Display Ad 30 -- No Title New York Times Aug 2, 2001' PrOQuest Historical Newspapers: The New York Times (1851-2007) with Index (1851-1993) pg. A21 . Sifting and winnowing Twenty years ago. ExxonMobil believed that oil prices would continue to rise. allowing us to make money extracting oil from oil shales in Colorado. We were very wrong. Similarly. the U.S. government. confident that petroreum could be economically produced from coal. cre? ated the now defunct but hugely expensive Fuels CorpOration. Oops. More re- cently. regulators in California thought they could mandate a revolution in transportation with all-electric vehicles. Oops again. There are numerous examples of well-inten- tioned research programs for products nobody wanted. regulatory man- dates for advances that proved unattainable. proi- acts that seriously mis- judged the costs of production. Probably the least predictable aspect of economic life is technology. including energy technology. in 1973. right after the first OPEC oil shock. few would have predicted that US. en- ergy use per dollar of GDP would deerease 40 percent by the year 2000. But that's what hap- pened. Some said that energy was Such a ne- cessity that the ordinary laws of economics didn't apply. True. there have been some special in- centives for conservation. But energy conserva? tion was mostly achieved by consumers who wanted to save money and by businesses that adopted new energy-saving technologies be- cause they were profitable. As we have learned. energy efficiency sometimes mails from innovations in industries that produce energy and sometimes in energy- using industries; sometimes it comes from Wise use of energy comes from invest~ ments in new ideas and approaches changes in work practices or consumer behav- ior: sometimes it requires large-scale capital in- vestments. But ultimately. wise use of energy comes from investments in new ideas and ap- proaches. Today, there are many technical innova- tions on the herizon that may revolutionize the production and use of energy fuel cells and gasoline-electric engines for automobiles. natu- ral-gas?to-quuid and clean-coal technologies. next-generation nuclear reactors. ethanol from waste. crops. and im- proved techniques to gen- erate power using wind and solar energy. What we don't know is which of these technologies, or oth- ers yet unidentified. will prove to be the best choice. After all. who in 1970 could have foreseen the impact of innumerable applications of mi- crocomputers in the energy industry. or the huge improvements in turbine ef?ciency that have made natural gas the fuel of choice for new electricity generation? That's why it's important that business and government leaders not pretend that we know enough to force our energy future to cen- form to some predetermined vision. Nor should some sources be subsidized. thereby masking their true costs and true consumer preferences. Future improvements can come from oii. gas. coal. nuclear power. alternative energies and conservation technologies. Governments should encourage creativrty. competition and. to cite words used a century ago by the Regents of the University of Wisconsin. "that continual and fearless sifting and winn0wing by which alone the truth can be found.? - ExonMobil'" Please welt our Web 5:19 at wwexxonrrobil corn 1. Rift Mob-I Stagnation Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.