INDEX NO. 3908/2019 FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 08/17/2020 09:10 PM NYSCEF DOC. NO. 39 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/17/2020 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF KINGS In the Matter of the Application of the New York State Urban Development Corporation d/b/a Empire State Development, Petitioner To acquire title in fee in certain real property, required for the Index No. 3908/19 NOTICE OF ENTRY ATLANTIC YARDS LAND USE IMPROVEMENT AND CIVIC PROJECT – PHASE 2B BLOCK 927, LOT 1 AND BLOCK 927, LOT 16 (FEE) as said property is shown on the current Tax Map of the Borough of Brooklyn, City and State of New York. PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the annexed Decision and Order, dated August 12, 2020, was entered in the office of the Clerk of the County of Kings on the 12th day of August, 2020. August 17, 2020 New York, New York 1 of 10 INDEX NO. 3908/2019 FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 08/17/2020 09:10 PM NYSCEF DOC. NO. 39 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/17/2020 CRAVATH, SWAINE & MOORE LLP /s/ Robert H. Baron By: Robert H. Baron Rory A. Leraris Justin C. Clarke 825 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10019 (212) 474-1000 GOLDBERG WEG & MARKUS PLLC 14 Wall Street, Suite 2064 New York, NY 10005 (212) 697-3250 DOMENIC M. RECCHIA, JR. 172 Gravesend Neck Road Brooklyn, NY 11233 (718) 336-5550 GOLDSTEIN, RIKON, RIKON & HOUGHTON, P.C. 381 Park Avenue South, Suite 901 New York, NY 10016 (212) 422-4000 Attorneys for Condemnee-Respondent TO: Charles S. Webb III Kenneth J. Applebaum Judith Z. Katz Adam H. Brodsky BERGER & WEBB, LLP 7 Times Square New York, NY 10036 (212) 319-1900 Attorneys for Petitioner -2- 2 of 10 FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 08/17/2020 09:10 PM NYSCEF DOC. NO. 39 INDEX NO. 3908/2019 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/17/2020 Harold P. Weinberger James G. Greilsheimer Susan Jacquemot Cynthia Siderman KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS & FRANKEL LLP 1177 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10036 (212) 715-9136 Attorneys for FC Pacific Associates LLC -3- 3 of 10 INDEX NO. 3908/2019 INDEX NO. 3908/2019 FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 08/17/2020 09:10 PM SCEÉ' NYSCEF DOC. NO. 39 NY DOC. NO. 38 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/17/2020 NY SCEF: RECE IVED 08/17/2020 At an Court for at IAS of the the Part Term, state New of County of Center, Brooklyn, Civic Kings, N in and Courthouse, New York, on August of the 2020. T: Wayne Hon. held York, day Supreme the at the 12th P R E S E of 89 P. Saitta, Justice. ----------------------------------------------------------------------X In the Matter URBAN of the Application DEVELOPMENT NEW YORK the STATE d/b/a DEVVELOPMENT STATE EMPIRE of CORPORATION No Index 3908/19 Petitioner, DECISION to acquire real title in LOT 927, as said property Borough of - 1 and as shown 2B BLOCK 927, the Brooklyn, City ------------------------------------------------------------- AJ appeal of pursuant a to Upon the of Goldberg, Weg H Robert & & Houghton, Memorandum the reading Affirmation Rikon, of of Marcus to in the 16 Map (FEE) of the York. it Order Baron PLLC, Support, Show of Esq., condemnation obtained with to this stay agreement PC as attorneys Law Tax New of seeks an LOT current State judgment terms for X Richards declaratory ORDER IMPROVEMENT USE on and certain acquired, PHASE and Claimant in heretofore PROJECT CIVIC absolute LAND YARDS ATLANTIC BLOCK Simple not where Property, AND Fee Dominic requiring its City Ratner Forest Cause dated Cravath M for Condemnee dated June & Recchia AJ 5, 2020, Jr. 18, Moore Esq., Richards, the to property 2020, LLP, and dated Affirmation an pending purchased by LLC. Companies June Swaine of 10 7 41 of proceeding the Emergency co-counsel Goldstein, June with Rikon, 5, 2020, in Support the of INDEX NO. 3908/2019 INDEX NO. 3908/2019 FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 08/17/2020 09:10 PM NYSCEF DOC. NO. 39 NYSCEF DOC. 38 NO. H Robert in RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/17/2020 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/17/2020 Baron Opposition York State dated July Urban the deliberation to condemn sought to be Fourth Avenue, Forest A.J. of order given provided AJ that a condominium condominium replacement Avenue would property by executed Richards in be for that the on its of Law The property Atlantic Avenue, Brooklyn. ATLANTIC and been below. Procedure by Borough the ("FCRC") part the street current the designated by the on YARDS ESDC as the to of its be and store. on which the the corner AJ site. Richards determination the FCRC directed to of of provide an AJ site. a Letter sell a store pending Ash Sylvia at located property operates proceeding would building of currently Justice property Richards AJ of and issued in have ("AYDC") condemnation a replacement and Avenue due and forth set Project. roughly Reply thereto, counsel of Yards the annexed Domain Atlantic ("ESDC"), 2, 2020; reasons the for bounded LLC exhibit New the project. owner this stay a judgment FCRC which to the 4th and LLC Yards is Flatbush Companies Atlantic Richards with Richards Ratner the is the Eminent the with proceeding and COMPANY Avenue an this Street, City of the developers in to connection in is granted pursuant brought condemned Cause July argument after 2020; for Development dated and 7, 2020, 7, July attorneys State Opposition Affirmation the thereto; LLP, Empire in July Show to property DEVELOPMENT Atlantic is Pacific dated Law, Law dated Esq., Order the proceeding (EDPL) appeal Baron & Webb d/b/a of annexed exhibits Berger of Corporation of thereon, This seeks H Robert Memorandum Reply Esq Memorandum the and 5, 2020, Brodsky, Development 2, 2020, of June H Adam of Affirmation dated Esq., Intent on mezzanine As to property built part 2 of 10 7 52 of the FCRC site levels of dated (LOI), the LOI, as December and part and AJ in return of the would Richards 2, 2006, for project. be used also being The as agreed a INDEX NO. 3908/2019 INDEX NO. 3908/2019 FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 08/17/2020 09:10 PM NYSCEF NO. 39 F DOC. NYSC DOC. NO. 38 not RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/17/2020 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/17/2020 join to In Richards notice AJ Richards of In an Richards the FCRC 2015, performance be and the its LOI to were affiliates sold the Atlantic never completed a portion of project. Yards or their The final executed. interest the in project to the Group. In in challenges for FCRC 2014 Greenland was public the documents implementing AJ of any of its the to to condemnation begin acquire the property an action commenced eminent by ESDC and proceedings gave domain. FCRC against specific seeking LOI. and judgment, judgment dated, that declaring of the and LOI, harmed irreparably intent then order breach ESDC directed FCRC if LOI the AJ that 28, January was Richards acquired a valid has the no Judge 2019, and property other than ordered FCRC that FCRC and would at law remedy pursuant AJ granted contract, binding adequate Ash Sylvia to the terms of LOI. Order The obligations from the under the breaching FCRC Appellate has argues harmed to AJ Division that it LOI will if ESDC further and enjoined the order FCRC and anyone to perform specifically in working concert with its FCRC, . date this pursuant Appellate LOI, No filed Claimant Judgment appealed Division. ESDC deadline and for on for seeks decides FCRC's be deprived of is able to the vest has its time its of FCRC judgment property. to this or for It the been 21, a stay appeal and yet November §401(C) Richards judgment argument petition EDPL and also 3 7 63 of of 10 is currently before the set. 2019 file appeal the eminent a few petition argues before was domain performs specific days under ten-year run. until proceeding the performance that to the allowing LOI. and ESDC AJ the Richards irreparably to vest the INDEX NO. 3908/2019 INDEX NO. 3908/2019 FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 08/17/2020 09:10 PM NYSCEF DOC. NO. 39 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 38 property in RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/17/2020 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/17/2020 would violate the with FCRC, from concert ESDC opposes because it not concert with was credible. In decision her would the the The LAFPMRA to to offer all ESDC accept by of the not bound action the those working it is not order in acting independently. FCRC with FCRC that and Ash's Judge by property concert that found directed ESDC to AJ of principal to have terms the project, with or its ESDC to affiliates is commence not the developer the of the 2.o4 condemnation the offer by an of affiliate provided project which FCRC, AYDC that and property was would ESDC that develop. to as Section the condemning AYDC to AYDC, Management Property Funding LAFPMRA The of AYDC, about Acquisition project. costs over a settlement ESDC and the in acting a Land the proceedings. FCRC opposition is condemn to "LAFPMRA") allows Additionally, the of properties with agree an for turn consult not into (the developer condemnation to is it performance right Ash entered Agreement ESDC reimburse it Judge ESDC Relocation as its or FCRC, enjoining proceedings. Further, named that specific pursuing order LOI. arguing the that Ash's Judge the motion to argument condemnation and the but of breaching a party FCRC ESDC's terms to be LAFPMRA provides proceedings. a condemnee that has involved It been throughout AYDC that AYDC grants refused by the has the right right ESDC or LOI and to object a condemnee. Richards received of the and has the LOI AJ already of benefit was that Richards, performed partly that partial AJ Richards in compliance project. 4 of 10 7 74 of under to performance. would with one Specifically, not join the the LOI, did both community not oppose INDEX NO. 3908/2019 INDEX 3908/2019 NO. FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 08/17/2020 09:10 PM DOC' NYSCEF DOC. NO. 39 NYSCEF NO. 38 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/17/2020 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/17/2020 ESDC this condemning grant the to Judge directing should be order FCRC to until judgment the harmed other if Forest than to is taken, then provides In this remedy in for Greenland will the Richards appeal have it in the replacement to it right comply property the would possible with Forest the specific in concert. To to FCRC abet of the LOI this reason, in case is determined. should proceeding has held that would a be obtain City be money irreparably the in condemn the that order property, to stay for LOI value would the an not property of other real be are value the of the not the the on the hand property. adequate order purchase LOI. In pending performance of free Ash's the proceeding specific property of 10 7 85 of the taken, to order in The and for only case LOI. the and for is granted but if if Judge as called case addition pointless if the performance business. property, be the its to under even this in compensation loss perform to Richards with in petition just any because is entirely fact involved for to this this "AJ or outside judgment Ash acquiring LOI." as a business FCRC that concert If the for For Judge that in entitled not argues still However, is LOI. whether Richards. and the proceeding. property to acting ESDC allow the and as to remedy working interests of of the would those compensation failure also adequate equities AJ of the fixtures, the favor the out, and just of the order are they acquiring Ash's as it relates would under Judge of Richards to AJ of terms this from perform the AJ context, determination Richards points benefits ESDC ESDC to those property an or City ESDC identical in is decided, FCRC appeal project Yards appeal balancing be pursuant As real not the however entities, Atlantic barring decidedly would the specifically the weighs independent before Ash's stayed two for vest Additionally, stayed, are property petition evading and FCRC and any the is affirmed, encumbrances. is affirmed, the property that event, that and there FCRC or give AJ would be INDEX NO. INDEX NO . 3908/2019 3908/2019 FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 08/17/2020 09:10 PM ' NYSCEF DOC. NO. 39 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 38 little reason ESDC for to condemn that Judge RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/17/2020 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/17/2020 the it as property would be already owned the by developer. it Also, affiliates from eminent domain. appears ESDC would articulated by ESDC years the final notice of since gave they In by which to ready had proceed the proposal for therefore as of current planned on the take the project about to at this developer on for. The site 5 will project even to this if to was filed There time if the to developed at this does to time "[t]o to not The only has waited harm ten years because after the the time developer larger date is building developer's and Directors, MGPP the the the ESD's provide construct by vested. by according its proceeding. a significantly that or property four that were approved correct, technically this indication ESDC been and November build by stayed. project last property approval not the is no the ESDC commence property has proceed to ADYC FCRC, acquiring However, challenges only bar was project. assertion be in proceeding run. is seeking provides incurred the the could upheld, any planned (the Modified real assurance at its building size. It decision the is ready if proceeding was Plans)" developer harmed it developing to filed the today costs of this bulk greater that the be plan Project in intent that the General be delay their with current not if order, for determinations to Moreover, than is it is evident it ESDC reimbursing Lastly, Ash's appears is made on and building appeal probable will not that whether any no to necessary actually cause on development seek the reviews transfer are this development completed. a significant 6 7 96 of o f 10 delay Thus, in will property development rights a stay occur to enlarge decision pending of the until site. a the INDEX NO. 3908/2019 INDEX NO. 3908/2019 FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 08/17/2020 09:10 PM NYSCEF DOC. NO. 39 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 38 it WHEREFORE, resolution LLC, Case ' • of No. the appeal 2019-o1624 is in RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/17/2020 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/17/2020 ORDERED hereby A.J. Richards (2nd Dept). & that Sons, Inc., this proceeding v Forest City E N T E R: JSC R noN.gm 3.S.C. 7 7 of of 7 10 10 SM is stayed Ratner pending Companies