees? Kelvin (K). The Cooper Light Bar is the current specification. Recommend 2700K. Acc'uLEDQp?m 5 Asymmetric Distributions ?Tm? lined-quip: In? Anew: Wit C3 53? ESpiIILiaht Figure 4 -The picture above compares the various light distributions and spill light control options. 323 600720, 06/28/2013 at 09:54:29 AM, 28 OF 64, CO Pitkin County, Janice K. Vos Caudill, E?har c1 ELEVATION 1m Are ELEVATION 1w AFG SCREEN WALL T5 AFG 550' AFG (abo- AEG) ELEVATION suo- AFG w-o- AEG) SLOPED OVERFRAMNG WI SINGEFLY MEMBRANE ROOF WI BURIED RIBS ELEVATION (am-has] . open! MW i EXIST INGSL NG WI OVERFRAMNG w: SINGLE-FLY mm ROOF wr SINGLE-FLY MEMBRANE ROOF EXTRUDED mas . WIEXTRUDED RIBS .4 ON AFG BUST. COURTYARD WI SINQE-PLY MEWRME ROOF WI EXISTING RUDED RIBS OVERFRAMING WI SINGLEPLY MEMBRANE ROOF WI EXTRUDED RIBS (Eg?f?gg? {smut-:6) SLOPED WISINGIE-PLY x, AD TF0 MEMBRANE j! WITAPERED SKYLIGHT insumon QUEERTU ELEVATION ELEVATION I 4110' REG) (1 4'4? AEG) (223? AEG) TFO WWNE I WITAPEED ELEVATION ur-u- are ummec) EEVAT ION 2356' AFG (199' EEG) . "rm" A HEUPADSAFETYNEI j?A?Cx I ADHEREDTPO MEMJRALJE 1W ?59 (152313;) ELEVATION ROOFING w; TAPERED 152mm mswmou 553122? ?.0193, (33-0' AEG) ELEVATION :5qu 24-41- m; (info-A230) ?fa-?Em ELEVATION VEUPAD SAFEI I PET 79. 1656' AFG (520' AEG) 324 600720, 06/28/2013 at 09:54:29 AM, 29 OF 64, Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO END VIEW: OUTSIDE AIR CLADDING LEFT SIDE RIGHT SIDE JOB The Hosphol 1 0t 11 2005 2 trO/ NAME Behavioral Hecfth Buifdin mm?, NLEMW Pre p0 Box 409 OKARCHE. ox 73762 ch Pre 325 600720, 06/28/2013 at 09:54:29 AM, 30 OF 64, CO Pitkin County, Janice K. Vos Caudill, 3A Izimalz I 337'] 199:.- In? 555504.Lh? 3.. 1.55WIJ [Ill 2.5mm vI>mm umbmm nu Pardon Iii; ?a?ksnruni Baa-ans A Hm??m 091.2. 3; SNES >mnmz <>Elm< VI>mm 22 use? oi; .65 Sig-55.0: In: .I a tieaza?ug 5? L.. y. Dill (cilil i 3 z. nut. 3. 25,355., ll. .rr is; ?3.45: 51: .r u? It. I will 89.5 1.1 1'51 .-.I. E93525. 75:65. 3 H: magi?29m . . [lull-II Fl: 3.623.232- 1 . .- 1.3. rl\\ 51.31 La 3558? 326 31 OF 64, :29 AM, 54 600720, 06/28/2013 at 09: Vos Caudill, Janice K. CO Pitkin County, SCREEN WALL ELEVATION 1616' AFC (1620- AEG) SLOPED OVERFRAMING w: SINGLE-FLY MEMBRANE ROOF EXTRUDED RIBS SLOPED OVERFRAMING WI SINGLE-PLY MEMBRANE ROOF WI EXTRUDED RIBS -. EXISTING SLOPED OVERFRAMING WI . i i SINGLE-FLY MEMBRANE ROOF WI - - EXTRUDED RIBS HT ABOVE ROOF 73/ ADHERED TPO MEMBRANE ROOFING WI TAPERED EXIST. EXISTING SLOPED OVERFRAMING w; MEMBRANE ROOF wr EXTRUDED mas 1, 34-0" l, 344)? SLOPED OVERFRAMING WI SINGLE-FLY MEMBRANE ROOF WI EXTRUDED RIBS SLOPED OVERFRAMING WI SINGLE-FLY MEMBRANE ROOF WI EXTRUDED RIBS SKYLIGHT ELEVATION AEG) j: 2-0? HT ABOVE ROOF 10-6? HT ABOVE ROOF 10'-6" EGETATI I I I HELIPAD 327 EXHIBIT 3 THREE ROOF TOP UNITS TO BE SCREENED EXWBW 3c CO 600720, 06/28/2013 at 09:54:29 AM, 32 OF 64, Pitkin County, . ?2 HEERY deSIg mu gnu?. ?In. - ram-m I: :1 m. L. $121PHASE 3 AND 4 a ADDITIONIEXPANSION alums a: uncut-mm mum? $mm - Ida ?a Minimal-nun ?ght-mu men - mun; h?Jo- Han-n Ill-m..- Minus nu In: - $3 an?? Mm? {m 1 {In?nu nun-mu..- summoniunsung: . - Luv-,um magnum-val wu- mu (Hm 33733:? nub .- w" PHASE 11M 33%? FM PUD must in a um- nun 'Wll" ?ns-w, mum?! mun; Imam awn-urn x. unu? Ww @610 unmannwov ?wan-nu 393"" nmmr-ntuamm "Int-0m!? l?mll?. .wa ?gm ROOF MW AF-103 Janice K. Vos Caudill, 328 600720, 06/28/2013 at 09:54:29 AM, 34 OF 64, Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO Aspen Valley Hospital Lighting Design Ideas December 28, 2012 Heery International Page 3 Specific Mitigation Ideas and Intended Resolution 1. Whitcomb Terrace The pole mounted luminaires on this property have the greatest visibility to properties and street below. lowering the height of the luminaires will make the greatest impact by reducing visual line of site from the property to the offending luminaire. Mitigation options and intended resolution, pending new and final photometrics include: 0 Remove some or all luminaires, poles and bases at the traffic circle; 0 Replace some or all light poles with round bollards with fully shielded bollard without Iouvers; 0 Review additional landscape and exterior architectural lighting; Fully shielded bollard alternate Current exterior lighting 2. Hospital Parking Lot The hospital parking lot has 12-foot high poles with LED luminaires. Mitigation options and intended resolution include: 0 Replace LED light bars in parking lot Iuminaire with 2700K LED bars with Type distribution and spill light control; 0 Use black finish light bar cover; 0 Reduce the number of light bars from 3 to 2, pending new and final photometrics. 330 600720, 06/28/2013 at 09:54:29 AM, 35 OF 64, Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO Aspen Valley Hospital - Lighting Design Ideas December 28, 2012 Heery international Page i 4 2700K LED color temperature with spill light shielding on right pole 3. Hospital Parking Garage The parking garage LED lighting is currently controlled with motion sensors that switch from a low light level to high as people walk or drive near. Since some of the lighting is visible off site, below are mitigation ideas and intended resolution: 0 Turn off upper deck pole mounted luminaires at a designated curfew as an additional control step beyond the motion sensors already installed;. Use black finish light bar cover to control luminaire brightness where light bars are being replaced as recommended on the top deck only; 0 Shield perimeter mounted interior garage lighting with permanent shields at fixture locations which are fully visible to the exterior; Shielding demo for garage light 0 Install a permanent mesh fabric at openings at the perimeter to reduce garage luminaire brightness. 331 600720, 06/28/2013 at 09:54:29 AM, 36 OF 64, Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO Aspen Valley Hospital Lighting Design ideas December 28, 2012 Heery international Page I 5 4. Rear Loop Drive Navigation on the service loop road can easily be accomplished with lower height bollards. Mitigation options and AVH's intended resolution include: 0 Install non-lowered bollards at each location previously planned to receive vertical light poles. 5. Hospital Wall Sconces The wall sconces have similar issues as the parking lot lighting, such as color and brightness and should be included in the overall mitigation effort. Options for mitigation and intended resolution include: 0 Replace light bars with 2700K LED and spill light control bars; 0 Use black finish light bar cover; 0 Sconces on the east wall have been disconnected. Sconces at the stair wells will be retrofitted. 332 600720, 06/28/2013 at 09:54:29 AM, 37 OF 64, Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO Aspen Valley Hospital Lighting Design Ideas December 28, 2012 Heery international Page I 6 Future Lighting Design Strategies for Phases and IV There are many human factors related to lighting in the built environment. These factors will be the primary drivers of the lighting design for the Hospital in order to deliver a high quality visual environment, increased occupant comfort, and foster wellness and productivity. A successful electric lighting design will provide a system of lighting layers (ambient, task, and accent) which respond to the needs of the occupants. This strategy is particularly effective in energy-aggressive, high performance buildings. Separating lighting into layers will increase visual comfort, provide additional flexibility, and create visual interest. Additionally, exterior and lobby interior lighting design will be designed consistent with the principles of minimizing light trespass and brightness to the neighborhood. Exterior - Specify 2700K light sources; 0 Specify Type distribution with spill light control for pole-mounted luminaires; 0 Use retaining walls and other hardscape features as lighted elements (face towards building); 0 Use fully shielded bollards without louvers; Minimize use of poles in general. When used, specify 2700K LED light bars with built-in shielding as recommended above; 0 Specify wall sconces with deeply regressed light sources; and 0 Provide dimming for all lighting and establish a nighttime schedule with automated controls. 0 Use low lumen (light) output luminaires for reduced brightness and minimum acceptable safe light levels (footcandles). The success of most lighting designs lies in the selection of the correct equipment. Luminaires are built differently in order to optimize specific performance characteristics for which they are applied. Selecting luminaires cannot be done on aesthetics alone, but must also consider photometric performance, energy use, and project goals. Interior Lobby Specify 2700K light sources; 0 Specify only non-luminous or non ?glowing? luminaires; 0 Use luminaires with fully shielded light sources; - Do not allow direct illumination through exterior windows; 0 Provide a low mounting height layer of light such as step lights, and wall washing (below 0 Light between windows such that lighted surfaces are not reflected out the windows; and 0 Provide dimming for all lighting and establish a nighttime schedule with automated controls. Tune (set) minimum acceptable lighting (footcandle) levels. 0 If ceiling is lighted, aim lights towards interior and either turn off or dim the lights to a low level at night. 333 334 ASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL - PHASE 3 4 LUMINAIRE SCHEDULE TYPE DESCRIPTION SOURCE MAN UFACTU RER CATALOG NUMBER EBN1 GRADE MOUNTED SOLID STATE CUTTOFF BOLLARD WITH CANTILEVERED LUMINAIRE, TYPE IV DISTRIBUTION, DIMMABLE WITH ELV TYPE LINE VOLT DIMMER. MATTE BLACK BAKED ENAMEL FINISH, 36" HEIGHT, UNIVERSAL VOLTAGE, MODIFIED WITH SINGLE LED LIGHTBAR OUTBOARD POSITION. LED 50.000 HR per LM79 70 CRI Driven 2 0.9 PF 5 20% THD LUMIERE MODIFIED: OUTBOARD LIGHTBAR ONLY EBN2 SAME AS TYPE EBN1, EXCEPT TYPE II DISTRIBUTION SAME AS TYPE EBN2 LUMIERE MODIFIED: OUTBOARD LIGHTBAR ONLY EPN4 POLE MOUNTED SOLID STATE AREA LUMINIRE, TWO TYPE IV SPILL LIGHT CONTROL DISTRIBUTION BARS WITH LIGHTBAR COVERPLATE FINISHED BLACK, NOMINAL 13 23 6" CAST ALUMINUM HOUSING, BAKED BLACK ENAMEL FINISH, IP 66, 5 YEAR WARRANTY. SUPPLY WITH ROUND STRAIGHT POLE, ARM AND BOLT COVER FOR 12' MOUNTING HEIGHT. LED 50,000 HR per LM79 70 CRI Driver: 2 0.9 PF 5 20% THD INVUE VXS-BOZ-LED-E1 -S EPNL SAME AS TYPE EPN4. EXCEPT LEFT SPILL LIGHT ELLIMINATOR DISTRIBUTION SAME AS TYPE EPN4 INVUE VXS-BOZ-LED-E1-SLL-BK-2700K EPNR SAME AS TYPE EPN4, EXCEPT RIGHT SPILL LIGHT ELLIMINATOR DISTRIBUTION SAME AS TYPE EPN4 INVUE VXS-BOZ-LED-E1-SLR-BK-2700K EWN1 WALL RECESSED LED STEPLIGHT, FULL CUT-OFF LONG THROW DISTRIBUTION, ALUMINUM FACEPLATE, BAKED BLACK ENAMEL FINISH, INTEGRAL DIMMING DRIVER, MODIFIED WITH TEMPERED GLASS LENS AND TAMPER RESISTANT FASTENING HARDWARE. SUITABLE FOR WET LOCATIONS, 5 YEAR FULL WARRANTY. FOR POURED-IN-PLACE CONCRETE INSTALLATION (SEE CUT SHEET FOR J-BOX REQUIREMENTS) LED 50,000 HR per LM79 70 Driver: 2 0.9 PF 5 20% THD VVINONA MOD: FACEPLATE 216751 MOD: TAMPER RESISTANT RECESSED SOLED STATE ACCENT LIGHT, NOMINAL 6" DIAMETER SEMI-SPECULAR CLEAR SELF FLANGED CONE, INTEGRAL ELECTRONIC 0?10 VOLT DIMMING DRIVER. 5 YEAR WARRANTY. XICATO REMOTE PHOSPHOR LED 2700' K, 80 CRI 50,000 HOURS AT 70% LUMEN MAINTENANCE KURT VERSEN SURFACE MOUNTED LINEAR SOLID STATE COVE UPLIGHT WITH ASYMMETRIC DISTRIBUTION, MCP 110? FROM NORMAL, NOMINAL 6" FOR CONTINUOUS RUNS. AS SHOWN ON PLANS, INTEGRAL ELECTRONIC 0?10 VOLT DIMMING DRIVER. 5 YEAR WARRANTY. LED 50,000 HR per LM79 80 CRI Driver: 2 0.9 PF 5 20% THD WINONA RECESSED SOLID STATE DOWN LIGHT, NOMINAL 6" DIAMETER SEMI- SPECULAR CLEAR SELF FLANGED CONE, INTEGRAL ELECTRONIC 0- 10 VOLT DIMMING DRIVER. 5 YEAR WARRANTY. XICATO REMOTE PHOSPHOR LED 2700?? K, 80 CRI 50,000 HOURS AT 70% LUMEN MAINTENANCE KURT VERSEN RECESSED LINEAR SOLID STATE WALL GRAZING LUMINAIRE, NOMINAL 6" WIDE APERTURE, AS SHOWN ON PLAN, SOURCE MASKING DEVISE TO AVOID VIEW OF LEDS, INTEGRAL ELECTRONIC 0?10 VOLT DIMMING DRIVER. 5 YEAR WARRANTY. LED 50,000 HR per LM79 80 CRI Driver. 2 0.9 PF 5 20% THD LITECONTROL 1 SURFAC MOUNTED SOLID STATE UPLIGHT, TWO ASYMMETRIC FORWARD THROW LED LIGHT BARS, NOMINAL 12" DEEP 14" WIDE 4" HIGH ALUMINUM HOUSING, COLOR TO BE SELECTED. INTEGRAL DIMMING DRIVER, MODIFIED MOUNTING TO ALUMINUM WINDOW MULLION. MODIFIED WITH BACKLIGHT GLARE SHIELDS. 5 YEAR WARRANTY. LED 50,000 HR per LMTQ 80 CRI Driven 2 0.9 PF 5 20% THD AMETRIX 0 MOD: MOUNTING, 2700K, SHIELDS, 2 BARS Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO 600720, 06/28/2013 64, Janice K. Vos Caudill, DESCRIPTION are compact, low profile, dimmable, LED bollards that provide downlight only via a fixed head. 303 - Bl has a single head on one side of the luminaire and 303 - 32 has two, integrated heads coming off opposite sides of the luminairecome standard with universal input LED drivers (120 - 277V, 50/60 Hz). Dimming is achieved with a standard ELV, reverse phase dimming driver. Eon fixtures may be used indoors or outdoors and carry an IP66 rating. Our patented LumaLevelTM leveling system provides quick installation. easy adjustment, secure mounting and protection from vibration. FEATURES A Material Head is precision-machined from corrosion-resistant 6061 -T6 alumi- num. Body is extruded aluminum and mounting base is cast from corrosion resistant silicone aluminum alloy. Finish Fixture and mounting base are double protected by a compli- ant chemical film undercoating and polyester powdercoat paint finish, surpassing the rigorous demands of the outdoor environment. Mounting base is painted black. Fixture housing and head are available in a variety of standard colors. In addition to the standard five colors offered by Lumiere, the Eon bollards are aiso available in colors to match other out- door Cooper brands, such as Invue. See the Finish section in the ordering detail for more information. Lens Clear, tempered glass lens, fac- tory sealed with high temperature adhesive to prevent water intrusion and breakage due to thermal shock. EDGE LIT option: when specified with the EDGE option, the glass will be thicker, clear, tempered and sealed in the same manner referenced above. The added glass thickness will offer a brigher line of light around the edge of the glass that will accentuate the fixture's aesthetics and styling. Adjustable Mounting Base Cast aluminum mounting base is equipped with the patented Luma- LevelTM ieveling system that includes mounting chassis, 70 shore neoprene base, stainless steel hardware and 3/4" conduit entry. It provides quick instailation, easy adjustment, secure mounting and protection from vibra- tion. Hardware Stainless steel hardware is standard to provide maximum corrosion- resistance. 600720, 06/28/2013 at 09:54:29 AM, 39 OF 64, Pitkin County, lumi?re Catalog Type Project ASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL EBN Comments Date Prepared by Electrical Both models come standard with universal input LED drivers (120-277, 50/60Hz). The standard driver is ELV reverse phase dimmable. LED LEDs are included and available in three color temperatures (2700K, 3000K 4000K) and a variety of optics. Both color temperature and distribution must be specified when ordering - see reverse side for details and catalog logic. 303 - Bl comes standard with two mini lightbars and 303 - 82 comes standard with four mini lightbars. Labels &Approvals UL and listed, standard wet label. iP66 rated. I Lumiere warrants it?s fixtures against defects in materials 81 workmanship for five (5) years. Auxiliary equipment such as transformers, ballasts and LED drivers carry the original manufac- turer's warranty. 303-Bl 303-82 i [a (3 (E) E) (El 7.72? 12.70" 1 196mm i 323mm 1.40" 1.40? 35mm 35mm ijt: 24.00" 609mm 609mm 36.00" 36.00? 914mm 914mm 3,43? +7 5.47" 3.43" 5.47? 87mm 139mm 87mm 139mm Lighting Specification and Dimensions subject to change without notice. Consult your representative for additional options and ?nishes. 303-B1 303-32 15.5w LED 31 LED LED BOLLARD 335 RECE PT Janice K. Vos Caudill, LED INFORMATION 600720, 06/28/2013 at 09:54:29 AM, 40 OF 64, Pitkin County, CO Watts Distribution Total Lumens CRI Life (hrs.) Volts LEDB2 - 2700 - T2 15.5 Type II - Lateral Throw 725 95 2700 50000 Universal Input (120 277V, 50/60Hz) LEDB2 - 2700 - T4 15.5 Type iV - Forward Throw 709 85 2700 50000 Universal Input (120 - 277V, 50/60Hz) LEDBZ - 2700 - T5X 5.5 Type - Flood 626 65 2700 50000 Universal Input (1 20 - 277V, 50/60Hz) LEDB2 3000 - T2 15.5 Type II - Lateral Throw 95 3000 50000 Universal Input (120 - 277V. 50/60Hz) LEDB2 3000 - T4 15.5 Type IV - Forward Throw 85 3000 50000 Universal Input (120 - 277V. 50/60Hz) LEDB2 - 3000 T5X 15.5 Type - Flood 65 3000 50000 Universal Input (120 - 277V, 50/60Hz) LEDB2 - 4000 T2 15.5 Type 11 - Lateral Throw 1209 95 4000 50000 Universal Input (120 - 277V, 50/60Hz) LEDB2 - 4000 - T4 15.5 Type IV - Forward Throw 1181 85 4000 50000 Universal Input (120 - 277V, 50/60Hz) LEDB2 - 4000 - T5X 15.5 Type - Flood 1044 65 4000 50000 Universal Input (I20 - 277V. 50/60Hz) LEDB4 - 2700 - T2 31 Type II - Lateral Throw 1436 95 2700 50000 Universal Input (120 - 277V. 50/60Hz) LEDB4 - 2700 T4 31 Type iV - Forward Throw 1410 85 2700 50000 Universal Input (1 20 - 277V, 50/60Hz) LEDB4 - 2700 - 31 Type - Flood 1247 65 2700 50000 Universal Input (1 20 277V, 50/60Hz) LEDB4 - 3000 - T2 31 Type II - Lateral Throw 95 3000 50000 Universal Input (120 - 277V, 50/60Hz) LEDB4 - 3000 T4 31 Type lV - Forward Throw 85 3000 50000 Universal Input I i 20 - 277V, 50/ 60Hz) LEDB4 3000 - T5X 31 Type - Flood 65 3000 50000 Universal Input (120 - 277V, 50/60Hz) LEDB4 - 4000 - T2 31 Type II - Lateral Throw 2393 95 4000 50000 Universal Input (120 277V, 50/60Hz) LEDB4 - 4000 - T4 33 Type IV - Forward Throw 2350 85 4000 50000 Universal Input (120 - 277V, 50/60Hz) LEDB4 - 4000 - T5X 31 Type Flood 2078 65 4000 50000 Universal Input (120 - 277V, 50/ 60Hz) NOTES AND FDRUMULAS 0 Apply appropriate light loss factors where necessary. 0 Photometry is LM-79 compliant. ORDERING Sample Number: 303 - BT - LEDBT 3000 - UNV -T2 - BZ 1 IF _1 Series 303-81 LED single head bollard 303-32: LED dual head boliard Quantity of Mini Lightbars LEDBZ Light Emitting Diode. LED84 Light Emitting Diode. coo?n Lighting Color Temperature 2120:2120: 3000= 3000K 4000: 4000K Input Voltage Universal 120 277V, Dimming SOISOHZ Rev 3.. Two Mini Lightbar (31 only) Rev 3., Four Mini Lightbars (B2 only) Optics Wm T4 Type IV. Forward Throw T5X Type V, Extra Wide Flood Consult factory for other optics ELV=Trilin :1 Ph Dimming Driver Finish Height option: - 24:24.. Height EDGE Edgellt Clear Tempered 3??9?6=36" Her ht Glass Lens BK Black 32 Bronze cs City Silver VE Verde White Ap Grey (Invue) DP Dark Platinum (Invue) GM Graphite Metallic (Invue) MODIFIED: REMOVE INBOARD LIGHT BAR Specification and Dimensions subject to change without notice. Consult your representative for additional options and ?nishes. 336 Janice K. Vos Caudill, DESCRIPTION The classic lines and sophisticated construction of Vision Site LED makes it an ideal complement to site design. Offering LED technology across the VXS and VXM, Vision provides true family scaling in both physical form and lumen capability for architectural site lighting applications. listed for use in wet locations. SPECIFICATION FEATURES 600720, 06/28/2013 at 09:54:29 AM, 41 OF 64, Pitkin County, CO INVU ?9 Catalog Project ASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL Com ments Prepared by Construction HOUSING: Heavy wall one-piece, die-cast aluminum housing has precise tolerance control and repeatability in manufacturing. Housing features a partition wall that isolates driver components for cooler operation. Integral aluminum heat sink provides superior thermal heat transfer in ambient environments. DOOR: One-piece, die-cast aluminum construction with tool- less release latch. Door swings down and is retained on two (2) catch hinges. GASKET: Continuous gasket provided to seal housing to optic tray. LENS: Downlight lens is LED board integrated acrylic over- optics, each individually sealed for lP66 rating. HARDWARE: Tool-less release door latch is stainless steel/ aluminum construction, painted to match housing and allows access to internal housing and electrical components. Optics DISTRIBUTION: Choice of thirteen (13) patented, high efficiency Opticsm. featuring designs that maximize light collection and directional distribution onto the application region. Each optical lens is precision manufactured via injection-molding then precisely arranged and sealed on the board media. LEDs: High output LEDs, 50,000+ hours life at >70% lumen DIMENSIONS maintenance, offered standard in 275K) CCT and nominal 70 CHI. Optional factory- set optic rotation or allows uniform product orientation on site, independent of optical orientation. Electrical DRIVER: LED drivers are potted and heat sunk for optimal performance and prolonged life. Standard drivers feature electronic universal voltage greater than 0.9 power factor, less than 20% harmonic distortion and feature ambient temperature range of down to minimum starting temperature of Shipped standard with Cooper Lighting proprietary circuit module designed to withstand 10kV of transient line surge. All LED and drivers are mounted to dedicated mounting trays and are easily replaced by use of quick disconnects for ease of wiring. Driver tray is hinged and removable without the use of tools. Options to control light levels, energy savings and egress capabilities (battery pack and separate circuit) are available. Mounting ARM: One-piece extruded aluminum arm available in standard 5" Internal bolts guides allow easy positioning of fixture during installation to pole or wall surface. STRUCTURAL MOUNT: Die-cast aluminum cleat factory mounted to Iuminaire and finished in luminaire color. Stainless steel structural rod measures 1/2" in diameter and is provided in Iuminaire finish color or optional natural finish. Product works in conjunction with dedicated accessory arms (order separately). Invue poles are provided pre-drilled when structural mount option drill pattern is specified. See Invue poles section for complete selection. Additional mounting accessories available. Finish Housing is finished in 5 stage super premium TGIC polyester powder coat paint, 2.5 mil nominal thickness for superior protection against fade and wear. cover plates are standard white and may be specified to match finish of Iuminaire housing. Standard colors include black, bronze, grey, white, dark platinum and graphite metallic. RAL and custom color matches available. Consult Outdoor Architectural Colors brochure for a complete selection. Warranty VXS LED features a 5 year limited warranty. [152mm] l. 13 1/2" I343mm] conga Lighting 23" l584mm} 5" [127mm] VXS VISION SITE SMALL LED 1 - 4 Solid State LED ARCHITECTURAL SITE LUMINAIRE ?El 5 CERTIFICATION DATA Listed ISO 9001 IP66 ARRA Compliant LM79 I LMBO Compliant 1.5G Vibration Tested A TA Electronic LED Driver >03 Power Factor <20% Total Harmonic Distortion 81 60hz. 347Vl60hz. 480V/60hz Minimum Temperature Ambient Temperature Rating PA Effective Prolectod Area: (Sq. Ft.) Single: 1.18 w/arm included Single Structural: 1.27 w/arm included SHIPPING DATA (Approximate) Net Weight: 35 lbs. Volume (cu. ftl: 3.00 AVUOSZI 01 2013-02?26 12:57:30 337 600720, 06/28/2013 at 09:54:29 AM, 42 OF 64, Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO VXS VISION SITE SMALL LED POWER AND LUMENS BY BAR COUNT .. 1 Dlsmaeunou (?gure: 12 ?ra 1'4 512 SL3 5L4 5M0 5wo 5710 kW SLRISU. 7 LED LIGHTBAR 1:01 27 0.23 0.13 1,319 1,753 1.311 1,305 1,746 1,734 1,923 1,930 1,868 1,334 1,650 (1 5:4 0.4?6 0.21 3,509 3,495 3,434 3,366 331$ 3,724 3,605 3,540 3,203 003 77 0.65 0.29 5,291 5,230 5,259 5,252 5,073 5,046 5,594 5,614 5,436 5,337 43:29 LU MU anL I 004 101 0.66 0.37 6.983 6.902 6,954 5,932 6.703 6,660 7,333 7,410 7,174 7,043 6,373 21 LED UGHTBAH Ambient Lumen 301 27 0.23 0.13 2,237 2,211 2,223 2,220 2,147 2.133 2,365 2,374 2,293 2,256 2,041 302 51 0.43 0.20 4,317 4,257 4,233 4,235 4,143 4,117 4,564 4,530 4,435 4,354 3,940 12:: 1:3: 503 73 0.62 0.23 6,508 6.433 6,481 6,450 6,246 6,207 6,331 3,906 6,686 6,564 5,939 25=c 1,00 304 35 0.61 0.35 3.559 3,490 3,554 3,526 6,244 3.192 9,081 3,114 3,324 3,663 7.339 0-95 MOUNTING VARIATIONS Wall Mount Arm Mount Single Arm Mountz @150? Am Mount 2 90" Arm Mount: @120? Arm Mount 3 90? Arm Mount ll 90" 5.173 5.17.4 1015 1.13 2.25 POLE DRILLING PATTERNS OPTIC ORIENTATION VXS VXS Structural Mount Street Side Street Sid (TYPE 213/16" 5/16" [8111111] dia. hole [72mm] [20mm] 2g] .. dra. hole {70mml 7/8" [23mml [39718"] 111! mm [280mm] 37'8" [10mm] 3,14? [20mm] House Side House Sid die. holes die. holes Standard Optics Rotated left 90' 3 7/ [ggmn? Street Side . 3? [77mm] xv (2) 3.18" [10mm] die. holes House Side Optics Rotated High! 90? MOUNTING OPTIONS AND ACCESSORIES Structural Pole Mount Extruded Arm (Round or Square Pole) StructurelWaIl Mount Top Cap 9 0 0 12" [305 mm] 0 Set Screws (Round or Square Pole) Direct Wall Mount Wall Bracket with Arm Tenon Adapter mg Li htin NOTE: Specifications and dImenSIons subiect to change Without notice. AVU092101 9 Visit our web site at 20130243125130 Customer First Center 1121 Highway 74 South Peachtree City, GA 30269 770.486.4800 FAX 770.486.4801 2013?02-26 16:02:45 0 Direct Mount 338 600720, 06/28/2013 at 09:54:29 AM, 43 OF 64, Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO VXS VISION SITE SMALL LED ORDERING INFORMATION Product Family Lamp Type Structural Options 2" Accessories ?5 vxs=Vision Site Small State Light Tz=Type l Menage; Arm for Square P016 Emitting DIOCIGS 1'3=Type Rod and Clevis Set for 7 Arm for Round Pole .. of 3. 4=Type IV Square Pole (Painted to match A1013-WH=Direct Momt foquuare PM ?xture, does net arm) MA1o7e.WH=Direct Mount for Round Pole so1=i1121 LED LightBAR soz=i2121 LED LighteARs see: [3121 LED LightBARs 30444121 LED LightBARs our [117 LED LightBARs coz= [217 LED LightBARs c03= [317 LED LightBARs c04=i417 LED LightBARs Notes: 1 ?h?hl GONG MA107I arm only. 430: 480V 5M0=Type Square Medium 5WQ=Type Square Wide 5X0=Type Square Extra Wide aw: Rectangular Wide Type II wlSpill Control Type wISpill Control 5 Type IV w/Sgill Control I 90 Degree Sgill Light Imlnator 5L3: 90 Degree Spill Light imtnator lg Finish 5 BK: Black Grey az= Bronze White Dark Platinum GM=GraPhite Metallic DesignLights??Consorlium Qualified. Refer to Products List under Family Models for details. Arm not included. Order separately. See accessories. Standard 4000 CCT and greater than 70 CHI. 21 LED LightBAR powered at 350mA. 7 LED LightBAFi powered at 1A. Custom and HAL color matching available upon request. Consult your customer service representative for further information. Add as suffix in the order shown. Compatible with 5" MA1071 arm only. Compatible with 5" MA1074 arm only. Wall mount structual options do not include arm assembly (See Accessories). Compatible with 5" 1a Low-level output varies by her count. Consult factory. Requires quantity two or more 11 Consult customer service for lead times and lumen multiplier. 12 Available with 301, 302, (201 or C02 con?gurations only, Specify 120 or 277V. LED cold weather integral battery pack is rated for minimum operating temperature Operates (1) lightbar for 90 minutes. Not available in all configurations, consult factory. Rated for use in ambient. 13 Sensor mounted to the lumineire. Available C06 con?gurations. Replace XX with mounting height in feet for proper lens selection, li.e., MS-LZE). Consult factory for additional information. 14 Sensor mounted to Iuminaire. Available in 802 - BOB and C02 COS con?gurations. Replace with number of bars operating in low output mode and replace XX with mounting height in feet for proper lens selection, Maximum 4 bars in low output mode. Consult factory for additional information. 15 Order separately, replace XX with color suffix. 000%! Lighting Strut Rod and Clevis Set? for Square Pole (Clovis painted to match ?xture. does not include arm) Strut Rod and Clevis Set for 0 Round Pole (Painted to match ?xture, does not include arm) Stainless Strut Rod and Cievis Set8 for Round Pole (Clevis painted to match ?xture. does not included arm) I an Strut Rod and Clevis Set (PaintedI to match ?xture. does not include arm) Stainless Steel Strut Rod and 0 Clevis Set (Clevis' painted to match ?xture. does not include arm) Options pc=Button Type Photocell (specify voltage) 2L=Two Circuits? ch=LightBAR Cover Plate Matches Housing Finish 1060=70 8030=80 Lso=0ptics Rotated Left 90 Degrees nso=0ptics Rotated Right 90 Degrees lCB=lntegral Cold Weather Battery Pack ?2 (Specify 120 or 277) Ms-LXX=Motion Sensor for onloff13 operation MSIX-Lxx=Motion Sensor for bi-level" switching NOTE: Specifications and dimensions subject to change without notice. Visit our web site at Customer First Center 1121 Highway 74 South Peachtree City, GA 30269 770.488.4800 FAX 770.486.4801 =Wel Bracket with 5" Arm MA1200-WH=Direct Wall Mount Kit MA1 Single?arm Tenon Adapter for 2 all" OD. Tenon MA 1 2@150 DegreeTenon Adapter for 2 0.0. Tenon @120 Degree Tenon Adapter for 2 0.D. Tenon MA1 104-WH: 4@90 Degree Tenon Adapter for 2 (1D. Tenon MA1 2@90 Degree Tenon Adapter for2 3/8" OD. Tenon MAttoo-WH= 3@90 Degree Tenon Adapter for 2 OD. Tenon 101-WH: 2@120 Degree Tenon Adapter for 2 318" 0.0. Tenon MA1 Single-arm Tenon Adapter for MA1 105w": 2@180 Degree Tenon Adapter for 3 172" 0.0. Tenon MA1 1 10-WH: 3@120 Degree Tenon Adapterfor 3 1i 0D. Tenon MA11 1 Degree Tenon Adapter for3112'O.D.Tenon MA 1 Degree Tenon Adapter for 3 1/2" OD. Tenon MA1 1 Degree Tenon Adapter MA1 1 Degree Tenon Adapter for 3 112" OD. Tenon MA 1 253:1Dkv Circuit Module Replacement AVU092101 201 2013-02-26 16:02:45 339 600720, 06/28/2013 at 09:54:29 AM, 44 OF Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO i II II LED?Project: MOUNTING DETAIL 64, Type: 11?50" WW1 11 50" WW1 No Option 9 Inch QUICK FIND (JP-2057 STEP13 9 Inch is a surface mount step light with a concealed optic. Five LED white temperatures and six LED colors are available. Distribution: One light distribution pattern available. Ribbed design with matte black ?nish reduces glare (dry location hidden fasteners) Steel City H4BD WL Wet Location Option Integral dnver Long: For large area illumination. 0, equivalent Construction: Die-cast LED module with solid aluminum, brass, or stainless recommended steel faceplates. (by others) (wet location exposed fasteners) weer??TV 2.125" box min. LED module with concealed optic CROSS SECTION Mounting: Luminaire is mounted to a standard multi-gang switch box (supplied by others) with four fasteners. Steel City H4BD or equivalent (by others) recommended. Integral Driver: integral drivers available for 120V-277V AC in both dimming and non-dimming versions. Finish: Recessed surfaces have a ribbed design with a matte black ?nish to i . . :1 - reduce glare. Faceplates in natural metal ?nishes have protective clear top coat. i Faceplates in painted are ?nished with a two-part wet paint system. Primer only I option allows for ?eld painting. i 5 i Dimming: True 0?100% dimming is compatible with (IV-10V ?uorescent-type i dimmer. i Power Consumption: Non-dimming unit consumes 8.04W. Dimming unit consumes 18W. ETL Listed: Dry Location, Wet Location optional Note: Winona Lighting reserves the right to make design changes without Typicat Distribution Based on 30K Grid in 1' increments 9 inch Long Distribution Lumen Output at 30K prior notice. 9 Inch Long 310 6.04 36.6 PRODUCT SPECIFICATION SOURCE MOUNT FACEPLATE DISTRIBUTION LED CODE VOLTAGE opnons SPECIAL LED STEP13 9 . 9 inch - long 27K -ANSt-oinned 2700K Non?Dimming Natural Metal Finishes - STD . no 0 tons standard 30K -ANSI~binned 3000K WSW aluminum pl 35K ANSI o? 350% BB ??5th brass vvyeLt iocation ?sided - inne Dimming - brushed stainless steel 40K -ANSi-binned 4000k DM120V - 277W PB . polished brass 50K -ANSi-binned 5000 . o1 0v dimer pollshed stainless steel . required (by others) - CUS om metal finish 003 amber (consultfactory) 004 - blue . Painted Finishes Modi?cation: 005 I cyan A35 - antique brass paint 005 green BBP - brushed brass paint 007 - red-orange LBPS - tight bronze paint smooth 008 . red LSP - light srlver parnt PGP - pale gold paint SGB - semi-gloss black paint . . SGW - semi-gloss white paint IES report available on the websrte. . PRM - primer only CPF - custom paint finish (consutt factory) Ni ?xtures ETLIlsted. Visrl for the most complete and current information. (en, USA and Canada ?In I 3760 wesltourth street - winona, mlnnesota 55987 - 507 - 454- 5113 - tax: 507 - 452 - 8528 Revised: 09-11-12 Page 1 of 2 340 600720, 06/28/2013 at 09:54:29 AM, 45 OF 64, Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO Type: Win?naLEDProlect POWER SUPPLY I DIMMING All STEPS models are available with Dimming and Non-Dimming internal drivers in both 120V and 277V input versions. Dimming drivers require a dimming control. Read all instructions before installation. 00 not make live connections! NON-DIMMING INSTALLATIONS Connect STEP WHITE wire to power NEUTRAL. Connect STEP BLACK wire to power HOT. Connect STEP GREEN wire to power GROUND. 120V WHITE To other or BLACK STEP 277V GREEN I I I - I ?xtures BLACK WHITE BLACK WHITE BLACK WHITE BLACK err a DIMMING ENSTALLATIONS The integral dimming driver is designed to the IEC dimming speci?cation 60929 and is compatible with common 0-10V dimmers and dimming systems. Do NOT connect line voltage to dimming input wires, Connect STEP WHITE wire to power NEUTRAL. Connect STEP BLACK wire to power HOT. Connect STEP VIOLET wire to POSITIVE INPUT of Dimming Control. Connect STEP GREY wire to NEGATIVE INPUT of Dimming Control. 120V WHITE Tg other or BLACK TEP 277V GREEN I I I I I ?xtures tux; mxi tux?" Lux? EEL egh gen salts. as?? am?: as? gal-:5 To other 0-10V VIOLET STEP Dimmer (-) Grew I I I I ?xtures 3760 west fourth street . winona, minnesota 55987 - 507454? 5113 . lax: 507-452- 8528 I I I I PageZon 341 RECE PT Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO MultiSourceTM Cover Plug-in Housing Vent Junction Box Connectors Top Slot Electronic LED Driver Module Alzak Heat Cone Sink Thermal Protector Primary Reflector Branch Circuit Dimensions and Sources it A LED Number Depth Aperture Width' Length Module 2:12; 11" 157/8" 16%" 2000 lm 279mm 111mm 403mm 416mm Xicato A5143 2 'For Lutron dimming use 167/3". Energy and Ordering Information Module System System Order Code Fixture Lumens Amps Lumens Watts Model A A5147 2000 1A 1051A 47 39.6 A51472030271A A5145 2000 1A 1515t 46 32.5 A5145 20 30 271A A5143 2000 1A 1743A 47 37.1 A5143 20 30 27 1A - Fixture provided standard as 3000K operating on 2771!, specular cone. Module lumens: 20 for 2000 im. For other Kelvin color temperatures: change 30 to 27 for 2700K, 35 for 3500K, 40 for 4000K. For 120 volt change 27 to 12. Add 01 for Lutron to add DE for Lutron Eco to Finish: add SS for SoftSheen??, add for Sohglotr?. See accessories for colors. A5147-2030271 AD1 SS for A5147 2000 lm 3000K 277V 1A with SoftSheenT? cone, Lutron dimming to *lndicates LM-79 Test Data. AIndicates Preliminary KV Test Data. kur-I- Kurt Versen Company Paint Source Lighting New Jersey 07875 1012 600720, 06/28/2013 at 09:54:29 AM, 46 OF 64, ASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL - TYPE IA A51 47 Narrow Beam, 2000 Im A22 A51 45 Medium Beam, 2000 Im A51 43 Wide Beam 2000 lm Conoid Directional Downlight Xicato Remote Phosphor Flex Function, illiultiSourceTM Technology Optics and Applications Directional systems are designed with locking capability to rotate 360? and angulate 25? providing true architectural aiming and control capability. Optics designed to control the rigors of sloped ceiling installations while maintaining a glare free environment. Design Features - MultiSourceTM Capable Flex Function design allows future functions to be changed in the field from below. Downlights/Directionals can become wall washers and vice versa. Fixture housings are designed with MultiSourceTM plug and play connectors allowing field conversion to PAR LED and MH MR-fs GX10 bases. Proprietary passive heat sinks ensure proper temperatures are maintained. Service from below only. Maximum ceiling thickness is Modules Xicato remote phosphor packages are standard with 2000 lm module operating on 1A driver. 3000K, 80 CHI is standard. 2700K, 3500K, 4000K available. Ftated Life is 50,000 hours at 70% lumen output. Dimming Driver Dimming is standard See accessories for additional dimming options. Specify voltage. Finish Specular Alzak cones are standard. SoftSheenTM is a new finish designed to mitigate the color over angle ?yellow streak? associated with remote phosphor sources. Softglow? and colors available, see accessories. Steel parts are phosphate conditioned then painted matte black. Warranty 5 year limited. See KV website for manufacturers detaiis. General Fixture is pre-wired and thermally protected, UL and C-UL listed, for damp location and eight wire, branch circuit wiring. All products are union made IBEW. Designed and manufactured in the USA. Marked spacing requires fixture centers to be 24" from adjacent luminaire and 12" from nearest wall. Allow 3" clearance above unit in the plenum. Accessories Black cone. Titanium cone. Gold cone. Wheat cone. Mocha cone. Pewter cone. Graphite cone. Bronze cone. WT White trim flange. WHT White complete cone. 80 Fine microprism. Flush mount, contact factory. LL Linear lens. DP Fixed downlight position. FR Frosted Lens. FLC4 Full lens cone, specify lens. STC Straight top cone. 27 2700 Kelvin temp. R2 26" support rails. 35 3500 Kelvin temp. R5 52? support rails. 40 4000 Kelvin temp. Fuse. D1 Lutron to 3 wire control.? DE Lutron EcoSystem to digital 4 wire? *Specify voltage. Ftemote Bodine EM. Includes battery pack, charger light, test switch and single lamp operation for 90 minutes. Ceiling access required. SS SoftSheertT'VI add SS, e.g. SSW, SoftSheenTM Wheat. Softglow? add to color, e.g. SC Softglow"t clear. 342 600720, 06/28/2013 at 09:54:29 AM, 47 OF 64, Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO A22 A5147 A5145 A5143 Performance Datachart Single Unit initial Footcandies. 30" Work Plane Ceiling to Floor Multiple Units Initial Footcandles. 30" Work Plane A5145 Xicato 2000 lm 3000K 1Amp Ceiling 80% Walls 50% Floor 20% Nadir 10? 20? 30? Spacing is Maximum Over Work Plane F0 F0 Diam FC Diam FC Diam Spacing RCR See note 2. Candlepower Distribution Candelas ?f T?fjj' -- .. 85.. 46W 400' 75,; 1515* 800 0 3971 659. 5 3696 ?200 12 2331 555 20 1915 as 81% 1 2000 35 54 40 26 2400 45 50 0 2800 5? 55 0 60 0 3200 65 0 7g 3 7 3600 3g 8 4000 5?l 15 ?25" 90 0 A5145 Xicato 2000 lm 3000K 1 Amp Driver Vertical Angles Eli. 32.5 SM .64 Luminaire Lumens Notes 1 Photometric Report: A5145 LTL Report No. 29190. 2 Datachart degree headings show one side 01 nadir. Diameter data includes both sides. Therefore the 10? column shows a 20? pattern diameter at the work plane. Footcandle values are at the diameter edge. 3 Specular colored cone multipliers, contact factory. 4 SoftSheenT? cone multiplier: Clear .93. SoltglowQ cone multiplier: Clear .87. For colored cone multipliers. contact factory. 5 The luminous e?icacy (lm/W) refers to the total measured luminous flux (lumens) of the fixture divided by the total measured electrical input power (watts) of the complete fixture. a Kurt Versen Company, Westwood, New Jersey 1012 343 600720, 06/28/2013 at 09:54:29 AM, 48 OF 64, Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO m. . e: wondlrect Protect: Qty: t? I 64/ SCV1 Asymmetric. LED Cove Weight: QUICK FIND err?1130 MOUNTING- Integral Ifront wireway runs the length of PERFORMANCE High performance small pro?le linear PROFILE- P1 (basic): Anodized. extruded high-purity the iuminaire allowing for a continuous row mount luminaire incorporating an extruded re?ector speci?cally aluminum specular re?ector with solid aluminum end without spaces betweens sections. Knock outs are designed for high output LED sources. The optical caps and wireway. Stainless steel hardware. located at each end of the housing to allow for through design allows for maximum beam projection across the . wiring. individual aiming is achieved with the target plane and even cove or slot illumination in tight OP ERA TIN TURE and adjustable locking mechanism. See Mounting Detail setback applications. Has aimable and lockable optics, ?3?9um ambient arr around ?"50 above. is ruggedly constructed and utilizes an extruded luminaire She? not exceed '0 "3 ('30 to Any application of this product should also take into consideration air ?ow and ventilation to ensure performance and reliability aluminum front wireway that allows low pro?le TYPE- Small profile linear luminaire. For indoor use luminaires to be installed continuously, etminaiing only. socket shadows. CQLOR AND LIGHT IOUTPUT: SCV1 Cove Series EL ECTRIC A L- Power consumption is 15W/ft. Bright anodized specularre?ector with mill utilizes Nichia 183 white LEDs In ?ve standard color - finish aluminum components and stainless steel ratures Mod SC V1 feat (12) t. 0 Sift (maxrmum run length 28 feet). Operates on 24VAC and empe a ?re can be dimmed with commonly available low voltage hardware. Estimated LED lamp life is an industry standard 50, 000 hours to 70% depreciation. A modular design has been incorporated that allows ?eld replacement of the LED board/heat sink assembly for this product. Color Model SC V1 ANSI-2700K White 341lm/tt ANSI-3000K White 350 lm/ft White 371 lm/tt ANSI-4000K White 427 lm/fl non-ANSl-5000K White 485 iant magnetic dimming equipment. A wide range of remote transformers are available in 120V and 2771/ primary (see technical section), - IMnona Lighting reserves the right to make design revisions without prior notice. thdirect Is ETL listed . cm? for dry location. This complies DH 5 a with UL Standard 2108. PRODUCT SPECIFICATION 3190865 i SCV1 I. I.ED1 ix 27K DM24V P1 RA .510 . . . - - . ?v i .. I MOUNTING I RUN LENGTH CODE LED CODE VOLTAGE PROFILE FINISH OPTIONS CLASS scv1- ?t Total Run 27K - nozrv- RA- X- STD - tronlwireway I re! Length in Feel - 2700KANSI?binned non-dimming raw anodized no options standard I dry label LED1 (12) Nicola 183 SCV1 otlrisredt i312" 124 30K 24 VORAC P1 (basic) anodized re?ector MOD . - . Incremen sa mga - . with mill ?nish cove h'gh ou put it ex. SOFT 60 toot run 3000K ANSI b'nmd gg?xg components modi?ed I or 35K - 24 volt AC Nicola-183 LED I Precon?gured 3500K ANSI-binned 36" Luminaire ?7th Run Length Code - 40K 300eporl .. see submltialat 4000K ANSI-binned is it, (additional information 50K . see technical section) 5000K non-ANS!- or binned . To Be Determined - . 5n Ihe web?fo, TBD when run length I detailed photometry unknown I reports Visit for the most complete and current information3760 westtourth street - wlnona,minnesota 55987 - 507-454~5113 - tax: 507494- 0320 . Revised: 11-1741 Page 1 of6 344 600720, 06/28/2013 at 09:54:29 AM, 49 OF 64, Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO Type: The Windirect Asymmetric Cove SCV1 Series is available in up to 96" in 12? increments starting at 24". Mounting An integral wireway runs the length of the luminaire allowing for a continuous row mount without spaces between sections. Knock cuts are located at each end of the housing to allow for through wiring. Individual aiming is achieved using adjustable locking mechanisms. Nominal installed Length Length 24" 24 3/8" 619.25mm 36? 36 3/16" 919.23mm Ad' 20 .4 48" 48" 1219.20mm ment a ?t 60" 59 7/8" 1520.95mm . 72" 7111/16" 1820.93mm #:Time?i?onufe r? 84" 831/2" 2120.90mm 5 ace between 21/3" 96" 95 5/16? 2420.87mm 54.10mm it it i i ii 61/2" 165.10mm length (watts) 24"- (30W) 36"- (44W) (9 a 48"- (59W) 60"? (74W) 72?- (88W) 84"- (103W) 96"- (118W) it It Adjustment Range 20? SIGHT DIM DIM LINE Recommended Cove Opening 12" minimum 0? 2-1/8" 9" II 4. on 5 19/16 71/2 ?3439/, dust cover lens 777777777777 3760 westtourth street winona. minnesota 55987 - 507-454 - 5113 - fax: 507~494-0320 - Revised210-27-11 Page 2 of6 AhmarandsCompany 345 600720, 06/28/2013 at 09:54:29 AM, 50 OF 64, Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin CountyWindlrect Protect: Qty: yp The SCV1 Series is to be powered by 24VAC only. Do not connect directly to line voltage under any circumstance. Connection toline voltage will permanently damage internal components and void manufacturer's warranty. POWER REQUIREMENTS SCV1 consumes 15W/ft. Maximum single run length (from a single 24VAC tap) of SCV1 is 28' (420W). The SCV1 series must be powered by a magnetic transformer. Do not use electronic transformers. Choose a transformer with adequate capacity. Total load should not exceed 80% of the rated output of the transformer at 24VAC. 24VAC Transformer Luminaires can be mounted without space between - i Dimrgg? (if required) The SCV1 Series is easily dimmed with Magnetic Low Voltage (MLV) Dimmers. Not all MLV by Others dimmers are alike, even among the same manufacturer. Confirm with dimming equipment manufacturer WT that dimmer selected is designed to work with the transformer selected. 120v or 277v MOUNTING AND WIRING Loosen Phillips head screws and Lay in power feed wires and make electrical Luminaire is wired and ready for remove wireway cover. Mount in connections with supplied connectors. ?nal aiming (if necessary). desired location. Screw wireway cover back in place. REMOTE MOUNTING CONSIDERATIONS The SCV1 Series is powered from remote-mounted transformers. The maximum remote distance of the transformer is dependent on many factors including total LED load. wire size, distance from the transformer to the first fixture in each run, and starting voltage at the transformer. The installer is to ensure that 24VAC is present at the beginning of the run. By using a combination of large-gauge wire and adjusting the output voltage of the transformer, the installer can compensate for voltage drop over long remote distances. The wiring from the start of the run to the last ?xture on the run need only be 12 AWG3760 westfourth street - winona, minnesota 55987 . 507-454-5113 - fax: 507-494-0320 - Revised: 10-27-11 PageS of6 Anqw?vsrancts Company 346 600720, 06/28/2013 at 09:54:29 AM, 51 OF 64, Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO windirect Project: Clear Acrylic Lens 36" Luminaire - 3000K Peak Candela 8430d ANSI-binned 2700K ANSivbinned ANSI-binned 4000K non-ANSl-binned 5000K LMTQ Data - Windirect SCV1 36" Long Luminaire 1024 1050 111 1280 1459 BALL Test Report 15314-LM79-08 Catalog Number Description: 36 Nichia 3000K 183 LEDs /36" Windirect SCV1 Luminaire Extruded Semi-Specular Re?ector! Zonal Lumen Summary Nichia183 3000K Tote! Lumisiaire Candlepower Distribution Type: 3000K Cataiog Number: Description. 72 Nichia 3000K 183 LEDs 72" Windirect SCV1 Luminaire I Extruded Semi-Specuiar Re?ector! Clear Acrylic Lens 72" Luminalre - 3000K Note; All resutts based on BALL Test Report 15314. A 2.0 multipiierwas w? used to provide 72" data. ?Emil/y Peak Candela 16860d ANSI-binned 2700K non-ANSl-binned 5000K Mention Numb-r: Model Manner P1 Two: Cove ?ght ligliil?'g facts? A Fromm oltha US. DOE All malls in according to IESNA Approved Mom for me Sharia! and Pam-mum's many of Solid-Sm Lighting. The US. Depa?mont 0! Energy (DOE) vari?da pm: In: am end results. Visit for the Ubol Raf-anon Guido. Wmaimct LMTQ Data - Windirect SCV1 72" Long Luminaire .975 2048 1.00 2100 1.06 2226 2550 2918 .97 .96 .96 .96 .96 Zonal Lumen Lumens %Fixture Summary Nicnia 183 3000K 1016 48.4 1370 65.2 1845 87. 9 2100 100. Lumingitfel 2.150 1003760 weslfoudh street - winona. minnesota 55987 507-454 - 5113 - fax: 507-494- 0320 - Candiepower Distribution Revised: 10~27~11 3000K Page4 ONE 347 600720, 06/28/2013 at 09:54:29 AM, 52 OF 64, Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO e: Ill/Indirect Protect: - Qty: yp DETERMINING THE BEIJRREICT PRECDNFIBURED RUN LENGTH DUDE STEP 1; Determine which model is right for your project. See column 1 of the chart below. in this example, model has been selected. Find complete information (catalog, submittals, applications guide) at winonalightingcom. STEP 2: Determine how many feet are required. The second column of the chart below provides codes for Nominal Run between 1 and 28 feet. STEP 3: if the amount of product required exceeds the length in the last row of a chart, you should break the run into several to arrive at the desired amount. For example a 48' run of SCV1 can be speci?ed as: Quantity Run Length Code Total Feet 2 L24 48 3 L16 48 Note: Run length codes are nominal The exact dimensions are displayed in column 4 (actual run length). 3 3 indicates 3 foot 2-3/8" 50 Watt indicates which chart 323/16" 75 Watt you are using (model 4?40" 75 Watt 4'-11 7/8" 100 Watt By placing L3 in the run length 5211 11m;~ 150 Watt code field of your speci?cation 5211 1/2" 150 Watt you have indicated you need 71.11 5115- 150 Watt SCV1 in a run Of 3 feet. 8'41 7,8? 300 Watt Total Run Length in Feet 1 L3 i 10:11 9116* 300 Watt SCV1 uttered in 12" increments starting 21124" 11'-11 3/8" 300 Watt at {10f ,1 60 foot iur: code 9; 12'-11 3/15" 300 Watt Preconfigured Run Length Code 13-11" 300 Watt see submittal er 14:40 13/15" 300 Watt bog: 15-10 5 1'8? 300 Watt To Be Determined 16310 1?4. 500 Watt TED when run length unknown 17?-11 1/16" 500 Watt 13l16" 500 Watt System Run Con?guration 19210 5/8" 500 Watt Describes size of Iuminaires and 20-10 1/2? 500 Watt quantities of each which will be used 21'40 5/16? 500 Watt to con?gure the run. In this example. 22210113" 500 Watt L20 is made up of (1) 48" and (2) 96" 233 15/16? 500 Watt luminaires- 24?-101l2' 500 Watt - 500 Watt Actual Run Length 401/8? The final run length dimension. 15/16" 500 Watt Maximum Single Run Length Required Transformers The last row of each chart identifies the proper size transformer to power a run indicates the maximum single and includes 20% headroom. run length from a single 24VAC tap for if the information above is not available and the specification process needs to get underway you can supply the total number of linear feet for the entire job. We will be able to provide an approximate budget quote at that time. however, specific Run Length Code information will have to be provided later for accurate pricing. When no ?xture run length information is known enter TBD (to be determined) to begin the specification process. No pricing will be determined at this time. 3750 westiourth street - Winona, - 507 .454 5113 tax: 507 494 - 0320 . Revised: 1027?11 Page 5 ate Anqncu?vBrm Company (}48 Janice K. Vos Caudill, 600720, 06/28/2013 at 09:54:29 AM, Pitkin County, CO Windirect ProjectAnW?dSCanmty 2-3/8" 4'41 7/8" 5'-11 11/16" 6'-11 1/2" 7'41 5/16" 8'41 7/8" 9'41 3/4" 10-11 9/16" 11?-11 3/8" 12'-11 3/16" 13?-11" 14'-10 13/16" 15-10 5/8" 16'-10 1/4" 17'-11 1/16" 19-10 5/ 20'-10 1/2" 21'-10 5/16" 22'o101/8? 23-9 15/ 16" 1/ 25'-10 5116" 26'-101/ 3760 west fourth street - wtnona, mtnnesota 5598? - 507 - 454-5113 . tax: 507-494 -0320 - 50 Watt 75 Watt 75 Watt 100 Watt 150 Watt 150 Watt 150 Watt 300 Watt 300 Watt 300 Watt 300 Watt 300 Watt 300 Watt 300 Watt 300 Watt 500 Watt 500 Watt 500 Watt 500 Watt 500 Watt 500 Watt . 500 Watt 500 Watt 500 Watt 500 Watt 500 Watt 500 Watt Revised: 10-27-11 Type: Page 6 of6 349 RECE PT Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO Branch Circuit Junction Box MultiSourceTM Vent Housing Cover Slot Top Plug-in Connectors Alzak Heat Cone Sink Thermal Protector Xicato Module Electronic Driver A LED Number Depth ??Aperture Width" Length Module 21132 9" 157/5" 16%" 2000 lm 229mm 111mm 403mm 416mm Xicato A4132 *For Lutron dimming use 167/3". Energy and Ordering Information Module System System Order Code Fixture Lumens Amps Lumens Watts Int/W Model A A4136 2000 1A 1859A 47 39.8 A4134 2000 1A 1811* 49 37 A4134 20 30 27 1A A4132 2000 1A 1878? 47 40.8 A4132 20 30 27 1A Fixture provided standard as 3000K operating on 277V, specular cone. Module Iumens: 20 for 20001m. For other Kelvin color temperatures: change 30 to 27 lor 2700K, 35 for 3500K, 40 lor 4000K. For 120 volt change 271012. Add 01 for Lutron to add DE tor Lutron Eco lo Finish: add SS for SottSheenW, add for Softglow??. See accessories lor colors. for A4134 2000 lm 3000K 277V 1A with SoftSheenW' cone. Lutron dimming to AIndicates Preliminary KV Test Data. A4136 20 30 271A 600720, 06/28/2013 at 09:54:29 AM, 54 OF 64, ASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL - TYPE ID A41 36 Narrow Beam, 2000 lm A2 A41 34 Medium Beam, 2000 lm A41 32 Wide Beam, 2000 lm 43/5" Conoid Downlight Xicato Remote Phosphor Fixed Function, MultiSourceTM Technology Optics and Applications Downlight optical systems have been engineered to produce high efficiencies and soft patterns while maintaining excellent brightness control. Beam patterns range from 25? to 75?. Design Features - MultiSourceT'?I Capable Fixture housings are designed with MultiSourceTM plug and play connectors allowing field conversion to PAR LED and MH GX10 bases. New lighting technologies will be incorporated as they become available assuring continuity. Proprietary passive heat sinks ensure proper temperatures are maintained. Service from below only. Maximum ceiling thickness is Modules Xicato remote phosphor modules use high efficiency blue LEDs that are converted to white light when directed through a phosphor lens. 2000 lm module operating on 1A driver standard. 3000K, 80 CHI is standard. 2700K, 3500K, 4000K available. Rated Life is 50,000 hours at 70% lumen output. Dimming Driver Dimming is standard See accessories for additional dimming options. Specify voltage. Finish Specular Alzak cones are standard. SoftSheenTM is a new finish designed to mitigate the color over angle ?yellow streak" associated with remote phosphor sources. Softglow? and colors available, see accessories. Steel parts are phosphate conditioned then painted matte black. Warranty 5 year limited. See KV website for manufacturers details. General Fixture is pre-wired and thermally protected, UL and C-UL listed, for damp location and eight wire, branch circuit wiring. All products are union made Designed and manufactured in the USA. Accessories Black cone. Titanium cone. Gold cone. Wheat cone. Mocha cone. Pewter cone. Graphite cone. 2 Bronze cone. WT White trim flange. WHT White complete cone. R2 26" support rails. FMR4 Flush mount, contact factory. R5 52" support rails. 27 2700 Kelvin temp. Fuse. 35 3500 Kelvin temp. 40 4000 Kelvin temp. D1 Lutron to 1 3 wire control." DE Lutron EcoSystem to digital 4 wire? *Specify voltage. REM Remote Bodine EM. includes battery pack, charger light, test switch and single lamp operation for 90 minutes. Ceiling access required. SS SoftSheenWI add 88, e.g. SSW, SoftSheenTM Wheat. Softglow?i? add to color, e.g. SC Softglow? clear. kur-I- Pom: Source Lighting Wesiwood New Jersey 07875 1012 Kurt Versen Company 350 RECE PT Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, C0 A2 A4136 A4134 A4132 Performance Datachart 600720, 06/28/2013 at 09:54:29 AM, 55 OF 64, Single Unit lnitial Footcandles, 30" Work Plane Ceiling to Floor Multiple Units Initial Footcandles, 30" Work Plane A4134 Xicato 2000 lm 3000K 1Amp Ceiling 80% Walls 50% Floor 20% Nadir 10? 20? 30? Spacing is Maximum Over Work Plane PC PC Diam FC Diam FC Diam Spacing HCR See note 5. A4136 use A11371300 Im 1Amp, multiply by 1.4. A4132 use A11331300lm 1Amp, multiply by 1.4. Candtepower Distribution Candelas ?:41 - 85? 37W 290 7 4-751? 1811* 580 0 2447 .59 .2223 8 0 553 15 2469 1160 20 1914 53 219 1450 ?43 35 565 40 329 1740 45 24 50 2030 5" 55 0 60 0 2320 65 0 32 8 2610 3g 8 2900 so 90 A4134 Xicato 2000 im 3000K 1 Amp Driver Vertical Angles Eff. 78.0 SIM .56 Luminaire Lumens Notes 1 Photometric Fleport: A4134 LTL Report No. 26909. 2 Datachart degree headings show one side of nadir. Diameter data includes both sides. Therefore the 10? column shows a 20? pattern diameter at the work plane. Footcandie values are at the diameter edge. 3 Specular colored cone multiptiers, contact factory. 4 Sof'tSheenTM cone multiplier: Clear .93. Softglochone multiplier: Clear .67. For colored cane multipliers. contact tactory. 5 The luminous efficacy (lmlW) refers to the total measured luminous flux (lumens) of the fixture divided by the total measured electrical input power (watts) of the complete fixture. 3 Kurt Versen Company, Westwood, New Jersey 1012 351 600720, 06/28/2013 at 09:54:29 AM, 56 OF 64, Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO 2:32:33; Wall/Slot 6000 WS-L60 Recessed Perimeter Product Description Small-scale LED recessed perimeter lu minaire using Cree LED packages for wall grazing applications. Available in three output levels and four color tem peratures, with an optional Luminance Control De?ector. Extruded aluminum LED module snaps into steel housing for in-?eld replacement. CSA and/or UL Listed. Also adjustable to 5" (127) and 6" (152) in ?eld Mounting Series Length in Output Color Temperature Finish Ceiling Type Dimming Voltage Options feet (mm) ws L60 02 (510) 35K is CWM 910 120 LCD Wall/Slot 03 (914) MO standard (matte grid LEC 277 04 (l 219) HO 27K, 30K, white) is 06 (1829) 40K also available standard drywall/ LTW 08 (2438) Low Output plaster NDM not available see in 3' 03"" see Temperature Dimming is a typical catalog number for a 4-foot long LED wall/slot ?xture, medium output, 3500K correlated color temperature, matte white ?nish, for grid ceiling wired with a Lutron Hi?Lume dimming power supply, 120 volts. Output Dimming LO Low Output output from LED boards approximately 250 lumens/ D10 Low-voltage dimming; ?xture will be wired for 0??l 0V dimming. foot out of the ?xture at an input power ofapproximately 4 Watts/foot. LEC Lutron Ecosystem dimming; ?xture will be wired with a Lutron A-series driver These values may vary based on CCT. Consult test reports for details. for compatibility with Ecosystem controls. Driver provides constant current M0 Medium Output - output from LED boards approximately 500 lumens/ output and uses constant current reduction dimming. See lutron.com for a list foot out of the ?xture at an input power of approximately 8 Watts/foot of compatible dimming devices. These values may vary based on CCT. Consult test reports for details. Lutron Hi-Lume 3-wire dimming; fixture will be wired with a Lutron A?series HO High Output - output from LED boards approximately 775 lumens/foot driver for compatibility with Hi-Lume controls. Driver prevides constant out of the ?xture at an input power of approximately 16Watts/foot. current output and uses constant current reduction dimming. See lutroncom These values may vary based on CCT. Consult test reports for details. for a list of compatible dimming devices. LTW Lutron 2-wire forward phase dimming; ?xture will be wired with a Lutron Temperature A-series driver for compatibility with 2~wire forward phase controls. Driver . provides constant current output and uses constant current reduction 3500K is standard and available With normal lead times. Other CCTS dimming See lutronxom for a ?st of compatible dimming devices_ may require longer lead times; please contact factory for details. Within NDM Non-dimming; ?xture will be wired for ?xed light output. an individual ?xture of 3500K LEDs, color tolerance is limited to i64K (compared to ANSI allowance of i245K) and to i0.0015 Duv (compared - - . . . . to i0.006). Color variation over life is expected to be <0.001 Type Specrfy the applicable ceiling. compared to Energy Star speci?cation of 0.007. See color statement at litecontrolcom for details and for other CCT tolerances. Minimum 80. DP Drywall/ Plaster Gr'd Accommodates a range of drywall thicknesses: 5/8" aMTi (165) . Options ceilin I .L LCD Luminance Control De?ector. Shields LEDs from direct view and minimizes opening is Dr wall [Plaster Ceilin shadows on wall. Paint ?nish is Matte White (CWM) baked enamel. Shield is 4.. wigh optional Luminagce removable without tools and remains attached to the ?xture with cable tethers (102 mm) Control De?ector (LCD) See photometric reports for details. Also adiustable to 5" (127) and 6" (152) in ?eld Lumen Maintenance Lumen maintenance based on data and in-situ temperature measurement: L90 calculated at >50,00 hours; L70 calculated at >160,000 hours for Medium Output Since LM-BO testing ended at 6048 hours, the reported L90 and L70 values are 2 36,288 hours See litecontrolmm for detailed lumen maintenance statement These ?xtures have a ?ve-year warranty, with a detailed warranty statement available at litecontrolcom. Quick Find L60 Questions to Ask 1.Row information, inciuding desired ?xture 2. Output? 3. Color 1 20 2 litecontrol.com Temperature? 4. Dimming? 5.120 or277 volt? 6. Option? ??59 1 1 352 Janice K. Vos Caudill, 2 Specifications CO 600720, 06/28/2013 at 09:54:29 AM, 57 OF 64, Pitkin County, Wall/Slot 6000 WS-L6O FIXTURE SUPPORT RAIL. Extruded white aluminum, wall-mounted rail provides continuous support and true alignment of ?xtures and components. Rail is designed to provide a reveal at the wall to compensate for irregularities in wall construction. Splines are included for continu0us alignment. HOUSING. Steel housing, ?nished white. Ends provided with 7/8" diameter hole to accommodate wiring. Supplied with external brackets for ease of row mounting. LED MODULE. Extruded aluminum, ?nished matte white for high reflectance, easily removable for ?eld replacement. Module has 12 Cree LEDs per foot. LENS. The LED module includes a lens comprised of highly ef?cient diffusion ?lm optically bonded to pure acrylic sheet. SECONDARY OPTIC. Injection molded optical material that incorporates multiple total internal re?ection lenses to shape and smooth the light. CEILING TYPE. Compatible with most types of ceiling systems, including grid and plaster. Fixture system must be installed prior to installation of ceiling. Finish of wall should extend 6" above ?nished ceiling height. CERTIFICATION. Fixture and electrical components shall be CSA, UL and/or CUL Listed. WARRANTY. Fivewyear product warranty. See Iitecontrolcom for full warranty details. Note: Litecontrol reserves the right to change speci?cations without notice for product development and improvement. Planning for Installation inture Adjustable Ceiling Opening Nominal . . . . . Fixture Length 2 3 4 6 8 Actual Fixture .. .. .. .. Length 24 (609) 36 (914) 48 (1219) 72 (1829) 96 (2438) System Connectors IWS- JILGO- II IL II IICWM Mounting Series Ceiling Type Option Connector Finish Straight Extension Matte IC Inside Corner White see Connector Details OC Outside Corner 4" (102) 5" (127) 6"(152 mm) is a typical catalog number for an outside corner connector for a grid ceiling ?xture. Plan View 70? 140? See web site for installation details. LITECONTROL 781 294 0100 f: 781 293 2849 itec0ntroLcom 70" - 160? Comers, extensions, and end caps, when added to ?xtures, permit continuous wall-to~ wall installation. Ceiling trim requires ?eld cutting. Corner angles are adjustable, see plan view for angles. Connector Details Ceiling Extension or Corner Dimensions Connector Opening (Minimum?Maximum along wall in parenthesis) SE 4" SE Straight Extension IC IC Inside Corner - 90? 135? DC DC Outside Corner - 90? 135? 5" SE Straight Extension IC Inside Corner - 90? 1 35? OC Outside Corner 90? 1 35? 6" SE Straight Extension IC Inside Corner - 90? 135? OC Outside Corner - 90? 135? Find L60 I itecontrol.com (O 2012 353 600720, 06/28/2013 at 09:54:29 AM, 58 OF 64, Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO 3 Photometric Data (medium output) Wall/Slot 6000 WS-G-L60, WS-R-L6O 3500K 4" opening 3500K LCD 4" opening 3500K 6" opening 3500K LCD 6" Opening I Atrogs Acmss Across 45 45 45 . 45 "lo Along Along ml? Along Along 1500 1500 mm 150' 150? 150? 12 you 12?; ?20 120' I no ii 300 ill illWS-L6004-MO-35K-LCD WS-LGOM-MO-3SK WS-LGOM-MO-SSK-LCD with 4" Opening with 4" Opening with 6" Opening with 6" Opening 53 LPW Efficacy 40 LPW Efficacy 54 LPW Efficacy 42 LPW Efficacy Quick Find 781 294 0100f: 781 293 2849 litecontrol.com L60 litecontrol.com 354 600720, 06/28/2013 at 09:54:29 AM, 59 OF 64, Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO AM r? Type DESCRIPTION The Ametrix Asyx is an LED asymmetric luminaire designed for both general illumination and highlighting architectural features. The sleek minimal design makes it an ideal complement to any modern space. Proprietary optics offer precision optical control to maximize light Project ASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL collection and directional distribution onto the application area. The Asyx outperforms similar traditional HID fixtures with a 25% improvement in efficacy as well as a superior lifespan that will minimize maintenance costs. Catalog Comments Date Prepared by SPECIFICATION FEATURES Construction Electrical LED Optics Heavy wall, die-formed aluminum LED drivers are potted and heat Asyx luminaires feature patented, housing and heat sink has precise sunk for optimal performance and high-efficiency Optics tolerance control and repeatability prolonged life. Standard drivers that maximize light collection and in manufacturing. Housing features feature electronic universal voltage directional distribution onto the vents for air flow and thermal greater than application region. Each optical management. Fixture is rated for 0.9 power factor, less than 20% lens is precision manufactured via ambient environment. harmonic distortion and feature injection-molding then precisely ambient temperature range of arranged and sealed on the board down to minimum media. LEDs: High output LEDs, HOUSING is polyester powder coat starting temperature of 50,000+ hours life at >70% lumen paint for superior protection O-10V dimming option maintenance, offered standard in against fade and wear- LightBAH? available. and 275K) CCT. cover plates are standard white 3000K LEDs nominal 30 cm, and and may be specified to match 4000K nominal 70 CHI. finish of luminaire housing. Standard colors include black, Warranty bronze, silver, and white. RAL and Standard ?ve?year limited Wall custom color matches available. warranty. LED 12 7/3? 14 Va" j?s/s" i" 27/8? i 3 1/2? ORDERING INFORMATION LWL II WV 303 Al ll R0 Product UL Rating Lens Numberoi' LightBARs ColorTemperature Voltage Finish Options As damp Ioca- Clear acrylic 303: 21 LED Lightbars, 30= 3000K Universal 3: Bronze D10- Dimming CIassnc xWeng? shape, tion rated Lens. 70 Watts, 6000 lumens k0; 6%05' Custom Color LED Asymmetric Indirect N: None MOD 302 700K Black Light Distribution Al-lndirect Asymmetric Light Note: 1 Consul! factory for 80 cm option in 4000K attern RC=Rectangular Canopy MODIFIED WITH BACKLIGHT GLARE CONTROL LOUVERS CUSTOM coo? Lighting Specifications and Dimensions subiect to change without notice. ADY121404 Consult your representative for additional options and ?nishes. 08/171'2012 10:53:09 AM 355 600720, 06/28/2013 at 09:54:29 AM, 60 OF 64, Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO PHOTOMETRICS Amotrix Candeia Zonal Lumen Summary 5400 "?7745, Angie 0-099 45-099 90-Deg Zone Lumens Lamp Fixture . 0 0 0 0 90-110 862 N.A. 14.4 1? 90 0 0 90-120 2648 N.A. 44.1 95 145 11s 35 90-130 3616 N.A. 60.2 100 327 494 58 90-150 4948 N.A. 82.4 no- 105 827 2773 110 90-180 6003 N.A. 100 woo 110 3223 5089 497 110-180 5141 N.A. 85.6 my 115 4223 4231 1561 0?180 6003 N.A. 100 120 3644 2346 1696 x? 125 2157 1421 1380 90? 130 1789 1327 877 135 1871 1391 843 LEGEND: 140 1968 1464 920 ?333 145 2034 1522 1011 1881.9 150 2031 1563 1097 Asyx 155 1943 1586 1162 16? 1839 1507 1212 6003 lumens 165 1773 1608 1289 70Watts 170 1663 1560 1391 175 1553 1528 1468 85'8 180 1488 1488 1488 Test Report . Coef?cnents of Utilization Effective floor cavity re?ectance 20(300% Lighting Specifications and Dimensions subiact to change without notice. Ametrix 0 Customer First Center - 1121 Highway 74 South - Peachtree City. GA 30269 - TEL 170.486.4800 9 FAX 110.486.4801 ADY121404 08/17/2012 10:53:09 AM 356 357 1/ (PHASE 2) SYMBOL KEY Calculation Summary Label Avg Max Min MaxIMin BUILDING WALK 0.00 5.87 0.33 7.79 ENTRY WALK 1.64 5.17 0.03 72.33 LUMINAIRE TYPE PA RK Pla naf 0.73 .74 0.01 574.00 6.00 PA RKI NC WALK 0.00 .0 0.5 PA RKINIC 0.99 3.74 0.16 23.38 3 XWAL 2.76 2.98 2.53 1.18 ?1 XWALK 3.10 3.66 2.53 1 .45 Pwmwi (pHNsez) DISTRIBUTION PATTERN LUMINAIRE SYMBOL TYPE BOLLARD FULL CUTOFF 2700K 36" MOUNTING HEIGHT BLACK FINISH TYPE STEPLIGHT FULL CUTOFF 2700K 24" MOUNTING HEIGHT BLACK FINISH TYPE AREA LUMINAIRE FULL CUTOFF 2700K 12' MOUNTING HEIGHT BLACK FINISH NORTH 10' 40' 0' 20' 80' SCALE: 40'?0" PARKING LOOP 1 mum ASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL PARKING LOOP ?mum!" saun- us. In mum mum ?my; Date: 02-284 3 Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO 600720, 06/28/2013 64, 358 SYMBOL KEY DISTRIBUTION PATTERN LUMINAIRE SYMBOL LUMINAIRETYPE TYPE BOLLARD FULL CUTOFF 2700K 35' MOUNTING HEIGHT BLACK FINISH TYPE STEPLIGHT FULL CUTOFF 2700K 24' MOUNTING HEIGHT BLACK FINISH TYPE AREA FULL CUTOFF 2700K 12' MOUNTING HEIGHT BLACK FINISH (PHASE 2) U1 NORTH 10' 40' 0' 20? 30- SCALE: 4020" mum ASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL UGHING mm EMERING c?mummum magma LOOP ROAD Drawing No. Dale: 02-284 3 Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO 600720, 06/28/2013 64, 359 1.42 11.43 A TYPE I ?4 RECESSED ACCENT LIGHT 2700K LED ?11? GK TYPE 16' LINEAR WALL GRAZE 2700K LED TYPE COVE UPLIGHT 2700K LED TYPE RECESSED ACCENT LIGHT 2700K TYPE RECESSED DOWN LIGHT 2700K LED ATRIUM LIGHTING PLAN SCALE: n?m ASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL ATRIUM LIGHTING PLAN SK-8 Date: 02-28?1 3 Janice K. Vos Caudill, 600720, 06/28/2013 at 09:54:29 AM, Pitkin County, CO 63 OF 64, castle creek corridor planting diagram - may 2013 ASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL CASTLECREEKROAD wage/e 9 WATER MAIN .. 12? X. ?v-v'v *Vv-LOOP ROAD - - a SHRUBS . EX SHRUB: PROPOSED SHRUBSJU PROPOSED EVERGREEN PROPOSED DEGDUOUS - WHITCOMB . TERRACE ?0 A I 5 r\ l\ 360 Janice K. Vos Caudill, 600720, 06/28/2013 at 09:54:29 AM, Pitkin County, CO RECE PT 64 OF 64, 608884, 03/25/2014 at 08:59:36 AM, 1 OF 18, $96.00 Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO Exhibit 11 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR PHASE AND IV OF THE ASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL DISTRICT MASTER FACILITIES PLAN THIS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR PHASE AND IV OF THE ASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL DISTRICT MASTER FACILITIES PLAN (the "Agreement") is made and entered into this 3 day of Matt-c; 2019f, by and among THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO, a Colorado municipal corporation (the "City") and the Aspen Valley Hospital District, WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, AVH has submitted to the City for approval, execution and recording Final PUD Development Plan, including without limitation, a PUD Plat and this Agreement (collectively the ?Final PUD Agreements?), for a development proposal within Aspen, Colorado known as Phase and IV of the Aspen Valley Hospital District Facilities Master Plan (the "Project"); and, WHEREAS, The City has fully considered the Final PUD Agreements, the proposed development and improvement of the Project, and the effects of the proposed Project on adjoining or neighboring properties and property owners; and WHEREAS, The City found that the Project meets or exceeds all the applicable development standards; and, WHEREAS, The City found that the Project meets important community needs through its provision of health care to City and District residents; and WHEREAS, The City found that the Project furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safety, and welfare; and, WHEREAS, The City has imposed certain conditions and requirements in connection with its approval, execution and recordation of the Final PUD Agreements, such matters being necessary to protect, promote and enhance the public welfare; and WHEREAS, AVH is willing to meet the conditions and requirements suggested by the City in approving the Final PUD Agreements; and NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements herein contained, the approval, execution and acceptance of the Final PUD Agreements for recordation by the City, and for other good and valuable considerations, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: 1 I Aspen Valley Hospital PUD Agreement Phases 361 608884, 03/25/2014 at 08:59:36 AM, 2 OF 18, Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO 1. Approvals. Pursuant to Ordinance No. 6 (Series of 2013) adopted, passed and approved on May 13, 2013 and recorded as Reception No. 600720 in the office of the Clerk and Recorder of Pitkin County, Colorado (the "Ordinance"), the City approved the Project including without limitation all final land use approvals for Phase and IV and granted a development order for a site specific development plan for the Project. The land use approvals granted by the Ordinance includes Growth Management Review, Final Planned Unit Development, and Vested Rights for the Project. Specifically, the Ordinance permits the AVH to develop Phase and IV of a four phase master facilities plan inclusive of 10,187 sq. ft. of net leasable commercial and office space for the development of medical offices which are considered accessory to, and part of the hospital function, as well as an expansion of the Hospital Facility as shown in Exhibit 1 of the Ordinance. These new improvements represent additional square feet to be constructed on the site and are divided into two phases, with associated gross square feet outlined below: Phase Phase IV Basement 19,385 1,854 Level One 33,280 6,721 Level Two 8,152 0 Medical Of?ce Space 10,187 0 Ambulance Garage 3,436 0 TOTAL 74,440 8,575 2. Dimensional Requirements of Phase and IV. The following approved dimensions of the Project shall be reflected in the Final PUD plans for Phase and IV: Minimum Lot Size As represented on the Final PUD Plans recorded as Reception ea 3 in the office of the Minimum Lot Width Clerk and Recorder of Pitkin County, Colorado. Minimum Front Yard Minimum Side Yard Minimum Rear Yard Maximum Site Coverage Minimum Distance Between Buildings 2 I Aspen Valley Hospital PUD Agreement Phases 362 608884, 03/25/2014 at 08:59:36 AM, 3 OF 18, Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO Maximum Height a. Hospital/Medical Office a. As noted by the spot elevations Space depicted above grade on the "Roof Plan, Height Detail" as detailed in Exhibit 2 of the Ordinance . b. Mechanical equipment as detailed in Exhibit 3 of the Ordinance, dimensions are as depicted and may exceed the requirements of the land use code. All other structure shall meet the requirements of the land use code. New Gross sq.ft. (including 83,015 square feet medical office space) Maximum Net Leasable Commercial 10,187 square feet and Office Space Note: Hospital gross square footage includes the basement and shall be measured from exterior wall to exterior wall for this PUD as the method of measurement for zoning review purposes only. 3. Voluntary Deed Restriction. AVH agrees to record a deed restriction prohibiting the condominiumization of the 10,187 sq. ft. medical office space approved in Phase The deed restriction shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy of the hospital/ medical office component of the Project. 4. Desiqn elements to be incorporated into Phase and IV. Based upon recommendations of the Planning Commission, City Council requires the following be incorporated into the Final PUD Approval. A. Pedestrian Access. An additional pedestrian access way has been incorporated into the site plan as shown in Exhibit 4 to the Ordinance. B. Lighting Plan. A lighting plan, as presented in Exhibit 5 to the Ordinance and approved by Council shall be implemented to incorporate the remediation techniques for lighting that has been installed on the site as well as the design of additional outdoor lighting in Phases Ill and which Council has found will minimize undesirable brightness and light trespass. Any upper story on the hospital or medical office space shall include automated window shades to limit the impact of indoorhgh?ng. C. Enhanced Landscaping. An enhanced landscape plan is approved as shown in Exhibit 6 to the Ordinance. There are certain constraints on the landscape plan, most notably, a utility easement paralleling Castle Creek Road that is located on the hospital?s property with a water main located in it. The plan commits to avoid the 3 Aspen Valley Hospital PUD Agreement Phases 363 608884, 03/25/2014 at 08:59:36 AM, 4 OF 18, Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO planting of trees within ten feet of the water service line. All plantings will be field located with representatives from the Parks and Utilities department present to determine final locations. Within this utility easement corridor, the hospital has agreed to do a like replacement (like species of readily available nursery stock; not based upon the diameter or gallon size of the plant) of plantings in the event the Utilities department has to remove or cut down plantings for maintenance purposes. D. Amended Lobby Design. As shown in Exhibit 1 of the Ordinance, an amended lobby design is approved for Phase of the project. E. Mechanical Screening. Two mechanical units for Phase II and one mechanical unit for Phase are required to be wrapped in screening as shown in Exhibit 3 to the Ordinance. 5. Parking. The total number of parking spaces approved for the site as a whole, upon completion of Phase IV shall be as follows: Parking Structure 219* Phase II New Surface Parking 77 New West Side Employee Parking 5 New main entry Parking 16 Surface at Whitcomb 31 Surface for Affordable housing 2 Tuck under for affordable housing 6 356 Notes: 10 parking Spaces in the parking garage shall be reserved for the affordable housing units Not included in this tally is the parking for the existing ambulance barn, the proposed ambulance garage and existing CEO residence. Due to the phased construction of the project there will be more parking spaces available at the end of Phase II construction than upon completion of Phase IV. Therefore, 79 parking spaces shall be decommissioned in the parking garage until the issuance of a building permit for Phase In the event that AVH does not undertake construction of Phase within the vested rights period for Phase or extension thereof, AVH will be required to remove the 71 parking spaces located along the western side of the hospital and detailed in Exhibit of the Ordinance No 12 (Series of 2010). In addition, any existing paving in this area that is not necessary to use as a connection for the service loop road shall be removed. Once the surface parking spaces are removed, the decommissioned garage spaces may be used. 6. Affordable Housing. A. Affordable Housing Credit Balance. As required by City Council Resolution No. 3 (Series of 2009), each phase of development shall verify the number of employees generated. An audit within 1 year of a 0.0. being issued for each phase of 4 I Aspen Valley Hospital PUD Agreement Phases 364 608884, 03/25/2014 at 08:59:36 AM, 5 OF 18, Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO development is required to verify the projected and actual employee generation of the project. An audit, agreed upon by AVH and APCHA, shall be conducted during the hospital?s high season of operation, winter. Any difference in employee generation between the audit and what was anticipated in the approval shall require the ?Balance Available?, as shown in the chart in Section B. below, to be updated through an administrative approval. B. Off- Site Housing Requirement. Although Ordinance No. 12 (Series of 2010) requires the provision of off- site affordable housing to house six (6) Full Time Equivalents City Council hereby rescinds any off site affordable housing requirements. Employees Employees Balance Housed Generated Available Beaumont, Mountain Oaks CEO House 57 0 Credit (Council Resolution No. 3, 2009) PhaseI 0 Phase II 28.5 19.98 Phase 20.16 Phase IV 8.46 Total 85.5 48.6 36.9 The employees required to be mitigated for in Phases and IV is the greater of two uses on the site: Medical Of?ce Space or the hospital function as permitted by the land use code with the provision of on?site affordable housing. The audit will verify the employees generated by the MOS in Phase II and the employees generated by the hospital ?mction in Phases and IV. 7. Plat and Agreement. AVH shall record a PUD plat and agreement that meets the requirements of Land Use Code Section 26.445.070, Recording 8 Final PUD Development Plan, within 180 days of date of final adoption of the Ordinance or any extension granted thereof. 8. Building Permit Application. The building permit application shall include the following: A. A copy of the Ordinance and recorded Resolution. B. The conditions of approval shall be printed on the cover page of the building permit set. C. A completed tap permit for service with the Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District. D. A drainage plan, including an erosion control plan, prepared by a Colorado licensed Civil Engineer, which meets adopted City standards. 5 I Aspen Valley Hospital PUD Agreement Phases 365 608884, 03/25/2014 at 08:59:36 AM, 6 OF 18, Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO E. An excavation stabilization plan, construction management plan (CMP), and drainage and soils reports pursuant to the City?s Building Department's requirements. As part of the CMP for Phase and IV improvements, provisions shall be made to ensure that parking for Aspen Valley Hospital visitors, staff and construction workers will be accommodated to prevent overflow in the Health and Human Services lot. F. A fugitive dust control plan to be reviewed and approved by the Environmental Health Department. G. A detailed excavation plan for review and approval by the City's Engineer. H. Accessibility and ADA requirements shall be addressed to satisfactorily meet currently adopted City building codes. 9. Engineering. Final design and analysis for drainage shall be compliant with all sections of the City of Aspen Municipal Code, Title 21 and all construction and excavation standards published by the Engineering Department in effect prior to the submittal of the building permit. 10. Fire Mitigation. All codes adopted by the Aspen Fire Protection District shall be included in the building permit application. This includes but is not limited to access (International Fire Code (IFC), 2003 Edition, Section 503), approved fire sprinkler and fire alarm systems (IFC, as amended, Section 903 and 907). 11. Utilities Department Requirements. AVH shall comply with the City of Aspen Water System Standards, with Title 25, and with the applicable standards of Title 8 (Water Conservation and Plumbing Advisory Code) of the Aspen Municipal Code. 12. Sanitation District Requirement. Service is contingent upon compliance with the District's rules, regulations, and specifications, which are on file at the District office at the time of construction. AVH shall provide the district with proper representation that will show all means and methods to preclude any and all pathological, radioactive, heavy metals, and any other hazardous material on the list of EPA prohibited toxic discharges. 6 Aspen Valley Hospital PUD Agreement Phases 366 608884, 03/25/2014 at 08:59:36 AM, 7 OF 18, Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO 13. Parks. A. An approved tree permit will be required before any demolition or access infrastructure work takes place for Phases Ill and IV. The City Forester should be contacted at 920-5120. Mitigation for tree removal will be paid either through cash-in-lieu or replacing the trees on site. The overall mitigation for removals during this phase of improvements already has a carry-over from the construction of the Obstetrics Unit and Phase ii. The final mitigation value of all phases will be reconciled with City of Aspen Parks and Open Space via the tree removal permit process and a review of paid invoices. B. A vegetation protection fence shall be erected at the drip line of each individual tree or groupings of trees on site. The vegetation fence shall be installed at the edge of the construction impact as depicted on page P101, Master Site Phasing Diagram. This fence must be inspected by the city forester or his/her designee (920- 5120) before any construction activities are to commence. No excavation, storage of materials, storage of construction backfill, storage of equipment, foot or vehicle traffic is allowed within the drip line of any tree on site. The standard for this protective fencing is found on L-103, Plant List and Notes. A line defining the limits of tree protection has been added to the Existing Vegetation Plan, L-100. C. General Landscaping notes: Parks requests the opportunity to field locate all of the plantings proposed for Phases Ill and IV. The areas proposed for new plantings are heavily planted with existing trees and other landscaping. All new plantings must be planted appropriately in a manner that doesn?t jeopardize the health of existing trees and provides appropriate space for projected mature growth. D. For Sheet L-102 the following note has been added: Plant locations as shown are approximate. All evergreen trees west of the loop road are to be flagged for review with Aspen Parks and Recreation Department staff prior to installation. Adjustments to plant layout and final plant count may result. Methods of access and installation for trees west of the loop road are to be coordinated with Aspen Parks and Recreation Department staff, prior to mobilization into this area for planting, to determine best management practices for reducing impact of equipment on existing landscape. E. Plant material depicted on Sheet L-105 and not yet installed at the time of the recordation of the Plat is to be flagged for review with Aspen Parks and Recreation Department staff prior to installation. Adjustments to plant layout may result. AVH shall be responsible for maintaining clearance of plant material in the 14' pedestrian trail easement and Nordic trail easement as identified on the plat. Plant material encroaching into these easements is to be trimmed back to remove encroachment. Vegetation existing prior to Phase II construction is exempt. 7 I Aspen Valley Hospital PUD Agreement Phases 367 608884, 03/25/2014 at 08:59:36 AM, 8 OF 18, Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO F. Landscape Guarantee. The hospital shall be required to provide a landscape guarantee adequate to assure completion of the approved landscape plan for Phases The Parks department may agree to a reduction in the standard amount of the landscape guarantee which shall be memorialized in the required improvements agreement. No building permit for any Phase or IV will be issued until the guarantee is accepted by the Parks Department. 14. Transportation. As noted in Ordinance No. 12 (Series of 2010), a Transportation Demand Management (TDM) plan requires a traffic analysis to be completed every two years. For clarification purposes the first traffic analysis shall be completed within 6 months of the Certificate of Occupancy being issued for Phase II. As part of the Conceptual PUD approval, AVH agreed to financially contribute to improvements to the roundabout and Cemetery Lane intersections to improve capacity. The preportionate ?nancial contribution for capacity improvements to either of these two intersections is (.003) of funds the City of Aspen spends on the project(s.) As no projects have been identified, the Applicant will be required to outline in the PUD Agreement its ability to contribute to any projects that occur to the two intersections within seven years of approval of the Ordinance. This obligation expires on May 13, 2020. The Chief Financial Officer of the Aspen Valley Hospital District has confirmed that the District does have the funds available to contribute a financial proportion of the improvements, if required. The letter is Attachment 1 of this document. 15. Impact Fees. The Parks Development Impact Fees shall not be assessed on the hospital facilities for Phases and IV. Pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.610, Impact Fees, AVH shall pay a Parks Development impact fee solely for the medical office space. The Transportation Demand Management Quality impact fee for Phases and IV have been waived. Any applicable impact fees shall be assessed at the time of building permit application submittal and paid at building permit issuance. The amount shall be calculated using the methodology and fee schedule in effect at the time of building permit submittal. 16. School Lands Dedication Fee. As no residential development is proposed during Phases and IV, a school lands dedication fee shall not be assessed. 8 I Aspen Valley Hospital PUD Agreement Phases 368 608884, 03/25/2014 at 08:59:36 AM, 9 OF 18, Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO 17. Vested Rights. The development approvals granted pursuant to Planning and Zoning Commission Resolution Number 2, Series of 2013 and City Council Ordinance Number 6, Series of 2013 herein shall be vested for a period of seven (7) years from the date of issuance of the development order which was published on May 23, 2013. 18. Cost and Financial Assurances. A. Proof of Financing for Permit. Before the issuance of an Access and Infrastructure permit for the construction of either Phase or IV, and as a condition of such permit, Aspen Valley Hospital shall provide to the City Building Department, Finance Director, and City Attorney for review and approval, satisfactory evidence that Aspen Valley Hospital has in place sufficient financing to accomplish and complete the construction contained in the Access and Infrastructure permit for, Phases and or IV. If there is no loan with respect to the construction of the access and infrastructure for Phases or IV, then Aspen Valley Hospital shall provide a letter from a financial institution stating that Aspen Valley Hospital has funds available in an amount that covers the estimated cost of construction for the access and infrastructure for Phases or IV. Such financing may include without limitation, a construction loan from an institutional lender or lenders and equity capital investments and/or donations from Aspen Valley Hospital or third party investors or contributors. In lieu of evidence of such requirements, the Aspen Valley Hospital may provide a completion bond sufficient to complete the Access and Infrastructure improvements covered by the permit. Such bond shall be subject to the review and approval of City Building Department, Finance Director, and City Attorney. In addition, before issuance of an Access and Infrastructure permit for Phases or IV, Aspen Valley Hospital shall provide supporting cost estimates for all improvements covered by the requested permit prepared by Aspen Valley Hospital?s general contractor for review and approval by the City of Aspen Building Department. B. Proof of Financing for Building Permits. Before the issuance of a building permit for the construction of either Phase or IV, and as a condition of such approval, Aspen Valley Hospital shall provide to the City Building Department, Finance Director, and City Attorney for review and approval, satisfactory evidence that Aspen Valley Hospital has in place sufficient financing to accomplish and complete the construction of the Aspen Valley Hospital Master Facilities Plan, Phases and IV covered by the building permit and any public improvements identified within this PUD and required under this Agreement; provided, if there is no loan with respect to development of Phases or IV, then Aspen Valley Hospital shall provide a letter from a financial institution stating that Aspen Valley Hospital has funds available in an amount that covers the estimated cost of construction for Phases or IV. Such financing may include without limitation, a construction loan from an institutional lender or lenders and equity capital investments and/or donations from Aspen Valley Hospital or third party investors or contributors. In lieu of evidence of such requirements, the Aspen Valley Hospital may provide a completion bond sufficient to complete the project. Such bond shall be subject to the review and approval of City Building Department, Finance 9 I Aspen Valley Hospital PUD Agreement Phases 369 608884, 03/25/2014 at 08:59:36 AM, 10 OF 18, Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO Director, and City Attorney. In addition, before issuance of a building permit for Phases ill or IV, Aspen Valley Hospital shall provide supporting cost estimates for all improvements covered by the requested permit prepared by Aspen Valley Hospital?s general contractor for review and approval by the City of Aspen Building Department. C. Cash Escrow for Site Enhancement Fund. Before the issuance of an Access and Infrastructure permit or a building permit for Aspen Valley Hospital Master Facilities Plan Phases or IV, and as a condition of such issuance, the Aspen Valley Hospital will deposit with a title company the sum of ONE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS AND (the ?Site Enhancement Escrow Funds") in the form of cash or wired funds pursuant to an Escrow Agreement made and entered into between Aspen Valley Hospital and the City which shall provide as follows: i. In the event construction work on the Aspen Valley Hospital Master Facilities Plan, Phases or IV shall cease for ninety (90) days or longer (?Work Stoppage?)I prior to a final inspection by the City of the work authorized by a foundation/structural frame permit on said Parcel C, Aspen Valley Hospital District Subdivision, and cessation of such construction work continues for a period of one hundred twenty (120) days after notice from the City to Aspen Valley Hospital specifying the subject work in reasonable detail, or if such breach cannot be cured reasonably within such one hundred twenty (120) day period and Aspen Valley Hospital fails to commence and proceed diligently to cure such breach within a reasonable time period, then the City, in its reasonable discretion, may draw upon the Site Enhancement Escrow Funds from time to time as needed for the purposes of improving the appearance of any construction work not already completed on the exterior of the Hospital Building only. This work may not in any way impact the operation or access to the Hospital. ii. The Site Enhancement Escrow Funds or any remaining balance thereof shall be_returned to Aspen Valley Hospital, upon completion by the City of a final inspection and issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for Aspen Valley Hospital Master Facilities Plan, Phases or IV or when othenivise agreed to by Owner of Aspen Valley Hospital and the City. D. Cash Escrow for Site Protection. Before the issuance of a building permit for Aspen Valley Hospital Master Facilities Plan, Phases or IV, and as a condition of such issuance, the owner of Aspen Valley Hospital will deposit with a title company the sum of ONE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS AND (?Escrow Funds") in the form of cash or wired funds pursuant to an Escrow Agreement made and entered into between Aspen Valley Hospital and the City which shall provide as follows: i. In the event construction work on the Aspen Valley Hospital Master Facilities Plan, Phases or IV shall cease for sixty (60) days or longer (?Work Stoppage"), prior to a final inspection by the City of the work 10 I Aspen Valley Hospital PUD Agreement Phases 370 608884, 03/25/2014 at 08:59:36 AM, 11 OF 18, Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO authorized by a foundation/structural frame permit on such lot, and cessation of such construction work continues for a period of thirty (30) days after notice from the City to Aspen Valley Hospital specifying the subject work in reasonable detail, or if such breach cannot be cured reasonably within such thirty(30) day period and Aspen Valley Hospital fails to commence and proceed diligently to cure such breach within a reasonable time period, then the City in its reasonable discretion may draw upon the Escrow Funds from time to time as needed for the purposes of protecting and securing the construction site and improvements thereon from damage by the elements and/or from trespass by unauthorized persons, and for purposes of improving the site to a safe condition such that it does not become an attractive nuisance or othenivise pose a threat to neighbors or other persons. The work provided for in this paragraph shall only be permitted on the exterior of the Hospital Building and this work may not in any way impact the operation or access to the Hospital. Half of the Escrow Funds shall be returned to Aspen Valley Hospital upon completion by the City of a final inspection of the work authorized by the Foundation/Structural Frame Permit on the project. The balance of funds shall be returned to Aspen Valley Hospital once exterior finishes to the building have been installed. 19. LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS. A. Improvements itemized. 1. Landscape Phase $50,000.00 2. Landscape Phase IV $50,000.00 Total $100,000.00 8. Security for Improvements. Simultaneously with the full execution by the City and AVH of the Agreement, AVH shall deposit with Stewart Title of Colorado Inc, in Aspen, Colorado (?Escrow Agent?) cash funds in the total amount of $100,000.00 (?Escrow Funds?) as security for the completion of the improvements (?Improvements?) described above: It is further agreed that $100,000.00 cash funds described above shall constitute the total of all security required for the landscaping (?Landscaping") which AVH is required to perform, which is described by reference to Landscaping Plan as follows: ll Aspen Valley Hospital PUD Agreement Phases 371 608884, 03/25/2014 at 08:59:36 AM, 12 OF 18, Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO Final Application Sheet Landscape Plan Final Application Sheet Landscaping Plant List Notes Landscaping Plan is recorded at Reception Number of the Real Estate records of the Clerk and Recorder of Pitkin County, Colorado. In no event shall any Escrow Funds be released until the Landscaping is ?Substantially Complete?. For purposes hereof ?Substantially Complete" or ?Substantial Completion" shall mean that the City has inspected the Landscaping and has reasonably determined that it is Substantially Complete in compliance with applicable specifications and has issued a Certificate of Substantial Completion. No money may be released from the Escrow Funds until the Landscaping is Substantially Complete. Once the Landscaping is Substantially Complete, then Escrow Funds shall be immediately released to AVH, subject to the provisions of Section below. C. Landscaping Completion. Upon delivery by AVH of written notice that the Landscaping has been completed and is ready for inspection (?Request for Inspection") the City shall, within 14 days, inspect the Landscaping identified in the Request for Inspection. If the City finds that the Landscaping identified in the Request for Inspection is Substantially Complete the City shall, within 7 days, provide a Certificate of Substantial Completion to AVH and the Escrow Agent. If the City finds that all or a portion of the Landscaping identified in the Request for Inspection is not Substantially Complete, the City shall deliver a letter of potential deficiencies to AVH and the Escrow Agent within fourteen (14) days of such finding. Any such letter of potential deficiencies shall specify what part or parts of the Landscaping identified in the Request for Inspection is potentially deficient. If a letter of potential deficiencies is issued which specifies a portion of the Landscaping identified in the Request for Inspection as potentially deficient, then all Landscaping not so specified in the letter of potential deficiencies shall automatically be deemed Substantially Complete without requirement of any further action. AVH need oniy provide written notice to Escrow Agent, with a copy to the City, that Landscaping not identified in the letter of potential deficiency is Substantially Complete. Such notice to Escrow Agent shall be deemed the equivalent of a Certificate of Substantial Completion from the City. If no letter of potential deficiency is furnished within the said fourteen (14) day period, all Landscaping identified in the Request for Inspection shall automatically be deemed Substantially Complete without requirement of any further action. AVH need only provide written notice to Escrow Agent, with a copy to the City that no letter of potential deficiency was provided as required hereunder. Such notice to Escrow Agent shall be deemed the equivalent of a Certificate of Substantial Completion from the City. With respect to any Landscaping identified in the Request for Inspection which is specified as potentially deficient in a letter of potential de?ciencies as provided hereunder, AVH shall have a reasonable period of time to cure any such potential deficiencies. After performing cure measures, AVH shall deliver a Request for Inspection to the City. The City will, within 14 days, inspect the Landscaping previously specified as deficient, to determine whether or not such Landscaping is Substantially Complete. If the City reasonably finds that the Landscaping previously speci?ed as 12 I Aspen Valley Hospital PUD Agreement Phases 372 608884, 03/25/2014 at 08:59:36 AM, 13 OF 18, Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO de?cient is Substantially Complete, then the City shall, within 7 days, deliver a written Certificate of Substantial Completion to AVH and Escrow Agent. If the City fails to respond to Request for Inspection regarding cure measures taken as to previously identified as potentially deficient Landscaping within such 7 day period, all such Landscaping identified in the Request for Inspection shall automatically be deemed Substantially Complete without requirement of any further action. AVH need only provide written notice to Escrow Agent, with a copy to the City that no letter of potential deficiency was provided as required hereunder. Such notice to Escrow Agent shall be deemed the equivalent of a Certificate of Substantial Completion from the City. If the City reasonably finds that the Landscaping previously specified as deficient is not Substantially Complete then City and AVH shall have 14 days after the City?s delivery of notice to AVH of such finding, to reach written resolution regarding the Landscaping determined by the City to be potentially deficient. lf AVH and the City are not able to reach resolution within such 14 day period then the City and AVH agree to submit the dispute to the Hearing Officer of the City of Aspen (hereinafter referred to as ?Hearing Officer?). The Hearing Officer shall base its decision upon substantial evidence presented. The Hearing Officer?s finding would be subject to review pursuant to C.R.C.P. Rule 106(3) (4) in accordance with the laws of the State of Colorado. lf AVH has not applied to the District Court for review of the determination of the Hearing Officer within that time set forth pursuant to C.R.C.P. 106(a)(4) and has not obtained a Certificate of Substantial Completion regarding the potentially deficient Landscaping within such time or such additional time as may be reasonably required under the circumstances, the City may cause the Landscaping to be Substantially Complete and the costs of making the Landscaping Substantially Complete shall be paid from the Escrow Funds; provided, however, that in so doing, the City?s expenses shall be commercially reasonable. If the Hearing Officer finds that the City?s determination was correct, then AVH shall have the right to take such corrective action as may be reasonably necessary taking weather and time of year into account to correct the Landscaping found by the Hearing Officer to be potentially deficient. Upon completion of such corrective action, AVH will deliver to the City a Request for Inspection. If the City determines that Landscaping found by the Hearing Officer to be potentially deficient is Substantially Complete then the City shall, within 7 days, deliver a Certificate of Substantial Completion to AVH and Escrow Agent. If the City determines that Landscaping found by the Hearing Officer to be potentially deficient remains potentially deficient then the City may cause such potentially deficient Landscaping to be Substantially Complete and the costs of making the potentially deficient Landscaping Substantially Complete shall be paid from the Escrow Funds; provided, however, that in so doing, the City?s expenses shall be commercially reasonable. In the event the Hearing Officer finds in favor of AVH, then the Landscaping in issue shall automatically be deemed Substantially Complete without requirement of any further action. AVH need only provide written notice to Escrow Agent, with a copy to the City that the Hearing Officer found in favor of AVH. Such notice to Escrow Agent shall be deemed the equivalent of a Certificate of Substantial Completion from the Hearing Officer. 13 I Aspen Valley Hospital PUD Agreement Phases 373 608884, 03/25/2014 at 08:59:36 AM, 14 OF 18, Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO If there are delays in performance hereunder due to, abnormal adverse weather conditions, acts of God, casualties or any causes beyond the control of AVH or the City, or by other causes which reasonably would justify delay, then the affected time period or deadline shall be extended for a reasonable period of time, as may be agreed upon by the parties. No agreement to extend may be unreasonably withheld. 20. PUD DEVELOPMENT PLANS. Pursuant to City Land use Code Section 26.4450 0 B., the Final PUD Development Plans have been recorded at Reception No EQE 5 in the office of the Clerk and Recorder of Pitkin County Colorado, which plans include: (1) Final Plat; (2) Illustrative Site Plan; (3) Architectural Character Plan; (4) Landscape Plan; (5) Grading and Drainage Plan; and (6) Utility and Public Facilities Plan. 21. NON-COMPLIANCE AND REQUEST FOR AMENDMENTS OR EXTENSIONS BY AVH. In the event that the City Council determines that AVH is not acting in substantial compliance with the terms of this Agreement, the City Council shall notify AVH in writing specifying the alleged non-compliance and asking that AVH remedy the alleged non-compliance within such reasonable times as the City Council may determine, but not less than thirty (30) days. If City Council determines AVH has not complied within such time, the City Council may issue and serve upon AVH a written order specifying the alleged non-compliance and requiring AVH to remedy the same within thirty (30) days. Within twenty (20) days of the receipt of such order, AVH may file with the City Council either a notice advising the City Council that it is in compliance or a written petition requesting a hearing to determine any one or both of the following matters: 0 Whether the alleged non-compliance exists or did exist, or 0 Whether a variance, extension of time or amendment to this Agreement should be granted with respect to any such non-compliance which is determined to exist. Upon the receipt of such petition, the City Council shall schedule a hearing to consider the matters set forth in the cease and desist order and in the petition. The hearing shall be convened and conducted pursuant to the procedures normally established by the City Council for other hearings. If the City Council determines by a preponderance of the evidence that a non-compliance exists which has not been remedied, it may issue such orders as may be appropriate; provided, however, no order terminating any approval previously granted by the City Council shall be issued without a finding of the City Council that substantial evidence warrants such action and affording AVH a reasonable time to remedy such non-compliance. A final determination of non-compliance which has not been remedied or for which no variance has been granted may, at the option of the, City Council, and upon written notice to AVH, terminate any of such approvals which are reasonably related to the requirement(s) with which AVH has failed to comply. Alternatively, the City Council may grant such 14 I Aspen Valley Hospital PUD Agreement Phases IV 374 608884, 03/25/2014 at 08:59:36 AM, 15 OF 18, Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO variances, extensions of time or amendments to this Agreement as it may deem appropriate under the circumstances. In addition to the foregoing, AVH or its successors or assigns may, on its own initiative, petition the City Council for a variance, an amendment to this Agreement or an extension of one or more of the time periods required for performance hereunder. The City Council may grant such variances, amendments to this Agreement, or extensions of time as it may deem appropriate under the circumstances. The parties expressly acknowledge and agree that the City Council shall not unreasonably refuse to extend the time periods for performance if AVH demonstrates by a preponderance of the evidence that the reasons for the delay(s) which necessitate said extension(s) are beyond the control of AVH, despite good faith efforts on its part to perform in a timely manner. 22. GENERAL PROVISIONS A. The provisions hereof shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of AVH and City and their respective successors and assigns. B. This Agreement shall be subject to and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Colorado. C. If any of the provisions of this Agreement or any paragraph, sentence, clause, phrase, word, or section or the application thereof in any circumstance is invalidated, such invalidity shall not affect the validity of the remainder of this Agreement, and the application of any such provision, paragraph, sentence, clause, phrase, word, or section in any other circumstance shall not be affected thereby. D. This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the parties hereto with respect to the transactions contemplated hereunder and may be altered or amended from time to time only by written instruments executed by all parties hereto. E. Numerical and title headings contained in this Agreement are for convenience only, and shall not be deemed determinative of the substance contained herein. As used herein, where the context requires, the use of the singular shall include the plural and the use of any gender shall include all genders. F. Upon execution of this Agreement by all parties thereto, City agrees to approve and execute the Final PUD Plat for Phases Ill IV of the Aspen Valley Hospital District Facilities Master Plan and any other Final PUD Documents as may be necessary, and to accept the same for recordation in the Office of the Clerk and Recorder for Pitkin County, Colorado, upon payment of the recordation fee by AVH. 15 I Aspen Valley Hospital PUD Agreement Phases 375 608884, 03/25/2014 at 08:59:36 AM, 16 OF 18, Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO G. Notices to be given to the parties to this Agreement shall be considered to be given if hand delivered or if deposited in the United States Mail to all of the parties by registered or certified mail at the addresses indicated below, or such other addresses as may be substituted upon written notice by the parties or their successors or assigns: Aspen ValleLHogJJtal: Daniel Bonk, CEO of Aspen Valley Hospital 401 Castle Creek Road, Aspen Colorado 81611 Gideon Kaufman, Land Use Attorney for Aspen Valley Hospital 315 East Hyman Avenue, Suite 305, Aspen Colorado 81611 Elaine Gerson, Council for Aspen Valley Hospital 401 Castle Creek Road, Aspen Colorado 81611 John Schied, Director of Operations Aspen Valley Hospital 401 Castle Creek Road, Aspen Colorado 81611 Leslie Lamont, Land Use Planner for Aspen Valley Hospital 725 Melissa Lane, Carbondale, CO 81623 City of Aspen: Community Development Director 130 South Galena Street Aspen Colorado 81611 City Attorney 130 South Galena Street ASpen Colorado 81611 H. The terms, conditions, provisions and obligations herein contained shall be deemed covenants that run with and burden the land underlying the Project and any and all owners thereof, their successors, grantees or assigns, and further shall inure to the benefit of and be specifically enforceable by or against the parties hereto, their successors, grantees or assigns. I. In the event of any conflict between the terms of this agreement and the ordinance, the terms off the ordinance shall be given paramount effect, unless specifically exempted via this IPUD Improvement Agreement. 16 I Aspen Valley Hospital PUD Agreement Phases 376 608884, 03/25/2014 at 08:59:36 AM, 17 OF 18, Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto set their hands and seals as of the day and year first above written. CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO, a municipal corporation By: Steve Barw'ick, City Manager Attest; I S. #71, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: EMW True, City Attorney ASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL DISTRICT ?rel?$56 I I 9 Attachments: 1. Statement confirming availability of funds for roundabout improvements per Section 14 of this PUD Agreement. I CFO 17 Aspen Valley Hospital PUD Agreement Phases 377 608884, 03/25/2014 at 08:59:36 AM, 18 OF 18, Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO ASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL February 20, 2014 VIA Hand Delivery Re: PUD Application, Master Facility Plan, Phase Three Access and Infrastructure Dear City Council, Please accept this letter on behalf of Aspen Valley Hospital as an assurance to the City of Aspen (?City") that AVH is committed to completing its Phase Three Access and Infrastructure Plan in accordance with the PUD Application, Agreement and City Council Ordinance. Part of that commitment includes AVH's assurance that it shall maintain sufficient cash on hand to cover any and all landscaping costs as required in the PUD Agreement. In addition to our commitment to hold funds sufficient to pay for such landscape improvements, AVH has worked diligently with the City Parks Department to finalize a Master Landscape Plan, which will be recorded with the final PUD Plat and Plan. This Plan will be subject to the City?s review during completion of each Phase in order to assure the City that AVH is following the prescribed plan. Also, as part of the Conceptual PUD approval, AVH agreed to financially contribute to improvements to the Roundabout and Cemetery Lane intersections to improve capacity. proportionate financial contribution for capacity improvements to either of these two intersections is (.003) of the funds the City spends on the project(s). Since the planning for these improvements has not yet been done, AVH will be required to contribute to any projects to improve capacity that occur to the two intersections that commence within seven years of the approval of the Ordinance. This obligation will expire on May 13, 2020. i am hopeful that this letter will serve as adequate assurance of AVH's commitment to meeting the City's expectations and to working collegialiy with the City during completion of the Phase Three Access and infrastructure component of the Hospital's Master Facilities Plan. Sincerely, CM Terry Collins Chief Financial Officer 378 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: 401 Castle Creek Road Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: May 12. 20% STATE OF COLORADO ss. County of Pitkin 1, Lisa Guida (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an of?cial paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least ??een (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. (continued on next page) Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty?two (22) inches wide and twenty?six (26) inches high, and which was cOnlposed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least ?fteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on the day of 20_, to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (Sign) is attached hereto. Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least ?fteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage .1 prepaid US. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the _"'property subject to the development application.r The names and addresses of - property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A Neighborhood Outreach: Applicant attests that neighborhood outreach, summarized and attached, was conducted prior to the first public hearing as required in Section 26.304.035, Neighborhood Outreach. A copy of the neighborhood outreach summary, including the method of public noti?cation and a copy of any documentation that was presented to the public is attached hereto. 379 ?5 Mmmjiswe Wigwam nmam??emmwaem am new ?we; and-v immune?; ?reman ?Lat: 96$ Waning mm?mmamimalmaum wanna WA my :mnduaug 1.5.1 Mineral Estate Owner Notice. By the certi?ed mailing of notice, return receipt requested, to affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty (30) days prior to the. date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application of development. The names and addresses of mineral estate owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County. At a minimum, Subdivisions, PDs that create more than one lot, and new Planned Developments are subject to this notice requirement. Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the of?cial zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for ?fteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. .- Lm arm/63?? Signature The foregoing ?Affidavit of Notice? was acknowledged before me this ?lowi'day 0f Agni. 2020, by lint/1n 292% GuideWITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL in" ggs-og a g- 3% eat gains expires: It i 32 initiating git Notary Public . . 3 Wm ROSS curves ??gment: ATTACHMENTS AS APPLICABLE: ngmwa 20194037332 0 COPY OF THE PUBLI CA I 0N OCTOBER 2. 2023 1- PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) 0 LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED YMAIL . APPLICANT CER TIFICA TION 0F MINERAL ESTA TE 0 WNERS NOTICE AS REQUIRED S. ?24~65. 5.1 03.3 380 CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: 401 Castle creek Road, Aspen Valley Hospital _____________________________________________________, Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: Tuesday May 12th, 2020 20 _____________________________________________, 20______. STATE OF COLORADO County of Pitkin ) ) ss. ) Chris Bendon I, ____________________________________________________ (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: _______ Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official Paper or paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. _______ Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof Materials, which was not less than twenty two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) Inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on the April 27 24 20 to and including the date and _______ day of ______________________, 20____, time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto: _______ - Mailing of notice. By mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E) (2) of The Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S mail to all owners of property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. ________ Neighborhood Outreach: Applicant attests that neighborhood outreach, summarized and attached, was conducted prior to the first public hearing as required in Section 26.304.035, Neighborhood Outreach. A copy of the neighborhood outreach summary, including the method of public notification and a copy of any documentation that was presented to the public is attached hereto. (Continued on next page) 381 March, 2016 City of Apen 130 S. Galena St. (970) 920 5050 6 CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMEN Mineral Estate Owner Notice. By the certified mailing of notice, return receipt requested, To affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty (30) days prior to the date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application of development. the names and addresses of mineral estate owners shall be those on the current tax tax records of Pitkin County. At a minimum, Subdivision, Spas or PU Ds that create more than one lot, new Planned Unit Development, and new Specially Planned Areas, are subject to this notices requirement. Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, to whenever the text ofthis Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other significant legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real estate property in the ears of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning during all business, ours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. (2 7% I Signature The foregoing ?Affidavit Notice? was acknowledged before me this 7/0 day of Arm?l ,2070,by (rifts WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL LINDA MANNING Notary Public My commission expires: State of Colorado Notary ID 20104003455 My Commission Expires 10-07-2023 Notary Public ATTACHMENTS AS APPLICABLE: 0 COPY OF THE PUBLICATION 0 PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICES (SIGN) I LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BY MAIL 0 APPLICANT CERTIFICATION OF MINERAL ESTATE OWNERS NOTICED AS REQIURES BY C.R.S {224-655-1033 March, 2016 City of Apen 130 S. Galena St. (970) 920 5050 PUBLIC NOTICE Date: 5:00 PM Time: 130 S. Galena, City Hall, Place: Tuesday, May 12th, 2020 Council Chambers Purpose: The applicant, Aspen Valley Hospital, 401 Castle Creek Road (represented by Elaine Gerson) requests an Extension of Vested Rights for existing approvals associated with phase IV of the development. For further information contact Kevin Rayes with the Aspen Planning Dept. at 970-429-2797; or kevin.rayes@cityofaspen.com 383 384 . he- PUBLIC NDTICE Date: Llama-1:. Hum- 2cm Time: Place: it": 3 Cal-ma i-ull II. - nu .. ne51?: . Jr?: - ?Ilirl - - "lu' .: NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING 130 S. Galena Street, Aspen, CO 81611 p: (970) 920.5000 f: (970) 920.5197 www.aspenpitkin.com Aspen Valley Hospital Project LocaƟon: 401 Castle Creek Road Land Use Reviews: Extension of Vested Rights Decision Making Body: Aspen City Council Hearing Date: March 12, 2020, 5:00pm Hearing LocaƟon: City Hall, City Council Room; 130 S. Galena St; Aspen, CO 81611 386 Project DescripƟon: The applicant is seeking a 5-year extension of vested rights associated with land use approvals including, but not limited to: City Council ResoluƟon 3, Series 2009; P&Z ResoluƟon 2, Series 2013; Ordinance 6, Series 2013; a Development Agreement recorded at RecepƟon No. 608884, and two AdministraƟve Approvals’ recorded at RecepƟon Numbers’: 622520 & 633493. The project is currently vested unƟl May 23rd, 2020. Legal DescripƟon: Aspen Valley Hospital Subdivision Parcel C and Track F; Pitkin County, Colorado. Parcel ID: 2735-12-307-801 Applicant: Aspen Valley Hospital, Elaine Gerson-General Counsel for AVH, 401 Castle Creek Road, Aspen, CO 81611. Represented by BendonAdams. More InformaƟon: For further informaƟon related to the project, contact Kevin Rayes at the City of Aspen Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO, (970) 429.2797, kevin.rayes@cityofaspen.com BendonAdams 300 South Spring Street Aspen CO 81611 970.925.2855 bendonadams.com 188 Exhibit 8 Pitkin County Mailing List of 300 Feet Radius From Parcel: 273512307801 on 03/12/2020 Instructions: This document contains a Mailing List formatted to be printed on Avery 5160 Labels. If printing, DO NOT "fit to page" or "shrink oversized pages." This will manipulate the margins such that they no longer line up on the labels sheet. Print actual size. Disclaimer: Pitkin County GIS presents the information and data on this web site as a service to the public. Every effort has been made to ensure that the information and data contained in this electronic system is accurate, but the accuracy may change. Mineral estate ownership is not included in this mailing list. Pitkin County does not maintain a database of mineral estate owners. Pitkin County GIS makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the completeness, accuracy, or reliability of the content at this site or at other sites to which we link. Assessing accuracy and reliability of information and data is the sole responsibility of the user. The user understands he or she is solely responsible and liable for use, modification, or distribution of any information or data obtained on this web site. http://www.pitkinmapsandmore.com 388 KELEHER LINDA BUREAU TRUST HEATHER LANE LLC CITY OF ASPEN 202 MEADOWOOD DR 5379 LYNBROOK DR 130 S GALENA ST ASPEN, CO 81611 HOUSTON, TX 77056-2004 ASPEN, CO 81611 CASTLE RIDGE ASSOCIATES LTD RINTOUL AMY V KRET LORI A & COLE JEFFREY M PO BOX 95 161 GROVE CT 262 GROVE CT ST ANN, MO 63074 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ANGUS CRAIG M & KAREN S ASPEN CHAPEL KREUTZER GARY REV TRUST PO BOX 7965 77 MEADOWOOD DR 109 TWIN RIDGE DR ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 LEE BRUCE LANDON MEANS GRAEME DONALD & ELIZABETH C TWIN RIDGE HOA 141 GROVE CT 189 MEADOWOOD DR 363 GROVE CT ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611-3341 ASPEN, CO 81611 PODHURST AARON S QPRT 50% WALLA JOHN D & JEAN D ASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL DISTRICT ONE S.E. THIRD AVE #2300 PO BOX 161 0401 CASTLE CREEK RD MIAMI, FL 33131 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 PATTERSON PATRICIA O REV TRUST POLOVIN DAVID L KIERNAN MARC 499 MEADOWOOD DR 363 GROVE ST 161 GROVE CT ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 816113140 ASPEN, CO 81611 KREUTZER DEBBIE REV TRUST CITY OF ASPEN MACLEAN ARCHIBALD JR & ANNE 109 TWIN RIDGE DR 130 S GALENA ST 90 TWIN RIDGE DR ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 RYMAN KAREN L FRIAS RAYMOND C & MARILYN F HOOD JEFFREY M 343 GROVE CT 100 MEADOWOOD DR 121 GROVE CT ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 MEADOWOOD METROPOLITAN DIST MOREHEAD RONALD L & ERLINDA M TWIN RIDGE HOA PO BOX 8774 128 TWINRIDGE CT 363 GROVE CT ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 JACKSON MEADOWS LLC HEGER FRANK & CARLA PROCHASKA JUDITH ELLEN 437 MEADOWOOD DR 222 GROVE CT 108 TWIN RIDGE LN ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611-3139 ASPEN, CO 81611 389 PITKIN COUNTY TWIN RIDGE TOWNHOMES ASSOC CITY OF ASPEN 530 E MAIN ST #301 121 GROVE CT 130 S GALENA ST ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 KELEHER JOHN GORRY TRUST FORD JOHN LAHR DANIEL & RACHEL 202 MEADOWOOD DR 188 MEADOWOOD DR 323 GROVE CT ASPEN, CO 816113336 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 CROSS SUSAN K GIBSONE ALEXANDER S PITKIN COUNTY 242 GROVE CT 303 GROVE CT # 9 530 E MAIN ST #301 ASPEN, CO 81611-3139 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 LYONS MICHAEL J & JENNIFER C MTN OAKS EMPLOYEE HSING PODHURST DOROTHY E QPRT 50% 74 TWIN RIDGE DR 200 CASTLE CREEK RD ONE S.E. THIRD AVE #2300 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 MIAMI, FL 33131 ASPEN CHAPEL WEISS CLIFFORD A & STACEY L PATTERSON PAUL T REV TRUST 77 MEADOWOOD DR 202 GROVE CT 499 MEADOWOOD DR ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 LOBO DA CUNHA MARINA G ONEIL DENNIS & SHARON 121 GROVE CT 101 GROVE CT ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611-3134 390