Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSDl4-001332 Inc1dent Informatlon Date/Time Reported Date/Time At: Date/Time Found Of?cer 04/02/2014 16:06 14:30 04/02/2014 16:06 (250303) DUDLEY. NICOL Incident Location Supern'sing Of?cer 2470 SAGE CANYON RD. CA 94573 (250120) ORTIZ. OSCAR Case Status Disposition LEARED BY EXC - LEARED BY COMPLAINT Charges Charge Type Description Statute UCR Att 1 State FEL - MURDER 187 (A) PC 09A Com Alcohol, Drugs or Computers Used Location Type Premises Entered Forced Entry W'eapons Alcohol Drugs Computers ARK Yes No 1. mat Object (club. Etc.) Entry Exit Criminal Activity 2- 3. Bias Motivation Bias Target Bias Circumstances Hate Group Charge Type Description Statute UCR Att 2 State FEL - ROBBERY 211 PC 120 Com Alcohol, Drugs or Computers Used Location Type Premises Entered Forced Entry Weapons El Alcohol Drugs Computers HIGHW AD ALLEY Yes No l. Object (club. Etc.) Entry Exit Criminal Activity 2- 3. Bias Motivation Bias Target Bias Circumstances Hate Group Victims Seq. Type Injuries Residency Status Ethnicity 1 INDIVIDUAL Fatal Unknown Hispanic Name(Last, First, M) Race Sex DOB Age REYNALDO PACHECO - 44 SSN Victim of Crimes 1.2 Address Home Phone Employer Name/Address Business Phone NSD14- 332 Printed by: (250161) DETVVILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 DUDLEY, NICOL Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case NumbeerSDl4-001332 Offenders Seq. Type Name(Last, First, NI) 1 INDIVIDUAL GARCIA. NHGUEL ANGEL AKA Race Sex DOB Age Miguel Angel Matron. Miguel Angel Matron - 32 Height \Veight SSN 5'04" 170 Address Home Phone Employer Name/Address Business Phone Scars, Marks, Tatoos or other distinguishing features Tattoo Back -"111ichoaca11"And Tribal Symbol: Tattoo Chest ?115 With Number 3: Tattoo. A1111. Rigl1t'-'mexica11 Pride": Tattoo. Shoulder Left: Tattoo. Arm. Left Upper: Tattoo. A1111. Right Up er Suspect Details Ph}'sical Characteristics Seq. Type Name(Last, Fi . t, NI) 2 INDIVIDUAL TOVAR. URICIO AKA Race Sex DOB Age Maiu'icio Telles - 24 Height ight SSN 5'05 80 Address Home Phone Employ er ame/ Address BuSiness Phone Scars, \?Iarks, Tatoos or Physical haracter7 Printed by: (250161) DETVVILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 DUDLEY, NICOL Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case NumbeerSDl4-001332 Offenders Seq. Type Name(Last, First, M) 3 INDIVIDUAL GUERRERO. NORBERTO AKA Race Sex DOB Age Norberto Gonzalez. Norberto Guerrero - 28 Height Weight SSN 5'06" 160 Address Home Phone Employer Name/Address Business Phone Scars, Marks, Tatoos or other distinguishing features Tattoo. Wrist. Nonspeci?c - Rt "beto" Physical Characteristics Suspect Details Witnesses Seq. Name (Last, First, RI) Race Sex DOB Age I ome Phone - . Name/Address Busmess Phone ?171m Tme ilness Notes Seq.# Name (L?ast, First, Race Se DOB Age 0/ I idreis ?i i Home Phone furoyer Name/Addrey/ Business Phone ?itness Notes Printed by: (250161) SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 DUDLEY, NICOL 1 Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case NumbeerSDl4-001332 Witnesses Seq. Name (Last, First, M) Race Sex DOB Age 3 I Addres. H07?one EmploTer Name/Address ?siness Phone itne, 5 Type SSN NOT PLIC ABLE itnelss Notes Seq. Name (Last, First, M) Race Sex DOB Age I Add es Hy/Phone Emjlofer Name/Address /?Bu5iness Phone i T}pe SSN PLIC ABLE ?inks Notes Seq.# Name (Last, First, M) ,Kaee Sex DOB Age A es ye Phone - . Busmess Phone IVYitiess Notes Seq.# Name (Last, First, M) Race Sex DOB Age I E/npfyer Name/.Adt1ress Business Phone f/?W lVV/tness Notes Seq7# Name (Last, Fii-i?t, 1: DOB Age. ?7?loyer Business Phone 3 Printed by: (250161) SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 DUDLEY, NICOL Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case NumbeerSDl4-001332 Witnesses [\Vltness Notes .. '74 - . ?phone 3 Printed by: (250161) SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 DUDLEY, NICOL Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case NumbeerSDl4-001332 . Witnesses Seq. Name (Last, First, M) Race Sex DOB Age 13 I Addresi Hoyhone Employer Name/Address fusiness Phone ?'itneis Type SSN itnelss Notes Seq. Name (Last, First, M) Race Sex DOB Age 14 I Add es Hy/Phone Em lofer Name/Address /?Business Phone \Vifnefs T}pe \Vi?n?ss Notes Seq. Name (Last, First, RI) (Kate Sex DOB Age 15 I A es ye Phone Name/Address Business Phone rltn/ss Type IVYit?ess Notes Age I Seq. Name (Last, First, M) i dre ??ome Phone 16 Name/Address Business Phone 17 d/ VM I ss Home Phone Business Phone 3 Printed by: (250161) SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 DUDLEY, NICOL Case Summary Report Case Number . Wltnesses Seq. Name (Last, First, M) Race Sex DOB Age 18 I Addres Home iione Emplo. me/Add ?siness Phone ?'itneis Tvpe SSN itnelss Notes Seq. Name (Last, First, M) [Rae DOB Age 19 I Add es Notes Seq. Name (Last, First, RI) (Kate Sex DOB Age 20 I Phone SSN T_'p It?ess Notes a? ?0 777777 am Eff-"Mm Address Busmess Phone 2.2 ast,i [$17 DOB Age. 55 Hoone Phone phone Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case NumbeerSDl4-001332 Witnesses 73 77' am IArdde 7 lace/?ip: Age. 7: one 773%:me gut- [gab/I DOB Age. Printed by: (250161) SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 0fficer:(250303) DUDLEY, NICOL Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case NumbeerSDl4-001332 Witnesses Seq. Name (Last, First, M) Race Sex DOB Age 28 I Addres. HOVhone Emploi er Name/Address ?siness Phone itneis Tme SSN itnelss Notes Seq. Name (Last, First, M) 29 Age Addjes Em lo er Name/Address Tn? SSN ??i?niss Notes Seq. Name (Last, First, RI) //Kace Sex DOB Age 30 Home Phone I 'er Name/Address Business Phone rltn/ss Type Iitfess Notes Other Persons Involved Name Code Seq. Na (Las t, M) Involved Party ce Sex 0 00:00:00 Address Home Phone Business Phone ?001 Printed by: (250161) SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 DUDLEY, NICOL 1 Case Summary Report Agency: NSD 7 Case NumbeerSDl4-001332 Other Persons Involved Name Code Seq. Name (Last, First, 31) Involved Party 2 Race Sex DOB SSN 00:00:00 Address Home Phone Employer Name/Address Business Phone I I Name Code Seq3. Name (Last, First, Involved Party Race SSN :dx/ 00:00:00 Address Home Phone Employer Name/Add/ess Business Phone I I I Name Code Seq. Name (Last, First, Involved Party 0? Race hi 00:00:00 Address Home Phone Emphyerxafyarle/f/ 1/ Business Phone Name Code Seq. Name (Last, First, M) Involved Party Hm Home Phone ??7777?7?7? Business Phone I II I I /S.eq ?ame (Last, First, M) SSN 00:00:00 Name Code DOB Home Phone 777777?7? Business Phone r/z/g/M 4? 001332 Printed by: (250161) SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14: 25 DUDLEY, NICOL 1 Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case NumbeerSDl4-001332 Other Persons Involved Name Code Seq. Name (Last, First, RI) Involved Party 6 Race Sex DOB SSN 0952351976 00:00:00 Address i Home Phone Employ er ame/Address Business Phone I Name Code Seq. Name (Last, First, RI) mummy 7 Race Sex DOB SSN Address I Home Phone Employ er ame/Add/ess I Business Phone Name Code Seq. Name (Last, First, M) Mommy 8 Race Se SSN 7/ 00:00:00 Address I Home Phone Employ er afe/A/ldresls/ I Business Phone I Name Code Involved Party Seq-7* 9 I Name (Last, First, M) i 717/ Home SSN Address Home Phone Business Phone ?Pf/7777 1/ Name Code Involved Party Seq. ?ame First, M) SSN :71 Home Phone 777777777 Printed by: (250161) SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 DUDLEY, NICOL 1 Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case NumbeerSDl4-001332 Other Persons Involved Name Code Seq Name (Last, First, M) Involved Party 11 Race Sex SSN 00:00:00 Address Home Phone Employer Name/Address Business Phone Name Code Seq. Name (Last, First, RI) Involved Party Race Sex DOB SSN Address Home Phone Employer Name/Add/ess 1/ Business Phone I I Name Code Seq. Name (Last, First, M) Involved Party 1 3 Race Se DOB SSN 00:00:00 Address i i i i Home Phone Employer Nafe/?dress/ 1/ Business Phone I II I I - Name Code Seq. hame (Last, First, M) Involved Party 1 117/ Business Phone Name Code Seq. Name (L ,First, Involved Party 1 re Home Phone Printed by: (250161) SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 DUDLEY, NICOL Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case NumbeerSDl4-001332 Other Persons Involved Name Code Seq. Name (Last, First, M) Involved Party 16 Race Sex DOB SSN 00:00:00 Address i Home Phone Employer Name/Address Business Phone Property Seq- Description Serial ber Blake/Model 1 1 DA AUDO ORDING OF TOBAR TO SCENE Owner Li nse State Color PACHECO REYN PAC HEC 0 Status Status Of?cer ntity Units of )Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250303) DUDLEY. NICOL 1.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type El Yes No Yes No Property Notes Seq. sc 'ption Serial Number llake/Model - SAMSUNG SGH M819N 358865050649106 SAMSUNG SGH M819N Owner License State Color PAC HEzg/ REYNALDO PAC HEC Status Status ficer Quantity Units of Measure Value EVID CE (250 3) HALLMAN. JOHN JR 1.00 $1.00 Gun 7?71 Calibe/ Finish Grip Gun Stock Con i on Gu est Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes No Yes No I7/rty Notes D14-001332 Printed by: (250161) SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 DUDLEY, NICOL Agency: NSD Case Summary Report Case NumbeerSDl4-001332 Property Seq. Description Serial Number BIake/?Model 1 NDZ- CELL PHONE 0139120045 75404 ALCATEL 5020N Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of .\Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250133) HALLMAN. JOHN JR 1.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes NO Yes No Property Notes Seq. Description Serial Number )Iake/Model BLACK GLOVES Owner License State Color GARCIA. ANGEL Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250363) HURTADO. NATHALIE 1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes No Yes No Property Notes Seq- Description Serial Number )Iake/Model 1 NV-25 BLACK HOODED SWEATSHIRT Owner License State Color GARCIA. WGUEL ANGEL Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250363) HURTADO. NATHALIE 1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes No Yes No Property Notes Printed by: (250161) SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 DUDLEY, NICOL Agency: NSD Case Summary Report Case NumbeerSDl4-001332 Property Seq. Description Serial Number BIake/?Model 1 00-2: NIEMOREX CD WITH SURV. VIDEO FROM NIEMOREX Owner License State Color Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of .\Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250120) ORTIZ. OSCAR 1.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes NO Yes No Property Notes chewon surv video from 3-24~2014 Seq. Description Serial Number )Iake/Model ICS - CELL PHONE KEYPAD VX8300 Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250235) SARNIK. CHARLIE 1.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes No Yes No Property Notes sage rd 13.63 Seq- Description Serial Number )Iake/Model 1 BC -3 INTERVIEWS WITH Owner License State Color Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250345) CHANIBERS. BRADLEY 4.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes No Yes No Property Notes Printed by: (250161) SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 DUDLEY, NICOL Agency: NSD Case Summary Report Case NumbeerSDl4-001332 Property Seq. Description Serial Number Blake/Model 1 2 DA PHOTO LINE UP (TOVAR) Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of RIeasure Value EVIDENCE (250164) ACKMAN. DAVID 1.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes No Yes No Property Notes Seq. Description Serial Number )Iake/Model BNIBA-BMBD: SOIL SAMPLES FROM FLOOR MATS Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250401) BREEDLOVE. BRIANNE 4.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes No Yes No Property Notes Seq- Description Serial Number )Iake/L?Iodel 1 00-3: IVIEMOREX CD OF INTERVIEWS CAR BUYE CD IVIEMOREX CD Owner License State Color Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of RIeasure Value EVIDENCE (250120) ORTIZ. OSCAR 1.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes No Yes No Property Notes Villegas and Juarez audio interview (car buyers) Printed by: (250161) SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 DUDLEY, NICOL Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case NumbeerSDl4-001332 Property Seq. Description Serial Number Blake/Model 1 5 DA INDICIA BLACK BOOK Owner License State Color Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of .\Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250164) ACKMAN. DAVID 1.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes NO Yes No Property Notes Seq. Description Serial Number )Iake/Model BNIB 1 12-BMB 16: CONTACT DNA SWAB Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250401) BREEDLOVE. BRIANNE 12.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes No Yes No Property Notes Seq- Description Serial Number )Iake/Model ND3A-CD COMP EXAM REPORT Owner License State Color PAC HEC O. REYNALDO PAC HEC 0 Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250133) HALLMAN. JOHN JR 1.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes No Yes No Property Notes Printed by: (250161) SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 DUDLEY, NICOL Agency: NSD Case Summary Report Case NumbeerSDl4-001332 PACHECO. REYNALDO PACPIECO Property Seq. Description Serial Number BIake/?Model 1 RECORDING Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of .\Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250335) EDDLEMAN. KYLE 1.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes NO Yes No Property Notes Seq. Description Serial Number )Iake/Model CONTACT DNA SWABS Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250401) BREEDLOVE. BRIANNE 2.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes No Yes No Property Notes Seq- Description Serial Number )Iake/Model 1 NV-32 LAPTOP COMPUTER C02LPX3BFSV7 APPLE MACBOOK AIR Owner License State Color Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of BIeasure Value EVIDENCE (250133) HALLMAN. JOHN JR 1.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes No Yes No Property Notes Printed by: (250161) SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 DUDLEY, NICOL Agency: NSD Case Summary Report Case NumbeerSDl4-001332 Property Seq. Description Serial Number Blake/Model 1 2CS A-CD OF CONIPUTER EXAM OF ITEM 2CS Owner License State Color STATE OF CA 2014 Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of RIeasure Value EVIDENCE (250133) HALLMAN. JOHN JR 1.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes No Yes No Property Notes Seq. Description Serial Number )Iake/Model 2CP- SONOMA SO SW RESULTS VICTHVI PHONE Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250314) PACHECO. CHRIS 1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes No Yes No Property Notes SW written by SC SO and results provided to me via email. Seq- Description Serial Number )Iake/L?Iodel 1 NV-22A FORENSIC EXAM OF CELL PHONE Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of RIeasure Value EVIDENCE (250363) HURTADO. NATHALIE 1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes No Yes No Property Notes Printed by: (250161) SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 DUDLEY, NICOL Agency: NSD Case Summary Report Case Number:NSDl4-001332 1 7C P- AUDIO OF FRESNO INTERVIEWS AND PHON Property Seq. Description Serial Number Blake/Model 1 6 DA GOOGLE SW RESULTS Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of .\Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250164) ACKMAN. DAVID 1.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes N0 Yes No Property Notes Seq. Description Serial Number )Iake/R'Iodel 5CP- SETOF 3 PHOTOS FOR ID Owner License State Color Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250314) PACHECO. CHRIS 3.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes No Yes No Property Notes Photos used in Arriaga interview to 1D suspects Seq- Description Serial Number )Iake/Model NIEMOREX D-R Owner License State Color Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250314) PACHECO. CHRIS 1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes No Yes No Property Notes multiple interviews on d-R and 2 recorded phone calls and voicemails from victim family NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 DUDLEY, NICOL Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case NumbeerSDl4-001332 Property Seq. Description Serial Number Blake/Model 1 BNIB17: HAIR FROM SEAT BELT Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PAC HEC 0 Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of 3Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250401) BREEDLOVE. BRIANNE 1.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes NO Yes No Property Notes Seq. Description Serial Number Blake/Model NV-39 AUDIO INTERVIEW Owner License State Color Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of Measure Value ENC (250363) HURTADO. NATHALIE 1.00 Gun jype Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Con ition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes No Yes No Pro erty Notes tw recordings on one dvd. interview with esperanza plancarte Seq- Description Serial Number )Iake/Model INTERVIIEW MEMOREX CD-R iwueri License State Color ta Status Officer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value ENCE (250314) PACHECO. CHRIS 1.00 Guf Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock ndition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes No Yes No roperty Notes interview at sonoma jail NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 DUDLEY, NICOL Agency: NSD Case Summary Report Case NumbeerSDl4-001332 Property Seq. Description Serial Number Blake/Model 1 9CP- METRO PCS SW RESULTS NIETRO PCS Owner License State Color GARCIA. ANGEL Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of .\Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250314) PACHECO. CHRIS 1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes NO Yes No Property Notes SW for Miguel Garcia and Malu?icio Tovar cell phones. Seq. Description Serial Number )Iake/Model CD CONTAINING PHOTOGRAPHS Owner License State Color Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250303) DUDLEY. NICOL 1.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes No Yes No Property Notes Seq- Description Serial Number )Iake/Model ROSS VIDEO - PETALLUMA SONY CD-R Owner License State Color Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250314) PACHECO. CHRIS 1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes No Yes No Property Notes Printed by: (250161) SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 DUDLEY, NICOL Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSDl4-001332 Property Seq. Description Serial Number Blake/Model 1 13CP- VIDEO OF TOVAR INTERVIEW 04-11-14 Owner License State Color TOVAR. MAURICIO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of .\Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250314) PACHECO. CHRIS 1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes NO Yes No Property Notes Interview by Alfonso Ortiz Seq. Description Serial Number )Iake/R'Iodel 15CP-- INTERVIEW Owner License State Color Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value ENCE (250314) PACHECO. CHRIS 1.00 Gun Iype Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Con ition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes No Yes No Pro erty Notes Seq- Description Serial Number )Iake/Model 1 A-DVD OF CELL PHONE EXTRACTION wner License State Color TATE OF CA 2014 tatus Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250133) HALLMAN. JOHN JR 1.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes No Yes No Property Notes NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETVVILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 DUDLEY, NICOL Agency: NSD Case Summary Report Case Number:NSDl4-001332 Property Seq. Description Serial Number )Iake/Model 1 NORBERTO METRO PCS CELL PHONE HUAWEI Owner License State Color GUERRERO. NORBERTO GONZALEZ BLACK Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of .\Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250314) PACHECO. CHRIS 1.00 $100.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test El Yes NO Yes No Property Notes collected via SW Seq. Description Serial Number )Iake/Nlodel 22CP- PHONE RECOIRDs Owner License State Color Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value ENCE (250314) PACHECO. CHRIS 1.00 Gun Iype Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Con ition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test El Yes No El Yes No Pro erty Notes Seq- Description Serial Number )Iake/Model 1 CELL RECORDS METRO PCs wner License State Color ta Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value ENCE (250314) PACHECO. CHRIS 1.00 Gu7 Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock ndition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes No Yes No roperty Notes cell records from Metro PCS via SW NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 DUDLEY, NICOL Case Summary Report Description ND-S CD AUDIO FRESNO INTERVIEWS DUDLEY Agency: NSD Case NumbeerSD14-001332 Property Seq. Description Serial Number )Iake/Model 1 24CP- AUDIO INTERVIEW Owner License State Color Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of Measure Value CE (250314) PACHECO. CHRIS 1.00 Gun Ti'pe Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Cond' 'on Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes NO Yes No Prop rty Notes Seq. Serial Number )Iake/Model MEMOREX DR Ow er CHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO License I State Color St tus Status Of?cer Quantity Units of Measure Value ENCE (250303) DUDLEY. NICOL 1.00 $1.00 an Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock ondition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes No YES No roperty Notes Du? DUDLEY INTERVIEWS WITH PACHECO FAMILY IN FRESNO. Seq- Description Serial Number )Iake/Model METRO PCS RESULTS CD-R Owner License State Color PAC EC 0. REYNALDO PAC HEC 0 Sta Status Of?cer Quantity Units of Measure Value ENCE (250303) DUDLEY. NICOL 1.00 $1.00 Guf Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock ndition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes No Yes No roperty Notes CD CONTAINING METRO PCS CELL PHONE RESULTS FOR NORBERTO GONZALEZ NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETVVILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 DUDLEY, NICOL Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSDl4-001332 Property Seq. Description Serial Number Blake/Model 1 INTERVIEW AUDIO Owner License State Color Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of .\Ieasure Value CE (250314) PACHECO. CHRIS 1.00 Gun 'pe Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock ond' 'on Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes NO Yes No Prop rty Notes Seq. Description Serial Number )Iake/R'Iodel 1 ONE PLASTIC LOCK (#04098). 0 er License State Color CHECO. REYNALDO PAC HEC St tus Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value ENCE (250203) KIIVTNIEL-LAKE. DONNA 1.00 $1.00 Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock ondition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes No Yes No roperty Notes Seq- Description Serial Number )Iake/Model 1 8 DA SW RESULTS--B OF A RECORDS Owner License State Color PAC HEC 0. REYNALDO PAC HEC 0 Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250164) ACKMAN. DAVID 1.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes No Yes No Property Notes NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 DUDLEY, NICOL Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSDl4-001332 Property Seq. Description Serial Number )Iake/Model 1 CD- CELL CD CELL RECORDS Owner License State Color PAC CO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value CE (250303) DUDLEY. NICOL 1.00 $1.00 Gun Tf'pe Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock 0nd' 'on Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes NO Yes No Prop rty Notes CD ,ontaining Cell Records from Search Warrant on? from ATT ingular Seq. Description Serial Number )Iake/Model CELL RECORD- CDR MEMOREX Ow er License State Color ECO. REYNALDO PACHECO St tus Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value ENCE (250303) DUDLEY. NICOL 1.00 $1.00 G/ln In? Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock on ition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes No Yes No ro erty Notes containing cell phone records for? Seq- Description Serial Number )Iake/Model 1 ND-22 CD METRO wner License State Color AC EC 0. REYNALDO PAC HEC ta Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value ENCE (250303) DUDLEY. NICOL 1.00 $1.00 Guf Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock ndition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes No Yes No roperty Notes CD CONTAINDNG CELL RECORDS FROM SEARCH WARRANT ON METRO NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 DUDLEY, NICOL Agency: NSD Case Summary Report Case NumbeerSDl4-001332 Property Seq. Description Serial Number )Iake/Model 1 9 DA VIDEO Owner License State Color PAC CO. REYNALDO PAC HEC 0 Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of Measure Value CE (250164) ACKMAN. DAVID 1.00 $1.00 Gun Ti'pe Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Cond' 'on Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes NO Yes No Prop rty Notes Seq. Description Serial Number )Iake/Model 26CP- AUDIO OF FORD INTERVIEW Owier License I State Color St tus Status Of?cer Quantity Units of Measure Value ENCE (250314) PACHECO. CHRIS 1.00 an Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock ondition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes No YES No roperty Notes Seq- Description Serial Number )Iake/Model 1 27CP- AUDIO RECORDINGS OF SEVERAL INTERV Owner License State Color Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of Measure Value EVIDENCE (250314) PACHECO. CHRIS 1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes No Yes No Property Notes NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETVVILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 DUDLEY, NICOL NSD14-001332 Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case NumbeerSDl4-001332 Property Seq. Description Serial Number )Iake/Model 1 00-4: D-R OF JAIL CALLS BY TOVAR CD-R OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PAC HEC 0 Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250120) ORTIZ. OSCAR 1.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes NO Yes No Property Notes Seq. Description Serial Number Blake/Model DNA BUCCAL SWABS Owner License State Color PAC ECO. REYNALDO PAC HEC 0 Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value ENCE (250303) DUDLEY. NICOL 1.00 $1.00 Gun jype Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Con ition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes No Yes No Pro erty Notes A BUCCAL Seq- Description Serial Number )Iake/Model 1 ND-34 CD METRO CELL RECORDS- wner License State Color AC ECO. REYNALDO PACHECO ta Status Of?cer Quantity Units of RIeasure Value ENCE (250303) DUDLEY. NICOL 1.00 $1.00 Guf Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock ndition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes No Yes No roperty Notes CELL RECORDS METRO PCS Printed by: (250161) SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 DUDLEY, NICOL Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSDl4-001332 Property Seq. Description Serial Number )Iake/Model 1 NV-40 RED BINDERDOCUMENTS FROM SHED Owner License State Color Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250363) HURTADO. NATHALIE 1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes NO Yes No Property Notes Seq. Description Serial Number )Iake/Model 10 DA WELLS FARGO BANK STATEMENTS -MAIL Owner License State Color PAC HEC O. REYNALDO PAC HEC 0 Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250164) ACKMAN. DAVID 1.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes No Yes No Property Notes Seq- Description Serial Number )Iake/Model 1 we or? Owner? License State Color Sta Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value ENCE (250314) PACHECO. CHRIS 1.00 Guf Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock ndition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes No Yes No roperty Notes 2 interviews on one D-R NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 DUDLEY, NICOL Agency: NSD Case Summary Report Case NumbeerSD14-001332 Property Seq. Description Serial Number Blake/Model CD Owner License State Color PAC O. REYNALDO PAC HEC 0 Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of Measure Value NCE (250303) DUDLEY. NICOL 1.00 $1.00 Gun Tfpe Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Cond' 'on Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes No Yes No Prop rty Notes Seq. Description Serial Number Blake/Model AUDIO 0? Owier License State Color St tus Status Of?cer Quantity Units of Measure Value ENCE (250314) CHRIS 1.00 of?; Iype Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock on ition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes No Yes No ro erty Notes 2 terviews on D-R Seq- Description Serial Number Blake/Model ND-24 CD CELL wner License State Color AC ECO. REYNALDO PACHECO tatu Status Of?cer Quantity Units of Measure Value ENCE (250303) DUDLEY. NICOL 1.00 $1.00 I on]! Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock ndition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes No Yes No roperty Notes Printed by: (250161) SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 DUDLEY, NICOL Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case NumbeerSDl4-001332 Property Seq. Description Serial Number )Iake/Model 1 ND-23 WELLS FARGO BANK RECORDS Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PAC HEC 0 Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250303) DUDLEY. NICOL 1.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes NO Yes No Property Notes WELLS FARGO BANK RECORDS FOR V-PACHECO AND HIS KIDS. OBTAINED FROM WIF- ON 04506514. Seq. Description Serial Number Blake/Model INTERVIEW Owner License State Color Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value ENC (250363) HURTADO. NATHALIE 1.00 Gun jype Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Con ition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type El Yes No El Yes No Pro erty Notes Seq- Description Serial Number )Iake/Model 1 30CP- AUDIO OF- 2ND INTERVIEW iwueri License State Color ta Status Of?cer Quantity Units of RIeasure Value ENCE (250314) PACHECO. CHRIS 1.00 Guf Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock ndition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes No Yes No roperty Notes At Petalluna PD NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 DUDLEY, NICOL Agency: NSD Case Summary Report Case NumbeerSDl4-001332 Property Seq. Description Serial Number )Iake/Model 1 32CP--ARREST AND 3RD INTERVIEW Owner License State Color Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value CE (250314) PACHECO. CHRIS 1.00 Gun Tl'pe Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock 0nd' 'on Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes NO Yes No Prop rty Notes Seq. Description Serial Number Blake/Model 35CP- APPLE IPHONE 6 FROM- 3543 90061269566 APPLE IPHONE 6 Ow er License State Color ARIAS. ANGELA ARIAS WHITE St tus Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value ENCE (250314) PACHECO. CHRIS 1.00 $200.00 G/m 13m Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock on ition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes No Yes No ro erty Notes Seq- Description Serial Number )Iake/Model 1 38CP-- THIRD INTERVIEW - AUDIO wner License State Color ta Status Of?cer Quantity Units of RIeasure Value ENCE (250314) PACHECO. CHRIS 1.00 Guf Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock ndition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes No Yes No roperty Notes NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 DUDLEY, NICOL Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case NumbeerSDl4-001332 Property Seq. Description Serial Number Blake/Model 1 ND-28 UCCAL SWAB FOR ARIAS Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of RIeasure Value EVIDENCE (250314) PACHECO. CHRIS 2.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes No Yes No Property Notes returned from cellmark on 07-01-15 Seq. Description Serial Number )Iake/Model 39C P- LIQUID DNA SAMPLES FROM CELLMARK Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250314) PACHECO. CHRIS 2.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes No Yes No Property Notes Liquid samples are created by lab during pro?le process and returned to NSO Seq- Description Serial Number )Iake/L?Iodel 2 A-CD OF ITEM EXTRACTION Owner License State Color STATE OF CALIFORNIA 2014 Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of RIeasure Value EVIDENCE (250133) HALLMAN. JOHN JR 1.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes No Yes No Property Notes Printed by: (250161) SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 DUDLEY, NICOL Agency: NSD Case Summary Report Case Number:NSDl4-001332 Property Seq. Description Serial Number BIake/?Model 2 NDZ A-CD OF EXTRACTION OF ND2 Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of .\Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250133) HALLMAN. JOHN JR 1.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes NO Yes No Property Notes Seat! Description Serial Number )Iake/Model BLACK GLOVE FROM FRONT SEAT AREA Owner License State Color GARCIA. ANGEL Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250363) HURTADO. NATHALIE 1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes No Yes No Property Notes Seq- Description Serial Number )Iake/Model 2 NV-26 GREY T-SHIRT Owner License State Color GARCIA. WGUEL ANGEL Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of BIeasure Value EVIDENCE (250363) HURTADO. NATHALIE 1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes No Yes No Property Notes Printed by: (250161) SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 DUDLEY, NICOL Agency: NSD Case Summary Report Case NumbeerSDl4-001332 Property Seq. Description Serial Number BIake/?Model 2 00-3: CHEVRON RECEIPT Owner License State Color Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of .\Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250120) ORTIZ. OSCAR 1.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes NO Yes No Property Notes receipt from chewon purchase . Description Serial Number )Iake/Model BC -2 BODY BAG LOCK Owner License State Color Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250345) CHAIVIBERS. BRADLEY 1.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes No Yes No Property Notes Seq- Description Serial Number )Iake/Model 2 3CS-LAPTOP SCREEN PORTION Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250235) SARNIK. CHARLIE 1.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes No Yes No Property Notes Printed by: (250161) SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 DUDLEY, NICOL Agency: NSD Case Summary Report Case NumbeerSDl4-001332 2 2C S-BROKEN LAPTOP COMPUTER 5D029451Q Property Seq. Description Serial Number Blake/Model 2 3 DA PHOTO LINE UP (GARCIA) Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of RIeasure Value EVIDENCE (250164) ACKMAN. DAVID 1.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes No Yes No Property Notes . Description Serial Number )Iake/Model BMBZ: CONTACT DNA SWABS Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250401) BREEDLOVE. BRIANNE 2.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes No Yes No Property Notes Seq- Description Serial Number )Iake/L?Iodel TOSHIBA C85 5D85900 Owner PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO License State Color Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of RIeasure Value EVIDENCE (250133) HALLMAN. JOHN JR 1.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes No Yes No Property Notes Printed by: (250161) SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 DUDLEY, NICOL Agency: NSD Case Summary Report Case NumbeerSDl4-001332 Property Seq. Description Serial Number Blake/Model 2 3CP- PHOTOS FROM WELLS FARGO OF SUSPECT Owner License State Color GARCIA. IVIIGUEL ANGEL Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of RIeasure Value EVIDENCE (250314) PACHECO. CHRIS 1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes No Yes No Property Notes Photos obtained by SC $0 from Wells Fargo ATM camera. Provided to me by email . Description Serial Number )Iake/Model NV-33 BIG 5 PETALUMA SURVEILLANCE Owner License State Color Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250363) HURTADO. NATHALIE 1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes No Yes No Property Notes Seq- Description Serial Number )Iake/L?Iodel 2 7 DA WELLS FARGO BANK RECORDS Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of RIeasure Value EVIDENCE (250164) ACKMAN. DAVID 1.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes No Yes No Property Notes Printed by: (250161) SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 DUDLEY, NICOL Agency: NSD Case Summary Report Case Number:NSDl4-001332 Property Seq. Description Serial Number Blake/Model 2 6CP- AUDIO OF- INTERVIEW MEMOREX CD-R Owner License State Color Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of .\Ieasure Value CE (250314) PACHECO. CHRIS 1.00 Gun Tf'pe Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock ond' 'on Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes NO Yes No Prop rty Notes Seq. Description Serial Number )Iake/R'Iodel FOIL WRAPPER. 0 er License State Color CHECO. REYNALDO PAC HEC St tus Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value ENCE (250203) DONNA 1.00 $1.00 Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock ondition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes No Yes No roperty Notes Seq- Description Serial Number )Iake/Model 2 TRACE DNA SWABS Owner License State Color PAC HEC 0. REYNALDO PAC HEC 0 Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250401) BREEDLOVE. BRIANNE 2.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes No Yes No Property Notes From rear cargo area NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETVVILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 DUDLEY, NICOL Agency: NSD Case Summary Report Case Number:NSDl4-001332 Property Seq. Description Serial Number )Iake/Model 2 llCP- HOFF AUTOPSY PHOTOS - SRPD Owner License State Color Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250314) PACHECO. CHRIS 2.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test El Yes NO Yes No Property Notes photos retrieved from SRPD for Hoff Lane scene and Garcia Autopsy Seq. Description Serial Number )Iake/Model 14CP- PHOTO LINEUP NORBERTO GONZALEZ Owner License State Color TOVAR. MAURICIO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250314) PACHECO. CHRIS 6.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes No Yes No Property Notes Norberto II) by Tovar in this lineup Seq- Description Serial Number )Iake/Model 2 INTERVIEW Owner? License State Color Sta Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value ENCE (250314) PACHECO. CHRIS 1.00 Guf Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock ndition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes No Yes No roperty Notes NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 DUDLEY, NICOL Agency: NSD Case Summary Report Case NumbeerSDl4-001332 Property Seq. Description Serial Number )Iake/Model 2 17CP- SEARH WARRANT PHOTOS - NORBERTO Owner License State Color GUERRERO. NORBERTO GONZALEZ Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250314) PACHECO. CHRIS 1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes NO Yes No Property Notes Seq. Description Serial Number Blake/Model ND-6 CD AUDIIO INTERVIEWS DUDLEY NIEMOREX DR Owner License State Color PAC HEC O. REYNALDO PAC HEC 0 Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250303) DUDLEY. NICOL 1.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes No Yes No Property Notes cv AUDIO INTERVIEWS WITH DUDLEYAND Seq- Description Serial Number )Iake/Model 2 DKD-2: SCALP HAIR STANDARD. Owner License State Color PAC HEC O. REYNALDO PAC HEC 0 Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of RIeasure Value EVIDENCE (250203) KINHVIEL-LAKE. DONNA 1.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes No Yes No Property Notes NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 DUDLEY, NICOL Agency: NSD Case Summary Report Case Number:NSDl4-001332 Property Seq. Description Serial Number )Iake/Model 2 SONOMA c0. DVD Owner License State Color PAC CO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value CE (250303) DUDLEY. NICOL 1.00 $1.00 Gun Tf'pe Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Cond' 'on Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes NO Yes No Prop rty Notes Vid 0 of interview wi_ and Sonoma County Detectives on 03:30:14 regarding Reynaldo Pacheco being missing Seq. Description Serial Number )Iake/Nlodel ND-30 DNA BUC AL SWABS ROSA PAC HEC 0 BUC AL SWABS 0 er License State Color CHECO. REYNALDO PAC HEC St tus Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value ENCE (250303) DUDLEY. NICOL 1.00 $1.00 Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock ondition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes No Yes No roperty Notes NA BUCCAL swas? Seq- Description Serial Number )Iake/Model 2 NV-41 BLUE BINDER FROM LIVING ROOM Owner License State Color Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250363) HURTADO. NATHALIE 1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes No Yes No Property Notes NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 DUDLEY, NICOL Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case NumbeerSD14-001332 Property Seq. Description Serial Number )Iake/Model 2 11 DA LEDGER Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PAC HEC 0 Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250164) ACKMAN. DAVID 1.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes NO Yes No Property Notes Seq. Description Serial Number Blake/Model ND-37 CD SEALED PER IUDGE- CD Owner License State Color PAC EC 0. REYNALDO PAC HEC 0 Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value ENCE (250303) DUDLEY. NICOL 1.00 $1.00 Gun jype Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Con ition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes No Yes No Pro erty Notes Seq- Description Serial Number )Iake/Model 2 ND-25 DVD VIDEO SON. COUNTY INT. wner License State Color AC HEC O. REYNALDO PAC HEC tatus Status Of?cer Quantity Units of RIeasure Value EVIDENCE (250303) DUDLEY. NICOL 1.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes No Yes No Property Notes DVD SONOMA COUNTY SHERIFF INTERVIEW WITH V-PACHECO FAMILY. COPY OBTAINED FROM SONOMA SO NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 DUDLEY, NICOL Agency: NSD Case Summary Report Case NumbeerSD14-001332 Property Seq. Description Serial Number Blake/Model 2 31CP- VIDEO OF- 2ND INTERVIEW Owner License State Color Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of 3Ieasure Value CE (250314) PACHECO. CHRIS 2.00 Gun Tl?pe Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Cond' 'on Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes NO Yes No Prop rty Notes 2 Seq. Description Serial Number Blake/Model 2 INTERVIEW FOR JEWELRY Ow?er License State Color St tus Status Of?cer Quantity Units of Measure Value ENCE (250314) PACHECO. CHRIS 1.00 G/m jype Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock on ition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes No Yes No ro erty Notes Seq- Description Serial Number )Iake/Model 2 36C P- SAMSUNG HROIVIE LAPTOP IBEF9FBFA22779T SAMSUNG XE500C12 wner License State Color SILVER tatus Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250314) PACHECO. CHRIS 1.00 $300.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes No Yes No Property Notes NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 DUDLEY, NICOL Agency: NSD Case Summary Report Case NumbeerSDl4-001332 Property Seq. Description Serial Number BIake/?Model 2 ND-3 BUCCAL SWABS FROM NORBERTO GONZALEZ Owner License State Color GUERRERO. NORBERTO GONZALEZ Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of .\Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250314) PACHECO. CHRIS 2.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes NO Yes No Property Notes rettuned from cellmark on 07-01-15 Seq. Description Serial Number )Iake/Model 3 NV-3 BLACK GLOVE FROM FRONT SEAT AREA Owner License State Color GARCIA. ANGEL Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250363) HURTADO. NATHALIE 1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes No Yes No Property Notes Seq- Description Serial Number )Iake/Model NV-27 WHITE SHORT SLEEVE TSHIRT Owner License State Color GARCIA. WGUEL ANGEL Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250363) HURTADO. NATHALIE 1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes No Yes No Property Notes Printed by: (250161) SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 DUDLEY, NICOL Agency: NSD Case Summary Report Case NumbeerSDl4-001332 Property Seq. Description Serial Number Blake/Model 3 4 DA PINK SLIP TO LAND ROVER Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of RIeasure Value EVIDENCE (250164) ACKMAN. DAVID 1.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes No Yes No Property Notes Seq. Description Serial Number )Iake/Model 3 BMB3: CONTACT DNA SWABS Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250401) BREEDLOVE. BRIANNE 2.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes No Yes No Property Notes Seq- Description Serial Number )Iake/L?Iodel 4CP- SW RESULTS FROM METRO PCS - VICTOR Owner License State Color GARCIA. ANGEL Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of RIeasure Value EVIDENCE (250314) PACHECO. CHRIS 1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes No Yes No Property Notes Evidence from Metro PCS via SW written by me on 04?03-14 Printed by: (250161) SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 DUDLEY, NICOL Agency: NSD Case Summary Report Case NumbeerSDl4-001332 Property Seq. Description Serial Number BIake/?Model 3 NV-34 BIG 5 ROHNERT PARK SURVEILLANCE Owner License State Color Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of .\Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250363) HURTADO. NATHALIE 1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes NO Yes No Property Notes Seq. Description Serial Number )Iake/Model 3 DKB-2: BEVERAGE CAP. Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250203) KJMMEL-LAKE. DONNA 1.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes No Yes No Property Notes Seq- Description Serial Number )Iake/Model BMBIQ BMB20: CONTROL SWABS Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of BIeasure Value EVIDENCE (250401) BREEDLOVE. BRIANNE 4.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes No Yes No Property Notes Blank and water-only for BMB 29. TC l-C TC 10 Printed by: (250161) SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 DUDLEY, NICOL Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case NumbeerSDl4-001332 NSD14-001332 Property Seq. Description Serial Number )Iake/Model 3 12CP- NEGOTIATIONS AUDIO FROM HOFF LANE Owner License State Color GARCIA. NHGUEL ANGEL Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of Measure Value EVIDENCE (250314) PACHECO. CHRIS 1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes NO Yes No Property Notes Seq. Description Serial Number )Iake/Model 3 18CP- WIFE BEATER STYLE UNDERSHIRT Owner License I State Color GUERRERO. NORBERTO GONZALEZ WHITE Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of Measure Value EVIDENCE (250314) PACHECO. CHRIS 1.00 $5.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes No YES No Property Notes Seq- Description Serial Number )Iake/Model 3 ND-7 CD AUDIO DUDLEY INTERVIEWS NIEMOREX DR Owner License State Color PAC HEC O. REYNALDO PAC HEC 0 Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of Measure Value EVIDENCE (250303) DUDLEY. NICOL 1.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes No Yes No Property Notes Printed by: (250161) DETVVILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 DUDLEY, NICOL Agency: NSD Case Summary Report Case Number:NSDl4-001332 3 ND-2O CD AUDIO INTERVIEWS 06/03/14 Property Seq. Description Serial Number )Iake/Model 3 DKD-3: SCALP HAIR STANDARD (DNA). Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250203) KIMIVIEL-LAKE. DONNA 1.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes NO Yes No Property Notes Seq. Description Serial Number )Iake/Model D-R MEMOREX Owner PAC HEC O. REYNALDO PAC HEC 0 License State Color Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250303) DUDLEY. NICOL 1.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test El Yes No El Yes No Property Notes CD with audio recordings with Dudley? interviews on O6:"03x"14 with Magdelena Vasquz. Helena Mantese and Juan Vasquez Seq- Description Serial Number )Iake/Model ND-29 DNA BUC AL SWABS LUCERO IUAREZ BUC AL SWABS Owner License State Color PAC HEC O. REYNALDO PAC HEC 0 Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250303) DUDLEY. NICOL 1.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes No Yes No Property Notes DNA BUCCAL SWABs mom? NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETVVILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 DUDLEY, NICOL Agency: NSD Case Summary Report Case NumbeerSDl4-001332 Property Seq. Description Serial Number Blake/Model 3 NV-42 BOX OF REIVIINGTON 22 CAL AWUNITION REMINGTON Owner License State Color Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of RIeasure Value EVIDENCE (250363) HURTADO. NATHALIE 1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes No Yes No Property Notes Seq. Description Serial Number )Iake/Model 3 12 DA WELLS FARGO BANK PRINT-OUTS Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250164) ACKMAN. DAVID 1.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes No Yes No Property Notes Seq- Description Serial Number )Iake/L?Iodel ND-38 SEALED WIRE DOCUMENTS PER JUDGE Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of RIeasure Value EVIDENCE (250303) DUDLEY. NICOL 1.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes No Yes No Property Notes WIRE ORDER. APPLICATION. AFFIDAVIT PER JUDGE BOESSENECKER Printed by: (250161) SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 DUDLEY, NICOL Agency: NSD Case Summary Report Case Number:NSDl4-001332 Property Seq. Description Serial Number )Iake/Model 3 ND-39 CD INT Owner License State Color PAC CO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value CE (250303) DUDLEY. NICOL 2.00 $1.00 Gun Tf'pe Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock 0nd' 'on Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type El Yes NO Yes No Prop rty Notes TW INTERVIEW AT NAPA so ON 07x?03x?14 WITH DET. DUDLEY Seq. Description Serial Number )Iake/Model 3 34CP- BRACELT AND RJNG WITH DIAMOND Ow er License State Color HEC O. REYNALDO PAC HEC 0 GOLD St tus Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value ENCE (250314) PACHECO. CHRIS 3.00 $200.00 Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock ondition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes No Yes No roperty Notes ianond is from ring but had fallen out prior to collection. Seq- Description Serial Number )Iake/Model 37C P- HP LAPTOP HP LAPTOP Owner License State Color Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250314) PACHECO. CHRIS 1.00 $200.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes No Yes No Property Notes NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 DUDLEY, NICOL Agency: NSD Case Summary Report Case NumbeerSDl4-001332 Property Seq. Description Serial Number BIake/?Model 3 SWABS FROM PASS. SHDE VEHICLE Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of .\Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250314) PACHECO. CHRIS 2.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes NO Yes No Property Notes Seq. Description Serial Number )Iake/Model NV-4 DUCT TAPE Owner License State Color GARCIA. ANGEL Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250363) HURTADO. NATHALIE 1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes No Yes No Property Notes Seq- Description Serial Number )Iake/Model 4 NV-28 BLACK TSHIRT Owner License State Color GARCIA. ANGEL Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250363) HURTADO. NATHALIE 1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes No Yes No Property Notes NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 DUDLEY, NICOL Agency: NSD Case Summary Report Case NumbeerSD14-001332 Property Seq. Description Serial Number BIake/?Model 4 BMB4: CONTACT DNA SWABS Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of .\Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250401) BREEDLOVE. BRIANNE 2.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes NO Yes No Property Notes Seq. Description Serial Number )Iake/Model NV-35 BIG 5 PETALUMA VIDEO-WORKING COPY Owner License State Color Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250363) HURTADO. NATHALIE 1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes No Yes No Property Notes Seq- Description Serial Number )Iake/Model 4 DKB-3: PLASTIC STRAWFSTIC K. Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250203) KIIVHVIEL-LAKE. DONNA 1.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes No Yes No Property Notes Printed by: (250161) SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 DUDLEY, NICOL Agency: NSD Case Summary Report Case NumbeerSDl4-001332 Property Seq. Description Serial Number Blake/Model 4 BMB21: TRACE LIFTS Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of RIeasure Value EVIDENCE (250401) BREEDLOVE. BRIANNE 4.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes No Yes No Property Notes From rear cargo area Seq. Description Serial Number )Iake/Model 19CP- PUMA BASEBALL HAT Owner License State Color GUERRERO. NORBERTO GONZALEZ GREY BLACK Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250314) PACHECO. CHRIS 1.00 $20.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes No Yes No Property Notes Seq- Description Serial Number )Iake/L?Iodel 4 NDS CD AUDIO DUDLEY INT. WITH GONZALEZ Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of RIeasure Value EVIDENCE (250303) DUDLEY. NICOL 1.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes No Yes No Property Notes CD AUDIO FILES 0F DUDLEY AND LT. ORTIZ INTERVIEW WITH NORBERTO GONZALEZ AT NAPA SHERIFF OFFICE Printed by: (250161) SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 DUDLEY, NICOL Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSDl4-001332 Property Seq. Description Serial Number Blake/Model 4 DKD-4: BODY BAG AND WHITE PLASTIC. Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of .\Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250203) KHVEMEL-LAKE. DONNA 1.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes NO Yes No Property Notes Seq. Description Serial Number )Iake/Nlodel ND-21 BUS. CARD WE BUY JUNK CARS BUISNESS CARD WE BUY Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PAC HEC 0 Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250303) DUDLEY. NICOL 1.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes No Yes No Property Notes Business card recovered from Tovars girlfuiend. and card used to call buyers of Range Rover? Seq. Description Serial Number )Iake/Model 4 ND-32 AUDIO INTERVIEW CD Owner License State Color PAC EC 0. REYNALDO PAC HEC 0 Sta Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value ENCE (250303) DUDLEY. NICOL 1.00 $1.00 Gu/ Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock ndition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes No Yes No roperty Notes 3 INTERVIEW AT ROHNERT PARK PD ON 07.x'23x14. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 DUDLEY, NICOL Agency: NSD Case Summary Report Case Number:NSDl4-001332 Property Seq. Description Serial Number Blake/Model 4 777 PAPERWORK FROM MIDDLE BEDROOM Owner License State Color Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of .\Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250363) HURTADO. NATHALIE 1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes NO Yes No Property Notes Seq. Description Serial Number )Iake/Nlodel 13 DA IVIISC PAPER Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PAC HEC 0 Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250164) ACKMAN. DAVID 1.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes No Yes No Property Notes Seq- Description Serial Number )Iake/Model 4 ND-26 DVD SON. so INTERVIEW- Owner License State Color PAC EC 0. REYNALDO PAC HEC 0 Sta Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value ENCE (250303) DUDLEY. NICOL 1.00 $1.00 Gu/ Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock ndition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes No Yes No roperty Notes DVD OF SONOMA COUNTY INTERVIEW COPY OBTAINED FROM SONOMA so NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 DUDLEY, NICOL Agency: NSD Case Summary Report Case Number:NSDl4-001332 Property Seq. Description Serial Number BIake/?Model 4 BMB-S CONTROL SWABS Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of .\Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250314) PACHECO. CHRIS 2.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes NO Yes No Property Notes Sgt! Description Serial Number )Iake/Model NV-5 BLACK GLOVE IN CENTER CONSOLE Owner License State Color GARCIA. ANGEL Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250363) HURTADO. NATHALIE 1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes No Yes No Property Notes Seq- Description Serial Number )Iake/Model 5 NV-29 GREY DOCKER STYLE PANTS Owner License State Color GARCIA. WGUEL ANGEL Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250363) HURTADO. NATHALIE 1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes No Yes No Property Notes Printed by: (250161) SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 DUDLEY, NICOL Agency: NSD Case Summary Report Case Number:NSDl4-001332 Property Seq. Description Serial Number BIake/?Model 5 BMBS-BMB8: SOIL FROM WHEEL WELLS Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of .\Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250401) BREEDLOVE. BRIANNE 4.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes NO Yes No Property Notes . Description Serial Number )Iake/Model NV-36 BANK OF MARIN SURVEILLANCE Owner License State Color Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250363) HURTADO. NATHALIE 1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes No Yes No Property Notes Seq- Description Serial Number )Iake/Model 5 DKB-4: VEGETATION STANDARD. Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of BIeasure Value EVIDENCE (250203) KIIVHVIEL-LAKE. DONNA 1.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes No Yes No Property Notes Printed by: (250161) SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 DUDLEY, NICOL Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case NumbeerSDl4-0013 3 2 Property Seq. Description Serial Number Blake/Model 5 BMB22: TRACE LIFTS Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of RIeasure Value EVIDENCE (250401) BREEDLOVE. BRIANNE 2.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes No Yes No Property Notes From front passenger?s seat area Segif Description Serial Number )Iake/Model 20CP- PUMA TENNIS SHOES PUMA SHOES Owner License State Color GUERRERO. NORBERTO GONZALEZ WHITE Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250314) PACHECO. CHRIS 2.00 $50.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes No Yes No Property Notes Seq- Description Serial Number )Iake/L?Iodel 5 ND-9 DVD NORBERTO GONZALEZ INTERVIEW TDK DVD Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of RIeasure Value EVIDENCE (250303) DUDLEY. NICOL 1.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes No Yes No Property Notes DVD OF NORBERTO GONZALEZ INTERVIEW AT NAPA SHERIFF OFFICE WITH DET. DUDLEY AND LT. ORTIZ Printed by: (250161) SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 DUDLEY, NICOL Agency: NSD Case Summary Report Case Number:NSDl4-001332 Property Seq. Description Serial Number )Iake/Model 5 DKD-S: LEFT SHOE. Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of .\Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250203) DONNA 1.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test El Yes NO Yes No Property Notes . Description Serial Number )Iake/Nlodel ND-33 LATENT PRINTS Owner License State Color PAC ECO. REYNALDO PAC HEC 0 Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value ENCE (250303) DUDLEY. NICOL 1.00 $1.00 Gun Iype Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Con ition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test El Yes No El Yes No Pro erty Notes PRINTS TAKEN ON 0723514 DURING INTERVIEW AT ROHENERT PARK PD Seq- Description Serial Number )Iake/Model 5 NV-44 MISC. INDICIA 7wnei/ License State Color ta Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value ENC (250363) HURTADO. NATHALIE 2.00 Gu7 Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock ndition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes No Yes No roperty Notes NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 DUDLEY, NICOL Agency: NSD Case Summary Report Case Number:NSDl4-001332 Property Seq. Description Serial Number Blake/Model 5 14 DA Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of .\Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250164) ACKMAN. DAVID 1.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes NO Yes No Property Notes . Description Serial Number )Iake/R'Iodel ND-27 SON. COUNTY Owner License State Color PAC ECO. REYNALDO PAC HEC 0 Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value ENCE (250303) DUDLEY. NICOL 1.00 $1.00 Gun Iype Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Con ition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes No Yes No Pro erty Notes . SONOMA COUNTY INTERVIEW COPY OBTAINED BY NSO Seq- Description Serial Number )Iake/Model 5 BMB-6 CONTROL SWABS WATER wner License State Color AC HEC 0. REYNALDO PAC HEC tatus Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250314) PACHECO. CHRIS 2.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes No Yes No Property Notes received from ellmark 07-01-15 NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETVVILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 DUDLEY, NICOL Agency: NSD Case Summary Report Case NumbeerSDl4-001332 Property Seq. Description Serial Number BIake/?Model 6 NV-6 VEHICLE REGISTRATION AND TICKET Owner License State Color GARCIA. IVIIGUEL ANGEL Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of .\Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250363) HURTADO. NATHALIE 2.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes NO Yes No Property Notes Seq. Description Serial Number )Iake/Model NV-30 WHITE LONG SLEEVED Owner License State Color GARCIA. ANGEL Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250363) HURTADO. NATHALIE 1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes No Yes No Property Notes Seq- Description Serial Number )Iake/Model 6 BMBIS &Bl\/fBl6: CONTROLS FOR Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of BIeasure Value EVIDENCE (250401) BREEDLOVE. BRIANNE 4.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes No Yes No Property Notes NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 DUDLEY, NICOL Agency: NSD Case Summary Report Case NumbeerSDl4-001332 Property Seq. Description Serial Number BIake/?Model 6 NV-37 BUCCAL SWABS FROM NHGUEL GARCIA Owner License State Color GARCIA. IVIIGUEL ANGEL Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of .\Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250363) HURTADO. NATHALIE 1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes NO Yes No Property Notes Seq. Description Serial Number )Iake/Model DKB-5: SOIL STANDARD. Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250203) KJMMEL-LAKE. DONNA 1.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes No Yes No Property Notes Seq- Description Serial Number )Iake/Model 6 BMB23: TRACE LIFTS Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of BIeasure Value EVIDENCE (250401) BREEDLOVE. BRIANNE 2.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes No Yes No Property Notes From rear passenger?s seat area Printed by: (250161) SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 DUDLEY, NICOL Agency: NSD Case Summary Report Case NumbeerSDl4-001332 Property Seq. Description Serial Number Blake/Model 6 21CP- HIGH STOP SHOES OOGI SHOES Owner License State Color GUERRERO. NORBERTO GONZALEZ WHITE Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of RIeasure Value EVIDENCE (250314) PACHECO. CHRIS 2.00 $50.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes No Yes No Property Notes Seq. Description Serial Number )Iake/Model DVD TOVAR INT. 04/021?14 NCDC NIEMOREX DVD Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250303) DUDLEY. NICOL 1.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes No Yes No Property Notes DVD OF MAURICIO TOVAR INTERVIEW AT NC DC ON 04.102314 WITH NPD DET. ALFONSO ORTIZ AND NPD DET. ANDY HESS Seq- Description Serial Number )Iake/L?Iodel 6 DKD-6: LEFT SOCK. Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of RIeasure Value EVIDENCE (250203) KINHVIEL-LAKE. DONNA 1.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes No Yes No Property Notes Printed by: (250161) SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 DUDLEY, NICOL Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSDl4-001332 Property Seq. Description Serial Number )Iake/Model 6 NV-45 CD OF PHOTOS OF SEARCH WARRANT Owner License State Color Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250363) HURTADO. NATHALIE 1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes NO Yes No Property Notes Seq. Description Serial Number )Iake/Model ND-35 AUDIO PHONE Owner License State Color PAC EC 0. REYNALDO PAC HEC 0 Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value ENCE (250303) DUDLEY. NICOL 1.00 $1.00 Gun jype Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Con ition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes No Yes No Pro erty Notes OBTAINED FROM ALAMEDA COUNTY SHERIFF. PHONE CALLS AND- WHILE SHE WAS IN CUSTODY. JAIL CALLS. Seq- Description Serial Number )Iake/Model 7 NV-7 BLACK GLOVE FROM BACKSEAT wner License State Color GARCIA. MIGUEL ANGEL tatus Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250363) HURTADO. NATHALIE 1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes No Yes No Property Notes NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 DUDLEY, NICOL Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case NumbeerSDl4-001332 Property Seq. Description Serial Number BIake/?Model 7 BLUE Owner License State Color GARCIA. IVIIGUEL ANGEL Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of .\Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250363) HURTADO. NATHALIE 1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes NO Yes No Property Notes . Description Serial Number )Iake/Model CONTACT DNA SWABS Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250401) BREEDLOVE. BRIANNE 2.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes No Yes No Property Notes Seq- Description Serial Number )Iake/Model 7 NV-38 AUTOPSY PHOTOS IVIIGUEL GARCIA Owner License State Color Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of BIeasure Value EVIDENCE (250363) HURTADO. NATHALIE 1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes No Yes No Property Notes Printed by: (250161) SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 DUDLEY, NICOL Agency: NSD Case Summary Report Case NumbeerSDl4-001332 Property Seq. Description Serial Number Blake/Model 7 DKB-6: WATER STANDARD. Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of RIeasure Value EVIDENCE (250203) DONNA 1.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes No Yes No Property Notes 395*! Description Serial Number )Iake/Model CD FROM SEAT Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250401) BREEDLOVE. BRIANNE 1.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes No Yes No Property Notes Seq- Description Serial Number )Iake/L?Iodel 7 ND-ll DVD TOVAR INTERVIEW 04.108.514 NC DC IVIEMOREX DVD Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of RIeasure Value EVIDENCE (250303) DUDLEY. NICOL 1.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes No Yes No Property Notes DVD OF MAURICIO TOVAR INTERVIEW AT NCDC ON 04/?081?14 WITH NPD DET. ALFONSO ORTIZ AND DUDLEY WATCHING IN VIEWING ROOM Printed by: (250161) DETVVILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 DUDLEY, NICOL Agency: NSD Case Summary Report Case NumbeerSDl4-001332 Property Seq. Description Serial Number BIake/?Model 7 DKD-7: RIGHT SHOE. Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of .\Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250203) DONNA 1.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes NO Yes No Property Notes Seat! Description Serial Number )Iake/Model NV-46 CD OF PHOTOS OF EVIDENCE ITEMS Owner License State Color Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250363) HURTADO. NATHALIE 1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes No Yes No Property Notes Seq- Description Serial Number )Iake/Model 7 ND-40 AUDIO CD. SONOMA COUNTY Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250303) DUDLEY. NICOL 1.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes No Yes No Property Notes CD SONOMA COUNTY AIUDIO RECORDINGS OF PHONE INTERVIEW WITH- Printed by: (250161) SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 DUDLEY, NICOL Agency: NSD Case Summary Report Case Number:NSDl4-001332 Property Seq. Description Serial Number BIake/?Model 8 NV-8 DOOR RAM Owner License State Color GARCIA. IVIIGUEL ANGEL Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of .\Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250363) HURTADO. NATHALIE 1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes NO Yes No Property Notes Seq. Description Serial Number )Iake/Model BMBIS: CONTACT DNA SWABS Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250401) BREEDLOVE. BRIANNE 2.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes No Yes No Property Notes Seq- Description Serial Number )Iake/Model 8 DKB-7A: UPPER ROCK. Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of BIeasure Value EVIDENCE (250203) KIIVHVIEL-LAKE. DONNA 1.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes No Yes No Property Notes Printed by: (250161) SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 DUDLEY, NICOL Agency: NSD Case Summary Report Case NumbeerSDl4-001332 ND-12 DVD 7-11 VIDEO FIRST STREET NAPA Property Seq. Description Serial Number Blake/Model 8 BMB29: TRACE DNA SWABS Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of RIeasure Value EVIDENCE (250401) BREEDLOVE. BRIANNE 2.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes No Yes No Property Notes From rear driver' 5 side ?oor mat Description Serial Number )Iake/Model NIEMOREX DVD Owner PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO License State Color Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250303) DUDLEY. NICOL 1.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes No Yes No Property Notes DVD OF 7-11 VIDEO FROM NAPA FIRST STREET STORE CAPTURED ON GIVEN TO DET. DUDLEY BY SONOMA DEPARTMENT. 2 Seq- Description Serial Number )Iake/L?Iodel 8 DKD-8: RIGHT SOCK. Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of RIeasure Value EVIDENCE (250203) KINHVIEL-LAKE. DONNA 1.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes No Yes No Property Notes Printed by: (250161) SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 DUDLEY, NICOL Agency: NSD Case Summary Report Case NumbeerSDl4-001332 Property Seq. Description Serial Number Blake/Model 8 CD OF FBI CELL PHONE ANALYSIS Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of RIeasure Value EVIDENCE (250303) DUDLEY. NICOL 1.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes No Yes No Property Notes CD FBI AGENT MELISSA VANEK CELL PHONE RECORDS ANAYLYSIS 393*! Description Serial Number )Iake/Model NV-9 ELECTRICAL TAPE FROM CENTER CONSOLE Owner License State Color GARCIA. NIIGUEL ANGEL Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250363) HURTADO. NATHALIE 1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes No Yes No Property Notes Seq- Description Serial Number )Iake/L?Iodel 9 BMBI9: CONTACT DNA SWABS Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of RIeasure Value EVIDENCE (250401) BREEDLOVE. BRIANNE 2.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes No Yes No Property Notes Printed by: (250161) SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 DUDLEY, NICOL Agency: NSD Case Summary Report Case NumbeerSDl4-001332 Property Seq. Description Serial Number Blake/Model 9 DKB-7B: LOWER ROCK. Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of RIeasure Value EVIDENCE (250203) DONNA 1.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes No Yes No Property Notes . Description Serial Number )Iake/Model WATER BOTTLE Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250401) BREEDLOVE. BRIANNE 1.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes No Yes No Property Notes From under front passenger?s seat Seq- Description Serial Number )Iake/L?Iodel 9 DVD OF CHEVRON VIDEO STAPLES DVD Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of RIeasure Value EVIDENCE (250303) DUDLEY. NICOL 1.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes No Yes No Property Notes DVD OF CHEVRON ST. NAPA FROM 03/24/14. SHOWS WHAT APPEARS TO BE RANGE ROVER PASS THROUGH FOOTAGE AT 1432 HOURS. GIVEN TO DET. DUDLEY BY SONOMA SO Printed by: (250161) SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 DUDLEY, NICOL Agency: NSD Case Summary Report Case Number:NSDl4-001332 Property Seq. Description Serial Number BIake/?Model 9 DKD-9: ONE PAIR OF BLACK CORDUROY PANTS Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of .\Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250203) DONNA 1.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes NO Yes No Property Notes Seq. Description Serial Number )Iake/Model 10 MCDONALDS RECEIPT Owner License State Color GARCIA. ANGEL Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250363) HURTADO. NATHALIE 1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes No Yes No Property Notes Seq Description Serial Number )Iake/Model 0 BMBZO: CONTACT DNA SWABS Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of BIeasure Value EVIDENCE (250401) BREEDLOVE. BRIANNE 2.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes No Yes No Property Notes Printed by: (250161) SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 DUDLEY, NICOL Agency: NSD Case Summary Report Case NumbeerSDl4-001332 Property Seq. Description Serial Number Blake/Model 10 HAJRS. Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of RIeasure Value EVIDENCE (250203) DONNA 1.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes No Yes No Property Notes Seq. Description Serial Number )Iake/Model 10 TRACE DNA SWABS Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250401) BREEDLOVE. BRIANNE 2.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes No Yes No Property Notes From gas pedal Seq- Description Serial Number )Iake/L?Iodel 0 ND-14 VIDEO CHEVRON TRANCAS NAPA IVIEMOREX CDR Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of RIeasure Value EVIDENCE (250303) DUDLEY. NICOL 1.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes No Yes No CAP. Property Notes VIDEO FROM JOES CHEVRON NAPA SOSCOL AND TRANCAS. NORBERTO GONZALEZ PURCHASE OF DRINKS. WHITE PUMA Printed by: (250161) SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 DUDLEY, NICOL Agency: NSD Case Summary Report Case Number:NSDl4-001332 Property Seq. Description Serial Number BIake/?Model 10 ONE PAIR BRIEF-STYLE UNDE Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of .\Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250203) DONNA 1.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes NO Yes No Property Notes Seq. Description Serial Number )Iake/Model 1 1 NV-ll BACK PIECE OF A CELL PHONE Owner License State Color GARCIA. ANGEL Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250363) HURTADO. NATHALIE 1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes No Yes No Property Notes Seq Description Serial Number )Iake/Model CONTACT DNA SWABS Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250401) BREEDLOVE. BRIANNE 2.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes No Yes No Property Notes Printed by: (250161) SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 DUDLEY, NICOL Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case NumbeerSDl4-001332 Property Seq. Description Serial Number Blake/Model 1 1 DKB-8: PIECE ELECTRICAL TAPE. Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of RIeasure Value EVIDENCE (250203) DONNA 1.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes No Yes No Property Notes Seq. Description Serial Number )Iake/Model 1 1 CTC2: TRACE DNA SWABS Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250401) BREEDLOVE. BRIANNE 2.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes No Yes No Property Notes From brake pedal Seq Description Serial Number )Iake/L?Iodel A STILL PHOTOS FROM ND-14 VIDEO IVIEMOREX CD-R Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of RIeasure Value EVIDENCE (250303) DUDLEY. NICOL 1.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes No Yes No Property Notes CD STILL PHOTOS OF NORBERTO GONZALEZ AT CHEVRON PURCHASING DRINKS. WEARJNG WHITE PUMA HAT . TAKEN FROM VIDEO ND-14 Printed by: (250161) SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 DUDLEY, NICOL Agency: NSD Case Summary Report Case Number:NSDl4-001332 Property Seq. Description Serial Number BIake/?Model 1 1 ONE DRESS Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of .\Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250203) DONNA 1.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes NO Yes No Property Notes Seq. Description Serial Number )Iake/Model 12 NV-12 PAPERS WITH Owner License State Color GARCIA. ANGEL Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250363) HURTADO. NATHALIE 1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes No Yes No Property Notes Seq- Description Serial Number )Iake/Model 12 BMB22: SWABS OF RED-BROWN STAINS Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250401) BREEDLOVE. BRIANNE 2.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes No Yes No Property Notes Printed by: (250161) SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 DUDLEY, NICOL Agency: NSD Case Summary Report Case Number:NSDl4-001332 Property Seq. Description Serial Number BIake/?Model 12 DKB-9: CARDBOARD TAPE ROLL CENTER. Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of .\Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250203) DONNA 1.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes NO Yes No Property Notes Seq. Description Serial Number )Iake/Model 12 CTC3: TRACE DNA SWABS Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250401) BREEDLOVE. BRIANNE 2.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes No Yes No Property Notes From driver? 5 ?oor mat Seq- Description Serial Number )Iake/Model 12 ONE COLORED BUTTON. Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of BIeasure Value EVIDENCE (250203) KIIVHVIEL-LAKE. DONNA 1.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes No Yes No Property Notes Printed by: (250161) SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 DUDLEY, NICOL Agency: NSD Case Summary Report Case Number:NSDl4-001332 Property Seq. Description Serial Number BIake/?Model 13 DUFFEL BAG Owner License State Color GARCIA. IVIIGUEL ANGEL Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of .\Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250363) HURTADO. NATHALIE 1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes NO Yes No Property Notes Seq. Description Serial Number )Iake/Model 13 BMBZ3. BIVIB29. BNIB30: CONTROLS FOR BIVIB22 Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250401) BREEDLOVE. BRIANNE 6.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes No Yes No Property Notes Seq- Description Serial Number )Iake/Model 13 VEGETATION STANDARD. Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of BIeasure Value EVIDENCE (250203) KIIVHVIEL-LAKE. DONNA 1.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes No Yes No Property Notes Printed by: (250161) SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 DUDLEY, NICOL Agency: NSD Case Summary Report Case NumbeerSD14-001332 Property Seq. Description Serial Number BIake/?Model 13 CTC4: TRACE DNA SWABS Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of .\Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250401) BREEDLOVE. BRIANNE 2.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes NO Yes No Property Notes From front passenger?s side ?oor mat Seq. Description Serial Number )Iake/Model 13 DKD-13: ONE WHITE UNDERSHIRT (USED AS Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250203) DONNA 1.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes No Yes No Property Notes Seq- Description Serial Number )Iake/Model 14 NV-14 INDICIA FOR THE TRAILER Owner License State Color GARCIA. WGUEL ANGEL Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250363) HURTADO. NATHALIE 1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes No Yes No Property Notes Printed by: (250161) SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 DUDLEY, NICOL Agency: NSD Case Summary Report Case Number:NSDl4-001332 Property Seq. Description Serial Number BIake/?Model 14 BMB24: TRACE DNA SWABS Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of .\Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250401) BREEDLOVE. BRIANNE 2.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes NO Yes No Property Notes Seq. Description Serial Number )Iake/Model 14 SOIL STANDARD. Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250203) KML-LAKE. DONNA 1.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes No Yes No Property Notes Seq- Description Serial Number )Iake/Model l4 CTC5: TRACE DNA SWABS Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of BIeasure Value EVIDENCE (250401) BREEDLOVE. BRIANNE 2.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes No Yes No Property Notes From rear passenger? 5 side ?oor mat Printed by: (250161) SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 DUDLEY, NICOL Agency: NSD Case Summary Report Case Number:NSDl4-001332 Property Seq. Description Serial Number BIake/?Model 14 ELECTIAPE (WRIST BIND Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of .\Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250203) DONNA 1.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes NO Yes No Property Notes Seq. Description Serial Number )Iake/Model 1 5 NV-15 PAPERS WITH NOTESFWRITING Owner License State Color GARCIA. ANGEL Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250363) HURTADO. NATHALIE 1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes No Yes No Property Notes Seq- Description Serial Number )Iake/Model 15 BMB25: TRACE DNA SWABS Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of BIeasure Value EVIDENCE (250401) BREEDLOVE. BRIANNE 2.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes No Yes No Property Notes Printed by: (250161) SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 DUDLEY, NICOL Agency: NSD Case Summary Report Case NumbeerSDl4-001332 Property Seq. Description Serial Number Blake/Model 1 5 DKB-12: BRUSH DEBRISNEGETATION. Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of RIeasure Value EVIDENCE (250203) DONNA 1.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes No Yes No Property Notes Seq. Description Serial Number )Iake/Model 15 CTC6 CTC6A: SWAB OF STAIN AND CONTROL Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250401) BREEDLOVE. BRIANNE 2.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes No Yes No Property Notes From rear passenger 5 side seat head rest Seq- Description Serial Number )Iake/L?Iodel 15 DKD-15: BLK. ELECT. TAPE (FACE BINDING) Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of RIeasure Value EVIDENCE (250203) KINHVIEL-LAKE. DONNA 1.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes No Yes No Property Notes Printed by: (250161) SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 DUDLEY, NICOL Agency: NSD Case Summary Report Case Number:NSDl4-001332 Property Seq. Description Serial Number BIake/?Model 1 6 GREY BAG Owner License State Color GARCIA. IVIIGUEL ANGEL Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of .\Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250363) HURTADO. NATHALIE 1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes NO Yes No Property Notes Seq. Description Serial Number )Iake/Model 16 TRACE DNA SWABS Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250401) BREEDLOVE. BRIANNE 2.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes No Yes No Property Notes Seq- Description Serial Number )Iake/Model 6 DKB-13: UNDERWATER RECORDING. Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of BIeasure Value EVIDENCE (250203) KIIVHVIEL-LAKE. DONNA 1.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes No Yes No Property Notes Printed by: (250161) SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 DUDLEY, NICOL Agency: NSD Case Summary Report Case NumbeerSDl4-001332 Property Seq. Description Serial Number BIake/?Model 16 CTC7 CTC7A: SWAB OF STAIN AND CONTROL Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of .\Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250401) BREEDLOVE. BRIANNE 2.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes NO Yes No Property Notes From back side of front passenger seat Seq. Description Serial Number )Iake/Model 16 LEFT FINGERNAIL CLIPPINGS AND Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250203) KJMMEL-LAKE. DONNA 1.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes No Yes No Property Notes Seq- Description Serial Number )Iake/Model 7 NV-17 SAMSUNG BATTERY Owner License State Color GARCIA. WGUEL ANGEL Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250363) HURTADO. NATHALIE 1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes No Yes No Property Notes Printed by: (250161) SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 DUDLEY, NICOL Agency: NSD Case Summary Report Case Number:NSDl4-001332 Property Seq. Description Serial Number BIake/?Model 17 BMB27: TRACE DNA SWABS Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of .\Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250401) BREEDLOVE. BRIANNE 2.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes No Yes No Property Notes Seq. Description Serial Number )Iake/Model 17 DKB-14: CAST OF DIVOT. Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250203) KML-LAKE. DONNA 1.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes No Yes No Property Notes Seq- Description Serial Number )Iake/Model l7 CTC8 CTC8A: SWAB OF STAIN AND CONTROL Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of BIeasure Value EVIDENCE (250401) BREEDLOVE. BRIANNE 2.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes No Yes No Property Notes From rear center seat head rest Printed by: (250161) SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 DUDLEY, NICOL Agency: NSD Case Summary Report Case Number:NSDl4-001332 Property Seq. Description Serial Number BIake/?Model 17 DKD-17: RIGHT FINGERNAIL CLIPPINGS AND Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of .\Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250203) DONNA 1.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes No Yes No Property Notes Seq. Description Serial Number )Iake/Model 18 CELL PHONE BATTERY Owner License State Color GARCIA. ANGEL Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250363) HURTADO. NATHALIE 1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes No Yes No Property Notes Seq- Description Serial Number )Iake/Model 18 BMB28: TRACE DNA SWABS Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of BIeasure Value EVIDENCE (250401) BREEDLOVE. BRIANNE 2.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes No Yes No Property Notes Printed by: (250161) SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 DUDLEY, NICOL Agency: NSD Case Summary Report Case Number:NSDl4-001332 Property Seq. Description Serial Number BIake/?Model 18 CTC9 CTC9A: SWAB OF STAIN AND CONTROL Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of .\Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250401) BREEDLOVE. BRIANNE 2.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes NO Yes No Property Notes From rear passenger' 5 side seat cushion area Seq. Description Serial Number )Iake/Model 18 DKD-18: MJKROSIL CAST OF RIGHT THUNIB PR Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250203) DONNA 1.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes No Yes No Property Notes Seq- Description Serial Number )Iake/Model l9 CELL PHONE BATTERY Owner License State Color GARCIA. ANGEL Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250363) HURTADO. NATHALIE 1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes No Yes No Property Notes Printed by: (250161) SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 DUDLEY, NICOL Agency: NSD Case Summary Report Case NumbeerSDl4-001332 Property Seq. Description Serial Number BIake/?Model 19 BMB31: TRACE LIFTS Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of .\Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250401) BREEDLOVE. BRIANNE 8.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes NO Yes No Property Notes Seq. Description Serial Number )Iake/Model 19 CTC10 SWAB OF STAIN AND CONTRO Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250401) BREEDLOVE. BRIANNE 2.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes No Yes No Property Notes From passenger?s side of center console Seq- Description Serial Number )Iake/Model 19 DKD-19: CAST OF RIGHT HAND PRI Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250203) KIIVHVIEL-LAKE. DONNA 1.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes No Yes No Property Notes Printed by: (250161) SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 DUDLEY, NICOL Agency: NSD Case Summary Report Case Number:NSDl4-001332 Property Seq. Description Serial Number BIake/?Model 20 NV-20 BURNED CELL PHONE Owner License State Color GARCIA. IVIIGUEL ANGEL Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of .\Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250363) HURTADO. NATHALIE 1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes NO Yes No Property Notes Seq. Description Serial Number )Iake/Model 20 TRACE LIFTS Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250401) BREEDLOVE. BRIANNE 9.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes No Yes No Property Notes Seq- Description Serial Number )Iake/Model 20 TRACE LIFTS Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of BIeasure Value EVIDENCE (250401) BREEDLOVE. BRIANNE 2.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes No Yes No Property Notes From driver 5 seat area Printed by: (250161) SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 DUDLEY, NICOL Agency: NSD Case Summary Report Case Number:NSDl4-001332 Property Seq. Description Serial Number BIake/?Model 20 DKD-20: MJKROSIL CAST OF LEFT PALM PRIN Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of .\Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250203) DONNA 1.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes NO Yes No Property Notes Seq. Description Serial Number )Iake/Model 2 1 Nv-21 BAGS OF RUBBER GLOVES Owner License State Color GARCIA. ANGEL Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250363) HURTADO. NATHALIE 1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes No Yes No Property Notes Seq Description Serial Number )Iake/Model 21 BMB33: SOIL SAMPLE Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250401) BREEDLOVE. BRIANNE 1.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes No Yes No Property Notes Printed by: (250161) SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 DUDLEY, NICOL Agency: NSD Case Summary Report Case NumbeerSD14-001332 Property Seq. Description Serial Number BIake/?Model 2 1 CTC12: TRACE LIFTS Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of .\Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250401) BREEDLOVE. BRIANNE 2.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes No Yes No Property Notes From rear driver's side seat area Seq. Description Serial Number )Iake/Model 2 1 DKD-21: SCALP HAIR SHAVED FROM WOUND SI Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250203) DONNA 1.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes No Yes No Property Notes Seq- Description Serial Number )Iake/Model 22 NV-22 CELL PHONE Owner License State Color GARCIA. WGUEL ANGEL Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250363) HURTADO. NATHALIE 1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes No Yes No Property Notes Printed by: (250161) SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 DUDLEY, NICOL Agency: NSD Case Summary Report Case Number:NSDl4-001332 Property Seq. Description Serial Number BIake/?Model 22 BMB34: TRACE DNA SWABS Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of .\Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250401) BREEDLOVE. BRIANNE 2.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes NO Yes No Property Notes Seq. Description Serial Number )Iake/Model 22 CTC13: TRACE LIFT Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250401) BREEDLOVE. BRIANNE 1.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes No Yes No Property Notes From rear center seat area Seq- Description Serial Number )Iake/Model 22 DKD-22: RIB BONE SEGMENTS. Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of BIeasure Value EVIDENCE (250203) KIIVHVIEL-LAKE. DONNA 1.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes No Yes No Property Notes Printed by: (250161) SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 DUDLEY, NICOL Agency: NSD Case Summary Report Case Number:NSDl4-001332 Property Seq. Description Serial Number BIake/?Model 23 NV-23 BLACK ELECTRICAL TAPE Owner License State Color GARCIA. IVIIGUEL ANGEL Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of .\Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250363) HURTADO. NATHALIE 1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes NO Yes No Property Notes Seq. Description Serial Number )Iake/Model 23 BMB35: INDICIA FROM GLOVE Box Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250401) BREEDLOVE. BRIANNE 1.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes No Yes No Property Notes Seq- Description Serial Number )Iake/Model 23 DKD-23: ONE TUBE OF BLOOD. Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of BIeasure Value EVIDENCE (250203) KIIVHVIEL-LAKE. DONNA 1.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes No Yes No Property Notes Printed by: (250161) SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 DUDLEY, NICOL Agency: NSD Case Summary Report Case Number:NSDl4-001332 Property Seq. Description Serial Number BIake/?Model 24 NV-24 COMPUTER MOUSE Owner License State Color GARCIA. IVIIGUEL ANGEL Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of .\Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250363) HURTADO. NATHALIE 1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes NO Yes No Property Notes Seq. Description Serial Number )Iake/Model 24 BMB36: UNLABELED FROM CONSOLE Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250401) BREEDLOVE. BRIANNE 1.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes No Yes No Property Notes Seq- Description Serial Number )Iake/Model 24 NHKROSIL CAST OF RIGHT HAND. Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of BIeasure Value EVIDENCE (250203) KIIVHVIEL-LAKE. DONNA 1.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes No Yes No Property Notes Printed by: (250161) SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 DUDLEY, NICOL Agency: NSD Case Summary Report Case Number:NSDl4-001332 Property Seq. Description Serial Number BIake/?Model 25 BMB38: IPOD FROM GLOVE BOX Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of .\Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250401) BREEDLOVE. BRIANNE 1.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes NO Yes No Property Notes Seq. Description Serial Number )Iake/Model 25 DKD-25: MJKROSIL CAST OF LEFT HAND PRIN Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250203) DONNA 1.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes No Yes No Property Notes Seq- Description Serial Number )Iake/Model 26 BMB39: PIECE OF WHITE ZIP TIE Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of BIeasure Value EVIDENCE (250401) BREEDLOVE. BRIANNE 1.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes No Yes No Property Notes Printed by: (250161) SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 DUDLEY, NICOL Agency: NSD Case Summary Report Case Number:NSDl4-001332 Property Seq. Description Serial Number BIake/?Model 27 BMB40: ONE PAIR RUBBER BOOTS FROM TRUNK Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of .\Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250401) BREEDLOVE. BRIANNE 2.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes NO Yes No Property Notes Seq. Description Serial Number )Iake/Model 28 BMB41 BIVIB42: CONTROLS FOR BIVIB24-28.34 Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250401) BREEDLOVE. BRIANNE 4.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes No Yes No Property Notes Seq- Description Serial Number )Iake/Model 29 BMB43: TRACE LIFTS Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of BIeasure Value EVIDENCE (250401) BREEDLOVE. BRIANNE 4.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Yes No Yes No Property Notes Printed by: (250161) SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 DUDLEY, NICOL Agency: NSD Case Summary Report Case NumbeerSDl4-001332 recovered 10851 out of 80111011 Property Seq. Description Serial Number )Iake/Model 30 JGS7: TRACE LIFTS Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of .\Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250401) BREEDLOVE. BRIANNE 11.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes NO Yes No Property Notes Seq. Description Serial Number )Iake/Nlodel 3 JGS8: TRACE LIFTS Owner License State Color PACHECO. REYNALDO PAC HEC 0 Status Status Of?cer Quantity Units of )Ieasure Value EVIDENCE (250401) BREEDLOVE. BRIANNE 17.00 $1.00 Gun Type Caliber Finish Grip Gun Stock Condition Gun Test Test Type Sight Test Sight Type Yes No Yes No Property Notes Vehicles Seq. Year Color Style Llake Model 1 2006 BLACK SUV LAND ROVER RANGE ROVER VIN License Plate Type License State License Year Owner PASSENGER 2014 PACHECO. REYNALDO PACHECO Status atus Date Value INVOLVED VEHICLE 1 4 Vehicle Notes NS 4-001332 Printed by: (250161) SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 DUDLEY, NICOL Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSDl4-001332 Vehicles Seq. Year Color Style )Iake Model 2 2007 CREAM SEDAN. 4 DOOR 300 VIN License Plate T}pe License State License Year Owner CA 0 Tom ms Status Status7hte Value Vehicle Notes Seq. Year Color Style Blake Model 3 1996 BLACK SUV JEEP GRAND CHEROKEE VIN License Plat ype License State License Year Owner Status Statufate Val7 Vehicle Notes Related Name Relationships PAC HEC O. is AC QU AN to GARCIA. MIGUEL ANGEL PAC HEC O. is AC AIN TAN to TOVAR. MAURICIO PAC HEC O. is QUAIN TAN to GUERRERO. NORBERTO . D14-001332 Printed by: (250161) SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 DUDLEY, NICOL Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Notes/Narratives CASE SUMMARY NSD #14-001332, AS OF 04/15/14 The following is a case summary of NSD #14-001332 as of 04/15/14. There will be more comprehensive reports by myself and other Detectives to follow. On 04/02/14 at approximately 1009 hours, I was asked by Napa Sheriff`s Lt. Oscar Ortiz to respond to 237 Hoff Road in Santa Rosa, CA for a report of a suspected homicide in Napa County. I was told by Napa Sheriff`s Lt. Ortiz Suspect-Miguel Angel Garciahad barricaded himself inside a trailer at 237 Hoff Road, Santa Rosa after Napa Special Investigations Bureau Agents attempted to serve an arrest and search warrant for S-Garcia at the location. S-Garcia had an active felony bench warrant from Napa County (CR16998). The search warrant for S-Garcia and 237 Hoff Road was in relation to NSIB Case #14-00048, which is an unrelated case to Napa Sheriff`s suspected homicide. NSIB Det. Alfonso Ortiz authored a search warrant for Hoff Road after developing information related to S-Garcia while assisting in Napa Police Case #14-001854. In summary, Napa PD Case #14-001854 charged Suspect-Mauricio Tovarfor shooting into an inhabited vehicle on 03/31/14 in the City of Napa. During the course of Napa PD`s investigation of that case, S-Tovar told police he obtained the firearm he used in the shooting from his friend S- Miguel Garcia . Tovar identified Garcia from a booking photo during the investigation. Also, during the course of the investigation, it was learned S-Garcia was staying at 237 Hoff Road in Santa Rosa. Napa Special Investigations Bureau obtained a search warrant for 237 Hoff Road. During the service of the search and arrest warrant for S-Garcia, he barricaded himself in a trailer at the residence and a standoff ensued. S-Garcia also had a female inside the trailer he was holding hostage during the standoff. The female was identified as . During negotiations with S-Garcia inside the trailer at Hoff Road, Garcia started making statements to negotiators indicating he committed a murder and disposed of the body somewhere in Napa County. Lt. Ortiz sent me to the location an effort to obtain additional details regarding the suspected murder and assume the homicide investigation if the statements made by S-Garcia proved to be true. On 04/01/14, at about 1130 hours, I arrived at 237 Hoff Road in Santa Rosa and spoke to Sonoma County Sheriff`s Sergeant Shannon McAlvain. He told me he had been conducting negotiations with Garcia during the standoff. During the negotiations he told Garcia he was simply wanted for a warrant and it was not a big deal. In response, S- Garcia proceeded to tell Sgt. McAlvin he was wanted for more than a warrant. He proceeded to confess he had kidnapped and killed a man within the last week and dumped the body near Lake Berryessa in Napa County. Sgt. McAlvin told me Garcia seemed to be under the impression that somebody had reported him for the murder. Garcia said the word "Rat" to negotiators as if somebody had reported him. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250303) DUDLEY, NICOL Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Notes/Narratives Sgt. McAlvin also told me Sonoma County Sheriff`s Detective Joseph Horseman had recently begun investigating a missing person`s case out of Sonoma County. Based on the information Sgt. McAlvin knew regarding the missing person case, he suspected the murder and body Garcia was speaking about during the standoff might be the same person reported missing. The missing person that Sonoma County Sheriff`s Det. Joseph Horseman was investigating was Reynaldo Pacheco-Pacheco. On 04/02/14 I met and spoke with Det. Horseman at the Sonoma County Sheriff`s Office. He told me the following: On 03/25/14 Victim- Reynaldo Pacheco-Pacheco was reported missing by his family to Santa Rosa Police after he didn`t return home from a business meeting on the morning of 03/24/14. Refer to (SRPD Case #14-0004003). Additionally, V-Pacheco had not picked his daughter up from school on 03/24/14 which was unusual and his cell phone immediately went to voice mail when dialed. Pacheco had left his home the morning of 03/24/14 for his business meeting driving his dark colored 2006 Range Rover bearing a CA license plate of . Due to V-Pacheco residing in Sonoma County`s Jurisdiction, Det. Horseman assumed the missing person investigation from Santa Rosa Police regarding V-Pacheco. Detective Horseman`s case number for Sonoma County is #140327-030. Through Det. Horseman`s missing person investigation of V-Pacheco, he learned Pacheco was involved in a pyramid Ponzi scheme type business known as "Kingdom 777" or "WCM777". He learned the business had recently been shut down by the United States Security Exchange Commission. Due to the shutdown, multiple investors into the business had lost significant amounts of money, had their bank accounts frozen and were upset. Det. Horsman also learned V-Pacheco normally had business meetings throughout the Napa and Sonoma County area. He learned several of his investors were located in Napa and Sonoma County. Det. Horseman told me he had authored a search warrant for Pacheco`s cell phone records which included text messages and cell phone location based on GPS data and tower locations. Utilizing the information, Det. Horseman determined Reynaldo`s Pacheco`s last whereabouts to be in the Napa County area. A phone call was last made from Pacheco`s phone on 03/24/14 at approximately 1500 hours near Silverado Trail and SR-121 in Napa. Det. Horseman also spoke to on 03/31/14 and 04/01/14. She told Det. Horseman V-Pacheco had come to her business located at 109 Southwest Boulevard Rohnert Park, CA on 03/24/14 sometime after 1000 hours. She said he stayed at her shop for approximately 30-45 minutes and left. She said V-Pacheco was behaving normal and she described as a nice man. said she had personally invested in the Kingdom 777 business for approximately 3 units. She paid $2000.00 for the first unit and obtained additional units through a mixture of points and cash. Additionally, through Det. Horseman`s investigation, he learned Pacheco`s Wells Fargo account had been used on 03/24/14 at 1430 hours at the 7-11 located at 2906 First Street in Napa. His card was used to withdraw the amount of $302.95. Det. Horseman also determined through video surveillance that two unknown subjects arrived at 7-11 in NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250303) DUDLEY, NICOL Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Notes/Narratives Pacheco`s Range Rover. The Range Rover was partially visible in a portion of the surveillance. An unknown subject got out of the Range Rover and went into the Napa 7-11 using V-Pacheco`s ATM card to withdraw the $302.95. Following, the subject inquired into Pacheco`s bank balance attempting to withdraw additional money, however was denied. The subject then got back into the Range Rover and the occupants of the vehicle drove to the Wells Fargo Bank branch located on Jefferson Street in Napa. At that location, an ATM photo time stamped on 03/24/14 at 1440 hours shows what appeared to be the same subject from the video at 7-11 attempting to withdraw additional cash from Pacheco`s account. A subsequent search warrant of bank records authored by Det. Horseman confirmed the transactions made on Pacheco`s ATM card. On 04/02/04 shortly after learning about the statements made by Garcia to negotiators, I requested Napa Police Detectives` Alfonso Ortiz & Andy Hess to go to the Napa County Department of Corrections and interview S-Mauricio Tovar regarding the body Garcia was speaking of. Det. Ortiz spoke with Tovar at about 1600 hours on that date and continued to interview S-Tovar several more times on different dates about the incident. Refer to Det. Alfonso Ortiz`s supplemental reports for further detail. Det. Ortiz told me the following in summary: He advised Tovar of his warnings per Miranda at the beginning of his conversation and Tovar said he understood the warnings. Det. Ortiz told S-Tovar he could not talk to him about the Napa PD case. During the course of the interview, he asked S-Tovar about other crimes he and Miguel Garcia had been involved in together. S-Tovar told Ortiz about a home invasion robbery on Pine Street in Napa earlier this year. S-Tovar said he, Garcia and a third unidentified male had been involved in. Refer to Napa PD Case #14-00826. Also, S-Tovar told Det. Ortiz that he was present when S- Garcia killed someone and left the body near Lake Berryessa area in Napa. Tovar went on to tell Det. Ortiz additional detail about the event. , He said S- Garcia came to his house about two weeks earlier and asked for a ride to Petaluma to meet a man who owed him $6000-$7000.00. S-Garcia told Tovar if the man did not give him the money, he was going to take his car as payment. S-Tovar and S-Garcia then drove in Tovar`s vehicle (Crme- Chrysler 300, CA Plate ) to two Big 5 Sporting Goods stores prior to meeting the Victim. The purpose in going to the Big 5 stores was to purchase ammunition for a small revolver S-Garcia had in his possession. First they drove to Big 5 Sporting Goods in the City of Petaluma; however the store refused to sell them ammunition. Video surveillance later obtained by NSO investigations shows two Hispanic males who appear to be S- Garcia and S-Tovar enter the store and inquire about ammunition on 03/24/14 at about 1213 hours. Both subjects left the store NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250303) DUDLEY, NICOL Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Notes/Narratives without making a purchase. Afterwards, S-Tovar and S-Garcia went to Big 5 Sporting Goods in the City of Rohnert Park. At that location, Garcia purchased a box of ammunition, however when S-Tovar and S-Garcia returned to the vehicle, they noticed the ammunition was too long and did not fit into the revolver. S- Garcia kept the bullets he purchased. Video surveillance later obtained from Big 5 Sporting Goods in Rohnert Park shows two Hispanic males who appear to be S-Tovar and S-Garcia make a purchase in the store at about 1301 hours on 03/24/14. According to the Rohnert Park Big 5 Assistant Store Manager the subjects in the video purchased 4 boxes of ammunition (one box of Fiochi 32 auto ammo, one box of Win. Razorback.22 ammo and two boxes of Hrndy.223 Vmax ammo). The two subjects are seen leaving the store at approximately 1306 hours on 03/24/14. A copy of the receipt for purchase was also obtained. It shows the mentioned purchase was made with cash for a total of $122.84. Following, S-Tovar and S-Garcia drove in Tovar`s car (Chrysler 300) to a vineyard ranch area near Highway 116 near the dump area in Petaluma, CA to meet the Victim. During the course of the investigation, this location was later determined to by Napa Sheriff`s Detective Pacheco as (1074 Stage Gulch Road, Petaluma CA). Det. Pacheco contacted the property manager at on 04/10/14 at 1900 hours. During Det. Pacheco`s interview with , he recalled the Crme Colored Chrysler being parked on his property unoccupied for several hours on 03/24/14. told Det. Pacheco he contacted two Hispanic males on the afternoon of 03/24/14 when they came to pick up the car. did not recall the exact time, however said it was later in the afternoon. was irritated hey had parked the vehicle on his property blocking part of an entrance. He did not know who the males were. also identified both Hispanic males being in a Range Rover when they arrived to pick up the Chrysler. He identified the Range Rover by viewing V-Pacheco`s missing person`s flyer. S- Tovar further told Det. Ortiz during his interview that once he and S-Garcia arrived at (1074 Stage Gulch Road, Petaluma) a man who S-Tovar identified from a photo as V- Reynaldo Pacheco, drove up in a Range Rover and met them. S-Tovar said S-Garcia got out of the Chrysler and began to speak with V-Pacheco. Soon after, S-Garcia and V- Pacheco got into a verbal argument. During the argument, S-Garcia grabbed his gun from his waistband & pushed it into V-Pacheco`s stomach area. V-Pacheco in turn grabbed the gun, and a physical fight began between S-Garcia and V-Pacheco. During the course of the fight, S-Garcia grabbed V-Pacheco by the neck overpowering him, and forced him into the back of the Range Rover. S-Garcia then used some shoe laces to tie / bind V-Pacheco`s hands behind his back. Also, S-Tovar tied Pacheco`s feet at S-Garcia`s direction. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250303) DUDLEY, NICOL Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Notes/Narratives S-Tovar, S-Garcia and V-Pacheco drove off in the Victim`s Land Rover to Napa. S-Garcia was driving, V-Pacheco was bound in the back seat and S-Tovar was sitting next to V-Pacheco in the back seat guarding him. S-Tovar left his vehicle (Crme Chrysler CA Plate, 5) parked on the property where they met. Following, S-Garcia made a cell phone call asking someone for help watching someone. When they arrived in Napa, they drove to the back of the Napa Outlet stores & picked up an unknown Hispanic male (Suspect #3). S-Tovar initially claimed to not know Suspect-3, however in further interviews stated he did. Suspect-3 got into the front seat of the Victim`s Range Rover. According to S- Tovar, they all drove to Chevron gas station on First Street in Napa and used the Victim`s ATM card to withdraw $300.00 from his bank account. S-Tovar said Suspect-3 was the one who used the Victim`s ATM card, while S-Garcia and S-Tovar waited in the vehicle with V-Pacheco. Afterwards, they drove down Silverado Trail in Napa towards the Sage Canyon Road. They ended up driving the Range Rover to 2470 Sage Canyon Road in Napa County, which is Kauleto Winery. The entrance to the property was gated and locked, however S-Tovar knew the gate code, so he entered the code and opened it. S- Tovar stated he knew the code from visiting the location with friends in the past. Following, S-Garcia drove into the property about a mile north and parked the Range Rover in a turnout. The GPS coordinates for the location per Google Earth was determined to be 38 29.849 N/122 18.847 W Once at that location, Suspect-3 and S-Tovar got out of the car with the Victim and walked down the trail taking V-Pacheco down towards the creek with them. S-Garcia then came down and met them. S-Gonzalez then headed back towards the Range Rover and S-Tovar and S-Garcia proceeded with the Victim to the bottom of the hill until they got to the creek. Once at the creek S-Garcia threw V-Pacheco into the creek and started throwing rocks at his head. V-Pacheco was bound at the time behind his back and around his mouth with tape. At one point, S-Garcia told S-Tovar to record the incident with his camera phone. S-Tovar estimated he saw S-Garcia throw 8-10 large rocks at the V-Pacheco`s head. S-Tovar said he handed a rock to S-Garcia to throw at the Victim. Also, he recalled S-Garcia stood behind V-Pacheco and threw one last large rock onto his head. S- Tovar heard V-Pacheco moan one last time after being struck by the last rock. S-Tovar said he asked S-Garcia if he could leave when he was throwing the rocks, however S-Garcia told him to stay. S-Tovar said he stayed out of fear of S-Garcia. According to S-Tovar, Suspect-3 was out of site from the creek and waited towards the Range Rover when the rocks were being thrown at the Victim. After S- Garcia was done throwing large rocks at V-Pacheco`s head, the Victim was left in the creek. S-Tovar and NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250303) DUDLEY, NICOL Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Notes/Narratives S-Garcia walked back to the Range Rover. S-Garcia was laughing on the walk back to the vehicle and seemed to have enjoyed what he did. Following, they drove out of the property in the Victim`s car. S-Tovar said S-Garcia broke the cell phone used to record the murder into pieces and threw the pieces out the window on the drive out. Additionally V-Pacheco`s laptop computer that was in the vehicle was thrown out of the window as well. S- Tovar said afterwards, they drove back to Napa & dropped off Suspect -3 near the gas station at Freeway Drive and Imola Avenue in Napa. Next, they drove back to Petaluma where they had left his S-Tovar`s vehicle during the kidnapping and picked up his Chrysler 300. S-Garcia then drove away in the Range Rover and S- Tovar drove off in his Chrysler 300. S-Tovar said S-Garcia likely sold the Range Rover afterwards, however he did not know who he sold the car to or where. S-Tovar was shown the missing person`s flyer of V-Pacheco which included a photo of Pacheco and a Land Rover. S-Tovar told Det. Ortiz the man in the flyer (Pacheco) was the same person he and Miguel Garcia had taken from Petaluma and eventually killed. END OF S-TOVARS INTIAL INTERVIEW WITH DET. ORTIZ A search for a deceased body based on Tovar`s statement was conducted by Nap Sheriff`s & Napa Police Detectives on 04/02/14 with negative results. Later that evening, on 04/02/14 during the course of the standoff with S-Garcia on Hoff Lane in Santa Rosa, S-Garcia took his own life by a self-inflicted gunshot wound and the incident concluded. The pull- trailer S-Garcia was held up in on the property caught fire during the incident. Napa Sheriff`s Det. Nathalie Verdeille and Napa Sheriff`s Evidence Technician Breanne Breedlove later processed the trailer and S-Garcia`s black Jeep Cherokee (CA Plate, ) he had at the location for evidence related to this case. I was told by Det. Verdeille that she had recovered what appeared to be black electrical tape inside the Jeep during the evidence processing. At the conclusion of the standoff with S-Garcia, I spoke again with Sonoma County Sheriff`s Hostage Negotiators. I was told Garcia made additional statements to them during the standoff. Garcia told them he contacted and kidnapped a "business type guy" in Petaluma CA. He said he had tied the Victim up, took his money, his phone and shot him. He said he then dumped the body off a cliff near Lake Berryessa. The next morning, on 04/03/14, Napa Sheriff`s Detective Ackman and Napa PD Detective Ortiz retrieved S-Tovar from the Napa County Department of Corrections in an effort to have S-Tovar direct then to the body. The contact and car ride was audio recorded. Tovar was advised of his rights per Miranda and he voluntarily agreed to show the detectives the location of the body in Napa County related to the homicide talked about by S-Garcia in the standoff. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250303) DUDLEY, NICOL Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Notes/Narratives Tovar was aware he was not promised any consideration regarding the Napa PD case. S-Tovar was told by Det. Ortiz he could not talk to him about the Napa PD case and the purpose of the contact was to find the location of the body. Tovar provided directions to the detectives which led them to the gate of 2470 Sage Canyon Road. Tovar provided the combination to the metal gate at the entrance to the location. He further directed detectives & Napa Sheriff`s Sgt. Bartlett who had arrived at the location to assist down a dirt road on the property. S-Tovar told them to follow the road down to the creek and "he is in the creek". Detective Ortiz and Sgt. Bartlett walked down to the creek based on S-Tovar`s directions and located a deceased human male body in the creek bed. The body was located at approximately 1009 hours on 04/03/14. The scene where the body was located was secured, and later processed for evidence subsequent to a search warrant obtained that day. On 04/03/14 at approximately 1705 hours, I went to the crime scene at 2470 Sage Canyon Road. I saw the Victim`s body was mostly submerged below water in a semi-seated position in the creek. Once the scene was processed and the body was removed by Napa Sheriff`s Coroner Investigators, I saw the body was bound with his hands tightly behind his back with what appeared to be a shoe string. Additionally I saw the body was bound tightly around his mouth by what appeared to be some sort of black electrical tape and a white colored tank top in and around his mouth. The body was fully clothed in black corduroy pants, a forest green long sleeved button up shirt and brown shoes. The right shoe was missing its shoelace. I saw the victim`s head had multiple facial injuries and what appeared to be several skull fractures and major head trauma. I was told by Napa Sheriff`s Evidence Technician Donna Kimmel-Lake a large bolder/ rock was initially sitting near the victim`s head he was initially found. The rock was cracked into two pieces and suspected to have been used by suspects during the incident. The Victim did not have visible jewelry, tattoos, or identification on his person. Napa Sheriff`s Coroner`s secured the body in sealed locked bag and transported the Victim to the Sheriff`s Coroner`s area. On the morning of 04/04/14 a fingerprint was attempted to be obtained by NSO Evidence Technicians from the Victim for identification purposes. A usable fingerprint was unable to be obtained at that time without compromising potential forensic evidence from the bindings on the Victim`s hands. The Victim was re-secured in a locked bag. Refer to Det. Brad Chambers supplemental report for further. On the afternoon of 04/04/14 I spoke with V-Reynaldo Pacheco`s wife & family in . Pacheco`s wife told me V-Pacheco left their house in Sonoma County on 03/24/14 wearing black soft dress type pants, a white button up shirt with stripes and brown dress shoes. She stated Pacheco did own a forest green dress up shirt and would change clothing at times for business meetings. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250303) DUDLEY, NICOL Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Notes/Narratives Additionally she told me Pacheco likely had a black canvass style briefcase with wheels containing his laptop computer with him as well as a droid style cell phone. told me her husband had two laptop computers. One computer was an Apple Air which Sonoma County Detectives had obtained via search warrant during the missing person`s case. The second computer was a Toshiba Laptop Computer that he likely had with him when he left on 03/24/14 for his meeting. told me she suspected her husband had been kidnapped because someone was angry about money related to her husband`s business. did not know a lot about the business, however she was aware several people had lost money and might be angry. She told me the business was named "Kingdom 777". She had no knowledge of direct threats to her husband. On the morning of 04/05/14, Napa Sheriff`s Detectives and Napa County Search and Rescue conducted a search of the area in and around 2470 Sage Canyon Road for items discarded by S-Garcia and S-Tovar after leaving the body in the creek and driving off. During the course of the search, a broken flip style cell phone & a broken Toshiba Laptop Computer were located on the side of an embankment within the property of 2470 Sage Canyon Road. The items were collected as evidence for this case. Refer to Napa Sheriff`s Deputy Charlie Sarnik`s supplemental report for further details. On 04/05/14 myself and other members of the Napa County Major Crimes Task Force returned to and interviewed numerous business partners and family members of V-Reynaldo Pacheco`s. Based on interviews conducted with the family and associates, it was learned V-Pacheco had been involved in the "Kingdom 777" business for about a year and had brought in multiple other investors. On 04/07/14 an autopsy was conducted of the victim`s body at the Napa County Sheriff`s Office. The Victim was positively identified during the course of the autopsy by Napa Sheriff`s Evidence Technician Donna Kimmel-Lake through fingerprints identification. She identified the Victim as V-Reynaldo Pacheco-Pacheco. I was present during the autopsy. I saw the Victim`s hands were bound tightly behind his back with what appeared to be a shoelace and dark colored tape. Also, I saw the Victim was tightly bound around his mouth with dark tape and a white colored tank top. During the course of the removal of the tape /binding around and in V-Pacheco`s mouth, I saw the binding was so tight that permanent indentation marks were imbedded around V-Pacheco`s cheeks from the tape. I spoke with the Doctor Joseph Cohen who conducted the autopsy. He told me the cause of death to V-Pacheco was likely due to blunt force trauma to the head. Dr. Cohen further told me the object used to produce the head trauma would likely not have been something narrow, however based on the injuries he saw, it would have likely been an object with a broader surface such as a rock or similar. Dr. Cohen told me the V-Pacheco had 8 skull fractures ranging from approximately "-3" in length. Additionally he told me the Victim had a chest injury consistent with being struck hard in the chest. According to Doctor Cohen, V-Pacheco had a slight hemorrhage inside his chest cavity from the blow to his chest. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250303) DUDLEY, NICOL Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Notes/Narratives There were not any bullet wounds to the V-Pacheco`s body or other significant traumatic injury that I saw. On 04/08/14 & again on 04/11/14 Napa PD Det. Alfonso Ortiz interviewed S-Tovar at NCDC regarding his involvement and knowledge of the homicide of V-Pacheco. Det. Ortiz told me the following about his interviews with S-Tovar at their conclusion: He read S-Tovar his warnings per Miranda during the interviews and reminded him he would not be promised any consideration for his information provided. Also, he reminded S-Tovar he could not talk to him about the Napa PD case and was not there to talk about that case. S- Tovar told Ortiz he had not told the entire truth about the incident involving V-Pacheco. S-Tovar said S-Garcia had called him on 03/24/14 and told him he was going to meet a guy in Petaluma who owed him money. They did go to the Big 5 Stores to purchase bullets, however afterwards they met a female he referred to as "La Senora" at the Jack in the Box in Rohnert Park on Washington Street prior to kidnapping the Victim. We were unable to obtain video surveillance of the meeting. The female provided Garcia with money and then S- Garcia and S-Tovar drove in the Chrysler 300 to the meet location. S- Tovar described the female as using S-Garcia to conduct criminal activity at her direction. He described S-Garcia as having great respect for "La Senora". Afterwards, "La Senora" arrived with V-Pacheco inside his Range Rover at (1074 Stage Gulch Road, Petaluma). According to S-Tovar, "La Senora" and V-Pacheco actually knew one another and she actually had lured V-Pacheco there. S-Tovar said the "La Senora", Garcia, and he all participated in the kidnapping. V-Pacheco was bound and forced into the back seat of his own vehicle. Following, all of them left inside the Victim`s vehicle and drove to Broadway Deli Market in Sonoma CA, (20511 Broadway Sonoma CA). He said "La Senora" was sitting in the front passenger seat while S- Garcia drove and S-Tovar was in the back seat with the Victim. They dropped off "La Senora" on the street in front of the Deli, and then drove to Napa. S-Tovar told Det. Ortiz he his fearful of "La Senora" due to her involvement in spiritual world practices. S-Tovar was shown two photos obtained from Facebook of who is the owner of the shop that V-Pacheco met the morning he went missing. S-Tovar said the woman in the Facebook photos he was shown was "La Senora" and the same one who had been in the V-Pacheco`s vehicle during the kidnapping. She was also the same one that met with S-Garcia in Vallejo after the sale of the Victim`s car. S-Tovar also identified her vehicle as a blue Honda. After they arrived in Napa, they drove and picked up Suspect -3. S- Tovar disclosed that Suspect -3 used to work with his father in the Vineyards. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250303) DUDLEY, NICOL Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Notes/Narratives I later spoke & interviewed S-Tovar`s father on 04/11/14. I showed him a photo of Suspect #3 taken when Suspect #3 attempted to use V-Pacheco`s ATM at card Wells Fargo Bank in Napa. told me he knew the person in the photo to be "Norberto Guerrero". He said he used to work with him in the fields sometime in January of 2014. Suspct#3 was subsequently identified by NSO investigations as Norberto Guerrero Gonzalez . S-Tovar later confirmed with Napa Police Det. Ortiz during his interviews the person in the ATM photo (Suspect-3) was in fact Norberto Gonzalez. He said S-Gonzalez was the one who went into 7-11 and the other locations to use V-Pacheco`s ATM card. He said he was with them in Napa when they had the Victim bound in the car and with them when the Victim was killed at Sage Canyon. S-Tovar said the white tank top used to bind V-Pacheco`s face was provided by S-Gonzalez when they arrived at 2470 Sage Canyon Road with the Victim. Once at that location, S-Garcia told him and S-Gonzalez to take V-Pacheco down to the bottom of the trail where the creek was and to "beat" him on the way down. S-Tovar said they pushed V-Pacheco down to the trail, however did not beat him as instructed by S-Garcia. S-Garcia then came down pushed the Victim into the water and began throwing rocks at the Victim`s head. S-Tovar said S-Gonzalez did not observe the killing and had gone back up to the car prior to the killing and S-Garcia allowed him to do so. After the murder, the three of them drove off and returned to Napa. They dropped off S-Gonzalez in Napa, near the 76 gas station in the area of Freeway Drive and Imola Avenue. Video was unable to be obtained. Next they drove to pick up his S-Tovar`s Chrysler where they left it in Petaluma (1074 Sage Gulch Road, Petaluma). Sometime during or after the kidnapping and murder, S-Garcia had called to arrange to sell V-Pacheco`s Land Rover. After they picked up the Chrysler, they drove to the "Food For Less" parking lot in the City of Vallejo and sold the Victim`s car. Afterwards, they drove a short distance to the old Vallejo Walmart parking lot. Within minutes "La Senora" ( ) arrived in her blue Honda with what appeared to be her husband. S-Garcia then got into the blue Honda with "La Senora" and her husband and they drove off. S-Tovar left in his Chrysler. On 04/10/14, V-Pacheco`s vehicle (Grey 2006 Land Rover CA Plate was recovered by NSO investigations at approximately 1430 hours at . Through the course of the investigation, the resident at the location stated he had purchased the vehicle on 03/24/14 from two Hispanic males near Food for Less in the City of Vallejo, just south of American Canyon. He paid $8000.00 for the purchase. Both S-Tovar and S-Garcia were positively identified via photo lineup by . Additionally, stated one of the men was driving a Crme Chrysler 300. The vehicle was subsequently towed as evidence to NSO and processed for evidence to the case. Refer to NSO Lt. Ortiz`s report for further detail. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250303) DUDLEY, NICOL Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Notes/Narratives On 04/14/14 S-Gonzalez was located, contacted and detained during the course of a probation search at in the City of Napa. S-Gonzalez was brought back to Napa Sheriff`s Office and interviewed by Lt. Oscar Ortiz and myself. During the interview, S- Gonzalez was read his warnings per Miranda and went on to tell us the following: S-Gonzalez said he had been contacted by a guy he knew as "Pacheco" a few weeks earlier. S-Gonzalez later identified via a booking photo the person he knew by the nickname "Pacheco" as S-Miguel Garcia. S-Gonzalez said S-Garcia had been driving down the road and saw him walking near the Napa Outlet Stores. S-Gonzalez said S-Garcia owed him money, so S-Garcia told S-Gonzalez to get into his "bosses" truck he was driving and he would take him to get the money. S-Gonzalez described the truck as a grey SUV type of vehicle. Following, they drove to 7-11 in Napa and S-Garcia gave S-Gonzalez his ATM card. S-Garcia provided S-Gonzalez the ATM pin number and he withdrew $300.00 from the account. Afterwards, S-Garcia dropped him off. S-Gonzalez initially denied any knowledge of the kidnapping, murder or any other people being inside the car. After further discussion, S-Gonzalez eventually changed his story. He then said he had actually met S-Garcia from his friend S-Tovar. S- Gonzalez said a few weeks earlier, S-Tovar had called him saying he had a job and needed help watching someone. He understood this request for help to mean he would be a look out or something. Based on his statements our understanding of the investigation, S-Gonzalez meant a few weeks earlier to be 03/24/14, the day of the murder. S-Garcia picked S-Gonzalez up behind the Napa Outlet stores driving a grey colored Range Rover. S- Gonzalez got into the front passenger seat. When he got into the car, a man who he later identified via photo as V-Pacheco was in the back seat bound with his hands behind his back. S-Tovar was sitting beside the Victim. Following, they drove to 7-11 where S-Garcia had S-Gonzalez withdraw $300.00 utilizing the Victim`s ATM card and pin number. Next they drove to Wells Fargo bank in an attempt to withdraw additional money, however he was denied. During this time, S-Garcia allowed the Victim to make telephone calls to arrange his daughter to be picked up from school. At some point when in the Range Rover, S-Gonzalez said he saw S-Garcia with a gun in his waistband. S-Gonzalez claimed he was scared of S-Garcia. S-Gonzalez said S-Garcia told them during the drive if they got stopped by the police, V-Pacheco would get it and eluded that S-Gonzalez would be next. Next they drove to the Chevron Gas Station located at 630 Trances Street in Napa near Soscol Avenue. When there, S-Gonzalez went into the store and purchased 3 Gatorade drinks, an energy drink, then returned to the Range Rover. The purchase was made with cash. Video surveillance was later obtained by NSO Investigations of S- Gonzalez making this purchase as well as a copy of the receipt of purchase. The date & time stamp on the receipt of purchase NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250303) DUDLEY, NICOL Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Notes/Narratives indicated 03/24/14 at 1447 hours. In the surveillance footage, S-Gonzalez is seen wearing a white "Puma" hat with black lettering. A white Puma hat with black lettering was later obtained by a search warrant on 04/14/14 at 2619 Laurel Street in Napa, where S-Gonzalez was located and had been living. Following, S-Gonzalez said they drove up to a ranch area up valley in Napa. S-Garcia parked the car. S-Tovar and S-Gonzalez then got out of the car with the Victim. He saw S-Tovar bind up V-Pacheco`s mouth with tape, and then S-Tovar asked S-Gonzalez for his shirt. S-Gonzalez handed S-Tovar his white tank top and used it to further bind the Victim`s mouth. Prior to binding up his mouth, the Victim was asking them not to tie him up. I asked S- Gonzalez if he thought the Victim was afraid and he said yes. S-Garcia then met them on the trail on the way down to the creek. S-Gonzalez then walked back up to the car after the Victim was bound in his mouth, but prior to V- Pacheco being at the creek. He claimed he later learned from the news the Victim had died, however he assumed he died from dehydration and exposure to the elements. When asked how he felt to learn the Victim was dead, he said he felt bad. S-Gonzalez said he thought S-Tovar and S-Garcia were only going to tie the Victim up and leave him there. S-Gonzalez said when S-Tovar and S-Garcia returned to the car, they were laughing about not having any bullets. I asked S-Gonzalez if he had told anybody else about the incident. He said he spoke to because she came to his house claiming S-Tovar told her about the incident. S-Gonzalez told ATM machine and did not do anything else. he only used the During the interview, I showed S-Gonzalez two photos taken of the deceased Victim at the scene. S-Gonzalez appeared upset and disturbed to see the condition the Victim had been found. Refer to Lt. Ortiz` supplemental regarding S-Gonzalez`s interview for further detail. END OF CASE SUMMARY AS OF 04/15/14 Based on the statements from involved parties & evidence found to date, I believe on 03/24/14 Victim- Reynaldo Pacheco-Pacheco was kidnapped in Sonoma County, CA, taken against his will to a rural area of Napa County robbed and subsequently murdered. Based on the evidence obtained thus far, including admissions from involved parties, witnesses interviews and surveillance videos, I believe the suspects responsible for the kidnapping; robbery and murder of V-Pacheco have been identified as Miguel Garcia-08/08/81, who is deceased, Mauricio Tovar-Telles-06/15/90 and Norberto Guererro Gonzalez-01/12/86. Further investigation is being conducted on the female involved suspect RECOMMENDATION: NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250303) DUDLEY, NICOL Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Notes/Narratives Forward this case summary report to the Napa County District Attorney`s Office for review for charges against the above listed suspects (Mauricio Tovar-Telles and Norberto Guererro Gonzalez) for 211 PC, Robbery and 187 PC, Murder. Notes/Continuation NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250303) DUDLEY, NICOL Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Supplement Information Supplement Date Supplement Type Supplement Officer 04/15/2014 16:56:12 EVIDENCE (250164) ACKMAN, DAVID Contact Name Supervising Officer (250134) WILSON, JOEL 418 Supplement Notes Search Warrant Service, 89 Harrison Ave, Napa On 4/4/2014 at 2230 hours, Detectives from Napa Sheriff and Napa Police Dept. served a search warrant at , the residence of . There was not an answer at the door during knock and notice which was announced in both English and Spanish. The back door was found open; no force was used to enter the residence. No one was inside of the residence when entry was made. I took photographs of the entire residence and evidence recovered. Evidence recovered: Indicia of Small black book with license plates written within. Items of evidence were booked at the Sheriff`s Department. Recommendation: On-going investigation. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250164) ACKMAN, DAVID Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Supplement Information Supplement Date Supplement Type Supplement Officer 04/15/2014 17:10:43 SUPPLEMENTAL (250164) ACKMAN, DAVID Contact Name Supervising Officer (250134) WILSON, JOEL 418 Supplement Notes Google Search Warrant Results On 4/15/2014, I received A FedEx package from Google, Inc. The package contained a CD of the information I requested in the warrant. Recommendation: On-going investigation. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250164) ACKMAN, DAVID Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Supplement Information Supplement Date Supplement Type Supplement Officer 04/17/2014 16:35:34 SUPPLEMENTAL (250164) ACKMAN, DAVID Contact Name Supervising Officer (250134) WILSON, JOEL 418 Supplement Notes Wells Fargo Search Warrant results. On 4/17/14, I received a FedEx package from Wells Fargo that contained the records that I requested. Recommendation: On-going investigation. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250164) ACKMAN, DAVID Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Supplement Information Supplement Date Supplement Type Supplement Officer 05/20/2014 09:04:23 SUPPLEMENTAL (250164) ACKMAN, DAVID Contact Name Supervising Officer (250134) WILSON, JOEL 418 Supplement Notes On 5/19/2014, I received the search warrant results from Bank of America, the records of WCM777 (Kingdom 777). I will be reviewing the records and give the results to lead Det. Dudley. Recommendation: On-going investigation. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250164) ACKMAN, DAVID Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Supplement Information Supplement Date Supplement Type Supplement Officer 05/23/2014 13:35:19 EVIDENCE RESULTS (250164) ACKMAN, DAVID Contact Name Supervising Officer (250134) WILSON, JOEL 418 Supplement Notes Search warrant results from Bank of America on the account of WCM777. On 5/1/2014, Judge Williams authorized the search warrant for the accounts of WCM777 (Kingdom 777). I requested bank records from 7/1/2013-4/4/2014. On 5/23/2014, I reviewed the records. I found that the owner of the account appears to be The account was opened 3/13/2013 and closed 9/25/2013. I reviewed all of the records provided and did not see any names associated with this investigation. The records came on an encrypted CD. The program on the disk will not allow any of the documents to be printed. The paper records (account information) and the CD will be booked into evidence. Recommendation: On-going investigation. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250164) ACKMAN, DAVID Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Supplement Information Supplement Date Supplement Type Supplement Officer 07/29/2014 08:46:17 SUPPLEMENTAL (250164) ACKMAN, DAVID Contact Name Supervising Officer (250120) ORTIZ, OSCAR 418 Supplement Notes Search Warrant Service, On 7/23/2014 at about 0945 hours, Investigators Severe and Jaramillo from the D.A.`s office, Petaluma Detective Shoemaker and I served a search warrant at the in Rohnert Park. At the time, there were not any customers in the store, the only employee inside was . We asked to stay outside with Det. Shoemaker while the business was searched. The following evidence was seized: Wells Fargo bank statements. Book with writing in Spanish. Wells Fargo Bank account print-outs. Miscellaneous paper found on blue book. Check # 711020707 for $64,522.56 from Next Level Funding to Investigator Severe took photos of the store and the items seized as evidence. All items of evidence were booked at the Sheriff`s Department. Recommendation: On-going investigation. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250164) ACKMAN, DAVID Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Supplement Information Supplement Date Supplement Type Supplement Officer 04/08/2014 16:04:28 SUPPLEMENTAL (250137) BARTLETT, MICHAEL Contact Name Supervising Officer (250106) PACE, DOUG 418 Supplement Notes SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT: On 4-3-14 (Thursday), at about 0830 hours, Lieutenant Ortiz, of the Napa Sheriff`s Office, requested I assist Detective Ackman, also of the Sheriff`s Office and Officer Ortiz of the Napa Police Department with the search of missing person Reynaldo Pacheco. On 4-3-14, at about 0945 hours, I met Detective Ackman and Officer Ortiz at the driveway entrance of 2470 Sage Canyon Road. They advised me there was information that Pacheco may be located on the property and asked I assist them with the search. We drove up the driveway about 1/8 mile and parked in a small turnout. We exited our vehicles and Detective Ackman pointed to a dirt road that led off of the main driveway just to our north. He advised he had information that Pacheco was possibly left somewhere along the road or near the creek that was located at the end of the roadway. At about 1000 hours, Officer Ortiz and I began walking down the roadway. After about 240 yards, we arrived at the creek, where we located what appeared to be an adult male submerged under the water. We walked back up to our vehicles and I advised Detective Ackman what we located. I taped off the area with crime scene tape and started an Incident/Crime Scene log. Detective Ackman and Officer Ortiz left the scene and returned to Napa. I remained for scene security. I maintained the crime scene log until the scene was released at 1815 hours. Everyone who entered or exited the scene was placed on the log, noting entrance and exit times along with their purpose. RECOMMENDATIONS: Refer to original report NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250137) BARTLETT, Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Supplement Information Supplement Date Supplement Type Supplement Officer 04/17/2014 10:48:55 EVIDENCE COLLECTION (250401) BREEDLOVE, BRIANNE Contact Name Supervising Officer (250134) WILSON, JOEL 418 Supplement Notes REPORT OF 237 HOFF ROAD, SANTA ROSA SCENE PROCESSING NSD #14-001332 L140036A Preliminary Information: At approximately 0830 on April 3, 2014, I was requested by Napa County Sheriff`s Department Detective Nathalie Verdeille to assist in the serving of a search warrant at 237 Hoff Road in Santa Rosa, Ca. Detective Verdeille informed me that a trailer located at 237 Hoff Road had been the scene of an officer involved shooting on April 2, 2014. Additionally, Detective Verdeille informed me that the suspect of the officer involved shooting was one Miguel Garcia (DOB 08-08-1981), that Garcia was also a suspect in a Napa County Sheriff`s Department homicide investigation, and that Garcia was now deceased. Detective Verdeille further informed me that Garcia had been staying in the trailer with a friend for some time. The purpose of our examination of the scene was to search for, collect, and document any evidence possibly related to the Napa County Sheriff`s Department homicide investigation. Evidence related to the investigation of the officer involved shooting was to be handled by other law enforcement agencies. We arrived at 237 Hoff Road at approximately 0945 on April 3, 2014. Also on scene were multiple personnel from Petaluma Police Department, Santa Rosa Police Department, and the Santa Rosa Office of the State of California Department of Justice. Event Information: The property at 237 Hoff Road consisted of the following structures: one two-story barn toward the southwest and one single-story residence toward the northeast. Between the two structures was a turnabout that connected to a driveway. The driveway ran southeast and connected to Hoff Road. On either side of the driveway was a large open space. The open space to the northeast of the driveway consisted of grass and other vegetation. The open space to the southwest of the driveway was bordered by fencing and vegetation, with its own driveway leading southeast to Hoff Road, and a gap in the northeast corner of the fence that led to the turnabout area in front of the barn. To the rear of the property, behind the house and the barn, was a large open space that consisted of the following: multiple vehicles, multiple piles of NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250401) BREEDLOVE, Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 construction-related equipment and supplies, and vegetation. The trailer was located in the enclosed space southeast of the main driveway. The area around the trailer appeared to be where the officer involved shooting occurred. In that area, I observed the following: multiple piles of construction-related equipment and supplies on both sides of a gravel driveway; multiple expended law enforcement gas canisters on the ground of the gravel driveway; a trailer with extensive fire damage in the northeast corner of the open space, front end facing the street; a red Toyota Camry (California license plate number to the southwest of the trailer; a red Ford Ranger XLT (California license plate number to the southwest of the Camry; a black Jeep Cherokee (California license plate number near the front end of the trailer, towards the southeast and the street; a portable bathroom between the Jeep Cherokee and the trailer; and a boat and a storage shed to the northeast of the trailer. The gap in the fencing that led to the turnabout was just north of the trailer. Scene Processing: Detective Verdeille and I searched the two-story barn, the one-story residence, and all open spaces located on the property of 237 Hoff Road. We found no evidence related to the homicide investigation. The trailer was deemed unsafe to enter at the time of scene processing, due to fire damage and due to tear gas contamination. Detective Verdeille and I examined the trailer from the exterior. We located no evidence for collection. The trailer will be towed by the Santa Rosa Police Department to another location for processing at a later date. Per Detective Verdeille, the Jeep Cherokee located near the trailer belonged to Garcia. The Jeep Cherokee will be towed by the Santa Rosa Police Department to another location for processing at a later date. I documented the scene using overall and midrange photography. A total of two hundred seventy-seven digital images were taken and submitted into the Evidence Laboratory files. I created one copy compact disc for Detective Verdeille, and one copy compact disc for Napa County Sheriff`s Department Sergeant Joel Wilson. I also uploaded the images to Veripic, the Napa County Sheriff`s Department digital file management system. Detective Verdeille and I concluded our examination of the scene and departed at approximately 1240 on April 3, 2014. Pending Examinations: See future laboratory reports for the processing of the trailer and of the Jeep Cherokee. Disposition of Evidence: - The 277 digital images of the scene will be retained in Veripic database. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250401) BREEDLOVE, Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Supplement Information Supplement Date Supplement Type Supplement Officer 04/17/2014 11:15:26 EVIDENCE COLLECTION (250401) BREEDLOVE, BRIANNE Contact Name Supervising Officer (250134) WILSON, JOEL 418 Supplement Notes REPORT OF ATTEMPTED FINGERPRINTING OF VICTIM NSD #14-001332 L140036C Preliminary Information: At approximately 0845 on April 4, 2014, I was requested by Napa County Sheriff`s Department Lieutenant Oscar Ortiz to attempt the recovery of friction ridge detail from the right thumb of a deceased male, in an effort to confirm identity. Evidence Technician Jacqueline Shikowitz and I arrived at the autopsy room of the Napa County Sheriff`s Department at approximately 1010 on April 4, 2014. Also present were Napa County Sheriff`s Department Coroner`s Investigator Jay Jones, Napa County Sheriff`s Department Detective Brad Chambers, and Napa County Sheriff`s Department Detective Kyle Eddleman. Event Information: I applied black fingerprint powder to the right thumb of the deceased in an attempt to lift friction ridge detail. Two lifts were obtained. Neither lift contained enough friction ridge detail as to be suitable for a comparison, due to the condition of the skin at the time. Additional friction ridge detail recovery techniques will be attempted at a later date during the autopsy. Detective Chambers photographically documented the process, assisted by Detective Eddleman. Pending Examination: Conduct additional friction ridge recovery techniques at autopsy. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250401) BREEDLOVE, Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Disposition of Evidence: - The two lifts of the right thumb will be retained in the Evidence Laboratory files. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250401) BREEDLOVE, Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Supplement Information Supplement Date Supplement Type Supplement Officer 04/17/2014 11:52:39 EVIDENCE COLLECTION (250401) BREEDLOVE, BRIANNE Contact Name Supervising Officer (250134) WILSON, JOEL 418 Supplement Notes REPORT OF VEHICLE PROCESSING - JEEP CHEROKEE NSD #14-001332 L140036F Preliminary Information: On April 3, 2014, I had responded to the scene of an officer involved shooting at 237 Hoff Road in Santa Rosa (see Laboratory report L14036A). During the processing of that scene, a Jeep Cherokee was towed by Santa Rosa Police Department personnel to a tow yard for future processing. At approximately 1213 on April 7, 2014, I was notified by Napa County Sheriff`s Department Detective Nathalie Verdeille that the processing of that Jeep Cherokee was to take place the next day. Per Detective Verdeille, the Jeep Cherokee was known to have been driven by suspect Miguel Garcia prior to and after the homicide of Reynaldo Pacheco. We were to conduct our examination of the vehicle in conjunction with members from the Santa Rosa Police Department. The purpose of our examination of the vehicle was to search for, collect, and document any evidence possibly related to the homicide. I arrived at the tow yard located at 4298 Santa Rosa Avenue in Santa Rosa, Ca. at approximately 0850 on April 8, 2014. Also on scene were personnel from the tow yard, personnel from the Santa Rosa Police Department, and Detective Verdeille. I began my examination at approximately 0920 the same day. Event Information: The vehicle was a 1996, black, four-door, Jeep Cherokee Laredo with California license plate number and Vehicle Identification Number . Upon my arrival, all doors were closed and locked, all windows were up, and the rear cargo door was closed and locked. The vehicle was dirty overall, and it had paint scratches throughout. There was a dent with green paint marks on the passenger`s side fender and front bumper. There was also a dent above the passenger`s side rear tail light. The interior of the vehicle contained gray, cloth seats and a gray dashboard with black trim. I observed multiple items in the interior of the vehicle. Some of those items included: soil and debris on all four floor mats; a coin and a cigarette NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250401) BREEDLOVE, Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 lighter in the front passenger`s side seating area; multiple lottery scratchers, a roll of gray duct tape, multiple gloves, and a roll of black electrical tape in the center console and cup holder area; a Department of Motor Vehicles registration form for " in the in the glove box; a water bottle and a glove in the rear seating area; and a spare tire, miscellaneous car repair tools, and what appeared to be a metal battering ram in the rear cargo area. Vehicle Processing: The vehicle keys were not present. Tow yard personnel used standard tools to unlock the front passenger door and gain us access to the interior. I collected scrapings of soil and debris from the driver`s floor mat (BMB-A), the front passenger`s floor mat (BMB-B), the rear driver`s side floor mat (BMB-C), and the rear passenger`s side floor mat (BMB-D). Detective Verdeille collected items of interest from the vehicle. I documented the vehicle using overall, midrange, and close-up photography. A total of one hundred thirty-four digital images were taken. I created one copy compact disc for Detective Verdeille. I also uploaded the images to Veripic, the Napa County Sheriff`s Department digital file management system. Detective Verdeille and I completed our examination at approximately 1100 on April 8, 2014. The Jeep Cherokee was left in the possession of the Santa Rosa Police Department. Pending Examinations: BMB-A through BMB-D may be sent out for soil analysis and comparison if needed. Disposition of Evidence: - BMB-A through BMB-D were submitted to the Napa County Sheriff`s Department Property Unit under Property Control Number 170459. - The 134 digital images of the vehicle examination will be retained in the Veripic database. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250401) BREEDLOVE, Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Supplement Information Supplement Date Supplement Type Supplement Officer 04/22/2014 10:13:34 EVIDENCE COLLECTION (250401) BREEDLOVE, BRIANNE Contact Name Supervising Officer (250134) WILSON, JOEL 418 Supplement Notes REPORT OF VEHICLE PROCESSING - TRAILER NSD #14-001332 L140036G Preliminary Information: On April 3, 2014, I had responded to the scene of an officer involved shooting at 237 Hoff Road in Santa Rosa (see Laboratory report L140036A). During the processing of that scene, a trailer was towed by Santa Rosa Police Department personnel to a tow yard for future processing. At approximately 1213 on April 7, 2014, I was notified by Napa County Sheriff`s Department Detective Nathalie Verdeille that the processing of that trailer was to take place the next day. Per Detective Verdeille, suspect Miguel Garcia was known to have been staying in the trailer for some time. We were to conduct our examination of the vehicle in conjunction with members from the Santa Rosa Police Department. The purpose of our examination of the vehicle was to search for, collect, and document any evidence possibly related to the homicide. I arrived at the tow yard located at 4298 Santa Rosa Avenue in Santa Rosa, Ca. at approximately 0850 on April 8, 2014. Also on scene were personnel from the tow yard, personnel from the Santa Rosa Police Department, and Detective Verdeille. Kris Capeheart of the Santa Rosa Police Department stated that members of her team had previously entered the trailer to collect firearms evidence that could readily be seen and were relevant to the officer involved shooting, but they had not yet conducted a thorough search. Detective Verdeille and I began our examination of the trailer at approximately 1100 the same day. Event Information: The vehicle was a Mallard brand, Sprinter, fifth-wheel trailer. No license plates were on the vehicle, and a standard vehicle identification number (VIN) was not visible. A label on the driver`s side exterior stated the vehicle was manufactured by Mallard Coach Co., Inc. in August of 1991; and that the "Vehicle ID#" was The trailer had sustained extensive fire damage. Burn marks were visible on all sides of the exterior, and portions of the NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250401) BREEDLOVE, Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 exterior appeared to be melted. The door and many of the windows were missing. The interior of the trailer consisted of the following spaces (from front to rear): a bedroom, a bathroom area, a general living room area, and a kitchen area. The primary entrance of the trailer was a door on the passenger`s side. The door opened into the general living room area, with the kitchen to the left and the bathroom and bedroom to the right. The entire interior of the vehicle was badly damaged by fire. I observed multiple items melted together, miscellaneous clothing and other items strewn about the floor, and sections of the interior walls were missing. There was a layer of charred debris on all counter surfaces and floor throughout the vehicle. Many items were wet, presumably from the fire extinguishing process. Vehicle Processing: Detective Verdeille and I searched through the debris of trailer for evidence items. Detective Verdeille collected all items of interest. I documented the vehicle using overall, midrange, and close-up photography. A total of one hundred seventy-one digital images were taken. I uploaded the images to Veripic, the Napa County Sheriff`s Department digital file management system, upon return to the laboratory. Detective Verdeille and I completed our examination at approximately 1310 on April 8, 2014. The trailer was left in the possession of the Santa Rosa Police Department. Disposition of Evidence: - The 171 digital images of the vehicle examination will be retained in the Veripic database. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250401) BREEDLOVE, Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Supplement Information Supplement Date Supplement Type Supplement Officer 04/24/2014 14:08:51 EVIDENCE COLLECTION (250401) BREEDLOVE, BRIANNE Contact Name Supervising Officer (250134) WILSON, JOEL 418 Supplement Notes REPORT OF VEHICLE PROCESSING - CHRYSLER 300 ) NSD #14-001332 L140036H Preliminary Information: At approximately 1700 on April 3, 2014, I was requested by Napa County Sheriff`s Department Detective Nicol Dudley to conduct a vehicle examination of a Chrysler 300. Per Detective Dudley, the Chrysler may have been involved in the kidnapping and transport of homicide victim Reynaldo Pacheco. Detective Dudley further informed me that the vehicle was also connected to a Napa Police Department case, and therefore the vehicle may have been previously processed by their personnel. At approximately 0900 on April 4, 2014, I spoke with Napa Police Department Forensic Specialist Janet Lipsey regarding her examination of the vehicle. Forensic Specialist Lipsey informed me that she photographed the vehicle, that she searched the vehicle for evidence related to their case, but that she collected no items. Forensic Specialist Lipsey stated no further forensic examination was conducted. The examination of the vehicle remained pending until a sear warrant was approved. On April 9, 2014, I received authorization from Detective Dudley to proceed with my examination. I arrived at the Napa County Sheriff`s Department Vehicle Bay at approximately 0930 on April 10, 2014 and began the examination. Also present was Napa County Sheriff`s Department Evidence Technician Jackie Shikowitz. Event Information: The vehicle was a 2007, white, 4-door, Chrysler 300 with California license plate number and Vehicle Identification Number . Upon my arrival, all doors were closed and locked, all windows were up, and the trunk was closed and locked. The vehicle exterior was dusty overall, and it had paint scratches in both bumpers. All four wheel wells contained significant amounts of dried mud. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250401) BREEDLOVE, Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 The interior of the vehicle contained gray, cloth seats with plastic dashboard and trim. The interior of the vehicle was very clean and contained few items. The front seating areas were empty. I observed red-brown stains on the armrest of the driver`s door. In the rear seating area, I observed miscellaneous items including: a child`s car seat, a roll of blue foam, and a container of "Huggies" brand baby wipes. Underneath the car seat, I observed a piece of a white zip tie. In the center console, I observed miscellaneous items including: paperwork, make-up items, bank receipts, and compact discs. In the glove box, I observed miscellaneous items including: a white iPod, a Department of Motor Vehicles Registration paper for "Luis Tovarlona," and insurance papers for "Mauricio Tovar." The trunk contained miscellaneous items including a stereo system; a spare tire; and a pair of black, "LaCrosse waterproof," size 13, rubber boots (galoshes) that had dried mud on the sides and on the soles. Vehicle Processing: I collected swabs for possible contact DNA from the following areas: - the exterior driver`s door handle (BMB1) - the exterior rear driver`s side door handle (BMB2) - the exterior front passenger`s side door handle (BMB3) - the exterior rear passenger`s side door handle (BMB4) - the driver`s seating area including the seat belt cloth, the textured area of the seat belt buckle and fastener, all vent controls, the grooved areas of the center console controls, the grooved areas of the armrest controls, the grooves of the steering wheel, and the headrest (BMB17) - the rear driver`s side seating area including the seat belt cloth, the textured areas of the seat belt buckle and fastener, the grooved areas of the armrest controls, and the headrest (BMB18) - the front passenger`s side seating area including the seat belt cloth, the textured area of the seat belt buckle and fastener, all vent controls, the grooved areas of the armrest controls, and the edges of the glove box handle (BMB19) - the rear passenger`s side seating area including the seat belt cloth, the textured areas of the seat belt buckle and fastener, the grooved areas of the armrest controls, and the headrest (BMB20) - the rear center seat area including the seat belt cloth, the textured areas of the seat belt buckle and fastener, and the headrest (BMB21) - blank swab controls (BMB 15) and swab controls with water only (BMB16) I collected swabs of the red-brown stains on the driver`s door armrest for possible blood (BMB22), with the following control swabs: - an area of the armrest near the red-brown stains (BMB23) - blank swabs (BMB29) - swabs with water only (BMB30) I collected swabs for possible trace DNA from the following areas: - the gas pedal and the brake pedal (BMB24) - the driver`s floor mat (BMB25) - the rear driver`s side floor mat (BMB26) - the front passenger`s side floor mat (BMB27) - the rear passenger`s side floor mat (BMB 28) - blank swab controls (BMB41) and swab controls with water only (BMB42) I collected soil samples from the front driver`s side wheel well (BMB5), the rear driver`s side wheel well (BMB6) the front passenger`s side wheel well (BMB7) and the rear passenger`s side wheel well (BMB8). NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250401) BREEDLOVE, Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Evidence Technician Shikowitz and I collected a total of forty-nine trace lifts for possible hairs and fibers from the interior of the vehicle. The areas collected included the following: - the headrest, backrest, seat cushion, and floor of the driver`s seating area (JGS8) - the headrest, backrest, seat cushion, floor, backside of the front seat`s headrest, backside of the front seat, and floor of the rear diver`s side seating area (JGS7) - the headrest, backrest, seat cushion, floor, and backside of the front seat`s headrest, backside of the front seat, and floor of the rear passenger`s side seating area (BMB 32) - the headrest, backrest, seat cushion, and floor of the front passenger`s side seating area (BMB31) - the headrest, backrest, seat cushion, and floor of the rear center seating area (BMB43) I collected the following items from the vehicle: - the Department of Motor Vehicle registration form and insurance papers from the glove box (BMB35) - an unlabeled compact disc from the center console (BMB36) - multiple bank receipts from the center console (BMB37) - the white iPod from the glove box (BMB38) - the piece of a white zip tie from underneath the car seat in the rear seating area (BMB39) - the pair of black rubber boots (galoshes) from the trunk (BMB40) Prior to the collection of the black rubber boots (BMB40), I collected a soil sample from the tread (BMB33) and swabs for possible trace DNA from the tread (BMB34). Control swabs BMB41 and BMB42 may be used for BMB34. Evidence Technician Shikowitz and I processed the following areas of the exterior of the vehicle for latent impressions: the hood, both bumpers including light fixtures, both fenders, all doors and door windows, the A/B/C pillars, the driver`s side of the roof (approximately six inches inward), the passenger`s side of the roof (approximately six inches inward), both side mirrors, the windshield, the rear window, both quarter panels, and the trunk. A total of twelve latent lift cards were collected (BMB9-BMB14, JGS1-JGS6). Evidence Technician Shikowitz processed the following areas of the interior of the vehicle for latent impressions: the rearview mirror, all visor mirrors, all door windows, all door handles, all metal portions of seat belt buckles, all frame areas, the silver-colored portions of the steering wheel, and the silver-colored portions of the center console area. No friction ridge detail was developed. Evidence Technician Shikowitz documented the vehicle using overall, midrange, and close-up photography. A total of one hundred sixteen digital images were taken. Evidence Technician Shikowitz uploaded the images to Veripic, the Napa County Sheriff`s Department digital file management system, upon return to the laboratory. I created one copy compact disc for Detective Dudley. Prior to evidence packaging, Napa County Sheriff`s Department Detective Nathalie Verdeille and I discussed the evidence items that were collected. Detective Verdeille decided the bank receipts (BMB37) were of no value due to the fact that the date stamp was prior to the time frame of the crime. Detective Verdeille further decided that the Department of Motor Vehicles registration form from BMB38 was of no value. The bank receipts and the registration form were therefore not submitted, and were instead turned over to Detective Verdeille for her to return them to the vehicle. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250401) BREEDLOVE, Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Disposition of Evidence: The following items were submitted to the Napa County Sheriff`s Department Property Unit, and are listed by their Property Control Number: - 170648 - BMB1: Contact DNA swabs - 170649 - BMB2: Contact DNA swabs - 170651 - BMB3: Contact DNA swabs - 170654 - BMB4: Contact DNA swabs - 170655 - BMB5-BMB8: Soil samples from wheel wells - 170656 - BMB15 & BMB16: Controls for BMB1-4, 17-21 - 170657 - BMB17: Contact DNA swabs - 170658 - BMB18: Contact DNA swabs - 170659 - BMB19: Contact DNA swabs - 170660 - BMB20: Contact DNA swabs - 170661 - BMB21: Contact DNA swabs - 170662 - BMB22: Swabs of red-brown stains - 170663 - BMB23, BMB29, BMB30: Controls for BMB22 - 170664 - BMB24: Trace DNA swabs - 170665 - BMB25: Trace DNA swabs - 170666 - BMB26: Trace DNA swabs - 170667 - BMB27: Trace DNA swabs - 170668 - BMB28: Trace DNA swabs - 170669 - BMB31: Trace lifts - 170670 - BMB32: Trace lifts - 170671 - BMB33: Soil sample - 170672 - BMB34: Trace DNA swabs - 170673 - BMB35: Indicia from glove box (insurance papers) - 170674 - BMB36: Unlabeled CD/DVD from glove box - 170675 - BMB38: IPod from glove box - 170676 - BMB39: Piece of white zip tie - 170677 - BMB40: One pair of rubber boots from trunk - 170678 - BMB41 & BMB42: Controls for BMB24-28, 34 - 170679 - BMB43: Trace lifts - 170680 - JGS7: Trace lifts - 170681 - JGS8: Trace lifts The latent lift cards (BMB9-BMB14, JGS1-JGS6) will be maintained in the Evidence Laboratory files. The 116 digital images will be maintained in the Veripic database. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250401) BREEDLOVE, Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Supplement Information Supplement Date Supplement Type Supplement Officer 04/25/2014 17:48:21 EVIDENCE COLLECTION (250401) BREEDLOVE, BRIANNE Contact Name Supervising Officer (250120) ORTIZ, OSCAR 418 Supplement Notes REPORT OF VEHICLE PROCESSING - RANGE ROVER NSD #14-001332 L140036J Preliminary Information: At approximately 1600 on April 10, 2014, I was notified by Napa County Sheriff`s Department Detective Nicol Dudley that a Range Rover was being towed to the Napa County Sheriff`s Department for vehicle processing. Detective Dudley informed me that the vehicle had belonged to homicide victim Reynaldo Pacheco, and that the vehicle may have been used by the suspects to transport the victim. Detective Dudley further informed me that the suspects sold the vehicle around March 24, 2014. Napa County Sheriff`s Department Lieutenant Oscar Ortiz provided additional information regarding the vehicle. Lieutenant Ortiz informed me that the new owners of the vehicle had discarded all items found within the vehicle upon purchase, but that they had not cleaned the vehicle. Additionally, Lieutenant Ortiz informed me that the new owners adjusted the driver`s seat in order to drive the vehicle, that the front passenger`s seat adjuster was broken when they purchased it, that they have driven the vehicle on multiple occasions since its purchase, and that they often had children in the rear seating area. The vehicle arrived at the Napa County Sheriff`s Department vehicle bay at approximately 1600 on April 10, 2014. I arrived at approximately 0840 on April 11, 2014 and began my examination. Napa County Sheriff`s Department Sergeant Chris Carlisle arrived shortly after to assist. Event Information: The vehicle was a 2006, gray, 4-door, Land Rover Range Rover Sport HSE with California license plate number and Vehicle Identification Number . Upon my arrival, all doors were closed and unlocked, the windows were up, and the rear cargo door was closed and unlocked. The vehicle exterior was dirty overall. There was paint deterioration or peeling in multiple areas, and minor paint scratches throughout. There was NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250401) BREEDLOVE, Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 minor damage to the driver`s side of the front bumper. The interior of the vehicle contained dark leather seating, with a dark plastic dashboard and trim. The interior was dirty overall. I observed miscellaneous items in the vehicle, including: a set of keys and a compact disc in the driver`s seat area; a pen and a safety pin in the front passenger`s seat area; vehicle manuals and a remote control in the glove box; coins and wrappers in the center console and cup holder area; metal rods/equipment and child-related items in the rear seating area; a clipboard and car repair tools in the rear cargo area. Vehicle Processing: I collected swabs for possible contact DNA from the following areas: - the exterior driver`s door handle (BMB1) - the exterior rear driver`s side door handle (BMB2) - the exterior front passenger`s side door handle (BMB3) - the exterior rear passenger`s side door handle (BMB4) - the exterior button for the rear cargo door (BMB7) - the driver`s seating area including the seat belt cloth, the textured area of the seat belt buckle and fastener, the grooved areas of the vent controls, the stitched seams of the seat and headrest, the edge of center console control handle, the grooved areas of the armrest controls and seat controls, the steering wheel, the groves of the radio area, and the grooves of the shifter (BMB12) - the rear driver`s side seating area including the seat belt cloth, the textured areas of the seat belt buckle and fastener, the grooved areas of the armrest controls, the stitched seams of the seat and headrest, and the edges of the DVD screen on the back of the front seat headrest (BMB13) - the front passenger`s side seating area including the seat belt cloth, the textured area of the seat belt buckle and fastener, the grooved areas of the vent controls, the grooved areas of the armrest and seat controls, and the edges of the glove box handles, the textured area on the top side of the glove box, and the stitched seams of the seat and headrest (BMB14) - the rear passenger`s side seating area including the seat belt cloth, the textured areas of the seat belt buckle and fastener, the grooved areas of the armrest controls, the stitched seams of the seat and headrest, and the edges of the DVD screen on the back of the front seat headrest (BMB15) - the rear center seat area including the seat belt cloth, the textured areas of the seat belt buckle and fastener, the grooved areas of the vent controls, and the stitched seams of the seat and headrest (BMB16) - blank swab controls (BMB 5) and swab controls with water only (BMB6) I observed a long strand of dark-colored hair lodged in the driver`s seat belt shoulder mechanism. I collected it using sterile tweezers (BMB17). Sergeant Carlisle and I collected swabs for possible trace DNA from the following areas: - the gas pedal (CTC1) - the brake pedal (CTC2) - the driver`s floor mat (CTC3) - the front passenger`s side floor mat (CTC4) - the rear passenger`s side floor mat (CTC5) - the rear driver`s side floor mat (BMB29) - the rear cargo area (BMB18) - blank swab controls (BMB19) and swab controls with water only (BMB20) NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250401) BREEDLOVE, Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Sergeant Carlisle collected swabs from multiple stains in the interior of the vehicle for possible blood. For each stain collected, Sergeant Carlisle also collected a control swab of an area near the stain. The stains were from the following areas: - the rear passenger side headrest (CTC6, control CTC6a) - midway down the backside of the front passenger seat (CTC7, control CTC7a) - the side of the rear center seat headrest (CTC8, control CTC8a) - the side of the rear passenger`s side seat cushion and the area directly below (CTC9, control CTC9a) - the passenger`s side of the center console, between the center console and the front passenger seat (CTC10, control CTC10a) - blank swabs BMB19 water-only swabs BMB20 may be used for controls for CTC6-CTC10 Sergeant Carlisle and I collected a total of 13 trace lifts for possible hairs and fibers from the interior of the vehicle. The lifts were collected from cloth or carpet-like areas including the floor, the roof, and the rear cargo area. The lifts were grouped into the following areas: - the driver`s seating area (CTC11) - the rear driver`s side seating area (CTC12) - the rear center seating area (CTC13) - the rear cargo area (BMB21) - the front passenger`s side seating area (BMB22) - the rear passenger`s side seating area (BMB23) I collected a compact disc that was lying on the driver`s seat (BMB24). Upon removal of the rear passenger`s side floor mat, I observed a water bottle lodged underneath the front passenger`s seat. It had not been visible until the mat was removed. I collected it for possible latent impressions and DNA (BMB30). Sergeant Carlisle and I processed the following areas of the exterior of the vehicle for latent impressions: the hood, both bumpers including light fixtures, both fenders, all doors and door windows, the A/B/C pillars, the driver`s side of the roof (approximately six inches inward), the passenger`s side of the roof (approximately six inches inward), both side mirrors, the windshield (approximately twelve inches inward on both sides), the rear window, both quarter panels, and the rear cargo door and window area. A total of twelve latent lift cards were collected from the exterior (BMB8-BMB11, CTC14-CTC21). Sergeant Carlisle and I processed the following areas of the interior of the vehicle for latent impressions: the rearview mirror, all visor mirrors, all door windows, all metal portions of seat belt buckles, all frame areas, the silver-colored portions of the doors, and the silver-colored portions of the center console area, the silver-colored portions of the glove box, and the vanity lights. A total of four latent lift cards were collected from the interior (BMB25-BMB28). I documented the vehicle examination using overall, midrange, and close-up photography. A total of one hundred twenty-seven digital images were taken. I uploaded the images to Veripic, the Napa County Sheriff`s Department digital file management system, upon return to the laboratory. I created one copy compact disc for Detective Dudley. Disposition of Evidence: NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250401) BREEDLOVE, Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 The following items were submitted to the Napa County Sheriff`s Department Property Unit, and are listed by their Property Control Number: - 170490 - BMB1-BMB7, BMB12-BMB16: Contact DNA swabs and controls - 171148 - BMB17: Hair from driver`s seat belt - 171149 - BMB18: Trace DNA swabs - 171150 - BMB19 & BMB20: Control swabs - 171152 - BMB21: Trace lifts - 171154 - BMB22: Trace lifts - 171155 - BMB23: Trace lifts - 171156 - BMB24: CD from driver`s seat - 171157 - BMB29: Trace DNA swabs - 171158 - BMB30: Water bottle - 171159 - CTC1: Trace DNA swabs - 171160 - CTC2: Trace DNA swabs - 171161 - CTC3: Trace DNA swabs - 171162 - CTC4: Trace DNA swabs - 171163 - CTC5: Trace DNA swabs - 171164 - CTC6 & CTC6a: Swab of stain and control - 171165 - CTC7 & CTC7a: Swab of stain and control - 171166 - CTC8 & CTC8a: Swab of stain and control - 171168 - CTC9 & CTC9a: Swab of stain and control - 171169 - CTC10 & CTC10a: Swab of stain and control - 171170 - CTC11: Trace lifts - 171172 - CTC12: Trace lifts - 171173 - CTC13: Trace lifts The latent lift cards (BMB8-BMB11, BMB25-BMB28, CTC14-CTC21) will be maintained in the Evidence Laboratory files. The 127 digital images will be maintained in the Veripic database. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250401) BREEDLOVE, Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Supplement Information Supplement Date Supplement Type Supplement Officer 05/16/2014 11:55:17 EVIDENCE RESULTS (250401) BREEDLOVE, BRIANNE Contact Name Supervising Officer (250134) WILSON, JOEL 418 Supplement Notes REPORT OF LATENT PRINT ANALYSIS AND COMPARISON (LIFT CARDS FROM RANGE ROVER) NSD #14-001332 L140036L Description of Evidence Received: 1) One manila envelope retained by me after the processing of the vehicle, containing: sixteen latent lift cards from the processing of the Land Rover Range Rover (CA 6FHF048). The lift cards were previously labeled as BMB8-BMB11, BMB25-BMB28, and CTC14-CTC21. - Lift BMB8 = "ext. rear passenger`s side window (1st lift of area)" - Lift BMB9 = "ext. rear passenger`s side window (2nd lift of area, 1st = BMB8)" - Lift BMB10 = "ext. rear passenger`s side window" - Lift BMB11 = "ext. rear passenger`s side window" - Lift BMB25 = "Int. rear pass. side door window (1st lift)" - Lift BMB26 = "Int. rear pass. side door window (2nd lift, 1st lift = BMB25)" - Lift BMB27 = "Int. rear pass. door window" - Lift BMB28 = "Int. rear pass. door window" - Lift CTC14 = "Hood corner above headlight - driver side" - Lift CTC15 = "Hood above headlight approx. 8" back toward windshield - driver side" - Lift CTC16 = "Above door handle - driver side (exterior)" - Lift CTC17 = "Driver side, rear pass door glass back side of rear glass panel on door - fixed glass portion (exterior)" - Lift CTC18 = "Driver side door handle exterior lift" - Lift CTC19 = "Driver side door on door frame midway behind glass (exterior)" - Lift CTC20 = "Backside of door handle driver side (exterior)" - Lift CTC21 = "Driver side left rear qtr panel @ midway of glass windows" 2) One manila envelope retrieved from the Evidence Laboratory files containing: three fingerprint records for the purposes of victim elimination, previously submitted by Napa County Sheriff`s Department Detective David Ackman. - One fingerprint record marked - One fingerprint record marked " - One fingerprint record marked NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250401) BREEDLOVE, Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 3) The following items were retrieved from the California Department of Justice Automated Archive System on May 6, 2014: - One copy of a fingerprint record and one copy of a palmprint record, both marked "Garcia, Miguel Angel," SID: 28406933. Fingerprint and palmprint date 02/08/2014. - One copy of a fingerprint record and one copy of a palmprint record, both marked "Tovar-Telles, Mauricio," SID: 29719011. Fingerprint and palmprint date 04/01/2014. - One copy of a fingerprint record and one copy of a palmprint record, both marked "Gonzalez, Norberto Guerrero," SID: 33443982. Fingerprint and palmprint date 03/19/2013. 4) The following items were retrieved from the California Department of Justice Automated Archive System on May 15, 2014: - One copy of a fingerprint record marked "Garcia-Marron, Miguel Angel," SID: 28406933. Fingerprint date 06/15/2012. - One copy of a fingerprint record marked "Tovar, Mauricio Tellez," SID: 29719011. Fingerprint date 10/24/2008. *Note: these records were obtained because the initially-printed records did not contain all areas needed for conclusive comparisons to the suitable friction ridge impressions. These two records contained any areas not present in the initial records, so that conclusive comparison results could be obtained. Analysis of Friction Ridge Impressions for Comparison Suitability: Lift BMB8 contained two areas friction ridge impressions I labeled BMB8-A and BMB8-B - BMB8-A was suitable for comparison - BMB8-B was not suitable for comparison Lift BMB9 was a duplicate lift of BMB8. BMB8 contained more detail, examination of BMB9 was deferred. Lift BMB10 contained two areas friction ridge impressions I labeled BMB10-A and BMB10-B - BMB10-A and BMB10-B were not suitable for comparison Lift BMB11 contained no areas of friction ridge impressions Lift BMB25 contained eight areas friction ridge impressions I labeled BMB25-A through BMB25-H - BMB25-D and BMB25-E were suitable for comparison - BMB25-A through BMB 25-C, and BMB25-F through BMB25-H were not suitable for comparison Lift BMB26 was a duplicate lift of BMB25. BMB25 contained more detail, examination of BMB26 was deferred. Lift BMB27 contained six areas friction ridge impressions I labeled BMB27-A through BMB27-F - BMB27-E and BMB27-F were suitable for comparison - BMB27-A through BMB27-D were not suitable for comparison Lift BMB28 contained one area friction ridge impressions I labeled BMB28-A - BMB28-A was not suitable for comparison Lift CTC14 contained three areas friction ridge impressions I labeled CTC14-A through CTC14-C - CTC14-A through CTC14-C were suitable for comparison Lift CTC15 contained four areas friction ridge impressions I labeled CTC15-A through CTC15-D - CTC15-B was suitable for comparison - CTC15-A, CTC15-C, and CT15-D were not suitable for comparison Lift CTC16 contained five areas friction ridge impressions I labeled CTC16-A through CTC16-E - CTC16-A through CTC16-E were not suitable for comparison Lift CTC17 contained five areas friction ridge impressions I labeled CTC17-A through CTC17-E - CTC17-E was suitable for comparison - CTC17-A through CTC17-D were not suitable for comparison NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250401) BREEDLOVE, Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Lift CTC18 contained no areas friction ridge impressions Lift CTC19 contained two areas friction ridge impressions I labeled CTC19-A and CTC19-B - CTC19-A and CTC19-B were not suitable for comparison Lift CTC20 contained no areas friction ridge impressions Lift CTC21 contained one area friction ridge impressions I labeled CTC21-A - CTC21-A was not suitable for comparison Comparison of Friction Ridge Impressions to Known Standards: Examination of the fingerprint record marked showed that the inked impressions in the box for finger number seven (the left index) and in the box for finger number nine (the left ring) were made by the same finger. It is reasonable to conclude that either finger number seven or finger number nine was recorded twice, and the other finger was not recorded at all. Examination of friction ridge impressions BMB25-C and BMB25-D revealed that they were left by the same hand. Impression BMB25-D had greater visible detail. Therefore examination of impression BMB25-C was deferred. Comparison of the ten suitable friction ridge impressions to the fingerprint record marked "Ceasar Villegas" revealed the following - Comparison of impression CTC15-B yielded an identification - Comparison of impressions BMB25-D, BMB25-E, CTC14-A, CTC14-B, CTC14-C, and CTC17-E were inconclusive due to incomplete standards. Clear and complete standards, including all ten fingers and all sides of fingers, may be submitted if a conclusive comparison is needed. - Comparison to impressions BMB8-A, BMB27-E, and BMB27-F could not be conducted. Clear and complete palmprint standards, including joints, are required for comparison. Comparison of the remaining nine unidentified suitable friction ridge impressions to the fingerprint record marked "Genesis Villegas" revealed the following - Comparison of impression CTC17-E was inconclusive due to incomplete standards. Clear and complete standards, including sides of all fingers, may be submitted if a conclusive comparison is needed. - Comparison of impressions BMB25-D, BMB25-E, CTC14-A, CTC14-B, and CTC14-C yielded no identifications - Comparison to impressions BMB8-A, BMB27-E, and BMB27-F could not be conducted. Clear and complete palmprint standards, including joints, are required for comparison. Comparison of the remaining nine unidentified suitable friction ridge impressions to the fingerprint record marked "Lucero Villegas" revealed the following - Comparison of impression CTC17-E was inconclusive due to incomplete standards. Clear and complete standards, including sides of all fingers, may be submitted if a conclusive comparison is needed. - Comparison of impressions BMB25-D, BMB25-E, CTC14-A, CTC14-B, and CTC14-C yielded no identifications - Comparison to impressions BMB8-A, BMB27-E, and BMB27-F could not be conducted. Clear and complete palmprint standards, including joints, are required for comparison. Comparison of the remaining nine unidentified suitable friction ridge impressions to the copies of the fingerprint and palmprint records marked "Garcia, Miguel Angel" revealed the following - Comparison of latent impressions BMB8-A, BMB25-D, BMB25-E, BMB27-E, BMB27-F, CTC14-A, CTC14-B, and CTC14-C, CTC17-E yielded no identifications NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250401) BREEDLOVE, Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Comparison of the remaining nine unidentified suitable friction ridge impressions to the copies of the fingerprint and palmprint records marked "Tovar-Telles, Mauricio" revealed the following - Comparison of latent impressions BMB8-A, BMB25-D, BMB25-E, BMB27-E, BMB27-F, CTC14-A, CTC14-B, and CTC14-C, CTC17-E yielded no identifications Comparison of the remaining nine unidentified suitable friction ridge impressions to the copies of the fingerprint and palmprint records marked "Gonzalez, Norberto Guerrero" revealed the following - Comparison of latent impressions BMB8-A, BMB25-D, BMB25-E, BMB27-E, BMB27-F, CTC14-A, CTC14-B, and CTC14-C, CTC17-E yielded no identifications Analysis of Ridge Detail for AFIS Suitability, and Subsequent AFIS Searching: Examination of the unidentified suitable friction ridge impressions revealed that BMB8-A, BMB25-D, BMB25-E, CTC14-A, CTC14-B, and CTC14-C were suitable for searching in the AFIS databases. A search of latent of those friction ridge impressions in the local and state databases revealed no possible identifications. All identifications in this case were verified by Napa County Sheriff`s Department Evidence Technician Jackie Shikowitz. Pending Examination: A search of the AFIS suitable friction ridge impressions in the FBI database may be conducted at a later date if needed. Comparison of the unidentified suitable friction ridge impressions to the castings of the hands of victim Reynaldo Pacheco (submitted under L140036D) may be conducted at a later date if needed. Disposition of Evidence: All items will be retained in the Evidence Laboratory files. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250401) BREEDLOVE, Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Supplement Information Supplement Date Supplement Type Supplement Officer 05/30/2014 16:36:22 EVIDENCE RESULTS (250401) BREEDLOVE, BRIANNE Contact Name Supervising Officer (250134) WILSON, JOEL 418 Supplement Notes REPORT OF LATENT PRINT ANALYSIS AND COMPARISON - TITLE FROM RANGE ROVER NSD #14-001332 L140036K Description of Evidence Received: 1) The following was retrieved from Locker 30 on April 22, 2014: Item 170430, one tape-sealed evidence envelope containing one state of California certificate of title for an automobile. The following information was contained on the title - VIN: - Year and Model: 2006 "LNDR" - Plate Number - Registered Owner: Pacheco Reynaldo P, - Issue date: March 7, 2014. 2) The following was retrieved from the Evidence Laboratory files: one manila envelope containing - One fingerprint record marked - One fingerprint record marked - One fingerprint record marked - One copy of a fingerprint record and one copy of a palmprint record, both marked "Garcia, Miguel Angel," SID: 28406933. Fingerprint and palmprint date 02/08/2014. - One copy of a fingerprint record and one copy of a palmprint record, both marked "Tovar-Telles, Mauricio," SID: 29719011. Fingerprint and palmprint date 04/01/2014. - One copy of a fingerprint record and one copy of a palmprint record, both marked "Gonzalez, Norberto Guerrero," SID: 33443982. Fingerprint and palmprint date 03/19/2013. Chemical Processing: I processed item 170430 for the presence and development of latent friction ridge impressions. A total of fourteen digital images of developed friction ridge impressions were taken. The images were labeled A through N. A latent NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250401) BREEDLOVE, Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 photo log of the images was created, with the following descriptions: - Image A was from the "front side paper, upper left corner" - Image B was from the "front side paper, upper left corner" - Image C was from the "front side paper, upper left corner" - Image D was from the "front side paper, upper right corner" - Image E was from the "front side paper, upper right corner" - Image F was from the "front side paper, right edge just below upper right corner" - Image G was from the "front side paper, right edge just below upper right corner" - Image H was from the "front side paper, just under address" - Image I was the "Same impressions as image C" - Image J was the "Same impressions as image A" - Image K was the "Same impressions as image E" - Image L was the "Same impressions as image F" - Image M was the "Same impressions as image G" - Image N was the "Same impressions as image H" These images were uploaded to Veripic, the Napa County Sheriff`s Department digital file management system, on May 16, 2014. The original images were retained on the media card for comparison purposes, and deleted from the card upon completion of comparisons. Analysis of Friction Ridge Impressions for Comparison Suitability: Image A contained the same areas of friction ridge impressions as image J. Image J was found to contain better clarity and detail. Examination of image A therefore deferred. Image B contained six areas of friction ridge impressions I labeled B1 through B6 - B1 through B6 were not suitable for comparison Image C contained four areas of friction ridge impressions I labeled C1 through C4 - C4 was suitable for comparison - C1 through C3 were not suitable for comparison Image D contained five areas of friction ridge impressions I labeled D1 through D5 - D1 through D5 were not suitable for comparison Image E contained the same areas of friction ridge impressions as image K. Image K was found to contain better clarity and detail. Examination of image E therefore deferred. Image F contained the same areas of friction ridge impressions as image L. Image L was found to contain better clarity and detail. Examination of image F therefore deferred. Image G contained the same areas of friction ridge impressions as image M. Image M was found to contain better clarity and detail. Examination of image G therefore deferred. Image H contained the same areas of friction ridge impressions as image N. Image N was found to contain better clarity and detail. Examination of image H therefore deferred. Image I contained the same areas of friction ridge impressions as image C. Image C was found to contain better clarity and detail. Examination of image I therefore deferred. Image J contained five areas of friction ridge impressions I labeled J1 through J5 - J1 was suitable for comparison - J2 through J5 were not suitable for comparison Image K contained four areas of friction ridge impressions I labeled K1 through K4 - K1 through K4 were not suitable for comparison NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250401) BREEDLOVE, Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Image L contained six areas of friction ridge impressions I labeled L1 through L6 - L1 was suitable for comparison - L2 through L6 were not suitable for comparison Image M contained two areas of friction ridge impressions I labeled M1 and M2 - M1 and M2 were not suitable for comparison Image N contained four areas of friction ridge impressions I labeled N1 through N4 - N1 through N4 were not suitable for comparison Comparison of Friction Ridge Impressions to Known Standards Examination of the fingerprint record marked " showed that the inked impressions in the box for finger number seven (the left index) and in the box for finger number nine (the left ring) were made by the same finger. It is reasonable to conclude that either finger number seven or finger number nine was recorded twice, and the other finger was not recorded at all. Comparison of the three suitable friction ridge impressions to the to the fingerprint record marked revealed the following - Comparison of friction ridge impression C4 yielded an identification - Comparison of friction ridge impressions J1 and L1 were inconclusive due to incomplete standards. Clear and complete standards may be submitted for conclusive comparison if needed. Comparison of the remaining two unidentified suitable friction ridge impressions to the to the fingerprint record marked revealed the following - Comparison of friction ridge impressions J1 and L1 were inconclusive due to incomplete standards. Clear and complete standards may be submitted for conclusive comparison if needed. Comparison of the remaining two unidentified suitable friction ridge impressions to the to the fingerprint record marked revealed the following - Comparison of latent impressions J1 and L1 yielded no identifications Comparison of the remaining two unidentified suitable friction ridge impressions to the to the copies of the fingerprint and palmprint records marked "Miguel Angel Garcia" revealed the following - Comparison of friction ridge impression J1 was inconclusive due to incomplete standards. Clear and complete standards may be submitted for conclusive comparison if needed. Comparison of friction ridge impression L1 was also inconclusive. Comparison of the remaining two unidentified suitable friction ridge impressions to the to the copies of the fingerprint and palmprint records marked "Mauricio Tovar-Telles" revealed the following - Comparison of friction ridge impression J1 was inconclusive due to incomplete standards. Clear and complete standards may be submitted for conclusive comparison if needed. - Comparison of latent impression L1 yielded no identifications Comparison of the remaining two unidentified suitable friction ridge impressions to the to the copies of the fingerprint and palmprint records marked "Norberto Guerrero Gonzalez" revealed the following - Comparison of latent impressions J1 and L1 yielded no identifications NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250401) BREEDLOVE, Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Analysis of Ridge Detail for AFIS Suitability, and Subsequent AFIS Searching: Examination of the two unidentified suitable friction ridge impressions J1 and L1 revealed that J1 was suitable for searching in the AFIS databases. A search of latent J1 in the local and state databases did not reveal any possible identifications. All identifications were verified by Napa County Sheriff`s Department Evidence Technician Jackie Shikowitz. Pending Examination: Comparison of friction ridge impressions J1 to L1 to any additional suspects may be performed as necessary. Conclusive comparisons of friction ridge impressions J1 to L1 to clearer and more complete standards of previously submitted suspects and victims may be performed as necessary. Disposition of Evidence: Item 170430 will be returned to the Napa County Sheriff`s Department Property Unit. All standards used for comparison purposes will be retained in the Evidence Laboratory files. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250401) BREEDLOVE, Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Supplement Information Supplement Date Supplement Type Supplement Officer 06/06/2014 16:11:13 EVIDENCE RESULTS (250401) BREEDLOVE, BRIANNE Contact Name Supervising Officer (250134) WILSON, JOEL 418 Supplement Notes REPORT OF LATENT PRINT ANALYSIS AND COMPARISON - LIFT CARDS FROM CHRYSLER NSD #14-001332 L140036M Description of Evidence Received: 1) The following item was retained by me after the vehicle examination of a Chrysler 300 (CA 6BMV595): One manila envelope containing twelve latent lift cards from the vehicle examination. The lift cards were previously labeled BMB9-BMB14 and JGS1-JGS6. - Lift BMB9 described as: "Ext. pass side B-pillar" - Lift BMB10 described as: "Ext. pass side B-pillar" - Lift BMB11 described as: "Under side ext. front pass side door handle" - Lift BMB12 described as: "Ext. rear pass side door" - Lift BMB13 described as: "Ext. rear pass side door handle" - Lift BMB14 described as: "Under side of ext. rear pass side door handle" - Lift JGS1 described as: "Driver`s door below handle" - Lift JGS2 described as: "Driver`s door beside handle" - Lift JGS3 described as: "Driver`s door handle" - Lift JGS4 described as: "Driver`s side rear passenger door" - Lift JGS5 described as: "Driver`s side rear passenger door" - Lift JGS6 described as: "Driver`s side rear passenger door handle" 2) The following was retrieved from the Evidence Laboratory files: one manila envelope containing - One copy of a fingerprint record and one copy of a palmprint record, both marked "Garcia, Miguel Angel," SID: 28406933. Fingerprint and palmprint date 02/08/2014. - One copy of a fingerprint record and one copy of a palmprint record, both marked "Tovar-Telles, Mauricio," SID: 29719011. Fingerprint and palmprint date 04/01/2014. - One copy of a fingerprint record and one copy of a palmprint record, both marked "Gonzalez, Norberto Guerrero," SID: 33443982. Fingerprint and palmprint date 03/19/2013. 3) The following was retrieved from the California Department of Justice Automated Archive System on May 29, 2014: NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250401) BREEDLOVE, Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 - One copy of a fingerprint record and one copy of a palmprint record, both marked and palmprint date 04/05/2014. Fingerprint Analysis of Friction Ridge Impressions for Comparison Suitability: Lift BMB9 contained five areas of friction ridge detail I labeled BMB9-A through BMB9-E - BMB9-A and BMB9-D were suitable for comparison - BMB9-B, BMB9-C, and BMB9-E were not suitable for comparison Lift BMB10 contained four areas of friction ridge detail I labeled BMB10-A through BMB10-D - BMB10-A through BMB10-D were not suitable for comparison Lift BMB11 contained one area of friction ridge detail I labeled BMB11-A - BMB11-A was not suitable for comparison Lift BMB12 contained two areas of friction ridge detail I labeled BMB12-A and BMB12-B - BMB12-A and BMB12-B were not suitable for comparison Lift BMB13 contained two areas of friction ridge detail I labeled BMB13-A and BMB13-B - BMB13-A and BMB13-B were not suitable for comparison Lift BMB14 contained no areas of friction ridge detail Lift JGS1 contained twelve areas of friction ridge detail I labeled JGS1-A through JGS1-L - JGS1-E was suitable for comparison - JGS1-A through JGS1-D, and JGS1-F through JGS1-L Lift JGS2 contained four areas of friction ridge detail I labeled JGS2-A through JGS2-D - JGS2-B was suitable for comparison - JGS2-A, JGS2-C, and JGS2-D were not suitable for comparison Lift JGS3 contained eight areas of friction ridge detail I labeled JGS3-A through JGS3-H - JGS3-A was suitable for comparison - JGS3-B through JGS3-H were not suitable for comparison Lift JGS4 contained six areas of friction ridge detail I labeled JGS4-A through JGS4-F - JGS4-A, JGS4-B, and JGS4-C were suitable for comparison - JGS4-D, JGS4-E, and JGS4-F were not suitable for comparison Lift JGS5 contained four areas of friction ridge detail I labeled JGS5-A through JGS5-D - JGS5-C and JGS5-D were suitable for comparison - JGS5-A and JGS5-B were not suitable for comparison Lift JGS6 contained three areas of friction ridge detail I labeled JGS6-A through JGS6-C - JGS6-A through JGS6-C were not suitable for comparison Comparison of Friction Ridge Impressions to Known Standards Impression BMB9-A was deposited by the same area of friction ridge skin as impression BMB9-D. Examination of BMB9-D was therefore deferred. Comparison of the remaining ten suitable friction ridge impressions to the copies of the fingerprint and palmprint records marked "Arroyo, Rosa Anna" revealed the following - Comparison of impressions JGS1-E, JGS4-A, JGS4-B, JGS4-C, JGS5-C, JGS5-D yielded identifications - Comparison of latent impression JGS2-B was inconclusive NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250401) BREEDLOVE, Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 - Comparison of latent impressions BMB9-A and JGS3-A yielded no identifications Comparison of the remaining three unidentified suitable friction ridge impressions to the copies of the fingerprint and palmprint standards marked "Garcia, Miguel Angel" revealed the following - Comparison of latent impression JGS2-B was inconclusive - Comparison of latent impressions BMB9-A and JGS3-A yielded no identifications Comparison of the remaining three unidentified suitable friction ridge impressions to the copies of the fingerprint and palmprint standards marked "Tovar-Telles, Mauricio" revealed the following - Comparison of latent impression JGS2-B was inconclusive - Comparison of latent impressions BMB9-A and JGS3-A yielded no identifications Comparison of the remaining three unidentified suitable friction ridge impressions to the copies of the fingerprint and palmprint standards marked "Gonzalez, Norberto Guerrero" revealed the following - Comparison of latent impression JGS2-B was inconclusive - Comparison of latent impressions BMB9-A and JGS3-A yielded no identifications Analysis of Ridge Detail for AFIS Suitability, and Subsequent AFIS Searching: Examination of unidentified suitable friction ridge impressions BMB9-A, JGS2-B, and JGS3-A revealed that BMB9-A was suitable for searching in the AFIS database. A search of impression BMB9-A in the state database revealed no identifications. All identifications were verified by Napa County Sheriff`s Department Evidence Technician Jackie Shikowitz. Pending Examination: The unidentified suitable friction ridge impressions may be compared to additional victim or suspect standards as necessary. Disposition of Evidence: The latent lift cards, and the copies of the fingerprint and palmprint records will be retained in the Evidence Laboratory files. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250401) BREEDLOVE, Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Supplement Information Supplement Date Supplement Type Supplement Officer 08/20/2014 17:23:42 EVIDENCE RESULTS (250401) BREEDLOVE, BRIANNE Contact Name Supervising Officer (250120) ORTIZ, OSCAR 418 Supplement Notes REPORT OF LATENT PRINT COMPARISON NSD #14-001332 L140036N Preliminary Information: On January 29, 2014, I received a request from Napa County Sheriff`s Office Detective Nicol Dudley to compare previously-developed friction ridge impressions in this case to fingerprint and palmprint records for . See Laboratory reports L140036K (processing of the title paper from the Range Rover), L140036L (analysis of impressions from processing of Range Rover), and L140036M (analysis of impressions from processing of Chrysler) for original analysis and comparison of developed friction ridge impressions. Description of Evidence Received: The following item was retrieved from Veripic, the Napa County Sheriff`s Department digital file management system 1) One compact disc containing copies of fourteen digital photographs of friction ridge impressions from the processing of the title paper from the Range Rover, previously labeled A through N The following items were retrieved from the Evidence Laboratory files 1) Sixteen latent lift cards from the processing of the Range Rover, previously labeled BMB8-BMB11, BMB25-BMB28, and CTC14-CTC21 2) Twelve latent lift cards from the processing of the Chrysler, previously labeled BMB9-BMB14 and JGS1-JGS6 The following item was received from Locker #30 on July 29, 2014 1) Item ND-33/177161: One tape-sealed evidence envelope containing one fingerprint record and one palmprint record - Fingerprint and palmprint records were not labeled or marked. However, the evidence envelope was marked as containing print cards for - The palmprint record contained only a portion of the left palm, and the writer`s palm area of the right palm NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250401) BREEDLOVE, Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Description of Friction Ridge Impressions Suitable for Comparison: Images A through N from the title of the Range Rover - Prior analysis determined that only friction ridge impressions C4, J1, and L1 were suitable for comparison purposes. Friction ridge impression C4 was previously identified in Laboratory report L140036K to so will not be compared here. The remaining two suitable friction ridge impressions were described as such - Friction ridge impression J1 was contained within Image J, which was described as "same impression as image A" (Image A had been described as "front side of paper, upper left corner") - Friction ridge impression L1 was contained within Image L, which was described as "same impression as image F" (Image F had been described as "front side of paper, right edge just below upper right corner") Latent lift cards BMB8-BMB11, BMB25-BMB28, and CTC14-CTC21 from the processing of the Range Rover - Prior analysis determined that only friction ridge impressions BMB8-A, BMB25-D, BMB25-E, BMB27-E, BMB27-F, CTC14-A, CTC14-B, CTC14-C, CTC15-B, CTC17-E were suitable for comparison. Friction ridge impression CTC15-B was previously identified in Laboratory report L140036L to " so will not be compared here. The remaining nine suitable friction ridge impressions were described as such - Friction ridge impression BMB8-A was contained within latent lift card BMB8, which was described as "ext. rear passenger`s side window (1st lift of area)" - Friction ridge impressions BMB25-D and BMB25-E were contained within latent lift card BMB25, which was described as "Int. rear pass. side door window (1st lift)" - Friction ridge impressions BMB27-E and BMB 27-F were contained within latent lift card BMB27, which was described as "Int. rear pass. side door window" - Friction ridge impressions CTC14-A, CTC14-B, and CTC14-C were contained within latent lift card CTC14, which was described as "Hood corner above headlight - driver side" - Friction ridge impression CTC17-E was contained within latent lift card CTC17, which was described as "Driver side, rear pass door glass back side of rear glass panel on door - fixed glass portion (exterior)" Latent lift cards BMB9-BMB14 and JGS1-JGS6 from the processing of the Chrysler - Prior analysis determined that only friction ridge impressions BMB9-A, JGS1-E, JGS2-B, JGS3-A, JGS4-A, JGS4-B, JGS4-C, JGS5-C, and JGS5-D were suitable for comparison. Friction ridge impressions JGS1-E, JGS4-A, JGS4-B, JGS4-C, JGS5-C, and JGS5-D were previously identified in Laboratory report L140036M to so will not be compared here. The remaining three suitable friction ridge impressions were described as such - Friction ridge impression BMB9-A was contained within latent lift card BMB9, which was described as "Ext. pass side B-pillar" - Friction ridge impression JGS2-B was contained within latent lift card JGS2, which was described as "Driver`s door beside handle" - Friction ridge impression JGS3-A contained within latent lift card JGS3, which was described as "Driver`s door handle" Comparison of Friction Ridge Impressions to Known Standards: NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250401) BREEDLOVE, Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Impressions from the processing of the Range Rover Title paper Comparison of the two previously unidentified suitable friction ridge impressions J1 and L1 to the fingerprint and palmprint records from the evidence envelope marked resulted in the following - Comparison of J1 and L1 was inconclusive due to incomplete standards Impressions from the processing of the Range Rover Comparison of the nine previously unidentified suitable friction ridge impressions BMB8-A, BMB25-D, BMB25-E, BMB27-E, BMB27-F, CTC14-A, CTC14-B, CTC14-C, and CTC17-E to the fingerprint and palmprint records from the evidence envelope marked "Angela Arias" resulted in the following - Comparison of BMB8-A, BMB27-E, BMB27-F, and CTC17-E was inconclusive due to incomplete standards - Comparison of BMB25-D, BMB25-E, CTC14-A, CTC14-B, and CTC14-C yielded no identifications Impressions from the processing of the Chrysler Comparison of the three previously unidentified suitable friction ridge impressions BMB9-A, JGS2-B, and JGS3-A to the fingerprint and palmprint records from the evidence envelope marked resulted in the following - Comparison of BMB9-A, JGS2-B, and JGS3-A was inconclusive due to incomplete standards Pending Examination: Impressions that yielded inconclusive results due to incomplete standards may be later compared to additional standards for conclusive results. Clear and complete fingerprint and palmprint standards (including rolls of fingers with complete side areas, all joint areas, and the entirety of both palms) may be submitted if conclusive comparison will assist the investigation. Disposition of Evidence: The compact disc containing copies of digital images that were retrieved from Veripic was disposed of. Item ND-33/177161, as well as all latent lift cards, will be maintained in the Evidence Laboratory files. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250401) BREEDLOVE, Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Supplement Information Supplement Date Supplement Type Supplement Officer 06/23/2016 12:07:20 EVIDENCE RESULTS (250401) BREEDLOVE, BRIANNE Contact Name Supervising Officer (250222) DODD, CULLEN 418 Supplement Notes REPORT OF AFIS T/LI NOTIFICATION AND IDENTIFICATION NSD #14-001332 L140036O Preliminary Information: On June 21, 2016, I observed three Tenprint-to-Latent Inquiry (T/LI) notifications in the California State Automated Fingerprint Identification System (AFIS) software. These notifications indicated a possible identification of a previously-unidentified friction ridge impression in this case to a newly-entered palmprint record. All three notifications were regarding friction ridge impression BMB8-A in this case. Additionally, all three possible identifications were to the same subject. Description of Evidence Received: The friction ridge impression in this case that was related to the T/LI notifications was impression BMB8-A, on lift card BMB8. I retrieved latent lift card BMB8 from the Evidence Laboratory files. - BMB8 was described as being from the "Ext. rear passenger`s side window" of the Range Rover (CA I retrieved a copy of the palmprint record related to the T/LI notifications from the California Department of Justice, via the Automated Archive System. The copy of the palmprint record bore the following information - Comparison of Friction Ridge Impressions to Known Standards: Comparison of the suitable friction ridge impression BMB8-A to the copy of the palmprint record marked NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250401) BREEDLOVE, Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 " resulted in and identification to the right palm, hypothenar area. Pending Examination: There are additional, unidentified friction ridge impressions in this case that resulted from the examinations of the Range Rover (CA ), the title paperwork from the Range Rover (CA ), and the Chrsyler 300 (CA ). Comparison of those friction ridge impressions to the fingerprint and palmprint records for may be conducted upon request. Disposition of Evidence: Lift card BMB8 was returned to the Evidence Laboratory files. The copy of the palmprint record marked Evidence Laboratory files. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE will be retained with my case notes in the at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250401) BREEDLOVE, Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Supplement Information Supplement Date Supplement Type Supplement Officer 04/03/2014 10:21:32 SUPPLEMENTAL (250345) CHAMBERS, BRADLEY Contact Name Supervising Officer (250134) WILSON, JOEL 418 Supplement Notes SUPPLEMENT: On 04/04/2014, at approximately 1000 hours, Detective Eddleman and were present at the Napa County Sheriff Coroner Division to document the attempt to lift fingerprints from "John Doe" C14-199. Also present were, Coroner Investigators Jay Jones and Mark Horvath and Evidence Specialists Brianne Breedlove and Jackie Shikowitz. We arrived in the autopsy room at approximately 1010 hours. The unidentified decedent, "John Doe" had already been removed from the refrigerated room and was on autopsy table #2 in a sealed body bag. The following actions were taken in an attempt to identify the decedent. I documented the actions taken through photograph and in a timeline below: 1010 Arrive in Morgue. 1015 Coroner Investigator Jay Jones opened the outer white wrap. 1018 Lock #09125 cut off the body bag by Coroner Jones. 1019 Body bag opened. 1020 Left pant leg rolled up and sock rolled down to try and located a scar. 1024 Right pant leg rolled up to try and locate scar on leg. 1025 Pant legs rolled down by Coroner Investigator Jones. 1026 Decedent rolled onto left side to expose hands that were bound behind the Decedent. 1027 Evidence Specialist Breedlove dried fingers with towel. 1028 Finger dusted for print. 1030 Print lift attempt from right thumb. 1030 Fingers are wiped and dried again. 1032 Right thumb dusted and print attempted to be lifted. 1032 Decedent rolled onto back. 1033 Right pant leg rolled up again so Coroner Investigator Horvath could take photographs. 1034 Right pant leg rolled down. Bag zipped closed by Coroner Investigator Jones. 1035 Lock # 04098 placed on the bag and locked. 1037 Decedent placed back in refrigerated room. I loaded the photographs I took onto a CD and booked them into evidence as BC-1. I also collected and booked the original lock from the body bag as evidence (BC-2). EVIDENCE: NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250345) CHAMBERS, Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 BC-1 CD containing photographs BC-2 Body bag lock RECOMMEDATION: Attach to report. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250345) CHAMBERS, Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Supplement Information Supplement Date Supplement Type Supplement Officer 04/14/2014 11:34:53 SUPPLEMENTAL (250345) CHAMBERS, BRADLEY Contact Name Supervising Officer (250134) WILSON, JOEL 418 Supplement Notes SUPPLEMENT: INTERVIEW: On 04/04/2014 at approximately 1700 hours, Detective Vedeille and I interviewed regarding this case. at her residence of The following is a summary statement of the interview: stated she had known Reynaldo Pacheco for about six to seven months. Pacheco was responsible for introducing her to WCM777 and convincing her to invest in the company. Her initial buy in consisted of $5,000.00, but continued to invest and had about $30,000.00 into WCM777 when the government seized control of the assets. described Pacheco as a leader in the company who would bring her and others information about the company. Pacheco would conduct lectures in Santa Rosa and teaching those he had enlisted in the company about how to manage the system. On 03/18/14, and a friend of Pacheco traveled to Las Vegas, NV for a meeting regarding a new company similar to WCM777. During the conference heard Pacheco make the statement that he had up to 400 below him in WCM777. Pacheco told he was going to Fresno around the 20th of March to learn more about the new company. stated she spoke with Pacheco on 03/24/14. Pacheco told her he was going to meet with someone regarding the new company that was supposed to start in the U.S. Pacheco asked if she was available to fill out the paperwork to sign up for the new company. described Pacheco as a very nice decent person and she was surprised that he was missing. stated when the money was seized by the government many people were asking questions about the money they had invested. She stated he continued to assure people that he was doing his best to get money back for his people. described as a friend and business partner of Pacheco. She described the two as being like brothers. was not aware of anyone who may have been upset with Pacheco or who would have been threatening him. I audio recorded the interview with NSD14-001332 and booked it into evidence as BC-3 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250345) CHAMBERS, Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 EVIDENCE: BC-3. RECOMMENDATIONS: Attach to report. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250345) CHAMBERS, Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Supplement Information Supplement Date Supplement Type Supplement Officer 04/15/2014 10:03:00 SUPPLEMENTAL (250345) CHAMBERS, BRADLEY Contact Name Supervising Officer (250134) WILSON, JOEL 418 Supplement Notes SUPPLEMENT: INTERVIEW: On 04/04/2014 at approximately 1800 hours, Detective Verdeille and I interviewed at his residence in Petaluma CA. was a business associate of Reynaldo Pacheco and spoke with him just after 12:00PM on 03/24/14. said he and Pacheco were scheduled to meet on Monday night, 03/24/14 between 6-7 PM to discuss the business. stated he and Pacheco spoke for about 30 minutes earlier in the day about the business and their meeting. After Pacheco had been reported missing a lady in Santa Rosa on March 24th. spoke with Pacheco`s wife who told him Pacheco was going to meet had known Pacheco for about 10 years. During that time the two had been partners in other businesses similar to WCM777. spent $2,000.00 to initially buy into WCM777 and invested a total of $12,000.00 total during his involvement. was not aware of anyone who was upset with him due to his involvement in WCM777. As far as knew Pacheco did not owe anyone money. He did mention to months ago that he was having some financial hardships when his family moved out of their apartment and were having trouble finding a new place to live due to his bad credit. told me Pacheco had brought people into the company both in Santa Rosa and in Fresno. stated there was a lady named in Napa who he also did business with. Pacheco had brought Elena into the company and was part of Pacheco`s team. said Pacheco had his Land Rover for about 4 months. He also stated he had heard a rumor that there was a man in Fresno who really liked Pacheco`s wife and could have possibly tried to get rid of Pacheco. did not have any other information at the time. I audio recorded the interview with and booked it into evidence as BC-3 EVIDENCE: NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250345) CHAMBERS, Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 BC-3. RECOMMENDATIONS: Attach to report. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250345) CHAMBERS, Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSDl4-001332 Supplement Information Supplement Date Supplement Type Supplement Of?cer 04:? 1 552014 10:03 :40 SUPPLENIENTAL (250345) CHAMBERS. BRADLEY Contact Name Supervising Of?cer (250134) WILSON. JOEL Supplement Notes SUPPLEMENT: INTERVIEW: 011 04/04/2014 at aiiroximately 1900110111?s. Detective Verdeille andI interviewed? at their residence in The following is a of the interview: immediately expressed her concern with Pacheco?s disappearance. She said she thought his disappearance was directly related to the WC M777 business. I asked- about the phone calls that were made from Pacheco?s phone to her cell phone number on 03/24/14 at 2:26 PM. and 2:30 PM. - stated the phone number Pacheco called belonged to her husband-. - told me he was in the hospital and missed his ?rst call. He picked the second time Pacheco called and Pacheco asked if - could pick 11p his daughter at school for him. i told Pacheco he could not. He then played for me a voicemail message from 03/24/14 2:26 PM that was left on his phone in which a miknown male can be heard saying in is there anyone else you can call in Spanish. also received a phone call from that went to voicemail. No message was left. - said there was something different in Pacheco?s voice when he called to see if he could pick up his daughter from school. - said he and Pacheco were very close and considered him to be one of his only close ??iends. said Pacheco was scared because there were a lot of people who had invested a lot of money in the company. He had heard a nunor that brothers in law were from Fair?eld and were possibly drug dealers. He had also heard that. had purchased 16 units for $32.000.00 and his brothers in law had spent about 2510000000 011 the company. was suspicious that maybe there were people who were upset with Pacheco because of the money that was invested and now seized by the government. - said he heard the information about? who was a ?iend of both- and Pacheco and also from-. Pacheco?s wife. said that there was a black truck that- and Pacheco?s family claimed was following them around in the weeks prior to and after Pacheco was reported missing. - showed me a picture Pacheco?s wife sent him on his cell phone which showed a black Nissan Frontier bearing CA license plate in the parking lot behind a police patrol car. The vehicle was registered to . Printed by: (250161) SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 CHAMBERS, Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case NumbeerSDl4-001332 positively identi?ed had never seen brother after he wamed him about him - provided me with a phone number? from Napa. said there is a lady named- in Rolmeit Park who owned a . - said his friend owns a shoe store in the same commercial complex as the-. He had heard that was also involved in WC M777. said he overheard speaking about a kidnapping that took place in January where a man was kidnapped and taken to Napa. was very suspicious that the two were passively connected. I audio recorded the interview with the - and hooked it into evidence as BC-3 EVIDENCE: BC -3 Audio recording of inteiview RECOMMENDATIONS: Attach to report. Printed by: (250161) DETVVILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 0fficer:(250345) CHAMBERS, Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Supplement Information Supplement Date Supplement Type Supplement Officer 04/18/2014 13:35:06 SUPPLEMENTAL (250345) CHAMBERS, BRADLEY Contact Name Supervising Officer (250134) WILSON, JOEL 418 Supplement Notes SUPPLEMENT: INTERVIEW: On 04/06/14, I interviewed me. in Fresno. The following is a summary statement of what he told were 1st cousins. had last seen his cousin about 15 days earlier when Reynaldo had been in the Fresno area visiting family. During his visit Reynaldo stayed with different family members in the area. told me he joined WCM 777 in April of 2013 and made an initial purchase of $400.00. He estimated that during the time he was working in the company he made $40,000.00 - $45,000.00. said he was part of WCM777 before Reynaldo. He though Reynaldo was probably responsible for bringing about 6-8 people into WCM777. Those people would have been considered people directly below Reynaldo in the pyramid structure and would be on Reynaldo`s team. About three years before to WCM777, however neither profited any money. and Reynaldo were also business partners in a company called Momentis, Recently Reynaldo had been leaning more about a company called Visa NOVA that was in the process of starting up in America. Recently , Reynaldo, and one other person all went together to a VISA NOVA conference in Las Vegas to learn more about the business. I asked if Reynaldo ever mentioned anyone being angry or upset since WCM777 was frozen by the government. He stated after the company was shut down, he and Reynaldo were contacting all of their clients to discuss the problems the company was having. stated Reynaldo was very close friends with . invested about $32,000.00 and recruited several of his family members. I showed a DMV photo of . He positively identified from the photograph. had heard rumors that was upset following the shutdown of the business. told me when he heard Reynaldo was missing his initial thought was he had been in some type of accident was arrested or contacted by immigration. He stated the day Reynaldo went missing he was supposed to have a meeting with female named who owned a store in Santa Rosa. On Tuesday, 03/25/14, NSD14-001332 called but was unable to get ahold of him. He then called Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 to speak Officer:(250345) CHAMBERS, Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 with him about Reynaldo`s disappearance. told he would help try and find Reynaldo. stated several times of the following days, called family members and requested to speak with Reynaldo`s wife, . sister, also started calling trying to get ahold of . During our conversation I showed could not be sure. To a photograph of . He stated he may have seen him before but knowledge Reynaldo did not have any enemies, connections with drugs or other criminal activity. I audio recorded the interview with and booked it into evidence as BC-3 EVIDENCE: BC-3 Audio recording of interview RECOMMENDATIONS: Attach to report. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250345) CHAMBERS, Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Supplement Information Supplement Date Supplement Type Supplement Officer 04/18/2014 13:51:42 SUPPLEMENTAL (250345) CHAMBERS, BRADLEY Contact Name Supervising Officer (250134) WILSON, JOEL 418 Supplement Notes SUPPLEMENT: : On 04/04/2014 at about 1100 hours, I interviewed summary: in Frenso. told me the following in was Reynaldo`s brother in-law and had known him since childhood. The last time he saw Reynaldo was two weeks earlier when he was visiting family in the Fresno area. Prior to Reynaldo`s visit traveled with Reynaldo, and to Las Vegas for a business conference. He stated Reynaldo was very excited about the possibilities the new company had. Enrique became involved with WCM777 in June of 2013 around the same time Reynaldo got involved. stated he only recruited three people during the time the business was active and had maybe invested a total of $13,000.00. stated purchased 16 units but he did not know told me he had only met one time. got the money to make the purchase. said Reynaldo was very active in the Santa Rosa area with WCM777. He would put on teaching seminars on a fairly regular basis at the Mi Zacatecas Restaurant in American Canyon. He stated the owner; was also heavily involved in WCM777. did not know of any enemies that Reynaldo may have had. I audio recorded the interview with and booked it into evidence as BC-3 EVIDENCE: BC-3 Audio Recording RECOMMENDATIONS: Attach to report. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250345) CHAMBERS, Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Supplement Information Supplement Date Supplement Type Supplement Officer 04/18/2014 14:07:44 SUPPLEMENTAL (250345) CHAMBERS, BRADLEY Contact Name Supervising Officer (250134) WILSON, JOEL 418 Supplement Notes SUPPLEMENT: : On 04/04/2014, I interviewed Reynaldo Pacheco`s sister, she told me. . The following is a summary of what stated she last spoke with Reynaldo on 03/24/14 at about 1:05 PM. They discussed her getting a dress for her daughter. stated Reynaldo sounded normal on the telephone. She said it was normal for him to call and talk. stated she bought into WCM777 in July of 2013. Her initial purchase was $10,000.00 and she bought in under . told me the money she spent to buy into WCM777 was money she had saved from her job. stated Reynaldo was very excited about WCM777 and hoped that it would provide an opportunity to bring their father who was in Mexico to America. did not know how much Reynaldo made from WCM777 but she did say he was always traveling. did not know of anyone who was upset with Reynaldo over the company being shut down. She said he never mentioned anyone having any problems with him personally. did mention a friend of Reynaldo`s named who told Reynaldo WCM777 was a bad idea. mentioned that told her was trying to create problems between Reynaldo and also told that had tried to hurt him before. did not have any other information to provide. I audio recorded the interview with and booked it into evidence as BC-3 EVIDENCE: BC-3 Audio Recording RECOMMENDATIONS: Attach to report. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250345) CHAMBERS, also Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Supplement Information Supplement Date Supplement Type Supplement Officer 06/26/2014 07:13:57 SUPPLEMENTAL (250345) CHAMBERS, BRADLEY Contact Name Supervising Officer (250120) ORTIZ, OSCAR 418 Supplement Notes SUPPLEMEMENT: On 06/26/2014, I conducted follow up at Carniceria Y Taqueria and Zapateria Morelia in the 100 block of Southwest Blvd in Rohnert Park. I showed two clerks at Carniceria Y Taqueria a picture of Pacheco-Pacheco and a picture of his Land Rover. Neither of the clerks recognized the vehicle or Pacheco-Pacheco. I also showed them pictures of Miguel Garcia and Mauricio Tovar, but neither recognized the men. I spoke with at Zapteria Morelia. I showed the photograph of Pachecho-Pacheco. She recognized him and stated he was in the store several times buying shoes for his daughter and boots for himself. I showed her a picture of Miguel Garcia. stated Garcia had been in the store with other guys several times months earlier. On a few occasions they would ask for money and appeared to be waiting for someone in the area. They would often hang out in the store she thought while they waited for whoever they were looking for to arrive. had not seen any of them for months and was unaware that Garcia was dead. She did not seem to know who Garcia was, just that he had been in the store multiple times in the past. did not recognize the picture of Tovar I showed her. No further action. RECOMMENDATIONS: Attach to report. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250345) CHAMBERS, Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Supplement Information Supplement Date Supplement Type Supplement Officer 08/13/2014 17:15:51 SUPPLEMENTAL (250345) CHAMBERS, BRADLEY Contact Name Supervising Officer (250120) ORTIZ, OSCAR 418 Supplement Notes AWARENESS: On 06/26/2014, Detective Dudley requested that I attempt to contact from related to a phone call she had with Pacheco on the day of his kidnapping and murder. ) and get a statement SUPPLEMENT: On 06/26/14, I drove to Petaluma and attemtped to contact at her residence. No vehicles were present and there was no answer at the door. Since 06/26/14, I have tried multiple times to contact by telephone at with negative results. RECOMMENDATIONS: Attach to report. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250345) CHAMBERS, Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Supplement Information Supplement Date Supplement Type Supplement Officer 04/21/2014 09:40:17 SUPPLEMENTAL (250303) DUDLEY, NICOL Contact Name Supervising Officer (250134) WILSON, JOEL 418 Supplement Notes STATEMENTS OF ON 04/10/14 AND 04/24/14 On 04/02/14 I learned from speaking to Sonoma County Sheriff`s Detective Joseph Horsman`s that z was a close friend of the Victim Reynaldo Pacheco. Det. Horsman told me had received a telephone call from V-Pacheco on the afternoon of 03/24/14 asking for to pick up Pacheco`s daughter from school. On 04/10/14 I telephoned at number . agreed to come to the Napa Sheriff`s Department that afternoon to speak with me. Also, on 04/23/14, telephoned me and made arrangements to speak with me a second time. Our second interview was on 04/24/14. Both of my interviews with were audio and video recorded and digital copies of both media were later booked into Napa Sheriff` evidence. During my interviews with , he told me he knew many people in the Hispanic community. Based on knowing may people in the community, it appeared many of his statements in the interviews were simply things he had heard, rumors, or theories. seemed to speak English well; however he admitted he had difficulty hearing. Spanish was primary language; however we had little difficulty understanding one another in the interviews. My conversations with on 04/10/14 and 04/24/14 went as follows: STATEMENT OF ON 04/10/14 became emotional at times speaking about Pacheco because he said they were good friends. referred to Victim-Pacheco by the name "Rey" or by the nickname "Jueto" throughout the interviews. explained the name "Jueto" he called Pacheco was a nickname for a light skinned Mexican. told me he had been depressed since learning of Pacheco`s death. said he had known and been friends with Pacheco for about 20-25 years. Whenever needed something, Pacheco would come right away and help. said Pacheco and his family lived with him and his wife about 3-4 months ago. Prior to living with , Pacheco was living in the town of Pengrove with who referred to by the names and . I have identified and interviewed him regarding this case. has been identified by Napa Sheriff`s Investigations as and has been interviewed by NSO Detective Pacheco and myself. Refer to those supplemental reports for further details. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250303) DUDLEY, NICOL Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case NumbeerSDl4-001332 I asked how he liked- He said he didn?t like him. He heard- had stolen credit cards from his boss. Also. he heard had owed someone money for a job and- said he spent the money rather than paying the man he owed. The person- owed for the job was later determined through other interviews to be . Detective Pacheco and I both interviewed? Refer to those supplemental reports for further. I told- I was going to ask a lot of questions. dif?cult questions; however it was most important to be honest about everything he knew. responded to me by saying. before I asked further questions. he wanted to tell me what he thought. went 011 to tell me the following: About 3 months ago a guy he knew by the name was kidnapped in Rohnert Park. - has been subsequently identi?ed by Napa Sheriff 5 Investigations as via the Rohnert Park Police. Case #14-0000190. said said he knew- was associated with the "Zapateria Morelia" store in Rolmert Park. was associated with a lady wlu- knew by the name of - was the owner of a - shop in Rolmert Park which is close proximity to the "Zapateria Morelia" store in Rohnert Park. When I asked what full name was he. he said it was I showed- a photo I obtained of who I knew to be via her Facebook page. said the lady in the picture was the same person he knew as the owner of the Botanica shop in Rohnert Park. Angela Arias. . Based 011 law enforcement . and surveillance c0111 leted Napa I fluther identifre search databases vehicle registrations. and statements provided by Special Investigations Bru'eau.- current address of record appears to be The Facebook photo shown to- was later booked into Napa Sheriffs evidence. I determined the full name of the- shop- referred to as owned by -in Rolmert Park as The shop is located at 103 Southwest Rolmert Park. CA. had a husband named-. His full name was later determined to be . According to DMV records of vehicle registration. his address of record is has two vehicles registered to him. a 2003 Anna CA Plate and 2003 Toyota CA Plate said he knew- for about a year. He had been hired to make a sign for her-a business and met her that way. I asked what he thought of her. He said he didn?t know. because she was the type of person who "lied to the people". He explained 110w her line of work in the- business stole money from people by scanmrirrg them. Based 011 information I obtained 011 the internet and speaking from other involved parties in this case. I learned a "Botanica" shop is essentially a shop that sells products for Santeria. voodoo. pagan rituals. or other products regarded as magical. The Botanica stores are cormnorr in many Hispanic American countries and of Latino people. Also. Hispanic people will go to these kinds of stores to solicit help to rid themselves of negative spiritual feelings or beliefs about their money or things in their life. In essence the Botanica shop is what some may refer to in American culture as a Palm Reader business of sorts. -went on to tell me he knew - didn?t work and his wife -didn?t work. however they had fancy cars. Printed by: (250161) DETVVILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 DUDLEY, NICOL Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 said he knew wife had invested in the Kingdom777 business. said and knew one another from the Kingdom777 business. was identified through Rohnert Park Police Case #14-0000190 as Anna Solis-07/29/79. went on to tell me was a "little drug dealer". He described as going to the bars and selling drugs. suspected was involved somehow in kidnapping. knew called and he was kidnapped. also knew V-Pacheco had called and he was kidnapped and killed. felt there was some involvement and connection two both crimes with . I asked if he heard about drug deals being conducted inside it. He said he didn`t. business or even rumors about said he heard that on 03/24/14, the day Pacheco went missing, closed her store at 5:00 p.m., however other days her shop closed at 7:00 p.m. Also, somebody had told was crying or something, "or something like that". He said he didn`t know who told him was crying, but he could try and find out. I asked how could find this information out. said he knew many people in the community and was often asked for help from people within the community regarding their problems. He described himself as sort of a go to guy within the Hispanic community in Sonoma County. explained he used to work in Mexico City, Mexico for the Federal Police for ten years. Based on his prior occupation, people came to him for help. I told I heard a lady was mad at Pacheco because they lost a lot of money. I asked if he knew who was mad at Pacheco said many people lost money in the Kingdom777 business and people thought Pacheco had the money. He said people didn`t understand, because Pacheco`s wife told they did not have money to pay the rent. talked about how Pacheco would speak about money and had even purchased a "Range Rover" vehicle. said it was not common for a Hispanic to drive a Range Rover and it appeared as if Pacheco had money, but he didn`t. said he suspected Pacheco`s friend had a lot of money. He said he heard had invested around $100,000 in the Kingdom77 business and were upset. Also, he had seen a meeting and felt she might be upset. s brother in laws wife one time at said the people responsible for Pacheco`s death was "one of two lines", he said either had something to do with it, or and his family had something to do with it. also said it was either somebody that thought Pacheco had a lot of money, or someone was angry at Pacheco due to their loss of money in the Kingdom777 business. also talked about a guy he saw who was in shop on at least two different occasions. He referred to the person he saw in the newspapers (Miguel Garcia). described Garcia and as having a very close relationship. I showed a photo of Miguel Garcia. He said the person in the photo looked like the same person he saw go into shop. He referred a mark on Garcia`s face in the photo and he recalled it. said the guy always walked in a certain way with his head down. I also showed a photo of Mauricio Tovar, did not recall seeing Tovar. He said one time there was a guy in a pickup truck outside place, but he could not recall. I showed him the Wells Fargo ATM photo of Norberto Gonzalez and he did not recognize the person in the photo as well. I asked NSD14-001332 how he thought of . He said he didn`t know, because she was the type of person who lied to the Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250303) DUDLEY, NICOL Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 people. He described how he felt she stole money from people based on her religious practices within the shop, making people believe things for money. said it didn`t make sense that there were two similar cases, and both people contact with . & Pacheco) both had said Pacheco tried to get him into the Kingdom 777 business; however told him he didn`t have the money. Pacheco in turn told not to worry because he would loan him the $2000.00 to get him into the business. I asked how Pacheco met . said he introduced Pacheco to so he could proposition her about investing into the Kingdom 777 business. knew was interested in business adventures, and he knew Pacheco was trying to recruit new investors. told Pacheco to go talk to about the business. After they talked one day, husband deposited $2000.00 into a Wells Fargo account and that was how was enrolled into the business. I asked what type of car drove. He said it was a bright blue car. He said her husband drove a white pickup truck. Later that afternoon after our meeting, provided me a photo he knew to be vehicle in front of her Botanica shop in Rohnert Park. The photo was of a blue Acura, bearing the CA license plate of which CA DMV records show is registered to s husband . I asked when he last spoke to Pacheco. He said Pacheco had called him on 03/24/14 asking if he could pick up his daughter for school. He told Pacheco he was at the hospital and would not be able to. Later on, he received a second call from Pacheco`s phone which appeared to be an accidental dial. He could hear someone in the background asking if there was anything else. This is documented in Sonoma County Sheriff`s Detective Horsman`s report. went on to say on the morning of 03/25/14, Pacheco`s wife called telling him Pacheco had not returned home the previous night. said Pacheco would always call his wife and there was never a time he didn`t return home without calling her. After learning Pacheco didn`t return home on 03/24/14, drove to Botanica shop on 03/25/14 and asked her about Pacheco. told Pacheco had come to her shop the morning of 03/24/14 around 10:00 a.m. She said while Pacheco was there, he received many phone calls and text messages and then he left. She did not know where he went or what happened to him. I asked if Pacheco had mentioned any problems with his wife or anything about her seeing somebody else. He said he knew had gone to Fresno to get away, and there were some problems with Pacheco spending too much time at work and not enough time with his family. wife had spoken to Pacheco about him spending more time with his family and not so much time at work. END OF STATEMENT ON 04/10/14 STATEMENT OF ON 04/24/14 AT THE NAPA SHERIFF`S OFFICE On 04/23/14, said he and Sheriff`s Office and were interviewed separately. During the course of my conversation with NSD14-001332 wanted to talk to me. and Pacheco both came to the , he said most of the same things he told me on 04/10/14. The Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250303) DUDLEY, NICOL Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 following in a summary of our conversation: said he had been doing better since the last time he and I spoke. He said he had a question regarding Pacheco. He said he was concerned about how obtained $90,000.00. said he thought had kept some money from the "777" business. He talked about how obtained $14,000 from . He talked about how had owed a while back for a concrete job they worked together. He talked about how had defrauded his boss with a credit card and work done on a truck. It appeared was simply throwing theories out speculating I told I had heard similar things about idea where he obtained the $90,000.00. was not honest. in the past. I told him I had spoken to and I had an I told it was my understanding that he had invested $2000.00 into the Kingdom 777 business. He clarified that Pacheco had provided him $2000.00 points into the business and he did not actually invest money. He told Pacheco initially he was not interested, however Pacheco provided him with points anyway. I told the last time we spoke; he suspected had given "those guys" Pacheco`s phone number. It appeared who killed Pacheco. might be involved. He said yes, he suspected was referring to "those guys" as the people speculated the men who kidnapped and killed him, suspected he had money; however Pacheco really didn`t have money. He suspected may have facilitated this or was at least involved. I asked how he actually met business and that was how they met. . He said he made signs for businesses. He had made a sign for her He talked about how he didn`t care for her business and felt it was taking money from the people. He talked about how she charged one person $1000.00 to go inside a house for protection from "Sante Muerte". said he didn`t understand how people believed in that. He said he wouldn`t pay one penny for that. He said the past is the past, we already know what is in the present and the future is in the future. He said he wasn`t going to pay money to try and know his future. Additionally, he talked about how since Pacheco went missing and was killed, had not asked any questions about Pacheco at all. Prior to him going missing, said would call 1-2 times a week asking questions about where Pacheco was or trying to get to have Pacheco call her. thought it was unusual, that never called to ask any questions about Pacheco or to provide condolences for him being dead. said even the people were saying "was acting I don`t know, weird, or completely different". explained people were saying before Pacheco was dead, was friendlier. said he had known for about two years and he knew she was acting different. I asked no. if Pacheco ever told was mad at him or anything she did in a meeting and he said I asked if he went to the business meetings in Petaluma and he said he did. I asked if he remembered a meeting in Petaluma around late January where was at a meeting with someone else and got very upset with NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250303) DUDLEY, NICOL Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Pacheco. He said he didn`t remember, however came to the meeting with her son. Case Number:NSD14-001332 came to meetings with her husband I asked if I asked with .V Botanica shop. about husband . He said didn`t know of anyone else besides and the last time she son looked like a boy or a girl. I had found Facebook photos of what appeared to be ). The photos appeared her son might cross dress. responded by saying "good question". He went on to tell me about a story when he went to house to visit her husband and her son answered the door. He said her son had long hair and was acting very feminine. and son worked in the Botanica store , her son or husband that worked in the I asked to describe the inside of house on a. He said he was in her house about a month before Pacheco went missing. He asked for her address, because he wanted to visit since he had been injured while doing work. described the layout of the house to his knowledge by sketching a map on paper. He further sketched a layout of the Botanica store according to his knowledge. I asked more about and how he thought he was dealing drugs. hold a regular job, however he had nice cars. said he knew did not mentioned a lady he knew by the name of He didn`t know her last name. had known for a while and described her as a respectable lady. He said she worked hard with 2-3 jobs; however saw in Botanica shop one time. According to had enrolled into the Kingdom777 business. He knew had lost about $2000.00. had talked to about losing her money and wondering what she was going to do. said "the people" were very scared. He talked about how his relationship with the owner of the Zapateria Morelia shop ) was very close. He talked about how was scared since all of this had occurred. Santiago`s shop was neighbors with Botanica shop. I showed a DMV photo of and he confirmed it was the same person he was referring to as ". END OF STATEMENT RECOMMENDATION: Attach to original report NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250303) DUDLEY, NICOL Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Supplement Information Supplement Date Supplement Type Supplement Officer 05/22/2014 12:42:58 SUPPLEMENTAL (250303) DUDLEY, NICOL Contact Name Supervising Officer (250134) WILSON, JOEL 418 Supplement Notes STATEMENT OF Based on my interviews with other involved parties and , I learned He will here further be referred to in this report as commonly goes by the alias name On 04/18/14 I contacted by telephone at . I did not have a good address for however suspected he lived in Vacaville, CA. It took me making multiple calls and a voicemail for him to finally call me back. I identified myself to on the telephone call as a Detective with the Napa Sheriff`s Office. I told Ortiz I needed to speak with him about Reynaldo Pacheco. agreed to speak with me. He said he was at home located at Following, NSO Det. Pacheco and I met and his wife ) there on 04/18/14 at approximately 1119 hours. Refer to Det. Pacheco`s supplemental report for the conversation with My conversation with lasted approximately 2 and hours and was audio recorded. I later transferred the audio recording to a CD-R and booked the CD-R into NSO evidence under evidence item (ND-7). The conversation & meeting went as follows: lived in a small apartment with his wife and his children; one of their children was a newborn baby. and invited Det. Pacheco and I into the residence. I sat and spoke with in the living room, while his wife went into a back bedroom. was soft spoken. He seemed nervous, sweaty and was less than forthcoming with information until later in the interview. It appeared still had important information he was not sharing at the conclusion of the interview. I asked if he understood why I was there to speak with him. He said the Sheriff`s Office (Sonoma Sheriff`s Office) had spoken to him about Reynaldo Pacheco. I had previous knowledge of conversation with Sonoma County Sheriff`s Detectives and received a CD copy of the interview. I later booked into NSO evidence as item (ND-18). I asked how long he knew Reynaldo Pacheco. He said they met in the year 2000. said his sister and his brother who passed away moved into Pacheco`s house. met Pacheco through his sister . At the time and Pacheco met, Pacheco was doing a network marketing NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250303) DUDLEY, NICOL Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 business called "Tahiti Nui International". Pacheco invited into the business. Pacheco and another in that business for a few years and also ventured into other network marketing businesses. was his "best friend" and someone who was very good to him. worked with one said Pacheco I asked what he knew so far about what happened to Reynaldo Pacheco. said he and a lot of other people were wondering what happened, but he didn`t know. said the other people who worked with Pacheco all had a lot of questions. said he contacted Pacheco`s family to try and find out what happened as well. said people thought he knew things because they knew he and Pacheco were close, but he didn`t know anything. said he told Sonoma Sheriff`s Department anything he could do to help find out what happened to Pacheco, he would do it. said if he could confirm anything he would. said Pacheco was his best friend and very helpful to him. went on to tell me about how he was injured at work and Pacheco took care of him. He said Pacheco checked on him all the time, so anything he could do to help, he wanted to do. He and Pacheco became close based on Pacheco being good to him. I asked when the last time he actually spoke to Pacheco was. hesitated, then said it was on Saturday or Sunday they texted one another. said on his last conversation with Pacheco, asked how Pacheco`s trip was. Then on Sunday he and texted about the company, talking about if there was any new information. It should be noted; cell phone records for number were obtained via search warrant and are booked under evidence item (23-CP). said Pacheco was working on seeking investors into new company however was not interested in the new company. declined because he was still focused on Kingdom777. was researching Kingdom 777 and waiting to get his money back. Kingdom777 was the company he and Pacheco both invested in. told Pacheco Kingdom777 was going to come around and he didn`t think it was a good idea for Pacheco to venture into a new company. was telling investors to just wait and the government will release funds and the company will come around. Kingdom777 was shut down by the United States Security and Exchanges Commission in January of this year. I asked if he really believed the company funds would be released or if it was something he was just telling investors. He said he really believed it. I asked to help me understand how Pacheco would keep records of who he enrolled into the company. Instead of answering the question, explained briefly how the Kingdom777 business worked. He said it was built on networks. Pacheco brought into the company about 6 months after Pacheco started. ended up starting his own network or "line" of people into the business. The initial investment for a person cost $2000.00. The person enrolling or recruiting the new investor received 20% of the purchase cost or $400.00. I told I knew a lot of people were upset with Pacheco and asked him who was the most upset. were upset investors, but did not give me their names. said there I asked him who was most upset in his opinion. stumbled and very unconvincingly said, he didn`t know. I told him he was a close friend of Pacheco`s and I didn`t buy what he was telling me. said he was being honest. then started talking about how this business was risky and you never knew if you would get your money back. I told I knew people were angry at Pacheco and knew about it. I told I knew he was upset at a Kingdom777 meeting. I told him I knew for a fact he was so upset at the meeting, he and his wife actually walked out NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250303) DUDLEY, NICOL Case Summary Report Agency: NSD and left the meeting early. I told saying "no". Case Number:NSD14-001332 I knew his wife was upset too. calmly and unconvincingly responded by I told Pacheco he was not the first person I was talking to. I asked again who was most upset with Pacheco in the business. skirted the question again. then changed the subject. He said he was going to be honest, but he was not upset and was checking the company every day and believed the money would be released. I told , he was entitled to his opinion, however I thought the company was a scam and he was not going to get his money back. seemed quite nervous and was visibly sweating even more. I refocused and told him I knew he was upset because he walked out of a Kingdom777 meeting with Pacheco. then said, "Yes, I did walk out of a meeting". explained there was a new leader trying to take them to a new platform at a new company. Essentially was trying to start a new company when Kingdom777 had its assets frozen. said he was upset he had already invested in the Kingdom777 business and he didn`t think it was right to try and recruit people for the new company. He felt it would be better to try and find out how they could help the existing investors. told they shouldn`t be trying to go to the new company. I asked who else besides him was upset. sighed and paused then said, "like I said the rest of the people he was recruiting, I don`t know". said the upset people were for Pacheco`s team and not his team, so he didn`t know. was reluctant to say what he knew. I told Pacheco. he claimed to be Pacheco`s best friend, however was also trying to tell me he didn`t know who was upset at said he gave the Sheriff`s in Sonoma all of the phone numbers of the people he knew. I told I agreed people were "pissed off" that Pacheco was starting a new company, without making amends with people in the existing company (Kingdom777). I told him I didn`t know who was the most upset and was trying to find out. I told , I thought it may be him, I didn`t know, but I was trying to find out. I told Pacheco`s family was pointing in his direction constantly, and fel was involved in Pacheco`s death. said it wasn`t him. Following, started saying how the company (Kingdom777) was looking promising from the literature he had been reading, so he had no reason to be that upset. said he had been reading updates on Kingdom777 every day. I told , honesty was super important. said he was being very honest. I asked how much money he lost into Kingdom777. He responded by saying you mean how much money did I "invest?" I said yes, how much did you invest. said he personally invested $30,000.00. He started with 6 units, and with the income from the six units, he reinvested. I asked how much money his sister invested, and said none. I asked him why his sister kept calling Pacheco`s family at direction. He said she was not calling at his direction at that was false. During the interviews with Pacheco`s family in Fresno, I was told called the family several times inquiring about Pacheco. The family felt it was suspicious. said he told Rachel his wife he was a little worried because people thought he was helping Pacheco. I asked if he was afraid. He said "a little bit". He explained how he had things to actually in the City of Santa Rosa, however since Pacheco`s death, he was afraid to go to Santa Rosa. I told him I would be afraid if I were in his shoes. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250303) DUDLEY, NICOL Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 I asked Pacheco to fill me in on his pyramid in Kingdom777. briefly explained who he personally brought into the company as investors. He called himself #1 as an investor and said he first brought in himself. Next he brought in a person named with two units for $6000.00. claimed he didn`t know last name. then brought in a person named for $12,000.00. then brought in his step-daughter`s for $2000.00 and a female named for $2000.00. brought in her cousin named for $2000.00. wife did not invest and neither did her family members. I asked if had brothers who invested or wanted to invest and he said no. I asked how he kept business records. He said he would go to the "back office online". He explained the company had an online logon to the company at www. Global-unity-net. did not keep paper records or bank records said the company originally was called "WCM777", then changed to "Kingdom777", then changed to "Global Unity". I later searched for the www.global-unity.net. The website did not completely load and stated it was under construction. I saw multiple other internet articles regarding the same. Some of the articles stated the name changes from WCM777 to Kingdom777 to Global Unity. I asked if knew all of the names of people Pacheco signed up for the business. said he did not, however " would be able to see everything. He explained was higher up in the company and could see everything as far as who was brought in and by whom. From a previous interview I had with Pacheco`s best friend ; I had a basic knowledge of Reynaldo Pacheco` Pyramid lines. I knew was above Pacheco. I was told brought in Reynaldo Pacheco`s cousin and brought in Reynaldo Pacheco. was brought in by a man named was brought in by the head of the line "Francisco Figueroa". I told , I figured since he was Pacheco`s good friend, he would know who was upset with Pacheco. said he had attended a meeting at Mi Zacatecas restaurant for Kingdom777. The owner of the business had called and invited him to the meeting, however once arrived he was told Pacheco was not invited to the meeting. said he stayed at the meeting out of respect and courtesy; however after a while they started talking about promoting a new company. Once they began talking about the new company, said he left. I asked if he and Pacheco shared a business account or a business phone line and he said no. I asked to tell me again about the last time he spoke with Pacheco. He said Pacheco had gone to Las Vegas for a meeting and did not go. It was either a Friday or a Saturday. told Pacheco the owner of Mi Zacatecas restaurant had a meeting and did not invite Pacheco. told Pacheco he wanted to know why Pacheco was not invited. said he heard someone in the meeting say they were going to sue him and Pacheco. claimed he didn`t know who it was in the meeting saying they were going to sue, because there were so many people in the room. said he heard someone say "wow, why don`t we sue them". I asked said it was a female, but he didn`t know who it was. if it was a male or a female voice. I asked to tell me about the voicemail. stumbled on his words and said "the voicemail, the one that I told him?" I said yes, the one you talked about with Pacheco, the same one you have not told me about already. hesitated and said "the voicemail, about what?" said somebody called him and he didn`t know who it was. Based on previous text messages from Pacheco`s phone to NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE phone on 03/23/14, I knew at 6/23/2020 14:25 had texted Pacheco Officer:(250303) DUDLEY, NICOL Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSDl4-001332 to warn him about a female that was upset and how he thought it was the female near Commerce Boulevard. I knew Commerce Boulevard is right near_ Botanica Shop in Rolmert Park. -spoke about receiving a voice mail from the upset female and warned Pacheco to be careful. seemed very nervous and scared. I told- he looked scared. He said he was worried. he had a new baby and he was wonied. I told I understood. however a man was dead. I told- allegedly a man who he called his close friend was dead and he was hiding information from me. -danced arorurd the issue again. and did not address his lack of being forthcoming with information. -said he thought we knew everything. He said he wanted to tell everything he knew and he told Pacheco there was someone wanting to sue them. I interrupted-and told him to stop. I told him I didn?t particularly like to be lied to and I was trying not to be upset with him. I told him I rurderstood he was scared. but he was telling me someone was going to sue him and he didn?t know who it was. I told him that was a lie and he had to know the person. I explained if somebody wanted to sue him. it certainly was 011 his mind and he must know who it was -responded by saying he knew it was a big thing. - said ok. "the lady who was really upset that day. that I. I uh. (inaudible) Petalruna. was uh from. 11h what the hell was her name. was from Rohnert Park". I told- I knew she was ?'om Rolmert Park. - went on to ramble. saying he didn?t know. He said "she" started "yelling on me" when he was at a meeting with Pacheco in Petalruna. - said there were a lot of things. went on to explain. he was at a meeting helping in Petaluma helping Pacheco. -stood 11p and presented himself in the meeting. -told the crowd he was like everybody else and not the CEO of the company. He asked the crowd to not take things out 011 him. because he was not the CEO. People were asking why their rurits were taken and were upset. I thanked. for ?nally telling me that information: however I wanted to know everything this particular lady was yelling. He said the lady was askingwas telling them this information. I asked. who this lady was and what her name was. stalled again and said he was trying to remember her name. yet still did not give me her name. - said this event happened 011 the last meeting in Petalruna. said the lady had a business in Rolmert Park 011 Commerce Avenue. He said her business was a Botanica. Also. the lady had a son /dau hter: the person looked like a boy and a girl so he was not sure if it was a male or female. I asked the lady?s name. i acted as though he could not remember and said he was woriied about his secun' . I tol(-. Pacheco had a wife and kids too. and to think about that. - said Pacheco was a good man. a still did not provide the lady?s name. Following. I asked- to tell me everything he knew about this lady at the meeting. said the lady was pointing at Pacheco in the meeting and then pointing at- As a result. Pacheco got mentally lost and asked- to help him. - told the lady to let the company work. and she would get reimbru?sed. He told the lady there were online forms for people could ?ll out in order to try and get their money back. - then explained the lad ?3 son or daughter was yelling and doing most of the talking for the lady in the meeting. but they were both upset. i said the lady was asking 110w to get their money back. Pacheco told them if they wanted their money. he would give their money back. Det. Pacheco then showed the Facebook photo for con?rmed the person in the photo was the same upset lady at the meeting still did not say the lady?s name that he identi?ed by photo as the owner of the Botanica shop in Rohnert Park. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETVVILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 DUDLEY, NICOL Case Summary Report Agency: NSD claimed to not know how much money of investors. I told in. Case Number:NSD14-001332 invested into the company because was part of Pacheco`s line , I was sure he and Pacheco talked after the meeting about how upset the lady was. said he asked Pacheco who brought the lady into the business and he said claimed that was all he and Pacheco spoke about regarding It should be noted I previously interviewed for business purposes. said they did talk. ) brought her and he told me he introduced to Pacheco seemed less than forthcoming with information about s. I told him I knew he and Pacheco spoke further about and he kept skipping information when answering questions. I told him I was starting to think he was involved based on his lack of provided information. I asked him if he understood the gravity of the situation. said he was trying to provide information and he was not hiding anything. He said the problem was he didn`t know who was upset, because there were so many people that were upset at the situation. said the tried to help Pacheco to keep him from pursing another business. I asked how he heard the voicemail from the lady. He said he didn`t receive a voicemail from the lady, but then did not elaborate. was softly stumbling on words and response. I asked if Pacheco spoke to him about a voicemail he received a lady. said no, and then said he made up the voicemail from the lady. I asked what he was talking about. said he made up the voicemail from the lady to tell Pacheco in an effort to get him to stop pursuing the new business. said he texted Pacheco and told him about the voicemail from the lady and but he voicemail wasn`t true. said "I lied" the voicemail "did not exist". I asked why he made up a lie like that. He said because "I wanted help". He went on to say he didn`t know how to stop Pacheco. Around this time, s wife l walked in the room and stood behind seemed less than happy with her husband and what she was hearing. listening to the conversation. I asked Pacheco if he was still good talking with us at that point because there was a lot he was still not telling us. I asked if he wanted to come back to our department and talk more in private, since his wife was in the other room. asked if I could help him refresh his mind it would be good and wanted to continue to talk there. days before they went to the meeting, he could feel the frustration from people that were upset with them. said the I asked him if he made up the voicemail because he felt Pacheco was in danger and he said "yes". I told I needed to know all about the reactions of people and what was said, because kept brushing over things. claimed he was not hiding things. I told a moment ago he did not even talk about the voicemail, which I already knew about and now he was claiming the voicemail was a lie. said the voicemail was a lie and he was just trying to figure out a way to get Pacheco to stop because people were upset. In particular "that lady" was upset. she was calling them "stealers". Also, when he left the meeting, he heard the lady talking to about how they were going to sue them. was worried because calling them stealers was a big deal. He later said if they were in Mexico and people thought they were stealers, something bad may happen to them. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250303) DUDLEY, NICOL Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSDl4-001332 said he texted Pacheco stating he heard they were going to sue them. He texted Pacheco and told him about the voicemail which was fake. He told Pacheco to be careful. I asked- if he heard speci?c threats they were talking about doing besides lawsuits and he said no. said he was a hard worker and normally didn?t lie. He said ifI could refresh his memory about things that might help. I told- I rmderstood he might be scared. however a man he was claiming his best friend was dead. I told- he was sitting there telling me he didn?t remember things: however I knew he was so bothered by the situation he probably had trouble sleeping at night. I told- I had no doubt he thought about this situation day and night constantly because he was scared and didn?t want to be the next one to be killed. I told- I knew he remembered things. I told him I didn?t want him or his family to be next. I told him I know he was wonied and his wife was worried and asked him to please start telling us the truth about everything. - wif interjected and said was worried as if there were things -had not told her. At that oint Det. Pacheco too into another room and interviewed her. Refer to his supplemental report for further. i starting crying. Once - left the room. told me he knew the man who owned Mi Zacatecas restam?ant was upset. He knew a guy named and other men were very upset with him and Pacheco as well. He claimed to not know name. said he knew the were 11 set. becaus and were on Paclreco? 5 "down line" and Pacheco was not invited to the meeting. asked why Pacheco was not invited to the meeting and he simply said Pacheco was not invited. - rmcomfortable that Pacheco was not invited. - ended 11p leaving early from the meeting. It should be noted I previously interviewed a man named? on 04/09/14. had called rue and desperately wanted to talk to me. He into the Sheriffs Of?ce to speak with me along with the owner of Mi Zacatecas restaru'ant on 04/09/14. Refer to my supplemental reports with them for further details. said it was hard because he didn?t know all of Pacheco?s "downlines". - explained he took care of his own people he enrolled to invest. however when Pacheco asked for help he would help him. I told- I thought the lady actually called Pacheco- said no. he made 11p the voicemail. He said he made it up and lied because the lady was so mad at him. He said if they were in Mexico he thought the lady would have him. - said "she was so angry". I asked- what the lady was doing to make him think she was so angry. He said she called them "stealers". I asked what was going through his mind during the time the lady called him stealers. He said in his mind he thought they would be sued: however he was not scared he would be killed at that time. In his mind he told himself to be careful because the lady and people in the meeting thought he and Pacheco were stealers. Once Pacheco was killed. - started to fear he would be next. I asked what kinds of things Pacheco was saying to in response to the angry lady- said the following meeting was at Mi Zacatecas put on by however Pacheco was not invited. The meeting was about one week after the meeting in in which the lady was yelling and calling him and Pacheco stealers. Ortiz then looked at his calendar 011 his cell phone. His best guess based orr texts he recalled from his phone and by looking at the calendar was the meeting in Petaluma was 011 a Tuesday January 28th at 320 N. McDowell Boulevard. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETVVILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 DUDLEY, NICOL Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 There were about 80 people at the meeting. could not recall if were at that meeting. According to all of the Petaluma formal meetings were always at 320 N. McDowell Boulevard, which was a community hall. The meeting at Mi Zacatecas restaurant held by was about a week later. This was the meeting Pacheco was not invited to. After that meeting, texted Pacheco asking him why he was not invited to Mi Zacatecas. Pacheco said he didn`t know why he wasn`t invited. thought it was unprofessional to not invite Pacheco, holding the meeting behind his back. I asked when all of the investors` money became frozen by the government. thought it was January 10th. He learned the accounts were frozen from a posting on the Kingdom777 Facebook website. Additionally the top leaders texted everybody below them and called for a phone conference to inform people more. The conference told investors the government was going to shut the company down. The conference also informed investors that if they were in Mexico or another country, they would not be affected by the freeze on accounts. The leaders told the investors if they should wait and they would get reimbursed. said there were teleconferences every day at 9:00 a.m. The conferences were still going on. Investors simply needed to dial in and listen. The average amount of people on the conference was 100-1000 people. You could simply listen, but not ask questions. I asked what else he knew about the Botanica lady. said he had been in her shop a couple of times. A friend of his told her the lady in the shop could read hands, so he went in. said the hand reading scared him and he felt it gave people bad luck. He could not remember when he went in. He said he was sick from stress and went in to the shop for a remedy after his friend recommended it felt it was witchcraft and didn`t believe in it. claimed to not know if Pacheco met with the Botanica lady a lot. He claimed Pacheco never told him. I asked to tell me more about his conversations with Pacheco regarding the upset lady and owner of the Botanica shop. said he felt the situation was serious because of the heated temperature of people at the meeting. felt he needed a way to get Pacheco to understand the seriousness of the situation and to get him to stop pursuing another company. said he had an instinct the situation was bad. He decided to fabricate a voicemail message. He told Pacheco he received an angry voicemail from a lady who he thought was the lady that owned the Botanica Shop said the message never existed; he made it up to tell Pacheco in an effort to get him to quit pursing other companies felt it made current investors angry Pacheco was pursuing another business, without making amends with existing investors who lost money. I asked why he chose to use the Botanica lady out of all the people that were angry with him and Pacheco. said out of all the people that were mad, the Botanica lady was the angriest. She was the only one in the room who was asking a lot of questions to make him and Pacheco look bad. I asked him if the lady talking and angry in the meeting was the same one Det. Pacheco showed him the photo of earlier. He said it was the lady and her daughter/ son. They were both asking questions. said he felt Pacheco knew they weren`t happy. said he tried to dress up their anger to Pacheco by making up the fake call from the lady. felt when people were angry; they would not always be upfront. suspected the lady and her son/daughter were holding him responsible when Pacheco was the one who brought them into the business. felt they were trying to hold him responsible simply because in meetings would stand sit or stand next to Pacheco and help him felt people in the meeting tied them in together because they were working with NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250303) DUDLEY, NICOL Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 one another; however they each had their own people they brought into the business. I asked who Pacheco was supposed to meet the morning he went missing (03/24/14). said he didn`t know, however told him Pacheco was going to have a meeting with a lady at 10:00 a.m. felt the meeting was with the lady who owned the Botanica shop. I asked if he spoke to Pacheco the day he went missing. He said Pacheco tried to contact him around 10:00 a.m., however he was working at did not talk. Pacheco also did a misdial to phone when he was inside the Botanica shop on 03/24/14 speaking with a lady he thought was the owner of the Botanica. The conversation from the misdial was captured on voicemail. listened to the conversation, which was about medical ailments between Pacheco and a female. It should be noted Sonoma County Sheriff`s Office Det. Horsman listened to this phone call during his missing person`s investigation of Pacheco and told me about it previously. I asked to explain what happened to Pacheco and who he felt was involved and why. said it was hard because there were so many things. I told if he was going to guess what happened, what he would say. He didn`t have an answer. Det. Pacheco had returned to the room after speaking with wife Det. Pacheco then confronted with information he just learned from Det. Pacheco asked how much money he actually invested into the business. responded by saying he invested about $32,000 total. Earlier told me $30,000. Det. Pacheco told , his wife said he invested $100,000 into the business and it was now gone. responded by explaining he received a large amount of money from a settlement from a work. He said he received $100,000 settlement, however there was money spent on other things. then agreed he invested roughly $82,000 in cash and from loaning money to other investors. Det. Pacheco then confronted with saying he didn`t know the name of the Botanica lady. According to ) was good friends with . In fact, had gone to store numerous times. Additionally, according to believed in the same religion as then admitted he did know through is ex-wife and had gone to the Botanica shop. His excuse was he could not remember name. said he didn`t know what kind of car involved in. He said she was "just a witch". drove. He claimed to not know what other kind of business was then claimed to not know whether or not Pacheco knew said knew recruited and were recruited by Pacheco. claimed he didn`t know how much invested into the business. claimed he didn`t know how much invested into the business; however he heard a rumor invested 32 units, which said was $64,000. was asked if he received any threats via text, phone or in person since the incident and he said no. Det. Pacheco asked about when Pacheco came to him and said he was going to start carrying a gun. said that was because Pacheco was worried about problems with . Pacheco told that one day he found his wife on the couch with . He felt his wife and were having an affair. It should be noted in my interviews with Pacheco`s wife and my interview with , they both admitted to having an affair with one another. Refer to those supplemental reports for further. Det. Pacheco confronted NSD14-001332 with information that wife was the one who found Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 on the Officer:(250303) DUDLEY, NICOL Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 couch and then told about it. said he came home one day and found Pacheco upset. Pacheco told he learned was carrying a gun and Pacheco decided he would try to carry one too. Pacheco was crying and upset over his wife cheating on him with . said he knew and V-Pacheco disliked one another. explained he knew disliked him. explained he and worked together on a construction job site a while back. owed him money over the construction job. also felt was confronted again about the voice message from "the lady". He still claimed it was made up. He said he told Pacheco "somebody called me" and he felt it was the lady. He said the lady was a good friend of his ex-wife and didn`t like him, so he knew she would not call him. I told he was sitting there telling me this lady was a good friend of his ex-wife, he was scared the lady was going to kill him, however didn`t know this lady`s name. I told I knew he knew this lady`s name. responded by saying He still claimed to not know her last name. He said all he knew about was she read hands and she was a witch. She didn`t know if she was married, but there was a guy around her. When first saw with his wife at the meeting, did not shake hands with This was many weeks before the accounts became frozen, so he knew did not like him. I asked why he was not telling the truth from the beginning and hiding things. He said to him it was not hiding. I told him he seemed like an intelligent person; however it was like pulling teeth to get information out of him that was important for his friend who was dead. claimed he didn`t know if anybody was working for . He claimed to not know where lived or anything else. Det. Pacheco told showed him a photo of Miguel Garcia from the newspaper. said he remembered seeing that guy in the photo from the paper at a party Pacheco hosted for Pacheco`s youngest daughter in Stony Point, CA. was not at the party, however he was pretty sure the guy in the newspaper (Miguel Garcia) was at the party. didn`t know if the guy in the paper was an investor in Kingdom777. Ortiz claimed he never saw the guy in the paper at Angela`s shop. I asked if he thought if there were any rumors said he didn`t know. was responsible in any way for Pacheco`s death. He said he didn`t know. I asked had somebody working for her or if she was involved in any illegal activity. I asked if Pacheco had a Facebook account and he said no. I asked about the photo he posted on his own Facebook account I saw of Pacheco standing by his Range Rover vehicle. said he took the photo and posted the photo took the photo when he and Pacheco were attempting to rent out an office space a while back in Rohnert Park. interrupted and said she was there when the photo was taken too. Also, she asked if I saw her husband`s photo of the money on his Facebook. I told her I had. She laughed and said her husband enjoyed flaunting things on Facebook and she consistently told him not to. sounded disappointed in her husband. It should be noted I previously viewed Facebook account and saw a photo of the Pacheco standing by his Range Rover posted on the account. The photo was posted after Pacheco was killed and had a caption that said something to the effect of "I miss my friend". Also, I saw a photo posted with a large amount of fanned out U.S. cash money, which was the photo was referring to. said he didn`t like problems. NSD14-001332 interjected and said she didn`t think her husband invested so much money, Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250303) DUDLEY, NICOL Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 but later learned he did. She said her husband did not always make the best decisions. She didn`t exactly trust him. said her husband didn`t show him anything, so she even checked his cell phone when he was sleeping. said her husband didn`t know when to stop. She was upset her own money was invested in the business and it was gone. She was thankful they didn`t lose more. She said there were people willing to invest a lot more money because they trusted him and Pacheco. seemed very forthcoming and the dominant one in the relationship with said there were a lot of people arguing on the Facebook page for Kingdom777 trying to get their money back. said they did have to come up with $2000.00 to pay back one of the investors brought into the company. I asked about the meeting in which was angry and yelling. said she was at the meeting, however at the time she didn`t know who the person was. recalled being at the last meeting. She recalled a male/female attacking and Pacheco. She recalled the person asking what his name was because he introduced himself as . Most people knew by his alias name said she didn`t even know his real name was until after she was his girlfriend for a while. recalled this person was sitting next to the lady in the picture she saw of There were a lot of heated business questions. decided to stay out of it. Following the meeting, noticed the lady and the he/she was behind her. The he/she proceeded to open the door for l to leave with standing next to them. said thank you in English. seemed surprised, and then proceeded to ask , "no habla Espanol?" Following told about how was mad because she felt he owed her money. got angry because never bothered to tell her that information previously. interjected again and said she really needed to ask a question while we were there because she needed a witness. She asked if the people who were calling him, threatening him and telling him they wanted their money back, was because he and Pacheco were the ones running the meetings. said "like who?" said she didn`t know, all of the people who were calling. For example the Portuguese lady or whatever her name is. He said yes. said she was worried now that Pacheco was dead; they were going to threaten her husband. said there were a couple of girls calling him, but they were not actually threatening him. They were simply calling to see how to get their money back. said she was concerned because the morning Pacheco went missing; Pacheco was going to meet a new prospect for the business. felt Pacheco was really into the new "platform" or new business and Pacheco was simply lured to the meeting. She felt he was lured there because an existing investor was angry Pacheco was venturing into the new platform. talked about how she thought the business were scams. She believed a person needed to work for their money and not do "fake businesses". She told and Pacheco they were stupid for thinking they would make money. She told them no wonder the lady was eating them up in the meeting, because they were stupid for not educating themselves on Kingdom777. She told she would divorce him if he entered into the new platform / business. I told if somebody called and threatened him, to report it immediately. said a lot of people were calling him asking about Pacheco`s case and asked how to answer the questions. I told him it was simple, he should say he didn`t know anything about the case. said he felt bad. He said I was right; there were nights he had not slept because he was so bothered by the situation. interjected and said she felt there was more NSD14-001332 had not told her yet. We agreed she and Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 would talk and Officer:(250303) DUDLEY, NICOL Case Summary Report Agency: NSD if there was more to share they would call me. Case Number:NSD14-001332 thanked me and said he felt more relaxed. END OF INTERVIEW RECOMMENDATION: Attach to case file. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250303) DUDLEY, NICOL Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Supplement Information Supplement Date Supplement Type Supplement Officer 05/28/2014 17:26:05 SUPPLEMENTAL (250303) DUDLEY, NICOL Contact Name Supervising Officer (250134) WILSON, JOEL 418 Supplement Notes INTERVIEW OF AWARENESS On 04/07/14 I received a voice mail message from a person identifying himself as . His message stated he was trying to get information about Reynaldo Pacheco and he heard they found his car. He left a number of . He was subsequently identified as . INVESTIGATION: On 04/09/14 I telephoned . He said he wanted to know if I had any news about what happened to his friend Reynaldo Pacheco. Following, agreed to come to the Napa Sheriff`s Office and speak with me. The interview was audio and video recorded and lasted about 1 hour and 25 minutes. Due to software malfunction, the video was unable to be retrieved at this time. The audio recording was transferred to a CD-R and booked into NSO evidence under item ND-6. The interview proceeded as follows: I met in the Sheriff`s lobby. When I went to greet him, I saw had brought along the owner of Mi Zacatecas restaurant in American Canyon. I asked to speak with alone first and agreed to speak with afterwards. Refer to supplemental report for further. I interviewed in the soft interview room of the Sheriff`s Office. I noticed was sweating a lot and appeared quite nervous. Also, was talking very fast. His quick speech did not appear to be from being under the influence, but appeared from nervousness. had a heavy Spanish accent, however he spoke English well. He provided his full name of . He said he was single. He lived at with two roommates. They were named and brother was an investor in the business as well, but had not invested much. I told I wanted to ask a lot of questions to try and find out what he knew to assist the investigation. I told him he didn`t have to answer questions and he could leave anytime he liked because the door was open. said he called me to try to find out information and he heard the Detectives found a note with Pacheco. said he was really scared, and others were scared. said a lot of people were "pissed" because the accounts were frozen in Kingdom777 and people were afraid. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250303) DUDLEY, NICOL Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 I asked why came with him to see me. said the other day, he and along with were in the Mi Zacatecas together. called the Spanish speaking Sonoma County Detective (Det. Horsman) to obtain information and Det. Horsman provided them my name and number. It should be noted, I interviewed on 04/10/14. Refer to that supplemental report for further. told to call me because he had information for me. said they were scared because he called from and he told him Detectives found a note with Pacheco when we located the body. As soon as heard about the note, he called right away to find out what the note actually said. told him the note said they were going to look for other people in the business. It should be noted, a note was not found on or near V-Reynaldo Pacheco`s body. also told we found a body, however the body was not yet determined to be Reynaldo Pacheco. subsequently saw on the internet news we found a body and it was determined to be Reynaldo Pacheco. I asked what else he did for work. He said he worked in finance, repaired people`s credit and did business loans. He was trying to start a new business with and Reynaldo Pacheco called "Visa Nova". They started this new business after the former one Kingdom777 was frozen. explained there was a recent event in Las Vegas for the new business. In the new business, Pacheco was in the line with from . was in a line with told Pacheco he would rather be in the line with if he entered into the new business because he lived closer to . said in the first business (Kingdom777) he was in line with Pacheco. said Pacheco had attended the event in Las Vegas for the new company and Pacheco was filling out applications for people in the new business. saw Pacheco at the Las Vegas event. said both Pacheco were excited about the new business adventure. was still quite excited and talking very quickly. In an effort to calm to me was between us and I was not going to tell what he told me. down, I told what he said I asked how he met Pacheco. He said he met Pacheco about ten years ago when they were in the business "Mon a Vie". Pacheco was in other business too. From that point on, he didn`t see Pacheco for about five years; however Pacheco would always call him about other telemarketing businesses to see if was interested. I asked how Kingdom777 worked. He said an investor would invest $2000.00 in exchange for 2000 points. Once the original investor brought in more investors into the business, they would start making $380.00 for each unit of $2000.00 the new investor would purchase. According to the points were purchased in cash and then deposited into a bank in Hong Kong. said there was a lot of cash on the street from the business because points were being sold. He heard from that Pacheco was carrying a lot of cash, anywhere from $30,000 to $60,000. thought somebody may have heard Pacheco was carrying so much cash on his person and did something to him. Herrera told it was too dangerous carrying that amount of cash on the street. I asked how much money NSD14-001332 personally invested. Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE said he invested about $4000.00 and also brought in at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250303) DUDLEY, NICOL Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case NumbeerSDl4-001332 several other investors. - entered into the business about a year ago. - brought in the following people through his line of investors. said claimed he received a text message in the last week stating "you?re next" and- was scared. The phone number appeared to be ??om Lake Tahoe area. kept asking if the note 011 the body was real. I told- I could not share a lot of information with him because the case was still under investigation. From understandin . Re ialdo Pacheco was brou ht into Kingdom777 by his corlsn- and- was brought in by from Fresno. i said Reynaldo Pacheco was making a lot of money and was able to quit his job and work in this business full time. met two times. He met him once at Mi Zacatecas meeting in American Canyon in which explained to investors they needed to be patient with the business. met a second time at a meeting in Petalmna. - thought- brought a lot of money into the company because he had a lot of investors from Fresno and Modesto. I asked to tell me about_. He said Pacheco brought- into the business about ?ve months ago. was very "pissed" at Reynaldo Pacheco because the business was frozen. -went 011 to say there was a meeting at Mi Zacatecas where he noticed- was very angry. During the meeting. the group of attendees was asked who wanted to invest into the new company "Visa Nova". The attendees were told if they wanted to invest. to stand up. - said- just sat there scared and pissed. - left the meeting early because he was angly. claimed it was all he knew about- and that was the only time he met Rogelio. into the company. Pacheco "forgot about us" and focused more 011 said after Pacheco brought felt this ha ened because brought in a lot of money. I asked how- felt about Pacheco focusing far more 011* said he felt normal because it was business and he 1u1derstood. - said many people were still trying to get their money back from Kingdom777 before entering into a new business. - said Pacheco was signing up people for the new business (Visa Nova) and not being accountable to people he signed 11p in Kingdom777. - said a lot of people were "pissed" and other people simply understood it was just business investment and a gamble. - said the business was based on cash. People did not get receipts for giving cash to plu?chase points. The only receipts given out were for bank deposits provided by the bank. I asked- if his business was a scam. He said yes. I asked how he felt about it. He said he felt it was luisafe and that was why he did not invest a lot of money into it. I asked what the most amount of money lost for the investors brought in. He said the most was about $10-12.000.00 by I asked who line of investors were holding responsible for losing their money. - said his line of investors miderstood it was a risky investment and- cautioned them from the beginning 011 investing too much. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 DUDLEY, NICOL Case Summary Report Agency: NSD I asked Case Number:NSD14-001332 if he knew who Reynaldo Pacheco brought into the company. didn`t know exactly. I asked what females investigated into the business. only knew of from Napa and some Brazilian ladies from Novato that invested. One Brazilian lady was named , later identified as knew was friends with , who Reynaldo Pacheco brought into the company. in turn brought into the business. Det. Chambers briefly interviewed on 04/04/14. Refer to his supplemental report for further. According to invested about $15,000.00 and lost it. ladies, but didn`t know who they were. According to what Juan told invested $100,000. brought in two other Brazilian one of these other Brazilian ladies provided phone number of . NSO Det. Chambers interviewed briefly on 04/04/14. Refer to his supplemental report for further. said also invested into the company for $2000.00. did not know last name. was very close with Pacheco and felt Pacheco may have confided in about problems he was having in the past months. Also, told Pacheco was having problems with his wife noticed Pacheco was drinking alcohol more heavily at meetings in recent months and suspected it had to do with problems with his wife. did not think Pacheco and were romantically involved with one another. provided phone number of . said he knew when the business became frozen; the ladies were out a lot of money. I asked about the lady who owned the Botanica shop. He said he didn`t know her, however he heard of a lady that owned a Botanica shop in Rohnert Park. did not know the lady`s name; however he heard she wanted to invest into the business. Herrera went to meetings in Petaluma a few times, but claimed he didn`t have relationships with many people there. I asked what his relationship with in the business. was. He said he met through I asked what his understanding was regarding what happened to Reynaldo Pacheco. He said he knew Pacheco was driving to Santa Rosa and Pacheco stopped in Rohnert Park and met with a lady. Somebody called her and said they wanted to meet with him to start in the new business. Pacheco went to Napa to meet with them and Pacheco never came back. said he learned this from . He did not know how knew this information; he thought may have told him. was also told when Pacheco got to Napa, somebody used Pacheco`s debit card in 7-11. said the last time he actually spoke with Pacheco was on Sunday March 23 at around 11:15 a.m. on the telephone. According to Pacheco only had one phone number and it was . Pacheco was coming back from Las Vegas and was telling about the new business during their phone conversation. Pacheco seemed very excited. It should be noted I saw this call on Pacheco`s cell records obtained for number . The call was made at 11:14 from Pacheco to and the call lasted 25 minutes. initially claimed Pacheco never told him about a meeting with a lady during the conversation. I told I spoke to the Sonoma County Detective and he told me said Pacheco was going to meet a lady the next morning NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250303) DUDLEY, NICOL Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 03/24/14. I asked if he could think of a reason the Detective would tell me that if it was not true. said Pacheco mentioned an appointment, but he didn`t remember the lady saying anything about names or ladies, he said "no I don`t think so". I asked if that was actually true, or if he was simply too scared to tell me. I told him it was just he and I in the room talking. said "ok, he told me that there was a lady who was pissed". Pacheco told a lady was pissed and told "we need to be careful". Pacheco told the angry lady was going to go to court against him and make a complaint. Pacheco told him the lady was pissed because she lost a lot of money claimed Pacheco did not provide him the ladies name. Herrera told Pacheco to not worry about it, because they did not sign any papers and that should be fine for court. I asked how Pacheco was behaving during the call. He said initially they spoke about the new business Visa Nova. told Pacheco a lot of people were angry, but the money was there. He told Pacheco not to worry. Following, Pacheco told there was a lady who was "pissed" and to be careful. Pacheco told it was a lady from Santa Rosa, however Pacheco told he would not know the lady and would not provide her name. said he didn`t understand why Pacheco didn`t tell him the name because he felt he knew any lady in Santa Rosa. Pacheco also mentioned he had been receiving a lot of calls from the "pissed" lady, but did not mention threats contained in the calls to . Pacheco was not afraid he would be killed. I asked was simply afraid to give me the name. if Pacheco really didn`t provide the ladies name, or if still maintained Pacheco didn`t provide the ladies name. I asked who else he though Pacheco would have told about this lady. Pacheco may have called Pacheco. did know exactly. He suspected I asked who he thought was responsible for Pacheco`s death. He said it had to be somebody who lost a lot of money. He said brought someone who invested a lot of money, but he was not sure. It may have been wife`s brother. It was just a suspicion. also suspected the Brazilian lady from Novato may be responsible because she brought in a lot of money. I asked him how much invested and he said about $14,000.00. felt was happy and understood business was risky. I showed an unmarked booking photo of Miguel Garcia and asked who it was. said he thought it was the guy in the paper. He said he never met the man (Garcia) however a lady named " that works at Mi Zacatecas told she thought she saw Garcia eating at Mi Zacatecas one time. In turn, told this information. Raquel`s number was Next, I showed the still photo taken from the Wells Fargo ATM transaction of Norberto Gonzalez and asked who it was. said he didn`t know, however he recognized the photo because he had gone with Pacheco`s wife and family to obtain the photos and ATM account information from Wells Fargo. Next, I showed not recognize him. an unmarked booking photo of Mauricio Tovar. said he never met that person and did I took a short break, left then returned to the room to continue the interview. The audio recording was reactivated. I asked NSD14-001332 where meetings would take place for new investors. He said they would always meet in a Starbucks. Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250303) DUDLEY, NICOL Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 They would at Starbucks in Petaluma, sometimes at Mi Zacatecas in American Canyon or Starbucks on Jefferson Street in Napa. said Pacheco was desperate to start new people in the business, so he suspected Pacheco may have deviated from the normal meeting places to meet somewhere else with a new person. I asked what else was important to know that I didn`t already ask. said he was more than willing to help. said we should talk to Pacheco`s good friend It should be noted I interviewed twice. Refer to that supplemental report for further. END OF STATEMENT RECOMMENDATION: Further Investigation NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250303) DUDLEY, NICOL Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Supplement Information Supplement Date Supplement Type Supplement Officer 05/28/2014 18:27:53 SUPPLEMENTAL (250303) DUDLEY, NICOL Contact Name Supervising Officer (250134) WILSON, JOEL 418 Supplement Notes STATEMENT OF On 04/09/14 at about 1520 hours, I spoke with at the Napa Sheriff`s Office. The interview lasted about 27 minutes and was audio and video recorded. The audio recording was transferred to a CD-R and booked into NSO custody under evidence item ND-9. The video recording has not been able to be retrieved at this time due to computer software compatibility issues. The interview went as follows: was soft spoken, calm and seemed forthcoming. I asked what his understanding so far was regarding what happened. He said all he knew was Pacheco was found and he saw in the newspaper a guy might be responsible for killing him. Also, he heard some rumors a hand written note was found with Pacheco`s body. He did not know Pacheco for a long time. He met Pacheco through the business. was brought into the business through invested about $10,000.00 and he got back $10,000.00 and kept the money. He was happy with the business. He heard some people were unhappy however he believed the money was still there. He met Pacheco through meetings at his restaurant. Pacheco was one of the ones that did the presentations. The last time he saw or spoke to Pacheco was around the second week in January of 2014. only brought his son and daughter into the business, however the lost money. did not know who killed Pacheco or who would have done that. When he first heard Pacheco was missing, hoped it was not related to the business. said he saw Pacheco driving a new truck and he thought some people might get angry seeing Pacheco with a new truck when they were out money due to investing with Pacheco. knew Pacheco carried large amounts such as $5000.00 on his person sometimes. knew knowledge that NSD14-001332 from the band the played at his restaurant Mi Zacatecas. I had previous plays in a band. hired band at times. Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250303) DUDLEY, NICOL Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 He knew was involved in the business and he heard from Reynaldo Pacheco into the business. texted He and invested about $60,000 on 03/25/14 at 1601 hours. The text was asking to call exchanged a few other texts following, asking if they heard from Pacheco. when he had a chance. r did not know of any females Pacheco got into the business in the Santa Rosa area. He did know there were a group of Brazilian girls in that area in the business. I asked who he suspected killed Pacheco. He said he didn`t know and it was hard to say. He knew was upset with Pacheco about the situation the company was going through. I asked about a meeting he hosted at Mi Zacatecas in which got upset and left early. He recalled the meeting and recalled wife was asking most of the questions. He did not know her name. She was asking if there was any way they could recover the money. He felt like she was the one who took charge in the relationship. was just sitting there and not saying much recalled when was asked his name; he provided another name " true name is The meeting was on February 26th, 2014. He did not recall I showed wife bringing her brother into the business. a booking photo of Miguel Garcia. He did not know Garcia. Also, I showed him a photo of Mauricio Tovar and Norberto Gonzalez. said he didn`t know, because he saw a lot of people in his business. He did not definitely know who the people in the photos were. I asked if he had heard of anybody who would have wanted Pacheco dead. He said no. I asked if he had been doing research on Kingdom777 at its frozen assets. He said he heard the assets were released today. I asked if he was going to invest in Visa Nova. He said he was still researching it and had not invested yet. asked about the note he heard was found on Pacheco`s chest. I told him there were a lot of rumors, however could not share information about it. I provided him my business card. END OF STATEMENT RECOMMENDATION: Further investigation. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250303) DUDLEY, NICOL Case Summary Report Agency: NSD NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE Case Number:NSD14-001332 at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250303) DUDLEY, NICOL Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Supplement Information Supplement Date Supplement Type Supplement Officer 05/29/2014 10:09:11 SUPPLEMENTAL (250303) DUDLEY, NICOL Contact Name Supervising Officer (250120) ORTIZ, OSCAR 418 Supplement Notes SUPPLAMENTAL REPORT-INTERVIEW WITH ON 07/03/14 On 07/03/14, I spoke to V-Pacheco`s wife at the Napa Sheriff`s Office. The meeting was video recorded and a CD copy of the recording was later booked into NSO evidence under item ND-39. During the course of the interview, I obtained DNA reference swab samples from her. The swabs were for possible comparison to DNA swabs collected from V-Pacheco`s recovered vehicle used in the crimes in this case. I later booked DNA reference swab samples into NSO evidence under item ND-30. During the course of the meeting, went on to tell me the following in summary: Her new address was and her contact number was . The day her husband went missing, (03/24/14) the following occurred: She woke up and V-Pacheco told her he had an appointment that day with a lady at 0900 hours. told her husband she had Zumba exercise class that morning. In turn, V-Pacheco said he would call the lady and tell her he would meet her at 1000 hours instead because would be using their only vehicle to go to her Zumba class. She returned home after her Zumba class and V-Pacheco was ready for the day. They talked about who would pick their daughter up from school since he would have their only car. V-Pacheco agreed to pick their daughter up from school that day. Later that day, she received a call from her daughter stating her dad never picked her up. heard later that V-Pacheco had called his cousin to pick their daughter up from school and noticed V-Pacheco sounded as though he was in a hurry when he called. said once she returned home from Zumba class the day V-Pacheco went missing, she never left the house again until the next day when she and other family members went to the police to report V-Pacheco missing. The night V-Pacheco did not return home, said she was very worried and it caught her off guard. She said he always returned home or would call stating where he was. did not recall anybody calling V-Pacheco to threaten him or noticing any unusual type of calls. said V-Pacheco would carry large amounts of cash money on his person at times. She recalled him carrying $40,000 in cash money to the City of Modesto with in November of last year. From NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250303) DUDLEY, NICOL Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 understanding, V-Pacheco was taking the money to Modesto to give to somebody for the business never actually saw the $40,000 in cash, only heard V-Pacheco speak of it. never told her who he was actually taking the money to, however the person was the one in charge of collecting money for the business. According to other times, V-Pacheco would carry cash in the amounts of $2000.00- $4000.00 or so on his person. s current wife to be named did meet ex-girlfriend, however did not recall her name. said she heard told V-Pacheco if anybody needed money, he could lend them the money. was offering to lend people money if they invested it into the company. This was around November of last year. I showed a photo for looked at the photo said it was "La Senora". She said she saw La Senora one time in Napa at a house party in December of 2013 hosted at s house in Napa. said hello to La Senora and that was it recalled La Senora being at the party with her boyfriend or husband. She recalled the man was short. Following, I showed a photo of . After looking at the photo, she said it might have been the same person she saw at the party with La Senora, but not sure. Following, I showed a photo of Miguel Angel Garcia. She said "is that the one who died". I asked if she ever saw the person in the photo and she said no. I showed a photo of Mauricio Tovar. She said she never saw him before. I showed a photo of Norberto Gonzalez and she never saw him before. I asked about V-Pacheco`s relationship with said she didn`t know of any direct problems between them, however in her experience and hearing rumors, she heard was the type to stab someone in the back. She heard was the type who would say one thing, however turn around and do something else. I asked if ever went into the Botanica business in Rohnert Park and she said no. I went through a series of names to see if she recognized them. The only name she had anything significant to say about was: : She knew him to be the one who brought her husband into the company and said her husband would go to Petaluma with him. Also, one time heard her husband talking to a person named Jorge on the phone in November of last year. Her husband was being accused of stealing points from the company, however he told it wasn`t him and he didn`t need to steal. Also, told the family V-Pacheco was the one who invested the money of the brothers of ). asked some questions about their recovered vehicle and the people who purchased the car. I explained the person who purchased the car appeared to not know it was stolen and the car was seized as evidence. RECOMMENDATION: Attach to case file. Forward this supplemental report to the Napa DA`s Office. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250303) DUDLEY, NICOL Case Summary Report Agency: NSD NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE Case Number:NSD14-001332 at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250303) DUDLEY, NICOL Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSDl4-001332 Supplement Information Supplement Date Supplement Type Supplement Of?cer 0650532014 15:42:04 EVIDENCE (250303) DUDLEY. NICOL Contact Name Supervising Of?cer (250134) WILSON. JOEL Supplement Notes STATEMENT (REYNALDO WIFE) ON 04/04/14 AND 04/06/14 011 04/04/17 at about 1730 horu?s. Napa PD Of?cer Peralez. NPD Of?cer Salem and NSO Detective Eddleman and I arrived in Fresno Corurty to eak with the victim?s wife and her husband?s family. Sonorna Cormty Det. Horsman had informed me_ (Reynaldo Pacheco? 5 Sister In Law) was English 5 eaking and his main point of contact to reach- or any of Reynaldo Pacheco?s other family members. I contacted by phone just prior to arriving in Fresno and made arrangement to speak to_ at- house located at in the told me- had relocated there to be with family since Reynaldo went missing. Once we arrived at the house. NSO Det. Kyle Eddleman and Napa PD Of?cer Omar Salem interviewed Reynaldo?s brother and sister in-law_ and . Refer to Det. Eddleman?s supplemental report for fluther details. At the same time. I spoke to Reynaldo?s wife . Napa Police Of?cer Jose Peralez who is a certi?ed Spanish inter reter was with me for translation during my conversation with-. My meeting and conversation with went just over two hours. was audio recorded. A CD copy of the recording was later booked into NSO evidence rurder item ND-S. The interview went as follows: At the time of the interview. it was suspected the body we formd at 2470 Sage Canyon Road in Napa 011 the afternoon of 04/03/14 was that of husband Reynaldo Pacheco: however it had not of?cially been at that time. Attempts were ruade for of?cial identi?cation via ?ngerprints. however were rmsuccessful up until that time. Additionally. there was no physical identi?cation with the body when it was located or other means of positive of?cial identi?cation. demeanor during the beginning of the interview was that of concern and worry: however she was not overly emotional. I introduced myself to- and told her I would be asking a lot of questions. and I was trying to determine what happened to her husband. I told her it was most important she was simply honest about everything. She indicated she understood. I asked her what she suspected happened to her husband. She said her belief was her husband Reynaldo Pacheco was kidna ed and somebody was keeping him against his will. I asked her why she believed that was what happened to him. a said her husband left the morning he went missing for a meeting and he never returned. Her husband had always returned home in the past. or called if was going to be somewhere else. Her husband told her his meeting was with a female. however he never told- when or where the meeting that day was or the name of the female. I asked -what her husband did for business. She said he was working in a company called WCM777. She knew Printed by: (250161) DETVVILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 DUDLEY, NICOL Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 very little about the company because she was not directly involved in the company. She did hear a little about the company from her husband. said she had known her husband for 11 years; they had been married for 4 years. They had two young female children in common and the children were currently in Fresno at her brother`s house. Her brother was named and his wife was , they lived on at an unknown address. Their phone number was . The morning her husband left on 03/24/14, was the last time she spoke with him. Pacheco left their house located at , wearing black colored corduroy style dress pants and a long sleeve tan dress shirt with orange colored thin stripes and dark brown shoes. Her husband had black hair with a little grey. He was clean shaven. I asked if her husband had any medical problems, tattoos or scars. He didn`t have any medical problems she knew of. He had a scar on his left foot by his heel and a scar on his forehead. Pacheco had gone to a dentist about 8 years ago; he went to a dentist in Petaluma. She didn`t know who the dentist was or the address, and only knew it was located near hills in Petaluma. Her husband had two computers. The computer he used for business was a black laptop "Toshiba" brand, which he took with him when he left on 03/24/14. Pieces of a black laptop computer were subsequently recovered on 04/05/14 during a detailed search of the area of 2470 Sage Canyon Road. The items located were a piece of a flip style cell phone (Item #1-CS) as well as a keyboard top of a laptop computer (2-CS) and a screen from a laptop computer (Item #3-CS). The second computer was taken by Sonoma County Detectives after she reported her husband missing. The computer taken by Sonoma County Detectives was later obtained by Napa County Sheriff`s and booked under evidence item NV-32. The computer was an Apple MacBook and forensically examined by NSO Det. Hallman. The forensic exam did not recover files that appeared to be related to this case. Refer to his supplemental report for further. Her husband had two cell phones he used. The first cell phone he took with him the morning he left on 03/24/14. The second cell phone was a blue phone he used for business and let his daughter use to play games on. provided me with the blue cell phone (Alcatel) before I left for forensic analysis. The phone was forensically analyzed by NSO Det. Hallman and booked under evidence item ND-2. She stated when her husband left for meetings in the Napa, Vallejo area; he would dress for meetings at home and not ordinarily change clothing. It should be noted when the male body was found at 2470 Sage Canyon Road, the body was clothed in black corduroy style pants and a dark green colored dress shirt. I asked who Pacheco`s closest business partner was. She said it was She didn`t know his address, however provided a telephone number for him of . She knew he was not married. Also, a man named was a close business partner. telephone number was ; she did not have an address for him. Her understanding was he was living in Santa Rosa; however she heard he had been staying in Vacaville since her husband went missing. She and her husband had a joint checking account through Wells Fargo, . Also, he had two other accounts he opened up in their oldest daughter`s name . The account numbers were which is a savings account & which is a teen savings account. provided me old bank statements for each of these accounts. Additionally she provided me a partial statement for a Wells Fargo Visa credit card ending in the number #5487. The statement didn`t show the entire account number. The statements were NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250303) DUDLEY, NICOL Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 booked into NSO evidence under item ND-23. She said her husband`s Wells Fargo bank card was used the day he went missing. She checked with the bank to see if there was any other bank activity on the account and there was none. was not aware of anyone who had conflicts with her husband or anybody that was mad at him. knew the business was something involving computers and involved points. Prior to her husband becoming involved in this business, he worked did concrete work. When her husband first started working in the 777 business, he would always leave early and return home late, however he would always return home. He would sometimes mention where he was going, sometimes he wouldn`t. His car was a Range Rover and it was the only car they had and drove. I asked how her husband handled confrontation based on his personality. She said they had been married for 4 years; however she never saw him angry or aggressive. knew the business was stopped because the government in the United States stopped it. She heard this from her brother in law . She knew lived in , but didn`t know where he lived. I asked who was. She said he was the main guy at the company. I heard earlier from Sonoma County Sheriff`s Det. Horsman that was having an affair with a man named who was her husband`s cousin. said the she was referring to was a different . It was later determined the she was likely referring to was an " with a cell phone number of . The who later admitted to having an ongoing sexual relationship with was named who NSO Det. Pacheco and I later interviewed. Refer to those supplemental reports for further. mentioned a female named who had called Pacheco`s Aunt who was inquiring about Pacheco was identified as , and was interviewed by NSO Det. Pacheco on 04/06/14. Refer to his supplemental report on her interview for further. was later identified as and was interviewed briefly on 04/01/14 By Sonoma County Detective Horsman. was interviewed again briefly on 04/04/14 by NSO Det. Chambers and again by myself on 06/03/14. During the course of the interviews, admitted she was friends with Pacheco`s Aunt and an investor in Kingdom777 . She stated she invested approximately $30,000 and Pacheco spoke on the phone on 03/24/14. Refer to those supplemental reports for further details. said called inquiring about Pacheco. Also, was jealous of Pacheco. knew mentioned how she felt through the business meetings for Kingdom777. said her husband called his good friend on 03/24/14 to see if could pick up Pacheco`s daughter from school on the afternoon of 03/24/14. was unable to pick up his daughter. Following, Pacheco called his cousin at about 1440 hours, to see if he could pick up his daughter. learned this after speaking with . and both said when Pacheco called; his demeanor seemed nervous and very quick about the call. I asked is she suspected her husband had any girlfriends. said she heard her husband was seen frequently with a pretty girl who was an investor in the company, however she did not have any confirmation Pacheco was unfaithful to her or seeing anybody else. People told her Pacheco was frequently seen with this girl, she was pretty and NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250303) DUDLEY, NICOL Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Pacheco was very attentive to her. She never confronted her husband with the information she heard about him and the girl. I asked if her husband knew she was having an affair with and she said he was. suspected told her husband about the affair. She suspected found out, because she and her husband used to live with and . They lived together up until August of 2013. felt told her husband something was going on between her and was separated from his wife for about six years. He never asked to leave her husband. said told her had a conversation with him about 4 weeks earlier. said was concerned that Pacheco was trying to leave the Kingdom777. told it wasn`t fair when so many people had invested in the company and Pacheco was trying to leave and begin a new company. said her husband was speaking with people about how they would get their money back, and was still working in the company, so she didn`t understand why would be saying those things. told Pacheco about what was saying and told him to be careful with . I asked if her husband ever seemed worried or ever said someone had threatened him. She said no. Also, he was not the type to worry her about things and share things with her. At that time, it was getting very late in the evening. I decided to end the interview at that time and return the following day to continue interviews. At the end of the conversation, I met with and her sister in law and brother in-law and together in the living room. I told them we had located a deceased human body in Napa County in the late afternoon the previous day. I told her we were not able to officially confirm who the person was at that time; however we were working diligently to confirm identity of the person. I told them the autopsy would be on Monday and I hope to have identification confirmed by then. I explained there was not enough information at that time to determine 100% officially the body we located was , however based on the clothing description and the statements of involved thus far, I had every reason to believe it was . I told them we had numerous Detectives working long hours to determine what happened. At that time broke down sobbing. Her brother in-law went on a rant in Spanish about and his brothers and how they were involved. was fixated that was responsible for his brother`s disappearance and suspected death. I told them we had two people so far that we suspected to be involved in the person`s death and we were working to determine who else might be involved and why. I told them we were still investigating numerous things including . I told and her family the investigation was far from done, I would tell them more details as soon as I could and I would be in close contact with them. Despite the somber tone with the and the family at that point, they agreed to help in any way they could. I told and her family I would return in one day with additional Detectives to speak with the other family members in the area. I made arrangements for myself and a team of Detectives to return to the location on 04/05/14 for further interviews. END OF INTERVIEW WITH STATEMENT OF NSD14-001332 ON 04/04/14 ON 04/06/14 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250303) DUDLEY, NICOL Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 On 04/06/14 at about 0940 hours, Napa Detectives and I went back to in the to speak with and additional members of Pacheco`s family. I spoke with . The conversation was audio recorded and booked under evidence item # ND-5. Calistoga Police Officer Carolina Weigers who is a certified Spanish translator, assisted in the conversation. The conversation lasted just over 2 hours and went as follows: was calm during the course of the interview and held herself together emotionally. began the conversation talking about her children and how her daughter was asking where her dad was. said her daughters were currently staying with family members in town. I asked if there was any new information that came up since I last spoke with her. She said no. I told I wanted to talk more about the business her husband was involved in. She responded by saying she already told me everything she knew about the business and suggested I speak with and to learn more about the business. I asked how her husband got involved in the business. said in June of 2013, (Business PartnerHigher in Company than Pacheco), (Pacheco`s Cousin) and (Pacheco`s brother in law) came to their house and did a presentation about the business. Following, her husband began investing into the company. and were already invested into the company and solicited Reynaldo Pacheco to invest. In September of 2013, her husband quit his other job working in concrete and began working on Kingdom777 full time. Her husband was also working for a business called "Momentis" which to her understanding was an electrical type phone company. I later "google" researched "Momentis" and it appeared to be an energy company pyramid style business. Initially, when approached about entering into the Kingdom777 business, her husband told them he didn`t have the money to invest. The recruiters, however offered to let Pacheco borrow the money to invest and start in the company. explained how the initial buy in to invest in the business was $2000.00 and that equaled 1 unit. knew the business involved a point system in the cyber world; however Pacheco never really explained how the business worked. was skeptical of the business from the beginning. From understanding, once a person invested into the company, their return for the investment would be points and or cash. From understanding, the only records of investment into the company would be from a bank receipt for a deposit. She said her husband kept all of his business records in his briefcase he had with him the day he went missing. She previously described the briefcase and being a black canvass laptop style briefcase with wheels. I asked if her husband had any other business records at their house in Santa Rosa and she said no. I asked if her husband had any other bank account other than ones she told me on 04/04/14 and she said no. She said she called the bank (Wells Fargo) and was told her husband had 4 accounts with them. He had one joint checking account with , he had two savings accounts under his oldest daughters name and he had one credit card. said her husband was contemplating making a change to Chase Bank, however did not know if he had an account with Chase Bank or not. I asked how much money was in their checking account when her husband went missing. She thought they had about $1000.00, however after the suspects used their bank card the account was down to about $700.00. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250303) DUDLEY, NICOL Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSDl4-001332 - said the transaction made by the suspects 011 03/24/ 14 with her husband? 5 bank card was the last transaction on the account. I asked if Pacheco ever mentioned having any money problems and. said no. - said about 3-4 weeks earlier her husband had a phone call from a persor didn?t know. Dining the call. the person was talking to her husband about do. She doesn?t know if her husband ever went to do the job or what the job was. I asked. if she heard any other unusual conversations that might be bene?cial to know for the investigation and she said no. I asked. to tell me in detail about the morning her husband left- said the morning of 03/24/14. she was going to take her daughter to school and Pacheco was still in bed. She and Pacheco had a conversation about picking 11p their daughter from school and a Zumba class- was going to attend that morning. Pacheco told- he had a meeting at 0900 hours with a lady. however said he would change the meeting to later so- could go to Zrunba. Pacheco stayed home with their youngest daughter while - took their older daughter to school and went to Zumba class. retruned home at about 0955 horu's on 03/24/14. They had a short conversation about who would pick up their oldest daughter from school. Pacheco agreed to pick up their daughter since he would be out using their only vehicle. Pacheco left for his meeting with a lady. He did not tell-the name of the lady he was meeting with. or where it was. said everything seemed frne when Pacheco left the morning of 03/24/14. I asked if she heard her husband pru?chased any fn'earms. - said hadn?t heard he pru'chased any ?rearms and did not know where that kind of information would come from. I told- druing our fn?st conversation. she said her husband had on a striped shirt when he left. - said she was her husband left the house wearing light brown shirt with orange colored stripes. I asked if Pacheco owned a forest green colored shirt and she said he did. I asked if he ever changed clothes when going out for business. - said when he was traveling. he would sometimes have clothing with him. however presentation. he would leave the house wearing the clothing for the meeting. She said it was possible he changed his shirt after leaving the house. I asked if Pacheco normally wore an undershirt.? said at times he did. not often. I asked again about his dental work. - again said the last time he visited a dentist was a while back. - said Pacheco wore size 7 shoes. he did not wear jewehy. a wedding band or a watch. mentioned she had brought a large box of old photos and records with her from home. Following. produced a very large storage box full of old personal records and photos. She allowed me to look through the box. I did not see items of evidentiary value to this case. The box contained mainly photos and historical records from years ago. I asked. if she ever met- from? said she met him one time when he came to the house. however she didn?t really get a feeling either way about him. She didn?t interact with him very much. I asked. if she knew a_ from? said- came with her and her family when they went to the Wells Fargo Banks to determine if her husband?s bankcard had been used. - was not exactly sru?e why was there. She suspected one of the other family members called and invited him. I asked abou_ said she met? about 11 years ago and her husband had known NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETVVILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 DUDLEY, NICOL Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 far longer than that. Her husband and became good friends years ago when car that exploded. Her husband was there and pulled the grandson out of the car and saved him. I asked grandson was in a if she ever received calls on her phone for her husband`s businesses and she said no. said at some point on Tuesday 03/25/14, asked for phone number from had his sister call on his behalf and inquire about Pacheco. He claimed he could not call because he was in a remote area without a signal. asked if was ok. thought it was weird would have his sister call and ask if was ok. was a little confused, because it was only one day into her husband being gone. said she and her husband used to live with and brother who had since passed away. described as being a little weird and not all there mentally. When called on behalf, told she was fine, but would love to know where her husband was. did not have a response. The call ended fine. They agreed to call one another if they found out where Pacheco was. did not understand why didn`t call himself and felt it was odd. About three days after she reported her husband missing, called . He offered to go and help her to make a report, however his offer was weird. explained offered to take to a place where he knew a Sheriff and the Sheriff would help her. thought it was weird, because she knew a Sheriff` wasn`t going to just meet her in a random place. wondered why he didn`t just offer to take her to a police department. The call ended. called her back again asking what she decided. said she had a friend who spoke English and she would just take care of making the police report herself. sister sent text messages as well. The messages were simply encouraging and telling she hoped Pacheco returned home soon. The phone number his sister used to contact was . According to had a little boy with his ex- girlfriend; however he was with a new girlfriend now. said previous girlfriend was very young. heard from , that current girlfriend had brothers who invested in Kingdom777. also thought it was weird that didn`t just come down and see her since he knew where they lived. felt was trying to lure her out of the house for some reason. spoke about some inconsistencies with . For example, knew lived at the Ranch in Stoney Point, however he would tell he lived with a girlfriend in Vacaville. said she had seen the Ranch before and there were two houses there. said was a liar. She said on Tuesday 03/25/14, told some people he lived in Oakland, some people he lived in Modesto, Tracy or other cities. also said was supposed to go with her husband to the Vegas trip on March 18th. Also he was supposed to loan her husband a van for the trip. For an unknown reason, backed out of the trip and didn`t loan her husband the van to go to Vegas. Her husband ended up going to Vegas with and . I asked if her husband had a Facebook account. did not know if her husband had an account or not said offered to put up missing person information on however it did not appear her husband had a page. said posted some sort of missing person photo to solicit help finding her husband on a Facebook site. It appeared her husband was simply tagged in the photo. tried to pull up the Facebook site she was referring to. It appeared the site was under the www. . The screen name on the page was There was a linked Facebook site under the name "Lideres por exelencia" which appeared to be a site for investors in the "777" branch. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250303) DUDLEY, NICOL Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 suspected it belonged to her husband; however it did not appear to belong to him but a general group site. I submitted Facebook preservation requests for the websites. and I talked again about the clothing her husband was wearing when he left. When the body was located at 2470 Sage Canyon Road, I noticed the pants had a very specific rear pocket pattern. I drew a photo of the pattern and said the pockets looked the same and were a soft fabric. I asked if she heard of the name before. She said she had but didn`t know who he was. wanted to ask some questions. She asked when we found the body. She asked if the person could have potentially been alive the day the missing person report was made and if we could tell from the body how many days it had been there. I told we found the body on Thursday and it did not appear the person was alive when the missing person report was made. asked when she could claim the body and about identification. I told her the autopsy would be the next morning and I would call her as soon as I had more information. I explained the reason I had asked all the questions about clothing, scars and tattoos and medical issues was for assisting with identification purposes. also asked if we had found the Land Rover yet. I told her the vehicle still had not been found at that time. said the vehicle had a brown Evenflo car seat inside the vehicle. inquired about getting the items back if located. We spoke briefly about when the vehicle was located how she would likely not be able get it back due to insurance and evidence issues. began to cry and talk about her daughters and having to tell them about their father. I talked to about resources for her and her family. I later arranged for the Napa County Victims of Violent Crimes Services to assist and her family. END OF STATEMENT OF RECOMMENDATION: Attach to case file NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250303) DUDLEY, NICOL Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Supplement Information Supplement Date Supplement Type Supplement Officer 08/19/2014 16:27:43 SUPPLEMENTAL (250303) DUDLEY, NICOL Contact Name Supervising Officer (250120) ORTIZ, OSCAR 418 Supplement Notes STATEMENT OF On 04/09/14, NSO Det. Verdeille and I contacted at her hair salon business at in the City of Napa. The very brief conversation audio recorded and a CD copy of the recording was later booked into NSO evidence under #ND-6. spoke very little English and required a Spanish Interpreter. We agreed to meet the following morning 04/10/14 at the Sheriff`s Office. She did say her . The following morning came to the Napa Sheriff`s Office. NSO Lt. Ortiz and I spoke with her in the soft interview room. Since was primarily Spanish speaking, Lt. Ortiz was utilized as a Spanish interpreter. The conversation was audio recorded. A CD copy of the audio was booked under #ND-6. The conversation went as follows in summary: At the beginning of the conversation, I told she was free to leave at any time and the door was open. I asked how she knew V-Pacheco. She said she knew V-Pacheco through in September of last year, 2013. introduced her to V-Pacheco in an effort for her to invest into the 777 business. Felix said this past Monday, she, and others got together at Mi Zacatecas restaurant in American Canyon to see if there was anything they could do to find V-Pacheco. She heard from the case was handed to me and told her to call me to get information. I told I was going to ask a lot of questions; however it was most important to be honest about things. Following I asked her what her understanding was regarding what happened to V-Pacheco. could understand why it happened. She described V-Pacheco as a very noble person. said none of them I asked if she was an investor in the 777 business. She said yes, she started out by purchasing one unit, however in the end bought a total of 6 units for an investment of $12,000 lost her investment in the company, however understood there was risk with the investment. In her mind, the money was not lost, the money was simply frozen. She said the money was still there, however the investments were only frozen at the time. said a lot of people were angry, because they didn`t understand this. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250303) DUDLEY, NICOL Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 She said the 777 company was sold to a new company named Global Unity. She said brought her into the business; however more experience in making the presentations. used V-Pacheco because V-Pacheco had brought several people into the business. One was named from Napa, a second was named unknown last name from Napa, and a third was named unknown last name from Stockton, CA and a fourth person named Angel unknown last name from Stockton, CA. Pedro invested $4000.00 and the other invested only one unit for $2000.00. I asked to tell me about the last time she saw or spoke to V-Pacheco. She said they would often meet at Starbucks or in Petaluma at the meetings. About one month before he went to Vegas was the last time she met him. They did have some phone calls. She described there really was no point to meet that often since the business was frozen. broke down crying. She said V-Pacheco invited her to Vegas and to explore the new business platform, but she declined. She described V-Pacheco as a very caring man and a wonderful person. She said he would help her with gas money when she needed it, so she could make it to meetings. She said they were very good friends. seemed very fond of V-Pacheco. said in December of 2013, she had a party at her boyfriend`s house in Napa on Karen Street. Her boyfriend was named . V-Pacheco was the one who requested to have the party because V-Pacheco wanted to invite business partners. She said the party stopped early because the police were called because of loud music. I told , I heard she and V-Pacheco may have been romantically involved. said they were only very good friends and not romantically involved. She said V-Pacheco was very respectful of her. was asked if there was anybody specific she knew was very upset at losing money in the business. She said V-Pacheco never told her, however she heard a person named was very upset. She met one time briefly, but it was nothing more than "hello, good afternoon". The meeting with was at a business meeting hosted at Mi Zacatecas restaurant. Felix said the last business meeting was at Mi Zacatecas. was invited to go up front and talk by V-Pacheco, however he didn`t want to go up front and talk. It was her understanding that V-Pacheco and Rogelio were very close and like brothers. Rogelio`s band also played that day at the meeting. I asked who was. She said she didn`t know him. Following, I showed and she still didn`t recognize him. a photo of I asked who was. She said he was a good friend of V-Pacheco`s and she didn`t know much about him. She just recalled him at meetings. The meetings she normally attended were on Tuesday`s in Petaluma. I asked what female business investors were at the meetings. She recalled Brazilian ladies and a lady named . I told it was my understanding that every time he came to Napa, he would meet with her. She said he would meet her on Monday`s usually, however when the accounts became closed that changed. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250303) DUDLEY, NICOL Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 said V-Pacheco would always talk about his family; however she knew there were problems between him and his wife. felt the problems were due to him being gone so much. V-Pacheco started dedicating Sunday`s to his family. I asked who she suspected of killing V-Pacheco. She said she had no idea. I asked who she would talk to in order to try and find out who killed him. She said she didn`t know, however she knew V-Pacheco`s wife was on Facebook a lot and V-Pacheco didn`t like it. Following, I showed I asked photos of and . She didn`t know who either one was. who else I should talk to in order to find out what happened to V-Pacheco. She said she didn`t know. I asked if she ever heard of because he was a good person. . She said he was V-Pacheco`s good friend and didn`t suspect him RECOMMENDATION: Attach to original report. Forward this supplemental report to the Napa DA`s office. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250303) DUDLEY, NICOL Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Supplement Information Supplement Date Supplement Type Supplement Officer 08/19/2014 16:51:12 SUPPLEMENTAL (250303) DUDLEY, NICOL Contact Name Supervising Officer (250120) ORTIZ, OSCAR 418 Supplement Notes STATEMENT On 04/06/14 I spoke to V-Pacheco`s brother in law in Fresno, CA. The conversation was audio recorded and a CD copy of the recording was later booked into NSO evidence under item #ND-5. was Spanish Speaking only. Calistoga Police Officer Carolina Weigers was with me for interpretation. The conversation in summary went as follows: was not an investor in the 777 business. He was not interested in investing in 777, however he was solicited to invest by other his family members and , however he declined. He didn`t want to invest and didn`t have the money to invest. never had any arguments with Pacheco. I asked if there was anybody he knew that V-Pacheco was not getting along with or anyone who would want to harm him. He said no. I asked if he noticed any demeanor changes in V-Pacheco and he said no and everything seemed fine. understood V-Pacheco to get along well with his wife . I asked said no. if he heard any rumors about and V-Pacheco having any marital problems and he I asked what his understanding was of what happened to V-Pacheco. He said he really didn`t know and the family was looking to us to try and find out what happened. According to Officer Weigers, based on responses to questions, it appeared Soriano was not yet aware V-Pacheco was deceased. then asked when we would be able to confirm the body we located was V-Pacheco. It did not appear had a lot of knowledge of V-Pacheco`s business or his associates. RECOMMENDATION: Attach to original report. Forward this report to the Napa DA`s office. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250303) DUDLEY, NICOL Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Supplement Information Supplement Date Supplement Type Supplement Officer 08/20/2014 13:49:27 SUPPLEMENTAL (250303) DUDLEY, NICOL Contact Name Supervising Officer (250120) ORTIZ, OSCAR 418 Supplement Notes STATEMENT ON 06/03/14 On 06/03/14, Napa PD Officer Jose Peralez and I went to and spoke with . The conversation was audio recorded. I later booked a CD copy of the recording into NSO evidence under item #ND-20. did not have a lot of time to talk with us and was on her way out for a previously scheduled appointment. It was my understanding; was one of the female "Brazilian" investors in the 777 business with V-Pacheco. Also, based on cell phone records I saw for V-Pacheco`s cell phone , V-Pacheco spoke with on her cell phone for approximately 6 minutes the morning he was killed 03/24/14 at about 0854 hours. had been previously interviewed very briefly at the beginning stages of the investigation by Sonoma County Sheriff`s Det. Horsman and Napa County Sheriff Det. Chambers. Refer to their reports for further. spoke with a heavy Brazilian accent, however spoke English very well. was very animated, loud and talkative during the meeting. She spoke quickly and jumped around in her conversation a lot. At one point she became teary eyed. She seemed genuinely upset that she lost money investing into the business and genuinely upset that V-Pacheco was killed. I asked how much she invested. She said in total, she invested about $30,000. She said she even took money off of her credit card to invest. She said she had never invested in something like that before and called herself "Naive". said she invested along with another Brazilian lady named who didn`t invest that much. I told I heard there was a Brazilian lady who invested $100,000. seemed surprised and said "nooo". She said if there was a Brazilian lady who invested that much; it wasn`t her or . She said invested in other multi-level markets such as Avon, however was older in her fifties and just trying to make money. said she was brought into the business by a man named even went to Las Vegas to learn more about the business at a seminar. She said it was hard for her to understand, because when she went to the meetings they were often spoken in Spanish. I asked what thought of V-Pacheco. She said he was a "nice human being". said she could never understand why V-Pacheco`s wife was never at the meetings. She asked V-Pacheco about it one time and his response was his wife preferred to clean for work. V-Pacheco told his wife was very hard on him. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250303) DUDLEY, NICOL Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 recalled when she went to Vegas; V-Pacheco was looking to have more people in the new business. didn`t go to all the meetings in Petaluma. I asked her about a meeting in February of 2014 in Petaluma in which a lot of people were upset with Pacheco and said she recalled the business and recalled people being very upset at both V-Pacheco and . I asked who was the angriest at V-Pacheco at the meeting. said there was a guy who looked like a "gay guy". The guy seemed very upset. I asked if this guy she was referring to was with a lady. She said yes. I asked if she recalled someone calling V-Pacheco a stealer at the meeting. didn`t recall that and thought maybe the meeting was a different one. said V-Pacheco kept telling the people the business was going to turn around, however he felt sorry for people that lost money investing in the business. I told I heard V-Pacheco would at times carry large amounts of cash on his person. said she never saw him with money; however it may have been true since he bought the truck. said he may have had money, but he didn`t keep it, because he died with nothing. She said she spoke with V-Pacheco`s aunt and she told her that V-Pacheco didn`t have any money when he died. Also, she recalled V-Pacheco telling her that he had made a lot of money in the past, however for him it did not matter that he lost money. He said he wanted to make money, however he wanted to help others. I asked who she suspected killed V-Pacheco. She said it was already in the news who killed him. I told yes, but asked if there was anything else. She said it was probably someone who invested that killed him. I asked when she last spoke with V-Pacheco. She said "oh a while ago". She went on to say she had been contacted by the police several times and she was done. She said she wanted to move on. She said she was upset she lost money and was just trying to move on. then started to ask questions about the business and what was going on with people getting their money back. She started talking further about her inquiries to the head leaders in the 777 business and what the government was going to do with them. She asked if there was a possibility the root of this money scam would be found out. She said in Vegas there were over 300 people who invested in 777. I told her there were thousands of investors from my understanding. I told her I heard there might be a class action law suit for investors that she could look into. She said she heard one of the leaders " left the country. I told her my investigation primary focus was the death of V-Pacheco. said money comes and goes, however it was a big loss. She said she didn`t know V-Pacheco a lot, however he seemed like a really good person and they became friends. She said he was a very decent person, however you never really know. She said people are very naive when it comes to money. I asked if V-Pacheco called her the morning he went missing. She said "yes, yes" he did. She said she thought it was right after they got back from Vegas. V-Pacheco and her spoke about the business. later talked to and told he and V-Pacheco were planning to meet later in the afternoon on 03/24/14, however said they never met. I asked if V-Pacheco ever told her who he was planning to meet the day she last talked to him and she said no. I told I heard V-Pacheco was planning to meet a lady in Napa the day he went missing. said she heard that, however didn`t remember where she heard it or who he was going to meet. She may have heard it from V-Pacheco`s aunt or . NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250303) DUDLEY, NICOL Case Summary Report Agency: NSD I asked went to if she was friends with V-Pacheco`s for massages. Case Number:NSD14-001332 . She said yes, was a good masseuse and she I asked if she knew how much money invested into the 777 business. said she didn`t know, however "the people" were saying he invested so far, and then did about ten more units. I asked if it would surprise her to know invested about $90,000. seemed flabbergasted and said "noooo!" She said she was shocked. then said "oh my God, it was the best scam ever then". asked who got all that money then? I asked if she ever saw wife at the meetings. She said yes, she was always there. Following, I showed a photo of and asked if that was the same lady she saw at the meeting who was upset. looked at the photo and said she didn`t remember because she didn`t pay attention that well. asked who the lady was. I asked if she ever heard of a "Botanica" shop. said she had not. asked details about how V-Pacheco died. I told her I was not able to give her details about it. I asked if there was someone else we should talk to. She said she didn`t really know, but maybe the lady who had the hair salon in Napa ). I told I had already spoken to her. said when she went to the bank to deposit her money into the 777 business; the teller questioned her to see if she really wanted to deposit the money into the account. said it was a sign and she should have paid attention to it. seemed very forthcoming and helpful during the meeting. I provided my contact information and asked her to contact me if she learned new information that might be important for the case. RECOMMENDATION: Attach to case file. Forward to this report to the Napa DA`s Office. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250303) DUDLEY, NICOL Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Supplement Information Supplement Date Supplement Type Supplement Officer 08/20/2014 15:14:19 SUPPLEMENTAL (250303) DUDLEY, NICOL Contact Name Supervising Officer (250120) ORTIZ, OSCAR 418 Supplement Notes STATEMENT ON 06/03/14 On 06/03/14, NPD and I went to in the City of Novato, CA and interviewed . I noticed a newer red BMW vehicle in the driveway and know the area of the residence to be very affluent. had been previously interviewed briefly by Napa County Sheriff`s Det. Chambers during the early stages of this case. Refer to his report for further. Based on cell phone records I saw for V-Pacheco to from V-Pacheco on 03/24/14 at about 1219 hours. I saw there was about a 27 minute outgoing phone call The conversation was audio recorded. A CD copy of the recording was later booked into NSO evidence under item # ND-20. chose to be interviewed in his back yard on the patio. The interview in summary went as follows: spoke English well. During the course of the interview, very low key, often monotone and matter of fact. He was slow to speak and not overly forthcoming with information. I asked what he could tell me about the incident with V-Pacheco, how he knew him and how he invested. said he knew V-Pacheco for about 10 years. He said he met V-Pacheco through other mulit- level businesses years ago. He referred to V-Pacheco as a good friend and said he used to come to his house and they would talk and that was it. I asked if the latest business investment was the 777 business and he said yes. I asked how much he invested into 777. He said "I invested like $12,000". I asked how he felt about losing the money. He said he knew it was a risk when he started, but he did it. I asked if he went to all of the meetings in Petaluma. He said he used to work in the evenings, so he didn`t go to all of the meetings. I asked what he heard happened to V-Pacheco. He said he heard he was kidnapped, but he really didn`t know why. He said he had not spoken to V-Pacheco`s wife and didn`t know a lot. He heard V-Pacheco`s wife moved to Fresno. I asked who he brought into the business. He said he brought in a couple of friends and a couple of sisters. I asked who the Brazilian ladies were he brought in. He said he only brought in one and her name was "Hoochie". He said she lived in Corte Madera, however never went to any meetings or met anybody. I asked how she got her money NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250303) DUDLEY, NICOL Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 back. He said when she started she didn`t have any money, so he lent her money to sign her up. He lent her his points to get her into the business. I asked when he last spoke to V-Pacheco. He said it was the Sunday before he went missing. He explained he and V-Pacheco were going to meet on that Monday 03/24/14. V-Pacheco said he would call to set-up the meeting for Monday, but never heard from him on Monday. It should be noted previously told NSO Det. Chambers he last spoke to V-Pacheco the day he went missing and call records details reflect this information. I asked what they were meeting for. He said V-Pacheco wanted to talk about investing in the new business Visi Nova. said he told V-Pacheco he didn`t have the money and wasn`t going to invest in Visi Nova. I told I know there are a lot of rumors circulating, however I heard one of the Brazilian ladies invested about $100,000. He said no, he had not heard that and from what he knew, the Brazilian lady invested about $15,000 or maybe $20,000. He said made some money and re-invested the same money. I asked what he thought happened to V-Pacheco. He said he didn`t know. I told him I didn`t think he knew, but I wanted to know what he heard or thought happened to him. very nonchalantly said "well I guess he was at the wrong place at the wrong time and that guy was there or something and he got kidnapped". I asked if he ever heard of V-Pacheco carrying around large amounts of cash. said in order to sign people up in the business you would have to have points. He explained sometimes he would obtain cash from people and carry the cash around when he signed them up. He said sometimes it would be like $5000-$6000. I told I understood there were a lot of angry people. I asked who was the angriest in his opinion. responded by saying he told people they could invest if they wanted however he never told them they would get their money back. He told them if they wanted to invest they should, if they didn`t then don`t. He said he signed up 3 friends and a couple of sisters. I asked if he was ever at a meeting where people were upset. He said no and V-Pacheco was "the nicest guy". I told I heard he had to use his credit cards to invest and he lost a lot of money. He said again very nonchalantly said well for me no. I said he knew he could make money or not. He said he lost a lot of money when the economy went down. He said he lost about $50,000 so he didn`t really care about investing $10,000 in the 777 business. I asked what he did now for work. He said he had a janitorial business and worked part time at a country club. I told I had spoken to his sister and she told me he invested a lot of money, used his credit cards to invest and quit his job for the business. said he did quit his job, because he points and V-Pacheco told him he needed to go to the meetings. He said his work schedule and manager would not allow him off to make the meetings on Tuesdays. He ended up having to quit his job in order to go the meetings. I asked who else I should be talking to in order to investigate what happened to V-Pacheco. He said "well they already arrested the people responsible". He said he saw one of the guys killed himself or something. He said he didn`t know if any other people were involved. I asked NSD14-001332 who was. He said he didn`t know anybody named Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 . I showed a photo of Officer:(250303) DUDLEY, NICOL Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 and asked who it was and if he recognized her from one of the meetings. He said he didn`t know who it was and asked if it was one of the ladies he was going to meet. He said he heard he had a meeting with a lady, but was in a hurry and left. This was what his wife told him. He heard he was supposed to pick up his daughter at around 3 or something. said he tried to call V-Pacheco about 3-4 times after, but it just went to voicemail. I asked when the last meeting he attended was. He said he thought it was the month V-Pacheco disappeared. I asked how he deposited the money to start an investor. He said "they" gave them an account to deposit money into and then they would receive points on the website. The website was now stating it was under construction; however he heard it was going to re-open soon. I told I know a lot of people felt the business was a scam and I thought it was a scam. I asked was a scam. He said looking back now he did think it was a scam. felt it I asked if he noticed any demeanor changes in V-Pacheco. He said he knew V-Pacheco had to move and had to live in a hotel for a few weeks, then was renting a motor home or something. He said V-Pacheco didn`t really tell him about a lot of problems. He said , V-Pacheco`s wife had called him to see if he knew where V-Pacheco was or knew anything. One or two days later tried to call her back to inquire about what happened and she didn`t answer. was asked if he knew . He said yes he knew him. He knew V-Pacheco and were really good friends and like brothers. He said they were both nice people. He explained one time V-Pacheco had a concrete job and and helped Pacheco. recalled being at meetings helping V-Pacheco talk to people at meetings and being in charge. had called to inquire about V-Pacheco and said he didn`t know anything. tried to call after V-Pacheco was determined to be dead, however didn`t answer. I asked how much invested in the 777 company said when he started, wasn`t in the business. was surprised, because later he learned invested about 15 units for $30,000. asked V-Pacheco how invested so much and V-Pacheco told him he just put the money down. heard a rumor he obtained the money after brother died. I asked what his impression of was. He said he had not heard anything he did wrong. He heard he was married to a lady that had brothers who were drug dealers. He heard that information from a guy name from Petaluma or Santa Rosa. I asked didn`t know. what the word was out with the people. I asked if people were afraid to talk. said he really I asked if he ever met . He said he thought he saw him a couple of times. He heard he invested a lot of money, somewhere around $50,000-$100.0000. He heard this from V-Pacheco one time. He said V-Pacheco told him one time there was a guy in American Canyon who invested a lot of money. V-Pacheco told him his name was he had a restaurant and he invested a lot of money. I asked if he ever heard about a meeting a said he didn`t. NSD14-001332 restaurant in which V-Pacheco was purposely not invited. Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250303) DUDLEY, NICOL Case Summary Report Agency: NSD I provided Case Number:NSD14-001332 my contact information to contact me if necessary. RECOMMENDATION: Attach to case file. Forward this report to the Napa County DA`s Office. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250303) DUDLEY, NICOL Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Supplement Information Supplement Date Supplement Type Supplement Officer 08/21/2014 11:09:59 SUPPLEMENTAL (250303) DUDLEY, NICOL Contact Name Supervising Officer (250120) ORTIZ, OSCAR 418 Supplement Notes STATEMENT OF ON 06/03/14 On 06/03/14 NPD Officer and I went to and contacted . She is the sister of . The location was her current residence. The residence did not appear to be of a person who was affluent or had a lot of money. I had contacted her by telephone just prior in order to confirm where she lived and she agreed to speak with me. She spoke primarily Spanish, however understood and spoke a good amount of English. I utilized NPD Officer Perlalez for Spanish interpretation when necessary. The conversation was audio recorded and I later booked a CD copy of the recorded conversation into NSO evidence under item #ND-20. provided her name, DOB, drivers` license number. She said she cleaned homes for a living, however her child was also special needs so she received income for that as well. The conversation with her in summary went as follows: invited us into her home. I told her I understood she was very close with V-Pacheco and good friends. She said they were both from Qaxaca Mexico and had known one another for about 12 years. I told her I wanted to ask her questions to see what she knew and what she thought happened to him. I asked if anybody from law enforcement had spoken to her yet and she said no. I asked her what she thought happened to V-Pacheco. She said she didn`t know. She had received a phone call from her brother who was an investor to try and find out as well. She had received a phone call from V-Pacheco`s wife she thought on Tuesday, the day after he went missing to see if she knew where he was. a told she didn`t know where V-Pacheco was. She said V-Pacheco normally called her almost every day or every other day, but he stopped contacting her. I asked when she last talked to V-Pacheco. She said she thought it was 3-4 days prior to "black Monday". I asked i Monday" was what she or others were calling the day V-Pacheco went missing and she said yes. I asked if she invested into the 777 business. She said yes, she invested approximately 2 units for a total of $4000.00 and she invested through V-Pacheco. She explained she had participated in marketing businesses years ago with V-Pacheco as well. She recalled V-Pacheco contacting her a while back about this new business 777. She told V-Pacheco she didn`t have the money to invest. V-Pacheco in turn told her he would help her invest and he would provide her the money to start investing in 777. He told her when she got money she could pay him and he trusted she would. He gave her $500.00 to start. described V-Pacheco as a very nice man. said she thought people thought he had a lot of money, but he didn`t. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250303) DUDLEY, NICOL Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 I asked how she got along with , V-Pacheco`s wife. said she was a very good wife, a good friend and they got along well. I asked if V-Pacheco talked to her about having problems in their marriage. said he didn`t talk to her about problems in his marriage. I told I heard he may have confided in her about problems he was having with . She said she heard something before he passed about some friend of V-Pacheco`s trying to get with , but didn`t think it was true. From what she knew stayed home with their children all the time and didn`t think it was possible for her to be with someone else. I asked if she ever heard the name of this "friend" trying to get with and she said no. I asked who brought her brother into the 777 business. She said V-Pacheco brought her brother into the business and Juan brought her into the business. Also, her brother brought in , as well as her sister , and her brother , all for one unit each. I asked how she felt with the company froze. She said at first the feeling was it was something serious. However, they stated the business was only under construction and things were essentially in the works to get better. I asked what she knew about She immediately said "I know . I asked her to tell me about him. She said he was a friend of V-Pacheco and years ago he and V-Pacheco lived together. She was not that close with . I asked what the rumor was with him and what she was hearing. She said when she started in the business, didn`t invest and was "broke". She knew his brother had passes away as well. A few months later, she saw up front talking in the meeting as though he was an investor. She asked how much he had invested, because from what she knew he was broke. was told he invested a lot of units, something like 12-13 units which would be about $24,000-$26,000. said she thought to herself, wow what is he doing and where can I get some of that money because it surprised her. Also, she heard his wife had a lot of money somehow. I asked if went to meetings in American Canyon at Mi Zacatecas. She said no, she only went to meetings in Petaluma. She said there were meetings every week. She said V-Pacheco ran the meetings and never helped him at the meetings. I asked who the Brazilian ladies were that her brother brought into the business. She said she didn`t know, however one of the ladies worked at the Best Western Hotel with her brother at night. He knew was an investor, but they didn`t talk a lot because didn`t understand Spanish that well. I asked how much money her brother lost in the business. She said she thought he lost a lot. She knew he used his credit cards and savings. I asked how he reacted when he discovered his money was gone. She said he was "sad". She said the thing was, they never really said the money was gone, they just kept saying "oh they are working on it and it`s closed". I asked what her understanding was regarding what actually happened to V-Pacheco. She said she really didn`t know. She said he paid everything. He paid for food for the people at meetings and paid for the rental of the meeting location. I told her I heard one of the Brazilian ladies invested $100,000.00. didn`t know of anything like that. She said invested a good amount, but certainly not that much. I told her it may have only been a rumor. I told there was a meeting in Petaluma in which people were very angry and calling people stealers. She didn`t recall that meeting and said sometimes she had to miss meetings. She never heard about a meeting in which that NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250303) DUDLEY, NICOL Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 occurred either. I asked if she knew who worked at the Botanica. is a masseuse. She didn`t know from the Botanica. confused her with V-Pacheco`s Aunt who I asked if she knew . She said she may have met him at meetings, but didn`t recall him. The last time she attended a meeting was in November of 2013. I asked how she learned the business accounts were frozen. She said V-Pacheco gave everyone the heads up that it was coming and that accounts would be frozen for 2-3 months. I asked , if she were me, what she would suspect happened to V-Pacheco. She said maybe it was someone who lost a lot of money in 777, or maybe somebody who was jealous of him because everybody liked him. I asked who she thought may have been jealous of V-Pacheco. She said everybody liked V-Pacheco, however she knew he had other investors in other cities she didn`t know. I asked if he ever talked about investors in Napa. She said he made comments about having or starting a group of investors in Napa. She didn`t know if there were any female investors in Napa. I asked if she knew who worked at the Botanica. confused her with V-Pacheco`s Aunt who is a masseuse. later explained, the lady who worked at the Botancia had been at meetings. She said she would see "the lady" in the meetings and she would hand out business cards, but she never went into the Botanica. I asked if recalled who the Botanica lady was at meetings with. said the lady was always alone. I asked if she had read the newspapers about V-Pacheco and photos they put in there. She said had seen the photo of the guy who killed himself. I asked what she thought when she first saw it. She said after V-Pacheco went missing for a few days, I hoped he was just kidnapped, however then she found out. She said she always thought it was jealously because (V-Pacheco`s wife) is young and beautiful. Also, V-Pacheco always did things right and would help people. I asked if V-Pacheco would give rides to people. She said yes, and then explained if a meeting was in the Bay Area such as San Francisco, he would try to get people to commute with him. He would organize the commute or sometimes get a van. I asked who would be the angriest with V-Pacheco out of all the investors. She said someone who invested a lot. I asked if she heard any rumors. She said everybody was sad, but there was not anybody upset enough to the level to kill him that she knew of. She said her group went back 10-12 years ago with V-Pacheco. She thought maybe one of the new investors may have been angry enough to kill him. I asked if she heard any rumors of any new investors dealing drugs or guns and she said no. I showed a photo of and asked if it was the Botanica lady. didn`t recognize the photo to be her. Following, I showed her another photo of said she only saw her once and was not really sure. I asked her who else we should talk to in order to try and found out who harmed V-Pacheco. said all of his family didn`t know, and there group was not people she felt would do something. I provided her my contact information and asked her to please contact me if she learned anyting new about V-Pacheco I might want to know. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250303) DUDLEY, NICOL Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 RECOMMENDATION: Attach to case file. Forward this report to the Napa DA`s Office. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250303) DUDLEY, NICOL Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Supplement Information Supplement Date Supplement Type Supplement Officer 08/21/2014 16:57:50 SUPPLEMENTAL (250303) DUDLEY, NICOL Contact Name Supervising Officer (250120) ORTIZ, OSCAR 418 Supplement Notes INTERVIEW ON 04/24/14 On 04/24/14, came to the Napa Sheriff`s Office unsolicited in an effort to talk with me. Pacheco had been previously interviewed on two different occasions regarding this case by Sonoma County Sheriff`s Office and Napa County Sheriff`s Office Det. Pacheco. The interview with NSO Det. Pacheco & took place when was in custody at the Sonoma County Jail. Refer to Sonoma County Sheriff`s scanned in report and NSO Det. Pacheco`s reports for further regarding his prior interviews. I agreed to speak with and talked with him in the soft interview room of the Sheriff`s Office on 04/24/14. I utilized NSO Lt. Oscar Ortiz for translation during the conversation since spoke Spanish. The conversation was audio recorded and I later booked a CD copy of the recording into NSO evidence under item #ND-7. The interview went as follows in summary: seemed very anxious to talk as though he had important information to relay. He recently was released from custody at the Sonoma County Jail. At the conclusion of the interview, it didn`t appear he had any new information to benefit the case. At the conclusion of the interview, it appeared he wanted to focus the investigation towards as being a suspect; however he and had negative history based on a prior business relationship on a construction job. felt scammed him out of payment for a job and it appeared had negative feelings towards based on that, rather than factual information had involvement in the homicide of V-Reynaldo Pacheco. Additionally, in the recent past. previously. admitted to having a sexual relationship an "affair" with V-Pacheco`s wife admitted to the same relationship with when I interviewed her also stated the following in summary: He was good friends with V-Pacheco and V-Pacheco had baptized is son. The day V- Pacheco went missing, was contacted by V-Pacheco`s brother to see if he knew where V-Pacheco was. ended up driving around with to try and locate V-Pacheco. felt was trying to implicate as a suspect in V-Pacheco`s disappearance. I asked if maybe he thought was trying to implicate him because was having an affair with NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250303) DUDLEY, NICOL Case Summary Report Agency: NSD V-Pacheco`s wife. Case Number:NSD14-001332 said yes maybe. went on to talk about a construction job he did with and how was paid for the job, but did not pay his share. He said it was about ten months earlier. said he had been warned by brother in the past that was not trustworthy. Also, he heard invested around $100,000 in the 777 business, however was not sure how he came into the money. He heard it was some sort of settlement. said he was invited to invest in the 777 business, however he declined. I asked if he knew anybody specific that was angry at V-Pacheco. He said V-Pacheco met some guy in Napa and he felt it bothered . He also heard sold some property in San Francisco to V-Pacheco in order to invest into this business. I asked if he had seen since V-Pacheco died. He said he called girls were doing but had not seen her. He said he wanted to go to V-Pacheco`s funeral. I asked if he knew to see how she and the and he said no. I told it was my understanding, or his wife walked into a room and found together in a situation that caused suspicion they were romantically involved. and started talking about how he was almost kidnapped in Cotati by three Hispanic males and got away. His story appeared unusual, scattered and didn`t seem credible. I asked him why he hadn`t told Det. Pacheco about how he was almost kidnapped when Det. Pacheco interviewed him last week. said he didn`t remember. He said the kidnappers wanted to make him disappear and frame him for kidnapping V-Pacheco. He said through other people, he did his own investigation on drug dealers. It didn`t appear . He found out wife`s brothers were had beneficial information to share. I ended the interview at that time. RECOMMENDATION: Attach to case file. Forward this report to the Napa DA`s Office. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250303) DUDLEY, NICOL Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Supplement Information Supplement Date Supplement Type Supplement Officer 08/22/2014 11:07:26 SUPPLEMENTAL (250303) DUDLEY, NICOL Contact Name Supervising Officer (250120) ORTIZ, OSCAR 418 Supplement Notes STATEMENT OF ON 04/06/14 (V-PACHECO`S SISTER) On 04/06/14, I spoke to . I had arranged a team of Detectives and Spanish Interpreters to interview family members of V-Pacheco while there and was one of the family members I interviewed. was primarily Spanish speaking and I utilized Calistoga PD Officer Carolina Weigers for interpretation. The conversation was audio recorded. I later transferred the audio recording to a CD and booked the CD into NSO evidence under item #ND-5. She told me the following in summary: She was V-Pacheco`s sister. She resided at telephone number was and her the 777 business, however came into the business through , refer to his supplemental report for further. . Her contact . Her husband was an investor in . Det. Brad Chambers interviewed According to , the company seemed like a good business and a good opportunity at a stable good company. She understood the company operated in teams. said V-Pacheco and her husband got along well. V-Pacheco would always tell favorite brother in law. that he was his I asked if there was anybody she knew who may have wanted to harm her brother V-Pacheco. She said in the last week or so V-Pacheco was very stressed and acting different than usual. She said the Sunday before he disappeared he was there in Fresno with her for a family gathering and he received a phone call. During the call, he walked away when talking, then when returned seemed very sad. She didn`t know who called. She didn`t ask who called him, but she asked him if he was ok. V-Pacheco said he was fine. She got a bad feeling because his behavior based on the call was not normal. The call might have been between 11 a.m. and 2 p.m. I asked According to if V-Pacheco would have been the type to tell her if something was wrong and she said no. there was not anybody she knew of V-Pacheco was not getting along with. I asked , if V-Pacheco were to get into a fight, how he would react. She said he was not the type to fight, to be violent or confrontational. She felt he was calm and would try to resolve the situation. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250303) DUDLEY, NICOL Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 I asked if V-Pacheco owed her and husband money. She said yes, about $5000.00 he needed to try and purchase a trailer. She said V-Pacheco had been living with and V-Pacheco wanted money to try and get a trailer or his own place to live. said regarding the actual case with V-Pacheco she knew very little. She knew her brother was reported missing and this person was very insistent in trying to contact the family to get information. The feeling was that was somehow involved because wanted to move up in the company to where V-Pacheco was. She met at News Years of 2013. Her feeling of was he was "two faced". He seemed friendly on the exterior, but appeared he would be different in his private life. She wondered why her brother trusted , when she got a bad feeling from him. didn`t think her brother had any enemies and they communicated often. She was very surprised this happened. did not seem to have any other information beneficial for the case at that time. RECCOMENDATION: Attach to case file. Forward this report to the Napa DA`s Office. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250303) DUDLEY, NICOL Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Supplement Information Supplement Date Supplement Type Supplement Officer 08/26/2014 08:59:24 SUPPLEMENTAL (250303) DUDLEY, NICOL Contact Name Supervising Officer (250120) ORTIZ, OSCAR 418 Supplement Notes STATEMENT OF (REYNALDO PACHECO`S COUSIN) On 04/06/14 at about 1505 hours, I spoke with . The conversation was audio recorded and I later booked a CD copy of the audio recording into NSO evidence under item # ND-5. Calistoga PD Officer California Weigers was with me for Spanish translation since spoke primarily Spanish. stated the following in summary: He was V-Reynaldo Pacheco`s cousin. On 03/25/14, he received a telephone call from wondering if he knew where Reynaldo Pacheco was & that was how he found out he was missing. didn`t think a lot of it at the time and felt V-Pacheco maybe just had an argument with his wife and left for a short period of time. also received Facebook contact from a person who identified himself as on 04/25/14. had never met " and would not be able to pick him out from photos. This person who identified himself as posted photos of V-Pacheco on Facebook under the account named "Lidares por Exelencia". and soliciting information from Altimirano to see if he knew where V-Pacheco was. told the Facebook page was one they shared for their business. didn`t share much information with because he didn`t know who he was. then received a telephone call from Rogelio on 04/26/14 to see if he had heard from V-Pacheco. said he had called V-Pacheco`s sisters and brothers to try and find out where V-Pacheco was, but nobody was answering his calls and giving him information. According to said he had tried to go the police to report V-Pacheco missing, but was told it needed to be family members to report him. began investing in the 777 business on August 28th of last year (2013) and invested $16,000. He got about $5000, of his $16,000 investment back. He explained when an investor enrolled somebody new into the 777 business, the investor would get the money of the person the investor enrolled. He enrolled his brother and about 6 more people. I asked if there were any other ways for an investor get money back from the 777 business. said supposedly someone could ask the company for their money back, however he never did that. I asked if V-Pacheco owed him any money or if owed V-Pacheco any money said he owed V-Pacheco $2000. V-Pacheco liked Apple computer, so they arranged a deal in which V-Pacheco took possession of Apple computer for partial payment of the $2000 he owed V-Pacheco, then only owed V-Pacheco $800 after the conputer exchange. V-Pacheco obtained the computer about 1 month earlier. The Apple computer was later determined to be a silver 13" Apple Air, with a serial # of C02LPX38F5V7. tried NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250303) DUDLEY, NICOL Case Summary Report Agency: NSD to wipe the computer before giving it to V-Pacheco, so if V-Pacheco used the computer for his business. Case Number:NSD14-001332 did not know what was on the computer currently or I learned the Apple computer had been obtained by search warrant by Sonoma County Sheriff`s Office and later turned over to the Napa County Sheriff`s Office Det. Nathalie Verdeille on 04/08/14. On 04/14/14 Napa Sheriff`s Det. John Hallman conducted a forensic exam of the Apple Computer. Refer to his supplemental report for further. didn`t know of anybody who would want to harm V-Pacheco. When asked if he felt V-Pacheco may have been cheating on his wife or having a girlfriend he said no. Also, he did not know of having an affair with another man or having a boyfriend. said he always got the feeling V-Pacheco loved his wife very much. talked about the recent Las Vegas trip that V-Pacheco went on. went to Las Vegas as well, however just saw V-Pacheco briefly then went their separate ways. He never knew V-Pacheco to have a gun or weapons. He said he had only gone to V-Pacheco`s residence maybe two times in all the years he knew him. He explained they really only had brief contact with him. He did not notice any demeanor changes in V-Pacheco and really didn`t see him often. RECOMMENDATION: Attach to case file. Forward this report to the Napa DA`s Office. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250303) DUDLEY, NICOL Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Supplement Information Supplement Date Supplement Type Supplement Officer 04/17/2014 15:23:28 SUPPLEMENTAL (250335) EDDLEMAN, KYLE Contact Name Supervising Officer (250134) WILSON, JOEL 418 Supplement Notes SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT: On 04/03/2014 I contacted and interviewed in reference to case NSD14-001332. I contacted at his residence in Napa a . I asked if he would be willing to come to the Napa County Sheriff`s department voluntarily to for an interview. said, "yes" and walked to an unmarked Sheriff`s car. Sheriff`s Department interview room. was not handcuffed and was transported to the In the interview room I spoke to in English for several minutes to verify his contact information and reminded him that he could end the interview and leave at any time. The interview was conducted in the Sheriff`s Department interview room. I recorded my interview with using a digital voice recorder. The recording was later transferred onto CD and booked as evidence. I began my interview with in English. Over the course of the interview in English Cortes began to provide me with details surrounding crimes committed by Miguel Garcia. Cortes occasionally had difficulty explaining himself in English. told me in English that he would "go behind with" Garcia when Garcia would commit crimes like "beat up people or threaten people." told me that he would go with Garcia during these crimes because he was "scared of Miguel, because he would kill me." told me that the last time that he saw Garcia, it was when Garcia told him "to steal from a house with horses." told me that he didn`t like that Garcia would beat up and rob a "normal person" and after that incident, and Garcia didn`t get along. After their falling out, Garcia threatened to kill arrest. Once I told "horse man." , which led to calling Napa PD and Garcia`s eventual that Garcia was deceased, appeared to relax and then elaborated on the robbery against the told me that it was a 50-year old man in east Napa, past the Middle School near First Avenue. Due to the language barrier I requested that Deputy Felipe Hernandez with the Napa Sheriff`s Department assist with translation. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250335) EDDLEMAN, KYLE Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Deputy Hernandez assisted me in my interview by providing translation services. I provided and food during the Spanish interview. with some water told me that he met Garcia back in September at the apartment complex that currently lives at r . said that he met Garcia during a passing encounter outside of ` apartment, but don`t have any mutual friends and most of the times that he met with Garcia they were by themselves. said that he became friends with because family also lived in the . has become good friends with over the past four years, and a couple of times per month they would get together for a family meal. was asked how he got started "working for" Garcia. said that in December 21st, Garcia needed ride to Fresno, so went with Garcia in Dodge Neon to Fresno. While in Fresno, they went to a party at the Vagabond Hotel. At the hotel, a homicide occurred, and they had to leave vehicle behind and come back to Napa in a different car. Back in Napa, they were stopped by CHP Officer Ensley and were arrested for possession of drugs, because Garcia made them hold the drugs. I asked why he would continue to associate with Garcia, if Garcia had threatened to shoot him in the past. said that he went with Garcia because he knew Garcia to carry a gun and had seen it in the past. I asked if Garcia had forced him to take Garcia anywhere else. s said that between December and January, Garcia forced to take him to other towns in Sonoma, usually to Hotels. did not know who Garcia would meet with, and just made wait in the parking lot. said that Garcia would make drive him around too, but that Garcia usually just made Cortes go with him alone. knows that Garcia does have a friend that only knows as "Chaparro" who lives behind other friend I showed a picture of Mauricio Tovar, who identified as "Chaparro." Cortes described Tovar as Garcia`s "very good friends" and said that Tovar was a Godfather of one of Garcia`s children, and it`s "common knowledge" that Tovar and Garcia are best friends. was asked who knew the "horse guy" that mentioned earlier was. The "horse guy" was a rancher who owned horses, which Garcia had beaten and robbed in the past and told . was uncertain who exactly knew the "horse guy" but suspected that knew the "horse guy" and had told Garcia to rob the "horse guy" because the "horse guy" was holding a lot of cash from a recent horse sale. was asked if Garcia had ever forced to go with Garcia during a robbery. he only knew about Garcia`s robberies, because Garcia would brag to him. said, "no" and said that was asked what happened in Rohnert Park. said that he and Garcia had gone to Rohnert Park in Garcia`s brown Silverado pickup truck and met "a guy" and picked him up. had never seen him before, but they picked him up at a "voodoo shop" and took him. Garcia made drive, and they took the victim back to Napa, up to the lake. They drove the victim up to the "horse shoe" turn out by Lake Hennessey, and Garcia told Cortes to tie up the victim, and they would leave the victim behind. When got out of the truck and cut the rope to length, sees Garcia pointing a gun at the victim and orders to tie up the victim. After tied up the victim, Garcia was asking if Garcia should "kill him right there." told Garcia not to kill the victim. was asked what Garcia wanted from his now tied-up victim. said that Garcia was demanding money. was asked if Garcia had also been demanding guns from the victim. said that Garcia was also demanding that the victim`s wife and/or girlfriend drop off some money and two boxes of guns as "ransom." When asked who picked up the ransom money and guns, was evasive, but eventually admitted that it was and that was ordered to get the guns by Garcia. went on to describe some additional crimes that Garcia had committed that had been forced to participate NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250335) EDDLEMAN, KYLE Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 in, including a convoluted kidnapping, vehicle theft for ransom incident that occurred in Sonoma county involving Garcia`s ex-wife and another Hispanic male who they kidnapped up to Ukiah, stole his truck, then drove the truck back to Santa Rosa until he paid to get his truck back. At a later time, Garcia and had gotten into an argument and Garcia had threatened to kill led to calling Napa PD on Garcia and Garcia`s eventual arrest. was asked about Garcia`s behavior after he was released from NCDC, to which Garcia because he was tired of living in fear. parents, which said he had confronted then told me about a time when was with Garcia at the "voodoo shop" when Garcia was talking to a lady about Garcia killing an owner of a nearby taco stand. As far as knew, the taco stand owner was still alive. said he does not know anything about anyone having their hands cut off, it was the first he had ever heard of such a thing. then spoke about a time that he and Garcia went to one of Garcia`s girlfriend`s houses "up a mountain" where another man was present. Garcia then went to the house and went outside with this other man, and heard a gunshot. Garcia then came back and they left, but doesn`t know what happened to the other man from Garcia`s girlfriend`s house. said he does not know anyone named Reynaldo Pacheco Pacheco or know anything about a black Range Rover. gave additional statements regarding some acquaintances and associate for Garcia`s, as well as tried to describe Garcia`s girlfriend`s house. had not heard Garcia tell him about any murders or killings or specifically if Garcia had dumped any bodies anywhere. was then asked again about the kidnapping Garcia and he had committed in Rohnert Park, and confirmed that the victim was alive when he and Garcia left and assumes that the victim is still alive now, because a week after the kidnapping, the "voodoo lady" had told Garcia that the victim was scared because of the kidnapping. said that he had never talked to the "voodoo lady" and has only seen her 2 or 3 times. said that Garcia would talk to "voodoo lady" and Garcia would refer to her as "La Senora" and thinks that she is a "Boss" a "Patrona" and that if she wanted someone dead, she "could make it happen." At about this time the interview concluded and was placed under arrest by Rohnert Park police. RECOMMENDATION: Attach to original report. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250335) EDDLEMAN, KYLE Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Supplement Information Supplement Date Supplement Type Supplement Officer 04/17/2014 15:31:05 EVIDENCE (250335) EDDLEMAN, KYLE Contact Name Supervising Officer (250134) WILSON, JOEL 418 Supplement Notes Booked audio recording NSD14-001332 . Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250335) EDDLEMAN, KYLE Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Supplement Information Supplement Date Supplement Type Supplement Officer 07/29/2014 18:02:17 SUPPLEMENTAL (250335) EDDLEMAN, KYLE Contact Name Supervising Officer (250120) ORTIZ, OSCAR 418 Supplement Notes SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT: On 07/23/2014 I assisted with surveillance of involved parties in conjunction with a signed search warrant. Surveillance notes are summarized as follows: NSD14-001332 07/23/2014 - 07/24/2014 Surveillance Notes 0545 0600 0625 0630 0918 0931 0940 0941 1605 1617 1624 1625 1636 1644 1646 1846 1853 1854 1905 1907 1916 2030 2205 2343 2358 0029 0039 Agent Tijero saw Blue Acura, White pickup @ 14 Huntington Sgt. Greenberg, Agent Tijero, Agent Koford, Agent Cerna, Agent Ensley, Lt. Pitkin SET Agent Tijero saw walking with white plastic bag Agent Koford saw walking with white shirt, not bag Agent Tijero saw walk out to Blue Acura Agent Cerna, Lt. Pitkin, Agent Koford followed Blue Acura to Walgreens Agent Cerna saw back in Blue Acura 10-95 by NSO Det. Pacheco Agent Koford saw at Botanica Store Agent Koford saw Arias closing up Botanica Store Agent Tijero saw Whi Chev 2500 PK leave Botanica Store Agent Koford, Agent Tijero, saw go to Blue Acura and drive away w/b onto s/b 101 Agent Koford saw Blue Acura go to Jack-N-Box Agent Koford saw Blue Acura leave Jack-N-Box back towards 14 Huntington Agent Cerna saw Blue Acura parked in front of , into Agent Cerna saw Blue Acura away with Agent Ensley saw Blue Acura arrive Botanica Store out with bag, goes into Botanica Store Agent Ensley saw Bautista out, into Blue Acura, Blue Acura away Agent Tijero saw Blue Acura to Graton Casino Agent Ensley saw Blue Acura away Graton Casino back to Agent Koford saw Blue Acura Lt. Pitkin order Agent Tijero,Agent Koford,Agent Ensley,Det. Chambers,Det. Eddleman break Agent Cerna saw out for walk. Last seen W Ellis way to E. Washington. UTL Agent Cerna saw Blue Acura away from Sgt. Greenberg, Lt. Pitkin followed Blue Acura to Graton Casino then Safeway Sgt. Greenberg saw Blue Acura @ Safeway Agent Cerna saw Blue Acura arrive @ NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250335) EDDLEMAN, KYLE Case Summary Report Agency: NSD 0245 0245 0900 0953 0955 1002 1015 1027 1030 dogs Case Number:NSD14-001332 Lt. Pitkin order Agent Tijero, Agent Koford, Agent Ensley, Det. Chambers, Det. Eddleman back on station No activity until 0900 Sgt. Greenberg, Agent Cerna, Lt. Pitkin back on station Agent Ensley saw into Blue Acura Agent Koford saw Blue Acura away from to Shell Gas Agent Koford saw Blue Acura back to Agent Ensley saw Blue Acura leave to Walgreens Agent Ensley saw Blue Acura away from Walgreens Sgt. Greenberg, Agent Cerna saw Blue Acura @ Botanica Store, into Botanica Store with RECOMMENDATION: Attach to original report. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250335) EDDLEMAN, KYLE Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Supplement Information Supplement Date Supplement Type Supplement Officer 04/18/2014 10:42:53 SUPPLEMENTAL (250211) GREENBERG, RICKY Contact Name Supervising Officer (300313) PITKIN, GARY 418 Supplement Notes NSIB Surveillance Report on NSD14-1332 SUPPLEMENTAL: During the week of April 14, 2014, the Napa County Sheriff`s Department Investigations Division requested assistance from the Napa County Special Investigations Bureau (NSIB). NSIB was to establish surveillance on in the , the alleged residence of and her husband . Surveillance was also requested on a blue 2003 Acura sedan CA license plate . NSD Detective Pacheco advised me he had authored a search warrant for the placement of an electronic vehicle tracking device to be placed on the Acura, which was signed by a NSC Judge on 4/17/14. On 4/17/14 at approximately 0800 hours, NSIB Detective Pat Ensley conducted an operational briefing for the following NSIB personnel; Sgt. Rick Greenberg, Detectives, Bill McGlothern, Ricardo Cerna, Eric Koford, and Jose Tijero, In reference to the aforementioned surveillance. On the same date at approximately 0900 hours, Detective Tijero established surveillance on the blue Acura which was parked in close proximity of the residence. and on At approximately 0926 hours, Detective Tirjero observed a Hispanic male and female adult exit the front door of the residence. Detective Tijero positively identified the subjects as and , from a picture provided by the Napa County Investigations Division. entered the driver seat of the Acura and entered the passenger seat of the vehicle. was observed using a cane to assist him in walking. The vehicle left the area of the residence and traveled directly to southbound highway 101. Once on southbound highway 101 the vehicle made no stops prior to entering the parking lot of Kaiser Hospital in the City of San Rafael, 99 Montecillo Road. NSIB Detectives maintained visual surveillance of the vehicle at all times. I Sgt. Rick Greenberg observed the Acura park in the south east portion of the parking lot at approximately 1000 hours. Rodas and Arias exited the vehicle and entered the Kaiser Hospital. I then placed an electronic vehicle tracking device on the Acura. RECOMMENDATION: Attach to the original report. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250211) GREENBERG, Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Supplement Information Supplement Date Supplement Type Supplement Officer 04/08/2014 14:03:03 SUPPLEMENTAL (250133) HALLMAN, JOHN JR Contact Name Supervising Officer (250106) PACE, DOUG 418 Supplement Notes AWARENESS: On 4/08/14 at about 0900 hours, Detective Ackman gave me a NSO Technical Assistance Request form, copy of a search warrant and evidence Item #ND1 (Samsung SGH-M819N cellphone). INVESTIGATION: I took some digital photos of the cell phone, I used the Cellebrite Touch UFED device and conducted a logical extraction. I generated an HTML report from the results and put the report and digital pictures on two CDs. I gave one CD to Detective Dudley and booked the other one into the Sheriff`s Office Evidence Room. RECOMMENDATIONS: Case Pending NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250133) HALLMAN, JOHN Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Supplement Information Supplement Date Supplement Type Supplement Officer 04/08/2014 18:44:33 CELL PHONE/COMPUTER EXAM (250133) HALLMAN, JOHN JR Contact Name Supervising Officer (250106) PACE, DOUG 418 Supplement Notes AWARENESS: On 4/08/14 at about 1400 hours, Detective Pacheco gave me a Technical Assistance Request form, an Alcatel One Touch 5020N (Item #ND2) and told me that he had verbal consent from the owner of the phone to examine and perform an extraction. INVESTIGATION:I placed the phone into a Faraday box, changed the language to english and placed the phone into airplane mode. I connected the phone to the Cellebrite UFED Touch and performed a logical extraction of the phone. I used the Android v4.x GSM setting to connect to the phone. Once the extraction was complete, I generated an HTML report and placed it onto a CD. I also place evidence item pictures of the phone on the CD. I made three CDs with that data. I gave one to Detective Dudley, one to Agent A. Ortiz and booked one into the Sheriff`s Office Evidence along with the phone. RECOMMENDATIONS: Case Pending NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250133) HALLMAN, JOHN Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Supplement Information Supplement Date Supplement Type Supplement Officer 04/16/2014 15:17:29 CELL PHONE/COMPUTER EXAM (250133) HALLMAN, JOHN JR Contact Name Supervising Officer (250134) WILSON, JOEL 418 Supplement Notes I was assigned to assist Detective Dudley with the Napa County Sheriff`s Department with the examination of an Apple MacBook Air. I reviewed the Request for Technical Assistance form and the accompanying search warrant. I began my examination on 4/14/14. I used BlackBag Technologies MacQuisition 2014 R1 & BlackLight 2014 R1, a computer forensic software program, to complete my forensic examination. MacQuisition & BlackLight are based on law enforcement specifications and requirements. MacQuisition allows the forensic investigator to save an exact image of a disk to an evidence file. This image includes hidden and deleted files, and the data contained in unallocated disk space and partitions. Every file contains an exact, sector-by-sector copy of the hard drive or other media. The entire evidence file is verified using an MD-5 hash. The MD-5 hash is a 128bit (16byte) number that uniquely describes the contents of a file. Any changes to a file, however small, will drastically change the MD-5 hash. After the evidence file is created, the original media (suspect`s hard drive, etc) can be returned to secure storage. Any further analysis is completed on the evidence file created by MacQuisition and not the original media. The Blacklight program allows me to view standard and deleted files automatically, see fragments of information in the "slack space" (where bits of erased files reside until overwritten), and to "tag" files and file segments to come back to later or to save to another media for permanent storage of evidence. BlackLight allows me to view these files without changing the file contents or time stamps in anyway. I can also export any part of a file, any selected files, or even an entire folder or tree (folders, subfolders, and files) with ease. BlackLight also automates several tasks, such as identifying operating systems and user accounts, displaying internet browser histories and e-mail. ITEM #NV-32, Apple MacBook Air computer: Item #NV-32 is an Apple MacBook Air laptop computer (Model #A1466 (Ser#C02LPX3BF5V7) containing a 112.1 GB unknown brand hard drive. Acquisition: I used MacQuisition 2014 R1 to create a duplicate image of the hard drive from Item #NV-32 After the image was NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250133) HALLMAN, JOHN Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 created, it was retained for future needs and the Apple MacBook Air laptop computer was returned to Det. Verdeille to be booked into Napa Sheriff`s Department evidence. The system date matched the actual date, but the system time of 10:50:50 am (PDT) mismatched the actual time of 10:47:30 am (PDT). Image Files: I used the Media feature in BlackLight to view all image files on the computer. I located (11) images that may be related to this case. Documents: I did not locate any documents that appeared to be related to this case. Internet history and email: I located (4) Internet artifacts that may be related to this case. I located (2) emails that may be related to this case Both emails were relating to User Accounts: The installed operating system on this drive was Mac OSX (10.8.4). There was 1 user account used on the system: 1) The account Further Action: I contacted Detective Dudley and informed her of my findings. I provided Detective Dudley with a CD disc containing a copy of the report. **This evidence item was originally issued (2) item numbers (NV-32 & ND3)** That is why the report is numbered Item # ND3a. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250133) HALLMAN, JOHN Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Supplement Information Supplement Date Supplement Type Supplement Officer 04/22/2014 09:13:52 SUPPLEMENTAL (250133) HALLMAN, JOHN JR Contact Name Supervising Officer (250134) WILSON, JOEL 418 Supplement Notes This supplemental report is to add evidence item "NV-32" to the case. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250133) HALLMAN, JOHN Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Supplement Information Supplement Date Supplement Type Supplement Officer 04/22/2014 10:53:33 CELL PHONE/COMPUTER EXAM (250133) HALLMAN, JOHN JR Contact Name Supervising Officer (250134) WILSON, JOEL 418 Supplement Notes I was assigned to assist Detective Dudley of the Napa County Sheriff`s Department with the examination of a Toshiba laptop computer. I reviewed the Request for Assistance form and talked to her about the case. I authored a search warrant for the examination of the Toshiba laptop computer (Item#2CS). I began my examination on 4/15/14. I used EnCase v7.09, a computer forensic software program from Guidance Software, to complete my forensic examination. EnCase is based on law enforcement specifications and requirements. It reads all DOS and Windows hard disk and removable media, including FAT 32 drives and NTFS files, and allows the forensic investigator to save an exact image of a disk to an evidence file. This image includes hidden and deleted files, and the data contained in unallocated disk space and partitions. Every file contains an exact, sector-by-sector copy of the hard drive or other media. Every 32KB of data within this evidence file is verified using a 32bit CRC (cyclical redundancy checksum). The CRC compares two large, unique numbers to one another, to say for a certainty that the evidence file created matches exactly the files captured from the original media. The odds that two different strings produce the same CRC value are roughly 1 in 4 billion. In addition to the CRC, the entire evidence file is verified using an MD-5 hash. The MD-5 hash is a 128bit (16byte) number that uniquely describes the contents of a file. The MD-5 hash is a similar, but more robust, method to verify the evidence file than the CRC. Any changes to a file, however small, will drastically change the MD-5 hash. After the evidence file is created, the original media (suspect`s hard drive, etc) can be returned to secure storage. Any further analysis is completed on the evidence file created by Encase and not the original media. Throughout the examination process, EnCase verifies the integrity of the evidence file by recalculating the CRC and MD-5 hash values and comparing them with the values recorded at the time of acquisition. The EnCase program allows me to view standard and deleted files automatically, see fragments of information in the "slack space" (where bits of erased files reside until overwritten), and to "bookmark" files and file segments to come back to later or to save to another media for permanent storage of evidence. EnCase allows me to view these files without changing the file contents or time stamps in anyway. I can also export any part of a file, any selected files, or even an entire folder or tree (folders, subfolders, and files) with ease. If needed, the Encase program will allow restoration of an entire hard disk volume back to its original state. Encase also automates several tasks, such as identifying operating systems and user accounts, displaying internet browser histories and e-mail. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250133) HALLMAN, JOHN Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 ITEM # 2CS, computer: Item #2CS is a Toshiba laptop computer (Ser#5D029451Q) containing a 500 GB Toshiba brand hard drive (Ser#33EASQICS YN9 HDKEB03T3A02 S). Acquisition: I used a Tableau SATA hardware write blocking device to connect the hard drive from Item #2CS to my forensic computer. This write blocking device prevents any information from being written to or altered on the original hard drive. I used Encase to create a duplicate image of the hard drive from Item #2CS. After the image was created, the original hard drive was returned to the computer and the forensic image was retained for future needs. Image Files: I used the gallery feature in Encase to view all image files on the computer. I located (13) images in the user profile of "azucena" that may be related to this case. They were pictures of the victim, another subject and identification cards. I also located (9) images in the "RECYCLE.BIN" that may be related to this case. They were pictures of identification cards. Documents: I located (2) documents that appeared to be related to this case. One is a powerpoint presentation on the WCM777 group/business. The other is a document with information for wire transfers into a Bank of America account for WCM777. Internet history and email: I used EnCase to search for email, but it did not locate any. I used Magnet Forensics Internet Evidence Finder (version 6.3) to process the computer image for internet use with the following results: Parsed Search Queries- www.kingdom777.com, www.1and300.com, Google location " CA US", Google location Rebuilt Webpages- several webpages related to www.wcm777.hk , www.easy-hide-ip.com/ , a login page for the email NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250133) HALLMAN, JOHN Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Gmail Fragments- a login page for the email IE InPrivate/Recovery URLs- http://www.russianbrides.com/ User Accounts: I used the Case Analyzer feature in EnCase and obtained the following account and system info: The installed operating system on this drive was Windows 8, version 6.2, build 9200. The registry showed the computer`s registered owner was "azucena". The system was last shut down on 03/02/14 at 22:11:46 (PST). There were 5 user accounts used on the system: 1) The account "Default" did not display any logon information. 2) The account "Administrator" was last logged on to on 05/03/13 at 09:03:00 (PDT) 3) The account "azucena" was last logged on to on 03/24/14 at 10:48:42 (PDT) 4) The account "Guest" did not display any logon information 5) The account "Public" did not display any logon information Further Action: I contacted Detective Dudley and informed her of my findings. I provided Detective Dudley with a CD disc containing a copy of the report. I also booked a CD with a copy of the report into the Sheriffs Department Evidence Room with the computer itself. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250133) HALLMAN, JOHN Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Supplement Information Supplement Date Supplement Type Supplement Officer 05/01/2014 13:23:44 CELL PHONE/COMPUTER EXAM (250133) HALLMAN, JOHN JR Contact Name Supervising Officer (250134) WILSON, JOEL 418 Supplement Notes On April 16, 2014 Detective Pacheco requested my assistance with the search of a Huawei cell phone that had been seized during a 187 PC investigation. Detective Pacheco requested that I attempt to extract the call logs, contact list, text messages, images, emails and videos contained on the device. Item#1 CP Huawei M931 Cell Phone (serial# F4G2D91332605787) The device was contained in an evidence bag. On 4/16/14, I removed the device (item #1 CP) from the envelope and placed it into a radio frequency isolation chamber (Faraday Box). The Faraday Box prevents the device from connecting to the cell phone network or Wi-Fi and possibly changing data on the device. Once the device was inside the Faraday Box I turned the device on and found that it was locked with a swipe/pattern type lock. The phone was also requesting a user name and password to unlock the phone. I removed it from the Faraday Box. I removed the SIM card and used the Cellebrite UFED Touch device to extract the data on it. The SIM card showed to be a Metro PCS card with a phone number of " I also removed the Micro SD Card. I used the CelleBrite Physical Analyzer software (version 3.9.5) to extract data from the Micro SD Card. CelleBrite Audio: 437 Text: 51 Documents: 2 Images: 22452 Video:39 NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250133) HALLMAN, JOHN Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 The CelleBrite generated reports for item #1 CP were placed on a USB thumbdrive and booked it into the Sheriff`s Office Evidence Room. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250133) HALLMAN, JOHN Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Supplement Information Supplement Date Supplement Type Supplement Officer 04/09/2014 08:50:48 EVIDENCE COLLECTION (250363) HURTADO, NATHALIE Contact Name Supervising Officer (250134) WILSON, JOEL 418 Supplement Notes SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT: On 04/08/14, I went to Santa Rosa Police Department`s secured vehicle facility to process the jeep and the trailer that were at the scene of the standoff. They had been transferred to the secured vehicle facility by Santa Rosa PD. Evidence Specialist Brianne Breedlove and I processed the vehicles and I seized multiple items as evidence per a previously authored and signed search warrant. The items were transported back to NSO and booked into a secured drying room. On 04/09/14, I booked the evidence items NV-1 through NV-24 into the NSO evidence lockers. Items NV-25 through NV-31 were kept in the drying room until they could be processed and booked. On 04/23/14, I booked the clothing from the drying room into the NSO evidence lockers. EVIDENCE: Items taken as evidence booked into NSO evidence lockers under NV-1 through NV-31 RECOMMENDATION: Attach to original report NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250363) HURTADO, Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Supplement Information Supplement Date Supplement Type Supplement Officer 04/22/2014 15:11:29 SUPPLEMENTAL (250363) HURTADO, NATHALIE Contact Name Supervising Officer (250134) WILSON, JOEL 418 Supplement Notes SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT: 04/03/14, Det. Nicol Dudley asked me and Evidence Specialist Brianne Breedlove to respond to 237 Hoff Road in Santa Rosa, CA to process the scene. When we arrived, I spoke with Sgt. Dave Boettger from Santa Rosa Police Department. He informed me that his Field Evidence Technicians would be aiding in processing the scene; the lead Field Evidence Technician was Kris Capeheart. They both showed us around the scene. The trailer that was to be processed had been burned and still possessed a pungent aroma of gas. The Department of Justice responded and deemed the trailer safe for entry, but recommended that processing occur at a later time so the aroma had time to dissipate. Sgt. Boettger decided that the vehicles and the trailer at the scene would be towed to Santa Rosa Police Department`s secured vehicle facility for processing at a later time. Evidence Specialist Breedlove and I took photographs of the scene and I searched the residence and barn listed within the search warrant written by Det. Pacheco. I left a copy of the search warrant in the residence for the homeowner. After the scene in Santa Rosa, Det. Dudley called me and asked me and Evidence Specialist Breedlove to respond to 2470 Sage Canyon Road in Saint Helena, CA. She told me the victim Reynaldo Pacheco Pacheco had been discovered at that address and requested I aid Evidence Specialists and Technicians in processing of the scene. We arrived on scene and met with Evidence Specialist Donna Kimmel and Evidence Technician Jackie Shikowitz. I aided them in processing the scene. Please refer to their reports for Crime Scene reports. On 04/04/14, I went to Sonoma County Sheriff`s Department and picked up surveillance video that Detective Joseph Horsman had left for me at the front desk. The surveillance video was for two separate Big 5 stores, one in Petaluma and one in Santa Rosa. I later booked those into NSO evidence. I reviewed the videos and noted the following. On 03/24/14 at approximately 1211 hours, two Hispanic males entered the Big 5 in Petaluma. One was wearing a white T-shirt and the other a dark colored long sleeved shirt with a stripe across the middle. The males appeared to be Miguel Garcia and Mauricio Tovar. They went to the ammunition section and waited to be helped. A gentleman came to the counter, but they did not purchase any ammunition. The Rohnert Park video was dated 03/24/14 at approximately 1300 hours and showed the same two Hispanic males, Miguel Garcia and Mauricio Tovar, enter the store. The male who had been wearing a white T-shirt previously was wearing a different dark colored shirt. They went to the ammunition section and were able to purchase items. I received a copy of the receipt from Detective Horsman and had it attached to this report. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250363) HURTADO, Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Later, I authored a search warrant for Mauricio Tovar`s vehicle, a Chrysler 300. The vehicle had been seized by the Napa Police Department during the investigation of their case (NPD14-001854). It had been moved to the NSO secured vehicle bay to be processed pending a search warrant. I wrote the search warrant and on 04/07/14, the Honorable Judge Michael Williams signed the search warrant. I gave a copy to Evidence Technician Jackie Shikowitz so she could begin processing the vehicle. On 04/07/14, I went to the autopsy of Miguel Garcia. The autopsy was performed by Dr. Arnold Josselson with the Sonoma County Coroner`s Office. During the autopsy, I took overall photos of Garcia. I also witnessed as Dr. Josselson took DNA buccal swabs from the interior of Garcia`s cheeks. I later booked the swabs and photos into evidence. On 04/09/14, I picked up a computer and video surveillance from Detective Horsman with the Sonoma County Sheriff`s Department. The video surveillance was a better working copy of the Petaluma Big 5 video surveillance system, which I later booked into evidence. The computer I labeled as NV-32 and turned over to Detective Dudley. The computer was later booked as NV-32 by Detective Hallman. Detective Hallman provided me with a CD of the forensic examination of NV-22, a cell phone I had recovered in the trailer. I booked the CD as NV-22A. On 04/10/14, I picked up ATM video surveillance from the Bank of Marin in Napa, CA. I reviewed the video and observed the victim`s Range Rover drive through the bank parking lot. However, due to the glare of the sun, I was unable to make out any of the occupants. I booked the video into evidence. On 04/11/14, I authored a ping order for Norberto Guerrero Gonzalez`s phone. The court order was signed by the Honorable Judge Michael Williams at 1432 hours. I sent the court order to Metro PCS and then contacted a representative to begin the ping. I was told that the phone number was no longer active and was cancelled in November 2013. Gonzalez had reported this to be his cell phone number during a probation visit in March 2014. On 04/23/14, I filed the court "ping" order with the court. I also composed a search warrant return for the Chrysler 300 vehicle. The Honorable Judge Francesca Tisher signed the return. The search warrant and return were filed with the court. EVIDENCE: NV-22A: CD of forensic examination of NV-22 NV-33: Big 5 Petaluma surveillance NV-34: Big 5 Rohnert Park surveillance NV-35: Big 5 Petaluma surveillance - working version NV-36: Bank of Marin surveillance NV-37: Buccal swabs from Miguel Garcia NV-38: Autopsy photos for Miguel Garcia RECOMMENDATION: NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250363) HURTADO, Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Attach to original report NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250363) HURTADO, Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Supplement Information Supplement Date Supplement Type Supplement Officer 04/25/2014 15:16:43 SUPPLEMENTAL (250363) HURTADO, NATHALIE Contact Name Supervising Officer PLANCARTE, ESPERANZA (250120) ORTIZ, OSCAR 418 Supplement Notes SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT INTERVIEW WITH On 04/24/14 at approximately 1800 hours, Detective Eddleman and I spoke with Norberto Gonzalez`s girlfriend, . The interview was audio recorded. Approximately six minutes into the interview, my recorder died. I replaced the battery, turned the recorder back on, and resumed the interview. The interview was approximately two hours and was very hesitant about telling the truth. The following is a summary of the two hour interview. During the interview, she will refer to Mauricio Tovar as "Cole" and will refer to Norberto as "Berto" and "Luis." A full copy is booked into the evidence lockers at the Napa County Sheriff`s Department. She told me the following in summary: She met Norberto (whom she also knows as Luis) over a year ago at a party. They were friends first and then started dating. They started living together 5 months ago at the apartment on Laurel Street. She said their relationship wasn`t very good because he didn`t work, he wasn`t responsible, and he was using drugs. He told her that he wasn`t using, but she found out that he was still using drugs. I asked her if there was any time in the past month that Norberto was acting strange. She said about a month ago he went with his friends and took out money. I told her to tell me everything Norberto told her. She said he went with his friends and returned home an hour later. asked him where he went and he said he went with his friend to 7-11 and used his friend`s credit card to withdraw money. He then gave the money to his friend because Norberto owed his friend money. said Norberto received a call from his friend on a Tuesday around 230pm. Then he left to go meet his friend. She texted him to find out where he was and he said he would be back. He then came home an hour later. Before coming home, he stopped and bought a drink and a lottery ticket. When he got back he told about going to 7-11 and using his friend`s credit card to take money out. said when Norberto got back he was scared because he didn`t know if the credit card he used was his friend`s credit card. She said he was confused as to whose card he used. I showed a picture of Miguel Garcia. She said she had never seen him in person, but she had seen him in the newspaper. I then showed her a picture of Mauricio Tovar; she said she had seen him around and knows him by his nickname, "Cole." She said he drives a khaki or pearl colored Chrysler. Mauricio and Norberto know each other from NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250363) HURTADO, Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 working in the fields. Norberto owed Mauricio $300 and that`s the money he took out of 7-11 and gave to Mauricio. When Norberto first left the apartment, he said he was meeting a friend. She didn`t know until he got back that he met with Mauricio. I told I believed she knew more than what she was telling us. She then said that Norberto was with Mauricio and another guy, but she didn`t know who the other guy was. She again claimed Norberto went to 7-11 with Mauricio and another guy and Norberto took out money with a credit card. Norberto was then dropped off at the gas station next to the apartment. He was gone for one hour and only made one stop at 7-11 on First Street. She said about fifteen minutes after Norberto left, she texted him to find out where he was. He didn`t respond because his phone was dead. After she texted him, he returned an hour later. He was quiet for a little bit and then started telling about where he had been. He was worried because he didn`t know who the credit card belonged to. She said he has been worried about everything until police came and arrested him at the apartment. He regretted going with Mauricio and taking out the money. One day, looked in the newspaper and saw Mauricio was in jail. Norberto started worrying that Mauricio was arrested. He was worried Mauricio would say something about the money and Norberto would get caught. She said Norberto was having trouble sleeping and eating and was very, very worried. claimed that all the worry was because of the credit card and the money. said she read in the newspaper that "the other guy" (Miguel Garcia) and Mauricio killed some guy. When she and Norberto saw Miguel`s picture in the newspaper, Norberto told her that Miguel and Mauricio were the ones who picked him up the day he used the credit card at 7-11. Norberto told her he was worried because he thought maybe he used the victim`s (Reynaldo Pacheco) credit card. She said Norberto guessed Mauricio and Miguel killed Reynaldo after they dropped off Norberto. Norberto had seen Mauricio and Miguel around town together before. then claimed she has seen Miguel one time before. She and Norberto were riding bikes from Wal-Mart and she saw Miguel from a distance, but has never met him. When she saw Miguel, he was with Mauricio. We asked why Norberto would think that Miguel and Mauricio were together and killed Reynaldo on the same day that Norberto had taken money out at 7-11. She said because the newspaper said the last day the victim called someone was the same day Norberto had gone with them to 7-11. Also, the 7-11 video was taken at 230pm and then the victim made his last phone call at 240pm. I told her, based on that timing, Norberto would`ve been with the victim at the time of the phone call. She said, "probably." Norberto told the "truck" he was picked up in did not belong to Mauricio or Miguel. Norberto said the "truck" was a Land Rover. When Norberto saw Reynaldo`s picture in the paper, he thought maybe the Land Rover belonged to Reynaldo, along with the credit card he used at 7-11. He knew the truck and card did not belong to Mauricio, but to some unknown person. said maybe Norberto was in the car the same time Reynaldo was. I confronted her and told her that was what Norberto told her; she said yes. I asked her if Norberto told her that he was in the car with Mauricio, Miguel and Reynaldo; she said yes. Norberto told that he saw Reynaldo when he was alive in the Land Rover. Norberto knew the credit card belonged to Reynaldo. He told her he knew that Mauricio and Miguel "killed the guy" (Reynaldo). I told I knew Norberto was gone a lot longer then what she was telling me. I believed that he left at 230pm, but I did not believe that he returned an hour later. admitted he came back around 5pm. I told her she knew more about where he went. She said that she couldn`t contact Norberto when he was gone because he was in a place with no service, but didn`t know where. I told her I knew she knew where he was and she should tell me; she said he NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250363) HURTADO, Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 told her he was at Lake Berryessa. After several different versions of the "truth", finally told the full version of what Norberto had confessed to her. When he first got home the day Reynaldo was killed, all he told her was he went to 7-11 and took money out using a credit card Mauricio had given him. Once Miguel`s picture showed up in the newspaper, Norberto confessed everything to her. Norberto received a phone call and said he had to go with some friends. He told her when he was picked up, Mauricio, Miguel and Reynaldo were already all in the car. The car that they were in was a Land Rover that belonged to Reynaldo. They all drove to 7-11 and Norberto took money out using Reynaldo`s credit card. They then went up to Lake Berryessa. Norberto told her when they got there, Mauricio and Miguel tied up Reynaldo with a rope. Norberto said he did not kill Reynaldo because he wouldn`t be able to do that. She said Norberto told her he stayed in the car while Mauricio and Miguel left Reynaldo by the lake. Norberto told her "these two (Mauricio and Miguel) went and killed the guy." Norberto said Miguel and Mauricio left the car and Norberto stayed in the car while they killed him (Reynaldo). Norberto did not say anything about how Reynaldo was killed. Norberto told her he knew Miguel and Mauricio had killed Reynaldo because he (Norberto) was there. He knew at the time he was at Lake Berryessa that Reynaldo was killed, but he did not tell until he saw Miguel`s picture in the newspaper. Norberto told that his involvement in the whole thing was how he was supposed to work off his "debt" to Mauricio. I clarified with said yes. that Norberto told her he knew Reynaldo was dead when they all left Lake Berryessa and she EVIDENCE: NV-39: Audio interview with RECOMMENDATION: Attach to original report Forward to Napa County District Attorney`s Office for review NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250363) HURTADO, Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Supplement Information Supplement Date Supplement Type Supplement Officer 07/25/2014 17:24:12 EVIDENCE COLLECTION (250363) HURTADO, NATHALIE Contact Name Supervising Officer (250120) ORTIZ, OSCAR 418 Supplement Notes SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT: On 07/23/14, I served a search warrant at . NSO SWAT was the first on scene to clear the house and make it safe for a search team to enter. They had a key for the residence provided to law enforcement by the homeowner . She claimed no one was inside the residence except for her small dogs. NSO SWAT member Osvaldo Hernandez provided Knock Notice at approximately 1016 hours. At approximately 1017 hours, with no answer coming from inside, entry was made and the residence was cleared. There was no one inside. The residence was turned over to me and the search team for the search. I was informed by NSO SWAT leader Sgt. Cullen Dodd that the wooden side gate was damaged upon entry into the backyard and the door to the storage shed was damaged as SWAT gained entry. I took photographs of the residence, including the damaged areas pointed out to me by NSO SWAT, before the team began searching. Each member of the search team was provided a copy of the search warrant so they understood what they were searching for. During the search, one of the artifacts in the backyard storage shed was unintentionally broken. I seized the following items from the residence per the search warrant. Photos were taken of each item in their location of discovery: 1.Miscellaneous indicia/documents from the storage shed with Miguel Garcia`s name 2.Blue Binder from the living room 3.Box of Remington 22 caliber ammunition from the front bedroom closet 4.Paperwork from the middle bedroom pertaining to business 777 5.Miscellaneous indicia/documents from the living room showing residency for After the search was completed, I took pictures of the residence. I left a copy of the search warrant and a property receipt. The residence was secured and the key returned to NSO Detective Dudley at Rohnert Park PD. On 07/24/14, Detective Dudley looked through the evidence items. I also gave her a CD copy of the photos I took at the residence during the search warrant. On 07/25/14, I took photographs of the evidence items, specifically the binder with Miguel Garcia`s name inscribed inside. I also took photos of the binder from the living room. Inside the binder was a list of names in the form of a NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250363) HURTADO, Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 hierarchy listing people as protectors, secretaries, etc. I booked all evidence items into the evidence lockers at NSO. EVIDENCE: NV-40: Red Binder/documents from storage shed NV-41: Blue Binder from the living room NV-42: Box of Remington 22 caliber ammunition NV-43: Paperwork from the middle bedroom pertaining to business 777 NV-44: Miscellaneous indicia/documents from living room showing residency for NV-45: CD of photos taken during the search warrant NV-46: CD of photos taken of evidence items RECOMMENDATION: Attach to original report NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250363) HURTADO, Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Supplement Information Supplement Date Supplement Type Supplement Officer 11/14/2014 15:28:09 WITNESS STATEMENT (250363) HURTADO, NATHALIE Contact Name Supervising Officer RODAS, ROQUEFELER J (250120) ORTIZ, OSCAR 418 Supplement Notes INTERVIEW OF SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT: AT PETALUMA POLICE DEPARTMENT On 11/11/14 at approximately 1036 hours, Det. Chambers and I spoke with at the Petaluma Police Department. We spoke in an interview room located in the front lobby. The door was unlocked and I told he was not under arrest and he was free to leave at any time. I asked him what he had planned for the rest of the day; he said he was going to open their store later in the day. The following is a short summary of our interview, which was audio recorded: We spoke with for a while about his family and what his life has been like since our last interview. He said his stepson moved out of the home and it was just him and living in the house now. We spoke about Kingdom 777. said they were supposed to make money off of it but ultimately ended up losing 6-8 thousand dollars. invested 3-4 thousand of their own money and then reinvested any "returns" back into the company. both believed, and still believe, that they are going to get their money back. said he and weren`t really concerned about the money loss because they have invested in things before that didn`t work out. He claimed he and his wife spent a lot of money a few years ago trying to have a child so losing 6-8 thousand dollars wasn`t a big deal. I told we were investigating the murder of Reynaldo Pacheco. said he first met Reynaldo when he came into the store to talk to them about Kingdom 777. He came in a few times to convince them to invest and they eventually did. He said got involved through Reynaldo and another man named I asked if he and spoke about the case since their last contact with us in July. He said they never spoke about it at all. He claimed had heart problems and he didn`t want to cause her any problems and ask her questions. I told to tell me about claim to Detectives that she was kidnapped. said he didn`t know anything about that; he had no emotional reaction to the information I had just given him and he did not appear concerned that she was kidnapped. He said never spoke to him about a kidnapping. I asked how he knew Miguel Garcia. He said Garcia would come into the store and buy religious stuff once a week. and knew Garcia for about 6-8 months. Roque said he did not know a man named Mauricio Tovar. I asked why would say Garcia and Tovar kidnapped her; he said he didn`t know and would have to ask her. We asked if ever mentioned to him that she was afraid of Miguel; said no. We told that we knew met with Miguel and Mauricio in Vallejo after Reynaldo was murdered. We also told him we knew that he was there. said he remembered being with when they went to Vallejo. He said was going to meet Miguel, but he never saw Miguel. said he parked there and got out of the car. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250363) HURTADO, Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case NumbeerSDl4-001332 said he didnsee anyone. He guessed it was in the afternoon when this happened. approximately 4 or 5pm.- said they would meet people a lot to drop things off from the store. However. he said the meeting in Vallejo was a one-time thing and it was to meet Miguel. When- and- met Miguel. saw she had a bag with her and he said it was stuff from the botanica. He didn?t actually see what was in the bag; told him it was stuff from the botanica store. got out of the car. but- didn?t see who she met. When she got back in the car. he didn?t see that she had anything with her that he hadn?t seen before. I confronted- about the fact a witness had seen Miguel get in the car with them. denied that ever happened. He said just he and- left together. Throughout oru? interview. - admitted he was in the vehicle in Vallejo when- met Miguel 011 the day Reynaldo Pacheco was killed. He claimed he never saw Miguel or got out of the car himself. He also said- gave Miguel a bag with items from the botMca store. He also claimed that he and his wife never spoke about anything after the search warrant was conducted at their house. He claimed he didn?t want to distru?b his wife by asking her what was going on and why police were contacting them. Dru?ing oru? conversation. - showed little to no emotion or reaction to any of the information we gave him. He never heard- say she was afraid of Miguel or Maruicio and never heard her talk about any kidnapping. EVIDENCE: NV-46: Interview with RECOMMENDATION: Attach to original report NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETVVILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 HURTADO, Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Supplement Information Supplement Date Supplement Type Supplement Officer 04/10/2014 11:39:39 SUPPLEMENTAL (12987) JARAMILLO, ALICE Contact Name Supervising Officer (11266) FREY, MIKE 418 Supplement Notes On Thursday, April 3, 2014, I responded to a briefing for the Major Crimes Task Force at the Napa County Sheriff`s Office. I was eventually teamed up with Officer Carolina Weiger from Calistoga Police Department. We were tasked with canvassing the apartment complex on Cooper Court. We were given a photograph of Miguel Garcia-Marron to show residents and inquire about any relationships the residents may have had with him and history of residences. Officer Weiger and I split making the contacts and the following are the results of my contacts: lived in the apartment directly below the subject`s apartment. He stated he had had a confrontation with the subject in the photograph in regards to noise coming from the upstairs apartment. He stated the male subject verbally abused him and tried engaging him in a fight which he did not pursue. He stated after he complained to the manager, the subject avoided him and they did not have any other confrontations. Shortly after, the family suddenly and quickly moved out. I asked if he ever saw the subject with weapons and he stated he did not. I asked about any suspicious activity and he stated he did not observe any. This juvenile stated he recognized the photograph as a subject who had lived in the apartment complex but he did not talk to the subject and had no further information. (Refused to provide any further contact info) She stated she recognized the subject in the photograph as one who lived across the way from her family. She was cordial to his wife and exchanged greetings but did not speak to him and had no information on their whereabouts. She NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(12987) JARAMILLO, ALICE Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 was very reluctant to provide her name or any identifying information. He stated he did not recognize the subject in the photograph and could provide no information. This juvenile was home alone at the time of the contact. He stated he recognized the subject in the photograph as a neighbor. He stated he was familiar with the subject`s children because he played with the son outside. He stated they moved but he did not know any more information. No answer at . No answer a He stated he did not recognize the subject in the photograph. I later learned from another resident that he lived in the same apartment as a good friend of the subject in the photograph. Neither recognized the subject in the photograph; however, were familiar with the search warrant that took place at his apartment because other tenants told them about the incident. Neither was home at the time it occurred. She recognized the subject in the photograph as someone who used to live in the apartment complex. She stated the family moved and she did not know where to. She stated that subject had a reputation in the complex and people were afraid of him. She stated her downstairs neighbor, , had had a confrontation with the subject in the past that involved a gun. She had no further information. I went back down to where I had contacted . I asked for and he had mother come outside. She stated that her son had been picked up by the police earlier in the day and had not returned. I confirmed that he was a subject being interviewed at the Sheriff`s Department. No answer at NSD14-001332 . Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(12987) JARAMILLO, ALICE Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Refer to Officer Weiger`s supplemental report for additional contacts. As we were leaving the complex, juveniles came up and stated that we should talk to subject we were looking for had moved to their cousin`s house. They described the home a large white house with a fence and gate in front of the St. John`s Church bell dome. because the moved to as Officer Weiger and I then drove over to that location and found a residence matching that description which was . We asked a female outside about talking to and she directed us through the gate and to an apartment in the rear of the residence. We made contact with a female who identified herself as . We identified ourselves as officers with Napa County law enforcement and asked if we could speak with her regarding the subject in question. She stated she had already spoken to Sonoma County and Petaluma law enforcement but would speak with us as well. She stated she was the subject`s girlfriend and had been helping law enforcement during the standoff the previous day. She stated they asked her to make phone contact with the subject and that is the last contact she had had with him. She stated that they had lived together off and on at the but she lost the apartment and had nowhere to live and was staying with her cousin. She stated that she and the subject had not been living together for some time but he would visit regularly and stay in contact. She stated that when they moved to the complex he became friends with who lived in the complex and his friend , unknown last, who lived on Laurel Street behind the Outlets. She stated that once he began hanging around these two he changed and started getting into trouble. She stated he used drugs and would disappear for several days at a time. She suspected he was involved with other women but he would deny it and she never actually confirmed that he was cheating. She stated that lately he would call her crying telling her he was depressed and afraid for her. He would tell her to be very careful but she did not know why he would say that. She did not know what he was fearful of and he never explained. She stated they mostly talked about missing each other. She stated that he always denied being involved with other women although she suspected he may have been cheating. She also stated that he once went to the Fresno area in regards to the sale or purchase of a vehicle. When he came back, he confided in her that the man he was meeting with in regards to the vehicle was shot and killed during the transaction and he had witnessed the murder. He told her this happened in December 2013 and the man`s name was . She stated he was upset about that. I asked if she knew where he was living during this time and most recently where he stayed. She stated she did not know other than he would stay with friends and hotels. He mostly hung around with . He was hanging around with Mauricio (identified as Mauricio Tovar-Telles, ) the last couple of weeks. She once visited him at the Motel 6 in Rohnert Park and thought he may have stayed at cheap hotels in the Petaluma area. She also stated he had previously stayed at the hotel on Silverado Trail. I asked if she knew how he paid for them. She stated he did not have money and believed paid for them because he was receiving unemployment benefits. was later identified as She stated she was considering moving back to Mendocino County because she had no resources here. I asked her to contact me and let me know if she did relocate so that we could continue to maintain contact. On Friday, April 4, 2014, I went to the Discovery Inn at 500 Silverado Trail, Napa. I spoke with . I explained that I was inquiring about Miguel Garcia Marron or were ever registered guests. stated it would be difficult to check because it would take a hand search to look for those names or NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(12987) JARAMILLO, ALICE Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 looking at the register for a specific date. I asked if she could check the month of March 2014. She hand searched the guest list and did not find either of those names as registered guests in March of 2014. She stated that they do not rent rooms unless the person has an ID. She stated it was not unusual for a male subject to rent a room under a female`s name if she was the only one with an ID and the male`s name would not be listed. I showed her photographs of both subjects and asked if she remembered either one ever being a guest. She stated she did not recognize either one. I then went to Motel 6, 6145 Commerce Blvd., Rohnert Park. I made contact with the manager . I explained that I had information that Miguel Garcia Marron had been a guest at the hotel and asked if she could check her registry. She stated that her employee, , is usually the night clerk and would most likely have better information. was working at the time I was there and she checked the guest registry for the last three months and found that Miguel Garcia had been a registered guest on 1-6-14. She also stated there was a connected room that was associated with him. That stay was registered to and stayed on 1-9-14. She recalled the guests paid cash for the rooms. She stated there were no notations in the computer related to any complaints or issues with those guests. I showed her photographs of Miguel Garcia and and asked if she recognized either one. She stated Miguel Garcia looked familiar and did recall him as a guest. also looked at the photographs and stated she recognized Miguel as well. I received two printouts of the room transactions for those two days. On Monday, April 7, 2014, myself, Officer Omar Salem, NDP, Officer Jose Pelaiz, NPD, and Officer Carolina Weiger, CPD, were sent to Kuleto Estate, 2470 Sage Canyon Road, St. Helena, to interview the vineyard workers. Upon arrival, we met with , winemaker for Kuleto Winery. arranged for the vineyard workers to be brought to a central location for interviewing. I spoke with the following individuals: I showed her photographs of Miguel Garcia and Mauricio Tovar and asked if she recognized either subject as having been employed at the vineyard. She stated she has worked at the vineyard for approximately five years and does not recall either one ever being employed there. I asked about temporary workers and she stated they normally do not employ temps; that most of the workers are long-term placements. I asked if she had heard anything about the pending investigation. She stated only what the vineyard manager had told them. She had not heard any workers talk about the incident otherwise. I showed him photographs of Miguel Garcia and Mauricio Tovar and asked if he recognized either subject as having been employed at the vineyard. He stated he did not recognize either one as ever working there. He stated he had worked there for approximately one year. I asked what he knew about the incident. He stated only what the vineyard manager had told them and nothing more. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(12987) JARAMILLO, ALICE Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 I showed him photographs of Miguel Garcia and Mauricio Tovar and asked if he recognized either subject as having been employed at the vineyard. He stated he has worked there for ten years and did not recognize either one as ever working there. I asked if the names sounded familiar or if he recognized the last names as being the same as another person previously employed there and he stated he did not recognized the names. I asked about temporary workers being hired and he stated that the usual practice is to hire family and/or friends of those already employed. I then spoke to , property owner. stated he also did not recognize the faces or the names of the two subjects in question as ever being employed there. He stated we should check with the winemaker and his staff as that is a different company than the vineyard workers are employed by. I asked what possible connection either one of these may have had to the property that would have given them the gate access code. He stated he did not know; but the gate code has been the same for the last 20 years. He stated there are many people that come and go from the property and there is no monitoring system for the gate as there is no electrical power at the gate that would allow for it. I then recontacted , winemaker. I also showed him the two photographs and asked if he recognized them as winery workers. He stated he did not recognize either one nor did he recognize the last names as anyone that ever worked there. He then asked , assistant manager, if she recognized the faces or names and she also did not. He then asked , cellar master , and he stated he also did not recognize either one nor the names as that of any prior or current employee. No further information at this time. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(12987) JARAMILLO, ALICE Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Supplement Information Supplement Date Supplement Type Supplement Officer 04/24/2014 12:37:16 EVIDENCE COLLECTION (250203) KIMMEL-LAKE, DONNA Contact Name Supervising Officer (250134) WILSON, JOEL 418 Supplement Notes Napa County Sheriff`s Office #NSD14001332 Evidence Laboratory #L140036B FIELD SERVICES REPORT: PROCESSING OF A HOMICIDE SCENE LOCATED NEAR SAGE CANYON ROAD IN NAPA: PRELIMINARY INFORMATION: On April 2, 2014, at approximetely 1:50 p.m., I received a telephone notification from Napa County Sheriff`s Office Investigations Sergeant Joel Wilson, that there may be a crime scene response request, originating from a previous scene involving a shooting into a vehicle from a Napa Police Department case. A search warrant had subsequently been served in regards to the vehicle shooting, and information was developed that led to the location of, and to a request to process a homicide scene. On April 2, 2014, at approximately 4:30 p.m., I was notified by Detective David Ackman, in person at the Evidence Laboratory, that Lieutenant Oscar Ortiz requested that Evidence Laboratory personnel be on "standby" for the processing of the homicide scene, upon the location of the scene site. On April 2, 2014, at approximately 4:45 p.m., I received a telephone call from Detective Nicol Dudley. Detective Dudley notified me that our assistance would be needed for the processing of a homicide scene when the site was located, and the search of a trailer as part of a seperate scene. I suggested that if the homicide scene were located tonight, due to the suspected location being an outdoor scene in possible rugged terrain, that the scene be held for processing until the following morning, as better lighting and visibility would be needed. Detective Dudley told me that she had requested a Napa Sheriff`s Office case number for the incident. Case number NSD14001332 had been assigned to this case. On April 2, 2014, at approximately 5:30 p.m., I received a telephone call from Lieutenant Oscar Ortiz. Lieutenant Ortiz told me that the search to locate the homicide scene was ocurring tonight, and that if it were located tonight, the scene would be secured, and held for processing to occur the following day. He also told me that I was released from "standby", and allowed to return to my residence for the night. On April 3, 2014, at approximately 8:15 a.m., Detective Nicol Dudley told me that the homicide scene had not yet been located. Detective Dudley also requested at this time , that Evidence Specialist Brianne Breedlove assist in the processing and search of a trailer involved in another aspect of this case, and a seperate scene. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250203) KIMMEL-LAKE, Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 On April 3, 2014, at approximately 10:30 a.m., I received telephonic notification from Lieutenant Oscar Ortiz, that a homicide scene had been located, and he requested that I respond to process the scene, upon writing and service of a search warrant. On April 3, 2014, at approximastely 11:50 a.m., I received a telephone call from Lieutenant Oscar Ortiz, giving me permission to proceed towards the St. Helena Police Department, to stage for entry into the crime scene. On April 3, 2014, at approximately 12:10 p.m., Evidence Technician Jacqueline Shikowitz and I, left the Napa County Sheriff`s Office, to proceed to the staging area. At this time, we also notified Coroner Investigator Mark Horvath, that we were proceeding to the staging location. On April 23, 2014, at approximately 1:10 p.m., Lieutenant Oscar Ortiz notified me by telephone, that I was directed to meet with Detective Nathalie Verdeille, and Evidence Specialist Brianne Breedlove, at a staging area located on Sage Canyon Road and Silverado Trail. A miscommunication occured regarding the location of the staging area. On April 3, at approximately 2:50 p.m., Jacqueline Shikowitz and I arrived at the scene location. Nathalie Verdeille and Brianne Breedlove arrived at approximately the same time. Present at the scene upon our arrival were Sergeant Mike Bartlett, and Sergeant Chris Carlisle. Sergeant Mike Bartlett maintained the Entry/Exit Log for the crime scene. For a detailed list of individuals present at the scene, refer to the Crime Scene Entry/Exit log. DESCRIPTION OF THE SCENE: General Area: The scene was located at the property as part of the Kuletto Winery, located at 2470 Sage Canyon Road, in St. Helena. The specific location of the scene on the winery property, was accessed by driving north on a private roadway, after entering the main gate to the winery on the north side of Sage Canyon Road. The private road is oriented in a northwest and southeast direction, and is narrow, but allows for travel in both directions. A turn-out area was located at the soft shoulder of the north side of the private road near the entrance to the scene location. This area was partly paved and some of the area consisted of exposed soil. The approximate odometer reading from the main gate of the winery at the north side of Sage Canyon Road to the location of the tree labelled as Tree "A" at the point at the furthest west edge of the turn-out area, was 8/10ths of a mile. This measurement was approximated and documented by Sergeant Chris Carlisle on April 4, 2014. The turn-out area had been cordoned off with barrier tape, at the north side of the private road, and also across an access route to the body site of the scene, prior to my arrival. The turn-out area had reportedly not been preserved or condoned off prior to Sergeant Bartlett`s arrival on scene. Items of possible evidentiary value located on the ground in the turn-out area included: A crumpled, silver colored foil apparent gum wrapper; an orange colored plastic beverage bottle cap; a white plastic straw/stick, and a tire tread impression in the soil. The tire tread impression appeared to be a "skid" type of mark, and was oriented in a west and east direction in the turnout area. The tire tread impression measured approximately 6 feet long, and 8 inches wide. The major area of the scene was located down a slight slope located to the north of the turn-out area and the roadway. A pathway was located from the roadway towards a creek to the north. The body of the victim was located partially submerged in the water of the creek. This pathway did not appear to have been recently cleared, but appeared to have NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250203) KIMMEL-LAKE, Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 been a pre-existing route to the creek. The pathway and the area surrounding and including the scene where the body was located, was comprised of soft soil, dried vegetation including grass, leaves, and vines, and fresh grass. The pathway and scene area was lined with vegetation including bushes and trees. Several bushes of Poison Oak" were prevalent in the area. The area of the pathway sloped downwards towards the north, at the west side it sloped upwards toward the west, and at the east side it sloped downwards towards the east. The creek is oriented in a northwest and southeast direction in the scene. The flow of the water of the creek is downwards from the west towards the east. The width of the creek in the general area of the body location, measured approximately 17 feet. A large boulder that partially hung over the creek in the area where the body was foound, was located on the north edge of the bank. Numerous gray and brown colored rocks and small boulders were present in the area of the scene and creek, as well as in the water flow area/bed of the creek. A body of an adult male victim was located in the water of the creek. The water level to the body at the time of the processing of the scene, reached just above the victim`s nose. The victim appeared to be in a seated position with the hands behind the back. The victim`s body was facing towards the southeast. A large gaping wound was visible in the top of the victim`s head. A pile of brush was located at the north and back side of the body in the creek. This brush pile consisted of dried vegetation, soil, and rocks. This brush pile appeared to have been formed from the flow of the water of the creek, and appeared to be an aged "wash" pile, due to the dried vegetation, and an embedded root system. Two large rocks were present on the surface of the brush pile, and leaning against the vicitm`s upper torso region. These rocks may have originated from an impression area in the soil at the edge of the south bank of the creek. The body of the victim was not tangled in the brush pile, and appeared to have floated against the pile. Another apparently aged brush/"wash" pile was located towards the west and south of the vicitim`s body. A decomposing white and orange colored material that appeared to be an old vinyl tarp, was tangled within the dried vegetation of the pile. This aged tarp did not appear to be of evidentiary value to the scene. Sergeant Carlisle located an apparent recent divot/impression in the soil at the south edge of the creek, near the location of the victim`s body. It appeared that a small boulder, or boulders had recently been removed from this spot. It should be considered that the two large rocks that were located near the body of the victim, had originated from this impression area. It is possible that the two rocks near the body, had originally been one rock when in place in the soil where the impression was located, prior to removal from the soil. Items of possible evidentiary value located at the body site area of the scene included: An "upper" rock located on the brush pile at the west side of the victim`s body; a "lower" rock located on the brush pile at the west side of the victim`s body (this "lower" rock was positioned resting against the victim`s right upper back); a piece of black electrical-type of tape measuring approximately 7 inches in length and a brown colored circular-shaped cardboard apparent "tape roll center" measuring approximately 2 1/4 inches in diameter, located on the ground south of the creek and the body of the victim. There were no prints or impressions located in the soil at the creek area of the scene. List Of Evidence Items And Designated Placard Numbers: Placard #1: Placard #2: Placard #3: Placard #4: Placard #5: NSD14-001332 Silver colored foil apparent gum wrapper. Orange colored plastic beverage container lid. White plastic straw/stick. Tire tread impression in soil. Victim`s body in the creek. Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250203) KIMMEL-LAKE, Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Placard #6: Placard #7: Placard #8: Placard #9: Case Number:NSD14-001332 Two large rocks on the brush/"wash" pile. Divot area in the soil at the south side of the creek edge. Apparent piece of black electrical-type of tape. Circular-shaped cardboard core from an apparent roll of electrical-type of tape. DOCUMENTATION OF THE SCENE: Jacqueline Shikowitz took overall photographs of the area of the scene, items of evidence and areas of relevance. She also took medium, and close-view photographs, both with and without a photographic scale in place, to document the items of evidence and areas of relevance in the scene. Chris Carlisle also assisted with the photography of the placement of the victim`s body in the water. I prepared a "rough sketch" of the turn-out area at the north side of the private roadway, to demonstrate the approximate location of the items of evidence present in that area (labelled as #1 through #4 with evidence placards). I also prepared a "rough sketch" to demonstrate the approximate positioning of the victim`s body in the water of the creek. Brianne Breedlove prepared a "rough sketch" of the turn-out area at the north side of the private roadway, to demonstrate the approximate location of the items of evidence present in that area (labelled as #1 through #4 with evidence placards); a "rough sketch" of the scene site at the creek, to demonstrate the approximate location of the victim`s body (labelled as #5 with an evidence placard), and the items of evidence present in that area (labelled as #6 through #9 with evidence placards); and a "rough sketch" to demonstrate the approximate positioning of the victim`s body in the water of the creek. Measurements were collected and recorded by Brianne Breedlove, to demonstrate the location of the items of evidence and areas of relevance at the scene. Jacqueline Shikowitz andf Chris Carlisle assisted with the collection of the measurements for the sketches. I measured the tire tread impression in the soil of the turn-out area, to be approximately 6 feet long, and 8 inches wide. Detective Nathalie Verdeille measured the distance from the north edge of the private roadway at the turnout area to the south edge of the creek approximately across from the victim`s body. This distance measured to be approximately 717 feet 10 inches. I measured the divot/impression in the soil at the south edge of the creek. This impression area measured approximately 3 inches deep, in greatest diameter from west to east, approximately 1 foot 3 inches; and greatest diameter from north to south, approximately 1 foot 1.5 inches. The ambient temperature of the scene site, at the time and date of processing, was recorded as being 59 degrees Fahrenheit. I measured the approximate temperature of the creek water at the east side of and near the victim`s body, to be 59 degrees Fahrenheit. The depth of the water at the east side of the victim`s body measured approximately 2 feet 2 inches. EVIDENCE COLLECTION AT THE SCENE: The crumpled silver-colored foil apparent gum wrapper (# placard #1), the orange colored plastic beverage cap (# placard #2), and the white plastic straw/stick (# placard #3), were collected from the ground at the turnout area at the north side of the private roadway, south of the scene site. The items were collected by Jacqueline Shikowitz, and transferred to me at the scene. I collected a vegetation standard, and a soil standard, from the ground at the turnout area. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250203) KIMMEL-LAKE, Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 The tire tread impression (# placard #4) in the soil of the turnout area, was photographed and diagrammed, but did not contain sufficient detail for casting. The body of the victim (# placard #5) was recovered from the scene by Coroner Investigator Mark Horvath. The "upper" rock from the brush pile at the west side of the victim`s body (# placard #6), the "lower" rock from the brush pile against the right upper back and at the west side of the victim`s body (also # placard #6), and a brush vegetation/debris standard from the brush pile at the west side of the victim`s body, was collected by Chris Carlisle, and transferred to me at the scene. Nathalie Verdeille assisted with the collection of the two rocks. There were no visible apparent bloodstains located on the two rocks. I poured dental stone casting material into the divot area in the soil at the south side of the creek edge (# placard #7), to approximately demonstrate the size of the impression in the soil. The cast was allowed to dry, and collected by Chris Carlisle on April 4, 2014. Chris Carlisle transferred the cast to me at the Evidence Laboratory. The piece of black electrical-type of tape (# placard #8), and the cardboard apparent "tape roll center" (# placard #9), were collected from the ground at the south side of the creek, by Brianne Breedlove, and transferred to me at the scene. I collected a vegetation standard, and a soil standard, from the ground near the bank, at the south side of the creek. I collected a water standard from the creek, at the east side of the victim`s body. Sergeant Chris Carlisle searched the creek banks and bed area, at a distance measuring approximately 100 yards from the body towards the west, and approximately 100 yards from the body towards the east. No additional items of evidentiary value were located or collected during this search. COMPLETION OF PROCESSING OF THE SCENE: Detective Nicol Dudley, accompanied by Coroner Sergeant Chris Perry, and Coroner Investigators Mark Horvath and Jay Jones, entered the scene at approximately 5:00 p.m. At approximately 5:15 p.m., Coroner Investigator Mark Horvath used an underwater camera to digitally record the recovery of the victim`s body, beneath the surface of the water. Coroner Investigator Mark Horvath also recovered the victim`s body from the water, as part of his role as a member of the Napa County Sheriff`s Office Dive Team, as well as his role as a Coroner Investigator. With the use of the underwater camera, we were able to visualize that the victim was clothed in a light blue or green colored long-sleeved shirt; black or green colored pants with a brown colored belt about the waist; and brown colored shoes. It appeared that there was a white t-shirt style of shirt around the victim`s mouth and neck, and that there was a major gash-type of wound to the right side of the victim`s forehead. Upon removal of the body from the water, it appeared that the friction ridge detail skin had began to loosen on the victim`s hands, and that there were no insects present on the body. Coroner Sergeant Chris Perry searched the victim`s clothing pockets. The victim`s body was placed inside of a blue colored plastic body bag, and the zipper sealed with lock #09125, by Chris Carlisle, at approximately 5:24 p.m. Coroner Investigator Mark Horvath assigned Coroner`s case #C14-194, to the victim. The body of the victim was removed from the scene at approximately 5:30 p.m. Upon completion of processing, all crime scene processing personnel left the scene site at the creek, at approximately NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250203) KIMMEL-LAKE, Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 5:35 p.m. Jacqueline Shikowitz and I left the turn-out area of the scene at approximately 5:55 p.m. EVIDENCE EXAMINATION AND COLLECTION AT THE EVIDENCE LABORATORY: The following items of evidence were examined in the Evidence Laboratory on April 15, 2014, at approximately 11:40 a.m. Item #DKB-7A: "Upper" rock: Photos taken. This rock measured 9.5 inches in greatest length, 6.5 inches in greatest width, one end measured 1.75 inches in greatest height, and the other end measured 4 inches in greatest height. Measurements are approximate. The rock was visually examined. No apparent bloodstains or trace evidence were collected from this rock. Item #DKB-7B: "Lower" rock: Photos taken. This rock measured 9.5 inches in greatest length, 6.5 inches in greatest width, one end measured 4 inches in greatest height, and the other end measured 5.5 inches in greatest height. Measurements are approximate. During the examination of the "lower" rock (Evidence Item #DKB-7B), in the Evidence Laboratory, I located and collected several medium length dark colored hairs, from the butcher paper placed beneath the rock. These hairs were packaged seperately, and labelled as Item #DKB-7B(1). Upon visual examination, no apparent bloodstains were located on this rock. Item #DKB-8: Electrical tape. Photos Taken. No additional items of evidence were collected from the tape at this time. Item #DKB-9: Cardboard apparent "tape roll core". Photos taken. No additional items of evidence were collected from the cardboard at this time. Item #DKB-14: Dental stone cast of the divot inthe soil. Photos taken. DESCRIPTION OF EVIDENCE COLLECTED: Item #DKB-1: One crumpled, silver colored foil, apparent gum wrapper (# placard 1), collected from the turn-out area at the north side of the private road south from the scene-2740 Sage Canyon Road. Collected by Jacqueline Shikowitz, and transferred to Donna Kimmel-Lake, on 04/03/2014, at approximately 3:20 p.m. Item #DKB-2: One orange colored plastic beverage cap (# placard 2), collected from the turn-out area at the north side of the private road south from the scene-2740 Sage Canyon Road. Collected by Jacqueline Shikowitz, and transferred to Donna Kimmel-Lake, on 04/03/2014, at approximately 3:23 p.m. Item #DKB-3: One 2 9/16" long, white colored plastic straw/stick (# placard 3), collected from the turn-out area at the north side of the private road south from the scene-2740 Sage Canyon Road. Collected by Jacqueline Shikowitz, and transferred to Donna Kimmel-Lake, on 04/03/2014, at approximately 3:25 p.m. Item #DKB-4: Vegetation standard, collected from the ground in the turn-out area at the north side of the private road south from the scene-2740 Sage Canyon Road. Collected by Donna Kimmel-Lake, on 04/03/2014, at approximately 3:20 p.m. Item #DKB-5: Soil standard, collected from the ground in the turn-out area at the north side of the private road south NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250203) KIMMEL-LAKE, Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 from the scene-2740 Sage Canyon Road. Collected by Donna Kimmel-Lake, on 04/03/2014, at approximately 3:23 p.m. Item #DKB-6: Water standard, collected from the creek near the east side of the victim`s body at the scene-2740 Sage Canyon Road. Collected by Donna Kimmel-Lake, on 04/03/2014, at approximately 3:55 p.m. Item #DKB-7A: Upper rock (# placard 6), collected from the brush/debris pile at the west side of the victim`s body in the creek at the scene-2740 Sage Canyon Road. Collected by Sergeant Chris Carlisle, and transferred to Donna Kimmel-Lake, on 04/03/2014, at approximately 4:15 p.m. Item #DKB-7B: Lower rock (# placard 6), collected from the brush/debris pile against the right side of the upper back of the victim`s body, at the west side of the victim`s body in the creek at the scene-2740 Sage Canyon Road. Collected by Sergeant Chris Carlisle, and transferred to Donna Kimmel-Lake, on 04/03/2014, at approximately 4:20 p.m. Item #DKB-7B(1): Several medium length, dark colored hairs, collected from the butcher paper beneath the lower rock (Item #DKB-7B). Collected by Donna Kimmel-Lake, on 04/15/2014, at approximately 12:40 p.m. Item #DKB-8: One approximately 7" long piece of black electrical-type of tape (# placard 8), collected from the ground south of the creek near the victim`s body at the scene-2740 Sage Canyon Road. Collected by Brianne Breedlove, and transferred to Donna Kimmel-Lake, on 04/03/2014, at approximately 4:25 p.m. Item #DKB-9: One 2 1/4" approximate diameter, brown colored, cardboard tape roll center, "Tartan Brand-Black Vinyl Tape" on the inside of the roll (# placard 9), collected from the ground south of the creek near the victim`s body at the scene-2740 Sage Canyon Road. Collected by Brianne Breedlove, and transferred to Donna Kimmel-Lake, on 04/03/2014, at approximately 4:26 p.m. Item #DKB-10: Vegetation standard, collected from the ground from the bank area at the south side of the creek near the victim`s body at the scene-2740 Sage Canyon Road. Collected by Donna Kimmel-Lake, on 04/03/2014, at approximately 4:35 p.m. Item #DKB-11: Soil standard, collected from the ground from the bank area at the south side of the creek near the victim`s body at the scene-2740 Sage Canyon Road. Collected by Donna Kimmel-Lake, on 04/02/2014, at approximately 4:35 p.m. Item #DKB-12: Brush debris/vegetation, collected from the back side of the head and torso area of the victim`s body, on the pile at the west side of the victim`s body in the creek-2740 Sage Canyon Road. Collected by Sergeant Chris Carlisle, and transferred to Donna Kimmel-Lake, on 04/03/2014, at approximately 4:20 p.m. Item #DKB-13: One CD recorded during the underwater recovery of the body in the creek at the scene-2740 Sage Canyon Road. Recorded by Coroner Investigator Mark Horvath. Collected by Coroner Investigator Mark Horvath, and transferred to Donna Kimmel-Lake, on 04/03/2014, at approximately 5:15 p.m. Item #DKB-14: One dental stone cast of the divot area in the soil (# placard 7), collected from the water edge at the south side of the creek near the victim`s body at the scene-2740 Sage Canyon Road. Collected by Sergeant Chris Carlisle, and transferred to Donna Kimmel-Lake, on 04/04/2014, at some time in the morning. * One DVD containing 135 digital images taken during the processing of the scene-2740 Sage Canyon Road. Taken by Jacqueline Shikowitz, and transferred to Donna Kimmel-Lake, on 04/03/2014, at approximately 2:50 p.m.-5:55 p.m. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250203) KIMMEL-LAKE, Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 * One media card containing 335 digital images taken of evidence items collected from the scene, taken at the Evidence Laboratory. Taken by Donna Kimmel-Lake, on April 15, 2014, at approximately 11:40 a.m., and transferred to Jacqueline Shikowitz for submission into the Veripic Digital File Photo Database, on April 16, 2014, at approximately 9:40 a.m. DISPOSITION: Evidence items #DKB-1 through #DKB-14, were transferred to the Napa County Sheriff`s Office Property Division, to be retained as evidence. Evidence item #DKB-13 was submitted into the Veripic Digital File Photo Database. The 135 digital images taken during the processing of the scene, and the 335 digital images taken of evidence items collected at the scene, were also submitted into the Veripic Digital File Photo Database. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250203) KIMMEL-LAKE, Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Supplement Information Supplement Date Supplement Type Supplement Officer 05/27/2014 15:00:23 EVIDENCE COLLECTION (250203) KIMMEL-LAKE, DONNA Contact Name Supervising Officer (250120) ORTIZ, OSCAR 418 Supplement Notes Napa County Sheriff`s Office #NSD14001332 Napa County Coroner`s Office #C14-194 Evidence Laboratory #L140036D REPORT OF THE AUTOPSY EXAMINATION OF A JOHN DOE VICTIM (REYNALDO PACHECO): PRELIMINARY INFORMATION: On April 3, 2014, at approximately 5:00 p.m., Detective Nicol Dudley requested that I attend the autopsy of the John Doe homicide victim (presumed to be Reynaldo Pacheco). The autopsy was scheduled to take place at the Napa County Sheriff`s Office Coroner`s Division, on April 7, 2014. On April 7, 2014, at approximately 9:25 a.m., I responded to and arrived at the Coroner`s Office. Present in the autopsy suite upon my arrival at the Coroner`s Office were Sergeant Chris Perry, Detective Nicol Dudley, and Evidence Specialist Brianne Breedlove. Brianne Breedlove was assigned to assist me at the autopsy. Pathologist Assistant Alexandra Torres arrived at the autopsy suite at approximately 9:35 a.m. At approximately 9:35 a.m., Captain Steve Blower, and Deputy District Attorney Jodi Dell, entered the autopsy viewing room to view the examination. Coroner Investigator Jay Jones arrived at the autopsy suite at approximately 10:05 a.m. The autopsy was to be performed by Pathologist Doctor Joseph Cohen. Doctor Cohen arrived at the autopsy suite at approximately 10:10 a.m. DESCRIPTION OF THE VICTIM`S BODY: General Description: The body of the victim had been placed inside of a blue colored vinyl-like material body bag at the scene, for transport. A plastic lock (#09125), had been secured on the zipper of the body bag at the scene. Upon removal of the body from the Coroner`s Office refrigerator, I noted that a white plastic sheet had been wrapped around the exterior of the body bag. Writing with black ink was present on the right side of the exterior side of the white plastic sheet. The writing NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250203) KIMMEL-LAKE, Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 read as follows: "John/Doe/C14 194/4-3-14". Upon removal of the white plastic sheet from the body bag, writing with a black marker-type of ink was visible on the left side of the exterior side of the body bag, at the top near the victim`s head. This writing read as follows: "C14-194". The previous lock that had been secured to the zipper of the bag had been removed, and a different, orange colored plastic lock (#04098), had been secured to the zipper, near the top of the bag in the area of the victim`s head. Reportedly, the original lock had been cut from the zipper of the body bag by Coroner`s Sergeant Chris Perry, on April 4, 2014. The lock had been removed by Sergeant Chris Perry so that Evidence Specialist Brianne Breedlove could examine the victim`s hands and attempt to collect friction ridge detail to positively identify the victim. An identification was not made during this examination. For details regarding this examination, refer to Brianne Breedlove`s report. Sergeant Perry cut the current lock (#04098), from the zipper of the body bag on April 7, 2014, at approximately 9:50 p.m. Sergeant Perry transferred the lock to me to retain as evidence. The victim was an adult Hispanic male with dark brown colored, short to medium length of scalp hair, and apparent brown colored eyes. The victim had no apparent growth of facial hair. There were several apparent lacerated-type of wounds to the victim`s head. The victim had been bound about the head and mouth with a white apparent tank-style of shirt and a black apparent electrical-type of tape, and the victim`s hands had been bound behind the back, at the wrists, with a black apparent shoe lace, and black electrical-type of tape. The apparent shirt binding the head and mouth, was soiled, and was apparently bloodstained. The victim`s body was soiled, and there were numerous leaves present on the body as well. The victim`s body was clothed upon removal from the body bag. The victim was clothed in the following articles: An apparent gray/green colored dress-style of men`s shirt, with long sleeves, a collar, and two pockets and buttons down the front. The pockets of the shirt were empty. A small tear was present in the fabric of the shirt, on the front side to the right of the midline and the buttons. The shirt was soiled, and apparently bloodstained. The victim was also clothed in a pair of "Southpole" brand, black corduroy fabric pants, with a brown colored leather-like belt in place in the loops of the waistband. The pants were soiled, and apparently bloodstained. A tear was present in the fabric of the pants, at the back side of the seat of the pants at the center area of the buttocks region. The pockets of the pants were empty. The victim also wore a pair of "Dockers" brand, men`s size 9, lace-up style of brown colored leather-like material shoes. A brown colored lace was present in the left shoe. There was no lace present in the right shoe. A Coroner`s tag had been attached to the left shoe. Information written on the Coroner`s tag read: "C14-194/Doe, John/ M. Horvath". Upon removal of the outer clothing and shoes, the victim was clothed in a pair of black with light blue colored polka dots, bikini-style of men`s underpants; and a pair of black socks. There were no tears present in the fabric of the underpants. Description Of Wounds: Doctor Cohen estimated that there were approximately eight lacerated wounds to the front, sides, and back of the victim`s head. These wounds ranged in size from approximately 3/4 of an inch to 3 inches in length. Doctor Cohen determined that there were multiple fractures to the victim`s skull. He also determined that there was no internal neck injury, but the victum had a broken sternum and that there was some hemorrhaging to the skin and beneath the chest plate in this area. There were no defensive-type of wounds to the victim`s hands. There was superficial post mortem abraded skin loss to the back side of the right hand between the right thumb and right ring fingers, and to the back side of the left hand between the left thumb and the left small fingers. There was some post mortem peeling to the skin at the back side of the left shoulder and upper arm area of the victim`s body. Refer to the body diagram and report written by Doctor Cohen for specific details regarding the wounds to the victim`s body. Description Of Bindings On The Body: NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250203) KIMMEL-LAKE, Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 The victim was bound about the head and wrists. Head: The victim`s mouth and back of the neck had been bound with black electrical-type of tape, and a white sleeveless tank-style of shirt had been wrapped around the electrical-type of tape. The sleeveless shirt was knotted at the back of the head. The shirt was soiled and bloodstained. Wrists: The victim`s wrists had been bound behind his back. One black apparent shoe lace, and black electrical-type of tape, had been wrapped around the wrists. The electrical-type of tape was knotted at the back, and to the left side of the victim`s body. EXAMINATION OF THE VICTIM`S BODY: Doctor Joseph Cohen began the autopsy examination on April 7, 2014, at approximately 10:25 a.m. X-ray images had been taken of the victim`s body by Coroner`s Office personnel, prior to the start of the autopsy. An "aged" scar was present on the outer aspect of the victim`s right calve. Dctor Cohen shaved the hair from around the site to allow for a clear view of the scar. Photographs were taken of the site prior to and after shaving the hair. Doctor Cohen made the following determinations in regards to the victim`s body: The maxilla was broken, but there was no significant trauma to the inside of the lips; there were no pettichia present in the eyes or eyelids; there werre no signs of striangulation to the victim`s body; and that there were no wounds to the palm side of the the victim`s hands. Doctor Cohen determined the cause of death to the victim to be from blunt force trauma to the head. Refer to the report written by Doctor Joseph Cohen for further details regarding the autopsy examination. DOCUMENTATION OF THE VICTIM`S BODY: Evidence Specialist Brianne Breedlove photographically documented the victim`s body during the autopsy, from approximately 9:30 a.m. until approximately 12:00 p.m. I photographically documented the victim`s body during the autopsy from approximately 2:50 p.m. until approximately 5:15 p.m. Overall photographs were taken to document the victim`s body as clothed, unclothed, and prior to and after rinsing. Identification photographs were taken of the victim`s face, and of the Coroner`s tag affixed to the left shoe. Medium and close range photographs were taken to document the wounds sustained by the victim, and to document the condition of and processing techniques used on the hands. Doctor Joseph Cohen prepared a diagram to document the wounds and his findings in regards to the victim`s body. I received a copy of the diagram prepared by Doctor Cohen. PROCESSING OF THE VICTIM`S BODY: Doctor Cohen shaved the scalp hair from around the wounds in the victim`s head. This scalp hair was transferred to me to retain as evidence. Processing Of The Victim`s Hands: The hands were visually examined prior to further processing. Doctor Cohen determined that there were no wounds to the palm side of the victim`s hands. I requested that Doctor Cohen collect fingernail clippings from the victim, for the purpose of recovering any foreign DNA or trace evidence that may be present on or beneath the nails. Doctor Cohen collected clippings from the nails of the right and left hand. There was no visible foreign DNA or trace evidence present on the nails. The clippers used for the collection process were retained as evidence, for possible future examination. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250203) KIMMEL-LAKE, Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 I assigned Brianne Breedlove to collect lifts of the victim`s right thumb print, using black fingerprint powder and white adhesive lifting material. She collected three lifts of the right thumb print. I processed the victim`s right thumb using the "boiling" technique. Brianne Breedlove collected three lifts of the right thumb print after this processing. I collected lifts of the nine remaining fingers of the victim. Three lifts, using black fingerprint powder and white adhesive lifting material, were collected from each finger. I collected casts of the friction ridge detail of the right thumb, and both of the hands, using black fingerprint powder and white Mikrosil casting material. I requested that Doctor Cohen sever the hands from the victim`s body, so that I could further process the hands in the Evidence Laboratory, in order to recover friction ridge detail "known" standards from the victim, for use with comparison of any evidence items that might be developed. Additional casts were collected from the ridge detail of the hands, using black fingerprint powder and white Mikrosil casting material, upon completion of the later examination in the Evidence Laboratory. Refer to the Evidence Laboratory report #L140036E, written by Donna Kimmel-Lake, for details regarding the processing of the hands in the Evidence Laboratory. Upon completion of the processing of the hands, they were returned to Coroner Investigator Jay Jones, at the Coroner`s Office, on April 8, 2014, at approximately 3:05 p.m., to be retained with the body of the victim. EVIDENCE COLLECTION FROM THE VICTIM`S BODY: The orange colored plastic lock (#04098), was cut from the body bag by Sergeant Chris Perry, and transferred to me to retain as evidence. Pathologist Assistant Alexandra Torres removed the body of the victim from the blue colored body bag with the white plastic outer wrapping, and the clothing from the victim, and transferred the items to me to retain as evidence. Articles of clothing that were collected included the above described dress-style of shirt; the corduroy pants and waist belt; the underpants; the shoes; and the socks. Upon removal of the dress-style of shirt from the body, one loose gray/green colored button was located and collected from the autopsy table beneath the body. The button appeared to be similar to the remaining buttons in place on the dress-style of shirt. Doctor Cohen and I removed the bindings from the victim, and I retained them as evidence. Head: The tank-style of sleeveless shirt, and the black electrical-type of tape were removed from around the head and mouth. The shirt was slipped over the top of the victim`s head, and the knot was left tied. Doctor Cohen cut the ligature of black electrical-type of tape from the victim`s mouth. I directed Doctor Cohen to cut the tape in an area to best preserve any friction ridge detail evidence that might be present on the tape. I marked and labelled the cut ends of the tape, to identify the ends as being cut during removal at the autopsy. Wrists: Doctor Cohen cut the ligature of apparent shoe lace and black electrical-type of tape from around the victim`s wrists. I directed Doctor Cohen to cut the lace and tape, on the palmar side of the left wrist, and on the palmar hypothenar side of the right wrist, so as to best preserve any friction ridge detail evidence that might be present on the tape. I marked and labelled the cut ends of the lace and the tape, to identify the ends as being cut during removal at the autopsy. I collected scalp hair standards from the victim`s head for comparison and DNA purposes. I also retained the scalp hair that was shaved from around the wounds to the scalp, by Doctor Cohen. I retained the fingernail clippings and collection clippers, that were transferred to me by Doctor Cohen. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250203) KIMMEL-LAKE, Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 I requested that Doctor Cohen collect a blood standard and rib bone segments from the victim (as DNA standards). Doctor Cohen collected a tube of the victim`s blood, and the rib bone segments, and transferred them to me to retain as evidence. IDENTIFICATION OF THE VICTIM: On April 7, 2014, Detective Nicol Dudley provided me with information obtained from the "California Department Of Motor Vehicles", regarding the possible identify of this John Doe victim. The information provided to me contained the demographics, photograph, and right thumb print of an individual by the name of Reynaldo Pacheco Pacheco. During a recess of the autopsy examination on April 7, 2014, I compared the right thumb print contained on the "California Department Of Motor Vehicles" record, "Driver`s License" , and issued on 11/14/1997, to the third lift collected from the right thumb of the victim at autopsy after the "boiling" process (lift collected by Brianne Breedlove). It is my opinion that the right thumb print contained on the above listed "DMV" record, and the lift collected from the right thumb print of the victim at autopsy, were collected from the same individual, by the name of Reynaldo Pacheco Pacheco. The comparison and identification were verified by Evidence Technician Jacqueline Shikowitz, on April 7, 2014, at approximately 12:55 p.m. I verbally reported the results of the identification of the victim, to Coroner`s Sergeant Chris Perry, on April 7, 2014, at approximately 12:58 p.m. COMPLETION OF THE AUTOPSY: Brianne Breedlove left the autopsy suite prior to the completion of the autopsy, at approximately 12:35 p.m. Upon completion of the autopsy, I left the Coroner`s Office at approximately 6:00 p.m. I began a "rehydration" process of the victim`s hands, in the Evidence Laboratory, at approximately 6:25 p.m. I transferred the blood and rib bone segments to temporary storage in the Evidence Laboratory refrigerator, at approximately 6:30 p.m. I transferred the body bag and the clothing to temporary storage to begin the "drying" process, in Drying Room #1, at approximately 6:30 p.m. DESCRIPTION OF THE EVIDENCE COLLECTED: The following items of evidence were collected from the body of the victim on April 07, 2014, during the autopsy examination; and on April 08, 2014, during subsequent examination in the Evidence Laboratory: Item #DKD-1: One orange colored plastic lock (#04098), collected from the zipper of the body bag containing the body of the victim. The lock was cut from the zipper of the body bag by Sergeant Chris Perry, at approximately 9:50 a.m. Collected by Sergeant Chris Perry, and transferred to Donna Kimmel-Lake, on 04/07/2014, at approximately 9:50 a.m. Item #DKD-2: Dark colored scalp hair standard, collected from the head of the victim. Collected by Donna Kimmel-Lake on 04/07/2014, at approximately 10:05 a.m. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250203) KIMMEL-LAKE, Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Item #DKD-3: Dark colored scalp hair standard (DNA standard), collected from the head of the victim. Collected by Donna Kimmel-Lake on 04/07/2014, at approximately 10:07 a.m. Item #DKD-4: One blue colored, vinyl-like material body bag with white plastic wrapped around the outside of the bag, collected from around the body of the victim. Collected by Pathologist Assistant Alexandra Torres, and transferred to Donna Kimmel-Lake, on 04/07/2014, at approximately 10:15 a.m. Item #DKD-5: One brown colored, size 9, "Docker`s" brand, lace-up style, left, men`s shoe (the lace was in place on the shoe), collected from the left foot of the victim. Collected by Pathologist Assistant Alexandra Torres, and transferred to Donna Kimmel-Lake, on 04/07/2014, at approximately 10:37 a.m. Item #DKD-6: One black sock, collected from the left foot of the victim. Collected by Pathologist Assistant Alexandra Torres, and transferred to Donna Kimmel-Lake, on 04/07/2014, at approximately 10:38 a.m. Item #DKD-7: One brown colored, size 9, "Docker`s" brand, lace-up style, right, men`s shoe (the lace was missing and not in place on the shoe), collected from the right foot of the victim. Collected by Pathologist Assistant Alexandra Torres, and transferred to Donna Kimmel-Lake, on 04/07/2014, at approximately 10:38 a.m. Item #DKD-8: One black sock, collected from the right foot of the victim. Collected by Pathologist Assistant Alexandra Torres, and transferred to Donna Kimmel-Lake, on 04/07/2014, at approximately 10:39 a.m. Item #DKD-9: One pair of black corduroy fabric pants with a brown colored, leather-like material belt in the waist loops (soiled and bloodstained), collected from the body of the victim. Collected by Pathologist Assistant Alexandra Torres, and transferred to Donna Kimmel-Lake, on 04/07/2014, at approximately 10:44 a.m. Item #DKD-10: One pair of black with light blue colored polka dots, men`s style of briefs/underwear, collected from the body of the victim. Collected by Pathologist Assistant Alexandra Torres, and transferred to Donna Kimmel-Lake, on 04/07/2014, at approximately 10:44 a.m. Item #DKD-11: One green/gray colored, long-sleeved, with a collar and a button front, men`s dress style of shirt (soiled and bloodstained), collected from the body of the victim. Collected by Pathologist Assistant Alexandra Torres, and transferred to Donna Kimmel-Lake, on 04/07/2014, at approximately 10:45 a.m. Item #DKD-12: One gray/green colored button. The button appeared to be similar to the buttons on the shirt (Item #DKD-11). The button may have come loose from the shirt upon removal of the shirt from the victim`s body. The button was collected from the autopsy table, next to the victim`s body. Collected by Donna Kimmel-Lake, on 04/07/2014, at approximately 10:45 a.m. Item #DKD-13: One white fabric, sleeveless, tank-style of men`s style of undershirt (soiled and bloodstained), Collected from around the neck, mouth, and chin (used as a "gag") of the victim`s body. Collected by Pathologist Doctor Joseph Cohen, and transferred to Donna Kimmel-Lake, on 04/07/2014, at approximately 10:50 a.m. Item #DKD-14: One black, apparent shoe lace, and black, electrical-type of tape, collected from around the wrists of the victim. Collected by Pathologist Doctor Joseph Cohen, and transferred to Donna Kimmel-Lake, on 04/07/2014, at approximately 11:20 a.m. Item #DKD-15: Black, electrical-type of tape (binding), collected from around the face and neck of the victim. Collected by Pathologist Doctor Joseph Cohen, and transferred to Donna Kimmel-Lake, on 04/07/2014, at NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250203) KIMMEL-LAKE, Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 approximately 11:25 a.m. Item #DKD-16: Fingernail clippings (and collection clipper), collected from the fingers of the left hand of the victim. Collected by Pathologist Doctor Joseph Cohen, and transferred to Donna Kimmel-Lake, on 04/07/2014, at approximately 11:40 a.m. Item #DKD-17: Fingernail clippings (and collection clipper), collected from the fingers of the right hand of the victim. Collected by Pathologist Doctor Joseph Cohen, and transferred to Donna Kimmel-Lake, on 04/07/2014, at approximately 11:45 a.m. Item #DKD-18: White Mikrosil cast of the friction ridge detail of the right thumb, collected from the right thumb of the victim. Collected by Donna Kimmel-Lake, on 04/07/2014, at approximately 12:20 p.m. Item #DKD-19: White Mikrosil cast of the friction ridge detail of the right hand, collected from the palm side of the right hand of the victim. Collected by Donna Kimmel-Lake, on 04/07/2014, at approximately 2:10 p.m. Item #DKD-20: White Mikrosil cast of the friction ridge detail of the left hand, collected from the palm side of the left hand of the victim. Collected by Donna Kimmel-Lake, on 04/07/2014, at approximately 2:45 p.m. Item #DKD-21: Scalp hair shaved from around the wounds to the head, collected from the scalp of the victim. Collected by Pathologist Doctor Joseph Cohen, and transferred to Donna Kimmel-Lake, on 04/07/2014, at approximately 3:55 p.m. Item #DKD-22: Rib bone segments, collected from the body of the victim. Collected by Pathologist Doctor Joseph Cohen, and transferred to Donna Kimmel-Lake, on 04/07/2014, at approximately 4:20 p.m. Item #DKD-23: One tube of blood, collected from the body of the victim. Collected by Pathologist Doctor Joseph Cohen, and transferred to Donna Kimmel-Lake, on 04/07/2014, at approximately 4:35 p.m. Item #DKD-24: White Mikrosil cast of the friction ridge detail of the right hand (collected after performing the "boiling" technique), collected from the palm side of the right hand of the victim (collected in the Evidence Laboratory). Collected by Donna Kimmel-Lake, on 04/08/2014, at approximately 2:55 p.m. Item #DKD-25: White Mikrosil cast of the friction ridge detail of the left hand (collected after performing the "boiling" technique), collected from the palm side of the left hand of the victim (collected in the Evidence Laboratory). Collected by Donna Kimmel-Lake, on 04/08/2014, at approximately 3:00 p.m. * Six acetate sheets, containing 33 white adhesive fingerprint lifts, collected from the fingers of the victim`s hands. 6 lifts of the right thumb collected by Evidence Specialist Brianne Breedlove, and transferred to Donna Kimmel-Lake, 0n 04/07/2014, at approximately 12:03 p.m. to 12:32 p.m. 27 lifts of the nine remaining fingers, collected by Donna Kimmel-Lake, on 04/07/2014, at approximately 1:15 p.m. to 2:20 p.m. * One DVD containing 271 digital images, taken during the autopsy examination. Images taken on 04/07/2014, at approximately 9:30 a.m. - 12:00 p.m., by Brianne Breedlove; and on 04/07/2014, at approximately 2:50 p.m. - 5:15 p.m., by Donna Kimmel-Lake. DISPOSITION: NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250203) KIMMEL-LAKE, Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Evidence Items #DKD-1 through #DKD-25, were transferred to the Napa County Sheriff`s Office Property Division, to be retained as evidence. The six acetate sheets containing the 33 white adhesive fingerprint lifts, will be retained in the Evidence Laboratory files. The DVD containing 271 digital images, taken during the autopsy, will be retained in the Evidence Laboratory Photograph Files. The images were also submitted to the Veripic Digital File Management System database. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250203) KIMMEL-LAKE, Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Supplement Information Supplement Date Supplement Type Supplement Officer 07/03/2014 15:55:51 EVIDENCE (250203) KIMMEL-LAKE, DONNA Contact Name Supervising Officer (250120) ORTIZ, OSCAR 418 Supplement Notes Napa County Sheriff`s Office #NSD14001332 Napa County Coroner`s Office #C14-194 Evidence Laboratory #L140036E REPORT OF THE EXAMINATION OF THE VICTIM`S HANDS-IN THE EVIDENCE LABORATORY: Preliminary Information: The hands of the victim, identified as being Reynaldo Pacheco Pacheco, were collected from the victim`s body by Doctor Joseph Cohen, during the autopsy examination on April 7, 2014. Refer to the Evidence Laboratory report #L140036D, written by Donna Kimmel-Lake, for further details regarding the autopsy, and the collection of the hands. The right hand of the victim was collected on April 7, 2014, at approximately 5:15 p.m. The left hand of the victim was collected on April 7, 2014, at approximately 5:17 p.m. The hands were collected from the body for further processing. Due to the circumstances of the case, it was important from an evidentiary stand point, to collect the best samples of the friction ridge detail on the hands, for the purposes of comparison to friction ridge detail evidence that might develope in the future. The hands were collected, to allow for the best opportunity and processing, to recover the best friction ridge detail possible from the palm side of the hands. Processing Of The Hands: On April 7, 2014, at approximately 6:25 p.m., the hands were placed in containers in the Evidence Laboratory, and soaked in a fluid solution of "Downey" brand fabric softener, in an attempt to rehydrate, and seperate the friction ridge skin. On April 8, 2014, at approximately 11:00 a.m., I began the examination of the hands. Evidence Technician Jacqueline Shikowitz was assigned to assist me. The hands were removed from the rehydration solution, and I determined that the friction ridge skin had not loosened sufficiently to allow for seperation from the remaining tissue of the hands. I next used a "boiling" technique to rehydrate the ridge detail of the hands. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250203) KIMMEL-LAKE, Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Upon completion of the "boiling" process, lifts and casts were collected from the friction ridge skin of the hands. I processed the right hand, and Jacqueline Shikowitz was assigned to assist with the processing of the left hand. Three lifts were collected from each fingertip region, and one full palm print lift was collected from each hand, using black fingerprint powder and white adhesive lifting material. Casts were collected from the palmar side of each hand, using black fingerprint powder and white Mikrosil casting material. Documentation Of The Hands: The examination of the hands, and different processing techniques used, were photographically documented by Evidence Technician Jacqueline Shikowitz, with the assistance of and under the direction of Evidence Specialist Donna Kimmel-Lake. Description Of Evidence Collected: * Eight acetate sheets, containing thirty, white adhesive fingerprint lifts, and two white adhesive palm lifts, collected from the hands of the victim (in the Evidence Laboratory). The lifts were collected by Donna Kimmel-Lake, and Jacqueline Shikowitz, on April 8, 2014, at approximately 12:00 p.m.-2:55 p.m. * One DVD containing 122 digital images taken during the examination of the hands (in the Evidence Laboratory). Taken by Jacqueline Shikowitz, on April 8, 2014, at approximately 11:00 a.m.-3:00 p.m. Item #DKD-24: One white Mikrosil cast of the right hand (collected after the "boiling" process), collected from the palm side of the right hand of the victim (in the Evidence Laboratory). Collected by Donna Kimmel-Lake, on April 8, 2014, at approximately 2:55 p.m. Item #DKD-25: One white Mikrosil cast of the left hand (collected after the "boiling" process), collected from the palm side of the left hand of the victim (in the Evidence Laboratory). Collected by Donna Kimmel-Lake, on April 8, 2014, at approximately 3:00 p.m. *The Mikrosil casts of the hands (collected after the "boiling" process), were packaged with the items of evidence collected during the autopsy. For details regarding the items of evidence collected during the autopsy, refer to the Evidence Laboratory report #L140036D, written by Donna Kimmel-Lake. Disposition: The six acetate sheets containing the white adhesive finger and palm lifts, will be retained in the Evidence Laboratory files. The DVD containing the 122 digital images, taken during the examination of the hands, will be retained in the Evidence Laboratory Photograph files. The images were also submitted to the Veripic Digital File Management System database. Upon completion of the processing of the hands, the victim`s hands were returned to Coroner Investigator Jay Jones at the Coroner`s Office, on April 8, 2014, at approximately 3:05 p.m., to be retained with the body of the victim. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250203) KIMMEL-LAKE, Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Supplement Information Supplement Date Supplement Type Supplement Officer 07/07/2014 11:04:03 EVIDENCE RESULTS (250203) KIMMEL-LAKE, DONNA Contact Name Supervising Officer (250120) ORTIZ, OSCAR 418 Supplement Notes Napa County Sheriff`s Office #NSD14001332 Napa County Coroner`s Office #C14-194 Evidence Laboratory #L140036I REPORT OF THE LATENT PRINT PROCESSING OF AN ITEM OF EVIDENCE COLLECTED DURING THE PROCESSING OF A 187 PC SCENE: Preliminary Information: On April 9, 2014, at approximately 11:50 a.m., I received evidence item #DKB-2 from the Evidence Laboratory, and broke the evidence tape seal of the brown paper evidence bag, to process the item contained within for latent prints. The item was collected during the processing of a homicide scene. Refer to Evidence Laboratory report #L!40036B, written by Donna Kimmel-Lake, for details regarding the processing of the scene. Description Of The Item Of Evidence: Item #DKB-2: One orange colored plastic beverage cap (# stand #2), collected from the ground of the turnout area at the north side of the private road (south of the scene)-2740 Sage Canyon Road. Collected by Jacqueline Shikowitz, and transferred to Donna Kimmel-Lake, on April 3, 2014, at approximately 3:23 p.m. Processing Of The Item Of Evidence: I examined item #DKB-2, on April 9, 2014, from approximately 11:50 a.m. through 12:25 p.m. I visually examined the item using a magnifying glass and a forensic light source, prior to chemical processing. No clear friction ridge detail was located during the visual examination. The item was processed for latent prints using the cyanoacrylate (CAE), and Black Fingerprint Powder techniques. A single-use fingerprint powder and brush were used during the processing, to preserve the future examination for the collection of DNA evidence. Some friction ridge detail was developed during this process, however the friction ridge evidence lacked sufficient detail for comparison or identification purposes. Upon completion of the chemical processing, the item was visually examined using a magnifying glass and a forensic light source. Some friction ridge detail was visualized at this time, however the friction ridege evidence lacked NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250203) KIMMEL-LAKE, Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 sufficient detail for comparison or identification purposes. Processing Results: No sufficient clear friction ridge detail for comparison or identification purposes, was developed or collected from evidence item #DKB-2. Disposition: I sealed the evidence bag with an evidence tape seal, on April 9, 2014, at approximately 12:25 p.m. Evidence item #DKB-2 will be retained in the Napa County Sheriff`s Office Property Room. Pending Examinations: Several additional items collected during the processing of the scene, may be useful for the development of latent prints, and should be considered for submission for latent print processing, after the collection of DNA evidence from the items is first considered. The following items may be considered for future latent print processing : Item #DKB-3: One approximately 2 9/16" long, white plastic straw/stick (# stand #3). Item #DKB-7A: Upper rock (# stand #6). Item #DKB-7B: Lower rock (# stand #6). Item #DKB-8: One approximately 7" long piece of black electrical-type of tape (# stand #8). Item #DKB-9: One approximately 2 1/4" diameter, brown colored cardboard tape roll center, "Tartan Brand-Black Vinyl Tape" printed on the inner side of the roll (# stand #9). NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250203) KIMMEL-LAKE, Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Supplement Information Supplement Date Supplement Type Supplement Officer 04/11/2014 17:04:14 SUPPLEMENTAL (320145) ORTIZ, ALFONSO Contact Name Supervising Officer (250211) GREENBERG, RICKY 418 Supplement Notes Reporting Detective: A. Ortiz Case number: NSD14-0001332 Report Type:Maurico Telles TOVAR Interview on 4/2/2014 at NCDC - Detective A. Hess present. Supplemental: On 4/2/14 Lt. Debbie Peecook of the Napa Police Department requested I respond to the Napa County Department of Corrections (NCDC) to Interview S-Mauricio Telles TOVAR who was in custody. Lt. Peecook told me that during the surround and call-out of wanted subject, Miguel Angel GARCIA had stated to hostage Negotiators that he and S-TOVAR had killed someone and left the body near Lake Berryessa in Napa County. On the same date at approximately 1600 hours, I met with Detective Andy Hess at the Napa Police Department. Detective Hess and I went to NCDC and spoke with S-TOVAR in the interview room at NCDC. The interview was video/audio taped. The interview was conducted in Spanish. I advised S-TOVAR of his Miranda Rights by memory. When I asked S-TOVAR if he understood the rights I had explained to him he nodded in the affirmative and said yes. I spoke with S-TOVAR regarding other crimes he had committed or been involved with in association with S-Miguel Angel GARCIA. S-TOVAR stated the following in summary. S-TOVAR told me had been involved in a Home Invasion robbery on Pine Street in the City of Napa earlier this year with S-Miguel Angel GARCIA and another unidentified Hispanic male. S-TOVAR told me that during that robbery he only forced open the door of the residence and S-Miguel Angel GARCIA and the other male went in and committed the robbery. That crime was later determined to be Napa Police Department case number NPD14-00826 which is being investigated by Officer Heath Morrison. S-TOVAR continued to tell me that he was also present when S-Miguel Angel GARCIA killed someone and left the body near the Lake Berryessa area. S-TOVAR told me the following in Summary. S-TOVAR told me that approximately 2 weeks ago S-Miguel Angel GARCIA went to his house and asked him for ride to Petaluma to meet a man who owed S-Miguel Angel GARCIA six or seven thousand dollars. S-Miguel Angel GARCIA told S-TOVAR that if he didn`t collect the money he was going to take the persons car as payment. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(320145) ORTIZ, ALFONSO Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 S-TOVAR stated he and S-Miguel Angel GARCIA drove to Petaluma in S-Tovar Chrysler 300. Before they arrived at the meet location they stopped at two Big 5 sporting goods stores. The first one was in the City of Petaluma. The purpose of the stop at Big 5 was to purchase .25 caliber ammunition for a small revolver that S-Miguel Angel GARCIA had in his possession. The store refused to sell the ammunition to S-Miguel Angel GARCIA. S-TOVAR then told me that he and S-Miguel Angel GARCIA went to the second Big 5 store in Rohnert Park. At that location S-Miguel Angel GARCIA did purchase a box of ammunition however when they returned to the vehicle they noticed that the bullets were too long and did not fit in the revolver. S-Miguel Angel GARCIA kept the bullets and they both left to the meet location. S-TOVAR told me that he was driving the Chrysler 300 and S-Miguel Angel GARCIA was the front passenger. They went to a ranch with a vineyard near the Petaluma dumps to meet the person. S-TOVAR and S-Miguel Angel GARCIA arrived, and shortly after a male, whom he identified with a picture provided by Detective Hess as REYNALDO PACHECO arrived. S-TOVAR told me that PACHECO was driving a brownish color Range Rover. S-Miguel Angel GARCIA got out of the Chrysler 300 and began to speak with PACHECO. The conversation turned into an argument and S-Miguel Angel GARCIA removed his gun from his waist band and placed it into the stomach area of PACHECO. PACHECO grabbed the gun and a physical fight ensued. S-Miguel Angel GARCIA grabbed PACHECO by the neck and forced him into the back seat of the Range Rover. S-Miguel Angel GARCIA tied up PACHECO`s hands behind his back using some shoe laces. S-Miguel Angel GARCIA told S-TOVAR to tie up his feet, which S-TOVAR did. S-TOVAR told me that S-Miguel Angel GARCIA drove the Range Rover and PACHECO was in the back seat with S-TOVAR. They drove into Napa and S-Miguel Angel GARCIA made a phone call. They drove to an area behind the Napa Premium Outlets and picked up another male who seemed to be waiting for them. S-TOVAR said he does not know the man who was picked up but could identify him if he was to see him again. After picking up the male they drove to the Chevron gas station on First St and Matt Drive in the City of Napa. The unidentified subject that was seated in the front passenger seat got out of the vehicle and went to the ATM and withdrew $300.00 using PACHECO`S debit card. PACHECO provided the pin number to the debit card. After withdrawing money they drove down Silverado Trail towards Lake Berryessa. S-TOVAR described the area as past Lake Hennessey up Sage Canyon Rd. They entered a locked gate with a passcode. Both S-Tovar S-Miguel Angel GARCIA had been to this ranch before and met with friends and had some beers on a previous date. S-TOVAR gave me the pass code of 0313 or 1303. After passing the gate they drove for approximately 4 minutes and parked. S-Miguel Angel GARCIA and S-TOVAR walked down a trail with PACHECO. S-TOVAR told me he thought S-Miguel Angel GARCIA was going to tie him up and leave him there. Once they were at the end of a trail by a creek, S-Miguel Angel GARCIA threw PACHECO into the creek and started throwing rocks at his head. S-TOVAR told me that at one point S-Miguel Angel GARCIA told him to record the incident with a camera phone. S-TOVAR did hand S-Miguel Angel GARCIA some rocks which S-Miguel Angel GARCIA was requesting to continue to throw at PACHECO. S-TOVAR told me that the unidentified subject stayed at the vehicle out of view. At one point S-TOVAR tried to leave and go back to the car but S-Miguel Angel GARCIA told him to stay and out of fear S-TOVAR stayed. S-TOVAR estimates that S-Miguel Angel GARCIA hit PACHECO approximately 8-10 times with large rocks on his head. S-TOVAR heard PACHECO moan one last time as S-Miguel Angel GARCIA stood behind him and threw one large rock on his head. PACHECO also had tape around his mouth. They both walked up the trail and back to the vehicle. S-TOVAR told me that as they were walking S-Miguel Angel GARCIA was smiling and seemed to enjoy what he had done. S-TOVAR told me that PACHECO was wearing a light green polo shirt and black pants when they took him. S-Miguel Angel GARCIA was wearing a black shirt with white lettering and blue converse. As S-TOVAR was telling me about what he had seen he became very emotional and started to cry. S-TOVAR told me he felt bad because he knew PACHECO had a daughter and since he has daughters it upset him. S-TOVAR knew PACHECO had daughters because PACHECO kept telling them that he needed to pick up his daughter from school at 3pm. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(320145) ORTIZ, ALFONSO Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 When S-TOVAR and S-Miguel Angel GARCIA got back to the vehicle with the unidentified subject no one said anything about what had occurred. It seemed to S-TOVAR that the unidentified subject already knew what had happened. S-TOVAR told me that PACHECO`s cell phone and other belongings were thrown out the window during the drive back to the City of Napa city limits. S-TOVAR could not recall exactly where S-Miguel Angel GARCIA threw the items. The phone used to record the murder was also broken into pieces by S-Miguel Angel GARCIA and thrown out the window. They drove to the gas station at Imola Ave and Freeway drive and dropped off the unidentified subject. S-Miguel Angel GARCIA and S-TOVAR drove back to the ranch in Petaluma where S-TOVAR got back into his own vehicle and came back to Napa. S-Miguel Angel GARCIA left with the Range Rover and S-TOVAR assumed he tried to sell it. The interview was terminated. I asked S-TOVAR that if we were unable to find the body with the directions he had given me if he would be able to take us there and he said he would. Detective Hess told me he had contacted the Napa County Sheriff`s Office and briefed them on the interview. S-TOVAR was returned to NCDC staff. At approximately 1730 hours, at the request of Lt. Oscar Ortiz I conducted an operational briefing for the purpose of locating a body in the area S-TOVAR had described. Present at the briefing was Lt. Gary Pitkin, Detectives Bill McGlothern, Eric Koford, Pat Ensley, Jose Tijero, Brian McGovern (NSIB) and Lt. Oscar Ortiz and Detective Dave Ackman from the Napa County Sheriff`s Office investigation unit. After a search in the area I defined to be what S-TOVAR had described we were unable to locate a gate with the passcode he had given and not able to locate the body. Due to darkness the search was terminated. I debriefed all parties involved regarding the day`s events. Lt. Ortiz told me that he had made arrangements to have S-TOVAR come with Detective Ackman and I the following day and attempt to locate the body. At approximately 2030 hours all units cleared the scene. Disposition: Further Investigation. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(320145) ORTIZ, ALFONSO Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Supplement Information Supplement Date Supplement Type Supplement Officer 04/15/2014 15:45:06 SUPPLEMENTAL (320145) ORTIZ, ALFONSO Contact Name Supervising Officer (250211) GREENBERG, RICKY 418 Supplement Notes Reporting Detective: A. Ortiz Case number: NSD14-0001332 Report Type: 4/3/2014 S-TOVAR transported from NCDC to locate body of PACHECO. Detective Ackman present. Details: On 4/03/2014 at approximately 0800 hours, Detective Dave Ackman and I met at Napa County Department of Corrections (NCDC) to take custody of S-Mauricio Telles TOVAR for the purpose of him taking us the location where he and S-Miguel Angel GARCIA left the body of Reynaldo PACHECO. S-TOVAR was dressed in NCDC blue pants and blue sweatshirt. He was secured with belly chains and ankle chains. S-TOVAR was placed in the back seat of Detective`s Ackman unmarked police vehicle seated next to me. The entire time I was with S-TOVAR the interview was audio recorded. Prior to leaving the sally port of NCDC I explained to S-TOVAR he was still under arrest for the NAPA PD case and this was a separate incident we were investigating. I explained to S-TOVAR I would also explain to him his rights. I advised S-TOVAR of his Miranda Rights. When I asked S-TOVAR if he understood the rights I had explained to him he stated yes. I also explained to S-TOVAR that he understood that we have not promised him anything in return for him co-operating in this investigation and he was doing it voluntarily. S-TOVAR stated that he was doing to clear his conscious. Detective Ackman drove towards the area of Sage Canyon Road from the City of Napa. There was minimal small talk during the drive. When driving up Sage Canyon Rd S-TOVAR told me that S-Miguel Angel GARCIA had told him that at the horse shoe bend at Lake Hennessey he was going to dump a different body once. When driving in front of 2470 Sage Canyon Road S-TOVAR stated "here." Detective Ackman pulled infront of the gate and I exited the vehicle and punched in the gate code provided by S-TOVAR the day prior. The gate code "3013" opened the electronic gate immediately. Detective Ackman utilizing the call box at the gate spoke with the estate manager who came down and spoke with Detective Ackman. (refer to Detective Ackman report for more information.) Detective Ackman and I waited for Sgt. Bartlett to arrive who was in a fully marked Sheriff vehicle wearing a full police uniform. We drove up in both vehicles approximately .8 miles and S-TOVAR told us to park at a turnout. S-TOVAR told me to walk down the trail towards the creek and that the body should be by right there not past the creek and he remembers him wearing a greenish shirt and black pants. Sgt. Bartlett and I walked down and surveyed the NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(320145) ORTIZ, ALFONSO Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 area. At approximately 1010 hours, after a brief search I located a human body in the creek next to some piled up wood debris. I called Sgt. Bartlett over and showed him the human body. We walked back up to the start of the trail and Sgt. Bartlett started to secure the crime scene with Police tape around the outer perimeter of the area. Sgt. Bartlett started a crime scene log. Detective Ackman and I transported S-TOVAR back to NCDC. At approximately 1020 hours, while we transporting S-TOVAR back to NCDC I advised him that the rights I had explained to him still applied and I asked him if he understood and he stated yes. S-Tovar told me the following in summary. S-TOVAR stated that the unidentified male did go down all the way to the creek but left before S-Miguel Angel GARCIA started to throw rocks at PACHECOS head. When S-TOVAR and S-Miguel Angel GARCIA returned to the vehicle without PACHECO the unidentified male did not ask about PACHECO. S-TOVAR stated the unidentified male knew what was going to happen to PACHECO. S-TOVAR said he did not throw any rocks at PACHECO even though S-Miguel Angel GARCIA told him to do it. He did hand S-Miguel Angel GARCIA a rock. S-TOVAR turned away and did not see the last rock hit PACHECO. S-TOVAR did not ask S-Miguel Angel GARCIA why he had killed PACHECO. S-TOVAR could not recall where items were thrown from the vehicle. S-TOVAR said he was too scared to tell S-Miguel Angel GARCIA to stop or not to kill him. S-Miguel Angel GARCIA had told S-TOVAR that he wanted to kip nap and kill other people and S-TOVAR would try to convince him not to. S-TOVAR stated that S-Miguel Angel GARCIA grew up very poor and if he ever felt belittled or disrespected he would have a personal vendetta against them. This is why S-Miguel Angel GARCIA wanted to kill Officer Tommy Keener and I, after his arrest and interview back in February 2014. During the drive back to NCDC S-TOVAR appeared to be visibly upset, S-TOVAR was crying and wiping tears from his eyes as he stared out the window of the vehicle. During the drive S-TOVAR spontaneously said in summary, I want you to know that I`m not doing this for anything other than to clear my conscious. Detective Ackman and I returned S-TOVAR to the custody of NCDC. Disposition: Further Investigation. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(320145) ORTIZ, ALFONSO Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSDl4-001332 Supplement Information Supplement Date Supplement Type Supplement Of?cer 04/16/2014 12:28:25 SUPPLEIVIENTAL (320145) ORTIZ. ALFONSO Contact Name Supern'sing Of?cer (250211) GREENBERG. RICKY Supplement Notes Reporting Detective: A. Ortiz Case number: NSD14-0001332 Report Type: 4/8/2014 S-TOVAR interview at NCDC with Detective Nicole Dudley. Supplemental: Orr 4-8-2014 at approximately 1447 hours. I Detective Alfonso Ortiz and Detective Nicol Dudley went to Napa Cormty Department of Corrections (N CDC) to interview S-Maurico Telles TOVAR who was in custody. The interview was conducted in the interview room of NCDC with Detective Dudley observing via camera and recording device. The entire interview was video and audio recorded. The Video was kept in the possession of Detective Dudley for evidence. S-TOVAR was brought into the interview by NCDC staff. I his handcuffs and had him sit down. I explained to S-TOVAR I was back to speak with him regarding the body that was formd in Napa and we would not be discussing the NPD case he was in custody for. S-TOVAR stated he rurderstood. I also advised S-TOVAR of his Miranda rights by reading them from a Miranda card issued to by the Napa 5 of?ce. When I asked S-TOVAR if he rmderstood the rights I had explained to him he stated yes. and when I asked him that if having those rights in he still wished to talk to me S-TOVAR nodded in the affnmative and verbally said yes. S-TOVAR stated the followirr in srurmr . S-TOVAR told he S-Miguel Angel GARCIA in January of this year through a good friend is cousins with S-Miguel Angel GARCIA live in girlfriend. They met casually while drinking beers at 5 home. S-Miguel Angel GARCIA then started asking for S-TOVAR and S-TOVAR would get him drugs through source. They friends and S-TOVAR would often help S-Miguel Angel GARCIA ?nancially by loaning him money and renting hotel rooms for him to stay the night. The ?rst time he did a "job" with S-Miguel Angel GARCIA was when they did a home invasion robbery on Pine Street in the City of Napa. (NPD14-826). S-Miguel Angel GARCIA asked S-TOVAR for help because he needed a door breaclrer and a lookout. The other subject was a man named- S-TOVAR and S-Miguel Angel GARCIA had not done any other "j obs" until the one we were investigating. I asked S-TOVAR where S-Miguel Angel GARCIA got the ri?e from and he stated that "La Senora" gave it to him. "La Senora" is a formal method of addressing a female who is respected in Mexican culture and Spanish language. S-TOVAR stated that S-Miguel Angel GARCIA always spoke of "La Senora." 011 3-24-2014 which was a Monday. S-TOVAR received a call from S-Miguel Angel GARCIA. S-Miguel Angel GARCIA asked S-TOVAR if he could go to Petaluma and give S-Miguel Angel GARCIA a ride back to Napa. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 ORTIZ, ALFONSO Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 S-Miguel Angel GARCIA also told S-TOVAR that "La Senora" was going to give him some money and S-Miguel Angel GARCIA wanted to pay S-TOVAR back some money owed. S-TOVAR called into work and advised them he would not be going in to work so he could do his friend the favor. S-TOVAR picked up S-Miguel Angel GARCIA at a house in Petaluma. S-TOVAR stated he had been to that house before but it was not "La Senora" house, however S-Miguel Angel GARCIA would meet "La Senora" at a near by JacknBox on Washington street in Petaluma. After S-TOVAR picked up S-Miguel Angel GARCIA they went to the JacknBox, S-Miguel Angel GARCIA got out of the vehicle for approximately 10 minutes as he was going to meet "La Senora." S-TOVAR did not meet with "La Senora." S-TOVAR states S-Miguel Angel GARCIA told him he needed bullets for a 25 caliber pistol so they visited a ROSS department store and a nearby Big 5 sporting goods store. The store did not sell S-Miguel Angel GARCIA the bullets he needed. S-TOVAR stated S-Miguel Angel GARCIA called " La senora" and told her that the store would not sell them bullets and requested she go down to buy them. "La Senora" told S-Miguel Angel GARCIA that she would not. S-Miguel Angel Garcia asked S-TOVAR to take him to the Rohnert Park Big 5 to purchase the bullets. At that store he was able to purchase the bullets however they were the wrong size and did not fit the revolver S-Miguel Angel GARCIA had. S-Miguel Angel GARCIA told S-TOVAR that he had just purchased the handgun and wanted bullets to try it out. After they left Big 5 S-Miguel Angel GARCIA told S-TOVAR they could now go to meet the person that owed him money, and if the man did not have the money S-Miguel Angel GARCIA was going to take his car as payment. S-Miguel Angel GARCIA gave S-TOVAR directions; S-TOVAR knew the area because he had been in the area for work before. S-TOVAR states he told S-Miguel Angel GARCIA that he did not want to be involved if S-Miguel Angel GARCIA was going to do anything bad. S-Miguel Angel GARCIA told S-TOVAR that he wasn`t going to do anything bad he was just picking up his money. Utilizing google earth photos and a computer tablet I had brought to the interview I attempted to have S-TOVAR show me the ranch where they had met PACHECO. S-TOVAR was able to identify 1074 Stage Gulch Rd, in Petaluma California as the place they met PACHECO. S-Miguel Angel GARCIA was giving S-TOVAR directions and as they were approaching the destination S-Miguel Angel GARCIA told S-TOVAR, that he thought he saw the Range Rover in front of them on the road. S-TOVAR told me that as they were driving to the location S-Miguel Angel GARCIA received a call from either "La Senora" or "La Senora" husband and S-Miguel Angel GARCIA was told that the man was on his way. S-TOVAR pulled into the drive way across of 1074 Stage Gulch and the Range Rover passed the driveway. The Range Rover made a u turn and pulled into 1074 Stage Gulch Road. S-TOVAR pulled into the drive way behind the Range Rover and parked alongside of the Range Rover to the left. S-TOVAR told me that S-Miguel Angel GARCIA and PACHECO spoke normally. It did not appear to S-TOVAR that PACHECO seemed surprised or scared. It appeared to S-TOVAR that S-Miguel Angel GARCIA and PACHECO knew each other. S-TOVAR stated he waited in the car and could hear the conversation. S-TOVAR stated S-Miguel Angel GARCIA asked PACHECO for money for fuel and asked him for a gas container. S-TOVAR was confused because it seemed that S-Miguel Angel GARCIA was asking PACHECO for a ride to a car that S-Miguel Angel GARCIA had purchased. PACHECO gave him a gas container and told him he needed to give him the ride because PACHECO had to leave soon to pick up his daughter from school. PACHECO started walking towards his vehicle and S-Miguel Angel GARCIA pulled the gun on PACHECO. A struggle ensued and S-Miguel Angel GARCIA grabbed PACHECO from the throat. S-TOVAR stated he heard S-Miguel Angel Garcia tell PACHECO that he wasn`t going to rip him off like PACHECO had ripped off lots of other people. S-TOVAR also heard S-Miguel Angel Garcia tell PACHECO that he had lent a women money and she invested in his company, with someone who was under PACHECO and that PACEHCO had ripped everybody off. S-Miguel Angel Garcia made PACHECO get in the back seat of the Range Rover, and told S-TOVAR to leave his vehicle and get into the Range Rover. S-Miguel Angel Garcia told S-TOVAR to tie up PACHECO arms and feet by using some shoe laces. S-TOVAR tied up PACHECO wrist behind his back and tied up his feet together. S-Miguel NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(320145) ORTIZ, ALFONSO Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Angel Garcia told S-TOVAR that if PACHECO got loose he was going to kill S-TOVAR. S-TOVAR stated PACHECO asked to be let go because he had to pick up his daughter from school. PACHECO also said that his hands were tied up too tight; S-TOVAR apologized to PACHECO and said he had no choice. S-TOVAR continued to tell me that they left the area towards Napa. S-Miguel Angel Garcia made a call to a male and S-Miguel Angel Garcia was heard saying that S-Miguel Angel Garcia needed help watching a man. They pulled into the rear of the Napa outlets and picked up the unidentified male. The unidentified male got into the front of the Range Rover. They drove to Chevron on First Street and Matt Drive and the unidentified male got out of the vehicle and withdrew $300.00. S-TOVAR told me that they then drove to the Wells Fargo Bank on Jefferson Street. The unidentified male attempted to withdraw more money but was unsuccessful. They all drove in the Range Rover to the Chevron on Trancas St, in Napa and purchased some drinks. From that gas station they proceeded to head to the Lake Berryessa area. S-TOVAR told me PACHECO had two cell phones and S-Miguel Angel Garcia had already gone through his wallet. S-Miguel Angel Garcia then allowed PACHECO to use the phone to make arraignments to have his daughter picked up from school. PACHECO made a call and was warned by S-Miguel Angel Garcia not to try anything sneaky because S-Miguel Angel Garcia was a Knights Templar from Michoacn. The first call that PACHECO made was suspicious to S-TOVAR. S-Miguel Angel Garcia also thought it was a conversation in code asking for help and hung up the phone. The unidentified male dialed the phone for PACHECO and a male answered. Even though S-Miguel Angel Garcia was upset they allowed him to make another phone call to make arrangements to pick up his daughter. The second phone call was made to a female. S-TOVAR told me they drove to the gate, and S-Miguel Angel Garcia got out and pressed the gate code and the door opened. They drove up to turnout. S-TOVAR and the unidentified male got out of the vehicle and took PACHECO out of the vehicle. They removed the ties from PACHECOS feet so he could walk down the trail. S-Miguel Angel Garcia told S-TOVAR and the unidentified male to take PACHECO down the trail while S-Miguel Angel Garcia parked the Range Rover. When they got to the bottom of the trail the unidentified male removed his white sleeveless shirt and tied up PACHECO mouth also using tape that was found in the Range Rover. S-TOVAR told me that S-Miguel Angel Garcia came down the trail and the unidentified male went back up to the vehicle out of sight. S-Miguel Angel Garcia said some words to PACHECO and asked S-TOVAR to record it using a cell phone that S-Miguel Angel Garcia also later destroyed. S-Miguel Angel Garcia asked PACHECO how many people PACHECO had stolen from, PACHECO told S-Miguel Angel Garcia that he had stolen from a lot of people. S-Miguel Angel Garcia threw PACHECO into the creek and started throwing large rocks at PACHECO. S-TOVAR was trying to turn away and not see what was happening and wanted to leave but S-Miguel Angel Garcia told him that he had to stay. Out of fear S-TOVAR stayed but would turn away. S-TOVAR stated he saw a large rock also hit PACHECO in the chest, along with the multiple large rocks to the head. S-TOVAR heard one final blow to the head of PACHECO and S-TOVAR started walking up the trail to the vehicle. S-Miguel Angel Garcia broke the laptop that was in the Range Rover belonging to PACHECO and threw it out the window before leaving the property. A brief case was left in the Range Rover. S-TOVAR told me they all drove to Napa and dropped off the unidentified male at Freeway Drive and Imola Ave. No other phone calls were made during the drive back to Napa. They went back to the ranch and S-Miguel Angel Garcia left to get money for the Range Rover. S-TOVAR believes he took the vehicle to a friend that S-TOVAR had a business card for. S-TOVAR knows someone who buys and sells cars. He believes he may have a business card at his residence. S-TOVAR described the business card to me. S-TOVAR stated he and S-Miguel Angel Garcia never spoke of the incident. S-Miguel Angel Garcia would ask S-TOVAR what he felt about what had happened and S-TOVAR told S-Miguel Angel Garcia that he did not want to talk about it. S-TOVAR saw S-Miguel Angel Garcia a couple more times after this incident and rented hotel rooms for NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(320145) ORTIZ, ALFONSO Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 him. S-TOVAR told me that the only person he told was a girl he was seeing named Rosa. Rosa just listened to him and told him that S-Miguel Angel Garcia was going to get him in trouble. I asked S-TOVAR about the male S-Miguel Angel Garcia had kidnapped and had been let go. S-TOVAR stated that S-Miguel Angel Garcia let the person go against his wishes and he had received a call from "La Senora" Rohnert Park police department is investigating the kidnapping case. I reported in summary my finding of the interview to Detective Dudley and the interview was terminated. S-TOVAR was returned to custody staff. Disposition: Further investigation. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(320145) ORTIZ, ALFONSO Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Supplement Information Supplement Date Supplement Type Supplement Officer 04/16/2014 20:09:59 SUPPLEMENTAL (320145) ORTIZ, ALFONSO Contact Name Supervising Officer (250211) GREENBERG, RICKY 418 Supplement Notes Reporting Detective: A. Ortiz Case number: NSD14-0001332 Report Type: 4/11/2014 S-TOVAR interview at NCDC with Detective Chris Pacheco and Lt. Oscar Ortiz. Supplemental: On 4-11-2014 at approximately 1050 hours, I Detective Alfonso Ortiz and Detective Chris Pacheco and Lt. Oscar Ortiz went to Napa County Department of Corrections (NCDC) to speak to S-Maurico Telles TOVAR who was in custody at his request. The interview was conducted in the interview room of NCDC with Detective Pacheco and Lt. Ortiz observing via camera and recording device. The entire interview was video and audio recorded. The video was kept in the possession of Detective Pacheco for evidence. S-TOVAR was brought into the interview room by NCDC staff. I removed his handcuffs and had him sit down. I advised S-TOVAR of his Miranda rights by reading them from a Miranda card issued to me by the Napa DA`s office. When I asked S-TOVAR if he understood the rights I had explained to him he stated yes, and when I asked him that if having those rights in mind he still wished to talk to me S-TOVAR verbally said yes. I explained to S-TOVAR that we could not talk about the shooting case from the Napa PD. S-TOVAR stated he understood. I asked S-TOVAR why he had requested to see me. S-TOVAR stated the following in summary. S-Tovar told me that he had spoken with his wife and she was scared because she had seen people not familiar to the area in the neighborhood. One of S-TOVAR concerns is that "La Senora" that S-Miguel Angel GARCIA lived with did not like S-TOVAR and S-TOVAR knows that S-Miguel Angel GARCIA brother did things like S-Miguel Angel GARCIA did and he lived in Ukiah, Ca. I explained to S-TOVAR that I would send an email out to the Napa Police Department Patrol division for patrol checks in his neighborhood and instructed him to tell his wife that if she saw something suspicious to call the Police Department. I then spoke with S-TOVAR regarding the unidentified male who was with him and S-Miguel Angel GARCIA the day they murdered PACHECO. I explained to S-TOVAR that his father had helped us identify the person. I translated a photo lineup admonition to S-TOVAR from English to Spanish. S-TOVAR then initialed and signed the admonition. I allowed him to view six separate 8x10 color photos one by one, that were numbered 1 thru 6 in pen. Once he viewed all the photos S-TOVAR told me it was number four (4),I asked S-TOVAR if he wanted to see the pictures again and he said, no it`s number 4. I had S-TOVAR sign the Admonition. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(320145) ORTIZ, ALFONSO Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Number 4 is identified by Napa Sheriffs Department Investigation unit as S-NORBETO GONZALEZ I also spoke with S-TOVAR regarding the sale of the Range Rover. Lt Oscar Ortiz and Detective Dave Ackman had already briefed me that they had recovered the Range Rover and had spoken to the male who purchased the Range Rover from S-Miguel Angel GARCIA. The buyer of the Range Rover had stated that S-TOVAR was also present during the transaction. S-TOVAR stated the following in summary regarding this new development. S- TOVAR initially stated he was not present and that he had only placed a call to the buyer of the Range Rover and never went to meet with them. After S-TOVAR appeared somewhat confused about his story he stated the following. S-TOVAR also said he saw "La Senora" who picked up S-Miguel Angel GARCIA but that was all he knew. S-TOVAR stated he had spoken with the car buyer a day after. While S-TOVAR was telling me the story of the conversation with the person who purchased the Range Rover, S-TOVAR became visibly upset and started to cry. He said that he wished he could tell me all the truth but was concerned for the safety of his family. S-TOVAR stated that he knew more about the car and "La Senora." S-TOVAR is scared of "La Senora" because he heard that she practices voodoo and magic. S-TOVAR stated that everything he had told me in the previous interviews was true except for the new information he provided. S-TOVAR stated the following in summary. S-TOVAR told me that the first time he saw "La Senora" on the 24th was at the ranch. "La Senora" was the passenger in the Range Rover and lured PACHECO into the ranch. S-TOVAR stated that everything else up to the meet location was still true however "La Senora" was in the vehicle. "La Senora" pretended she do not know S-Miguel Angel GARCIA and S-Miguel Angel GARCIA pretended he did not know the female. S-Miguel Angel GARCIA even took the females purse and told her he had nothing against her. When S-Miguel Angel GARCIA was fighting with PACHECO "La Senora" yelled to stop. S-TOVAR said that PACHECO gave "La Senora" a look which he interpreted to be that she was the one who had set this up. S-TOVAR stated they all left the ranch in the Range Rover and the dropped off "La Senora" on the street in front of Broadway Deli in the City of Sonoma. S-TOVAR did not see anyone pick up "La Senora" at the drop off point. S-Miguel Angel GARCIA gave " her purse back and allowed her to make a phone call. "La Senora" was the same female who later came to Vallejo and picked up S-Miguel Angel GARCIA after he had sold the Range Rover. S-Tovar described "La Senora" as a Hispanic female adult approximately 37 years old, Taller female, light complexion, medium sized. S-TOVAR described "La Senora" husband a Hispanic male adult, approximately 30-35 years old, shorter male, dark complexion and long hair. The male walks with a cane from a work related accident. S-TOVAR has only seen them in a Blue Honda or Acura 2 door coupe. S-TOVAR states that "La Senora" has a store in Rohnert Park, in a Plaza where S-Miguel Angel Garcia had kidnapped the other person who was let go from Rohnert Park. S-TOVAR had seen "La Senora" and her husband on a couple different occasions when they would come to Napa and meet S-Miguel Angel GARCIA and pick up the Ar-15 that S-Miguel Angel GARCIA had in his possession. S-TOVAR continued to tell me that everything else he had explained was true to the point when they returned to the ranch on Sage Gulch Road to pick up S-TOVAR Chrysler. S-TOVAR told me that he went ahead of S-Miguel Angel GARCIA who was driving the Range Rover and they were both en route to meet the man who was going to purchase the Range Rover. While they were driving to Vallejo, S-Miguel Angel GARCIA called S-TOVAR and told him that the vehicle had stalled. S-TOVAR stopped and asked if he needed to go back to get him, but S-Miguel Angel GARCIA told him that the vehicle started up again. They both drove in separate vehicles to the small Wal-Mart in Vallejo. When they met the buyer of the Range Rover, S-Miguel Angel GARCIA removed the child seat and a brief case from the Range Rover. S-Miguel Angel GARCIA provided the pink slip to the buyer and told him the name of the registered owner was his brother. The buyer gave S-Miguel Angel GARCIA $6,000.00 in a white envelope. S-TOVAR and S- Miguel Angel GARCIA went to a smoke shop in the same plaza and purchased two pipes. The blue 2 door Honda or Acura arrived NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(320145) ORTIZ, ALFONSO Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 the front passenger was "La Senora" and her husband was the driver. S-Miguel Angel GARCIA got into the vehicle and also loaded the child seat and brief case he had taken from the Range Rover. S-Miguel Angel GARCIA got into the back seat of the vehicle. S-TOVAR left the area back to Napa. S-TOVAR told me that he called the buyer of the Range Rover three days later and asked him if he had registered the vehicle. He said he made the call because he wanted to make sure everything was in order from the purchase. S-TOVAR stated he could identify her and tell us where she had picked up S-Miguel Angel GARCIA before. He is not sure "La Senora" lives there but knows she is connected to that house. Utilizing google maps on my cell phone, S-TOVAR was able to show me the area of Hunington Street in the City of Petaluma. S-TOVAR said that is "La Senora" residence. He had been there before at night and saw the blue coupe in front of the residence. I showed a Facebook photo that Detective Pacheco had on his cell phone of who we believed was "La Senora", S-TOVAR saw the photo and said, yes that`s her. The interview was terminated and S-TOVAR was returned to custody staff. Disposition: Further Investigation. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(320145) ORTIZ, ALFONSO Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Supplement Information Supplement Date Supplement Type Supplement Officer 11/18/2014 08:11:10 SUPPLEMENTAL (320145) ORTIZ, ALFONSO Contact Name Supervising Officer (250211) GREENBERG, RICKY 418 Supplement Notes Case Number: NSD14-1332 Reporting Detective: A. Ortiz Type of Report: Supplemental Summary: On 7/23/2014 I assisted Detective Nicole Dudley in interviewing regarding the murder of V-Reynaldo PACHECO. The interview was conducted at the Petaluma Police Department. The interview was audio and video recorded. The interview was conducted primarily in Spanish with Detective Dudley present. Details: was contacted during a traffic stop by Detective Chris Pacheco. I responded to the area of the traffic stop with Detective Dudley. I contacted and asked her if she would come to the Peteluma Police Department and speak with us. agreed to go to the police station with us. was seated in the front seat of Detective Dudley`s unmarked police vehicle, she was not handcuffed. I was seated in the back seat of the vehicle during transport. When we arrived to the Police Department she was escorted into the interview room. Once in the interview room Detective Dudley and I introduced ourselves again to . She identified herself again verbally and provided her date of birth of 3/29/1973. Prior to any other questioning I advised of her Miranda rights by reading them from a Spanish card issued to me by the Napa County DA`s Office. After each of the advisements I read to she would state "uh-huh" in the affirmative. When I asked if she understood the rights I had explained to her she stated "si" translated from Spanish to English as "yes." told me she has been in the United States for approximately 14 years and living in the same region. She stated she met her husband here who is a laborer for construction work, and that she has a 17 year old son. me she owns her business. She described her business as a religious store selling items from multiple religions. got into the business because of her religion Santeria. She described to religion as the prayer and healing through saints and spirits. was asked if she had an idea why we wanted to talk to her and she stated she was not sure. She thought it was because of a vehicle code violation that got her pulled over, and she was afraid her vehicle was going to be impounded because she is an unlicensed driver. I explained to again that we were from Napa and we were not concerned about her being unlicensed and it would seem extreme to interview her at a police station in Sonoma county by Napa Detectives for being unlicensed. She agreed and stated she had no idea why we wanted to talk to her. was asked how she knows a Reynaldo PACHECO. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE stated she was introduced to PACHECO from a at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(320145) ORTIZ, ALFONSO Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 friend she call . told me that she invested $2000.00 into a business known as "777." explained the business she had invested in and told me how she would monitor her investments. As she described the business she and others would invest money and PACHECO would be the broker and make the investments also stated that when people where interested in her investment she would set up meeting with those who were interested and PACHECO to get them invested. stated the business was mostly a cash business except when you would see your money invested into points and then the points would increase implying that your assets would also increase. stated that 4 people had invested under her platform, also explained to me about the business internet site going down and the problems the company was having. The people who invested under her were looking to her for answers. attended meeting where the investors would give updates. stated a short stocky guy and male named would run the meetings and it appeared and PACHECO were very close. stated PACHECO was a good sales person and seemed trustworthy. When was asked when the last time she saw or heard from PACHECO she initially stated it was earlier this year when PACHECO signed up another investor at her store. She then recalled that she had seen him a day before went to her store and asked if had seen PACHECO. was unsure of the date. states she has not seen again since that date. When and PACHECO met that day he visited in the store for an hour. told me she did not go anywhere with him and she had never been in his vehicle and never traveled with him anywhere. She described PACHECO`s vehicle as a box type SUV dark color, but was not sure of the make. When asked if had heard about anything regarding PACHECO she stated that , one of the investors under her platform told her that PACHECO had died also heard about his death from another male at one of the "777" meetings told me she did not know if she believed what she had heard beucase she believed she would of heard more about it from people. She thinks he could have possibly moved since people where asking him about their investments as well. was asked if she attempted to confirm his death by watching the news or researching it on the internet and told us that she does not like doing those things because she does not like seeing e violent things because it affects negatively. Detective Dudley and I had not mentioned the manner PACHECO had passed away. Detective Dudley and I told sorry. we could confirm that PACHECO was deceased. told us she was very After approximately the first hour and a half Detective Dudley and I took a break from the interview. offered a break or water and declined at this time. was Detective Dudley and I returned from the break and again spoke with I request she tell me the names and information she knew regarding the people that had invested under her platform. provided the information she had on the individuals by memory and stated she could provide more information from her phone. I then read some names of people who also possibly invested into the "777" company. I asked her if she knew any of the names I had mentioned or recognized any of the names. The name included , Mauricio Tovar and Miguel Angel Garcia, stated none of the names sounded familiar. I asked S-ARIAS if she was sure about the names I had mentioned and again asked about Mauricio Tovar, even if she had heard on the news. stated she doesn`t watch news and her and her family keep to themselves. I asked NSD14-001332 if I could show her some pictures of individual and see if any of those people looked familiar. denied knowing or recognizing any of the photos of Mauricio Tovar and Miguel Garcia. She did recognize Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(320145) ORTIZ, ALFONSO Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 the picture of Reynaldo PACHECO and his vehicle. After another short break I set up a finger print card to take palm and finger prints from . I explained to that part of the search warrant was to obtain her fingerprints and a DNA sample. asked if everyone was giving DNA and fingerprints I said it was part of our investigation and it would also help eliminate people who from evidence we collected from PACHECO`s vehicle. stated she wished she never got into the "777" business. Detective Dudley collected the DNA sample and I collected the fingerprints. Those items were collected and kept in the possession of Detective Dudley. continue to deny knowing or any involvement with Miguel Angel GARCIA and Mauricio TOVAR. She again denies any contact with them. As the interview goes longer starts providing information that that she may have had contact with GARCIA and they were acquaintances. She continues to provide information admitting she had met both GARCIA and TOVAR. I again showed the photo of TOVAR to told me that she also has to protect her family. stated she had met TOVAR only once in her life when he went into the store and threatened her and her family. She does not know why TOVAR threatened her. said she denied knowing him earlier in the interview because she was scared for her son. stated she never told anyone about TOVARS threats. The threats occurred after Pacheco had disappeared. again told me that she was being honest with me. After asking her to be honest with me said she also knew Miguel GARCIA, but had only met him once at the store when GARCIA went with a female. said she never spoke with him and only dealt with the female he was with. She never spoke with him and only dealt with the female that brought him in. said that the she only would look at her and that he was carrying a dead spirit with him. again spoke about the threats that TOVAR gave to her. She still doesn`t understand why he threatened her since she had never seen him before in her life. She mentioned the threats to her husband once, her husband suggested to call the police and she thought the police would be no help. We asked why Miguel GARCIA name was on her books multiple times. stated that the lady still owed money to her and would continue to do treatments regarding GARCIA but he would not come to the store. did not know the name of the girl. The female had been to her store approximately 5 times. said that the names were not had given her a picture of Miguel GARCIA because she wanted separation of Miguel GARCIA. We asked if there was anything else she wanted to be honest about. the store with visible injuries and the female also threatened her. said that the same female did return to stated she has not heard what has happened to TOVAR and GARCIA. I told that TOVAR had informed us that he said she was friends with GARCIA. She said she does not know why TOVAR would say that. We asked if she had ever been in a car with Miguel GARCIA. After a long pause said that she had once given a ride to GARCIA from her shop to Napa. This occurred approximately one month before Pacheco disappeared. We asked if there were any other times she gave GARCIA a ride. again remembered she gave him a ride to a gas station in Napa. again remembered a third time she gave GARCIA a ride to Napa again. GARCIA would show up to her shop and ask for rides. She would lie to her husband about it so she would not get in trouble. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(320145) ORTIZ, ALFONSO Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 said GARCIA was polite and always respectful. When they travelled together they would speak of family and his work from working in the fields. GARCIA had been to house one time when she did a spiritual cleansing of him. He never threatened her and was always polite and humble. said the last time she saw GARCIA was when he told her that he was going to go see his family in Los Angeles to visit. This conversation happened after Pacheco disappeared. This was the last time she saw GARCIA. said she never saw GARCIA and TOVAR together. said she once saw an off white Chrysler 300 at a gas station when she dropped off GARCIA. We asked if she had ever been in a car with TOVAR. told a story that once she drove to Napa to give GARCIA money that he needed. When she arrived to Napa Miguel was sitting in the Chrysler and GARICA was sitting in a cream color Chrysler. was walking to the car and wanted to give the money to GARCIA but the windows were not working. She walked to the rear passenger seat of the vehicle, as the door opened she got a sharp pain in her back and fell seated in the back seat of the vehicle. saw TOVAR from the side. When she was threatened at the store by TOVAR she recalled he was the same person from the vehicle that day. said she heard the PACHECO had died through him. She did not know how he died. said she has not heard anything about GARICA since the last contact and has no clue or cares what happen to said she never seen GARCIA with a weapon. said she very rarely looks up local news on the internet. said she has two facebook accounts for her and for her business. She has never spoke about PACHECO on facebook and most of the people on the facebook are from her religion. said she heard that PACHECO had died but never asked how he had died and doesn`t like knowing those things because she had seen her best friend in Mexico killed and she suffers from that stress. Her best friend was killed by her husband because he thought she had cheated on him. Her friend was beaten to death and then killed by a large rock over her head. was hiding in the closet when this happened. said she never saw PACHECO with any weapons. PACHECO would brag about his computer and bragged about all the money he was making. said she warned PACHECO about being careful about showing off money because some people don`t like when people brag. We again took a break and offered out her back. a bathroom break or water. She requested to walk around the room to stretch After a short break we returned to the interview room and continued to speak with . I asked if she remembered the rights I had explained to her in the begging of the interview and she nodded in the affirmative. We asked that her husband had stated they lost more money in the Kingdom 777 scam. We told her that he estimated $25,000. stated he must be an idiot because they never had that much money. stated that the money in the house is from her business. She gives her husband the money from the store. I asked if PACHECO knew Miguel GARCIA and TOVAR. She said she didn`t know. I asked her if PACHECO knew them through her and again she stated no. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(320145) ORTIZ, ALFONSO Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 I asked if she, PACECO, TOVAR and GARCIA had ever been in a car or meeting or specifically PACHECO`s vehicle at any time. now stated that she had been in PACHECO`s vehicle before. He was in the store and she retrieved some papers from his vehicle and PACHECO and once travelled to Santa Rosa to meet a for the purpose of investing into the Kingdom 777. I asked why she had lied about being in the car with PACHECO. She said she was confused. said she has never been in the vehicle with PACHECO towards the direction of Napa. She answered quickly no and I told her to think longer and she paused. She remembers again a time when PACHECO gave her a ride to Kaiser in Petaluma. She did not have an appointment and she returned with him. This occurred before had gone to her shop looking for information regarding PACHECO. The ride to Kaiser was the day before was looking for PACHECO. said PACHECO had to pick up her daughter so he left her and she walked the rest of the way. I asked her who else they saw that day and she said just them. I pressed for more information from and she asked what I was accusing her of. I explained to her I just wanted to find out what happen and again she stated I already told you what happen. I asked her if they had seen TOVAR and GARCIA that day and she again said no. I asked her why people would tell me that they saw her, PACHECO, TOVAR and GARICA together that day. now was saying she can`t remember because that day she was taking medication and she gets real stupid and doesn`t remember things. now remember that after Kaiser they continued south and took a different route. PACHECO took a dirt road off the road and exited the vehicle with a small tank of gas. was not paying attention to what PACHECO was doing. Another vehicle was there, the same color car that she mentioned earlier. I asked if GARCIA and TOVAR where there and she said she did not see them. I asked her to be honest and she asked me why she wanted me to swear that she did not see them said PACHECO gave the tank of gas to someone but she did not see who she gave it to. I asked her if GARCIA and TOVAR were there and she said she did not see them. told me that she did get out of her car because of her back problems but her back was facing away from everyone. I kept asking for the truth and started crying. then asked that she is still protecting her family. then told me the following in summary. PACHECO drove to her appointment at Kaiser. She was mistaken about her appointment and asked for a ride back. As they were leaving Kaiser PACHECO told that he had to run a quick errand. They arrived at the ranch and saw the white vehicle. She got out of the vehicle and a basketball had fallen out of the vehicle. She chased the ball down and when she returned to the vehicle they had pulled a gun on her and PACHECO and told her to get in the back of the Range Rover. was crying while telling me the story. I asked her if she knew GARCIA why did he not ask him why was doing this. said she did and he told her that how it was going to be done. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(320145) ORTIZ, ALFONSO Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 GARCIA and TOVAR made her and PACHECO take their shoes off and remove their show laces. GARCIA was driving and was pointing a gun at her and PACHECO was in the back seat tied up. saw them beat PACHECO. They went towards Napa but she doesn`t remember the route. They dropped her off at a stop sign somewhere. asked them what was going to happen to PACHECO and they said that he owed them a lot of money and he was going to pay. They left the area and two or three days later TOVAR showed up and threatened her. She never knew what had happened to PACHECO. I showed her a picture of PACHECO from the crime scene and told her that is what had happened to PACHECO. I told that she still was not being completely honest with me. I told her I knew that I knew she had spoken with GARCIA that day prior to the kidnapping. said she did not remember. said she did not see GARCIA that day before he kidnapping of PACHECO. She did not see him at the jack in the box. said that GARCIA always called her and asked for money. did give GARCIA money that morning but she doesn`t remember where. She remembers giving GARCIA $50.00 the morning of the kidnapping. She doesn`t remember talking to GARCIA again. Recapping the version of the story told me the following. received a phone call from GARCIA in the morning requesting money. she does not recall where specifically she met him. gave GARCIA $50.00. met GARCIA somewhere Later that day PACHECO arrived at store and she asked him for a ride to KAISER. stayed at the store and kept it open. They drove to Kaiser and she found out that she did not have an appointment. They drove away and ended up on the dirt road. said she later heard about GARCIA from GARCIA`s mother. was in Los Angeles and ran into GARCIA`s mother and GARCIA`s mother told her that the police had killed him. said she did not mention to GARCIA`s mother that he had kidnapped her. went to Los Angeles on business and sought to find GARCIA`s mother. said when she found GARCIAS mother she asked her about her son and was worried about him. I told her that it did not make sense that she went to looking for her kidnapper`s mother. She said she wanted peace and know what had happened to him. remembered details of what happen. She remembers GARCIA telling PACHECO that he owed him lots of money that he had invested money though a lady. doesn`t know what lady GARCIA used to invest with. said she did not hate PACHECO and had no reason to want to hurt PACHECO. I reviewed with her final statement as I understood and cleared up what was the truth. She verified the information I told her as the truth. (refer to end of video interview.) The interview was terminated and was given a ride back to her shop and released. Disposition: NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(320145) ORTIZ, ALFONSO Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Follow up. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(320145) ORTIZ, ALFONSO Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Supplement Information Supplement Date Supplement Type Supplement Officer 01/14/2015 00:00:00 SUPPLEMENTAL (320145) ORTIZ, ALFONSO Contact Name Supervising Officer (250211) GREENBERG, RICKY 418 Supplement Notes Supplemental: On 1/14/2015 I attended an operation briefing for the purpose of assisting Detective Pacheco in executing an arrest warrant on at her place of business in Rohnert Park, Ca. On the same date was contacted outside her place of business when she arrived to open the store. She was placed under arrest and placed in handcuffs by Detective Pacheco and placed in his vehicle. was seated in the front passenger seat and I sat directly behind her. was handcuffed in the front for comfort during transport. made no comments regarding the arrest during the drive from Rohnert Park to the Napa Sheriff`s Office. When we arrived at the Napa Sherriff office was seated in an interview room. Detective Pacheco and I went into the interview room to conduct an interview. The interview was conducted in Spanish. identified herself by verbally providing her full name and date of birth. I explained to she was under arrest for the kidnapping and robbery of Reynaldo Pacheco which was associated in the death and homicide of Reynaldo Pacheco. At approximately 1145 hours I advised of her Miranda rights. When asked if she understood the rights I had explained to her she stated "si" translated to "yes." I explained that all the evidence had been submitted to the Napa DA and the arrest warrant was issued. I told that I wanted to give her the opportunity to clear up some facts regarding the meeting between Miguel GARCIA, Mauricio TOVAR with Reynaldo Pacheco. stated that the statement she had given in the past was the truth and if I didn`t believe her that was my decision. told me that if we were going to try to confuse her and have her change her statement it was not going to happen. said her biggest regret is that she became friends and fed a man. (Miguel Garcia). She also said her worst mistake was that she met and introduced her to Pacheco and forced her to invest into that company. (Kingdome 777). said she was tired of not being believed and requested her lawyer. All other questions were terminated and the interview was terminated. asked if she was being treated this way because she was Latin. I explained to her that she was arrested and handcuffed because she is under arrest for the kidnapping and robbery of Pacheco not because she is Latin. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(320145) ORTIZ, ALFONSO Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Disposition: No further action pending from this officer. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(320145) ORTIZ, ALFONSO Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Supplement Information Supplement Date Supplement Type Supplement Officer 04/04/2014 07:31:36 SUPPLEMENTAL (250120) ORTIZ, OSCAR Contact Name Supervising Officer (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE 418 Supplement Notes SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT: On the morning of 4-3-2014, I, Lt. Oscar Ortiz, contacted California Highway Patrol Air Operations and requested aerial photographs of the crime scene area related to this investigation, at 2470 Sage Canyon Road, St. Helena CA. I further requested that they look overhead in a wider area for any sign of an abandoned, dark colored SUV vehicle, specifically a Range Rover. Officer Romero of Air Operations later completed this mission. He notified me that they did observe any vehicles matching this description in the area. Officer Romero dropped off a CD containing the digital file photographs taken from above the scene. On 4-4-2014, I booked the CD into evidence at the photo-evidence locker. RECOMMENDATION: Investigation continuing NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250120) ORTIZ, OSCAR Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Supplement Information Supplement Date Supplement Type Supplement Officer 04/09/2014 14:42:54 EVIDENCE COLLECTION (250120) ORTIZ, OSCAR Contact Name Supervising Officer (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE 418 Supplement Notes SUPPLEMENTAL (EVIDENCE COLLECTION ONLY): On 4-9-2014 at approx. 1250hrs., I, Lt. Oscar Ortiz, went to the "Joe`s Chevron", 630 Trancas St. Napa, to pick up video surveillance footage from the afternoon of March 24th. The store manager, Howard Swayln, transferred copies of the footage to a thumbdrive that I provided him. I had Detective John Hallman burn the files onto a Compact Disc (CD) and booked the CD into evidence on 4-9-2014. The store manager also printed a copy of the receipt for the transaction involving one of the suspects in this case. The suspect, a thin Hispanic male adult wearing a black t-shirt and white "Puma" baseball cap, purchased Gatoraide and a Monster Energy drink, using cash. I marked the receipt, "OO-3" and booked it into evidence along with the CD. EVIDENCE: OO-2: CD with Chevron surveillance footage NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250120) ORTIZ, OSCAR Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Supplement Information Supplement Date Supplement Type Supplement Officer 04/15/2014 16:33:00 SUPPLEMENTAL (250120) ORTIZ, OSCAR Contact Name Supervising Officer (250134) WILSON, JOEL 418 Supplement Notes SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT: Interview of RECOVERY OF VICTIM VEHICLE (LAND ROVER) IN DIXON INVESTIGATION: During the morning hours of April 10, 2014, I, Lt. Oscar Ortiz, called and spoke to a male voice that identified himself as I advised that I was looking for information on the purchase of a Land Rover SUV related to a case the Napa Sheriff`s Office is investigating. immediately responded by saying, "Yo lo compre." (trans: I bought it). s explained that he was currently at work and unavailable to assist me with the recovery. He stated it locked in a garage and he would cooperate fully with the investigation and assist with our efforts to seize it for evidence. He stated nobody has used it very much since the day he purchased it and it has been kept garaged. I made an appointment with to meet him after he got off work at his home in Dixon at 3PM. Detective Pacheco authored a search warrant for home for evidence of the vehicle and it`s seizure. That same date, at approx. 1445hrs., Detective Ackman and I went to . We waited in front of the residence. At approx. 1450hrs., arrived and introduced himself. He opened the garage to his home and we confirmed that the Land Rover in his garage was the victim`s vehicle. I provided (via email) with a copy of the search warrant. was cooperative but concerned about his financial loss from the purchase of the vehicle, which he assumed was a legal transaction. At approx. 1451hrs., I translated a photo line-up Admonition from English to Spanish to both and his spouse, . I then showed a series of six photographs to , with the second photograph being Miguel GARCIA. identified GARCIA as the subject who sold him the Land Rover. I then showed him a series of six photographs with the second photograph being Mauricio TOVAR. Villegas identified TOVAR as the person he met with and introduced him to the buyer (Garcia). I then showed the same series of photographs to ` spouse, since stated she was with him when he went to buy the car. It should be noted that was not present in the garage (where the photo line-ups were conducted) when identified GARCIA and TOVAR as she was busy with their five year old son (taking him inside the house). also identified both GARCIA and TOVAR. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250120) ORTIZ, OSCAR Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 I put on latex gloves, entered the Land Rover to turn the ignition and back it up into the tow truck. The vehicle was then towed by "Blackhawk" towing service to the Napa Sheriff`s Office were it was stored inside the evidence vehicle bay. Detective Ackman took photographs of the vehicle in the garage prior to the removal and later booked the photographs into evidence. Detective Ackman and I asked to come inside home so that I could interview them both and obtain elimination fingerprints since they had been inside the victim vehicle. They both consented and the interviews were done by me, in Spanish, at their dining room table. I interviewed them independently of one another went into her son`s room while I interviewed ). Both interviews were recorded on a digital recorder. STATEMENT IN SUMMARY OF : makes a living as a forklift operator for a clothing warehouse, along with buying and selling cars. Regarding the purchase of this car, he recalls that it was between the 24th and 26th (of March). He believes it was a Monday (the 24th). He usually doesn`t work on Mondays and he remembers that the day he bought the car he didn`t have to work. explained that about 6 or 7 months ago, he sold a car in Napa. The person he sold the car is the person he identified in the second set of photographs I showed him (TOVAR). It was a green Honda Civic. When he sold the car to TOVAR, he gave him business cards in case anyone he knows is ever looking to sell or buy cars. TOVAR called him and offered to sell him a vehicle like the one he already owns (Range Rover). negotiated with TOVAR over the price. TOVAR initially asked for $10,000. Since the vehicle had over 200,000 miles on it and some motor problems, thought that was too much. countered with $7,000. The agreed on a purchase price of $8,000. TOVAR told he would have to come pick it up in Napa. At this point in the interview, was unsure of the location they agreed to meet as he recalls a sign off the highway that read, "Sonoma". He recalled that it was at a shopping center with a Baskin Robbins store. was unclear on the exact location of the meet at this point, but explained he wanted it to be in a public place since he was bringing so much cash. ( We were later able to determine, through photographs and the interview of wife, that the shopping center he was referring to was the Food for Less shopping center of Vallejo, off of "Sonoma Blvd", just south of American Canyon.). waited for TOVAR at this shopping center. TOVAR showed up in a cream colored "300" (Chrysler), by himself. Within 5 minutes, the other subject whose picture he saw (GARCIA) showed up in the Range Rover. GARCIA was also by himself. I asked what name he knew TOVAR as. couldn`t remember exactly but thinks it was " or something similar. He had previously met TOVAR when he sold him the Honda. The other person (GARCIA) who showed up with the Range Rover was unknown to . This was the first time he had ever met him. They negotiated further but the price stayed at $8,000. confirmed with GARCIA that everything was straight with the vehicle`s registration and that he had the right to sell it. checked with a friend at the Dixon office of the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) to make sure it wasn`t stolen or anything prior to the meet, after the initial phone call from TOVAR during which they provided him with the license plate and Vehicle Identification Number (VIN). At the meet location, he verbally confirmed with the sellers once again that the transaction was legal. He called his friend again and reviewed the pink slip to make sure it wasn`t counterfeit. He compared the numbers on the pink slip with the numbers on the vehicle. To complete the purchase, he asked the seller (GARCIA) for identification. explained that it is common practice for him, when purchases cars, to look at and even snap a photograph of the seller`s identification with his cell phone. GARCIA stated he didn`t have his identification. GARCIA told him the sale was urgent because he needed the money for someone that was sick. asked TOVAR if GARCIA "Es de confianza?" (trans: trustworthy) and TOVAR told him he was, that he knows GARCIA`s wife and family. stated he hardly knows TOVAR and there was further discussion of the sale and if should trust GARCIA. went to check the car with his friend again but GARCIA was growing inpatient, stated he was in a big hurry and asked if the deal was going to happen or not? Based on them having NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250120) ORTIZ, OSCAR Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 the pink slip in hand, GARCIA`s explanation that he had an emergency and needed the money, and the plate not being reported as stolen or anything, agreed to purchase the vehicle. He handed GARCIA an envelope containing $5,000 in cash, and then an additional $3,000. GARCIA did not count the money. He then drove the Range Rover to his home in Dixon and parked it in the garage. has not washed it. In the time they have been in possession of it, his wife drove it twice. He had not attempted to change the title or register the vehicle because they left for a weeklong trip to Los Angeles shortly after the purchase (in a different vehicle). He had planned on registering it this week or next. I asked to describe the condition of the interior of the vehicle at the time he purchased it. stated that after the transaction, GARCIA removed an infant seat from the car, and a bunch of clothes. It looked like they had been on a road trip because there were lots of coins, paper, and garbage spread out around the inside of the car. When took possession of the vehicle, he discovered the front seat did not work. He asked for a discount on the price but "no quisieron" (trans: they didn`t want to.). They left in a hurry as GARCIA explained that he had left his wife alone with the children and had to go pick them up right away. In the rear compartment, noted there were lots of papers and what appeared to be check stubs. got the impression that the man worked in the fields. He did not recall the names on the check stubs. I asked him if he noticed any business related documents. stated it was mostly trash and he noticed some type of note for fertilizer. I asked what time of day this car deal was done at. stated it was late, about 6pm. recalled that everything started around 11am, when the phone calls about selling him the car started. After the initial phone calls, they kept putting off the deal for later. became suspicious that they may have been wanting to wait until after DMV closes so that is why he got the information he needed by phone early and checked before the meet happened. I asked if he was sure on the time of the first phone call. checked his cell phone but the call log for that date was no longer available in his handset. He does not have TOVAR`s number in his handset directory. I asked about Gatorade and garbage in the Range Rover when he took possession of it. described the garbage items in the Range Rover as if the occupants had been on a road trip (empty bags of chips, bottles, etc). Specifically, he does recall one empty Gatorade bottle. cleaned up these items and threw them out. tried calling TOVAR about a week later, before he registered the Range Rover, because he was still uncomfortable with the hurry they were in during the sale. TOVAR did not answer the call. He planned to register the car anyway since his friend had already told him it was clear when he initially bought it. also recalled that he received a phone call from TOVAR the day after the Range Rover sale, from a new number he didn`t recognize ( different than the number TOVAR had used before). TOVAR asked him if he registered the car yet, which he hadn`t. After that call, became suspicious again. He tried calling that number back but there was no answer. stated he still had the pink slip and retrieved his file folder where he kept it. several paperwork items to find it so I had him put on latex gloves. Wearing gloves, slip and placed it in an evidence folder for me. had to go through found the correct pink stated he wanted to cooperate fully and consented to submitting a full set of fingerprints for elimination purposes. Detective Ackman fingerprinted ---End of Statement--I next interviewed ` wife, . During Detective Ackman being fingerprinted (within ear shot). Ackman fingerprint their fourteen year old daughter, NSD14-001332 interview, was in the adjoining kitchen with and also consented to having Detective , who also rode inside the Range Rover during the time it Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250120) ORTIZ, OSCAR Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 was in their control. STATEMENT IN SUMMARY OF : didn`t remember the exact date of the Range Rover purchase, but estimates it was on March 24 based on the fact that about three days later they left for Los Angeles. As she remembers it, the day`s events started at about 5pm. The first she knew of it was when her husband told her that someone was going to sell them a good vehicle, at a good price, and that they were going to go look at it. He told her it was a Range Rover. Since they already own one, and this one would cost less and was newer, she agreed to go see it. Initially, they told them to meet in San Rafael. They went to San Rafael and then her husband called to let them know he was there. At that point, they told him to return back to Vallejo. They got lost for a bit but then took the exit for "Sonoma" off the highway. I discussed the location further with Juarez and confirmed she was describing the Food for Less parking lot off Sonoma Blvd in Vallejo. While waiting for the sellers, they had an ice cream at the Baskin Robbins ( and their 5 year old child). The first person to show up was in a cream colored Chrysler 300. Closely behind him, another male in the Range Rover showed up. I reference to the two photo line ups I previously showed her and confirmed that the driver of the Chrysler 300 was from the second line up she viewed (TOVAR) and that the driver of the Range Rover was from the first set (GARCIA). did not participate in the negotiations and took the child to Food for Less while her husband met with the sellers. After the sale, the two sellers left in the Chrysler. described the interior of the Range Rover as having trash (empty bottles, bags). Her husband cleaned out the trash but they hadn`t gotten around to thoroughly cleaning the vehicle yet. stated that since they bought the vehicle, she has driven it twice. Other than that, it has been garaged. I asked if there was a backpack or briefcase in the vehicle. stated there was not. She believes she remembers seeing dirty towels, but everything was thrown out with the garbage. I asked about tape or cord, ropes. stated she did remember seeing paper type tape, yellow or brown in color. added that when she returned with the child after going into Food for Less, the sale was not complete. She noted that the guy with the Range Rover (GARCIA) kept covering his face with his hands. She thought this was suspicious and she told her husband to examine the car closely. She then got the impression GARCIA was very stressed because supposedly his father was very sick and she felt bad for him. Detective Ackman showed Google overhead photographs of the parking lot and she identified where the meet for the car sale took place (third parking row in, east of the Baskin Robbins store). ---End of Statement--With consent, Detective Ackman fingerprinted her for elimination purposes. Both and expressed concern about their financial loss in purchases this Range Rover from GARCIA and TOVAR. They emphasized that they want to fully cooperate with our investigation, but the financial burden of this loss was difficult for them. I advised them that I would be in touch with them and look into any possible resolutions as to the ownership of the vehicle, but they were crime victims in all of this. I explained to them that the seller they met with was not the legal owner of the car. On 4-15-2014, I transferred the audio file of these interviews onto a CD and booked the CD into evidence. EVIDENCE: NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250120) ORTIZ, OSCAR Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 OO-3: CD with audio files of interviews with RECOMMENDATION: Investigation continuing NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250120) ORTIZ, OSCAR Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Supplement Information Supplement Date Supplement Type Supplement Officer 04/18/2014 17:57:11 SUPPLEMENTAL (250120) ORTIZ, OSCAR Contact Name Supervising Officer (250134) WILSON, JOEL 418 Supplement Notes SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT: INTERVIEW OF NORBERTO GUERRERO GONZALEZ INVESTIGATION: On April 14, 2014, at approx. 1745hrs., I, Lt. Oscar Ortiz, along with Detectives Pacheco, Chambers, Eddleman, and Ackman, went to to see if Norberto Guerrero GONZALEZ lived there. We all donned marked "Sheriff" department raid attire. Detective Pacheco had previously confirmed that GONZALEZ was on probation with a Search and Seizure condition. Norberto had recently (March of 2014) reported an address of but when Detective (same as mentioned above) went there, it was determined he hadn`t lived there in several months. I knocked on the front door to apartmen two females (mother and adult daughter) answered the door. The two females were later identified as (mother) and 18 year old . Both were cooperative. While standing at the front door, both confirmed GONZALEZ lived in the apartment and had been living there for several months. identified herself as the girlfriend of GONZALEZ. She stated GONZALEZ was at work and she expected him home within the hour. I asked both where GONZALEZ sleeps and where he keeps his clothing, toiletries, possessions, etc. pointed to the living room couch and stated they sleep there (the apartment is a one bedroom apartment). She stated GONZALEZ`s possessions are kept in the back. I advised both that GONZALEZ was on probation with search terms, and I needed to confirm he lived there to search and search his property. They continued to be cooperative and welcomed us inside the apartment to conduct our probation search. led us through the bedroom to a back patio area where a tarp style tent structure was erected to store property. I then stood by with elderly grandmother in the living room while the other detectives started to do a probation search. identified GONZALEZ`s cell phone number as . While I was in the living room, explained that she was allowing her daughter`s boyfriend to stay with them because that is what her daughter wanted. Detective Pacheco advised me that before they started to search through GONZALEZ`s property, they immediately noticed a light colored "Puma" hat that matched the description of the hat GONZALEZ was wearing when he purchased Gatorade at a Chevron gas station on the day of the murder. The probation search was stopped and Detective Pacheco left to go author a search warrant for the apartment. At that time, Detective`s Chambers and Eddleman saw GONZALEZ approach the apartment and they detained him. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250120) ORTIZ, OSCAR Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Detective Eddlemen searched GONZALEZ pursuant to his probation terms and seized a methamphetamine smoking pipe with a usable amount of methamphetamine inside it (see NSO#14-1503). GONZALEZ was arrested and transported to the Napa Sheriff`s Office by Detective Hallman. Detective Nicole Dudley and I then met with GONZALEZ in an interview room at the Sheriff`s Office. The interview was conducted in Spanish and I translated throughout the interview to both GONZALEZ and Detective Dudley. The interview was audio and video recorded. Prior to questioning, I read a Spanish Miranda Admonition to GONZALEZ from a pre-printed Spanish "Miranda Card". GONZALEZ stated he understood each of the rights. The following is a summary of that interview: STATEMENT IN SUMMARY OF NORBERTO GUERRERO GONZALEZ: GONZALEZ admitted that he has been living at for since December or January, about 4 months. He has been using the cell phone of for about the past 2 months. GONZALEZ acknowledged that he was on probation for an arrest related to being in possession of "Crystal" (slang for methamphetamine) and that when he was detained today, he had a pipe. GONZELEZ had just returned home from working in the vineyards at "Buena Tierra" Vineyards. He has been working there about 2 weeks. He works for a vineyard contractor business owned by a person he only knows as and under a manager for that company he knows only as I asked him how things are going with his addiction. GONZALEZ admitted he is struggling and was about to call his counselor, about going to "McCallin" for treatment. I asked him when was the last time he updated probation with his most current address. GONZALEZ stated he last went to court two weeks ago. At that time, he was in a hurry so he didn`t update his address. I told GONZALEZ that it appears he provided an old address on Marshall. GONZALEZ stated he updated his address at one point to an address on Trancas. I asked him why he didn`t provide the accurate address. GONZALEZ stated he didn`t think it was too important since he was going to his group meetings and court dates every two weeks anyway. Detective Dudley asked GONZALEZ what his drug of choice was. GONZALEZ stated it was "Crystal". He stated he doesn`t drink or use other drugs. He last used in the morning, before work. Detective Dudley asked him if it was hard to quit. GONZALEZ explained that it was more of a need in the early mornings to get by a full day of work. He knows it is not an excuse to use, however. We asked GONZALEZ if his treatment is helping and he stated it does help. He has had some difficulty with his mother-in-law because he has to leave frequently for group meetings or court. His neighborhood is also quick to gossip. GONZALEZ stated he has been pretty steadily employed, working in vineyards, but he misses days frequently due to court appearances or drug treatment appointments. In addition to his most recent work site, he has also worked recently for a vineyard contractor company named, "Ceja." This employer was flexible with him and the frequent days he needed to miss for court appearances, treatments, or visits with his child. GONZALEZ doesn`t have a car and he gets around by getting rides. Detective Dudley asked GONZALEZ if he knows a guy named "Miguel" or "Miguel Garcia." Initially, GONZALEZ stated he did not know Garcia. When I asked him if there is any reason his phone number would be in GARCIA`s cell phone, GONZALEZ explained that he knew a person, who he only knew by the nickname "Pacheco", that he once saw on a website as having an arrest warrant. He did not know the person was named Miguel GARCIA because he always called him "Pacheco." GONZALEZ met this person about 3 months ago. He met him on Marin Street, when he went to see "Tovar." GONZALEZ explained that "Tovar" is a manager for "Ceja." He went there to pick up his check. GONZALEZ estimated that "Tovar" is 40 or 50 years old. While there, the person he knew as "Pacheco" showed up and was sad that he didn`t have enough money for diapers or the rent. GONZALEZ loaned him $300. He saw him again about a month NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250120) ORTIZ, OSCAR Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 ago when he paid him back the $300. GONZALEZ explained that the person he knows by the nickname, "Pacheco" , is the same person as Miguel GARCIA because he saw GARCIA on the news website as having an arrest warrant. GONZALEZ frequently checks this website to make sure he is not on it as wanted. He noticed GARCIA was listed as wanted about a month and a half ago, for child abuse type charges. (note: GONZALEZ would later admit that he made the story about the $300 loan to GARCIA for rent and diaper money was a lie). Detective Dudley confirmed with GONZALEZ that the "Tovar" from Ceja Vineyard Management that he was referring to was "Luis Tovar." We asked GONZALEZ to tell us about how GARCIA paid him back. GONZALEZ stated GARCIA gave him his ATM card and sent him into the Seven Eleven store to withdraw the money. He described that he was out walking near his home, ran into GARCIA who was driving his bosses` vehicle, and GARCIA picked him up, gave him a ride to the Seven Eleven store to withdraw the money, then brought him back. GONZALEZ described the vehicle as a "trocka" (trans: truck), enclosed and similar to a "Cherokee" (SUV), and was newer. GARCIA told him his boss sent him to get it washed. GONZALEZ stated GARCIA was alone and nobody else was in the vehicle. (note: GONZALEZ would later admit this was a lie and that there were more people in the car). GONZALEZ was walking, heard GARCIA whistle at him, he asked about the money GARCIA owed him, GARCIA invited him to get in and they would go to the ATM to withdraw it, they did, and then GARCIA dropped him back off. GONZALEZ has not seen GARCIA since. The only other time he had seen GARCIA was when he loaned him the money while at Luis Tovar`s house to pick up his paycheck (about a month and a half ago). When Detective Dudley asked GONZALEZ what he thought of GARCIA, GONZALEZ stated he didn`t know very well but felt bad for him when he needed money for rent and diapers. Detective Dudley and I asked GONZALEZ if he has times when he doesn`t remember things due to his drug use. GONZALEZ stated there is not and explained that he really isn`t that addicted. GONZALEZ stated he didn`t know if GARCIA used drugs. GONZALEZ stated that the car GARCIA was using that day was gray or green. The time of day when he ran into GARCIA and got his money paid back was around 11am. We confirmed that GONZALEZ was sticking to his story of being picked up by Garcia, going to Seven Eleven, then straight back and dropped off. GONZALEZ explained that he can`t be away from home for long because his wife is very jealous. They do not have any children together. GONZALEZ does have one child with someone else who he is no longer together with. He gets to visit with that child every Tuesday. We asked him about the card he used. GONZALEZ stated it was a Debit card. He didn`t look at it closely. GARCIA pulled it out of his wallet, gave him the PIN, and sent him into the store. Detective Dudley asked why GARCIA didn`t make the withdrawal himself. GONZALEZ stated GARCIA was in a hurry and sent him in, staying in the car. GONZALEZ didn`t pay attention to the name or details on the actual card. We explained to GONZALEZ that the card that was used did not belong to GARCIA. Gonzalez responded, "eso yo no sabia." (trans: that I didn`t know). GONZALEZ asked if he was going to have problems for this. We emphasized with him that the most important thing for him was to be truthful with us. I asked GONZALEZ if he knew Mauricio TOVAR. He stated he did, from working with him with the Ceja company. He has known TOVAR for two years. GONZALEZ met GARCIA through Mauricio TOVAR. He met GARCIA when he went to pick up his check, was talking to TOVAR, and GARCIA showed up. That`s when GARCIA was talking about having money problems. The last time he saw TOVAR was about a week before he (TOVAR) got arrested, on a Friday, at his house on Marin Street. TOVAR sold him some speakers. He doesn`t know how long TOVAR or GARCIA knew one another. GONZALEZ stated he didn`t know much about GARCIA but loaned GARCIA the money because TOVAR vouched for him. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250120) ORTIZ, OSCAR Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 We asked GONZALEZ if he could think of a reason why TOVAR would tell us that the day he made the ATM withdrawal, he was with him and GARCIA. GONZALEZ stated he did not know why he would say that but TOVAR was not with them. We asked him if he knew him as a liar. GONZALEZ stated he is more of a jokester, than a liar. I asked GONZALEZ if they also drove to a gas station, off Trancas near Nob Hill store. GONZALEZ stated he did not go anywhere else, he was sure. I confronted GONZALEZ with the fact that I had already viewed surveillance footage from that day that showed him going into the Chevron convenience store, buying several Gatorades and a "Monster" energy drink. I asked GONZALEZ why he would lie to me about that. GONZALEZ asked if it was that same date and I told him it was. GONZALEZ stated he was confused but he did buy the Gatorades. I suggested to GONZALEZ that we start over, with honesty, and he agreed. GONZALEZ stated once again that he was picked up by GARCIA, they went to make the ATM withdrawal at Seven Eleven, then GARCIA asked him if he would help wash the vehicle. GONZALEZ agreed to help him. They then went to the Chevron store. I asked him who was in the vehicle at that point. GONZALEZ stated it was the person he calls "Pacheco" (GARCIA), Mauricio TOVAR, and him. GARCIA was going to pay him to help wash the vehicle. They never did end up washing it. Since GONZALEZ purchased 3 Gatorade bottles and a "Monster" energy drink, we asked him who the fourth drink was for. GONZALEZ explained it was a Gatorade for each of them, and an additional "Monster" drink for GARCIA. GONZALEZ admitted he was seated in the front passenger seat, GARCIA was driving, and TOVAR was seated in the rear seat, behind GONZALEZ. We asked if there was anything else in the car, including child car seats, or other items. GONZALEZ stated that there were papers in the car. I had GONZALEZ start over and explain how the three of them (GARCIA, TOVAR, and GONZALEZ) came to gather together that day. GONZALEZ stated he initially got a call from TOVAR, inviting him to join them and GARCIA would pay him. He agreed and the two of them (GARCIA and TOVAR) picked him up near his apartment. At this point of the interview, GONZALEZ stated that the purpose of them picking him up was to pay him the $300 GARCIA owed him. The three of them went northbound on Freeway drive to First St., turned east on First street to the Seven Eleven store. They dropped him off to go use the ATM, when he came out of the store after the withdrawal, they were waiting for him on the other side of the Gas Station. TOVAR and GARCIA were in a hurry. They did not tell GONZALEZ what their rush was. After the stop at the Seven Eleven store, they went to California Blvd, to Trancas, and stopped at the gas station where he bought the Gatorade drinks. After they bought the Gatorades, they were going to wash the truck, and then the person he referred to as "Pacheco" (GARCIA) said he changed his mind about washing it. They told GONZALEZ they were going to go somewhere else, GONZALEZ said he didn`t want to go, so they took him home. We asked him if they stopped anywhere else and GONZALEZ said "no." Detective Dudley then told GONZALEZ that we have him on video at a Wells Fargo, to which GONZALEZ immediately responded, "oh, si,si,si." (trans: oh, yes, yes ,yes). GONZALEZ stated they did stop at Wells Fargo, before they went to buy the Gatorades. At Wells Fargo, he tried to get money out for "Pacheco" (GARCIA), but the maximum had already been withdrawn. This at approx. 3pm. Detective Dudley asked GONZALEZ what types of cell phones they all had. GONZALEZ described his as a Metro touch screen phone that can access the internet. He did not know what types of phones TOVAR and GARCIA used. We told GONZALEZ we heard they went to other places that day and we knew from the cell phones they went to other places. GONZALEZ initial responded that they did not. We asked if he had heard of anything happening to "Pacheco" (GARCIA). GONZALEZ stated he had heard that GARCIA committed suicide at a trailer because SWAT was there to arrest him. He didn`t really know GARCIA, had only seen him two or three times, and wasn`t scared of him. He hasn`t heard of anyone afraid of GARCIA. Regarding TOVAR, GONZALEZ stated they get along well and he considers him a friend. GONZALEZ knew that TOVAR was in jail for a shooting at someone. We asked GONZALEZ why he thought we were talking to him about all this today. GONZALEZ stated he didn`t know, but he thinks it has to do with using the card. We told him that was part of the reason and that it was a stolen card. GONZALEZ stated he did not know that. If he would have known that he wouldn`t have used it. We told him NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250120) ORTIZ, OSCAR Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 the car was not GARCIA`s car either. We told GONZALEZ that we knew there was another person in the car besides the three of them. GONZALEZ stated there was not. He said he didn`t know if they picked up someone else after they dropped him off. I assured GONZALEZ that I knew there was another person with the three of them even if he is denying it. We told GONZALEZ that we have been investigating this case for a week, have been talking to people, including TOVAR, and we knew there was a fourth person in the vehicle. Detective Dudley showed GONZALEZ a photograph of the victim in this case, Reynaldo Pacheco. GONZALEZ looked at it and said he didn`t know him. Detective Dudley then showed GONZALEZ a photograph of TOVAR. GONZALEZ identified the photograph as "Mauricio." We then told GONZALEZ that the cell phones can tell us where they have been. We reminded him of the importance of being honest. I told him he didn`t know what we already knew, but he needed to have the courage to be honest. I pointed out to him that he has already been caught lying to us during this interview, and that all three of us in the room knew he had information he was keeping from us. GONZALEZ asked me how much time he could get for using the card. I explained to him that it depended on the circumstances, and the circumstances are exactly what we are investigating. I told him that all three of us knew that the most serious of the offenders out of GARCIA, TOVAR, and him is not him. GONZALEZ agreed. GONZALEZ agreed to be honest. He explained that the truth is, he didn`t know what they were planning to do when they called him and picked him up. That day, he had called TOVAR to ask him to loan him money. TOVAR invited him to help on a job and watch somebody. GONZALEZ admitted that there was another person in the car when they picked him up. This person was seated in the backseat, next to TOVAR. He was awake and talking with TOVAR and GARCIA. GONZALEZ just got into the car and didn`t turn to look at him. GONZALEZ didn`t know that there was going to be another person when they picked him up. I asked him if the person was tied up. GONZALEZ paused and stated he didn`t notice if he was or wasn`t. GONZALEZ admitted that the card he used belonged to this other person. He got the card from GARCIA and this other person provided the PIN code. I asked GONZALEZ at what point did he realize the victim was tied up. GONZALEZ admitted he noticed it when they when they were at the Seven Eleven store. I asked him if his mouth was bound or tied up. He stated it was not. I asked GONZALEZ who tied up the victim`s mouth. GONZALEZ responded, "Mauricio." He stated the victim`s mouth was tied up at the mountain site. When they went to the Chevron, the victim`s mouth was not gagged or tied up. GONZALEZ saw when TOVAR tied it up. At the mountain site, TOVAR and GARCIA stayed with the victim. They told GONZALEZ they were just going to tie him up. GONZALEZ left the three of them and returned to the vehicle. When GARCIA and TOVAR returned, they told him they had tied him up, and that he would get loose in two or three days. After that, they returned GONZALEZ to Napa. GONZALEZ stated he never helped tie up the person and had never seen the person before. GONZALEZ does not know what they did to the person. He only knows that they told him they were going to tie him up. We asked GONZALEZ what the man was saying. GONZALEZ stated he was just asking not to get tied up. GONZALEZ confirmed that TOVAR allowed the man to make a phone call. The call had something to do with arranging for someone to pick up his daughter. GONZALEZ didn`t know who dialed the phone. Detective Dudley asked GONZALEZ what was going through his mind during all of this. He stated he knew he had done a bad thing by making the ATM withdrawal. When he was at Seven Eleven and got back into the car after getting the money, he wanted to get out of the car. He noticed that GARCIA had a handgun however, so he couldn`t get out. This was the first time he had noticed the gun. He had never seen GARCIA with a gun before. GARCIA didn`t threaten him with the gun. After they returned from the mountain, GARCIA did point the gun at GONZALEZ. GONZALEZ reacted by saying, "Que pues?" (trans: whats up?). GARCIA then told him it didn`t have any bullets. They had already left the man at the mountain tied up. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250120) ORTIZ, OSCAR Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 GONZALEZ stated that GARCIA and TOVAR just told him they had left the man tied up, to see who finds him. Detective Dudley asked GONZALEZ what he thinks happened. He believes they just left him tied up. When they dropped him off at the gas station on Imola, he returned the $300 and ATM card to TOVAR. TOVAR then gave him $100 from the money. Detective Dudley and I then clarified why GONZALEZ keeps referring to GARCIA as "Pacheco", which coincidently happens to be the victim`s last name in this case. GONZALEZ explained that "Pacheco" is a nickname he used for GARCIA. To GONZALEZ, the word "Pacheco" is an adjective, describing someone who looks real "high" or on marijuana or drugs. We asked him why he thinks this person was tied up and left up on the mountain. GONZALEZ thinks it was so he wouldn`t be able to call the police on Miguel (GARCIA). GONZALEZ believes the conflict had something to do with that man robbing from GARCIA and causing GARCIA to get kicked out of his apartment. He didn`t know details and had only overheard the victim and GARCIA talking about that. TOVAR wasn`t saying anything and was just going through the victim`s cell phone. We asked GONZALEZ if a female was with them at any moment. He responded that there was not, but GARCIA talked about some woman. GONZALEZ didn`t pay close attention but he did overhear TOVAR and GARCIA talk about the "Senora" giving a thousand dollars to the person. GONZALEZ doesn`t know what woman they were talking about. On the way back, GONZALEZ sat in the passenger side rear seat. We asked GONZALEZ about the victim`s computer and cell phone. GONZALEZ stated that he didn`t know about the phone, but the computer was thrown out the window. We asked GONZALEZ if he noticed a briefcase or computer carrying case in the car. GONZALEZ did not see one. After a short break, Detective Dudley and I returned to the interview room to clarify some questions with GONZALEZ. GONZALEZ confirmed that the initial story of getting a phone call from "pacheco" (GARCIA) about paying him back the $300, or even the whole story about GONZALEZ loaning GARCIA $300 when he met him because GARCIA needed money for rent and diapers, was all a lie. GONZALEZ is actually the one who owed TOVAR $300. I asked GONZALEZ to help me understand what the "jale" (trans: job) was that he was invited to participate in. GONZALEZ said he was just going to watch somebody. I asked GONZALEZ, at what moment, did you realize this was a kidnapping. GONZALEZ stated he realized it when they got up to the mountain location. I asked GONZALEZ if, before going up to the mountain site, the victim had any opportunity to escape and run off. GONZALEZ replied, "yo creo que no." (trans: I don`t think so). GONZALEZ explained that GARCIA had a gun, and he told them that if they got pulled over, the first person to die would be him (the victim). At one point, GONZALEZ motioned like he was going to exit the car. GARCIA then said, "ni uno de aqui se va bajar, el primero que se baje se lo va llevar a la verga." (trans: no one here is getting out, the first one to get out is going to hell). This threat was after the stop for the Gatorades, on the way up to the mountain. At one point, GARCIA also asked GONZALEZ about his girlfriend`s brother. GONZALEZ feared that GARCIA knowing about his family would put them in danger if he got out of the car at that point. While driving, GARCIA kept the gun at his legs (thighs). The gun was a handgun, but GONZALEZ wasn`t sure if it was a revolver or semi-auto. I asked GONZALEZ about the stop at Seven Eleven, and how the victim gave the PIN number to them. GONZALEZ stated he was present when the victim gave GARCIA his PIN. That verbal exchange was normal, the victim and GARCIA didn`t say anything about letting him go. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250120) ORTIZ, OSCAR Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 I asked GONZALEZ where they were when TOVAR allowed the victim to make a phone call to arrange for his daughter to get picked up. GONZALEZ responded that it was before the stop for the Gatorade, before the attempt ATM withdrawal at Wells Fargo. They did not make any other stops. I asked GONZALEZ what types of negotiations he heard between the victim, GARCIA, and TOVAR. GONZALEZ stated they weren`t talking about that. The man did not look scared. I asked GONZALEZ if he was scared of TOVAR. He stated not at this time, but at that moment he was scared for his family when GARCIA asked him how his brother-in-law "pato" was doing. He was surprised GARCIA knew about him and about his girlfriend. This made GONZALEZ nervous for his girlfriend and his girlfriend`s mother. I asked GONZALEZ if he helped tie up the victim`s mouth up at the mountain site. GONZALEZ stated he did not. He saw them tie up the victim with tape. They also asked GONZALEZ for his t-shirt, which he provided. When he handed TOVAR the shirt and TOVAR started tearing it, GONZALEZ told them he was heading back up (towards the car). TOVAR asked GARCIA if that was ok. GARCIA was fine with it and GONZALEZ was able to leave them and return up to where the car was. I attempted to clarify with GONZALEZ if this exchange while the victim was being tied up at the mouth occurred at the creek. GONZALEZ described it as being below where the car was parked, near a tree, but didn`t remember it being exactly at any creek. GONZALEZ stated he never went all the way down to the creek. They stopped near the tree before he headed back up towards the car. We asked him why he wanted to go back to the car. GONZALEZ stated he understood that they were going to tie him up to the tree, and he did not want to see that. We asked GONZALEZ if they talked about what they did to the victim down there after they returned. GONZALEZ stated they just said they tied him up and he would get found later or walk out to the road eventually. GONZALEZ didn`t leave the scene because he was still afraid for his girlfriend. We asked GONZALEZ what TOVAR and GARCIA were saying when they returned to the car. GONZALEZ recalled that they were laughing about not having bullets for the gun, and about selling the vehicle. He told them he didn`t want to be any part of the sale of the vehicle. After they dropped him off, he suspected the owner of the truck was the man they left up at the mountain. I asked GONZALEZ about when they arrived at the ranch on the mountain, specifically, who punched in the gate code to access the property. GONZALEZ stated TOVAR gave the code to GARCIA. Once they got to the spot, TOVAR and GONZALEZ walked the victim down the hill. Initially, GARCIA stayed behind with the car. GONZALEZ did not know what GARCIA was doing. He then came down the hill with them, before GONZALEZ walked back up. I asked GONZALEZ if GARCIA stayed behind to make a phone call. GONZALEZ stated there was no cell signal up there. I asked GONZALEZ if GARCIA gave them any instructions about beating the victim on the walk down the hill (as TOVAR has previously described to NSIB Detective Ortiz). GONZALEZ replied, "no" and that they just walked him down. His feet were not tied and he never noticed the victim having had tied feet. GONZALEZ never saw anyone videotape or use their cell phone to tape any part of the incident. We asked GONZALEZ if the victim was saying anything. GONZALEZ stated he was only asking to not be left tied up. During the drive, the victim`s mouth was not bound or tied up. TOVAR tied up the victim`s mouth when they got to the mountain site. TOVAR tied him so he wouldn`t be able to yell. He watched TOVAR tie up his mouth with tape, ran out of tape, then asked GONZALEZ for his shirt. He gave him the shirt, GARCIA showed up, and that`s when GONZALEZ was able to leave back up to the car. We asked GONZALEZ if the victim looked scared. GONZALEZ responded that he thinks all of them were scared. The victim was not fighting. GONZALEZ described him as calm. We asked GONZALEZ what he thinks happed down there. GONZALEZ responded, "que lo dejaron amarado." (trans: that he was left, tied up). I asked him what he has heard. GONZALEZ stated that he heard he was found days later. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250120) ORTIZ, OSCAR Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 He found this out on a news site he accessed from his cell phone. GONZALEZ stated he felt real bad about that because had he known, he wouldn`t have participated. He heard GARCIA tell the victim he was going to let him live but he was not to report anything to the police. GONZALEZ knows that one other person knows about this, Rosa. Rosa told GONZALEZ that she knew about it from TOVAR. Rosa told him that TOVAR told on him. GONZALEZ stated all he did was use the ATM so that is why he hasn`t tried to flee the area. Detective Dudley showed GONZALEZ a photograph a picture of GARCIA. GONZALEZ recognized the photograph of GARCIA as the person he refers to as "Pacheco." Detective Dudley asked GONZALEZ why he initially lied. GONZALEZ responded that it was out of fear because he heard the man died. We asked him how he thinks the man died. GONZALEZ stated he thinks he died from dehydration, no fluids or food. GONZALEZ did not know the victim`s name. Detective Dudley showed GONZALEZ a DMV photograph of the victim. GONZALEZ did not recognize the photograph. We asked him if he recalled what clothing the victim was wearing. GONZALEZ recalled that he was possibly wearing a brown shirt. Detective Dudley showed GONZALEZ another photograph of victim-Pacheco. GONZALEZ recognized the photograph as being the victim they drove to the mountain that day. Detective Dudley also showed GONZALEZ a photograph of the victim`s vehicle. GONZALEZ recognized the vehicle as well. Detective Dudley showed GONZALEZ photographs of the victim taken at the crime scene when his body was recovered. GONZALEZ became visibly upset. He stated that they just told him they were going to tie him up. I asked him what he thinks now. GONZALEZ responded, "Que soy una basura." (trans: that I am garbage). He has no idea how they killed him. I asked GONZALEZ to tell me the truth, and at which point he noticed the victim`s were tied up. He responded that he first noticed this when they got out of the car at the mountain. I told GONZALEZ I do not believe him but I know he is not the one who tied him up. GONZALEZ then admitted that he realized the victim`s hands were tied up when he returned to the car after getting money at the 7eleven. He got the ATM card from GARCIA when they got to 7eleven. When he climbed back into the car and went to return the card to them, he noticed the man did not extend his hand to take it back. I asked GONZALEZ, when they invited him to take part in this job, he knew it was to watch a kidnapped person. GONZALEZ stated he did not know that. He assumed it was a job that involved waiting in a get-a-way car or serve as a look-out, while GARCIA and TOVAR stole money from someone, something they`ve done before. He wouldn`t have participated in something like this for just $100. Once he was involved, he never thought they would have done something like this. Detective Dudley pointed to the shirt in the crime scene photograph. GONZALEZ confirmed it was his t-shirt. ---End of Interview--After the interview, I thanked GONZALEZ for finally being honest. He apologized for initially lying. I handed him my business card and instructed him to stay in touch if he gets out of jail on his probation violation charges. RECOMMENDATION: NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250120) ORTIZ, OSCAR Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Investigation Continuing NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250120) ORTIZ, OSCAR Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Supplement Information Supplement Date Supplement Type Supplement Officer 06/26/2014 15:58:00 SUPPLEMENTAL (250120) ORTIZ, OSCAR Contact Name Supervising Officer (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE 418 Supplement Notes SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT: RE: Jail calls on 4-28-14 by Tovar As part of this investigation, I monitored calls originating from Napa jail on April 28, 2014, which is the day S-TOVAR was arraigned on this murder charge. I noted that at 1946hrs, s-TOVAR called and spoke with a female. The female appears to be some type of close friend or relative of s-TOVAR. Of note, at the 3minutes 48seconds into the call, after she tells s-TOVAR to have faith because law enforcement needs proof, the female also states, " A ver porque no envestigan a la vieja? Esa Vieja es la que sabia. Esa Vieja era la que todo el tiempo lo cargaba para arriva y pa bajo." (trans: Lets see, why don`t they investigate that woman? That woman is the one that knew. That woman is the one that all the time carried him up and down." S-TOVAR then proceeds to tell the female that `he` even told them (law enforcement) that he killed someone before he got killed, so what more do they want. Later that night, s-TOVAR called again and spoke with a male who appears, based on the conversation, to be his father. Most of the conversation had to do with s-TOVAR`s father offering words of encouragement. I downloaded these two calls on to a CD and booked the CD into evidence (item#oo-4). EVIDENCE: oo-4CD with jail calls RECOMMENDATION Investigation continuing. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250120) ORTIZ, OSCAR Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Supplement Information Supplement Date Supplement Type Supplement Officer 07/01/2014 12:10:37 SUPPLEMENTAL (250120) ORTIZ, OSCAR Contact Name Supervising Officer (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE 418 Supplement Notes SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT: Re: Jail calls from Alameda County Jail inmate to . INVESTIGATION: During the week of 6/23/14 and 6/27/14, I listened to 44 jail calls originating from Alameda County Jail, by Inmate to the following numbers: The phone calls were over a period between March 22 and May 30th. The conversations in these phone calls were mostly between and a female she refers to as of the conversations was mostly about upcoming court date, infant child, and about the activities of her husband while she is incarcerated. When calling appears to be son The calls to . The topic concerns , the number appears to be a common landline, frequently answered by someone that . appear to be to The calls to appear to be to several occasions, before passing the phone to phone. cell phone. answers these calls. cell phone, based on the fact that On multiple occasions, however, answers this phone on also answers this After listening to all 44 phone calls, I found no mention of the homicide in Napa County or information to assist in this investigation. It appears are close friends and is helping care for infant child while she is incarcerated. RECOMMENDATION: Investigation continuing... NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250120) ORTIZ, OSCAR Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Supplement Information Supplement Date Supplement Type Supplement Officer 04/22/2014 12:39:40 SUPPLEMENTAL (250314) PACHECO, CHRIS Contact Name Supervising Officer LARIOS, NANCY (250134) WILSON, JOEL 418 Supplement Notes SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT NANCY LARIOS INTERVIEW, 237 HOFF LANE SEARCH WARRANTS, METRO PCS SEARCH WARRANT AND EVIDENCE FROM SONOMA S.O. INVESTIGATION: On 04-02-14, I was requested by Lead Detective Nicol Dudley to assist in an investigation of a possible homicide in Napa County. Det. Dudley had responded the Command Post at 237 Hoff Lane in Santa Rosa in response to comments made by a barricaded subject, Miguel Angel Garcia. Garcia told hostage negotiators that he had killed a person within the last week and dumped the body near Lake Berryessa. Garcia was currently in the middle of a 16 hour standoff with SWAT units in which he would eventually take his own life. Investigators were led to Garcia by Mauricio Tovar who was currently in custody for a separate shooting which occurred in Napa. Tovar admitted Garcia had supplied him with guns, leading Investigators to 237 Hoff Lane. Tovar told investigators he had last seen Garcia at a trailer located at 237 Hoff Lane in Santa Rosa. He had been driving in a black Jeep Cherokee for the past couple of days. I met with Det. Dudley and Det. Horseman of Sonoma County Sheriff`s Department Violent Crimes Unit and Det. Todd Shulman of Napa Police Department at Sonoma County Sheriff`s Office. I was briefed by these detectives and learned the following: On Monday, 03-25-14, Reynaldo Pacheco was reported missing to the Santa Rosa Police Department. This was documented in report #14-0004003. Santa Rosa Police met with Reynaldo`s wife, and she explained her husband had left the previous day, 03-24-14 for a meeting and had not returned home. She stated he had not picked up their daughter from school and his cell phone went immediately to voicemail. He was driving his 2006 Range Rover nearing license plate, CA Due to the missing person residing in county jurisdiction, Sonoma County Sheriff`s Department assumed the investigation. Through his investigation, Det. Horseman determined Reynaldo was involved in a pyramid style Ponzi scheme using a company name of "Kingdom 777". Det. Horseman spoke with several affiliates and associates of Reynaldo Pacheco who all indicated he would have meetings with potential clients throughout the Sonoma County area. Reynaldo`s wife told Det. Horseman she believed his scheme had lost significant amounts of money and some of Reynaldo`s investors may be angry. initially indicated she had received threatening phone calls concerning Reynaldo`s disappearance. However, after further interviewing, she admitted to Detectives that she had lied regarding the phone calls in an effort to ensure Law Enforcement took the case seriously. On 03-27-14, NSD14-001332 provided bank statements to law enforcement indicating Reynaldo`s Wells Fargo account Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250314) PACHECO, CHRIS Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 had been used on 03/24/14 at 1430 hours for a withdrawal of $302.95 at the 7-11 located at 2906 First Street in Napa. During his investigation, Det. Horseman determined through video surveillance that two subjects arrive at 7-11 in Reynaldo`s Range Rover. An unknown subject gets out of the vehicle and enters 7-11 and uses Reynaldo`s ATM card to withdraw the money. The subject then inquired into account balances and attempted to withdraw additional money, but was denied. The subject gets back into the Range Rover and they drive to Wells Fargo Branch located on Jefferson Street in Napa. At that location, ATM video shows the same subject from 7-11 attempting to withdraw additional cash from Reynaldo`s account but was denied. On 04-02-14, Det. Horseman emailed me a copy of the ATM photographs he was given by Wells Fargo. I later transferred these photos to a CD-R and booked them into NSD evidence. I printed out several copies of the photographs depicting the suspect and provided them to detectives in an effort to identify him. Further, on 04-04-14, I requested Det. Chambers author a Law Enforcement Trax Bulletin using the ATM photograph requesting assistance with the identification. Det. Horseman authored a search warrant for cell phone records, to include text messages and cell phone location based on GPS data and tower locations. Utilizing that information, Det. Horseman determined Reynaldo Pacheco`s last whereabouts to be in the Napa County Area. A phone call was made from Reynaldo`s phone on 03-24-14 at approx. 1500 hours near Silverado Trail and SR-121 in Napa. On 04-02-14, Det. Horseman emailed me a copy of the Search Warrant he authored and the results obtained from the phone company. I later burned those items to a CD-R and booked them into NSD evidence. After receiving the email, I briefly reviewed the results and noted the same information regarding the location of Reynaldo`s last phone calls. On 04-02-14, at the request of Det. Dudley, Mauricio Tovar was interviewed at Napa County Department of Corrections by Napa Police Detectives Hess and Ortiz. During that interview, Tovar told detectives that Miguel Garcia and he took a "Reynaldo" from Petaluma to the Sage Canyon Road area in Napa County. Once they arrived in Napa County, Tovar witnessed Garcia kill Reynaldo Pacheco by striking him several times in the head with a rock. Tovar stated they disposed of the body on a private dirt road east of Nicholini Winery in the woods. Tovar was shown the missing person flyer authored by Det. Horseman with a photo of Reynaldo and his Range Rover. Tovar stated the person in the flyer was the same person they took from Petaluma near the dump on Highway 116. In Petaluma, Tovar and Garcia got into Reynaldo`s Range Rover and drove to Napa, eventually killing him. Statement of (Not audio recorded) While at Sonoma Sheriff`s Department, Det. Dudley and I spoke with had been in the trailer with Miguel for some of the standoff. She had been released by Miguel after several hours. She had already been interviewed by Sonoma County Sheriff Detectives and Napa Police Det. Todd Shulman. See their respective reports for full details if interview. Based on their interviews, we learned met Garcia earlier in the week. She had rented a hotel room with Tovar and her friend on 03-23-14 in Napa. The three of them partied until "passed out". When she woke up she was alone in the room. A short time after waking up, Tovar knocked on the door with Garcia claimed this was the first time she had met Garcia. Tovar stated they needed a place to stay and said they could probably stay at her uncle`s place in Santa Rosa. She telephoned her uncle (who is not actually related by blood) and asked if they could stay in his trailer if they paid him $300. He said yes. They all drove over in a black Jeep Cherokee and stayed at the trailer at 237 Hoff Lane in Santa Rosa. continued to state she had only recently met Garcia, but proceeded to hang out with him over the next couple of days. Tovar left the trailer on 04-01-14, prior to the police arriving. When the police arrived at the trailer, they announced `Sheriff!" and Garcia immediately became agitated and upset. He reached into a bag by the couch, grabbed an assault rifle which she later identified as an AR-15 style rifle. Garcia strapped it around his body and told to get on her knees and stay put. He told her he would shoot it out with police. stayed on her knees for several hours until eventually being allowed to use the restroom. (owner of the trailer) was sent out of the trailer almost immediately. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250314) PACHECO, CHRIS Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 We introduced ourselves to and asked if she was OK speaking with us. She said that would be fine. I asked if Garcia said anything to her. She stated he spoke a lot about his two children and his girlfriend. He told her his girlfriend had two children which he cared for and his girlfriend was very special to him. She stated he appeared to call her several times during the standoff. She said she did not ask him a lot of questions or pry because she did not want to agitate him further. I asked why she thought he finally let her go. She told me she felt it was because he had thought about his girlfriend and correlated that with her. She said he did not talk to her at all about a murder in Napa. Due to the amount of interviewing she had already been subjected to, we decided a brief introduction and interview would be appropriate. We had information that was possibly Garcia`s girlfriend. On 04-02-14, while researching the criminal history of Miguel Garcia at Sonoma Sheriff`s Department, I was informed by Det. Horseman that Garcia was a suspect in a kidnapping which occurred in Rohnert Park; CA. Garcia had been identified via DNA analysis from a profile obtained from the steering wheel of the victim`s vehicle. Garcia was also identified by the victim in a photo lineup. This investigation is documented in Rohnert Park report # 14-0000190. I spoke with Sgt. Jeff Justice of Rohnert Park Police Department by telephone. He provided me with a brief description of the incident which had occurred in January 2014. During the incident, the victim was lured to a strip mall located at 109 Southwest Blvd to sell his truck. Once in the parking lot he was confronted by Garcia and another subject. They forced the victim into his own vehicle and drove him to Napa. They forced the victim to contact his wife and bring guns to a third person waiting in Santa Rosa. Initially they told the victim he was going to be killed. However, after Garcia received a phone call, they bound the victim and left him on the side of Sage Canyon Road in Napa. They took his license and told the victim if he reported the incident they would find him and kill his family. On 04-03-14, I requested a copy of the report, which was subsequently faxed to me. I read and reviewed the report and had it scanned into iLeads. Based on the information I had received to this point, I believed Garcia was intimately involved in a possible homicide and would possibly have evidence of the crime on his person or at his current location. On 04-02-14, I authored a Search Warrant for Garcia, the residence and property at 237 Hoff Lane and a black Jeep Cherokee that had been associated with Garcia. The Search Warrant was signed by Napa Superior Court Judge Francisca Tisher on 04-03-14. The standoff was concluded when Garcia ended his own life by shooting himself. Due to the nature of events, Sonoma County Sheriff`s Department officials activated their Fatal Incident Protocol for the scene at 237 Hoff Lane. Per the protocol, Petaluma Police Department assumed the investigation into the officer involved shooting and the scene at 237 Hoff Lane. The search warrant was executed on 04-03-14. Det. Verdeille oversaw the search warrant with Evidence Technician Breedlove. See their supplemental reports for further details. I later authored a Return to Search Warrant. On 04-02-14, I was informed by Sonoma County Sheriff Department personnel that Miguel Garcia was utilizing phone number to communicate with hostage negotiators. I was informed the phone belonged to , the individual living in the trailer. had been released by Garcia at the beginning of the standoff. I verified the phone number belonged to Metro PCS and authored a search warrant for the records pertaining to . The warrant was signed by Napa Superior Court Judge Francisca Tisher on 04-03-14 and served the same day to Metro PCS. I received the records via email on 04-14-14. I transferred the records to a CD-R which I later booked into NSD evidence. I reviewed the records and discovered the following: All indications were Garcia only had the phone during the standoff on 04-01-14 and 04-02-14. In reviewing the phone numbers from previous dates, none of the numbers for incoming or outgoing calls appeared related to Garcia. During the standoff, I noted 6 phone numbers which were called or called into the phone. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250314) PACHECO, CHRIS Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 None of the names or phone numbers appeared to be connected with any associates of Miguel Garcia. On 04-03-14, I requested Det. Chambers review the search warrant information obtained from Sonoma County Sheriff`s Department and compile a list of most frequent and recent calls made by the victim. Once he created the list, I requested that he contact and interview the subjects he identified. Det. Chambers identified several subjects associated with the victim through his business. See his supplemental reports for details. RECOMMENDATIONS: Attach to original report. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250314) PACHECO, CHRIS Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Supplement Information Supplement Date Supplement Type Supplement Officer 04/23/2014 09:08:00 SUPPLEMENTAL (250314) PACHECO, CHRIS Contact Name Supervising Officer AVILA, LUIS ARRIAGA (250134) WILSON, JOEL 418 Supplement Notes SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT SAGE CANYON ROAD SEARCH WARRANT AND INTERVIEW INVESTIGATION: On 04-03-14, I continued with follow up regarding the possible homicide of Reynaldo Pacheco. On 04-03-14, Det. Ackman (Napa Sheriff`s Dept.) and Officer Ortiz (Napa Police) retrieved Tovar form Napa County Department of Corrections. Tovar was advised of his Rights per Miranda and he voluntarily agreed to show the detectives the location of the body in Napa County related to the homicide conducted by Miguel Garcia. Tovar was aware that he was not promised any consideration regarding the identification of the body scene. Tovar provided directions to the detectives which led them to the gate at 2470 Sage Canyon Road. Tovar provided the combination to the metal gate at the entrance and directed the detectives north on the paved road. Approx. 0.8 miles north on the road he directed them to stop at a turnout. Tovar pointed to the east side of the roadway and told the detectives, "Follow the road down and he is in the creek". Sgt. Bartlett (Napa Sheriff`s Dept.) and Officer Ortiz walked eastward of the roadway approx. 200 yards. Laying in a creek bed was a human body which appeared deceased. Sgt. Bartlett secured the scene and the detectives returned Tovar to NCDC. Sgt. Bartlett spoke with a property manager who spoke with the property owner by telephone. The property owner is and he was currently in Mexico. The property manager stated he spoke with by telephone and he provided consent for law enforcement to utilize his property as necessary. The property was marked with GPS coordinates per Google Earth as 38 29.849N / 122 18.847W. I authored a search warrant for the location and the body. The warrant was signed by Napa Superior Court Judge Mark Boessenecker on 04-03-14 and served on the same date. Evidence Technician Donna Kimmel-Lake processed the scene and collected evidence pertaining to the homicide. The body was removed to by Napa County Sheriff Coroner personnel and transported to Napa County Sheriff`s Department, pending an autopsy. I later authored a return to search warrant. See Kimmel-Lake`s report for further details regarding the crime scene. Napa County Search and Rescue personnel were utilized to search the roadway and area around the body scene. Specifically they were asked to look for a cell phone, possibly broken up and a computer. See supplemental report from Deputy Sarnik for further details. On 04-03-14, I attended a Napa County Major Crimes Task force briefing conducted by Det. Nicol Dudley. The briefing informed all in attendance about the homicide and anticipated interviews. I was tasked with continuing my efforts regarding search warrants and finding associates of Tovar and Garcia`s. During the briefing I learned Garcia had been contacted on 12-20-13 by California Highway Patrol Officer Ensley. I spoke with Off. Ensley and reviewed his report, file # F130-325-2013. In doing so I learned that Off. Ensley had made a traffic stop on a vehicle for a NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250314) PACHECO, CHRIS Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 mechanical violation. Off. Ensley contacted the occupants and subsequently arrested two of them for drug related violations. The driver, was arrested for possession Methamphetamine and possession of a Methamphetamine pipe. A passenger in the vehicle, was arrested for possession of cocaine and possession of a methamphetamine pipe. A third passenger in the vehicle, Miguel Angel Garcia was not arrested and picked up at the scene by his girlfriend. Off. Ensley recognized Miguel Garcia from a booking photograph as the same one he had released at the scene in December 2013. Off. Ensley then told me on 03-25-14; contacted him and stated his life was in danger. Off. Ensley and Detective Koford conducted an interview of , documented in case # NC2014-00043. told Det. Ensley that a subject named Miguel Garcia had threatened him and his family. stated he had heard Garcia was a member of the Knights Templar Cartel and had approached him in December 2013. Garcia showed a photo of wife and son and told him bad things would happen if he did not help him out. proceeded to assist Garcia for the next few months with crime related activities. I also learned from Rohnert Park Police Sgt. Jeff Justice that the FBI had an "informant" regarding their kidnapping involving Miguel Garcia (case # RPK14-000190). The informant had approached the FBI and told them he was in fear for his life and his family because of drug cartel connections. He told the FBI, who later told Rohnert Park Police that he knew Miguel Garcia worked for a woman at the "Botanica" shop in Rohnert Park and he would do jobs for her. Those jobs included murder, kidnapping and robbery. We suspected at the time this "informant" was , however it was not confirmed until after interview. Sgt. Justice had also informed me a small, Hispanic suspect had not been identified as of yet. Based on this information, I requested Napa Sheriff Det. Eddleman and NSIB Detectives Ensley and Tijero locate as possible associates to Miguel Garcia. They located both subjects and asked them to come to Napa Sheriff`s Department for interviews. Both subjects voluntarily agreed to be interviewed. I requested Det. Eddleman interview . See his supplemental report for details. Interview of (Audio and Video recorded) On 04-03-14 at approx. 1725 hours, I met with in interview room #3 at Napa County Sheriff`s Department. Arriaga came to Napa Sheriff`s Department voluntarily and wished to speak with someone regarding threats to his life. Det. Jose Tijero assisted me with the interview as he is bilingual in Spanish. The interview was audio and video recorded and stated the following in summary: I introduced myself and explained I wanted to speak with him regarding Miguel Garcia. I told he was free to leave at any time and he did not have to speak with me. He stated he understood and was willing to speak with me. said he did not want to lie to me and wanted to be honest. asked if this had anything to do with him talking to the FBI. I explained I had nothing to do with the FBI and my case was separate. explained he had called the FBI and explained everything to them. He stated the FBI claimed the stories did not seem logical and they brushed him off. He explained to the FBI he had been arrested for possession of Methamphetamine (CHP file # F130-325-2013); however the meth was not his. He had been forced to carry the meth by Miguel Garcia. Garcia handed the meth and a pipe to as they were being pulled over. Garcia told if he did not do it, he would hurt his family. explained he liked living in Napa, but because of the recent events he did not want to be here anymore. We explained we did not care about his previous case and inly wanted to ask questions regarding our case. He said that would be fine, ask what I wanted to know and he would tell me. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250314) PACHECO, CHRIS Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 I asked to tell me about Miguel Garcia and how he knows him. father in law resides on and he had heard rumors about a person living at the complex who was possibly a cartel member from Michoacn or the Zeta`s cartel. He had not met Miguel Garcia at this time and this was approx. a year ago. In December 2013, was at the apartment complex when he was approached by Garcia. Garcia asked him for a ride, but declined saying he was with his wife and could not do it. did not know who Garcia was at this time and just thought he was random person asking for help. Garcia said that is fine and left. Garcia approached a second time in December at the Cooper Court apartments. It was 4-5 days after Garcia had asked him for a ride. had recently dropped his wife and son off at the airport to go to Mexico. Garcia approached him and showed a picture of his wife and child and asked, "Do you have time now?" The picture appeared to be his wife, her cousin and child pulling luggage so he assumed it was taken at the airport. did not say anything and Garcia told him he was now going to do everything he tells him to do. Garcia told him to not contact police otherwise he would kill and his family. thought Garcia lived in apartment . I asked what he did for Garcia. He said initially he would drive him places. Usually it was to get Methamphetamine and would go inside the houses to get it for personal use. Garcia would be with , but would wait in the vehicle. He would also drive Garcia to houses in Napa, Petaluma, and Santa Rosa where Garcia would sell and obtain guns. stated he had a little notebook in which he would write down addresses, vehicle license plates and other things he and Miguel would do. He said it contained the license plates of cars thought was following them and the address of the lady who would order Garcia to do "hits". I asked if he would give the book to us. He initially said no because it was evidence that showed was forced to do things he did not want to do. He felt it also showed how nobody, namely the FBI did nothing to help him. Eventually, consented to giving us the notebook. The notebook was later retrieved via consent from residence. It was reviewed by Lt. Ortiz and booked into evidence by Det. Ackman. The notebook contained numerous partial license plates, addresses and notes indicating how Arriaga wanted to be an informant for the FBI. There did not appear to be anything of evidentiary value to the homicide. I asked if Garcia told him about the "hits" he had to do. He stated a began to cry and said he wants to know why he had not received any help, from Law Enforcement. I explained I could not answer his questions about that. He stated his car had been taken and he still did not have it back. then explained he had driven Garcia, his cousin and to Fresno and the car was left down there. They had gone to the Vagabond Inn on Jensen Street in Fresno and was murdered while they were there. did not see the murder, but he heard gun shots and witnessed a lady come out of the hotel very upset and crying. Garcia became upset at because he did not do anything in retaliation. He recalled this was around 12-22-13. I asked if he had spoken with Fresno Police about this and he said no. I asked what vehicle he drove Garcia around in. He said he would drive him in his own Dodge Neon. When that car was confiscated in Fresno during the homicide, started to use his wife`s Mitsubishi Galant to drive him around. Garcia had told to leave his car in Fresno and not try to get it out. If he attempted to get the car, then police would investigate and Garcia said he would hurt if that happened. would tangent off subject and begin talk about how no one was willing to help him. I explained no one could help if he was not willing to talk with me. He consistently would questions why law enforcement would show up at people`s houses requesting to speak with . I explained they could be asking for a different person all together. Several times throughout the interview I had to explain I could not change the lack of effort by other Law Enforcement agencies. I explained I believe he felt threatened by Garcia and because of that he assisted in illegal acts. I told him he NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250314) PACHECO, CHRIS Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSDl4-001332 needed to talk with so I could see if help was possible. but was clear that I was not promising him anything. - sad the only illegal act he participated din was driving Garcia to get ?rearms. He stated he never drove Miguel places to "do work". He said Garcia would tell him about jobs he had done. but he never saw anything. He stated he was here to talk with me and knows he did nothing wrong. said he went to speak with the FBI in the middle of January 2014. The day after that. Garcia stopped having any contact with him. I asked if he had seen or spoken with Garcia in since that time. - stated he saw Garcia in February at the apartments- had ah?eady spoken with the FBI so he was weary of Garcia and his intentions. tries to stall and avoid Garcia but was rurable to. Garcia confronts- and tells him to tell that he is going to "kill him like a dog" because he (Garcia) knows what they are trying to do to him. Miguel hinted to that he had a glur and he was going to forgive and not going to kill -so he could get the message to- I asked what he was going to forgive him for and- guessed it was because he had gone to Law Enforcement. said Garcia was always worried about the little things and getting caught. However. he felt Garcia never worried about the "big thin like robbing people or having guns and drugs. I asked if he knew of Garcia living anywhere else besides He had heard Garcia talk about a place in the Sierra?s where his x-wife and children stayed. He believed it was possibly near Willits. He was aware he sometimes stayed at a place on Marin Street in Napa. He was aware Miguel had 4 or 5 kids. I explained to I was going to show him some photographs (with identifying information removed) and asked him to tell me if he recognized the person 011 the picture. I fn?st showed him a booking photo of Miguel Angel Garcia. He stated that was "Miguel" and wrote "Miguel on the paper. I then showed him a booking photo of Maruicio Tovar. He stated he has seen him arormd and was aware he sold methamphetamine. but he did not know his name. I asked where he has seen Tovar and he explained they went to high school together. He last saw him in January 2014 at the on Cooper Corut when he brought meth to Garcia. I lastly showed him a Cal Photo of Reynaldo Pacheco. He said he did not recognize that person. He stated he thought it looked like "Santos". but was not positive. I asked to tell rue about the incident involving CHP. He stated they were driving to the apartments with Garcia and While driving. Garcia told him the FBI was looking at him for a robbery he had conmritted. During the robbery he was dressed as Law Enforcement. but- did not know where or when that had occrured. He then changed the story and said the robbery story was told when they went to Fresno the ?rst time. Garcia had wanted to go to Fresno: however the got stopped by HP. Prior to pulling over. Garcia handed a nreth pipe and meth and told him to hold it. initially declined. but Garcia pulled out his cell hone and started to dial. He told- if irelented and was eventually arrested for he did not hold the drugs he knew what would happen to his family possession of meth. Garcia was released at the scene and was picked up by his girlfriend-". - knew- .had two children (not Garcia?s) and she lived at_ with him. I asked- to tell me about the kidnapping that occurred in January which started in Rolmert Park. He told me Garcia had contacted him and asked him to help with a job. He told if he assisted. he would not bother him anymore: however he needed to keep his shut or his family would be in dan er. . agreed and followed Garcia to Rohnert Park in his Mitsubishi. Garcia was driving his brown truck. as with them as well. They arrived in Rolnrert Park and contacted a subject. later identi?ed as 'ng lot of strip They were to meet at a shoe store in the strip mall. -understood the person they were meeting was Garcia?s "contrary" in Sonorna Cormty. In other words he sold glurs and did the type of things Garcia did. -understood that the deal possibly had to do with selling a vehicle. When they an?ived at the location. Garcia.-nd .got into .5 truck. -got into his own car and NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETVVILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 PACHECO, CHRIS Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSDl4-001332 they all started to drive back toward 5 Napa. - lost sight of them on the freeway and realized he was numing out of gas. He called Garcia. who told him to go back to the strip mall and ask the lady in the shoe store for $20. does this and the lady tells him to leave and she would not give him any money. He called Garcia again who told him to wait for a female with 2 kids to show 11p. She was going to be bringing guns and money and if anyone else shows up to "just start shooting". - was to take the guns. get into Garcia?s truck and return to Napa. waited for approx. 30 and no one showed 11p. He went back into the shoe store and asked the lady if anyone had called the store. The female told him he needed to leave or she would call the police. He asked not call the police. r?etruned to Garcia?s truck outside and noticed 2 guns were now in the vehicle in a box. got into the truck and drove back to Napa. - said he saw a female with two kids walking arorurd the area. but he never contacted her and did not know how the guns got into the vehicle. I asked- what happened to the owner of the truck. . He learned what happened to- from- . who was present dru?ing the incident. explained he and- had agreed to tell each other everything regarding Garcia and his actions because they were afraid of him. It was a way they felt they could watch each other?s back and not get double crossed by Garcia. told- they ha taken the victim to a place near the water in Napa. Garcia received a phone call from a lady who told him not to kill the Victim. The lady 011 the phone said not to kill him because the shoe store owner had called the police after had come into the store a second time. - has not told anyone this story previously. He said he tried to tell the FBI. but they stated they were too busy to listen. - heard this only from-. Garcia did not talk to him about the incident. I asked what was the name of Garcia?s female boss. He stated he did not have her name. but had her address in his little notebook. He again becanre reluctant to provide the information until he received "help". I again asked if he was going to give me the book. He stated he would if we helped him. He said he wanted his property back which he sold and gave the money to Garcia. He also wanted his car back from Fresno. I explained I could not help him with his property. as he had sold it. I said I would call Fresno Police regarding his vehicle. but I could not promise anything. then stated Garcia?s boss (female) worked in the same complex as the shoe store. He stated the shoe store was on the corner in Rohnert Park (109 Southwest Blvd). He said Garcia told him his boss had also ordered hits on competition across from the shoe store. He did not have any more details about that. I asked- to tell me about the hit ordered orr Reynaldo (Pacheco). He said he did not know anything about that. I asked how many hits Garcia had performed that he was aware of- said he did not know how many because he never saw any of them. rurderstood most of the hits were done in Lake County and Ukiah. which is where Garcia got started. I asked for Garcia?s phone nrunber. He stated Garcia constantly changed his phone number and would always throw away phones. Garcia would tell - and -to change phones often as well. I asked- to tell me about a hit Garcia did in which the victim?s hands were cut off. He stated he had not heard of anything like that rmtil right now. I explained to- that I have been told he knows about this hit and he should be honest and tell me about it now. He again denied any knowledge of a hit in which the victim lost his hands. explained Garcia was friends with was the person who told Garcia that February. lives in the apartments 011 con?rmed that is called- At this time we took a break and used the restroom. While on break. I contacted Rolmert Park Police Sgt. Jeff Justice and informed him of the progress in the interview. I explained I believe we had additional suspects regarding his and- would pass along information. - believed had contacted the FBI. resulting in the tln?eat Garcia made in -is well known to Napa law enforcement). - NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETVVILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 PACHECO, CHRIS Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 case. He stated he would be en route to Napa SO with other detectives. I also learned on the break that Fresno Police had been contacted regarding the homicide at the Vagabond Inn. The Fresno detective told Det. Ensley that he had spoken with about the homicide. He also informed me that mother was currently in custody for the homicide. Also during the break it was suggested that had a cousin named , who possibly was the unknown suspect in the Wells Fargo ATM photos. I returned to the interview room with Det. Tijero and continued the interview. I explained to that I felt he was holding back on some information. I told him I knew he had spoken with Fresno Police and I was told his mother was in custody for the homicide denied talking to Fresno Police and he only spoke with the FBI about the Fresno homicide. also denied it was his mother in custody for the homicide. He stated his mother resides in Mexico with his father. I asked him who killed and he stated he did not know. The only thing he knew was Garcia and had a problem with a guy called . He had heard from Garcia that "was the one who had killed . I told that Garcia was dead and he no longer needed to fear him. still appeared apprehensive and said he was unsure if his family is still safe because of had not heard of hurting anyone or being part of the cartel did not go on any of the trips that did with Garcia, but he has seen following him before, but he could not provide details. I asked if he was ever paid by Garcia for the driving. He stated he was not paid and actually had to pay Garcia. He stated he has paid Garcia approx. $1000. I asked how met Garcia. said knew Garcia first for approx. 3 years. I asked to tell me about some associates. I asked who was. He stated was a friend of and lived on was contacted in past). I asked him about cousin, . He stated had a cousin who had tattoos on his arms who also worked for Garcia. I showed photographs from the Wells Fargo ATM of the unidentified suspect using the victim`s ATM card. I asked if he recognized the person on the photos and he said no. I showed him a photograph of Tovar again and asked if he knew him. He again said he did not know him. I explained we had information that Tovar was close friends with Garcia. said he was good friends with Garcia, but he did not know the person`s (Tovar) name. I asked what Tovar did for Garcia. He stated he did not know if he worked for Garcia or if he just supplied Garcia with methamphetamine. admitted he had picked up meth from Tovar previously for Garcia. I asked how much Tovar and Garcia worked together. He stated he did not really see them together very much and he never worked with Tovar. He saw Tovar supply Garcia with meth on approx. three occasions. I asked him if he had heard if Tovar did hits on people or had shot at people. He heard from that Tovar had shot at a vehicle 2 days earlier and was arrested by Napa PD. He then told me he had overheard Tovar asked Garcia for gun, but that was in January 2014 before Garcia stopped talking to him. I asked if he heard anything regarding Tovar and Garcia hurting someone the previous week. He stated the only thing he had heard was that Garcia and Tovar were dead, but he did not believe it. He has not heard anything else. I again asked that he and to tell me about the time Garcia cut off some one`s hands. I explained Garcia had told negotiators had cut off a person`s hands. denied having any knowledge regarding that incident. I asked to tell me about the lady that gave orders to Garcia. He agreed that she worked in Rohnert Park and owned the "Botanica Store". I asked how he knew she was the boss. Garcia told that he would go to the Botanica store to receive orders. Garcia never told him her name. said on the day of the kidnapping in Rohnert NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250314) PACHECO, CHRIS Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Park, he went into the Botanica store to get money. She lady inside told him no and to leave the store. He said the address for the store was in his notebook at home. I asked him where the book was at his house. He again was reluctant to provide the information. He eventually stated the book was in his nightstand next to the bed and I could have it. I asked if he had anything else at the house that would be related to Garcia such as guns, drugs or stolen items. admitted he had the driver`s license of the victim from Rohnert Park ). He had received the DL from Garcia who told him to hang onto it. The DL was in his bathroom under the lip of the vanity. I asked if there were any guns in the residence. He stated he had a .22 rifle which he kept as protection against Garcia. Subsequently a search warrant was authored by Det. Koford for the residence and signed by a Napa Superior Court judge. The warrant was executed on the same night at . During the search, the notebook was located and collected. However, the DL was not found. At this time we ended the interview. Rohnert Park Detectives had arrived and I briefed them on the interviews of They placed both subjects under arrest for the kidnapping of and transported them to Sonoma County. On 04-04-14, I requested Det. Ackman author a search warrant for the victim`s (Reynaldo Pacheco) email accounts. I additionally requested Det. Verdeille author a search warrant for the Chrysler 300 owned by Mauricio Tovar for trace evidence. The Chrysler was transferred from Napa Police Department to Napa Sheriff`s Department by Blackhawk Tow for processing and later processed by Evidence Technician Breedlove. See their supplemental reports for details. RECOMMENDATIONS: Attach to original report. Send copy to Rohnert Park Department of Public Safety, care of Sgt. Jeff Justice. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250314) PACHECO, CHRIS Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Supplement Information Supplement Date Supplement Type Supplement Officer 04/23/2014 19:12:32 SUPPLEMENTAL (250314) PACHECO, CHRIS Contact Name Supervising Officer GONZALEZ, ERIKA (250134) WILSON, JOEL 418 Supplement Notes SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT FRESNO INTERVIEWS OF VICTIM FAMILY INVESTIGATION: On 04-06-14, Detectives from Napa Sheriff`s Department, Napa Police Department and I went to interview several family members of the victim Reynaldo Pacheco. We arrived at the residence of the victim`s brother, . Multiple family members were at the residence and each was interviewed individually by detectives and translators. to , Upon arrival I was requested to interview and his wife . Due to a language barrier between and me, Det. Alfonso Ortiz interviewed . See his supplemental report for details. At the conclusion of this interview, I collected an Alcatel cell phone from on consent. He informed us he had purchased the phone after his brother went missing and used it to communicate with was a business partner of the victim`s and the family suspected him of possibly being involved in foul play resulting in the victim`s death. used the phone as a "cold phone" and only used it for communication with Rogelio. stated I could collect the phone as evidence and could search the contents. I provided with a property receipt, which I had scanned into the report, for the phone and transported it back to Napa SO. Upon returning to Napa SO, I requested Det. Hallman forensically examine the phone for calls, text messages and photographs. Det. Hallman took possession of the phone, performed an examination and later booked the phone into NSO evidence at 1CP. See his supplemental report for details. **Statement of On 04-06-14 at approx. 1000 hours, I met with at her residence. The interview was conducted in her backyard and was audio recorded. The recording was later transferred to a CD-R and booked into NSD evidence. is the sister in law to Reynaldo Pacheco, the victim. She stated the following in summary: is one of the only family members who are bilingual. Therefore she has had to process a lot of information through multiple sources over the last couple of days. I asked to tell me about Reynaldo, the victim. She said he was a caring and loving man. If he was having problems, he was not the type who would have told anyone about it. last saw him on 03-16-14 at a party at her house. She stated he seemed quiet during the party and usually he was loud and vocal. She knew he had gone to Las Vegas with (his brothers) the following week for business. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250314) PACHECO, CHRIS Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Erika said the victim had done concrete for employment. He recently started the work with the business (Kingdom 777). which closed 011 01-16-14. - said he had been working for the company for approx. 6 months. After the company closed he was working for a similar company and trying to get it started again. -said the company was similar to a stock market and the victim would collect money for people to pru?chase "units" Each rurit cost $2000 and you accrunrrlated points which were paid back onto a "Kingdom Card". They initially thought the company was legitimate because there seemed to be lots of company meeting and conferences. husband. - invested $2000 on her behalf. Reynaldo always acted as if the company was in good standing and there were not any problems. She stated he was not "?ashy". she had heard he would carry large sums of cash up to $60000 in his vehicle. stated Reynaldo had a Wells Fargo account with his wife. She was unaware of any other accounts that he would have used and said he always used cash to pay for items. I asked- if the company ever seemed shady to her. She said it did. but her husband was the bread wimrer and made the decisions concerning the money. She said invested an additional $22.000. They have not seeing any type of return on their investment. I asked what other family members had invested. knew- had invested $15.000 and. (Reynaldo?s cousin) and had also invested although she did not know 110w much. She stated several family members and friends were involved. but she was ruraware of the amorurts. had heard a man named- had invested a large of money. approx. $32.000. She had heard had borrowed the money form his brother in law. I asked if she had ever met-. She said he was invited to party by Reynaldo at her sister in law?s house in Fresno on 01/01/14. He appeared ?ashy and cocky to- did not know how Reynaldo met . She said was in a band and heard he had sold drugs prior to the business. said she had been looking at Facebook page and saw things that concerned her. He was listed in Facebook as and he had pictures of deputies with guns on his page. She said Reynaldo told her from money and they were business partners in Kingdom 777. Erika was told Reynaldo had brought into the business and was below him in the pyramid scheme. - heard from- that Reynaldo had spoken with him about the business. Approx. a month prior Reynaldo said people were upset with him because they had lost money in the scheme. I asked if Reynaldo seemed scared or worried. She said he seemed scared. After Reynaldo had gone missing. received a phone call fron- The call seemed suspicious to and he pretended to not be proceeded to go out and get a "cold phone" (the one collected) and gets the number to and his sister would call the phone and send pictru?es and texts regarding Reynaldo. -and the family became very suspicious of- and looked at everything he did as told me about a voicemail they had received after Reynaldo had gone missing. had travelled to Sonoma County to help Reynaldo?s wife and try to out what happened. While there he received runnerous phone calls from people who would leave voicernails. They would also receive text messages from and his sister. Marta providing names of people they should talk to. One of the names was also texted them a picture of Reynaldo standm next to his Range Rover. They did not know why he sent this so they contacted them ?rst or if the contacted him. - explained that seemed like suspects to the family. Whenh arrived in Sonoma. he called . He told both of them he had heard they had issues with Reynaldo and to conre meet him so they could work things out. irmrrediately to-and assisted in looking for Reynaldo and moving his wife back down to Fresno with the family. It was later discovered through an interview with that he and Reynaldo? 5 wife have been having an affair for approx. one year. The family more suspicious 0 because he did not show 11p to the house after the call. They felt it was more suspicious because - did not contact Printed by: (250161) SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 PACHECO, CHRIS Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case NumbeerSDl4-001332 them any further trying to Reynaldo. -stated her ruiderstanding was Reynaldo and- were just business partners and not friends. I explained the time line of events to - I explained to her Miguel Garcia and Mauricio Tovar were the identi?ed suspects. I told her Garcia was dead and Tovar was crurently in custody and cooperating with us. She asked if Tovar was the brother in law of because she had heard that person was heavily involved in the business. She stated she had heard that information ??om who is the person above Reynaldo in the Kingdom 777 pyramid scheme. I explained there was going to be a lot of nunors and theories on what had happened to Reynaldo. She needed to have faith that we would track down these rumors and either con?rm or dispel them. stated they foruid out about Reynaldo missing when his wife. - called-(Reynaldo sister) on 03-24-14. -left the next day and went to Sorronra County to help. They were receiving numerous calls and tracking down Reynaldo?s last whereabouts. They went to the 7-11 in Napa because they had discovered someone had used the Victim? 5 ATM card. At this time I showed a picuu?e ??om the Wells Fargo ATM to- and asked if she recognized him. She said she did not. on 03-26-14. The caller. found this suspicious. then explained then received a phone call to his regular cell phone a female asked if this was and seemed to know some personal information. placed the call 011 speaker and lied. saying it was not_ was listening and told he recognized the voice as . then purchased the "cold phone" and had his brother . give the number to then received phone calls 011 the cold phone and- started to record them. Dru'ing one call. told- to rest and there were some people who wanted to meet him regarding Reynaldo. was wider the impression the meeting could result in ?nding Reynaldo. I asked if it was always- who called. - said sometimes- sister called. - stated they always received the calls and they did not initiate calls back to said- (Reynaldo?s sister) had received a phone call from- sister and they recorded it. The caller identi?ed herself as- and all- knew was the phone call was "weird". The call was listened to at a later time and recorded onto my digital recorder. Det. Ortiz listened to the call and stated nothing suspicious regarding the call. The call was transferred to a D-R and later booked into NSD evidence. I asked- to tell me about . heard- had told Re aldo to be careful about because he is known to carry guns. They felt was trying to make look sus icious. told that Re ialdo and did not get along and where out to kill each other. believed it mitil he contacted and told him if he had nothing to hide to come over and help look for Reynaldo. -came right over and helped. Erika heard the dispute was because- liked_. Reynaldo? 5 wife. I asked if they were having an affair and she said she did not think so. also heard had problems with-. Her understanding was- and- had done a landscaping job to ether and never received his cut. met- for the fn?st time when he came back to Fresno with after Re ialdo went missing. She said he seemed concerned and she was not suspicious of him. While in Fresno. i heard he had a warrant in Sonoma Cormty. He told the family he had nothing to hide so he was going to go back to County and turn himself in. I asked -if she had heard the names Maru?icio Tovar or Miguel Garcia. She said she had not. I asked if there were any other names of people she had come across who might be important. She provided the following names: 1 . He is above Reynaldo in the pyramid scheme. They have never spoken with him and she received the information from Jose. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 0fficer:(250314) PACHECO, CHRIS Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Reynaldo`s 3 4 5 6 Case Number:NSD14-001332 . Had a meeting with Reynaldo on day he went missing. Knows that she called after Reynaldo went missing. . Unsure of who this is or why she has the name. - was the person who went with to get 7-11 photos on Napa . Not sure if who this is but got the name from . . Unsure if who this is or how connected to case. had texted the following names and contact information and told him they may be able to help find Reynaldo. This again raised suspicion with the family with Rogelio. I showed pictures of . She stated she did not recognize them. At this time I ended the interview. A phone call from to was also recorded by the family. The recording was copied to my digital recorder and later booked into NSD evidence. The family found the call suspicious and said seemed to be fishing form information. The call was listened to by Det. Ortiz and Det. Tijero. Both of them stated the phone call did not appear suspicious and sounded like a concerned friend. **Statement of - Victim Uncle On 04-06-14 at 1300 hours, I spoke with . Det. Ortiz acted as a translator as he is bilingual in Spanish. The interview was audio recorded, transferred to a CD-r and later booked into NSD evidence. He stated the following in summary: Alfredo had heard about the business but had not invested. He stated he did not have a lot of money and that was not something he would be interested in. He last saw Reynaldo on 03-22-14 at his house. Reynaldo stopped by to visit and he seemed normal. He did not have any other information. At this time I ended the interview. **Statement of - Victim sister On 04-06-14 at approx. 1349 hours, I spoke with at Det. Ortiz was utilized as a translator as he is bilingual in Spanish. The interview was audio recorded, transferred to a CD-R and later booked into NSD evidence. She stated the following in summary: told us she had last seen Reynaldo on the 22nd of March at a party. She spoke with him briefly at the party. He seemed normal and did not appear worried about anything. was aware of the business and had invested $4000 into it. She was aware the company had its assets frozen but she had been told to wait and the government would eventually give them their money back. was informed of Reynaldo`s disappearance on Tuesday, 03-25-14. They got nervous and started to think maybe he was arrested or in the hospital. She became extremely nervous about his disappearance after said he did NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250314) PACHECO, CHRIS Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 not feel good about the situation and started to receive phone calls from then started to call the other family members. This caused suspicion among the family. She said she saw Rogelio one time at a party that Reynaldo brought him to in Fresno. After Reynaldo went missing, she received a call from but did not answer it. told her not to answer any calls form a "707" number because it might be . The call was on 03-26-14 at 2101 hours and came from r). She next received a call at 2114 hours from 6 and she answered it. The call was from sister. The caller asked if this was and she lied and said no. The caller asked if this was Reynaldo`s sister and said she got this phone number from a person did not know. continued to lie and say she did not know and , but asked why the caller was looking for Reynaldo. The caller stated it was a private matter and her brother wanted to give Reynaldo a message. The caller then hung up. One of sisters recorded this conversation on her phone. This recording, also in Spanish was recorded onto my digital recorder and eventually booked into NSD evidence. Det. Ortiz and Tijero listened to the conversation and did not detect anything suspicious being said. stated she knew because he was from the same town in Mexico. They have known him for several years and he was an "old time friend". I asked if she knew about a problem between and Reynaldo. She said she had heard a rumor that had made a threat to We asked what she thought happened to Reynaldo. She heard from that was trying to get Reynaldo and to fight with each other. She heard at a funeral that had threatened , but she did not have any more details about it. They thought it was not working and because it involved large amounts of money, that was getting frustrated and had something to do with Reynaldo`s death. It is weird to the family that is calling family members for information, but has not shown up anywhere to assist in the search. As far as knew, Reynaldo and were still friends and were not fighting. We asked if she had heard anything regarding Reynaldo or his wife, have an affair. She stated she had not heard anything. We asked her if she knew Miguel Garcia or Mauricio Tovar. She said she did not know either of them. We showed her the Wells Fargo ATM photo and she told us she did not know that person. ** Statement of - Victim`s Aunt On 04-06-14 at approx. 1444 hours, I spoke with Maria at Det. Ortiz was utilized as a translator as he is bilingual in Spanish. The interview was audio recorded, transferred to a CD-R and later booked into NSD evidence. son was present during the interview as she was extremely upset about the victim`s death. She was notified of his death by the family minutes prior to the interview. She stated the following in summary: stated she had received a call from asking about Reynaldo. had known for some time and had several conversations with her after Reynaldo`s disappearance. said she did not think had a romantic relationship with Reynaldo and felt would have said something if they did. was aware was a business associate of Reynaldo`s. was told by that people above Reynaldo in the pyramid scheme would benefit from Reynaldo`s disappearance. Reynaldo was adamant to investors they would receive their money back somehow. She theorized that if Reynaldo were gone, the company would have a scapegoat to not provide the money back to the investors. was told by that she spoke with Reynaldo by telephone on two occasions the day he went missing. Reynaldo told , who then told that he was going met with "the leaders" in Napa on the day he went missing. After that conversation, Reynaldo did not answer any of calls. stated one of the leaders was NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250314) PACHECO, CHRIS Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 . I told I understood was under Reynaldo in Kingdom 777. then confirmed was a "leader" in a new company in which was going to open ion Wednesday. The new company was the same type of pyramid scheme at Kingdom 777. provided the contact information for saying she lived in . At this time I ended the interview. RECOMMENDATIONS: Attach to original report. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250314) PACHECO, CHRIS Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSDl4-001332 Supplement Information Supplement Date Supplement Type Supplement Of?cer 0452952014 13 :46: 54 SUPPLEIVIENTAL (250314) PACHECO. CHRIS Contact Name Supervising Of?cer PACHECO. ARMANDO MIJANGOS (250134) WILSON. JOEL Supplement Notes SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT INTERVIEW INVESTIGATION: 011 04-09-14 at approx. 1319 hours. I met with- at the Sonoma Comlty jail. - was c1urently in custody on an unrelated matter. Present in the interview was Con?ectional Deputy Rick Oseguera. as he is bilingual in Spanish and translated the interview. The interview was audio recorded. transfeired to a D-R and later booked into NSD evidence- stated the following in I inf01med- that I was not there to speak with him about his cmrent case. I stated I did not want to know about it and would not ask any questions regarding it. I told him he was there willingly to speak with me and he did not have to talk if he did not want to. He stated he understood and would speak with me. stated Reynaldo was his paitner and they have known each other for their entire lives. I asked if he was aware Reynaldo was dead. - said he saw in the paper this moming. - said they grew up in Mexico together. They moved to Fresno and eventually moved to Petaluma. - knows Reynaldo?s family well. I asked if he knew about Kingdom 777 or invested any money in Reynaldo? 5 business. - stated he had heard of it. but never invested. He said Reynaldo used to do concrete work. but was now involved in this investment business. I asked if Reynaldo ever told him about people who had lost money in the business. He said no. I asked to tell me what he knew about He stated to him in a long time. He said the job was approx. 1 year ago and saw-. He said saw him a month piior at Los aballos. a bar in Santa Rosa not talk. The last time they talked to each was in July 2013. They lived together at . At that address. . Reynaldo and all lived together. owed him money and he has not talked still has not paid him. I asked when he last was in the band. but they did in lived there lmtil August 2013. At that time- (Reynaldo?s best friend) helped place his stuff in storage. stated he and are friends. He did not know where went to after they all moved out. A guy named also lived at the address. but only for a brief time. was in band. but he stopped living at the residence long before August 2013. Pacheco state is a good guy and is a "bad" guy. I asked- if he was having a sexual relationship with . Reynaldo?s wife. He stated he was. They have been seeing each other for approx. 1 year and he believed they were still together. He has not seen her recently because she is in Fresno for the past two weeks. - admitted he drove- with family to Fresno and stayed a Printed by: (250161) SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 PACHECO, CHRIS Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 couple of days with Reynaldo`s family. I later asked if Reynaldo was aware of the affair. stated he believed was telling Reynaldo about it, but he did not know for sure. He was unaware of how anyone would know they were together. He thinks may have suspected something because he and would laugh and talk to each other around the house when the all lived together. I asked when the last time he had seen Reynaldo. He saw him driving approx. 2-3 months ago in Cotati. He last spoke with Reynaldo around harvest time (September or October) at a party in Rohnert Park. He has not talked to Reynaldo since that time. did try to call Reynaldo approx. 6 months ago to help with a job. Reynaldo never called him back. I asked how he discovered Reynaldo was missing. He stated had called him when Reynaldo did not come home on Tuesday, 03-25-14. then called to see what happened. told him he did not know what happened and it was odd that Reynaldo did not go home. then went to work in Mill Valley. I asked if any of Reynaldo`s family members contacted him (brother to victim) called him on Tuesday night. wanted to see and talk to so they could try and find out what happened to the victim. Every day from that point forward, was with Reynaldo`s family. They stayed in Reynaldo`s trailer, but did not sleep much because they were afraid someone was going to come and get them. I asked why they were afraid. They were afraid that due to the money lost in the business, someone might be angry and come try to collect. Further, had had been calling since the disappearance. The family found these calls suspicious and it scared them. never spoke to himself. I asked if Reynaldo owed money. said he did not know about money. He just knew they were in the business together. I asked if he knew of any problems between and Reynaldo. He did not know of any issues between the two men. I asked if he knew anyone Rogelio worked with or was in trouble with. He said no. I asked if he knew where was living and he said no. I told I was going to show him some photographs and asked him to tell me if he recognized them. I showed him photos of Miguel Garcia, Mauricio Tovar and the guy from the ATM photos. They all had the identifying information covered. He stated he did not know any of them. I asked who Reynaldo would be visiting in Napa. He stated was a friend and business partner from Napa or Vallejo. He did not know his last name, but (Reynaldo`s cousin) knows . I asked if he knew the name and he said no. I asked if he knew Reynaldo`s friend and he said no. I asked if he knew who might have been after Reynaldo and he said no. He did not know of Reynaldo or being involved in anything illegal. I asked if he goes to the "Botanica" shop in Rohnert Park and he said no. He did not know of the store I was talking about. I described the location in Rohnert Park and stated a lady named worked there. He knew the area, but did not know the store. I asked if he knew `s wife. stated her name was and he met her at a funeral one time. He knew had brothers and had seen one of them one time at Casa De Mar club in Santa Rosa. He does not know their names and has never met them. I asked if had a sister. He said sister`s name was and he thought she lived near Palo Alto. He knew this because he had been to her apartment in that area in April 2013. RECOMMENDATIONS: Attach to original report. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250314) PACHECO, CHRIS Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSDl4-001332 Supplement Information Supplement Date Supplement Type Supplement Of?cer 0452952014 14:22:33 SUPPLEIVIENTAL (250314) PACIIECO. CHRIS Contact Name Supervising Of?cer CHAVEZ. JOSE (250134) WILSON. JOEL Supplement Notes SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT FOLLOW UP SEARCH WARRANTS. ROSS VIDEO. SCENE PICTURES. NEGOTIATIONS AUDIO. KIDNAPPING SITE PICS AND INTERVIEW INVESTIGATION: 011 04-09-14. I authored a search warrant for the following phone munbers and accormt holder names: Metro PCS Miguel Angel Garcia - DOB Maru?icio Telles Tovar- DO The warrant was signed on the same date by Napa Superior Coru't Judge Stone and faxed to the appropriate business. I received notice via email from Splint 011 04-10-14 that target phone number belonged to Metro PCS. (I subsequently authored another search warrant to Metro PCS for those phone records.) 011 04-29-14. I received a email from Metro PCS containing the information requested in this warrant for the Metro PCS phone munbers I authored a return of search warrant for those records. See separate supplemental report for review of phone records. **Statement 0 - not audio recorded. 011 04-09-14. I proceeded to Stage Gulch Road to locate the scene in which Reynaldo had met Garcia and Tovar. Prior to leaving Napa SO. I consulted with Det. Alfonso Ortiz regarding one of his interviews with Tovar. Det. Ortiz. utilizing Google Earth had Tovar point at the location where they met with Reynaldo and forced him into the vehicle. Det. Ortiz showed the location 011 Google Earth pointed out by Tovar. I am very familiar with this area and recognized the road and location. Tovar told Det. Ortiz he recalled it was that location because of the fence line and ?owers along the fence. I arrived at the scene at approx. 1800 horns and noted the address as 1074 Stage Gulch Road. I recognized the location from Google earth and the fence line containing red ?owers. The area matched the description of the area provided by Tovar druing his interviews. There was a sign located at the gate of the property marked "Stage Gulch Vineyards". I took runnerous photographs of the area which I later booked into the NSD photo locker. I took photographs of several tire tracks in the mud. However. information I gained later indicated it is a working vineyard and the tire marks could Printed by: (250161) DETVVILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 PACHECO, CHRIS Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 be from a number of vehicles in that area. While at the location, I observed two residences on the property. I contacted at one of the residences. He stated he is the ranch manager for the property at 1074 Stage Gulch Road. The property is owned by who resides at one of the residences near the gate. I asked if he recalled vehicles being parked by the gate a few weeks earlier. He stated he did recall. It was on 03-24-14. He was notified by , who was upset a vehicle had been left on her property. During his duties, noticed a cream colored sedan parked behind the fence line, blocking an access road. I asked if the vehicle resembled a Chrysler 300 with big shiny wheels and he said yes. stated he could not recall the exact time, but sometime in the afternoon he spoke with the owner of the vehicle. He saw a gray colored SUV pull up with two Hispanic males in it. They got out and one started to walk towards the Chrysler. approached and spoke briefly with the Chrysler owner. told the owner he was going to call the police and have the vehicle towed. The owner became slightly nervous and told him not to call the police; he was moving the vehicle immediately. said he did not think he could identify the two males. I showed him a photograph of Miguel Garcia and Mauricio Tovar with their identifying information hidden and asked if he recognized either person. He said he did not recognize them. He did not see the vehicle arrive and only knew it was there after called him. I asked about the SUV they arrived in. He stated it was a dark gray or green colored SUV, similar to a Range Rover. I showed him the photograph of Reynaldo Pacheco`s Range Rover from his missing person Trax flyer. stated it appeared to be the same SUV. showed me where the vehicles were parked and he spoke with the subject. He believed did not actually speak with any of the suspects. I attempted to contact at her residence. No one answered the door. I left a business card at the door and attempted to re-contact her on a separate date. At this time I have been unable to speak with her and obtain a statement. ** Range Rover Search Warrant During a previous interview with Tovar on 04-08-14, he was asked what happened to the victim`s vehicle. He stated Garcia had told him he had sold the Range Rover for $5000 to an individual in Vallejo or the East Bay. Det. Ortiz asked who the vehicle was sold to. Tovar stated he was unsure; however, he had provided Garcia a business card for a person he knew that purchased used vehicles. Tovar had another business card of this person`s at his friend Alma Romero`s residence. He suspected Garcia may have sold the vehicle to this person. After the interview, Det. Dudley and Det. Ortiz contacted at her residence. Det. Ortiz was provided a cell phone left by Tovar and a business card for a car buyer from Alma Romero. The business card did not have a name, but had two phone numbers and an email address for contact and stated they buy used and junk vehicles. On 04-09-14, Lt. Oscar Ortiz called the numbers on the business card provide by . A male voice answered the phone and identified himself as ". told Lt. Ortiz that he had purchased a gray Range Rover from two Hispanic males. had done business with one of the males previously, but did not know his name. He stated he would recognize a picture of him. told Lt. Ortiz he purchased the vehicle a couple of weeks ago and it was currently stored in a garage at his brother`s residence. said he would be cooperative in assisting us in retrieving the vehicle. I authored a Search warrant on 04-10-14 that was signed by Napa Superior Court Judge Michael Williams. The warrant authorized the seizure of the vehicle, its keys and a search of the vehicle for trace evidence and missing items. The vehicle was transported to Napa Sheriff`s Department by Blackhawk Tow. was interviewed by Lt. Ortiz and Det. Ackman. See supplemental report for details on interview. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250314) PACHECO, CHRIS Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 The vehicle was examined by Evidence Technician Breedlove at Napa Sheriff`s Department. She was able to obtain some fingerprints and DNA swabs for later analysis. I was provided a copy of the evidence she obtained during the search. I authored a return to search warrant for the items. See her report for further details regarding the Range Rover. ** Follow up and Video On 04-10-14, I contacted the store manager at the 76 gas station located at the intersection of Freeway Drive and Imola Avenue in Napa. Information from Mauricio Tovar indicated they had dropped the third suspect (ATM photo guy) off at this business after the incident. I requested video surveillance on 03-24-14. The store manager indicated they only keep video for 12 days. He allowed me to view the saved data to ensure the video had been erased. The video from the day requested was un-retrievable. I then drove to Ross store, located at 151 N McDowell Blvd, Petaluma, CA. I spoke with the on duty manager and requested video surveillance of the store on 03-24-14 from 1200 to 1430 hours. The manager provided the front door camera video. He stated they have video over the registers, but would require a transaction receipt or credit card to verify the time of purchase. On 04-11-14, I reviewed the video from Ross. At 12:41:39, I observed two individuals enter the store through the front entrance. They are partially visible outside the store as they approach. They appear to be coming from the north, where there is a Big 5 Sporting Goods store located a couple of doors down. The two suspects enter the store and disappear out of the camera view. I recognized both subjects as Mauricio Tovar and Miguel Garcia from other pictures and video that I had seen. The suspects appeared to be in the same clothing as some of the video retrieved from Big 5 stores and had the same height and stature as Tovar and Garcia. The same two suspects leave the Ross store at 12:46:26, now carrying a bag, presumably with items they had purchased. I booked the CD-R into NSD evidence. I then proceeded to Santa Rosa Police Department. Det. Verdielle had requested I go there and pick up some photographs she had requested. I contacted the lobby records clerk and informed her I was there to retrieve evidentiary photographs that were left for me. She handed me a manila envelope marked "Napa County Sheriff`s Department" and was sealed with a confidential seal. On 04-11-14, I opened the package and retrieved 2 CD-R`s. The first one was marked "14-4432, Item 2, SRPD". I reviewed the CD-R which depicted several aerial photographs of the residence and scene at 237 Hoff Lane in Santa Rosa, CA (Miguel Garcia standoff scene). The second Cd-R was marked "14-4432, Item #3, SRPD, Autopsy". I reviewed the Cd-R and noted it was several photographs from the autopsy of Miguel Garcia. I resealed the envelope and booked both CD-R`s into NSD evidence. On the same date, I met with Det. Horseman at Sonoma County Sheriff`s Department. Det. Horseman was able to provide me with a CD-R containing the audio recorded during the negotiations at 237 Hoff Lane. The CD-R contained several audio tracks, all in Spanish of law enforcement negotiators talking with Miguel Garcia prior to him killing himself. I booked the Cd-R into NSD evidence. Det. Horseman also provided me with a copy of an 8 page list he had obtained from Reynaldo Pacheco`s residence. He collected the list during a search warrant they had executed during their missing person investigation. The list was first and last names (appearing mostly Hispanic) with phone numbers. Det. Horseman was unaware as to what the list was for, but assumed it was a list of potential investors to the business. It appeared to be in Reynaldo`s hand writing when compared to other documents. I had the list scanned into the report. **Metro PCS Search Warrant for Phone I had authored a previous search warrant for phone records for phone to Sprint. I was informed by Sprint the phone number requested was owned by Metro PCS. I authored a new search warrant for records pertaining to phone on 04-10-14 to Metro PCS. It was signed by Napa Superior Court Judge Michael Williams on 04-10-14 and served to Metro PCS via email on the same date. As of the date of this report I have not received the information requested. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250314) PACHECO, CHRIS Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 RECOMMENDATIONS: Attach to original report. Further investigation required. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250314) PACHECO, CHRIS Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Supplement Information Supplement Date Supplement Type Supplement Officer 04/30/2014 16:34:01 SUPPLEMENTAL (250314) PACHECO, CHRIS Contact Name Supervising Officer TOVAR, MAURICIO (250134) WILSON, JOEL 418 Supplement Notes SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT MAURICIO TOVAR INTERVIEW ON 04-11-14 BY DET. ORTIZ INVESTIGATION: On 04-11-14 at 1045 hours, I accompanied Det. Ortiz to Napa County Detention Center to interview Mauricio Tovar regarding this homicide case. The interview was video recorded and I later booked the video into NSD evidence. The interview was conducted in Spanish, with Det. Ortiz being bilingual. It was translated to me at the time by a translator in separate room. See Det. Ortiz`s report for full statement of Tovar. Tovar was advised his rights per Miranda and he stated that he knew them. He was also told we did not want to talk about the case he was in custody for and he was not going to being promised any consideration for his statements regarding the homicide investigation. Tovar had requested to speak with Det. Ortiz because he was concerned about his wife`s safety. He stated Miguel had a brother and his wife had seen a suspicious vehicle around the residence lately. Prior to the interview, we had gained knowledge of the identification of the 3rd suspect. Det. Dudley had spoken with Tovar`s father who identified the person in the ATM photos as Norberto Guerrero Gonzalez I had a photo lineup created of 6 individual photos with Norberto as the 4th photograph. Tovar was read the admonition and stated he understood. He was told to look at the photos and see if he recognized the person who took the money out of the ATM on 03-24-14. He was shown the 6 photos individually and then went back and said the person in photo #4 was the person with them on 03-24-14. I booked the photo lineup into NSD evidence. Tovar was asked about the Range Rover and if he was present during the sale of it. He initially stated he was not present, but later admitted he was there. Tovar said he made a call to Villegas to sell the vehicle after they had kidnapped Reynaldo Pacheco, but before they had murdered him. They met with Villegas at the Food 4 Less in Vallejo. He stated Garcia signed the pink slip for the vehicle and received $8000 for the car. He then drove Garcia across the parking lot to the old Walmart where he was picked up by "La Senora" in a blue colored sports car. Tovar said he recognized "La Senora" driving the vehicle and it was occupied by two other people. He described "La Senora" as tall, approx. 37 years old and she gave job orders to Garcia. He stated she drove a blue sedan, either a Honda or Acura. He stated she was married to an older Hispanic man with long hair who was disabled. We asked when he had seen her. Tovar stated "La Senora" had brought the victim to the meeting place on Stage Gulch Road on the day of the murder. After they kidnapped Pacheco, all four people (Miguel Garcia, Mauricio Tovar, "La Senora" and Reynaldo Pacheco) got into the Range Rover. They drove to Broadway Market in the town of Sonoma and dropped off "La Senora". Tovar, NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250314) PACHECO, CHRIS Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Garcia and Pacheco proceeded onto Napa where they met with Norberto Gonzalez. I had Det. Ortiz show Tovar three photographs from my cell phone. Two of the photographs were pictures taken from Facebook page. The third photograph was of a Hispanic female related to the Rohnert Park kidnapping. Tovar looked at all three photos and said the two Facebook photos were "La Senora". The third photo was of a female that he did not know. I returned to Napa SO and Google searched "Broadway Market in Sonoma, CA". The search returned a business located at 20511 Broadway, Sonoma, CA 95476. On 04-11-14, I requested Det. Ackman go the Broadway Market in Sonoma and see if they had video surveillance. Det. Ackman later informed me they only had video surveillance inside the market. RECOMMENDATIONS: Attach to original report. Further investigation required NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250314) PACHECO, CHRIS Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Supplement Information Supplement Date Supplement Type Supplement Officer 05/01/2014 14:29:25 SUPPLEMENTAL (250314) PACHECO, CHRIS Contact Name Supervising Officer MARTINEZ ARIAS, ANGELA ARIAS (250134) WILSON, JOEL 418 Supplement Notes SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT TRACKER SEARCH WARRANT FOR INVESTIGATION: On 04-17-14, I authored a search warrant to place a GPS tracker on the primary vehicle of . The warrant was signed by Napa Superior Court Judge Francisca Tisher on 04-17-14. A GPS tracker was placed onto the blue colored Acura by NSIB agents on 04-17-14. See Sgt. Greenberg`s report for further details. In reviewing the tracking information on the vehicle for the dates of 04-17-14 through 04-24-14, the driver of the blue Acura would park the vehicle near the Way address ) and would drive to Rohnert Park, where owns a business at 109 Southwest Blvd. The vehicle did not drive to any place that seemed suspicious at this time. On 04-25-14 at approx. 0330 hours, I replaced the tracker on the Acura with one that contained fresh batteries. We lost contact with that tracker on 04-25-14 at 0902 hours in Petaluma. We have been unable to locate the tracker and it is no longer on the vehicle. The report obtained from the tracker website showed the vehicle driving around the Petaluma area on 04-25-14 prior to being deactivated. I printed up copies of the tracker reports and authored a return to search warrant. RECOMMENDATIONS: Attach to original report. Further investigation required. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250314) PACHECO, CHRIS Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Supplement Information Supplement Date Supplement Type Supplement Officer 05/02/2014 11:38:49 SUPPLEMENTAL (250314) PACHECO, CHRIS Contact Name Supervising Officer GUERRERO, NORBERTO GONZALEZ (250314) PACHECO, CHRIS 418 Supplement Notes SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT IDETIFICATION, ARREST AND SEARCH WARRANT FOR NORBERTO GONZALEZ INVESTIGATION: During this investigation, we had received ATM surveillance photographs of the suspect who withdrew money from Reynaldo`s account on the day of the murder. The photos were obtained by Sonoma County Sheriff`s Department Detective Joseph Horseman through Wells Fargo bank and then provided to me via email. The photo was taken from the ATM camera at the Wells Fargo located on Jefferson Street in Napa on 03-24-14 at 1440 hours. It depicted a Hispanic male adult, wearing a black colored shirt, a gray and black, flat billed baseball style hat and a silver or gold bracelet on his right hand. The suspect had a small, thin goatee. During the previous interviews, Tovar admitted the person on the ATM photos was with them, but he did not know his name. Tovar also told Det. Ortiz on 04-08-14 that they had stopped at Chevron Gas station 630 Trancas Street to purchase Gatorade prior to killing the victim. Det. Chambers went to Chevron and obtained video surveillance footage for the day of the murder. I reviewed the footage and observed a Hispanic male adult, similar to the suspect in the ATM surveillance photo. He was dressed in a dark t-shirt, dark pants, had a gray colored "Puma" hat with a dark bill and black Puma on the front of the hat. He was wearing white colored tennis shoes and purchased several bottles of Gatorade. The time the suspect was seen inside the Chevron coincided with the timeline provided by Tovar. On 04-10-14, Det. Dudley interviewed Mauricio Tovar`s father. She showed him the ATM surveillance photo and asked if he recognized the person. He stated the person on the photo was Norberto Guerrero Gonzalez. He knew this because Norberto used to briefly work for him. I checked local databases and performed a criminal history check on Norberto; I discovered he was on Napa County Probation until 2016. His probation condition included a search and seizure clause and he resided a . Associates of Norberto through local databases indicated he had a wife named . Previous cases with her indicated she was investigated for child abuse and she and Norberto had a child in common. On 04-10-14, I contacted Napa Child Protective Services and spoke with Kim Longmore. She informed me they had an open case with and Norberto and they had removed their 2 year old child from the home due to physical abuse. CPS informed me they had a last address for Norberto at in Napa as of December 2013. On 04-14-14, I organized an operation to locate and detain Norberto using Napa County Sheriff detectives. We arrived at and contacted the resident, ). I asked if he knew Norberto and NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250314) PACHECO, CHRIS Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 he said yes. He stated Norberto had rented a room from him for 2 months, but had only paid for one month. He had kicked him out a couple of months ago and had dropped him off at his girlfriend`s house on Laurel Street. He had also brought Norberto`s personal belongings with them to the apartment on Laurel Street. I asked if he could point out the apartment to us. Det. Hallman took to the apartments and was directed to . He pointed to and stated Norberto was living there with his girlfriend. On 04-14-14, I and fellow detectives contacted the residents at . and her daughter, stated they lived at the apartment. admitted she is the girlfriend or Norberto and he moved into the apartment in December 2013 stated Norberto kept his clothes at the apartment and slept there at night. They consented to us searching the apartment and showed us where Norberto kept his clothing. The clothing was located in a small wooden overhang in the backyard. As I looked at the items I noticed several items of male clothing, noting a gray colored Puma hat that matched the one in surveillance photos. We froze the residence and I authored a search warrant for clothing items belonging to Norberto related to the crime. The search warrant included Norberto`s cell phone and a DNA sample for Norberto. The warrant was signed by Napa Superior Court Judge Michael Williams and executed on 04-14-14. Photographs were taken of the items collected. The following items were collected at the scene and later booked in Napa SO evidence: Items collected (Note- items numbers changed from the property sheet) 18CP- White "wife beater" style undershirt 19CP- Grey and black colored "puma" baseball style cap 20CP- White colored "Puma" shoes, size 9 21CP- White colored "Coogi" high top shoes, size 7.5 Subsequently Norberto was contacted and detained on 04-14-14 walking to the apartments at . When he was searched, a black colored cell phone was retrieved from his person. The phone was collected pursuant to the search warrant. He was found to be in possession of methamphetamine and drug paraphernalia and was detained and transported to Napa Sheriff`s Department. He was interviewed by Det. Dudley and Lt. Ortiz. See report by Lt. Ortiz for further information. While being interviewed, Det. Dudley collected a DNA sample from Norberto pursuant to the search warrant. She retained the DNA sample in her custody. I collected the cell phone from Det. Eddleman, who had discovered the item on Norberto`s person. I submitted the cell phone to Det. Hallman with a request to forensically examine the contents. See Det. Hallman`s report for further details. On 05/01/14, Det. Hallman returned the phone to me and I booked the item into NSD evidence. I authored a return to search warrant. RECOMMENDATIONS: Attach to original report. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250314) PACHECO, CHRIS Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Supplement Information Supplement Date Supplement Type Supplement Officer 05/05/2014 10:36:14 SUPPLEMENTAL (250314) PACHECO, CHRIS Contact Name Supervising Officer (250120) ORTIZ, OSCAR 418 Supplement Notes SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT CESAR VILLEGAS SEARCH WARRANT INVESTIGATION: Subsequent to a search warrant I authored, I read and reviewed cell phone records for the suspects, Miguel Garcia and Mauricio Tovar. In reviewing those records, I noted some items did not seem to match up with the testament provided by Tovar. Specifically, I did not see any phone calls from Tovar to , the person who purchased the stolen Range Rover. Statements by both Tovar and indicated these two spoke on more than one occasion on 03-24-14 and 03-25-14. On 05-01-14, I authored a search warrant for phone records through Sprint. The warrant was signed by Napa Superior Court Judge Michael Williams and served on Sprint on 05-01-14. I received the information requested via the online Sprint L-site. I later burned then items to a CD-R and booked them into NSD evidence. In reviewing the documents for cell phone I noted a phone number that called on 03-24-14 and 03-25-14. The call appeared to match the call times as described by Tovar and in their statements. A search of the phone number indicated Metro PCS owns the number; however a name was not associated. The initial call came in on 03-24-14 at 1419 hours from . There were approx. 30 calls back and forth between and the number on 03-24-14 from 1419 hours until 2021 hours. On 03-25-14 On 03-25-14, I noted 5 additional calls to from the phone number . I compared the phone number to the call logs for Garcia`s phones. I noted outgoing calls and text messages from both of Garcia`s phone and This information leads me to believe, Tovar had an additional phone he utilized on the day of the homicide, . RECOMMENDATIONS: Attach to original report. Further investigation required, search warrant to be written for NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 . Officer:(250314) PACHECO, CHRIS Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Supplement Information Supplement Date Supplement Type Supplement Officer 05/07/2014 19:11:00 SUPPLEMENTAL (250314) PACHECO, CHRIS Contact Name Supervising Officer KULLBERG, MARGARET (250120) ORTIZ, OSCAR 418 Supplement Notes SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT INTERVIEW INVESTIGATION: On 05-01-14, I spoke with by telephone. The call was audio recorded and later booked into NSD evidence. is the property owner of , the area where the victim met with Mauricio Tovar and Miguel Garcia. She stated the following in summary: I explained I had spoken with her ranch manager, I asked if she recalled a day in which a vehicle was parked on her property. She stated she recalled a white colored sedan parked on her property. She did not see any people associated with it and had told about the vehicle. She saw the vehicle in the afternoon and thought it was only there for an hour or so. She said it was not normal for a vehicle to be there and that is why she had spoken with about the vehicle stated she knew the vehicle did not belong to a field worker because of where it was parked. She said the vehicle seemed very odd to her. RECOMMENDATIONS: Attach to original report. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250314) PACHECO, CHRIS Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSDl4-001332 Supplement Information Supplement Date Supplement Type Supplement Of?cer 0551552014 10:44:10 SUPPLEMENTAL (250314) PACHECO. CHRIS Contact Name Supervising Of?cer RACHEL (250134) WILSON. JOEL Supplement Notes SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT INVESTIGATION: 011 04-18-14 at approx. 1400 hours. Det. Dudley and I contacted and his wife._ at their residence in Vacaville. We asked to speak with them separately and went into the bedroom while we spoke with - in the living room. The interview was audio recorded. See Det. Dudley?s supplemental report for statement of Approx. 1 110m and 5 minutes into the interview.- came out of the room and started to listen to the interview. I asked- to go with me into the bedroom and I conducted an interview with her. The interview was audio recorded. transferred to a D-R and later booked into NSD evidence. She stated the following in srurnnaiy: provided her personal information and stated she was married to stated she does not really handle the money in the relationship. but she felt Kingdom 777 was some sort of scam. and do not speak about the situation very much. but she has noticed he speaks to a lot of other people about the business. said- has always been a "get rich quick" type person where she feels hard work is what makes money. That is why she though Kingdom 777 was not legitimate. - said she did not know a lot about the business itself and she only attended meetings as a support for- 011 03-23-14 she began dating -. Through her relationship with - she was introduced to other people in the business. including Reynaldo Pacheco. She stated-and Reynaldo lived to ether at the time in Penngrove. She stated several people lived in the house together. She has noticed recently that does not want to go to Santa Rosa alone and has had trouble sleeping. However. he does not talk to her about it much. She stated- never expressed any concern for his safety of the safety of Reynaldo during the decline of Kingdom 777. stated all she really knew about the business was she had and now it is gone. She did not personally invest the money and she is not sure what happened to it. had received a workers compensation injruy claim so knew the money was in an account. She stated they thought ver differently about the money and she told him she did not want to part of the business. When- approached to get $10000 for school. he provided different excuses. He told her the money had been invested or loaned to numerous people. including Reynaldo. has gone through- belongings and found a receipt for $30000 being wired to Hong King. She knew the money had been invested in Kingdom 777 and was all but lost now. He received the settlement in November 2013 and all of the money was gone by January 2014. Printed by: (250161) SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 PACHECO, CHRIS Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Initially, when met Reynaldo and his wife she did not realize he was part of Kingdom 777. At the time, Reynaldo was a "concrete guy". She felt Reynaldo and became very close and she felt they cared for each other very much, like brothers. She stated they had other friends, like . I asked Rachel to tell me about She said he seemed like he was trying to be someone he was not. She did not get along with him and felt he was disloyal. She saw several subtle incidents between and Reynaldo`s wife . She felt that and were possibly having an affair. She told of her thoughts and assumed he told Reynaldo about it. stated she knew and Reynaldo would post pictures of themselves with money in a way to promote the company. attended a meeting held by and Reynaldo for investors in Kingdom 777. The meeting took place at "Park of the Ducks" in Petaluma. At the meeting a female became irate and started yelling at Reynaldo and about losing money. She stated the lady that was yelling seemed to be speaking for someone else, not specifically herself. She stated the lady was "attacking" and Reynaldo. She clarified that the lady never made any threats, but was upset about losing money and was calling them liars. was later told the lady upset during the meeting was actually a man and was the son of the older lady sitting next to him told her the person upset and talking actually did not invest in the company, he was speaking for the older lady next to him. I asked if she would recognize a picture of the older lady. She said she would. I showed her a picture of from her Facebook page. said that was the older lady who was sitting next to the guy yelling. stated Reynaldo had called at 10 AM on the morning he went missing. became upset when she learned Reynaldo was missing because she felt no one was doing anything to find him. admitted she texted to try and make sure Reynaldo was reported missing. heard ask his sister, to call Reynaldo`s family and ask about Reynaldo. did not know why asked his sister to do make the calls and she did not know why he had told Det. Dudley and I he never did that. She believed was afraid, but she did not have an answer. did call one of Reynaldo`s brothers, but it was because he was concerned and wanted to help. She felt the Reynaldo`s family had ill feeling toward because he had told the Sheriff they thought were having an affair. I asked to tell me what she knew about had told her had invested money in the company. knows x-wife, (her real name as or something similar) because and practice witchcraft together. resides in Santa Rosa. was told and are "heavily" into the witchcraft religion. used to be into the religion, but since they had gotten together he did not believe as much. She stated has known for several years. seemed concerned because was aware had told the Pacheco`s about the affair with . Prior to his disappearance, Reynaldo had supposedly told either he was going to kill might kill him. Reynaldo also told that he was going to buy a gun for protection because had killed someone in Fresno and was running drugs. She felt was scared of because of these statements. I asked if she knew of anyone who had invested a lot of money into Kingdom 777. She said Reynaldo told her the owner of Mi Zacatecas, had invested over $100,000. At this time I ended the interview and returned to the interview with Det. Dudley and NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250314) PACHECO, CHRIS Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 RECOMMENDATIONS: Attach to original report. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250314) PACHECO, CHRIS Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Supplement Information Supplement Date Supplement Type Supplement Officer 06/17/2014 10:04:04 SUPPLEMENTAL (250314) PACHECO, CHRIS Contact Name Supervising Officer (250134) WILSON, JOEL 418 Supplement Notes SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT INTERVIEW INVESTIGATION: On 06-11-14, I was requested by Det. Dudley to contac and speak with him about this case. was the victim in a Napa Police case in which Mauricio Tovar shot at him. It was suspected the shooting was possibly associated with current girlfriend, . On 06-12-14 at approx. 0900 hours, I contacted at his residence in Yountville. He answered the door and I identified myself. He stated he would be willing to speak with me and the interview was audio recorded. I later booked the recording into NSD evidence. He stated the following in summary: I explained to that I wanted to talk with him regarding a homicide investigation. I told him I was not there to talk with about any of the other cases he was involved in. I told him it was about the Napa PD case in which he was shot at. He stated that would be fine. I asked if he had heard anything that occurred after his incident involving Tovar. said he read some stuff in the newspaper but felt the newspaper was not very reliable. I explained to I needed him to be completely honest with me and that he was not in trouble. I told him I would be showing some photographs to see if he recognized anyone. He said that would be fine. I showed a CalPhoto of Miguel Garcia with the identifying information hidden. He stated that was the guy that jumped him with Tovar. I showed him the booking photo for Garcia and he confirmed it was the same person as the first photo. He did not know the guy`s name, but thought it was Tovar`s cousin. I asked him to tell me about being jumped. said he was picking up his girlfriend, when Tovar and Garcia jumped him with brass knuckles approx. 2 weeks prior to the Napa PD shooting. He stated the incident was documented in Napa PD`s report. He had gone to pick up at her work when they attacked him. He thought it was because he had told Tovar to stay away from . I asked if he had any other contacts with Garcia. He stated he saw him one other time. He went to pick up at Tovar`s house. While there, he told Tovar he did not appreciate all of the sneaking around with his girl. At that time, Garcia came out of the house with a baseball bat. thought it would be a good idea to leave at that time so he did. That incident occurred approx. 2 weeks prior to him being jumped. I showed Ford a photo of Mauricio Tovar with no identifying information. He confirmed the identity. I showed him a NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250314) PACHECO, CHRIS Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 photo of Norberto Gonzalez and he did not recognize him. He did not know the name "Norberto Gonzalez". I showed a photo of and ( husband) and he did not recognize them. I asked if he had heard anything about the homicide. He only knew what he had read in the Napa Register. He did not know anyone else involved in the homicide. I asked if he had heard anything about Tovar. He heard Tovar was a "bad guy" but when I asked if he was connected with the cartel he said no. He stated he believed most people thought he was a "punk" and he just hung out with people who were bad. At this time I ended the interview. RECOMMENDATIONS: Attach to original report. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250314) PACHECO, CHRIS Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Supplement Information Supplement Date Supplement Type Supplement Officer 06/17/2014 15:43:23 SUPPLEMENTAL (250314) PACHECO, CHRIS Contact Name Supervising Officer MORA, MIGUEL ANGEL (250134) WILSON, JOEL 418 Supplement Notes SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT FOLLOW UP INTERVIEWS FOR PHONE RECORDS INTERVIEWS INVESTIGATION: On 06-03-14, I was requested by Det. Dudley to perform follow interviews related to this case. Based upon examination of cell phone records obtained by search warrants for the suspects, several phone numbers appeared numerous times on and around the day of the homicide. The phone numbers were checked using secure law enforcement databases and follow up interviews would need to be conducted to see if they were related to the crime. On 06-03-14, Lt. Ortiz and I were tasked with contacting several individuals. Lt. Ortiz was present as a translator as he is bilingual in Spanish. Some contacts were audio recorded and later booked into NSD evidence. We contacted the following people and related to the following phone numbers: These numbers were on phones believed to be related to - (audio recorded). This phone number had calls on the day of the homicide to stated she did not recognize the phone number and it was not a number she ever had. She has had her current phone number for approx. 4 years. Her current cell phone number was . She stated her husband had a cell phone but it was not the one we had. She never had a phone number with that number and did not know why that phone would be in her name. I asked if she recognized the phone number or (both originally suspected of being phones utilized by Garcia). She stated she did not recognize the phone numbers. I showed photographs of Miguel Garcia, Mauricio Tovar and Norberto Gonzalez and asked if she recognized them. She said she did not. We had call the phone number in an attempt to identify who owned the number. The call was answered by an automated voice message and indicated the phone was owned by a Hispanic male. At this time we ended the interview. . Calls made to and from on and around the day of the homicide. Det. Ortiz and I met with Tovar in the parking lot of Denny`s in Napa. Interview was audio recorded knew Lt. Ortiz from prior contacts. We explained to we were there to talk with him about some phone calls. He stated his current phone number is . We informed he had made several phone calls to a number associated NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250314) PACHECO, CHRIS Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSDl4-001332 with our homicide. - seemed sruprised. We showed him photographs of Miguel Garcia. Maruicio Tovar and Norberto Gonzalez. He did not know any of the people in the photographs. He admitted he had seen Miguel Garcia arormd Napa 011 one or two occasions. but did not know who he was or associate with him. I confronted Rivas with the phone records: at the time believing the phone 11m11ber_belongedto Miguel Garcia. He said he has never called Garcia and did not know why his phone was showing up 011 the records. I asked who was. That name and phone number_ also appeared 011 the phone records for . stated that was his former sister in law. Based 011 his crurent Napa County Probation status with search terms. we looked at cell phone. We typed in the munbe and it was located in his contact list rmder the name "Miguel". explained that was brother and he was a mechanic. -was positive the Miguel in his phone was not the same person in the photo I had shown him earlier (Miguel Garcia). He stated his Miguel was a mechanic and he had seen him as recently as tln?ee weeks ago. We called the phone number and the automated stated to leave a message for "Miguel". He said the he knew was he called him frequently to help with his vehicle. - said knew a lot of people and may know Miguel Garcia. but he did not know. At this time I ended the interview. and Several phone calls Interview was not recorded. I spoke witl by telephone 011 06-04-14. He stated his phone number was his house landline. He knew ?and had called him using the He did not know any of 0m suspects. - Several phone calls to . ontacted family members at their residence in Napa on 06-05-14. They stated he has been in prison for approx. 1 year an does not have a phone. They did not recognize the phone numbers or know any of 0m suspects. Numerous hone calls to I contacted belonged to her brother . She had recently seen him and he still had but did not know any of 0m suspects. She stated- has had that phone and she informed me that number. She knew number for approx. 2 years. Phone calls 011 . I contacte at her address at She stated she did not recognize the numbers. I was unable to locate addresses at this time for the other two individuals. 011 06-13-14. I contacted at his residence in Napa with Det. Tijero present as a translator. The interview was audio recorded and later booked into NSD evidence. He stated the following in summary: He has had that phone munber for approx. 2 years. He was shown photographs of Miguel Garcia. Mauricio Tovar and Norberto Gonzalez. He did not know Norberto. However. he used to live with Tovar at the Marin Street address. He admitted he had done drugs with Tovar in the past. but they were not great ??iends. He had only seen Garcia with Tovar and believed they were cousins. He admitted he had called Tovar orr several occasions using that phone. He did not even know Garcia?s name. He state- was his sister and he knew_ He did not know anything regarding the homicide other than Tovar was arrested and in jail. said he currently had the cell phone with number . but it had recently been dropped in water and the phone was not working. He had obtained a new munber. . At this time I determined the phone number belonged ?and likely was never in the possession of Miguel Garcia. Printed by: (250161) DETVVILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 PACHECO, CHRIS Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 These numbers were on phones believed to be related to Norberto Gonzalez - ** 14 calls to Norberto on day of homicide. I initially contacted in relation to this number on 06-03-14. She stated she did not recognize the number, although her actual cell phone was only 2 digits off. She did not recognize any of the suspects. I then contacted at his mother`s house . He was also listed as a possible owner of this phone. He did not recognize any of the suspects, although he hesitated when shown a photograph of Norberto. He stated Norberto was "sketch" and he would not hang out with him. When I told him it sounded like he knew him, he said no he could tell from the photograph admitted to a drug history, but said he never knew them. said he did not recognize the phone number . The phone number is currently out of service. . Neither subject was able to be contacted. I called the phone number and the voicemail stated to leave a message for " Utilizing iLeads, I located a in Napa with phone number It appeared he possibly received that phone number in June 2014. RECOMMENDATIONS: Attach to original report. Follow up investigation led to the conclusion that phone number to Miguel Garcia and is not related to this case. I will attempt to make contact with regarding the incident. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE did not belong for interviews and knowledge at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250314) PACHECO, CHRIS Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Supplement Information Supplement Date Supplement Type Supplement Officer 06/20/2014 14:21:25 SUPPLEMENTAL (250314) PACHECO, CHRIS Contact Name Supervising Officer (250134) WILSON, JOEL 418 Supplement Notes SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT SURVEILLANCE INVESTIGATION: I was requested by Det. Dudley to conduct a surveillance of On 06-19-14, I organized an operation with Detectives Chambers, Koford, and Ensley to observe at her work or residence. The objective was to track her movements with a secondary objective to obtain a DNA sample surreptitiously if the situation arose. We briefed at Napa SO at approx. 1000 hours and in unmarked vehicle proceeded to the locations. I established surveillance at her business at approx. 1130 hours, Team #1. At approx. 1215 hours we established a second surveillance at her residence, Team #2. Both teams observed the locations for several hours. Team #2 followed husband as he left the residence and drove to the business. He picked up a male subject and dropped him off at a shopping center in Petaluma. At that time the team lost sight of the vehicle. The vehicle, a blue Aura sedan known to be driven by and her husband arrived at the business a short time later. He remained at the business until 1830 hours when we ended the operation. was seen inside the business and at no time left. We did not note anything of a suspicious nature during the surveillance. Business appeared very slow, with little to no customers. An opportunity to obtain a DNA sample never presented itself. At approx. 2000 hours, I went to residence and noted the vehicle was parked in its normal spot in front of the house. I observed the residence for some time and no one arrived or left. We ended the surveillance. RECOMMENDATIONS: Attach to original report. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250314) PACHECO, CHRIS Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSDl4-001332 Supplement Information Supplement Date Supplement Type Supplement Of?cer 0753052014 14:04: 57 SUPPLENIENTAL (250314) CHRIS Contact Name Supern'sing Of?cer RODAS. ROQUEFELER (250120) ORTIZ. OSCAR Supplement Notes SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT SEARCH WARRANT SERVIE REERVEEVS SE INVESTIGATION: 011 07-22-14. I assisted in organizing and attended a brie?ng conducted by Det. Dudley regarding this case. The brie?ng provided the logistics and details regarding sewing a search warrant on 07-23-14 at the following locations: - Residence CA - Business The warrant additionally instructed investigators to obtain a DNA sample and ?ngerprints from?the owner of the above assignment dm?ing the operation was to contact- husband- -and her son. and interview them. 011 7-23-14. I arrived in Petaluma with numerous other detectives and Law Enforcement persomrel. I was attired with a raid vest with clearly marked insignia 011 the front and rear of my vest. I was driving a marked Napa 01m Sheriff patrol vehicle. At approx. 1000 hours. I made visual contact with the vehicle known to be driven by Blue Acura sedan A-) at the Peet?s coffee 011 Old Redwood Highway in Rolmert Park. I observed iving icle with a male passenger. Based on the information in the search warrant. which authorized a search of 1d the Acura. I initiated an investigative stop utilizing my emergency lighting in the marked patrol m1it. ulled over in the parking lot of Chevron on Old Redwood Road in Rohnert Park. I contacted and identi?ed myself. I immediately recognized-as the passenger in the vehicle from photographs I had previously seen. I explained to? that I had a search warrant for their business and residence. as well as their vehicle. I asked them to step out of the vehicle. which they agreed. I explained that I and other detectives would like to speak with them regarding an ongoing investigation at Rohnert Park police station. Both of them stated that would be fme. informed me he had a doctor?s appointment he did not want to miss. but would be willing to speak with me at any other time. I told he was free to leave and did not have to speak with me. but the vehicle was also subject of the search warrant and he could not take it with him. I offered to have someone drive- to his doctor?s appointment so he did not miss it and he agreed. I informed she was not free to leave and would be required to go to the police station. She stated that would be fme. understood the vehicle was part of the search warrant and I could not let them have it at this time. Printed by: (250161) SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 PACHECO, CHRIS Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSDl4-001332 They agreed to both be driven to their locations by Law Enforcement and that I would drive their vehicle to the business address then bring the keys to when the search was completed. At this time Det. Dudley and Det. Ortiz (N PD) arrived orr scene and contacted She left the scene with them. **Statement of Roque Rodas A short time later. Lt. Ortiz (N SO) arrived on scene to transport to his medical appointment in Santa Rosa. Prior to leaving the scene. I spoke with- in the parking lot of the Chevron. I told him he did not have to speak with me but he said it would be OK. The interview was audio recorded and later booked into NSD evidence. He stated the following in smmnary: stated he spoke English and did not have a problem turderstanding me. He was comfortable speaking in English. He stated he is married to- and they have been married for 6-8 years. They have been together as a couple for approx. 14 years. They met through his brother and started a relationship. is from Guatemala and has resided in America for 18 years. - is from Mexico City and they met while both living in America. is his stepson and he does not have any biological children. Cturently he is not working due to an injury he sustained in January 2014. He fell of a roof while performing construction work. stated they owned the Botanica Store. but is the one who runs it. They have had it for approx. 2 years. is not too involved in the operation as it i passion and religion. The employees who work the store are and described the store as a "candle" store related to - religion. I asked him to explain the religion. He stated it is similar-. He does not particularly follow it but has to go with it because his wife is involved. I asked if they owned any other type of business. He said no. I asked if the store was doing well and he said no. He stated they only reason they are still open is because he has a 5 year contract with the owner. He said they are just living month to month with the rent. He said the only other income they have is from his accident. I asked about people and friends who come into the store. He stated people come in. but he does not know a lot about the store. I asked if they invest any of their money or have other methods of trying to get more money. He initially indicated he did not know what "investment" was. I explained what it was and he stated- was involved in something called "777". I asked him to tell me what he knew about that. - said he thought it was a good thing. but just knew it "dropped off". I asked if he knew why and he said no and no one has been able to explain why. I aske- how much- invested into "777". He stated it was probably 3-4 thousand dollars. He said that was a guess. I asked 110w she got into it. He stated a couple of guys she knew got her into it. One of them was- and the other guy was "Reynaldo Pacheco". He stated Reynaldo was "running the show" and the person who took all the money. I asked what he knew about Pacheco. stated all he knew was Pacheco had been "killed". He said someone came to the store and tol that Pacheco had been killed. The person who came into the store was a female. but- did not know her name. She stated that she had learned about the killing on Facebook. At this time the ride for- had arrived. I provided- with my business card and asked him to call me so we could speak ftutlrer? he stated that would be fine and he would call me. At this time I secured the Acura at Chevron. It was later moved over to the business at? by Law Enforcement personnel as per the request of - The keys were given to me and they were later provided to - at Rolmert Park Police Department. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETVVILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 PACHECO, CHRIS Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 ** I arrived on scene and contacted Det. Ackman, who was in charge of the scene. He stated they had found some items that they were going to collect. See his supplemental report for details. was sitting outside the business with Det. Lamison from Rohnert Park Police Department. identified himself and had a copy of the search warrant in his hand. I introduced myself to him and requested he go with me to a police department to speak. stated he did not want to leave the store, but was willing to speak with me. understood and spoke some English, however he was most comfortable speaking in Spanish. Det. Lamison was present during the interview as a translator as she is bilingual in Spanish. ** Statement of I informed he did not have to speak with me and he could end the conversation at any time. He stated he understood and was willing to talk while at the store. I informed him he was not in trouble. He stated the following in summary: is the son of and stepson of . He attends Rancho Cotati High School and sometimes works at the Botanica shop. He provided his personal information. He did not know how long had been together. said he has been working at the store for almost 2 years. He stated business was doing pretty good, but this was the only source of income for the family right now. explained worked in construction but was currently injured and not working. I asked if they have any other sources of income. He stated they sometimes sell items at the flea market. said people in the area are always talking about them and discriminating against them. I asked him to provide examples. He said they discriminate against him because he is gay and against his mom because of her religion. He could not provide and specific examples. He stated they criticize them because of their religion but would not say who. I asked him to explain the religion so I could attempt to understand. He stated the religion is African based that was established before Christ. Each person has their own "saint" and things related to the religion. These items are sacred and they do not want them to be touched or photographed. I explained we would have to touch and photograph these items as part of the Search warrant but we would do it in a respectful manner. asked why we were doing the search warrants. I explained that a crime had occurred in Napa County and we believe items related to the crime may be at the business or residence. I explained he would not know all the details of the case but by the end of the interview he would have an understanding of the situation. He asked what his mother was accused of. I told him his mother was not specifically accused of a crime at this time, but we had to talk to people to conclude our investigation. I asked if he had heard of "Kingdom 777". He stated he had and knew they provided points for money. He was aware a man had opened the company and his mother had invested approx. $20,000 to $25,000. I asked if he knew the man who took the money. has seen him, but they have never met before. He has seen the man at the store on 2 occasions, but he has not seen him lately. I asked if he knew where the man was now and said no. I asked if he knew what happened to the money. He figured the guy had taken the money and fled the area. I asked where he heard this information from and he said from people around town. I asked if he would recognize a photo. He said he would and described him a Mexican guy. I told him I would show him a photograph and wanted him to tell me if he recognized the person. I stated it may or may not be the guy we were talking about. I then showed him a photograph of Pacheco which was on the missing person flyer. The photo did not NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250314) PACHECO, CHRIS Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 contain and identifying information and was just the photo itself. said that was the guy who took the money from his mother. I asked him what kind of vehicle he (Pacheco) drove. He stated it was an SUV type vehicle. I then showed him a photograph of Pacheco`s vehicle (Range Rover) and he stated that looked like his vehicle. I asked if he would recognize the name if I told him. He was not sure and said it may be similar to . I asked if the name "Pacheco" was familiar and he said yes, that was the last name. I confirmed with had had only seen Pacheco on two occasions. He had only seen him twice but recalled he was always at the store. He said Pacheco would "hound" his mom for money. I asked what thought of Pacheco. He said was getting fed up with Pacheco coming to the store and asking for money. would tell his mother to not give Pacheco any additional money. did not know where Pacheco was now. I asked if Pacheco ever came to the store with another person. said he attended a meeting with Pacheco and several other people. did not like the meeting or what was going on. admitted he did talk at the meeting. He felt Pacheco was trying to confuse people at the meeting to try and get more money. There were two more people at the meeting with Pacheco, 1 male and 1 female. I asked if he would recognize a picture of the guy. I then showed him a picture of with no identifying information. He stated that was the guy at the meeting who he argued with, but he did not know his name. I asked what the argument was about. explained told him to "shut up" during the meeting and he did not like that. did not like that because he felt they were just trying to confuse everyone about the money they had lost. I confirmed again that his mother had invested approx. $25,000. stated from what he "heard and saw" it was more than that amount which she invested. They were going to use that money to expand the store, but it was lost in the investment, causing to be upset. He thought this occurred approx. 1 year ago. He later admitted the last time Pacheco was around was in March 2014. I asked if he knew anyone else who had invested. He knew of two other people. One was a restaurant owner in Santa Rosa but he did not know his name. He did not know the name of the restaurant but his mother does. He knew of a store customer who had invested, but did not know his name. I asked what wanted done after losing her money. wanted the money back and had asked for it, but Pacheco told her it was gone. I asked if had plans of trying to get the money back. He said she did not and did not know how to get the money back. She just wanted Pacheco to give her back cash. I asked if there were other people upset who had invested. He said yes, people would talk to about being upset because they lost money. I asked if there was anyone who seemed so upset they wanted to do something about it. said no. No one had any plans for revenge and everyone who lost money was an honorable person. I then showed a picture of Miguel Garcia (older booking photo in media) with no identifying information. He initially stated he did not know the guy. I asked if he had ever been in the store. pondered the question, looked at the photo and then stated several times that the person was "very ugly". I asked him to look one more time at the picture and asked if he had ever been in the store. asked if the person worked in the fields. I said sometimes and he said he now knew who he was. He asked if Miguel had tattoos on his arms. I said he did. He now admitted he had seen him in the shop and it was the person from the photo. I asked what he knew about him. said the guy was weird. wondered why Garcia worked in the fields, but would come into the store dressed very well. felt Garcia got a little too close to and he " did not like that. I asked if people came to for advice or opinions based on her position in the religion (similar to a priest). said people came in and talked to him because he did card readings. People would come in and "confess" to him, but his mom stayed out of that part of the business. I asked if Miguel ever confessed to him and he said no. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250314) PACHECO, CHRIS Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 did read Garcia`s cards and told him he needed to be careful in relation to his job. On another occasion Garcia came to the store with a woman and little girl. I asked if he ever came with another guy. He said no. I then showed a photograph of Mauricio Tovar with no identifying information. He stated he had never seen that person before. Later in the interview, again confirmed people did not confess to his mother. I asked if she would get calls at nighttime for advice and he said no. I asked if Garcia came into the store a lot said he only recalled one day that he came in. said he normally works in the mornings and on Saturdays. I told him I had information that Garcia frequented the store a lot. then stated he came only "once a month". I asked what he would do when he came. read his cards every time. I asked if Garcia spoke with nd he said no. His mom would hide in the back. I asked him to explain that. said he would tell his mom to go to the back when Garcia came in because he did not like Garcia talking to his mom. I asked if they had any family on the Napa, Vallejo or American Canyon area. He said no, except had a brother in Vallejo. and his brother don`t talk. They only have their one residence in Petaluma and the one store. They buy all of their merchandise for the store in LA. They travel down once a month in the Acura and get supplies. I asked if there was any reason for or to be in Napa or American Canyon. He said no, they hardly ever go out of town. He said his mother does not see well at night, so after 1600 hours, they are done and go home. stated they each had a cell phone and there is a phone at the house. He said they do not trade phones or let other people use their phones. I told this was about his mother losing her money. He said he does not get involved in this part of the business so he does not know anything else. I asked if had friends that he would not know about. He said no, he knows everyone his mother knows. I asked him again about the rumors regarding his mother and the store. He again would not provide specifics, but said people discriminate against them because of the business and their religion. He stated there has been talk because they sell the products at their store cheaper than similar stores. I asked if they had problems with the other store owners in the immediate area. He said no. He has not seen criminal activity in the area. I asked if he was ever told by or what happened to Pacheco. I explained that I had recently spoken with who told me Pacheco had been killed. said he never heard anything. I told Pacheco was dead and had been murdered. He did not think anything of it and did not care as Pacheco was not a family member. I asked if had ever mentioned his death or said prayers for Pacheco`s death. He said they had a lot of people to pray for but he did not specifically recall anything. I provided with a list of items we took from the business. I asked if he knew anything regarding the check for $64,000 that was taken during the search warrant. He said he did not. At this time I ended the interview. contacted me by telephone and stated he had time between doctor`s appointments to speak. He said I could meet him in Santa Rosa. I met with in Santa Rosa. He was seated on the curb in the parking lot. **Continued Interview of I re-contacted and sat next to him. The interview was audio recorded and later transferred to a CD-R and booked into NSD evidence. He stated the following in summary: I reminded NSD14-001332 that we spoke about Kingdom 777 and how Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE had invested money. He stated it was approx. 3-4 at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250314) PACHECO, CHRIS Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 thousand dollars which she had invested. He told me it was that had started her in the investments and Reynaldo Pacheco was the guy taking money for the investments. He had heard at the store that Pacheco had been killed. I asked if was upset when they found out Pacheco had been killed. He said no. I asked if he knew how Pacheco died and he said no. stated Pacheco came to the store frequently, which is how he knew him. I showed a photo of Pacheco without identifying information (photo from missing person flyer) said that was "Reynaldo". Pacheco was normally with a friend when he would come to the store. I showed him a photograph of without identifying information. said he knew him from a meeting they had one night about the investments. The meeting had taken place in Petaluma at the Duck Pond. He said was at the meeting and had become upset with I asked him to tell me what the lady said to when she informed her of Pacheco`s death. The lady came in and asked if she heard what happened to Pacheco. She then told her Pacheco had been killed. I asked if ver talked to him about Pacheco`s death. He said he did not think so. I asked if was upset about losing the money. He said yes, but they were told several times that they would get the money back. I asked if they believed they would get the money back. He said in the beginning. appeared to possibly believe the investment was a scheme. He stated sometimes the store loses money and they just had to chalk it up to that. I asked if he knew of other people who were upset about losing money. He stated there were a lot of people who were upset. He knew of one guy who had approx. $40,000 dollars invested and heard one lady invested $60,000. He did not know the names of either person. I showed a photograph of Miguel Garcia (booking media photo) without any identifying information. He recognized the guy and said he came into the store to buy items. He did not know what Garcia did for a living. I asked if he was friends with said was friendly to everyone who came into her business. I asked if people came to and would seek religious advice or confess their sins to cleanse their soul (like a priest). He said they did and she was that type of person in the religion. He stated many people would come to her and that was part of the religion. I asked if Garcia would come and ask her for advice. He said "probably" but he is usually not around for that. is very "nosey" and he would constantly listen in to conversations between his mom and customers. I asked if he knew Garcia`s name. He said no, there are lots of people that come in and out of the store. I showed a picture of Mauricio Tovar with no identifying information. He stated he did not know who that was. I asked about the discrimination they had experienced (from interview). I asked if there were rumors about them. He stated it was mainly regarding her religion because people did not understand it. I asked if there were any other kind of rumors regarding things happening at the store or shopping center. He said no. I asked how they got along with the other shop owners. They all got along except for the convenience store owner. did not know why, but said the owner "hated" them. He said they got along well with the shoe store owner. I asked if he knew or his wife (Victim from Rohnert Park PD`s kidnapping case in January). He did not know the names but might recognize a photo. (I did not have a photo of either subject). I told that guy in the photograph (Garcia) was named "Miguel Garcia" and asked if that sounded familiar. He hesitated and then slowly said "yeah". He said the name "Miguel" was familiar but Garcia was not. He heard his name around. I asked if he had ever talked with him and he said yes. They talked in the store about buying items. I asked if he was heavily into the religion. Garcia said he was, but appeared to have his doubts about that. He did not know NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250314) PACHECO, CHRIS Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 what Garcia did to make money. He did not know where Garcia was at and last saw him 4-5 months ago. I asked if he knew why Pacheco was killed or who had killed him. He said he did not know. I asked if he has a brother in Vallejo. said no, he has a brother in San Rafael. They did not have any family or friends in Vallejo, Napa or American Canyon. I asked if they had reason to be in that area. He said they had been there a couple of times, but they would just drive through. I asked when they were last there. paused for a long time and said he could not remember. I asked if it was this year and he said probably. I asked if he knew why they were in the area. He said they were probably just driving through. When asked if they stopped he said "probably, yes". He did not know why they stopped or who was with them. He thought maybe was with them. I asked if they had gone to the area to pick someone up at any time. He thought again for a while and hesitantly said "no". I asked how many times they had driven over to the Napa Vallejo area this year since January. He said he did not know but guessed it was 3-4 times. I asked what roads they take to get there. He said they go on Lakeville Hwy (SR116) to the highway and wind up in Vallejo. (This would be the route in which cell phone was tracked on). He did not recall when or why they were in the area the last time then explained he had memory issues due to his accident and he was just now starting to recall things. I asked if he knew where Miguel lived and he said no. I asked if Miguel was close to the family and how often he frequented the store. He said he was just a regular guy. I asked if he worked for and he said "I don`t think so". I asked if he could have worked for her without his knowledge. He stated if Garcia did, never told him. I asked if talked about Garcia to him and he said no. I told that I felt he knew more about Garcia then he was telling me. I told Garcia I thought Garcia was more involved with and was in the store more often than he said. I told him he probably has heard rumors about Garcia as well and he is just not telling me. He agreed that he might come into the store more often than he originally said. I asked if they ever gave him rides to places. He initially seemed confused by the questions. I asked if and he had ever gone somewhere to pick up Garcia and then driven him to another location. He paused and said no. I asked if he was sure and he said they had not. After a pause he then said, "Not that I can remember right now". I asked about any rumors he had heard about Garcia. I told him I had heard rumors about Garcia, so it would be hard for me to believe he had not heard any. remained silent for a while and then asked what rumors. I explained it did not help me to tell to him what rumors I had heard, I needed to know what he knew. He said he did not know of any rumors and I told him I did not believe that. I confirmed that and he had never given Garcia a ride before. stated he did not know if had ever given him a ride. I asked if Garcia knew Pacheco. said he did not know. I told that Garcia murdered Pacheco. did not say anything. I told him it was odd to me that he did not know them better. These two people did not seem to have any connection to each other except for the Botanica shop. I asked how Garcia and Pacheco knew each other. said he did not know but agreed it would seem they knew each other from the store. I told him I think he knew how Pacheco and Garcia met. began to talk quieter and seemed less confident in his answers. He said they could have met in the store, but he did not know. I asked if they were introduced to each other by . He hesitated again and then said could have introduced them. I asked why she would introduce them. He felt it could have be a situation where both guys were just in the store. I asked if mentioned trying to bring Pacheco into the religion and he said no. stated he tried not to get involved in the store and religion very much. I told him there are rumors regarding the shopping center and store. I told him there was information that drug sales were occurring at the center. did not answer for some time. He looked around the area uncomfortable and tense. I told him it was OK to know about drug sales and he could tell me about it. I jokingly stated he would only be in some NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250314) PACHECO, CHRIS Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 trouble if he was selling the drugs. This seemed to ease his tension and he laughed and said no. I told him does not seem like the type to sell drugs. said no and "I`m trying not to sell drugs and stay out of trouble". I asked of someone was selling them and had gotten into trouble and he said he did not know. Based on his previous statement I asked if they had been selling drugs and had stopped. He replied "I have never sold drugs before". I told him I believed him, which he appeared surprised by. I explained he may not have sold them but he appears to know who has. He stated he has never seen drug activity at the store or center. He said it was possible that occurred in the area, but he never saw it. I asked if drugs were being sold out of the store and he said no. I asked if people who sold drugs came into the store and he said probably. stated he had to get to is appointment so we ended the interview. He said he would speak with me again if I wanted. RECOMMENDATIONS: Attach to original report. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250314) PACHECO, CHRIS Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Supplement Information Supplement Date Supplement Type Supplement Officer 08/05/2014 09:32:23 SUPPLEMENTAL (250314) PACHECO, CHRIS Contact Name Supervising Officer BONILLA, HUGO (250120) ORTIZ, OSCAR 418 Supplement Notes SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT INTERVIEW INVESTIGATION: On 04-15-14, I met with Rohnert Park Police Detectives at an undisclosed location in Northern California. Det. Lamison and Rodriguez from Rohnert Park Police accompanied me and introduced me to the witnesses. They were victims in a kidnapping case involving Garcia from January 2014 in which Rohnert Park Police had identified Garcia as the suspect via DNA. **Statement of On 04-15-14 at approx. 1125 hours, I met with in a hotel room. Also present during the interview was Det. Lamison who acted as a translator since she is bilingual in Spanish. also had several children present in the room as well. I introduced myself and told her I wanted to ask her some questions. She stated that would be fine. The interview was audio recorded and later booked into NSD evidence. She stated the following in summary: I began the interview by showing her several photographs of people involved in the case. The photos were single photos with no identifying information visible. Some photos were CA DMV photos, booking photos and Facebook photos. She did not recognize photos of Miguel Garcia, Mauricio Tovar or . She stated she had not ever seen them coming or leaving the Botanica shop. When showed a Facebook photo of , stated "That`s . I showed her a second photograph of which was obtained from Facebook. She positively identified the photo as . Solis confirmed she cleaned house on one occasion prior to Christmas 2013. said the house she cleaned for was the same one she had identified to Rohnert Park Police ). She thought still resided in the same residence. said drove a blue colored car that belonged to . She later identified the Acura as vehicle from a photograph. was the owner of the Botanica shop and she has frequented the store. She walks by the store daily on her walks and says "hi" to . They are not really good friends, but good enough that she says hi to her on a daily basis. I asked if she knew s husband. She said she had met him before and knew his name to be . Sometimes he would be in the store when she was there, but not all the time. I asked if said no NSD14-001332 spoke with her about business partners. has heard of "Kingdom 777" because said no. I asked if had any other businesses and she told her about it. understood that you put money into it Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250314) PACHECO, CHRIS Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 and earned money every day, $3-4 dollars. asked her to invest in Kingdom 777 in November 2013. told her the minimum was $400 but each unit was $2000. She said they did not put any money into it. I asked if could have on his own and she said no. said there were people who put in a lot of money, but she did not know who. I asked if she knew how much had put into the company ` invested three different times but did not tell her how much money she had invested. I asked if told her that she had lost money. told her the account was closed, but she did not seem upset or mad about it. I asked if she knew anyone else who had been involved with Kingdom 777. She said some of friends had invested, but she did not know any of them. She did know one of the people was best friend and her name might have been " . I asked if she knew of any illegal activity occurring at the Botanica. She said no. I asked what happened at the shop related to the religion. said reads cards and does "white stuff". She explained that meant she did the opposite of "black magic" as it relates to the religion. I asked if she knew anyone who was scared of and she said no. I asked if there were any rumors about being able to get stuff or solve people`s problems. She said no. She only knew as a good person. I asked who she thought was behind the kidnapping of her husband said the only thing she knew was they were walking by the Botanica when Garcia asked about a truck being for sale. She stated she knew Miguel from the Botanica. I asked if she would recognize a picture of him and she was unsure because it had been awhile. I showed her a booking photo of Miguel (earlier I had shown his CA DL photo) and she identified him as Miguel Garcia, the guy who asked about a car for sale the day prior to being kidnapped. She said the only time she had ever spoken with Garcia was at the store regarding the truck sale. She had never seen Garcia prior to this conversation. I asked if made the introduction between Garcia and her. She said no, Garcia and were talking when Garcia mentioned looking for a vehicle for sale. I asked if there was anything else she wanted to tell me. stated the owner of the Shoe store (next door to the Boatnica shop) gave her a dirty look at Walmart one time. later spoke with about it and told her that stated she was a bad person and to not get involved with her. did not why she would say that. asked if I knew who had kidnapped her husband. I stated I did not know. I asked why she thought her husband was kidnapped in the first place. She said she did not know. I told her I did not have any information that was connected, I was just checking all of my leads. At this time we ended the interview. **Statement of On 04-15-14 at approx. 1215 hours, I met with after speaking with his wife. The interview was audio recorded and later booked into NSD evidence. Also present during the interview was Det. Lamison and Det. Rodriguez from Rohnert Park Police. He stated the following in summary: I introduced myself to and explained why I would like to speak with him. I told him priority was to solve our case and I did not care about drug deals or other lesser crimes, I just needed the truth. I explained he was not in trouble and he agreed to speak with me. I asked how often he went to the Botanica. He said he has never been to the Botanica and he only goes to the small market next door from time to time. I asked if he knew who owned the Botanica. He stated he does not go there so he is unsure, but believed it was the lady who worked inside. He said his wife, knew the owner. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250314) PACHECO, CHRIS Case Summary Report Agency: NSD knew the store owners name was her dog by the store. Case Number:NSD14-001332 but he has never spoken with her. He has seen her 2-3 times as she walked I showed several photos of people involved in the case, all with the identifying information hidden. He identified Miguel Garcia and . He stated he had not seen Pacheco, Tovar, Norberto Gonzalez or Rogelio Ortiz before. He recognized Pacheco as "the guy from the newspaper". I asked to tell me about Kingdom 777. His wife had come to him and told him wanted them to invest in the company. He said they wanted $4000 to start. said they did not have the money to do it, therefore they did not invest. He stated consistency hounded his wife about investing. This was approx. 6 months ago. I asked if there was anyone else who had invested in the company. He did not know of anyone else who had invested. I asked if he had heard any rumors regarding or the Botanica store. He claimed he had not heard anything and kept to himself. I asked if was into anything bad. said he did not see or know anything regarding that. The only thing he knew about her is that cleaned her house and she reads cards. I asked how Eventually, started to clean house. He said began by helping asked her to clean the house and she did one time. with inventory in the store. I asked why he was kidnapped. He stated he did not know. He said he did not have problems with anyone and was only trying to sell his truck. He said if Garcia wanted to kill him, he would have killed him "because that`s how he was". then explained he used to work for a tile company but now does tile jobs on his own. He sometimes worked with a guy named ". I asked him to tell me about and guns (this was based on previous information from Rohnert Park detectives regarding a gun deal). He explained had .40 cal gun that wanted. I asked why he wanted the gun and he said he just likes guns. I asked how many he had. He explained most were under his brother`s name because he was a US citizen. I asked if he bought and sold guns for profit. said no, they just like guns. I asked if people around the community knew and his brother had guns which they bought and sold. He said no. The only person who was aware he had guns was a friend who works for a company who manufactures gun lubricants. The company was moving to Fresno and had traded pictures of guns with his friend via cell phone. Garcia and his accomplice did not know about the guns until they looked at s cell phone during the kidnapping. told me after Miguel and put the gun to his head, they tied him up. stated his nickname was "El Camador" (The burner) and told to give him his necklace and wallet. said they were upset because he only had $130 in his wallet. argued with Garcia and saying they had the wrong guy. They demanded his cell phone and looked at his pictures, noticing he had photos of guns. After seeing the photos of guns, that is when they demanded the guns be delivered to the truck in Rohnert Park. said he had never seen Garcia prior to the incident. He had heard afterwards that Garcia hung out at the Botanica, but he had never seen him. had asked Solis if she had seen Garcia before and she said no. I asked if anyone at the store would know he had guns on him and would have set him up for a robbery. He said he did not think so. I asked if he had friends who knew he had guns. He stated the only people who knew he had guns were his mother, his brothers, close friends and . I asked if the gun he bought from was registered in his name. He said it was not and they had forgotten to do the transfer. There was no legal reason he could not own a gun, except that he was not a legal US citizen. All of the guns he "owns" are registered in his brother`s name for that reason. He then admitted he had not NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250314) PACHECO, CHRIS Case Summary Report Agency: NSD transferred the ownership of the gun from Case Number:NSD14-001332 because he was not a US citizen. I asked if he and his brother have ever sold any of their guns. He stated they never have. I explained to I thought he had been kidnapped because he had a reputation of having guns and Garcia was someone who would rob people for guns and money. He said he understood, but he did not think anyone would rob him for guns. He said just his close friends knew about his guns, so he did not know who would set him up like that. He said he asked his brother if he had told anyone about the guns and his brother said no. mentioned while he was kidnapped they had stopped at an apartment in Napa so Garcia could buy methamphetamine. knew where the apartment was and could bring us there. explained he was in the car in the front passenger seat, not tied up. They drove to the apartments and Garcia got out of the vehicle, he had been sitting in the backseat. did not get out of the vehicle because he thought if he tried to run they would shoot him. Garcia opened the back door and spoke with a guy who described as fat. He later stated that they referred to this guy as "El Gordito". He had previously been shown a picture of who he did not identify as the seller. did not know his name. They left the apartments and then drove to the end of Henry Road. Once at Henry road they were contacted by a local rancher and they decided to leave the area, with Garcia driving this time. They next drove to Sage Canyon Road and pulled over just off of Silverado Trail. Garcia received a phone call and exited the vehicle to talk. a could not overhear the conversation, but told him they were just going to tie him up and leave him, not kill him. told me Garcia had two cell phones on him. I asked if he could tell if it was a female on the other end of the phone. He said he could not hear but Garcia and continually referred to the person as "La Senora". said Garcia was on the phone several times throughout the incident. One conversation he overheard was Garcia presumably talking to (accomplice in kidnaping) who was trying to get money for gas. Garcia told to go to "La Senora" and ask for money. Apparently, went into the incorrect store and asked for money, causing the shoe store clerk to become concerned and threaten to call the cops. stated Garcia received another call from "La Senora" who stated had gone to the wrong store and the cops had been called. said Garcia showed a lot of respect for "La Senora". Miguel then drove them up Sage Canyon road to the spot where they left . At this time I ended the interview. RECOMMENDATIONS: Attach to original report. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250314) PACHECO, CHRIS Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Supplement Information Supplement Date Supplement Tnie Supplement Of?cer 10.503152014 16:46: 19 EVIDENCE RESULTS (250314) PACHECO. CHRIS Contact Name Supervising Of?cer (250120) ORTIZ. OSCAR Supplement Notes SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT DNA RESULTS FROM RANGE ROVER INVESTIGATION: 011 10-02-14. I received a report of laboratory examination from Celhnark Forensics. I was aware that swab samples had been sent to Cellmark Forensics for comparison with Buccal swab samples obtained from and Norberto Gonzalez. Information through the investigation had led us to believe that both 1d Norberto had been inside the Range Rover owned by the victim on the day of the murder. I read and reviewed the report and it stated in summary: The DNA pro?le obtained ??om the swabs of the vehicle interior is a mixture of two individuals. including at least one unknown male. However. the DNA pro?les obtained did not match the pro?les of Norberto Gonzalez and and they are excluded as contributors. I had the report scanned into the report. RECOMMENDATIONS: Attach to original report and forward copy of report to Napa 5 of?ce. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 PACHECO, CHRIS Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Supplement Information Supplement Date Supplement Type Supplement Officer 11/14/2014 16:11:47 SUPPLEMENTAL (250314) PACHECO, CHRIS Contact Name Supervising Officer MARTINEZ ARIAS, ANGELA ARIAS (250314) PACHECO, CHRIS 418 Supplement Notes SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT 2ND INTERVIEW INVESTIGATION: On 11-11-14 at approx. 1015 hours, Det. Nathalie Hurtado, Det. Brad Chambers, Det. Alfonso Ortiz and I went to 14 Huntington Drive in Petaluma, CA to contact "La Senora" and her husband for further interviewing. I contacted both subjects (the contact was audio recorded and later booked into NSD evidence) at the front door of the residence remembered me from past contacts and I informed him I would like to speak with him again regarding the same subject, the Reynaldo Pacheco homicide. He stated that would be fine. I inquired if was home and he stated she was. exited the residence at that time and asked what was going on. I introduced myself in Spanish (as that is `s primary language). I asked if was present son) and they both informed me he had moved out while ago. I asked where he was currently living and they said they did not know and did not have any contact information for him at this time. I told her in English that I wished to speak with her regarding the case and asked if they would come to Petaluma Police Department for some privacy. Both and Arias agreed to speak with us at Petaluma Police Department. They requested to drive themselves and they met us at the department a short time later. I assigned Det. Hurtado and Det. Chambers to interview once they arrived at Petaluma Police Department. I informed of this and he stated that would be fine. They spoke with him in an interview room in the front lobby. See Det. Hurtado`s supplemental report for full statement. **Interview of aka "La Senora" On 11-11-14 at approx. 1130 hours, Det. Alfonso Ortiz and I spoke with in an interview room at Petaluma Police Department. The room was located behind the secured doors of the lobby. The interview was audio and video recorded, which were later booked into NSD evidence. Det. Ortiz was present as a translator as he is bilingual in Spanish. It should be noted that I observed throughout the interview was able to understand my questions and statements made in English. On several incidents, she responded to my questions prior to a translation being made. It should be noted this is a summary of statements and may not be in the exact order it was provided. For specific details the video/audio files should be referred to. She stated the following in summary: was advised her rights per Miranda by Det. Ortiz verbatim from an issued Miranda card. She stated she understood her rights. We informed her that I was a new detective assigned to the case and I wanted to get up to speed with the particulars regarding the Pacheco case. We asked where was living now. He had turned 18 years old NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250314) PACHECO, CHRIS Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 and wanted to live his own life. He was upset about their lifestyle only involving work and home and decided to go and live with his friends. stated is homosexual, whom she accepts, but he also prefers to dress like a women and she is not accepting of that. We asked her to recap what had happened on the day Pacheco was taken. stated Pacheco arrived at her shop (La Botanica in Rohnert Park) and they spoke about Kingdom 777. He was there for some time while clients entered and exited the store. recalled she had a Kaiser Doctor`s appointment and asked Pacheco to drive her there. Once she arrived at Kaiser she realized she did not have an appointment. She told Pacheco they could go back to Rohnert Park now. As they exited the parking lot, she stated Pacheco turned right and headed southbound on SR-116 (Lakeville Highway). Pacheco told her he knew how to go around this way and later turned left onto Stage Gulch Road. She indicated Pacheco said this was a shortcut to get back. Once on Stage Gulch Road, that is where everything happened. stated she was medicated and was unsure why, but they stopped on the side of the road. She recalled Miguel Garcia and Mauricio Tovar asking for gasoline. She reconfirmed she knew Garcia from the store, but had never seen Tovar before. Pacheco went to the rear of his vehicle to look for a gas can. When he opened the back, a basketball fell out and began to roll away chased after the ball. When she came back to the car with the ball, which is when everything happened. She saw Garcia and Tovar had Pacheco at gunpoint and she became paralyzed with fear. She asked them what they wanted and told them they could have anything. They told Pacheco to get in the back of the car. Arias said she was scared because there was a gun and she knew not to mess around with guns. Initially she got into the backseat of Pacheco`s car, but they told her to get into the front seat. They left the area with Garcia driving, Pacheco and Tovar in the backseat and her riding in the front passenger seat. Garcia and Tovar are swearing at Pacheco, but he is not tied up yet. They left the area in Pacheco`s Range Rover towards Napa and drove around for some time. She said they drove weird, pulling into random driveways and then pulling back out. She said they drove for a while until they reached an area with a stoplight. They told her to get out of the vehicle and she recalled looking around and seeing a liquor store. She said she was very afraid and terrified at the time and even now telling the story she gets chills. While relaying this part, did not appear upset or scared. She seemed to speak normally and did not show any outward, physical signs of being scared. She began walking and does not recall what happened after that. I asked for reaffirmation that she did not remember what happened next. then stated after walking for some time she asked a women how to get a bus back to Santa Rosa. She gets on a bus to Santa Rosa and at the transit station, catches a second bus to Rohnert Park. She returns to the La Botanica shop were is. She does not tell about anything that occurred. To this day she has not told Rodas anything that occurred on Stage Gulch Road. became upset at this time and started to cry. She hunched forward and told us she was not in a good place with her spirits and saints after we contacted them the first time (During search warrant of residence and business). She stated we were disrespectful to her spirits and saints when the house was searched. Items were moved and opened which should not have been. We explained that neither of us was present that day and we are sorry that she felt disrespected. It had been communicated to her on the day of the search warrant that items would be moved and looked into for evidence. However, items were not placed back in their original locations as people were unsure where they went and thought it would be better for her to place them back. She said she has not been right since that time. said to this day she feels nervous and thinks she is being followed. She does not think it`s the police, but she is unsure when people enter her store and follow her in her car. I asked why she was so nervous and scared. Det. Ortiz also asked why if she was so scared and terrified, why she later went and looked for Garcia`s mother. told us she wanted to confront Garcia because after the experience she had no life. She knew Garcia`s mother lived in Los Angeles from conversations she had with him. travels to LA for business on occasion, so she thought to look for his NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250314) PACHECO, CHRIS Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 mother. We asked if she had seen Garcia since the day of the incident. She said he had called her after and asked her for money. could not provide a time frame, stating several times that she did not remember. I asked if she met up with him. She drove to Garcia and provided him with $200-300. It was at a parking lot in Napa area, near the flea market and was with her. She had told they were meeting someone to provide religious artifacts. She could not provide any better details about the location of the meet. She said it was an empty parking lot, past a gas station. I asked if there were businesses around. She said they would go to one and then Garcia would tell her to go to another one. He had them moving around to several lots. She would not lock onto a time frame of when this occurred, but Det. Ortiz recalled she had told him earlier that after the incident, she met with , told him nothing and they went home. We asked why she had gone to meet Garcia in Napa if she had been so scared of him after he had kidnapped her with a gun. She was in fear for her family. She met him because she would rather give her life than the lives of her husband and son because they had been threatened. I asked her to explain the threats. Garcia knew where she lived and knew the business, he knew everything about them. I asked if he had made a direct threat to them. Initially she said no. Then she said he told her if she did not do what he said, they would all wake up dead. I asked if that came over the phone and she said the threat was in person. We asked for clarification. Then she said Garcia had called her on the phone and told her she knew what he was capable of and to bring him money. She met with him, brought him money and he told her she needed to do what he told her and give him whatever he wants, because he knows where her son went to school, he knew where they lived and bad things would happen to them. I asked if he demanded anything else at that time. She said no and she had not talked or seen him since. I later asked if Garcia had been with anyone at the meet and she said Tovar was also there. They were driving Tovar`s vehicle. Tovar never got out of the car and Tovar and Garcia left together, with Tovar driving. After the meeting, Arias and Rodas went home. I asked what she thought he was capable of and what he had done to make her scared. She said it was because she had witnessed the kidnapping of Pacheco and that made her scared. She stated they hit Pacheco multiple times in the car, but she did not recall any specific threats made to him. I asked why this incident made her so scared; she had surely seen people fight before. She said it was the gun and she had never seen one before. She admitted to seeing domestic violence growing up, but had never seen a gun before. I asked where she had gotten the cash to give to Garcia. She got it from her store. She gathered up what cash she could from the store from her sales. She offered to give him a check but he said no because he was not an idiot. She said the meeting occurred during the daytime and the sun was up. I asked if she would recognize a picture of the liquor store she was dropped off at. She said she would not be sure because it was all kind of fuzzy. I showed her a photograph of the front of Broadway Market in Sonoma and asked if that was the place. She said she did not know. I asked to tell me about her interactions with Garcia prior to the incident. She would not consider them friends, but she knew him as a customer. She initially met him through another customer and did a religious "cleansing" for him. She knew he worked in the fields, but did not know about any other type of work for him. She reconfirmed that she had provided rides for Garcia to Napa on numerous occasions. She said he would talk about his kids and working in the fields. Prior to the incident, she had no idea he (Garcia) was a violent person. At this time I began to go over the day of the kidnapping with . She confirmed Pacheco came to her shop, which he routinely did because of her investment into Kingdom 777. While the meeting were not scheduled, he would routinely check in with her to provide updates. She initially invested $2000 cash and watched it grow to $3000. However, she agreed by the date of the incident, she understood the business to be a scam and the money was lost. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250314) PACHECO, CHRIS Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Everything was shut down and they were suspicious it was a fraud. Pacheco continually told them they would get their money back, but they were going to open a new platform and they could reinvest into the new platform. I told her that seemed insulting; to reinvest money he had already lost. She stated it was kind of like a dirty car salesman and she was not going to invest any more money with Pacheco. She said $2000 is a lot of money which she works hard for and it was gone quickly. She said unfortunately someone else was getting rich off of her money. confirmed she went to some of the meetings put on by Pacheco. I asked about the meeting in which became upset. She stated the meeting was shady in that they would not allow cell phones or photos in the meeting. became upset because they were not providing answers concerning the money they had invested. Pacheco and his fellow business partners were trying to quie down because he was asking a lot of questions and was stirring the pot. They made comments regarding sexuality and they eventually left the meeting. I asked if she had requested the ride to Kaiser from Pacheco or if he offered it. She stated he was outside the shop and she asked him if he would take her to Kaiser. She said it was very casual. I asked why did not give her a ride. had recently been in an accident and he could stay at the shop and keep it open. was at school that day. I asked why she did not drive herself. She had taken hydrocodone for her back and knee pain. I told her I have seen her drive on numerous occasions. She admitted sometimes she has to do what she must and drives even though she has taken her meds. Pacheco takes her to Kaiser in Petaluma. Her doctor`s name is Dr. Roberto Gonzalez. I later confirmed there is an internal medicine doctor at the Kaiser in Petaluma by that name. Once they arrive, goes inside the building and sees a date posted on a board. She realizes at that time she does not have an appointment on that day. She does not write the appointments down and keeps the schedule in her head; therefore sometimes she gets the dates mixed up. She realized she had to urinate, so she went to the bathroom while inside and then goes back to the car. She tells Pacheco to take her back to the shop. He exits the parking lot and turns right, southbound. She confirmed again they were going to the shop in Rohnert Park, but Pacheco told her this way was quicker knew that was the wrong way, but she did not say anything because she was getting a ride. I asked if it was her idea to go that way or Pacheco`s. She said it was Pacheco`s idea. I told that made no sense at all. It was a longer way and there would be no reasonable reason to go back to Rohnert Park that way. I told her she already did not trust him because he had taken money from her and now she was allowing him to drive her all over. She said as a person she did not, not trust him. It was the business that took her money and she understood that. I asked why she, a strong personality would allow him to drive her the wrong way unless they were going somewhere else. She said she cannot explain it, which is just the way he went. They are driving down Stage Gulch Road in Pacheco`s Range Rover when they pull over on the side of the road. I asked why they stopped. She had been dozing off in the front passenger seat when she realized they were stopped there. She recalled Pacheco mentioning something about gasoline. She got out of the car to get some fresh air. I stated it was very coincidental that the person needing gas was Garcia. She said it was Garcia and Tovar, in Tovar`s car and they were parked behind the fence line. When I attempted to get specific about the location, she said that is when she went and chased the ball that fell out of the back. She did recall a house being down the driveway from the location. When she came back from getting the ball, Pacheco is near the trunk of the car and she said to him that she did not like the situation and they should get out of there. Pacheco heads back to the driver`s side when Garcia takes out a gun and hits Pacheco. I asked what Garcia and Tovar said to Pacheco during the incident. She only recalled them cussing at Pacheco and they told her to shut up. She saw the gun and was locked in fear; therefore she did not identify herself to Garcia or asks why he was doing this. I asked why she did not run away to the house or roadway. She said she was too scared and was paralyzed. I asked if Garcia ever acknowledged that they knew each other. He did not say anything to her but at one point he gave her a look like a dog with rabies. It was a very scary look. When they got into the Range Rover, Arias initially sat in the back seat. She was looking for her cell phone because NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250314) PACHECO, CHRIS Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Garcia and Tovar had taken her purse. Pacheco was motioning with his eyes to the floorboard, causing to think he wanted something. Tovar got into the vehicle at this point and started to hit Pacheco again. told them to stop hitting him and they told her to shut up and get into the front of the car. I asked if she got her purse back. She stated when they dropped her off they threw her purse at her. I asked if her cell phone was in it then and she said she did not look. had stated earlier in the interview that Pacheco "had not been tied up yet". I asked when they tied up Pacheco. Right before they dropped her off, Garcia and Tovar were mad because they could not find something to tie him up with. When they stopped at the light, they started to take off Pacheco`s shoes to tie him up. I asked what they tied him up with. She assumed they used his shoelaces because she saw them taking the shoelaces off. She never saw him tied up. then began walking and asked a random woman how to get to Santa Rosa. The lady asked her if she was OK and she told her she had a fight with her boyfriend and wanted to go home. I asked how she paid for the bus and she said with quarters she had. I asked if they took anything out of her purse. She was so scared she never checked to see if anything was missing. She took the bus to Santa Rosa Transit station, boarded another bus to Rohnert Park and went to the Botanica Shop. Rodas was at the store and she did not tell him anything. I asked why she would not tell him anything. She said because she was scared. I asked why she would not tell her companion of 15 years a single thing about the incident. She answered that she didn`t tell him anything. I asked when found out Pacheco was dead. She said he did not know the day of the incident. A lady had called and told her about Pacheco`s death. She never told he was dead and they have never talked about it. She believed he had possibly found out from the internet or someone else told him. I asked her why told me something different regarding Pacheco`s death when I interviewed him before. She said she did not know. I asked who I should believe. She said she is telling us how it is and that is it. At this time we took a break. We asked if needed to use the restroom and she declined. We returned to the interview room and asked about Garcia putting a car seat in her car from Pacheco. seemed surprised and denied that happening. She stated a car seat never went into her car. I told it was when Garcia got into her car. She said no. I told her I knew she had given Garcia a ride from the parking lot. She said no. I confirmed the time she gave him the money was during daylight hours. I asked her to tell me about when she met Garcia during the night on the day of the kidnapping. She again said no and I told her I knew it had occurred. I told her Tovar has been speaking with Law Enforcement and he told us they all met up that night in a parking lot in Vallejo. She answered no before it was translated. I asked if she understood me and she became smug, turned her head away from me and said no. Det. Ortiz translated the statement and she said she did not meet him that night. She was adamant that she did not meet him at night, there was still daylight. I told her it was at approx. 2000 hours on the night of the incident. She stated it must have been when she had met him to give the money, but it was during daylight hours. I asked her if she actually recalled it being that day because previously she could not remember the day. I asked if she was only saying it was the same day because I was telling her they met that day. She stated she had met him during daylight hours, she gave him money and he left on his own. We explained the investigation would not stop and there would be consequences for anyone lying to us. She stated she did wish death on anybody, but she didn`t do anything. We told her it was not just a coincidence they met Garcia on Stage Gulch road and asked who set up that meeting. She denied setting up the meeting. We told her admitted to other detectives they had met Garcia the night of the incident and had given him a ride. She said she was telling the truth and did not know why he would say that. She told us she could not tell us things she did not know. We asked why they stopped on the side of the road and she said she did not know. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250314) PACHECO, CHRIS Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 We explained we had phone records to show she had met up with Garcia in Vallejo the night of the incident. Further we had Tovar admitting they were all together. It was also very hard for us to understand why she would meet Garcia if she had been so scared by him earlier that same day. She stated she only left with her husband. I explained it was not just a coincidence that they met Garcia on the side of the road. It was not just a small turnout, but they had to go up a small driveway off of the road. People would not happenstance upon each other there, it had to be a preset meeting and we think she was the one who set up the meeting. The only connection between Pacheco and Garcia was her, or her son Since she and s were giving different stories, I would have to start looking at and as possible suspects. I told her it did not make sense to leave Kaiser in that direction unless he was told to. We asked again why they stopped at the location on Stage Gulch Road. She said she already told us how everything happened. She said she was telling us the truth and we should just do what we have to do. I again explained it did not make sense that she would have numerous calls to Garcia and meet up with him if she is so scared of him. I pointed out that she stated she was scared to meet him because he would hurt her family, yet she brought her husband to the meet the night of the incident. She told us if she had left husband at home he was in danger, if she brought him he was in danger. However, she parked, got out of the car and walked away from the car to meet Garcia. We asked how much money Garcia gave her from the sale of the Range Rover. She said she got nothing; she had to give Garcia $300. We told her we knew she had spoken with Garcia on the phone on the day of but prior to the kidnapping. We told her we knew she had met with Garcia at Jack in the Box in Petaluma prior to meeting with Pacheco. We knew this because their cell phone records indicated it. I stated the actions she did after the incident did not indicate she was scared of Garcia. I stated she knows he is capable of scary things, like murdering Pacheco, but she is not scared of him doing that to her family. She knows very well Garcia would never harm anyone closely related to her. I told her if she was scared she would not go his mother`s house to confront him. She stated she was telling the truth and she could not tell us what she did not know. I told her it was not the entire truth. She sighed and stated she was telling us the truth. I explained that I did not think she wanted Pacheco to die, but she did know how the meeting was set up. We told her that she set up the meeting to try and scare Pacheco so she could get her money back that was lost. She stated she was telling the truth and he (Garcia) would call her all the time. She met him because she was scared. We explained a normal person would call the police after they were kidnapped and someone else`s life was in danger (Pacheco). At least a normal person would have told their husband when they got home. She again stated she was telling the truth and she did not organize anything. I asked how this looked to her. I told her I can prove they spoke with Garcia and met with him on the morning of the kidnapping. I have a third person (Tovar) who saw them together prior to meeting with Pacheco. Then coincidently they wind up in a rural area with the same two people and Pacheco, where he is kidnapped. Then hours after that Pacheco winds up dead and three hours after that she picks up the murderer in American Canyon. I rhetorically asked her if she really wanted the world to believe all of that was just coincidence. She stated she already gave us her explanation of the events. We told her she still couldn`t explain all of the coincidences. She stated we were going too far at this point and she wanted her lawyer. re-initiated conversation and said she was telling us the truth, we just were not listening. We told her she was not telling the truth and she needed to explain the coincidences and the scenario and she said she already told us. At this time we ended the interview. She was escorted to the front lobby and she left Petaluma Police Department with her husband. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250314) PACHECO, CHRIS Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 On 11-14-14, I made copies of the interview recordings and audio. I provided the copies to the Napa DA`s office. RECOMMENDATIONS: Attach to original report. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250314) PACHECO, CHRIS Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Supplement Information Supplement Date Supplement Type Supplement Officer 12/24/2014 12:00:33 SUPPLEMENTAL (250314) PACHECO, CHRIS Contact Name Supervising Officer (250120) ORTIZ, OSCAR 418 Supplement Notes SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT SEARCH WARRANT - KAISER RESULTS INVESTIGATION On 12-22-14, I authored a search warrant related to this case. The warrant requested the Kaiser information for surrounding the dates of the murder, 03-24-14. Based on statements in her interviews that she had a Kaiser appointment the day of the murder, and then recalled she did not have the appointment, the warrant was authored to verify the authenticity of her statements. The warrant was signed on 12-22-14 by Napa Superior Court Judge Michael Williams and served on 12-23-14 at the Petaluma Hospital. I discovered the following information: is a Kaiser member. is a patient of Dr. Roberto Gonzalez She had the following appointments around the date of the murder: The above information was provided verbally by , the Resident Nurse Manager at the Petaluma facility. At this time they are unable to inform me of when the appointments were actually made. RECOMMENDATIONS: Attach to original report. Copy of Report to Napa DDA Paul Gero NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250314) PACHECO, CHRIS Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Supplement Information Supplement Date Supplement Type Supplement Officer 01/02/2015 14:55:44 SUPPLEMENTAL (250314) PACHECO, CHRIS Contact Name Supervising Officer CAMPAGNA, KAREN (250120) ORTIZ, OSCAR 418 Supplement Notes SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT ADDITIONAL SEARCH WARRANT RESULTS - KAISER INVESTIGATION: On 12-30-14, I received a phone message from , the nurse manager at Kaiser in Petaluma. She had follow up information concerning the search warrant I had previously served. informed me the doctor`s appointment attended by on 03-27-14 was made on the same day. had called into the Kaiser Call center (located in Vallejo) at 1131 hours. She spoke with Kaiser Employee who booked the appointment for the same day. RECOMMENDATIONS: Attach to original report. Forward copy to Napa DA`s office, care of DDA Gero NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250314) PACHECO, CHRIS Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Supplement Information Supplement Date Supplement Type Supplement Officer 01/18/2015 01:13:20 SUPPLEMENTAL (250314) PACHECO, CHRIS Contact Name Supervising Officer (250120) ORTIZ, OSCAR 418 Supplement Notes SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT INTERVIEW AND JEWELRY COLLECTION INVESTIGATION: On 01-15-15 at approx. 1530 hours, Det. Hallman and I met with . is the cousin of victim Reynaldo Pacheco. Erika Gonzalez acted as a translator for the interview. The purpose of the interview was to collect jewelry that had been given to the victim by had witnessed the transaction. **Statement of provided the following statement. The interview was audio recorded and later booked into NSD evidence. had laid out several pieces of jewelry in front of me which she had collected from the victim`s wife, had been told by her husband (who heard it from that Reynaldo had taken jewelry from as payment for an investment in "777". had then confronted who provided the jewelry. has had the jewelry in her possession since collecting it from . He stated the following in summary: identified 2 pieces of jewelry as ones that he witnessed the lady at the Botanica shop give to Reynaldo Pacheco as payment for an investment. He stated the bracelet and ring with the diamond out (diamond was present but had fallen out of the setting), along with other necklaces had been given to the victim. The total weight of all the jewelry given was approx. 1 oz. I asked where the jewelry came from. He said it came from the lady at the Botanica store, which was located in Rohnert Park. knew the lady gave the jewelry to the victim because he was present at the shop when it occurred. stated he had met the lady; however he did not know her name. I later showed a booking photograph of with no identifying information. I advised him the person in the photo may or may not be involved in the case and if he did not recognize her to say so. He looked at the photo and stated it was the lady in the Botanica shop who gave the victim the jewelry. stated on 12-26-13 or 12-27-13, he and the victim had gone by the Botanica shop because it was near the victim`s residence. They were at the shop for no more than 30 minutes. stated did not have cash to invest so she provided the jewelry to the victim. had wanted to purchase another unit in "777". The victim had told that had invested $2000 already and wanted to invest additional. I asked NSD14-001332 if he had had ever seen on any other occasion. He did not recall seeing her any other time. The Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250314) PACHECO, CHRIS Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 victim and had a friendly exchange because at that time the business was doing well. I asked if the victim ever indicated having problems with . The victim did tell he had problems with someone when it started to go bad, but he never specifically said it was The victim did tell that since the Botanica shop was only 2 miles away, he would see frequently. I collected the bracelet, ring and diamond and later booked them into NSD evidence. At this time I ended the interview. **Statement of I next spoke with (victim`s wife) regarding the jewelry was again used for translation and the interview was audio recorded and later booked into NSD evidence. She stated the following in summary: I asked how she had obtained the jewelry. She stated her husband got the jewelry from a lady. She did not know who the lady was or when Reynaldo got it. clarified she had not been specifically given the jewelry, but they had found it at the house when she was packing her items to move to Fresno after the victim`s death. The victim had shown her the jewelry when he received it, but he did not give it to her. She did not recall when he first showed it to her. I asked what the victim said about the jewelry. He told her he was going to check it to make sure it was good and he had gotten it from a lady because she was using the jewelry to buy another unit in 777. At this time I ended the interview. RECOMMENDATIONS: Attach to original report and forward copy to Napa DA`s office. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250314) PACHECO, CHRIS Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Supplement Information Supplement Date Supplement Type Supplement Officer 01/21/2015 09:20:49 SUPPLEMENTAL (250314) PACHECO, CHRIS Contact Name Supervising Officer (250120) ORTIZ, OSCAR 418 Supplement Notes SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT CASE SUMMARY, CELL PHONE DATA AND ARREST INVESTIGATION: This is a case summary and review regarding the involvement of in relation to the kidnapping, robbery and murder of Victim Reynaldo Pacheco on 03-24-14. Many of the events and information referred to in this report are fully documented in previous supplemental reports associated with this case. Other information is derived from assisting agency reports (Sonoma County Sheriff #140327-030, Napa Police, and Petaluma Police #14-1553). Please see those reports for full statements and descriptions of events. The following is a summarized account of events regarding involvement: **Case Summary: On 04-02-14, it was reported to Napa County Sheriff`s Department that Miguel Garcia had barricaded himself in a trailer in Sonoma County. During a tenuous 16 hour standoff with SWAT personnel, Garcia stated to negotiators that he had been involved in a murder and body dump in Napa County. Napa County Sheriff Detectives were informed and an investigation was begun. During the early stages of the investigation, it was quickly determined the body dump was probably related to a missing person`s case being investigated by Sonoma County Sheriff`s Department Violent Crimes unit, Det. Horseman. Briefings with Det. Horseman and Sonoma County VCI detectives taught us Pacheco had been reported missing by his family on 03-25-14. Pacheco had been involved in a Pyramid / Ponzi style scheme called "Kingdom 777". The scheme had been shut down recently by the Federal Government and assets associated with the scheme had been frozen. This information came from Det. Horseman as well as numerous media articles related to the scheme. During the course of the missing person`s investigation, Det. Horseman had determined several investors Pacheco had brought into "777". Based on the pyramid style, Pacheco would have been seen "as above" any investors he brought in, as well as any investors those people brought in. Pacheco and his business partner, were the primary investors for the Sonoma County area and regularly sought additional investors and held meetings for updates. The investigation primarily focused on large investors with Pacheco and was identified ` owns a business selling religious artifacts in Rohnert Park, called "La Botanica". Det. Horseman interviewed on 03-29-14 and 04-01-14. told Det. Horseman that Pacheco had been at her shop on 03-24-14 at approx. 1000 hours. He stayed for approx. 30-45 minutes and then left. admitted to Det. Horseman she had invested in "777" for 3 units at approx. $3000 each. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250314) PACHECO, CHRIS Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Further investigation led us to Mauricio Tovar and Norberto Gonzalez. It was determined through statements and physical evidence that both Tovar and Gonzalez assisted Miguel Garcia in murdering Reynaldo Pacheco. Garcia threw rocks at Pacheco`s head, some of which were handed to him by Tovar. The men left Pacheco in a creek bed in a rural area of Napa County off Sage Canyon Road. After dropping off Gonzalez in Napa, Tovar and Garcia facilitated the selling of Pacheco`s Range Rover to a guy from Dixon ). purchased the vehicle from Tovar and Garcia in Vallejo for $8000. The Napa Sheriff Investigation continued and included interviewing people associated with Garcia, to include Tovar and Gonzalez. Two associates of Garcia`s, were interviewed at Napa Sheriff`s Department. and admitted to being involved with Garcia in a kidnapping and robbery of . They stated Garcia would have them assist with "jobs". These jobs came from Garcia`s boss, a female he referred to as "La Senora". On this particular job, they were to kidnap and kill him. However, prior to killing him, Garcia received a phone call from a female who told them not to kill was kidnapped from the parking lot of La Botanica store. Further, it was determined through interviews that s wife knew and had been in the store several times. was in fact the one who set up the meeting for a car purchase with wife that led to the kidnapping. For full details related to this incident review Rohnert Park Public Safety report. **Timeline The following is a summarized outline of events on 03-24-14 concerning the kidnapping and murder of Reynaldo Pacheco. The events are pieced together utilizing cell phone records obtained via search warrants, physical evidence, cell phone records examination, GPS and cell tower extraction and witness statements. All times listed are approximates. Mauricio Tovar and were interviewed multiple times during this investigation. Tovar stated Garcia did jobs for "La Senora" and identified was also identified as being tied with Pacheco through multiple business partners and friends. Arias and her family were very clear during interviews they do not share cell phones or let others use them. Please see those respective reports for full statements. In reviewing cell phone records, personal records and witness interviews, it was determined Victim Pacheco did not know Garcia, Tovar or Gonzalez prior to the kidnapping. Reviewing the cell phone records data, secured law enforcement information databases and witness statements, the following phone numbers were associated with the suspects: - AT&T - AT&T Miguel Garcia - Metro PCS (regular phone) - Metro PCS (Murder day phone. Per records and witnesses Garcia utilized a specific phone on days were major crimes were performed. Analyzing Tovar`s cell records for the day of the murder, the number was flagged due to numerous calls on 03-24-14. Subsequent search warrant for that number showed numerous calls to phone and other people related to Garcia. The phone was terminated and quickly re-issued shortly after the homicide). Mauricio Tovar - Metro PCS (Determined using car buyer`s cell records) - Metro PCS (This number was provided from Napa PD related to their case involving Mauricio Tovar.) Norberto Gonzalez NSD14-001332 - Metro PCS Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250314) PACHECO, CHRIS Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 On 03-24-14 at 1030 hours Tovar receives a call from Garcia`s murder day phone. He receives a second call shortly after. Per interviews with Tovar, this was Garcia calling to help with a job. 1100 hours - Garcia murder day phone receives a call from Based on Tovar statements, Garcia would meet Arias at a Jack in the Box on Washington Street in Petaluma. This is close to residence at . On this date, Tovar stated Garcia met with for approx. 10 minutes. Cell phone records show phones communicating with a tower near this location. initially denied meeting Garcia. She later stated she did meet him and provided him with $50 to buy food. Tovar stated they had received money from Arias to purchase ammunition. 1213 hours - Garcia and Tovar go to Big 5 store in Petaluma to purchase ammunition. They are denied. This is determined by video surveillance, cell record data and statements. 1301 hours - Garcia and Tovar purchase ammunition at Big 5 in Rohnert Park. At approx. 1240 Garcia and trade phone calls. This confirms the statement by Tovar that Garcia called Arias and told her they could not get ammo. The two suspects then went to another Big 5 and purchased the ammo for the incorrect gun. 1240 hours - 1350 hours and Garcia`s murder day phone trade calls and text messages. There are 14 calls made during that time frame. 10 of those calls are from phone to Garcia. Per statements, Pacheco arrived at her store in Rohnert Park during this time. Cell records for Pacheco indicate the two had two phone calls on 03-19-14. Multiple witnesses stated Pacheco had an appointment with a female client, some specifically stated on 03-24-14. From 1239-1307, made calls to Garcia which communicated with a cell phone tower in Cotati, near her shop. stated she told Pacheco she had a Kaiser appointment and requested he drive her to it. She did not have a reason for asking Pacheco, even though she drove herself to work that morning. They arrive at Kaiser and realizes she does not have an appointment and they leave. Cell calls from 1326-1346 hours from to Garcia communicate with a tower located on Petaluma Hill road and Highway 101. A subsequent search warrant indicated did not have a doctor`s appointment on that day or a scheduled one in the immediate future. However, there is no evidence that and Pacheco ever went to the Kasier property in Petaluma on this date. As they leave Kaiser, stated Pacheco turned southbound and began driving in the opposite direction they needed to go. claimed she did not know why he did this, yet she did not question it. claimed Pacheco told her this was a shortcut. However, when I confronted her that way would only increase their drive time and loop them back near Kaiser, she did not have an answer. 1343-1346 hours makes two phone calls to Garcia with communicate with a cell phone tower on Stage Gulch Road. The tower is approx. 500 yards from 1074 Stage Gulch Road, the site of the kidnapping. Upon arriving at the 1074 Stage Gulch Road, and Pacheco are confronted by Garcia and Tovar. They group met on a dirt driveway approx. 40 yards from the roadway, behind a fence line. Their location was determined by the cellular phone communicating with the tower and property owner`s and manager`s statements that they observed Tovar`s and Pacheco`s vehicles there. While claimed they must have stopped to help because Garcia and Tovar needed gas, she had no explanation how Pacheco knew they were there. Further, there is no evidence Pacheco knew Tovar or Garcia prior to the incident. admitted she recognized Garcia, but did not plea with him or try to stop the incident. She claimed it was pure coincidence they all met up. Just minutes after she called Garcia`s phone. At this time, Garcia, Tovar, NSD14-001332 and Pacheco get into Pacheco`s Range Rover. Garcia is driving with Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 in the Officer:(250314) PACHECO, CHRIS Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 front passenger seat and Pacheco and Tovar in the rear seat. stated her purse and phone were taken by Garcia. She initially claimed Pacheco was tied up in the backseat, but later stated she never saw him tied up. claimed she was kidnapped as well but could not tell us why she was let go. 1403 hours was released near a store close to the town of Sonoma. stated she received a phone call after being dropped off, although she did not answer it. Cell records indicate she received a call at this time which communicated with a tower near the town of Sonoma. stated she took a bus back to Santa Rosa. Subsequent cell phone calls to phone communicate with towers indicating she travelled a route taken normally taken by buses. She then received a call from at 1549 hours which communicated with a tower near the Santa Rosa Mall and Bus depot. Per statements from , she never told e that she had just been kidnapped. She did not tell him anything regarding Pacheco or the meeting. stated this was out of fear for the safety of her family. 1346 - 1638 hours does not have any communication via cell phone with Garcia. Per cell phone records, there is communication between Tovar and Gonzalez indicating a meet up. However, Garcia and do not communicate during that time frame due to the fact they are together for a portion of it. Based on surveillance video, cell phone records of Tovar and Gonzalez, bank records and statements, the group spends that time frame attempting to get money from Pacheco`s accounts. In analyzing those time frames in conjunction with reasonable driving times, it appears Pacheco was murdered at approx. 1615-1630 hours. 1638 hours received a phone call from Garcia which lasted approx. 1:27 minutes. The calls from communicated with towers in the Petaluma area. Witness statements also stated the "La Botanica" shop closed early on that day, which was unusual. From 1638 -1722 hours there were 5 calls to / from and Garcia. 1758-1814 hours - 4 calls are documented between and Garcia. The calls communicated with towers in the American Canyon and Napa area. These calls coincide with the statement provided by Tovar that met with them in Vallejo after they sold the Range Rover. The Range Rover was sold in the parking lot of Food 4 Less in Vallejo. After the sale, Tovar and Garcia drove to a different are of the lot and met up with . At that time, Garcia exited Tovar`s vehicle (which they had retrieved after the murder and confirmed by property manager witness) and went with . Tovar stated Garcia left with stated she met with Garcia because he had threatened her and her family. She met him there and provided $300. Per statements, she was so fearful of what Garcia would do to her husband and son; she had to bring him money. However, she brought her husband with her to the meeting with Garcia. 1917 hours received a phone call which communicates with a tower in Petaluma area. This would indicate that she is near her home. Based on normal driving times, this would be a reasonable travel time from the Vallejo area. 1917- 2050 hours - and Garcia`s murder day phone and regular continue to have communications with each other. The cell phone call and tower data was also reviewed by forensics experts. They were able to provide GPS data or NELOS data for phone. In essence, these are communication the phone would have with specific cell towers which are able to provide that type of data. This information was then mapped over an area which included Rohnert Park, Petaluma, Stage Gulch Road and American Canyon. cell phone is in the areas of key events at key times regarding the kidnapping and murder. In review of the cell phone records for the phone listed above the following information was obtained: NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250314) PACHECO, CHRIS Case Summary Report Agency: NSD From 03-24-14 - 03/31/14 there are 17 calls from 03-24-14. Case Number:NSD14-001332 cell phone to Garcia`s regular phone. 5 of those calls are on On 03-24-14 there are a total of 28 calls between cell phone and Garcia`s murder day phone. Specifically there were approx. 18 calls that were made from ` phone to Garcia. Approx. 20 calls / texts between Garcia and occurred on the day of the murder after the murder occurred. In reviewing her records, I noted from 03-18-14 through 03-31-14 phone had communication with phones known to be operated by Garcia 92 times. This would contradict initial statement that she did not know Garcia (which she made to both Sonoma County and Napa County detectives) and her second statement that she had only met Garcia a few times. **Conclusion In reviewing the cell phone records, tower data and statements of involved parties; I concluded that was involved in the kidnapping of Reynaldo Pacheco. It is clear based on statements from and witnesses that she had invested approx. $4000-6000 with Pacheco for the Kingdom 777 scheme. That money was frozen and essentially lost. Further, Pacheco was attempting to get people to re-invest into a new company with a similar system. herself had investors come underneath her and their money was frozen as well. and her family did not have a lot of money and she was upset that other people were getting rich off of her hard earned money. and witnesses state she and her son were very upset at a public meeting with Pacheco. stated she did not like that Pacheco and his associates had made fun of sexuality at the meeting. told detectives she wished she had never met Pacheco, would not have invested money into 777 and therefore none of this would have happened. statements regarding the interactions of the day appear to not be consistent with the cell call data or actions taken by Pacheco. Further, lied on several occasions to detectives regarding her relationships with Pacheco and Garcia. stated Pacheco randomly showed up at her shop on this day when witnesses and cell data would indicate Pacheco had an appointment with her. On this date stated she requested Pacheco drive her to a Kaiser appointment in Petaluma. had driven herself to work that morning and did not give a reason as to why she wanted Pacheco to drive her. Cell records indicate they travelled to Petaluma area and she was in communication with Garcia during this time. Upon arriving at Kaiser, she realizes she does not have an appointment. Medical records show she did not have an appointment near that date which she could have mixed up. did make an appointment on 03-27-14 in which she saw a doctor on the same day. Further, there is no evidence to support that they ever went to Kaiser. There is no video or record of them on the property of Kaiser in Petaluma. As they leave Kaiser, she stated Pacheco turned southbound and stated this was a shortcut back to the shop in Rohnert Park. In reviewing the area, there is no way turning that way is a shortcut and in fact it would only loop them back around onto the same road near Kaiser. stated due to medications she had taken earlier in the day, she was drowsy and she woke up as they pulled over in a rural area to help people. Coincidently, the people to help were Garcia and Tovar. There is no evidence to show Pacheco knew Garcia or Tovar prior to this meeting, however admits to knowing Garcia and cell records indicate they are very familiar with each other. At the scene on Stage Gulch Road, claimed they were both kidnapped. However, only Pacheco was tied up and was let out of the car, given her purse and cell phone near Sonoma. stated she was completely terrified due to the gun used by Garcia in the kidnapping. However, she did not call anyone for help and took a bus back to Santa Rosa. There she met with her husband and did not inform him about the incident, due to fear for his safety. However, because of the same fear she brought with her to a meeting with Garcia on the evening of 03-24-14 to give him $300. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250314) PACHECO, CHRIS Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 The frequency and amount of phone calls between and Garcia on the day of the murder would indicate a relationship beyond slight acquaintance. Numerous calls and a meeting between the two occurred prior to the incident. Many cell contacts were made between the two after the murder to include a face to face meeting in Vallejo. In fact Arias had two calls to Garcia moments before stopping at Stage Gulch Road with Pacheco. provided inconsistent statements and lied regarding her relationships with Pacheco and Garcia. All of these items together would indicate that was intimately involved in the kidnapping and robbery of Pacheco which ultimately led to his death. **Arrest of On 03-13-15, I received an arrest warrant for in connection with this case. On 03-14-15, I made contact with in front of the La Botanica shop in Rohnert Park. arrived in her blue Acura Sedan and I contacted her in the front seat. stated she knew who I was and I informed her she was under arrest. I explained there was an arrest warrant for the kidnapping and carjacking of Reynaldo Pacheco. She said "OK". I handcuffed in front without incident. I placed in the front seat of my unmarked vehicle for transport back to Napa Sheriff`s Department. During the arrest I collected cell phone and two laptop computers she had in her possession. They were later booked into NSD evidence. was transported to Napa Sheriff`s department by Det. Ortiz and myself. During the ride she remained quiet and did not speak regarding the case. Once at NSD, she was placed in an interview room and advised of her rights per Miranda. provided a short statement which was translated by Det. Ortiz. See his supplemental report for full statement. then requested to speak with a lawyer. The interview was terminated and I transported and booked her into NCDC. RECOMMENDATIONS: Case closed - evidence supports the violation of Felony Penal Code sections 207 - Kidnapping and 215 - Carjacking by . organized a meeting between the victim, Reynaldo Pacheco and Miguel Garcia and Mauricio Tovar at Stage Gulch Road. During that meeting, Pacheco was kidnapped beaten and his vehicle was stolen. , Garcia and Tovar took Pacheco in his vehicle. was subsequently dropped off in Sonoma, however maintained phone contact with Garcia throughout the day. Pacheco was eventually murdered by Garcia and Tovar in Napa County. Attach to original report and forward copy to Napa DA`s office, care of ADA Paul Gero and DDA Agnes Dziadur. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250314) PACHECO, CHRIS Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Supplement Information Supplement Date Supplement Type Supplement Officer 01/27/2015 14:42:13 SUPPLEMENTAL (250314) PACHECO, CHRIS Contact Name Supervising Officer (250120) ORTIZ, OSCAR 418 Supplement Notes SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT THIRD INTERVIEW INVESTIGATION: On 01-21-14 at approx. 1800 hours, Det. Dunagan and I contacted at his residence in Petaluma. and I were familiar with each other from previous contacts. I provided him with purse and the contents, to include $300 cash. I annotated on the property sheet that I had removed and retained an iPhone 6 and two laptops for evidence. I had sign the property sheet and later had it scanned into iLeads. I explained to why had been arrested and the charges she was facing. We spoke on the front porch of his residence and I explained he did not have to talk with me if he did not want too. The interview was audio recorded and he stated the following in summary: I explained to him the nature of the charges and why was arrested. He did not have any type of reaction. I told him I did not want things to get worse for and that I believed she did not think Pacheco was going to be killed. said "OK". I explained I thought probably on wanted her money back and Garcia might have gone crazy and killed him. responded with "Right". I asked if he knew anything about the meeting and getting her money back. He said no. He said they were hoping to get the money back through the government and she never spoke with him about the meeting. I asked if she ever told him she would not wait for the government and would seek help in getting the money back. stuttered and said "no, I " and then trailed off. denied picking up in Santa Rosa after the incident. He did not see her until she arrived at home later that evening. At that time, she told him she had to drop some stuff off and asked if he wanted to go. He said yes. She did not tell him about the kidnapping at that time. I explained to that story did not make sense and I was trying to find the truth of the matter. He remained silent. I told him again that I believed she set up the meeting, but did not necessarily know they were going to kill Pacheco. I asked him if that was the truth, then it was different from her ordering a murder and he should tell me. He said he did not know anything. I asked what she told him in the car on the way to meet Garcia. He stated she only told him that she had to drop "some stuff off from the business". He did not know if she got money from Garcia because he stayed in the vehicle while she went and spoke with him. I asked if she seemed scared. He agreed that she did not act abnormal and seemed like regular . stated Garcia did not get in the car with them and they did not provide him a ride anywhere. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250314) PACHECO, CHRIS Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 I asked if said anything to him after meeting with Garcia. He said no. I asked when she first said something to him regarding the incident. He stated it was not until after we had interviewed him the second time that she told him anything about the incident. I told him I found it hard to believe his wife of 14 years had not told him about the incident. He said he could understand how I see it that way, but what he is saying is how it happened. I asked if he saw her get money from Garcia when they met up with him. He said no because was the one who handled the money and she took care of everything. He did not see her get any money, but alluded to the idea that he may have just not seen it. I asked if he saw give Garcia any money. He only saw her holding a bag which he assumed had items from the store in it. stated he could not see how someone would go about ordering this type of thing. I explained that and Garcia were more than acquaintances. Garcia was known as someone who would rough people up and rob them. knew that and wanted her money back. I think she contacted Garcia, arranged the meeting with Garcia and it went bad. admitted the store was not doing well and the money lost in the 777 scheme was a lot. He said they were just waiting for the government to give the money back and she never told him anything about a meeting or plan. At this time I ended the interview. RECOMMENDTIONS: Attach to original report. Forward copy of report to Napa DA`s office care of ADA Gero and DDA Dziadur. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250314) PACHECO, CHRIS Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Supplement Information Supplement Date Supplement Type Supplement Officer 02/27/2015 14:41:30 EVIDENCE (250314) PACHECO, CHRIS Contact Name Supervising Officer (250120) ORTIZ, OSCAR 418 Supplement Notes SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT EVIDENCE INVESTIGATION: was arrested and 2 laptop computers and an iPhone were seized subsequent to her arrest. A search warrant was written for a forensic examination for the three items. Prior to the examination be conducted, reached a plea agreement and her case was closed. The items were returned to me and I booked them into NSD evidence. RECOMMENDATIONS: Case is closed by arrest. has pled on the case, however the DA`s office request the items be held in evidence until the appellate period has passed. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250314) PACHECO, CHRIS Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Supplement Information Supplement Date Supplement Type Supplement Officer 04/07/2014 16:47:08 SUPPLEMENTAL (320344) PERALEZ, JOSE Contact Name Supervising Officer (320122) HOLLIDAY, SCOTT 418 Supplement Notes Supplemental: On 04/07/14 at approximately 1440 hours, Officer Salem, Officer Wiegers, DA Investigator Jaramillo and I responded at 2470 Sage Canyon Road, Kuleto Villa Winery. Interviews were conducted with the Kuleto Winery field and winery employees regarding Mauricio Tovar-Telles, Miguel Angel Garcia Marron and an unidentified third suspect. On 04/07/14 at approximately 1445 hours, I spoke with IP. I showed a picture of Mauricio, Miguel and the unidentified third suspect. stated he did not know the suspects and has never seeing them before. mentioned he is a full time employee at Kuleto Winery and has been working for the winery for the past 2 years. I next contacted . I showed stated he did not know any of the suspects. for the past 3 years. a picture of Mauricio, Miguel and the unidentified third suspect. mentioned he has been a full time employee at Kuleto Winery I next contacted . I showed a picture of Mauricio, Miguel and the unidentified third suspect. stated he had never seeing any of the subjects and does not know who they are. has been a temporary employee with Kuleto Winery for the past year. Disposition: No further action pending this Officer. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(320344) PERALEZ, JOSE Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Supplement Information Supplement Date Supplement Type Supplement Officer 04/07/2014 16:47:48 SUPPLEMENTAL (32L38) SALEM, OMAR Contact Name Supervising Officer (320085) HENSLEY, MICHAEL 418 Supplement Notes Supplemental: On 4/7/14 I assisted the Napa county Sheriff`s Department on contacting agricultural employees of Kuleto Winery at 2470 Sage Canyon Rd per the request of Lieutenant Oscar Ortiz. I accompanied Officer Peralez, DA Investigator Alicia Jaramillo, and Calistoga Officer Carolina Wiegers to Kuleto Winery. I was asked to speak to the workers and ask them if they knew S-Mauricio Tovar and S-Miguel Angel Garcia. I spoke to the following employees: who has worked for the winery for 7 years. who has worked for the winery for 11 years. who has worked for the winery for 9 years I provided them photos of Garcia and Tovar and they all said they did not recognize either of them. Disposition: No further action pending by this Officer. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(32L38) SALEM, OMAR Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Supplement Information Supplement Date Supplement Type Supplement Officer 04/07/2014 09:23:50 EVIDENCE (250235) SARNIK, CHARLIE Contact Name Supervising Officer (250054) BROBST, BRETT 418 Supplement Notes SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT: On 4/4/13 at about 1400 hours I was notified by Lieutenant Ortiz that I would be working as the Napa Sheriff`s Office (NSO) Liaison to the NSO Search and Rescue team. The team was being activated for an evidence search related to this case and would be meeting at the NSO main office building on 4/5/14 at 0800 hours. Lieutenant Ortiz briefed me regarding what was being searched for and where. On 4/5/14 at about 0745 hours I met with Investigator Ackman who briefed me again on the evidence and area to be searched. At 0800 hours I met with the NSO search and rescue (SAR) team. was the head of their command and was also present. See attached roster for full list of SAR volunteers. I briefed the SAR team on the assignment and they began their operation. They were advised they were looking for a laptop computer and a cellular telephone (possibly broken into pieces). The search area was based around the driveway of 2470 Sage Canyon Road as well as the north roadside edge of Sage Canyon Road between 2470 Sage Canyon Road and Chiles Pope Valley Road. The SAR team set up their Incident Command (IC) at the Chiles Pope Valley Road and Sage Canyon Road intersection. The SAR teams began their search at about 0930 hours. At about 1050 hours I was notified via telephone by the IC that their teams had located half of a laptop computer and part of a cellular telephone. The computer piece was located up the driveway of 2470 Sage Canyon Road, and the cellular telephone piece was located approximately .5 mile west of that driveway on Sage Canyon Road. Travis Wiley advised me that the items were not touched and were left in place where they were found. On my way to collect the evidence I stopped in at IC command. SAR team member updated me that the team that located half the laptop computer also located a second half of a laptop computer. I responded to Sage Canyon Road (Sthy 128) near Mile Post Marker (MPM) 13.63. I located a gray plastic keypad which appeared to be from a "flip" type cellular telephone. I photographed the area and item. I marked the item to be 58 yards west of MPM NAP 128 13.63. The item was approximately two feet off the north roadway edge, in the dirt shoulder, and partially covered by a rock. I collected the item and marked it as "1CS". I responded to the driveway of 2470 Sage Canyon Road and met with SAR team members approximately .3 miles north of the driveway entrance at Sage Canyon Road. They pointed out two items of interest to me. The first was approximately 5 feet off the east driveway edge down the embankment. I saw a black laptop keyboard in the dirt with the keyboard facing up (Item # 2CS). It appeared to be missing the screen portion of the laptop. The second item they found appeared to be the screen of similar size to the keyboard (Item # 3CS). I saw this item approximately 12 yards north of the keyboard item and 30 feet down a steep embankment off the east roadway edge of the driveway. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250235) SARNIK, CHARLIE Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 This area of the driveway was approximately .3-.39 miles north of the entrance to 2470 Sage Canyon Road. Item 2cs (keyboard) was located about 5 feet off the east roadway edge and nearly directly in line with the north end of a concrete retaining wall supporting this stretch of the driveway. I marked both of these locations with orange paint on the asphalt to identify where they were found downhill. I photographed both areas and items before collecting them for evidence. I later submitted one digital media card into evidence. I returned to the Napa Sheriff`s Office at about 1430 hours and I signed 1CS, 2CS, and 3CS over to Detective Eddleman who took over possession and chain of custody. RECOMMENDATION: Supplemental report. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250235) SARNIK, CHARLIE Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Supplement Information Supplement Date Supplement Type Supplement Officer 04/16/2014 12:28:55 AUDIT CONTROL LOG (250081) STEELE, DEANNA Contact Name Supervising Officer (250081) STEELE, DEANNA 418 Supplement Notes 4-16-14, 1 cc to DA (per Ortiz) primary rpt only no attachments or supps, dcs 4/24/14 copy to DA In Custody role for review , SD 4/29/14 copies of Eddleman interview of Siordia and Pacheco interview of to Lt Ortiz for rls to Rohnert Park PD, SD 5-1-14 Pacheco`s supp from 4/30 linked to DA SUPP role AG 5-1-14 Pachecos supp from 4/29 linked to DA SUPP role AG 5-2-14 Hallman`s supp from 5/1 linked to DA SUPP role AG 5-2-14 Pacheco`s supp from 5/1 linked to DA SUPP role AG 5-24-14 Det. Dudley`s supp (5/22/14) linked to DA Supp Role - LA 5-28-14 Det Ackman supp (5/23/14) linked to DA Supp Role - LA 8/12/14 copy of entire report thru todays date to DA in cust role, SD 8/13/14 supp dated 8/13/14 to DA supp role, SD 8-21-14 Det. Dudley supp x 2 (8/19/14) linked to DA supp role - LA 8-21-14 Det. Dudley supp x 2 (8/20/14) linked to DA supp role- LA 8-21-14 Det. Dudley supp (5/29/14) linked to DA supp role - LA 8-21-14 Det. Dudley supp (8/21/14) linked to DA supp role - LA 8-21-14 B. Breedlove supp (8/20/14) linked to DA supp role - LA 8/26/14 Dudley supps dated 8/21 and 8/22 to DA supp role, SD 8/26/14 Dudley supp dated 8/26/14 to DA supp role, SD 10/7/14 evidence supp dated 10/3 to DA supp role, SD 12/8/14 Pacheco`s supp dated 11/18 to DA supp role, SD 12/8/14 Ortiz supp dated 11/18 to DA supp role, SD 12/29/14 Pacheco supp dated 12/24 to DA supp role, SD 1/5/15Pacheco supp dated 1/2 to DA supp role, SD 1/8/15 Sonoma CO Pub Defender Liam Kidd report and flash drive LC 1/21/15 supps dated 1/18 and 1/21 to DA supp role, SD 1/22/15 Property sheet and voucher mailed to Roque Rodas, SD 1/30/15 supp dated 1/27 to DA supp role, SD 3/2/15 evidence supp dated 2/27 to DA supp role, SD 4-1-16 1cc of victim, witness and offenders info, prop and case summery only to R. Elorza AG NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(250081) STEELE, DEANNA Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Supplement Information Supplement Date Supplement Type Supplement Officer 04/10/2014 13:53:14 SUPPLEMENTAL (320118) ULITIN, SEAN Contact Name Supervising Officer (320109) HAAG, CHASE 418 Supplement Notes Supplemental: On 4/2/14 during the late morning I was contacted by Lt. Peecook by telephone. Lt. Peecook informed me Napa PD personnel along with other agencies were attempting to serve a search / arrest warrant on an individual, Miguel Garcia, in Sonoma County. Garcia had barricaded himself inside a trailer and had a female with him inside the trailer. Lt. Peecook instructed me to locate Garcia`s girlfriend, , who resided in Napa. It was possible Garcia was speaking with via cell phone. Officer Jose Peralez and I left the PD and responded to last known address, . The residence was vacant and the apartment maintenance employee stated the residents had moved out approx. two weeks prior. Officer Peralez and I responded to McPherson Elementary School. two children, , attend the school. We met with did not know his new address but could show us the location. Officer Peralez transported to his residence to point out the address. A short time later Officer Peralez and returned. was released back to the school. Officer Peralez informed me the address was 904 Napa St. #3. Officer Peralez and I responded to the location. We arrived at the residence which was located to the rear of . We knocked on the door and were greeted by . stated resided at the residence but she was not home. As we spoke to a female walked up to the residence. She identified herself as . Officer Peralez communicated with in Spanish. agreed to come with us to the Napa Police Dept. We transported to the Napa Police Dept. Officer Peralez and I spoke with inside a Napa PD Investigations interview room, approx. 1230 Hrs. I recorded our conversation on video. told me the following in summary: She had been dating Miguel Garcia. She and Garcia had recently split up and she was living by herself. Her friends urged her to stay away from Garcia because he was not good for her. She last saw Garcia two weeks ago. He stopped by her apartment, ate some food and left. She has been talking with Garcia via cell phone this morning. Garcia informed her he was surrounded by police and was wanted for the charges stemming from a prior incident in Napa when he was arrested. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(320118) ULITIN, SEAN Case Summary Report Agency: NSD Case Number:NSD14-001332 Garcia told her he was with a female inside the trailer. At one point also spoke with the female on the phone. Garcia told he was tired and he was either going to kill himself or he would be killed by someone else. Garcia was paranoid and felt people had been following him. stated she did not think would kill himself because he was not that type of person. Garcia did not mention having any weapons to 2720 Cooper Ct. had not seen any guns with Garcia since his arrest at stated the majority of the conversation was about Garcia surrendering peacefully. END OF STATEMENT. Santa Rosa Police Crisis Negotiators, Nolan Cleall and Tommy Isachsen, arrived at the Napa PD. Their intent was to interview and attempt to gain information that would be helpful in a peaceful resolution to the ongoing incident involving Miguel Garcia. I stopped the video recording. Officer`s Cleall and Isachsen conducted their interview and follow up with . agreed to a consent search of her cell phone and signed the consent form. Detective Shulman was tasked with the forensic search of the cell phone. (See Detective Shulman`s supplemental and attached forms NPD Case# 14-001854). Later in the evening approx. 1830 Hrs. it was learned that Miguel Garcia had died during the incident in Sonoma County. I requested a Chaplain respond to the Napa PD. Chaplain Lee Shaw responded. Garcia. was informed of the death of Officer Peralez and Chaplain Shaw were going to coordinate the transportation for The following day I met back to her residence. at the Napa Police Dept. during the morning. I returned phone. Disposition: Further action this Detective. NSD14-001332 Printed by: (250161) DETWILER, SHONTELLE at 6/23/2020 14:25 Officer:(320118) ULITIN, SEAN NSD 13001339. AGENCY CHECK IN LIST USE ONE SHEET PER AGENCY NCIDEN NAME 2 ATE, gctgu 93.9 vs! 3. INCIDENT NUMBER 4. CHECK IN LOC Tl {33,1 ?ageCCym 8% [m :6 5. 6. LIAISON NAME 7. AGENCY ADDRESS u-I/ A Lv?i) I'd/3 {7.9 I Nam SM. @124 . CATRD RESOURCE MEDICAL SAR specmusrs DOG TRANS OTHER QUAmemous oR SPECIALITIES - :mg? HOURS .8135." T: 3 Hoe? I .5153 :03 .. 1: Sod - [1/00 if. ?gj . 1400 -. . :1221 ICS 211 PAGE 1 OF 9. PREPARED BY (RESOURCE UNIT) BASARC 3/98 TYPE (MURDER, ROBBERY, 11?80, ECT.) CREME SCENE I INCIDENT LQG CASE NUMBER PAGE OF TYPE 1? INITIAL RADIO CALI. (EXACTLY AS BROADCAST UN TYPE, LOCATSON, ECT.) DATE AND TIME CALL RECEIVED FIRST UNIT ON SCENE FIRST SUPERVISOR ON SCENE INCIDENT COMMANDER INCEDENT DESIGNATION TIME INCIDENT COMMAND ESTABLISHED LEST ALL PERSONNEL AT SCENE (IncIude above personnei and aIl persons entering or assigned to crime scene) ARRNE TEMEEFT UNITNO. NAMEANDID. ?5,236} Q: QQESQ $17 if?? QQ I (TQM 335 7 rm :3 QQ??$335 M?gg?? Tff?j?i?ff a x? I vat?! ~33 We a? ?Wm-m? QQ Q5 . . f} .QQ 3No? STATE 0F EALTFORNTA CSUNTY SE NAPA Detective David Ackrnan, a Napa County Sheriffs Deputy, being sworn, says that the facts in support of the issuance of the Search Warrant are contained in the attached Statement of Probabie Cause, which is incorporated herein by reference as if fuily set forth herein. Wherefore, your Af?ant prays that this Search Warrant be issued for the seizure of said property, or any part thereof, at any time of the day, with good cause having therefore been shown. Subscribed and sworn to as the truth and tactuai l?/W Contents of the Statement of Probable Cause. ANTHEM) NEGHT SEARCH REQUESTED: YES NO wan hr) THE PEOPLE 6F THE STATE 0F TO ANY PQLECEMAN GR PEACE OFHCER THE CQUNTY GE NAEA proof by affidavit having been made before me by Detective David Ackrnan that there is probable cause to believe that the property described herein may be found at the locations set forth herein and that it is lawfuiiy seizable pursuant to Penal Code Section 1524 as indicted below by in that it: was stolen or embezzled was used as the means of committing a feiony Cl is possessed by a person with the intent to use it as means of committing a public offense or is possessed by another to whom he/she may have delivered it for the purpose of concealing it or preventing its discovery. Kt tends to show that a felony has been committed or that a particular person has committed a felony. tends to show that sexual expioitation of a child, in violation of RC. Section 311.3 has occurred or is occurring. SVATE ot CAUFGRNEA, CGUNTY of NAPA, BECLARATECN and FGR GRBER SEALENG SEARCH WARRANT DQCUMEN13 Your Affiant, Detective David Ackrnan, relates that this Search Warrant sought pursuant - to this Search Warrant Affidavit, Statement of Probable Cause and the Return to Search Warrant and all documents relevant to this Search Warrant relate to an ongoing investigation of a Homicide. it is expected that additional Search Warrants will be sought relating to this matter. if information contained in the above listed documents is made public, it would compromise this investigation and make it impossible to continue. Your Attiant requests that the Search Warrant Affidavit, Statement of Probable Cause and the Return to Search Warrant and alt documents relating to this Search Warrant be ordered to be sealed. And that the Search Warrant Affidavit, Statement of Probable Cause and the Return to Search Warrant and ail documents relating to this Search Warrant remain sealed and in the custody of the clerk of the court until order of this court or other competent court having jurisdiction over this matter. i declare under penalty of perjury that the related foregoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledgewAttiant) AU People Sanchez (1972) 24 Cal. App. 3d 664, 678; People Greenstreet (1990) 218 Cat. App. 3d 1516; Swanson Superior Court (1989) 211 Cal. App, 3d 332' at :05? AM. ORDER Based upon the foregoing Declaration and Request and a reading of the originai Affidavit, Search Warrant, Statement of Probable Cause, and the Return to Search Warrant thereof referred to above, it is hereby ordered that the Affidavit, Search Warrant, Statement of Probable Cause and the Return to Search Warrant thereof, be sealed and maintained in a score location in the custody of the clerk of the court until further order of this court or competent coo aving jurisdiction over this matter. or} - ?anmignature of Magistrate Judge of the Superior Court of Caiifornia, County of Napa, Superior Court. ?va if i i me Christepi?ier Freer: Wiison, Joe? G, Seat: Tuesday, Aprii 08, 2014 11:88 AM ?Fe: Dudley, Nicei; Pacheco, Christopher Sabieet: PW: tier tire case tiie ?eet: Vere, Lenard Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2814- 8:24 AM Wiisori, Joe! G. Ce: Dreyer, Lori; Foister, Teresa; Ciark, 3ames (Mike); Ortiz, Oscar Subject: RE: YOVARJELLES, MAURICEO Sgt. Wiisee advise NCOC stat? te this; request? eiease eesere that we have a eietairier sigeeti isgr yew et'tieers eriar re the inmate transeertr Tirariir "yeti. Lenard Vere {Lei/rem Vere; Oirecter Hears: (Sweaty {if {erreetiees 3:525 reed Etreet seem, 94-559 Were: Wiisoe, Jeei (3. Sent: Thursday, Aprii 03, 2014 8:15 AM ?Ye: Vere, Lenard Ce: Ciark, James (Mike); Ortiz, Oscar Subject: TOVARJFELLES, MAURICIO some morning sir, this is a termai request to have inmate Mauricio Tovar?Teiies released it) the Napa County Sheriff?s Department investigations bureau temperaiiy to assist in the iecation of a crime scene withiri the County at Napa. Napa County Sheriff?s Detective David Ackmae arid Napa Poiice Detective Aiteriso Ortiz tie with Mr. Tovaereiies during the search for the crime scene? The estimated time frame 01? temporary custody be from 0830 am to 1230 pm. Chief Deputy Oistrict Attorney Haiey was advised of the situatien East night by Napa County Sheriff?s Lieutenant Oscar Ortiz. Thank yeu for your assistance. if you have any further questions, piease give me a salt. Joei WiieOn Naive Countg Siaer'ii?rs Ottice i 5 Airport 1:2)in Napa, Ca 94558 702739?994 527 STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL VEHICLE REPORT CHP 180 (Rev. 2.99) OPI 061 REPORTING DEPARTMENT NOTE: CHP 1% IS FURNISHED TO ALL PEACE OFFICERS BY THE CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL LOCATION CODE DATE (TIME OF REPORT NOTICE OF STORED VEHICLE DELIVERED PERSONALLY FILE NO. ?3 M3034 (?53 Z. LOCATION TOIMED I STOLEN FROM DDOMETER READING VIN CLEAR IN yes No DATE I TIME DISPATCH NOTIFIED HOG NoMAKE MODEL COLOR MONTH I YEAR STATE ONE TWO Eco SODWDK. GINE NO. ION SY BOPFICER DOMER Elam 133014000 D4001 REGISTERED OWNER LEGAL OWNER .U a SAME STORED [j IMPOUNDED [j RELEASED RECOVERED - VEHICLE I COMPONENT TOWING I STORAGE CONCERN INAME, ADDRESS, PHONE) STORAGE AUTHORITY I REASON TOWED To I STORED AT VIN YES NO I 2 EYES BNO DJUNK BUNK CITIES CONDITION YES "0 ITEMS no ITEIS YES NO ITEMS YES no TIRES WEEL8 con?ne? WRECKED SEAT (FRONT) REGISTRATION CAMPER LEFT FRONT BURNED HULK pox 431m) vc SEAT (REAR) ALT. I GENERATOR VESSEL AS LOAD RIGHT FRONT VANDALIZED RADIO BATTERY FIREARMS LEFT REAR ENG. I TRANS. STRIP TAPE DECK DIFFERENTIAL OTHER RIGHT REAR MISC. PARTS STRIP TAPES TRANSMISSION SPARE BODY METAL. STRIP OTHER RADIO AUTOMATIC HUS CAPS SURGICAL STRIP per mm vc IGNITION KEY MANUAL SPECIAL WHEELS RELEASE VEHICLE TO. we on AGENT AGENCY How 223503 vc GARAGE PRINCIPAL I AGENT STORING VEHICLE DATE ITIME NAME OF PERSON IAGENCY AUTHORIZING RELEASE DATE NO. CERTIFICATION: I THE UNDERSIGNED. DO HEREBY CERTIFY THATI AM LEGALLY WM . a, Zr. 1'0, 1?4 AUTHORIZED AND ENTITLED TO TAKE POSSESSION OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED VEHICLE. SIGNATURE OF PERSON AUTHORIZING RELEASE SIGNATURE OF PERSON I- POSSESSION >0 .. STOLEN VEHICLE I COMPONENT EMBEZZLED VEHICLE REPORT DATE 1 TIME OCCURRENCE DATE I TIME REPORTED NAME OF REPORTING PARTY (RIP) DRIVER LICENSE No_ I STATE DATE I TIME ADDRESS OF RIP TELEPHONE 0F RIP I CERTIFY OR DECLARE UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY UNDER THE LAWS OF 0? ?as? REPORT THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THAT THE FOREGOING Is TRUE AND CORRECT. REMARKS PROPERTY. TOOLS, VEHICLE DAMAGE. ARRESTSI NAME ARRESTED I REPORTED BY CARGO I VALUE 5 DYES DNO SILL 0F LADING ATTACHED FRONT REAR SIGNATURE OF OFFICER TAKING REPORT -. SUPERVISOR REQUIRED NOTICES SENT To REGISTERED Yes DATE NOTIFIED AND LEGAL OWNERS PER 22352 No "is-r? . - A. ., 80_299.1Ip nu Apr 10 16:53:33 2014 LOCATE m? [paw 235/ ENTERED BY fig CHECKED m? MESSAGE RECALL Sequence 007994 Transaction Time: Thu Apr 10 22:33:43 2014 4CIACOO7994.IA INQUIRY MATCH ON LOCATED STOLEN VEHICLE LOCATED BY NAPA CO 30/707 253?4209 NOT NO PLATES MISSING NO ONE IN CUSTODY 2006 LNDR LL BLK VICTIMS VEH UNK SUSPECT AND FIREARM OUTSTANDING - IF LOCATED NOTIFY NAPA C0 DETECTIVE DUDLEY 707-253-0911 CALIF AND NCIC FILES IMMEDIATELY CONFIRM WITH SONOMA SHERIFF TELEPHONE 707 565?2569 IF NO ANSWER CALL TELEPHONE 707 565?2204 iv a? 1 VICTIM DATA i- i- i 1- REYNALDO VCY SA.TA NQUIRY MATCH ON TOLEN VEHICLE ARMED AND DANGEROUS LIT PC 006 LNDR RRV LL BLK VIN, FCN 2926 VICTIMS VEH - UNK SUSPECT AND FIREARM OUTSTANDING - IF DCATED NOTIFY NAPA CO DETECTIVE DUDLEY 707-253-0911 CALIF AND NCIC FILES CONFIRM WITH SONOMA SHERIFF ELEPHONE 707 565*2569 IF NO ANSWER CALL TELEPHONE 707 565-2204 1k it 9: 4r VICTIM DATA 1k ~k AD SANTA ROSA hu Apr 10 16:07:41 2014 CIA1005714.IV ATE: 04/10/14 TIME: 16:07 4/03/14 DOJ STOP-REFERRAL NSURANCE INFORMATION ON FILE OSSIBLE FILE CODES: EG M: 10/28/13 TO 10/28/14 MAK REYNALDO P, VEH :17 EC STATUS: 2/27/14 SMOG DUE 10/28/15 LEARANCE INFORMATION RECORDS: FFICE WORK DATE SEQ VALUE FICHE DATE TTC 141 10/11/10 10 2709 00473.00 00/00/00 POT L02 05/31/11 BA 0000 00000.00 00/00/00 Z02 195 08/02/11 16 0369 00015.00 00/00/00 F00 195 07/11/11 17 0460 00015.00 PRIOR SUSPENSE RIB 09/29/11 42 7117 00291.00 00/00/00 POT 144 10/15/12 17 9489 00243.00 00/00/00 POT 143 09/24/13 13 7413 00216.00 09/30/13 POT N71 10/17/13 BA 0000 00000.00 00/00/00 201 634 02/24/14 20 0007 00840.00 02/27/14 F00 634 11/19/13 20 0033 00600.00 PRIOR SUSPENSE 200,500 MILES ACTUAL MILEAGE ND :metv lewer -- nvem?. CnronOIogy Time 14:44:59 14:45:00 14:45:06 14:45:07 14:45:07 14:45:07 14:45:07 14:45:07 14:45:08 14:45:16 14:45:19 14:46:45 14:51:37 14:51:57 15:13:09 15:14:15 15:16:48 15:30:52 15:45:00 16:21:37 16:21:38 I AIM Page 1 ol 1 Event Chronology -- E140403604 Date 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/ 10/2014 4/ 10/ 2014 4/ 10/ 2014 4/ 10/ 2014 4/10/2014 4/ 10/ 2014 4/10/2014 4/ 10/ 2014 4/ 10/ 2014 4/ 10/ 2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/10/2014 4/ 10/ 2014 4/10/2014 4/ 10/ 2014 4/ 10/ 2014 4/ 10/ 2014 4/10/2014 Terminal Operator napadispl napadispl napadispl napadispl 512 napadiSpl 512 512 napadispl napadispl napadispl napadisp9 napadisp9 napadisp3 napadisp3 napadisp3 napadl5p8 napadispS napadisp2 napadisp2 320315 320315 [3 System Comments Actlon EVENT CREATED: Location_ Call Agency=NSD, Group=NSD, Status=A, Priorlty=80, Hold Type=0, Primary Unit=512250164, Current= F, Open Current= F, Type INFO Unit=512, Status=DP, Location=1580 WEST FIELD DR, Employee=250164 Unit=512, Status=AR, Location=1580 WESTFIELD DR, Employee=250164 SUPP INFO CREATED: VEHIC: Year=0, License Number=6FHF048,Unit=512 Unit=512, Status=UC, Comment=Unit [512] Inf Issue er 10779032512 IA QV. Employee=250164 Unit=512, Status=UC, Comment: Unit [512] Inf attach 10779036 er 10779032512 IA QV. Employee=250164 Unit=5I2, Status=UC, Comment=Unit [512] Inf Issue er 1077903425I2 IA QV. Employee=250164 Unit=512, Status=UC, Comment=Unit [512] Inf attach 10779035 er 10779031512 1V4 6FHF048, Employee=250164 UnitzSIZ, Status=UC, Comment=Unit [512] Inf attach 10779033 er 10779033zBr0adcast No records found in local ICAD database where curent and license Employee=250164 Unit=512, Status=UC, Comment=Unit [512] Inf Issue er 10779031512 1V4 - Employee=250164 Unit=512, Status=UC, Comment=Unit [512] Inf Issue er 1077903328roadcast No records found in local ICAD database where curent and license Employee=250164 Unit=512, Status=UC Comm nt=Unit [512] Inf attach 10779037 er 10779034512 IA QV. Employee=250164 EVENT ON THE 28 EVENT 512 C4 EVENT DIXON EVENT SGT WILSON - DOING RECOVERY ON A HOMICIDE VEH - HAS ANOTHER OFFICER (ORTIZ) WITH HIM EVENT COMMENT WILL BE REQUESTING A TOW TO BRING THE VEH BACK TO NSD FOR EVIDENCE EVENT PLS REMOVE VEH AS RECOVERED EVENT REC EVENT REC NEEDS TO WRECKED STRIPPED BURNED LPS ON VEH AND IS SOMOENE IN CUSTODY EVENT 512 ON RADIO Unit=5I2, Status=~, Location=1580 WEST FIELD DR, Employee=250164 Unit=512, Status=AV, Location=1580 WEST FIELD DR, Employee=250164 Agency: NSD, Group=NSD, Status=A, Priority=80, Hold Type=0, Primary Unit=512250164, Current=T, Open Current=F, Type INFO EVENT CLOSED HEARD WOO All mom/1 Napa County Sheriff?s Department Digital Evidence Technical Assistance Request Computer Forensic Exam. [3 Cellular Phone Exam. Other: Video Clarification ?'Cas'er'Referral - . N. S. D. AGENCY [4 ['33 Z. Requ egg; Of?cerl lD# Your Agency AND case number Phone# Md 5: 303 MAM 30- 14/3332. Address of Agency Phone 1536 mega/m awry (2253- (003) PC Violation County l8 31 PC i 77? 20?; Pk; IU AVA (Computer,- Cfeliulat: Telephone, Video Enhancement, Information Sought." Li?tEvidenceltem amen/1 Gompw?fatl Ph?f?5 DatumaMiS 1 I 1? .2 mac ?some Am (27" If item to be examined is a cell phone: Cell number: ESN: Carrier company: IMEI: Suspect Name (Last First Middle or Busmess Name) Sex 10 1 (5/4er Mtqug? . Suspect Name (Last First, MiddleVictim information Victim Name (Last First Middle) 1 Pad/H560 i Victim Name (Last. First Middle) ID 2 Additional VictimsNVitnesses? (Attach sheet with names and information) Investigative Information Date rffe?zure: Type fSeizure: earch Warrant [IProbation DConsent [:IAdmin gOther investig tor?s es: . at La. mop Was 011 43/5) ?r 5?32? I {fag 5., {<38 HTIY) L- RX DateITime 0411712014 10:06 39:38 Incident/Investigation Report Agency: Sonoma County Sheriff?s Of?ce Case Number: 140327-030 RX Datemme 04I1712014 10306 Incident/Investigation Report Agency: Sonoma County Sheriff?s Of?ce Case Number: 140327-030 RX Datemme 04I17I2014 10:06 Incident/Investigation Report Agency: Sonoma County Sheriffs Of?ce . Case RX DatelTime 10:06 1/ Lax Incident/Investigation Report Agency: Sonoma County Sheriffs Of?ce . Case Number:140327-030 RX Datemme ommom 10:06 Us? ABS Incident/Investigation Report Agency: SonOma County Sheriffs Of?ce Case Namber: l40327~030 RX DateITime 041172014 10206 93:39 AM Incident/Investigation Report Agency: Sonoma County Sheriffs Of?ce Case Number: 140327-030 RX DatelTime 04H7I2014 10206 .h'U 03:40 AM Incident/Investigation Report Agency: Sonoma County Shariff's Of?ce - Case Number=140327-030 RX Datemme 0411712014 10208 [If-x, g? niR/u/m4/m Incident/Investigation Report Agency: Sonoma County Sheriffs Of?ce Case Number: 140327-030 RX Datemme 04I17I2014 10:06 39: 1.3 REE Incident/Investigation Report Agency: Sonoma County Sheriffs Of?ce Case Number: 140327-030 RX Datemm'e 04:17:2014 10:06 39:46 AM Incident/Investigation Report Agency: Sonoma County Sheriff?s Of?ce Case Number: 140327-030 RX Datemme 041172014 10106 Incident/Investigation Report Agency: Sonoma County Sheriff?s Of?ce case Number: 140327-030 RX Datemme 04I17l2014 10:06 lti/TH?J 39:41 Ali FAX Incident/Investigation Report Agency: Sonoma County Sheriffs Of?ce C888 Number=140327~030 RX Datemme 04:17:20? 10:Incident/Investigation Report Agency: Sonoma County Sheriff?s Of?ce Case Number: 140327?030 RX DateITime 041179014 10206 85?; 0" Incident/Investigation Report Agency: Sonoma County Sheriff?s Of?ce Case Number: 140327-030 RX Datemme 0411712014 10:06 09:42 Afr-.6 Incident/Investigation Report Agency: SonOma Connty Sheriffs Of?ce Case Number; 140327-030 RX Datemme 0411712014 10:06 Incident/Investigation Report Agency: Sonoma County Sheriff?s Of?ce Case Number: 140327?030 RX DatelIime 04I17i2014 10:06 v. :I'l Incident/Investigation Report Agency: Sonoma County Sheriffs Of?ce Case Number: 140327?030 RX DateITime 04117i2014 10:06 29:4. in Incident/Investigation Report Agency: Somma County Sheriffs Of?ce Case Number: 140327-030 RX oatemmg oanmom 10:06 3 ?315 Incident/Investigation Report Agency: Sonoma County Sheriff?s Of?ce Case Number: 140327030 RX oatemme 0411712014 10:06 FAX No. Incident/Investigation Report Agency: Senoma County Sheriff?s Of?ce Case Number: 140327~030 RX Datemme 04x1712014 10:06 39:44 Ah Incident/Investigation Report Agency: Sonoma County Sheriff?s Of?ce Case Number: 140327?030 RX Datemme o4n712014 10:06 39: 4'4 AIA Incident/Investigation Report Agency: Sonoma County Sheriff's Of?ce Case Number: RX oatemme 0411722014 10:06 Incident/Investigation Report Agency: Sonoma County Sheriffs Of?ce Case Number: 140327-030 RX oatemme 0411712014 10:06 . Incident/Investigation Report Agency: Sonoma County Sheriff?s Of?ce Case Number: 140327-030 RX oatemme 04117I2o14 10:06 APR 3 .. Incident/Investigation Report Agency: Sonoma County Sheriff?s Of?ce Case Number: 140327-030 RX Datemmg 0411712014 10:06 Incident/Investigation Report Agency: Sonoma County Sheriffs Of?ce Case Number; 140327?030 RX oatemme ommom 10:06 39:45 RM Incident/Investigation Report NAP PROVE Agency: Sonoma County Sheriffs Of?ce, Case Number: 140327-030 RX Date/Time 04:17:2014 10:06 7/28 3 09: Incident/Investigation Report Agency: Sonoma County Sheriff?s Of?ce Case Number: 140327?030 RX oatemme 0411mm 10:06 39:45 AM Incident/Investigation Report Agency: Sonoma County Sheriffs Of?ce Case Number: 140327-030 RX Datemme 04n7rzo14 10:06 39; 45 Incident/Investigation Report Agency: Sonoma County Sheriff?s Of?ce Case Number: 140327-030 RX Datemme 04I17i2014 10206 nan WT Incident/Investigation Report Agency: Sonoma County Sheriff?s Of?ce Case Number: 140327-030 RX Datemme 041170014 10:06 Incident/Investigation Report NAPPROVED Agency: Sonoma County Sheriff?s Of?ce Case Number: 140327?030 RX Datemme 0411mm 10:05 99:46 A Incident/Investigation Report AP PROVE Agency: Sonoma County Sheriffs Office Case Number: 140327-030 RX Datemme 04117IZO14 10:06 I I, I 38.46 Incident/Investigation Report Agency: Sonoma County Sheriffs Of?ce Case Number: 140327-030 RX DatelTime 041170014 10206 Incident/Investigation Report Agency: Sonoma County Sheriffs Of?ce Case Number: 140327-030 ate! Time 04? 712014 10:06 - '3 An I r/?diLi/ThJ Jt?l'4/ Incident/Investigation Report Agency: Sonoma County Sheriff?s Of?ce Case Number: 140321030 RX Datemme 04! 1712014 10:06 39: 47 AM Sonoma County Sheriff's Department EVIDENCE I PROPERTY SHEET RX Datemme 04i1712014 10:06 P.039 09:47 AM P. 039 @6583?st . . (?$475530 RX Datemme E39: 47 Ali 04I1712014 10:06 gamma ?>betth$ QBffite Sonoma County Sheriff's Office Exigent Circumstance Form 3 TE WA .9 Con: #57 LORENZO DUENAS Ambient Six/{0? La wErdbnemmr DMIIM RANDALL WALKER Aubmnr Dn?m?m Dim [an RX DateiTime 04I17I2014 10:06 P.041 r7 . "3f If), I41 r/Zw?/idb [3-9 AM in}. PRC. P. #1031030 Incident/Investigation Report Agency: Santa? Rosa Police . Case 14-0004003 RX natemme oanmom 10:06 09:48 FAX 5:0. Incident/Investigation Report Agency: Santa Rosa Police Department . Case Number: 14-0004003 RX Datemme 04n712014 10:06 -. Incident/Investigation Report . Agency: Santa Rosa Police Department Case Number: 14-0004003 RX Datemme oanwzom 10m - . a l: Incident/Investigation Report Agency: Santa Rosa Police Department Case Number: 14-0004003 RX natemme 0411712014 10:06 09:48 AM . n- .311 . '1 Santa Rosa Police Department 965 Sonoma Avenue Santa Rosa, CA 95404 '707 543-3600 P.045 045 MISSING PERSON FORM DJuvenile Adm: Escapee ReportNumbcr: 14-4003 Rciated Reports: RX Datemme 04:17:2014 10:06 0948 AM No, RX Datemme 0411712014 10:06 W203 39:4 AM Incident/Investigation Report a 03 #7433 Agency: Santa Rosa Police Depanment Case Number: 14'0004003 uatemme van/MUM 39:4" ADMIN MESSAGE RX Daten'ime 04! 1712014 10:06 Incident Investigation Report SCSD CCA: 140327?030 RX Datemme 041172014 10:06 33:49 Alf: FAX c. Sonoma County Sheriff?s Department EVIDENCE I PROPERTY SHEET RX DateITime 041170014 10:06 09:49 No. Sonoma County Sheriff's Department EVIDENCE I PROPERTY SHEET RX Datemme 04:17:2014 10:06 39:38 Mi 5 Sbmf?Caroncr ?unoma @nuntp mags ?heriff?g @ffite Law Enforument vaslon m. yew: ?me ueweizme 13325 P381 ewes/2:314 FRI 13:01 FAX [9021654 5458320? $0102 Nepa Ceunty Sher??ge i Jehn Rebe?eere, She?fwaomner 1535 Alrpert Blvd. Nepe, CA 9455a 7071-2534591 - Enveetteetlene Divleien FAQS T0: EMelen Cemeeny: Re?ned Park Police Fee: ERGM: Bet. Chr?e #314 NAPA CQUNTV DEPARTMENT Desk: 701299?1530 Gen: Fee: Date: wee-am Pages (Beeleeing Sever eege? Materiel: Please Hemiclde Enveettgetiem We are a new ef report to include e55 etteehmente end reperie. We euepecte in this case are in hemicide i?vee?ga?m in Nepe Ceunty. The being faxed ie extended only for the use ef the pereen er entity to which it Is addressed end may contain informatics?! that is p?viieged, cenfldent?e? and exempt under epp?cebte Jew. yee receivee this en errer. ne?fy ue smeaee?eteiy by phene end return the document via the L93. Poets! Service. nA UQIUMZUIQ 13225 04/04/2014 FRI 13:02 FAX P.002 [002/064 Incident/Investigation Report Id; ?1/7 Agency: Rohnert Park Public Safety Case Number: 14-0000190 uatemme 13:25 P.003 04/04/2014 FRI 13:02 FAX [003/064 Incident/Investigation Report Agency: Park Public Safety Case Number: 14-0000190 Date: I we 0410412014 13:25 04/04/2014 FRI 13:02 FAX Incident/Investigation Report Agency: Rohnert Park Public Safety Case Number: 14-0000190 Rx Datemme OMOMZOM 13:25 P.005 04/04/2014 FRI 13:03 FAX @005/054 Incident/Investigation Report Agency: Rohnert Park Public Safety Case Number: 14?0000190 xx uatemme 04/0412014 13:25 P.006 04/04/2014 FRI 13:03 FAX [006/054 Incident/Investigation Report Agency: Rohnen Park Public Safety Case Number: 14-0000190 RX Datemme 0410412014 13:25 P.007 04/04/2014 FRI 13:03 FAX @007/064 Incident/Investigation Report Agency: Rohnert Park Public Safety Case Number: 140000190 KX Data! nme UMUMZUHI 125223 04/04/2014 FRI 13:03 FAX @008/064 Incident/Investigation Report Agency: Rohnert Park Public Safety Case Number: 14-0000190 vale: lune uawauu I4 I31: PDUB 04/04/2014 FRI 13:03 FAX [009/064 Incident/Investigation Report Agency: Rohnert Park Public Safety C850 Number: 1443000190 um: IU 04/04/2014 FRI 13:04 FAX [010/054 Incident/Investigation Report Agency: Rohnert Park Public Safety Case Number: 140000190 r.u I I 04/04/2014 FRI 13:04 FAX .011/064 Incident/Investigation Report Agency: Park Public Safety Case Number: 140000190 UGLCI HHIC .U IL 04/04/2014 ram 13:05 FAX @012/064 Incident/Investigation Report Agency: Park Public Safety Case Number: 14?0000190 UOLCI F.U ID 00/04/2014 13:05 [013/054 .U 04/04/2014 FRI 13205 FAX [014/064 Dunn l? PM I 3 04/04/2014 pa: 13:05 FAX [015/064 nA wow-"cum 04/04/2014 FRI 13:05 FAX .016/064 I\l\ UH (Jul I '1 04/04/2014 FRI 13:05 FAX [01370.04 Pa 1 ofl UGLCI mm: IO 04/04/2014 FRI 13:06 FAX [018/054 Page 1 of 1 HUN: r.u I: 04/04/2014 FRI 13206 FAX [019/064 ROHNERT PARK DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY Date} ?ch IQ 04/04/2014 FRI 13:06 FAX [020/064 Page 1 ofl Udl?l I 4/2014 FRI 13:06 FAX [021/064 Page 1 ofl 04/0 MK uate: UMUHMU l4 hula 04/04/2014 FR: 13206 FAX @022/064 Page 1 of 1 nA vow: mm: umumcu no no?: 04/04/2014 FRI 13:06 FAX '023/064 Page 1 of1 i I I, Kl uate: Mme I4 L113 ?qu 04/04/2014 FRI 13:06 FAX [024/064 Administrative Message - APB - Printable Output Page 1 of 1 new: mm: umumw nuza 04/04/2014 FRI 13:06 FAX [025/064 uaw: um: umumzu :4 mm: 04/04/2014 FRI 13:05 FAX [026/064 Incident/Investigation Report Agency: Rohnert Park Public Safety Case Number: 14-0000190 Mk Dale: Hm: [313 not! 04/04/2014 FRI 13:07 FAX [027/064 Incident/Investigation Report Agency: Park Public Safety Case Number: 14-0000190 nA mum nun: umumcu nuao 04/04/2014 FRI 13207 FAX .028/064 Incident/Investigation Report Agency: Rohnert Park Public Safety Case Number: 14-0000190 mum "me uwumzu r204: 04/04/2014 FRI 13:07 FAX [029/064 Incident/Investigation Report Agency: Park Public Safety Case Number: 14-00001 90 muc 04/04/2014 FRI 13:07 FAX UOLCI .UJ I 04/04/2014 FRI 13:07 FAX @031/064 ROHNERT PARK DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY - HUN: H. 04/04/2014 FRI 13:07 FAX Incident/Investigation Report Agency: Rohnert Park Public Safety Case Number: 14-0000190 04/04/2014 FRI 13:07 FAX [033/054 Mk Date: Illue 04/04/2014 FRI 13:07 STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE BUREAU OF FORENSIC SERVICES FAX Lila [034/054 sn-m-maa,~ was: ?me wumzu In.? nun: 04/04/2014 FRI 13:08 FAX [035/064 Incident/Investigation Report Agency: Rohnert Park Public Safety Case Number: 14-0000190 13:08 .- [03'670'51 Incident/Investigation Report Agency; Rohnert Park Public Safety Case Number: 14-0000190 Date: ?me unluauum 1:521: P.037 04/04/2014 FRI 13:08 FAX Incident/Investigation Report Agency: Rohnert Park Public Safety Case Number: 14-0000190 13:08 pm: loss/054 Incident/Investigation Report Agency: Park Public Safety Case Number: 14-0000190 xx uate: nme uawalzum 13:25 P.039 04/04/2014 FRI 13:08 FAX Incident/Investigation Report Agency: Rohnert Park Public Safety Case Number: 14-0000190 uv I-v . I .v-vv 13:08 [040/064 Incident/Investigation Report Agency: Rohnert Park Public Safety Case Number: 14-00001 9O KR uate: nme I 04/04/2014 FRI 13:08 FAX @041/064 ROHNERT PARK DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY nn vuu?! v-"v-wnv 04/04/2014 FRI 13:08 FAX [042/064 Incident/Investigation Re} :tU APP ROVE Agency: Santa Rosa Police Department Case Number114-0000824 RX Datemme 0410412014 13225 P043 04/04/2014 FRI 13:09 FAX .043/064 Inceidnt/Investigation Re} Agency: Santa Rosa Police Department Case Number: 14-0000824 RX Date/Time 04/04/2014 13:25 P044 04/04/2014 FRI 13:09 FAX Incident/Investigation Re} rtU APP ROVE Agency: Santa Rosa Police Department Case Number: 14-0000824 04/04/2014 FRI 13:09 FAX ROHNERT PARK DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY Date: Mme UMUQMU I4 raw-Io 04/04/2014 FRI 13:09 FAX @046/064 (4-190 rm lune umumw nun; 04/04/2014 FRI 13:09 FAX [047/064 04/04/2014 FRI 13:09 FAX [048/064 nA UdLe: mm: 4 nu?: 04/04/2014 FRI 13:09 FAX @049/064 Page 1 of} 04/04/2014 FRI 13209 FAX [050/064 ENTERED IN ILEADS: YES NO ?x uatemme UMUMZUHI 12532:! 04/04/2014 FRI 13:10 FAX @051/064 Page 1 ofl 3 i 1 - cru? W.-- -.. .. .. . . 52/ 4 04/04/2014 FRI 13:10 . - @0 06 NA uatei lime UMUQMU I4 I31: tuna 04/04/2014 FRI 13210 FAX [053/064 Richmond Laboratory 3 33. 3 3 lsi?? 04/04/2014 pm 13:10 FAX [054/064 Date: I une UMUQMU 4 is.? run: 04/04/2010 FRI 13:10 FAX [055/064 SRPD 14-824 04/04/2014 FRI 13210 FAX lose/05h 4._4 a .HI nua/ 7057/054 uawnlmu 04/04/2014 FRI 13:10 04/04/2014 FRI 13:11 my: ?oss/0's} ?Ll: 04/04/2014 FRI 13211 FAX v-nv-whvu-v I . 0476333133111 13: 11 FAX lose/054 SONOMA COUNTY DETENTION FORM ?mm? FRECLASS ROLDING UdtUl mm: I 04/04/2014 FRI 13:11 FAX [061/064 . I?l? IW ldn?d I .vul. 04/04/2014 mu 13:11 FAX [062/064 'llHA water mu: ?1?3 04/04/2014 FRI 13:11 FAX [063/064 C7131) SONOMA COUNTY DETENTION PRE-BOOKING FORM 3523123" "312127.10 UOLCI 04/04/2014 FRI 13:11 FAX [064/064 FAX RX Result Report SEARCH WARRANT NO. ll? Vii STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF NAPA ,ng 225% er 0 parlor 0U a) RETURN TO SEARCH WARRANT Deer The personal property listed below was taken from the location described as: item# ZCS?Toshiba Satellite 08550-85900 Laptop Competer (Seriai#5?02945?l Q) FOR THE Search of all electronic data processing and storage devices, computers and computer systems, internal and peripheral storage devices, optical storage devices, dongles or USB keys, or other permanent or transient storage medium. Search of all of the above items for ?les, data, images, software, operating systems, deleted files, altered files, system configurations, drive and disk configurations, date and time, and unallocated and slack space, for evidence relating to this murder by virtue of a search warrant dated the 15th day of April, 2014 and executed by Honorable Judge Price of below-entitled court: Napa County Superior Court. A compact disc (CD) containing the computer forensic exam results, l, Detective John Hellman, by whom this warrant was executed, so swear that the above inventory contains a true and detailed account of all the property taken by me, under the warrant, on 15 day of April, 2014. All of the property taken by virtue of said warrant will be retained in my custody, or released prior to final adjudication of the case, provided photographs of the items (with the person(s) claiming ownership of the property) have been taken and retained in evidence, subject to the order of this Court or any other Court, in which the offense in respect to which the property of things taken is triable. Upon final adjudication and completion of the Appeals period, seized items may be disposed of according to law without necessity of further Court order. PM CDETECTIVE JOHN HALLMAN AFFIANT Subscribed and sworn to before me ihis 22th day of Agril 2014. err/5:; MAGISTRATE ?rw?ga? mew Judge of the Superior Court of Napa, Napa County, California. 24 25 26 27 28 GARY (r DESTRICT ATTORNEY SEARCH WARRANT NO. We, 43/ 931 Parkway Mali El (Jr Napa, CA 94559 7 253?4211 STATE OF COUNTY OF NAPA SEARCH WARRANT AND WT APR 22 20% Clerk of the-stale Superior Court flak . Detective John Hallman, Napa County Sheriffs Of?ce, being sworn, says that the facts in support of the issuance of the Search Warrant are contained in the attached Statement of Probable Cause, which is incorporated herein by reference as if fully set forth herein. Wherefore, your Affiant prays that this Search Warrant be issued for the seizure of said property, or any part thereof, at any tirne of the day, with good cause having therefore been shown. 7 (Signature of Af?argl (AFFIDAVET) Subscribed and sworn to as the truth and factual Contents of the Statement of Probable Cause. Nionr REQUESTED: YES NO )3 (SEARCH WARRANT) THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF TO ANY SHERIFF, POLECEMAN 0R PEACE OFFICER IN THE CQUNTY 0F NAPA proof by affidavit having been made before me by Detective John Hellman that there is probable cause to believe, and do believe that the property described herein may be found at the locations set forth herein and that it is lawfully seizable pursuant to Penal Code Section 1524 as indicted below by in that it: was stolen or embezzled was used as the means of committing a felony is possessed by a person with the intent to use it as means of committing a public offense or is possessed by another to whorn he/ she may have delivered it for the purpose of concealing it or preventing its discovery. tends to show that a felony has been committed or that a particular person has committed a felony. tends to show that sexual exploitation of a child, in violation of PC. Section 311.3 has occurred or is occurring. YOU ARE THEREFORE COMMANDED TO SEARCH: THE Evidence item: ZCS- Toshiba Satellite C855D-SS900 Laptop Computer (Serial FOR THE FOLLOWING: Search of all electronic data processing and storage devices, computers and computer systems, internal and peripheral storage devices, optical storage devices, dongles or USB keys, or other permanent or transient storage medium. Search of all of the above items for files, data, images, software, operating systems, deleted ?les, altered tiles, system con?gurations, drive and disk con?gurations, date and time, and unallocated and slack Space, for evidence relating to this murder. AND TO SEIZE IT 1F FOUND and bring it forthwith before me, or this court, at the courthouse of this court. All of the property taken by virtue of said warrant will be retained in the custody of the Napa County Sheriff?s Department, or released prior to ?nal adjudication of the case, provided photographs of the items (with the person(s) claiming ownership of the property) have been taken and retained in evidence, subject to the order of this Court or any other Court, in which the offense in respect to which the property of things taken is triable. Upon final adjudication and completion of the Appeals period, seized items may be disposed of according to law without necessity of further Court order. The of?cers serving the search warrant are hereby authorized, without necessity of a further court order, to return seized items to any known victim(s) or turn over to another Law Enforcement entity if required for further investigation. With respect to any computer devices or items related to the operation of such devices during the execution of this search warrant, such are to be removed to a secure law enforcement forensic computer examination facility with the necessary equipment to conduct the search safely and ef?ciently, where the search of the contents, including files, documents, data, data images, software, operating systems, deleted ?les, system configurations, dates and times, e?mails, and data in unallocated and slack space or otherwise present in any device capable of storing data will be conducted. Furthermore, the court orders said search may continue beyond ten days from the order of this warrant to the extent necessary to complete the search. This Search Warram and incorporated Affidavit was sworn to and subscribed before me this /f day of ,20 {?71 ,at Wherefore, i find probable cause for the issuance of this Search Warrant and issue it. ,2 ?2 NIGHT SERVECE APPROVED: YES 56455;?, ye? Judge of the Napa County Superior Court STATE of CQUNTY of NAPA, and FOR ORDER SEALENG SEARCH WARRANT DOCUMENTS Your Af?ant, Investigator John Hallman, relates that this Search Warrant sought pursuant to this Search Warrant Af?davit, Statement of Probable Cause and the Return to Search Warrant and all documents relevant to this Search Warrant relate to an ongoing investigation of a Homicide. it is expected that additional Search Warrants will be sought relating to this matter. if information contained in the above listed documents is made public, it would compromise this investigation and make it impossible to continue. Your Affiant requests that the Search Warrant Af?davit, Statement of Probable Cause and the Return to Search Warrant and all documents relating to this Search Warrant be ordered to be sealed. And that the Search Warrant Af?davit, Statement of Probable Cause and the Return to Search Warrant and all documents relating to this Search Warrant remain sealed and in the custody of the clerk of the court until order of this court or other competent court having jurisdiction over this matter. declare under penalty of perjury that the related foregoing is true and correct to the best of my [?lial/day of MEX ?l?liat 0?3: 30AM. (Signature of Af?ant) POINTS AUTHORITIES People Sanchez (l972) 24 Cal. App. 3d 664, 678; People Greenstreet (1990) 218 Cal. App. 3d 1516', Swanson Superior Court (1989) 211 Cal. App. 3d 332. ORDER Based upon the foregoing Declaration and Request and a reading of the original Af?davit, Search Warrant, Statement of Probable Cause, and the Return to Search Warrant thereof referred to above, it is hereby ordered that the Af?davit, Search Warrant, Statement of Probable Cause and the Return to Search Warrant thereof, be sealed and maintained in a secure location in the custody of the clerk of the court until further order of this court or other competent court having jurisdiction over this matter. a d,y .29 Signature of Magistrate) Judge of the Superior Court of California, County of Napa, Superior Court. Electronic Journal Copy Date: 3I2412014 Store: 00260 Register: 001 Transaction: 6,384 BIG 5 SPORTING GOODS #260 Rohnert Park, CA 94928 4521126 FIOCCHI 32 AUTO 24.99 1 24.99 4735403 .223 VMAX 26.99 1 26.99 4591012 WIN. .22 33.99 1 33.99 4735403 .223 VMAX 26.99 1 26.99 SubTotal 112.96 Sales Tax $9.88 TOTAL $122.84 Cash 123.00 Change 0.16 TAX 100260 8 750% 9 88 260 DATE: 3/24/2014 TIME: 1 6384 TOTAL: $122.84 REASON TYPE: REASON: MANAGER: CASHIER: 454 CUSTOMER NAME: TAX EXEMPT DL 0 ACCT NAME: STATE: ACCOUNT EXP.DATE: PO Electronic Journal Copy NAPA COUNTY DEPARTMENT PROPERTY RECORD SCRIMECODE ILI I952 IL 6 LOCATION PROPERTY COLLECTED 7 PROPERTY fr) ?01 R??g?v gjw?gue SQSSEIETPROPERTY BOEISEFRON 233$ 8 VICTI IOWNE 9 0.0.8. 10 ADDRESS 11 PHONE 12 PID 1 13 14 DOB. 15 ADDRESS 16 PHONE 17 PID 2. 1s 19 0.0.8. 20 ADDRESS 21 PHONE 22 PID 3. 23 24 DOB. 25 ADDRESS as PHONE 27 PID 4. 27 28 FIREARMS HISTORY (1028) TO BE ATTACHED av OFFICER I. PROPERTY CODE 2. PROPERTY TYPE A -- ASSET FORFEITURE 0 OTHER EVIDENCE CONYRABAND RECOVERED A . CUSTODY EVIDENCE STOLEN YEN i FOUND 2 SEARCH NOT IN STORAGE SAFEKEEPING WARRANT 8102 3. I (5150 GUNS) 3. PROPERTY CATEGORIES A AUTOMOTIVE FIREARMSIWEAPONS PHYSIOLOGICAL FLUIDS PERSONAL ACCESSORY PHOTO LINE UPIPHOTOS 8 BICYCLE TRACE EVIDENCE CLOTHING WALLETIPURSE . EQUIP HOUSEHOLD GOODS MUSICAL EQUIP 8 EQUIP - MONEY I INDICIA CASSETTES OTHER METALS EQUIP CONSUMABLES CREDIT CARDS 3v :2 as 38." 3'7 - as 10995 . qmi.? -. .SERIALNO vague. 3? Mirac- 12-x CELL CREME. (Cash i 979??: Kwa. Ems-:1- Ex 4: \ngmm 2:NOTIFICATION OF RIGH This form commutes nouIIcaIIon 0! your accommg Io Iaw. Your sgnature IS not an admissum OI responsibilny. but .ndicates that you have received a my 0? this notice. Please review the back of this sheet for an emanation of your rights. FOUND PROPERTY (Required by Civil Code 2080} I decIare under penatty of perjury, that the IisIed Items were found. that nems Ieund have been smendarad and I do not know he identity OItherrue owner. Finder wishes to claw. Iound propeny a?esQOdays. YES NO. SIGNATURE DATE . IQMOTINGOFFICER . i 420155WHITE - PROPERTY ROOM CANARY MASTER FILE PINK - PROPERTY ROOM GOLDENFIOD RECEIPT I NOTIFICATION OF RIGHT. . Stu his? RR 1 7 RR STATE of CALIFORNEA, COUNTY of NARA, mark of the Nana Superior Gm?: Ry: GGLEMAN Seputy DECLARATEON and REQUEST FOR ORDER SEALENG SEARCH WARRANT DOCUMENTS Your Af?ant, lnvesti gator Eric Koford, relates that this Search Warrant sought pursuant to this Search Warrant Af?davit, Statement of Probable Cause and the Return to Search Warrant and all documents relevant to this Search Warrant relate to an ongoing investigation of a Homicide. it is expected that additional Search Warrants will be sought relating to this matter. If information contained in the above listed documents is made public, it would compromise this investigation and make it impossible to continue. Your Af?ant requests that the Search Warrant Af?davit, Statement of Probable Cause and the Return to Search Warrant and all documents relating to this Search Warrant be ordered to be sealed. And that the Search Warrant/ Af?davit, Statement of Probable Cause and the Return to Search Warrant and all documents relating to this Search Warrant remain sealed and in the custody of the clerk of the court until order of this court or other competent court having jurisdiction over this matter. 1 declare under penalty of perjury that the related foregoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. .. of ZZ/?i/j?vj at /52 9AM. (Signature of Af?ant) POINTS AUTHORETIES People Sanchez (1972) 24 Cal. App. 3d 664, 678; People Greenstreet (1990) 218 Cal. App. 3d 1516; Swanson Superior Court (1989) 211 Cal. App. 3d 332. ORDER Based upon the foregoing Declaration and Request and a reading of the original Af?davit, Search Warrant, Statement of Probable Cause, and the Return to Search Warrant thereof referred to above, it is hereby ordered that the Af?davit, Search Warrant, Statement of Probable Cause and the Return to Search Warrant thereof, be sealed and maintained in a secure location in the custody of the clerk of the court until further order of this court or other competent court having jurisdiction over this matter. WM day of at Signature of Magistrate) Judge of the Superior Court of California, County of Napa, Superior Court. MESSAGE RECALL Sequence 012798 Transaction Time: Mon Apr 28 08:30:28 2014 1EBCX012798.IV DATE: 04/28/14 TIME: 08:30 INSURANCE INFORMATION UNKNOWN FILE CODES: VALID FROM: 04/28/13 TO 04/28/14 BTM VIN Z.C.: VEH :17 STATUS: )1/22/2014 RENEWAL NOTICE EXTRACTED )4/05/13 SMOG DUE 04/28/15 -0/02/12 PREV LIC 6RVN145 OF LIABILITY (REG. 138) TRANSFER SELL quER: THE SAME AS ON FILE ZLEARANCE INFORMATION RECORDS: WORK DATE SEQ VALUE FICHE DATE TTC D34 05/06/11 MQ 0078 00206.00 00/00/00 BOO V90 04/20/12 ME 0002 00233.00 00/00/00 F00 V90 10/02/12 ME 0002 00019.00 00/00/00 H00 618 04/03/13 24 0016 00123.00 00/00/00 F00 3ND EBCX012798.IA NQUIRY MATCH ON MPOUNDED VEHICLE TOW 707?584?5000 996 LL BLK 30 DAY HOLD rm /1\1 CALIF FILE ONLY CONFIRM WETH PETALUMA PD EELEPHONE 707 778%4332 - . I Page 1 Napa,:cAMSss 707453-4451 140155 REPORT 7_ Printed by 160 4 Offenses Description Fel/Misd Date Occurred Time Occurred Date Printed j. I AOA Assist Other Agency 04/07/ 14-04/07/ 14 1440 - 1440 04/23/2014 A PR 2 8 2014 Date Reported Time Reported Time Printed 04/07/2014 1258 04:31:55 Related Cases Incident Location it'd"? Beat Area Disposition Dispo Date 2470 Sage Canyon Rd, Napa, CA 94559 Referred to Other Agency 04/23/2014 Location Type Location of Entry i Method of Entry Point of Entry Alarm System Means of Attack (Robbery) Other Public Premise i 5- Reporting Party/Victim Drivers License Cell Phone Email Residence Address Noti?ed of Victim Rights Residence Phone DOB Age Sex Race I Business Name and Address Business Phone Height Wt Hair Eyes 3 0~ f5 Assistance Rendered/Victim Disposition Transporting Agency Means of Attack (Assaults) '11, Description of Injuries Other Information Drivers License Cell Phone Email Residence Address Residence Phone Sex Race A: If: Business Name and Address Business Phone Height Wt Hair Eyes i if. Suspect Name Action Taken Charges I. Residence Address Cell Phone DOB Age Sex Race I Business Name and Address Business Phone Height Wt Hair Eyes ldentifying Features Residence Phone Drivers License Arrest Number 37:) Status Vehicle Make and Model License/State Vehicle Type No Status/Disposition Property Description Value Val Recovered Val rim-?5? Solvability Factors f. .. .. Prepared By Date Assisted By Approved By 1.1-: -. . {Date 137 - Wiegers, Carolina 04/07/2014 1 15 - Sgt, Martin? :1594/23/2014 Routed To Date Routed To Date Notes Napa so 04/23/2014 \a/f no NOT nvmcail?i: 1535 AIRPORT NAPA, CA 94558 NAPA SHERIFFS DEPT 707-253-4451 MATTER OF RECORD REPORT 140155 Printed by 160 Business Name and Address Business Phone Business Name and Address Business Phone Height Wt Hair Eyes lnslolved Drivers License Cell Phone Email Napa County Sheriffs Department ?3 Residence Address 2 Residence Phone DOB Age Sex Race 1535 Airport North, Napa, CA 94558 707 253-4451 Business Name and Address 1 Business Phone Height Wt Hair Eyes Fax Number 2 707 253-4451 Contacted --. Drivers License Cell Phone Email Business Heme and Address - - {Business?Phone .. - 3 Hair Eyes lnvo?liied I Drivers License i Cell Phone Email Sage Canyon Vineyard Residence Address 9 Residence Phone DOB Age Sex Race 2470 Sage Canyon Rd, Napa, CA 94558 i Business Name and Address Business Phone Height ?\Vt Hair Eyes ooN'i?imman noemnm'i? no NM innujmm A PA SH FS DEPT Kayaks?? . Page 3 ga?jwy 1535 AIRPORT NAPA, CA 94558 707-253-4451. . NARRATIVE . 140155 ?4 AWARENESS: On 04/07/14 at approximately 1440 hrs. I responded to Sage Canyon Vineyard on follow up to Napa County Sheriff Department case number 14-001332, regarding an unidenti?ed male who was found deceased on the grounds. I was advised by Lt. Ortiz that the suspects in this case, Miguel Garcia and Mauricio Tovar may have at one point been employed at that location or may have visited the premises I interviewed four individuals who are currently employed at the vineyard and attempted to ascertain if they recognized either suspect by name or photograph and showed them photographs provided to me by NSO. They advised the following in summary. INVESTIGATION: (C)-related he has been working at the vineyard for approximately 1 year and 4 months. He did not recognize either suspect by name or photo. He works here with his brother _and most of the employees here are family or close friends. (C) i-related he has been employed here for about a year. He did not recognize either suspect by name or photo. (C) _elated he has been working here for about a year. He also did not recognize either suSpect by name or photo. no NOT urn-le'rl .E (C) -related he has been working at the vineyard for 14 years. He oversees the employees. He could a not recall ever having seen either suspect on the property and said they had never worked here to his recollection. ,5 RECOMMENDATIONS: Forward to NSO, attach to NSO case number 14-001332. Prepared By: Date: Approved By: Date: [37 WIEGERS. CAROLINA 04/14/2014 1 15 SGT, MARTIN 04/23/2014 W? 1V1alJfl5LLll vv CU Page 1 0f! Regons Stop Trme Device -- Stop Time Report 02: 23: 00 17 Apr ?4 5/1/20; 4 10. 23' 00 AM mir -u.e threshoidmw {51-3-19 7-77? 7 I 1 54;/24/201491o PM 071122 7?2775 6733314777"? 16 7 3 54/24/20 4 6 25 5' 00 06-30" 4 54/24/2014 3:34 02 40177 5 .4/24/2014329 PM 7 00-0507 6 7m72'014-3 13 PM M7577 70?0?1416- 7 4/24/2014 3 07 PM 00 05 06'? 6 '4/24/2014 11:25 AM 03 45-32 9 4/24/2014 11 06 AM 7V 00:71 52 10 4/24/2014 10:34 AM 00; 32 04 1__1 14/23/2014 6 00 PM 5 7 5:22.467 12 4723/2014 7 55 3 7 00:05-06? 13 54/23/2014 ""7775? 07535706 15 4/?2737/2?014727 14 PM 00771572767 16 4/23/2014 1. 23 PM AV 7 00-3642 17 4/23/2014 11:39 AM 01:35:46" _16 /23/2014 1134 AM V7 00:05 07? 19 47257177471315? AM 70717063170? 72707? 4/22/2014 7. 30 PM 7 14.34 44 '21 74722/2014 7:19 PM 00:07:14 22 4/22/20143-46 PM 75 03 31; 12 723' 4/22/2014 4/22/2014 12. 45 5 7 ?5621.736 725? 4/22/2614-12734 PM 7 7' E6509 7 "2'6 47.2272014? 11. 46 AM 7 070737-4767? 2.7 54/22/2014 11:41 AM 00. 05 26 54/22/2014 104/16/2014 7307 4/16/2014 7'31 41/16/2014 5:54/757201? 5:04 PM 00; 06: 13:77 33 54/16/2014 3:23 PM 01; 40 46 7374? 4/16/2014215 PM 7 I 01- 07:42 35 4/16/2014 2 10 PM 3 00:05:06 7 35 4/16/2014 2. 03 PM 7770006557 737 6/2014 11:42 AM 7 0049:4077 '36. 4/16/2014 10; 17 AM "00-1040 .2 39 5 15-3000 40 7/2014 6:29 PM V7 5 00 05?56 41 ?4/17/2014 5:4/17/2014 5:06 PM "602641 43 14/17/2014 3 00 5 02 05746?7 44 54/1772514 2 55 PM .. 7 07370?5707~ r745 4/17/20 14 11: 31 AM 0312.36 45~ 4/17/2014 1154/17/2614951Af71 5 00; 49. 24 746: 4/17/2014 9 5 00:05:54 map/\gemwen Page 1 of 1 Regons Slop TEme Device -- Stop Time Report 5/1/2014 10 22: 00 AM: 5 minute threshold 5' LN . 30:11:13.: iAddra-t .5: A 11 ,4/25/2014 9 02AM 55 ~41 - E- 111125532118 55AM-.. 4.991615. 3 :4/25/2014 8:30 AM 00.2355 1 4/25/2014 4/25/2014 4.16 AM 3 ?57372512014 8-32 A311 00 42. 31 . 00.05.29 151%?8709 j:Zilf??rsa?af 9 14/24/20 4 6 44 00:05.57 1o i43412014 Pf'inco *5/60 0 <70 Napa County Sheriff?s Department Digital Evidence Technical Assistance Request Computer Forensic Exam. Cellular Phone Exam. Other: El Video Clari?cation Date:04-08-14 Case Referral N.S.D. AGENCY Requesting Of?cer Your Agency AND case number Phone# Pacheco 314 Napa Sheriff 707-299-1530 Address of Agency Phone 1535 Airport PC Violation County 187 PC Napa REQUEST (Computer, Cellular Telephone, Video Enhancement, Information Sought, List Evidence Item Cell was collected from Norberto Gonzalez during a probation search. Pursuant to a SW signed on 04-14-14, requesting the phone be downloaded for text messages, calls logs, pictures and other relevant data. If item to IE examined is a cell phone: Cell number: ESN: Carrier company: IMEI: Suspect Information Suspect Name (Last. First, Middle or Business Name) DOB Sex ID 1 Gonzalez, Norberto Suspect Name (Last. First. Middle) Sex ID 2 Garcia, Miguel Angel Victim Information Victim Name (Last. First, Middle) DOB Sex ID 1 Pacheco, Reynaldo Victim Name (Last. First. Middle) DOB Sex ID 2 Additional VictimsNVitnesses? [3 (Attach sheet with names and information) Investigative Information Date of seizure: Type of Seizure: 04-14?14 IXISearch WarrantJlerobation QParole QConsent [; Admin QOther Investigator' 8 Notes: .Ji/[Q/y Pidle Mao's, .JJLVIFE: L?z ?576- a Mums 9 (mg CL am?) We. [ff fit/l Signature bf Magistrate seamuo season Your Af?ant, lnvesti gator Chris Pacheco, relates that this Search Warrant sought pursuant to this Search Warrant Af?davit, Statement of Probable Cause and the Return to Search Warrant and all documents relevant to this Search Warrant relate to an ongoing investigation of a Homicide. it is expected that additional Search Warrants will be sought relating to this matter. if information contained in the above listed documents is made public, it would compromise this investigation and make it impossible to continue. Your Af?ant requests that the Search Warrant Af?davit, Statement of Probable Cause and. the Return to Search Warrant and all documents relating to this Search Warrant be ordered to be sealed. And that the Search Warrant Af?davit, Statement of Probabie Cause and the Return to Search Warrant and ali documents relating to this Search Warrant rernain sealed and in the custody of the clerk of the court until order of this court or other competent court having jurisdiction over this matter. l. declare under penalty of perjury that the related foregoing is true and correct to the best of ray ge. (?Signature of Affiant) . .. POINTS AUTHORITIES People Sanchez (1972) 24 Cal. App. 3d 664, 678; People Greenstreet 218 Cal. App. 3d 1536; Swansonv Superior Court (1989) 211 Cat. App. 3d 332. ORDER Based upon the foregoing Declaration and Request and a reading of the original Affidavit, Search Warrant, Statement of Probable Cause, and the Return to Search Warrant thereof referred to above, it is hereby ordered that the Af?davit, Search Warrant, Statement of Probable Cause and the Return to Search Warrant thereof, be sealed and maintained in a secure location in the custody of the clerk of the court il further order of this court or other competent court having jurisdiction over this matter. if day of Judge of the Superior Court of California, County of Napa, Superior Court. satire kid i Pitt-"tit? 9s . skum? STATE of CALEFQRNEA, 14 an and roa ginseng seasoacouat "my .332} 11W snattuo season a Your Affiant, Investigator Chris Pacheco, relates that this Search Warrant sought pursuant to this Search Warrant Af?davit, Statement of Probable Cause and the Return to Search Warrant and ail documents relevant to this Search Warrant relate to an err?going investigation of a Homicide. It is expected that additional Search Warrants will be sought relating to this matter. if information contained in the above listed documents is made public, it would compromise this investigation and make it impossible to continue. Your Affiant requests that the Search Warrant Af?davit, Statement of Probable Cause and the Return to Search Warrant and all documents relating to this Search Warrant be ordered to be sealed. And that the Search Warrant Af?davit, Statement of Probable Cause and the Return to Search Warrant and all documents relating to this Search Warrant remain sealed and in the custody of the clerk of the court until order of this court or other competent court having jurisdiction over this matter. 1 declare under penalty of perjury that the related foregoing is true and correct to the best (wature of Affiant) POINTS People Sanchez {1972) 24 Cal. App. 3d 664, 678; Peopie Greenstreet (1990) 218 Cal. App. 3d 1516; Swanson Superior Court {1989) 211 Cal. App. 3d 332. ORDER Based upon the foregoing Declaration and Request and a reading of the original Affidavit, Search Warrant, Statement of Probable Cause, and the Return to Search Warrant thereof referred to above, it is hereby ordered that the Af?davit, Search Warrant, Statement of Probable Cause and the Return to Search Warrant thereof, be sealed and maintained in a secure location in the custody of the clerk of the court ?1 further order of this court or other competent court having jurisdiction over this matter. 26? 7? dayof ST ggi??i?/PHM WSignature of Magistrate Judge of the Superior Court of Caiifoniia, County of Napa, Superior Court. ?vb?g?i, ?teaser STATE CALEFQRNEA, CGUNTV 0f NARA, MAY 14 2mg oacmsauou and ron awe Morrow SEAMNG semen oocuaurs? Your Affiant, Investigator Chris Pacheco, relates that this Search Warrant sought pursuant to this Search Warrant Af?davit, Statement of Probable Cause and the Return to Search Warrant and all documents relevant to this Search Warrant relate to an on- going investigation of a Homicide. it is expected that additional Search Warrants will be sought relating to this matter. If information contained in the above listed documents is made public, it would compromise this investigation and make it impossible to continue. Your Af?ant requests that the Search Warrant Af?davit, Statement of Probable Cause and the Return to Search Warrant and all documents relating to this Search Warrant he ordered to be sealed. And that the Search Warrant Affidavit, Statement of Probable Cause and the Return to Search Warrant and all documents relating to this Search Warrant remain sealed and in the custody of the clerk of the court until order of this court or other competent court having jurisdiction over this matter. I declare under penalty of perjury that the related foregoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge 421/ f?/dayorWMW Willi/f? EM MQAM (481/ ature of Affiant) POINTS People Sanchez (1972) 24 Cal. App. 3d 664, 678; People Greenstreet (l990) 218 Cal. App. 3d 1516; Swanson Superior Court 0989) 211 Cal. App. 3d 332. ORDER Based upon the foregoing Declaration and Request and a reading of the original Af?davit, Search Warrant, Statement of Probable Cause, and the Return to Search Warrant thereof referred to above, it is hereby ordered that the Affidavit, Search Warrant, Statement of Probable Cause and the Return to Search Warrant thereof, be sealed and maintained in a secure location in the custody of the clerk of the cou until further order of this court or other competent court having jurisdiction over this mm" NEE daya Er 2E, at S/gnature of Magistrate Judge of the Superior Court of California, County ofNapa, Superior Court. we?. were Pre?x u?t eerie We?d t? to lo ?ts-t we; 4 Mamatea Seating Order: Your Affiant, lnvestigator Chris Pacheco, relates warms Search 1' arrant sought pursuant to this Search Warrant Af?davit, Statement of Prohable Cause and the Return to Search Warrant and all documents relevant to this Search Warrant relate to an on- going investigation of a Homicide. It is expected that additional Search Warrants will he sought relating to this matter. lfinfonnation contained in the above listed documents is made public, it would compromise this investigation and make it impossible to continue. Your Af?ant requests that the Search Warrant Af?davit, Statement ot?Prohable Cause and the Return to Search Warrant and all documents relating to this Search Warrant be ordered to be sealed. And that the Search Warrant Af?davit, Statement of Probable Cause and the Return to Search Warrant and all documents relating to this Search Warrant remain sealed and in. the custody of the clerk of the court until order of this court or other competent court having jurisdiction over this matter. - Grounds for seating: Of?cial information (Evid. Code 1040) informant protection (Evid. Code 1041) Points Authoritieszl?eople Sanchez (1972) 24 Cal. App. 3d 664, 678; People Greenstreet (1990) 218 Cal. App. 3d lSl?; Swanson Superior Court (1989) 211 Cal. App. 3d 332; People V. Hobbs (1994) 7 Cal.4th 948. Subscribed and sworn to as the truth and factual . Contents of the Statement of Probable Cause. (87" attire ofAf?ant) declare under penalty of per; ury that the related foregoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. Based upon the foregoing Declaration and Request and a reading of the original Af?davit, Search Warrant, Statement of Probable Cause, and the Return to Search Warrant thereof referred to above, it is hereby ordered that the Af?davit, Search Warrant, Statement of Probable Cause and the Return to Search Warrant thereof, be sealed and maintained in a secure location in the custody of the clerk of the court until further order of this court or other competent court having jurisdiction over this matter. 3 est lal was - Date and tltne whrrant issued Signature ot?Magistrate Judge of the Superior Court of Napa gum cit?seat ?Casket? STATE of CALEFGRMA, CQUNTY of NAPA, DECLARANON and SENJNG SEARCH 4. Edit Your Affiant, Investigator Chris Pacheco, relates that this Search Warrant sought pursuant to this Search Warrant Af?davit, Statement of Probable Cause and the Return to Search Warrant and all documents relevant to this Search Warrant relate to an on going investigation of a Homicide. it is expected that additional Search Warrants will be sought relating to this matter if information contained in the above listed documents is made public it would compromise this investigation and make it impossible to continue. Your Affiant requests that the Search Warrant Af?davit, Statement of Probable Cause and the Return to Search Warrant and all documents relating to this Search Warrant be ordered to be sealed And that the Search Warrant Affidavit, Statement of Probable Cause and the Return to Search Warrant and all documents relating to this Search Warrant remain sealed and in the custody of the clerk of the court until order of this court or other competent court having jurisdiction over'this matter. I declare under penalty of perjury that the related foregoing is true and correct to the best of my Xy% (1&0nyng Zit at?. (Sr/?ature of Affiant) POINTS People Sanchez {1972) 24 Cal. App. 3d 664, 678; People Greenstreet (1990) 218 Cal. App. 3d 1516; Swanson Superior Court (1989) 211 Cal. App. 3d 332, ORDER Based upon the foregoing Declaration and Request and a reading of the original Af?davit, Search Warrant, Statement of Probable Cause, and the Return to Search Warrant thereof referred to above, it is hereby ordered that the Affidavit, Search Warrant, Statement of Probable Cause and the Return to Search Warrant thereof, be sealed and maintained in a secure location in the custody of the clerk of the court until further order of this court or other competent court having jurisdiction over this matterSignature of Magistrate Judge of the Superior Court of California, County of Napa, Superior Court. waft? ts, . rit? it trim if? it ?t?tr? it?) 3 t. 55 ii rimSTAYE of CAUFORNEA, CQUNTY of NAPA, an tiara nectaamaou and av SEAUNG SEARCH DQCUMEN Your Affiant, Investigator Chris Pacheco, relates that this Search Warrant sought pursuant to this Search Warrant Affidavit, Statement of Probable Cause and the Return to Search Warrant and all documents relevant to this Search Warrant relate to an ongoing investigation of a Homicide. It is expected that additional Search Warrants will be sought relating to this matter. lf information contained in the above listed documents is made public, it would compromise this investigation and make it impossible to continue. Your Af?ant requests that the Search Warrant Affidavit, Statement of Probable Cause and the Return to Search Warrant and all documents relating to this Search Warrant be ordered to be sealed. And that the Search Warrant Af?davit, Statement of Probable Cause and the Return to Search Warrant and all documents relating to this Search Warrant remain sealed and in the custody of the clerk of the court until order of this court or other competent court having jurisdiction over this matter. I declare under penalty of perjury that the related foregoing is true and correct to the best of my f0 dayefwaz?ani II (Si?ature of Affiant) . POINTS AUTHORITIES People Sanchez (1.972) 24 Cal. App. 3d 664, 678; People Greenstreet (1990) 2l8 Cal. App. 3d 1516', Swanson Superior Court (1989) le Cal. App. 3d 332. ORDER Based upon the foregoing Declaration and Request and a reading of the original Af?davit, Search Warrant, Statement of Probable Cause, and the Return to Search Warrant thereof referred to above, it is hereby ordered that the Af?davit, Search Warrant, Statement of Probable Cause and the Return to Search Warrant thereof, be sealed and maintained in a secure location in the custody of the clerk of the court until 6" er order of this court or other competent court having jurisdiction over this matter. 20wanna: of Magistrate Judge of the Superior Court of California, County of Napa, Superior Court. idiot; 2;ij 52am ?mm-W DECLARATEQN and FOR OREER SEAUNG SEARCH Your Affiant, Investigator Chris Pacheco, relates that this Search Warrant sought pursuant to this Search Warrant Af?davit, Statement of Probable Cause and the Return to Search Warrant and all documents relevant to this Search Warrant relate to an ongoing investigation of a Homicide. it is expected that additional Search Warrants will be sought relating to this matter. if information contained in the above listed documents is made public, it would compromise this investigation and make it impossible to continue. Your Affiant requests that the Search Warrant Af?davit, Statement of Probable Cause and the Return to Search Warrant and all documents relating to this Search Warrant be ordered to be sealed. And that the Search Warrant Affidavit, Statement of Probable Cause and the Return to Search Warrant and all documents relating to this Search Warrant remain sealed and in the custody of the clerk of the court until order of this court or other competent court having jurisdiction over this matter. I declare under penalty of perjury that the related foregoing is true and correct to the best of my know edge. L?Z/f?i/v?/f \t?i day of 7/37 . Zdjdat i, PM. Signature of Affiant) . POINTS AUTHORITIES People Sanchez (1972) 24 Cal. App. 3d 664, 678; People Greenstreet (1990) 218 Cal. App. 3d 1516; Swanson Superior Court (1989') 211 Cal. App. 3d 332. ORDER Based upon the foregoing Declaration and Request and a reading of the original Af?davit, Search Warrant, Statement of Probable Cause, and the Return to Search Warrant thereof referred to above, it is hereby ordered that the Af?davit, Search Warrant, Statement of Probable Cause and the Return to Search Warrant thereof, be sealed and maintained in a secure location in the custody of the clerk of the court until further order of this court or other competent court having jurisdiction over this matter. of at AM. as Signature of MagistratePrat/wise? we?? Judge of the Superior Court of California, County of Napa, Superior Court. {r raw: ?w :3 a?s, a? tt tax? it :t?fif} 3L: in; stars of causoamn, couurv of NAM, my 14 mg, Your Affiant, Investigator Chris Pacheco, relates that this Search Warrant sought pursuant to this Search Warrant Affidavit, Statement of Probable Cause and the Return to Search Warrant and all documents relevant to this Search Warrant relate to an ongoing investigation of a Homicide. it is expected that additional Search Warrants will he sought relating to this matter. If information contained in the above listed documents is made public, it would compromise this investigation and make it impossible to continue. Your Affiant requests that the Search Warrant Affidavit, Statement of Probable Cause and the Return to Search Warrant and all documents relating to this Search Warrant be ordered to be sealed. And that the Search Warrant/ Af?davit, Statement of Probable Cause and the Return to Search Warrant and all documents relating to this Search Warrant remain sealed and in the custody of the clerk of the court until order of this court or other competent court having jurisdiction over this matter. 1 declare under penalty of perjury that the related foregoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge; ,Aipw - ?Edayof Mgat 13% A?M?h/b (Signature 6f Af?aht) POINTS AUTHORITIES People Sanchez (1972) 24 Cal. App. 3d 664, 678', People Greenstreet (1990) 218 Cal. App. 3d 1516; Swanson Superior Court (1989) 211 Cal. App. 3d 332. ORDER Based upon the foregoing Declaration and Request and a reading of the original Af?davit, Search Warrant, Statement of Probabie Cause, and the Return to Search Warrant thereof referred to above, it is hereby ordered that the Af?davit, Search Warrant, Statement of Probable Cause and the Return to Search Warrant thereof, be sealed and maintained in a secure location in the custody of the clerk of the court until further order of this court or other competent court having jurisdiction over this matter. day of {3 ,at Signature of Magistrate Judge of the Superior Court of California, County 0th apa, Superior Court. STATE of canroauta, counrr of men, will 14 an coup; SENJNG SEARCH DOCEMENTS Your Af?ant, Investigator Chris Pacheco, relates that this Search Warrant sought pursuant to this Search Warrant Af?davit, Statement of Probable Cause and the Return to Search Warrant and all documents relevant to this Search Warrant relate to an err-going investigation of a Homicide. It is expected that additional Search Warrants will be sought relating to this matter. If information contained in the above listed documents is made public, it would compromise this investigation and make it impossible to continue. Your Af?ant requests that the Search Warrant/ Af?davit, Statement of Probable Cause and the Return to Search Warrant and all documents relating to this Search Warrant be ordered to be sealed. And that the Search Warrant Af?davit, Statement of Probable Cause and the Return to Search Warrant and all documents relating to this Search Warrant remain sealed and in the custody of the clerk of the court until order of this court or other competent court having jurisdiction over this matter. 1 declare under penalty of perjury that the related foregoing is true and correct to the best of my knowl be; 2/ 70/: day Of fill-E?, at (DEF: P.M (Signature of Af?ant) in, POINTS AUTHORITIES People Sanchez (l972) 24 Cal. App. 3d 664, 678; People Greenstreet (1990) 218 Cal. App. 3d 1516; Swanson Superior Court (1989) 2ll Cal. App. 3d 332. ORDER Based upon the foregoing Declaration and Request and a reading of the original Af?davit, Search Warrant, Statement of Probable Cause, and the Return to Search Warrant thereof referred to above, it is hereby ordered that the Af?davit, Search Warrant, Statement of Probable Cause and the Return to Search Warrant thereof, be sealed and maintained in a secure location in the custody of the clerk of the court until further order of this court or other competent court having jurisdiction over this matter. 9 t) El 510% WM :32 at ?i 1?s (AM. bra/1. Signature of Magistrat arm En. . Judge of the Superior Court of California, County of Napa, Superior Court. gout-bur2} ?tr? so a a? Ek?? tbm?? it ?g WY 15 art CLERK 0, THE PA sure-tron count" stars of cauronnrn, of inseam, wssuw DECLARATEQN and REQUEST FQR ORDER SEALENG SEARCH WARRANT DQCUMENTS Your Affiant, Detective David Ackman, relates that this Search Warrant sought pursuant to this Search Warrant Affidavit, Statement of Probable Cause and the Return to Search Warrant and sit documents relevant to this Search Warrant relate to an on-gotng investigation of a Homicide. lt ts expected that additional Search Warrants wilt be sought relating to this matter. if information contained in the above listed documents is made public, it would compromise this investigation and make it impossible to continue. Your Afftant requests that the Search Warrant Affidavit, Statement of Probable Cause and the- Return to Search Warrant and all documents rotating to this Search Warrant be ordered to be sealed. And that the Search Warrant Affidavit, Statement of Probable Cause and the Return to Search Warrant and all documents reiating to this Search Warrant remain seated and in the custody of the clerk of the court order of this court or other competent court having jurisdiction over this matter. 1 declare under penalty of perjury that the related foregoing is true'and correct to the best of my knowiedge. 44% day of {?11514 ,at to5o..re.u. (Signature 0 A rant) . 8s People Sanchez (1972) 24. Cal. App. 3d 664, 678; People Greenstreet (1990) 218 Cal. App. 3d 1516; Swanson Superior Court (t989) 211 Cal. App. 3d 332. ORDER Based upon the foregoing Declaration and Request and a reading of the original Affidavit, Search Warrant, Statement of Probable Cause, and the Return to Search Warrant thereof referred to above, it is hereby ordered that the Affidavit, Search Warrant, Statement of Probable Cause and the Return to Search Warrant thereof, be sealed and maintained in a secure location in the custody of the clerk - the court until further order of this court or other competent court Judge of the Superior Court of Caiifornta, County of Napa, Superior Court. CLERK OF NAP COURT .M STATE couurv of ringer {farm r' and REQUEST FOR GREER SEALENQ SEARCH WARRANT DOCUMENTS Your Affiant, Detective David Ackman, relates that this Search Warrant sought pursuant to this Search Warrant Affidavit, Statement of Probable Cause and the Return to Search Warrant and all documents relevant to this Search Warrant relate to an on-going investigation of a Homicide. it is expected that additional Search Warrants will be sought relating to this matter. if information contained in the above listed documents is made public, it would compromise this investigation and make it impossible to continue. Your Affiant requests that the Search Warrant Affidavit, Statement of Probable Cause and the Return to Search Warrant and all documents relating to this Search Warrant be ordered to be sealed. And that the Search Warrant Affidavit. Statement of Probable Cause and the Return to Search Warrant and ail documents relating to this Search Warrant remain sealed and in the custody of the clerk of the court until order of this court or other competent court having jurisdiction over this matter. declare under penalty of perjury that the related foregoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. grit/0% lyf/V? dayorlel51% ,at (065AMJRM. (Signature of Aft People Sanchez (1972) 24 Cal. App. 3d 664, 678; People Greenstreet (1990) 2?18 Cat. App. 3d 1516; Swanson Superior Court (1989) 211 Cal. App. 3d 332. ORDER Based upon the foregoing Declaration and Request and a reading of the original Affidavit, Search Warrant, Statement of Probable Cause, and the Return to Search Warrant thereof referred to above, it is hereby ordered that the Affidavit, Search Warrant, Statement of Probable Cause and the Return to Search Warrant thereof, be sealed and maintained in a secure location in the custody of the clerk of the court untii further order of this court or other competent court having jurisdiction over this matter. dayofM,at/O (Signature of Magistrate Judge of the Superior Court of California, County of Napa, Superior Court. XEWWZB if g! wet, '3 RAKE f" a; 913?was if; 533 . 5: ivy-Inst?: i it .r?rg?ii .rfr, it if? err ?rst}; it EE hi. ?Page: .. rut 15 Z?itt STATE of CALEFGRNEA, COUNTY 0t NAPA, CLERK or: WEBER COURT BECLARATEQN and REQUEST FUR QR?t?n manuw SEALENG SEARCH WARRANT DQCUMENES Your Attiant, Detective David Ackman, relates that this Search Warrant sought pursuant to this Search Warrant Affidavit, Statement of Probable Cause and the Return to Search Warrant and all documents relevant to this Search Warrant relate to an ongoing investigation of a Homicide. it is expected that additional Search Warrants will be sought relating to this matter. if information contained in the above listed documents is made public, it would compromise this investigation and make it impossible to continue. Your Affiant requests that the Search Warrant Atiidavit, Statement of Probable Cause and the Return to Search Warrant and all documents relating to this Search Warrant be ordered to be sealed. And that the Search Warrant Affidavit, Statement of Probable Cause and the Return to Search Warrant and all documents relating to this Search Warrant remain sealed and in the custody of the clerk of the court until order of this court or other competent court having jurisdiction over this matter. i declare under penalty of perjury that the related foregoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge ., fix/14% Afr/V? dayot 4? [Elf ,at . (Signet? of Affiant) POINTS AU People Sanchez (1972) 24 Cal. App. 3d 664, People Greenstreet @990) 2i'8 Cal. App. 3d 1516; Swanson Superior Court (1989) 211 Cal. App. 3d 332. ORDER Based upon the foregoing Declaration and Request and a reading of the original Affidavit, Search Warrant, Statement of Probable Cause, and the Return to Search Warrant thereof referred to above, it is hereby ordered that the Affidavit, Search Warrant, Statement of Probable Cause and the Return to Search Warrant thereof, be sealed and maintained in a ecure location in the custody of the clerk of the court until further order of this court or competent cog/Elvaving jurisdiction over this matter {7 day of MVSignature of Magistrate Judge of the Superior Court of California, County of Napa, Superior Court. 1156% 2 Emma gg La of cAqunNTA, cournv of TTAEA. itAt 15 2th and segues-r roe ssAune sEAnci?i WARRANT i Your Attiant, Detective David Acknian, relates that this Search Warrant sought pursuant to this Search Warrant Affidavit, Statement of Probable Cause and the Return to Search Warrant and all documents relevant to this Search Warrant relate to an ongoing investigation of a Homicide. It is expected that additional Search Warrants will be sought relating to this matter. if information contained in the above listed documents is made public, it would compromise this investigation and make it impossible to continue. Your Attiant requests that the Search Warrant Affidavit, Statement of Probable Cause and the Return to Search Warrant and all documents relating to this Search Warrant. be ordered to be sealed. And that the Search Warrant Affidavit, Statement of Probable Cause and the Return to Search Warrant and sit documents relating to this Search Warrant remain seated and in the custody of the clerk of the court until order of this court or other competent court having jurisdiction over this matter. i declare under penalty of perjury that the related foregoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. ?oor/J dayct?l??fi ,ar2:w (/Signa?/bre of Afiiant) People Sanchez (1972) .24 Cal. App. 3d 664, 678; People Greenstreet (1990) 2t8 Cal. App. 3d 1516; Swanson vSuperior Court (1989)211 Cat. App. 3d 332. ORDER Based upon the foregoing Beclaration and Request and a reading of the original Affidavit, Search Warrant, Statement of Probable Cause, and the Return to Search Warrant thereof referred to above, it is hereby ordered that the Affidavit, Search Warrant, Statement of Probable Cause and the Return to Search Warrant thereof, be sealed and maintained in a are location in the custody of the clerk of the court until further order of this court er competent coquing jurisdiction over this matter. 7 of I . . @Signature of Magistrate Judge of the Superior Court of California, County of Napa, Superior Court. 3w NO. jq 43% STATE OF CALIFORNIA-COUNTY OF NAPA RETURN TO SEARCH WARRANT 4 AGENCY CHECK IN LIST NAME ?444; 4:4 4:4 3. 4 CHECK IN LOC 4:4 54444 USE ONE $44544 PER AGENCY ?@444 44444 4 4 4? 444444444: 44,. 4 4.4 44 5. 6. LIAISON NAME 7. AGENCY ADDRESS 5. AGENCY PHONE 44 ,4 44 4 4, 44: 44:44:? 4' :45} 44?;34?4?3?34: $4,4ng [4&4 ?453% :3 4.437% GAZED RESOURCE MEDICAL SAR OTHER QUALIFICATIONS OR SPECIALITIES NAME (PERSONNEL) r: 8 325? DESCRIPTION (EQUIPMENT) TIME OUT HOURS 33' 4555534444 444? 4 3434444444 44:45? 4443! 444443444 4444? 4444444 4?4 43 444 . -. 44 444444 4444 4?gy?44 44444534 :44? 44444 44444" 444:, f4?? 44? ff; ENE QPEW 445434,} f; 4: 5444? 44-4. 4444 4444 44444444444444 4 44 $444444 4444444 434 4 4444 ?434? 3/38 424435 45 OF 14' 9. PREPARED BY (RESOURCE UNIT) NIGHT SERVICE REQUESTED: YES NO GARY LIEBERSTEIN DESTRICT ATTORNEY SEARCH WARRANT NO. 5?43 Ki - \?if-i-v 93$ Pamway Mall Napa, CA 94559 (707) 253?421 1 stars or CALEFORNIA counw or uses 10 gm NAP COURT SEARCH (AFFIDAVBT) KT Detective Nicol Dudley, Napa County Sheriffs Of?ce, being sworn, says that the facts in support of the issuance of the Search Warrant are contained in the attached Statement of Probable Cause, which is incorporated herein by reference as if fully set forth herein. Wherefore, your Affiant prays that this Search Warrant be issued for the seizure of said property, or any part thereof, at any time of the day, with good cause having therefore been shown. 7 Subscribed and sworn to as the truth and factual Contents of the Statement of Probable Cause. {Sigma ?M?an?j i (SEARCH WARRANT) THE PEGPLE OF THE STATE OF CALEFORNIA TO ANY SHERIFF, POLICEMAN 0R I PEACE OFFICER IN THE CGUNTY 0F NAPA proof by af?davit having been made before me by Detective Nicol Dudley that there is probable cause to believe, and do believe that the property described herein may be found at the locations set forth herein and that it is lawfully seizable pursuant to Penal Code Section 1524 as indicted below by in that it: was stolen or embezzled was used as the means of committing a felony is possessed by a person with the intent to use it as means of committing a public offense or is possessed by another to whom he/she may have delivered it for the purpose of concealing it or preventing its discovery. jg tends to show that a felony has been committed or that a particular person has committed a felony. tends to show that sexual exploitation of a child.) in Violation of PC. Section 3 ll .3 has occurred or is occurring. RETURN TO SEARCH WARRANT STATE of CALEFGRNEA couurr of MAY 15 293i cresrorrssu nectanmiou and neuesr son We?? 300w Your Affiant, investigator Nicol Dudley, relates that this Search Warrant sought pursuant to this Search Warrant Af?davit, Statement of Probable Cause and the Return to Search Warrant and all documents relevant to this Search Warrant relate to an ongoing investigation of a Homicide. It is expected that additional Search Warrants will be sought relating to this matter. if information contained in the above listed documents is made public, it would compromise this investigation and make it impossible to continue. Your Affiant requests that the Search Warrant/ Affidavit, Statement of Probable Cause and the Return to Search Warrant and all documents relating to this Search Warrant be ordered to be sealed. And that the Search Warrant Af?davit, Statement of Probable Cause and the Return to Search Warrant and all documents relating to this Search Warrant remain sealed and in the custody of the clerk of the court until order of this court or other competent court having jurisdiction over this matter. 1 declare under penalty of perjury that the related foregoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. QA dayof 72/2 ,atlblio POINTS AUTHORITIES People Sanchez U972) 24 Cal. App. 3d 664, 678; People Greenstreet (1990) 2l8 Cal. App. 3d 1516; Swanson Superior Court (1989) 2ll Cal. App. 3d 332. ORDER Based upon the foregoing Declaration and Request and a reading of the original Affidavit, Search Warrant, Statement of Probable Cause, and the Return to Search Warrant thereof referred to above, it is hereby ordered that the Affidavit, Search Warrant, Statement of Probable Cause and the Return to Search Warrant thereof, be sealed and maintained, in a secure location in the custody of the clerk of the court until further order of this court or other competent court having jurisdiction over this matter. day of (Seem of Judge of the Superior Court of California, County of Napa, Superior Court. 1535 AIRPORT NAPA, CA 94558 707-253-4451 MATTER OF RECORD REPORT Page 1 140155 Printed by 168 Offenses Description Fel/Misd- Date Occurred Time Occurred i Date Printed AOA Assist ()thcr Agency 1440- 1440 0612742014 Da?te Reported lime Repdrted Time Printed 04/07/2014 1258 4:11 15: 24 Reiated Cases Incident location -- Beat 1 Area [Disposition D1sp0 Date .I 247 0 Sage Canxon Rd. 1\apa. CA 94559 Referred to Other Agenm :04?23 '2014 I neation ?T1ype Location ofEntn Method?0f Entry Point of Entry EAlarin S1 stem ?cans of Attack (Robber_1) ()thei Public P1emisc Reportmg?Par?tT/Vicnm I [3?111ch Lice?rise .. (ell-Phone IEnail? I Residence Address - I, I 11111111111 Rightsi Residence Pho?ne DOB Age Sex R:ace lrmiiness?iName and Address y- w. E.Businc?hoiic Height _Wt Er 11111:? i 1 Assistance RerRlered/Victirn Disposition i'l'ransportingAgeney Means of fAttackiAssnultsDescription of Injuries Other Information (Tm'ac?ieli Writ-Em {Reuse iEmaiBusiness Nanie and Address Business Phone Height llair Eyes 3 i M's??pect Name 7 "7231011141175 Residence-Addie? A 7 DOB Age Sex TRace Business Narne. and Address - Business Phone Height Wt Ellair Eyes Identify?gli?eatul'eT- ?Residenc?hon?c- DriveELieense_ .jArgs?tNu?mber L. 4%:71' 72' Status E1 eliicle \lake and Model License/State - Vehicle Type A Frog-11 Description _w {alRe?t?n1crcd {al?Danmged? 1 A Solvability Factors 1 Prepared 81'? - Date Assisted Approved 8} ?Bate? 137- \11 1031.15. Carolina 04/07/2014 . i 115 Martin .041121/2014 Rou?ted lo Date 110111611 '11) one Notes Napa SO 3 Napa $0 06/27/2014 43411411111111.1211 1411 11411111134112: NAPA SHERIFFS DEPT . Page? 1535 AIRPORT NAPA. CA 94558 701253-4451 5?40?55 MATTER OF RECORD REPORT by 168 (Tomaeted (Sell Phone ilimail 2732 Old Sonoma Rd. Napa- CA 9433?} Business Name and Address Business Phone -- - . Business Name and Address Business Phone 1 Height Drivers License T?(iell?l?hnne ?Invdl-s'ed Napa County Sheriffs DOB Age Sex Race Residence Address . - -- i Residene: Phone 1535 Airport North. Napa. CA 94558 707 253-4451 Business Name and Address Business Phone Height Hair 5 Eyes I 707 253-4451 Fax Number (:eii 1 Email 349(1) her \1 4 apa. 5. Business Phone Business Name and Address 2 lieighl Wt Hair Eyes sThais Lie??cnser Ec?i Phi-me man Sage Canyon Vineyard Residence Address Residence Phone DOB Age Sex Race 2470 Sage Canyon Rd. Napa. CA 94558 1 Business Name and Address Business Phone 3 Height Hair Eyes M: P- 15:? .i Ms #253 Am W. - 4 s. A Len: NE 110 MET 3. SH ERIFFS DEPT 1535 AIRPORT NAPA. CA 94558 707-253-4451 ARRATIV 140155 AWARENESS: On 04/07/14 at approximately 1440 hrs. I responded to Sage Canyon Vineyard on follow up to Napa County Sheriff Department case number 14?001332, regarding an unidenti?ed male who was found deceased on the grounds. I was advised by Lt. Ortiz that the suspects in this case, Miguel Garcia and Mauricio Tovar may have at one point been employed at that location or may have visited the premises I interviewed four individuals who are currently employed at the vineyard and attempted to ascertain if they recognized either suspect by name or photograph and showed them photographs provided to me by NSO. They advised the following in summary. INVESTIGATION: related he has been working at the vineyard for approximately 1 year and 4 months. He did not recognize either suspect by name or photo. He works here with his brothe_and most of the employees here are family or close friends. (C) _elated he has been employed here for about a year. He did not recognize either suspect by name or photo. (C) _related he has been working here for about a year. He also did not recognize either suspect by name or photo. :3 (C) -elated he has been working at the v1neyard for 14 years. He oversees the employees. He could not recall ever having seen either suspect on the preperty and said they had never worked here to his 6 recollection. at RECOMMENDATIONS: "=53 Forward to NSO, attach to NSO case number 14?001332. PIE ?3 A Prepared By: Date: Approved By: Date: 137 WIEGERS. CAROLINA I 15 SGT. MARTIN 04/23/2014 . . <71 goat; ix Page 4 1535 AIRPORT APA, CA 94558 707-253.4451 SUPPLEMENT 1 140155 #7 if AWARENESS: On Monday, May 19, 2014, at approximately 0754:41 1 was listening to phone calls being made by suspect Mauricio Tovar?Telles from the Napa County Detention Center, as assigned by the Napa County Sherrifs Department, as part of the Major Crimes Task Force. :33 INVESTIGATION: 9* an: A phone call was placed by Tovar-Telles to_on 05-13-2014 at approximately 06:54:59. Tovar?Telles was speaking to a female. During this conversation Tovar-Telles was explaining to the 3 female that the lawyer told him the preliminary hearing was to see if there was enough evidence to 9? charge him. The female replied in summary that there was no evidence, Tovar-Telles replied "well yes but now there is". RECOMMENDATIONS: ?a Forward to NSO. A A p3, P'Prepared By: Date: Approved By: Date: 137 WIEGERS. CAROLINA 06/24/2014 1 15 SGT. MARTIN 06/27/2014 NAPA COUNTY DEPARTMENT 06 NAT CODE PROPERTY RECORD ICASE 35223232 .. 2 DATE OF THIS REPORT 3 CRIME CODE - 1. PAGE SEW - 1. PROPERTY CODE 2. PROPERTY TYPE [5 PROPERTY CITATION ROOM OTHER ONLY 12 PID 17 PID Ie 19 0.0.3. 20 ADDRESS 21 PHONE 22 PID 3. 23 24 0.0.8. 25 ADDRESS 26 PHONE 27 PID 4. 27 28 29 COMMENTS FIREARMS HISTORY (10-28) To BE ATTACHED BY OFFICER A AUTOMOTIVE - FLUIDS A ASSET FORFEITURE OTHER EVIDENCE - CONTRABAND RECOVERED IN CUSTODY EVIDENCE STOLEN FOUND SEARCH NOT IN STORAGE SAFEKEEPING WARRANT 8102W &l (5150 GUNS) 3. PROPERTY CATEGORIES PERSONAL ACCESSORY .. PHOTO LINE 5W INLLEEC. . EM Wm BICYCLE .. TRACE EVIDENCE CLOTHING CAMERAJPHOTO EOUIP HOUSEHOLD GOODS MUSICAL EOUIP EOUIP MONEY I INDICIA CASSETTES OTHER EQUIPMENTHOOLS .I JEWELRYIWATCHIPRECIOUS METALS o= EQUIP CONSUMABLES CREDIT CARDS 30 _32 :33 .3) 35 .36 g3?r 332 EVID .j I CODE .2 ?5?pr CAT . ARTICLE ammo MODEL. . SERIAL NO 2 VALUE 2 ROOM . - 4 ONLY EAQI. E4932.) LIL). E21. R: ?NMivu?u REM) W4 Nu; M. M?s 231.1465: if?\ .. I. wan-In? ZWICA-C: .- 1" LI): 0 FOUND PROPERTY NOT FICATION OF RIGHTS (Required by Cal. Crvit Code 2980) i dedare under penatty of perjury, that the listed Items were found, that all items found have been surrendered and I do not know the Identity of the true owner. Fmder wishes to claim found property aIIer 90 days YES This form constitutes noti?cation OI your rights according to taw. Your signature is notice. Ptease review t: a back of this sheet for an Dxptanatton of your rights. ENC. SIGNATURE not an admission of responsibizlty. but indicates that you have received a copy of this DATE 410 ECTING OFFICER WHITE - PROPERTY ROOM PROPERTV DELIVERED TC. CANARY - MASTER FILE LOCK SP NO PINK PROPERTY ROOM GOLDENROD - NOTIFICATION OF . 4%ka 43 APPROVED BY PH 4.4 DATE Coroner?s Report Napa County Sheriff - Coroner Forensic Science Center 1535 Airport Blvd. Napa, CA 94558 (707) 253-4256 CLASSIFICATION CORONER NUMBER CASE NUMBER (Dispatch) HOMICIDE C14-194 NSD14-001332 DATE REPORTED TIME RECEIVED RY DEPUTY ASSIGNED 04/03/2014 0700 OFFICE HORVATH, MARK REPORTED BY ADDRESS PHONE NAPA COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE 1535 AIRPORT BLVD LAST NAME FIRST NAME MIDDLE NAPA CA 94558 ORTIZ OSCAR DECEDENT FIRST NAME MIDDLE LAST NAME AKA PERSONAL REYNALDO PACHECO DATA LAST USUAL ADDRESS PHONE I - . BIRTH PLC. HISPANIC 5'4' 1 145 BLACK BROWN AGE I . STATE CITIZENSHIP MARITAL A1 U5 IUN LOYER MARRHX) I DEATH STREET ADDRESS OR LOCATION CITY OR TOWN DATE OF DEATH TIME OF DEATH LOCATION 2470 SAGE CANYON RD NAPA 04/03/2014 1009 LAST SEEN LAST SEEN ALIVE BY DATE TIME LAST SEEN ALIVE WHERE ALIVE MAURICIO TOVAR 03/24/2014 1500 2470 SAGE CANYON RD CAUSE CAUSE OF DEATH INJURY TIME AND DATE OF INJURY DESCRIBE HOW INTURY OCCURRED INJURY OCCURRED (Work or Non-Work) PLACE OF INJURY CITY OR LOCATION COUNTY STATE NAPA CA VEHICLE YEAR MAKE MODEL LICENSE NO. KEYS LOCATION OF VEHICLE RESIDENCE RESIDENCE PROPERTY STATUS KEYS RESIDENCE RELEASED BY: UNKNOWN PROPERTY LOCATION DISPOSITION SEE PROPERTY SHEET FOR DETAILED INFO CLOTHING DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF CLOTHING WORN WORN GREY LONG SLEEVE SHIRT, BLACK PANTS, BLACK SOCKS, BROW SHOES, BROWN BELT IDENTIFICA- REMAINS IDENTIFIED HOW OR HOW IDENTIFIED TION PHOTOGRAPHS PHOTOGRAPHS AT SCENE BY: PHOTOGRAPHS AT MORGUE: REPORTABLE SUMMARY DISPOSITION of REMOVED BY: REMOVED TO: FAMILY MORTUARY PREFERENCE REMAINS FACILITY FACILITY PATHOLOGIST: DATE NOTIFIED TIME NOTIFIED DEATH CERTIFICATE SIGNED INFORMATION RELATIVES WIFE RELATIVE WHO WAS NOTIFIED OF DEATH: RELATIONSHIP DATE NOTIFIED NOTIFICATION NOTIFIED BY: HOW WERE THEY NOTIFIED Coroner?s Report Narrative Napa County Sheriff .. Coroner Forensic Science Center 1535 Airport Blvd. Napa, CA 94558 (707) 253-4256 . .. . .. . . Ca co -. Deceased Deputy Assigned Coroner Number Case Number Date and Time of Report First Middle Last REYNALDO HORVATH, MARK {314494 On 04/04/2034 15:54 PACHECO On 04/03/2014 at approximately 0700 hours, I was contacted by Sgt. Perry and noti?ed of a possible homicide investigation that the Napa County Sheriff?s Department was conducting (N SD14-001332). Investigators had received information during the course of another investigation of the Homicide. At that time they were attempting to locate the decedent?s remains in a rural part of Napa County. At approximately 1030 hours I was contacted by Lt. Oscar Ortiz, who noti?ed me that they had located the decedent?s remains in a creek at 2470 Sage Canyon Rd. The remains were located at 1009' hours by Detective Dave Ackman and Agent Alfonso Ortiz. The remains were partially submerged in a creek at that location. Lt. Ortiz told me that there investigation had revealed that the decedent had been bludgeoned to death with large rocks at that location (See for details). He indicated that they were in the process of obtaining a search warrant for the location, and that there would be a delay in being able to access the decedent. Lt. Ortiz told me that they believed that the decedent was possibly a missing person out of Sonoma County identi?ed as Reynaldo Pacheco Pacheco (Sonoma County Sheriffs Department 140327?030). Pacheco had been reported missing to the Santa Rosa Police Department on 03/25/2014. He had been last seen by his family on 03/24/2014 at approximately 1000 hours, when he left for a meeting. At approximately 1047 hours, I noti?ed Dr. Cohen of the case. At approximately 1540 hours, i was requested to respond to the 2740 Sage Canyon by Mike Bartlett. Chris Perry, Deputy lay Jones, and responded from the coroner?s facility to conduct our investigation. 1 arrived on scene at approximately 1620 hour. Scene: The property at 2740 Sage Canyon Rd. is accessed by a private drive through pass coded gate. The entrance is identi?ed as Kuleto Estate. There are several private residences and a Winery on the property. The driveway is a single lane road with several turnouts. The crime scene was located approximately eight tenths of a mile north of the gate. At the turnout was an unmarked earthen road that ran approximately 200 yards down to the creek. The creek is approximately 12 feet in Width and runs in a south west direction. The water at this time was ?owing at a steady pace. The water depth ranged from approximately 6 inches to 2 feet in depth. The water was very clear with an approximately 6?1 0 feet of visibility. At the location Where the decedent was located there was a log jam consisting of several medium to small branches. The jarn ran perpendicular to the flow of the creek and was located on the up stream. side of the decedent. Deputy Jones and I took extensive Coroner?s Report Narrative Napa County Sheriff Coroner Forensic Science Center 1535 Airport Blvd. Napa, CA 94558 (707) 253?4255 Deceased 7 7 7 I I I Deputy A?srgned Coroner Number Case Number ?hate and Time ofRenort I I I First Middle Last REYNALDO HORVATH, MARK 014494 On 04/04/2014 15:54 PACHECO photographs of the scene. or detailed description/measurements of the scene refer to 001332. Observations of the decedent: The decedent was a white or Hispanic male adult with medium length black hair. He was in a sitting position in the middle of the creek, with his back against the log jam on the down stream side. Only the upper portion of the top and back of his head were visible above the water line. The decedent had a visible injury in the approximate area of the left side of the crown of his head. There was noted insect activity at that location. The decedent?s head was slumped to the right and forward. His forehead was pressed against a large tree branch. I could see that he had an injury to his forehead that was mostly obscured by the tree branch. The decedent had what appeared to be a ?wife beater? type white t-shirt tied around the lower portion of his face and neck. It was tied at the base of the back of his head. He also had what appeared to be black electrical tape wrapped across his mouth and neck. This was underneath the white shirt. The decedent?s arms were both behind him and appeared to be bound. His left leg was straight out with a slight bend at the knee. The lower portion from just below the mid shin was completely buried in the loose sediment (which consisted of leaves and mud). His right leg was bent at a 45 degree angle. The lower portion of his leg was also buried in the sediment. The decedent?s clothing was covered with a thin layer of sediment. Prior to moving the body, I made an underwater video of the decedent as he was found. At l7l0 hours, I pulled the decedent into shallower water where Sgt. Perry and I placed him into a new blue water body bag. The decedent had little to no rigor present. Sgt. Perry and Deputy I ones carried the decedent onto the shore for additional photographs and observations. After removing the decedent, a search of the area where the body was located. I located approximate football sized rocks that were underneath the decedent. The rocks were on top of the decedent. I removed several rocks and gave them to Sgt. Carlisle. Once the decedent was removed from the water I observed the following. The decedent was a male subject, approximately 40 years of age. He was approximately 5 foot 6 inches tall, and approximately 160 pounds. The decedent was dressed in black corduroy pants with a brown leather belt. The pants were ripped in the seat. The decedent had on a grey button up long sleeve shirt on, that was tucked into his pants. There was a small tear in the shirt near the right pocket. The decedent was wearing brown leather Dockers? brand shoes. The right shoe was missing its laces. The left shoe had black woven nylon laces that were still tied. Coroner?s Narrative Napa County Sheriff - Coroner Forensic Science Center ?1535 Airport Blvd. Napa, CA 94558 (707) 253-4256 Deceased Deputy Assigned Coroner Number Case Number Date and Time of Report First Middie Last REYNALDO HORVATH, MARK 014-194 On 04/04/2014 15:54 PACHECO The decedent?s hands were bound behind his back, with the back of his left hand over his right palm. The binding was a black woven nylon cord that matched the laces in his left shoe. The decedent had no property or identi?cation on his person. There was signi?cant visible trauma to the decedent?s forehead. He had three large lacerations on his forehead. All had very jagged edges. The first was approximately 3?4 inches in length and extended from the approximate center of his hairline down to his right eyebrow. There was a visible skull fracture with brain matter visible through the laceration. The second laceration was approximately 2? 3 inches in length and was located above his left eyebrow with skull visible. The Third was an approximate l~2 inch laceration that was above his right eyebrow that connected to the first larger laceration. The decedent had a clear gelatinous coating on the portions of skin that were underwater. His Nose and right side of his face were deformed from being pressed against the tree branch. At 1724- hours, the body bag was closed and locked with bag lock number 09125. Sgt. Perry, Deputy Jones, Sgt. Carlisle and carried the decedent to the paved turnout. At approximately 1805 hours, the coroner?s facility team arrived on scene. The decedent was placed into their van at 1816 hours and transported to the coroner?s facility. I followed the van to maintain chain of custody. We arrived at the coroner?s facility at 1859 hours. The decedent was placed into the secure side of the refrigerator at 1910 hours. The decedent matched the general description of Reynaldo Pacheco, but due to the injuries to his face and bindings, I was unable to make a visual match to the photograph of Pacheco. An autopsy has been scheduled for Monday 04/07/2014 at 0900 hours. 9 Unknown I I See Ns'mr?ooissz I Coronei?e Report Narrative Napa County Sheriff Coroner Forensic Science Center 1535 Airport Blvd. Napa, CA 94558 (707') 2534256 Coroner Number 'C'ase Number I Date and Time of Repori Deceased I [5:391:in As'sig' First Middle Last REYNALDO HORVATH, MARK {314-194 On 04/64/2014 15:54 PACHECO ?Scene. photograol??s arid irideo I None of report ihe decedent?s notbeen confirmed NSO investigations will Conta?t the family of Reynaldo Pacheco to obtain additional identification information to assist in a positive identification. CLERK OF COURT RETURN TO SEARCH WARRA SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA 1 a?e?mark he FORENSICS Fax: 214-271-8322 Murmur; . 35?? Report of Laboratory Examination We? September 25, 2014 Supplemental - Detective Dudley Re naldo Pacheco-Pacheco Napa County Sheriff?s Of?ce 1535 Aliport .. . .. SUSPECTS: . . Norberto Gonzalez; Mauricio Napa, CA 94558 Tovar Angela Arias CELLMARK FORENSICS NO: Rl4-0094 AGENCY CASE NO: 14-001332 AGENCY NO: EXHIBITS Client Item CF Item Received Item Description PCR 14-001332-BMB-14 4/30/2014 Swabs: Interior Front Passenger Side of Vehicle I4-001332-ND-3 FR14-0094-02 4/30/2014 BuccalSwabs: Norberto Gonzalez 7/28/2014 Buccal Swabs: NOT EXAMINED 4/30/2014 Swab PackagerBlank Control Swabs . NOT EXAMINED 4/30/2014 Swab PackagezBlank Control Swabs with Water RESULTS DNA testing using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and the Identi?ler PlusTM Ampli?cation Kit was performed on the indicated exhibit(s). The loci tested and the results obtained for each tested sample are listed in Table 1 (see attachment). This report supplements Cellmark Forensics' Laboratory Report dated May 14, 2014. CONCLUSIONS FR14-0094-01.01.1 The DNA pro?le obtained from the swabs of the interior front passenger side of the vehicle is a mixture of at least two individuals, including at least onc unknown male. Norberto Gonzalez and _are excluded as possible contributors of DNA to this mixture. DISPOSITION In the absence of speci?c instruction, evidence will be returned to the submitting agency by Federal Express or another appropriate carrier. Gel/mark Forensics 14001332 FR 1 4-0094-A Accredited by the American Society of Crime Laboratory Directors/Laboratozy Accreditation Board - International 1 of 2 REVIEW The results described 111 this report have been reviewed by the following individuals: . ,1 1 - Technical - . 1:5 f? - Analyst . f? f? 3e11ni?er L. Smiih Senior F01ens1c DNA Analyst - Deanna D. Lankford Associate Laeoratery Director ?3rocedures used 111 the anaiysis of this case adhere to the Quality Assurance Standards for Forensic DNA Testing Laboratories. Ceilmark Forensics as accrediied by the American Society of Crime Laboratory DirectorsiLaberatory Accreditation Board lhe results in {his report relate only to ?11e1'te111?s tested September 25, 2014 Celimark Far?ensics 1 14-00832} Accredited by the American Society ofCrz'm'e Laboratory Direciors/Labaratmy Accreditation Board International 2? of2 533? Gellmark FORENSICS LabCorp Spatially Testing Group Report of Laboratory Examination . 9/25/2014 Supplemental - FR14-0094-A 13988 Diplomat Dr. Suite 100 Dallas TX 75234 Phone: 1-800-752-2774 Fax: 214-271-8322 CELLMARK FORENSICS NO: R14-0094 AGENCY CASE NO: 14~001332 AGENCY NO: Fable 1 [denti?lcr Plus iamplc Name Front Passenger 12, 13,14 29, 30,31, 8,9, 10,12 10,13* 15,17,18* 6, 7, 9, 9.3 9,11,12, 11,12* 17, 19, 23 14,15* l6,17,19* 8,11?, 12, 13* 7,10,11* 21, 23, 24* Side of Vehicle 312* 13? 3R14-0094-01.01.1 14-001332-BMB-14 Vorberto Gonzalez 13,16 32.2 8,10,12 23 14,142 15, 16 10,11 14, 15 X, 9,11 19, 22 8,13 30, 32.2 11 11,12 15,20 6 8,13 12,13 18 13.2.15 16,17 8,12 13,18 7,11 20,28 ?R14-0094-03.01.l Female Male Possible additional allele(s) below threshold the results listed in the table do not depict intensity differences. Only alleles exceeding validated analysis threshold are included in table. Accredited by the American Society of Crime Laboratory Directors/Laboratory Accreditation Board - International Supplemental - of JAN 08 2015 sumamoa comm STATE OF CALIFORNIA-COUNTY OF NAPSAW NO. oo GARY .i - .. ATTORNEY SEARCH WARRANT NO. 5 931 Parkway Mat] Napa, CA 94559 (707) 2534211 stars or MN 08 Z?ti CGUNW or NAFA CLERK or [as NAP fastens coua SEARCH NT AND Vi?? 5 ?Como (AFFIDAVET) Detective Christopher Pacheco, Napa County Sheriffs Office, being sworn, says that the facts in support of the issuance of the Search Warrant are contained in the attached Statement of Probahie Cause, which is incorporated herein by reference as if fully set forth herein. Wherefore, your Affiant prays that this Search Warrant be issued for the seizure of said property, or any part thereof, at anytime of the day, with good cause having therefore been shown. a Subscribed and sworn to as the truth and factual . . ,2 . Contents of the Statement of Probabie Cause. {S?gnamre Nionr SERVICE REQUESTED: YES No 3 {season WARRANT) THE PEOPLE 3F Tm STATE OF CALIFORNIA TO ANY SHEREFF, POLICEMAN GR PEACE EN TEE OF NAPA proof by affidavit having been made before me by Detective Christopher Pacheco that there is probable cause to believe, and do believe that the property described herein may be found at the locations set forth herein and that it is iawfuliy seizable pursuant to Penal Code Section l524 as indicted below by in that it: was stolen or embezzled was used as the means of committing a felony is possessed by a person with the intent to use it as means of committing a public offense or is possessed by another to Whom he/ she may have delivered it for the purpose of concealing it or preventing its discovery. tends to show that a felony has been cornrnitted or that a particular person has committed a felony. tends to show that sexual exploitation of a child, in Violation of PC. Section 311.3 has occurred or is occurring. wl STATE of cariroama, counrv of men, and REQUEST FGR SEAUNG SEARCH Your Af?ant, Detective Chris Pacheco, relates that this Search Warrant sought pursuant to this Search Warrant Affidavit; Statement of Probable Cause and the Return to Search Warrant and all documents relevant to this Search Warrant relate to an err?going investigation of a Kidnapping and Homicide. It is expected that additional Search Warrants will be sought relating to this matter. If information contained in the above listed documents is made public, it would compromise this investigation and make it impossible to continue. Your Af?ant requests that the Search Warrant Af?davit, Statement of Probable Cause and the Return to Search Warrant and all documents relating to this Search Warrant be ordered to be sealed. And that the Search Warrant Af?davit, Statement of Probable Cause and the Return to Search Warrant and all documents relating to this Search Warrant remain sealed and in the custody of the clerk of the court until order of this court or other competent court having jurisdiction over this matter. I declare under penalty of perjury that the related foregoing is true and correct to the best of my knowled? W?iday of dd: radar a s; A (Signature rant) POINTS AUTHORITIES People Sanchez 0972) 24 Cal. App. 3d 664, 678; People Greenstreet (1990) 218 Cal. App. 3d 1516; Swanson Superior Court (1989) 2ll Cal. App. 3d 332. ORDER Based upon the foregoing Declaration and Request and a reading of the original Af?davit; Search Warrant, Statement of Probable Cause, and the Return to Search Warrant thereof referred to above, it is hereby ordered that the Af?davit Search Warrant Statement of Probable Cause and the Return to Search Warrant/git ereof, be sealed and maintained in a secure location in the custody of the clerk of the court ura an of this co or other competent court having jurisdiction over this matter. Curt OfCallfm?ma County ofN Npa Sure?orCOU% gt SM fret DA ADC (REV ?5.06) Form - - 1' -NAPA I PAIGE AGENCY CRIMIN a I SYSTEM AGENCY CASFFORM . 14-1332 m? ARREST KLOUILSI FOR COMPLAINT WARRANT ON VIEW ADULT NOT om? El bV'llON ONLY El VIOLENCE CITIZENS ARREST DATE OF OFITNSF WEAPONS USED WARKAXT ARREST JUVENILE 05 74 14 RELEASED. PC 849th) KARCOTICS OFFEVSF. . SUSPECT NAME IFIRST. MIDDLE. LAST) AKA NICKNAME DL 1* STATE 55 '3 SEX ADDRESS (I I i 3:9 HAIR EYES BRO BRO COLOR 3 . .1 TYPE STYLE LOCATION MODEL I LICENSE a STATE ADDITIONAL DESCRIPTION NAME (PARENTJGUARDIAN, Ir JUVENILE) RELATIONSHIP 1 EMBROEVCYNOTIFICATION NOTIFIED av or ARREST (MUST BE COMPLETED IF JUVENILE) ADDRESS DATE TIME DATEITIME OF BOOKING MK Ol- ARREST ARREST INC: DEPUTY TRANSPORTING DEPUTY RECEIVING OFFICER JAIL E) IUV. HALL CODE SECTION OFFENSE DESCRIPTION l- COURT BAIL AMOLNT PC 207 KIDNAPPING NAPA PC 215 CARJ AC KING NAPA WARRANT CHECKS CONFIRMED av I CUSTODY ALERT 8 LOCAL YES PRO CL STODY RISK UMEDICAL RISK (EXPLAIN) l8 DMV ASSAUI COMBATIVE USUICIDE RISK Bl NO Cl KliliP SEPARATE FROM INAMEI DYES .NO TREATED I le ELOM -.Z.: AUTHORITY . 3w] COPIES TO: i DA. MISDEME ONE OR MORE ADULI ION I ($853.6 CITATION RELEASE EXCEPTION ROB Tl ON lntoxicated state may result in danger to selfor others a Arrested for or \?C23l521b) ID - A The immediate release would jeopardize prosecution There are additional outstanding arrest wurants NSIB Arrested for one or more offenses listed under Arrestcc had no identi?cation DETECTIVES Arrested for one or more offemes or refused to sign promise to appear Release would increase the chance of offense continuing ST KROI. Imminent danger to safety of other persons or property WIC626 PC647 EXCEPTIONS DReason to believe arrestee would fail to appeartExplain) CYA undcr the in?uence of any drug or ol'drugs and alcohol ADMINISTRATION Probable cause to believe anestcc has committed a felony or other misdemeanor 0' Good faith belief arrestee will attempt escape or is dif?cult for medical personnel to control ECONTINUATION PAGE RIBE PROBABLE Al SE TOR 0R CIRCUMSTANCES EADING TO WARRANT WEST (DO NO USE CON PAGE UNLESS ABSOLUTELY NECESSARY) On 03-24-14,-et with Suspect Garcia and l?ovar at jack In the Box In Petaluma where she provided them money. -had many previous contacts with Garcia and it was said he did ?jobs? for her I atcr in the morning she met victim Pacheco at her Rohnert Park business. -had invested 83000-4000 with Pacheco into a pyramid Ponzi scheme In which she lost money -ad brought in investors underneath her who lost money as well On 03~24- i4 ,-requcsted Pacheco drive her to a Kasier appointment in Petaluma. Upon arrival -stated she did not have an appointment and they left the area and drove to a rural spot where they met up with Garcia and Tovar. At that location, Pacheco was beaten, kidnapped and tied up. Garcia, -and Tovar then drove Pacheco away from that site in Pacheco?s Range Rover. They dropped off-at a market near the town of Sonoma. Garcia, Tovar and Norberto Gonzalez used Pacheco?s ATM cards to take money from his account and they eventually killed him by throwing rocks at his head. Pacheco?s vehicle was later sold by Garcia and Tovar for cash. Garcia and Tovar met up with-after selling the vehicle In Vallejo. Garcia left that meeting wit-initially lied to detectives about knowing Pacheco and Garcia Cell phone records show -nd Garcia had phone contact 92 times from 03-18-14 thru 03the homicide Garcia and-tad phone contact 36 times, with 18 of those initiated from hone. Arias contacted Garcia immediately prior to the kidnap and Garcia contacted Ariasjust a?er the murder. CITIZENS ARRESTING CITIZENS NAME (PRINT) HEREBY ARREST THE ABOVE PERSON AND DEMAND BE TAKEN TNTO CUSTODY ARRESI CITIZEN SKIN ATURE DATE I DECLARE UNDER navy/h 07691?? UNDMIE )vf??r THE ST ATE or CALIFORNIA AND PON AND BELIEF THAT no: FOREGOING Is nun: mo CORRLC - DEPUTY V/t/ DEPUTY 3 NAME IPn?m) C. PAC HECO mm 01-12-REVIEWED BY(Signaturc)- M5 1Law/ 0 BY [Punt Name): M) Ly)? L. ,f PAGE NAPA COUNTY CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM ARREST . ARREST a WARRANT ARR-E FERSF MIDCI E. LAST) JUVENILE QIJSPECY: ?/me I MAN AWENTIGUARDIAN. IF LOCATION OF MIN OFFICER 1 CONFIRMED WARRANT wacx LOCAL 0w o; ILLNESSIMURV 5&0:ng ARREST MEDEMEJANC R. ARI-IE srs- CHECK CINE OR MORE BELOW 555 cm: TION Vi). ?ier} sta' we I ray result ItI--. YES UI A. ie 9 mm; '(eC madam or car? 0' ..01 new 0-. woaid' Iapa. dip: B: 0:22 I. am: 302 Jana: . ?61933:ch the or were affenma iszed ?fC 4. Demanded asp?a: I-I mfg-5:11 lL-s .. darger $3827 of are: germ-Is or none II, EXCEPTIGK - Unde: zhsa LII-I .i ccminl-?Ied mine-?CI or under- cause?c a7. . I. Good {aim Dell-35 arres'ee wil! attempt sec; 3- FOP. ma?. ?mm i U7 ER 5 IONA I've .: REF: DY {Sl'q? DAI :2 LII: CF. OFFENSF . .0 NC I or Is Iznseascr-abiy 5 LEAFEIME FORM FOR EN INUI - 33853-435); CAR SIX-HE EMERGENCY NOTIFIED MUST BE IF [5 ARRE5. JAIL, .ws; I 1 OFFII..ER new TREATEC av. AUTHORITY ?a shim: IierQ av?rs'm! warrants; 2 peraI- LII-I I- ease we I. 'c Increasa :?0Ij of?s: JD has a mic-"y I:-r than PC 647)?? . 0875mm? to NABBAFEYE To ARPFS (no ?was f' i,I QLSTODY I . 250 3? d4 3? Im; DICA r- ML: I, I. .- .. ?3.5mm: -II, AIJE N- 33' ME FEFL OFFIL COME .rI-c; V101 FENCE WEAPONS USED NARCOTCS owns: DOB HI -- VEHICLE LOCATEON YES I DATEITIME JUV. HALL my .. COURT COPIES FCI ELLA l; PROBATECIN LE N358 SIM: PAH x2 MIMI-MS 7 FUCICA I ?3 . ATTACHFFRUE My?) CORRECT OER-ISM 1.00minew mom 900m whom qubAM' Ma232014 Tut 'Colo' 3 Yo; up?lo tom I Gama lc- Jams {0.33 Gum: [3 Norm to I FM 3; 'hoomng fem Forbeno to Tow ITcwno Gun-is a C-aruuo uiasllunETowm Gonzalo: Rube?o to Tour a On?: to Tova-r ibrbeno 10 bar {3 Your!? GonzlhIIMllt Fargo ATM a ?rm: to Your Norton) to four 3 0011?on 10m iI trot.? Oak-Mona?: Namerw Tour Gonzahno Tovar "To do Mum to Yovr! ?his to Carri: (1?19) ?3 8m 6 Puma Awnvx to buy MOE lava: Io Gonna: a Towrw wbrno ?Vthar? BTowno comm: to Tour Dope 1m ?Dbok mu up" Tova: Io Norbum ?lmnot'n mpz" Gama 21) Tenano Sonata: 3 Gar-m (11M) '74! Fun mum?: a an: buy suns Chum Irma: .Qo Bird: (1 a Big 5 Ronnm Park a Gard: {-114} allmomu Your? Gonzalez "fo with dUdo? Donatello Tour 0 Gare-u 01$1 Io Gavcia [2,591 noun!? Io Tow 'Flcit n43" I .to Garcia (1:17) Gonzales to Tow a Gltcil to -un) I 0 Oven 10 onnlono Tom oasrda?zml 0 (am: (0'26) Tour 1w pu' {As 23 2014 I I BOOAM 9mm mnom 11mm my: . 0am) I) Town! . Garcia 1? Tow Gawia R) 91:35 {0 -o cam': ?1:271 'm/cu -: r-av .3 "'Ebb?ia'u'tohibmi" I 08rd! var . I amino Garcial??l Barui41omin; [(611) I. Garcia (1 25} Ana: to Daron: [0.18] I boom torn-Tut. Pnont- Crab! I Gama to Tour! You!? Damn via Gut. a? N13: to Garcia [3 a Gavel-loner I Gareato $1 ?Garcia :53 Irma: 55(ch [i 03} _m cm. 8 sum (o-lur) Mano G:rm:[658] E. lilxijlil'lx 170mm ?angry 4039? can: No? Phcno bn: Mauc? mm ?mo/PM?: WI: 1 13 Comm: Phone 5:00 PM 6'00 PM 700 PM 1/20/2015 1/20/2015 NW 2. TY SEERIFF Vf?? . 1200 PM WOW 200 PM {imam am 1? anln) swam) -oxa'ann) l?a?zt; lama-'54; rda?zl?) mam) 106mm?) 5106363093] Mazszma ?mm 1203914 100m 230m 41mm ?563 ilisg5f?lf1 300W mom lama-27) Imam 24) no) Focamaam) E-nomnm 5mm-m) Oman-.49) . 3mm 03MB 0 ?13) Grdno - - (mt) Em e! acme? 503mm In) gag, Li L, 1- L2, may: ., 1.5.9.08?" liH'IH-fl (I llil if I IL: .. . .. NAPA COUNTY DEPARTMENT ss 00 NAT CODE I CA NUMBER . 2 DATE OF THIS REP 3 CRIME CODE 3 as?sgiimmesw .- 0F 6 LOCATION PROPERTY COLLECTED PROPERTY [3 CITATION ROOM TY OTHER ONLY DOB. 20 ADDRESS 2: PHONE 22 PID 3. 23 24 0.0.8. 25 ADDRESS 25 PHONE 27 P10 4. 28 29 COMMENTS FIREARMS HISTORY (10-28) TO BE ATTACHED BY OFFICER 27 1. PROPERTY CODE 2. EVIDENCE FORFEITURE R3 I I \mm I CONTRABAND RECOVERED IN CUSTODY EVIDENCE STOLEN FOUND SEARCH NOT IN STORAGE 3 SAFEKEEPING WARRANT . 8102 (5150 GUNS) 3. PROPERTY CATEGORIES A AUTOMOTIVE PHYSIOLOGICAL FLUIDS PERSONAL ACCESSORY PHOTO LINE - BICYCLE TRACE EVIDENCE CLOTHING 1-- a EQUIP HOUSEHOLD GOODS MUSICAL EQUIP EQUIP MONEY I INDICIA CASSEWES OTHER - METALS O: EQUIP CONSUMABLES I CREDIT CARDS DROP Elie Ti" -, 1 EDGE 2 TYPE 3 CAT ARTICLE . BRAND MODE-L SERIAL NO VALUE 1 ROOM . ?Im?jI TR EMQLW >u2\r~ NE 723- Z. Ev?rkk?rm 3CD I I IQIVE ?ms-ME; CHM mm I"g Raw-?gs ?Drama (3391;) km Hawk. I \3 mm WNW CAMAWL ?bur?n.? ESQ NOTIFICATION OF This form constitutes no ?ificalicn of your rights according to law. Your signature Is not an admission of responsibility but ndicaies that you. have :eceived a copy of this notice. Please review she back of this sheet for an expianalion oi your rights I: FOUND PROPERTY (Required by Cal. Civil Code 2080) I declare under penalty of perjury, that the listed items were found, that all items found have been surrendered and I do no: know the oi Ine true owner. Finder wishes to ciaim iand property afier QC days: [3 YES NO. SIGNATURE - DATE I COLLECTING OFFICER 5 4-1 RRORERTV. LOCKER NO 3 4? DATE ?3 9v 1 ?4 DATE . me OELIVEREC WHITE - PROPERTY ROOM CANARV - MASTER FILE PINK - PROPERTY ROOM GOLDENROD - RECEIPT i NOTIFICATION 0.: RIGHTS. PROPERTY AND EVIDENCE VOUCHER Agency Name Date Time Reported Case No. Napa Shen?s Department CA 040280000 04/02/2014 [6:06 Wed mom?001332 FROM SUSPECTARIAS NSDI4-001332 Address Collecting Of?cer 109 SOUTHWEST BL VD Park, CA (2503 I 4) PA CHE 0, CHRIS Property Description of articles Property No. Control number (Include model, serial 110., Identi?xing marks, etc.) Value 1 187645 35CP- APPLE 6 FRO. 300-00 APPLE 6 Serial No: 354390061 2695 66 WHITE Category: WDENCE Status: EVIDENCE Quantity: 1 2 187648 36CP- SAMSUNG CHROME LAPTOP 3300.00 SAAIISUNG XESOOCU Serial No.2 IBEF 9FBFA22 779 SILVER Category; Status: EVIDENCE Quantity: 3 187654 HP LAPTOP $300.00 HP ZAPTOP Serial No.1 BLACK Category: EVIDENCE Status; EVIDENCE Quantity: I Narrative Of?cer's Name Supervisor Name Case Status (250314) PA CHECO, CHRIS (250120) OR 772, OSCAR Further Investigation Of?cer's Signature Submitted Date Case Disposition \Inunkl DA ADC (REV Form NAPA COUNTY PAGE I OF I AR KESTING AGENCY CRIMINAL SYSTEM AGENCY CASE A ND 3 . Do 604 03? Napa Co ean FORM 144301332 0 TYPE 0F RE LEST FOR COMPLAINT AN 3 (9:111 ?gs ARREST ADULT 0 (NOT CUSTODY) ARR CI DETENTION ONLY 8 WARRANT ARREST JUVENILE DATE OF OFFEME RELEASED, PC 849(6) OFFENSE 03/24/14 SUSPECT NAME (FIRST. MIDDLE. LAST) NICKNAME Norbcnoouemwconzaxez .W RACE sex - TE, ZIP) ADDRESS HT wr 5'06" 160 HAIR EYES BLK BRO HOMI: PHONE LAR COLOR CAR TYPI: STYLE VEHICLE ION WORK PHONE MARE MODEL LICENSE I sure ADDITIONAL DESCRIPTION NAME IPAREN IJUUARDIAN. IF JUVENILE) RELATIONSHIP EMERGENCY NOTIFICATION 3v DA or my (MUST BE COMPLETED IF JUVENILEL ADDRESS DATE TIME OF BOOKING LOCAIION 0F ARREST ARRESTINO DEPUTY TRANSPORTINO DEPUTY JAIL I3 IIAU. CODE SECTION OWENSE DESCRIPTION I CHARGES I em a COURT BAIL AMOUNT PC 1 87 MURDER PC 21 ROBBERY WARRANI CHECKS LONFIRMED ET I CUSTODY ALERT [3 LOCAL 0 YES PROTECTIVE (USIOOY UESCAPF, RISK DMEDICAL RISK CI OMV DSLIICIDE RISK 0 N0 0 KEEP SEPARATE FROM (NAME) EVIDENCEICOMPLAINT or DYES DNO TREATED BY: I {j ARREST 1 BOOKING I COPIES T0: MISDEMEANOR ONE OR MORE BELOW 23011 PROBATION PC8516 CITATION RELEASE EXCEPTION CI JUV PRO cute may resuh in danger to it?ll-Or my? [01 vcz? 0f 152$) BATIO The mam release would jeopardize prosecut?km ?m mum, ?sanding mm ?mm NSIB Arrested for one or mere offenses listed under VL40302I40303 Arrestee had no mm! identi?cation DETECHVES Arrested for one or more offenses or mined to sign promwe to appear - - . Imminent danger to safely ofothcr persons or prop-my B3122: g" mum [he Chance ?one?: STATE PAROLE PC647 EXCEPTIONS UROIISOII to believe Imam would fail to appearIExphinl; CYA 0 under the In?uence ol'any drug or and alcohol ADMINISTRATION Probable cause to believe male: has commillcd a felony or other misdemeanor [3 OTHER El Good aim belicfmec will .ncmpI escape or a ?man for mast-a1 personnel Io control NARRATIVE I UCONI INLATION PAGE DESCRIBE PROBABLE CAUSE FOR 0R CI LEADING IO WARRAN ARREST NOT USE CONTINUATION PAGE UNLESS ABSOLUTELY NECESSARY) On 03/24/14. S-Tovar and his friend S-Miguel Garcia (N ow Deceased), bound and kidnapped Victim Reynaldo Pacheco from Sonoma County. S-Tovar and S-Garcia then stole V-Pacheco's vehicle and drove him to Napa County. Once there, they picked up an associate identi?ed as Gonzalez. Following, the three suspects S-Tovar, S-Garcia and S-Gonzalez took V-Pacheco's wallet and ATM card from his person as he was bound inside the car. They used his ATM card to withdraw money from V-Pachcco?s account. Afterwards, they drove V-Pacheco to a rural area of Napa County as he was still bound in his car. Once there, they walked V-Pachcco down to a creek bed where S-Garcia proceeded to push V-Pacheco into the creek and throw large rocks at his head killing him. S-Tovar was present during the murder and handed S-Garcia rocks to throw at V-Pacheco. S-Gonzalez was in the area with S-Garcia and S?Tovar during the murder and assisted S- Garcia and S-Tovar with events leading up to V-Pacheco?s death. V-Pacheco was located deceased on 04/03/14 at 2470 Sage Canyon Road in Napa County with multiple skull fractures to his head. The autopsy on V-Pacheco indicated he was killed by blunt force trauma to the head. ARREST ARRESTING CITIZENS NAME (PRINT) I HEREBY ARREST THE ABOVE PERSON AND DEMAND BE TAKEN INTO CUSTODY ARRESTING SIGNATURE: DATE: THE SIATE OF CALIFORNIA AND ON INFORMATION AND BELIEF THAT THE FOREGOING ISTRUE AND CORRECT. NAME (Prim; NICOL DUDLEY #303 DATE: 04/15/14 ELEWED Namc)? 05cm it)? DATE: 9-- (I DECLARE UNDER PEN SIGNATURE REVIEWED BY IsIngm-I- - DA ADC (REV ?1586)Me31/De1mnonlComplaIm Form AP A COUNTY PAGE OF I FING AGENCY CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM AGENCY CASE 8 PID '3 df . 32 Napa CO Sheriff CA0280000 FORM 14001332 20 0F ARREST . ON VIEW 5 ADULT 8 REQUEST WARRANT El DETENTION ONLY El DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ARREST WEAPONS USED 0 WARRANT ARREST JUVENILE DATE OF OFFENSE RELEASED. PC 8490:) :1 NARCOTICS OFFENSE 03/24/14 suspm NAME (FIRSI. MIDDLE. LAST) AKA I NICKNAME DL A HATE Mauricio Tovar-Tclles Maurice $5 I: RACE sex HOME ADDRESS (STREET. CITY. STATE. ZIP) BUSINESSISCHOOI. ADDRESS HT WT 5?05" [80 HAIR BLK BRO COLOR CAR TYPE 5 VEHICLE LOCATION MODEL LICENSE ADDITIONAL DESCRIPTION NAME IF JUVENILE) EMERGENCY NOTIFICATION NOTIFIED BY DATUTIMI: or ARREST (MUST BE COMPLETED IF JUVENILE) ADDRESS DATE TIME DATPJTIME OF BOOKJNG LOCATION OF ARREST ARRESTING DEPUTY TRANSPOK DEPUIY RECEIVING OFFICER UJAIL JUV. HALL CODE OFFENSE: DESCRIPTION CHARGES I I COURT AMOUNT PMI PC I 87 MURDER PC 21 ROBBERY WARRANT cuecns CONFIRMED BY CUSTODY ALERT LOCAL YES PROTECTIVE, RISK DMEDICAL RISK (EXPLAIN) DMV DSUICIDE RISK I: No I: KEEP SEPARAIE FROM INAMEI EVIDENCBCOMPLAINT OF ILLNESSIINJURY: UYES ONO TREATED I FELONY ARREST I BOOKING AUTHORITY COPIES TO: MISDEMEANOR ARRESTS-CHECK ONE OR MORE BELOW 2&1 PROBATION PC853.6 CITATION RELEASE EXCEPTION .IUV InIOxkatcd state my resuh In danger to seller others mg? for or VCZS The mumdillc release would jeopardize prove-eunon There an additional outstanding an? WWI NSIB Arrested for one ormon orl'cnm Wed under had no ?mm? idcml?calion DETECTIVES CI Arrested for one or more oll?cnses or refusal to pmnusc to appear Clueless: won? muse the chance continuing STATE PAROLE danger Io safety ot?olhcr persons or property [3 WIC626 PC647 EXCEPTIONS DReuou Io believe anestcc would fail Io WExplaln): CYA 0 mm In?uence ofany or Ind alcohol ADMINISTRATION Probable cause to believe mac has committed a or other OTHER Good l'a'nh belicfarrenee will escape or is di?lcult for medical personnel ho comml NARRATIVE I acorn INUATION PAGE ATTACHED DESCRIBE PROBABLE CAUSE FOR OR CIRCUMSTANCES LEADING TO ARREST (DO NOT USE CONTINUATION PAGE UNLESS ABSOLUTELY NECESSARY) 0n 03/Z4fl4, S?Tovar and his friend S?Miguel Garcia (Now Deceased), bound and kidnapped Victim Reynaldo Pacheco from Sonoma County. S-Tovar and S-Garcia then stole V-Pacheco?s vehicle and drove him to Napa County. Once there, they picked up an associate identi?ed as S-Norberto Gonzalez. Following, the three Suspects S-Tovar, S-Garcia and S-Gonzalez took V-Pacheco's Wallet and ATM card from his person as he was bound inside the car. They used his ATM card to withdraw money from V-Pachcco?s account. Afterwards, they drove V-Pacheco to a rural area of Napa County as he was still bound in his car. Once there. they walked V-Pacheco down to a creek bed where SoGarcia proceeded to push V-Pacheco into the creek and throw large rocks at his head killing him. S-T0var was present during the murder and handed S-Garcia rocks to throw at V-Pacheco. S-Gonzalez was in the area with S-Garcia and S-Tovar during the murder and assisted S- Garcia and S-Tovar with events leading up to V-Pacheco?s death. V-Pacheco was located deceased on 04/03/14 at 2470 Sage Canyon Road in Napa County with multiple skull fractures to his head. The autopsy of V-Pacheco indicated he was killed by blunt force trauma to the head. ARREST ARRESTING NAME (PRINT) I HEREBY ARREST THE ABOVE PERSON AND DEMAND BE TAKEN INTO CUSTODY ARRESTING CITIZENS SIGNATURE: DATE: LAWS F. STATE OF AND UPON INFORMATION AND BELIEF THAT ?It FOREGOING IS TRUE AND CORRECT, I DECLARE UNDER PENALTY PE URY SIGNATURE: A 4- NAME (anl NICOL DUDLEY #303 DATE: 04/15/14 RPVIEWED av Islgmuumz REVIEWED BY (him Name): 045 cm fab?? ?7 diet?: at the tie; one arena is nae STATE of CALEFQRNEA, CGUNTY at NWPWDGC NTS WERE deputy Your Af?ant, Detective Chris Pacheco, relates that this Search Warrant sought pursuant to this Search Warrant Af?davit, Statement of Probable Cause and the Return to Search Warrant and all documents relevant to this Search Warrant relate to an on-going investigation of a Kidnapping and Homicide. it is expected that additional Search Warrants will be sought relating to this matter. if information contained in the above listed documents is made public, it would compromise this investigation and make it impossible to continue. Your Af?ant requests that the Search Warrant Af?davit, Statement of Probable Cause and the Return to Search Warrant and all documents relating to this Search Warrant be ordered to be sealed. And that the Search Warrant Affidavit, Statement of Probable Cause and the Return to Search Warrant and all documents relating to this Search Warrant remain sealed and in the custody of the clerk of the court until order of this court or other competent court having jurisdiction over this matter. 1 declare under penalty of perjury that the related foregoing is true and correct to the best of my Signat?w t??Af?ant) AUTHORITIES zany of at -i?..337?3 PM. People Sanchez (1972) 24Cal. App. 3d 664, 678; People Greenstreet (1990) 218 Cal. App. 3d 1516; Swanson Superior Court (1989) 211 Cal. App. 3d 332. ORDER Based upon the foregoing Declaration and Request and a reading of the original Affidavit, Search Warrant, Statement of Probable Cause, and the Return to Search Warrant thereof referred to above, it is hereby ordered that the Affidavit, Search Warrant, Statement of Probable Cause and the Return to Search Warrant thereof, be sealed and maintained in a secure location in the custody of the clerk of the court til further order of this court or other competent court having jurisdiction over this @55ru7 a? dayof 22F FMQ KS/(gnature of h/lagistrate) Judge of the Superior Court of California, County of Napa, Superior Court. w?iow DISPOSITION OF ARREST AND COURT ACTION NAPA SUPERIOR COURT Defendant Name: Gonzalez Norberto Guerrero Filing Date: 04/28/2014 Court File No.: CR170589 Number: 201300607-05 Action Type: Nolo Plea Report Type: Original Disposition AKA: Guer'em. Norberto Reported to DOJ: 02/13/2016 PERSONAL INFORMATION Sec sage: LE 1m Number St_ate LAW ENFORCEMENT INFORMATION Arresting Agency Cite/Report Booking gency File Napa Sheriff's Office 14-001332 Arrest Date: 03/24/2014 Charges: PC187 - Type: CHARGE INFORMATION Count File Level Section/ Code/ Literal 1 Felony - Murder (Definition) No Bail Disposition: 10/29/2015 Dismissal - Motion of People Dispo Level: Felony 3 Felony - Kidnapping to Commit Robbery/Rape (No Bail) Disposition: 10/29/2015 Dismissal - Motion of People Dispo Level: Felony 5 Felony - Kidnapping (No Bail) Disposition: 10/29/2015 Nolo Plea Dispo Level: Felony 5 Allegation - Enhancement-Personal Use of a Firearm Disposition: 10/29/2015 Proven Dispo Level: Allegation 6 Felony PC211 - Robbery (Definition) Disposition: 10/29/2015 Nolo Plea Dispo Level: Felony 7 Felony - Assault by Means to Produce GBI Disposition: 10/29/2015 Nolo Plea Dispo Level: Felony SENTENCE INFORMATION 999111. 2:113 130?; 5 12/23/2015 State Prison Length: 8 Years 5 12/23/2015 Restitution Amount: $300.00 5 12/23/2015 Court Security Fee Amount: $40.00 5 12/23/2015 Criminal Conviction Assessment Fee Amount: $30.00 6 12/23/ 2015 State Prison Length: 1 Year Consecutive w/ Count 5 6 12/23/2015 Court Security Fee Amount: $40.00 6 12/23/2015 Criminal Conviction Assessment Fee Amount: $30.00 7 12/23/2015 State Prison Length: 1 Year Consecutive w/ Count - 5 12/23/2015 Court Security Fee Amount: $40.00 12/23/2015 Criminal Conviction Assessment Fee Amount: $30.00 12/23/2015 State Prison Length: 10 Years Consecutive w/ Count 5 Defendant Name: Gonzalez Norberto Guerrero Court File No.: CR170589 02/14/2016 9:55 pm DISPOSITION OF ARREST AND COURT ACTION NAPA SUPERIOR COURT Defendant Name: Gonzalez Norberto Guerrero Court File No.: CR170589 02/14/2016 9:55 pm DISPOSITEON OF ARREST AND COURT ACTEON l?1??l09m NAPA COURT Defendant Name: Tovar'l'elles Mauricio Filing Date: 04/28/2014 Court File No.: CR170590 FED Number: 201400732-04 Action Type; Noio Plea Report Type: Original Disposition AKA: Reported to 00.1: 02/13/2016 PERSONAL 335;, Race: L135 99; Lip; Number State Male Hispanic 5'5" 06/ 1 5/1 990 LAW ENFORCEMENT Arresting Agency Cite/Report Booking Agency File Napa Sheriff?s Office 14-001332 Arrest Date: 03/24/2014 Charges: PC187 - pc187 Type: CHARGE Dispo Level: Felony - Kidnapping During Carjacking {No Bail) Dispo Level: Felony - Kidnapping to Commit Robbery/Rape (No Bail) Dispo Level: Felony Dispo Level: Felony Dispo Level: Felony Count File Level Section Code/Literal 1 Felony P1218705.) Murder (Definition) No Bail Disposition: 10/ 29/ 2015 Noio Plea 2 Felony Disposition: 10/29/2015 Dismissal Motion of People 3 Felony Disposition: 10/29/2015 Dismissal - Motion of People 4 Felony Carjacking Disposition: 10/29/2015 Dismissal - Motion of People 5 Felony - Kidnapping (No Bail) Disposition: 30/29/2015 Dismissal - Motion of People 6 Felony PC2211 - Robbery (Definition) Disposition: 10/29/20i5 Dismissal - Motion of People Dispo Level: Felony SENTENCE INFORMATION Rein LEE 1 12/231 201 5 State Prison - Years To Life 1 12/23/2015 Court Security Fee 1 12/23/2015 Criminal Conviction Assessment Fee Length: 15 Years Amount: $40.00 Amount: $30.00 Defendant Name: TovarTelles Mauricio 02/14/2016 9:55 pm Court File No.: CR170590 NAPA COUNTY DEPARTMENT APPLICATION FOR RELEASE OF INFORMATION ll DATE OF OCCURRENCE TYPE OF REPORT REPORT NUMBER (if known) i f? TRAFFIC COLLISION [1 PHOTOS i I JC) {?in LOCATION OF OCCURRENCE NAME OF INVOLVED PERSON DATE OF APPLICATION ONE) [3 PERSON INVOLVED (circle ODE) REPRESENTATTVE OF INSURANCE COMPANY Driver Passenger Pedestrian Victim OR INSURANCE ADJUSTING AGENCY PROPERTY OWNER ATTORNEY AUTHORIZED INDIVIDUAL ROI-HER PARTY OF INTER ST piggy; (Signed Authorization Is Required) Afr 5' .2 Cl OF JUVENILE PARTY CERTIFICATION I declare under the penalty of perjury that . . . I am I represent El I am an attorney representing the party of interest identi?ed?i?ngbeteport recorded hereon. ADDRESS, Released by: Date 4 I (D lapel/Jr mam 4mm . Ugjwr [bf-?3"x/x?4/?1J1..-) i WOO Gary Lieberstein if 55"} District Attorney .. . A Paul Gero i 1? Iii-Ki . Al 15 A Assistant District Attorney (it f} ii): 2015 State Bar NO. 191199 (I: OLE - 1 tiziHlUH COURT at imU? SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF NAPA NSC CR170589 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNI: ff CR170590 ainti NDA 201300607-05 201400732-04 VS. ORDER FOR RELEASE OF PROPERTY NORBERTO GUERRERO GONZALEZ, AKA NORBERTO GUERRERO (DOB: 01/12/1985), MAURICIO TOVAR-TELLES, Defendant(s). TO THE NAPA DEPARTMENT: Good Cause having been shown, it is ordered that the following item seized pursuant to Search Warrant be released from police custody for the purpose of returning it to its rightful owner: 1. 2006 Landrover SUV 2. Samsung Galaxy cell phone (ND-1) 3. Laptop ?Macbook? (NV-32) n. STONE Judge, Napa superior??ourt Page 1 Gary Lieberstein E: District Attorney Paul Gero Assistant District Attorney AUG 15 2015 BY SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF NAPA NSC NUMBERIS): CR170589 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CR170590 Plaintiff, NDA 201300607-05 201400732-04 VS. REQUEST FOR RELEASE OF NORBERTO GUERRERO GONZALEZ, PROPERTY AKA NORBERTO GUERRERO (DOB: 01/12/1986), MAURICIO TOVAR-TELLES, Defendant(s). REQUEST FOR RELEASE OF PROPERTY Items were seized pursuant to Search Warrant from the premises described as 1580 Wenfield' Street, Dixon, California, and the crime scene in Napa County, California. These items are retained in the custody of the Napa Sheriff?s Department, pursuant to Penal Code Section 1536. The People seek the release of the following items from police custody: 1. 2006 Landrover SUV 2. Samsung Galaxy cell phone (ND-1) 3. Laptop ?Macbook? (NV-32) Page 1 (.0 mgngOcpmummAmN?soomummhcom-to The proposed disposition of this item upon its release is to return it to its rightful owner. WHEREFORE, the People seek the release of this item. I swear under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct to the best of my information and belief. Dated: August 11, 2016 RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, GARY District Attorney ?4 My By: PAUL GERO . Assistant District Attorney Attorneys for Plaintiff Page 2 Released To: (250120) OSCAR Property Signature Receipt Transaction: CHECK OUT at 08/18/2016 09:47:58 by User DSTEELE Printed:08/18/2016 09:52:15 User: Released By: (250081) STEELE, DEANNA Property 10 Case Description Quantity UM Value 170033 NSD14-001332 SAMSUNG SGH M819N SAMSUNG 1.00 $1.00 SGH M819N SN: 358865050649106 170882 NSD14-001332 NV-32 LAPTOP COMPUTER APPLE 1.00 $1.00 Release {elease By 3005 MACBOOK AIR 201 SN: .lwc" Release To {elease Bv A CFC Date Date Date .3 0.. - 8/08? K??c?f Page 1 of 1 Fingerprinted 1 ARREST REPORT 1 ORI # 2 AGENCY NAME CA0280000 X2 3a. ARREST # Napa Sheriff's Department 1 Yes 2 No 3b CASE # 4 SFX NSD14-001332 0020066359 5 LAST, FIRST, MIDDLE NAME R84 Completed Yes No 6 ALIAS AKA Real 7 SEX 1 M 2 F 8 RACE 1 W 2 B 9 HGT. 10 WGT. 3 A 4 I 5'04 X 15 PLACE OF BIRTH (CITY, COUNTY, STATE) 11 EYE 12 HAIR BRO 180 13 SKIN 14 1 SCARS 2 MARKS 3 TATTOOS 4 AMPUTATIONS BRO 16 SSN 17 18 AGE TE OF BIRTH 19 MISCELLANEOUS ID # 41 20 SID # 21 FINGERPRINT CLASS KEY MAJOR PRIMARY SCDV SUB-SECONDARY 23 ST CA HENRY CLASS 24 FBI # 201500101 22 DL # FINAL 25 IDENTIFICATION COMMENTS NCIC CLASS 26 1 RESIDENT 28 RESIDENCE PHONE 27 HOME ADDRESS (STREET, CITY, STATE, ZIP) 29 OCCUPATION (BE SPECIFIC) X 2 NON-RESIDENT 30 EMPLOYER (NAME OF COMPANY/SCHOOL) 31 BUSINESS ADDRESS (STREET, CITY, STATE, ZIP) 33 LOCATION OF ARREST (STREET, CITY, STATE, ZIP) 34 SECTOR # 32 BUSINESS PHONE 35 ARRESTED FOR YOUR JURISDICTION? 1 2 36 CONDITION OF ARRESTEE: 1 DRUNK 3 SOBER 2 DRINKING 4 DRUGS 41 DATE OF ARREST 11:10 X Fel - Carjacking 2 MISD 48 CHARGE-2 X 2 MISD X 2 MISD 1 FEL 1 FEL 1 FEL 1 FEL MIL. 43 DAY OF ARREST S M T W T 1 2 3 4 5 120 1 X 100 1 S 7 TAKEN INTO CUSTODY/WAR 40 DESCRIPTION OF WEAPON X 2 N 45 ARRESTED BEFORE? 1 YES 2 NO 3 UNKNOWN X 51 WARRANT # DISPOSITION 52 DATE ISSUED 54 WARRANT # DISPOSITION 55 DATE ISSUED 61 WARRANT # DISPOSITION 62 DATE ISSUED 64 WARRANT # DISPOSITION 65 DATE ISSUED 02/14/2006 207 (A) PC 02/14/2006 LOCAL 02/14/2006 CHRG CNT 59 UCR CODE 63 STATE CODE/LOCAL ORD. 68 ARRESTED WITH (1) ACCOMPLICE (FULL NAME) Total Charges this Arrest: (3) 66 ARREST DISPOSITION 69 ARRESTED WITH (2) ACCOMPLICE (FULL NAME) Felony 70 VYR 44 TYPE ARREST F 6 NO 215 (A) PC 999 1 1 Y 3 ARRESTEE CHRG CNT 57 UCR CODE 60 STATE CODE/LOCAL ORD. 2 MISD 39 ARMED? 1 NONE CHRG CNT 49 UCR CODE 53 STATE CODE/LOCAL ORD. Fel - Local Warrant 58 CHARGE-4 X 3 38 INJURIES? 2 OFFICER 2 NO CHRG CNT 47 UCR CODE 50 STATE CODE/LOCAL ORD. Fel - Kidnapping 56 CHARGE-3 1 YES 42 TIME OF ARREST 1 1. AM 2 2. PM 01/13/2015 46 CHARGE-1 37 RESIST ARREST? YES IN STATE OUT STATE AGENCY 71 VMA 72 VMO 73 VST 74 VCO 75 TAG # TOP 76 LIS 77 LIY BOTTOM 78 VIN 79 IMPOUNDED? 1 YES 2 NO VEHICLE RELATED TO: 80 STORAGE LOCATION/IMPOUND # VEHICLE RELATION: 81 OTHER EVIDENCE SEIZED/PROPERTY SEIZED CONTINUED IN NARRATIVE 82 JUVENILE DISPOSITION: 1 HANDLED AND RELEASED 3 REF. TO WELFARE AGENCY 2 REF. TO JUVENILE COURT 4 REF. TO OTHER POLICE AGENCY 83 RELEASED TO 5 REF. TO ADULT COURT 84 PARENT OR GUARDIAN (LAST, FIRST, MIDDLE NAME) 85 ADDRESS (STREET, CITY, STATE, ZIP) 86 PHONE 87 PARENTS EMPLOYER 89 ADDRESS (STREET, CITY, STATE, ZIP) 90 PHONE 88 OCCUPATION 91 DATE AND TIME OF RELEASE 92 RELEASING OFFICER NAME 93 AGENCY/DIVISION 94 ID # 1 AM 3 MIL. 2 PM 95 RELEASED TO 96 AGENCY/DIVISION 98 PERSONAL PROPERTY RELEASED TO ARRESTEE 1 YES 2 NO 3 97 AGENCY ADDRESS 99 PROPERTY NOT RELEASED/HELD AT: 100 PROPERTY # PARTIAL 101 REMARKS (NOTE ANY INJURIES AT TIME OF RELEASE) LOCAL USE 102 SIGNATURE OF RECEIVING OFFICER MULTIPLE CASES CLOSED 104 CASE # 111 ARRESTING OFFICER (LAST, FIRST, M.) Pacheco, Chris 103 SIGNATURE OF RELEASING OFFICER 105 SFX 112 ID # 250314 106 CASE # 113 ARRESTING OFFICER (LAST, FIRST, M.) 107 SFX STATE USE 108 CASE # 114 ID # 109 SFX 115 SUPERVISOR Wilson 110 ADDITIONAL CASES CLOSED NARRATIVE Y N 116 WATCH CMDR. ID # 250134 ID # Fingerprinted 1 ARREST REPORT 1 ORI # 2 AGENCY NAME CA0280000 X2 3a. ARREST # Napa Sheriff's Department X 8 RACE 1 W 2 B 4 SFX NSD14-001332 Real Name: Guerrero, Norberto Gonzalez - 9 HGT. 3 A 4 I 2 No 6 ALIAS AKA Gonzalez, Norberto 7 SEX 1 M 2 F 1 Yes 3b CASE # 0020066361 5 LAST, FIRST, MIDDLE NAME R84 Completed Yes No 10 WGT. 5'06 11 EYE 12 HAIR BRO 160 13 SKIN 14 1 SCARS 2 MARKS 3 TATTOOS 4 AMPUTATIONS BLK 15 PLACE OF BIRTH (CITY, COUNTY, STATE) 16 SSN 17 D TE OF BIRTH 18 AGE 19 MISCELLANEOUS ID # 29 20 SID # 21 FINGERPRINT CLASS KEY MAJOR PRIMARY SCDV SUB-SECONDARY 23 ST CA HENRY CLASS 24 FBI # 201300607 22 DL # FINAL 25 IDENTIFICATION COMMENTS NCIC CLASS X2 NON-RESIDENT 26 28 RESIDENCE PHONE 27 HOME ADDRESS (STREET, CITY, STATE, ZIP) RESIDENT 30 EMPLOYER (NAME OF COMPANY/SCHOOL) 31 BUSINESS ADDRESS (STREET, CITY, STATE, ZIP) 33 LOCATION OF ARREST (STREET, CITY, STATE, ZIP) 34 SECTOR # ARRESTEE: 1 2 1 DRUNK 3 SOBER 2 DRINKING 4 DRUGS 41 DATE OF ARREST 1 YES 13:07 X Fel - Murder 2 MISD 48 CHARGE-2 2 MISD 1 FEL 37 RESIST ARREST? 42 TIME OF ARREST 1 1. AM 2 2. PM 01/27/2015 46 CHARGE-1 X 3 MIL. X 38 INJURIES? 2 OFFICER 2 NO 43 DAY OF ARREST S M T W T 1 2 3 4 5 X 09A 44 TYPE ARREST F 6 S 7 ON-VIEW ARREST/PROB 120 1 NO 40 DESCRIPTION OF WEAPON X 2 N 45 ARRESTED BEFORE? 1 YES 2 NO 3 UNKNOWN X 51 WARRANT # DISPOSITION 52 DATE ISSUED 54 WARRANT # DISPOSITION 55 DATE ISSUED 187 (A) PC 02/14/2006 CHRG CNT 49 UCR CODE 53 STATE CODE/LOCAL ORD. Fel - Robbery 1 Y 3 ARRESTEE YES IN STATE OUT STATE AGENCY 39 ARMED? 1 NONE CHRG CNT 47 UCR CODE 50 STATE CODE/LOCAL ORD. 1 1 FEL 32 BUSINESS PHONE 35 ARRESTED FOR YOUR JURISDICTION? 1125 3rd St Napa, Ca 94558 36 CONDITION OF 29 OCCUPATION (BE SPECIFIC) (707)307-8075 211 PC 02/14/2006 56 CHARGE-3 1 FEL 2 MISD CHRG CNT 57 UCR CODE 60 STATE CODE/LOCAL ORD. 61 WARRANT # DISPOSITION 62 DATE ISSUED 58 CHARGE-4 1 FEL 2 MISD CHRG CNT 59 UCR CODE 63 STATE CODE/LOCAL ORD. 64 WARRANT # DISPOSITION 65 DATE ISSUED 68 ARRESTED WITH (1) ACCOMPLICE (FULL NAME) Total Charges this Arrest: (2) 66 ARREST DISPOSITION 69 ARRESTED WITH (2) ACCOMPLICE (FULL NAME) Felony 70 VYR 71 VMA 72 VMO 73 VST 74 VCO 75 TAG # TOP 76 LIS 77 LIY BOTTOM 78 VIN 79 IMPOUNDED? 1 YES 2 NO VEHICLE RELATED TO: 80 STORAGE LOCATION/IMPOUND # VEHICLE RELATION: 81 OTHER EVIDENCE SEIZED/PROPERTY SEIZED CONTINUED IN NARRATIVE 82 JUVENILE DISPOSITION: 1 HANDLED AND RELEASED 3 REF. TO WELFARE AGENCY 2 REF. TO JUVENILE COURT 4 REF. TO OTHER POLICE AGENCY 83 RELEASED TO 5 REF. TO ADULT COURT 84 PARENT OR GUARDIAN (LAST, FIRST, MIDDLE NAME) 85 ADDRESS (STREET, CITY, STATE, ZIP) 86 PHONE 87 PARENTS EMPLOYER 89 ADDRESS (STREET, CITY, STATE, ZIP) 90 PHONE 88 OCCUPATION 91 DATE AND TIME OF RELEASE 92 RELEASING OFFICER NAME 93 AGENCY/DIVISION 94 ID # 1 AM 3 MIL. 2 PM 95 RELEASED TO 96 AGENCY/DIVISION 98 PERSONAL PROPERTY RELEASED TO ARRESTEE 1 YES 2 NO 3 97 AGENCY ADDRESS 99 PROPERTY NOT RELEASED/HELD AT: 100 PROPERTY # PARTIAL 101 REMARKS (NOTE ANY INJURIES AT TIME OF RELEASE) LOCAL USE 102 SIGNATURE OF RECEIVING OFFICER MULTIPLE CASES CLOSED 104 CASE # 111 ARRESTING OFFICER (LAST, FIRST, M.) Dudley, Nicol 103 SIGNATURE OF RELEASING OFFICER 105 SFX 112 ID # 250303 106 CASE # 113 ARRESTING OFFICER (LAST, FIRST, M.) 107 SFX STATE USE 108 CASE # 114 ID # 109 SFX 115 SUPERVISOR Ortiz 110 ADDITIONAL CASES CLOSED NARRATIVE Y N 116 WATCH CMDR. ID # 250120 ID # Fingerprinted 1 ARREST REPORT 1 ORI # 2 AGENCY NAME CA0280000 X2 3a. ARREST # Napa Sheriff's Department X 8 RACE 1 W 2 B 2 No 4 SFX NSD14-001332 6 ALIAS AKA Mauricio Telles Tovar, Mauricio 7 SEX 1 M 2 F 1 Yes 3b CASE # 0020066362 5 LAST, FIRST, MIDDLE NAME R84 Completed Yes No 9 HGT. 3 A 4 I 10 WGT. 5'05 11 EYE 12 HAIR BRO 180 13 SKIN 14 1 SCARS 2 MARKS 3 TATTOOS 4 AMPUTATIONS BLK 15 PLACE OF BIRTH (CITY, COUNTY, STATE) 16 SSN 17 18 AGE ATE OF BIRTH 19 MISCELLANEOUS ID # 24 20 SID # 21 FINGERPRINT CLASS A29719011 KEY MAJOR PRIMARY SCDV SUB-SECONDARY HENRY CLASS 24 FBI # X2 RESIDENT NON-RESIDENT 26 25 IDENTIFICATION COMMENTS 28 RESIDENCE PHONE 27 HOME ADDRESS (STREET, CITY, STATE, ZIP) 30 EMPLOYER (NAME OF COMPANY/SCHOOL) 33 LOCATION OF ARREST (STREET, CITY, STATE, ZIP) 34 SECTOR # 3 SOBER 2 DRINKING 4 DRUGS X X 2 MISD X 3 MIL. 43 DAY OF ARREST S M T W T 1 2 3 4 5 09A 1 1 FEL 38 INJURIES? 2 OFFICER 2 NO 35 ARRESTED FOR YOUR JURISDICTION? X 44 TYPE ARREST F 6 S 7 ON-VIEW ARREST/PROB 120 1 NO 40 DESCRIPTION OF WEAPON X 2 N 45 ARRESTED BEFORE? YES 2 NO 3 UNKNOWN X 51 WARRANT # DISPOSITION 52 DATE ISSUED 54 WARRANT # DISPOSITION 55 DATE ISSUED 187 (A) PC 02/14/2006 CHRG CNT 49 UCR CODE 53 STATE CODE/LOCAL ORD. Fel - Robbery 1 Y 3 ARRESTEE YES IN STATE OUT STATE AGENCY 39 ARMED? 1 NONE CHRG CNT 47 UCR CODE 50 STATE CODE/LOCAL ORD. Fel - Murder 48 CHARGE-2 1 YES 13:10 2 MISD 1 FEL 37 RESIST ARREST? 42 TIME OF ARREST 1 1. AM 2 2. PM 01/27/2015 46 CHARGE-1 32 BUSINESS PHONE 1 2 1 DRUNK 41 DATE OF ARREST 29 OCCUPATION (BE SPECIFIC) 31 BUSINESS ADDRESS (STREET, CITY, STATE, ZIP) 1125 3rd St Napa, Ca 94558 ARRESTEE: 23 ST NCIC CLASS 129505CD5 36 CONDITION OF 201400732 22 DL # FINAL 211 PC 02/14/2006 56 CHARGE-3 1 FEL 2 MISD CHRG CNT 57 UCR CODE 60 STATE CODE/LOCAL ORD. 61 WARRANT # DISPOSITION 62 DATE ISSUED 58 CHARGE-4 1 FEL 2 MISD CHRG CNT 59 UCR CODE 63 STATE CODE/LOCAL ORD. 64 WARRANT # DISPOSITION 65 DATE ISSUED 68 ARRESTED WITH (1) ACCOMPLICE (FULL NAME) Total Charges this Arrest: (2) 66 ARREST DISPOSITION 69 ARRESTED WITH (2) ACCOMPLICE (FULL NAME) Felony 70 VYR 71 VMA 72 VMO 73 VST 74 VCO 75 TAG # TOP 76 LIS 77 LIY BOTTOM 78 VIN 79 IMPOUNDED? 1 YES 2 NO VEHICLE RELATED TO: 80 STORAGE LOCATION/IMPOUND # VEHICLE RELATION: 81 OTHER EVIDENCE SEIZED/PROPERTY SEIZED CONTINUED IN NARRATIVE 82 JUVENILE DISPOSITION: 1 HANDLED AND RELEASED 3 REF. TO WELFARE AGENCY 2 REF. TO JUVENILE COURT 4 REF. TO OTHER POLICE AGENCY 83 RELEASED TO 5 REF. TO ADULT COURT 84 PARENT OR GUARDIAN (LAST, FIRST, MIDDLE NAME) 85 ADDRESS (STREET, CITY, STATE, ZIP) 86 PHONE 87 PARENTS EMPLOYER 89 ADDRESS (STREET, CITY, STATE, ZIP) 90 PHONE 88 OCCUPATION 91 DATE AND TIME OF RELEASE 92 RELEASING OFFICER NAME 93 AGENCY/DIVISION 94 ID # 1 AM 3 MIL. 2 PM 95 RELEASED TO 96 AGENCY/DIVISION 98 PERSONAL PROPERTY RELEASED TO ARRESTEE 1 YES 2 NO 3 97 AGENCY ADDRESS 99 PROPERTY NOT RELEASED/HELD AT: 100 PROPERTY # PARTIAL 101 REMARKS (NOTE ANY INJURIES AT TIME OF RELEASE) LOCAL USE 102 SIGNATURE OF RECEIVING OFFICER MULTIPLE CASES CLOSED 104 CASE # 111 ARRESTING OFFICER (LAST, FIRST, M.) Dudley, Nicol 103 SIGNATURE OF RELEASING OFFICER 105 SFX 112 ID # 250303 106 CASE # 113 ARRESTING OFFICER (LAST, FIRST, M.) 107 SFX STATE USE 108 CASE # 114 ID # 109 SFX 115 SUPERVISOR Ortiz 110 ADDITIONAL CASES CLOSED NARRATIVE Y N 116 WATCH CMDR. ID # 250120 ID #