Case: 3:20-cv-00385-wmc Document #: 58 Filed: 07/27/20 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN DONALD J. TRUMP FOR PRESIDENT, INC., Plaintiff, v. NORTHLAND TELEVISION, LLC, d/b/a WJFW-NBC, Case No. 20-cv-00385-WMC Defendant and PRIORITIES USA ACTION, Intervenor Defendant. MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE TABLES FOR PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSITIONS TO MOTION TO DISMISS OF DEFENDANTS WJFW-NBC AND PRIORITIES USA ACTION Plaintiff, Donald J. Trump for President, Inc. (“plaintiff”), moves for leave to file the attached tables for plaintiff’s opposition briefs to the motions to dismiss filed by defendant Northland Television, LLC d/b/a WJFW-NBC (“WJFW-NBC”) and by intervenor defendant Priorities USA Action (“PUSA”). The attached document is not a brief and does not contain argument. It provides the Court tables matching up the Complaint to the Supplement to the Complaint. As set forth in the Court’s order (Doc.51), on the motions to dismiss, the Court will consider plaintiff’s Complaint (Doc.1-2: 4-64, filed as an attachment to WJFW-NBC’s Notice of Removal), and plaintiff’s “Supplement,” a Complaint filed against PUSA on June 18, 2020 (Doc.48). Plaintiff moves the Court to accept the attached tables for filing, to assist the Court in reviewing the motions to dismiss and briefing thereto. Case: 3:20-cv-00385-wmc Document #: 58 Filed: 07/27/20 Page 2 of 2 Dated this 27th day of July, 2020. By: s/Eric M. McLeod___________________ Eric M. McLeod Lane E. Ruhland Husch Blackwell LLP P.O. Box 1379 33 East Main Street, Suite 300 Madison, WI 53701-1379 Email: eric.mcleod@huschblackwell.com Email: lane.ruhland@huschblackwell.com s/Lisa M. Lawless______________________ Lisa M. Lawless Husch Blackwell LLP 555 East Wells Street, Suite 1900 Milwaukee, WI 53202-3819 Email: lisa.lawless@huschblackwell.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Donald J. Trump for President, Inc. 2 Case: 3:20-cv-00385-wmc Document #: 58-1 Filed: 07/27/20 Page 1 of 22 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN DONALD J. TRUMP FOR PRESIDENT, INC., Plaintiff, v. NORTHLAND TELEVISION, LLC, d/b/a WJFW-NBC, Case No. 20-cv-00385-WMC Defendant and PRIORITIES USA ACTION, Intervenor Defendant. TABLES FOR PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSITIONS TO MOTION TO DISMISS OF DEFENDANTS WJFW-NBC AND PRIORITIES USA ACTION Plaintiff, Donald J. Trump for President, Inc. (“plaintiff”), has filed opposition briefs to the motions to dismiss filed by defendant Northland Television, LLC d/b/a WJFW-NBC (“WJFW-NBC”) and by intervenor defendant Priorities USA Action (“PUSA”). As set forth in the Court’s order (Doc.51), on the motions to dismiss, the Court will consider plaintiff’s Complaint (Doc.1-2: 4-64, filed as an attachment to WJFW-NBC’s Notice of Removal), and plaintiff’s “Supplement,” a Complaint filed against PUSA on June 18, 2020 (Doc.48). To assist the Court in reviewing the motions to dismiss and briefing thereto, attached are tables matching up (a) the Complaint to the Supplemental Complaint and (b) the Supplemental Complaint to the Complaint by document page and paragraph number. Also attached is a table setting forth the authorities cited in each of plaintiff’s opposition briefs, by document page number. Case: 3:20-cv-00385-wmc Document #: 58-1 Filed: 07/27/20 Page 2 of 22 Dated this 27th day of July, 2020. By: s/Eric M. McLeod___________________ Eric M. McLeod Lane E. Ruhland Husch Blackwell LLP P.O. Box 1379 33 East Main Street, Suite 300 Madison, WI 53701-1379 Email: eric.mcleod@huschblackwell.com Email: lane.ruhland@huschblackwell.com s/Lisa M. Lawless______________________ Lisa M. Lawless Husch Blackwell LLP 555 East Wells Street, Suite 1900 Milwaukee, WI 53202-3819 Email: lisa.lawless@huschblackwell.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Donald J. Trump for President, Inc. Table Page Complaint to Supplement 3-9 Supplement to Complaint 10-16 Authorities Cited in Opposition Briefs 17-22 2 Case: 3:20-cv-00385-wmc Document #: 58-1 Filed: 07/27/20 Page 3 of 22 Original Complaint (Doc.1-2: 4-64) Doc.1-2: ____ Supplement to Complaint (Doc.48) ¶ Doc.48: _____ ¶ 1 ¶1 4-5 ¶1 2-3 ¶ 21 5 ¶2 3 ¶3 3-4 ¶4 4 ¶5 4 ¶6 5 ¶3 4-5 ¶7 6 ¶4 5 ¶8 6 ¶¶ 5, 6 5 ¶9 5 ¶ 10 6-7 ¶¶ 7, 8 5 ¶ 11 7 ¶9 5 ¶ 12 7 ¶ 10 6 ¶ 13 7 ¶ 11 6 ¶ 14 7 ¶ 12 6 ¶ 15 7 ¶ 13 6 ¶ 16 7 ¶ 14 6 ¶ 17 6 ¶ 18 7 ¶ 15 6 ¶ 19 8 ¶ 16 7 ¶ 20 The paragraphs of the Complaint-Supplement highlighted in yellow have added or different language compared to the original Complaint. 1 3 Case: 3:20-cv-00385-wmc Document #: 58-1 Filed: 07/27/20 Page 4 of 22 Original Complaint (Doc.1-2: 4-64) Doc.1-2: ____ 8-9 Supplement to Complaint (Doc.48) ¶ Doc.48: _____ ¶ ¶¶ 17-23 7 ¶ 21 7 ¶ 22 7 ¶ 23 7 ¶ 24 8 ¶ 25 8 ¶ 26 8 ¶ 27 8 ¶ 28 8 ¶ 29 9 ¶ 30 9 ¶ 24 9 ¶ 31 9-10 ¶ 25 9-10 ¶¶ 32, 33 10 ¶ 26 10 ¶ 34 10 ¶ 27 10 ¶ 35 10 ¶¶ 28, 29 10 ¶ 36 10-11 ¶¶ 37, 38 11 ¶ 39 10 ¶ 30 11 ¶ 31 11 ¶ 32 11 ¶ 40 11 ¶ 33 11 ¶ 41 11 ¶ 34 12 ¶ 42 4 Case: 3:20-cv-00385-wmc Document #: 58-1 Filed: 07/27/20 Page 5 of 22 Original Complaint (Doc.1-2: 4-64) Doc.1-2: ____ Supplement to Complaint (Doc.48) ¶ Doc.48: _____ ¶ 11 ¶ 35 12 ¶ 43 12 ¶ 36 12 ¶ 44 12 ¶ 37 12 ¶ 45 12 ¶ 38 12 ¶ 46 12 ¶ 39 12-13 ¶ 47 12 ¶ 40 13 ¶ 48 13 ¶ 41 13 ¶ 49 13 ¶ 42 13 ¶ 50 13 ¶ 43 13 ¶ 51 13 ¶ 44 13-14 ¶ 52 14 ¶ 45 14 ¶ 53 14-15 ¶ 46 14-15 ¶ 54 15 ¶ 55 15 ¶ 47 15 ¶ 56 15 ¶ 48 15-16 ¶ 57 15 ¶ 49 16 ¶ 58 15 ¶ 50 16 ¶ 59 16 ¶ 60 16 ¶ 61 16 ¶ 62 17 ¶ 63 15 ¶ 51 5 Case: 3:20-cv-00385-wmc Document #: 58-1 Filed: 07/27/20 Page 6 of 22 Original Complaint (Doc.1-2: 4-64) Doc.1-2: ____ 16 Supplement to Complaint (Doc.48) ¶ Doc.48: _____ ¶ 17 ¶ 64 17 ¶ 65 17-18 ¶ 66 18 ¶ 67 18 ¶ 68 18 ¶ 69 19 ¶ 70 19 ¶ 71 19 ¶ 72 19-20 ¶ 73 20 ¶ 74 20 ¶ 75 ¶ 52 16 ¶ 53 20 ¶ 76 16 ¶ 54 23-24 ¶ 95 16-17 ¶ 55 24 ¶ 96 17 ¶ 56 24 ¶ 97 17 ¶ 57 20 ¶ 77 17-18 ¶ 58 20-21 ¶ 78 21 ¶ 79 21 ¶ 80 21 ¶ 81 6 Case: 3:20-cv-00385-wmc Document #: 58-1 Filed: 07/27/20 Page 7 of 22 Original Complaint (Doc.1-2: 4-64) Doc.1-2: ____ Supplement to Complaint (Doc.48) ¶ Doc.48: _____ ¶ 21 ¶ 82 21-22 ¶ 83 22 ¶ 84 22 ¶ 85 22 ¶ 86 22 ¶ 87 22 ¶ 88 22-23 ¶ 89 23 ¶ 90 23 ¶ 91 23 ¶ 92 23 ¶ 93 23 ¶ 94 18 ¶ 59 24 ¶ 98 18 ¶ 60 24 ¶ 99 18 ¶ 61 25 ¶ 100 18 ¶ 62 25 ¶ 101 18-19 ¶ 63 25-26 ¶ 107 19 ¶ 64 25 ¶ 102 25 ¶ 103 25 ¶ 104 7 Case: 3:20-cv-00385-wmc Document #: 58-1 Filed: 07/27/20 Page 8 of 22 Original Complaint (Doc.1-2: 4-64) Doc.1-2: ____ Supplement to Complaint (Doc.48) ¶ Doc.48: _____ ¶ 25 ¶ 105 25 ¶ 106 26 ¶ 108 26 ¶ 109 19 ¶ 65 26 ¶¶ 110, 111 19 ¶ 66 26 ¶ 112 19 ¶ 67 26 ¶ 113 19 ¶ 68 27 ¶ 114 27 ¶ 115 27 ¶ 116 19 ¶ 69 27 ¶ 117 19 ¶ 70 27 ¶ 118 20 ¶ 71 27 ¶ 119 20 ¶ 72 27-28 ¶ 120 20 ¶ 73 20 ¶ 74 28 ¶ 121 20 ¶ 75 28 ¶ 122 Doc.48-1 Exhibit 1 Doc.48-2 Exhibit 2 Doc.48-3 Exhibit 3 Doc.48-4 Exhibit 4 Doc.48-5 Exhibit 5 8 Case: 3:20-cv-00385-wmc Document #: 58-1 Filed: 07/27/20 Page 9 of 22 Original Complaint (Doc.1-2: 4-64) Doc.1-2: ____ Supplement to Complaint (Doc.48) ¶ Doc.48: _____ ¶ Doc.48-6 Exhibit 6 Doc.48-7 Exhibit 7 Doc.48-8 Exhibit 8 22-25 Exhibit A 26-27 Exhibit B Doc.48-9 Exhibit B 28-34 Exhibit C Doc.48-10 Exhibit C 35-44 Exhibit D Doc.48-11 Exhibit D 45-51 Exhibit E Doc.48-12 Exhibit E 52-57 Exhibit F Doc.48-13 Exhibit F 58-64 Exhibit G Doc.48-14 Exhibit G 9 Case: 3:20-cv-00385-wmc Document #: 58-1 Filed: 07/27/20 Page 10 of 22 Supplement to Complaint (Doc.48) Doc.48: _____ ¶ Original Complaint (Doc.1-2: 4-64) Doc.1-2: ____ ¶ 1 ¶1 2-3 ¶ 22 4-5 ¶1 3 ¶3 5 ¶2 3-4 ¶4 4 ¶5 4 ¶6 4-5 ¶7 5 ¶3 5 ¶8 6 ¶4 6 ¶¶ 5, 6 5 ¶9 5 ¶ 10 5 ¶ 11 6-7 ¶¶ 7, 8 5 ¶ 12 7 ¶9 6 ¶ 13 7 ¶ 10 6 ¶ 14 7 ¶ 11 6 ¶ 15 7 ¶ 12 6 ¶ 16 7 ¶ 13 6 ¶ 17 7 ¶ 14 6 ¶ 18 6 ¶ 19 7 ¶ 15 7 ¶ 20 8 ¶ 16 The paragraphs of the Complaint-Supplement highlighted in yellow have added or different language compared to the original Complaint. 2 10 Case: 3:20-cv-00385-wmc Document #: 58-1 Filed: 07/27/20 Page 11 of 22 Supplement to Complaint (Doc.48) Doc.48: _____ ¶ Original Complaint (Doc.1-2: 4-64) Doc.1-2: ____ ¶ 8-9 ¶¶ 17-23 7 ¶ 21 7 ¶ 22 7 ¶ 23 7 ¶ 24 8 ¶ 25 8 ¶ 26 8 ¶ 27 8 ¶ 28 8 ¶ 29 9 ¶ 30 9 ¶ 31 9 ¶ 24 9-10 ¶¶ 32, 33 9-10 ¶ 25 10 ¶ 34 10 ¶ 26 10 ¶ 35 10 ¶ 27 10 ¶ 36 10 ¶¶ 28, 29 10-11 ¶¶ 37, 38 11 ¶ 39 10 ¶ 30 11 ¶ 31 11 ¶ 40 11 ¶ 32 11 ¶ 41 11 ¶ 33 12 ¶ 42 11 ¶ 34 11 Case: 3:20-cv-00385-wmc Document #: 58-1 Filed: 07/27/20 Page 12 of 22 Supplement to Complaint (Doc.48) Doc.48: _____ ¶ Original Complaint (Doc.1-2: 4-64) Doc.1-2: ____ ¶ 12 ¶ 43 11 ¶ 35 12 ¶ 44 12 ¶ 36 12 ¶ 45 12 ¶ 37 12 ¶ 46 12 ¶ 38 12-13 ¶ 47 12 ¶ 39 13 ¶ 48 12 ¶ 40 13 ¶ 49 13 ¶ 41 13 ¶ 50 13 ¶ 42 13 ¶ 51 13 ¶ 43 13-14 ¶ 52 13 ¶ 44 14 ¶ 53 14 ¶ 45 14-15 ¶ 54 14-15 ¶ 46 15 ¶ 55 15 ¶ 56 15 ¶ 47 15-16 ¶ 57 15 ¶ 48 16 ¶ 58 15 ¶ 49 15 ¶ 50 15 ¶ 51 16 ¶ 59 16 ¶ 60 16 ¶ 61 16 ¶ 62 17 ¶ 63 12 Case: 3:20-cv-00385-wmc Document #: 58-1 Filed: 07/27/20 Page 13 of 22 Supplement to Complaint (Doc.48) Doc.48: _____ ¶ 17 ¶ 64 17 ¶ 65 17-18 ¶ 66 18 ¶ 67 18 ¶ 68 18 ¶ 69 19 ¶ 70 19 ¶ 71 19 ¶ 72 19-20 ¶ 73 20 ¶ 74 Original Complaint (Doc.1-2: 4-64) Doc.1-2: ____ ¶ 16 ¶ 52 20 ¶ 75 20 ¶ 76 16 ¶ 53 20 ¶ 77 17 ¶ 57 20-21 ¶ 78 17-18 ¶ 58 21 ¶ 79 21 ¶ 80 21 ¶ 81 21 ¶ 82 21-22 ¶ 83 22 ¶ 84 13 Case: 3:20-cv-00385-wmc Document #: 58-1 Filed: 07/27/20 Page 14 of 22 Supplement to Complaint (Doc.48) Doc.48: _____ ¶ Original Complaint (Doc.1-2: 4-64) Doc.1-2: ____ ¶ 22 ¶ 85 22 ¶ 86 22 ¶ 87 22 ¶ 88 22-23 ¶ 89 23 ¶ 90 23 ¶ 91 23 ¶ 92 23 ¶ 93 23 ¶ 94 23-24 ¶ 95 16 ¶ 54 24 ¶ 96 16-17 ¶ 55 24 ¶ 97 17 ¶ 56 24 ¶ 98 18 ¶ 59 24 ¶ 99 18 ¶ 60 25 ¶ 100 18 ¶ 61 25 ¶ 101 18 ¶ 62 19 ¶ 64 25 ¶ 102 25 ¶ 103 25 ¶ 104 25 ¶ 105 14 Case: 3:20-cv-00385-wmc Document #: 58-1 Filed: 07/27/20 Page 15 of 22 Supplement to Complaint (Doc.48) Doc.48: _____ ¶ 25 ¶ 106 25-26 ¶ 107 26 ¶ 108 26 ¶ 109 26 Original Complaint (Doc.1-2: 4-64) Doc.1-2: ____ ¶ 18-19 ¶ 63 ¶¶ 110, 111 19 ¶ 65 26 ¶ 112 19 ¶ 66 26 ¶ 113 19 ¶ 67 27 ¶ 114 19 ¶ 68 27 ¶ 115 27 ¶ 116 27 ¶ 117 19 ¶ 69 27 ¶ 118 19 ¶ 70 27 ¶ 119 20 ¶ 71 27-28 ¶ 120 20 ¶ 72 20 ¶ 73 28 ¶ 121 20 ¶ 74 28 ¶ 122 20 ¶ 75 Doc.48-1 Exhibit 1 Doc.48-2 Exhibit 2 Doc.48-3 Exhibit 3 Doc.48-4 Exhibit 4 Doc.48-5 Exhibt 5 15 Case: 3:20-cv-00385-wmc Document #: 58-1 Filed: 07/27/20 Page 16 of 22 Supplement to Complaint (Doc.48) Doc.48: _____ ¶ Doc.48-6 Exhibit 6 Doc.48-7 Exhibit 7 Doc.48-8 Exhibit 8 Original Complaint (Doc.1-2: 4-64) Doc.1-2: ____ ¶ 22-25 Exhibit A Doc.48-9 Exhibit B 26-27 Exhibit B Doc.48-10 Exhibit C 28-34 Exhibit C Doc.48-11 Exhibit D 35-44 Exhibit D Doc.48-12 Exhibit E 45-51 Exhibit E Doc.48-13 Exhibit F 52-57 Exhibit F Doc.48-14 Exhibit G 58-64 Exhibit G 16 Case: 3:20-cv-00385-wmc Document #: 58-1 Filed: 07/27/20 Page 17 of 22 Cases Cited in Plaintiff’s Opposition to Motion to Dismiss Doc.38: ______ A & B Distrib., Inc. v. Heggie’s Pizza, LLC, 2019 WL 6837858 (W.D. Wis. Dec. 16, 2019) Advanced Tech. Corp. v. Instron, Inc., 66 F. Supp. 3d 263 (D. Mass. 2014) Allen-Noll v. Madison Area Tech. Coll., 2018 WL 6834477 (W.D. Wis. Dec. 28, 2018) Amoroso v. Schuh, 278 F. Supp. 3d 1106 (W.D. Wis. 2017) 35 Doc.54: _____ 38 14 30 14-15, 20, 30 31, 37-38, 52 Anderson v. The Augusta Chronicle, 585 S.E.2d 506 (S.C. Ct. App. 2003) Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662 (2009) Bartholet v. Reishauer A.G. (Zurich), 953 F.2d 1073 (7th Cir.1992) Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 (2007) Bentley v. Bunton, 94 S.W.3d 561 (Tex. 2002) Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc., 466 U.S. 485 (1984) Boyce & Isley, PLLC v. Cooper, 568 S.E.2d 893 (N.C. Ct. App. 2002) 17, 45 33-34, 85 13, 14, 15 30, 31 14 31 13, 14 30 42 82 45 86 17, 24, 43, 49 34, 44, 83 Boyce & Isley, PLLC v. Cooper, 673 S.E.2d 6946 (N.C. Ct. App. 2009) Brodzki v. Wisconsin, 2011 WL 1576388 (W.D. Wis. Apr. 26, 2011) Caudle v. Thomason, 942 F. Supp. 635 (D.D.C. 1996) Church of Scientology of California v. Flynn, 744 F.2d 694 (9th Cir. 1984) Cook v. Winfrey, 141 F.3d 322 (7th Cir. 1998) Corp. Training Unlimited, Inc. v. Nat’l Broad. Co., 981 F. Supp. 112 (E.D.N.Y. 1997) Corp. Training Unlimited, Inc. v. Nat’l Broad. Co., Inc., 868 F. Supp. 501 (E.D.N.Y. 1994) Croixland Properties Ltd. P’ship v. Corcoran, 174 F.3d 213 (D.C. Cir. 1999) Daytree at Cortland Square, Inc. v. Walsh, 332 F. Supp. 3d 610 (E.D.N.Y. 2018) DeKeyser v. Thyssenkrupp Waupaca, Inc., 589 F. Supp. 2d 1026 (E.D. Wis. 2008) 17 24 44 14 31 20, 22 38, 41 20 37 13 66 66 20 38 41 14 30 Case: 3:20-cv-00385-wmc Document #: 58-1 Filed: 07/27/20 Page 18 of 22 Cases Cited in Plaintiff’s Opposition to Motion to Dismiss Doc.38: ______ Doc.54: _____ Deripaska v. Associated Press, 282 F. Supp. 3d 133 (D.D.C. 2017) Dewine v. Ohio Elections Comm’n, 399 N.E.2d 99 (Ohio Ct. App. 1978) Doe v. Hagar, 765 F.3d 855 (8th Cir. 2014) Ennenga v. Starns, 677 F.3d 766, 773–74 (7th Cir. 2012) Felix v. Westinghouse Radio Stations, 186 F.2d 1 (3d Cir. 1950) Friends of Phil Gramm v. Americans for Phil Gramm in '84, 587 F. Supp. 769 (E.D. Va. 1984) Garrison v. Louisiana, 379 U.S. 64 (1964) Geinosky v. City of Chicago, 675 F.3d 743 (7th Cir. 2012) Gertz v. Welch, Inc., 418 U.S. 323 (1974) Goodson v. Republican State Leadership Comm. - Judicial Fairness Initiative, 2018 WL 6430825 (E.D. Ark. Nov. 1, 2018) Gorman v. Swaggart, 524 So. 2d 915 (La. Ct. App. 1988) Gosden v. Louis, 687 N.E.2d 481 (Ohio Ct. App. 1996) Hamus v. Bank of New York Mellon, 2011 WL 13266806 (W.D. Wis. May 13, 2011) Hanks v. Wavy Broad., LLC, 2012 WL 405065 (E.D. Va. Feb. 8, 2012) Harnischfeger Corp. v. Harbor Ins. Co., 927 F.2d 974 (7th Cir. 1991) Hart v. Bennet, 2003 WI App 231, 267 Wis. 2d 919, 672 N.W.2d 306 Hatmaker v. Memorial Medical Center, 619 F.3d 741 (7th Cir. 2010) Issa v. Applegate, 31 Cal App. 5th 689 (Ct. App. 2019) Jankovic v. Int’l Crisis Grp., 494 F.3d 1080 (D.C. Cir. 2007) John v. Journal Commc’ns, Inc., 801 F. Supp. 210 (E.D. Wis. 1992) Justice v. Town of Cicero, 577 F.3d 768 (7th Cir. 2009) 42 82 24 44 18 38 48 7 13 25 45 41 81 47, 49 16-17 30 24 44 23-24 42-43 20 38 14 31 39 35 30 52 14 31 62 22 41 45 86 13 30 Case: 3:20-cv-00385-wmc Document #: 58-1 Filed: 07/27/20 Page 19 of 22 Cases Cited in Plaintiff’s Opposition to Motion to Dismiss Doc.38: ______ Doc.54: _____ Kamtel, Inc. v. Bore Tech Constr., LLC, 2017 WL 532337 (W.D. Wis. Feb. 9, 2017) Keohane v. Stewart, 882 P.2d 1293 (Colo. 1994) Kerby v. Hal Roach Studios, 53 Cal. App. 2d 207, 127 P.2d 577 (1942) Klentzman v. Brady, 456 S.W.3d 239 (Tex. App. 2014) Ladd v. Uecker, 2010 WI App 28 323 Wis. 2d 798, 779 N.W.2d 723 Levesque v. Doocy, 560 F.3d 82 (1st Cir. 2009) Liberty Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. O’Keefe, 205 Wis. 2d 524, 556 N.W.2d 133 (Ct. App. 1996) Mahaffey v. Ramos, 588 F.3d 1142 (7th Cir. 2009) Martin v. Outboard Marine Corp., 15 Wis. 2d 452, 113 N.W.2d 135 (1962) Masson v. New Yorker Magazine, Inc., 501 U.S. 496 (1991) 89 Masson v. New Yorker Magazine, Inc., 960 F.2d 896 (9th Cir. 1992) Metabolife Int’l, Inc. v. Wornick, 264 F.3d 832 (9th Cir. 2001) Miller v. F.C.C., 66 F.3d 1140 (11th Cir. 1995) More v. Callahan, 2013 WL 4718333 (W.D. Wis. Sept. 3, 2013) Munger v. Seehafer, 2016 WI App 89, 372 Wis. 2d 749, 890 N.W.2d 22 Nat’l Right To Life Political Action Comm. v. Friends of Bryan, 741 F. Supp. 807 (D. Nev. 1990) New York Times v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964) Next Techs., Inc. v. Beyond the Office Door LLC, 2020 WL 3077052 (W.D. Wis. June 10, 2020) Ogren v. Employers Reinsurance Corp., 119 Wis. 2d 379, 350 N.W.2d 725 (Ct. App. 1984) 19 20 38 56 21 39 18 36 56 31 53 86 31 53 29, 32-34, 35, 38, 40, 43-44, 4445 51, 54-56, 57, 61, 63, 65, 67, 69, 70, 72, 78, 83-84, 8586, 86, 89 46 87 45 85 24 44 13 30 34-35 24 45 16-17, 41 32, 81 52 21 38 Case: 3:20-cv-00385-wmc Document #: 58-1 Filed: 07/27/20 Page 20 of 22 Cases Cited in Plaintiff’s Opposition to Motion to Dismiss Doc.38: ______ Doc.54: _____ Palin v. New York Times Co., 940 F.3d 804 (2d Cir. 2019) Palka v. Shelton, 623 F.3d 447 (7th Cir. 2010) Palm Springs Tennis Club v. Rangel, 73 Cal. App. 4th 1, 86 Cal. Rptr. 2d 73 (1999) Papasan v. Allain, 478 U.S. 265 (1986) Peagler v. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc., 560 P.2d 1216 (Ariz. 1977) Perkins v. Littleton, 270 So. 3d 208 (Miss. Ct. App. 2018) Pippen v. NBCUniversal Media, LLC, 734 F.3d 610 (7th Cir. 2013) Pub. Office Corp. v. Clinton for President Comm., 194 F.3d 139 (D.C. Cir. 1999) Republican Party of Minnesota v. White, 536 U.S. 765 (2002) Rosenthal v. R. W. Smith Co., 260 F. Supp. 3d 588 (W.D. Va. 2017) Schatz v. Republican State Leadership Comm., 669 F.3d 50 (1st Cir. 2012) Schiavone Const. Co. v. Time, Inc., 619 F. Supp. 684 (D.N.J. 1985) St. Amant v. Thompson, 390 U.S. 727 (1968) Starobin v. Northridge Lakes Dev. Co., 94 Wis. 2d 1, 287 N.W.2d 747 (1980) Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Env’t, 523 U.S. 83 (1998) Stevens v. Sun Publ’g Co., 270 S.C. 65, 240 S.E.2d 812 (1978) Storms v. Action Wisconsin Inc., 2008 WI 56, 309 Wis. 2d 704, 750 N.W.2d 739 Taj Mahal Travel, Inc. v. Delta Airlines, Inc., 164 F.3d 186 (3d Cir. 1998) Tatur v. Solsrud, 174 Wis. 2d 735, 498 N.W.2d 232 (1993) Tharpe v. Saunders, 285 Va. 476, 737 S.E.2d 890 (2013) The Team Working for You v. Ohio Elections Comm., 754 N.E.2d 273 (Ohio Ct App. 2001) 45 20 13 30 40 15 31 21 39 39 41 81-82 24 44 24 45 40 24 44 21 39 41 81 31 54 13 42 82-83 18, 41 36, 62, 81 20 37 37 70 61 24 44 Case: 3:20-cv-00385-wmc Document #: 58-1 Filed: 07/27/20 Page 21 of 22 Cases Cited in Plaintiff’s Opposition to Motion to Dismiss Doc.38: ______ Doc.54: _____ Thirteen Comm. v. Weinreb, 214 Cal. Rptr. 297 (Cal. Ct. App. 1985) Time, Inc. v. Pape, 401 U.S. 279 (1971) Tobey v. Chibucos, 890 F.3d 634 (7th Cir. 2018) Torgerson v. Journal/Sentinel, Inc., 210 Wis. 2d 524, 563 N.W.2d 472 (1997) Turner v. KTRK Television, Inc., 38 S.W.3d 103 (Tex. 2000) Uebelacker v. Paula Allen Holdings, Inc., 464 F. Supp. 2d 791 (W.D. Wis. 2006) United States v. Hook, 471 F.3d 766 (7th Cir.2006) Valento v. Ulrich, 402 N.W.2d 809 (Minn. Ct. App. 1987) Vander Linden v. Wilbanks, 128 F. Supp. 2d 900 (D.S.C. 2000) Vasquez v. Whole Foods Mkt., Inc., 302 F. Supp. 3d 36 (D.D.C. 2018) Wisconsin Cent. Ltd. v. Acuity, 2011 WL 208404 (E.D. Wis. Jan. 21, 2011) Wittman v. Personhuballah, 136 S. Ct. 1732 (2016) Writers Guild of Am., W., Inc. v. Superior Court for Los Angeles Cty.,78 Cal. Rptr. 520 (Cal. Ct. App. 1969) Young v. Gannett Satellite Info. Network, Inc., 837 F. Supp. 2d 758 (S.D. Ohio 2011) 25 45 45 86 48 18, 19, 41 62, 81 18, 42 34, 82 30, 31 53 89-90 24 44 24 44 21 39 35 35 21 40 42 82 47 U.S.C. § 312(a)(7) 6 13 52 U.S.C. § 30102(e)(1) and (3) 5 10 Wis. Stat. § 809.23(3) 34 Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(2) 13 30 11 CFR § 9032.1(a 5 9 47 CFR § 73.1941(a) 7 13 1 Law of Defamation § 4:40 (2d ed.) 38 21 Case: 3:20-cv-00385-wmc Document #: 58-1 Filed: 07/27/20 Page 22 of 22 Cases Cited in Plaintiff’s Opposition to Motion to Dismiss Doc.38: ______ Doc.54: _____ 1 Rights and Liabilities in Media Content § 6:9 (2d ed.) 36 3 Dobbs, The Law of Torts (2d Ed. 2011) 19, 21 36, 40 Restatement (Second) of Torts § 561 22, 27 42, 49 Restatement (Second) of Torts § 564 19, 20 36, 38 Restatement (Second) of Torts § 580A 41, 42 81, 82 22