tel. email : : Dr. Gabrielle Colleran, Consultant Radiologist National Maternity Hospital Holles St. Dublin 2 11 March 2018 Dear Dr. Colleran, I have reviewed physics QA records over the lifetime of the Siemens Sireskop fluoroscopy system in the main X-Ray department at NMH Holies St. This system was originally commissioned in June 2006 and is now in service for 13 years. The system has been subject to annual image quality measurments using a standard fluoroscopic test object and has maintained stable image quality throughout the first 9-10 years of operation. However, deterioration of image qualty in terms of low contrast visibility and spatial resolution, which impacts ability to see small detail, has been observed since then. In one instance, image quality was found to be significantly degraded, requiring significant engineering intervention by Siemens to restore adequate, although sub-optimal performance. I understand also that this system is now formally classed 'end-of­ life' by Siemens and subject to continuing service and support on a 'reasonable endevours' basis. I understand also that there have been persistent problems with system stability necessitating patient transfers, cancellations and rescheduling. These issues have been consistently noted at the radiation safety committee over the last number of years. Given the nature of the workload of this equipment particularly for neo-natal imaging but also for adult hysterosalpinography where high resolution imaging is essential, I consider the performance and reliability to be sub-optimal. Furthermore, It is important to remember that under previous SI478[2002] and new SI256[2018] patient protection legislation, special attention must be given to the use of appropriate equipment for the radiological examination of children. Best Regards, Niall Phelan MSc CPhys Medical Physicist & RPA Analysis of the risks of failure of the Axiom Sireskop SD System x-ray and fluoroscopy machine Table of contents Background .................................................................................................................................................. 1 Fluoroscopy machine ................................................................................................................................. 2 Usage stats and details 2018:................................................................................................................... 3 Consequence of equipment failure .......................................................................................................... 3 Current controls:.......................................................................................................................................... 3 Recommendations ...................................................................................................................................... 4 Background Fluoroscopy is an essential modality in a neonatal radiology department. For example, a common fluoroscopic case is when a newborn baby vomits bile (bilious emesis). This is a neonatal emergency due to the risk of volvulus, bowel ischemia and death; untreated. This is a basic test that should be performed with haste in the maternity hospital where the infant is delivered. Fluoroscopy is also necessary for the diagnosis of neonatal emergencies such as malrotation of the small bowel with volvulus described above, where urgent surgery may be necessary and any delay in imaging may have a significant negative impact on clinical outcome. It is also vital for diagnosis of other forms of bowel obstruction including atresia, meconium ileus and Hirschsprung’s disease. The fluoroscopy machine is also used for hysterosalpingogram examinations for adult women undergoing investigation of infertility – a service not provided in adult hospitals. Newer technology currently offers faster examinations, a substantial reduction in radiation doses, higher quality images, and new applications that allow better diagnosis. Increase in spatial and temporal resolution leads to identification and diagnosis of smaller pathologies with considerable impact on patient care. This is particularly important in neonates where structures are much smaller and harder to visualise. 1 Fluoroscopy machine The Axiom Sireskop SD System (M7677, Serial #71050) x-ray and fluoroscopy machine in the Xray Dept. was installed on 01.07.2006 – it is now 12 years and 8 months old. The obsolescence of the equipment has a direct impact on the quality of healthcare. Equipment older than 10 years is regarded as being obsolete. Older equipment has a high risk of failure and breakdown, causing delays in diagnosis and treatment of the patient and safety problems both for the patient and the medical staff. We have noted that in recent years the machine has become increasingly unreliable, for example the machine may switch off without warning in the middle of an examination. Fortunately to date this has not occurred at the critical point of a neonatal examination, however it is of significant concern as an equipment failure mid-procedure could lead to a need to repeat the examination: with associated increase in radiation exposure and delay in diagnosis. For an infant with volvulus that delay could lead to further loss of bowel and a worse morbidity and mortality. With aging equipment there is also a decrease or loss of image quality and an increase in radiation exposure. The risks of ionising radiation are higher in the paediatric population than in adults. It is therefore particularly important that the dose area product (DAP) used in imaging children should be as low as practicable whilst providing the clinician with diagnostic information. There is a regulatory obligation to measure and optimise the radiation dose. Maintenance will be impossible if no spare parts are available. In December 2017 (14 months ago) the manufacturer Siemens informed the NMH that due to the age of the machine, spare parts can no longer guaranteed. Siemens have assured the department that they will remain committed to the support of this unit and will continue to provide service and maintenance on a “reasonable endeavours” basis up until the point that they are unable to source suitable replacement parts. However now that spare parts can no longer be guaranteed, there is a risk of an unrepairable failure of the machine. The Sireskop suffers from on-going failure issues intermittently leading to it having to be shut down and restarted during examinations. Some of these examinations require the use of a contrast and the exam cannot be recommenced if the equipment fails, as the contrast agent could obfuscate the reporting of an exam if reporting is performed after a certain time period. Because of this it would necessitate the exam having to be rescheduled on another day (to allow full clearance of the contrast agent out of the patient). In many cases these examinations are used in the diagnosis of critical pathologies where immediate surgery is necessitated and where an alternative examination would not yield a result that would aid in surgical decision making with the associated increased in morbidity and potentially mortality. Because we are beyond the ‘end-of-life’ stage with the unit there is now a significant risk of machine failure and complete breakdown, rendering a significant portion of the radiology service in the hospital becoming unavailable. Such a risk would severely impact the NMH’s ability to provide a diagnostic service and patients would need to be transferred to other hospitals for x-ray and fluoroscopy. It should be noted that due to significant waiting lists in other hospitals there would very likely be delays in getting appointments for non-emergency patients (some radiology waiting lists are up to 2 years). It should also be noted that parts have become dislodged in these machines at other site due to wear-and-tear and old age. Should this happen while an infant was being examined the 2 resulting injury could likely be catastrophic as these parts are generally very heavy (in the amount of kilos). Because the machine is quite old the mechanical drivers have become stiff resulting in staff experiencing muscular strains trying to pull the equipment into position. It is unknown the extent to which we could lower patient dose using up-to-date equipment but it would be significant and there is a regulatory obligation to achieve the lowest dose possible especially in paediatrics. The image quality during the examination should also be seriously considered as the monitors are almost 13 years old. Usage stats and details 2018:  Infant x-rays = 1,971 (split between portable and x-ray Dept. - all infants referred from the Baby Clinic were done in the X-ray Dept.).  Adult x-rays = 220 (vast majority in the X-ray Dept.).  Hysterosalpingogram examinations = 250 (patients with infertility - service not provided in adult hospitals e.g. SVUH and this service could not be run without access to these exams).  Infant contrast studies = 31 (almost all were performed to rule out malrotation - these are true emergencies and there can be no delay in performing the examination as if confirmed, the infant must be transferred immediately for surgery). Consequence of equipment failure A temporary equipment failure mid-procedure may result in a non-diagnostic study. This would require the examination to be repeated – resulting in an increased overall radiation exposure to the patient. This could also result in an unacceptable delay in diagnosis with significant potential consequences for the patient. A prolonged or unrepairable equipment failure would mean that NMH could no longer provide a fluoroscopy service for its patients. Neonates suspected of having malrotation with volvulus would require emergency transfer to either CUH Temple Street or OLCH Crumlin for investigation. In sick neonates the transfer itself is not without risk. It also can be a difficult experience for accompanying parents. It is of note, that CUH Temple Street is having significant issues with its fluoroscopic machine which is also beyond end of life. Current controls: 1. Use of portable/otherwise located x-ray machines in certain cases (only used for general xrays, not fluoroscopy). 2. Informal collaboration with external hospitals to take patients in event of machine breakdown. 3. Onsite maintenance and break/fix by the Clinical Engineering Dept. 4. Maintenance contract with Siemens (suppliers) which will remain in place after the end of life date (31.12.2017) and is renewed annually. 3 Notes on current controls (secondary (control) risk): 1. Portable/otherwise located x-ray machines may not be easily available/accessible when required and will NOT allow fluoroscopy. 2. External hospital collaboration is informal at this time and as it cannot be scheduled and thus external hospitals may not take patients in event of machine breakdown. Temple Street is also experiencing significant reliability issues with its own fluoroscopy machine, and there is a very possible scenario where OLCH Crumlin is the only fluoroscopy service in Dublin. 3. Onsite Clinical Engineering Dept. for maintenance and break/fix will likely be hindered by potential lack of replacement parts. 4. A maintenance contract with Siemens (suppliers) will be similarly likely be hindered by potential lack of replacement parts. Recommendations It is recommended that the fluoroscopy machine be replaced. The consequences of equipment failure are such that NMH cannot be without a reliable fluoroscopy service. In the case of infants with suspected malrotation and volvulus, equipment failure or delay due to equipment breakdown poses a significant clinical risk of bowel ischemia with risk of additional morbidity and death. If the system is not replaced, given the risks to patient safety, we may have to suspend the provision of flouoroscopic services for infants and if so, all of these emergent cases will require transfer to either TSCUH and OLCHC with the associated risk of delay and additional costs. 4