2020 BLUEPRINT FOR POLICE DIVESTMENT/COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT
Decriminalize Seattle and King County Equity Now
The 2020 uprising in Defense of Black Lives has created an opening for immediate change to the
way cities across the country generate public safety and well-being. While this moment has created
the opening for long-overdue change, years of research, work, and lived experience by Black
communities and other communities of color informs the detailed vision in this blueprint. A
commitment to the urgent call to defend Black lives requires immediate cuts from the Seattle
Police Department budget. The City must make a 180 degree turn away from its long-standing
pattern of increasing the police budget, and instead immediately cut the budget to generate real
public safety and health. Coupled with the reinvestments listed below, these cuts have the capacity
to create transformative change in the city of Seattle to increase alignment with the City’s stated
commitments to racial and social justice.
The work to defund SPD and create true public safety and health will happen in phases. Phase one
- the initial cuts and reinvestments listed below - will be facilitated by the 2020 budget rebalancing
process the city of Seattle will complete by the first week of August 2020. This phase will be
followed by deeper cuts to SPD’s budget to come in the 2021 budget cycle, coupled with a
participatory budgeting process that will allow the community to determine the direction of deeper
investments to generate true public safety and health.

 BLUEPRINT FOR DIVESTMENT
To achieve immediate cuts to SPD’s remaining 2020 budget, the City must reorganize the
department to reduce its size, while reallocating its funds and positions to City departments and
community organizations better suited to creating public safety and health. To be clear, these cuts
would come from SPD’s budget for the last four months of the year, and would be phased in during
the last four months of 2020. Some of these cuts would come from fully eliminating SPD functions,
some would come from transitioning functions out of SPD that should never have been under
police control to begin with, and others will come from hiring freezes and reductions in staffing.
All cuts previously identified by Mayor Durkan (totalling 20 million) should be transferred to the
reinvestments named in this blueprint. The divestments named below expand on these cuts.
Cuts could come from many places in SPD’s bloated budget, and should include the following
actions:
•
•
•

•
•
•
•
•

•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

Freeze hiring. Any planned hiring, including for individuals in the training pipeline,
should be cancelled.
Eliminate funds for recruitment and retention, including bonuses for new hires.
Remove the Office of Collaborative Policing, including Navigation Team. While some
programs of this office, along with their administrative infrastructure, should be
eliminated altogether, others could be moved to a civilian-controlled city agency.
o Eliminate: Navigation Team, Community Outreach Administration
Transfer out of SPD control: Crisis Intervention Response, Community Service Officers
Eliminate spending on new equipment
Eliminate Data-driven policing
Eliminate spending on North Precinct Capital Project
Eliminate Professional Services -Including:
§ Photo Enforcement
§ Sworn Hiring in HR
§ Recruitment and Retention
§ Community Outreach
§ Implicit Bias Training
§ Communications
Cut SPD’s spending on Homeland Security (a misnamed unit that is mostly assigned to
large events like Bumbershoot)
Eliminate SWAT Team funding
End contracts with private firms that defend SPD and the City against police misconduct
lawsuits
Eliminate SPD’s travel and training budget
End overtime pay, including for Emphasis Patrols
Reduce patrol staffing, with corresponding reduction in administrative staffing
Transfer 911 dispatch out of Seattle Police Department to civilian control.
Transfer traffic/parking enforcement out of SPD control.
Transfer Office of Police Accountability out of SPD control.
Transfer Office of Emergency Management out of SPD control.

 •

Reduce administrative costs in line with the above cuts, including corresponding cuts to
the office of the Chief of Police, Leadership and Administration, and Administrative
Operations.

 BLUEPRINT FOR PHASE 1 OF COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT
1. Invest in Community-Led Research Process to Generate True Public Safety
Informed by Community Needs
Initial investments, funded by divestments from SPD’s budget, should go to funding a 2020
summer/fall participatory research process that will be crucial to the task of reimagining a world
built on a community vision for public safety and health. Policing and community safety are
fundamentally racial justice issues, so a broad coalition of directly-impacted people of color must
take the lead in shaping the solutions to creating sustained community safety beyond saturated
policing. Seattle residents most directly impacted by police policies and practices have never been
given the time and space to imagine responses beyond imperfect, inadequate, and violent police
responses, and years of bloated police budgets have reflected consistent disinvestment in Black
communities. This disinvestment has exacerbated racial inequities in Seattle. It has created less
community safety and more harm for Black residents.
The community-led research process will inform the vision for a world where we shift away from
our reliance on policing and move towards addressing root causes and unmet needs. A world where
instead of being met with an armed officer who is more likely to kill BIPOC community members,
people are instead met with support, services, and care so they can thrive. The community-led
research is in itself a community safety measure.
City-wide dialogues about expanded notions of community safety will inform the roadmap City
leaders need to move forward with further cuts to SPD’s budget. The funding from the City to
support the research will allow people who are most directly impacted by police contact and
surveillance to systematically produce their own solutions to guide the City’s next steps. Without
community voice and leadership, any proposed solutions are likely to be short-sighted, incomplete,
and actively harmful.
A portion of the research will be explicitly focused on defining community safety and offering
specific recommendations and support to community organizations as they scale and build
capacity. This may include providing analyses or projections that inform staffing or resource
allocation as community organizations scale, and in turn will inform the 2021 budgeting process.
The research will also be exploring, testing, and evaluating different strategies to achieve safer
communities. One strategy we will be exploring is increasing access to high speed internet and
technology. While this was an acute need in our communities before Covid-19, we anticipate
addressing this need will be critical to allowing community members to socially distance during a
time where more BIPOC community members are becoming sick or dying from COVID-19. With
schools, workplaces, and public services moving online, we are hearing strong concerns from our
community that many are being left behind (especially for people who speak languages other than
English, people with disabilities, and people without access to safe shelter). We are also hearing
about the need to explore health that includes COVID-19 alongside other health concerns that
disproportionately impact the BIPOC community. Our plan includes a deep exploration of how
effective research and outreach can be done in this challenging context. Our recommendations and

 evaluations are also anticipated outcomes from the Summer/Fall research. This will inform the
2021 budgeting process.
This community-led research process will transition into a 2021 Participatory Budgeting process
for the Public Safety sections of the city budget. We envision most of the funds for these processes
would come out of the police budget, though we recognize other City departments may contribute
funds as well.
Values guiding Participatory Research Process:
• Process must be community designed and controlled.
o Trust is essential to collecting good data, and the City has a long track record of
misusing this trust. In part because of the City’s long track record of supporting
harmful policies and procedures, many community members do not trust the City
to lead an effective research process. The pattern of collecting data and
recommendations and then doing little to nothing with the results must end. By
supporting and funding a community-led research process, the City will tangibly
address this legacy of using data to justify or ignore the harm done to communities.
• Process must provide tangible support for participants
o As city officials are paid to plan for public safety, community members should not
be expected to come up with solutions on a volunteer basis. Paying community
members to be involved in this dialogue will offer income support to the
communities most directly impacted by COVID-19 and the economic crisis.
Funding should be provided immediately to source the staffing and support for this
process to be successful. The scale of this work cannot be met with unpaid labor
alone, especially when some community members must prioritize meeting their
needs for food, shelter, and other basic needs during a global pandemic.
Research activities
We anticipate the full community-led research process to be about 12% of the total funds received
from our proposal, but our blueprint focuses on securing funding for the summer and fall activities
immediately. Additional research investments would increase the number of organizations that can
participate in this community-led participatory research. Research activities include funds to
resolve community issues identified during the research (e.g., a need for more PPE), research
analysis, and reporting activities.
Below are the overall research activities we would fund with an initial $3M investment (see
appendix for more details and estimated dollar amounts):
1. Staffing, training, administrative and technical support, and materials
2. COVID-related support
3. Removing institutional barriers
4. Data collection and analysis
5. Data reporting and presentations
Criteria for Organizations Receiving Funding:
The organizations to be funded must not have a financial conflict of interest with police
departments. Funded organizations would share some of the following characteristics:

 1.
2.
3.
4.
5.

BIPOC-leadership, particularly with youth leaders or a youth advisory council
Experience with people who have first-hand experience with policing systems
Experience with Black youth
Experience with centering the experiences of BIPOC people who are LGBTQ+
Experience working with BIPOC youth in culturally-responsive ways that promote youth
leadership
6. Experience with people who are overrepresented in juvenile justice system, foster care, or
people who are experiencing homelessness
7. Experience with people with disabilities
Timeline:
July - December 2020:
1. King County Equity Now and community members start preliminary research to test
accessible language and expand support for the summer/fall research (on-going)
2. Preliminary work plan and selection of participating organizations, in partnership with
community members
3. Participating organizations announced (additional organizations may be added on a
rolling basis)
4. Disburse funding
5. Finalize hiring
6. Deliver research skills training workshops for youth researchers, adult research, and
support staff
7. Update work plan based on participants’ research goals and preliminary needs assessment
8. Implement initial round of research to test participatory budgeting accessibility
considerations, as well as community-led research on what health and safety actually
means, including (but not limited to) alternatives to policing
9. Complete regular and ongoing community report backs to share preliminary findings as
the project continues. Assess community needs and resolve urgent issues.
10. Implement additional round(s) of research to test participatory budgeting accessibility
considerations, and equity-centered participatory budgeting process
11. Continue community-led research on what health and safety actually means, including
(but not limited to) alternatives to policing
12. Complete regular community report backs, and share additional findings. Assess for
community needs and resolve urgent issues. Update reports based on community
feedback
13. Share road map for how to engage in an accessible and equity-centered 2021-2022
participatory budgeting process.

 2. Invest in Scaling Up Community-Led Organizations, with Technical Support and
Capacity Building, to Increase Public Safety
The City should immediately invest 2020 dollars in groups that are already developing communityled alternatives to policing and criminalization. Seattle already has groups involved in non-armed
crisis response, violence-interruption and prevention, harm-reduction, and restorative and
transformative justice approaches to harm. For decades, Seattle organizations have been
undertaking safety-building activities such as: self-defense classes, healthy relationship skills
classes for teens and adults, community courses on preventing sexual violence and assault,
programs working with perpetrators of domestic violence to help them stop the behavior, bystander
training for disrupting violence, programs to support parents in de-escalating conflict in their
homes without violence, mediation programs to address conflict within schools, programs aimed
at reducing the harms of drug addiction in communities, programs to increase community
engagement between neighbors to reduce crime, and more. These efforts have developed and
survived despite the over investments in the current policing/criminalization paradigm. It is past
time to put real city dollars towards the development and growth of approaches to public safety
that do not involve policing. These immediate investments will allow the organizations to scale up
their operations in preparation for on-going cuts to SPD’s budget and operations.
SPD has had over a century to produce community safety and has failed. Community organizations
should not be required to end violence in Seattle in one funding cycle. Investing in these groups
will drastically increase the odds of generating true public safety for those communities who have
borne the brunt of police presence, surveillance, and violence. Funds will also go towards
incubating new projects and organizations in police-impacted communities. These investments
must begin in 2020 because we need to build up these organization’s capacity in order to be ready
for the transition to a drastically reduced police footprint in 2021.
The investments will include growing the capacity of both organizations who would respond to
911 crisis calls, the organizations who are providing long-term support beyond crisis intervention
to criminalized populations, and the organizations who are involved in interrupting and preventing
violence and harm to begin with.
Criteria for Organizations Receiving Funding:
The organizations to be funded will demonstrate the following characteristics:
• Culturally-relevant expertise rooted in community connections and support
• Well versed in de-escalation skills and mental health support
• Peer-Led models prioritized
• Trauma-informed, gender-affirming, anti-racist praxis
• Connected to resources like housing, food security, and other basic needs with wraparound services and long-term support
• Committed to retention of social service workers with adequate and equitable pay and
benefits, preferably unionized
• Committed to hiring and retaining staff who are from the communities they serve and
with lived experience of criminalization
• Demonstrated commitment to a harm-reduction model, including safer consumption
practices

 Timeline:
September - December 2020:
• Criteria and grant-making process established
• Capacity building workshops offered by the city for organizations who will be applying
for funds
• Monthly disbursements to organizations for general operating support
• Create work plans for scaling up responses
• Complete recruitment and hiring plans
• Regranting process in 2021 to continue work, with goal of organizations beginning to
offer enhanced services by mid-2021
To allow community groups to focus their efforts on their growth and development, the grants will
be for general operating funds, with minimal bureaucratic requirements. To reduce the burden of
contracting and reporting these funds will allow organizations to determine what data is important
and useful for them to collect for improving their work. Funding will include capacity-building
support for organizations to apply and receive city funding. This capacity-building support can be
used by organizations to increase their infrastructure (space, curricula, financial management
systems, staff training programs, and more) so that they are ready to serve far more members of
the community than they could when they were under-funded.

 3. Replace Current 911 Operations with Civilian-Led Dispatch to Increase Public Safety
The City of Seattle should immediately move to transition 911 call and dispatch under civilian
control. The City of Seattle can begin now to create an independent emergency operations system
responsible for coordinating first responders, and moving 911 dispatch out of police control.
Additionally, investments in scaling up organizations listed in the previous section will be key for
transferring calls involving people in crisis to community-led organizations who are grounded in
a harm reduction. The current model often results in people of color in crisis receiving an armed
police response and being funnelled into the criminal legal system, while white people in crisis are
offered supportive services. Transitioning to a non-armed response grounded in harm reduction
principles accessible to all communities will improve public safety.
The combination of civilian control of 911, investments in community organizations who can
respond to crisis calls, and investments in fully funding services and housing so that crisis workers
can offer appropriate referrals is key for the success of this model. Another key component will be
continued efforts to decriminalize misdemeanor charges, so that a police response can be rendered
moot. Currently, people of color in Seattle are disproportionately criminalized for low-level
crimes including shoplifting, low-level drug charges, trespassing, and disorderly conduct.
Enormous expenditures in police and court costs are the result. Decriminalizing misdemeanors
would free up resources for meeting real human needs, and would stop one of the main pathways
through which Black people and other people of color are targeted for criminalization.

 4. Support Immediate Survival Needs by Investing in Housing
Regardless of sensationalist media narratives, Seattle does not face a crisis of rising crime rates;
Seattle faces a housing crisis. This city has failed to provide all its residents access to basic housing
needs - i.e., a safe, secure, clean, humane space that provides the bare minimum for human
flourishing. Housing is an essential human need and few things are more central to real public
safety than a home. It’s a place to rest, eat and store possessions without fear of loss. A home
provides the critical stability, privacy, safety, and security necessary for individual health and
communal public health. To maximize the near and long-term public safety for the greater Seattle
area, we must prioritize and maximize housing access and availability.
Importantly, nothing in this proposal is novel or untenable. The current uprising in defense of
Black lives has revealed as untenable the City’s habit of bending to the will of a police department
whose conduct has chronically and systematically been violent and detrimental to the public safety
of many communities. The contrast between the makeshift tents and encampment intertwined with
a sea of cranes, high-rise towers, and opulent development point to the vast racial and economic
chasm that must be closed if we are to transform the City’s approach to public safety.
No proposal to increase true public safety by divesting from policing will be complete without a
commitment to expanding housing access and availability.
The City should prioritize the following near-term housing solutions:
• Support the immediate transfer of underutilized public land for BIPOC community
ownership, including, where necessary, purchase and activation capital and upfront
transaction costs.
• All empty housing stock in the city should be used until any unhoused person who wants
a place to live has one. People currently unhoused should be prioritized for receipt of any
assistance, with no barriers based on income, criminal records, record of addiction, etc.
• Dissolve the Navigation Team and end sweeps of homeless encampments.
• Fund existing BIPOC-led community-based, housing-service organizations to allow for
increased capacity and services, including the facilitation of emergency rent-assistance
programs related to COVID.
Considerations for funding would include ensuring organizations receiving funding can meet
the following criteria:
• Provide services to people who are currently and formerly incarcerated
• Commit to offering harm reduction training, programming and infrastructure to provide
low barrier substance use/homeless services to Black and Brown people.
City officials must remove barriers to accessing existing services, ensuring that community
services providers:
• Have direct access to low barrier/harm reduction shelters beds without requiring a referral
from the City of Seattle Navigation Team or any other city program.
• Have direct access to Crisis Solution Center without requiring a referral from law
enforcement or first responders

 •

Have direct access to permanent supportive housing (King County Coordinated for AllCEA set-a-sides) and independent housing vouchers (King County/Seattle Section 8,
Scattered Sites, & Shelter Plus Care)

Conclusion:
The 2020 investments are only the beginning of a multi-year process to create real public safety
and health in the City of Seattle. The summer/fall 2020 research process will lay the groundwork
for the 2021 Participatory Budgeting cycle, which will in turn identify further cuts to be made from
the City’s “Public Safety” agencies (namely the Seattle Police Department, the City Attorney’s
Office, and Municipal Court). Further investments to be made and distributed during the 20212022 biennium will be identified through the research processes completed in 2020 and the
participatory budget process completed in the first quarters of 2021.
The goal of these processes is not only to defund the police, but to create a new paradigm for how
the City distributes its funding and invests in community. We have an opportunity to close the
door on the era of bloated police budgets that put Black lives at constant risk of violence and
death. We invite city leaders to accept the invitation to transform our city.

 Appendix: Research Funding Detail of Initial $3M Investment Towards
Community Research Process
The amount of the full investment in the community-led research process will depend on elected
leader’s willingness to divest from SPD and reinvest in real community safety. We propose
funding the research in a staggered approach with at least $3 million for the initial 2020 funding.
We welcome additional funds, which would increase the number of organizations that can
participate and would add additional funds towards addressing community issues identified during
the research (e.g., a need for more PPE), research analysis, and reporting activities. The research
described below will be critical for developing a robust roadmap as community and City leaders
move forward with further cuts to SPD’s budget in 2021- 2022, as part of the participatory
budgeting process.
Below are additional details for what this funding would support:
Staffing, training, support, and materials.
These investments set the community-led research process up for success and allow us to
fund some of the current 2020 costs for us to do the research. (About $1.1M)
§ About $700K in youth researcher staffing for Summer and Fall research
§ About $220K in adult researcher staffing for FTE staff for at least 5 community
organizations
§ About $164K in administrative and support staff
§ About $25K in materials and research training
COVID-related support
Internet connectivity, masks, computer hardware, sanitation, tents for socially-distanced
in-person events, print materials (About $283K)
§ About $3K in masks, face shields, sanitation, and other PPE supplies for
participants, community members, and Seattle residents
§ At least $195K in internet connectivity supports increased access to facilitate
access to City and community resources and services during COVID-19.
§ About $85K in computer hardware
Removing institutional barriers to participation
This would also include resources to address barriers: disability, childcare, transportation,
interpretation and translations, nutrition, hygiene ($375K)
§ About $172K in childcare and educational supports
§ About $84K in nutrition and hygiene resources
§ About $60K in transportation resources
§ About $40K in administrative, technical, and material supports to address
racialized ableism
§ At least $19K in translation and interpretation in at least 12 languages
Data collection and analysis
Online survey tools, CRM and databases, website, transcriptions services, incentives,
focus group facility rental fees, user experience research, ethnographies, statistics and
data software. (About $516K)
§ About $85K in mailing and printing
§ About $80K in phone, SMS, social media data collection

 About $30K in community outreach
About $25k in software
About $19K in focus groups and interviews
About $25K in survey incentives
About $12K in participatory budgeting user experience website testing
At least $240K in materials translations in at least 12 written and spoken
languages
Data reporting:
Visualizations, reports, community sessions, including artistic and culturally responsive
materials. (About $313K)
§ About $13k in visualization, editing, recording, and reporting software
§ About $185K in mailing and printing of reports
§ At least $75K in materials translations in at least 12 written and spoken languages
§ About $40K in hardware, including lighting, sound amplifiers, and appropriate
equipment to effectively stream, broadcast, or transmit reports, sound,
performances, or videos.
Cash assistance and direct support for community members
Address economic and other urgent needs. ($500K)
§ About $140,000 for youth
§ About $360,000 to adults with families or elders
§
§
§
§
§
§