IN WE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWENTIWIfl J1D1C1AL CIRCtIT ST CLAM COLIY. ILLINOIS LW SYSTEMS. U.C.. P1imit Case No. 3-L.-4t CHRISTOPHER HUBBAI1D. ST. ci DefeMIWUL AGREED ORDER This maicr comes beiire die Cow' on be padics request for an red relazed ac. The junies appear throub undersigned covneL The Coat being fifl athiscd in the Pnenlises, ndas as follows., inruut3n o J'lainff alleges. and Defendant iicdgcs that the personaly iIi1in f D idanfs allqcd coo-misorators is irdent and nitaiaiat to this matter awl f is good eavtsc for discovciy of this mi natk Further. the 1ireasie ia lunnation contained on the contiies of Defcudanrs aHeged c- itors is relevant and narerial to this matter and is itnider - iunminn threat olpennarnent dtion 2. PlaintIff 2nd( Defendant may isstrc sal,pon sekin the itif)in iakraiion of Defendants a1sere4 co'-conspiragms. hEoonatiu athered :,&L-pacnas must be wM In zecmdowe with zWwabae rules oip- to the and rules of twsronal conduct3_ The ldenter Seke Pftwidcr # -JSPsrj listed in Exhibit A hereto are hcrthy ordered and audiethcd. p'snant to a bw1ijily issued sthi,oena in this cte.. to dicckse to the panics nti'In mtaon of certain of their substhber This indedes the true names, addressee, telephone nnnbers, e-mail addresses. and Media Access Control rMFc each subscber awAxiated with an Internet Protocot IP address for address that is listed in a subpoena isl by Ilaintiff or Defend mg. Any p ingan ISP with i UtToena 4=11 also se acy of this Arecd Order- zI a copy of the Notice pnided in Exhibit B hcnto with the subpoena. 1SPs subpoenaed I Case No.. B 3-L)l 5 T\' , cifl= piv slrAIi nd03 a cojw o T this Ae&J Order =od a capy of dDc Naice with any dcaeher nk ity dhe 1iSPs ART stnch Suhstmber ati-e shalt inrom. D dw sabriber than . ica1e ihe stthoena nith the Clerk of the Cirit Couu.. he or she ik a noiioi o qitash Si. Cai Cow, f irmpis flU Pub l ic Squarc, BeleiDe mIis 62220) within 3U da ys, of recclip oisue tice Wlcs to move to thilen a sth."ber idkmfifwation subjxwma. it I f any afl petw subpoc d iafouatioo perdiag the resohon of any timchIP& motion. if a sdasthher files a motiou thdkneim the tckitcc of his or her pc1u id -Qdf~ing infvaamfivni or for anythet fim of irelcf, i ESP shall withhold the dctuifyin2 with that edtic saliler gnding the solution of the ubscaebef motion, bitt shall rug delay in fcspotling to du-- balarwe of the mdqwmafiles a mottn d%d1cgqdug the cdcaw of his or her personzd g V&Md 6ing mEfonnatiL he or she mwt Ddmbfw the lIP address that 1the are associated with. lISPs nuy nax withheld the lIdttling infonmitan of an indhithtall bevc-awsc of a motion chat does not list an IP address wr may tSPs withheld the knti'ing i1omtation of any indi vidual who catbrnits an obtion direetly to the ISP bum does ti Me a motion with this cowl- -Any motion filed with this Court must cnmply with the. teant rukS of eedue and la of the Seoflllinois Plaintiff and Defendant mtdcistand and acknowledge that they may only use the 9 ini'm.atioa disclosed in response to this Agreed Order to protea and eatbree their tights as er forth in the Compkiint Dated: Janutry l&2013 Aao - kw - -. 1. lat:%. Du1Ty Esq.. 2LaSaUcSit3 ClhcaW, I L 6tJIiU2 3l2) 952-6136 Sns.. L-LC nor AUoriy for- De Cbristo(thetr Hnbbard itbzn LIC f TorverdIiti 365 N Jefferson 712, Chk2gKX IL6061 3U) 715-7312 admindiioncom Aim . DATED:__________ SO ORDERED:__________ 2 01r2 11 Case No. 134L-4.15