UNITED STATES SENATE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY QUESTIONNAIRE FOR NOMINEE TO THE SUPREME COURT EilBiiIC 1. mama: State full name (include any former names used). Amy Coney Barrett Amy Vivian Coney 2. Eaajlian: State the position for which you have been nominated. Associate Justice, Supreme Court of the United States 3. 3111122551 List current of?ce address. lt?eity and state of residence dil??ers from your place of employment, please list the city and state where you currently reside. Robert K. Rodibaugh United States Courthouse 401 South Michigan Street South Bend, Indiana 46601 4. W: State year and place of birth. 1972: New Orleans. Louisiana 5. Malian: List in reverse chronological order each college, law school, or any other institution of higher education attended and indicate For each the dates of attendance, whether a degree was received, and the date each degree was received. 1994 1997': Notre Dame Law School; JD. (summa cum fonds), 1997 1990 1994: Rhodes College; BA. (magna cum lauds), 1994 6. Emalaynianl List in reverse chronological order all governmental agencies, business or professional corporations. companies, ?rms, or other enterprises, partnerships, institutions or organizations, non-pro?t or otherwise, with which you have been affiliated as an of?cer, director, partner, proprietor, or employee since graduation from college, whether or not you received payment for your services. include the name and address of the employer and job title or description. 2017 -- present United States Court ol?Appeals for the Seventh Circuit Everett McKinley Dirksen United States Courthouse 219 South Dearborn Street, Room 2722 Chicago, Illinois 60604 Circuit Judge 2002 present Notre Dame Law School 3165 Eek Hall ofLaw Notre Dame, Indiana 46556 Professor of Law (2002 2017) Adjunct (2017 - present) October 16 November 1, 2007 University of Virginia School of Law 580 assie Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22903 Visiting Associate Professor of Law 2001 2002 George Washington University Law School 2000 Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20052 John M. Olin Fellow in Law Spring 2001 George Washington University Law School 2000 Street, NW. Washington, DC. 20052 Adjunct Faculty Member 2001 Baker Botts 1299 Avenue, NW. Washington, DC. 20004 Associate 1999 2000 Miller, Cassidy, Larroca 8: Lewin L.L.P. (Mtiler, {l'nssz'dy merged with Baker Ben?s LLP. in 2001) 2555 Street, NW. Washington, DC. 2003? Associate 1998 1999 Honorable Antonin Scalia Supreme Court of the United States One First Street, N.F. Washington, DC. 20543 Law Clerk. 199'? 1998 Honorable Laurence H. Silberman United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit 333 Constitution Avenue, NW. Washington, DC 2000] Law Clerk Summer 1997 Covington Burling LLP One CityCenter 850 10th Street, NW. Washington, 11C. 20001 Summer Associate Summer 1996 Liskow Lewis One Shell Square 701 Poydras Street, Suite 5000 New Orleans, Louisiana ?0139 Summer Associate Summer 1996 Stone Pigman Walther Wittmann LLC 546 Carondelet Street New Orleans, Louisiana 70130 Summer Associate 1995 1996 Notre Dame Law School Eek Hall of Law Notre Dame, Indiana 46556 Research Assistant, Professor William K. Kelley Summer 1995 Liskow Lewis (Jne Shell Square 701 Poydras Street, Suite 5000 New Orleans, Louisiana 70139 Summer Associate Summer 1995 Phelps Dunbar LLP 365 Canal Street, Suite 2000 New Orleans. Louisiana 70130 Summer Associate Summer 1994 Phelps Dunbar LLP 365 Canal Street, Suite 2000 New Orleans, Louisiana 70130 Administrative Assistant Other Affiliations Although not necessarily responsive to the question, out of an abundance of caution, I note that in May 2014, undertook a single consulting project on behalf of the Gerson Lehrman Group. Contact information is provided below: May 2014 Gerson Lehrman Group 60 East 42nd Street, 3rd Floor New York, New York 10165 7. Military Semigg and Draft Status: Identify any service in the Military, including dates of service, branch of service, rank or rate, serial number (if different from social security number) and type ofdischarge received, and whether you have registered for selective service. 1 have not served in the military. I was not required to register for the selective service. 3. Honors and Awards: List any scholarships, fellowships, honorary degrees, academic or professional honors, honorary society memberships, military awards, and any other special recognition for outstanding service or achievement. The Green Bag Almanac and Reader, Honoree for Exemplary Legal Writing 2019: Judicial Opinions (2020) Alumna ofthe Year, St. Mary?s Dominican High School (2018) Distinguished Alumnus of the Year, Archdiocese of New Orleans (2018) Notre Dame Law School Distinguished Professor of the Year {2006, 2.016, and 2018) St. Thomas More Award, St. Thomas More Society, Dallas, 'Iiexas {2018) Diane MO. Miller, 11 Research Chair in Law (2014 2017) Provost Featured Faculty at the University of Notre Dame (2016) Degree from Notre Dame Law School conferred summa cum [nude (199?) l-lovnes Prize (awarded to the Notre Dame Law School graduate with the best record in scholarship, deportment, and achievement) Dean?s Award (best exam): Administrative Law, Civil Procedure 1, Civil Procedure 11. Constitutional Law, Contracts, Criminal Procedure, Evidence, First Amendment, Torts Legal Research, and Legal Writing (1994 1097?) Kiley Fellow (full-tuition fellowship to Notre Dame Law School) (1994 1097) Degree from Rhodes College conferred magna cum loads (1994) Most Outstanding English Major (1994) Most Outstanding Senior Thesis (1994} Phi Beta Kappa (1994) Mortar Board (1994) Omicron Delta Kappa (1994) 9. Ba Associations: List all bar associations or legal or judicial-related committees, selection panels or conferences of which. you are or have been a member, and give the titles and dates of any offices which you have held in such groups. Advisory Committee on Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure (2010 2016] American Association of Law Schools Civil Procedure Section (2003 ?2017) Constitutional Law Section (2008 2017} Executive Board (2009 201 1) Evidence Section (2008 2017} Federal Courts Section (2008 2017) Chair-Elect (2017) Law Religion (2008 2017) Legislation Law ol?the Political Process (2008 2017) Women in Legal Education (2008 2017) American Law Institute (2018 present) Torts: Defamation and Privacy Subcommittee {2019 present} Federalist Societyr For Law Public Policy Studies (2005 a 2006, 2014 20] US. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit Bankruptcy Search Committee (2018 present) Northern District 01? Illinois (2019) Southern District of Indiana (2018) Eastern District of Wisconsin (20 3) Clerk of Court Hiring Committee [2020) Court Rules Committee (2018 present) Deputy Circuit Executive Hiring Committee (2020) Federal Judicial Center Seventh Circuit Workshop Planning Committee [3018 2019) Internal Rules Committee (2018 present) Judicial Council (2017 present) Pattern Civil Jury Instruction Committee (2019 present) Rules o't?Practiee and Procedure (.2018 present) Solicitor Generalis Resolution Committee to Honor Antonin Scalia (2016) 10. ll. Wanna: a. List the datets) you were admitted to the bar ot?any state and any lapses in membership. List any state in which you applied for reciprocal admission without taking the bar examination and the date ol?sneh admission or refusal of such admission. Please explain the reason for any lapse in membership. Virginia, 2000 District oi" Columbia, 2001 There have been no lapses in my membership in the Virginia bar. From 2002 (when I began teaching) until 2017, maintained ?associate member" status in Virginia. After taking the bench, I took ?judicial member? status. I had no lapses in membership in the District of Columbia bar before I became a judge. After taking the bench, I decided not to renew my membership in the District of Columbia Bar, and my membership status is listed as ?resigned? as ot?20l 3. b. List all courts in which you have been admitted to practice, including dates of admission and any lapses in membership. Please explain the reason for any lapse in membership. Give the same information for administrative bodies that require special admission to practice. I do not have records ol?the courts in which I was admitted to practice while at Miller, Cassidy, Larocca Lewin L.L.P., and Baker Botts L.L.P. mrs' a. List all professional, business, fraternal, scholarly, civic, charitable, or other organizations, other than those listed in response to Questions 9 or 10 to which you belong. or to which you have belonged, or in which you have participated, From the beginning ot'law school. Provide dates 01" membership or participation, and indicate any of?ce you held. ?Participation? means consistent or repeated involvement in a given organization, membership. or regular attendance at events or meetings. lnclude clubs, working, groups, advisory or editorial boards, panels, committees, conferences, or publications. Deseri be brie?y the nature and objectives of each such organization; the nature of your participation in each such organization and identify an of?ce or other person from whom more detailed information may be obtained. Notre Dame Law School Notre Dame University. Academic and Administrative Committees. Consistent with the practice of most law school faculty, while 1 was a full-time professor at Notre Dame Law School, I sat on a number of academic and administrative committees as listed below. For further information regarding Notre Dame Law School committees, please contact the administrative assistant to the Dean at (574) 631-0276. For further information related to University ofNotre Dame committees, please contact the Of?ce of the President at (574) 6316903. Notre Dame Law School Notre Dame Law Review, Faculty Adviser (2015 201??) Women?s Legal Forum, Faculty Adviser (2006 2017) Social Justice Forum, Faculty Adviser (2004 2006) Curriculum Committee (200'? 2008;2011; 2013 2014; 2016 2017) Chair (2013 2014; 2016 2017) Faculty Colloquium Committee (2005 2007:, 2013 2014; 2016 2017?) Promotions Committee (2014 2016) Chair (2014 2015) Appointments Committee (2008 2013) Chair (2008 2010) Lardy Fellowship Committee (2007r 2012) American Bar Association Self-Study Committee (2008 2009) Committee, Notre Dame Law School (2007 2008) Chair (2007' 2008) Faculty Development Committee (2006 2007) Advanced Legal Writing Committee (2005 2006) Admissions Committee (2003 2006) University of Notre Dame Committee on Women Faculty and Students, (2006 2010; 2016 20 Parking Committee (2016 2017') Dean Review Committee (2013) University Faculty for Life (approximately 2010 2016) Early Childhood Development Center Advisory Group (2009 2010) Trinity Schools (2015 2017) Member. Board of?i?rasrees The Trinity Schools arc a group of independent Christian schools located in South Bend, Indiana, Hagan, Minnesota, and Falls Church, Virginia. As a member of the Board of '1'1?ustees, I attended and participated in meetings of the board. For further infonnation, 12. contact the president of Trinity Schools, .lon Balsbaugh at Morris Park Country Club (approximately 2010 2012, 2018 present) Member Morris Park Country Club is a country club located in South Bend, Indiana. My family joined the club because it offers tamily-friendly recreational opportunities, including tennis, golf. and a swimming pool. The Union League Club o'fChicago (2018 present) Member The Union League Club is private club located in Chicago near the Dirksen Federal Building, the principal courthouse where the Seventh Circuit hears cases. Ijoined the Union League Club principally for lodging while in Chicago for court business. b. The American Bar Association?s Commentary to its Code of Judicial Conduct states that it is inappropriate for ajudgc to hold membership in any organization that invidiously discriminates on the basis of race, sex, religion, or national origin. Indicate whether any of these organizations listed in response to 1 la above currently discriminate or formerly discriminated on the basis of race, sex, religion or national origin either through formal membership requirements or the practical implementation of membership policies. If so, describe any action you have taken to change these policies and practices. Years before I became a member of the Morris Park Country Club and the Union League Club of Chicago, it is my understanding that. these clubs, like similar clubs around the country, may have excluded members on discriminatory bases that should not have been acceptable to people then and would not be acceptable now. Except as set forth above, to the best of my knowledge, none of the above organizations currently discriminates or formerly discriminated on the basis of race, sex, religion, or national origin either through formal membership requirements or the practical implementation of membership policies. c. List all conferences, symposia, panels, and continuing legal education events you have attended since you joined the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. For each event, provide the dates, a description of the subject matters addressed, the sponsors, and whether any funding, gifts or travel reimbursements were provided to you by the sponsors or other organizations. Please see Appendix 11.e. i li- 't a. List the titles. publishers, and dates of books, articles, reports, letters to the editor, editorial pieces, or other published material you have written or edited, including material published only on the Internet, regardless ol?whether it was published in your name, another name, or anonymously. Supply four copies ofall published material to the Committee. Assorted Conords' (if-Contemporary Lego} Anoiyris: Redux, 70 Case W. Res. L. Rev. 855 (2020}. Copy supplied. Forum 2019: Pane! Diseusuirm. 26 Geo. Mason L. Rev. 19 (2019). Copy supphed. ()riginoiisni and Store Dee-iota. 92 Notre Dame L. Rev. 1921 (2017'). Copy supplied. Congressionoi insiders and Outsiders, 84 U. Chi. L. Rev. 2193 (2017). Copy supplied. With John Copeland Nagle. Congressionoi ()riginoiisni. 19 Penn. .1. ot?Consl. L. 1 (2017). Copy supplied. Countering the Moioritorinn Difficuity. Const. Comment. 61 (2017). Copy supplied. With Neal K. Katyal. The Suspension (House. National Constitution Center?s Interactive Constitution, available at Copy supplied. Statutory interpretation. in 5 American Governance (2016). Copy supplied. Federal Jurisdiction, in 2 American Governance (2016'). Copy supplied. Re?ection. University of Notre Dame Alumni Association. Dec. 22, 2015. Copy suppHed. .S?uspension and Delegation. 99 Cornell L. Rev. 251 (2014). Copy supplied. Precedent and Jurisprudentioi Disagreement. 91 Tex. L. Rev. 171 1 (2013'). Copy supplied. Introduction." The interpretedion/Construction Distinction in Constitutionoi Low, 27 Coast. Comment. 1 {2010). Copy supplied. .S'ubstontive Canons and Agency, 90 B.U. L. Rev. 109 (2010). Copy supplied. Comment to Administrators. Hiring (Theirsfor 2009-110: Announce Yourueives Here Pieose, Aug. 26. 2009, yourselves-here-please.html. Copy supplied. Federal Jurisdiction. in 2 ot?lhe Supreme Court of the United States (2008:). Copy supplied. Nou'e Dame Lawyer, Fall 2008. Copy supplied. Procedural Common Law. 94 Va. L. Rev. 813 (2008). Copy supplied. Store Deeisis and Actors. 83 Notre Dame L. Rev. 1147 (2008). Copy supplied. Statutory Store Deeisis. Apr. 02, 2008. Copy supplied. Noogiegoie, Mar. 25. 2003. Copy supplied. EZPoss or EZ?Tickeifr". Mar. 14. 2008. Copy supphed. Grape Vodka. Anyone? Mar. 10. 2008, Copy supp?ed. Comment to James Grimmelmann, Si'uciem Note Title Hui! ofS?iimiie: Mar. 06. 2008, Copy supplied. Bobby Jindm' and Ethics Reform in LA. Mar. 06, 2008. Copy suppHed. Sentencing and Mar. 03., 2008., Copy supplied. Ari Uniikeiy Biogger. Mar. 02. 2008. Copy supplied. The Supervisory vaer o?he .S'iipi'eme Court. 106 Colum. L. Rev. 101 {2006). Copy supphed. Himmler}: Sim-e Deeisis in the Couris of?Appeaisg 73 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 317 (2005). Copy supplied. Siai'e Decisis and Due Process, '74 U. Colo. L. Rev. 1011 (2003). Copy supplied. With John H. Garvey. Cuihoiie Judges in Copiioi (.?oses. 81 Marq. L. Rev. 303 (1998}. Copy supplied. 10 b. Supply four copies of any reports, memoranda, policy statements, tninutes, agendas, legal ?lings, or other materials you prepared or contributed in the preparation of on behall?of any bar association, committee, conference, or organization of which you were or are a member or in which you have participated as de?ned in Include reports, memoranda, policy statements, or legal filings of any advisory board on which you served or working, group of any bar association, committee, or conference which produced a report, memorandum, policy statement, or legal tiling even where you did not contribute to it. If you do not have a copy ofa report, memorandum, policy statement. or legal tiling, give the name and address of the organization that issued it, the date ofthe document, and a summary of its subject matter. To the best of my knowledge and recollection: U.S. Court ol'Appeals for the Seventh Circuit Judicial Conference, Policy on Equal Employment Opportunity, Discrimination. Harassment, ond li'mployment Dispute Resolutiontor the United Stotes Court oprpeotsfor the Seventh Circuit, May 1, 2018. Copy supplied. US. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit Judicial Conference, Notice ot?Adoption of Modifications to Circuit Role it) and Rescission o/?Circttit Rule 1, March 23. 2018. Copy supplied. Resolution ot?the Bar of the Supreme Court of the United States in Gratitude and Appreciation for the Life, Work, and Service ol?Justice Antonin Scalia. Nov. 4. 2016. Copy supplied. Advisory Committee on Appellate Rules, Report of/ldvisory Committee on Appellate Rules, May 18, 2016. Copy supplied. Advisory Committee on Appellate Rules, Report of'Aclvisory Committee on Appellate Roles, Dec. 15, 2014. Copy supplied. Advisory Committee on Appellate Rules, Report ofAdvisory (i?ommittee on Appellate Roles. May 8, 2014. Copy supplied. Advisory Committee on Appellate Rules, Report of'Acivisory Committee. on Appellate Roles. Dec. 16, 2013. Copy supplied. Advisory Committee on Appellate Rules, Report ofAdvisory Committee on Appellote Roles, May 8, 2013. Copy supplied. Advisory Committee on Appellate Rules, Report ofAdvisory Committee on Appellate Roles, Dec. 5, 2012. Copy supplied. Advisory Committee on Appellate Rules, Report of'Acivisory Committee on Appellate ll Rules; Dec. 201 1. Copy supplied. Advisory Committee on Appellate Rules. Report af'Ailvisory Committee on Appellate Rules. May 2, 201 1. Copy supplied. e. Supply four (4) copies ol? any testimony. official statements or other communications relating, in whole or in part, to matters of public policy or legal interpretation. that you have issued or provided or that others presented on your behalf to public bodies or public of?cials. Letter to Robert P. Deyling, Assistant General Counsel. Administrative Office of the United States Courts (March 13. 2020). Copy supplied. On September 6, 2017. I testi?ed before the United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary at my con?rmation hearing to be a Circuit Judge on the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. Video ofthat testimony as well as my responses to written questions submitted by members of the committee are available at Ttnominations. Minutes 2Ul 6 Meeting ofAclvisory Committee on Appellate Rules (Apr. 5?6. 2016) (statements made as member of Committee). Copy supplied. Draft Minutes ofFall 2Ul5 Meeting of/lilttisoty {.?ommittee on Appellate Rules (Oct. 29? 30., 2015) (statements made as member of Committee). Copy supplied. 1 have been unable to locate a copy of the ?nal minutes, but the minutes of the Spring 2016 Meeting, supplied above state that these draft minutes were adopted with only one change. Minutes ot'Spring 20l5 Meeting ofAtlvisory (L'ommittee on Appellate Rules A pr. 23?24, 2015) (statements made as member of Committee). Copy supplied. Minutes ofF'all 2014 Meeting afAdvisory Committee on Appellate Rules (Oct. 20. 2014} (statements made as member of Committee). Copy supplied. Minutes ofSpt'lng 20] 4 Meeting of Advisory Committee on Appellate Rules (Apr. 28?29, 2014) (statements made as member of Committee). Copy supplied. Minutes at?Spring 2013 Meeting ofAdvisory Committee an. Appellate Rules (Apr. 22?23, 2013) (statements made as member of Committee). Copy supplied. Minutes all: all 2012 Meeting al'Aclvisoiji Committee on Appellate Rules (Sept. 27. 2012) (statements made as member ofCommittee). Copy supplied. Letter, Unacceptable, 'l?he Becket Fund, (Feb. 27, 2012) (signed letter as faculty member of religious institution). Copy supplied. Minutes ofFall Ettll Meeting (.Tommittee on Appellate Rules (Oct. 13?14, 201 I) (statements made as member of Committee). Copy supplied. Minutes of Spring 20! Meeting ofAdvisory Committee on .flppeiiate Rides (Apr. 6?7. 201 (statements made as member ot?Committee}. Copy supplied. Letter re Judicial Nomination ot?lohn G. Roberts. to the United States Court of" Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, 151 Cong. Rec. 8525 (Dec. 18, 2002} (signed letter as member of the bar ot?the District of Columbia). Copy supplied. d. Supply Your copies. transcripts or event?sponsored recordings of all speeches or talks delivered by you including commencement speeches, remarks, lectures, panel discussions, conferences, political speeches. symposia, panels, continuing legal education events, and question?and-answer sessions. Include the date and place where they were delivered, and readily available non-duplicative press reports about the speech or talk. If you do not have a copy ot?the speech or a transcript or recording of your remarks, give the name and address ot?the group before whom the speech was given, the date of the speech, and a summary of its subject matter. If you did not speak from a prepared text. furnish a copy of any outline or notes from which you spoke. To my recollection and through a review of my calendars and searches of publicly available databases by persons acting on my behalf, I have found the following responsive materials. September 26, 2020: Speaker, Nomination Announcement, The White House, Washington, DC. Video available at liY. September 1 I, 2020: Judge, ?Moot Court: (ammo v. Texas.? 2020 Supreme Court Preview, Institute of Bill of Rights Law, William Mary Law School, Williamsburg, Virginia. This event was held online. I have no notes, transcript, or recording. The address oI?the Institute of Bill of Rights Law is William 8; Mary Law School, Post Of?ce Box 8795, Williamsburg, Virginia 23187. August 12, 2020: Panelist, ?We?re All Textualists Now?1 Implementing a Sound Interpretive Approach on the Trial Court and Beyond," Jacksonville Lawyers Chapter of the Federalist Society. This event was held online. Video available at ollU&feature=youtu. be. March 1, 2020: Speaker. ?Women?s Empowemtent Week Brunch," Pasquerilla West Dormitory Brunch. Notre Dame University. Notrc Dame, Indiana. Notes supplied. February 27, 2020: Partieipeutt, ?Negligence in Neverland? The Trial of Peter Pan," Shakespeare Theatre Company. Washington, D.C. I have no notes, transcript, or recording. I served as ajudge in a ?ctional trial of Peter Pan. The address of the Shakespeare Theatre Company is 516 3th Street, S.H., Washington, DC. 20003. Press coverage supplied. 13 February 20?21, 2020: Participant, ?Constitutions, Peoples. and Sovereignty,? Notrc Dame Law School. London, United Kingdom. I have no notes, transcript. or recording. This was a round table discussion, and I commented on James Finnis?s paper, ?The Unconstitutionality of the Supreme Court?s Prorogation Decision.? The address of the Notre Dame Law School is Eek Hall of Law, Notre Dame, Indiana 46556. February 5, 2020: Introductory Speaker, ?Data-Driven Originalism: The Rise ol?Corpus Linguistics,? Notre Dame Law School Federalist Society, Notre Dame, Indiana. 1 have no notes, transcript, or recording. I offered briel? remarks and introduced the principal speaker, James Phillips. The address of the Notre Dame Law School Federalist Society is Eek Hall of Law, Notre Dame, Indiana 46556. February 3, 2020: Panelist, ?CIerkships,? Notrc Dame Law School, Notrc Dame, Indiana. I have no notes. transcript, or recording. I, and other members of the Seventh Circuit, spoke about the responsibilities and duties of a law clerk. The address 01? the Notrc Dame Law School is Eek Hall of Law, Notre Dame. Indiana 46556. Press report supplied. January 30, 2020: Judge, 2020 Van Vleek Constitutional Law Moot Court Competition. George Washington University Law School, Washington, DC. Video and press report available at over-Iisner. January 30, 2020: Speaker. George Washington University Law School Federalist Society, Washington, D.C. I have no notes, transcript, or recording. I spoke regarding originalism. The address ol" the George Washington University Law School Federalist Society is 2000 Street, N.W., Washington, DC. 20052. January 24. 2020: Panelist, "I-Iow Women l-Iavc Shaped the Judiciary,? Notre Dame Law School, Notre Dame, Indiana. Video and press coverage available at 1aw.nd .eduf news?events} s- January 20, 2020: Guest speaker, Professor AJ. Bellia?s Directed Reading Seminar for Future Law Clerks, Notre Dame Law School, Notre Dame, Indiana. I have no notes, transcript. or recording. I spoke to Professor Bellia?s class about the responsibilities and duties ofa law clerk. The address of the Notre Dame Law School is Eek Hall of Law, Notre Dame, Indiana 46556. November 15, 2019: Panelist, ?Showcase Panel ll: Why, or Why Not. Be an 2019 Federalist Society National Lawyers Convention. Washington, DC. Video available at November 4. 2019: Speaker, Women?s Legal Forum, Notre Dame Law School, Notre Dame, Indiana. 1 have no notes, transcript, or recording. I talked to students about challenges that women face in the workplace. The address of the Women?s Legal. Forum 14 is Eclt Hall of Law, Notrc Dame, Indiana 46556. October 25, 2010: Panelist, ?Federal and State Appellate Judicial Panel,? 20191 American Academy of Appellate Lawyers all Meeting, Chicago, Illinois. I have no notes, transcript, or recording. Panelists (two federal judges and two state judges) spoke on a variety of topics related to appellate practice. The address of the American Academy of Appellate Lawyers is 1300 Picctu'd Drive, Suite LL I4, Rockville, Maryland 20850. October 17, 2019: Speaker, "The Constitution as Our Story,? James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions, Princeton, New Jersey. Video available at Press report supplied. October 1, 2019: Speaker, ?The Obstacle in Your Path Is Your Path," Red Mass Reception, St. Thomas More Societies of South Bend and Fort Wayne, Fort Wayne, Indiana. Notes supplied in response to October 13, 20 I 8, event below. September 19, 2019: Speaker, ?Assorted Canards of Contemporary Analysis Redux," Case Western Reserve University School of Law, Cleveland, Ohio. Comments published as Assorted (forwards Legni Anoiysr?s: Redax, 7'0 Case W. Res. L. Rev. 855 (2020}, and supplied in response to Question I2.a. above. Video available at September 14, 2019: Panelist, ?Judges Panel,? 2019 Supreme Court Preview, Institute of Bill of Rights Law, William Mary Law School, Williamsburg, Virginia. I have no notes, transcript, or recording. I spoke on a panel regarding judicial independence. The address of the Institute of Bill of Rights Law is William Mary Law School, Post Office Box 3795, Williamsburg, Virginia 23187. Press report supplied. September 13, 2019: Judge, ?Moot Court: Boston}: v. Clayton (Pottery, Georgia," 2019 Supreme Court Preview, Institute of Bill of Rights Law, William Mary Law School, Williamsburg, Virginia. Video available at September 5, 2019: Speaker, ?The Constitution As Our Story,? Founder?s Day Dinner, BYU l.,aw School, Provo, Utah. Video supplied. May 29, 20] 9: Panelist, Annual Roundtablc Luncheon, Illinois Appellate Lawyers Association, Chicago, Illinois. I have no notes, transcript, or recording. Panelists addressed issues related to appellate practice. The address of the Illinois Appellate lawyers Association is 1717' North Naper Boulevard, Suite 102, Naperville, Illinois 60563. Press report supplied. May 22, 2019: Speaker, Originalism Summer Seminar, Georgetown Law School. Washington, D.C. Notes supplied. May 21, 2019: Speaker, ?Reflections on Judging: A Conversation with Amy Coney 15 Barrett,? Hillsdale College in D.C., Washington, DC. Video available at May 7, 2019: Speaker, Portrait Unveiling, Seventh Circuit Bar Association, Milwaukee. Wisconsin. Video available at April 25, 2019: Panelist, Scalia Forum, Antonin Scalia Law School, Arlington, Virginia. Comments published as SCLIHG Forum 2019: Pane! Discussion, 26 Geo. Mason L. Rev. 19 (2019), and supplied in response to Question 12a. above. April 17, 2019: Speaker, ?Originalism: Why We Should Live with our Dead Constitution,? University of Chicago Law School Federalist Society, Chicago, Illinois. 1 have no notes, transcript, or recording. I spoke regarding originalism. The address of the University of Chicago Law School Federalist Society is 1 East 60th Street, Chicago, Illinois 60637. April 17, 2019: Speaker, ?Judging and Advocacy,? Robert Crasaway's class titled ?Supreme Court Strategy, Administrative Jurisprudence, and the Law,? University of Chicago Law School, Chicago, Illinois. 1 have no notes, transcript, or recording. 1 spoke regardingjudging. The address ot?the University of Chicago Law School is 11 East 60th Street, Chicago, Illinois 60637. April 12, 2019: Speaker, ?Originalism: Why We Should Live with our Dead Constitution," New Orleans Lawyers Chapter of the Federalist Society, New Orleans, Louisiana. I have no notes, transcript, or recording. 1 spoke regarding originalism. The address of the Federalist Society is 1776 1 Street, N.W., Suite 300, Washington, DC. 20006. April 4, 2019: Speaker, ?Friendship and Differences,? University of Virginia Law School Federalist Society Spring Reception, Charlottesville, Virginia. Notes supplied. March 28, 2019: Speaker, Conversation with Judges Thapar and Barrett,? University ot'Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana. Video available at March 1, 2019: Judge, Moot Court, Notre Dame Law School, Notre Dame, Indiana. 1 have no notes, transcript, or recording. [judged moot court. The address of Notre Dame Law School is Eek Hall of Law, Notre Dame, Indiana 46556. February 25, 2019: Speaker, ?Constitutional Originalism and Continuity," The Eleanor l-l. lvl'eCullen Center for Law, Religion and Public Policy, Villanova University School of Law, Villanova, Video available at February 25, 2019: Speaker, ?Originalism: Why We Should Live with our Dead institution,? University of Federalist Society, Philadelphia, 16 I have no notes, transcript, or recording. I spoke regarding originalism. The address of the University of Federalist Society is 3501 Sansom Street, Philadelphia. 19104.? February 19, 2019: Speaker, Conversation with Judge Amy Concy Barrett Notre Dame Club of Washington, DC, Washington, DC Video available at February 14, 2019: Speaker, ?What Would James Madison Trinity School at Greenlawn, South Bend, Indiana. Notes supplied. February 1, 2019: Judge, 2019 Bass Berry 81. Sims Moot Court Competition, Vanderbilt Law School. Nashville, Tennessee. I have no notes, transcript, or recording. Ijudged moot court. The address of Vanderbilt Law School is 131 let Avenue South, Nashville, Tennessee 37203. Press report supplied. November 29, 2013: Speaker, ?On Civility," Yale Law School Federalist Society Winter Banquet, New Haven, Connecticut. Notes supplied. November 15, 2018: Moderator, ?The Future ofthc Past: Stare Decisis,? 2018 Federalist Society National Lawyers Convention, Washington, DC. Video available at November 7, 2018: Judge, Moot Court, Valparaiso Law School, Valparaiso, Indiana. 1 have no notes, transcript, or recording. [judged moot court. Valparaiso Law School is no longer in existence. October 18, 2018: Speaker, ?From John Jay to John Roberts: The Evolution of the Supreme Court,? Hesburgh Lecture, Notre Dame Club of Savannah and the Catholic Lawyers Guild, Savannah, Georgia. Notes supplied. October 13, 2018: Speaker. ?The Obstacle in Your Path Is Your Path," Catholic Bar Association Red Mass Dinner, Dallas. Texas. Notes supplied. October 9, 2018: Guest speaker, ?Leadership and Social Change,? Notre Dame University, Notre Dame, Indiana. 1 have no notes, transcript, or recording. I spoke to Prot?essory Timothy Scully?s class. The address of Notre Dame University is Notre Dame, Indiana 46556. September 27, 2018: Speaker, "Word Limits Why Testualism Constrains udges," Law School Federalist Society, Palo Alto, California. Notes supplied. September 12, 2018: Speaker, ?What Would James Madison Doll,? Notre Dame Club of St. Joseph Valley, Notre Dame, Indiana. Notes supplied. August 29, 2018: Participant, Roundtable Discussion Session I, Ch. 1-4, Notre Dame I7 Constitutional Studies Program, Notre Dame, Indiana. 1 have no notes, transcript, or recording. We discussed ?The Hollow Core ot?Constitutional ?l'heory,? a forthcoming book by Don Drakeman. The address of the Notre Dame Constitutional Studies Program is 2040 Nanovic Hall, Notre Dame. Indiana 46556. August 27, 2018: Speaker, Primer on Textualism Originalism,? Notre Dame Law School Federalist Society, Notre Dame, Indiana. Notes and press report supplied. August 15, 2018: Speaker, ?Welcome to the Profession,? Notre Dame Law School, Notre Dame, Indiana. I gave an address to incoming first?year law students. have no notes, transcript, or recording. The address of the Notre Dame Law School is Eek Hall of Law, Notre Dame, Indiana 46556. June 4, 2018: Speaker, ?From John .lay to John Roberts: The Evolution of the Supreme Court,? Hesburgh Lecture, Notre Dame Club of Greater Seattle, Seattle, Washington. Notes supplied in response to October 18, 2018, lecture. June 1, 2018: Speaker, ?From John Jay to .lohn Roberts: The Evolution ol?the Supreme Court,? Reunion 2018, Notre Dame University, Notre Dame, Indiana. Notes supplied in response to October 18, 2018, lecture. May 19, 2018: Commencement Speaker, Notre Dame Law School, Notre Dame, Indiana. Notes supplied. May 15, 2018: Panelist, Annual Roundtable Luncheon, Illinois Appellate Lawyers Association, Chicago, Illinois. have no notes, transcript, or recording. Panelists addressed issues related to appellate practice. The address of the Illinois Appellate Lawyers Association is 1717 North Naper Boulevard, Suite 102, Naperville, Illinois 60563.. Press report supplied. April 21, 2018: Speaker, Homecoming Luncheon, St. Mary's Dominican High School, New Orleans, Louisiana. 1 have no notes, transcript, or recording. I offered brief remarks upon receipt ofmy high school alma mater?s alumna of the year award. The address of St. Mary?s Dominican High School is 7701 Walmsley Avenue, New Orleans, Louisiana 70125. April 6, 201.8: Panelist, llabeas Corpus in Wartime Symposium, University of California, Berkeley School of Law and California Law Review, Berkeley, California. I have no notes, transcript, or recording. Panelists discussed issues raised by Professor Amanda Tyler?s new book, Hobeos Corpus in Wartime: From the flower ofLondrm Guantanamo Bay. The address of University of California, Berkeley School of Law is Law Building, Suite 7200, Berkeley, California 94720. March 19, 2018: Judge, Ames Moot (lourt Semi-Finals, Harvard Law School, Cambridge, Massachusetts. 1 have no notes, transcript, or recording. [judged moot cotut. The address of Harvard Law School is 1563 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, 18 Massachusetts 02138. March 17, 2018: Speaker, ?From .lohn Jay to John Roberts: The Evolution of the Supreme Court," lIillsdale College Federalist Society, I-lillsdale, Michigan. Notes supplied in response to October 18, 2013, lecture. March 12, 2018: Guest lecturer, ?Colloquium: Public Law 11,? Northwestern University Pritzker School of Law, Chicago, Illinois. I have no notes, transcript, or recording. I spoke to a law school class conducted by Professors Jim Pfander and .Iohn McGinnis on my article Insiders and Owns-triers, a copy of which is supplied in response to Question 12.a. The address ot'Northwestern University Pritzker School of Law is 375 East Chicago Avenue, Chicago, Illinois 6061 1. March 10, 2018: Moderator, ?Perfecting the Constitution a Roundtable: Visions for the 28th Amendment," Federalist Society 2018 National Student Symposium, Washington, D.C. Video available at March 6, 2018: Speaker, ?Congressional Originalism." Columbia Law School Federalist Society, New York, New York. This presentation focused on topics raised by my article {with John Copeland Nagle), Congressional Orfgr'noh'sm, 10 U. Penn. J. of Const. {2017), a copy ot?which is supplied in response to Question 12a. February 23, 2018: Investiture Speaker, Notre [Jame Law School, Notre Dame, Indiana 1 gave remarks on the occasion of my investiture as a Judge on the US. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. Video supplied. Press report supplied. February 15, 2018: Speaker, Book Celebration for Professor Randy Kozel, Notre Dame I..aw School, Notre Dame, Indiana. 1 have no notes, transcript, or recording. I spoke brie?y to congratulate Professor Kozel on the publication his new book, Settled Versus Right. The address ofNotre [Jame Law School is Eek Hall of Law, Notre Dame, Indiana 46556. November 19, 2017: Panelist, ?Sealia Speaks: Re?ections on Law, Faith, and Life Well Lived,? 2017 Federalist Society National Lawyers Convention. Washington. DC. Video available at October 10, 2017: Guest speaker, ?Leadership and Social Change,? Notre Dame University, Notre Dame, Indiana. have no notes, transcript, or recording. I spoke to Professory Timothy Scully?s class. The address of Notre Dame University is Notre Dame, Indiana 46556. March 22, 2017: Presenter, ?Justice Scalia The Future ofthe Court," Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law Federalist Society, Indianapolis, Indiana. I spoke about Justice Scalia?sjurisprudence and its effect on the Court going forward. I I9 have no notes, transcript. or recording. The address of Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law is 530 West New York Street, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202. February 17', 2017: Commentator, ?Continuity and Change in Public Law,? Notre Dame Law School Program on Constitutional Structure and Design, London, United Kingdom. In this roundtable discussion, which included a small group of scholars from both the United States and United Kingdom, I commented on a paper written by a scholar from the United Kingdom about British constitutional law. I have no notes, transcript, or recording. The address of the Notre Dame Law School Program on Constitutional Structure and Design is Eek Hall of Law. Notre Dame Law School, Notre Dame, Indiana 46556. Press report supplied. February 3, 2017: Panelist, ?Originalism and Store Decisis,? Symposium on the Jurisprudence of Antonin Sealia, Notre Dame Law Review, Notre Dame, Indiana. Recording supplied. January 13, 2017: Moderator, Young Legal Scholars Paper Presentations, American Association of Law Schools Annual Meeting, San Francisco, California. Video available at . November 7, 2016: Presenter, ?Modern Originalism,? Ilarvard Law School Federalist Society, Cambridge, Massachusetts. 1 spoke about the intellectual history olioriginalism. I have no notes, transcript, or recording. The address of the Harvard Law School Federalist Society is 103 Pound Hall, 1563 Massachusetts Avenue. Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138. November 3. 2016: Presenter, ?Justice Scalia and the Future of the Court,? Hesburgh Lecture, co-sponsored by the Jacksonville Notre Dame Club and Jacksonville University Public Policy Institute, Jacksonville, Florida. Press report supplied. Video available at October 25. 2016: Presenter, "Recent Developments in Evidence,? Federal Judicial Center Seventh Circuit Workshop, Notre Dame, Indiana. 1 spoke about Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b), which generally prohibits the admission o'l'charaeter evidence. Notes supplied. October 2016: ?Clerking for Justice Sealia,? Notre Dame Law School, Notre Dame, Indiana. At this event, hosted during the Law SchooI?s Fall Reunion, a panel of three faculty members discussed the experience of clerking for Justice Scalia. have no notes, transcript, or recording. The address oI?Notre Dame Law School is lick Hall of Law. Notre Dame, Indiana 46556. Press report supplied. August 30, 201 e: Presenter, ?The Jurisprudence ot?Justiec Sealia," University of Michigan Law School Federalist Society, Ann Arbor, Michigan. I spoke about .Iustiee Scalia?s jurisprudence and its effect on the Court going forward. I have no notes. 20 transcript, or recording. The address of the University of Michigan Law School Federalist Society is (125 South State Street, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109. August 2?3, 2016: Presenter, ?Introduction to Originalism and ?I?extualism," Notrc Dame Law School Federalist Society, Notre Dame, Indiana. 1 gave a general overview of these two theories. 1 have no notes, transcript, or recording. The address of the Notre Dame Law School Federalist Society is lick Hall of Law, Notre Dame, Indiana 46556. June 8, 201 6: Presenter, ?Construction andr?or Interpretation,? Blackstone Legal Fellowship Program, Alexandria, Virginia. Slides and handout supplied. May 14, 2016: Diploma Ceremony Address, Notrc Dame Law School, Notre Dame, Indiana. Copy supplied. May 3, 2016: Presenter, ?From John Jay to John Roberts: The Evolution of the Supreme Court,? University ol'Notre Dame Alumni Association Hesburgh Lecture Series, Wilmington, Delaware. Slides and notes supplied. April 1 I, 2016: Presenter, Women?s Legal Forum, Notre Dame Law School, Notre Dame, Indiana. I spoke to students about challenges that women Face in the workplace. 1 have no notes, transcript, or recording. The address ot?the Women?s Legal Forum is Eek Hall of Law, Notre Dame, Indiana 46556. March 18, 2016: Participant, ?Countering the Majoritarian Di'l?lieulty, Symposium on Randy Barnett?s Our Republican Constitution, University of Illinois College of Law, Champaign, Illinois. Comments published as Countering the .Mojoritorion Dif?culty. 32 Coast. Comment. 61 (2017), and supplied in response to Question 12.a. above. March 2, 2016: Presenter, ?Textualism and Its Discontents: A Discussion on Statutory Interpretation," Duke University School of Law Federalist Society, Durham, North Carolina. I described textualism and the primary criticisms of it. I have no notes, transcript, or recording. The address of the Duke University School of Law Federalist Society is 210 Science Drive, Box 90362, Durham, North Carolina 27708. February 5, 2016: Presenter, ?Congressional Originalism,? Notre Dame Law School Program on Constitutional Structure and Design, London, United Kingdom. Paper published as Congressional Uriginolism, 19 U. Penn. .1. ofConst. L. (2017) (with John Copeland Nagle), and supplied in response to Question 12.a. above. November 3, 2015: Debater, Constitutional Interpretation Debate,? Washington Lee Law School Federalist Society. Lexington, Virginia. 1 debated Ian Milhiser about constitutional interpretation before a student audience. I have no notes, transcript, or recording. The address of the Washington 3t: Lee Law School Federalist Society is 204 West Washington Street, Lexington, Virginia 24450. October 20, 2015: Presenter, ?Is the Filibusler Constitutional?" Indiana Law School 21 Federalist Society, Bloomington, Indiana. Slides supplied. June 10, 2015: Presenter, ?Construction andfor Interpretation,? Blackstone Legal Fellowship Program, Phoenix, Arizona. Slides and handout supplied as slides and handout from June 8, 2016, event. May 4, 2015: Panelist, Statutory Interpretation Theory and Method, Seventh Circuit Conference, Milwaukee, Wisconsin. I served on a panel discussing competing approaches to matters of statutory interpretation. have no notes, transcript, or recording. The address of the Seventh Circuit Bar Association is 53 West Jackson Boulevard. Suite 1050, Chicago, Illinois 60604. April 2, 20I5: Presenter, ?Congressional Constitutional Interpretation," Dulce University School ol?Law, Statutory Interpretation Colloquium, Durham, North Carolina. I was a guest lecturer in a seminar on Statutory Interpretation Colloquium taught by Professors Guy-Uriel Charles and Margaret Lemos. I discussed circumstances in which Congress engages in constitutional interpretation. 1 have no notes, transcript, or recording. The address ot'the Dulce University School ol? Law is 210 Science Drive, Durham, North Carmina 27708. March I7, 2015: Presenter, "King 12. Harwell,? Tulane University Law School Federalist Society, New Orleans, Louisiana. I described a case then pending before the Supreme Court. I have no notes, transcript, or recording. The address of the Tulane University Law School Federalist Society is Weinmann Hall, 6329 Freret Street. New Orleans. Louisiana 70118. February 6, 2.015: Commentator, ?Common Law in an Age of Regulation: US. and Commonwealth Perspectives,? Notrc Dame Law School Program on Constitutional Structure and Design, London, United Kingdom. In this roundtable discussion, which included a small group of scholars from both the United States and United Kingdom, I commented on a paper about tort law written by a scholar from the United Kingdom. I have no notes, transcript, or recording. The address of the Notre Dame Law School Program on Constitutional Structure and Design is Eek Hall of Law. Notre Dame Law School, Notre Dame, Indiana 46556. Press report supplied. August 14, 2014: Panelist, ?Statutory Interpretation," Federal Judicial Center Workshop for Bankruptcy Judges, Boston, Massachusetts. Slides supplied. June I 1, 2014: Presenter, ?Construction andlor Interpretation,? Blackstone Legal Fellowship Program, Phoenix, Arizona. Slides and handout supplied as slides and handout from June 8, 2016, event. March 3, 2014: Commentator, ?University ol?Notre Dame?s Strategic Plan 2014," Notre Dame University, Notrc Dame, Indiana. Recording available at February 24. 2014: Presenter. History ot?Originalism.? Indiana University School of Law Federalist Society. Bloomington. Indiana. 1 spoke about the intellectual history of originalism. have no notes. transcript. or recording. The address of the Indiana University School of Law Federalist Society is Baler Hall. 211 South Indiana Avenue. Bloomington. Indiana 47405. December 9 10. 2013: Presenter. Center for Constitutional Studies ot?the Constitutional Court of Ecuador. Quito. Ecuador. As I recall. I gave two talks at the event. The ?rst discussed some themes of United States constitutional law. and the second discussed precedent. Notes and press report supplied. November I4. 2013: Presenter. ?Suspension and Delegation.? Brigham Young University. J. Reuben Clark Law School. Provo. Utah. Paper published as Suspension and Delegation. 99 Cornell L. Rev. 251 and supplied in response to Question 12a. above. November I. 2013: Commenter. ?The Conservative Revival of the Rehnquist and Roberts Courts.? University ot?Notre Dame Law Review Constitutional Theory Symposium. Notre Dame. Indiana. I commented on papers presented by three other scholars. have no notes. transcript. or recording. The address of the Notre Dame Law Review is Notre Dame Law Review. Eek Hall of Law. Notre Dame Law School. Notre Dame. Indiana 46556. Press report supplied. September 23. 2013: Presenter. ?Suspension and Delegation." University of Illinois College of Law. Champaign. Illinois. Paper published as Suspension and Deiegorion. 99 Cornell L. Rev. 251 (2014}. and supplied in response to Question l2.a. above. June I2. 2013: Presenter. onstruetion andfor Interpretation.? Blackstone Legal Fellowship Program. Phoenix. Arizona. Slides and handout supplied as slides and handout from June 3. 2016. event. February I4 IS. 2013: Presenter. ?Stare Decisis and .lurisprudential Disagreement.? University of Texas Law Review Constitutional Foundations Symposium. Austin. Texas. Paper published as Precedent and Disagreement. 9! Tea. L. Rev. 17! (2013). and supplied in response to Question 12a. above. January IS. 2013: Presenter. ?Roe at 40: The Supreme Court. Abortion and the Culture War that Followed.? Tocqueville Lecture. sponsored by the Minor in Constitutional Studies program within Notre Dame?s Department of Political Science. University of Notre Dame. Notre Dame. Indiana. Notes and press report supplied. November 16. 2012: Moderator. ?Legislative Inaction and Gridlock.? Notre Dame Journal on Legislation Symposium. Notre Dame. Indiana. I moderated a panel of other scholars discussing papers related to the symposiunt?s topic. I have no notes. transcript. or recording. The address ol?the Notre Dame Journal on Legislation is Eek Hall of Law. Notre Dame. Indiana 46556. Is.) '34 November 8 or 9, 2012: Moderator, "Constitutional Structure as a Mechanism of Justice," Notre Dame Center for Ethics Culture, Notre Dame, Indiana. I moderated a panel ol'other scholars discussing papers related to the panel?s topic. I have no notes, transcript, or recording. The address of the Center is Notre Dame Center for Ethics Culture. Notre Dame, Indiana 46556. March 23, 2012: Commentator, ?The Reconstruction Amendments," University ot?Notre Dame Law School Program on Constitutional Structure and Design, Notre Dame, Indiana. I commented on a paper written by another participant in this small, roundtable gathering 1? scholars. have no notes. transcript, or recording. The address of the Notrc Dame Law School Program on Constitutional Structure and Design is Eek Hall of Law, Notre Dame Law School, Notre Dame, Indiana 46556. Press report supplied. February 21, 2012: Presenter, ?SUSpension and Delegation," Notrc Dame Law School, Notre Dame, Indiana. Paper published as Suspension and Delegation, 99 Cornell L. Rev. 251 (2014), and supplied in response to Question I2.a. above. June 201 l: Presenter, ?Construction and/or Interpretation,? Blackstone Legal Fellowship Program, Phoenix, Arizona. Slides and handout supplied as slides and handout from June 8, 2016, event. June 1 l, 201 1: Commencement Address, Trinity School, South Bend, Indiana. Copy supphed. March 25, 201 1: Participant, ?Separation of Powers: Theory, Development, and Applications Conference,? Notre Dame Program in Constitutional Structure and Design, Notre Dame, Indiana. As I recall, I participated in discussing the papers presented in this small, roundtable gathering of scholars, but 1 do not believe that I presented a paper or served as the commentator on someone else?s paper. I have no notes, transcript, or recording. The address of the Notre Dame Law School Program on Constitutional Structure and Design is Eek Hall of Law, Notre Dame Law School, Notre Dame, Indiana 46556. Press report supplied. January 9, 2010: Moderator, ?Interpretation and Construction,? American Association of Law Schools Aimual Meeting, New Orleans, Louisiana. I have no notes, transcript, or recording from this occasion, on which I moderated a panel of other scholars discussing papers they had written about this topic before an audience ot?law iaculty. I did, however, write an introduction to the collection papers once they were published, and this brief essay, Introduction: The interpreterion/CoMir-action Distinction in (L'onsii?riiomri Low, 27 Coast. Comment. I (2010), is supplied in response to Question l2.a. above. October 16, 2009: Presenter, ?Substantive Canons and Faithful Agency,? American University, Washington College of Law, Washington, Paper published as Canons and Agency, 90 B.U. L. Rev. 109 (2010), and supplied in response to Question 12a. above. 24 February 2009: Presenter, ?Substantive Canons and Faithful Agency.? St. Louis University School of Law, St. Louis. Missouri. I have not been able to identify the specific date ofthis presentation. Paper published as (L'nnons and Foittgfit! Agency, 90 B.U. L. Rev. 109 (2010), and supplied in response to Question 12a. above. February 2009: Presenter, ?Substantive Canons and Faithful Agency." University of Notre Dame Law School. Notre Dame, Indiana. I have not been able to identify the specific date of this presentation. Paper published as Substantive Canons and Fannie! Agency, 90 EU. L. Rev. 109 {2010). and supplied in response to Question l2.a. above. October 3, 2008: Presenter, ?Stare Deeisis in Constitutional Law.? University of Minnesota Law School Conservative Libertarian Legal Colloquium, Minneapolis, Minnesota. I have only a vague recollection of this event, but I believe I served on a panel ot?scholars discussing the role in constitutional interpretation. I have no notes, transcript. or recording. The address ol?the University of Minnesota Law School is Walter F. Mondale Hall, 229 19th Avenue South, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455. Press report supplied. May 2008: Presenter, ?Statutory Interpretation," Seventh Circuit Conference. Chicago, Illinois. I discussed recurrent issues in statutory interpretation. 1 have not been able to identify the speci?c date of this presentation, and have no notes, transcript, or recording. The address of the Seventh Circuit Bar Association is 53 West Jackson Boulevard. Suite 1050, Chicago, Illinois 60604. November 2007: Presenter, ?Procedural Common Law," University ol? Virginia School of Law, Charlottesville, Virginia. I have not been able to identify the specific date of this presentation. Paper published as Procedural Common Lon-t, 94 Va. I .. Rev. 813 (2008). and supplied in response to Question 12a. above. November 200?: Presenter, ?Stare Decisis and Nonjudicial Actors." University of Notre Dame Law School, Notre Dame. Indiana. I have not been able to identify the specific date of this presentation. Paper published as Introduction: Stare and Actors. 83 Notre Dame L. Rev. (2008}, and supplied in response to Question 12a. above. March 2007: Moderator, ?Stare Decisis and Nonjudicial Actors." Notre Dame Law Review Symposium, Notre Dame. Indiana. I have not been able to identify the speci?c date oi" this event, and I have no notes, transcript, or recording. The address of the Notre Dame Law Review is Notre Dame Law Review. lick Hall of Law, Notre Dame Law School, Notre Dame, Indiana 46556. The introduction I later wrote for this Symposium was published as Introduction; Stare Decisis and Actors. 83 Notre Dame L. Rev. 1147 (2008}, and supplied in response to Question 12a. above. March 2007: Panelist. ?The Jurisprudence ot?Antonin Scalia,? Notre Dame Department oi'Political Science, Notre Dame. Indiana. 1 have only a vague recollection of this event. 25 but I believe that I discussed Justice Scalia?s approach to interpreting statutes. I have not been able to identify the speci?c date o'Fthis panel. and I have no notes. transcript. or recording. The address ol?the Department is Notre Dame Department of Political Science. Notre Dame. Indiana 46556. December 2006: Presenter, ?Procedural Common Law." Notre Dame Law School. Notre Dame. Indiana. I have not been able to identify the speci?c date of this presentation. Paper published as Procedural Common Law. 94 Va. L. Rev. 813 (2008'). and supplied in response to Question 12a. above. November 10. 2006: Panelist, "Catholicism and the Court: The Relevance of Faith Traditions to Jurisprudence.? University of St. Thomas Law Journal. Minneapolis. Minnesota. I commented upon a paper written by Professor Edward A. Hartnett. I have no notes. transcript. or recording. The address of the University oI?St. Thomas Law Journal is University ot?St. Thomas School of Law. M81. 225. 1000 LaSalle Avenue. Minneapolis. Minnesota 55403. September 29. 2006: Panelist. "Roundtablc on Religion in the Public Square of the Legal Academy." Catholic University Columbus School ol?Law. Washington. D.C.. I have only a vague recollection of this event. but I believe participants discussed whether religiously af?liated law schools can contribute something unique to the legal academy. I have no notes. transcript. or recording. The address of Catholic University Columbus School of Law is 36000 John McCormack Road. NE. Washington. D.C.. 20064. May 2] . 2006: Diploma Ceremony Address. Notre Dame Law School. Notre Dame. Indiana. Copy supplied. April 2006: Commentator. ?Race and Political Influence in America.? Notre Dame Law School. Interdisciplinary Colloquium Series. Notre Dame. Indiana. I have no recollection ol?this event and thus cannot provide a summary. I have not been able to identify the speci?c date of this presentation. and I have no notes. transcript. or recording. The address of Notre Dame Law School is Eck Hall of Law. Notre Dame. Indiana 46556. January 7. 2006: Moderator. Christian and Legal Response to Katrina: Race. Environment. and the Role ot?Govenunent." The Law Pro fessors? Christian Fellowship and Lumen Christi Institute Law and Culture Colloquium. Washington. D.C. moderated a panel discussion and briefly shared my own experience of New Orleans. my hometown. I have no notes. transcript. or recording. The address ot?the Lumen Christi Institute is 1220 East 58th Street. Chicago. Illinois 60637. October 27'. 2005: Moderator. ?Rebuilding New Orleans: An Interdisciplinary Discussion.? Notre Dame Law School. Notre Dame. Indiana. I moderated a panel discussion and briefly shared my own experience ot?New Orleans. my hometown. I have no notes. transcript. or recording. The address ot?Notre Dame Law School is Eek Hall of Law. Notre Dante. Indiana 46556. Press report supplied. 26 September 20, 2005: Panelist, ?Women, Families. and the Christian University.? Notre Dame Center For Ethics and Culture Conference, Notre Dame, Indiana. 1 have only a vague recollection of this event, but I believe that panelists discussed the experience of being working mothers at Christian universities. have no notes, transcript, or recording. The address of the Notre Dame Center for Ethics and Culture is 424 Geddes Hall. Notre Dame, Indiana 46556. July 2005: Presenter, ?The Supervisory Power ol" the Supreme Court," Notre Dame Law School, Notre Dame, Indiana. I have not been able to identify the speci?c date of this presentation. Paper published as The Supervisory Power ofrhe Supreme Court, 106 Colum. L. Rev. 101 (2006), and supplied in response to Question 12.a. above. April 2005: Presenter, ?The Supervisory Power of the Supreme Court,? University of Illinois College of Law. Champaign, Illinois. I have not been able to identify the speci?c date of this presentation. Paper published as The Supervisory Power of'the Supreme Court, 106 Colum. L. Rev. 101 (2006), and supplied in response to Question 12.a. above. Spring 2004: Presenter, ?Recent Developments in Evidence," St. Joseph County Bar Association, South Bend, Indiana. This was a continuing legal education seminar for the local bar. I have not been able to identify the speci?c date of this presentation, and have no notes, transcript, or recording. The address of the St. Joseph County Bar Association is 101 South Main Street, South Bend, Indiana 46601. October 14, 2003: Presenter, ?Evidence Update," Workshop for .ludges of the Seventh Circuit, Lake Geneva, Wisconsin. I discussed recent developments in the law of evidence before an audience of judges from the Seventh Circuit. I have no notes, transcript, or recording. The address of the Federal Judicial Center is "1"hurgood Marshall Federal Judiciary Building, One Columbus Circle, NE, Washington, DC. 20002 i. In 2019, the Committee on Codes ot?Conduct of the udieial Conference of the United States issued ?Advisory Opinion No. 116: Participation in Educational Seminars Sponsored by Research Institutes, Think Tanks, Associations, Public Interest Groups, or Other Organizations Engaged in Public Policy Debates.? Advisory Opinion No. 1 16 states: ?Where the funding sources are unknown or likely to be from sources engaged in litigation or political advocacy, judges and judicial employees should not participate. The Committee has cautioned that, if there is insuf?cient information for the udge to decide whether to attend a seminar, then the judge should decline the invitation or take reasonable steps to obtain additional information.? Advisory Opinion. No. 1 16 also states: ?where the sources of the funding for the event are unknown, judges and law clerks should inquire as to the speci?c sources to ensure that there is no actual or potential con?ict or appearance ol?impropriety." The Advisory Opinion purports to interpret the Code of Conduct for United States Judges, which is binding on all federal Circuit Court judges (among others). Canon ol? the Code ot?Conduct states in relevant part that judge may 27 accept compensation and reimbursement of expenses [in the law-related and cxtradjudicial activities permitted by this Code if the source ot'the payments does not give the appearance of in?uencing the judge in the judge?s judicial duties or otherwise give the appearance of impropriety.? Please identi Fy what steps you have taken to comply with the Code of Conduct for United States Judges in attending any such covered seminars since the promulgation of Advisory Opinion No. 116. It has been my consistent practice, prior to and a?er the issuance of Advisory Opinion 1 16. to carefully scrutinize invitations to participate (either as an attendee or as a speaker) in events including, but not limited to. events covered by Advisory Opinion 1 l6 and to ask questions where further inibrrnation is needed. I do not participate in events where doing so would create an actual or potential con?ict or appearance of impropriety. e. List all interviews you have given to newspapers. magazines or other publications, or radio or television stations. providing the dates of these interviews and four (4) copies of the clips or transcripts of these interviews where they are available to you. To the best of my recollection and searches ot?publicly available databases by persons acting on my behalf. we have found the following such interviews. On April 22, 2018 was interviewed as part elmNotre Dame Day." I have been unable to locate a recording. An interview with Judge Amy ("oney Barrett. Heritage Society SCOTUS 101. March 2. 2020. Audio available at Amy Coney Barrett. Provost?s Featured Faculty Page. Fall 2016. Copy supplied. Lauren Love, Professor Amy Coney Barrett Recognized at Notre Dame Footboit Game. Notre Dame Law School, Sept. 30. 2016. Copy supplied. Lauren Love. Amy Carney Barrett to Deiiver Notre Dame Low Sch-sot Commencement Address. Notre Dame Law School, May 11. 2016. Copy supplied. Tricia Sloma. Notre Dame Day. Univ. of Notre Dame. Apr. 25. 2016. Video available at Fight Over Vacant SCOTUS Scottie Sent Gets (?irty. CBS News. Feb. 15. 2016. Video available at uglytiis. Shannon Roddel. Notre Dame Monrn the Loss rii'U?. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scolio. Univ. ot?Notre Dame, Feb. 15, 2016. Copy supplied. 28 Lauren Love, Maura the Loss of'a Great U. Supreme Com?! Justice, Notre Dame Law School, Feb. 13, 2016. Copy supplied. SCOTUS Upholds State Heutrh Care Subsidies, NPR On Point, WBUR. June 25, 2015. Audio available at john-roberts-antonin-scalia. Madeline Buckley, Court Clears Way/or Gay Marriage, South Bend 'l'rib., Oct. 7, 2014, atAl. Copy supplied. Tim Vandenack, Decision Merits Oppositionfor ?Fi?ireseeabie Future High Court Decision Paves Wny?ir Famine. Some Soy, Elkhart Truth, Oct. 7, 2014, at Al. Copy supphed. Vader: v. Dh'eaver Bank, Federalist Society, Oct. 17, 2008. Audio available at barrett. Ken Fowler, Law Students Show Discontent, Observer, Apr. 17. 2007. Copy supplied. Justice Harriet Miers?, NPR On Point, WBU (October 3, 2005). Audio available at on point/2005f] 03/j usti ce-harriet-miers. Eva Barkeff, A career in Law: Gratt?ante Pulls Sums in DC. as Law Clerk. Times- Picayune, June 8. 1997, at 101. Copy supplied. f. If, in connection with any public office you have held, there were any reports, memoranda, or policy statements prepared or produced with your participation, supply four (4) copies of these materials. Also provide four (4) copies of any resolutions, motions, legislation, nominations, or other matters on which you voted as an elected of?cial, the corresponding votes and minutes. as well as any speeches or statements you made with regard to policy decisions or positions taken. ?Participation" includes, but is not limited to, membership in any subcommittee, working group, or other such group, which produced a report, memorandum, or policy statement. even where you did not - contribute to it. If any of these materials are not available to you, please give the name of the document, the date of the document, a summary ol'its subject matter, and where it can be found. None. 13. ,lyg?gigl State (chronologically) anyjudieial of?ces you have held, including positions as an administrative law judge, whether such position was elected or appointed, and a description of the jurisdiction ot?each such court. I was appointed a Circuit Judge for the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh 29 Circuit on November 2. 2017. was nominated by President Donald Trump on May 8, 2017. and con?rmed by the United States Senate on October 31, 2017. The United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit has jurisdiction as set forth principally at 28 U.S.C. 1291 1292. as well as at various other sections of the United States Code. a. Approximately how many cases have you presided over that have gone to verdict orjudgment?? Because I have not been a trial judge. I have not presided over any cases as a trial judge. As a Circuit Judge, I have participated in the disposition of approximately 922 cases. Of these. approximately what percent were: i. jury trials: bench trials: WA ii. civil proceedings: 82% criminal proceedings 18% o. Provide citations for all opinions. dispositive orders, and orders affecting injunctive relief you have written. published and unpublished, including concurrences and dissents. If any of the opinions listed are not available on Westlaw, provide copies of the opinions. A list ot?citations to opinions I have written is included at Appendix 13b. c. Provide citations to all cases in which you were a panel member, but did not write an opinion. If any of the opinions listed are not available on Westlaw. provide copies of the opinions. A list of all cases in which I was a panel member but did not write an opinion is included at Appendix 13.c. d. For each of the 10 most significant cases over which you sat. provide: a capsule summary of the nature the case; the outcome of the case: (3) the name and contact information for counsel of record. designating which counsel was principal counsel; and (4) the citation of the case (?if reported) or the docket number and a copy of the opinion (if not reported and not available on Westlaw). l. Keefer v. Barr, 919 F.3d 43? (7th Cir. 2019) (Barrett, J., dissenting) Rickey Kanter challenged the application of federal and state felon dispossession laws to prevent him a nonviolent offender?from owning a ?rearm, arguing that these laws violated his Second Amendment rights. He had previously been convicted of tnail fraud 10 for selling therapeutic shoe inserts while misrepresenting them as Medicare-approved. A panel of'the Seventh Circuit held that the application of the statutes was substantially related to the important governmental objective of preventing gun violence. 1 dissented. Looking to the Founding-era history, I explained that legislatures have the power to prohibit dangerous people from possessing guns, but that power extends only to people who are dangerous, not to nonviolent felons like Mr. Kanter. Counsel for Appellant Mark A. Cameli Reinhart Boerner Van Deuren SC. 1000 North Water Street. Suite 1700 Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53202 (414) 298-8155 Malinda .1. Eskra Reinhart Boerner Van Deuren SC . 1000 North Water Street, Suite 1700 Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53202 {414) 298-330 Monica A. Mark Reinhart Boerner Van Deuren SC. 1000 North Water Street, Suite 1700 Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53202 (608') 229-2204 Counsel for Appellee United States Patrick G. Ncmeroff LLS. Department ot'Justiee 950 Avenue, NW. Washington, DC. 20530 {202) 305-8727 Counsel for Appellee Brad D. Sehimel Ryan J. Walsh Forntet?ty with the Wisconsin Department Eimer Stahl LLP 10 East Doty Street, Suite 800 Madison, Wisconsin 53703 (608) 441-5798 Sopen B. Shah Formerly with the Wisconsin Depc'tt'ttnent 31 Perkins Coie LLP 33 East Main Street, Suite 201 Madison, Wisconsin 53703 (608) 663-7480 Counsel for Ainicus Curiae Second Amendment Foundation. Inc. Alan Gura Gura PLLC 916 Prince Street. Suite 107 Alexandria, Virginia 22314 (703) 835-9085 Counsel for Atnicus Curiae Cato Institute Megan L. Brown Wiley Rein LLP 1776 Street, NW. Washington. DC. 20006 (202) 719-7579 Stephen J. Ohenneier Wiley Rein LLP 1776 Street, NW. Washington, DC. 20006 (202) 719-7465 Bethany A. Corbin Wiley Rein LLP 1776 Street, NW. Washington. DC. 20006 (202) 719-4418 B. Swendshoe Wiley Rein LLP 1776 Street, NW. Washington. DC. 20006 (202) 719-4197 llya Shapiro Cato Institute 1000 Massachusetts Avenue, NW. Washington, D.C. 20001 (202) 8420200 Counsel for Amious Curiae Evervtomi for Gun Safety 32 Eric Everytown for (ion Safety 450 Lexington Avenue. Suite 4184 New York, New York 1001? (646) 324-8222 Mark Anthony Frassetto Everytown for Gun Safety Post Office Box 4184 New York. New York 10163 (202) 851-6373 William .1. Taylor, .lr. Everytown for Gun Saliety 450 Lexington Avenue, Suite 4184 New York, New York 10017 (646) 324-8215 Decpak Gupta Gupta Wessler PLLC 1900 Street, N.W., Suite 312 Washington, DC. 20036 (202) 888?1741 Joshua Matz Then with Gupta Wes-star Kaplan Hecker Fink LLP 350 Fifth Avenue, Suite 71 10 New York, New York 101 18 (212) 763-0883 2. Yafar' v. Panama, 912 F.3 1018 (7th Cir. 2019}, rehearing en. boar: denied, 924 F.3d 969 (7th Cir. 2019) (Barrett. J., respecting the denial of rehearing en banc) A consular officer twice denied the visa application of Zahoor Ahmed, a citizen of Yemen, on the ground that she had sought to smuggle two children into the United States. Ahmed and her husband Moshin Yafai?a United States citizen?filed suit challenging the of?cer?s decision. Writing for the majority, I explained that the consular of?cer?s decision to reject the visa application was 'lacially legitimate and hona tide, and the plaintiff had made no af?rmative showing that the officer acted in bad faith. The doctrine of consular nom'eviewability set forth in Kieindiensr v. Mandel, 408 U.S. 753 (1972), accordingly barredjudicial review of these claims. The Seventh Circuit denied a petition for rehearing en banc, and I wrote a statement explaining that the pane] decision was required by Supreme Court precedent. 33 Counsel for Appellants Shannon Marie Shepherd Immigration Attorneys, 300 West Adams Street, Suite 500 Chicago, Illinois 60606 (312) 661-9100 Counsel for Apnellees Aaron S. Goldsmith U. S. Department of Justice 950 Avenue, NW. Washington, DC. 20044 (202) 532-4107 Co?counsel: Craig A. Oswald United States Attorney?s Office for the Northern District of Illinois 219 South Dearborn Street Chicago, Illinois (30604 (312) 886-9080 3. Cook County v. Woif, 962 F.3d 208 {7th Cir. 2020) (Barrett, .I., dissenting) A county and non-profit organization challenged a rule issued by the Department of Homeland Security to enforce the statutory bar on green cards for those who are likely to become a ?public charge.? The rule de?ned a ?public charge" as any noneitizen (with some exceptions} who receives certain cash and noncaslt government benefits for more than 12 months in a 36 month period. The majority thought that this interpretation was unreasonable, and it af?rmed a preliminary injunction of the rule, even though the Supreme Court had previously stayed that injunction. I dissented. In my view, the plaintiffs could not show that the term "public charge? refers narrowly to someone who is primarily and permanently dependent on government assistance. Instead, the term ?public charge? is a term, and the rule is a reasonable interpretation of the leeway that Congress gave the agency. Counsel for Appellant Joshua Dos Santos US. Department of Justice Civil Rights Division 950 Avenue. NW. Washington, DC 20530 (202) 353~0213 34 Joshua M. Kolsky ?1 Siren with the (J?iee of'rhe United States Attorneitr?for the District of?'olnmhio Civil Division, Federal Programs Branch US. Department of Justiee 1100 Street, NW. Washington, DC. 20005 (202) 305-7664 Gerard Sinzdak .S. Department of Justice Civil Division, Appellate Staff 950 Avenue, NW. Washington, D.C. 20530 (202) 514-0718 Daniel Tenny US. Department of ustiee Civil Division, Appellate Staff 950 Avenue NW. Washington, D.C. 20530 (202) 514-1838 Counsel for Aonellee Cook Countv, l'llinois Juan C. Arguello Goldberg Kohn Ltd., Suite 3300 55 East Monroe Street Chicago, Illinois 60603 (312) 201?3954 Steven A. Levy Goldberg Kohn Ltd., Suite 3300 55 East Monroe Street Chicago, Illinois 60603 (.312) 201? 3965 David E. Morrison Goldberg Kohn Ltd, Suite 3300 55 East Monroe Street Chicago, Illinois 60603 (312) EDI-4000 A. Colin Wexler Goldberg Koho Ltd? Suite 3300 55 East Monroe Street Chicago, Illinois 60603 35 (312) 201-3967 Takayuki Ono Goldberg Kohn Ltd, Suite 3300 55 East Monroe Street Chicago, Illinois 60603 (312) 201-3872 Lauren Elizabeth Miller Of?ce of The Cook County State?s Attorney 50 West Washington Street 500 Richard J. Daley Center Chicago, 60602 (312) 603?4320 Jessica M. Scheller Office of The Cook County State?s Attorneyr Civil Actions Bureau 50 West Washington Street 500 Richard J. Daley Center Chicago, Illinois 60602 (312) 603-6934 Counsel for Aopcllee Illinois Coalition For Immigrant And Refugee Rights Caroline Chapman Legal Council For llealth Justice 17 North State Street, Suite 900 Chicago, Illinois 60602 (312) 605-1981 Tacy Fletcher Flint Sidley Austin LLP One South Dearborn Street Chicago, Illinois 60603 (312) 853-7375 David A. Gordon Sidley Austin LLP One South Dearborn Street Chicago, Illinois 60603 (312) 853-7159 Militza M. Pagan Sliriver Center on Poverty Law 67 East Madison Street, Suite 2000 36 Chicago, Illinois 60603 (3 l2} 690-590? Marlow Svatek Sidley Austin LLP One South Dearborn Street Chicago, Illinois 60603 (312') 853-7028 Robert Velevis Sidley Austin LLP 2001 Ross Avenue, Suite 3600 Dallas, 'l"exas 75201 (214) 969-3501 Meghan P. Carter Legal Council For Health Justice 17 North State Street, Suite 900 Chicago, Illinois 60602 (312) 605-1979 Nanshelmun Dashan Legal Council For Health Justice 17 North State Street, Suite 900 Chicago, Illinois 60602 (3 l2] 605-1925 Katherine Elizabeth Wale Shriver Center on Poverty Law, Suite 2000 67 East Madison Street Chicago, Illinois 60603 (3 I 2) 368-2679 Counsel for Amici Curiae Immigration Reform Law Institute Mark Steven Venezia Immigration Reform Law Institute, Suite 335 25 Massachusetts Avenue, NW. Washington, D.C. 20001 (202) 232-5590 Counsel for Amici Curiae Nonpro?t Anti-Domestic Violence And Sexual Assault Organizations Alanna Peterson Pacifica Law Group 1191 Second Avenue, Suite 2000 Seattle, Washington 98101 (206) 602-1211 Counsel for Amiei Curiae National Housing Law Project Laurie Carr Mims Keker, 1Van Nest Peters LLP 633 Battery Street San Francisco, California. 941 1 (415) 676-222? Counsel for Amici Curiae Lena] Historians Elizabeth B. Wydra Constitutional Accountability Center 1200 18th Street N.W., Suite 501 Washington, DC. 20036 (202) 296-6889 Counsel for Amiei Curiae National Consumer Law Center. incorporated Ariel Claire Nelson National Consumer Law Center Seven Winthrop Square, 4th Floor Boston, Massachusetts 021 11] (617) 542-8010 Counsel for Amiei Curiae Health Law Advocates Matthew J. Owens Miner, Barnhill Galland 325 North LaSalle Street, Suite 350 Chicago, Illinois 60654 Kristyn DeFilipp Foley lIoag LLP 155 Seaport Boulevard Boston, Massachusetts 02210 (617) 832-1218 Counsel for Amici Curiae Immigration Law Professors Harry Lee Steptoe Johnson LLP 38 1330 Connecticut Avenue, NW. Washington. DC. 20036 (202)429-3112 Counsel for Amici Curiae Fiscal Policyr Institute Sadik Harry Huseny Latham Watkins LLP 505 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000 San Francisco, California 91 1 Counsel for Amici Curiae United States House of Representatives Douglas Neal Letter US. House of Representatives Office of General Counsel 219 Cannon House Office Building Washington, DC. 20515 (202.) 225-9700 Robert Mark Loeb Orrick, I-{errington Sutcliffe LLP 1152 15th Street, NW. Columbia Center Washington? D.C. 20005 (202) 339-3475 William E. Havemann .8. House of Representatives Of?ce of General Counsel 219 Cannon House Of?ce Building Washington, D.C. 20515 (202} 744-2427 Counsel for Amiei Curiae Cityr ot?Chicago Benna Ruth Solomon City of Chicago Law Department 30 North LaSalle Street, Room 800 Chicago, Illinois 60602 (312) 744-7764 Counsel for Amiei Curiae American Academy of Pediatrics American Medical Association. American College ol?thsicians. and American College of Obstetricians And Gynecologists 3L) Priyamvada Arora Cooley LLP 3175 Hanover Street 3000 El Camino Real Palo Alto, California 943 04 (650) 843-5384 Counsel for Amici Curiae American Civil Liberties Union Kyle A. Virgien Latham Watkins LLP 505 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000 San Francisco, California 91 1 11 (415) 395-8074 Charles F. Sprague Latham Watkins LLP 505 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000 San Francisco, California 91 1 (415) 391-0600 Tyce R. Walters Latham Watkins LLP Suite 1000 555 Eleventh Street, NW. Washington, DC. 20004 (202) 637-2200 Counsel for Amiei Curiae 5300 33rd St LLC Paul Whit?eld Hughes McDermott, Will Emery 500 North Capitol Street, NW. The McDermott Building Washington, D1). 20001 (202) 756-8981 4. Doe v. Purdue Univ., 928 F.3d 652 (7th Cir. 2019) John Doe sued his former university, alleging violations of due process and Title IX in its treatment ofa complaint ofsesual violence against him. According to John Doe, the University refused to provide with any of the evidence against him and to allow him to introduce any evidence of his own; denied him the opportunity to cross-examine his accuser; found his accuser credible without talking to her in person; and was blatantly biased against him. The University?s findings led to his suspension from the University 40 and his expulsion from the Navy ROTC program. Writing for the panel, I concluded that John Doe had a protected liberty interest in his freedom to pursue naval service. had adequately alleged that the University used fundamentally unfair procedures in determining his guilt. and had adequately alleged sex bias in his particular case. Counsel for Appellant Philip A. Byler Nesenoffdc Miltenberg, LLP 363 Seventh Avenue, 5th Floor New York. New York 1000] (212) 736?4500 Damon M. Cheronis Law Offices of Damon M. Cheronis [40 South Dearborn Street. Suite 4] 1 Chicago. Illinois 60603 (312') 386~7033 Counsel for Appellees William Peter Kealey Stuart Branigin LLP 300 Main Street, Suite 900 Lafayette, Indiana 47'902 (765) 428-707? James Francis Olds Stuart Branigin LLP 300 Main Street, Suite 900 Lafayette. Indiana 47902 {765) 428-7072 5. Rafa-charger v. Banner, 913 F.3d (340 (7th Cir. 2019) William was charged with murdering his elderly mother and imprisoned for two months before the charges against him were dropped. He sued the detective who had built the ease. alleging that the detective had knowingly or recklessly made false statements in the probable cause af?davit. Because it is clearly established that it violates the Fourth Amendment to use deliberately falsi?ed allegations to demonstrate probable cause, I concluded on behalf of a unanimous panel that the detective was not entitled to quali?ed immunity. Counsel for Appellant Richard A. Waples 41 Waples Hanger 410 North Audubon Road Indianapolis. Indiana 46219 (317) 357-0903 Counsel for Appellce Donald Eugene Morgan Of?ce of the Corporation Counsel City-County Building 200 East Washington Street. Suite 1601 Indianapolis. Indiana 46204 (317) 327?4055 6. Grunge? r. Milwaukee Jewish Day Sch. 882 F.3d 655 (7th Cir. 2013) Miriam a Hebrew teacher. sued the .lewish Day School at which she once worked for allegedly violating the Americans with Disabilities Act. We concluded that the suit was barred by the ministerial exception protected by the First Amendment. Applying the Supreme Court?s decision in Hosanna?bor Evangelical Lutheran Church Sch. EEOC. 565 US. 171 (2012), we explained that Ms. Grussgot?s integral role in teaching her students about Judaism and the school?s motivation in hiring her demonstrated that her role furthered the school?s religious mission. We declined to treat the factors identi?ed in Hosanna-Talmr as a rigid formula. looking instead to the totality of the circumstances. The Supreme Court later vindicated our approach in Our Lady of Guadeloupe School v. Morrissey?Berru. 140 S. Ct. 2049 (2020). Counsel for Appellant Pro se Counsel for Appellee Aaron Howard Aizenberg Kravit. Hovcl 825 North Jefferson Street. Suite 5th Milwaukee. Wisconsin 53202 (414) 271-7100 Counsel for Amici Curiae Becket Fund For Religious Liberty Howard Blomberg Becket Fund For Religious. Liberty 1200 New Hampshire Avenue. N.W.. Suite 700 Washington. DC. 20036 (202) 955-0095 42 Eric S. Baxter Becket Fund For Religious Liberty 1200 New Hampshire Avenue. N.W., Suite 700 Washington, DC. 20036 {202) 349?7221 Daniel Ortner Then with the Becker Fund For Religious Liberty Paci?c Legal Foundation 930 Street Sacramento, California 95814 (916) 419-7111 7. Wallace v. Grahhah Heidings, inc, 970 F.3d 798 (7th Cir. 2020) This appeal required us to decide whether food delivery drivers for Grubhub are exempt from the Federal Arbitration Act as ?any other class of workers engaged in foreign or interstate commerce.? Drivers who worked for Grubhub in cities including Chicago, Portland, and New York had sued, alleging, among other things, that Grubhub violated the Fair Labor Standards Act by failing to pay them overtime. But these drivers had each signed an agreement to submit to arbitration any and all claims arising out of their relationship to Grubhub. The Federal Arbitration Act required enforcement ot? those agreements unless they fell within the exemption for ?contracts of seamen, railroad employees, or any other class of workers engaged in foreign or interstate commerce.? Writing for a unanimous panel, explained that the residual clause ol'that exemption applies only to transportation workers who are actually engaged in the movement of goods in interstate commerce. Plaintiffs had not even tried to demonstrate that the interstate movement of goods was a central part of the job description of the class of workers to which they belong, and accordingly their contracts with Grubhub were not exempt from the Federal Arbitration Act. Counsel for Appellants Shannon Erika Liss?Riordan Lichten 8: Lisa-Riordan, RC. 729 Boylston Street, Suite 2000 Boston, Massachusetts 021 16 (617) 994-5800 James 13. Zouras Ryan F. Stephan Stephan Zouras, LLP 100 North Riverside Plaza, Suite 2150 Chicago, Illinois 60606 (312) 233-1550 43 Thomas Fowler Lichten Liss?Riordan, RC. 729 Boylston Street, Suite 2000 Boston, Massachusetts 021 16 (617) 994-5800 Counsel for Aoocllees Joshua Vaughn Littler Mendelson, P.C. 625 Liberty Avenue, 26th Floor Pittsburgh, 15222 (412) 201-7600 Todd M. Church Littler Mendelson. RC. 321 North Clark Street, Suite 1000 Chicago, Illinois 60654 (312} 372-5520 Robert William Pritcltard Littler Mendelson, RC. 625 Liberty Avenue, 26th Floor Pittsburgh, 15222 (412) 201-7600 Andrew Michael Spurehise Littler Mendelson, P.C. 900 Third Avenue, Eighth Floor New York, New York 10022 (212) 583-9600 Counsel for Antieus Public Justice Jennifer Bennett Gupta Wessler 100 Pine Street, Suite 1250 San Francisco, California 941 1 (415) 523-0336 Counsel for Amieus Washington Legal Foundation Cory L. Andrews Washington Legal Foundation 2009 Massachusetts Avenue, NW. 44 Washington. DC. 20036 (202) 588-0302 Counsel for Amiei Chamber of Commerce ot?the United States o'fAmerica and National Association of Manufacturers Arehis Ashok Parasharami Mayer Brown LLP l999 Street. N.W. Washington, DC 20006 (202) 263-3328 8. AF. Moore Associates. Inc. v. I?appas. 948 F.3d 889 (7th Cir. 2020) The Equal Protection Clause entitles owners ot?similarly situated property to roughly equal tax treatment. A group of taxpayers asserted that the tax assessor for Cook County violated that guarantee by offering a break to owners of similarly situated property. but not to them. The taxpayers had pursued a refund in Illinois court for more than a decade before they eventually came to federal court seeking to vindicate their federal constitutional claims. Writing list the unanimous panel. I explained that the Tax Injunction Act did not bar the suit because the taxpayers had no remedy at all for their claims in state court?let alone. a ?plain. speedy and ef?cient" one. Counsel for Appellants Mark R. Davis O?Keefe Lyons Ilynes LLC 30 North LaSalle Street. Suite 4100 Chicago. Illinois 60602 (312) 422-9166 Counsel for Appellee Fritz Kaegi Katherine G. Schnake Hinshaw :51: Culbertson LLP 151 North Franklin Street. Suite 2500 Chicago, Illinois 60606 (312) 704-3708 Gretchen I-Iarris Sperry l-linshaw Culbertson LLP 151 North Franklin Street. Suite 2500 Chicago. Illinois 60606 {312) 704-3521 Counsel for Appellees Maria .Pappas and Cook Countv. Illinois 45 Paul A. Castiglione Of?ce of The Cook County State?s Attorney Federal Litigation Division 50 West Washington Street 500 Richard .1. Daley Center Chicago. Illinois 60602 (312) 603-2350 Counsel for Amiei Curiae Board of Education ofConsolidated High School District 230. Board ot'Education of North Palos School District 1 17, Board of Education ot'Levden Community High School District 212. Board of Education of Township High School District 214. and Board of Education of Communitv Consolidated School District 59 Michael A. Warner Jr. Franezek Radelet P.C. 300 South Wacker Drive. Suite 3400 Chicago, Illinois 60606 (312) 986-0300 Counsel for Amiei Curiae Board of Education ot?Hoover-Schrum Memorial School District 157. Board of Education of Niles Elementary? School District 71. and Board of Education ol?Niles Township High School District John M. lzzo Hauser. lzzo, Petrarea. Gleason Stillman 1415 West 22nd Street. Suite 10 Oak Brook, Illinois 60523 (708) 799-6?66 Counsel for Arnie-i Curiae Board of Education of Thornton Fractional High School John J. Murphy Himes, Petrarca, Fester 'l?wo Prudential Plaza 180 North Stetson, Suite 3100 Chicago, Illinois 60601 (312) 565-3100 Counsel for Ainici Curiae City of Calumet City Robert Wilder Odelson Sterk 3318 West 95111 Street Evergreen Park, Illinois 60805 46 (708) 634-0268 9. Casiz'i'rrs v. Madison give. Assess, Inn, 926 F.3d 329 {7th Cir. 2019') Paula Casillas ?led a class action against a debt collection company because they sent her a debt-collection letter that described the process that the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act provides for verifying a debt but did not, as required by the Act, specify that she had to communicate in writing to trigger that process. The only harm that Casillas claimed to have suffered, however, was the receipt ot?an incomplete letter. I explained that this claim ofa bare procedural violation, divorced from any concrete harm, was not sufficient to satisfy Article standing requirements. Counsel tor Appellant .lohn G. Albancse Berger dc Montague. P.C. 43 Southeast Main Street, Suite 505 Minneapolis, Minneapolis 55414 (612) 594-5997 David Philipps Philipps ?Er Philipps, Ltd. 9760 South Roberts Road, Suite One Palos Hills, Illinois 60465 (708) 974-2900 Counsel for Appellee James R. Branit Liteh?eld Cavo LLP 303 West Madison Street, Suite 300 Chicago, Illinois 60606 (312) 7'81-6552 ll). EEOC v. Costco Wholesale Corp, 903 F.3d 613 (7th Cir. 2018) Dawn Suppo, an employee ofCosteo Wholesale Corporation, was stalked by Thad Thomspon, a customer of Costco, for over a year. Traumatized by the experience. she took an unpaid medical leave, and when she did not return to work, Costco terminated her employment. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission sued Costco on Suppo?s behalf, alleging that Costco had subjected her to a hostile work environment by tolerating Thompson?s harassment. Writing for the unanimous panel, we held that a reasonable jury could conclude that Thompson?s conduct was severe or pervasive enough to render Suppo?s work environment hostile. And although we agreed with the district court that Suppo could not recover backpay for the period ot?time after Costco ?red her, we instructed the district court to consider whether she was entitled to backpay for some 47 or all of her time on unpaid medical leave. Counsel for Costco Wholesale Corn. Gerald L. Pauling II Seyt?arth Shaw LLP 233 South Wacker Drive. Suite 8000 Chicago, Illinois 60606 .313) 460?5561 Erin Dougherty lioley Seyfartlt Shaw LLP 233 South Wacker Drive, Suite 8000 Chicago, Illinois 60606 (312) 460-5504 Counsel for Annellee/Cross-Anpellant EEOC Anne W. King Equal Employment Opportunity Commission 13] Street, NE. Fifth Floor Washington, DC. 2050? (202) 663-4699 e. For each of the 10 most signi?cant opinions you have written, provide: (1) citations those decisions that were published; a copy of those decisions that were not published (it? not available on Westlaw); and (3) the names and contact information [or counsel of record. In addition to the nine opinions authored by me discussed in 12(d), 1 would include the following case on my list ol'the 10 most signi?cant opinions I have written: Schmidt v. Poster, 891 F.3d 302 7th Cir. 2018), reversed on rehearing en bone in 91 1 F.3d 469 ('fth Cir. 2018} (en banc) A Wisconsinjury convicted Scott Schmidt ol??rst-degrec intentional homicide for the murder of his wife. Before his trial, the judge conducted an ex parts, in camera hearing during which he questioned Schmidt directly. rather than through his counsel, and ruled that Schmidt could not present his intended defense of ?adequate provocation? at trial. The Wisconsin Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction and concluded that this hearing did not violate Schmidt?s Sixth Amendment rights. Schmidt collaterally attacked his conviction in federal court, and the panel majority granted the writ ot?habeas corpus. dissented because the statute goveming collateral review ofstate criminal convictions prevents courts from granting a writ of habeas corpus unless the state court's decision was contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application ot?, clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court. No Supreme Court precedent addressed the 48 question whether a defendant has the right to counsel when testifying before a judge in a nonadversarial proceeding, and the majority gave too little deference to the decision of the Wisconsin Court of Appeals. The Seventh Circuit agreed to hear the case on hanc and concluded. as I had. that Schmidt was not entitled to a writ of ltabeas corpus. Counsel for Appellant Principal counsel: Shelley M. .Fitc Federal Defender Services of Wisconsin, Inc. 22 East Mifflin Street, Suite 1000 Madison, Wisconsin 53703 (608) 286-6718 Craig W. Albee chcral Defender Services of Wisconsin, Inc. 517 East Wisconsin Avenue, Room 182 Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53202 (414) 221-9900 Counsel for Appellcc Sarah L. Burgundy Wisconsin Department of Justice 17 West Main Street Post Of?ce Box 7'85? Madison, Wisconsin 53707 (608) 266-1221 f. Provide a list of all cases in which you participated, where ccltiorari to the Supreme Court of the United States or other relief was requested or granted. A list of all cases in which I participated where certiorari to the Supreme Court ofthe United States or other relief was requested or granted is included at Appendix 13.1?. g. Provide a brief summary of and citations for all of your opinions where your decisions were reversed by a reviewing court or where your judgment was af?rmed with signi?cant criticism of your substantive or procedural rulings. If any of the opinions listed were not of?cially reported, provide copies of the opinions if not available on Westiaw). None. h. Provide a description ofthe number and percentage of your decisions in which you issued an unpublished opinion and the manner in which those unpublished opinions are ?led and/or stored. 49 14. All opinions I have issued are available in the court records maintained by the Clerk of Court for the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. ?l?hese opinions are generally available through PACER. Based on a review conducted by others on my behalf, as of September 23, 2020, 1 am the author ot?92 opinions (including concurrences and dissents) in my own name. All but two of these opinions 999%), as explained in Appendix 13.b, are available through Westlaw, Lexis, or the Seventh Circuit oprpeals? publicly available database. 1. Provide citations for signi?cant opinions, dispositive orders, and orders affecting injunctive relief you authored and issued on federal or state constitutional issues. together with the citation to appellate court rulings on such opinions. If any of the opinions listed were not officially reported, provide copies ol?the opinions. Beyond the cases described in Questions 13.61. and 13c. above, 1 have authored the 'lbllowing significant constitutional opinions. Protect Our Parks, inc. v. Chicago Park Dist, 971 F.3d 722 (7th Cir. 2020) Pittman by and through Hnrniiton v. County 9370 F.3d 823 (7th Cir. 2020) Estate nfBiegert by Beiget?t v. .Mtiliitdr, 963 F.3d 693 (7th Cir. 2020) JS. T. Corp. v. Foxtiionn Interconnect Teen. Ltd, 965 F.3d 571 {7th Cir. 2020) v, Wiison, 963 F.3d 701 (7th Cir. 2020) (Barrett. J., concurring) v. AT&TServs.. inc. 950 F.3d 458 (7th Cir. 2020) Lett v. City tqf'C.'iriC'ttgr1, 946 F.3d 398 (7th it. 2020) Lexington Ins. Co. v. Hotni ins. Ca, 938 F.3d 874 {7th Cir. 2019) McCottreti 1). White, 933 F.3d 651 (7th Cir. 2019) Terry City of?ine-ago, 932 F.3d 579 (7th Cir. 2019) C?nreiio v. Aurore Potieernen Credit Union, 930 F.3d 830 (7th Cir. 2019) Acevedo v. Conic Officers Eieetorcti Bell, .925 17.3d 944 (7th Cir. 2019) United States v. Terry, 915 F.3d 1 141 (7th ICir. 201.9) Unitasf States v. Vacenro, 915 F.3d 431 (7th Cir. 2019) Sims v. 914 13.3d 1078 (7th Cir. 2019) (Barrett, ., dissenting) United States v. King, 910 F.3d 320 (7th Cir. 2018) United States v. Kiennst?, 907 F.3d 522 (7th Cir. 201 8) Cieven v. Sngiin, 903 F.3d 614 (7th Cir. 2018) Beiey v. (.fity of'CL?iticego, 901 F.3d 823 (7th Cir. 2018) United States v. Watson, 900 F.3d 392 (71h Cir. 2018) j. Provide citations to all cases in which you sat by designation on a federal court of appeals, including a brief summary ot?any opinions you authored, whether majority, dissenting, or concurring, and any dissenting opinions you joined. 1 have not sat by designation on a federal court of appeals. Regusgl: Identify the basis by which as ajudge you have assessed the necessity or 50 propriety of recusal. (If your court employs an "automatic" recusal system by which you may be recused without your knowledge, please include a general description ofthat system and a list of cases from which you were recused.) Provide a list of any cases, motions or matters that have come before you in which a litigant or party has requested that you recusc yourselfdue to an asserted con?ict of interest or in which you have recused yourself sua sponte. a. Identify each such case, and for each provide the following inl?brmation: i. whether your recusal was requested by a motion or other suggestion by a litigant or a party to the proceeding or by any other person or interested party; or il?you reeused yourself sua sponte; ii. a brief description of the asserted con?ict ofint'erest or other ground for recusal; the procedure you followed in determining whether or not to recusc yourself; iv. your reason for recusing or declining to recusc yourself, including any action taken to remove the real. apparent or asserted con?ict ol'interest or to cure any other ground for recusal. The Seventh Circuit employs an ?automatic? recusal system to help identify potential con?icts for the judges. Each judge maintains a recusal list, and a computer program ?ags potential con?icts against that list. I have produced my current recusal list as Appendix 14. The Circuit Executive reviews and notes potential con?icts against this list as he creates the list of cases scheduled for oral argument. My assistant cross checks the cases against my potential con?ict list to ensure that I am not assigned to oral argument on any case for which there is a con?ict. To the best of my knowledge, there has been only one occasion on which my assistant identified a potential con?ict in a case to which I had been assigned. That case was United States v. Orr, No. 10-1938 (?th Cir), and recused because Notre Dame students were presenting oral argument. To the best ol?my recollection and the records provided me by the Seventh Circuit. 1 was asked to recusc in the following cases: Klein v. "Brien, No. 17?2302 {Tth Cir). Plaintiffs-Appellants moved for the recusal of Judges l'iasterbrook, Wood, and myself, based on alleged mistakes in the panel opinion authored by Judge Easterbrook. liaehjudge voted to deny the motion. The Supreme Court has explained, ?[J]udicial rulings alone almost never constitute a valid basis for a bias or partiality motion. . . . [T]hey cannot possibly show reliance upon an extrajudicial source; and can only in the rarest circumstances evidence the degree of favoritism or antagonism required . . . when no extraiudicial source is involved.? Lireky v. Ultffed Stores, 510 US. 540, 555 {1994). I did not find the recusal standard met in these circumstances. 5] 15. Cooke v. Jackson Nat Life Ins, No. l8-3527 (7th Cir.) Plaintiff-Appellee moved for the recusal of Judges Easterbrook, Stadtmueller, and myself based on our participation as the previous appellate panel in the case, which Plaintiff?Appellee contended demonstrated favoritism toward the defendant. Once again, each udgc voted to deny the motion, ?nding the recusal standard not met. See Leaky. 510 U.S. at 555. In addition to these cases, pro se litigant Roger (or Raj) Shekar has ?led motions for the recusal of Judges Hasterbrook, Sykes, and myselfin three cases: Teiedyae Techs. Inc. v. Shaker, 17-2171 (7th Cit): Shaker v. chen Loon Servicing. LLC, 19?1122 (7th Cir); and Shelter v. (lower: Loon .S?ervicing. LLC. 19-1277 {7th Cir.) In an order issued .lune 10, 2019, the Seventh Circuit described these motions as ?baseless requests? and sanctioned Mr. Shekar $500 for ?ling ?repetitive frivolous motions." See Teiedyna Techs. Inc. v. Shaker, ?-2171 (7th Cir. June 19, 2019). His wife, Monica Shekar, ?led two similar motions to recuse .ludge Easterbrook, Sykes, and myself in Shaker v. Oewen Loam Servicing LLC, No. 20?1429 (7111 Cir. 2020'). b. Explain whether you will follow the same procedures for recusal if you are con?rmed to the Supreme Court as you have followed on the Circuit Court. If not, please explain the procedure you will follow in determining whether to recuse yourself from matters coming before the Supreme Court, if con?rmed. lt?conth?med, 1 will continue my present practice ofusing a recusal list to identify and avoid potential conflicts. This includes, but is not limited to, cases where Jesse Barrett, my husband and a practicing attorney, or Amanda Coney Williams, my sister and a practicing attorney, participated in any stage ofthe proceedings. This list also includes cases where Notre Dame University or af?liated entities (including, but not limited to, Notre Dame Law School) were a party. Finally, I would also recuse myself from matters in which I participated while ajudge on the court of appeals. a. List chronologically any public of?ces you have held. other than judicial of?ces, including the terms of service and whether such positions were elected or appointed. lf appointed, please include the name of the individual who appointed you. Also, state chronologically any unsuccessful candidacies you have had for elective of?ce or unsuccessful nominations for appointed of?ce. None. b. List all memberships and offices held in and services rendered, whether compensated or not, to any political party, election committee, or President-elect transition team. If you have ever held a position or played a role in a political campaign, including the 2000 presidential campaign and Florida recount, identify the particulars of the campaign, including the candidate, dates ofthe campaign, your title and responsibilities. Please supply four copies of any memoranda analyzing issues of law or public policy that you wrote on behalf of or in connection with a President-elect 52 16. transition team. None. c. List all political events for which you were on the host committee, including the date, location, which candidate or organization it bene?tted, and how much was raised at the event. None. Legal gamer, Answer each part separately. a. Describe in reverse chronological order your law practice and legal experience after graduation from law school including: i. whether you served as clerk to ajudge, and it" so, the name of the judge, the court and the dates of the period you were a clerk; Front 1998 to 1999, 1 served as a law clerk to the 1~lonorab1e Antonin Scalia. Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States. From 199? to 1998, 1 served as a law clerk to the Honorable Laurence H. Silberman, Circuit Judge ol?the United States Court oprpeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. ii. whether you practiced alone, and it?so. the addresses and dates; 1 have never practiced alone. the dates, names and addresses of law ?rms or of?ces, companies or governmental agencies with which you have been affiliated, and the nature 01' your affiliation with each. 2002 present Notre Dame Law School 3165 Eek Hall of Law Notre Dame, Indiana 46556 Prolbssor of Law (2002 2017) Adjunct (2017 present) October 16 November 1, 2007 University of Virginia School of Law 580 Massie Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22903 Visiting Associate Professor of Law 2001 2002 George Washington. University Law School 2000 Street, NW. Washington. DC- 20052 John M. Olin Fellow in Law Adjunct Faculty Member Spring 2001) 2001 Baker Botts L.L.P. 700 Street, NW. Washington, DC. 20001 Associate 1999 2000 Miller, Cassidy, Larroea Lewin (Miller, Cassidy merged with Baker Botts L.L.P. on January 1, 2001) 700 Street, NW. Washington. DC. 20001 Associate Summer 1997 Covington Burling LLP One CityCenter 850 10th Street, NW. Washington, DC. 20001 Summer Associate iv. whether you served as a mediator or arbitrator in alternative dispute resolution proceedings and, it'so, a description of the 10 most significant matters with which you were involved in that capacity. 1 have never served as a mediator or arbitrator. Describe: i. the general character of your law practice and indicate by date when its character has changed over the years. As a law clerk from 199? to 1999, I helped prepare my judges for oral argument and assisted them in drafting opinions. At the Supreme Court, I also reviewed petitions for c-ertiorari and provided written advice to the full Court about whether petitions should be granted. Upon the conclusion of my c-lerkships, was a litigator for approximately two years. My practice was general. I worked on cases in both trial and appellate courts, and while the bulk ol?my practice was civil, 1 did work on one criminal 54 appeal. I wrote briefs, motions, and research memoranda. conducted depositions and second-chaired a jury trial. ii. your typical clients and the areas at each period of your legal career. if any, in which you have specialized. Miller Cassidy {subsequently part of Baker Botts) had a mix of individual and corporate clients. and the cases on which I worked had that same mix. c. Describe the percentage of your practice that has been in litigation and whether you appeared in court frequently. occasionally, or not at all. If the frequency of your appearances in court varied, describe such variance, providing dates. My practice consisted almost entirely oi'litigation. I prepared motions and briefs, and I appeared in coun occasionally in support of them. i. Indicate the percentage ot?your practice in: federal courts: 90% (approximate) state courts ol?record: 10% (approximate) other courts: 0% administrative agencies: 0% ii. Indicate the percentage ofyour practice in: civil proceedings: 90% (approximate) criminal proceedings: 10% (approximate) d. List, by case name, all cases in courts of record. including cases before administrative law judges, you tried or litigated to verdict, judgment or ?nal decision (rather than settled), indicating whether you were sole counsel, chief counsel, or associate counsel. For each such case, include the docket number and provide any opinions and ?lings available to you. I served as associate counsel on behalf of "l?assi Drywall Construction Co., Inc. in Toast Drywall Consrracrion (70., Inc. v. Turner Jones Associates. P171, No. L190384 (Va. Cir. CL). The case was tried to a verdict in favor of my client by ajury. There were no opinions issued by the court and I have no ?lings from the case. i. What percentage of these trials were: jury: 00% non-jury: 0% Not applicable. 55 e. Describe your practice, if any, before the Supreme Court of the United States. the highest court of any state. or any state or federal coults of appeals. Supply four copies ofany briefs. amieus or otherwise, and, if applicable, any oral argument transcripts before the Supreme Court in connection with your practice. Give a detailed summary of the substance of each case, outlining brie?y the factual and legal issues involved, the party or parties whom you represented, the nature ofyour participation in the litigation, and the final disposition ofthe case. Also provide the individual names, addresses, and telephone numbers of co?eounsel of record and principal counsel of record for each of the other parties. I have not practiced before the Supreme Court. Although I worked on many litigation matters during my time as an associate at Miller Cassidy and then Baker Botts, I no longer have records of the matters upon which I worked. Based upon my recollection and searches of publicly available records conducted by others on my behalf, I have identi?ed the following cases in federal courts of appeals where I served as counsel. l. v. Berger, 224 F. 3d 107 (2d. Cir. 2000) From 1999 to 2000, 1 represented two criminal defendants convicted of crimes arising from a conspiracy to defraud several federal agencies. The defendants appealed their convictions and sentences on numerous grounds. including the suf?ciency of the jury instructions, the suf?ciency of the evidence, whether a peremptory strike violated Bataan, and the legality of a sentencing enhancement. Nathan Lewin was counsel of record, and I assisted him with the briefs. The Second Circuit (Judges Cardamone, Miner. and Walker) affirmed the convictions. (To-counsel for Defendant-Appellants Nathan Lewin Then with Casstafv. Lut'roco Lewis. LLP. Lewin Lewin L.L.P. 338 17111 Street, N.W., 4th Floor Washington. D.C. 20006 (202) 828-1000 Counsel for the United States Deborah E. Landis Then with the United States Attorney is Of?cefor the Southern District of?New York. New York City Commission to Combat Police Corruption 17 Battery Place, Suite 32? New York. New York 10004 (212} 8066370 56 Not Council (gf?Imn v. De}; of'Sfate, 25] F.3d l92 (DC. Cir. 2001) From 2000 to 200], I represented the National Council of Resistance of Iran and National Council of Resistance of Iran, .8. Representative Of?ce, in a petition for review of their designation as ?foreign terrorist organization[s]? under the Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996. The Council contended that the designation violated due process and that the Secretary of State lacked statutory authority to make it. The D.C. Circuit (Judges Sentelle, l-ienderson, and Edwards) agreed with the due process claim and remanded to the Secretary for further proceedings consistent with its opinion. Martin D. Minsker was counsel ot?reeord for my clients. and I assisted with legal research and brie?ng. Co~eounsel for National Council of Resistance of [ran Martin D. Minsker Then at Miller, Cussidy, Lorroea (if: Lawns. Retired Scott L. Nelson Then of Mifler. Cassidv, Lorroea d2 Lewin, 15.12.}? Public Citizen 1600 20th Street, NW. Washington, DC. 20009 (202) 588-1000 Ellen Fels Berkman Then of Miit'er. (?n.ssidy, Lnrroea dt Len-do. LLP. Of?ce of the General Counsel Harvard University Smith Campus Center, Suite 930 1350 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138 (617) 495-1230 od;r Manier Kris Then at Miller, Cassic?v, Lorroco d2 Latvia, LLP. Mercer Island Youth Family Services Foundation 2040 84th Avenue, SE. Mercer Island, Washington 98040 (301) 442-0953 Counsel for co-pctitioncr People?s Moiahedin Organization ot?lran Jacob A. Stein IJeceased Counsel for the United States Douglas N. Letter Then a! the US. Department of'Jasn'ee Of?ce of General Counsel LLS. House of Representatives 219 Cannon House Of?ce Building Washington, DC. 20515 (202) 225-9700 Litigation: Describe the ten (10) most signi?cant litigated matters which you personally handled, whether or not you were the attorney of record. Give the citations, if the cases were reported, and the docket number and date if unreported. Give a capsule summary of the substance ofeach case. Identify the party or parties whom you represented; describe in detail the nature of your participation in the litigation and the final disposition of the case. Also state as to each case: a. the date of representation; b. the name of the court and the name of thcjudge orjudges before whom the case was litigated; and c. the individual name, addresses, and telephone numbers ofeo-counsel and of principal counsel for each ofthe other parties. Although I worked on many litigation matters during my time as an associate at Miller Cassidy and then Baker Botts, I no longer have records of the matters upon which I worked. Based upon my recollection and searches of publicly available records conducted by others on my behalf, I have identi?ed the following signi?cant litigated matters that I personally handled: l. v. Berger, 224 F. 3d l07 (2d. Cir. 2000) root 1999 to 2000, represented two criminal defendants convicted of crimes arising from a conspiracy to defraud several federal agencies. The defendants appealed their convictions and sentences on numerous grounds, including the suf?ciency of the jury instructions, the suf?ciency of the evidence, whether a peremptory strike violated Bataan, and the legality ofa sentencing enhancement. Nathan l.-ewin was counsel of record, and assisted him with the briefs. The Second Circuit (Judges Cardamone, Miner, and Walker) affirmed the convictions. Clo-counsel for Defendant-Appellants Nathan Lewin Then with Mitten Cossr'aiv. Lnrroen Lewin, LLP. Lewin Lewin L.L.P. 888 17111 Street, N.W., 4th Floor 58 Washington, DC 20006 (202) 328-1000 Counsel the United States Deborah E. Landis Then with the United States Attorney '5 Q?ice for the Southern District ochw York New York City Commission to Combat Police Corruption 17 Battery Place, Suite 327 New York? New York 10004 (212) 806-5370 2. Not 7 Correct! ofResistonce affront v. De'p 't o?S?tote, 2.51 F.3d 192 (D.C. Cir. 200]) From 2000 to 2001, I represented the National Council of Resistance of Iran and National Council of Resistance ol? Iran, U.S. Representative Office. in a petition for review of their designation as ?foreign terrorist organization[s]? under the and Effective Death Penalty Act ol?1996. The Council contended that the designation violated due process and that the Secretary ot?Statc lacked statutory authority to make it. The DC Circuit (Judges Sentelle, Henderson, and Edwards) agreed with the due process claim and remanded to the Secretary for further proceedings consistent with its opinion. Martin D. Minsker was counsel of record for my clients, and assisted with legal research and briefing. Co-counsel for National Council of Resistance ot'lran Martin D. Minsker Then at. Miller, (l'ossidy, Lorroca cl?: Lewin, LLP Retired Scott L. Nelson Then at Miller. (i'assidy, Larrocu ch Lewin. LAP. Public Citizen 1600 20th Street, NW. Washington. D.C. 20009 (202) 588-1000 Fels Berkman Then at Miller. Cossidy, Lorroco div Lewis, LLP. Of?ce of the General Counsel Harvard University Smith Campus Center, Suite 930 1350 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, Massachusetts 02133 (617) 495-1280 Jody Manier Kris Then of Miller. Cosxridy. Larroeu dir Lewin. Mercer Island Youth Family Services Foundation 2040 84th Avenue. 8.1-5. Mercer Island. Washington 93041} (301)442-0953 Counsel for co-petitioner People's Moiahedin Organization of Iran Jacob A. Stein Deceased Counsel for the United States Douglas N. Letter Then at the US. Department quartt'ee Office of General Counsel U.S. House of Representatives 219 Cannon House Of?ce Building Washington. D.C. 20515 (202) 225-9700 3. Toast Drywalt Conan: (70., Inc. v. Tt.trner.ft.lne.r div Assocs. EC. No. 1.1911384 (Va. Cir. Ct.) I second-chaired a civil trial in the Circuit Court of Fairl'ax County. Virginia. involving an accounting malpractice claim. My client. Tassi Drywall Construction Co.. Inc.. obtained a jury verdict of the entire amount it sought. and Judge Marcus D. Williams entered the judgment in its favor. The case did not generate any opinions. Co-counsel for 'l?assi Drvwall Construction Inc. Michael J. Barta than at Miller. Lnrroca dir Lewin 12.12.11". 1900 Street. N.W.. 12th Floor Washington. DC. 20006 (202) 261-3354 Counsel for Turner Jones Associates. P.C. Ralph Bocearosse. .lr. Deceased 18. Legal Actixitigs Describe the most signi?cant legal activities you have pursued. including signi?cant litigation which did not progress to trial or legal matters that did not involve litigation. Describe fully the nature of your participation in these activities. List any clicnt(s) or organizationts) for whom you performed lobbying activities and describe the lobbying activities you performed on behalf of such clientts) or organizationst's). (Note: As to any facts requested in this question. please omit any information protected by the attorney-client privilege.) 60 The bulk of my work as an associate involved dra?'ing briefs, drafting motions, and providing research for partners on a broad range ol'eases handled by the ?rm. I also took depositions and conducted other pretrial discovery. One significant case on which I provided research and brie?ng assistance was Bush v. (fore. Baker Botts, represented George W. Bush, and i worked on the case on location in Florida for about a week at the outset ofthe litigation. I worked with Stuart Levey, a partner at the ?rm, while the case was in Florida courts. 1 did not continue working on the case after my return to Washington. While I was a full-time law my primary legal activities were teaching law students and researching and writing about the law. My scholarship focused primarily on constitutional interpretation, statutory interpretation, and the power conferred upon federal courts by Atticlc I also continued to be involved in the larger legal community through my service on the Advisory Committee for the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure from 2010 to 2016. This committee. comprised of federal judges, prominent appellate advocates, a state supreme court justice, and a law professor expert in the field, considered proposals to amend the Federal Rules ol'Appellate Procedure. When the committee determined that an amendment was needed, it was responsible for drafting the language and the accompanying note after soliciting comments from the bar. As described above in my answer to 12.13., I also regularly participated as an instructor in programs sponsored by the Federal Judicial Center and by bar associations. 19. Tgaghing: What courses have you taught? For each course, state the title, the institution at which you taught the course, the years in which you taught the course compensation received for courses taught since confirmation to the Seventh Circuit, and describe briefly the subject matter ofthe course and the major topics taught. If you have a syllabus for each year or term the course was taught, provide four copies to the committee Notre Dame Law School For classes I have taught at Notre Dame Law School, I regularly reused or updated existing syllabi without retaining copies ol?older versions. I have provided copies ofthe syllabi for which I continue to have records. Civil Procedure (spring 2003, fall 2003, Spring 2005, spring 2006, spring 2007, fall 2009, spring 201 1, spring 2013, fall 2013, fall 2016). This course covered the constitutional provisions, statutes, and federal rules that govern procedure in a civil suit. Major topics included personal jurisdiction, subject matter jurisdiction. pleading, discovery, joinder, and preclusion. Constitutional Law spring 2014, spring 2015, spring 2016). This course covered the powers the Constitution confers on the federal executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Major topics 61 included judicial review, the commerce power, the spending power, the president?s power over domestic affairs, and 5 of the 14th Amendment. Evidence (fall 2002, spring 2005, spring 2006, spring 2003, fall 2008, fall 201 1, fall 2012, fall 2014, fall 2015). This course covered the body of law determining whether evidence is admissible in a federal trial. Topics included relevance, prejudice, the character rules, hearsay, experts, authentication, and privilege. Federal Courts (spring 2008, fall 2008, spring 2010, spring 2017'). This course covered the role of federal courts in the constitutional system of the United States. Topics included the justiciability doctrines, congressional regulation of federal jurisdiction, federal common law, sovereign immunity, and habeas corpus. Modern Constitutional Theory Seminar (spring 2013, spring 2019, spring 2020}. This course covered several recurrent themes in debates about constitutional law. Topics included originalism, evolutionary theories, justi?cations for judicial review, judicial supremacy, judicial minimalism, and precedent. Statutory Interpretation Seminar (fall 2004, fall 2005, spring 2007, fall 2007', spring 2010, spring 2011, fall 2013, fall 2014. fall 2015, spring 2017, fall 2018,0111 2019,0111 2020). This course covered several recurrent themes in debates about statutory interpretation. Topics included purposivism, textualism, legislative supremacy, legislative history, the canons, and Chevron deference. Syllabus provided. George Washington University_Law School Constitutional Law and the Supreme Court (spring 2001}. John Elwood and I co-taught this seminar as adjunct faculty members while we were both in practice at Baker Bolts L.L.P. As I recall, the course focused on recently decided cases in the Supreme Court. I have been unable to locate the syllabus for this course. University of Virginia School of Law Statutory Interpretation Compressed Seminar {October 16 to November 1, 2007). This course was a shortened version of my standard statutory interpretation seminar, which is described above. Syllabus provided. My compensation from teaching during my time as a judge is as follows: 2017 $3,787 2018 $28,050* 2019 $27,825 2020 $19,908 *As explained in my 2018 Financial Disclosure report, my 2018 outside earned income was $214.45 over the statutory limit. The overage occurred because of my participation in the University ofNotre Dame?s continuing education program for alumni. I delivered three lectures that i thought were uncompensated. When I discovered that 1 had been paid (by direct deposit} 62 and that the amount caused me to exceed the limit, I returned the excess $214.45 to the University of Notre Dame. Thus, my earned income was reported as $28,264.45, but my net compensation was $28,050. 20. [negmgz Future Benefits: List the sources, amounts and dates of all anticipated receipts from deferred income arrangements, stock, options, uncompletcd contracts and other future bene?ts which you expect to derive from previous business relationships, professional services, firm memberships, former employers, clients or customers. Describe the arrangements you have made to be compensated in the future for any financial or business interest. None. 21. ?utsi?g During Cgurt Sg?ieg: Do you have any plans, commitments, or agreements to pursue outside employment, with or without compensation, during your service with the court? lfso, explain. If continued, I hope that i will be able to continue to teach in some capacity. I have no commitments or agreements to do so, and no other plans for outside activities. 22. 9f List sources and amounts of all income received during the calendar year preceding your nomination and for the current calendar year. including all salaries, fees, dividends. interest, gifts, rents, royalties, licensing fees, honoraria, and other items exceeding $500 or more (ifyou prefer to do so, copies of the ?nancial disclosure report, required by the Ethics in Government Act of 1978, may be substituted here). When my nomination is formally submitted to the Senate, 1 will tile my Financial Disclosure Report and supply a copy to this Committee. 23. map: Please complete the attached ?nancial net worth statement in detail (add schedules as called liar). Please see the attached Statement of Net Worth. 24. nil? fl' a. Identify the family members or other persons, parties, categories of litigation, and financial arrangements that are likely to present potential con?icts-of?interest when you first assume the position to which you have been nominated. Explain how you would address any such con?ict if it were to arise. [f continued, 1 will continue my present practice of using a recusal list to identify and avoid potential conflicts as described in response to Question 14. This list includes, but is not limited to, cases where Jesse Barrett, my husband and a practicing attorney, or Amanda Concy Williams, my sister and a practicing attorney, participated in any stage of the proceedings. This list also includes cases where Notre Dame University or affiliated 0" Lu entities (including, but not limited to. Notre Dame Law School) were a party. li?inally, would also recuse myself from matters in which I participated while ajudge on the court of appeals. b. Explain how you will resolve any potential conflict of interest, including the procedure you will follow in determining these areas of concern. If con?rmed, I would resolve any conflict. of interest by looking to the Code of Conduct for United States Judges (although it is not formally binding on members of the Supreme Court of the United States): the Ethics Reform Act of 1989, 28 U.S.C. 455; and any other relevant prescriptions. I would also seek guidance from judicial ethics officials to structure my limited ?nancial investments to minimize the potential for conflicts. 25. W: An ethical consideration under Canon 2 of the American Bar Association?s Code of Professional Responsibility calls for ?every lawyer. regardless of professional prominence or professional work load, to find some time to participate in serving the disadvantaged.? Describe what you have done to ful?ll these responsibilities, listing specific instances and the amount of time devoted to each. My present position as a federal judge does not permit me to undertake traditional pro bono legal work. Service is a priority for my family. We regularly participate in food and clothing drives for a shelter for homeless veterans, a day center for struggling women, and our parish?s sister school in Haiti. We always participate in Angel Tree drives, and we have served at a local soup kitchen. In my capacity as a professor, I make it a priority to help students in need. students with disabilities, and first-generation law students find their home at Notre Dame. It is my recollection that while at Miller, Cassidy, Larocca Lewin and Baker Botts I..I..P.. I participated in pro bono worked handled by these ?rms. 1 ceased all practice of law once I began teaching. I did. however. engage in work to improve the legal system, service recognized as important by the American Bar Association?s Model Rule Most notably, I donated my time to service on the Advisory Committee for the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and to teaching in programs for judges sponsored by the Federal Judicial Center. 26. Pr a. Describe your experience in the entire judicial selection process, from beginning to end (including the circumstances which led to your nomination and any interviews in which you participated). List all interviews or communications you had with anyone in the Executive Of?ce of'the President, Justice Department, President-elect transition team, or presidential campaign. Additionally, list all interviews or communications you or an individual known to you to be acting on your behalf had regarding your nomination or your potential nomination by the current President with outside organizations or 64 individuals at the behest of anyone in the Executive Of?ce ofthe President, Justice Depattment, President-elect transition team, or presidential campaign. List all persons present, participating, or otherwise involved in such interviews or communications. Do not include any contacts with Federal Bureau of Investigation personnel concerning your nomination. On Saturday, September 19, 2020, Counsel to the President Pat Cipollone and Chief of StaffMark Meadows called me about the vacancy. On Sunday, September 20. 2020, I spoke to Mr. Cipollone and Chief of Staff Meadows again, who invited me to come to Washington, and President Trump later called to confirm the invitation. I had meetings with President Trump, Vice President Pence, Mr. ipollone, and Chiefof Staff Meadows in Washington on Monday, September 21. 2020. The President offered me the nomination on that day, and I accepted, subject to ?nalizing, the vetting process. I have also been in regular contact with members ot'the White House Counsel?s Of?ce and the Department of Justice. b. Has anyone involved in the process of selecting you for this nomination (including, but not limited to anyone in the Executive Office of the President, the Justice Department, the President-elect transition team, presidential campaign, or the Senate and its staff) ever discussed with you any currently pending or specific case, legal issue, or question in a manner that could reasonably be interpreted as seeking any express or implied assurances concerning your position on such case, issue, or question? If so, explain fully. Identify each communication you had prior to the announcement of your nomination with anyone in the Executive Of?ce of the President, the Justice Depru?tment, the President-elect transition team or presidential campaign, outside organization or individual (at the behest of anyone working in the Executive Office of the President, the Justice Department, President-elect transition, or presidential campaign), or the Senate or its staff referring or relating to your views on any case. issue, or subject that could come before the Supreme Court of the United States, state who was present or participated in such communication, and describe briefly what transpired. No. c. Did you make any representations to any individuals or organizations as to how you might rule as a Justice, ifeonfirmed?? If you know of any such representations made by the White House or individuals acting on behalfof the White House, please describe them, and if any materials memorializing these communications are available to you, please provide thur copies. No.