Statewide Safe Schools Reopening Survey: Clark County School District The Clark County School District, like districts across the nation, is creating a school reopening plan for the fall. However, these plans make two (often unrecognized) assumptions. The first assumption is that teachers and school-based staff will be comfortable returning to the schools given the current COVID-19 public health crisis. The second assumption is that these groups of professionals will agree on the measures required to realize a safe reopening. To explore these assumptions, the Guinn Center, Nevada Action for School Options, and Nevada Succeeds partnered to administer an independent survey to school-based licensed and support staff, as well as school administrators. The purpose of the survey is to understand the comfort level of these professionals in returning to classrooms given the current preparation underway by districts. The survey also asks respondents to consider the importance of specific actions schools and districts could enact to attempt to prevent the spread of COVID-19. The survey, which was administered between June 15th to June 24th, was anonymous and included 11 questions. Overall, we received 9,220 responses statewide. Of these, 6,932 (75.1 percent) were CCSD employees, which included 5,407 licensed educators, 1,346 support staff, and 179 school administrators. The data presented below include only responses from CCSD employees. While this summary represents initial discoveries, a more complete report with additional findings will be forthcoming. Comfortability Returning to Schools The survey included two questions about the respondents’ comfort levels returning to their school and/or classroom. The first question asked individuals to provide their comfort level given the current school/district policies, while the second asked about their comfort level given all the public health precautions they felt necessary to adopt (except the availability of a vaccine). As displayed in the figure below, a greater percentage of CCSD school employees felt uncomfortable returning to schools given the current policies than those that were comfortable or expressed neutral feelings (52 percent to 48 percent). If additional precautions are taken, a larger percentage of employees would be comfortable returning to school in the fall, but a sizable group of employees — 32 percent of the respondents — will remain uncomfortable returning to school in the fall. This challenges one of the assumptions of school-reopenings during the pandemic — that all school employees will be comfortable returning to schools in the fall. June 25, 2020 1 Student-Centered Focus of Respondents The survey also offered respondents the opportunity to provide comments regarding the actions that the district and Nevada Department of Education could undertake to increase their confidence in reopening schools safely. Specifically, the open-ended question asked, “What actions — if taken by school leadership, districts, and/or the Nevada Department of Education — would increase your confidence that schools are ready to reopen in the fall?” Individuals provided opinions ranging from reopening schools without any changes necessary to moving to 100 percent virtual instruction until a vaccine is available. However, despite the differing opinions provided, students and learning were the primary foci of respondents’ concerns – as evidenced by the word cloud below that was created with the open-ended responses from this survey question. Even though school building professionals may have different ideas about the best set of actions or strategies district and state leaders should pursue to enhance safety, the ideas are informed largely by concern for the students, both their safety and learning environment. Options for Reopening The survey asked respondents how strongly they agreed or disagreed with various actions schools and districts could undertake as a reaction to COVID-19. These results are presented in the Appendix. Respondent groups held similar views on the importance of various actions — with the percentage of respondents agreeing with the statements in remarkably similar patterns. However, interesting differences did emerge (challenging the second assumption that differing groups of professionals will agree on the best course to reopen schools). Significant findings included: • • • • Overall, licensed educators, support staff, and school administrators provided remarkably positive responses to nearly all proposed actions the district could take to support schools to combat COVID-19 related issues. While respondents note they want more disinfecting supplies in the classrooms, actions that engage families in the process of keeping the students, teachers, and the school safe also elicited high levels of support. Licensed and support staff more strongly support mandatory temperature checks for everyone entering the school building than were school administrators. Licensed and support staff more strongly support more flexible sick leave policies for all schoolbased personnel than were school administrators. The full, statewide report and analysis will be published in early July. June 25, 2020 2 Appendix – Options for Reopening Reponses by Respondent Category Question Provide cleaning and disinfecting supplies in every classroom Educate families on when they should make the decision Update contact information for all families Develop a communication plan to notify staff, parents, and community officials in the event that a student or staff member tests positive for COVID-19 Educate students and families on proper handwashing, personal hygiene, and sanitation practices related to COVID-19 Establish strict policies instructing teachers and staff when they cannot come to work based on symptoms and indications of possible exposure Develop the guidelines for when the school should close due to an outbreak and move to an online learning More flexible sick-day policies for all school-based personnel and encourage utilizing with even minor Establish a protocol for isolating any individual exhibiting COVID-19 symptoms in designated rooms Prioritize training students and families to use online platforms such as Google classroom Train staff to recognize signs that a student is ill and how to properly care for them Focus on relationship building with students and families, including establishing clear methods of twoway families and schools communication at the outset of Give teachers time to collaboratively plan and realign curriculum to account for lost learning time Develop social distancing guidelines and protocols for students, school staff, guests, and visitors Mandatory temperature check for everyone entering school buildings Institute plans to ensure students can access physical and mental health/wellness supports Install protective panels for frontline office and food service team members Hire or contract for additional school nursing services Training to identify and report indications of child abuse or other safety issues in a virtual learning environment For teachers who reference a reason for feeling uncomfortable being present in-person at the school, allow them to provide distance-learning instruction only Place each student desk 6 feet apart to ensure proper social distancing in the classroom (acknowledging that this may limit class sizes) Incorporate more intentional methods of social emotional learning for students Maintain social distancing on school buses (acknowledging this might require additional bus routes and changes to the school start times to accommodate) Hire or contract for additional counseling to provide social-emotional wellness support No mandatory in-person student attendance at school until an approved vaccine is widely available Elimination of all in-person extracurricular activities outside of normal school hours June 25, 2020 Percentage of Agree and Strongly Agree Responses Licensed Support Educator n() Staff n() Administrator n() 95.7% 93.3% 91.4% 5,375 5,383 5,357 94.9% 94.0% 91.3% 1,322 1,326 1,316 95.5% 91.6% 88.1% 179 178 177 89.6% 5,369 89.9% 1,322 86.5% 178 89.4% 5,374 92.9% 1,323 88.1% 177 88.3% 5,371 90.5% 1,323 82.0% 178 87.5% 5,367 85.1% 1,323 83.1% 177 87.3% 5,368 87.2% 1,321 67.0% 179 85.6% 5,367 88.0% 1,320 79.8% 178 83.8% 5,374 79.9% 1,315 83.7% 178 81.2% 5,367 88.7% 1,319 87.0% 177 80.4% 5,359 81.2% 1,318 80.4% 179 78.5% 5,375 78.6% 1,316 87.6% 178 76.3% 5,367 74.5% 1,320 74.0% 177 73.9% 5,376 72.5% 1,323 57.3% 178 72.7% 5,362 78.1% 1,317 71.2% 177 72.6% 69.0% 5,368 5,362 73.1% 68.2% 1,316 1,312 68.0% 59.6% 178 178 68.7% 5,364 79.0% 1,316 61.2% 178 66.9% 5,363 64.8% 1,313 46.1% 178 66.4% 5,370 65.2% 1,322 55.4% 177 65.0% 5,357 69.4% 1,312 62.7% 177 63.6% 5,358 66.6% 1,323 54.0% 176 56.9% 5,361 57.4% 1,317 66.9% 178 48.0% 5,376 46.2% 1,314 47.5% 179 42.2% 5,359 47.4% 1,310 38.8% 178 3