July 20, 2020 Dear Management of the Los Angeles Times: We are writing to protest an environment of hostility, intimidation and harassment that has intensified at the Los Angeles Times during the past 18 months. It has reached the point where our members -- your newsroom employees -- are reluctant to report potential misconduct, mistreatment or ethical breaches. The experiences of colleagues have led them to fear retaliation and dismissal of their concerns. The company acknowledged this current reality in a July 9 staff-wide memo from Sewell Chan, who noted that some “did not feel comfortable raising personnel concerns with managers.” Asking our members to instead contact the Human Resources department is an inadequate remedy to a problem that puts our entire organization and our membership in peril. Our members have reported the following, which is not an exhaustive catalog: ● ● ● ● The executive editor berated and verbally harassed a respected investigative reporter by, among other means, using graphic and vulgar language in response to questions about potential ethical breaches. The executive editor subsequently killed follow-up stories to a recent front-page investigation by that reporter, with no reasonable explanation offered. Staff in our Food Department have spoken publicly and internally of a culture of fear and a “hostile and inhospitable work environment” and a pervasive reluctance to bring complaints forward. A sports reporter who shared concerns about ethical lapses was met with a hostile and dismissive response by the executive editor during a meeting with other masthead editors present. The executive editor pointedly interrogated a Guild member, erroneously believing the person had delivered an anonymous letter to Nant’s corporate headquarters that related concerns. The executive editor refused to believe the person’s denials of involvement, and invoked the existence of security footage to support his mistaken and threatening line of inquiry. The pattern of antagonism toward those who raise allegations of ethical breaches and other internal concerns threatens the integrity of the Los Angeles Times and poses ongoing harm toward current employees. In addition, our members have also questioned the independence and thoroughness of management’s internal investigations into complaints of ethical breaches and the adequacy of management’s response. For example, the public explanation of a 2018 party for staff at the Santa Anita racetrack leaves more questions than answers, and we demand a full investigation. A suite with free food and alcohol for Times employees and their spouses would cost far more than the $200 paid on the day of an event and the $100 to $200 subsequently paid to the racetrack. The executive editor’s explanation that a charity donation was made after-the-fact does little to cure an unpaid bill. Our members across multiple sections -- including Metro, Photo, Sports and Opinion -- have strived to cover the Santa Anita racetrack with integrity. Instead, the company has unwittingly tainted them while the racetrack is the subject of international and law enforcement scrutiny into an epidemic of horse deaths. Until that is rectified and given a full accounting, our members are compromised. Similarly, the company’s investigation of the executive editor’s Huawei stories appears cursory and incomplete, and the response to complaints about Colin Crawford requires further investigation. We will not stand for any effort to intimidate, harass or retaliate against our members who bravely come forward to report suspected ethical violations or other potential misconduct. The Guild will pursue all remedies available, including grievances, and we further demand that the company rectify any ethical lapses in a way that is transparent and respectful toward our membership, the community we serve and the newspaper’s mission. Sincerely, The Executive Committee of the Media Guild of the West Matt Pearce Alex Wigglesworth Matt Hamilton Colleen Shalby Bettina Boxall Hugo Martin Carolina Miranda Carla Hall Jad El Reda